20160345 Ver 1_Application_20160408

Carpenter,Kristi
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Dagnino, Carla S
Thursday, April 07, 2016 3:35 PM
Loretta Beckwith ([e-mail]); Chapman, Amy
Ayscue, Phillip W; Harmon, Beth; Andrew Henderson; Janet Duffey; RaSharon King
([e-mail]); AI-Ghandour, Majed N; Barnett, Kevin; Davis, Mark S; Green,
Edward A; Koch, Thomas K; Carpenter,Kristi; Chambers, Marla J; Mellor, Colin; Moore,
Brenda L; Staley, Mark K; Wilkins, Ronald B; Morgan, Stephen R; Hemphill, Jeffrey L;
Qubain, Joseph
Permit Application for B-5410, Jackson County
Follow up
Completed
The Permit Application for B-5410 has been posted to the NCDOT website. The electronic copy can be viewed
/downloaded at
https://connect.ncdot.qov/resources/Environmental/
This email serves as NCDOT's permit application submittal to the NC Division of Water Resources and the US
Army Corp of Engineers.
Thank you.
Carla Dagnino
Western Region Environmental Program Supervisor II
Natural Environment Section
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
NC Department of Transportation
919 707 6110 office
cdaqnino(a�ncdot.qov
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598
1020 Birch Ridge Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610
, ��
#, �.�
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Transporta tion
April 7, 2016
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton. Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTN: Ms. Lori Beckwith
NCDOT Coordinator
PAT McCRORY
Covernor
NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON
Secretary
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nation�vidc Permits 23 and 33, for the
Pt�oposed Replaceinent of Bridge 221 on SR 1367 over Little Savannah
Creek in Jackson County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1367(3); TIP B-
5�10, Division 14
Dear Vladam:
The North C��olina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge nLunber
221 on SR 1367 over Little Savannah Creek in Jackson Colult�� with a sinble span, 57.5 feet core
slab bridge on a ne�v alibnment 65 feet do�ti�nstream. The cYisting bridge ���ill be utilized as an
onsite detour duz•ing construction. There will be 25 lf of pei�manent impacts to surface waters
fi�om roadway f111. There will be <0.01 acre of tempoi•ary impacts to siu�face waters resulting
fiom this action. Mitigation will be acquired fi�orn the North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services (NCDMS) for the stream impacts for this project.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), NCDMS acceptance
letter, USFWS Conctiu�i•ence Letter, Stormwater Management Plan, Permit Drawings, and
Roadway Plansheets. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed in June 201� and distributed
shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request.
This project is located in a trout county; therefore comments frorn the NCWRC will be required
prior to alrthorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT
hereby requests NCWRC Review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the
Corps of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application.
A letter from USFWS dated February 23, 2016, granted concurrence for the Appalachian elktoe
with a call of May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect.
�Nothing Compares�_
State of North Carolina I llepaitment of Transportation I PDEA-Natural Environment Section
1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 I 1593 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F

This project calls for a letting date of June 23, 2016 and a review date of May 3, 2016; however,
the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available.
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website
at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please call Jeff Hemphill at [phone].
Sincerely,
I� �
Philip S. rris III, P.E., C.P.M.
Natural Environment Section Head
cc:
NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List

�aF wArE9Q Office Use Only:
� � o c Corps action ID no.
��. , � � Y DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23,33 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
� Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 221 over Little Savannah Creek on SR 1367 (Little Savannah
Road)
2b. County: Jackson
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Webster
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5410
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.33244 Longitude: - 83.23293
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 2.4 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Little Savannah Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Little Tennessee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Forest communities, agriculture, minor residential development
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.1 acre — this wetland is located just next to the project footprint — no impacts
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,068 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a three span 51-foot reinforced concrete and timber beam bridge with a single span, 57.5
foot precast concrete core slab bridge on a new alignment to the north with the existing bridge utilized as an onsite
detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other: NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
7/27/2011 w/ Lori Beckwith — she said she would issue a verification at permitting
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 1� P❑ T Roadway fill UT to Blake � PER � Corps 1 25
Branch ❑ INT � DWQ
Site 1❑ P� T Dewatering Blake Branch � PER ❑ Corps 2 28
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 3❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 25 Perm
28 Temp
3i. Comments:

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent
X Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Stormwater Management Plan. The new bridge will span the creek with the existing bents removed. No deck drains
will be required on the proposed bridge. The existing bridge will be utilized as an onsite detour.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices for Surface Waters will be used during all phases of construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ DWQ � Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 25 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool �cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
Zone 2
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes � No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
N.C. Natural Heritage Program database; USFWS-website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Jackson
County. Habitat for swamp pink exists in a wetland adjacent to the project footprint but a survey conducted in the study
area in 2014 resulted in no specimens being found. A Section 7 Survey Memo for the northern long-eared bat and
Indiana bat with calls of May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect No Habitat/No Effect, respectively. The survey Memo
declared that NCDOT was in Section 7 compliance for the NLEB with this information included with a Concurrence
request sent February 18, 2016 to USFWS. A letter from USFWS dated February 23, 2016, granted concurrence for
Appalachian elktoe with a call of May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect. Email correspondance with Andrew
Henderson of USFWS on April 1, 2016, confirmed that no concurrence was required for NLEB and Indiana bat for this
project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Phillip S. Harris � ` � •
ApplicantlAgent's Printed Name , � `� ���, I�� �°
App cant/Agents Signature ate
(AgenYs signature is vali only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
11

Environmental
Qualaty
PAT MCCRORY
������.��-
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
<rJ�. :��,°y
Apri16, 2016
Mr. Philip S. Harris, III, P.E., PLS
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
B-5410, Replace Bridge 221 on SR 1367 over Little Savannah Creek, Jackson County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the
compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on April 1, 2016,
the impacts are located in CU 06010203 of the Little Tennessee River basin in the Southern Mountains (SM) Eco-
Region, and are as follows:
Little Tennessee Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
06010203 Non- Coastal
SM Cold Cool Warm Riparian �p�an Marsh Zone 1 Zone 2
Impacts 25.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(feet/acres)
�viiic vi �uc �ucaut uu�u��� uiay uG piVpU�CCI W �G II11i1g8ie4 1L 1 1:1 1T11Llg8ilOri i8i10. Je8 pe2'1Tlli dppllCatlOri fOT
details.
This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2016 impact data.
DMS will commit to implement suffcient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated
with this project as deternuned by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section F.3.c.iii of the
In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated Ju1y 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this
mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from
DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
J e B. Stanfill
Cre it Management Supervisor
cc: Ms. Lori Beckwith, USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR
File: B-5410
-'..=���°�c�t�iing �ompar�es°�-t.,
5tate of North Car�lina ! Environmental Quality
1GO1Mail5erviceCenier; Raleigh,NorthCarnlina27G99-1G01
919-7U7-8E00

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
February 23, 2016
Ms. Carla Dagnino
NC Department of Transportation
Natural Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Ms. Dagnino:
Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for Proposed Replacement of Bridge Number 221 on
State Road 1367 (Little Savannah Road) over Little Savannah Creek, Jackson County,
North Carolina, TIP No. B-5410
On February 19, 2015, we received your letter (via email) requesting section 7 concurrence on
effects the subject bridge replacement may have on the federally endangered Appalachian elktoe
(Alasmidonta raveneliana). The following comments are provided in accordance with section 7
of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
We have reviewed the information provided in your concurrence request letter and the North
Carolina Department of Transportation's freshwater mussel survey report, dated October 29,
2013, as well as the Section 7 survey memo for the Northern long-eared bat and Indiana bat,
dated February 18, 2016. We concur with your biological conclusion that the proposed
construction may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Appalachian elktoe.
Therefore, we believe the requirements under section 7(c) of the Act are fulfilled for the
Appalachian elktoe. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered i£
(1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or
critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in
a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is
determined that may be affected by the identified action.
If we can be of assistance or if you have any questions about these comments, please contact
Mr. Andrew Henderson of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 227. In any future correspondence
concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-13-089.
Sincerely,

�� i � �
s�� ��
/ a
" i •" "9

E������ti �ati, North Carolina Department of Transportation
St[)a 1]1�vdtP!' Highway Stormwater Program ��
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 46125.1.1 TIP No.: B-5410 County ies): Jackson Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 46125.1.1 TIP Number: B-5410 Project T pe: Brid e Replacement Date: 8/21/2015
NCDOT Contact: Stephen Mor an Contractor / Designer:
Address: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit Address:
1590 Mail Service Center
Ralei h, NC 27699
Phone: [phone] Phone:
Email: smor an ncdot. ov Email:
Cit /Town: Count ies : Jackson
River Basin(s): Little Tennessee CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? No
Pro'ect Description
Project Len th lin. miles or feet : 660 ft. Surrounding Land Use: Rural
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.5 ac. 0.3 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Two lane section- 11' lanes with 4' paved shoulders. Two lane- 9' lanes.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hrlday): Design/Future: 1645 Year: 2036 Existing: 1,168 Year: 2016
General Project Narrative: Replace Bridge number 221 on SR 1367 (Little Savannah Road) over 65 FT Little Savannah Creek. The new bridge will be located downstream on new alignment. A 60" metal
(Description of Minimization of Water pipe will be replaced with a concrete pipe at the project begin station. The new bridge will be a single span structure with no direct discharge to Little Savannah Creek. Roadway
Quality Impacts) stormwater is dispersed through natural steeam buffer before entering the creek. High ground areas subject to erosive forces will be armored with the minimum amount of rip rap
required for stabilization. Impacts to surface waters will be temporary for construction only. The existing roadway will be removed and regraded. erosion and sedimentation will be
controlled through the appropriate measuers during construction. Any disturbed areas will be properly vegetated post-construction.
Waterbod Information
Surface Water Body (1): NCDWR Stream Index No.: 2-79-36-14
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primar Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
ThreatenedlEndan ered S ecies? Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect:
Pro'ect Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Bod ? (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

�
�
• �
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9-A For Zndex of Sheets
I
VICIIVITY MAP
�°�[l°�� I � �IF ��� IIF��� ��I��II��1��
�������� �� ��������
JACI�S01� COU11tTY
P E RMIT D RAW I N G �°� rE pRo, No B-5410
� �"� � �� � � � � 46125.1.1 BRZ-1367(3)
46125.2.1 I BRZ-1367(31
LOCATI0IV: BRIDGE 221 OVER LITTLE SAVANIIIAH CREEK
01V SR 1367.
TYPE OF WORK GRADIIVG, DRAi11lAGE, PAVING A111D STRUCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
BEGIN TIP PRO,j
U STA 11 + 00.00
T B-5410
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. l l
CLEARING O1V THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II
** DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR HORIZOIVTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTAIYCE
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
50 25 0 50 l00 ADT 2016 = 1,168
ADT 2036 = 1,645
PLANS K = 10 %
D = 65 %
50 25 0 50 100 T = 11 %*
V = 35 MPH **
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =1 DUAL 10
l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LOCAL
SUB REGIONAL TIER
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
E11tD TIP PROJECT B-5410
. U STA 17 + 60.43
SR1367
z �i
>�,
���
WU
F
�
a
PROJECT LENGTH Prepo�ed !n !he Office of:
DIVISI011t OF HIGHWAYS
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5410 = 0.114 Miles �000 a;.�h Ridge Dr., natetgh xc, z�elo
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5410 = 0.011 Miles zorz sraNnann srEc.FtcnzroNs
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5410 = 0.125 Miles. RIGHT OF WAY DATE: KEVIN E. MOORE, PE
J U LY 2 3� �L O� S _ PROJECT ENGINHF.R
LETTING DATE: MARK HUSSEY
J U LY 19, 2 O� 6 �'ROJECT DESIGN ENG7NEER
�
PE
WW. UTIL.
HYDRAULICS ENGIMEER
P.E.
SlGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGIIVEER
SlGNATURE:
P.E.
�
I0
�
�
�
Z
1�'ff8][;1LINH][hTAIIB i� l�1LA\N�
DO NOT U3E FOR CONSTRUCTION

N
O
�
� E
E
—L— —D Rl —
Pl S�a 10+3320 Pl Sto //+03.A0 Pl Sfo 14+97.8/ Pl Sta /0+3554
p= 28' 38' 56.6' !RT) 0= 53' 43' 50.9' fRTI p= 5/' 09' 26.9' fLTJ �= 28' 07' 062' fRTJ
D= 4404' 252 D= 7G23' 39T D=/5'/6' 43.9' D= 5T l7' 44.8'
[= 65.00' L= 7033' L= 33482' L= 49A8'
T= 33J9' T= 37.99' T= 179.50' T= 25A4' 3
R=/30.Oi0' R= 75A0' •• R= 375.00' R=/OiD.00'
SE-See Plons M RGAR T wom
�•DESIGN EXCEPTION FOR STOPPING 5/GHT DISTANCE �
� �, '�.,
� �
B /I �2
BFIpGE DGSLRIPTION \
` �iy
w� H[ADwALLS � \�'`'
-- zc WD BEAMS -DRI- POT StO. lO+ .IXJ � 9
2 WD PIERS
/ -- � coNc oecK -L- P� S/o. 14+7�J6
_ _ _ � —� coNc wnee� cuna�s _ �� �
,�y� I MTL RAILS
— CONC SURFACF \\
BE I � T �tOJECT B-5410 � — �
— iST� �� � OO.00 ��N S. STILLIMELL .�
� I Li � `
� ¢
Q V� -L- PC b�o. l3+183/ z
, {��j � � HTR �j , ; _
\ / `^' W� �ECK `^' � CL'I'RIP RAP
�� SIL' � EST.2 TONS
–L PT 5�0. + .34 � �� ceolexrue Fneaic �
S �� EST.S SY �
B � S ISBLKO �
SIL
- � �
ISBLKS �;� � j �
�R _ � -- _ s � , TS� �o, . . � � � a,
B=N
� S7 �
� S S
s
) s � , M-
�
_ _ � � ���
i � ��)
. . .- .. . WE� ARC� }
1 � /
-L- PCC Sto.10+65 i �
'�� I
MARGARET'LEWiS \ I
�
-L- PC S1o.10+00,00
%/�/\�\ HIGH TENSI6N� ,�IP
f\.� l�\\OWEP, LINE \ I
MILL AND ESURFACE
60" ROCP-III
IOGE HY UC DATA
DESK'iN A/if,E • q�
QESKJN REOUEMp' � 25
DESGAi E!E'YAT�PY • Pb509
BA.SE OUEMC�' � AD
BASE El£VATrON • PbS76
dERT dSCM • �YYO
OVEl7 MG F�q/E � 50
a£ar xc e�v,v - aow
nnrE wAver ' 3/i3/2�S
WS.E ATAN
AT OAT OF SUMfP ' 20�5/
10 11
-�
AND _-
CROWE
CL 'i' RIP
E5T.2 TC
GEOTE%TI
EST. 5 SY
'c�"' . snvaNmn�t Roao � Y
� a� '�\ v �r� GM�
�.5b NV=209356, INV=20 . 9' w �5`'�I" RIP M
'P ryyy � RETAIN F � I RUCTU AY
�� PUE {-- PU
' B �S FOOT .^. l Q
� EXISTING B DGE I �,y
AOVE \\ TO BE REMOVED � , �
1 � REALIGN DITCH (SEE X-SECTIONS)
FILL EXISTING DITCH TO NATURAL GROUND
�� GRADE TO DRAIN � ISFO
O\ �
.ro�N s. STILLNELL �'� 1 � a
MTL �'� a I1 1 MTL
SHE� 'T \�� nS�HE�
� T 1 +1 -L
G.P. E EV. 2052.8'
SKEW 120°
PROP SED 1@55 , 21" CORE SLAB
2051.
12
�
+
(+�0.30 0%
� A ATE TO E EV ION 204 .4'
� �
` 3
PIP HYDRA(/ DATA
6P -xi S�a u+2
Q4AINAGE � A • /2 50 .
OIESKrN FRE fAC7 • 25 YFS
FS
aesGx �w �tv�r�aw - z�o�oo Fr
i00 /EM p CHARG£ • 660 CFS
qp r£M EtEVAT�DY • P05�B9 FT
OVENTO� f/�PU£NGY- 50 r/+S
OVERTOWPi O�SCHMGE • 550 CFS
aEaro� e�v,v�aw - 205��2 Fr
13 14
���'� ___ �
— � �
.�
35
NATU L
GROU
DOWNSTREA
LOW CHORD
C 5 'll' RIP RAP
(ST PAY ITEM)
100yrT1 EORETICAL SC UR
NATER SU FACE 2046.1'
JN DAY F SURVEY (0 32013)
CLASS 'll' IP RAP
(STR.PAY EM)
15
%
� +� �a��e;" t N u I l r F'KUJ tC: l'6 �54�1 o e-54�o 4
' P° e� —L— POT STA. � I �O' 431 ROADWAY �IGN EET NO HYDRAULICS
/ �e� c� ENGINEER ENGINEER
�i ��`'
� �� �e i �
/ � �ti� I isF� \ N 1[� N�1�9[ll➢ olE lE �1LA o�
F �� �' '' �, \ � 11�1f31EiLd�9[dN 1E87Y 11�1LAN�
' DO NOT U9E I�O CON9TftUC'CION
0
� �� � JAMES ALLEN COWAN Q
/. / � � � � �
^ 1 ' — — \
� � �
� '' � PERMIT DRAWING
� 11 �
' � SHEET 2 OF 5
�
� 1 � � �' –L– PT Sta.16+53J9
� � 1
� �
� � � �� 1 � rsFp
I �
G E � `\ \
O RAIN � O
� � �—
S � \
/
REAUGN ITCH (SE XiSECTION� JEHRY D. WNEATLEY
FILL EXIST G DITCI{ TO NATI�RAL GROUN �� NANCY WNEATLEY
SEE - GRADE T ' DRAIN � �
CROSS
SECTIONS � �.
3 � -DRI- PC 5�0. l0+/0.50
0
D
R N z"
� p -ORi- PT 5/0.10+5957
m
PU�
/ \
PUE \
��� -DRI- POT 5/0. 11+1570
iANK
TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL A FIP
NOTE: REALIGN DITCH FROM STA 12-00 TO 13+50
AND FROM 15-�-00 TO 16-00
excnvaie io oaniN MARGARET WORLEY CROYIE O
4�.1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
���
16 17 18 10
/ / p�o"e�
�r�l —, 2� °��s�o°e
G�o��d y F
�; d
d= 1 Fi
6= 2 Ft. �Geo�ex�flaQry.25 SY
Type ofLiner- CLASS 'B' Rip-Rop Qty. 8 Tons
fROM STA.14+20 TO STA. 14+44 -L-
BEG N GRADE -DRI- TA. 10+
EL. 054.77
ri = ,o aa.00 END GRADE
e� = z, sa.vb EL. 053.08
vc =
PI W+92.00
EL 2,053.33'
VC = 46'
(+�I.UU�
� �
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
50' 0' S0' i00'
GRAPHIC $CALE
R1

E
� E
—L— —D Rl —
Pl S�a 10+3320 Pl Sto //+03.A0 Pl Sfo 14+97.8/ Pl Sta /0+3554
p= 28' 38' 56.6' !RT) 0= 53' 43' 50.9' fRTI p= 5/' 09' 26.9' fLTJ �= 28' 07' 062' fRTJ
D= 4404' 252 D= 7G23' 39T D=/5'/6' 43.9' D= 5T l7' 44.8'
[= 65.00' L= 7033' L= 33482' L= 49A8'
T= 33J9' T= 37.99' T= 179.50' T= 25A4'
R=/30.Oi0' R= 75A0' •• R= 375.00' R=/OiD.00'
SE-See Plons
�•DESIGN EXCEPTION FOR STOPPING 5/GHT DISTANCE
a
BFIpG DC RIPTION ��
� �� wo nFnowni.�s � / '
� � zo wo eEaM's � i-DRI- POT StO. IO+OQ�!
WD PIERS \
� � , '/ �' � � � coNc oECK -L- P� $/O /4f7.j�.71
_ � �_ � coNc wnee� cunaos \ __
� � �T_ I � MTL RAILS \.
- GONC $LRF'ACF�
B� ��I �� � T �tOJECT� B—�410 �� �' "�i
f
3 � � �
� r worner caowE
�
`��' �i
� :�
-� . L 'I' RIP R!
1 / ' ST. 2 TON
I c orexn�e
E�T 5 SY
� ��r��� �a��e;� ��/ ,��Nu i ir r�r�u�tc: i�� �4�0 ��,�� e_���Q--- 4--
\ L"y :� � � /��/ � T�U pIi �/� 1 � �— POT �TA. � I ;��OI �F�I � �I� ROADWAY �IGN EET NO. HYDRAULICS
I , � � / � � /� �e c` ( /.� � . � ` . � ENGINEER ENGINEER
r / � � �, �
��� � � � �� 5 I � � l� j � ,; ._
� � i d � �"� ! � I I � � � � / �4 �sFp � o dIVC�1�[]�1[,lE lE 1�1LAN�
��N W NOT USE FOR / W ACQUISiT[ON
� f F ��� y� ,,'� �� i,�lllll,��i�il�,� I����\������%�� �' � � 1'� ��a��,���N �a� ��,Azv�
� �� DO NOT U9E I�O CON9TftUC'CLON
� s oP ����� ��,=,� � `� �� ��'� 'i i� ' �' � , � �� �JAMES ALL�N COWAN Q
, — / � �
c v\ ,// 1 1- � i I I�\\\ �`
i �
� � ir� � �,
,, �� � / � � / ��� +� ��j----- / � � > '; � � � I I ��� � � � — — \
�r� , �� % f� � ,� �; ,. — � � -- � � /�i�i!� � � PERMIT DRAWING
� ` I � '�� SHEET 2 OF 5
� / %/I y.""7' / . � i 1 : � ,`� ,q
� �� �� �� ! r�� i � � � � " -L- PT S�a.16+53J9
21C //�' '.'I I � � � i .
/ / ( � �'
%�
��. � i �oHH s. sr���w � � ( � r
ST . 11 + 00.0 � � w ,� � 1 / � � � i { � 1—J a
�� � � I � � ��� � � � ,� � o � � � i t � �s�o
Q � � L- PC ��o.13+r83/ _ � �� �� �; � � C i � ��� � r � � i
� �� ��� � 1 / �' . ��+ue � � � � �y� � ri %�/
` � �j�� ' H7R {� � ` �� � e i � o IDRniN� � � � /
\ / / `^' � W� �ECK `^� � � � C :I'.RIP RAP � �\ � Y �' 1 . ` , � /- ��� O
� s�, i I � — .f�" e�.z roNs ��I. ��� �s '/ O,!'�,� � �1 \ � � I �� i
� - -L� � P� S►0. ..34 V / ��` eolexrue Fnaaic � 4
Q / / � % % �� ( REAUGN i�C � e x�SECTiON;y � . � . . JEpRY D. WNEAT EY
N A
' S �� � � � ST. 5 SY . .� SEE FILL EXIST �, IT� TO�� NAT R � /� �- ANCY wllE T�EY
� e o � ��� � � � � � /' b �anoe r �diN� � � �i�'���
' �� S I�BLKD / . �/ � , �� 2 i. / � I P � / /// . . �
� � � � � � caoss i �� f �i �ylli �" %
, � �� �� ` ,• y� '� ����� � � �s��T�oN� �� y � � � � /�
\�1� ISBLKS 'r.f ^ / � i,� /. �' {: '�`"^. J f I
�
�R — � I / � '�% � r _ ` � � �
,,�
— — L-� — {� �� J Ts �.� � � � � z�� ,
� l� esrB�� V� �$ �� � � ounR nNo / cx .o` �-ORI- PC SfO. IO+IO.�� ��
�� � � � -. � - - — __ �'� � ,c �a N ?� .� � � �
� � � � _ � � � a�v� __ _ } ! ; � �
� Nv z �E� I _
1 S ../ ETAI c � /I hl � 7, 'e __ �_�
� � .. �.�� ' .: - .�- .. . . ' '.. , . � .
� o m _ . _ - .- - -�
�� � � � _ " � �_ � ' � , � � � �� � �a � ORi- PT 5/0.10+5957
.._ � � _� � � -�� �_��- �� � �
"�_ -�_— ,� � � � ' p�s � � sA✓ANN�t,��A,� � M� ,����N�� ' � � !Iiil 1����f��i� /IIIII� � �
� � � � � � �
r . f 1 / 1
V �
p/�/� �h, ��y,�� � � ... . � i �6 Nv 2oqss� iNv zo . 9 I� w �. —, � „ �7 .�' �� .. . .:'� I �� ��, ;
�L� rl.l. SiO. �NT67.liV � � / , . _ S�I" RIP / ' II I '� / .�
J
Z - HW, RETAIN F RUCTUR��AY I,� � �/
�' r
� 'i � PU %�— PUE� /
5P � �a �fS Foor' �— PUE � � f � , I. DEl
� .,. I.. J EXISTING 8 DGE � / �
�A0 C fifig �r� RE (JUE TO BE REMOVED .�y , \ � ���� ' / � 'DR�- POT S�O. ���'�SJO
��,
MARGARET'� i5 V � � �� . Q.. � _.._�_ , ;-nNK , . �-'� . . � �°e�
REAI�IGN DITCH $EE�X-SE�TIONS �ral � ° � p
I m . FILL�EXISTING DRCH TO�'NATURAL GROUND �f � .�I I � J �' �1 �.a��d y F�
� _
'\.� �' � GRADE TO DRAIN I FO � i
� � � � 1 � � /� � � � vo� d�_r��r��� ��II �- �._— ---� d
� �
� � � � II � �� O � I , � � I I tiQ �Y�� �GN DI7�IM FxOM ISTAh2 Od T,O 13+5Q �' ��F � 6- z Ft �-6eorex�iaqry.25 SY
� -L- Pr, StO. 1Q+00.00 � ( — J� � II 1 p� Fea,n/ is� o rq it ov � \
� � � � JOMN S. STILLqEIL �� , j � �'i�' ��(CpVATE �O D�IN'� P I � �j/��jj�T, � R I�Y �` w� 3 Type of Liner- CLASS 'B' R'p-Rop Qty. 8 Tons
1 HIfH TEh�ION� � f"J I Akl O�E (i pLA ER � ��� FROM STA 1A+20 TO SiA 14+44 -L-
POWEP LIIJE� � \ \..,. � � . . \.
� � � _ �� � � . I I , siiEo �' � � � ��E° ����� � � � � � � � �� � , � �
10
2051.
MILL AND ESURFACE
60" OP-III
'OGE HY UC DATA
SCNA/if,E • lOm�"
9EOUEMd' � 25.
Y ElEYAT�PY •
.� __
?OUEMC�' � 100
El£VATrON • 805fZ6_
7A�G d5t// • /YZO�_
rMG a�q/E • 5Q_
rNG EIEY,v • 205fd..
wAver - auacaou
o�"wAver - aa�t_
11 12
l� JI 14+13 L
L G P E EV 2052 8'
SKEW 120°
PROP SED 1@55 , 21" CORE SLAB
-�- oin. ia+a
- STA.73+73.4
(+)0.30 0%
fE TO E EV ION 204 .4'
\ �
PIP HYDRA(/ DATA
12 ap5�a./f+
Q4AINAGE A ' l2"" 50
OIESKrN FRE fAC7 • Y5_ YF:
aesGx �w �tv�r�aw - zo5im_ Fr
i00 /EM MGf • 66Q�'-' CF:
AD r£Aa EtEVAT�DY • P05f89_ fT
OVENTO�P/ f/�PU£NGY- 5C. 1'R;
OVERTOWPi MSCHMGE • 550_e__ CP:
OVERTOPP/ E!E'VAT�QY ' E�Sfe�Y- FT
13
14
��
l�1'� ____ �
— � �
.�
35
NATU L
GROU
DOWNSTREA
LOW CHORD
C 5 'll' RIP RAP
(ST PAY ITEM)
100yrT1 EORETICAL SC UR
NATER SU FACE 2046.1'
JN DAY F SURVEY (0 32013)
CLASS 'll' IP RAP
(STR.PAY EM)
15 16 17
18 10
BEG N GRA
EL. 054.77
PI = 10 34.00
EL = 2, 54.96'
VC =
PI W+92.00
EL 2,053.33'
VC = 46'
l')2.8787%
�+�t.0000i
�(-1�
� �
11
-DRI- STA. 10+
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
50' 0' S0' i00'
GRAPHIC $CALE
R1

IMPACT
E1�lLARGEMEI�T
w
� TS
S
\ INV=2C
m
�
,� �
�
�—d
, ,
/� � _
��-�- ��,
n��O�/� INV=204305� INV 20450 9�
Hy� RETAIN �
*�i,vi
SH
30�26�
�—t����
-
LLAR AND
E� , Riw.
SAVANNAH ROAD
W
BURY 1 FOOT �� �EX�STI
OVE �\ TO E
�� � REALIGN DITCH (SEE X—SECTIONS
I FILL EXISTING DITCH TO NATUR/
N`" GRADE TO DRAIN
�
(
I� �,
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER p5' 0' 25'
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTSIN SURFACE WATER GRAPHIC $CALE

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (tt) (ft) (ft)
11+25 -L- 60" RCP < 0.01 28
11+13 -L- Fill Slope < 0.01 25
TOTALS`: < 0.01 < 0.01 25 28 0
'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
EXISTING PIIERS WILL BE REMOVED.
�

See Sheet � a For I ndex of Sheets
^ See Sheet � b For I ndex of Sheets ,
BEGI1� TIP PRO, j
—L— S TA 11 + 00. 00
,'1, ,�� � l�l ":I� ���'' 1 " �.���' 1\\ � l�l�ll
�11��1 `.1�1���.�-.
�l ' .,�,� 1\\ ��' 1 .,� 11`. .,�,\
I 1 1 �� I;� 1 1 � � ., �\ �I ' �
LOCATI01�: BRIDGE 22l OT�ER LITTLE SA T�A1�1�AH CREEI� 01� SR 1367
TYPE OF WORI�: GRADII�G, DRAII�A GE, PA VI1�G, S TR UCT URE
BEGI11t BRIDGE
E11tD BRIDGE
—L— STA.14 + 41.83
C011lSTR UCTIOIV
Sta. ll + 15.00
** DESIG11l EXCEPTI01� REQUIRED FOR HORIZOIVTAL STOPPI11tG SIGHT DISTA11tCE
E1�D TIP PR OJECT 8—�410
—L— STA 17+60.43
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11t DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH HYDRAULICS E1VGIIVEER
,,,,,�.,,,,,,
Prepared In tl� Offlce of: ,��.o�.��, cARo��.,
.
ADT 2016 = 1 168 DIVISI01� OF HIGHWAYS :..-?:�oF�ss�;o� "9�--,:
50 25 0 50 100 �` 9��� � �oa�
ADT 2036 = 1�645 _ 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 =� 039249 '=
� LEI�GTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-54I0 — 0.114 Miles �� : F , c,, �� o� ��q�,
p 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS . � �, S� Q �o
K= 10 /o -.-v '••N� � NE�:. o,, �
PLANS LE11tGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-5410 = 0.011 Miles �•,ti •�,� � ��
D= 65 % _ P.E��i��M�����'°Po� o a
TOTAL LE11tGTH TIP PROJECT B-5410 — O.I25 Miles. SIGNATURE: ,n *
50 25 0 50 100 — o * �°' �
T 11 /o RI HT F W Y D TE: KEVIN E. MOORE� PE �,,,,,����,,,,,� a o
V= 35 MPH ** JULY 23 2015 I'ROJECT ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIG11t ������N.�ARO������ �� �
� E11tGI11tEER ,�`��°� oF E s s io',� �9''-, � �
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =1 DUAL 10 =:'�� SEAL 9�': : ��' o� ��p��Qo�
�>
l0 5 0 l0 2p FUNC CLASS = LOCAL LETTI11lG DATE: STEVEN D. KENDALL, PE :�; 033296 :;
S U B RE G I O NAL T I E R P R O J E C T D E S I G N E N G I N E E R �'�` f •�' F'�' G I N E`��' .O ��,'
J U N E 2 1, 2 O l 6 .,�� ••.. .......•• a,.•
P.E.���i i���iu►►e���
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
SIGNATURE:

N w `�� � �� � � � � `�' PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
-L- POT S. �8+4�.0 85��2-39. w ,� �0�� �� � E N D TI P PROJ ECT :-�4� 0� n
-L- -DRI- � � ,� �Q� , . o B-54/0 4
. ,
� � i � "; ILW SHEET NO.
+46.14 +27,00 � � � // -L- POT STA. � � � O .� `rt' �i m ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
Pl Sto l0 +33.20 Pl Sto ll +03.00 Pl Sto l4 +97.8/ Pl Sto l0 +35.54 + 46.14 . e��
e . �� � . ,� . „ � . �, 75.00'(L ) � 29.89'(LT) .' 30.84'. r / �/�;/
�_ 28 38 56.6 fRTI �_ 53 43 50.9 fRTI �_ 5/° 09 26.9 �LTI 0= 28 07 06.2 fRTJ � .�� •�..�o, ENGINEER ENGINEER
a . „ +15.00 . i � � �'// S` ������nn►►���i �����n�m�����
D- 4 4° 0 4' 2 5. 2" D- 7 6° 2 3' 3 9. 7" D- l 5° l 6' 4 3. 9" D= 5 7 / 7 4 4. 8 � 5. o o'( L T) � ,'� � � Q,�, , s8, ^ �.�`���� �AR°�;',.. ..00��� �AR°�%'',.
,
� i D,O,... ..., ti i' `�; �FESS�/�. ti,9•,,�
L = 65.00' L = 70.33' L = 334.82' L = 49.08 - , �, �, , � � s, �o ►- ,.� � • F � s s'�o ••.. 9 , ,..
T = 37 99' T = l79 50' T = 25 04' 3 . , � �,��� � M TL ISFD 'S ' o _ :: �� ti.� •. _ _ � � ti.� : _
T = 33.19� . • • F �� � �, �� � � � MAILBOX 9 � N : SEAL � �' _ ' � � SEAL ! � -
f� _ 1,3�.��� f� = 7 'Jr.�O� :: R = 375.0�� f� _ 10�.��� � _ � �, � � END GRADE s s � � 033296 � � �':. 039249 .: � �
SE-See Plons M RGAR T WORLEY CROWE � �� ' -L- STA17+46.14 � 90 , .�� '- . -
B 446 PG 202 � END SHOULDER F-I� �� . �sg� 8so, G� s'., FN� E�,� .� �.��' '!� '' FtiG ��,� : S�:
=xDESIGN EXCEPTION FOR STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE � aER�w curr � � .+32.73 F . � • ... ,► N ..: •aa�, ,-9,�;••.. , ► N,,.. • o�,•
��� -L- STAI � 98.00 S OP � ' � �� 32.32' JAMES ALLEN COWAN Q ,',��i;�,�i��►►� ``,, ,,,����,;�:����►�►`P�,•
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS � RV , � N 87°I5�28� E DB 841 PG 63�
526 S. CHURCH STREET 19 JOHN STREET F � �
PO BOX 1006, ECIOQ MIDDLETOWN,NY 10940 s-�L -BL- 12+35e37 : PINC ?�p � �� i 513,25�
B CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 � / � � � C WELL
BRIDGE DESCRIPTION � � � � � HOUSE
WD HEADWALLS �- �+53.14 �/ p� � i i�
--- - BALSAM WEST FIBERNET 20 WD BEaMs -DRI- POT Sto. IOf . O= �-A 45.00'(LT) � � � �
52 COLONIAL S(lUARE 2 WD PIERS F � � �� ��
_ � �� � _� I SYLVA, NC 28779 CONC oECK -L- POC Sto. �4 .76 � / � � �
- _ _ _ ,' I CONC WHEEL GUARDS / � � i i
� L _CONC MTL RAILS �� ;' � � �� i i
- _ , � CONC SURFACE � � � . � i
' . BEGIN SHOULDER - � l I �' � � � � � -� - PT Sto. l6 +53.14
� _ BERM GUTTER Mi ST. I2 RTONS � i�'' � 1' ��
BE�I� T OJECT B 5410 � -L- STA13+35. T ,
�, GEOTEXTILE RIC � � � i � � �� �
BEGIN SHOULDER �-� EST. 5 SY .. �, �� ,', Wp
- IST/"'t: �� � OO.00 JOHN S. STILLWELL BERM GUTTER ��,
' , �
� -�- DB 192 PG 328 -L- STA.14+63.87 . , � / � � � � , � � STEPS isF .
ILT END SHOULDER 21 4 34 W � � ; i CONC �� �
B ✓-� -L- PC fC1. /.3f/8..3/ BERM GUTTER � � , � � 1�� ,��wAL� .
-L- STA13+81.60 • � � G E � � `` �\
\ '/ � � HTR +80.00 40° '4 E /� O �' RAIN� ` .
/ � WD DECK � +50.00 57.00' LT CL 'I' RIP RAP N 06 54'�8^ �' � 4" ,� ` ` � R�CK 2
SILO 29.46'(LT) +61.48 EST. 2 TONS Z.77 '�� �s 0401 �� I .�� � wA�l
ONC -L PT Sto. II f .,34 � 40.00' (LT) �� GEOTEXTILE FABRIC C`J, REALIGN ITCH (SE X-�SECTIONS)' JERRY D. WHEATLEY
B GIN GR E +18.31 ST. 5 SY N �$'2 '22° �0 / FILL EXIST G DITCI-f TO NATU.RAL GROUN NANCY WHEATLEY
S B p +37.00 � +00.00 45.00'(LT) 3.II' 040 B � GRADE T� DRAIN �� �' ,,_ „� DB 512 PG 4
ISBLK � ' , � � �s SEE _
�� - � . � , T►�"��
� � '�' � �
1► � � �
� � : �f�i ► �� �
� • � � . • ���. �, i�i�. ✓.,` �� �� �►.
Y `
-�, � � ,, � 0 �;; :�- ��I�" ;; ;,�►
,,-.,
` :�� • � � . �� �%I � � � �
� �•• � -� , � � � �� �� / `� �► '�� �I���'ii Y'
CROSS
SECTIONS
s DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
so, UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
9s �9_
�i s�o
PAVEMENT
� REMOVAL
�� �°�
SEE SHEET S-1 TO S-16
� �� FOR STRUCTURE PLANS
��
�
0
690 �ti
9) Op�2e� � D.��,�0�0
BRIDGE / ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP SKETCH
END BRIDGE �s .
, < �'�� - � �� �1 1 , � i� v` �� �'' ..�` � � . _ �`- - -
� I ' 1 1 ♦ � �� �� � � � � � i �I► �/�� • ' � . !.2 �
� � � � � � ► � � � � ��� I�� � � � � � ��� � �� �� e��/� ���� • a`���� ���������� � � � � • � i � 1 �
�� 1� � �', �_ �.n� ��, �%�,����� ;���� I i � I � �I ` �
� � �.��.,� i..�,� �j1� ���_ JI� � 1��' ► -- -� r � �,r/ I��j .
� ��� _ -Ip�O • �I��'���Is���'� • I�i� �-,�7���• ������♦♦♦ � � I � � I I
�(Z ��
1 � � � I • • � ` ��!'� i�.l-. R' � ��` _�._ _�-_..1���%��i��%�'r � � � � �♦�, � sI • � � � • • • ,
� �
, _ : � � � �� � i � r� �� - �r��sw�_=ii � '.•.� � � � ' •
� -` �.''
� . • ! • ♦ � 1� �I� � •� / U��%/ � ���b�� r • 11
�
r� ---_�.� �L t' '1f'' � � i � • � �� .,� � � � � ' I . / I����l, � �,���•C- E � ��j' , � � •
r • �� � � � ' ��.,�i'. � "►' _�♦•`'�• �� � •
�� �" � `i1�. �/ `� � /
'� � � � �/ ` _ i� \ • /• , ��1� � �
� � � �� ! �
: � . ` � .. / � � . �� �4"�' � �� � � • .� � �
� : . , � .�� ``r � �A '`vr . _ �
., y � � _ - � . .
' . • . ►• . • � �'� � � `� ► � � . . . � • �
��� . ,� � ._ � ' ��
w _ � �� �;. '�: ; � � �•' I• II • •• • '
`� � •• ' �� � � . . ►1 , - �� �
� � � : �i
.
� • � . ���� • •� � # ,� � : ' ' •' �. ./ i I � �
, .., . � • .
� ♦ �' � • � � � �.
..
O, '� m FILL EXISTING DITCH TO NATURAL GROUND °- ° 159.00'(RT) Ground � �� BEGIN APPROACH SL�
DB 1212 G 471 ���,%' � I � I � GRADE TO DRAIN � ISFD TOE PROTECTION S 7q°25'S3" W I I
A �?9F �s -BL-2 6+75.�� P�NC 1 N 024.4636'� SEE DETAIL A E�P g3.83� d_ � Ft. �d -L- STA.13+73.47
� NOTE: REALIGN DITCH FROM $TA 12+00 TO 13+50 b_ 2 Ft, GeotextileQty.25 SY
-L- PC f0. ��+0�.�� ' N 23�45 6^ � AND FROM 15+00 TO 16+00
JOHN S. STILLWELL EXCAVATE TO DRAIN MARGARET WORLEY CROWE Type of �iner= C�,4S5 'B' Rip-Rap Qty. 8 Tons �C TYPE III ANCHOR UNITS
HIGH TENSION I I -BL-I 5+00.�� POT 2�°�5'52" W� DB 446 PG 202 3 FROM STA. 14+20 TO STA.14+44 -L-
q POWER LINE � � EIP ^ � AATI �• . DB 192 PG 328 � • 22.55� T 4:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DAT A
DESIGN DISCHARGE _ 1A00 CFS
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YRS
DES/GN HW ELEVATION = 2,050.9 FT
BASE DISCHARGE _ 1,500 CFS
BASE FRE�UENCY = l00 YRS
BASE HW ELEVATION = 2A5/.76 FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE _ 1.220 CFS
OVERTOPP/NG FREQUENCY= 50 YRS
OVERTOPP/NG ELEVAT/ON = 2,05/.l FT
DATE OF SURVEY = 3/l3/20/3
W.S. ELEVAT/ON
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 2.046J FT
PIPE HYDRAULIC DAT A
60' RCP-lll Sto. 11+23.54
DRAINAGE AREA = l2 SQ Mi.
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YRS
DESIGN D/SCHARGE = 460 CFS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 2,05/.00 FT
l00 YEAR DISCHARGE = 660 CFS
l00 YEAR HW ELEVATION = 2.05/.89 FT
OVERTOPP/NG FREQUENCY= 50 YRS
OVERTOPP/NG D/SCHARGE = 550 CFS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 2.05/.42 FT
10 11
BEGIN GRADE
-L- STA. 12 + 00.
EL = 2.047.43
12
13
PI = 13 + 73.00
EL = 2,051.80'
VC = 120'
K = 54
END GRADE
-L- STA. 13 + 50.00
EL = 2.048.52
14
� STA. 14 + 13 -L-
G.P. ELEV. 2052.8'
SKEW = 120°
PROPOSED 1@55', 21" CORED SLAB
15
-L- STA. 15 + 00.00
EI = 2,049.24
16
�
END GRADE
-L- STA. 16 + 00.00
EI = 2,056.00
17
�
10
I = 10+34.00
L = 2,054.96'
'C = 38'
I'I = IU+Y"1.UU
EL = 2,053.33'
VC = 46'
11
-L- STA. 14 + 52.53
BEGIN BRIDGE
SEE SHEET 2B-1 FOR DETAIL
2,010

NATURAL
GROUND
----- � ---------
3:�
ti�� MACHINE
� DIRECTION _-----
_ ---
_--
�-�__ _-----------
EMQqNKME�IT�
SIQBI�IZQTI01�
GEOTEXTI�E
MINIMUM �ENGTH 20'
, � �
14+50 TO 16+25 —�—
�
�----------
�
�
--�
10 FOR ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS WITH �ESS THAN A 20501 S�OPEo
2oPLACE AL� GEOTEXTILE WITH THE MACHINE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE
SLOPE FACEo
3o GEOTEXTILE FOR EMBANKMENT STABI�IZATION SHAL� BE P�ACED FROM TOE OF
PROPOSED SLOPE EXTENDING A MINIMUM OF 20 FT ALONG THE TRANSITION FORM
EXISTING GROUND AND NEW EMBANKMENT FILL
GEOTEXTILE FOR
EMBANKMENT STABILIZATION
tSQUARE YARDS)
GEOTEXTILE
1,100 SYDS
TOE OF SLOPE
1 I
I I
I I
1 I
I ROLL WIDTH I
I
I
I
l8" OVERLAP 1
MlN ITYPJ
i
t
GEOT EXT lLE FOR
ROCK PLATING fTYPJ
� I
I
I
I
I
I
5' OVERLAP �
MlN ITYPI �
SLOPE FACE
GEOTEXTILE OVERLAP DETAIL
(PLAN VI EW)
TOE OF SLOPE
GEOTEXTILE CRO55-MACHINE
pIRECTION ICDI
SLOPE FACE
GEOTEXTILE PLACEMENT DETAIL
�P�,o,N vi Ew�