20160196 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160328

PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC
March 28, 2016
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. David Bailey
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Attn: Ms. Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office - 401 Wetlands Unit
450 West Hanes Mill Road
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27105
Reference: Response to USACE Request for Additional Information
Nationwide 404/401 Permit — SAW -2016-0049, DWR #16-0196
Proposed Qorvo Facility
Thorndike Road
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
PEI Project 1653.2
Dear Mr. Bailey and Ms. Homewood:
Mr. Robin Team of Carolina Investment Properties, Inc. received an electronic mail dated March
17, 2016 from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requesting additional information to
process the Nationwide Permit application for the proposed Qorvo facility, located north of
Thorndike Road in Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina. The electronic mail indicates
that the USACE received the Nationwide Permit verification request on February 29, 2016. The
purpose of this letter is to provide the USACE the requested information.
USACE Comment 1): "Plan Sheet C3 shows small areas of wetlands remaining downslope of the
proposed sidewalk. Typically, very small areas of wetlands remaining along the fringes of
proposed impacts will be considered losses of waters of the US based on indirect impacts from
the proposed project. In this case, the hydrology source for these wetlands is currently an
approximately 3 acre drainage area, rather than pond inundation; however, the proposed
project would reduce the drainage area to less than 0.25 acre. As such, the wetland remnants
are unlikely to receive sufficient hydrological input to retain wetland status. Given the above,
please include the remnant wetland areas as part of the total wetland impacts for this project.
If you have additional information to justify that these wetland remnants will retain wetland
status following the project, please provide this information for our consideration."
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com

Response to Requestfor USACE Additional Information
Proposed Qorvo Facility
March 28, 2016
Applicant Response: In response to reduction of the drainage area and functionality of the
remaining wetland area, the applicant requests that the USACE consider the remaining wetland
area not impacted as fill as take. Therefore, the wetland impacts associated with the proposed
crossing will cumulatively total 0.096 acres. Updated copies of the Pre -Construction
Notification Application and Plan Sheet C3 are included as attachments.
USACE Comment 2): "If addressing item 1) increases wetland impacts above 0.1 acre, please
provide a compensatory mitigation plan per Nationwide Permit Condition 23(c)."
Applicant Response: The applicant is not offering mitigation for the project due to the
cumulative wetland impact amount being less than one tenth of an acre and/or cumulative
stream impact being less than 150 linear feet.
USACE Comment 3): "Plan Sheet C4.2 appears to show rip rap placed on top of the stream bed,
inconsistent with Plan Sheet C2.2 which shows the rip rap dissipater placed such that the top of
the rip rap is flush with the existing stream bed elevation. Please correct this inconsistency."
Applicant Response: The rip rap dissipater will be keyed into the existing elevation of the
stream bed. An updated copy of Plan Sheet C4.2 is included as an attachment.
Based on the above information, it is our opinion that the applicant has fulfilled and provided
the above requested information for the USACE to proceed with Nationwide Permit Verification
for the above referenced project. If there are questions regarding this request, or a need for
further information, please contact us at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
�f
Bradley S. Luckey
Project Manager
Michael T. Brame
Principal
Attachments: Revised PCN Application, Dated March 28, 2016
Impact Drawings Plan Sheets C3 and C4.2

4,34F W ATR¢G
7 r
aNii� -'Z
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
N Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Qorvo
2b.
County:
Guilford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Greensboro
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
RF Micro Devices, Inc.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
004599\00523
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
7625 Thorndike Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27409
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Developer
4b.
Name:
Mr. Robin Team.
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Investment Properties, Inc.
4d.
Street address:
PO Box 1066
4e. City, state, zip:
Lexington, NC 27293
4f.
Telephone no.:
336.243.2600
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 128
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e.
Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
78144892432 and 7814488726
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.07762 Longitude: - 79.96453
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
20.65 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
East Fork Deep River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land and landscaped areas. The site is located in an industrial/commercial area
of Greensboro, NC.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.15 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
streams=1,400', open waters (pond) =0.75 acres
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide industrial, vehicular and pedestrian access from the site and existing
facility, located on adjacent property south of the site. The occupant of the adjacent property south of the site will also be
the occupant of the proposed facility.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of development of the site with an office building, parking areas and landscaped areas. The
office building will also be utilized to ship and receive parts and pieces from the proposed facility to the existing facility
located on adjacent property south of the site. Therefore, seperation of industiral and vehicular traffic and the need for
two separate access points to the proposed facility for safety concerns is critical to the proposed project. Additionally,
pedestrian and employee vehicular traffic between the existing and proposed facilities will be required as cafeteria and
break areas in the existing facility will be utilized by employees of the proposed facility. In order to provide safe industiral,
vehicular and pedestrian access and interconnection between the proposed and existing faciltiies, an access road/stream
crossing and greenway (walkway)/wetland crossing are necessary. To faciltate development of the site and construction
of the proposed stream crossing, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other
heavy equipment will be used during site construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: USACE site visit on -9 ac of site on 9.28.15
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Michael Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD not received.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
PFO
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.096
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.096
2h. Comments: It is necessary to fill 0.096 acres of wetlands for construction of a pedestrian greenway. Temporary wetland
impacts are not being proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Culvert/Rip
Rap/Pump Around
Unnamed
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
3
122/25/40
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
122/25/40
3i. Comments: The proposed stream crossing will permanently impact 147 linear feet of intermittent stream channel (122'
culvert and 25' rip rap) and temporarily impact 40 linear feet of stream channel with the associated pump around. Areas of
temporary impact will be restored to similar pre -construction conditions.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: Construction of ponds/lakes are not proposed. Stormwater bio -retention cells have been designed to treat
stormwater to at least 85% TSS.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ® Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ® P ®T
Stream
aUnnamed
Crossing
ElYes
® No
8,900/980
5,000
B2 ❑P❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
8,900/980
5,000
6i. Comments: A No Practical Alternatives Letter has been submitted to the City of Greensboro for proposed buffer impacts
simultaneously with this application.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the development of the site and requried occupant interconnectivity between an existing and the proposed facility, a
road/stream crossing and a pedestrian greenway/wetland crossing are necessary for safe industrial, vehicular and pesedtrian
traffic. The road crossing has been designed in a location as far up -gradient as possible to the discharge of a pond, without
impacting the pond buffer. Additionally, the road has been designed in an area of the stream that is relatively straight and to
cross the stream as close to perpendicular as possible given topographic constraints. An approximate 10 foot headwall has
been designed at the road crossing location in an additional effort to minimize impacts to the stream and assoicated riparian
buffer. The road crossing location is impacting an intermittent stream that has seasonal flow from an up -gradient pond. The
stream is lower quality and has minimal aquatic habitat.
The proposed greenway was evaluated as an elevated boardwalk to minimize impacts to wetlands located on the site.
However, the occupant/user of the proposed project has safety concerns with an elevated boardwalk due to topographic
gradients within the area. Based on preliminary design information, the board walk would need to be elevated to heights up to
six feet or greater from the ground surface on an approximate 5% slope. Additionally, the construction costs of the elevated
boardwalk compared to a standard concrete walkway as proposed has signficantly higher up front costs (2 to 3 times more)
and long term maintenance costs. Therefore, the occupant determined that an elevated boardwalk was not a viable option for
the proposed project.
There are approximately 0.15 acres of wetlands, 1,400 linear feet of stream channel and a 0.75 acre jurisdictional pond
located on the site. The pond and remaining approximate 1,250 linear feet of stream channel and 0.05 acres of wetlands are
being avioded.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and temporary erosion control devices will be used to prevent sediment from entering down -
gradient water bodies. A temporary coffer dam will be installed up -gradient of the proposed culvert. During construction, water
will be pumped around the construction footprint. Appropriate stream bank protection will be provided in the channel during
construction and all excess excavated material will be immediately removed from the stream bank crossing area. Upon
completion of the culvert installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dams will be removed and flow will be diverted through
the culvert. Following construction, disturbed banks will be restored to similair pre -construction conditions, matted and
seeded/live staked.
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
40%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Two bio -retention cells are proposed to treat stormwater at the site. The bio -retention cells will treat new imprevious
surfaces to at least 85% TSS.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Greensboro
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
S.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
® No
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance
with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be discharged to the existing municipal system. Impacts associated with wastewater are not proposed..
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
PEI consulted the NC Natural Heritage Program to determine if federally listed threatened or endangerd species have
been documented on the USGS quadrangle that contains the site. The site quadrangle is the Guilford Quadrangle. The
bald eagle was identified on the quadrangle that contains the site as a federally protected species by the BGPA. Large
water bodies capable of supporting the bald eagle will not be impacted by the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed
project is not likely to disturb the bald eagle.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering
down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
PEI reviewed the NC SHPO Historic Properties GIS website. Historic/cultural resources were not identified in the project
area. A copy is included as an attachement.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM 3710781400J (attached)
Digitally signed by Bradley S. Luckey
DN: cn=Bradley S. Luckey, o=Pilot
Bradley S. Luckey
r� Environmental, Inc., ou,
email=[e-mail], c=US
3.28.16
Date: 2016.03.28 14:06:14 -04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

/
,
,
/
,
,
,
,
/
,
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
A4
40 0 40 80 120
www -
SCALE: I"=40' (H)
1 11= 4' (\,,/)
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
EX. POND
`-30' ZONE I BUFFER
20' ZONE 2 BUFFER
- REV *I 5A'lAb
INCLUDED ALL OF THE
EX. VETLAND AREA

a
N
�
_-E
U
'
0000;
//,/ < g
o 0
0000
° L
ted,
4'°°°O
�o
Lo �o�
E
= Qg y
=UON
r- Z°lopo - _ �7
04 ,BW=
a
8� (n
i.Cov.
Y °o 0
c,°
0
o
0
,I
Y ,0%0
0000000°°
�a�/,
0�\ ,Z\\
0
10o
g
■
/11111 J
m�
Y
E
C
(0
GRASS SEED
J
WETLAND MIX
HERBAGEOUS PLUG, PLANTED
W, O.G.
z
x
3
TOP OF SLOPE VARIES,
a
I F-
SEE PLAN
o
MAX`
JUTE MATTING OVER 1/2"
w Q
z
STRAW MULCH, 5EGURE WITH
x ¢
HOOD 5TAKE5 24" O.G. ALONG
H
}
SLOPE AND 12" O.G. ALONG
z 3
G
EDGES AND OVERLAPS. BURY
z Q
8" INTO SLOPE.
6" TOPSOIL
�
a
o
EXISTING 5UBGRADE
TUCK JUTE MATTING UNDER
GOIR FABRIG AND SEGURE
WITH HOOD STAKE 12" O.G.
STA51 L I ZAT I ON FOR
�
CSMA DFD CHANNEL
5ANKS
~
lu
NOT TO SGALE
lu
-
lu
0
--
o=
- REV #1 Ml/I6
DATES 2/b/16
LOP4 RED THE
RIP RAP
FILEe
DRAM BY:
KEB
REVISM
NO:
JOB
SHEET:
C4.2