NCS000008 DMR SW (24)

Storm Water Prevention Plan
Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Elizabeth City, NC
STORM WATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
Calendar Year 2015
Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS000008 or
Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG
This monitoring report summary of the calendar year is due to the DWQ Regional Office n o
later than March 1St of the following year.
Facility Name: Fortress Wood Products, Inc., 899 Foreman Bundy Road, Elizabeth City, NC 27909 gq
County Pasquotank RE
Phone Number: [phone] Total number of SDOs monitored: 5 -
1-1
Outfall No. 1
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No a
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No 0
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency
Other
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes n No rxi
Page 1 of 4
Parameter, (units)
Total
Ammonia
Copper
Tier 11 Monthly
Rainfall,
BOD5
COD
Total
total TSS
pH
Inches
(5 day)
Nitrogen
recoverable
(Non-Trout)
Benchmark
NIA
30 120
7.2
0.007 100
6-9
Date Sample
Collected,
r
mmldd/yyyY
Semi -Annual
01/12/2015
3.1
131 152
288
021 387
7.24
Page 1 of 4

Storm Water Prevention Plan
Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Elizabeth City, NC
Outfall No. 2
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No 0
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No 0
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency
Other 0
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes 0 No [X]
Outfall No. 3
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No 0
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No 0
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency 0
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency 0
Other 0
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes 0 No [X]
Total
Parameter, (units)
BODS
AmmoniaCopper
Total
Ammonia
Tier II Monthly
Rainfal
Total
1,
(5
COD
Nitrogen
total
TSS
pH
Inches
day)
(5 day)
Non -Trout
recoverable
total
TSS
Benchmark
N/A
30 _
_ 120
7.2
0.007
100
64 _
Date Sample7`
Benchmark
N/A
30
120
Collected,_,.-
0.007
100
Z-9
Date,Sample
Collected,
mmidd/yyyY__-
mm/ddlyyyY
Semi-Annual
01/12/2015
31
381
201 759
070 480
736
Outfall No. 3
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No 0
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No 0
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency 0
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency 0
Other 0
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes 0 No [X]
Page 2 of 4
Parameter, (units)
Ammonia
Total
Tier II Monthly
Rainfall,
BOD5
Total
Copper
Inches
(5 day)
COD
Nitrogen
total
TSS
pH
Non -Trout
recoverable
Benchmark
N/A
30
120
7.2
0.007
100
Z-9
Date,Sample
Collected,
mm/ddlyyyY
Semi -Annual
01/12/2015
3.1
699 348
.694
1 82
2280
6.97
Page 2 of 4

Storm Water Prevention Plan
Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Elizabeth Cit , NC
Outfall No. 4
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No a
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No a
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency
Other Q
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes a No [X]
Outfall No. 5
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No a
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No a
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency 0
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency
Other p
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes a No [X]
Total
Parameter,
(units)
Rainf
Rainf
Ammonia
Ammonia
Tier II Monthly
all,
BOD5
Total
Copper
Inch
(5 day)
COD
Nitrogen
total
TSS pH
BOD5
Total
es(Non-Trout)recoverable
COD
total
Benchmark
NIA
30
120
7.2
0.0.0.7
100 6-9
Date Sample
l a
_.'1.F,'
.- r t�•ra" T � 'S-
.._ f":'i "r yt `iA^`S-'.'r,F 4{£- s mss''`
Collected,
mm/dd/ yYYY
•}
�, �,
� �, -
xis..,,- r,:'
Semi -Annual
N/A
30
120
7.2
0.007
01/12/2015
3.1
900
158
.671
.445 380 6.56
mmldd/yyyY,=
Outfall No. 5
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No a
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No a
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency 0
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency
Other p
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes a No [X]
Page 3 of 4
Total
Parameter,
(units)
Rainf
Ammonia
Copper
Tier II Monthly
all,
BOD5
Total
COD
total
TSS
pH
Inch
(5 day)
Nitrogen
es(Non-Trout)recoverable
Benchmark
N/A
30
120
7.2
0.007
100
6'-9
Date Sample
Collected,
-•s - 'f s"m=; q.n ry`• 'xm;rr ice,
€s '.`€
S,;"��.'ur _ `4.T .�`::-� `r,�= "'", r.,..r5�? n..n'^�s..�^ .a>
: h - - •,';=�i3L+` 3; `
,s, • , I
mmldd/yyyY,=
Semi -Annual
01/12/2015
1 31
357
176
1.12
515
470 6.52
Page 3 of 4

I certify under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Responsible Official Signature:
Printed Name:
Title- President, Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Date: January 26, 2015
Page 4 of 4