20160375 Ver 1_Application_20160418

4PUnited States Forest National Forests in 160A Zillicoa Street
Department of Service North Carolina P.O. Box 2750
Agriculture Asheville, NC 28802
N.C. Division of Water Resources
Wetlands Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1617
File Code: 2530-3
Date: April 5, 2016
20160375
01? i
To whom it may concern,
r;
This letter is to request Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolinas
Division of Water Quality for U.S. Forest Service project: Thos Creek Stream Enhancement Creek Stream Enhancement
Project. Located on the Pisgah National Forest in Caldwell County, North Carolina, this project
is situated on Thorps Creek, of the Wilson Creek watershed, Catawba River Basin.
Thorps Creek is classified by the state as an Outstanding Resource Water. This reach of stream
channel is within the Mortimer Recreation Area, and is currently adversely impacted by channel
manipulation, stream bank hardening from log crib walls and a loss in streamside vegetation
from recreation site development and foot traffic. As a result, sections of stream bank within the
reach are unstable; aquatic habitat diversity is lacking; and streamside and alluvial forests are
degraded.
This project proposes the following:
1. Reconstruct the existing `B" stream type along approximately 700 feet of channel, using
reference reach information. Where the stream has been channelized, excavate a bankfull
bench and lay back - 1,400 feet of stream bank to a 2:1 (run:rise) slope or less.
2. Construct up to seven log and/or boulder vanes and -80 feet of toe -wood structure within
the 700 feet stream reach. The instream structure below the fish barrier would create a
pool to improve passage of trout. Spacing of constructed channel features (e.g., riffles
and pools) would be determined using longitudinal and cross section data from the
upstream reference reach.
3. Implement erosion control measures, including native seed, straw mulch, coir matting on
stream banks, planting trees and shrubs, and installing split rail fence for long-term
stabilization. Replace the footbridge following the proposed stream work.
A copy of the 404 permit application has also been sent to the N.C. Wildlife Resources
Commission and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for review.
Enclosed are the following materials:
• Five copies of the Pre -Construction Notice (form 12-11-2008 version 1.3), application for
Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled PapeV

404 permit (Nationwide Permit #27), with the Letter of Delegation of Authority
• Five copies of the Project Description with vicinity map and site plans for the project
• Five copies of the project Decision Memo
• A check made payable to the Division of Water Quality for $570.00 since activities
cumulatively account for more than 150 feet of stream channel.
If you require any additional information, please contact me at 828-257-4214.
SincWy,rad
National Forests in North Carolina
Forest Hydrologist

ot W AT§9QG
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information '
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?Certification:
For the record only for DWQ 401
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes - ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Thorps Creek Stream Rehabilitation Project at Mortimer Campground
2b. County:
Caldwell
2c. Nearest municipality /town:
Morganton, NC
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A ?Oj�
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
USDA Forest Service
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Allen Nicholas
3d. Street address:
160 Zillicoa St., STE A
3e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
3f. Telephone no.:
828-257-4269
3g. Fax no.:
828-259-0584
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Brady Dodd
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
USDA Forest Service, Hydrologist
4d. Street address:
160 Zillicoa St., STE A
4e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
4f. Telephone no.:
828-257-4214
4g. Fax no.:
828-257-4874
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
USDA Forest Service, National Forest in NC, Grandfather
R.D.
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.991152 Longitude: -81.761246
1 c. Property size:
A portion of the 192,540 acres — Grandfather Ranger
District
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Thorps Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C, Trout, ORW
2c. River basin:
Catawba

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Thorps Creek is a tributary to Wilson Creek in the Catawba River Basin, and is classified by the state as an
Outstanding Resource Water. This reach of stream channel is within the Mortimer Recreation Area, and is
currently adversely impacted by channel manipulation, stream bank hardening from log crib walls and a loss
in streamside vegetation from recreation site development and foot traffic. As a result, sections of stream
bank within the reach are unstable; aquatic habitat diversity is lacking; and streamside and alluvial forests are
degraded (Project Description, Figures 2-4). The Thorps Creek drainage is 1.14 square miles in size and is
mostly forested and predominantly in federal ownership. Past management in the watershed within the last
hundred years included logging much of the timber using roads, railroads, and possibly splash dams to
transport timber downstream to local mills. Following harvest, much of the flatter terrain was used for
farming and small homesteads.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acre in the project area.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 6,000 feet in the Thorps Creek drainage.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The goals of this project are to improve the health of the stream ecosystem by improving channel stability and habitat
quality, along with improving riparian and streamside vegetation conditions. The desired condition is to have high
quality riparian areas and aquatic habitat features that maintain hydrologic function, enhance stream stability, minimize
erosion, and maintain the attributes which qualify Wilson Creek as a Wild and Scenic River, and maintain the State
classification for Thorps Creek of Class C, Trout, and Outstanding Resource Waters. The proposed action is needed at
this time, at these locations, because taking no action would lead to further erosion and sedimentation which, in turn,
would cause further damage to aquatic habitat and recreation sites.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project proposes to do the following (refer to attached "Project Description" for details):
• Reconstruct the existing "B" stream type along approximately 700 feet of channel, using reference reach
information. Where the stream has been channelized, excavate a bankfull bench and lay back — 1,400 feet of
stream bank to a 2:1 (run:rise) slope or less.
• Construct up to seven log and/or boulder vanes and —80 feet of toe -wood structure within the 700 feet stream
reach. The instream structure below the fish barrier would create a pool to improve passage of trout. Spacing of
constructed channel features (e.g., riffles and pools) would be determined using longitudinal and cross section
data from upstream in the reference reach (Appendix A — Reference Reach Data).
• Implement erosion control measures, including native seed, straw mulch, coir matting on stream banks,
planting trees and shrubs, and installing split rail fence for long-term stabilization. Replace the footbridge
following the proposed stream work.
A medium sized trackhoe shall be used in the construction of this project. All disturbed area shall be seeded and
mulched. The split rail fencing would be purchased and constructed using other funding. USFS Hydrologist to be
resent during construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ®No E3 Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑Corps
i
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Bank sloping &
stabilization
S1 EJP ® T
using
bioengineering
Thorps Creek
INR
® DWQ
20
1,400
techniques —
i
Excavation of
banks
Construction of
S2 ❑ P ® T
boulder and log
Thorps Creek
® PER
® Corps
20
75
vanes —
❑ INT
® DWQ
Excavation of bed
S2 [IP ®T
Construction of
Pool & Riffle
Thorps Creek
PER
®
Corps
20
500
Habitat
E] INT
®DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
1,975
3i. Comments: All impacts are expected to be temporary and would improve current conditions by using natural channel
design techniques.

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian
buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation,
then you MUST fill out Section D
of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse
❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
61 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Construction would occur largely in the dry, facilitated by pumping around the work site to avoid elevated turbidity
and sediment yield to Thorps Creek. A temporarily increase in turbidity and sediment deposition downstream of the
site is possible when the stream is turned back into the new channel. The implementation of pumping around and
erosion control should minimize sediment, and stabilization of the bank should decrease erosion and sedimentation
overall. Work is expected to be completed over a one week period, depending on weather.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A. Minimize the area and degree of soil disturbance that reduces infiltration capacity and permeability, and
destroys protective forest floor and ground cover.
B. All hazardous materials will be stored outside of flood -prone areas and surrounded with sediment fence to
reduce the risk of materials reaching the stream.
C. Work activities would not be scheduled on rainy days.
D. Heavy Equipment Operation.
1. All equipment shall be cleaned before entering the project area and stream, so as to reduce the risk of
fine grained sediment and oils and grease from entering the stream. This would also reduce the risk of
invasive weed spread onto the Forest.
2. Do not operate on wet soils when they are most susceptible to damage and erosion.
3. Operate heavy equipment on slopes less than 12 percent so as to reduce the risk of soil erosion.
Avoid operating heavy equipment on over -hanging stream banks.
4. Move large woody debris and boulders in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the forest floor,
exposure of mineral soil, or degradation of stream bank stability.
E. Install sediment fence or coir logs to trap potential sediment. Stabilize any disturbed area at the end of each
workday.
F. Re -vegetate exposed soils as soon as possible to take advantage of the loose soil conditions for seeding.
1. Exposed soil will be covered with pine -straw mulch or erosion control matting at the end of the project.
Matting will be secured in place with stakes and live stakes where conditions allow.
2. Temporary seeding will occur on all bare soil within five days of ground disturbing activities to provide
long-term erosion control.
3. Stabilize channel banks with a temporary seed mix of wheat, millet, or similar annual grain as work is
completed.
G. Do not move sediment trap devices until the vegetation in the disturbed areas has been established.
H. During on-going operations inspect the site frequently; inspect occasionally during inactive periods.
1. Check for potentially damaging or failing situations that may cause unacceptable water quality impacts.
2. Correct failing situations as soon as practical.
I. Conduct visual inspections of streamflow while the work is being conducted to maintain acceptable turbidity
levels.
J. Use a skilled heavy equipment operator, trained in stream restoration and construction of in -stream structures.
Instruct the operator to minimize disturbance to the streambed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
Does not apply since the site is not
being developed.
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The current site contains less than
24% impervious area and an increase in impervious area is not planned from the proposed work. Additionally, all
stormwater is transported primarily via vegetated conveyances.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: j
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
F1 DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
i
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
® ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other,
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ®No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
®Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
® Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a stream rehabilitation project and therefore will not further develop the site, but improve channel stability, aquatic
habitat, and water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will not produce sewage since it is a stream rehabilitation project.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
This information is published in the federal register for Designated Critical Habitat. We also received comment to project
scoping from the USFWS Asheville Field Office.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
We used the following web site: http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
-
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
USDA Forest Service, National Forests in North Carolina, Pisgah NF completed a field assessments during the winter of
2016.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http://floodmaps.nc.gov/fmis/ & field determination
Brady N. Dodd
I
7
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
App an Ag is Signature
Date
(Agent's sign re is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)

USDA
Forest Service
File Code: 2500
Route To:
National Forests in North Carolina
Subject: Delegation of Authority
To: Brady Dodd
160A Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-2574200
FAX: [phone]
Date: March 17, 2016
You are hereby delegated the authority to act as my agent for all phases of the application
process for permits required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for watershed restoration
and improvement projects such as aquatic habitat restoration and enhancement, habitat
restoration, channel stabilization, and channel relocation on the National Forests in North
Carolina. You are authorized to make formal application for all permits to the U.S. Army Corp
of Engineers and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, provide all necessary
information, and sign all correspondence.
Include this letter as part of all applications for Section 404 permits to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and Section 401 Water Quality Certification to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality.
HURSTON A. NICHOLAS
Forest Supervisor
ow
America's Working Forests — Caring Every Day in Every Way Printed on Recycled Paper foo

Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016
Project Description
Submitted by: Brady Dodd, NFsNC Forest Hydrologist, April 2016
PROJECT CURRENT CONDITION:
Thorps Creek is a tributary to Wilson Creek in the Catawba River Basin, and is classified by the state as
an Outstanding Resource Water. This reach of stream channel is within the Mortimer Recreation Area,
and is currently adversely impacted by channel manipulation, stream bank hardening from log crib walls
and a loss in streamside vegetation from recreation site development and foot traffic. As a result,
sections of stream bank within the reach are unstable; aquatic habitat diversity is lacking; and
streamside and alluvial forests are degraded (Project Description, Figures 2-4). The Thorps Creek
drainage is 1.14 square miles in size and is mostly forested and predominantly in federal ownership. Past
management in the watershed within the last hundred years included logging much of the timber using
roads, railroads, and possibly splash dams to transport timber downstream to local mills. Following
harvest, much of the flatter terrain was used for farming and small homesteads.
THORPS CREEK STREAM ENHANCEMENT
MORTIMER RECREATION AREA Mpk ,G
Grandfather Ranger District'
SITE LOCATION & DRAINAGEAREA
SITE LOCATION
LY
q1 ,f
�1
_ t rttE m'
¢
Figure 1. Location of the Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 1

RI_ FFIF_C_rossCiecion A-A—
A.................................... .......... A'
SIDESLOPE
UPPER UPPER
TERACE LOVER .
TERACE
CHANNEL 6 SMALL
FLOODPLAIN FEATURES
,BEITOVENTED FORD XING IPP/1} / BATHROOM
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION -THORPS CREEK @
MORTIMER RECREATION AREA
Grandfather Ranger District
PLAN VIEW SKETCH . W1 PHOTO POINTS
U
MORTIMER
WORK CENTER
A' —
Well
e3' nvu r` a E� -�... tea.
0 0
A
Photo Loa:
PP#1-Vented ford crossing
PP#2 -Old fish structure (OFS)
PP#3 -Thorps Cr. between OFS and fish barrier, looking downstream
r
#A-Natural Fish barrier
#5 -Failing crib wall, right bank
#6 - crib wall, left bank
#7 - Thorps Cr. looking upstream at crib wall & footbridge
#8 -Thorps Cr. looking upstream from Hwy 90 culvert
----- — -- ----- — --- —
ACCESS ROAD FSR 116
ESrES MILL CPy
.� . CONFLUENCE?
tE-- — wo
SKETCH-NOTTOSGLE
Figure 2. Sketch of existing condition Plan View at Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project, with
Photo Point locations (see Figures 3 & 4).
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 2

downstream.
Figure 3. Collection of existing condition photos, locations detailed on Figure 2.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 3

Photo #6— crib wall, left bank.
.—. sIN
;♦s, �jj
Photo #7—Thorps Cr. looking upstream at crib wall & footbridge. Photo #8 — Thorps Cr. looking upstream from Hwy 90 culvert.
Figure 4. Collection of existing condition photos, locations detailed on Figure 2.
PROJECT PURPOSE & NEED:
The goals of this project are to improve the health of the stream ecosystem by improving channel
stability and habitat quality, along with improving riparian and streamside vegetation conditions. The
desired condition is to have high quality riparian areas and aquatic habitat features that maintain
hydrologic function, enhance stream stability, minimize erosion, and maintain the attributes which
qualify Wilson Creek as a Wild and Scenic River, and maintain the State classification for Thorps Creek of
Class C, Trout, and Outstanding Resource Waters. The proposed action is needed at this time, at these
locations, because taking no action would lead to further erosion and sedimentation which, in turn,
would cause further damage to aquatic habitat and recreation sites.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED WORK:
1) Reconstruct the existing "B" stream type along approximately 700 feet of channel, using
reference reach information (Appendix A — Reference Reach Data). Where the stream has been
channelized, excavate a bankfull bench and lay back — 1,400 feet of stream bank to a 2:1
(run:rise) slope.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 4

2) Construct up to seven log and/or boulder vanes and —80 feet of toe -wood structure (Figure 5
and see Appendix B & C for Structure Typicals) within the 700 feet stream reach. The instream
structure below the fish barrier would create a pool to improve passage of trout. Spacing of
constructed channel features (e.g., riffles and pools) would be determined using longitudinal
and cross section data from upstream in the reference reach (Appendix A— Reference Reach
Data).
3) Implement erosion control measures, including native seed, straw mulch, coir matting on
stream banks, planting trees and shrubs, and installing split rail fence for long-term stabilization.
Replace the footbridge following the proposed stream work.
A medium sized trackhoe shall be used in the construction of this project. All disturbed area shall be
seeded and mulched. The split rail fencing would be purchased and constructed using other funding.
A.................................................
`off
EXCAVATE BANKFULL 'rJ ' CONSTRUCFA"B"
BENCH & LAY BACK •^ STREAM TYPE WITH
UPPER BANK TCA INNER BERM&
21 SLOPE STEP/PCOL FEATURES,
- REFERENCEFRCM
4woVENTED FORD XING
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION-THORPS CREEK @
MORTIMER RECREATION AREA
Grandfather Ranger District
PLAN VIEW SKETCH — PROPOSED ACTION
MORTIMER
WORK CENTER
Proposed Action:
1) Reconstruct the existing "B" stream type along approximately 700 feet of channel, using reference KEY:
reach information. = tog& boulder vane
2) Construct up to seven log and/or boulder vanes, and —80 feet of toe -wood structure within the 700 =toe -wood
feet stream reach. °
3) Implement erosion control measures, including native seed, straw mulch, coir matting on stream=vane arm
banks planting trees and shrubs, and installing split rail fence for long-term stabilization.
A medium sized trackhoe shall be used, along with a dump track -;ruck in the construction of this project. All = hank stop;ng
disturbed area shall be seeded and mulched. =pool habitat
Figure S. Plan view sketch of proposed action in Thorps Creek.
ESTES M I LL CR
i
CONFLUENCE?
7'
�f
d
}
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 5

APPENDIX A - Reference Reach Data
Measured Cross Sections:
Riffle:
96.00.
I' 97.00
Y
98.00 .. -
99.00 �h ,.. .... ... r •�(, a.
M 100.00 .. X
X'
101.00
102-00 ..
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o .-� N .ri .i v� .o r: oc ai o .i .`". .�. .'^. .'°i .ri m � o ,r n N ✓' N n °.° n not .Nn
Station (feet) N N N N N of T
EuLure
Value
mean BFd =
1.33
max BFd =
2
BFw=
24.3
inner berm
23-17=6
feature
V I e ft
mean BFd =
1.87
max BFd =
3.50
BFw=
16.1
inner berm =
23-17=6
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 6

Cross Sections (Continued):
99.00
Value
mean BFd =
T
max BFd =
2.28
BFw =
18.7
inner berm =
21-15=6
100.00
10050
d
.....-
t
r
r
i
.
101.0 0
10150
i �° �•
I
i =_
t _{
—�
_ 1 -
1
W 102.00
..
102.50
103.00 ._..1
�_; J�
{.;-
.-±-_
i
103.50
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
-
0 0 0 0 0 0
-�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Station (feet)
of o
Feature
Value
mean BFd =
1.34
max BFd =
2.28
BFw =
18.7
inner berm =
21-15=6
Design Features using Equations for the Regional Curve Relationships:
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area vs. Drainage Area: y = 21.61x0.68 = 23.62 ft2
Bankfull Discharge vs. Drainage Area: y = 100.64x0.76 = 111.18 cfs
Bankfull Width vs. Drainage Area: y = 19.05x°.37 = 20.00 ft
Bankfull Mean Depth vs. Drainage Area: y = 1.11xo.31 = 1.16 ft
* where x = drainage area of 1.14 square miles
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 7

2
0
8
0
LO
I
0
0
o rn rn rn M M COM w w CO
(11) uogena13
E c
0 �
O
w
O
0
O
rl
0
M
0
a� x
M
s
lOLn
m
N
o
r,
n
0
N
r,
O
0
m
m
0
U
c
fp
O
N
Om
0O
0
A
0
Ln
G1
N
O
0
0)
W
r!
0
c
�
�
~ X
4l
= c
n
N
u (o
O
N
(0 0J
HCL
m
M
c
N
00
r-
O
2(V
O,4
r4
CxN
G
Ln
O
M
�
In
c
(o
O
.-i
r,
o0
C
4—
s O
+� ~
c
O
lD
t!1
.�
N
�4
m
-,t
N
J
L
(co o
u t
oG
a°
C7
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 8

APPENDIX
B
- Structure
Typicals
POOLUSED
ROCK1-HOOK VANE DETAIL
A
PLAN VIEW
rl
.�CONSTRUCTINNERBERN
[/�
: 1
51 LL ROCK
MATERIAL
�'J
FROM POOL
USED TO
C. nstructed purl
CONSTRUCT'
INNERBERM
f
a
�
>
FOOTER. ROCK
AT OR BELOW
BANI.FULL
ELEVATION
G PS IN INVERT
A' TOP ROCK
ROCK1-HOOK VANE DETAIL
CROSS SECTION
�J\ �V'�•• • banl.tu.....aci:,n
V ................. ...VVV"'..
_75: SLUPF ON Vq NE ARM GAPSPLLIGGED W11H
"-- - - FROF.i ON SITE
/.
...........
•
......
CHANNEL BOTTOM ,CLOSELI'fffTEO
PPOFILE-THALWEG BOULDERS TO
GLIDE MINR.112E SAPS
POOL RUG+
Bndr Gadd
NFNCH d.
• IIJ"� ED
i�ELEVATION
'KHEADER
ROCK.
FOOTER
ROCK
P.TFLE
Br adr Godd
HF11C N�dro
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 9
11�'.?irP•�
r� ��.i�MATERIALFROM
POOLUSED
TO
.�CONSTRUCTINNERBERN
AT OR BELOW
BANI.FULL
ELEVATION
G PS IN INVERT
A' TOP ROCK
ROCK1-HOOK VANE DETAIL
CROSS SECTION
�J\ �V'�•• • banl.tu.....aci:,n
V ................. ...VVV"'..
_75: SLUPF ON Vq NE ARM GAPSPLLIGGED W11H
"-- - - FROF.i ON SITE
/.
...........
•
......
CHANNEL BOTTOM ,CLOSELI'fffTEO
PPOFILE-THALWEG BOULDERS TO
GLIDE MINR.112E SAPS
POOL RUG+
Bndr Gadd
NFNCH d.
• IIJ"� ED
i�ELEVATION
'KHEADER
ROCK.
FOOTER
ROCK
P.TFLE
Br adr Godd
HF11C N�dro
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 9

t^
0 1/8 TO 11'4 OF LOGS BUIN STREAM BED IT
o
1;3t� 1.3W
Rock & Lo J -hook
g
GAPS IN INVERT
BOULDERS ON TOP NEAR
.t..
Vane Detail
TOP ROCK
BEDELEVATIOIJ
WN DOWNSTREAM FROM
BNN'ERT
it
—.
2:1
BanKuh eltvationA'
SLOPE
Opt
LACED RIVER ROG
O
TO
MATERIAL
IN
E A
BANVFULL
FROM POOL
ROCY FABRIC
I
,,.
USEDTO
coNSTxucr
PLAN VIEW ]
ti
INNER BERM
HEADER ROCK
A
TOPS OF TREES BURIED
UNDER RIVIM
2. ROCK!FABRIC
FOOTER ROCK
A IA
�
<
<
MATERIAL
FROM POOL
USED TO
CONSTRUCT
INNER BERM
A
X -SECTION VIEW
LOWFLO'W'
ELEVATION
i
r
^HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
Constructed
pool
5 LOGS PLACED AT A 200 ANGLE
s - FROM BANK AND AT A2-4%
SLOPEFROM', BANFFULL
.L ' p•`. ELEVATION
SILL LOG
" 10' IN BANK'
Brady Dodd
1AFNC Hydro
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 10
1;3t� 1.3W
113'X
...............�............................. j..........
.t..
CONSTRUCTED POOL—MAX. DEPTH
WN DOWNSTREAM FROM
BNN'ERT
it
—.
BanKuh eltvationA'
Opt
LACED RIVER ROG
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
TOPS OF TREES BURIED
1
UNDER RT;ER
1
ROCY FABRIC
I
SILL LOG
" 10' IN BANK'
Brady Dodd
1AFNC Hydro
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 10

FxiS:ykg ay
Construction of TOE WOOD IwIth Transplants)& Bankfull Bench Typiral
C—smim t
to
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 11
TITO i'C'UNDOF
t
Lvg Vaim D*UH
LO"V~ 41
PLAN VIEW
sm" Ek, vipa
ONAWWONWOO
Mom
w
/R
D+ w
muftu
FR09 YOt
T
QW $MK7 O
Owlt K"
.41
.2V
KlatFR&Jbk iDM
A2111a_L,KfIRIW :i
JYU To
'*sm I
. ..........
pw#:
X-SECTIONViEW
—7,
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 11

APPENDIX C - STREAM RESTORATION
SPECIFICATIONS
EQUIPMENT AND OPERATOR SPECIFICATIONS
A) Manner of Construction - Excavation will be done in a manner which will minimize
sedimentation in the stream channel. Silt fence will be installed downstream of the
construction area to reduce the risk of sediment entering the stream.
B) Equipment Operator Performance - Equipment operators shall be experienced and competent
in the use of the equipment to which they are assigned. They shall be expected to demonstrate
a level of proficiency with the equipment which enables them to be productive in all aspects of
stream restoration work. Equipment operators shall be experienced in the construction of
Rosgen designed structures; including the cross vane, J -hook vane, and Toe-wood/Sod mat.
C) Operators will be instructed by the construction inspector as to the desired result of
construction activities. Operators will be responsible for determining how best to use
equipment to achieve the desired results. Chain saw operators will be required to cut trees,
limbs and root masses as necessary to facilitate the removal and placement of debris in the
stream.
D) Environmental Considerations - Earth moving equipment will cross and operate in the stream
flow only when necessary and only when directed to do so by the construction inspector.
Equipment shall be new or of low hours and be maintained to prevent fuel, oil and lubricant
spills in the vicinity of the stream. Refueling, repairs and lubrication will be performed at a safe
distances from the stream and only at locations approved by the construction inspector where
water is controlled by runoff control measures.
E) Safety Considerations - At work sites, where equipment will be operated on Forest Roads,
flagman shall be stationed to warn oncoming traffic of congestion. Construction road signs shall
be in place and a means of removing sediment, mud or rocks from roadways shall be
established. The contractor will be responsible for the implementation of these measures.
F) Equipment Specifications
Hydraulic Excavator:
Track mounted, hydraulic powered.
Excavator:
o Min weight — 30,000 lbs
o Min. Reach — 22 feet
o Min Digging Depth — 20 feet
o Min Bucket size —1.0 Cu Yd.
o Min 115 HP
o Equipped with hydraulic thumb, with experienced operator as described
above.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 12

(More than 1 excavator may be required. Unit price bid should be for one excavator for one hour of
running time).
IN -STREAM STRUCTURES SPECIFICATIONS
Structure Stone
Description
The work covered by this section consists of furnishing, stockpiling, placing and maintaining approved
stone to be utilized to construct rock and log vanes, root wad structures, the step -pool structures,
stream crossings, sediment and erosion control measures for use in locations as directed by the
Designer. The quantity of stone may be increased, decreased, or eliminated entirely at the direction of
the Designer. Such variations in quantity will not be considered as alterations in the details of
construction or a change in the character of the work.
Materials
Stone for Coarse Aggregate, No. 57 Stone, "Rip Rap -Class B", and "Boulder" shall consist of blasted stone
or other stone approved by the Designer. The stone shall be sound, tough, dense, resistant to the action
of air and water, and suitable in all other respects for the purpose intended.
All stone shall meet the approval of the Designer. While no specific gradation is required, the various
sizes of the stone shall be equally distributed within the required size range. The size of an individual
stone particle will be determined by measuring its long dimension.
Acceptance Criteria for Stone
CLASS REQUIRED STONE SIZES INCHES
Minimum Average Maximum
Boulder 20 36 42
48" x 24" x 24"
No more than 5 percent of the material furnished can be less than the minimum size specified, more
than 10 percent of the material can exceed the maximum size specified. Boulders shall be relatively flat
on either side in the same dimension, preferably the long dimension.
Construction
The Contractor shall place stone, in locations shown on the construction plans to the thickness, widths,
and lengths as shown on the construction plans or directed by the Designer. All stone shall be placed
neatly and uniformly with an even surface to form an in -stream structure or a sediment and erosion
control device or in accordance with the construction plans and special provisions, and shall meet the
approval of the Designer.
Method of Measurement
The quantity of stone required to construct the structures or sediment and erosion control measures
detailed in these special provisions will be incidental to those bid items. However, field conditions may
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 13

warrant the need for additional stone greater than the quantity specified or detailed for each bid item.
The quantity of stone that has been incorporated into the project, as directed or approved by the
Designer, which exceeds 110% of the quantity required for each bid item will be measured by weight.
Measured by weight will require the quantity to be weighed in trucks on certified platform scales. Stone
that was previously stockpiled for other bid items will not be measured a second time for this provision.
Basis of Payment
When field conditions dictate the need for additional quantity greater than 10% of the bid item, the
quantity of stone measured as provided above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per ton for
"Misc. Coarse Aggregate, No. 57 Stone", "Misc. Rip Rap -Class B", and "Misc. Boulder". Such price and
payment will be full compensation for all work covered by this section, including but not limited to
furnishing, weighing, stockpiling, re -handling, placing, and maintaining the stone and disposal of any
materials not incorporated into the project if directed by the Designer.
Payment will be made under:
Misc. Boulder..........................................................................................................................TON
Rock] -hook & Cross Vane
Description
Rock J -hook and Cross Vanes are primarily used for grade control. These structures serve to maintain the
integrity of the upstream riffle while promoting scouring in the downstream pool. The design shape is
roughly that of the letter "J" or "U" with the apex located on the upstream side at the foot of the riffle.
Footer boulders are placed in the channel bottom for stability. Header boulders are then placed on top
of these footer boulders. Header boulders in the middle of the channel are at approximately the same
depth as the riffle. For the J -hook, on one side of the channel, wing boulders are placed at an angle to
the stream bank, gradually inclining in elevation until they are located near the bankfull surface directly
adjacent to the stream bank. On the other side, the structure turns downstream to create the hook of
the "J", matching the slope of the wing until it goes directly toward the bank as a sill. Water flowing
downstream is forced over these boulders towards the middle and opposite side of the channel,
effectively turning flow and scouring out a pool below. Boulders placed at the apex hold back streambed
material and prevent it from washing downstream.
The quantity of Rock J -hook Vanes may be increased, decreased, or eliminated entirely at the direction
of the Designer. Such variations in quantity will not be considered as alterations in the details of
construction or a change in the character of the work (See Rock J -hook Vane detail below).
Materials
All materials shall meet the requirements of boulder as outlined in Special Provision "Structure Stone".
Back fill material shall be obtained from the stream channel bed, likely from the constructed pool. Large
woody debris may be incorporated into the structure as directed by the Designer.
Installation
A trench shall be dug in such a manner that the footer boulders, the hook header boulders and at least
1/3 of the wing boulders are buried beneath the bed surface elevation. Refer to the construction plans
for exact installation guide and locations of vane to be installed. An excavator, with a bucket that
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 14

includes a hydraulic thumb, shall be used to place boulders under the supervision of Designer. Footer
boulders shall be placed first with header boulders placed on top prior to any back filling of the trench.
Boulders shall be selected and positioned such that they butt tightly together and there are multiple
contact points between all boulders (flat smooth surfaces that fit together). Gaps between boulders
shall be filled (chinked) with a combination of class A and No. 57 size stone found on site until plugged.
In the center portion of the channel (vane invert), the header boulder shall be placed with gaps between
the rock with the top of the header boulder at an elevation designated by the Designer. The header
boulders in the side, or wing, portion shall be placed in such a manner as they slope up from bed
elevation to bankfull or below at a 2 to 7 percent slope or as shown in detail. Header and footer
boulders at both banks shall be tied in securely to the bank in such a way that eliminates the possibility
of water diverting around them. A rock sill shall be utilized to further prevent water from cutting around
the structure. The area between the stream bank and vane on the upstream side of the structure will be
backfilled with stream bed material.
Structures shall be built to the approval of the Designer. The Designer may adjust the number and
placement of structures in the field.
Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of Rock J -hook Vane shall be as outlined. This payment shall be considered full
compensation for all labor, equipment, hauling, placing, handling, sorting, fitting, materials, and
incidentals necessary to construct the rock vane.
Payment will be made under:
Equipment& Labor.................................................................................................................................HOURS
Materials: Boulders......................................................................................................................................TON
-.J-HOOK
VANE DETAIL
PLAN
VIEW
r,WAD
WTERML
.,••,..INTO
F ROM POOL
J MBELOW LOW
USEDTO
,. ,
=W P06
CONSTRUCT
INN E R BE RM
`
``JJI
� 15co
TER
ROCK
��Ki.^� A,
r�
MATERIAL
.ftp ��••
FROMPOOL
a '�
may: r:,
•
USEDTO
�yl�
CONSTRUCT
INNER BERM
HEADER
ROCK
�)
GAPSIN
,.
ROCK
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 15

Loy Vatic
Description
This structure serves to decrease stress in the near -bank region while promoting scouring in the
downstream pool. Logs are placed at an angle to the stream bank, gradually inclining in elevation until
they are located near % bankfull elevation directly adjacent to the stream bank. Water flowing
downstream is forced over these logs towards the middle of the channel, effectively scouring out a pool
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 16
ROCK J-HOOK VANE DETAIL
CROSS SECTION
AT OR BELOSi
BANKFULL
ELEVATION
A
... ..... .. ......
..... .....
DlTILLL tlN�On
2�>RSLOPgON
GAPS PLUGGED
VANE ARAT
ROCKFRO ONYSRf ,
AT BED
f LE VATION
HEADER
ROCK
k�
.... ...........
C LOSE LY FrM D
FOOTER
� AL
CHMNELSO OL!
BOULDERSTO
ROCK
ROOT NAD
PROFILE-THA11'JEG
VINWIM GAPS
—+
POOL
GLIDE ' RIFFLE —
ea,vx:
CROSS VANE DETAIL
PLAN VIEW
FOOTER
ROCK
Constructed pool
HEADER
ROCK
C
O
C
O
W
>
N
�
c
r—
C
MATERIAL
tp
FROM POOL
USED TO
CONSTRUCT
INNER BERM
MATERIAL
FROM POOL
USED TO
1/3channel
1/3channel
CONSTRUCT
bankfullwidth
i bankfullwidth
o
INNER BERM
R
..
9
­d, Dodd
NFNC HYd,o
Loy Vatic
Description
This structure serves to decrease stress in the near -bank region while promoting scouring in the
downstream pool. Logs are placed at an angle to the stream bank, gradually inclining in elevation until
they are located near % bankfull elevation directly adjacent to the stream bank. Water flowing
downstream is forced over these logs towards the middle of the channel, effectively scouring out a pool
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 16

below. The quantity of log vanes may be increased, decreased, or eliminated entirely at the direction of
the designer. Such variations in quantity will not be considered as alterations in the details of
construction or a change in the character of the work.
Materials
Trees to be used for the vane shall be provided by the Forest Service from near the site. All log materials
shall be at least 10 inches in diameter. A sheet of non -woven geotextile fabric (4oz. or greater) shall be
placed the length of the vane arm on the upstream side, stapled to the top log in a manner that they will
be covered by back fill material. Back fill material shall be obtained from the stream channel bed.
installation
A trench shall be dug in such a manner that the footer and header logs are buried beneath the bed
surface elevation at least three feet. An excavator, with a bucket that includes a hydraulic thumb, shall
be used to place logs under the supervision of Designer. Logs shall be tightly sealed with no gaps
between the header and footer log. Filter fabric shall be placed on the upstream side of the structure
and backfilled with materials excavated on-site to prevent the washout of sediment through log gaps.
Filter fabric shall extend from the bottom of footer log to the finished grade elevation and shall be
placed the entire length of the structure. Header and footer logs shall be tied in securely to the bank in
such a way that eliminates the possibility of water diverting around them. Structures shall be built to the
approval of the Designer. The Designer may adjust the number and placement of structures in the field.
Basis of Payment
This payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, equipment, hauling, placing, handling,
sorting, fitting, materials, and incidentals necessary to construct the Log Vane. Trees to be used for the
vane shall be provided by the Forest Service.
Payment will be made under:
Equipment& Labor..............................................................................................................................HOURS
Materials: Non -woven geotextile fabric.................................................................................LINEAR FOOT
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 17
118 TO 114 OF END OF
LOGS BURIED IN
p
,
STREAM BED NTTN
BOULDER AT
'a Th.s aroal
be
Log Vane Typical
INVERTABED
fillede.4bl
e
ELEVATION
rlops and
fabncr8
�•( slrvam oc
.. over fabri
h`
m
LOGS PLACED AT A 20 - 300
ANGLE FROM BANK AND AT
P•
_t
_
-- A2-4%SLOPE FROM IR
'••,4-�.
-
BANKFULL ELEVATION
I
CCn I-qd
pool
1
i
PROTECTED
BANK
A--
--A'
Ranklu'1�-�_plprat on
GEOTEX LE FABRIC /
PLACED RIVER
_
ROCK
LOGS_____
-
TOPS OF TREES
BURIED UNDER
Constructed-! - '-
RIVER ROCK
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 17

Toe-woad/,hod mat (bankfull bench)
Description
This structure serves to protect a length of stream bank by biulding a new bank with a bankfull area
where one did not exist before due to unstable conditions (See Toe-wood/Sod mat detail below). The
structure creates a large undercut bank providing an abundance of aquatic cover type habitat.
Materials
Trees and brush to be used for the structure shall be provided by the Forest Service from near the site.
Shrubs and willow shall be provided by the Forest Service from near the site. Excavated soil shall be
hauled off the site and dumped within 5 miles by the contractor. Seed, mulch, coir matting, and riparian
plantings (live stakes, potted material, etc.) shall be provided and installed by the contractor.
Installation
The channel shall be excavated to build a bench on the channel bottom on the outside of the meander
bend. Its elevation shall be well below determined low water elevation. A deep pool shall be
constructed where the new thalweg will be located, and excavated material shall be used to build the
point bar and back fill the structure. Footer logs laying parrallel to the stream channel shall be placed on
the bench, then the toe -wood on top of that. Toe -wood shall consist of a mixture of sizes, but include
several large tree stems with root wads attached. Stems shall be pushed into the bank were possible.
Trees, brush, and limbs shall all be used to fill this area with woody debris, and be placed up to the low
flow elevation. Bundles of live stakes, e.g. willow, shall be placed on top of the woody debris and alluvial
backfill shall be placed on the structure (amount determined by Designer). Shrubs, excavated from
nearby, shall be placed on top of the toe -wood up to the bankfull elevation. This shrub mat will replace
the "sod mat". From the bankfull elevation the verticle slope shall be excavated to the 2:1 slope (run to
rise). Excavated soil material shall be scattered on the adjacent terrace. All slopes shall have seed,
mulch, and coir matting installed. Riparian plantings shall be installed on the slope and during the plant
dormant season, live stakes shall be installed in the bench and bank.
Basis of Payment
This payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, equipment, hauling, placing, handling,
sorting, fitting, materials, and incidentals necessary to construct the bankfull bench. Trees to be used for
the structure shall be provided by the Forest Service.
Payment will be made under:
Equipment& Labor...........................................................................................................................HOURS
Materials:
CoirMatting.......................................................................................................... LINEAR FOOT
Seed........................................................................................................................................ACRE
RiparianPlantings.................................................................................................................EACH
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 18

Stabilization of Vertical Banks on outside Meander Bend
Construction of Bankfull Bench using TOE WOOD/SOD MAT DETAIL
EXCAVATED BANK MATERIAL
CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AND
SEQUENCE:
• Excavate high bank to construct a
2:1 slope from bankfull to terrace
elevation
• Excavate & construct toe wood
bench and new channel pool
feature based on reference pool
dimenslons
Place trees1logsflops on toe wood
bench & in toe of bank below low
flow
Place willow cuttingstbundles on
toe wood
• Excavate sod mats (using a front
eras loader) or shrub transplants
(e.g alder, willow) and place on toe
wood up to bankfull elevation
• Seed bank wth nacre grass seed
• Cover sod mat and sbped bank
with coir erosion control matting
Plant wffioruVsdky
dogwoodkidenbeny cuttings into
relocated sod mat and bank to help
pin sod into bank
FOOTER LOG
0
EROSION CONTROL. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS
Seed and Mulch
Seed Planting Summary Table
SOD M4T
•-•-----. LoarflowElevation
TOE WOOD
Channel Bogan
baC f Co7tl
N -W- H*0
Community Type: Riparian
Scientific Name
Common Name
Planting Density
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
22 lbs/acre
Festuca rubra
Creeping red fescue
5 lbs/acre
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deertongue
5 lbs/acre
Aster sagittifolius
Arrow Leaved Aster
2 lbs/acre
Rudbeckia hirta
Black Eyed Susan
2 lbs/acre
Eupatorium fistulosom
Joe Pye Weed
1 lbs/acre
Eupatorium perfoliatum
Boneset
1 lbs/acre
Vernonia gigantean
Giant Ironweed
1 lbs/acre
Lodelia cardinalis
Cardinalflower
1 lbs/acre
Asclepias syriaca
Common Milkweed
1 lbs/acre
Materials
All materials shall meet the approval of the Designer. Seed material shall consist of species in the "Seed
Planting Summary Table" above.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 19

Installation
Planting seed shall occur within 1 day of ground disturbing activities. The method of seeding may be
varied by the Contractor under his/her responsibility to provide a healthy, vigorous, weed free and
disease free uniform stand of grass. Seed shall be immediately covered with straw mulch in quantities
to cover at least 50 percent of the ground surface. On stream banks, biodegradable matting shall be
placed to hold seed and soil in place. Above are native grass species to be sown and their seeding
density.
Maintenance shall begin immediately after seeding operations and continue until final acceptance.
Maintenance of seeded areas shall consist of watering, weed and pest control, erosion repair, reseeding
and incidental operations as necessary to establish a healthy, vigorous, weed free and disease free
uniform stand of grass. All areas that fail to show a uniform stand of grass for any reason shall be
treated repeatedly until a uniform stand of at least 90% coverage is attained with no bare area greater
than five square feet.
Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of seed and mulch will be paid for as outlined. This payment shall be considered
full compensation for all labor, equipment, furnishing materials, hauling, rehandling, sorting, materials,
and incidentals necessary to seed and mulch.
Payment will be made under:
Seedand Mulch..............................................................................................................................SQUARE YARD
AloIi h iiy
Materials
All materials shall meet the approval of the Designer and include Coir fiber mat 700, wooden stakes, and
live stakes.
Installation
Coir fiber mat 700 shall be used on the lower stream bank up to the top of bank elevation. The matting
shall be fastened in place using wooden stakes. During the following plant dormant season, live stakes
shall be planted in the matting from water's edge to just above bankfull. A species list is in the Planting
Plan Summary Table in the "Plantings" section below.
Provide stakes made of hardwood with a hook to anchor matting. Stakes shall be installed to no less
than 1 foot deep for use on side slopes and no less than 3 feet for areas at the toe of the slope and along
the top edge of matting. Place the matting upon final grading, following seed and mulch application.
Provide a smooth soil surface free from stones, clods, or debris which will prevent the contact of the
matting with the soil. Unroll the matting starting at the bottom of the slope and apply without
stretching such that it will lie smoothly but loosely on the soil surface. Bury the top end of each piece of
matting in a narrow trench at least 6 in. (150 mm) deep and tamp firmly after staking with evenly spaced
stakes. Stake the matting according to the manufactures recommended pattern for specific product and
slope. Where one roll of matting ends and a second roll begins, install matting end -over -end with
approximately 6 inches of overlap. Stake through overlapped area using 5 stakes. Install stakes across
the matting at ends, junctions, and trenches approximately 1.3 feet apart. See the figure below for the
Erosion Control Matting Detail.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 20

Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of matting will be paid for as outlined. This payment shall be considered full
compensation for all labor, equipment, furnishing materials, hauling, stockpiling, rehandling, sorting,
fitting, materials, and incidentals necessary to install matting.
Payment will be made under:
Matting......................................................................................................................................SQUARE YARD
toi or ■ ` 3' LONG•
v A'ttc�taeaco DANK WOODEN
- - STAYS
Plantings
Description
Plantings shall be specified in each contract as to type e.g., container, bare root, and live staking.
Plantings from containers shall be from one gallon containers and can be planted throughout the year.
Live staking and bare root planting shall occur during plant dormancy. Bare root seedlings shall be 6 tc
12 inches tall. Below is a list of woody vegetation species to be planted on stream banks and
floodplains.
Planting Plan Summary Table
Scientific Name
Common Name
TOP OF em4x
Spacing (feet)
ERMOf: CONTROL
BLANCET FROM PANXTULL
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
TO 9' ABOVE TOP OF BANKe�
5
Clethra acuminate
COVERINGSEED1011111
.=y'
5
Cal canthus floridus
Sweetshrub
10%
5
Clethra acuminate
Cinnamon Bark Clethra
T;
5
Hamamelis vir iniana
j
10%
70 GRAM COIR MAI IING
�° ' ��'� �
I LONG
FROM TOE OF BA' KTO
5
WOODEN
E2A.%ZFVLL ELEVATION,
t�k. f":
S'FA} E
VE
COMO SEED
TOP 0r 3'
10%
5
_ STM ZES
Sweet birch
toi or ■ ` 3' LONG•
v A'ttc�taeaco DANK WOODEN
- - STAYS
Plantings
Description
Plantings shall be specified in each contract as to type e.g., container, bare root, and live staking.
Plantings from containers shall be from one gallon containers and can be planted throughout the year.
Live staking and bare root planting shall occur during plant dormancy. Bare root seedlings shall be 6 tc
12 inches tall. Below is a list of woody vegetation species to be planted on stream banks and
floodplains.
Planting Plan Summary Table
Scientific Name
Common Name
Percent of plantings
Spacing (feet)
Container & Bare Root Species:
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
10%
5
Clethra acuminate
Mountain sweet pepperbush
10%
5
Cal canthus floridus
Sweetshrub
10%
5
Clethra acuminate
Cinnamon Bark Clethra
10%
5
Hamamelis vir iniana
Witch Hazel
10%
5
Hypericum densiflorum
Bushy St. Johns
10%
5
Itea vir inica
15%
5
Xanthorhiza sim licissima
Yellowroot
10%
5
Betula lenta
Sweet birch
10%
10
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 21

Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
5%
20
Live Stake Species:
Cornus ammonium
silky dogwood
15
3
Salix nigra
black willow
20
3
Salix sericea
silky willow
20
3
Sambucus Canadensis
common elderberry
20
3
Salix humilis
prairie willow
10
3
Ph socar us o ulifolius
ninebark
15
3
Materials
All materials shall meet the approval of the Designer. Live staking plant material shall consist of species
shown in the Planting Plan Summary Table above.
All plant material shall be harvested locally (within the same physiographic ecoregion) or purchased
from a local nursery. All live stakes shall be dormant at time of acquisition and planting. Live stakes
shall be installed between November 15 and May 15. Live stakes shall be % -1 % inch (12-38 mm) in
diameter and 2 to 4 feet (0.6-1.2 meters) in length.
During preparation, the basal ends of the live stakes shall be cleanly cut at an angle to facilitate easy
insertion into the soil, while the tops shall be cut square or blunt for tamping. All limbs shall be removed
from the sides of the live cutting prior to installation.
Installation
Cuttings for live stakes shall be harvested in a manner such that they are cut, immediately put into
water to be soaked for ten days, and then planted immediately after the ten days are completed.
Cuttings shall remain wet until they are planted. Outside storage locations should be continually shaded
and protected from wind and direct sunlight. Live stakes shall be tamped perpendicularly into the
finished bank slope with a dead blow hammer, with buds oriented in an upward direction. Stakes
should be tamped until approximately 3% of the stake length is within the ground. The area around each
live stake shall be compacted by foot after the live stake has been installed. One to two inches shall be
cut cleanly off of the top of each stake (with loppers) at an angle of approximately 15 degrees following
installation. Any stakes that are split or damaged during installation shall be removed and replaced.
Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of plantings will be paid for as outlined. This payment shall be considered full
compensation for all labor, equipment, furnishing materials, hauling, rehandling, sorting, materials, and
incidentals necessary to plant.
Payment will be made under:
Plantings.........................................................................................................................................................EACH
TemFora►y Silt Fence
Description
Furnish material, construct, maintain, and remove temporary silt fence in locations shown on the plans
or in locations that require surface drainage to be filtered.
Materials
Posts:
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 22

Provide steel posts meeting the following requirements:
• Minimum 5 feet (1.5 meters) long.
• Minimum 13/8 inches (34.9 mm) wide measured parallel to the fence.
• Minimum weight of 1.33 Ib/ft of length.
• Equipped with an anchor plate with minimum area of 14.0 square inches (9,032.1 square mm).
• Have a means of retaining wire and fabric in the desired position without displacement.
Woven Wire Fence:
Provide woven wire fence meeting the following requirements:
• Minimum 32 inches (812.8 mm) high.
• Minimum 5 horizontal wires.
• Vertical wires spaced 12 inches (304.8 mm) apart.
• Minimum 10 gage top and bottom wires.
• Minimum 12 %: gage all other wires.
Filter Fabric:
Provide Type 3 engineering fabric, Class A or B meeting the requirements of Section 1056 of the NCDOT
Specification book.
Attachment Device:
Provide an approved attachment device (e.g., plastic tie).
Installation
Install in locations as shown on the plans or as directed. Install wire and fabric as shown in the plans.
Class B synthetic filter fabric may be used without the woven wire fence backing, subject to the
following conditions: a maximum post spacing of 6 feet (1.8 m), fabric is approved by the Designer, and
post spacing is inclined toward the runoff source, at an angle of not more than 20 degrees from vertical.
Install posts at a 10 feet (3.0 m) maximum spacing with wire support, with not more than 4 feet (1.2 m)
of the post appearing above ground. Attach filter fabric to the wire fence on the upslope side of the
post with wire or other acceptable methods.
Overlap filter fabric a minimum of 18 inches (457.2 mm) at splice joints. Install fabric that is free of
defects, rips, holes, flaws, deterioration, or damage. See figure below for detail.
Basis of Payment
Payment for installation of silt fence will be paid for as outlined. This payment shall be considered full
compensation for all labor, equipment, furnishing materials, hauling, weighing, stockpiling, rehandling,
sorting, fitting, materials, and incidentals necessary to construct the silt fence.
Payment will be made under:
SiltFence.........................................................................................................................................LINEAR FEET
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 23

TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT/SILT FENCE
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL
Installation
Step 1:
Drive steel posts at least 12 in
into ground and excavate a 41n x
8in. trench uphill along the Ine of
posts
Step 2.
Attach wire fence to pasts and
extend the bottom of the fence
8in. into the excavated trench
Step 3
Attach the filter fabric to the wire
fence and extend the bottom of
the fabric 8in. Into the trench
Step 4:
Backfill the trench and compact
the soil firmly to anchor the
bottom of the silt fence so that
runoff is forced to go through the
fence and cannot go around it
137 LE 7LM LtiR MOT 110R1AINC XMAL.ED
STEL FOVM.9 L0.0 ow REITTO 6"w R"
WJSC
frM FROTOtls / 90E01 P"T
1' YAR,
(4, 0ww(%60t0)
S'67ACE IT
I exrTAE.CM I ACRA%R,
W,T.COY►ACTED I
D AC K/RI '
1
TRE.CM W TM .RAVE ZACR9t t 7AE1CH VA 7. OR* -V
NOTES
1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENTS REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY
2 REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT C
4 CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
3 SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 24
1�
TM77TREROTHIATER .ff,DEO
WffMOtlT WIVE Y63M 2FORTtl f FORT
VO
\`
to LDJLYEnR IOOT
8TEL.OBB.9 LOBO
WITH FROJOCTO.F
ODBVLSww0wrKwM
ssf►o RT 1E■CE
-
f DUX. SW ROVOTMOET
y
Woe seffORT OUNCE
137 LE 7LM LtiR MOT 110R1AINC XMAL.ED
STEL FOVM.9 L0.0 ow REITTO 6"w R"
WJSC
frM FROTOtls / 90E01 P"T
1' YAR,
(4, 0ww(%60t0)
S'67ACE IT
I exrTAE.CM I ACRA%R,
W,T.COY►ACTED I
D AC K/RI '
1
TRE.CM W TM .RAVE ZACR9t t 7AE1CH VA 7. OR* -V
NOTES
1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENTS REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY
2 REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT C
4 CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
3 SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 24

APPENDIX D - Additional Information
Flood Maps:
R Ni Yw iwRa Tsk NYp
�'RFEx IN
tl �-
'
GRID NORTH
MAP SCALE
1'r . 1000' (1 12,000(
Soo 0
1000 moo
r
�
FEET
J
>c
ZONE X
ZONE A
r
16
. b 1524
'Z<)NEAE
S.�
PANEL iBl3N
FIRM
fir... 1579.. '. _ZONEX /.
-
u I'.
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
`rte
1532
�, :..1548
!
NORTH CAROLINA
•.
''-
�Y.
f1
1 ��
i
PANEL 1882
•- Nz`=� 1'r1S
j
j
Dwr uu wou r.�r:..
ZONE X ,_1504 �5zo K 28
- soa
s '
rte""
.�
s 'r7593
.C..
-
:.,y
•I
�rx �
�:
1� �
i:✓io Ion..
1509 t .1 r 1,03
ZONE h '�y.�' -" ;448
to F N 7J48
-(�
�T`°e'"e::.,.,
.f/
1495 ,�-
�a
i:l(d11 ���?C 111111(1 -
.
-
.,. ,--,
nincerpmlwd Area, '�'
-
.1
MAP REVISED MAP NUMBER
JULY T. 2009 3710IM200K
• }%1111,"9
r
14E1
I uti:
�o'Nu eao T2 ri E[Acn H1> r T
��
yj
�
m. w.n rc.r..cr a.
t _-gfDtl
wac^u .oae remasooewa r..D v
rot mqp oo[. W Ma
�rc�i t�r,ery�n
7•:7S
:-•
onsm e.w+nrCon..x
rm v><w arme w,-s:m..•....,, m.i k,,,.
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 25

Soils Map:
w W9 w
1Y a3 23' N
Soil Map—Caldwell County, North Carolina
(Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project Area)
431150 431_'30 431310 431390 433470 43140
3
Map Sraie: 1:3„'.10 f pnoV or A pntra4 11") sheet.
N Metes
\1 0 45 90 180 _^X1
Feet
/V
0 150 300 600 900
k
5'GP p'nl'cw1: Vfib W mala Carate, madrlaCCS: WGSS Edge Da: MN Zone 17N WG584
iliUt Natural Resources Web Sod Survey
is" Conservation Service National Cooperative Sal Survey
8 1} 14M"N
8
3Y 7913'N
431630
3
i
4/4/2016
Page 1 o13
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 26

tied 61.�t^.-r;llarrwu fa'r:M",y ►rami; (:aul,:a� s9 C,a.wd Stn-rn l;Nhme�rrrdrt
alta! l Alej
Map Unit Legend
Cow" cow MOM CNOWO pcsm
mmu"9lsN Fs,- VAWUWMOM ..._AvuMAa I+tc�nlwAa
Ar(_ s _ Aalt[ C a Et BkR 30 lea _ �.1 P £ zA.
Ast*,CMey?A rvT4let, 5O Ift `--- �79
{ tag mrttant%k". va ,-&. �-
tA.A ON"* sandy b m, 0 I 3F 7—i—
pe. Oe.Predominant Project S
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 27
tSso3O(wutMaasmGps slw�+
0"awhwdCuut[aavio, .
941
glib StJ 4�K�#[e-mail]3tA'
i(A,t�
Cftast(sRilfna�vt4 ecrmplas.
'.'Y�k�54pre[e[sts;.�tS.sVery'
i 1 �
�<°�
r
GSCtizjiniPfa tKb:iO (aBa[N..d
9
�
_. ....
99ojaBt. 3tt+ry
rttrpptWnt
i
G f
Tea: "w4*t. 3010
4 �t
si T•,�
IM9m+c ti,►s+ ."WOM44r
sklny
€kkn Arm Swided
eerier. I k) 9� t�Hd
3
sktdwf5 uxilC fx[}fi ttow
°
!
',tri.
E �tAia+i kwMa 1 k) (t pertt5fd
? g
(t ham;,
t
! SktC>� n*n°ailkh 13:!
p1
i
iTulaFdlr
ift sonaiy kw 2Vra
i
--..
_.._.......
: tnl''i
tierkrv.: uv�(hWn h v"
40..:.._.
t3T!
tale Clft-Oku.CtrV4k. ISfi
4[9
4k" 99,
342 PM*frt ktgpp VWVskxry
T*Ws Iw Am c/ Wetw
23 21
921f 0+`
Thorps Creek Stream Enhancement Project 2016 Page 27

USDA
DECISION MEMO
THORPES CREEK & UPPER CREEK STREAM IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS
U.S. FOREST SERVICE
GRANDFATHER RANGER DISTRICT
BURKE & CALDWELL COUNTIES, NC
BACKGROUND
At the Thorpes Creek project site, the stream channel is currently impacted by stream bank
hardening from log crib walls and a loss in streamside vegetation from recreation site
development and foot traffic. As a result, sections of stream bank within the reach are unstable;
aquatic habitat diversity is lacking; and streamside and alluvial forests are degraded. The Thorps
Creek drainage is 1.14 square miles in size and is mostly forested and predominantly in federal
ownership. On Upper Creek, the ford on Forest Service Road (FSR) 986 is made of concrete,
spanning the entire channel width of the channel. Therefore, when stream flow is low, water
depth is low and velocities are high over the ford, making passage of fish and other aquatic
organisms difficult or impossible. Just downstream is an old log dam used at one time to restrict
passage of fish, today it is damaged and no longer functioning and will therefore be removed.
DECISION
I have decided to implement the Upper Creek and Thorpes Creek Stream Improvement Projects
on the Grandfather Ranger District. While maintaining the concrete ford approaches on the
Upper Creek site, we will remove the center of the ford between the poured concrete seams.
Also involved will be the construction of a natural bottom ford using existing channel substrate
and imported boulders. The removal the old fish barrier will be achieved by pulling the logs out,
leaving the channel substrate stored behind it in place. The composition of substrate is a mix of
fine gravel to large cobble sizes and will benefit the channel below when it relocates during high
flows.
At the Thorpes Creek site, we will lay back approximately 700 feet of eroding stream bank to a
2:1 (rise: run) slope and replace the footbridge following the completion of proposed stream
work. The stream work includes removal of three old fish structures, construction of up to three
log and boulder vanes and two constructed riffles. The instream structure below the fish barrier
would create a pool to improve passage of trout. Once construction is completed we will
implement erosion control measures, including native seed, straw mulch, coir matting on stream
banks, planting trees and shrubs, and installing split rail fence for long-term stabilization.
— Decision Memo —
Page 1 of 4
M

USDAarm—
This action is categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental impact statement
(EIS) or an environmental assessment (EA). The applicable category of actions is identified in
agency procedures as Removing, replacing or modifying water control structures to restore the
flow of waters into natural channels and floodplains 32.2 (18) a of categorical exclusion and
CFR citation as described in FSH 1909.15 Sec. 31.2)]. This category of action(s) is applicable
because this project has been designed to "restore flow into natural channels and floodplains"
that was previous manipulated into "unnatural" conditions.
I find that there are no extraordinary circumstances that would warrant further analysis and
documentation in an EA or EIS. I took into accouni resource conditions identified in agency
procedures that should be considered in determining whether extraordinary circumstances might
exist:
• Federally listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat, species
proposed for Federal listing or proposed critical habitat, or Forest Service sensitive
species. The biological evaluation of these proposed stream improvement projects found
that no botanical, wildlife or aquatic threatened or endangered species will be effected by
the project implementation. No designated critical habitat or Forest Service sensitive
species (botanical, wildlife or aquatic) exist. .
• Flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds — The floodplains of these stream
improvement projects will improve with implementation.
• Congressionally designated areas such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national
recreation areas — none exist.
• Inventoried roadless areas or potential wilderness areas — None exist.
• Research natural areas — None exist.
• American Indians and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites — None exist.
• Archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas — These projects were considered an
exempt undertaking by USFS Archeologist, Scott Ashcraft, which concludes the
activities are in compliance with the programmatic Memorandum of Understanding
between the National Forest of North Carolina, North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) and Tribes. As such Tribal and NC SHPO concurrence is
not necessary.
These restoration projects have been designed to have a positive impact on the long term health
and viability of the watersheds involved.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
This action was originally listed as a proposal on the Pisgah National Forest Schedule of
Proposed Actions and updated periodically during the analysis. The Collaborative Forest
n Landscape Restoration Project (CFLRP) cooperators of the Grandfather Ranger District are also
supportive of these projects. The proposed action meets one of the primary goals of the CFLRP
— Decision Memo —
Page 2 of 4

to "Restore riparian vegetation, remove fish passage barriers, reduce sedimentation and
reconnect streams to their flood plains to benefit water quality and aquatic ecology."
The CFLRP collaborative involves many partners. State and national natural resource
management agencies involved in the project include the National Forests in North Carolina,
North Carolina Forest Service, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources, National Park Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service.
Local environmental conservation organizations include Wild South, Western North Carolina
Alliance, Foothills Conservancy, Southern Area Wilderness Stewards, Land of Sky Regional
Council, Friends of Wilson Creek, and the Grandfather Mountain Stewardship Foundation.
National conservation organizations with local presence include The Nature Conservancy and
The Wilderness Society. Special interest wildlife groups include Trout Unlimited, National Wild
Turkey Federation, and Quality Deer Management Association. Special interest recreation trails
groups include the Southern Area Wilderness Stewards and the volunteer trails coordinator for
the Linville Gorge Wilderness Area. Research partners include the Southern Blue Ridge Fire
Learning Network, the Forest Service Southern Research Station, Forest Stewards, and Western
Carolina University. The local wood -products industry is represented by Appalachian Designs.
FINDINGS REQUIRED BY OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS
This decision is consistent with the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forest Land Management
Plan. According to direction for management area 18 (riparian resources), soil and water
management should "protect the integrity of the stream system including channel, banks and
stream bottom (LRMP III -187). This project also adheres to the Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C.
§ 1251 et seq. (1972) by "restoring watersheds and their aquatic ecosystems to provide for
healthy habitat for fish, plants and wildlife." (EPA, Office of Water Standards).
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW (APPEAL) OPPORTUNITIES
This decision is not subject to administrative review and appeal.
CONTACT
For additional information concerning this decision, contact: Brady Dodd, USFS Hydrologist
and Soil Scientist [phone].
Nicholas Larson Date
Grandfather District Ranger
— Decision Memo —
Page 3 of 4

USDA
a"
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination In all its programs and activities on the
basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status,
parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part
of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all
programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information
(Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and
TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence
Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is
an equal opportunity provider and employer
— Decision Memo —
Page 4 of 4