20160269 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160414

oL�C�L�Q�IC�
DPAT MCCRORY
A N R 1 4 2016 Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Environmental Secretary
U S
Quality 4 18 FF R MI
March 30, 2016
Amelia Goschen
Virginia Electric and Power Co.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, VA 23060 Expiration of Acceptance: September 30, 2016
Project: Dominion Roanoke Rapids North Side Recreation Area County: Northampton
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table
below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program will be
approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts, It is the responsibility of the applicant to
contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other
state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including
G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a
copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It
is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an
invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the
authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory
mitigation are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact
is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
Impact
River
Basin
CU Location
(8 -digit HUC)
Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
I Cool Warm Riparian I Non -Riparian
I Coastal Marsh
Roanoke
03010106"
0
0 0 0.17 0
0
0
0
*DMS does not have credit available in the 03010106 HUC and proposes to provide credits in Roanoke 03010107.
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be
performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as
applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jam B Stanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
-5'�Nothing Compares
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
1601 M a, I Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina ;'5? -1601
919-," 7.26"

0
a@,• ,� r t 1
as •
1/1 •'a« a !
/ axes
ody
/60
!
Site #3
P,JD Site #4cl l : N
a •b b %
n b • •
n�3"�`\ � r���J ti a � > '. '...—�"-'.��—•• ,,.. .— '�,.. Sam i.
X.�i
Legend _ _ ;-s.� _l,t.ar
r��� ` �a �/� '�. ` � ��� � • �� "r.\fit � �' o � ;
Project Area
Q Proposed Access Road
Proposed Wetland Impacts
r
i
1000 4,000
Feet
c
�; 1_ ,• Copyri ht.O �0{1,3.tlational peograph,c Soc,ety:r.cubed
DOMINION NORTH MARCH 2016
CAROLINA POWER
ROANOKE RAPIDS RECREATION USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
X01111111011' FIGURE 2
AREAS NORTH SIDE

Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060
dom.com
April 5, 2016
Attention: Andrew Williams
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest North Carolina 27587
Via Email: [e-mail]
►
o
1
:'�'jr�Dominiow
FA�� 1 4 2016
RE: Lake Gaston Recreational Sites -Roanoke Rapids Northside Dam, Northampton
County, Virginia - Latitude: 3629'7.45"NLontzitude: 7740'25.11"W
Preconstruction Notification (PCN) — Response to Comments
Dear Mr. Williams,
Per your Incomplete Application Notification dated March 23, 2016, the following information
pertains to the PCN for the above referenced project. Your requests for information have been
reproduced in bold below. Dominion's responses are provided in italic typeface.
Comment 1: Please provide a USGS topographic map that includes an overlay of
the entire proposed roadway with all proposed impact locations
marked.
Response: Please find the attached revised Figure 2 showing the proposed roadway
and impacts overlaid on the USGS map.
Comment 2: Please confirm that the proposed impacts are for Wetlands identified
as WL3 and WL4 from the preliminary jurisdictional determination
associated with this Corps Action ID (SAW -2015-02621).
Response: The proposed impacts are for Wetlands identified as WL3 and WL4 from
the Preliminary Jurisdictional determination associated with the CORPS
Action (SAW -2015-02621). These designations have been added to the
revised Figure 2.
Comment 3: Please provide corrected or clarified proposed impact amounts.
Specifically, the proposed rip rap dissipation pad appears to be
classified as a temporary impact in the application/project plans.
Dissipation pads typically are classified as permanent impacts.

No
Reponse: The rip rap dissipation pad is included in the proposed permanent impacts
for the forested wetlands shown in area W3 on Sheet 2. The impact area
boundaries on Sheet 2 have been highlighted for your convenience.
Comment 4a: Please provide additional information regarding the proposed
mitigation. Specifically include the wetlands that are proposed for
impacts are considered as riparian wetlands. Your Pre -construction
notification (PCN) and acceptance letter from the North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) indicates that you plan to
mitigate by purchasing credits for non riparian wetlands. The DMS
letter only states that credits are not available in the 03010106 HUC
and does not make any reference to the type (riparian vs. non -
riparian). If available, you should secure riparian credits.
Response: A revised In Lieu Fee Program request was submitted to DMS and an
acceptance letter indicating that mitigation credits will be purchased for
riparian credits is attached. Page 6 Section D.4 of the PCNform has also
been revised accordingly (see attached).
Comment 4b: Please provide additional information regarding the proposed
mitigation. Specifically include additional information regarding the
location of the proposed DMS credit (not within the same HUC).
Specifically, please indicate reasons that the applicant believes that
credits within another HUC will provide adequate compensatory
mitigation. This should also include a discussion of any potential
permittee responsible compensatory mitigation.
Response: There are no approved mitigation banks within the 03010106 HUC where
this impact will occur. The NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
does not have and/or is not planning projects within 03010106. Permittee
responsible Mitigation within the 03010106 HUC would be in the form of
wetland creation and would involve impacting a mature forested system
and grading down to pool elevation of Roanoke Rapids Lake. Even if
successful, the wetland creation would increase the forested impact within
the buffer zone of Roanoke Rapids Lake until the site matured.
We believe that providing mitigation in the adjacent downstream HUC
will provide adequate compensatory mitigation because it is the most
practical alternative that is available. The proposed impacts are
immediately upstream (< 0.3 mile) of the dam that separates HUC
03010106 and 03010107. The DMS will accept payment for riparian
wetland mitigation within 03010107 (See attached Letter). Given the
proximity to the 03010107 and the unavailability of viable mitigation
alternatives within 03010106, we believe that the use of DMS is the best
alternative to mitigate the wetland functions and values that will be

impacted through the proposed project. In addition, this approach is
consistent with the preference hierarchy for mitigation established in the
10 April 2008 — Final Compensatory Mitigation Rule.
Comment 5: Section D1 (page 6) of the PCN states "acquiring additional easement
for the project in not feasible and additional easement would likely
not eliminate disturbance to the existing wetlands or intermittent
stream." This statement indicates that there are impacts to the
stream. No stream impacts are shown in the PCN or on the attached
plans. Please clarify this statement.
Response: There are no impacts to the existing stream with the current project
design. The statement under D.1 a has been revised accordingly to
eliminate any confusion. The previous statement was intended to convey
that any redesign of the road alignment would require additional
easement while still impacting the existing wetlands and that a redesign
could potentially lead to impacts to the stream as well.
Comment 6: The Wilmington District Regional Condition 3.6 states that "culverts
placed within riparian and/or riverine wetlands must be installed in a
manner that does not restrict the flow and circulation patterns of
waters of the United States. Culverts placed across wetland fills
purely for the purposes of equalizing surface water do not have to be
buried." Please provide a cross section drawing of the proposed
culvert indicating where it will be placed in relation to the wetland
surface.
Response: The culvert has been redesigned to provide 6" of burial depth beneath the
existing wetlands elevation. A cross section is now shown on drawing C-
11 showing its elevation in relation to the wetland surface. (See attached
revised Drawing C-5 and C-11).
Please contact Amelia Boschen at [phone] or [e-mail] if you have
any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
i
Paula A. Hamel
Director, Generation Environmental Services
Attachment

cc:
North Carolina Department of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

to
ho
6id"t;
W A
R M @ 110
a nn I
Use Only:
Hf'f{ 1 4 201 M action ID no.
project no.
1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 42 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes 0 No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
Q Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes Q No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Dominion Roanoke Rapids North Side Recreational Area
2b.
County:
Northampton County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Roanoke Rapids
2d. Subdivision name:
NA
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
NA
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Virginia Electric & Power Company
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
901/659
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
NA
3d.
Street address:
5000 Dominion Boulevard
3e.
City, state, zip:
Glen Allen, VA 23060
3f.
Telephone no.:
804-273-3485
3g.
Fax no.:
NA
3h.
Email address:
Amelia. H. [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
NA
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
NA
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no..-
o.:5f.
5f.Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
3999-29-0252
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.486696 Longitude: -77.673423
1 c. Property size:
605 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Roanoke Rapids Lake/Roanoke River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS IV B
2c. River basin:
Roanoke River
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing site is comprised of agriculture fields, grass, and woods.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.87
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 410
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project will provide a recreational fishing area on the Roanoke Rapids Lake open to the public through the use of a new gravel access road.
3e. Describe the overall proiect in detail, including the tvve of equipment to be used:
The project includes the construction of a gravel access road from NC State Route 46 to a gravel parking area near the Roanoke Rapids Lake. A
gravel trail will be constructed from the parking area down to a floating dock. It is expected that the contractor will use an excavator and front
loader for the construction of this Droiect.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Andrew Williams
Agency/Consultant Company: LISACE
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
February 5, 2016
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
Land Clearing
PEM
No
Corps/DWQ
0.02
W2 P
Fill
PEM
No
Corps/DWQ
0.07
W3 P
Fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DWQ
0.05
W4 T
Land Clearing
PFO
Yes
Corps/DWQ
0.03
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.17
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent'(P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
NA
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: NA
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: NA
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 _
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 _
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: NA
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The wetlands on the property are being avoided to the extent practical. The existing easement constrains the alignment of the access road to the
project area. One of the wetlands areas is located at the intersection of the access easement and parcel's property lines. Acquiring additional
easement for the project is not feasible and additional easement would likely not eliminate disturbance to the existing wetlands.
The road has been designed to minimize the temporary and permanent impacts to the wetland areas.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The area of disturbance has been minimized to the extent practical. Silt fence will be installed along the perimeter of the area of disturbance to prevent
the migration of sediment into critical areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of 1he State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by '(check all that apply):
DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which .mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
ZX Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu'Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
QX Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.17 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres.
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
NA
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes OX No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
NA
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.006%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes Z No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project does not trigger regulatory requirements for stormwater management beyond submittal of an erosion and sediment control plan since it
has
less than 24% built upon area for low density development per the NCDENR manual
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
NA
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NA
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Northampton County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
El USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other: NA
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[]Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review.
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
Eg No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
NA
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
NA
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑X Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-Raleigh Field Office
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Information Planning and Conservation System (IPaC), North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Natural Heritage Program database for Northampton County. Documentation Attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ YesX❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Coordination with North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources. Documentation Attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? 7_0
Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
NA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood map service https://msc.fema.gov
Pamela F. Faggert
a)cn
z41
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

IIIIIIIJITTjI Jill 11111 IIIIIIIJIIIITj-1-J-qIIIl 11
1
I — — 4—
INTERMITTENT
1 I STREAM CHANNEL
A P R 1' 4 Z'O 16
RES 01U S
401 RUFFER P
1
II J ! !I FORES�D, EMERGENT*nANDS
\\
1C T FI�1H
��TE Lf11CATi�i
/•
�t �} 1, 1, ll
r T � .� � � ,l ,ir � w .: �/ � � I 1 , 1 1;Q_-s�L_�.r�[[��-_.q..�..��,�>m.....,..�.
It
1 -,kk 14
.1.`� h -_--—_---'�`—
I I 1 1 , / 1 // / 1 1 / • , • � � I 1 � ( e° /� I �.�'r'°.. - ',1 \ 1 1 1+ /
1 1 / // � �.••�` 1
1 1 , /% 1 I I I I e`� 1 �s I 1 1 + �
I I � ��_ ,
� — �
� •`�\` - �- � —1 — + — `--
! II i 1 1 —�,-�/�-'T,-- � — -+- �- , \T- \�
��� 1—.—\I —T — - -- `II- — —
I I I // � 7 — -\\—
I
It
\ \ \ \ + PORARY CT
SF I
Iwo-
\ \ PROPOSED`.20' GRAVEL 1 w��w""w���a, • - / 1 +� I � y���
\ , ACC�SS ROAD \\ \ \ MENT'MPACT y lL WT I Sy 1 I r 01-."-T --CE 1 1 \ \
,
,
•RCP CULVERT: / ! f} \
� � � ',,"^Yrs , /,.1y
.VU3 FORESTED wETLANos
— —. — �• — ——:. — — — — — — ^ S� = I 16 ' PERMANENT IMPACT
--i6� X61
2354 SF
FORESTED WETLANDS
n ,59 W4 TEMPORARY IMPACT
.t 1116 SF
• - - ( ROANOKE RAPIDS RECREATION AREAS
PERMITTING NORTH SIDE
WETLANDS IMPACTS
° '° 20. 40
NOT FOR PROPOSED CONDITIONS
PROPOSED CONDITIONS PLAN SCALE: 1• = 20• CONSTRUCTION D..W dby: P. s. ��D-16 04314077 s ,N..
SCALE: 1'-20' Approval. ----- S -m 2 DF 2
APWov.la - AS SHOWN
BIM No. Rwl.lom
----- — — — — — — — —
Revisions
Typi-I Drawing
Llbmry Lootlon
WII Noma
DIM A—bly
PIP. souut F.und"m C.Ib (Pl.r) Pip. SmFoundation "Is (Spmad) Foundation C.Sa far otMr Typle l Sfnreluno SWI Datall B A..anbly
Wtl Fib Nam. Dwwlnp No.
(Plar) (SPr.ael
Information
PLOTTED:

it !1 il I j,� `VX -f.-
ISTIR NTERM TTENT
+! CHANNfiLFNG
���f
1,
2� r
F ESTEq WETLANDS
�� �•/' `L 7--�7 u14u.J/ �_ f� ,C l J\�
1\ \\
PROPOSED ' i-'
PROPOSED 20' GRAVEL \\
ti
ACCESS ROAD 1 \ \
SEE DETAIL. SHEET /
•k;J'`• : `�G•� 5' }'r11 (T1'P) r -j
•./ / / \ IEMERtI( 1yf ETLAN
/
J\\,.'•;J::i•`�e; �i �' - - - -- -
i i'� i:, ,♦0�-•: �� i�J / �/ LIMjD$ OF DISTURBANCE VARIES. / o� - y I I r o, I i 44 f t �• f� -`�' =`� l 1 s
y 1 i m p t 1 (i y•'
$�•�/. ,���. � i �LONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB/ i � 1 i
��`��'
� � �� {,
�` �-_/ .'.,0.: ,?�y�l•.` �i ��� `.' OUTSIDE 50' DOMINION EASBdE1VT♦�0' I l\ \ (\ ` +\ t , \ (, r: ,f:. . ` l 1 y�'"`
-�•^
'
/ -�; ---- / . � ?�� �: r;ry .�.T�,=��._ — — —,L`_ � � � / � ,, \.t ; 1 y � y y � , ; 1 �}�i y 1` � , `y - �;bo. ♦ .i�= � y t � �.
/
i,s
�-__=_/
/ /s/ -
// % f/z
`.`---�_// / // 42CLASS5 IV RCPCULVERT
'- _ -
/ i/jNRII i�I Trl 1
-_�T
-
-�"-`T•- _-__
—CP
// ,/ i/ � � , r. _
IN1571WcOC
�'-°°'•S s�•1•
f5S6.Y8.160
I
FORWETLANDS MOM=
°
'ce
PLAN
SCALE: ,•=50' 1Q Q
-' -
-
PNS :58+60.85
—^
•—_�
—�
�-•—
I
:11.70
L Ll45.46
N4 mm
N4
1[7 m
c P23
}' PVI ST
59+55.04-
_
m
19
_
_
- _
- --
-sem s7 9 ••�
PVI ELEV:1 7.45 K.8.80
190
K. -192m L
50.OD PVI STA:6 41.38
-
--
V
'-I
LVC:100
it-
0
^
o
m
m K-3.9
N
1O
NISHED GR E n n °na
+
m
..
a^
, n n'a,
N m
_
-
OT$ u�
Um W m
m
�n
rn W +^ +
o----
�—
P VI
PN
7A-62'14.79
V:162.31
P '
�J----
.•�
P
— PN E
�4±56.8�_
.16278
18
f
-
--
- m
t —
" m '
>
W
:18.93
say
6
K.21.17
v
ansa -- 180
N•-
-- —_
_ i♦
N i�
wliUl
m
m c4
m til
m
td
co
170 ----NW- _ ___-I - 170
�� - - - -- -
16 160
42• ULVERT
—
�62O
2 3-zs-ts
52 00 53 00 5400 55 00— 56 00 5700 58 00 59+00 60 00 61+00 63 00 64 00 _ 65400
CULVERT INVERTS
DUSTED
SACE COMMENTS
RBT
DmmiWaar
"^ 06mieion-
PROFILE ROANOKE RAPIDS RECREATION AREAS
"itti„
SCALE HORZ: 1•=50' ,,� NORTH SIDE
A3-10-16
EXISTING TREE
����„�Itl
VERT: 1•=10' ♦♦.♦ '(N ACCESS ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE
LINE ADJUSTED
RBT
o 25' 5o' too _S ': = STA 52+00 TO STA 65+00
' 18101 ` Nmrre Dab Ro)m xa slaty xo.
SCALE: 1" = 50' ,O'. J,S D kMdby.' P.R.B. 2-29-16 04314077
7
o 5• lo' 20 awl x ,,♦♦' (p APPror s ----- ----- sa. -,16
SCALE: 7" = 10' (VERT.) rnr � i¢j f IF h16 ----- — N. AS SHOWNReNslom
Revisions
sx xor TVD upas saEa xD bVm _ _
_ _--- — — —
ryPi�, Drawlrlg
LlbrPp' Looaxon
Call Name
WN Assembly
Moo stm d Fwmdatlon Coxa (Pbr)
Pipe stand Foundation Caxs (Spao.d) Foundaxon Celle br gbHTypkat Strusbma
Stool Detm b Aasoon
Cad FM Name C-05 Drawing No.—
1
1
1 1 1 (pw) (speed)
hitortmtion 11
PLOTTED: C-5

BMW BALE
STAPLES BINDMG WIRE
PER BALE)\
MAT THE OF TLE E7DSDNG CONRIONS
Jr
,�
TRENCH WIDTH
Ws/2 OR Wu/2
(SEE NOTE 6)
(2
10 mil PLASTIC LINING
TYPEI-CRUSHER AGGREGATE
it �'f?
/
WOOD OR METAL NATIVE MATERIAL
STAKES (2 PER BALE) (oPR�TA1)
ERIININ
TYPE D- ASPHALT
TYPE IV - ASPHALT COMMERCIAL I I
`&\
W
6" 1
MIN
NO LEDGE OR
W I
I
I-
Z
U EXCAVATED
TRENCH LIMLINE OF IT OW I i UNEXCAVATEI
MATERIAL SHALL
SOMM
NO SCALE
I
I I SmvACE Iwig I
rc
I PROJECT BEYOND
i I THIS UNE
PLYWOOD
mm
3m MINIMUM STAKE PANTED WHITE,
I< I
I g I * SEE NOTE I I
VI
SELECT I I COMPACTED BACKFILL
AL
(ttP.) CONCRETEII
mn
I W I I
W
SEE NOTE 5
o COMPACTED;
1 I I WASHOUT I,
915
8'
150 HEIGHT
LAG SCREWS
—WOOD POST
(89 mm x 89 mm x 2.4 m)
O
8
n
Z
V
N I
6" MIN / I
915 mm
j
`
L
I
V�� CONCRETE ErA[L R
SIGN;.OETAIL
SEE la
4�'��
7 Tea jr-y—
1`\
b
IL
O
w
NOTES* UNDISTURBED MATERIAL
(OR EpUNALFNQ
d
\
\
0
C,'UNE
1. TRENCHES MAY BE EXCAVATED WIDER THAN TRENCH WIDTH Ws ABOVE THE
OF NARROW TRENCH UMIY.
PPE aAVE3tT5 O' NE Y J
4-Q
I-il
2. BELOW THE 'UNE OF NARROW TRENCH LIMIT' THE TRENCH SHALL NOT BE
SO
W
EXCAVATED BEYOND THE TRENCH WIDTH Ws.
r
BALE �
3Sfm.
CH
Q
3. SHEETING IF USED IN ALL CASES SHALL BE LEFT IN PLACE BELOW A LINE
10 nut PLASTIC UNING � 200 mm �
WIRE
�
�
12' ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED OR
aAp
sntaDER
�
DIRECTED.
NOT TO SCALE4-2
T
I
i
�
'COVER"
TYPE 'ABDVE GRADE' ��� �
WI1N STRAW BALES
-AN 'i
MROADWAY PAVEMENT
¢
4. AT ANY POINT SHALL BE DEFINED AS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE
FROM THE UPPERMOST POINT OF THE PIPE TO A UNE WHICH CONNECTS THE
SURFACE OF UNDISTURBED GROUND AT EITHER SIDE OF THE TRENCH AND IS
NOTM
AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE DIRECTION OF THE PIPE.
��•
1. ACTUAL LAYOUT DETERMINED W THE FIELD.
L 111 JNCE Oi SHOIRDER LIVE P DRNNACE 6 NECESSARY THE DrtCH MY HE MOVED BACK TO PROVIDE AT LEAST
aA�R N
a°nrT n li�'iiMnto's FOR P1AC810 PPE IamER ENIRAN(As o1AGItAML
tH OF COYER
2 THE CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN (SEE FIG. 4-15)
2 EMRINCE GRAM ARE TO BE SMOOTHLY TED INTO THE ROADWAY BY ROUNDING
G AS NECESSARY.
5. SELECTED EXCAVATED MATERIAL WITH NO STONES LARGER THAN 2' FOR
PIPES. _
SHALL BE INSTATED WITHIN 10 m OF THE*
3.lTOR DGINO STWIDTH WHICHEVER 6 GREATER.
TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY
4. LENGTHS OF CLLVERTS SHOWN ON ROAD PLANS FOR ENTRANCES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SNALL BE ADAMED TO OBTAIN ABOVE ROADWAY
WIDTHS
6. FOR SHEETED TRENCH Ws = 4/3 D+32' OR 50', WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
PLTR—/N 14AL stc A-Ia
0.ENTRANCS N FILL TO BE SNE AS ABOVE EXCEPT LOCATION of CULVERT (WHEN NECESSARY).
FOR UNSHEETED TRENCH Wu - 4/3 D+18' OR 36, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
STANDARD PRIVATE ENTRANCE
TRENCH SECTION FOR RCP CULVERT
CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE * DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SHEET C-1 SHALL TAKE
PRECEDENCE OVER THOSE SHOWN ON THIS DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
4' MIN
WIDTH VARIES
a a 2' MIN 2' MIN
I
INSTALL TYPE B AGGREGATE
NCDOT BASE COURSE IN 4'
SHEET FLOW N CLEAN WASHED
LIFTS PER NCDOT SECTION
GRAVEL
1010. EXCEPT NO SLAC
5:1 MAX
FIN. GRADE PERM�z
PERMITTED
ElmGRAVEL
�� GEOTEXMLE
NON -WOVEN COMPACTED SUBGRADE
FABRIC
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC 'AT LOW SPOTS PROVIDE 16" OF
2V EITHER SlDE OF
OW SPOT A
\
1' MIN
P
LONG ROAD ALIGNMENT
ACCESS ROAD DETAIL
SIDE SLOES
NOT TO SCALE '
i 'y9
GD GRAVEL DIAPHRAM
' ' \
4" 4" 5'-0' 6" OF
\•' \
NOT TO SCALE
x 3/4' MINUS
LANDSCAPING LIMESTONE AGGREGATE.
•
\
155 �kyO
\
TIMBER INSTALL IN TWO 3" LIFTS.
COMPACT AFTER EACH LIFT
FIN. GRADE
\
------
-__z
—
a
• \ 1
\
GEOTEXTILE $4 REBAR 16' LONG,
FABRIC 2 PER TIMBER
\•..' \
\
FINISHED GRADE
.. 52 LF. 42° RCP
16
' t --—___----
1s0
TRAIL DETAIL
B-16
.\
RIPRAP OUTLET \o CULVERT.'
\
��— EXISTING GRADE
NOT TO SCALE
NCADENR
PROTECTION.
\
-- --_--
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFYRETT
COMMENTS
_. _-.-----�--------_---
STI GGIFADE` -
_
9�\
RIPRAP OUTLET
PROTEC710N. 52 LF. 42" RCP CULVERT.
" 00ami ime
D,cO 11F• \ • :�`•\\
\
f!
��� GRADE i----
ROANOKE RAPIDS RECREATION AREAS
Q 3-29-16\''
CULVERT INVERTS
•'... \
\�
--
I
- —
---
```�pNOtttNhgi A, NORTH SIDE
�,V
ADJUSTED
usA
15
150
_ '. - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
REIT
0+00
1+00
2+00
gqE
s N,mu Data Proloe No
CULVERT PLAN
18101 Liam No.
-�`•. : �' DmllDmd6Y P.R.B. 2-19-16 04314077
=
SCALE 1"=20'
CULVERT PROFILE
HORI20NTAL SCALE: 1"=20'
Q
o ;.��� A� APS. ----- _____ s.0 13 OF 16
A4AA'4tLtLi'�11A��M�"��,ILt' ADD1O�m ----- --- AS SHOWN
LF IM 2-24-11 BIM N. Rom ions
Revisions
VERTICAL SCALE: 1 •=4"Am
tWD uLEs smND ALU Dam
rypical DravAn9
lJhrary Location Cell Name
ENN Asu:m6ly Plpe Sbnd Feendulon Ceps (Pier)
Plpo Stand Foundation Cells (8proad)
Foundation Lela forONerryDiml BnucoLres
9tee1 Dotall B AswmWy
-----—--—-——--
CW Fib Num C-11 OrawltW No.
(PIerI (Bptpp)
Information
PLOTTED: C-11