20160348 Ver 1_Application_20160408

Carpenter,Kristi
From:
Sent:
To:
Murray, Christopher A
Friday, April 08, 2016 5:06 PM
Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW; Ridings, Rob
Cc: Carpenter,Kristi
Subject: NCDOT Division 5 permit application for replacement of Bridge No. 310093 over in
Third Fork Creek on SR 1945 (South Alston Avenue) in Durham County; WBS Number:
17BP.5.R.46
Attachments:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Eric and Rob,
Bridge 310093 signed and scanned PCN form.pdf; Brige 310093 Mitigation
Acceptance Letter.pdf; Bridge 310093 FINAL combined permit drawings.pdf
Follow up
Completed
NCDOT Division 5 proposes to replace Bridge No. 310093 over Third Fork Creek on SR 1945 (South Alston Avenue) in
Durham County. Note that this is part of the State Funded Design Build Year II Set A program. The existing bridge is
being replaced with an aluminum box culvert. The following information is attached as part of this permit application:
-Signed and scanned copy of PCN form
-In-lieu fee mitigation acceptance letter
-Combined Stream/Wetland and Riparian Buffer Permit Drawing Package
Please contact me if you need additional information.
Thanks,
Chris Murray
Christopher A. Murray, PWS
Division Environmental Supervisor
Division 5
[phone] office
[e-mail]
NCDOT-Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Courier: 17-27-03
Durham, NC 27704
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

�F W ATF9 —
o� pG Office Use Only:
�� � r Corps action ID no.
-�i
� � � � � _;' � � DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? OX Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank X� Yes � No
or in-lieu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h � Yes �X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 310093 on SR 1945 (S. Alston Ave.) over Third Fork Creek
2b. County: Durham County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Durham
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: WBS Number: 17BP.5.R.46
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Mr. J.R. Hopkins, P.E.
applicable):
3d. Street address: 2612 N. Duke Street
3e. Ciry, state, zip: Durham, NC 27704
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: Email questions or comments to: Chris Murray at: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Streetaddress:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.969944 Longitude: -�$•893595
1 c. Property size: 1.1 acres
2. SurFace Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Third Fork Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Cape Fear-Jordan Watershed
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Land use in the vicinity is generally mixed comprised of urban buildings with very little natural habitat. The project is an existing two lane road with
shoulder sections.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.03
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 198
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace two-lane bridge and roadway a aluminum box culvert. The bridge is structurally deficient.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Equipment includes crane, backhoe, dump truck, bobcat, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro�ect includin all rior hases in the ast? Comments: Site visit on 7/17/12 w/ COE personnel.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT
Name (if known): Deanna Riffey Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
On-site JD on 7/17/12 with USACE and NCDENR-DWR. Wetlands subsequently added/delineated by NCDOT personnel around 8/15/12 with info
sent to USACE .
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for �Yes �X No
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. . 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
W1 P Excavation Disturbed headwaterforest Yes Corps 0.01
1/�/2 P Mechanized Clearing Disturbed headwater forest Yes Corps 0.02
�/3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
�/4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
Wg - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.3
2h. Comments:
All impacts are restricted to Site 2.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 P Culvert Third Fork Creek PER Corps 30 72
S2 P Stabilization Third Fork Creek PER Corps 30 102
S3 T Dewatering Third Fork Creek PER Corps 30 24
S4 - Choose one - -
S5 - Choose one _ -
S6 - Choose one - -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts �98
3i. Comments:
All impacts are restricted to Site 1. Note that the culvert length is 72 linear feet of permanent impact. Rip rap bank stabilization is 102 linear feet of
permanent impact. Temporary dewatering is 24 linear feet.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all open water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Tem ora T
01 - Choose one Choose
Q2 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: ese pon impac s are is e as ermi i e.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑X Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name BufFer Zone 1 Zone 2
number — mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square (square
Tem ora T feet feet
B� P Roadway Third Fork Creek No 7,778 4,700
g2 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
64 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
66 - Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts: �,��8 4,�00
6i. Comments: Project is in Cape Fear River Basin-Jordan Watershed.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The bridge is being replaced with a single barrel Aluminum Box Culvert (ABC). The single barrel is slightly wider than the existing bridge (and channel
width). Rip rap in-stream benches will be installed above and below the culvert to maintain channel width. The culvert will be buried to maintain
stream bedform and there will be no excavation in non-permitted jurisdictional areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters and for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be implemented during the construction
phase. The site will be dewatered and pumped into an appropriate stilling basin or special stilling basin(s) for installation of the Aluminum Box Culvert.
Only the minimum amounts of filll in stream or wetland will occur during construction.
2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑X Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Com lete if Makin a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Pro ram
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 72 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.03 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes X No
buffer mitigation? � �
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and DifFuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified 0 Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑X Yes � No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 20 o�a
2b. Does this ro'ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? 0 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See stormwater management plan attached as part of permit drawing package.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? NCDENR-DWR
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local overnmenYs 'urisdiction is this ro'ect?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
� Water Supply Watershed
Q Other: NCDOT delegated
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
�Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply �ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes � No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes � No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the 0 Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State OX Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) . ❑ Yes X❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ SurFace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in �Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act 0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS has concurred with a Biological Conclusion of May Affect; Not Likely to Adversely Affect for the Northern long-eared bat. The bald eagle,
smooth confeflower and Michaux's sumac have a biological conclusion of No Effect.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this projeet occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFWS Databaase
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The Historic Preservation Office's GIS website and Durham County's GIS Tax Data website were used to determine likelihood for historic resources.
Durham County Soil Maps, and maps and files archived at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology were reviewed for archaeological resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? X� Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
NCDOT Hydraulics coordination with FEMA.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Maps/NC Floodplain Mapping Program
Christopher Murray �.� � ` 02-05-2016
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent' Sign ure Date
(Agent's signature is valid onl ' uthorization
letter from the a licant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

Environ�ental
Quality
PAT MCCRORY
ca��ra��,
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
�::�rr'r ,';�r±,-
Mr. Chris Murray
NCDOT Division 5 Environmental Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, North Carolina 27704
Dear Mr. Murray:
April 6, 2016
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 5 Project, Replace Bridge 310093 over Third Fork Creek on SR 1945 (South Alston
Avenue), Durham County; WBS No. 17BP.S.R.46
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ DMS)
will provide the stream and riparian wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied
by you on Apri14, 2016, the impacts are located in CU 0303Q002 of the Cape Fear River basin in the Central
Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Stream and
Wetlands
Impacts
River I CU I Eco-
Basin Location Region
Cape I 03030002 I CP
Fear
Stream
Cold Cool Warm
0 0 72.0
Wetlands
Riparian Non-
Riparian
0.03
Coastal
Marsh
*Some of the stream impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for
details.
This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2016 impact data.
NCDEQ DMS will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream and riparian wetland mitigation credits to
offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline
listed in Section F.3.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts
are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will
be required from NCDEQ DMS.
8420.
Cc:
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-
Sincerely,
���
James tanfill
Credit Management Supervisor
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE — Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, NC Division of Water Resources
File: SR 1945 — Bridge 310093 — Division 5
� ,,... .
� � ;ti��,��ra��� �c���������s�.,x.-
State of N�rxlr Czrolina � Em�ironmental QualiCy
1601 f�AailServiceCenter Raleigh,NorthCarolina2;699-1601
919-707-AE00

k 11�;11��'<14' North Carolina Department of Transportation ��
SL[�rtl]�YdtPf Highway Stormwater Program
���`
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ��--•
(Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.S.R.46 TIP No.: SF310093 County(ies): Durham Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 17BP.5.R.46 TIP Number: SF310093 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 2/19/2016
NCDOT Contact: Galen Cail Contractor I Designer: Wetherill Engineerin , INC/A Gamber
Address: NC Department of Transportation Address: Wetherill Engineering, INC
1590 Mail Service Center 559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 164
Ralei h, NC 27699-1590 Ralei h, NC 27606
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: cail ncdot. ov Email: a amber wetherillen .com
Cit ITown: Durham Count ies): Durham
River Basin s: Ca e Fear CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.05 miles Surroundin Land Use: Residential
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Buiit-Upon Area ac. 0.3 ac. 0.2 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: 11' roadway width and 4' bike lane with curb and gutter 11' roadway width and 4' bike lane with curb and gutter
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: N/A Year: Existin : 4800 Year: 2003
General Project Narrative: Note DWQ and USGS call the stream Third Fork Creek and NCDOT and FEMA call the stream Rocky Creek. There is no discharge directly into buffers. The discharge south
(Description of Minimization of Water of the bridge is conveyed through a pipelocated at an existing outfall and now in the proposed transportation facility. The discharge to the north is outside the buffer. The
Quality Impacts) northwest discharge outlets to an exisiting ditch that feeds a wetland. The discharge to the north east has several outlet points to disperse the flow as much as possible.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Third Fork Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-41-1-12-(1)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply V(WS-V)
Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments: zinc (Zn) dissolved oxygen (DO) copper (Cu)
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? N/A (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

�
N
O
N
V
.,
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9-B For Conventlonal Symbols
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF DURHAM
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
GRAPHIC SCALES
30 15 0 30 60
PLANS
30 15 0 30 60
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
DESIGN DATA
ADT = 4300
ADT FY = WA
DHV = WA
D = WA
T = 7%
(TfST WA + DUAL WA)
V = 35 MPH
CLASS = URBAN
COLLECTOR
SUBREGIONAL TIER
��� 1 1La �U✓� ������ �571��1Le�A� �
�������� �� ��������
D URHAM CO U1�T Y
LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110. 93 OVER THIRD FORK CREEK
O1V SR 1945 (SOUTH ALSTOIV AVEIVUE)
PERMIT DRAWING °T�re BTATB VR018CT REPEqBNC6 NQ
SHEET 7 OF 4 �o�o DB5 — 310093 �
BTATB PROl.N0. P.A.PROl.NQ OPdCRIV110N
176P.5.R.46 N.A. PE
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
H
q
NSR� � �
op) \
BEGIN PROJECT DB5 - 310093
8" CLASS 50 flESTRIANEO JOINT DIP
60 LF 20" STEEL ENCASEMENT
�
-L- STA. 10 + 50.00 y��'p �s
� /J
� �
---L—�--
TO SR 1171 — ��
(RIDDLE RD.) _ __
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT D65-310093 = 0.042 mi.
LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT DB5-310093 = 0.007 mi
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT DBS-310093 = 0.049 mi.
� � \
O��\ R
SITE 1 ����,�
---- �
/
BEGIN CULVERT
-L- STA. 11 + 61.45
SITE 2
-L-
SR 1945
S. ALSTON AVE.
Repared J'ar Fred Smieh Company in rFe O�ce oJ.�
� -f � 1223 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
�..NETHERILL Raleigh, N C. 2�606
ENGINEERING Liscense No. F-0377
BuS: 919 851 8077
Fax: [phone]�07
2012 ST9NDARD SPEClFICAT/ONS
EDWARD G. WETHERILL, PE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: PRo�scr sxcrvESR
LETTING DATE:
PROfECT DES/GN ENGlNEER
K. ZAK HAMIDI, PE
NCDOT TPMU
NCD07 CONTACT
EXPRESS DESIGN BUILD: DIVISION SA — YEAR 2
END PROJECT DB5 - 310093
-L- STA. 13 + 10.00
�I �—__�—/�
! l� ----
---------- .r.�--
-L- ----- T
END CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 13 + 64J0
END CULVERT
-L- STA. 11 + 96.55
HI'DRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
P.E.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDEREU FINAL
UNLE55 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

�
�1�.1'� �O
��q�NSTR[�fTION

-
-
� �Pi.�ii
SHEET NO.
�
� �� ���7 �
Ci3FJSTRUCTIQN
-
-

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (tt) (ft) (ft)
1 11+35 to 12+15 34'11"x10'4" ABC 0.07 < 0.01 174 24
2 12+05 to 12+35 LT SANITARY SEWER < 0.01 0.02
TOTALS*: < 0.01 0.02 0.07 < 0.01 174 24 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
-Culvert length is 721inear feet of permanent stream impact (mitigation proposed).
-Rip rap bank stabilization is 102 linear feet of permanent stream impact (no mitigation
proposed).
-Temporary dewatering is 24 linear feet of temporary stream impact (no mitigation proposed).
vised 2013 10 24
See note below:

S�e Sheet 9-B Fnr Convcntionol Symbols
�
N
O
� THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE
� N MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF DURHAM
— � V CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
� , TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III
°� �W
GRAPHIC SCALES
�� V
� 30 15 0 30 60
_
/
� PLANS
O
� � 30 75 0 30 60
i
Q
°' PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
0
X
� a'i 6 3 0 6 12
o� V
N�-�
��,N
��� PROFILE (VERTICAL)
�, �n_
DESIGN DATA
ADT = 4300
ADT FY = WA
DHV = WA
D = WA
T = 7°/a
(TfST WA + DUAL WA)
V = 35 MPH
CLASS = URBAN
COLLECTOR
SUBREGIONAL TIER
����� �� ����� ���������
���yl��� �� , � II� �����JI `��������
D URHAM CO U1�lTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 93 OVER THIRD FORK CREEK
0111 SR 1945 (SOUTH ALSTON AVENUE)
STATE STw'P6 PROl6 T RCPERENCE NO. SHF,�ET 5o'1'AL
BUFFER DRAWING _ HePTS
SHEET 1 OF 4 �o�o pg5 — 310093 �
17BP.S.R.46 P NAANo I re PE o�
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURE
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
HS�\
RS 83�
20�� \
BEGIN PROJECT DB5 - 310093
-L- STA. 10 + 50.00
o � -� i �
�6'� �� i i��
I � �'
��
�I_ � --
E TO SR 1171 — �_—�
(RIDDLE RD.) _
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT DBS-310093 = 0.042 mi.
LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT DB5-310093 = 0.007 mi
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT D65-310093 = 0.049 mi.
r_
- -- /
i
BEGIN CULVERT
-L- STA. 11 + 61.45
-L-
SR 1945
S. ALSTON AVE.
/ Prepared for Fred Smiek Company in ehe Office of.�
1223 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
�� ETHERILL Raleigh, N.C. 27606
ENGINEERING Liscense No. F-0377
Bus: 919 851 80��
Fax: [phone]
ZOl2 ST9NDARD SPECIFICATIONS
EDWARD G. WETHERILL, PE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: PRo�Ecr sNc,NeEn
_ APRIL 15 2013 _ JONATHAN HEFNER, PE
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
LETTIIVG DATE: K. ZAK HAMIDI, PE
_ APRIL 15 2013 _ NCDOT TPMU
NCDO7 CONTACT
EXPRESS DESIGN BUILD: DIVISI0IV SA — YEAR 2
END��ROJECT D65 - 310093
-L- STA. 13 + 10.00
�� �--_— �
� � — —.
--- �,r-----
—� — ----- T
END CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 13 + 64.70
END CULVERT
-L- STA. 11 + 96.55
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
iNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
P.E.
�
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SWNATURES COMPLETED

�
51�11°1"I� C�l.M�AldY
CpM STRUGTlOIV

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2)
1 34'11"x10'4" ABC 11+00 to 12+65 X 7778 4700 12478
TOTAL: 77�s 4�00 12478 0 0 0
Note : Lake Jordan Watershed

Rev.Jan 2009