HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061048 Ver 1_Emails_20060801[Fwd: Re: Kinnakeet Sand Mine]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Kinnakeet Sand Mine]
From: Tom Reeder <tom.reeder@ncmail.net>
Date: Tue, O1 Aug 2006 11:39:36 -0400
To: Alan Klimek <Alan.Klimek@ncmail.net>, Coleen Sullins <coleen.sullins@ncmail.net>,Pain Rawls
<Paul.Rawls@ncmail.net>, Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karoly@ncmail.net>
FYI - I thought you might be interested in this.
Subject: Re: Kinnakeet Sand Mine
From: Jim Stephenson <jims@nccoast.org>
Date: Tue, O1 Aug 2006 09:51:35 -0400
To: Tom Reeder <tom.reeder@ncmail.net>
CC: Jan DeBlieu <hatteraskeeper@nccoast.org>, Todd Miller <toddm@nccoast.org>
Hi Tom,
We've decided to withdraw our objection to the Kinnakeet Sand Mine project. We trust
the Environmental Management Commission will conduct a thorough review of the project
and make an appropriate determination on the variance request.
Jim
Tom Reeder wrote:
Jim - Thanks for your response. I guess I misspoke in that we did not distribute
Jan's letter to the EMC/WQC, although for some reason I was under the impression
that some of the members were aware of its contents. For your information I have
attached the Public Notice for the Public Meeting on Aug 3rd. Thanks.
James Stephenson wrote:
Hi Tom,
I did receive your voice mail when I returned from Raleigh on Friday. Did I
understand you to say that you distributed our letter to members of the Water
Quality Committee or EMC? If so, when did this occur?
After listening to the discussion at the EMC meeting, I conferred with Todd
Miller on the variance request. Our next step will be to confer with Jan
DeBlieu, who is on a well deserved two week vacation and will not be back in
the office until July 31. In the meantime, I conducted additional research on
the variance request and attempted to weigh the likely impacts and relative
significance of the points we raised in our letter. I will get back to you in
about a week with an answer to your question. If there is a reason you require
an answer before then, please let me know. I can be reached at 252-241-7313 on
Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday of this week.
I can tell you that we do not plan to formally intervene in the variance
request.
I have heard that a public meeting is scheduled for August 3. Do you have
additional details?
Jim
On Jul 24, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Tom Reeder wrote:
1 of 2 8/3/2006 10:00 AM
[Fwd: Re: Kinnakeet Sand Mine]
Jim - Just checking to see if you received my voice mail last week inquiring
as to NCCF's current position on the proposed variance for the Kinnakeet
Mine on Hatteras Island. I know we received the original letter from Jan
DeB. but since then we have heard that the Coastal Fed no longer actively
opposes the variance. Alan K, our Director, wanted me to check and see if
you all had softened your stance on this. Thanks for your help.
Jim Stephenson <jims~Lnccoast.or~>
Policy Analyst
North Carolina Coastal Federation
__ _ . _.
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Re: Kinnakeet Sand Mine
Content-Encoding: 7bit
__
__ _
2 of 2 8/3/2006 10:00 AM