20061521 Ver 1 - Oakley_Crossroads_273_Closeout2016 - 4/18/2016

OAKLEY CROSSROADS (G) STREAM AND BUFFER RESTORATION
DMS ID (IMS#) 273
USACE ACTION ID #200702696 (Reauthorization of #2004411286)
DWQ Project # 2006-1521
CLOSEOUT REPORT: STREAM, WETLAND, AND BUFFER
Project Setting & Classifications
Meeting XY Coordinates:
35.766920° N, 77.269077° W
County
Pitt
General Location
Robersonville
Basin:
Tar -Pamlico
Physiographic Region:
Coastal Plain
Ecoregion:
Middle Atlantic
As -built survey
Coastal Plain
USGS Hydro Unit:
0302010309002
NCDWQ Sub -basin:
03-03-06
Wetland Classification
Riverine bottomland
Monitoring Year 4
hardwood
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Project Performers
Source Agency:
NCDMS
Designer:
Stantec Consulting
Services, Inc.
Monitoring Firm
Stantec Consulting
Services, Inc.
Channel Remediation
Ecosystems Grading
Solutions, Inc.
Plant Remediation
Bruton Natural
Systems, Inc.
Approved for transfer to
Yes
Stewardship
Stewards
NC DOT
Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
February 2006
Permitted
August 2007
Permit - Reauthorization
July 2009
Construction Completed
May 2011
As -built survey
June 2011
Monitoring Year 1
November 2011
Monitoring Year 2
November 2012
Monitoring Year 3
February 2014
Monitoring Year 4
November 2014
Monitoring Year 5
December 2015
Closeout Submission
February 2016

Proiect Setting and Background Summary
The Oakley Crossroads Restoration Site is located approximately four miles south of Robersonville,
North Carolina in northern Pitt County. This project is located in the Coastal Plain physiographic region in the
03090020 Cataloging Unit of the Tar -Pamlico River basin. The Oakley Crossroads site was historically farmed
up to the ditch bank, which was characterized as a channelized third order perennial stream flowing west to east
before discharging into Tranters Creek and further downstream, to the Tar River. The project stream, Tranters
Creek, and Tar River are all nutrient sensitive waters (NCDWQ, 2004).
This project includes 3,789 linear feet of stream restoration credit and 329 linear feet of stream enhancement
credit. The 2006 Restoration Plan initially proposed a Priority I restoration approach and included a large area
of riparian wetland restoration. The designer later revised the Restoration Plan to include a Priority II approach
due to elevation constraints from the upstream DOT road culvert. With the change in stream restoration
approach, the wetland restoration component was removed due to the necessary floodplain benching. The site
was re -permitted in 2009.
Priority II stream restoration involves restoring riffle/pool sequences, the installation of structures, and
floodplain grading to improve floodplain connectivity and provide diverse instream habitat. The majority of the
floodplain grading occurred on the upstream portion of the stream. Enhancement II stream restoration includes
native hardwood tree and shrub planting throughout the conservation easement. Additionally, dimension was
restored on the highly eroded section of stream downstream on the Briley culvert through use of log footers.
The work on this project also included expanding the two project ponds for irrigation and fortifying a rock ford
crossing. The site contains 3.96 acres of jurisdictional wetlands that are permanently protected on site. The
project generates 3,920.60 stream mitigation units (SMUs), and 0.23 wetland mitigation units (WMUs).
This project also provides riparian buffer credit up to 200 feet from the top of stream bank under the Tar
Pamlico buffer rules (15A NCAC 02B.0260), and preservation closing under the 2015 Final Consolidated
Buffer rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 (o)(5). The total buffer credit should generate 791,093 of buffer mitigation
units (BMUs).
Beaver activity was observed and controlled throughout the project monitoring. Project streams maintained
geomorphic stability following the periods of beaver activity without a need for repair. Small areas affected by
beaver activities and areas exhibiting low stem density were replanted and are regenerating without any
negative setbacks to the success of the riparian buffer (1/2012: 500 stems over 3.3 acres; and 12/2014: 255
plants over 1 acre and 260 live stakes). Recorded conservation easements will protect all stream reaches and
riparian buffers in perpetuity.
Goals and Obiectives:
As described in the 2006 Restoration Plan, "the goal of the Oakley restoration project is to improve water
quality and wildlife habitat by restoring a stable stream and wetland system to the project site." Also consistent
with the 2006 Restoration Plan goals, "water quality functional improvements include floodplain processes,
increased filtering of pollutants, and attenuation of floodwaters. The stream restoration also improved the
aquatic habitat in the channels by restoring riffle /pool sequences and adding structures which helped stabilize
the channel as well as add diversity to the instream habitat."

Specific project goals achieved in this project include:
• Provide a stable stream channel
• Restore and preserve riparian buffers along stream channel
• Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat along a tributary to Tranters Creek
• Establish a wildlife corridor between the Tranters Creek and Briery Swamp to the south
• Preserve riverine wetlands
• Improved water quality by diverting an existing agricultural ditch from the stream channel into
the Taylor pond and by adding riparian buffers the length of the project.
Success Criterion
Success Criteria
Measured Parameter
Criteria Met
Stream:
Yes —
Cross-section and longitudinal
7 Cross Sections — 4 riffles, 2 pools
Cross section data indicates minor
profile measurements should show
With photo reference points
adjustments when compared to as -
little change from the as -built
built cross section data
cross-sections. Pools should not
aggrade nor do riffles degrade.
Multiple bankfull events were
Two bankfull events occurring in
1 crest gauge
documented at least every
separate years during the 5 -year
monitoring year. At least 2 years
monitoring period.
had more than one bankfull event
260 stems/acre at MY5
6 Vegetation plots within 50'
5/6 plots in the 50' stream buffer
stream buffer
met with planted stems; 6/6 plots
met with volunteer stems.
Wetland (restoration component
JD completed prior to project
Yes —
removed)
construction. No parameter
required.
Riparian Buffer:
8/9 plots in the buffer areas met
320 stems/acre at MY5
9 vegetation plots
with planted stems; 9/9 plots met
with volunteer stems.

Asset Table:
Asset Table
Oakley Crossroads Stream and Buffer
Restoration (EEP# 273)
Project
Project Component or Reach ID
Area
(sq ft)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Units
RESTORATION
Wetland
Buffer
Component
Restoration
395,403
As -built
Close out
Stationing/
Mitigation
Mitigation
or Reach
Level
Approach
(ft/ac)
(ft/ac)
Location
Ratio
Units
ID
PRESERVATION
0-50' Rural Subject Stream
20,507
10:1
Stream
R
PI
3,789
3,789
00+00 to
1:1
3,789
Section 1
Total Preservation Credits
3,817
37+98.64
Stream
E
EII
329
329
`"38+39 to
2.5:1
131.6
Section 2
—41+68
Wetlands
P
1.13
1.13
n/a
5:1
0.23
Riparian Buffer Asset Table
Riparian
Non -riparian
Total
Project Component or Reach ID
Area
(sq ft)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Units
RESTORATION
Wetland
Buffer
Offset
0-50' Rural Subject Stream
395,403
1:1
395,403
50-100' Rural Subject Stream
225,260
1:1
225,260
100-200' Rural Subject Stream
166,613
1:1
166,613
Total Restoration Credits
787,276
PRESERVATION
0-50' Rural Subject Stream
20,507
10:1
2,051
50-100' Rural Subject Stream
10,988
10:1
1,099
100-200' Rural Subject Stream
20,235
10:1 @
33%
668
Total Preservation Credits
3,817
TOTAL BUFFER CREDITS 791,093
* Restoration closing under Tar -Pamlico Buffer rule 15A NCAC 02B.0260
**Preservation closing under Final Consolidated Buffer rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 (o)(5)
***Credit removed for diffuse flow from ditches, and no credit on streams less than 50'wide.
MITIGATION UNIT TOTALS
Stream
Riparian
Non -riparian
Total
Riparian
Nutrient
Mitigation Units
Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
Buffer
Offset
SMU
Units
Units
WMU
BMU
3,920.6
0.23
NA
0.23
791,093
NA

Oakley Crossroads IMS 273: Stream and Wetland Asset Map
r.
Oil!
�.
x-
�,_
c W�6
\t7
N
.,lit•• �,.
. �_
_,j-- sem,
.r
Legend
Conservation Easement
Wetland Preservation Credit
Stream Credit
Mitigation Approach
Restoration
Enhancement II
s Source: Esri, Digital Globe, GeoEye, i -cub
swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
= Vegetation Plots
2004 JD Wetlands
Cross Sections
o Crest Gage
• Photo_points
I I Feet
0 100 200 400
1 " = 400'

Oakley Crossroads IMS 273: Riparian Buffer Asset Map
Legend
Conservation Easement
Buffer Restoration Buffer Preservation
Buffer Width
Wetland Preservation Credit - 0 -50 -
Vegetation Plots 50-100-
100-200-
Buffer Width
0-50-
50-100'
100 -200 -
I I Feet
0 100 200 400
1 " = 400'

Legend
O Site Entry
OStaging Area
»oo� Site Access
2013_01 Planting Zones
Plant—Zone
Riparian
Wetland (Bottomland)
Wetland (Obligate)
Conservation Easement
0 150 300
f
N
W+E
S
600
m Feet
PLANTING SUMMARY TABLE
Site Zone Quantity Area
Oakley 273 1 400 2.3
Oakley 273 2 100 1
NOTES:
Access from Jim Taylor Road to dirt farm road. Direct access to
planting areas using truck or 4 -wheeler along edge of farm field.
No fencing along boundaries.
Supplemental Planting Plan
Oakley Crossroads
EEP #273
Pitt County, NC
May 2013
�rti �rti �rti �rti ivy �r� . s.'
Jim Talyor Road
Farmville NC
a
r
fX
A
e3
�I

J L J L J 1
n In
z ti r r r
Legend
Live_ Stake_ Zone_ 260 live stakes total !`
Site Access
Riparian Zone_255 plants total N
G
Oakley_Crossroads_easement w-
E
0 0.015 0.03 0.06
Miles
Supplemental Planting Plan
Oakley Crossroads
EEP #273
Pitt County
Live Stakes:
2 rows with 3' spacing for 130' on each side of channel
(4 rows total)
s
i
a
�`�,�- NC OO neMap, NC Center for Geogr p is Informatio and An lysis, C 911 Boa d

030
M-,
N
20
0
cam 0302 1 12
UT tolTr nters Creek
IT
U)
S:
2aa, alldev
39
9R liZ-
Post Oak Grove
3020103090030
03020100. 010 f���%
30
Project Watershed Project Streams
(1.74 sq. miles)
Section 1 Stream Figure 2. Project Watershed
Q14-digit HUC Restoration Centerline
Boundaries (3,789 ft) Enviranmentat' Oakley Crossroads
Hydrography Section 2 Stream Quality Stream and Buffer Restoration Project
Enhacement 11 (329 ft) EEP #: 273
Pitt County, North Carolina
F ----- L Sta nte,.
Feet Ref. USGS 7.5 Minute Topography
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Map Robersonville West Quadrangle

Bd XB WaB ►at AgB
E
Bb P
xA a
WaB �
WaB
ExA
LoA
Ra ` a
Ra WaB
CrB2 OcB By
ExA Bb �\ �
AyA \I 1,
OcB
Ra �.
ExB ExB
l�
ExA
AyB2 WaB
Co
WaB R,
w _ OcB CrB2 ExA
NrA WaB ---__
WaB _
Bd i B \� \� \`
_ r Co
AyA ExB \ \ CrC� ""
WaB \�
NrB
jGoA / w Pg
LY
ExA AyA \
Co WaB
Tdy'or
CrB2 RO
De
r� Bd - Bladen fine sandy loam [HYDRIC]
-wLy GoA Co - Coxville fine sandy loam [HYDRIC]
CrC - Craven fine sandy loam, 6-10%
AyB2 AyB NrA ExB - Exum fine sandy loam, 1-6%
NrA - Norfolk sandy loam, 0-1 %
OcB NrB2 - Norfolk sandy loam, 1-6% eroded
OcB - Ocilla loamy fine sand, 0-4%
CrB2 GoA
CrA ExA Pg - Pantego loam [HYDRIC]
`
WaB ExA GoA Ra - Rains fine sandy loam [HYDRIC]
W W - Water
brA w Ra OcB WaB - Wagram loamy sand, 0-6%
L --_I County Boundary Project Streams
Figure 3. Project Site
Conservation Section 1 Stream
easement
NRCS Soil Survey Map
easement �� Restoration
Soil Map Units Centerline (3,789 ft)
Section 2 Stream Enviranmentat Oakley Crossroads
Hydrography
QualityStream and Buffer Restoration
�\f Enhacement II (329 ft) ffRiProject
Waterbodies EEP #: 273
Pitt County, North Carolina
Feet Stante(
1,000 500 0 1,000

Stream Morphology Data: Cross sections, Longitudinal Profiles, and Morphology Table
Oakley Crossroads - UT to Tranters Creek
X -Section 1, Riffle, Station 6+72
46
45
44
43
p 42
41
40
39
38
100
-- Flood Prone Area Elevation -MY01 -MY04
......• Bankfull Elevation -MY02 -MY05
-A, Built MY00 -MY03
Oakley Crossroads - UT to Tranters Creek
X -Section 2, Riffle, Station 6+17
47.00
46.00
45.00
44.00
43.00
x
4200.
w 41.00
40.00
39.00
38.00
3700
120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Station (ft)
-- Flood Prone Area Elevation -MY01 -MY04
......• Bankfull Elevation -MY02 -MV 05
-A, Built MY00 -MY03
100 120 140 160 180
200 220
Station (ft)
240 260 280 300

Oakley Crossroads - UT to Tranters Creek — — Flood Prone area Elevation —MY 01 —MY 04
X -Section 3, Pool, Station 12+59 ^••••• Bankfull Elevation —MY02 —MY 05
—AS Built MY00 —MY 03
51.00
49.00
47.00
45.00
x
c
41.00
39.00
37.00 1 J
35.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Station (ft)
Oakley Crossroads - UT to Tranters Creek — — Flood Prone area Elevation —MY 01 —MY 04
X -Section 4, Riffle, Station 28+46 ......• Bankfull Elevation —MY02 —MY05
—As Built MY00 —MY03
46.00
44.00
4200.
c
a
40.00
38.00
--�
36.00
1�
34.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Station (ft)

Oakley Crossroads - UT to Tranters Creek - - Flood Prone Area Elevation -MY 01 -MY 04
X -Section 5 Pool, Station 32+71 ......• Bankfull Elevation -MY02 -MY05
-As Built MY00 -MY 03
43.0
42.0
41.0
40.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ -------- - --
39.0 -39.0
38.0
r
W 37.0 .........................
36.0
I
35.0
34.0
T(
33.0
200.00 220.00 240.00 260.00 280.00 300.00 320.00 340.00 360.00 380.00 400.00
Station (ft)
Oakley Crossroads - UT to Tranters Creek - - Flood Prone Area Elevation -MY 01 -MY 04- Not surveyed, XS pins missing
X -Section 6, Riffle, Station 35+24 ......• Bankfull Elevation -MY 02 -MY05
-As Built MY00 -MY03
42.00
41.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
40.00
39.00
38.00
=0 37.00
u 36.00
35.00
34.00
33.00
32.00
200 250 300 350 400 450
Station (ft)

Oakley Crossroads - UT to Tranters Creek — — Flood Prone Area elevation — MY 01 —MY 04
X -Section 7 Riffle, Station 38+71 ......• Bankfull Elevation —MY02 —MY05
—AS Built MY00 —MY 03
46.00
44.00
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42.00
40.00
x
e
0 38.00
..........................................
36.00
34.00
32.00
30.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Stedon (ft)

Oakley Crossroads Stream and Buffer Restoration - Longitudinal Profile
Station 0+00 to 38+79
2015 Monitoring - Year 0, Year 01, Year 02, Year 03, Year 04, Year 05
42
41
-------YearOThalweg-YearlThawleg-Year2Thalweg-Year3Thalweg-Year4Thalweg-Year5Thalweg-Year5Water • Log Sill ■ Log Vane ® Rock ]-Hook w/Log Vane
40
39
38
37
W
I.Wk1
��
A
r
,
35
34
33
V
32
1000 1500 2000 2500
'I
3000 3500 4000
B 500
Station (ft)

1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Table 11a. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters -Cross Sections)
Oakley Crossroads Stream and Buffer Restoration / EEP Project No. 273 - Segment/Reach: Mainstem 3,950 feet
Cross Section 1 (STA 0+72, Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (STA 6+17, Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (STA 12+59, Pool)
Cross Section 4 (STA 28+46, Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (STA 32+71, Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1 MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
40.49
40.57
40.37
40.86
41.30
40.38
40.38
40.33
40.33
40.42
39.70 39.70 39.61 39.87 39.74
37.85 37.93
38.22
38.25
38.24
37.33
37.23
37.19
37.31
37.21
Bankfull Width ft
20.82
12.39
15.49
15.73
11.65
8.81
16.60
13.16
15.09
13.85
17.67
14.11
20.58
24.38 20.80 19.56 22.77 22.93
14.64
13.70 14.70
16.10
15.73
13.80
19.06
29.71
23.49
21.70
24.97
22.97
Floodprone Width (ft)
80.66
65.65
78.50
78.50
80.93
86.30
124.27
131.28 128.50 125.00 124.68 122.00
248.08
120.86 244.10 245.00 252.64 249.00
367.14
332.68 367.00 367.00 378.73 377.00
289.16
315.10 301.17 300.00 300.00 300.00
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.88
0.68
0.63
0.88
0.96
1.07
1.09
1.37
1.20
1.30
1.17
1.36
1.79
1.55 1.66 1.67 1.77 1.63
1.43
1.33 1.35
1.34
1.35
1.31
1.55
1.20
1.48
1.40
1.40
1.47
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.15
1.14
1.84
2.15
1.81
2.13
2.54
2.68
2.61
2.60
2.57
2.50
3.43
3.41 3.17 3.05 3.47 3.39
2.99
2.69 3.28
3.29
3.36
3.36
2.81
3.65
3.77
2.82
3.82
3.62
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
18.33
8.37
9.77
9.15
11.21
9.42
18.16
17.88
18.17
18.06
20.68
19.23
36.86
37.87 34.50 32.69 40.27 37.31
20.90
18.22 19.85
21.57
21.30
18.08
29.47
35.63
34.74
30.33
35.00
33.84
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
23.66
18.22
24.59
27.12
12.14
8.23
15.23
9.61
12.58
10.65
15.10
10.38
11.50
15.73 12.53 11.71 12.86 14.07
10.24
10.30 10.89
12.01
11.65
10.53
12.30
24.76
15.87
15.50
17.84
15.63
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.88
5.30
5.07
4.99
6.95
9.80
7.49
7.51
8.52
9.03
7.06
8.65
12.05
4.96 11.74 12.53 11.10 10.86
25.08
24.28 24.97
22.80
24.08
27.32
15.17
10.61
12.82
13.82
12.01
13.06
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
0.90 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (fe)
d50 (mm)
Cross Section 6 (STA 35+24, Riffle)
Cross Section 7 (STA 38+71, Other)
Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Cross Section 10 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline Bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY +
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1 MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
36.87
36.83
36.75
36.78
38.00
38.00
37.85
37.97
37.91
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.17
12.92 12.37
12.92
14.51
31.46
36.52
34.07
25.52
26.26
29.66
Floodprone Width ft
158.46
166.08 160.00 160.00
300.00
132.69
132.69
>200
200.00 200.00 200.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.10
1.35
1.54
1.45
1.76
2.41
2.13
2.09
2.46
2.51
2.38
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.55
2.70
3.61
3.51
4.14
6.23
6.01
5.42
5.39
5.44
5.71
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
18.91
17.43
19.10
18.74
25.51
75.91
77.93
71.24
62.90
65.91
70.71
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.61
9.59
8.03
8.91
8.24
13.05
17.15
16.30
10.37
10.46
12.46
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
9.23
12.82
12.93
12.38
13.78
4.22
3.63
5.87
7.84
7.62
6.74
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Cross Sectional Area between end pins fiz
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

Shaded cells indicate that these Wll typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Oakley
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Crossroads Stream and Buffer Restoration/ EEP Project No. 273 - Se ment/Reach: Mainstem 3,950 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
a
Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
a
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
a
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
a
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
a
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
a
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.6
17.31
20.82
4
12.4
12.8
12.92 13.16
0.394
4
12.4
14.4
14.9 15.49
1.399
4
12.9
14.7
14.8 16.1
1.5
4
11.7
15.02
15.73 17.67 3.073
3
8.8
12.8
14.0
14.5
2.7
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
80.7
182.63
367.14
4
65.7
118.7
124.3 166.1
50.45
4
78.5
183.5
144.3 367
126.9
4
78.5
182.6
142.5 367
127.4
4
80.9
194.78
124.7 379
160.8
3
86.3
221.3
211.0 377.0
139.7
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
1.13
1.43
4
0.7
1.1
1.35 1.37
0.393
4
0.6
1.2
1.275 1.54
0.392
4
0.9
1.2
1.3 1.5
0.2
4
1.0
1.16
1.17 1.35
0.195
3
1.1
1.4
1.3
1.8
0.3
4
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.2
2.56
2.99
4
1.1
2.2
2.683 2.703
0.897
4
1.8
2.8
2.945 3.61
0.783
4
2.2
2.9
2.9 3.5
0.6
4
1.8
2.58
2.57 3.36
0.775
3
2.1
3.0
2.9
4.1
0.9
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
18.2
19.08
20.9
4
8.4
8.4
17.43 17.88
5.365
4
9.8
16.7
18.64 19.85
4.686
4
9.2
16.9
18.4 21.6
5.4
4
11.2
17.73
20.7 21.30 5.655
3
9.4
18.1
18.7
25.5
6.6
4
Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
16.19
23.66
4
9.6
12.5
9.606 18.22
4.978
4
8.0
14.0
11.73 24.59
7.289
4
8.9
14.7
11.3 27.1
8.4
4
11.7
12.96
12.14 15.10
1.867
3
8.2
9.3
9.3
10.5
1.3
4
Entrenchment Ratio
4.7
10.55
21.21
4
5.3
9.2
9.443 12.82
3.767
4
5.1
12.9
10.73 24.97
8.682
4
5.0
12.3
10.7 22.8
7.6
4
7.0
12.70
7.06 24.1
9.858
3
8.7
14.9
11.8
27.3
8.6
4
'Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
1
1
1 1
0
4
1
1
1 1
0
4
1.0
1
1 1
0
4
1.0
1.00
1.00 1.00
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
24.8
35.98
53.02
4
24.2
35.2
53.1
4
20.28
30.8
55.2
4
19.4
33.1
52.1
4
15.05
24.8
33.53
4
23.9
31.5
41.75
4
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.002
0.003
0.006
4
0.002
0.003
0.006
4
0.002
0.004
0.006
4
0.00
0.004
0.01
4
0.00
0.0034
0.01
4
0.003
0.004
0.006
2
Pool Length (ft)
20.47
33.67
44.45
2
21
32.54
45.21
2
26.76
138.88
51
2
22.02
33
44.04
2
24.76
32.2
139.64
2
23.9
33.5
41.8
2
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.81
3.12
3.43
2
3.41
3.53
3.65
2
3.17
3.47
3.77
2
3.02
3.4
3.77
2
2.27
2.73
3.18
2
3.2
3.4
3.7
2
Pool Spacing (ft)l
43.4
1 64.26
1 94.03 1
2
42.1
1 65.2
95.2
2
28.72
64
106
33
27.48
64.31
113
33
25.52
63.62
116.81
52
25.7
62.7
110.9
32
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
38.6
55.94
86.18
48
Radius of Curvature (ft)
19.2
27.81
36.28
56
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 1.1 1.61 2.1 56
Meander Wavelength (ft) 85.5 103.92 118.61 48
Meander Width Ratiol
2.2
1 3.23 1
4.98 1
48
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4,E5
C4,E5
C4,E5
C4,E5
C4,E5
C4,E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.00146
0.00145
0.00145
0.00152
0.0015
n/a
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.00144
0.00139
0.00137
0.00135
0.00132
0.0013
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%52
-
48
52
48
52
48 -
52
48 -
52
48 -
52
48
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16/d351d50/d84/d95/
Z% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these Wll typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 12 - Verification of Bankfull Events
Oakley Crossroads Stream and Buffer Restoration Project - EEP Project No. 273
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo
Visual observation of
September 13, 2011
unknown
n/a
debris lines
October 4, 2012
unknown
Crest gauge
VBE1 (MY2)
Visual observation of
October 10, 2012
unknown
VBE2 (MY2)
debris lines
March 28, 2013
unknown
Crest gauge
VBE3 (MY3)
April 2, 2014
unknown
Crest gauge
VBE4 (MY4)
Sediment on
October 7, 2014
unknown
VBE5 (MY4)
vegetation
Crest gauge and debris
VBE6 & 7
September 16, 2015
unknown
Iles observed
MYS
VBEI — Crest gauge with cork observed
above the bankf ill line (10/4/2012)
I Bankfull line I
k/11,f7,7-7.
VBE3 — Crest gauge with cork observed
above the bankfull line (3/28/2013)
VBE2 — Debris line upstream of crest gauge along
right bank (10/10/2012)
VBE4 — Crest gauge with cork observed
above the bankfull line (4/2/2014)

hC .°
VBE5 — Sediment observed on vegetation
(10/7/2014)
VBE7 — Crest gauge with cork observed
above the bankfull line (9/16/2015)
VBE6 — Debris piles immediately upstream of the
ford crossing 1 (9/16/2015)

Vegetation Data:
Stems per plot per year
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Plot
Planted
stems
Total
Stems
Total
Stems/ac
Planted
stems
Total
stems
Total
Stems/ac
Planted
stems
Total
stems
Total
Stems/ac
Planted
stems
Total
stems
Total
Stems/ac
Planted
stems
Total
stems
Total
Stems/ac
1
22
39
1579
22
36
1457
23
34
1376
21
23
931
9
9
364
2
8
38
1538
8
41
1660
14
67
2712
16
59
2388
11
11
445
3
21
28
1133
22
30
1214
22
28
1133
21
28
1133
8
8
324
4
20
29
1174
20
46
1862
21
40
1619
20
25
1012
12
12
486
5
11
17
688
10
16
648
9
14
567
10
14
567
9
9
364
6
20
601
24328
22
156
6315
18
96
3886
18
39
1579
12
12
486
7
6
18
729
5
17
688
9
11
445
11
12
486
10
10
405
12
17
688
16
18
729
16
21
850
17
17
688
18
18
729
E98
18
42
1700
17
51
2064
15
29
1174
14
41
1660
1
1
40

DMS Recommendation and Conclusion
The project stream is stable and functioning, and the project meets all success criteria. The wetland preservation
areas were visually assessed and are stable and intact following the restoration of the project area. All assets
within the project area have remained stable for 5 years without the need for further monitoring. DMS
recommends closeout to proceed as proposed with 3,920.60 SMU, 0.23 WMU, and 791,093 BU.
Contingencies
There are no contingencies associated with the closeout of this project.

Project Oakley Crossroads Pre & Post Construction Photos:
Pre -construction and MY5 views of Section 1 from upper culvert looking downstream; March 2007 and November 2015
Pre -construction and MY5 representative view of upper Section 1 looking downstream; March 2007 and November 2015
Pre -construction and MY5 views of Section 1 (restoration) facing upstream from the Briley culvert; March 2007 and September 2015

Pre -construction and MY5 view of Section 2 (Enhancement) downstream of the Briley culvert; March 2007 and September 2015
Pre -construction and MY5 views of wetland preservation area; March 2006 and September 2015
Pre -construction and MY5 view facing south across floodplain; March 2006 and September 2015

APPENDIX A: Watershed Planning Summary
Oakley Crossroads is not located in targeted local watershed.

Appendix B: Property Ownership & Protection
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s), available at the specified
County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio at http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra ry/Property/Prope rty%20PortfoIio/273 OakleyCross
roads(G) PD 2003.pdf
Project Name County Grantor Property Rights Deed/Page Plat/Page Area
Oakley
Crossroads Pitt 24.8
Briley
Bullock
Day, Kelly, and Riley
Taylor et al
Day, Kelly, and Riley
Conservation Easement
Conservation Easement
Conservation Easement
Conservation Easement
Conservation Easement
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DOT.
1809/39
62/85
1825/530
62/85
2041/307
62/85
1965/655
62/85
3392/734
N/A

APPENDIX C - Permits U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200702696 County: Pitt
USGS Quad: Robersonville West
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Address: 1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Telephone No.: 919-715-7571
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): Oakley Crossroads Stream and Wetland
Restoration project is located west of NC 903, between SR 1547 and Tranters Creek, north of Stokes, Pitt County,
North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: The project site contains 24.8 acres to be used for stream and wetland
mitigation in accordance to restoration plan revised in August 2007.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact William Wescott at 252975-1616 ext. 31.
i�
Corps Regulatory Official NJ,l Date: 08/16/2007
Expiration Date of Verification: 08/16/2009
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit hitp://www.saw.usace.anny.mil/WETLANDS/index.html to
complete the survey online.
Copy Furnished:
Page 1 of 2
Y.S
W Lim,
A t
NC iNHA NCEKN OI A

Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (C WA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued 4/1/2004. Action ID 200411286
Basis of Jurisdictional
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date 08/16/2007
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
Page 2 of 2

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200702696 County: Pitt USGS Quad: Robersonville West
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Address: 1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Telephone No.: 919-715-7571
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): Oakley Crossroads Stream and Wetland
Restoration project is located west of NC 903 between SR 1547 and Tranters Creek, north of Stokes, Pitt County,
North Carolina ***(REAUTHORIZATION WITH NEW EXPIRATION DATE).
Description of projects area and activity: The vroiect site contains 24.8 acres to be used for stream and wetland
mitiention in accordance to restoration plan revised in August 2007.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact William Wescott at 252-975-1616 ext. 31.
Corps Regulatory Official (i(%• 5 • Date: 07/29/2009
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2012
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit httv://www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS/index.html to
complete the survey online.
Copy Furnished: RECEIVED
JUL 3 0 2009
Page 1 of 2 NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued 4/1/2004. Action ID 200411286
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date 08/16/2007
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
Page 2 of 2

EXISTII
EXISTING WETLAND
_ _•_ Yom%
ji •
v\,
28-
.24-
3-\
Q CONDITIONS
J
29
tantec
30 - Stantea Cormitln0 Servloea ha.
91% 7 es PMI JonFl"vift Road
31 ; RuJe{plt NC32 ;76va—1
_ PoNr
i
2
FCX 2 IM L7021
/
3 • CULT TED.FIE 1 /
7 �. .
.3a
7 Xt TING—TL4ND
An
'This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 \��•
of the Clean Water Ad as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there has been a change 1�
in the law or our published regulations, this detenninati of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon
for a period not to exceed five years from this date. T i9 tenninaGon was made utilizing the 1987
Corps of Engi rs W elineati n anu
Name.
Title:
Date:
AID: -L- ^- [ �7 11
Scale: NTS
EXISTING WETLAND 1
POINT
POINT
X COORDINATE
Y COORDINATE
1929973618
1
1929972810
2951875990
2951875793
2
1929972821
2951875957
4
3
1929972833
2951875945
1929973761
4
1929972880
2951875962
2951875743
5
1929972929
2951875970
8
6
1929972970
2951875978
1929973934
7
1929972992
2951875974
2951875689
295iS75698
8
1929973035
2951875995
13
9
1929973076
2951876001
1929973899
10
11
1929973113
1929973188 ^
2951876006
2951876'013
2951875645
12
1929973214
2951876025
17
13
1929973226
2951875996
1929973717
14
1929973198
2951875938
2951875656
15
1929973263
2951875905
21
16
1929973299
2951875892
1929973634
17
1929973336
2951875872
2951875549
18
1929973370
2951875850
24
19
1929973390
2951875827
1929973596
20
1929973421
2951875805
2951875605
21
1929973448
2951875770
28
22
1929972845
2951876026
23
1929972894
2951876036
24
1929972908
2951876056
25
1929972959
2951876055
26
1929973013
2951876072
27
1929973109
2951876097
28
1929973135
2951876103
29
1929973193
2951876110 EXI
TMC
30
1929973227
2951876085
1
1929973269
2951876080
32
1929973295
2951876096
33
1929973330
2951876086
34
1929973380
2951876064
f
35
1929973433
2951876032
36
1929973474
2951876012
=
37
1929973537
2951875964
i=F\
38
1929973551
2951875906
39 1
1929973522
2951875821
40 1
1929973490
2951875770
EXISTII
EXISTING WETLAND
_ _•_ Yom%
ji •
v\,
28-
.24-
3-\
Q CONDITIONS
J
29
tantec
30 - Stantea Cormitln0 Servloea ha.
91% 7 es PMI JonFl"vift Road
31 ; RuJe{plt NC32 ;76va—1
_ PoNr
i
2
FCX 2 IM L7021
/
3 • CULT TED.FIE 1 /
7 �. .
.3a
7 Xt TING—TL4ND
An
'This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 \��•
of the Clean Water Ad as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there has been a change 1�
in the law or our published regulations, this detenninati of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon
for a period not to exceed five years from this date. T i9 tenninaGon was made utilizing the 1987
Corps of Engi rs W elineati n anu
Name.
Title:
Date:
AID: -L- ^- [ �7 11
Scale: NTS
EXISTING WETLAND 2
POINT
X COORDINATE
Y COORDINATE
1
1929973618
2951875776
2
1929973643
2951875793
3
1929973690
2951875789
4
1929973720
2951875785
5
1929973761
2951875780
6
1929973801
2951875743
7
1929973832
2951875711
8
1929973886
2951875702
9
1929973934
2951875696
10
~11
1929973978
- 1929974012
2951875689
295iS75698
12
1929973971
2951875625
13
1929973948
2951875588
14
1929973899
2951875604
15
1929973815
2951875645
16
1929973752
2951875669
17
1929973736
2951875646
18
1929973717
2951875642
19
1929973711
2951875656
20
1929973731
2951875675
21
1929973675
2951875706
22
1929973634
2951875724
EXISTII
EXISTING WETLAND
_ _•_ Yom%
ji •
v\,
28-
.24-
3-\
Q CONDITIONS
J
29
tantec
30 - Stantea Cormitln0 Servloea ha.
91% 7 es PMI JonFl"vift Road
31 ; RuJe{plt NC32 ;76va—1
_ PoNr
i
2
FCX 2 IM L7021
/
3 • CULT TED.FIE 1 /
7 �. .
.3a
7 Xt TING—TL4ND
An
'This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 \��•
of the Clean Water Ad as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there has been a change 1�
in the law or our published regulations, this detenninati of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon
for a period not to exceed five years from this date. T i9 tenninaGon was made utilizing the 1987
Corps of Engi rs W elineati n anu
Name.
Title:
Date:
AID: -L- ^- [ �7 11
Scale: NTS
Oakley Crossroads
Mitigation Cite
Pitt County, North Carolina
Jurisdictional Waters
Existing Wetland 1 = 2.07 AC
Existing Wetland 2 = 0.78 AC
Existing Wetland 3 = 1.11 AC
Exhibit 5.1 .1
EXISTING WETLAND 3
POINT X
COORDINATE
Y COORDINATE
1
1929973472
2951875619
2
1929973470
2951875603
3
1929973544
2951875556
4
1929973668
2951875482
5
1929973787
2951875426
6
1929973892
2951875391
7
1929973995
2951875355
8
1929974059
2951875400
9
1929974077
2951875421
10
1929974001
2951875401
11
1929974018
295187.5_423
12
1929974001 1
2951875439
13
1929974021
2951875462
14
1929973976
2951875488
15
1929973925
2951875483
16
1929973896
2951875483
17
1929973832
2951875494
18
1929973791
2951875520
19
1929973781
2951875526
20
1929973768
2951875550
21
1929973796
2951875571
22
1929973723
2951875549
23
1929973681
2951875575
24
1929973641
2951875596
25
1929973596
2951875594
26
1929973553
2951875605
27
1929973536
2951875609
28
1929973519
2951875613
Oakley Crossroads
Mitigation Cite
Pitt County, North Carolina
Jurisdictional Waters
Existing Wetland 1 = 2.07 AC
Existing Wetland 2 = 0.78 AC
Existing Wetland 3 = 1.11 AC
Exhibit 5.1 .1

APPENDIX D - Debit Ledgers
Mitigation Project Oakley Crossroads
DMS IMS ID 273
River Basin TAR-PAMLICO
Cataloging Unit 03020103
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 13.55161:1
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 04/15/2016
o
c
c c
m
oda
o
_CG
zu
m
O
U
a
rm0
d
cvuN
1
I
=
wEUU
O
aO
z
z
0cA
O
z
Um
N A
O
O
OM
U
°
m
m.
wmmRr0wy
m
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
329.00
1.13
7,276.00
51,730.00
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
131.60
0.226
787,276.00
3,817.26
NCDOT Pre -DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWRPermits USACE Action IDImpact Project Name
Riparian Buffer LF Credit Purchase
492,438.20o°
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
1 3,789.001
1329.00
1.13
294,837.80
51,730.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
1 3,789.001
1131.60
0.226
294,837.80
3,817.26
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 04/15/2016

Mitigation Project Name Oakley Crossroads (G) (Purchase)
IMS ID # 273
River Basin TAR-PAMLICO
Cataloging Unit 03010203
Comment: This ledger shows the debits for the amount of mitigation that the Riparian Buffer ILF Program purchased from the NCDOT ILF Program.
The beginning balance represents the amount purchased and not the total mitigation credits available on the site.
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 3:1
19.163 297.541
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 04/15/2016
o'
E
c
m
O
C
-j
d
t
WC
2
C 2
_
O
t
N
J
N
O Z
m y O
L
a
E00
O Z
z
m
N
�
m
Beginning Balance (square feet)
492,438.20
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
492,438.20
DMS Debits (credits):
DWR Permits Impact Project Name
NCDOT TIP U-2527 - Henderson
2003-1494 Western Outer Loop, Vance Co
55,511.65
2003-1470 Hobgood Sewer Collection System
63,808.00
NCDOT TIP R-0218 - US 13 & NC 11
2000-1520 Bethel Bypass, Pitt County
263,103.00
2003-0212 Greenville Utilities (Westside sewer)
61,830.00
2005-0843 Greens Mill Run
10,230.00
2006-0241 Stanton Road
14.00
Lowe's Home Centers of East
2007-0343 Greenville
2,700.00
NC 97 Widening (MA04009), Division 4,
2006-1059 Edgecome County
4,714.50
2008-1721 River Hills Sanitary Sewer Outfall
798.00
Eastern Radiologist Inc. Breast Imaging
2009-0309 Center
1,467.00
2009-0677 Piedmont Natural Gas Line
17,160.00
Ocracoke Volunteer Fire Station gen
2009-0864 maj variance
2,319.00
2009-0989 Ocracoke Volunteer Fire Station
2,723.00
2009-0888 Burgan Residence
27.00
2009-0888 Browne Garage
503.00
754 McCotter Marina Rd/Bienes 03, 04,
2010-0618 05
578.00
2007-0405 203 British Cemetery Road
420.00
2011-0101 Bridge 51 on US 264
3,669.00
2012-0085 Bayside Shores Subdivision Lot 4
863.00
Remaining Balance (square feet)
0.05
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.00
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 04/15/2016

APPENDIX E - Buffer Vegetation Data
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Table 9 (continued). CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
EEP Project Code 273. Project Name: Oakley Crossroads
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY5 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T
MY4 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MY3 (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2012)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1 (2011)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2011)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
1
625
596
124
Acer rubrum var. rubrum
red maple
Tree
147
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
9
7
6
4
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
Eubotrys racemosa
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
24
24
24
25
25
25
22
22
22
22
22
22
13
13
13
13
13
13
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
27
40
41
33
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
7
7
7
7
71
71
8
8
8
9
9
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
18
18
18
17
17
17
16
16
17
13
13
13
2
2
2
2
2
2
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
2
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
25
25
28
26
26
28
27
27
33
28
28
28
14
14
14
14
14
14
Quercus
oak
Tree
2
2
2
7
7
7
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
31
311
361
34
34
36
321
32
36
30
30
30
10
101
10
12
12
12
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
7
7
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
6
6
6
7
7
7
9
9
9
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
11
11
11
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
13
13
13
7
7
7
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
6
6
6
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
12
12
12
16
16
16
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
8
8
6
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
5
1
1
6
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
7
7
1
3
Toxicodendron radicans
eastern poison ivy
IVine
1
Unknown
IShruborTree
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
138
141
620.5
1381 829
9
0.22
141 2013
620.5 3728
1421
638.5
1421 813
9
0.22
13 201
638.5 3656
147
12
661
147
9
0.22
12
661
340
1912
1529
1481
665.5
1481
9
0.22
121
665.5
339
19
1524
901
141
404.7
901 90
9
0.22
141 141
404.7 404.7
93
141
418.2
931 93
9
0.22
14 14
418.2 418.2
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%