The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160358 Ver 1_Application_20160413Carpenter,Kristi From: Herndon, Mason Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 3:05 PM To: Carpenter,Kristi Subject: FW: SR 1765 (Pebble Beach Drive) PCN_PJD Permit Package Request Attachments: Pebble Beach Drive Pipe Replacement - PJD_PCN_Request_20160412_Reduced.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Good Afternoon Kristi Lynn, I received the attached NW 14/GC 3886 application for secondary roadway improvements on SR 1765 in Pender County. The project is going to require written approval so I was hoping you would put it into BIMS and provide me with the DWR project number. Thank you! MH From: Christopher Dustin [mailto:CDustin@sepiengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 12:49 PM To: Shaver, Brad E SAW <Brad.E.Shaver@usace.army.mil>; Herndon, Mason <mason.herndon@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Jason Hales <jhales@sepiengineering.com> Subject: SR 1765 (Pebble Beach Drive) PCN_PJD Permit Package Request Good Afternoon Brad and Mason, Please find attached a PJD and PCN submittal package for the Pebble Beach Drive Pipe replacement and road paving improvement project. Please call or email if you have any additional comments or suggestions. Thank you, Chris Christopher Dustin Environmental Scientist 5030 New Centre Drive Suite B Wilmington, NC 28403 Phone: 910-550-3255 Cel I : 910-512-1587 Cele6mting 15 Years � � � I ENG111EERING s April 12� Z�16 C O N S T R ll L 7 I 0 N Brad Shaver Mason Herndon US Army Corps of Engineers NCDEQ - DWR Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Fayetteville Regional Office 69 Darlington Avenue 225 Green Street, Suite 714 Wilmington, NC 28403 Fayetteville, NC 28301-5095 Subject: Pre-Construction Notification and Preliminary JD Request SR 1765 (Pebble Beach Drive) Improvements. Pender County, NC Dear Mr. Shaver and Mr. Herndon, On behalf of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 3 environmental officer, Mr. Stonewall Mathis, this submittal serves as a preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) request as well as a pre-construction notification (PCN) application requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 14 and General Water Quality Certification (GC) 3886. Project Purpose and Need Pebble Beach Drive is currently a soil/gravel roadway. The road improvement project (Project) plans to upgrade the roadway to state standards which would include widening and moving roadside ditches, and paving. The project proposes to replace an existing 48" corrugated metal pipe (CMP) with one 81" x 59" x 50' corrugated aluminum arched pipe in conjunction with the road upgrade. The existing CMP is undersized and has deteriorated presenting a safety concern. The proposed replacement will provide adequate flow to prevent damming and address the existing safety concerns, while also allowing for aquatic life passage. The project also proposes to route drainage from the planned cul-de-sac through a drop inlet and rip rap dissipater pad. Project Location Pebble Beach Drive is located approximately 0.75 miles southeast of US 17 in Pender County (Figure 1). The project area consists of approximately 2.89 acres of right of way including the roadway (Figure 2). The project begins at the intersection of Pebble Beach Drive and Doral Drive and extends in a northwestwardly direction for 2,049 feet (0.39 miles). ]urisdictional Features As per the Natural Resources Conservation Service's Pender County Soil Survey, the soil series present within the project area are listed in Table 1 below and shown in Figure 3. i025 Wade Avenue � Raleigh, NC � 27b05 � Phone: 919.789.9977 � Fax: 9i 9.789.959i sepeengrneering.com � @SEPlengineers 5EP1 Table 1. SOILS PRESENT IN PROJECT AREA FOR PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE . - - . - .. Autryville fine sand, 1 to 4 AuB percent slopes Leon fine sand, 0 to Z percent LnA slopes Muckalee loam, frequently Mk flooded A delineation and evaluation of jurisdictional features within the defined project limits was conducted by SEPI on April 9, 2015. The evaluation identified one perennial stream/tributary (SA) and two jurisdictional wetland areas (WA and WF), as shown in Figure 4. Stream (SA) is classified as (SA;HQW). USGS Topographic imagery of the site is shown in Figure 5. LiDAR imagery of the site is shown in Figure 6. Photos 1 through 4 of the site are also included. Proposed Impacts There are a total of 43 LF of proposed permanent stream impacts for this project (impact figures attached). Proposed permanent stream impacts resulting from the pipe replacement, inlet and outlet headwalls and class B rip rap total 31 LF. There are 12 LF of proposed permanent stream impacts resulting from the cul-de-sac drainage class 6 rip rap dissipater pad. There are a total of 0.08 acres of proposed permanent wetland impacts associated with this project. Proposed permanent wetland fill impacts associated with this project are 0.02 acres for the roadway ditches and inlet rip rap. Proposed permanent wetland excavation impacts associated with this project are <0.04 acres for the roadway ditches. There are also <0.02 acres of permanent mechanized clearing in wetlands proposed for the project. To accommodate the designed flow capacity required by the NCDOT hydraulics unit one 89" x 59" corrugated aluminum arched pipe is proposed to replace the existing single CMP. To avoid widening the tributary channel or reducing the depth of the stream in connection with this construction activity, the box culvert will be aligned with the channel. The box culvert will be buried at least 1 foot below the natural bed elevation as determined from upstream and downstream elevations (Permit Drawings and stream survey table attached). A filter fabric waiver is requested for this site. I�Zial xii�Y�fu'lu/_17� Project Name Pebble Beach Drive Improvements Project Type Linear Transportation Project Owner / Applicant NCDOT; Attn: Stonewall Mathis County Pender Nearest Town Woodside Waterbody Name UT Mullet Run Index Number 18-87-9-1 Class SA; HQW USGS Cataloging Unit 03020302 2 SEPI IMPACT SUMMARY Temporary Stream Impact (linear feet) 0 Temporary Wetland Impact (acres) 0 Hand Clearing in Wetlands (acres) 0 Permanent Stream Impacts (linear feet/square feet) 43 / 477 Permanent Wetland Impacts (acres) 0.075 Total Impact to Waters of the US (acres) 0.086 Total Stream Impact (linear feet) 43 We appreciate the opportunity to work with you. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the information we have provided. Sincerely, C�� Jason Hales, PWS Environmental Project Manager 5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B Wilmington, NC 28403 Direct: 910-550-3252 Cell : 910-633-6921 Attachments: 1) Pre-construction notification form 2) Project Vicinity Maps: vicinity, aerial imagery, USDA soil survey, USGS topographic mapping, and LiDAR 3) Photos of site 4) Impact Table and Figures 5) Stream survey field sheet 6) Preliminary jurisdiction determination form 7) JD Tables 8) USACE wetland determination data forms 9) Threatened and endangered species survey summary 10) Cultural resources review clearances 11) DCM, WRC and DMF clearance e-mails Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. A licant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes ❑ No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Pebble Beach Drive (SR 1765) Improvements beginning at Doral Drive 2b. County: Pender 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Woodside 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state WgS 44170.03 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Karen E. Collette, P.E., Division Engineer applicable): 3d. Street address: Hwy Division 3, 5501 Barbados Blvd 3e. City, state, zip: Castle Hayne, NC 28429 3f. Telephone no.: 910-341-2000 3g. Fax no.: 910-675-0143 3h. Email address: kfussell@ncdot.gov Page 1 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Jason Hales 5b. Business name SEPI Engineering and Construction (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5030 New Centre Dr, Suite B 5d. City, state, zip: Wilmington, NC 28403 5e. Telephone no.: 910-550-3252 5f. Fax no.: 910-523-5716 5g. Email address: jhales@sepiengineering.com Page 2 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.408471 Longitude: 77.637578 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 2.89 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Mullet Run. NC SID: 18-87-9-1 proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: SA; HQW 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The site consists of a two lane section of a soil/gravel roadway. Land use in the vicinity of the project is primarily residential and forested. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.08 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 200' (-150' at the pipe replacement and —50' at drainage easement near cul-de-sac). 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To preserve the safety and mobility of the travelling public by upgrading the roadway to state standards which would include widening, moving ditches, paving, replacing the existing deteriorated pipe structure and the cul de sac drainage. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: NCDOT plans to grade, drain, base, and pave the road. The project proposes to replace an existing 48" corrugated metal pipe (CMP) with one 81" x 59" corrugated aluminum arched pipe in conjunction with the road upgrade. The existing CMP is undersized and has deteriorated presenting a safety concern. The proposed replacement will provide adequate flow to prevent damming and address the existing safety concerns, while also allowing for aquatic life passage. The project proposes to route drainage from the planned cul-de-sac through a drop inlet and rip rap dissipater pad. Standard road building equipment such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? � Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: SEPI Engineering Name (if known): Jason Hales Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 4/9/15 delineations were conducted, Preliminary JD request attached. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Page 3 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction Page 4 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T W1 � P❑ T Excavation PF01/4A � Yes � Corps 0.01 ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 � P❑ T Fill PF01/4A � Yes � Corps < 0.01 ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 � P❑ T Fill PF01/4A � Yes � Corps < 0.02 ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 � P❑ T Excavation PF01/4A � Yes � Corps < 0.03 ❑ No ❑ DWQ Mechanized � Yes � Corps W5 � P❑ T Clearing PF01/4A � No ❑ DWQ < 0.01 Mechanized � Yes � Corps W6 � P❑ T Clearing PF01/4A � No � pWQ 0.01 W7 � P❑ T Fill PF01/4A � Yes � Corps < 0.01 ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts < 0.08 2h. Comments: Impact figures attached. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 � P❑ T Rip rap and UT to Mullet Run � PER � Corps g_12 16 headwalls ❑ INT � DWQ S2 � P❑ T Rip rap and UT to Mullet Run � PER � Corps 12-18 15 headwalls ❑ INT � DWQ S3 � P❑ T Rip rap dissipater UT to Mullet Run � PER � Corps �_$ 12 pad ❑ INT � DWQ S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 43 3i. Comments: The cul de sac drainage design proposes a maximum of 12' of stream impacts to extend no further than 2' beyond the OHWM. This impact will be minimized to only that necessary to secure the structure and prevent erosion. Page 5 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 Sf. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T im act re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 6 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. To avoid widening the stream channel or reducing the depth of the stream in connection with this construction activity the pipe will be aligned with the stream channel and will be buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed elevation as determined from upstream and downstream elevations away from the scour holes associated with the current pipe. NCDOT design is minimum requirements for State standards. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Work in the dry to minimize aquatic impacts. Sediment fencing around limits of disturbance. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 7 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The project will be completed in accordance with the NCDOT BMP manual to the maximum extent practicable. Construction stormwater management will comply with NCS 000250. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? Pender County ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes � No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: NPDES 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes � No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: A Minimum Criteria Rule Compliance/MC Checklist was prepared by the NCDOT. 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ SurFace Water or Wetiand Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this road paving, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect and cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. NA Page 10 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? A review of GIS NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) elemental occurrence data from NHP was completed and a field survey for federally endangered species was conducted on April 9, 2015. No federally endangered species were found within the project area and a finding of No Effect was made. A summary memo is attached. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? The site crosses the upper-most reaches of the headwaters to a UT to Mullet Run and is separated from the tidal portion of Mullet Run by a man-made impoundment on a golf course. DCM, WRC and DMF clearance e-mails attached. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? A Historic- No Survey Required Form was completed by NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist. An Archaeological - No Sites Present Form was completed by NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodmap GIS Data Jason Hales, PWS �� 4/08/16 Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided. Page 11 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Page 12 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version �^*��■ �� ►L� �4"i* :l�I�L�i��~1 �,i►i►��r�� i�►�r� r-��Iy'.''�1►%��Ai��I ►�j �� ► ;� J� Ham�rtead N J� � �` J� � �� M1 ��- `� Project Vicinity �� ti r�:��,:�,i e�r�i, � �E PI � exc�ru��eiHe s conrsTRucrFpnr Figure 1 - Project Vicinity SR 1765 Pebble Beach Drive Pender County, North Carolina November 2015 �, , �� y'�, � , 0 250 500 1,000 Feet � � Y � . � • � ! �•� • �,` ' � � ; � � ♦ � � � � � �• \ � � . � . . . i . . � a ' * ' � T � � z � � ; � ra,a . r .. � > � . � . ,` '� � � r ,,� �� *. �a, . � � � . ; , . f , : -= �y� �. o�o . ., , �Q�f;� ' ( "P' + '.�• f, � . ^I. . �p�;; ' ` � � C 4"�' `�•ti.; 'k� , - �• � 'R � . ' ' � � • '� • � �, i � , ' , ,� � , Le e nd - . . a, :, • � r � �,, � � - ._ ., J - A . , • .��- � �, . - � . �. . •� . � : , � r , � � "� _ e . �r �' �, . . . , � N �. ; � �4.� t. . d , .` . . . , ,,`� � : r �, , `` �j , .1 • + � �, 1 � � � •: +. "f , " � �.% � • • • � . t.J�•�j • , � Pebble Beach Drive Project Area ' � `-�'��o . ' � • .; ` �4,�- , - . � i=',�'k`� � �'' - �, � . � _ • ,,;, . �' ' �`�� , � � � i ,� V� � �i► � i �� =02 �. t . � O . �l. . '� .a}� �f �� r� '� r( .�i� '� + • r . .��;� • � q �-� �� USACE Wetland ' • , °� . ...�, , !�.,� � � :��, �,.,, �,: .,� ,��' , , .'� � `•rJI� , � --J �+ � �i - � . (� . � . � . . � ,. , e - . -, �7 � . '� , C' � 1� .�` . � . �'.'�d� . 'r [ �, , •�1� , • d,,_ 'R �, y �� •� y, d �/ �. .�- t � � � , � �+ ` �. � 1 sQ� ,��4� h. ' I 1 . � " ��- � � . �'��'t,1 � � f� " � � � ' � � / � f ' �� • . � s ( \ � 1.'�' �: ' s ' �� i�.�' � �} Wetland Sample Point , � ,7 �fy ��i! , ..� �'��,, ,. �d� '�' � � . -i' =; �7 �.�;� ,�, +� �.t��1 ti • �, . �� '"�r. � � ; -� � � ti !t �a '` �C '.�. � r j� �"��, `r ' � �l � - ��" � ! T 7x• �� ♦ ,��` 1' j�it'�r � Upland Sample Point , ,, � �a, " ;� k�►• •, � �'" ��s _ ,� . � �•�. �!• ,j c�r ` +�,a, � a ��; � ti. � oh �_a. - . ti,=`ss �� ' ; . O � , ' �' i ! ti , ` . � �'� � + Wetland Line �,`'� �. 4%�- � ' k� ' ��• c� :'" . � � '`� . « � •. �4 a ••i�, � + _ � .. � « � �4 �� i,. ` • - ,��• f .�� .. . • . � ^�^- Perennial Stream '�'�,'� s4�. • �" f�,'��a•- �, � �� _ - - .� "• ,:�� ,�`',5 `•� �,,r ,�..`t.i�•,.� �r�� .� � - - I. � �� p i � � �; ,�� t . 1 ,� �,,, a.: � , r� ' � � •.4 i� 16• 1 . '1� � ,j �c � � � .�`Y�.' e�1� � f s , � ' /—� G , 9h �,.� � _ g � ' . �"'� � 1* �Y: .� � i ; �� j �.� ` � �� f � . �� f ti i r - , J. . '�1i r2 ` 1 �+t,� 'f !`/)04 � � - `'�'=4 /'•.- .{' • ' � �`� �'!, ��;� , R` x. � W 'r �. � � � �!o �� i `' } Se s �,r�l � « �`�. , ,`•• '' c J f, ', h ��` �. �, � r•'� .�� : (" t�1 .., t � �+% � �I, ' t7� � ►. �' � j � s. j L _ ,,. . � � � s, �", �• '�, ° � ��;:� . � r �•;,,.,. Y� •,r�,� ��;�.�... � �. � � , �� ,;T' � • °�,d' +' � � ' Champion� � r w � ' ` `' ,` . .+i ' � �,� �+ ,� j _ . ,. . � ,��+ � . � �;� a. _' �� , , , A , �",,, � � �f.. t; '' -l- f�'t,� °' ;J. ��`�l '`�� , � • • , C f �.� 1 }, ,9� � •• • ,�i1 � �.,3 7k � � ��'j� . � ` � � : ' • �,t �,j* � � ,� .i► ` � r, � ��a v(+, j� .t'�`�f( �� ' + ? _ , � "� t.. � u � `�p � � ��' � �' .i �'�t � .�' : 1� �'r.�� -4� Y s 6bi� sd�� I � �'.. �r� �' � , • ' �1 'O y,,� �, ' , ', , '� ',t, � �i�;�• -,�. ..;t � . ..+., T ,;�c` � , �� ; � •�i'., . - ;, . . , � .� , , ,.. .-r �ea ee�, � �� , . .. + � � ` � � . r � .' �r 1�' ., p�l .�,`d. •� C�j� ♦• /�S + ,..'�. �.� r f , �� .X: ' ' , � f �P y ��`� 1 •� . � � �� Y •' � � � ; t:�" . R � � � . , ,y ► '� � � . �i .+f • L'!' � i { �l � • / � � �M s,r j . , _ _ ^_ � � � � � •� � � • .�� r '�� ` �r � �i�• '�� t •�LB. 1 1 . - �� k f - � if y �ir 4r � �� . i '�Y, f� •�_�, � 1.f `j ' _ : , • ��. r � + �li;. *.., ��! � • .. � ` i .�� • � � � . � i.+' _ � • Y= � `A \ � � +� a ��i . : '� r �i �� ; ' #• �` � �art ` ' s ` �i. -- - - _ - i -+ � . . . _ ,� ; • � ,��. r . . . i �.,! - � '{ �4• 4Y w . � , =_ ` t�� i. � �' ��• 1' !'' " ` ' " ' `,. . M� •,�{� - . .�- � '� I r.: .�,�•.e�r.•• -�tii, ��.�'r�''' � • 1 � �u �s ��l��t�'` y r � * �� `•� �A� � � � : . � �: p • J � . i F� T . '� ' • � . � � . F r ,� � .. '� � � � � � t �I �A � ► + � w� , � � - ` � f; �`��, y d � �- � / �� ' � � '7 '' � ' � � � ; � I �.i � R�� r. • . • �'1 . r ' '� - �` ' ` r #t � � �• � � , • � ��,�j' �, . . �� , r - 1. . � � �• ♦.•- .' y • . � : � �' ; � e • • .. ♦ ! � � e� �C ,... Y � '��: � ��'' : , .; � . k[ r • . � . � � � ! �� •,e1f��.� •�ce ��t •�� - �J ��'. `.�►s F` � -y �% !f' p��f� �.,�.. O • y� � � • Zr � ,�- • ,�, � ' � i� � / p � ' • i •!� '� t . � . . � � 1�# . • `ri`�o . 4 �. - � .� F�' � �,1 '-t .<�r �' i � r, . . ,' , �� ' , �, � � • .., `F'�y ,�.s,�' , ,�1 \d/ � � . � � ��. . i � � i� �/ re t , /�j �i�"� i � • � S � � � r.. ��,.. �S.' �� • � `• L `• � � •� •� � � •r � .t•{ � �'v� . '► � - I��t ��- i • � ��p�. • � � -� �� , • P 4 /S''��1 • � " �� j� � I � i • Rt t ' ..� � r � � �� / � ` �d s ' '+ ''�, � � < f� ��` • `' � ` '�' . . �t � •' �f� .4� � � �'� ,•�• �'�� S'� � �� {i � � '`• i. � y ' �'`r •, � � a� ' • t!� ,,,�,''.- ,.� ; _ - � '� t r � � �. �. � ; ��3� �' �,. � - t � �,; � .�� { ; a„ � � � _; � '�� ` � � , . !. , ' �, �'Q�, , �, ��o • �'� '�� ` , � �r' ' �� " ( u► r'•� . �'o'� � ��J' .. V C ' 1 �' �f r � i � �i�'�. "��' ' 'y �� _ 1 � j 4rra ,, �r �. ' j � ,� • `.1' F , } . `+�1 ., *,�, . 4 � j � ( oQ - � 4�6�.. '"� • . � � , y ht r ,.�� .�,� .i * �� .1 '� �:�! ' Y., �. '� � ' , ^� ,3 y, ' '�- � o •-+ �";y f .I�.i a �. . .,� .�+: . �� ,� � � t.r ,� ., �+ ti ��,o `G , � V . : � •`�C` ,. f � * �! . � � a ,t �, + f -9��i �� ,� ��. � ,. �'a `� �� , � A � * � t} � •, �� y,` ; i trf �.`�� i+ `,QO� . � r• �� ^'� � . eerry �' y r� w ,r �. � � , . � �R �J,i � � � � � ooQ .�' ' , t � "� '� .< � ' � Q�t` '� g� '� ', , .t � %�A � � • � ; � � � ,f � •A- • This Exhibit is for planni9g purposes only and show9 herein does not meet NC 47-30 Require Pents and 1 i neh - 650 feet c�" therefore is not for desi n, construction, or recordin or transfer of title. The Exhibit was com iled from 'yOpT�' e p available informaiion obtained from the sources listed below. q �°r - � ��,� I Figure 2 - Aerial Photography � � s°U��es: GRAPHIC SCALE � N C D O T, E S R I, L i D A R, U S D A P e n d e r C o u n t y S o i l s �� 4 November2015 0 325 s5o ,,soo SR 1765 Pebble Beach Drive �F,� �� € R � N�� Qf,a,,„� eoNsrRucrFor� Feet �. r` . ,� �,�. .. i , � ;�" p - .-' ,� . - . �,�-y+ �' + ��., � o � �` � ' � r '� � J , � �m �. ,� , . . � , � - , -1 '� , • � c� � �'� Qt � • f � �'� � � sd,� , . �� ' • ��i� ; � � ' �� _ r .� � ' �s * �'�t • � � , � � _ , Legend - A . . y�� L , ��. . . � .� • , ,:ti , � ;� ��, ' 4' �� t • � t ;\ . ` ��`� `' .. � ` � ' , `� + �. ,i ��. f �.N, �' x • _�1. �i �. � ., � � i d - � . � � . �� - � j' • � ' ',�` t''�,;. _�. , ,.` � �Pebble Beach Drive Project Area � �� ° , . f � � �,,*�•� `� _' . "' .� ,� � . '��' , , � � �, r : �Q .''1'R�► 4� , � � '�r ��°� ` � � - .-. . s ' � . 'r � �� ' 1 �� .. _ � : � � �y, , ' ! � ��USACE Wetland '' 1�' � ��, -,r�.�• ,;� .''a,• *.,s�. . �:. �'�; ��['�,�, ��" *�' . � • � ►� � _ - u . ; � �R' �. - � � - a`� _ _`.�i��' � �„� �, � r �d � . � _ �� -.�i �i � i i� �1(�i�`, *'i��. ; n � � � '� 'S �,,� � � �� . y� ' ;�� .�`� � ` /r Wetland Sample Point �� f �• w � �.�� _ � .r•� .�. ,�' �'9, � �..� �h�� , '• k j , .� .� �. �ra,`0 1. t 0 ,r r � ` r` • � �ht%� • � Upland Sample Point � , k; � : � , 4 Q� �� i� ; Wetland Line t� � = '�s�' •� ~i' � ;��, , ' � � � Ir ^�^- Perennial Stream � � � �� " "� � ��'' • � i *�., •' �' �' _ .�- - , �� ,� ��a , ' �yhth x - - , .� � - 4 �� ' '�K y ,� , �.,� ,� � ' w .,. , ; �i, , ,y � � y i�ir:`.4.. ,.:,r•i� ` . . '�G � ,.�, ; 4 , � �aJ 1 �, • " , °4Se �.. � 4 � ''" j ,"�f' . . � '� • � � • � � 4 •' ..q � ' ��. . � �' • �/��'`titi � ` �.�� • -ti,' � • � f �Ir '� � '►� �� .ii.� ` •'4� �� T ,�M�:r s,'� f • 1 " �'r ' �• : . � '� � Champion �,� ... . 4�� -'�'�� s t �, ` � � , � �.�jr. , � �' � Y �. : .'� ' : s� � � , `! 1` -. � ' � ' � '' � T , � �� . �j } 1*' �� ' � • �r�, - � v ' � �, i � t' [. � �' "a �' f" A +� .r. e %Oa��" i�.� �f�', �i�,, .�'J� / %� �/� • �r., , 1 � •�.,,r1 S '� � �. �6 s' �• ��'� t ,. ,' � -� � '� � �► . ' ' . :'j r ' �� ! b�� d�� . � `� �. � , � � , .� , � � • ,,,. . a e�, , ,,(' ��o �- �, �� ,r ; +.• � �� .A . .- , _ '& ,� . . ti a�e �,c . `°�i�� . �. .. "�*. � �� f ' 3'iO�•`• �,�i( ;.�� '...� � < � - � � �.�`1, •, r �Y ,, ,• � �'�, ,', �;�. �'`'�t �. - a� ♦R2 1 �� .�• �•� A � _ ��! a��-� �"'��E � � � < _ � � . � . . . � �' �` n�" °%i� �. � • .. � =f ,�� w .r -. , . ' - � � �' � s� `•' <� � � �' •� , % �r+'� � _.�` j��.T ��! ' '� � . _�'� ,�� ; � � �. .: ; ., o,� " �� . � � � � � � �— - - �� ' � �� ' �� .h � b _y ' t�. 1 a , t _ �� i� � �� _ ' � I� � � � � �y �1� � �-�[;-� ;�� t ! �'�� . , ' r tr � � .J ��,. .`R� .��I�f� �y# Z s R � �. � r 'y 'i' ��I�, ��4« •�,` i • :-� . � r � � � �'�' � r • '�' _ � �rT � L ,ry , �' '4�� r � ��i � `� 1. � . � ; I � w �' �I � � - " ' ` M �' • . �� '' � � ;. , , , � , � � +y� � � � � l�, � :. . .; ' �t` Y ` '� � ' ,r-*� �' � ` '/► . , �,�. . . , f++� ; . `. . ' '. �, '� � •'� r ,� ' j , , '`r' . �+ - '�► ► •,i � ' , ,r,� C��„�• � � - SS��,�i � +� .� f + "- * ' �'�i �. ' .� �.. �, � r �M .�,�,� � ., • �s , � ` � fi � • � i r ' �+•�r� A.�, • l '�. . ��'/4� • � Ff� � r • � � '' �► � •.' � = � / � � °t; � j � ' • � �,'t � t�. i ! ��rs • ��.�. I � p�.� - -' �f l 3 � Sw�',' �� • •�� `� , f► •,�'.' � , '` •^' � ,��,�� • � "O,w�i � ' ` � � �.r � '+� � '�• . � � ,� S � � • � � t, r- S� " ..� �O � � «�: � "� • t{ ' i i } f i rt } . , � � � 1�' ; j y a � �' j � •� � ��'s � � � �`~�'/ t' �� , . t�� -'�� .�� .L��+• � .'� r,� .� � �'t . � �+ i. {� �� , � � t � �j . f�`s '� � • 'a' • �!• � � • � � � �' c/'� 'S �� ♦ � � • � � T'.., • � ' '�� 'T � Z *� ° ` r r � � , � � '� �_ �+ � . � i� r r. :i ♦ � � i 'i� + ' � i , 6% . ►. ��\,.:' i � � � � 'i� � ,� C R�`��l.. 1 � � �„ • ' �' , +_ � iV�- d�� • � 1R.,�� ,� �� ..� < � � � � . C r �� ,� . � ;� � �• '�i b" � � �� • - � a i _ %' . �� v'f ' � .�l� + �� r � ' `,� �, � - ! � � • ,�f� ��'(,i. '� ; � . O� t� �,, - , i� - �t �� a• ' � : r��,, \ � � � " .'� � u . ! r "� � �!•;' " t � : �,► •3 . r '" �. � � � ��• . � � e , ! r c � , �'' r� 4 . . �� „ � , ! - � � o � � � � ,p ,- ,�r, '� � � �.,� sr 4•�� ,+ �;� . �. _ � � V rr 4rr � .� " � r' �� : ��F 46� , •v : . \ ' rs f �ht� -!� '� `� ,� r � ,�,� a • ��,�`�t .R,�� , �`}' i' �q. _' r' '� ` `. 4- �\ �`y � � � . , ` �1 �'c f 4 � . « •, �.��[ ,, , Jy � '� . y � , �, . f t ;�° v � � a ,, 'ti � �! �' '�'4 � t �,. T i1 r` � �� li ! � � � y� , � r ` � •.I � I�,�' � . / r � ♦ � ! , ��` ' � + ,4 �.`• � r - �� ' ° � • � � � �� . • � � � This Exhibit is for planni9g purposes only and show9 herein does not meet NC 47-30 Require Pents and 1 i nch - 600 feet c�' therefore is not for desi n, construction, or recordin or transfer of title. The Exhibit was com iled from 'yOwT�' c p available informaiion obtained from the sources listed below. q �°r - � ��,� I Figure 3 - USDA Soils � � s°U��es: GRAPHIC SCALE N C D O T, E S R I, L i D A R, U S D A P e n d e r C o u n t y S o i l s �� 4 November2015 0 30o soo ,,20o SR 1765 Pebble Beach Drive �.F,� �� '� G I N�€ R I N G � ofra�,q� CON STR liG7fON Feet � ' ; � - . ,�.� r, �. �� +� •�Y ' 1 y ,., .c. �� . 'rt �� j- �. ♦ � .. � ` , ti' �-�� ,.. ;� > ;,`�i " �,. `;� . �.. - � " � �. �! + y - Le e nd � �� ' . r!�� •��. , �,�� - g = � � t �� : � � �, �� . ,. �,� - ,� ,� � �- � Pebble Beach Drive Project Area r; � -. , . ,, a. �`�, . ; ; '� # ... `i 4 � � USACE Wetland ,�:- k: ' -�� , � �' ,,�, j��►,.�►,t� `� , ,;� �'� � *� ...�r �r,... i .*y� � ._ r = , .1, .�,• � ; ,*��., � '�' .,�•.� j;^� _ Wetland Line �� . ' r,: � .� ., �' �r� �► � '".� : ; ' � � .• � `. . � � , j,• , '�I r � ' �.' s + � • � • •, •� • r � '� `� ,� - `� � � �i' •, � r , ' I � '" •t ! . • k • � �`� ` • • ♦ • �� ' � . � � � � d. �, '� 'f � + � � � � • �, 4. �� e; � • '�' _ • �i� r. , �i � . � , .� / � .i ..� � �.' � ,r Y.. � y � � ' • . . ; �., i� ' ; " �'y �. � � , � '"i� . ' � �1 . -�c . `' � ` • �`.' . .,, • . � • �, �- ' ., . � � ,• .� + � -.• • v� . - - - � � - . • - � • • ,: - ►' �' , • �,� r, , y ` f ��.� �. w- -r �. ► ! �l • �v'� � . ' , � ` .M� ,�' l �1 ��''R •� . �� ,� , �rw � � � ��V1 � I '•?ya ��, ~ •1 ��.. �.r .`��•I .�V✓ ��- � �� 1.`.�� . �• �• - � 7► �� ;,�, �� •�` � � ;F.i� �•�► '..• ` �.. . -%' ' e 'r 'a ,`' +�. + ,� •.�� • �r� � . � �� . � � ' _:� { �� , �� '..[ � � � ! '''" - ' ,�r 0 !, y'�!" �r '' ' , � . ��, ,r��P , ^• � ~�' ,. � `�• A�r" � �"`� i� ,• � . ��• � �^ • �, • . � • � t \ -v r � r � � �P• �'�� ' ��' � � ` �� ; + �" � �•" � `. � * �'�' . � .� � � � � d ` . / � I � ♦ �' ► i� � •` ! . � .4P '� l ! • -1 � � � " : i , "� t ' , • _ . � �`,,, � '� e 11 r _ � J► f .. P ' •�: , . ..� t - � : . , . . . . „ � . . .* � . i. , � ♦ A� �i � , i� �' . . {� -. � • '.> � � . 4•. • � n �. �� . � ,. '��' T � . . • - • . a ' ��^ `� t , i�• ' �. • � � � •� � �l . �� ♦ _ . -. .r �q� a�• ,. �s 'fR �,�5 '� ,• � . ..-., '� .fT'�� ,.,' .� �r' ,� ��.1 l� ��. M . • . j' j�,� � 4 , �, ` f( + r . ;� "!i, � � v , � � . • l � . f . r1 � , % �„ • 1+� , :. f . �> • � . � . ti � . '�' �►.3 , ;� � � ,. A �i. � ,� i r y� . . ' � • �• � �► • '� 1 •�' •' • • � � "� • . . ,� . _ .` ' �. : , �� r•�, �, ��a � _y � • '� �, .�. � i .�r� �, � "` .fR , �, . . � ` .� • _ .� .-: .� � ,,t • �' T ♦ . � f � . _ � ' ' � ,_ � � � '.� , • • � t ,��s J�il . . . . r . : . � ti " � . � . � �- • . : .� i , ,� . . . .� . _ . . . . . + h �. , . • �,. •�.• • ' �,;, , •.� � , . ►� , � , `� '+.� �,�. ,� �� f. � '"i' '�•� �f � • � . � � ..r � • �. n i ia�,: , 1. � � �. � � ` ;� , rl��.' „ � • � .I «.. , �. S* � � - �! � �4� .� � � .:�.� ""'. • ' .:• � '••�:� � � � ., � � .. '�" ' ' � '' � ,'°� �'�',11'� - � ,� � � .�► � ' : t'� : , ,.�� ` �'� '' * ' . . � � '� . %� �� C, . .�� •. ;.� '%� � � � � _,., � . � • �•� " �+�� '�` t •. S• ` � + - r � �� i ' , �'7�. . . e� �•� .� � � ��. ', • ..�� { - • � jV 'sr1�` . - w"� . ►• * � . ` � • , r� � P ' w ► +. � `� • ♦ T� t� . ��- •, �+ �"�.' y � ;r �_ I�•' � �,� ..-� • ,�, �. � .. � '.� �r , i� �. ✓' . �. . -` w � � ' ,j�� ' � � � ' • �� a � • " f , � � - 1 �dr . � . M � �(t � A � �� ► .� � �� r . • •,�� . � � � � r� � • T� . � ' . . � �• �, � � ,� s � � � � ' r, • - . �` a. � r . . ' . - e�� y � • .,� e, •``� . . f - � � r+,., • w � �. !s • S ` +� �r . �. �4 � , • . ` 1 . � Y ,� . , � � f* f � ` � o ! � � �,` i. �. �x� ' • � n ♦ � '� , � �s • �� • � � R � -!'� ,, � � •� �� '1 � � . � �'� ' � � ' ' j'• � . � •+� ` ,, + K� �� ' �� •�� '�;, - z � � �' � - .a ! ,� � � . � � � �� }_ - i � . ., � � �'i' .,,�� , `'. ,''''� � . ♦ , � `,'i� } _.� �` + . . �L� �. � .� �� '!� � 'J ' � � y � r � � . �� t �� . +Si ' .i�" a ,. � • �. . '�_ rn: • ��s �i�'' ` � �. .L� r �� ,i• • �,.., ..,c �\ This Exhibit is for planni9g purposes only and show9 herein does not meet NC 47-30 Require Pents and 1 i nch - 125 feet c�' therefore is not for desi n, construction, or recordin or transfer of title. The Exhibit was com iled from 'yOwT�' c p available informaiion obtained from the sources listed below. q �°r - � ��,� I Figure 4 - Jurisdictional Features � � s°U��es: GRAPHIC SCALE � N C D O T, E S R I, L i D A R, U S D A P e n d e r C o u n t y S o i l s �� 4 November2015 0 125 25o SR 1765 Pebble Beach Drive �F,� �� € R � N�� Qf,a,,„� eoNsrRucrFor� Feet This Exhibit is for planni9g purposes only and show9 herein does not meet NC 47-30 Require Pents and 1 i nch - 650 feet c�" therefore is not for desi n, construction, or recordin or transfer of title. The Exhibit was com iled from 'yOpT�' c p available informaiion obtained from the sources listed below. q �°r - � ��,� I Figure 5- USGS Topographic Map � � s°U��es: GRAPHIC SCALE N C D O T, E S R I, L i D A R, U S D A P e n d e r C o u n t y S o i l s �� 4 November2015 0 325 s5o ,,soo SR 1765 Pebble Beach Drive �F,� �� € R � N�� Qf,a,,„� eoNsrRucrFor� Feet � 0 Legei Pebble Beach I USACE Wetlan� Wetland Line Wetland Sampl Upland Sample �;��^- Perennial Strea Legend Elevation Value High : 50 Low:10 Hillside Shade Value High : 127 Low : 0 SA This Exhibit is for planni9g purposes only and show9 herein does not meet NC 47-30 Require Pents and 1 i nch - 125 feet a' therefore is not for desi n, construction, or recordin or transfer of title. The Exhibit was com iled from 'yORT�' c p available informaiion obtained from the sources listed below. q �°r - � ��,� I Figure 6 - LiDAR � � s°U��es: GRAPHIC SCALE N C D O T, E S R I, L i D A R, U S D A P e n d e r C o u n t y S o i l s �� 4 November2015 0 125 25o SR 1765 Pebble Beach Drive �F,� �� € R � N�� Qf,a,,„� eoNsrRucrFor� Feet s��i :. �. ��_L:�...�. .v� �_. _ �: ..�� Photo 1. Pebble Beach Stream SA near planned cul de sac. Photo �. V��a�le Beach Wetland Sample Location 4 s��i Photo 3. Wetland Soil Sample �'��''ti'1�< ,� � � �� 4�F r �Y� �' kr: � \ . �. ��(�� ' �?�,l �f� ��«. "� y�, � k� � , _+. '�w-+�'' < � 4 ",� l �`�„'�� Y �'� +� y',�, ��rR,.� ; � ��,�'' I .' �, -`��-�' X � �Z� T ' ,r rp,� Ir �, �i� ;.y 1 ;�',2s �`yLn � ' y,"i� •.tr , `. " % � �r , •' t +''. � �td r . ��`��@�,� w t'iL�,,��^;r �' � r� � �� . �t , 5'Cb� t � ' 7-`�•C� ��1� �, �.�,,�� ._�-a'` . � �'� }��e'� ,�,� k �Y y i �� S� :: .r : T . ,� �.'1 � M% i � . �n' r'�r /J'-'M"+ �, � �''�,'.,�'� � r .°i `�'� � � ie' �'�, ��1�� . '�° f'��y{ . � �� .'• '.. !' 1r4��.� ,-SS7 �,'' �..i� � . . :C; 1 ^�r'.J' �Y r 6 �j�if ��li��,�' t �'.�G��. ,r. ..hf ;.r :J��. , \ . � }•, i�� .�� f� � h:• � y� { � �+5�� .•...r ��k��;�:� ,r*�,r_Y+t�,7��i�6J �/` ,1�Mr _;i .s Sr� :n, .'1q['�` C� [ `��'� 7 � 1,T ,�'' r .'+ tt-'�,+� i.,.,� �" # '�xa��*�'ciM . '�`"1 .�1� r r i ' ;� �„��`A`r ,x w jkr' '4a' � �''.,,,, 6 ��4�! 1 �44� :4 J� '4 �� ,�� `J .�M �� y '�a�,, ��'�M�� l�� ..�.\° ��: �(C.'- 'tv�f � y 4 _ ' � �� l . % •;'A+ ' , .* �"��II � 7 '� '�. V � . � i �., `p,� -•,� . ",� ai%" y�+`r. � r° � `s', ♦ � �`��Y r � '�. � ) e � i� � ',s. � ff `��{.. {�� . ± � � �7� z��'�.y��a""��,. f�/ A;f'�. ,r'Cs+� 4 � r � i�'. � �. -, � 4�� x' 4 g� F,� ,� � f �`� � .�. `� � ,Z"'", ..L'.° T n' � � #`.t� '� "'"."�r��,�y� .��. � •.� k ¢� �� r_-. , '/ t ,�/ � �I � � ). � ! ! ' �\ M: � �� µ f�� ,p��{� �4 �p�e' {�� . ' '...'�. ^,.�� r� � � t r �� K" �' �' � 1/,� \ �,+" �. .� ' � � t ,��c �� °° �.� � � p� �, '7'T*i-. P� � � ';�., � � •�` ,�s r ,,V�� „ �> �*.�.°`� � � .r -. � i��,. �.�y . � * �l PM"y��T' �/� r�r�� `df' �, . .� � �:. � ♦ I�:. � . � �.. � � ' ' -�A`a�a.+ � L, / �' �S ��'��t.:�� ! M1�,� N4��* � `' 't_6�N . .� ,'�'-.lF{��,r�Y� ^� r �yy '� . . , . 5 1I'Y� F. 1 'n ¢ {�� +� � � .-r �, a � �h N !i S SY � 7y r- �. '�. , � ' Aj� P' '_ •{_ Y� �_'�� . 1F� i.T"�� yyy��''�_^� ' � � o �� '!0 ��`.�� "'f •,'a1 � : � i Y r J� '�} '� � . � �' �� ,l.4.. '� � �Y .�"d�� ( ��dltn.. ' �S.:l .__ -`��1' . �� 4 ��!�;�+A`�e�7�� '� i � � • ��'��'� �_ .,.y Photo 4. Upland Soil Sample ��;►a �. G � t 5 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (tt) W1 roadway ditch 0.01 W2 roadway ditch < 0.01 W3 roadway ditch < 0.02 W4 roadway ditch < 0.03 WS roadway ditch < 0.01 W6 roadway ditch 0.01 W7 rip rap < 0.01 S1 rip rap and head walls < 0.01 16 S1 rip rap and head walls < 0.01 15 S3 rip rap dissipater pad < 0.01 12 TOTALS: 0.02 < 0.04 < 0.02 0.01 43 Notes: W1 -0.0096 acres W2 - 0.0053 acres W3 - 0.0166 acres W4 - 0.0256 acres W5 - 0.0055 acres W6 - 0.0124 acres W7 - 0.00039 acres Total - 0.0754 acres W 1 - 418 sqft W2 - 230 sqft W3 - 723 sqft W4 - 1115 sqft W5 - 240 sqft W6 - 540 sqft W7 - 17 sqft Total - 3284 S1 - 242 sqft S2 - 210 sqft S3 - 25 sqft woodside O�, N w r; $ PLAN VI EW �s � c� � �� i m � � 3 � \ � \ \ � \ 1 / � ��/ � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� VICINITY MAP ,;, �� G i a h� W l� � � � N. T. S. � �`� \�� IMPACT � 3 � � � �� \ � � � � � � � � — � � \ � SEPI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC CORPORATE SEAL #: C-2197 LEGEND — NCllO'1' R1GHT-0E-WAY — WLB — — FLAGGF.D WF.TI,AND i,TNE ---- OHWM � � � wE�r�ll � WETLAND CUT WETI.AND FII.I. RIP RAP � IMPACL IN SURNACE WATER �, * * * * DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING � � � WETLAND � �. `� IMPACT �4 �� 1 �� .\ �� e�M� � 1� � � WETLAND \\�. �� ,,p \ � SHEET PILES • IMPACT #2 �`. �`. �D�� '— 1 �% Ij � � �/. � � W� LAND � � / \�� \�` IMPACT � 6 ` � IM ACT #7 � � '�� \�. \`� I WETMAND B UNDAI� Y� WETLAND � � � � �. �� / IMPACT �I �� `� � � � /.li '�,I. .1i � \\ �\ I 11 1 \ � � � \� \\ � � � WETLAND �� `� � � � � � m; IMPACT •5 `� �\ � � �� 3� �� \ �\ \ � � \ � IMPACT � 8 \�� \` 1 � � � � \ � � '� � ; `� `l' `A \ y \\� \\� \` �— �� RIP RAP �'f � ` SHEET PILES � 1 1 � / �' \ \ � SHEET PILES \ — —8-'"' — — ��\ ��\ CLAS�S�___ � � � �`__�_ --- � �_ � .�j ./ WETLAND � j IMPACT #7 - m �� I� �% /' 3 �/' ,/ <e�M`, � � � / , � � �0 � , WETLAND IMPACT #9 -�---- __—/ � � � � � — — — — — — — � ��8� __—_� � � \ � � \ ' PROPOSED 81' X 59' CAAP SEE DETAIL A WETLAND IMP 1 3 4 5 6 7 TOTAL ACRES 0.0096 0.0053 0. 0166 0.0256 0.0055 0. 0124 0.00039 0.0754 N W E NAD 83 NC GRID s DENOTES EXISTING PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED PIPE DETA L A STREAM IMPACT #2 ISTREAM IMPACT #I ' � 48�� MP�-- — — — — _.. .. �a� CAAP— �� STREAM IMPACT S FT 1 `Z4`� �� = 2�� 2 210 LF IMPACT � 1 15.7' 2 14.5' • � • � � � � � � � � � � � � � � I" = 50' ��.I��S1I�� OHWM Q Q Q Z z z o o � � o��oQ��z Q � V � U � � � w _�_��.� � � Q � � � v � M = � < � o � �� o�z�z�� ,,; � z � a Q � =rn�-�roo � � F w��Z��oo � � � � : � _ � o U � � > w : � �, Z z �o a-- � zr � w � U � � WW } w� > � Z~ : � (n U I� v Z K zo 0 W U Q � a � a V� N O � w� = U � � w o N ¢ N � � � m o w Y = U W� _ U � Q m Z Z � � � Q o� � SHANE NATHAN HANCOCK DB 4421 PG 39 MB 12 PG 64 N 45°58'22" W 182.00' TIMOTHY ALBERT SPROUSE ET AL DB 4411 PG 134 MB 12 PG 64 N 45°58'23'_W 186.59' i ,.ti .e �..' � � :� i ` , � �� v, 4�\ � � .. -�R,?r'—' r �, � ' ��Q : T�� CHRISTOPHER A. GAHAN ET AL e`;'� DB 3147 PG 92 'x' MB 12 PG 64 \\ � .��0 �O � �Q' BRAD CHAMBERS ET AL ��'�'S �^�� DB 4371 PG 151 �P� �� h.�:�` MB 55 PG 124 N 45°58'04" W � IOO.00' P ` � S 45°58'22" E ie2.00� � `�� , oo° ao MARK A. MONIGLE ET AL='` ��^ DB 3470 PG 205 M8 12 PG 64 TING R/W . MARY ELLEN EI DB 3816 PG 168 MB 12 PG 64 MB 55 PG 124 � o-> v 0 v v � 0 � OSEE R. FAGAN III E DB 4315 PG 257 MB12PG64 DB MB rn � 24' PIP � 20 LF RIP RAP DISSIPATOR f � WITH CLASS B STONE ANDREW FAZZARI ET AL DB 2441 PG 179 MB 12 PG 64 S 45°58'22" E iis.i2� / � � ,ti`° �o� 0'O ^� h�. � � �NKLIN E. DURST, JR. ET AL � 639 PG 10 � 12 PG 64 � � � � �F 24" PIPE � oN o.zi� E � 3 � 0 � � � , � ti� o, �o ;5 ^� o�. � � �I`� �� l �\� �� s R , � O� � O � LEGEND — VCDO'L121GH'f-OP-WAY — OHW➢[ JRo ET A� Af�DREW FAllARI ET DB 2441 PG 179 MB 12 PG 64 A� PACT #3 � X � � � � � � � � � � � ... . STREAM IMPACT S FT 3 25 LF IMPACT 3 12' 0 ¢ Q � Q Z z Z � o � � W J O p��o��n � � z F-> ��a�Q w Q rn U oo U I� ,� � w = Q _ � � � ~' � N N z N � H O� � V� M.0 � w d' � 0 m� z :.:� �� Z� Z�� Z 6) � V O O N N� a' W � O � � � � � � � Q Q � �i .� i � S J o U � � � w o - Q co � p o U � O — °t3 Z a az� O � �� } wm � V o w C� �J,J J WW= }Y= W� � W� Z ~ : U — � LL I� (� Z �a ZO 0 W U Q a m Z � N Z � V ��_ �Qo � U � r oo` � o��-i�,1- s,.��.��.- f o,�..F � M fl �{e�-iJ � �bw �1G � C i dss 2. �] ��bole, l��c~c,►1, 97105 cooNr.r: '1!�e,�1de�" � � �' oca7,oH: . ` . h!J! lYCS: ! � J�+ gl 4CS� PROPOSED:_I-� --'�"�." --�St3 , � SP u� rL EP SP ' E't`. E�EV ELFV � ELEv, �� TOP Q� WALL � �, OF �,� �� \ LEV y IIYV.fIILLf - , IlYY.�UI L�� , / ELEV -- T,� T2� r�� ELEV' � r�S -2D' rf0' -- �l --.,��-- ----------- ov-�m aF WALL Et�V -D r,o v� . �,��ET acrrr�, � a ��_._._.�.-� ti 4' b S u.�y L a. ti �p .1 S k � . r.�,� L2A � �o' . �o` r.� 80TrDM DF WALL EL�v roP FCFv. sorro�r F�ev. i�r LLLY sorro�r EtFv ATTAGHMFIVT A RRELIMlNARY JURISDiGTIONAL DETERMINATfON F4RM BACKGROUND INFQRMATIUN A. REPORT +CfJMPLETIDN DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURiSDICTII�NAL DETERMINATION {JD): B. NAME AND ADDRE3S �DF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Christopher Dustin - SEPI Engineenng 5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B, Wilmington NC, 28d03 C. DIS7RICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: USACE Wilmingtvn �istrict D. PRQJECT LOCATIQN(Sj AND BACKGROUND lNFQRMATIQN: Pender County -�R 1765 (Pehble Beach Drive) Improvements beginning at �oral �rive {USE TH� pTTACHED 7A8LE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERB�DIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: N� COUrltylpa�RSh/b01'ough: Pender Gity, Hampstead Center coordinates of site (fatllong in clegree decimal format): Lat. 3a.aasa�� °N; Long. 7�.ss��a °W. Ujj��/�j'��]1 TFC�nsVer$e IYI�r(�"dt�r. GCS_Morth_Amencan_7993_NAD_1983_5[atePlane_Nortfi_Carolina_FIPS_3200_Feet Name af nearest waterbody: ��iet R�� Identify (es#imate} amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: z�a linear feet: 4-s width (ft} and/or acres. Cowardin Class: Rzuez �trgam F�pW: PERENNIAL W�tlands: o�o$ acr�s. CiDVila�Cjll`1 Ci�aSS: Palustrine Forested Braad-Leaved beciduous/Needle-Leaved Evergreen 7emporarily Flooded Name of any water bodies on the site that hav� been identified as Section 10 waters: Tldal: None N41�-Tlda�: None 1 E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALIJATI�N (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY}: � Office (Desk) Determination. Date: � Field Determination. Date(s): SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for prelim�nary JD (check all that apply - ch�cked items should be included in cas+e file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below); � Maps, plans, pfots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the appficanilconsultant: Nc�or QData sheets preparedlsubmitted by or on behalf of the app ' anticonsultant. �ffice cancurs with data sheetsldelineation re�ort. Uffice does not concur with data sheets/delineatian report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Gerafogical 5urvey Hydrologic Atlas: a USGS NHD data � USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map{s}. Cite scale & quad name: 7�� opsa��, Ne QUSDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Cltc�tlQll; Pender County, No�th Carolina Sojl 5urvey ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ StatelLocal wetland inventary map(s}: ❑ FEMAIFIRM maps: � 1 d0-year Floodplain Elevation is: {National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) QPhotographs: lr J Aerial (IVame & Date): �c o��aP zo�z, Es�E �a�5 Q� Q Other (Name & Date): s�c� Pnoro� � Previous determination{s}. F�1e no. and date of respanse letter: � Other information (please specify}: ��a�� 2 1. The Corps of Engineers believes tf�at there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant ar other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option ta request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or o#her person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an appro�ed JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains ar� indi�idual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-canstruction notificatian" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applEcant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware af the following: (1) the permit aApficant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, whieh does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that ihe applicant has the option to request an appraved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorEzation, and that basing a permit authorizatian on an approved JD could passibly result in less compensatory mi#igativn being required or different special conditions; {3} that the applicant has the right to request an individuaf permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions af the NWP or ather genera! permit autharization; {4) that the applicant can accept a permi# authorization and thereby agree to compky with all the terms and canditians af that permit, ir�cluding whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has de#ermined to be necessary; (5} that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance af the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JQ will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on #he site aff�ected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judiciai compliance or enforcemenf action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal caurt; and (7) whether the applicant elects ta use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD witl be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved J�, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein}, or individual permit denia[ can be adminis#ratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F,R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised �see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2}). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official cfetermination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictiona! waters on the site, the Corps will provide an appraved JD to accomplish thaf resuit, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, a�d identifies all aquatEc fea#ures on the s�te that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the follvwing information: IMPORTANT NOTE: The informaiion recorded an this form has nat necessarif�b�en �erlfied bv the Corps and should not be refied uaon far later iurisdictional deierminations. Signature and date of Regulatary Prcaj�ct Manag�r (REQUIRED) 4 JO ��- Q � /� s � Signature and date of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIR�ED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) STREAM DELINEATIONS On On Subject 1D Map Linear NCDWQ HGM Waters Local 404 401 Section �D (ft) Score ��✓ardin Code Code Type �lassification Waterway Topo Soils �urisdiction lurisdiction to Comments Review Reviewer Map Map Buffers Date Pebble Beach Drive SA 200 32.50 R2U82-RIVERINE, LOWER PEREN, UNCONSOL BOT, SAN RIVERINE RPW PERENNIAL Mullet Run YES N/A YES YES NO WETLAND DELINEATIONS - COASTAL Map HGM Waters Local 404 401 �� Section �p Acres Cowardin Code �ode Type NCWAM Classification yyaterway Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Comments Review Reviewers Date WA 0.02 PF01-PALUSTRINE, FORESTED, BLD RIVERINE RPWWD BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD FOREST Mullet Run YES YES Pebble Beach Drive WF 0.06 PF01-PALUSTRINE, FORESTED, BLD RIVERINE RPWWD BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD FOREST Mullet Run YES YES NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Pebble Beach Dr. Date: Apr 9, 2015 PrOjeCt/Site: Pebble Beach Drive SA01 Latitude: 34.408421 Evaluator:J. Hall County: Pender Longitude:-77.637035 Total Points: Other: Topsail 32.5 Stream Determination: Stream is at least intermittent it @.Q. QUad NamE': >19 or perennial if >30 Pel'2nn181 A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =21 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2 ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 2 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 � 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes - 3 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 Hydrology (Subtotal =5 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiah water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate Stron 2 3 2 3 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 Yes = 1.5 SCORE 2 0 1 0 0.5 1.5 C. Bi010 Subtotal =6�5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 0 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 �perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: Sketch: Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate low Cefebmting 15 Years � � '� I April 8, 2016 E N G I N E E R I N G & L O N S T R U L 7 I 0 N To: Stonewall Mathis NCDOT Highway Division 3 5501 Barbados Blvd. Castle Hayne, NC 28429 From: Jason Hales Environmental Project Manager SEPI Engineering & Construction 5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B Wilmington, NC 28403 Re: Evaluation of Natural Communities and Threatened and Endangered Species. NCDOT Road Improvements on SR 1765 (Pebble Beach Rd), Pender County, NC. An evaluation of natural communities and threatened and endangered (T&E) species for the NCDOT Road Improvements to SR 1765 (Pebble Beach Rd) beginning at Doral Drive and extending northwest approximately 0.39 miles, in Pender County included GIS based review of aerial imagery, USDA soil survey mapping, USGS topographic mapping and LiDAR imagery; a wetland and stream delineation; review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) web-based mapping tool; and a field survey by qualified environmental scientists. Sixteen federally threatened and endangered species are listed in Pender County by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), including American alligator (T), Bald Eagle (BGPA), Green sea turtle (T), Hawksbill sea turtle (E), Kemp's ridley sea turtle (E), Leatherback sea turtle (E), Loggerhead sea turtle (T), Piping plover (T), Red-cockaded wood pecker (E), Red knot (T), West Indian manatee (E), American chaffseed (E), Cooley's meadowrue (E), Golden sedge (E), Rough-leaved loosestrife (E) and Seabeach amaranth (T). Biological Conclusion: No Effect Review of the GIS data indicated that habitat for American alligator exists throughout the project site. The project crosses an unnamed tributary to Mullet Run, a shallow slow-moving stream that consists of the upper-most reaches of the unnamed tributary. The project area is separated by the larger swamp system associated with Mullet Run by a man-made impoundment on a golf course. A field survey of the project area was conducted on April 9, 2015. No federally listed T&E species in Pender County were present within the project area. 5030 IVew Centre Drive � Suite B � Wilmingtvn, NC � 28403 � Phone: 910.523.57I5 � Fax: 9I Q.523.5716 � seprengineering. com � �[ SEPlengineers SEPI SEPI Engineering & Construction �� Jason Hales Environmental Project Manager SEPI Engineering & Construction 5030 New Centre Drive, Suite B Wilmington, NC 28403 910-633-6921 Prujec� Trriekix� No. (Iirferrrrri Use� 15-10'�]01 O HCST+QRIC ARCHIC�EC'I'URE AND LANDSCAPES N� �iJRVErY REQiJIRED FDI�M T�tis Fortn only p�ertains to Histaric �lrchitecture and Landsrapes for this project. It is nat �aiid for Arch�eQlogical Resaurces. You must cansult separately with fhe Archaeplogy Gr�up. PRQJEC"I' �NFORMA.TI�N Froject 1Vo: Cautrty: Pender WBS 1�da.: 44 i 7�.Q3 Dacum�nt 1VI�DC T,y e: F�rl. Air!' 1Yo: ' Funding: State ❑ Federal Feclerrrl Yes No Permit N W 14 Permit s : Ty e{s : Proiect Deseriplian: Widen at��l aue SR 17GS Pebble Beach I3rive . SU�I�IiVIAFLY OF HIST�RIC AIiCHICT�CTUIt� AND LANDSCAPES REVIE4'rV Descrr`t�tion rrf �evrew activities, results, �anrl con�lusinns: Reuiew of HPC,I q�ead maps, H�0 GIS information, hist�sric designations roster, and indexes was undertatcen on L3ctaber 21, 2d15. Based on ihis review, there are nU existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area ot !'otcntial Effects, which is 5� fee# from t13e centerline each w�y. The �r�vel road is a part of a subdivisic�n, with hvmes c�ating to the 2(]0{�s based on Pend�r County GISfTax Infprmation. There are n� pr�per�ies Lander tlfty years of age within the APE. 'There �re nc� Natianal Register listed or eli�ible pro�erties, and ncs survey is required. If riesign plans ciian e, additianal review will be re uired. Wli the �vrrilrrhle in or�rrtiori ravirles a relirrbl� Gasr's nr reasa�ar�bl rerlictiiT tl��t tl�ere rrre na una�l�nti rerl si nr` rccrnt Iristaric arclritectrsral nr Ianr�sea e resources in tlie �a'�ct area: HPC1 qtiad ma��s and GfS informatian recording NR, SL, LD, I)E, ai�d SS pa-apes�ties for t}�e f'endec CouE�ty sui�vey, E'ende�� +County CISITax Informa�tion, and Goo�le Maps are cc�nsic�ereci rr�lid for the purpeases of determini�ig the likelihooci of historic i•esaurc�s beir�g }aresent. Tl�ere are nn Natior�al Register listed oi• eligiblc properties within tl�e APE a�id na survey is rcquired. SU�'FORT D[?CUMFI�i'�'ATIf3N Map(s} �Previaus �urr�ey Infa. ❑Photos �Correspandence �I]esign Plans FIl"dDING B'Y NCDQT AR�HITECTUI'�AL HISTURIAN HistariC Architecture and Landscapes -- NQ SURVEY REQUIRED 1�ICDC�T Architectural �istarian �i��f��:� Date Nl.sloric Arel�uecrrrre nird t.na�el.rrnpea Nfl 1tJKVfiY iils�llllRlsl) jnrui j�r h7ruor '1'rrrrr.spr�a•lalrwr i'rs�jerls aa� I�lrralifreel ir1 �l�e 2QU71'raqrr�urni�xrc Agrc errlc�tt. Pa�e 1 of 2 !� r)' f7F u fl J � � '�' nf � rik ! ('� r 7`xh54i7 (i1ec11', S].t i �� u^ Pol7 ".,.� r� 4f� c'O.. rta F, ,�, r r C n tOs nf� `�a� ,,� •s,. h'`f OQ `f � ° e �F�rh � �lj ryJ HP� GpS. Hrsroric Arclrrrecrrer�e riucf l,rrralsc'r�pes Nfi Si1liYtiY Rf.� (lll�li'IJ forni farMi�ior T inrPspui7alrati 1'r�ujecls a.s Q�rrrlift�d iar rirc 111I17 Yro�i�r�r+rrirrlic Agrremrrrt. Page 2 of 2 �, �iM:��.. � ��• � �� t�� 1�� w # �� !� �� ■/��'��"��1��' • rr ��ir•�1►:r�►�1a��i►*Jj��'*�� `�� 1 ,,�5mpstead Rrnaect Vicin�ky �I � �.� .+�' �� iaRsai I Beath � ,_5i..:;l�' !► � �P� ,6� r �7 �� J� ci` Fp � °�f„ ,r ` '� � SEPI � ewsir�eeRi�vc s C¢ N S T R U C T 1 B N Fig�re � - �I"!7J@Gi �ICIC11�]/ SFt 17fi5 Pe�ble Beach Drive Pend�r Caunty, 4Vorth Garalina C)ctober 2�315 �� "�/ �r �� r� � 4 25fl 5�}0 1,iJ04 , �� Feek . ; si�°: �;� � . � � �f , 3 � � �, ' a ;� �� -.�. ��, .. , �. , r F , � �r t.Y � " ��: � 1� � �� ' .. f _. • �[� ' . � � ��' + ' `�� f'� � i: �.>/ ��' ,�f .,,� ' �� F � ' F.s r- ''� �.; ..,;'. ' � � $�. . � . E°� ,,,. �..ir�. .� � N ' � �1 . ' �� 4� - ; . �' l��.i � , 1� `� � ^ , i�' � .i�', s � �'�' ' .,� � �� i� . , - , � / � =r . � ,C, , ' � � ,., _ ' �yr�� s:r � � � � .. � - }r . ° �''r � : �,", , ♦ / � � � �;� � ' ' �� , ,. � � , ...� ; �� ' • �. � �, �„ ;� . .r"j% f . ; � ; , .,� � . . � % � �. . . ,� � �: ��r .. � � � �; � . r � r — ��' Y�` �T �► � :� . . . • .�' 4, �1 � f�.. � ':��,'' •� � . -:�. r 3 < E� �� , : "� .. �'�. s +�'. � 3 ;%� '- � � � � � "�' � `� . F � � � � � '�'. fb .: * � - � � � � r � � 4 � � � �`. , � ,' �,� � �, , �, . � � F �. � �� , f +i'� , �1" 'r1 � ,�-�r'I` r i� x� � � �� '� �� .� �� 4 � � `E't . . ' � �-�'., {,� ��;` t.� . � T � �_ � • .l6� , .. � . . ��-�-�-�- NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES �a�`�� ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES �;�a��'��, q �� u a � � �� ,� �,�,,�� ;; PRESENT FORM � ; } < �� . �' o�'��;' This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not �,�2 8� �¢ �`�.� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the 1 �"�•�.=�� Historic ArchiYecture and Landscapes Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: WBS No: 44170.03 F.A. No: Federal Permit Required? County: Document Funding � Yes ❑ No Pender Minimum Criteria Checklist � State ❑ Federal Per�nit Type: NWP 14 Project Description: Improve SR 1765 (Pebble Beach Dr.). Upgrade gravel road to state standards which include widening the roadway, moving ditches, and paving. Area of Potential Effects (A.P.E.) is approximately 625 meters (2,049 ft.) ]ong and 18 meters (60 ft.) wide. SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed the subject project and determined.• � There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents as needed.) ❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project. � Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources. � Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the National Register. ❑ All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project. Br�ief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: The original review of this project (11/10/2015) included the eXamination of a topographic map, an aerial photograph, and the listings of previously recorded sites, previous archaeological surveys, and previous environmental reviews at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA). The review determined that the landforms within the A.P.E. appeared to have some potential for prehistaric archaeological sites, and recommended an archaeological survey of the well-drained, undisturbed landforms within the A.P.E An archaeological survey was conducted by NCDOT archaeologists Scott Halvorsen and Caleb Smith on 12/17/2015. The A.P.E. is approXimately 697 meters (2,286 ft.) long, and begins at the intersection with Doral Dr. (referred to as the east end of the project). The road begins at the edge of an upland overlooking an unnamed drainage way, extends north across the drainage way for approximately 305 meters (1,000 ft.), turns to the southwest for approximately 250 meters (820 ft.), then turns to the southeast for approximately 122 meters (400 ft.) to end at the unnamed "NO NATlONAL RBGlS'1'F'R BLIGIl31,F. OR LISTF.D ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �'orn2 for Minor Trans�orlation ProjecGs as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. lofll drainage way (referred to as the west end of the project). The landform in the A.P.E. is an upland next to a seasonal drainage way. In general, this landform has a moderate potential for archaeological sites. There are several previously recorded sites recorded on similar landforms in the vicinity. The edge of the upland overlooking the drainage way has a higher potential for prehistoric archaeological sites. The highest potential parts of the A.P.E. are located at the east and west ends of the proj ect. Inspection of the A.P.E. found that most of it has a low potential for archaeological sites. The 18-meter (60-ft.) wide A.P.E. is clearly marked by stakes, and includes a narrow strip of land on each side of the road. Most of the roadside is disturbed by drainage ditches, residential yards, driveways, and construction sites. Beginning at the east end of the A.P.E., at the intersection with Doral Drive, the higher potential uplands on each side of the seasonal drainageway are occupied by homes. Along the rest of the road are several construction sites (not depicted on the most recent aerial photographs). The only part of the A.P.E. with potential for archaeological sites is the west end of the project, where the design includes a cul-de-sac and a drainage easement from the cul-de-sac to the seasonal drainage way. This part of the A.P.E. is located outside of the disturbance along the existing road and construction sites. Three shovel tests (STs 1-3) were excavated at a 15-meter (50-ft.) interval in the area of the proposed cul-de-sac and the drainage easement. This part of the landform had the highest potential for archaeological sites because it is the edge of the upland overlooking the drainage way. Each shovel test was excavated to a depth of approximately 60 centimeters (24 inches) below surface. The soils in the shovel tests consisted of bands of dark gray, brown, and white sand (see Table below). No artifacts were recovered from any of them. ST Description 1 0-40 cm bands of gray sand; 40-50 cm dark brown sand (subsoil?) 2 0-40 cm bands of dark gray sand; 40-60 cm dark brown sand; 60-75 cm white sand 3 0-23 cm gray sand; 23-35 cm white sand; 35-47 cm brown sand; 47-60 cm tan sand In summary, the original review for this project recommended an archaeological survey because the landform within the A.P.E. appeared to have a moderate potential for archaeological sites. There are several previously recorded archaeological sites on similar landforms (uplands near water) in the vicinity. However, examination of the A.P.E. found that most of the roadside is disturbed and has a low potential for archaeological sites. Three shovel tests excavated in an undisturbed part of the A.P.E. found no archaeological remains. Therefore, no further work is recommended for this project. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info Other: Signed: CALEB SMITH NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST � Photos ❑Correspondence 1/14/2016 Date "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 2of11 "NO NATIONAL REGISTh.'R ELIGlRI.h,' OR L/STED ARCHAF,OLOGICAL S17H.'S PRESENT OR AF'h'ECTFD form� �or Manm� Transportation Projecu a.r QuuliJied in the 2007 Progranmiatic Ag��ee�nent. 3of11 ♦.t. �C I� � _ � � MY' � # 1 �_... . . • _- .. :. .. . . n�" — � � . ' �. �' i i.i \ . — . - �� ' t { ' 4 ... G �'_._�C�,—. -`�»' L� - '- '-. _ li _ �Fd�,6a1 '"°�- ��,1 ..e�� .. J � y �, �z -� 1� _-,^"'� 3� __ � f � l ;., - . _. x �� s� � � � � '::�p 'r"� � `� . - � i �" . ° r ,t + . (ar -. �� . � � _ �-. " I ., � � . :. � � .� :. � .�l , S � . . ��,,• _� � - � � =� . � � �� I-* }� � ��' �; 3 � ' �� . '` t ; �-� , �. � +a��+� . ` ' � z�� _ I 4 " � � Yl �� I a . � '� — n,L- . Y" . .C' . � 9" � f - * r�. _ _ � i � ^: . � � �\"' � � ` � ..a�, �s � . �.�Ps^ . .>: ..F _� - ' . ' .. � r � �. � .- � .=''li� _ �= . . �,: :r�� _ � `�� _ ... x.ir�� Y� _ � �� ,� '� 1 - - � f g� - . .� �. `�4 �'..� � Y, � �^ 3 .r 1 r,p � h d _ "a� . i�� r, + .. � %` ,��'?�s�'�� I- � "� ��.� .ti � -5 � ��, ��I �,� �� I � a � ^� t�• �,�1 �'t{�, i ':i ;:w .�' j''-� -�4 � � - �-�� ' + ) [. F _ �� 'I i ��x.ir �, i --S - � �� u 1 I� �aj�l r�� '.\ � ylz�c7c . ar..., -- � i . � +��tr l -�y' �> � -�-� - � I ' � � `-I r � -?"^-�; rauwr _ � ^ ' � _ � ,�.� I � `��a �� ` 4 . _ � ' r .'� ,' �- � �� — �.� � � � �� _ �j �.. - � I =- -�� . "- _ _.' �{ W �„e a � �.. . C� � wFe�" _ ' '. r , � 4 ,-� .. I l . _ �.. 'f' I w �' � . ��. i . i ,. - _ �_ � � I - . -r � �y�)_(I'�'� � � �, '7 � � .- r'' ji`.`f .:.J' i-� �� .�; Y q�.. i � ` �-�R�.,-�... _ _ _ `: : �: ..._ " -�} ` � ��- � : �3Y�.. S i{ : ..: _ � } I � ��. 5 � ��,' �� o � � ��.`"`,� b d" . _ _, �� ; ( ' __ ' I �. "� 'J � � ° -3` - � ,. - T�s"r�— " r �, 'o:�` `: _ T"�apsaii �' �, _ .¢ - � � r � '� 'Ha114' Rids� I. m E t"` _ .i.-ya_ _ .. � r. .. "�y� al „ � y � � � . � � �� eaiumc� � • � 1 � _ ' �, , : � � � �. -T � _ � . �' � � �� ' . m >.. , "�: 1 � l,, � �t ,� -y . _ _ , � �' i c�? :-V, � , ' ".�. ,�...�� i ± �F z �(�� "5.� ��"'tY°..� �� """"' ' d.� — {k � , � t ti ,- - �y -_ ..:�i ` �' I'�-^°.I�.� i .� 1.:3 J 7'•'6: > > -- � - � -. i + � y, . � I _ - _ ,Yy'.� 'Y �::� , -r+��. _ � .. p : . + � � �?� /' � .. �' �. 1 _ I i j __ ��—ral.}t�'��: ,.iL � i �,✓ _ , �,�* J:`� fl � I .. 1� - .�� Y_ p � '� ,�," I �,__ �` _�t ,.c� �� L . . .. +'� �,dP� f . . . ... � � � \•i � ' L id 'a � _ �' � ��;� �'`� �f I' ' I ` 'f� �'� �� :� �� ' J d� - — - �^ � � i i � f . . l . �— - x } � � i ,�j � xy � � � , _ � : • , , k� {� � � J :�.-{`� �� N j "�. — T qsP �" � I r � _ � 4 �+, r ,� , �r- �o �'� �. I'r�aY,;: �` `�' �' . � f K� � �.., �-� � t - ��;� ~ �,�dr`„7 �gR6 ! .' . �� .�. yl 'e � � �x^�v ��s.., A ��y? - �� q j:. " + � . � _ � 1 � �,L �.+� � Sd' + � ;. 1 d".� �.'��,e��` 4`�.� �� g.rt� I �. ..ra« �4 ry"' I I I -. �, I �y _'} _ _ �•�. • ` Y' ~�.�'�-� i t; �� h4'} 5 � I ��t I-, I � .,. § I � ��..,._. � _. . - :.. .— _'— — _ I - — , � ...` � ' 1 � � �_ �.� ��. - s'� �� -'TRICnfI. � �.. I � � �!-T � i ,� � � v nrrtiu ,'-',� � ,-' � '�' :� :}' � - �`"� .�`` �a _ L ' :�' � �':: j � I ,. �, ;� . ... �J l a � - F �-�f., - § '. � ��.k" rt''�� a �r �'� � ti r�i ` 3X f� ��`� � ';i �� ,n.ee�a ��.. �5 � � _ ,. � I � � � \ y�1. �� 5 �' � �' � .f�' ' . :�.:� � '"' ` . - �''� . 1 z C� � �� . � i.t .. r � . �1 �` 'a � ,�'i �' `:� 1 s ' T "�� f � �� w S ', I �s� � h� �` � ��,��,�a �'• ��,�., �`'�`� � � �, � a o ., ; , . �_ _ .; �2 , -r d � 1 � � . �j � .'� � �'...s ,d,�'� . ry��. `7t .�;:� �� ;, .�_ � F-ia�p'stead . -� r I 'y�,F ��,� .' r��, � o �-.� �, ,; �� .... ,.� �. - - � y Figure 2: Topographic map locator of the project area (USGS Topsail [top left], Holly Ridge [top right], and Hampstead [bottom left] L•24,000-scale topographic maps). "NO NATIONAL REGISTh.'R EL/GlBI E OR L/STED ARCHAF.OLOGICAL S7TF.S PRESf'NT OR AFFF.CTED form� �or Manm� Transportation Projecu a.r QuuliJied in the 2007 Progranmiatic Ag��ee�nent. 4of11 "NO NATIONAL REGISTh.'R EL/GlBI E OR L/STED ARCHAF.OLOGICAL S7TF.S PRFSFNT OR AFFF.CTED form� �or Manm� Transportation Projecu a.r QuuliJied in the 2007 Progranmiatic Ag��ee�nent. Sofll - � "^•... � T � �p ��; 'a � f � � b �.. • .. � .. I' � + y � ' � �� ... � � } r' ti ,� � ` � 3 �� ,� a � : ��-�j �" " � . � "�` � � ,� �`� •� " �w` � ,ll� � � . �� " �� . �/� �+ �' � � ` � " ��:� t-� - t �"'�� : '� " ' � ;� � � ` *�• � � �.f \ - ,�y�� ,,��,�..h��,4,�� 4 �..7". �� yJtyL _ � . � { � � ,� �;T , �' � ., �Y. ,ik � _ � i�a,, �� r�� T��'��f��k +�aa'� ��` ` kx i � » i� � � �� _,,,�' � , � ��y '. -��- ',�r � '�� ' � � . � �r. '�" x t� ��','!� ' �' `� "'-"` �My ��.� , ,,�. ► � .t ��`�"� ..r �' Irr ':'• { � �� 1�4 .4 �'� , ,�.*,A �� y;��. �� g � � � P f�'�M � � - � �, , �Z 1. "t y a . }�� f. � `� � % ` # { � �. � � ' ' �� '��'�f� � ' � � � __ . y � �� ,r '�� ^+ �t. �� r� r . � � �- �� . ,�f � � �: , ,, ��, � � �� . r �t ° � �a "�-�� ; '_ey � r+� n; � , /�" ,+4 ��' , r � �„ � �.'!�. � ',�;� f!". n' ��- F�.��- ° �,t'�,•.ar� � '�' �� _� ��r'#r' .�w�,�� ii�. � �, 4•,}�: � � � � �' �� ',� � '� i � �4 ��k � . `�1 f'.'�, �� +� R'�a' 'a � �`� - � � - _ ' ,�,y • - . � �'4+Y �'1�5,�j- -+' " ,� � - 'i�,�� r � h r ~ � tt� ' #�- { . Y, � � . �,. + s � � � �� yk r ��• ° , -� e ti .� y.� y � � 4 � �{ � t�* �� p� � 4"��.��: �R '�A�� b .�i . � j4� 't • '� � / �' � , . ' ��` i _ "1 1�' �': ' � . • f � '' � � � ! � � � ,f� '� �� r�, � �� :�' � � .�.��"� � a �� `Y',� r��j�� *` ��f � fJ�..��•� '! '� ��pr� �� r� ��. f . �'. �. ^ . , � 1 - y� � ' 'i' iR �' � : �� . � M �� . , ��.�i� ��..�. . t 1 � `�.Y � �'. y,`� �%�...' � �• •� 1t� � ��Q�• 's'^5 �A" 11 � � � �f �� %" . � �. r ? ' � 'ti ' . C!'.;!. P 4f�! !��""f , y # }; ��., • '�„ � � �� 't� � � � N � -� � � • ..y� � r��y ��. '� .�' �p � �' � �� ' - - � ..- 4' ..�`. . '� ��D �� ! r . -r�� K ^*,� ti.� ` ' '4�'7 `; �, �!•-�f;.�:, _ r ' ''� �J T 2. � �i � -`� � �} '� �9� . � �/' ■;z i F��:�"•`�� Ks��,��;�� " �l , �:� ate. . T � ,, �'U i . � � "�. F� . t ��_ ,�rt � . - � . 'i r �� j � � s � l. � � � � � 1 ��{I:,/ yy��,��►. �. � �`p�� :!��' � w -:�� s�*.' a a � . -,. ��. y f �.�i � _..._ _�� _ ��.::� .r. . �` ,..r f' a�. �.: •' � �. � �h »� � , �� - r.._ � ,� � �� 7 � ,..,k, .� , � '� !h� l � �� `� � � Y. Figure 4: Aerial photograph of the project area showing the locations of the shovel tests. � f.s'i` F-ir i r�'" 4 *� r: � �: � �' � 1�5�'h a � � � ��f y n '.' i � Y �. �?-. a�:r. "NO NATIONAL REGISTh.'R EL/GlBI E OR L/STED ARCHAF.OLOGICAL S7TF.S PRESf'NT OR AFFF.CTED form� �or Manm� Transportataon Projecu a.r QuuliJied in the 2007 Progranmiatic Ag��ee�nent. 6of11 I _ — I'i . � tili3.h,E P:IAT:"Ap! HA"Jti.414k. . I �� I c..,:�,E — — —� II',I' �C GE, 4421 PG 39 .� � I � 1.. �;•' � 7 raf� i2 P'G b� ��i � � �� SPiaSOnal � II _ „ .,:�.,.�., �„ ,�, � � i � � draina e � "�"'" � �� Cul-de-sac � g � ' , �' , way I i I 7[� I n ;,�-Fq i=FF.r r.c �- ,^,i I I� .: ��CE f'. FAGAM III ET AL �� , - - �. i ` iE 'I: PG 2S7 Cr. II. i�:: IS�� i Mhiih A. Mbhll„ls� ET AL r�'- y3 I: F� �4 u� �_ 4�_ e.:a �. I �# 71P[7 PG Z05 !� ,..��.. � ;i !1� la P�v fi� � I' `� � ��,� ,-�� — , r �:; � E� � ' � I � ,f� � �� k r � �� . s� S T 1 '� / , . , � . „— - , . - � ,;: • — .. � � _ � i r � i � .;, _ i. � _ �,, �i E ■- k� 'rz r . �, _ I.� 'L • � . � — . � I^R h�. I': ' � � � AFL� I� -0 , ; . �r,i� Drainage � ��.: - Pe-��;f �� easement � �fil_T��•HEf? n..;;AHATI ET p.L _ �_ �,� � �B 91a1 PC 92 ,� ��--_ . M7 12 P� E4 /�:'' `��— 3� _' _G . FJ t t+.: �. � � ��1,1 / `- __ ' Ed Y�f��"�.1� -- �': —� . � �. + , � --; � r . C'�� „r�'. 9FiAp GHAM�E125 ET AL +I .'--, _ � q`�� / oe �7TI PG i�i � S'I' 2 + � :� C}L; M6 SS PG 12b µAR7' E�LEN E�KROA7E r"�� ,+ � �'��* �9 3��16 P6' 168 `�I �T !,,� ! ��' � MQ la PG 6i ST 3 } i� 5� PG 12A � .'r /� . — § ,fi1r� rl' r .:. . o-� — ,1. ' `� . i/:' - e'1Tqrth � Carolirsu Drpa. ra�Tranapanarian lJivis7ar¢ nf`Highways - Ux�tisaan 3 f Liisrr-tct 1 :' �j' SEf�NL7ARY R4AO SLJRNEY � sK;'��:� i,�;i�;_=�s�.ariir��e.�•r i,.r;ln(I TI THE Im'E�?=ErT:ra ur trlr �.�=a� c r�E:�r.,,�. - .,1��5 i'EFSLE 3-�_H GRI�:'EsIF� krv N��FiHWE�7Y+..�L'�Lr LR�ECTI:�I• It�.�� coi. r nx,�u=s .,,t�: .t:�-L 'r'1� 7rl`� 5�� us� WLMI`._T"n Ldi . 5::;�1u� I' - s.p� .rziw�in-r� r�_ �: «w i ; � i��"=0.L TUM45Nl� , �-E�]Eit ':_�... T7 Figure 5: Preliminary design plans showing the west end of the A.P.E. and the locations of the shovel test. "NO NATIONAL REGISTh.'R EL/GlBI E OR L/STED ARCHAF.OLOGICAL S7TF.S PRESf'NT OR AFFF.CTED form� �or Manm� Transportation Projecu a.r QuuliJied in the 2007 Progranmiatic Ag��ee�nent. 7of11 -�` Y � t . ' .+ q c 'y�'�'�*i #�'. ^%" � ¢ i+i`�, iy � - x1.'!/Y ,� � ' �+' ,1�` y �� }.� . ^,i� '�.S � �� w � \I L I i � 4 t I l�^y ��r �� - ,'�, . �� '� � 't �.�!"�'�� .. r.; �~ '��i,�. �� r -- � � ��'' �°'t��"` �E �NkF t s T,��ir .. . � ��' ' �-y1�k t� � � � ,� ,�, . �� 9 ' � _ '� .-r Ye�-�a ! � � i � � �� ,� � :J " ' � � «a � �' '�� +� • �' %,� � �` � $ y,. w• �• ��?- Sa ' � - ' � . ar'. � � w`.� �*' s � „��,y`, ��'° e ,��""�, �'�, + �� '`�'4y�" .�`f ' ,� `'� Q � l� � ;��,. ti � �� . ' L'[�. � rr" . . � � � �' � . ✓� . �� r« ,�� ,�I�w E�� .�# r. . � �1� !'» .i. ��i {��+�p _ r�_, - .y }� �' . .` �� .�.� � r 4 1t � "I�s � r�L.t �4� _ : p rw .'..•[�p' � � L�r' f �,� �:� � �� t��...#"d d�. �� . w,�'y _ 4.��N `"�'�''C�- '� . r'J �� ` s� ;``�`.''" � "!� ` k� �''� + ,� � � ��'�,�.t ��. � •-a r f � : �� I�. ' '; ' ?��`,�r +t � � J, , �� ,� k . �M: i. ,"�# � 4.'I�`}�+ �. �ii�� '�{�� • 't- FF� r r — y,* s .-,� ae � .'�•:. �� j; ,i. a-q�_,� � - ��.1 �- f--:. .. �' ` ' �` �'h� � V�y�iiA d�F�4'� � , � - . �� s'� ��ya ��Y . � �.�': �� ` a ',y} Y 5 + � , � c iT� � � r �+,� � � .�� +'�, - �' 4 ��t.. y k �,y� , ' �.-f.. �y' � — �� i .. y y �.�Y�rt� � .� •i4.�'� �� _.E�� _ _ . � -> � . . �� .. i _ _ - �- - . - . . ' ` .. 5 ,ty E � [ ,� . A j�y� f ' _ _ 4 � 4 "T. �:.;r. y�. .. � .�... . �- � ._lv�� ± « y;2y d��1_�_ ��'... 1 .. . � > s '•�i ,, A �r a � `e � * � � 4�� _ , �� '�` .� '�R,* � � ' ��q . � M L ;. .� �k � . ~� y� . , �y . y Y � e. �#/ y a "►� `�� • ' � �.-- . • t �� 'E . �� 4 . - .. .' r tiy ' �'� t+?i 4 r��"�+` ,'' ka. -'*�° . y�Y.. .�� -:. ��a.s�`�_� �Y:. w '1.. .-�f'�.��; lL Figure 6: North view of the east end of the A.P.E. (from Doral Dr.) NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �'orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifted in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 8of11 �� g� � �� y F*�,#t�� .� k. . *'F �i v� f��lyt��•�'� _ '� � � � ,� T� �r:�+i, .r' �,_._ I � .. ..,� � . i" . ,, � '��!`�� ,'�' � ' � � ° ''�`�_ ' ��;-� � � �% A.P.E. � �s *- � . � � � _.,� ,'� , '�� - � : �,� stake ,� � .,� .::;�� ,` �, .� - � ., - - . . "+ � w,�l' - �. � � L '='ii:i:+d�M.:a.. Qi. �r !'4 �'� � f I ��1, • � f . �_.:' ` � -� t � �� .� .. � � ^ � y..t � , A � � . . � � _ ' � � .� . � r��. ��--�-F _ t . . . ;�� A �y e. �. �L: y _��•+ SiT� . ". .�� + ��'a .. _ . - . � " . - "F�i' m �y. . . � _ _ y�y �� . ��+�� - - � r ,.a� �' � � �c � ..� � )°� { V - �.. ` t, + . . .. �. Nf I � �+ 4' � 4 ' � �• J - �*` : ls. �� a � { ��. _,��►.��r��` � , { �' _ `-� Figure 8: Southwest view of the middle section of the A.P.E. �� - Y�L,�'j �? {• �!i Y � F-- � ; . ` " ."� � __. �,' .' �. � � + * !��. � � ��c �' - s y ti� �� IHr� � � 't� :� �� . '�,� it� � r�-°� �f �- � �.�. � �.,; �;, , .;. �-� �� ♦ o..,'R. � � 6 � �Y,��'�'+t'� � . '� �i {rf � � ' � .*5 ..✓� +,: �. 9 �.. ♦, • . .S k � � . � i �-- - .� '� .�a � 3 x�,. `r � . " � � '- �f� 11�� 4 . . . �{�Mj a ,t�'�G� .� � .��r�� r� .`r . � 1:^I.+ M "► u� � ,- �� a?� � � ., �t,� �. A.P.E. + � r� %r, i � ,I �,,, Oa � , f;. - � b „ : _ , � ��,;� stake i�_i� �•��'��' --� �:;�, .��.,� - �,i f� +�my � , _ � ..�-�° �r .� •- , �'� , .. ��1�� „ ��,� ! 4 �V .._��YI_"�1�' ��_�� .e�� .�+ Y . .- - - — - _ - - ,� _ _ y . ,. '� .. _ � _ . __ �. _- �� -. i4 � �� ` ��? -•r, �r . ' ' �' t - ' - - ` `'�� j�"��rl. +I. ' f s �„ ' w _ �� . � y ; . � -; _ ��K+ .. �: .: � ,# ,. =1�•' ,W '' - .J:r ' J/' '�' �� y �� .,f f . •�� 9}�' "�' 4_ � Sf�� /�� . f �.'¢� �,� 4 a - r ' _ y '; - - - 4� ^- �,r e�� '� �a':'� � ,i�� r �y�� 1 ..� y,_ �' " �f�� i; _ F 2�Zii�Y�S`r ; -�� r'�! i _ "�-�a'- fi�. � 'Y �' s . 3- . _ R� ` � �M1 - . _'�"k4� . , «.._{.+...:w. , � a . - - t -. � � � �'�6 "r . ,..��r�'?' },r._,! _ ,- f'- - - ` . - a v� �. . .a ti _ yr, a . "y aU- .e_.. r .. ,f.'.� .r;.; � ' - � e " �a"� ��, �..:�" � °�.F { � . � ,r �' �` �. �=1: � � t�` � � ��—:.Y' i •. � -,.. � z - - .�� ` _ �, +y � ,�` __�""�c '' ' � ti �'- '+'� � r�.. _` _� �. �`► , �r+e^� � �.�,L �� . � <.=�.,� `'v�`t', `7=,� - �.s'.!-_ , a . ''t_ .� � _ - ,b Figure 9: Northeast view of a construction site near the west end of the A.P.E. NO NATlONAL RF.GlS'!'F'R ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifted in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 9of11 "NO NATlONAL RF.GlS'!'F'R ELIGLBLE OR LISTF.D ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �'orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifted in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. l0 of l 1 � �� " ��,, �. �'�A � u� a.. .., � � .. � � �� z i`" -- ''"} �a.°� � = G r`n � �� t - �`` i ��'�• � , F � � . ' � p,{' t.k � �f •"ti: �' �; �,_ � � �''� �` I �41��k �c � � �t-. ?�' '� �' Y � �� t 1 n .,��`.�: p ,��,•b. ' � . �_ ' , � � � �� ' � Lfi:. � � � � � � e �,,� � � -_. r i� ' � �t� �" �� .� ' Swi �p ��+�i� �� ' � � fi.p.E' . � �� - 'r'. �i� :�� u � �� yr� � �ar. - �` -� _ �� .rr�- stake - � _ � � ` y -� .�_� _ ,. -. - �r�� w �� ' ,.,: '� `�' _ '`_' _ �' .� r - �-.,,6 '�'?�` �, "-' -� u'- - +� i r , � �-s�r•" � — iyP�`�'z , '� �# -�,r -,.�f � , , .sY�`T � -c' < �,.�' �„�"� t��x��'�`' +r � +� `� 'Ew r" �' , . w� '�* � ' �w-��, 'i �7�. , � Ti � �n i,�a � a `.'`-"'� = �., �� '4 �� '�� ' � ��'--�- s -�' �'�-`� ; � � t t _.�r-�� r �`��°'l ��`''?`� .# "-�a.�' ��i z,. � �. r Y�� ` � '�, . t} '�` �-�-i Y' ti � �y 'v� �, � _.� ,� '�'� � � r � .�% j k !�r �� t �'�-'s�' p►' 7�1y� � � � � ,t . •. w r' ` � v'� �� #► ��' � � =•� F' � �, i.'ri-i J�~ `� `.dy 3.., �`� �'1 "1'� �16aM"g 44i!". �`�t'�. Y�� 'p+�-as� "�...: � -`� ,r� � � . 1 � ' � .�., � ,�..�. � i � �; ' -" '''',�, � a ,, �.�. � ��'+�r ,� �' � � �:.�.., ��..},�'!� ,� '_,� ,;,'��"�'3'.`�'-��' � � '� `�c �� "� t��C �P - � �7 s� '�'. �r'�;: � � _ ;"t;�- ,. -�l�'""� a . ,.y , .,� ��v' � =- �<�,; • �...:''�g *,X; ,, . �� „��`�` a`+ «'�" ai.� ♦ j�#' �,�: L '*-'.�i'.�-� e'�,'. .:, w � � �"y `r' p�l`,� . � �' i�`'r�� ,�,,�, ,,;�„�'`} �.i:+�r� ' �..� ..' � � :�i' � ! �, _ ��,�, '�` �, �,�., � ""'� v �� ""� Ja ,K,,,i��-'� �* i �' 's�'`'� 'r'+�' �� r• r�✓�'t�"y.,' �4,�,'�"'.�-�fc �'?_t-_�`�'4 �-��-a"HI[-�-�J�,�'�`-a,►A�T.,`. ``_ `h"+�� Figure 13: Northwest view of the A.P.E. from the cul-de-sac. NO NATlONAL RF.GlS'!'F'R ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifted in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. llofll From: Lane, Stephen <stephen.lane@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 10:51 AM To: Mathis, Stonewall D Subject: RE: Pebble Beach Drive Hi Stoney, As per our discussion during our visit to Pebble Beach Drive in Pender County on July 10, 2013, I have determined that the UT to Mullet Run crossing under Pebble Beach Drive is not located within one of the Division of Coastal Management's AEC's, therefore, a permit from DCM will not be required for work that may be needed to bring the road up to state standards. If I may be of any further assistance with this project, please let me know. Sincerely, Stephen Lane Coastal Management Representative From: Mathis, Stonewall D Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:51 PM To: Lane, Stephen Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D Subject: Pebble Beach Drive Hey Stephen, If possible, I would like to look at this proposal tomorrow afternoon with you. This is a proposed route to add to the system. There is a reported 48 inch pipe in this feature. We would like to know if it would be allowable to add another 48 inch pipe to bring the road up to minimum standards. I would like to know first if this is an AEC and depending upon that whether you would require permits, etc. Please see the attached maps. Thank you, Stoney Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Jasan Hales Fr�m: Lan�, Stephen <stephen.lane@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 14:51 AM To: Mathis, Stanewall D Subject: RE: Pebble Beach C�rive Hi Stoney, As per our discussion during Qur vhsi# ta Pebble Beach Dri�e in Pender Cc�unty on July 10, 2d13, I have cletermined that the Lii to Muliet Run crossing uncker Pebble Beach Qrive is not �ocated within one of the Division of Coastal Managemertt`s AEC's, therefore, a permit from RCM w�ll not be required far work that may be ne�d�d to bring the road up to state standards. if I may be af any further assistance with this project, please let me know. Sincerely, 5tephen Lane Cnastal Management Representati�e From: Mathis, Stanewaf{ D Sent: Tuesday, ]uly 09, 2�13 1:51 PM Ta: Lane, Stephen Cc: Mathis, Stonewal! D Subject� Pebble Beaeh Drive Fiey Stephen, If passible, I would like to look at this proposal tomorrow afternoor� with you. Ti�is is a proposed route to add to the system. There is a reported 48 inch p9pe in this feature. We would fik� ta know if it +,vould be allc�wable to add another 48 inch pipe to bring the road up to minimum standards. � wou9d like to know first if this is an AEC and depending upon that whether yau would require permits, etc. Please see the attached maps. Thank you, Staney !-maia corrAspondence tu and iiom th�=_ sender �s suG�ect to the N C I'ubl« Iteco{ds I a�v and may be d�sclosed lo third part�es Jason Hales �rom: Wilson, TraVis W. <travis.wifsonC�ncwildlafe.org> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2Q16 1:13 PM To: lason Hales; Bodnarr Gregg Subject. RE: DOT Pebble Beach caardinati4n WRC does nat have any speeific concerns with this praject. From: Jason Hales [m�i�#o:jhales@sepiengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, 4lllarch 30, 2016 3:53 PM Ta: Bodnar, Gr�gg �gregg.bodr�ar@ncdenr.gov>; Wilson, Travis W. �travbs.w6lson@ncwildlife,arg? Subject: DOT Pebb�e Beach coordination Gregg and 7rawis, please ct�eck t�is sit� out. Stephen Lane is r�ot claimin� CAMA. There is a pand between the site and the SA waters. Thanks. Jason ce7ebra[Ing I5 '4rrs SEPI cnciKcta�Ncc f O M S T M V i T i O N lason Hales, PWS � En�ironmental Projec4 Manager SEPf Engineering & Construction 5030 fVew Centre DrFve, 5uite B � Wilmington, �CC 28403 Direct:910.550.3252 � Ce11:910.b33.6921 � sepien�ineerin�.com Connect with us: Linkedln �'�witter � Faceboak Canfidentiaiityr Notice: This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s}. It may contain confidential ar proprietary informatiora and may be suhject to the attorney-client privilege vr other confidentia�ity protections. ff you are not a designated recipient, you may nai review, copy or distribute this message. IF you receive this in errar, please notify the sender 6y reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. Cnmd t��rrespondci�e.r: 10 &na irr�m tl;i; scr�dcr I5 sublcrl I� Ihc N C Pukadir. Records Law and may bc disclosed tr; Ihird �a�1u;�� Jason Hales From. Bfldnar, Gregg �gregg.bodnar@ncdenr.gav> Sent: Th�rsday, March 31, 2a16 8:40 AM To: Ja�an H�les; Wilson, Trauis W. Cc: Lane, 5tephen Subject: RE: DOT Pebble Beach coordinafion I agree with Stephen, no �ssues on my s�de. Gregg From: lason HaleS [mailtn:jhales@sepieng6neering.comj Sent: Wednesd�y,lVlarch 3D, 2difi 3:53 PM To: Badnar, Gregg �gregg.bodnar@ncdenr.gov>; Wilson, Travis W. <travi5.wilson�ncuvildlife.org> Subject: p0i Pebble Beach coordination Gregg and Travis, please check this site out. Stephen E.ane is not claiming CAMA. There is a pond between the site and the SA waters. ihanks. Jason Ce%6,+atMg IS lYnis SEPI (NGINEGRIMLF f O M S T N V f i 1 O X Jason Hales, PWS � Environmental Projett Manager 5EP1 Engineering & Construction 503Q New Centre Drive, Suite B � Wilmington, NC 284D3 Direct:910.550.3252 � Ce11:910.633.6921 � sepien�ineetin�.Com Connect with us: Linkedln � Twitter � Facebook Coni7dentfaliry Notfce; This messa�e is intended onty tor the designated recipient(s}. !t may contaln confidential or proprietary information and may 6e subject to the attorney-tlient priviiege or ather canfodentiality prolectiorrs. If you are not a designa#ed recipient, yau may not rewi��nr, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this 1n error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thar�k you.