20160344 Ver 1_401 Application_20160416

Environmental Consultants,
8413 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone]
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Deborah E. Shirley
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Re: Camberly
Action ID# SAW -2014-01957
Wake County, NC
April 8, 2016
S&EC Project # 12401.W6
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — 9th Floor
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
20160344
HrK U 8 2016 D�
On behalf of the applicant, Camp Kanata Development, LLC (Attn: Michael E. Jordan) please find
attached a complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N. C. Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) that the activities
proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality Certification 3890. Please
contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
Camberl
Project Type
Residential Development
Owner / Applicant
Camp Kanata Development, LLC
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Town of Wake Forest
Waterbody Name
UT to Mud Branch
Basin
Neuse
Index Number
27-17-1-(2)
Class
WS -IV, NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0.011
Wetland Impact (acres):
0
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.011
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
149
Total Riparian Buffer Impacts (square feet):
Zone 1: 7,230; Zone 2: 3,662
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
USGS Topographic Map
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Jurisdictional Determination -SAW -2014-01957
NCDWR Surface Water Determination letter #14-359
Existing Conditions & Overall Site Plan
Impact Exhibit
DWR ONLY:
Drainage Delineation Maps
Data CD
$240 DWR Application Fee

p�OF W AT �9�G
Olqiiii�T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: N/A
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Camberly
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Wake Forest
2d.
Subdivision name:
Camberly
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Michael E. Jordan
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
D. B. 15720; Pg. 2418
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Camp Kanata Development, LLC
3d.
Street address:
933 Old Knight Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Knightdale, NC 27545
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-422-3933
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
Mike(a)jvmpmt.net
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner-please send correspondence to Agent and
Applicant
4b.
Name:
Michael E. Jordan
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Camp Kanata Development, LLC
4d.
Street address:
933 Old Knight Road
4e.
City, state, zip:
Knightdale, NC 27545
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-422-3933
4g.
Fax no.:
NIA
4h.
Email address:
Mike(a_)ivmg2 t. net
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Deborah Edwards Shirley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c.
Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Ste. 104
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-846-5900
5f.
Fax no.:
919-846-9467
5g.
Email address:
DShirley(a)SandEC.com
Page 2 of 13

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel ID: 1821-64-7682
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): IMPACT #1
Latitude: 35.9900 Longitude: - 78.5734
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
± 113
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Mud Branch 27-17-1-(2)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin, Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: Existing conditions consist of forested land. A jurisdictional perennial stream bounds the eastern property.
Four intermittent/perennial streams flow eastward into the perennial perimeter stream with three jurisdictional wetland
areas located within the streams riparian buffers. The general land use in the vicinity of the project is rural residential
and forested land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0. 06 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 5,401 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access to uplands within a residential development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of the construction of the roads, single family lots and stormwater BMP's for a
residential subdivision. Specifically, there is one stream & riparian buffer impact associated with a proposed road
crossing. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators,
graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ® Final
Comments: AID# SAW --2014-01957
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Name (if known): Steven Ball
Consultants, PA Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE-a site visit was conducted with James Lastinger to verify jurisdictional wetlands & streams on October 8, 2014, a
final Jurisdictional Determination has been issued (AID# SAW -2014-01957); DWR-a site visit with the James Graham
was conducted on October 6, 2014 NBRRO 14-359).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
Page 3 of 13
- PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? --FE] -Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 13

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P [:IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -Permanent
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
(P) or Temporary (T)
intermittent
DWQ — non404,
width
(linear
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Road Crossing-
❑ PER
® Corps
S1 (#1) ® P ❑ T
Culvert &
UT to Mud Branch
® INT
❑ DWQ
5
149
Dissipater
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
149
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individu lly list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water impact
Name of
number —
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
number
pond
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts req uire mitigation, then you MUST"fill out Section D of this form.
tia.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?
131 (#1) ® P [:1 T
Road Crossing
UT to Mud Branch
®Nos
7,230
3,662
B2 E]' P.❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3❑P ❑ T
El Yes
❑ No
B4 ❑P ❑T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B5 ❑P ❑T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B6 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts...
7,230
3,662
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 13

. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S&EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property in order to identify
natural resources so that impacts could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact #1 is a
proposed road .crossing. This impact is necessary to access uplands on the northern portion of the property.
Proposed impacts include 149 linear feet of permanent stream impact and associated riparian buffer impacts. This
road crossing has been designed to minimize impacts by crossing the stream channel above the
perennial/important start point, in addition to crossing the stream at a near perpendicular angle. Additionally, the
entrance road Gentry Drive was shifted to the south to avoid parallel riparian buffer impacts. All other streams and
wetlands onsite have been avoided.
Furthermore, the applicant is aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permits 29. With
respect to residential developments (NWP 29 -Regional Conditions section 4.0) the applicant does not anticipate
any impacts to streams or wetlands _associated with stormwater facilities, there are no impact associated with
single-family recreation facilities, there are no permanent wetland or stream fills proposed within the
floodway/floodplain, the stream classification for this project is WS -IV, NSW (i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters,
High Quality Waters, Coastal Wetlands or wetland adjacent to these waters) and riprap stabilization is not
anticipated.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Erosion Control plans will be developed in accordance with Wake County standards and specifications and in
accordance with all applicable local, federal and state permits and regulations. These plans will be reviewed by the
Wake County to ensure compliance with regulations.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
El Yes No
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
* Permanent impacts -to streams are below 150 linear feet
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
and perennial/important channels have been avoided. All
wetlands have been avoided.
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Quantity:
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Per the project engineer. • The Stormwater Management Plan (SMP),
which includes diffuse flow measures, will be submitted to Wake County for review
® Yes ❑ No
and anticipated approval. This SMP includes level spreaders that will make sheet
flow going through the buffers and the stormwater should not concentrate until it is
received by the stream. Once approved by the County, the Applicant will provide a
copy of the plan and Approval to the Division for their files.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
17
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide. a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The Stormwater management plan (SMP) will include Dry Detention Ponds and level spreaders. The SMP is currently in
for review by Wake County. Copies of the Drainage Delineation Maps (4 & 4A) have been provided, along with the
Stormwater Design Report, Construction Plans with details and the O&M Manual on data CD. The applicant requests that
a conditional 401 Approval be considered allowing the SMP and its Approval by Wake County be submitted to the Division
once received from Wake County.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? `
Wake County
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 13

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
.Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past_ and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative -description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, 'including projects such as urban in -rill,
most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as.agricultural and silvicultural operations. The
Camberly project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within Wake County's jurisdiction,
therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect
downstream waters: 1) the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require
limited development within the riparian buffer area in addition to "diffuse flow" requirements at a minimum and could
require Best Management Practices that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved, and 2) the Water
Supply, Watershed Protection Program which limits development densities as well as requires protective riparian
buffers, and finally 3) the Phase 11 NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting
requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction stormwater
management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater. generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. .
Individual Septic systems
Page 1.2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10_2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? The NC -Natural Heritage Programs Data Explorer Map was used to search for elemental occurrences of
federally protected species listed within 1 mile of the project boundaries. It was determined based on the search that
there are no elemental occurrences that are listed as federally Threatened/Endangered within 1 mile of the project
boundaries. Please note the Final 4(d) rule identifies the Northern Long-eared Bat as a Threatened species within Wake
County.
References: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer Search [February 4, 2016]. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Office of Land and Water Stewardship, Raleigh, NC. http://www,ncnhp.org/
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAH Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website
was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The NC
State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on November 23, 2015; no
historic structures were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures were identified while onsite
evaluating wetlands.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Per project engineer, there is a "1% annual FEMA flood limit zone"
and a "0.2 % annual FEMA flood limit zone'; though neither area will be disturbed nor no lots will encroach into these
areas.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Project engineer & the NC Floodplain Mapping
Program
Deborah E. Shirley
Ll l Lyt
Aril 8, 2016
P
Applicant/Agent's Signature
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the appli nt
Date
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PSA
%Ell_ I -A- of %tint KnJ. Mre.' 114. ka1tt4k M:1,1/.l G • 1Mtnnt- f /19 AM, ;4, 11 • for t')i•)• iNlr'1N�'
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project NamtJoescri ion: AM2 j;� a , w. _-_ S&EC Project
Date:
Thr Department of the Arty
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington. NC 28403
Attn: AO-P,5Lti4:3,t,Field Ofiiae:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the
property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigatlions and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This
document also authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all anions
necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or oertlkstion and any and
all associated standard and special conditions.Thls nodf cation supersedes any previous
correspondence conoeming the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government offkmis W enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call
S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior tD visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Q Z l // `-! Z6 i,c.. _
Site Address:
City. County. Stets: e -t .r -C..
PROPERTY V1 N A;
- C-51.�� �I►�tozar.�lr•,-.Qs�'T ZL•4u` _� __.____ —.-_
OLD
IC r>iL 'a 01 C. a►? sots
_JQ[r4P1 anata Deveropment LLC
We hereby certify the above informabon submitted in this application Is true' and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS COPY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2014-01957 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -WAKE FOREST
Property Owner:
Address:
Telephone Number:
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Cama Kanata Development, LLC
Michael Jordan
933 Old Knight Rd.
Knightdale , NC, 27545
Size (acres) 113
Nearest Waterway Mud Branch
USGS HUC 03020201
Location description:
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Nearest Town Wake Forest
River Basin Wmer Neuse
Coordinates Latitude: 35.9874812257963
Longitude: -78.5714526951569
Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area
. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which maybe appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area delineated. Due to the
size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any
delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on October 28, 2015. Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this detennination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this detennination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal, Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of 'the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact ,Daanes )Lastinger at 919-554-4894 02 or
[e-mail].
i9.
C. Basis For Determination: Stream channels on site exhibit an established 0HWM. Wetlands on site meet the
three criteria as. described in the Corps 1987 wetland delineation manual and appropriate regional sut➢plemenL
D. Remarks* A site visit was conducted on -10/8/14 to verify extent of jurisdictional features on site°
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/defermination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or -anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals I nfformation (')Phis information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of -the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by December 28, 2015.
"It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the detennination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official;
Date: October 28,201t -Expiration Date: October 28, 2020

MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Reso rces i
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary
October 17, 2014
S&EC
Stephen Ball
8412 Falls of the Neuse Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject: Surface Water Determination
NBRRO# 14-359
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B.0233)
Start@
Stop@ Soil
Survey
0 Ephemeral/intermittent/Perennial Determination
El Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
P
Project Name:
Location/Directions:
Subject Stream:
12936 CamD Kanata Rd
Property is located at 12936 Camp Kanata Rd
M ud Branch
Determination Date: October 6, 2034
Staff: James Graham
Feature/Flag
Not
Subject
To Buffers
Subject
To Buffers
E/f/P*
Start@
Stop@ Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
A
X
P
throughout
X
X
B
x
vP
S06,S05
X
C
x
t
S02
X
D
X
P
X
E
X
E
X
F
X
P
X
X
Z**
X
P
*E/t/P - Ephemeral/Intefmittent/Perennial
* *Feature was not depicted on the Wake County Soil Survey or USGS maps; feature is therefore not subject to Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Rules;
Feature Z is a perennial channel and may be subject to 404/401 permitting.
None Carolina
tMAMY
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www-ncwaterQuality.org Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffinnabve Action Employer - 5011/6 Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper

12936 Camp Kanata Rd
Wake County
October 17, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
Thison-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact James Graham at [phone].
Rgspectfully,
i
J
Danny Smi , Supervisor
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO/SWP File Copy

A I ."A -10� 11 1 1
A d- -

sr�c
ARG
w VR!� r
-W4
tit..$ i
L.. -
4,1.4"=35
ek—
fa
a
lk
. 01 a
•1 f I rte- � ,�^- „mss+„� `+�"�,
ti
J

O
1.7
0
IMPACTED AREAS: _
BUFFER - PERMANENT:
ZONE 1 = 7,230 SF
ZONE 2 = 3,662 SF
WETLAND = 0 SF
STREAM o!,
PERENNIAL - PERMANENT = 0 LF (0.00 ACRES)
PERENNIAL - TEMPORARY = 0 LF (0.00 ACRES)
INTERMITTANT - PERMANENT = 148.6 LF(0.011 AC
INTERMITTANT - TEMPORARY = 0 LF(0.000 ACRES)
TOTAL = 10,892 SF OF BUFFER & 148.6 LF OF STREAM
w�
0
OWE
GRAPHIC SCALE Developer / Applicant:
Camp Kanata Development LLC
wPrepared by
«
1-h = 72e John W. Harris, P.E. Consulting Engineer
-----
INTERMITTENT
STREAM PER C
LEGEND
FZOOD 1RINDOd
AREA
L'"' IAM
FL'"'—'
PROPOSED BMP
LEVEL SPREADER
PERSNNfAL
^W �
"U car
CF'°�ua
x W 0z�
0
0°
ti U
biJ
_
----------- J'
SHEE IN6
IOVERALL SITE PLAN ................................. 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................. 2
IlNPACT EXHIBIT(] 1 X17) .......................... 3

tNTERMITTANT I / 1 ■ ,•.`�� r ' : l ,,,.III /
STREAMTOP OF
1 PERMANENT ,
' 1 IMPACT AREA 1 �'\ �� 1 , '��� ♦ BANK
Pipe 6
GRAPHIC SCALE
PLAN & PROFILE VIEW
50 0 25 50 100 200
IN FEET) W
�� . #/ + ., ri'' + , * ♦ / . 1 = S �3 _ 1 inch = 50 ft.
J J /�J' ' : ♦I '�• `\ ////'//••. ••�,,``` MAGNETIC
i \ \ 1 m CU
J jt / i ■ . 1 1 �� ` � \ /111111111111 ^ w � � s .i0c.
PA�TrJAREJ`
♦ RI ! ELEV:356.43 XIS ING 1 / / p U
10' LON-r, v INTI OUT=343.14 ` CEA TER
DISSIPATOR USEi "�� _ - l , 1 ` p� 13 �\ LIN GR DE j -
CLASS B STONE ,�, ■ --i/ V �; ��� v.�
OPEN
SPACE i ~! \�`. \\ ` \ `1 ELEV = 360.674—
\I PRORA E / / - / �` EXIS TI G 2 '
a 36 TUR - (9) /. 360
STR z o a
C I S RUC RE (27)W
IMPACTED AREAS: I IN RIM 353.9 // R M = 361.7 ° ¢ m
-
x GRADE BUFFER - PERMANENT: INV OUT 350.04 l / I INV OUr= 53.28
3 �GRADE 380 ZONE 1 = 7,230 SF r-PROPOSIED l /
ZONE 2 = 3,662 SF
STREAM D //
INTERMITTANT - PERMANENT = 148.6 LF (o.o> > ACRES)
1 TOTAL = 10,892 SF OF BUFFER & 148.6 LF OF STREAM STR CTUR 8
/ I iso - RIM_ -35( ) - --J---
IN� IN34 80 54' NG 4" R P
INV OUT 34 59 I I 1 I W/ F S® 0.29%
u' A x t 35 - _ • 350
345- • IN�iN10; W O
M94,• �• _ ••x••J N I INV TOUT 354. 012 4_4 v.
mpz :a
4;'ion /r �cr - - - - -- -- - - - ---
. ss . osau--P E 1
$ iHv ar`- saa I03
I 0
1 �g8gR��ooN�g�$n$W PIPE 11 PIPE _12 I III / j 8 LO 24" RCP C1
42' LONC_f8w_- - 101 •.ONG 4..- RSP- - t -- I - -- - ��, U
INV IN .28
W FES ® 0-55% w 0.53% I OUT = 3 3 1.90
INV IN - 350.5 1N 3.49. O - I _
INV OUT 350. 0 -- -
INV OUT 349. 5 -
GRAPHIC SCALEI s RUCTURE - (26 f-�
CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW 3 4 _
100 0 50 100 200 400 I I I 340.48
PE 1 I OUT = 43.14
34 4 NG 48" RC j 340
W/ ES G 0.55
( IN FEET) NV TN
343.3
= 343.1
1 inch = 100 ft. j
LEGEND
D
IMPACT AREA ZONE 2
OPEN SPACE
�
IMPACT AREA ZONE 1
•-•----------•-••-•
NEUSE RIPERIANBUFFER (ZONE 2)
w
PERMANENT STREAM
........ .......................
NEUSE RIPERIAN
IMPACTMENT
BUFFER (ZONE 1)
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
GRAPHIC SCALE
PLAN & PROFILE VIEW
50 0 25 50 100 200
IN FEET) W
�� . #/ + ., ri'' + , * ♦ / . 1 = S �3 _ 1 inch = 50 ft.
J J /�J' ' : ♦I '�• `\ ////'//••. ••�,,``` MAGNETIC
i \ \ 1 m CU
J jt / i ■ . 1 1 �� ` � \ /111111111111 ^ w � � s .i0c.
PA�TrJAREJ`
♦ RI ! ELEV:356.43 XIS ING 1 / / p U
10' LON-r, v INTI OUT=343.14 ` CEA TER
DISSIPATOR USEi "�� _ - l , 1 ` p� 13 �\ LIN GR DE j -
CLASS B STONE ,�, ■ --i/ V �; ��� v.�
OPEN
SPACE i ~! \�`. \\ ` \ `1 ELEV = 360.674—
\I PRORA E / / - / �` EXIS TI G 2 '
a 36 TUR - (9) /. 360
STR z o a
C I S RUC RE (27)W
IMPACTED AREAS: I IN RIM 353.9 // R M = 361.7 ° ¢ m
-
x GRADE BUFFER - PERMANENT: INV OUT 350.04 l / I INV OUr= 53.28
3 �GRADE 380 ZONE 1 = 7,230 SF r-PROPOSIED l /
ZONE 2 = 3,662 SF
STREAM D //
INTERMITTANT - PERMANENT = 148.6 LF (o.o> > ACRES)
1 TOTAL = 10,892 SF OF BUFFER & 148.6 LF OF STREAM STR CTUR 8
/ I iso - RIM_ -35( ) - --J---
IN� IN34 80 54' NG 4" R P
INV OUT 34 59 I I 1 I W/ F S® 0.29%
u' A x t 35 - _ • 350
345- • IN�iN10; W O
M94,• �• _ ••x••J N I INV TOUT 354. 012 4_4 v.
mpz :a
4;'ion /r �cr - - - - -- -- - - - ---
. ss . osau--P E 1
$ iHv ar`- saa I03
I 0
1 �g8gR��ooN�g�$n$W PIPE 11 PIPE _12 I III / j 8 LO 24" RCP C1
42' LONC_f8w_- - 101 •.ONG 4..- RSP- - t -- I - -- - ��, U
INV IN .28
W FES ® 0-55% w 0.53% I OUT = 3 3 1.90
INV IN - 350.5 1N 3.49. O - I _
INV OUT 350. 0 -- -
INV OUT 349. 5 -
GRAPHIC SCALEI s RUCTURE - (26 f-�
CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW 3 4 _
100 0 50 100 200 400 I I I 340.48
PE 1 I OUT = 43.14
34 4 NG 48" RC j 340
W/ ES G 0.55
( IN FEET) NV TN
343.3
= 343.1
1 inch = 100 ft. j
�
w
m E
U
a.
�U
Q�
x
3
U
=
.c
GRAPHIC SCALE
PLAN & PROFILE VIEW
50 0 25 50 100 200
IN FEET) W
�� . #/ + ., ri'' + , * ♦ / . 1 = S �3 _ 1 inch = 50 ft.
J J /�J' ' : ♦I '�• `\ ////'//••. ••�,,``` MAGNETIC
i \ \ 1 m CU
J jt / i ■ . 1 1 �� ` � \ /111111111111 ^ w � � s .i0c.
PA�TrJAREJ`
♦ RI ! ELEV:356.43 XIS ING 1 / / p U
10' LON-r, v INTI OUT=343.14 ` CEA TER
DISSIPATOR USEi "�� _ - l , 1 ` p� 13 �\ LIN GR DE j -
CLASS B STONE ,�, ■ --i/ V �; ��� v.�
OPEN
SPACE i ~! \�`. \\ ` \ `1 ELEV = 360.674—
\I PRORA E / / - / �` EXIS TI G 2 '
a 36 TUR - (9) /. 360
STR z o a
C I S RUC RE (27)W
IMPACTED AREAS: I IN RIM 353.9 // R M = 361.7 ° ¢ m
-
x GRADE BUFFER - PERMANENT: INV OUT 350.04 l / I INV OUr= 53.28
3 �GRADE 380 ZONE 1 = 7,230 SF r-PROPOSIED l /
ZONE 2 = 3,662 SF
STREAM D //
INTERMITTANT - PERMANENT = 148.6 LF (o.o> > ACRES)
1 TOTAL = 10,892 SF OF BUFFER & 148.6 LF OF STREAM STR CTUR 8
/ I iso - RIM_ -35( ) - --J---
IN� IN34 80 54' NG 4" R P
INV OUT 34 59 I I 1 I W/ F S® 0.29%
u' A x t 35 - _ • 350
345- • IN�iN10; W O
M94,• �• _ ••x••J N I INV TOUT 354. 012 4_4 v.
mpz :a
4;'ion /r �cr - - - - -- -- - - - ---
. ss . osau--P E 1
$ iHv ar`- saa I03
I 0
1 �g8gR��ooN�g�$n$W PIPE 11 PIPE _12 I III / j 8 LO 24" RCP C1
42' LONC_f8w_- - 101 •.ONG 4..- RSP- - t -- I - -- - ��, U
INV IN .28
W FES ® 0-55% w 0.53% I OUT = 3 3 1.90
INV IN - 350.5 1N 3.49. O - I _
INV OUT 350. 0 -- -
INV OUT 349. 5 -
GRAPHIC SCALEI s RUCTURE - (26 f-�
CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW 3 4 _
100 0 50 100 200 400 I I I 340.48
PE 1 I OUT = 43.14
34 4 NG 48" RC j 340
W/ ES G 0.55
( IN FEET) NV TN
343.3
= 343.1
1 inch = 100 ft. j