20061048 Ver 1_Emails_20060808

Avon Sand mine variance
Subject: Avon Sand mine variance
From: "Kevin Martin" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:04:22 -0400
To: "Tom Reeder" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Cyndi Karoly" <[e-mail]>
Cyndi and Tom, after reviewing the stuff from the hearing I was curious if the issue about the lots shown within the
proposed mining area had been clarified and if the applicant supplied anything to document that the proposed pond
will be in perpetuity and not future lots as shown on the proposed plan? Also has it been verified by the applicant and
the developer that the proposed mine will not infringe on the approved reuse irrigation fields? I did not see anything
in the new material that was sent to us for the Conference call/meeting tomorrow. Thanks Kevin
1 of 1 8/8/2006 2:14 PM

. _ .. _C ~
5
•• s ••
7~,r uoasta! ~ ~''~°
FAQ T~A~TSMIT'TAL
1'O: Ward ll7arotii Mr.arr:.,r~
a~~.
I+AX. Na.: 91.9-$Z2-9214 ,~ ~
~
.
~
f ~~
FROibI: ?Hark I3issel[ ~
~~ ~,~
DATE: 7-12-t1d ~,~+y~~~~~{~°'~`-- y
,~~ •4
.,
~
~d poa
'~1
. b
~raa~aa.
PROJECT ~: 1523 - I{i.r~nai:eet _"t-line
•^r^rr~rr~ra~r~.s^rrrrrrr~r^.^rrrrrr..rr...rrrrrrr.....rr.•.rr.^r.^^..rr...^^..
COMMEht'CS:
Re: EPIC questions about plan. lines and roadv~+a3°s:
The lines that were questioned within the proposed rraine expansion area are
tope lines that show tike cnt slopes and toc of slope for the proposed
excavation.
The roads that are shov~+n adjacent to the proposed expansion area are
included in the existin mining pern;Lit, and are haul roads as ~celi as
Sitkl{IiViSi02S ~•oads to access existrug propel•tleS to the south and ~tiest of the
mine.
?.~. Eox 1 ~ki8 ®3::.1 < N. C~catar ,-±~;+y. ^ ~:!tty Har.K. PdC 27999
2.52.261-3266r ?ax:252-26!-t76Q ^ E-iia;f bpg~~b+sse!~pr~fes=~onalgrr,J~a.com