HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0088838_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20160226 PAT MCCRORY
Nrc
DONALD R. VAS( DER VAAR"I
Yt'arerR$sources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
1-„NVIRONMLNIAt,n.UAd_ii'Y
February 26, 2016
RECEIVED/NCDEQ/DWR
Mr. Stuart Kerkhoff
Environmental, Health and Safety Manager MAR 01 2016
Radiator Specialty Company
600 radiator Road Water Quality
Permitting Section
Indian Trail, NC 28079
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Radiator Specialty Company
Ground water remediation
NPDES Permit No. NC0088838
Union County
Dear Mr. Kerkhoff:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection for the inspection conducted at
the subject facility on February 21, 2016 by Ori Tuvia and Ed Watson. Your cooperation during the
site visit was much appreciated. Please advise the staff involved with this NPDES Permit by
forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
As was discussed on site, please indicate in DMRs that grab sampling is used.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Ori Tuvia at (704) 235-2190, or at
ori.tuvia@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Ori Tuvia, Environmental Engineer
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, DEQ
Cc: NPDES (Ron Berry)
MRO Files
Mooresville Regional Office
Location:610 East Center Ave.,Suite 301 Mooresville.NC 28115
Phone:(704)663-1699\Fax:(704)663-6040\Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 [ I 2 LI 3 NC0088838 111 12 I 16/02/21 117 18 I d I 19 I s I 201 I
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111p6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA -----Reserved-----
6711.0 I 7014 1 71 Iti LI 72 I N I 731 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B:Facility l
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 10:00AM 16/02/21 09/10/01
Radiator Specialty Company
600 Radiator Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
Indian Trail NC 28079 11:15AM 16/02/21 13/10/31
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Richard Herman///
Stuart A Kerkhoff///
Stuart A Kerkhoff/ORC/704-684-1815/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Stuart Kerkhoff,600 Radiator Rd Indian Trail NC 28079/1704-684-1815/7046841868
No
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
• Permit • Flow Measurement II Operations&Maintenance • Records/Reports
Self-Monitoring Program II Facility Site Review • Effluent/Receiving Waters II Laboratory
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Edward Watson MRO GW///
Ori A Tuvia MRO WQ//704-663-1699/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
William C Basinger MRO WQ//704-235-2194/
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.) 1
31 NC0086838 I11 121 16/02/21 117 18 1,.1
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Noted by Ed Watson:
A review of historical groundwater analytical results indicate the presence of chlorinate volatile organic
compounds(CVOC's)in the onsite groundwater. However,these values have been shown to be being
reduced by the on-site remediation efforts. Trichloroethane and several of its various daughter products
remain in concentration in exceedance of the NC 2L standards. Historic reported values indicate these
constituents are moving forward with the expected degradation of chlorinated solvents.
Page# 2
Permit: NC0088838 Owner-Facility: Radiator Specialty Company
Inspection Date: 02/2112016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 ❑
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 II 0 El
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0
Comment: Permit has expired on 10/20/2013.The facility has applied for a new permit. The permit
renewal is in the process of being reviewed.
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0
Is all required information readily available,complete and current? • 0 0 0
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? • ❑ 0 0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0
Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0
Dates,times and location of sampling •
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis •
Name of person performing analyses U
Transported COCs MI
Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? El El • 0
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 • El
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • ❑ ❑ 0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • El El ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ I El
Comment: DMRs, COC. ORC logs and calibration logs for the months of June 2014-December 2015
were examined during the inspection. Records are well kept. It was discovered that DMRs
don't indicate what type of sampling method is used.
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
Page# 3
Permit: NC0088838 Owner-Facility: Radiator Specialty Company
Inspection Date: 02/21/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement -Effluent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0
Is flow meter calibrated annually? • 0 0 0
Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0
(If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? • 0 0 0
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated annually by Clearwater Inc.
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0
#Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees • 0 0 0
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 • 0
Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+l- 1.0 degrees? 0 0 • 0
Comment: Prism Lab is contracted to analyze samples.
ETS Lab performs chronic toxicity testing.
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 I 0
Is sample collected below all treatment units? • 0 0 0
Is proper volume collected? • 0 0 0
Is the tubing clean? • 0 0 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees • 0 0 0
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type • 0 0 0
representative)?
Comment: The permit requires grab samples for all required parameters.Samples are kept on ice in a
cooler until transferred to Prism Lab.
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 0
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 II 0
Comment: The discharge was clear with no foam and did not appear to impact the receiving stream.
Page# 4
Permit: NC0088838 Owner-Facility: Radiator Specialty Company
Inspection Date: 02/21/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS,MCRT,Settleable • 0 0 0
Solids,pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The facility pumps ground water from four recovery wells, treated by an air stripper tower.
Page# 5