HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061929 Ver 1_Information Letter_20070430~~~
.-~~-
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Apri125, 2007
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
Proposed Project:
Christina Breen /Nicole Thomson
O
~~l,f
Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit 9r~;p~
icy
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
NC Department of Transportation
Bridge #4 over Tulls Creek on SR 1222, Moyock, Currituck County
Bridge replacement
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by U~/IfrlU7, to C~tby $rittil~gham,1638 Mail Servfce Center, lt~iel~g~, SIC Z7699~.tf:3$. If
you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Lynn Mathis at (252) 264-
3901, ext. 233. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
SIGNED
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
DATE
1367 U.S. 17 South, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
Phone: 252-264-3901 1 FAX: 252-264-37231 Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
a ~ DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
t
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Bridge #4 over Tolls Creek on SR1222 (Tolls Creek Road), in
Currituck County, Moyock Township.
Photo Index - 2006: 203-7519 I20 & I21, J20 & J21, K20 and L20 2000: 203-3061 I21 &I22, J21, K21,
L20 & L21 1995 -1985: Not Available
State Plane Coordinates: X: 2 857 075 Y: 1 012 000
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA and Dredge/Fill
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit -February 20, 2007
Was Applicant Present -Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received -March 19,2007
Off ce -Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Currituck County
Land Classification From LUP -Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Water and Public Trust Shoreline, and Coastal Wetlands
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing -Bridge
Planned -Replacement bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: (AREA]
DREDGED FILLS ~
437s (0.01 acres) o
(A) Vegetated Wetlands: CW (Juncos) --------------------- 1,724sf (0.04 acres) mechanized wetland
clearing
404 Wetlands ------------------------ 437sf (0.01 acres) 7,841sf (0.18 acres)
(B)Non-Vegetated Wetlands: PTA 1,307sf (0.03 acres)
(C) Other: High Ground 2,560sf of high ground
will be under cut to
lengthen the bridge
Total Area Disturbed: 14,306sf (0.33 ac.)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: Yes
(F) Water Classification: B Sw Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation proposes to replace Bridge No. 4
along SR 1222 (Tolls Creek Road), over Tolls Creek, in Currituck County. The project includes
the replacement of an existing bridge.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Tulls Creek Bridge Replacement
Page 2
SITE DESCRIPTION
r 4
-I.
The project site is Bridge No. 4 crossing Tulls Creek, a tributary of Tulls Bay and the
Currituck Sound. Bridge No. 4 is commonly referred to as the Tulls Creek Bridge, and is
located on SR 1222 (Tuns Creek Road) in Currituck County, Moyock Township as shown on
the enclosed site map. The property in question is an NC Department of Transportation bridge
and road right-of--way that is classified as a two lane rural minor collector in the Statewide
Functional Classification System. The bridge was constructed in 1970 as a two-span structure
236' long x 28' wide with two travel lanes running in an easterly and westerly direction.
The bridge superstructure consists of asphalt over a steel plank deck supported by both timber
and steel bents that is considered functionally obsolete. Navigation clearance underneath the
bridge is approximately 9.5', and the average water depth under the bridge is approximately
15' below normal water level (NWL). Submerged aquatic vegetation can be found within the
Bay and Creek, none was found within the project area. Public access to Public Trust Waters
is currently possible along the shoulder of the road, but is difficult along the side of the bridge
due to steep slopes.
Land uses on the northwest side of the bridge include a coastal marsh dominated by black needle
rush, an access road and an old lodge that is situated over the water and partially within the new
road right-of--way. On the southwest side of the road is a canal paralleling the road with a coastal
wetland fringe with a mix of black needle nlsh, giant cord grass, and salt meadow hay. Land uses
on the east side of the bridge include a residence on the north side of the road and vacant land on
the south side with a mix of shrubs and a small area of non-coastal wetlands. Aerial power and
telephone lines parallel the bridge on the north side, and a buried county water line parallels the
bridge along the south side of the bridge.
Tulls Creek is classified as inland waters by agreement between the Marine Fisheries
Commission and Wildlife Resources Commission. The Division of Environmental
Management's water quality classification for Tulls Creek is B (Primary Recreational, Fresh
Water) Sw (Swamp Water). Tulls Creek is also classified as an inland Primary Nursery Area
(PNA) with in-water restrictions between February 15`" and September 30`" of each year. Review
indicates that while numerous archeological sites have been found along the Currituck mainland,
no identified archeological sites appear to be located within the project area.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge #4 over Tulls Creek in Currituck County; more specifically
located along Tulls Creek Road approximately one mile north of Poyners Road. The project will
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Tulls Creek Bridge Replacement
Page 3
include the demolition of the existing structure piece-by-piece, utilizing a barge to prevent
components from falling into the creek. Best Management Practices will be used during all work.
Replacement of the bridge will be along the same alignment utilizing anoff-site detour to access
properties on either side of the bridge. The length of the bridge will be increased from 236' to
300', and the width will be increased from 28' to 33'. The bridge width will include two 12'
lanes, a 3'-11" shoulder on the south side, and a 4'-11" shoulder on the south side for a total
width of 32'-10". Navigation clearance under the bridge will be increased .5' for a total of 10'.
The bridge approach will consist of two 12' lanes with shoulder widths from 4.5' to 8'.
The access road on the west side of the bridge will be relocated approximately 300' northwest of
its current location. A 335'retaining wall is proposed on the north side of the road and a 410'
retaining wall is proposed on the south side of the road. No retaining walls are proposed along
the bridge approach on the east side of the bridge. Existing bulkhead around the bridge
abutments will be repaired and replaced in place as needed. Four bents will be installed with
three in water and the fourth bent on high ground, on the west side of the creek. All pilings and
sheet pile retaining walls will be installed by a vibratory hammer. The bridge will be built using
top-down construction with pre-cast concrete deck panels. No deck drains are proposed. The
bridge will drain to a system on the landward side of each abutment. On the west side the water
will drain to the coastal marsh on the north side of the road. On the east side of the bridge the
water will drain to a swale on the south side of the road and flow into the creek.
All high ground disturbances will be undertaken within the existing right-of--way (R/W), and as
such, are excluded from the definition of development. The substrate under the existing bridge
will be undercut and expanded resulting in the removal of approximately 500 cubic yards of high
ground.
It is estimated that 7,841 square feet (0.18 acres) of Coastal Wetlands will be filled, 1,742sf (0.04
acres) of 404 wetland fill, 437sf (0.01 acres) of 404 wetlands will be excavated, and 437sf (0.01
acres) of mechanized wetland clearing will occur within adjacent 404 wetlands. In addition,
approximately 1,307square feet (0.03 acres) of Public Trust Waters will be filled in conjunction
with the roadway approach to the bridge. It is anticipated that the Ecological Enhancement
Program (EEP) will assume responsibility for establishing the mitigation requirements for the
proposed wetland fill. Enclosed in the application packet is correspondence from the Department
of Transportation to the EEP Transition Manager, William Gilmore, requesting confirniation for
compensatory mitigation.
The bridge approach does not appear to include any shoulder widening to accommodate parking
for recreational fishing from the bridge.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Tulls Creek Bridge Replacement
Page 4
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
• Temporary wetland impacts from mechanized clearing will be approximately 437sf (0.01
acres).
• There will be approximately 7,841 square feet (0.18 acres) of permanent Coastal Wetland
impacts associated fill activities.
• There will be approximately 437sf (0.01 aces) of 404 wetland impacts from excavation
activities.
• Compensatory wetland mitigation will be provided by the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program for up to 0.12 acres of riparian wetland and 0.36 acres of coastal wetlands.
• All high ground disturbances in the project area will be within the existing right-of--way,
and will total approximately 2,560sf.
• Utility relocation is not proposed.
• Temporary turbidity will occur during demolition and construction.
• There should be no long-term negative impact resulting from the construction of this
bridge.
Submitted By: Lynn W. Mathis
Date: April 13, 2007 (Revised Apri125, 2007)
.+~ ~4.
d ~~ °
~ vi...
~~~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 15, 2007
N. C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
1367 U. S. Highway 17
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
Attention: Ms. Lynn Mathis
Field Officer
Dear Madam:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
~~~ ~~~ ~~
S~O~15rp~ lv ~ ,:.. .
~li2dl~~?~ ~;1 {~ ~~lUr~11~ r
Subject: CAMA Major Development Permit Application for the proposed
replacement of Bridge No. 4 over Tulls Creek on SR 1222 (Tulls Creek
Rd.), in Currituck County. Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1222(2), State
Project No. 8.2040301, TIP No. B-2950. Debit $475.00 from WBS
Element 32773.1.1
Please find enclosed the CAMA Major Development Permit application, land owner
return receipts, MP forms, permit drawings, Categorical Exclusion (CE) and Addendum,
and half-size plan sheets for the above referenced project. The North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace existing Bridge No. 4 on SR
1222 over Tulls Creek in Currituck County. The project involves replacement of the
existing bridge structure with a 300-foot concrete box beam bridge at approximately the
same location using top-down construction. Bridge substructure will consist of steel or
concrete piles, which will be driven into position. The roadway elevation will be
increased 0.5 ft above the existing structure. The approach roadway will consist of two
travel lanes at least 11-feet wide with shoulder widths from 4.5-8 feet. There will be 0.02-
acre of permanent impacts to Tulls Creek and adjacent surface water and 0.24-acre of
permanent impacts to adjacent wetlands. Traffic will be detoured off-site, on surrounding
roads, during construction. The review date for this project is May 1, 2007 and the Let
Date is June 19, 2007.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
General Description: The project is located in the Pasquotank River Basin (Hydrologic
Unit 03010205). A best usage classification of "B Sw" has been assigned to Tulls Creek
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ANO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEHSITE: WWW.NCDOr.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
[DWQ Index #30-1-2-2-5-1]. Neither Water Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped watersheds or
WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds) nor Outstanding Resource Waters
(ORW) occur within 1.0 mile (1.6 km) of project study area. Tulls Creek is not
designated as a North Carolina Natural or Scenic River, or as a National Wild and Scenic
River. Tulls Creek is not classified as a 303d stream.
Permanent Impacts: Tulls Creek and adjacent wetlands will be impacted by the proposed
project. Construction of the proposed project will result in permanent impacts to
wetlands, including 0.18-acre of fill in DCM wetlands and 0.04-acre of fill in 404
wetlands due to roadway fill, 0.01-acre excavation in 404 wetlands due to roadway fill
activities, and 0.01-acre mechanized clearing in 404 wetlands due to roadway fill
activities. In addition, 0.02- acre of fill in surface water will result from roadway fill and
the placement of a 36-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe, and <0.01-acre of fill in surface
water will result from bridge bent placement (see permit drawings).
Temporary Impacts: No temporary impacts to jurisdictional resources will be necessary
for the construction of this project.
Utility Impacts: Less than 0.01-acre of fill in Waters of the U.S. will occur due to
relocation of two power poles and one down guy-line within coastal marsh in the north
west quadrant of project area. These poles will be relocated north of their existing
locations to provide construction access for bridge approach work. NCDOT will also
install a 12-inch PVC and 16-inch HDPE water pipe via directional bore to avoid impacts
to Tulls Creek or surrounding wetlands.
Bridge Demolition
The existing bridge consists of a steel plank deck and timber and steel abutments and
interior bent caps. The bridge will be removed and piles will be pulled piece-by-piece
utilizing a small barge without dropping components into Waters of the United States
during construction. Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will
be followed to avoid any temporary fill from entering Waters of the United States.
Federally Protected Species
As of January 29, 2007 the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists eight federally
protected species for Currituck County (Table 1). A Biological Conclusion is not required
for the American alligator due to its designation of Threatened (due to similarity of
appearance). The shortnose sturgeon was added to the list since the completion of the
NRTR (March 24, 1999). North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries scientist Fritz
Rohde was contacted on February 23, 2007 concerning the suitability of habitat for
shortnose sturgeon within the project vicinity. Mr. Rohde responded that "It is highly
doubtful that a sturgeon would ever be found there, thus no impact from this project." As
such, the Biological Conclusion is "No Effect" for this species. The Biological
Conclusion for West Indian manatee has been changed from "No Effect" in the NRTR to
"May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect" due to the >5-foot channel depth of Tulls
Creek. A Concurrence Request for the manatee has been sent under separate cover to
USFWS. Biological Conclusions for the other species remain valid. A Biological
r
NCDOT TlP B-3640 Page ? of 5
Conclusion of "May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect" was reached for the bald
eagle (Haliaeetzcs lezccocephalus). A copy of the USFWS concurrence letter is attached.
Table 1. Federally protected species of Currituck County.
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Biological
Status Conclusion
Haliaeetacs May Affect, Not
leucocephalus Bald eagle T(PFD) Likely to Adversely
Affect
Dermochel s coriacea Leatherback sea turtle E No Effect
Caretta caretta Lo erhead sea turtle T No Effect
Charadrius melodus Pi in lover T No Effect
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded E No Effect
wood ecker
Acipenser Shortnose sturgeon E No Effect
brevirostrum
May Affect, Not
Trichechus manatus West Indian manatee E Likely to Adversely
Affect
Amaranthus umilus Seabeach amaranth T No Effect
Avoidance and Minimization
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to
"Waters of the United States". Due to the presence of surface waters and wetlands within
the project study area, avoidance of all impacts is not possible. The NCDOT is committed
to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize
jurisdictional impacts. Minimization measures incorporated as part of the project design
included:
• Use of an off-site detour during construction
• Construction of a 64-foot longer bridge
• Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage will be implemented
• No in-water work will occur from February 15 to September 30, as requested by
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division
of Marine Fisheries, as Tulls Creek is designated as a Primary Nursery Area
• Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be utilized during demolition of
the existing bridge and construction of the new bridge due to the designation of
Tulls Creek as a Primary Nursery Area
• The bridge will be built using top-down construction and can therefore be built
without the need of a causeway or work pad
• The number of interior bents in the water is being reduced from eight for the
existing bridge to four for the new bridge
• There will be no deck drains on the proposed bridge
• Fill slopes in wetlands will be at a 3:1 ratio
NCDOT 77P B-3640 Page 3 of 5
Mitigation
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) has assumed responsibility for satisfying the federal Clean
Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for the unavoidable impacts to 0.24
acre of wetlands. See attached EEP Acceptance Letter dated March 14, 2007.
Regulatory Approvals
CAMA: NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area
Management Act Major Development Permit. The landowner receipts are provided with
this permit application.
Section 404 Permit: In a separate application, NCDOT has applied for a Clean Water Act
Section 404 General Permit. All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal
Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion". The NCDOT has requested that
these activities be authorized by a General Permit No. 19820003 1.
Section 401 Permit: In a separate application, NCDOT has applied fora 401 Water
Quality Certification from DWQ. We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3404
will apply to this project. All general conditions of the Water Quality Certifications will
be met. Therefore, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a), we have
provided five copies of this application to the NCDWQ for their review and written
concurrence. NCDOT received a stormwater permit (SW7060902), dated November 22,
2006, from NCDWQ (attached).
A copy of this application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
httn://www.doh.dot.state.nc.us/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html
Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Please contact Mr. David E.
Bailey at debailey@dot.state.nc.us or (919) 715-7257 if you have any questions or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
NCDOT TIP 8-3640 Pa,¢e 4 of 5
W/attachments
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
W/o attachments
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Michael Street, NCDMF
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Anthony Roper, P.E., Div. 1, Division Engineer
Mr. Clay Willis, Div. 1, Division Environmental Officer
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Mr. Todd Jones, NCDOT External Audit Branch
Mr. Stacy Oberhausen, P.E., PDEA Project Planning Engineer
NCDO%" f'!P B-3h40 Paee S of5
DCM MP-1
-- ~~
APPLICATION for ~~ DENR
Major Development Permit ~A~ ~~ ~~°~
~:c~A~r~
(last revised 12/27/06)
MANAOEMEI~ld
I:Ilzabefh Cii~
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
7. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
N. C. Department Of Transportation Project Name (if applicable)
B-2950 (32773.1.1) Replace Bridge No. 4 over Tulls Creek on
SR 1222
Applicant 1: First Name MI Last Name
Applicant 2: First Name MI Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
1548 Mail Service Center PO Box City
Raleigh State
NC
ZIP
276991548 Country
USA Phone No.
919 - 733 - 3141 ext. FAX No.
919 - 733 - 9794
Street Address (if different from above) City State ZIP
Email
2. Agent/Contractorlnformation
Business Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name MI Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name MI Last Name
Mailing Address PO Box City State
ZIP Phone No. 1
-
- ext. Phone No. 2
- - ext.
FAX No. Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above) City State ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back>
. ~ ~ n
~~ - -
Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5)
~~~~Y tl L~~
~dC ®4NI~
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location ~te1A5TAL IViANAGr:i,~11=i~~
County (can be multiple) Street Address ~ State Rd. #
Currituck SR 1222 Tulls Creek Rd. (Bridge No. 4) 1222
Subdivision Name City State Zip
Sligo/Moyock NC 27958 -
Phone No. Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext. N/A, ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located? b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Pasquotank Tulls Creek, Tull Bay
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade? d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ^Manmade ^Unknown Currituck Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
^Yes ®No work falls within.
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.) b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
2012 244300
c. Size of individual lot(s) d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list) 3' NGVD ^NHW or ^NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Spartina cynosuroides, Juncus roemerianus, Typha angustifolia, roadside grasses and fortis
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
roadway fill, roadway, bridge, bulkhead, fishing, hunting cabins, water line, power line, underground telephone line
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adJacent to the proposed project site.
Undeveloped coastal marsh on both sides of approaching roadway on NW side of bridge, private residences and an
agricultural field on both sides of SE approach
h. How does local government zone the tract? i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Existing RNV for transportation (Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes ^No ^NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ^Yes ®No
k. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ^No ^NA
If yes, by whom? Historic Preservation Office
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a Yes ®No NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ^No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes ^No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ^No
(Attach documentation, if available)
Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A ~~~~~i:
~G I~l:l~lR
., rt ,yt.,la
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A ~C3~4S7AI. EvL=1iVF1GEi?~I~I~I~'
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems. ~ ~ i I ;
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ^Commercial Public/Government
^ Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The project is needed to replace an aging bridge. The vertical profile will be adjusted to improve safety.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Heavy equipment will be used to remove the existing bridge and construct the new bridge and roadway fill.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Removal of existing bridge. Construction of proposed replacement bridge. Retaining wall required around NW approach fill.
Roadway approach fill.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Both
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 4.0 ^Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area Yes No NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Surface runoff from roadway approaches, deck drains on existing bridge.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? Yes No ^NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ®Yes ^No ^NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ®Yes ^No ^NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
6. Additionallnformation
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete, Items (a) - (~ are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name
Phone No. see attached sheet .. .
~~~EI`'~
Address NC DFNEr
Name ~t~ ! C r.~~~•
Phone No.
'+;gASiHi_ i~l ~iVl~;v~si~l~i'~9
Irlizabett? Cit~o
Address
Name
Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
State Stormwater Permit No. SW7060902, NCDENR-DWQ, November 22, 2006 until rescinded
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Weiland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
~ 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthf~u~l/t~o the best of my knowledge.
Date 3 ' (4J ' ~ ~ Print Name ~j ~ ~ ~-' ~ Sk
Signature ~. <
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
^DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
^DCM MP-3 Upland Development
pDCM MP-4 Structures Information
Adjacent Property Owners
Owner/ Business
Lester Interprises
Clifton M. Banks
Launch Landing Properties, Inc.
c/o M. Barney
Edmund Humphries, Jr.
Rogers L. Tice Estate
James W. Tice III
Elmer Walker
Address
PO Box 7206 Nortolk VA 23509
RT 1 box 234 Moyock NC 27958
113 84th St. #8 Virginia Beach VA 23451-1809
PO Box 39 Moyock NC 27958
Rt. 1 Box 60 Tice Rd. Moyock NC 27958
Rt. 1 Box 61 Moyock NC 27958
PO Box 792 Moyock NC 27958
"' ~ Permit Drawing
Sheet of
~C i~FN~
.M,~
BRIDGES and CUWERTS
i~Df1~TAL MAN/~.~EMEI~~'
Elizabeth Git~
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BR/DGES ^ This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
^Commercial ®Public/Government ^Private/Community Tull creek
c. Type of bridge (construction material): d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
Concrete box beams 15.5 ft.
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ^No f. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ^Yes ®No
If yes, If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 236 ft. (ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 28 ft. (iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 9.5 ft. (iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
(v) WiII all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed? NWL:
(Explain) All of the existing bridge will be removed. (v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
The existing bulkheads will be retained (Explain)
9• Length of proposed bridge: 300 ft. h• Width of proposed bridge: 33 ft.
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ^Yes ®No j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ®Yes ^No
If yes, explain: height will be increased by 0.5 ft., the width
between piers will be increased from 35 to 60 ft.
k• Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 10 ft. I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes ^No
If yes, explain: July 7, 1998 letter states no permit required
for this project
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands:
waters? ^Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed: b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form conti nues on back>
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
~li~ii ~~ ul~ ~ ':~i~,:~r i .. r_ift~~, ~
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
^Yes ^No ^Yes ^No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert: g. Width of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL, i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
increasing the existing navigable opening? ^Yes ^No
^Yes ^No
If yes, explain:
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ^This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ^Yes ®No excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
If yes, aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: ^CW ^SAV ^SB
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
®WL 530 ^None
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
A small isolated wetland in the southwest quadrant will
have a grass swale traversing it to collect and treat
stormwater runoff.
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high-ground excavation? ®Yes ^No
If yes,
(ii) Avg, length of area to be excavated: 60 ft.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 45 ft.
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 5. 0 ft.
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 490
~~~~• n~it~i~
(~ C~tlizaY~~th ~i~~viEtvl
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: to be determined by the contractor
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: to be determined by the contractor
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ^Yes ®No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ^Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
^CW ^SAV ^WL ^SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ^Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e.
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes ^No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 400 ft.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 2.5 ft.
(iv) Purpose of fill: Roadway embankment
f. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
®CW 7840 ^SAV ^SB
®WL 1740 ^None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Roadway embankment and new relocated driveway.
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high-ground? ®Yes ^No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 900 ft.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 50 ft.
(iv) Purpose of fill: roadway embankment to improve
vertical profile
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes ^No
If yes, explain: Dominion Power and NCDOT will relocate
two existing power poles and one down guy-line (2 sq.
ft. fill in wetlands); Currituck Co. Water Department will
install 12" water line along proposed road via directional
bore
!f this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or cerfifrcation.
,!~f,' DFRr1g'
°Af~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~
~:~)f~S`s~L t~ilAi~ll3C=~rl4+i~1'a.°
~lix~a(o~~ti* ~itv
b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ^Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
^Yes ®No controlled?
~ h'i"i1 ~ •'~i Ids ' i ~ ~ ~ i ,
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2.
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
crane(s), grading and paving equipment
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ^Yes ®No
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
3• ~~~~~
Date
a-Z4sv
Project Name
~~l ~t L~ ~l~C Ap
plicant Name ~`
C p
plicant Signature
Fill will be placed and compacted as part of the roadway
fill. Erosion will be controlled through NCDOT's BMP's
for sediment and erosion control
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
^Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
~k~~i'tf~~s
NC: DI:Nt?
"~ASTt~~ iYirNFitYi.i`lIEN
~IizCikt~4h t"i9~
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size /Type
Permanent
Fillln
Wetlands
(ac
Temp.
Fillln
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) an
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
ft
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1 22+50/ 27+30 Roadwa Fill 0.18 0.015
2 28+50/ 31+50 300' Bride 0.005
3 32+00 R. Roadwa Fill 0.04 0.01 0.01
4 34+26 Lt. 36" RCP 0.001
C~
'
.~,
4~. -
~i.
~~ +~
TOTALS: 0.22 0.01 0.01 0.021
Notes: Site 1: No clearing impacts are shown in the marsh. Marsh grass is the only vegetaion in the marsh.
Erosion control measures (silt fence) will be used at the toe of fill only.
Site 2: 50 square feet of surface water impacts are due to the proposed substructure (piers).
Site 3: 0.01 acres of wetlands will be drained adjacent to a proposed grassed swale
Relocation of two power poles and one down guyline will result in less than 0.001 acre fill in coastal marsh.
Permit Drawing
Sheet of
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Currituck County
PROJ - 32773.1.1 (B-2950)
Revised 3/31/05
~.}y . ~,
tl y' ~ ~,
~•~~~-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
~~ E3F~lir
~61Z~;iia~-~i1 `~¢cy~
DEPARTIV~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Transition Manager
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
March 13, 2007
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Amended Request for Mitigation Confirmation for the proposed
replacement of Bridge No. 4 over Tull Creek on SR 1222 in Currituck
County. Federal Project No. BRZ-1222(2), WBS Element: 32773.1.1, T.I.P.
No. B-2950.
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
The purpose of this letter is to modify the February 12, 2007 request that the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) provide mitigation for unavoidable impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The EEP accepted mitigation in a letter dated February 13,
2007. Impacts requiring mitigation to jurisdictional resources within CU 03010205 have
changed and are as follows:
Coastal Marsh Wetlands 0.18 acres
Riverine Wetlands 0.06 acre
Please send the letter of confirmation to our office confirming the receipt of this amended
mitigation request. In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be
performed; the NCDWQ requires a formal letter from EEP indicating their willingness and
ability to provide the mitigation work requested by NCDOT. The NCDOT requests such a
letter of confirmation be addressed to Mr. John Hennessy of NCDWQ, with copies
submitted to NCDOT.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
TELEPHONE: 919-715-1334
FAX: 919-715-5501
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
2728 CAPITOL BOULEVARD
SUITE 240
RALEIGH NC 27699
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Mr. David E. Bailey at
(919) 715-7257.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.,
Environmental Management Director
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Mr. David Wainwright, NCDWQ
Mr. Bill Biddlecome, USACE
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, DCM
Ms. Lynn Mathis, DCM
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT Natural Environment Unit
Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Mr. Majed Alghandor, P.E., Project Mgt./ Schd Unit
Mr. Todd Jones, NCDOT External Audit Branch
File :B-2950
o stem .
.~.. s ~e~
PROGRAM
February 13, 2007
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
R
`.~.
~rR ~ ~'.:,.. 1.
,i' ya :'~
f' ...
B-2950, Replace Bridge Number 4 over Tull Creek on SR 1222,
Cur<'ituck County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide the compensatory coastal marsh wetland mitigation for the subject ro'ec
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated February 12, 2007, the im actsJare
located in CU 03010205 of the Pasquotank River Basin in the Northern Outer Coastal Plain
(NOCP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Coastal Marsh Wetland:
0.16 acre
EEP commits to implementing sufficient compensatory wetland mitigation to offset the
impacts associated with this project by the end of the MOA Year in which this project is
permitted, in accordance with Section X of the Memorandum of Agreement between the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department o
Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, signed on July 22, 2003. If the above f
referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no lon er be
valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP. g
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
William .Gilmore, P.E,
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Bill Biddlecome, USACE -Washington
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-2950
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1651 Mail SPrvira ra~.a.~ a-,i~; ~ ~~~,,,,,,, ,,.. , _.. NCDENR
-~Eeos stem
PROGRAM
March 14, 2007
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
~19~q ~ ~ 2{101
~l~i~1~; nz-~~~~
,:, , , ~z;t,.
~6C D1T~
~4..O~t.S'l;ii_ ii~EiL~C-~k9~~1=111
lrlizcal~~:'i•,d~ ';filar
B-2950, Replace Bridge Number 4 over Tull Creek on SR 1222, Currituck
County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
will provide the compensatory coastal marsh wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the
information supplied by you in a letter dated March 13, 2007, the impacts are located in CU 03010205
of the Pasquotank River Basin in the Northern Outer Coastal Plain (NOCP) Eco-Region, and are as
follows:
Riparian Wetland: 0.06 acre
Coastal Marsh Wetland: 0.18 acre
This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter issued on
February 13, 2007. EEP commits to implementing sufficient compensatory wetland mitigation to
offset the impacts associated with this project by the end of the MOA Year in which this project is
permitted, in accordance with Section X of the Memorandum of Agreement between the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, signed on July 22, 2003. If the above
referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid
and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at
919-7 ] 5-1929.
Sinc e
~~r~
11' D ilmore, P.E.
irec or
cc: Mr. Bill Biddlecome, USACE -Washington
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-2950
- ~'~~
NCDENR
~lorth Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 162 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, PdC 27699-1 b52 / 919-115-0416 / www.nceep.net
:VEC~S S~~~11
II ~~
.,. _.... ~. .F _... ~.~ k~. f_ v,.,. .,- _..~.. ._. .
PROGRAM
March 14, 2007
Mr. Bill Biddlecome
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
Dear Mr. Biddlecome:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
:`~~ D~NP
"~A°-.J~51~i ~r~li°1iY;~'.7i:~.~IF'~IS.
~li~c~b~fln ~i~
B-2950, Replace Bridge Number 4 over Tull Creek on SR 1222, Currituck
County; Pasquotanl: River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03010205); Northern
Outer Coastal Plain (NOCP) Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
will provide the compensatory riparian and coastal marsh mitigation for the unavoidable impact
associated with the above referenced project. As indicated in the NCDOT's mitigation request letter
dated March 13, 2007, compensatory riparian and coastal marsh mitigation from EEP is required for
approximately 0.06 acre of riparian wetland and 0.18 acre of coastal marsh wetland impacts.
This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter issued on
February 13, 2007. Compensatory wetland mitigation associated with this project will be provided in
accordance with Section X of the Memorandum of Agreement between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, the N. C. Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers signed on July 22, 2003 (Tri-Party MOA). EEP commits to implement sufficient
compensatory riparian wetland up to 0.12 riparian wetland credits and compensatory coastal marsh
wetland mitigation up to 0.36 coastal marsh wetland credits to offset the impacts associated with this
project by the end of the MOA year in which this project is permitted. If the above referenced impact
amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new
mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
If you leave any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at
919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
~, ~,lf `mac
W 1 ~'D. Gilmore, P.E.
erector
cc: Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., NC -PDEA
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlandsi401 Unit
File: B-2950 (Revised)
d~~
.-_
~!C®EINlt
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,1552 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 21644-1652 / 914-115-0416 / www.nceep.net
(`f~U,~
~0~~ .A.TFi9Q ~~ J ti f..~~ , Michael F. Easley, overnor
~Os'J', ~'' ` ~ William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
~ ~` ~i't)~arolirtey~i}~partment f Environment and Natural Resources
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P~•t~fFlCE C~
p~ - ~ '_ -~ ,~;~i1f~01~MENT Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
""'"' Division of Water Qualiry
November 22, 2006 ~ ~
,~.IC f3~Nl~
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe ~~? ~. ~ 1~0 p
NC Department of Transportation :~°O~~ST~~ ~~ia~,iv~a~i_i~~il:~
1548 Mail Service Center ~llzctbetk~ ~i~-
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Subject: Permit No. SW7060902
TIP No. B-2950, SR 1222 Bridge Over Tulls Creek
State Stormwater Permit
Linear Public Road/Bridge Project
Currituck County
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
The Washington Regional Office received a completed Stormwater Application for the subject project on
September 5, 2006. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will
comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000. We are forwarding Permit No.
SW7060902 dated November 22, 2006 to the NC Department of Transportation for the proposed improvements and
bridge replacement to SR 1222 over Tulls Creek in Currituck County.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the conditions
and limitations as specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this permit. This
request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. Unless such
demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Roger
Thorpe or me at (252) 946-6481.
i cerely,
X11 Hodge, isor
Surface Water Protection Section
Washington Regional Office
cc: Washington Regional Office
Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Intune~t ~ ~ n~~._ i(uyualiC _~rz ~Cltr
943 Washington Square Mall Phunc i'_~"' i N4~ 6-131 NorthCarolina
Washington, NC ?7889 Fay I'_ ~~ i 94h-9? 15 ~~~~~~~~~
NCDOT Project 32773.1.1 (B-2950)
Currituck County
Bridge No. 4 over lulls Creek on SR 1222 (lulls Creek Road)
Hydraulics Project Manager: Andrew Nottingham, PE
Date: June 1, 2006
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
~~C ~ ~~~
!~llZ~b~~i~ ~i~l~ ~'~~~,
The NC Department of Transportation proposes to replace bridge no. 4 with a bridge.
SR 1222 is a rural minor collector and runs more or less east to west in the vicinity of the
project. The existing roadway cross section consists of an 18' wide two-lane paved
roadway with shoulders that vary from one to four feet wide. The existing bridge is 236'
long. It consists of seven spans, the longest of which is 35'. The proposed bridge will be
300' long, consisting of 5 spans at 60' each. The span arrangement will allow for top-
down construction.
To obtain a better vertical site distance crossing the bridge, approximately 4' of fill
will be required along 250'of the roadway just west of the bridge. Similarly,
approximately 3' of fill will be required along 300' of the roadway just east of the bridge.
A retaining wall will be used to contain the west roadway approach fill to the point where
it ties back to the existing grade. The crest of the roadway vertical curve is approximately
midway of the bridge.
There will be no deck drains on the proposed bridge. Storm water will be collected
from the west end of the bridge deck by a curb and gutter system with curb inlets. Curb
and gutter is required because of the retaining wall. The drainage system will then carry
storm water approximately 420 feet from the end of the bridge along the roadway to an
outlet in a coastal marsh. The outlet velocity of the 18" pipe will be 1.5 feet per second,
and a rip rap pad will be used to prevent scour.
Storm water will be collected from the east end of the bridge deck by a curb and
gutter system with curb inlets. Curb and gutter is required on the east end of the bridge to
prevent erosion of the fill slopes and roadway shoulder. The drainage system will then
carry storm water approximately 200 feet from the end of the bridge along the roadway to
an outlet in a constructed grass Swale. The outlet velocity of the 18" pipe will be 1.2 feet
per second, and a rip rap pad will be used to prevent scour.
The project encompasses 6.0 acres inside the highway right of way. The existing
impervious area is 1.29 acres and the proposed impervious area is 1.91 acres. The
existing bridge deck area is 6610 square feet and the proposed bridge deck area is 9900
square feet.
Beyond the curb and gutter system west of the bridge, the proposed roadway will
consist of a two-lane paved roadway section with grassed shoulders and fill slopes.
Beyond the curb and gutter system east of the bridge, the proposed roadway will consist
of a two-lane paved roadway section with grassed shoulders and ditches. An existing
cross-pipe will be replaced approximately 300' east of the bridge.
Traffic will be detoured off-site during the bridge construction.
NCDOT Project 32773.1.1 (B-2950)
Currituck County
Bridge No. 4 over Tulls Creek on SR 1222 (Tulls Creek Road)
Hydraulics Project Manager: Andrew Nottingham, PE
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION
Date: June 1, 2006
~+~~~~~ ,
~~®® ~G
~7~~~ ~. ~ ~~~~
~'lixr~~ ~~~~,1~E~^Jl:~~
The surrounding land use consists of marshland, rural, residential, and agricultural. The
project area is located in the Pasquotank River Basin where Tulls Creek enters Tull Bay.
The surrounding terrain is generally flat to very flat. The natural ground elevation at the
site is approximately 3' NGVD. The water depth at the site is approximately 15' in the
center of the channel. The best usage classification is Class B, Sw, and Primary Nursery
area. No watershed critical areas, HQW, or ORW waters are located within one mile of
the project site.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
• The bridge replacement will be accomplished with a road closure that will minimize
construction time and on-site impacts.
• The roadway typical section is a fill section with slopes no steeper than 3:1.
• To prevent erosion, a curb and gutter system will be used on the west approach along
the retaining wall section. Similarly, curb and gutter will be used along the east
approach to prevent erosion of the shoulder and fill slope due to the steep banking of
the pavement in the curved roadway section.
• There will be no deck drains on the proposed bridge.
• Storm water runoff from the bridge deck will be directed to a coastal marsh on the
west end of the bridge and to a grass Swale on the east end of the bridge .
• Placement of rip rap around the east bridge abutment and the retaining wall around
the west abutment will control erosion from storm event scour.
~`
\r ,
y
U.S. Department
of Transportation
0~
United States
Coast ..Guard
Mr. Richard Davis, P.E.
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Division of Highways
P.O. Box 26201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Commander Portsmouth, Va. 23704-5004 ~ r. ~{
United States Coast Guard Staff Symbol: Aowb ~S ` ;~~~'+\
Atlantic Area phone: (757)398-6587 ~,~`~ i `~
16690 ~~5~"'r- ,~~•~~~_
Jul 7, 1998 .~ ~~~ ~~~K•.
Y ~ w~ ~,
~~~~~~~
f~C 6~~N[?
,.1;
~1~51`ti~. 6~~A~iIl~1~R!~
Ulizobett~ ~it~
Dear Mr. Davis:
is is in response to your letter dated June ~, 1998 requesting Waterways. The followingtare the
Th
proposed projects to replace ten bridges of which five are o er #2q Tar River;
five bridge numbers and their locations: #~9 ~ig3~4ak River; # ~Tu~1~Deek; 5Z7f~~
#17 Dan River; and #64 ~ ~v River.
gzcN c; ~
e Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1982 exempts bridge pr arecnot used, susceptib e botuse in
Th
permits when the bridge project crosses nontidal waters whtc
their natural condition, or susceptible to use by reasonable nditions iin a telephone conve cation
interstate commerce. Ms. Pam Williams confirmed such c
e 30 1998. Due to this, the bridge projects on the Dan and Mayo Rivers are exempt, and
on Jun ,
will not require Coast Guard Bridge Permits.
reek, and the White Oak and Tar Rivers are subject to tidal inflS ewater ay ualso meet the
Tull C oses. However, th
:.legally navigable for Bridge Administration Purp
criteria for advance approval waterways outlined in Titeethat ared le in aw, butlnot
Section 115.70. Advance approval waterways are thos
11 navi ated by other than small boats. The Commandant of taesC th eforeaana ndividual
actua y g
advance approval to the construction of bridges across such waterw y ,
permit will not be required for these three projects.
e fact that Coast Guard permits are not required does not relor to al aoencv wh may have or
Th .
compliance with the requirements of any other Federal, State.
jurisdiction over any aspect of the project.
Sincerely,
~~
ANN B. DEATON
Chief, Bridge Administration Section
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Posc Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
~~ ~~ ~~~
~~~r~ _p n ~~~~
. ~,,M:
~~C E 1 ~~ .,, ..1;,,
June 9, 2003
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environrrlental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
JUN t! J ?.t'nt
DJVISIDN OF
HIGHWAYS
~FVELOPN
~L A N A~~
This letter is in response to your letter of May 29, 2003, which provided the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) with the biological conclusion of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) that the replacement of Bridge No. 4 on SR 1222 over Tulls Creek in
Cumtuck County (B-2950) is not likely to adversely affect the federally-threatened bald eagle
(Haliaeetits lezecocephalz~s). These comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to the information you submitted, a survey was conducted on March 7, 2003 by canoe
and by driving accessible roads within the area. The primary zone (1500 feet from the project
area) was surveyed both upstream and downstream of the existing bridge. In addition, five aerial
sweeps were made over the bridge site and surrounding area on May 21, 2003 from a small plane
at an altitude of 300 to 400 feet. No eagles or eagle nests were observed during either survey.
Based on the negative survey results, the Service concurs with your conclusion that the proposed
bridge replacement is not likely to adversely affect the bald eagle. We believe that the
requirements of section 7 (a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied. We remind you that obligations
under section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this
identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered in this review; (2) this action is subseq~lently modified in a manner that was not
considered in this review; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined that maybe
affected by this identified action.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions
regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at (919) 856-4520 (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
Garland B. Pardue, Ph.D.
Ecological Services Supervisor
Bill Biddlecome, USACE, Washington, NC
Dave Franklin, USACE, Wilmington, NC
Tohn Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmore, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
MAJOR PERMIT FEE MATRIX
Applicant: NC Department of Transportation, TIP No. B-2950
Selection Development Type Fee DCM % DWQ
(14300 1601 435100093 1625 6253) (24300 1602 435100095 2341)
I. Private, non-commercial
development that does not $250 100% ($250) 0% ($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or o en water areas:
II. Public or commercial
development that does not $400 100% ($400) 0% ($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or o en water areas:
III. For development that
involves the filling and/or
excavation of up to 1 acre
of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if A,
B, C, or D below a lies:
III(A). Private, non-
commercial development, if $250 100% ($250) 0% ($0)
General Water Quality
Certification No. 3490 (See
attached can be a lied:
III(B). Public or commercial
~ development, if General $400 100% ($400) 0% ($0)
Water Quality Certification
No. 3490 (See attached)
can be a lied:
III(C). If General Water
Quality Certification No. $400 60% ($240) 40% ($160)
3490 (see attached) could
be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional
review and written DWQ
concurrence is needed
because of concerns
related to water quality or
aquatic life:
I11(D). If General Water
Quality Certification No. $400 60% ($240) 40% ($160)
3490 (see attached) cannot
be a lied:
IV. For development that
® involves the filling and/or $475 60% ($285) 40% ($190)
excavation of more than
one acre of wetlands and/or
o en water areas:
o~
v
>,
L
r
N
s
tL ..
~~
~'~oa;
,.
=~
. 2
r >,a
~~iDw
~~~
>:~
'S _ y?
_'_tii
4
N
W
~o
0
v
H
v
0
U
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Si~efs
See Sheet i-B For Corveniionol Plon Sheet SymL~ls
See Sl~ei 1-C for Survey Control Sheet
~~~~ro ~ ~~
~ A `,
4
l/J~
~~~
-~-f
~J~~~N~~°~Y
SR 1211 (TOLLS
TO MOYOCK
~~~~~~~~' ~~ ~~~lll YW ~~~
CURRITUCK COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE N0. 4 OVER TOLLS CREEK
ON SR 1222
* DESIGN EXGEPTIpNS REQUIRED fpR DESIGN SPEED (50 MPFI), MIN, tipRIZpNTAL GURYE RADIUS (010')
AND HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE ~308'~.
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROTECT LENGTH
50 15 0 50 100 ADT 2007. 4418
ADT 2027 = 8508
PLANS DHV = 14% LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT &2950 = 0,514 MI
50 15 0 50 100 D = 60'Ya LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT &2954 = 0.057 MI
T = 5 % ' TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT &2950 = 4.567 MI
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) V = 50 MPH
10 5 0 t0 10 RURAL COLLECTOR
1 ' TTST 2% + DUAL 3%
Prenore0 !n ilp OrllCe d,
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
IODO Biuh Rld~~ Dr., Ra(a(~b NC, 17610
uae sr~s~veRn sPeemcana~a
RIGIiT OF WAY DATE; GARY LOVERING, PE
JUNE 16, 2006 PROn`~'"`
LETTING DATE; ANTHONY C. WEST
JUNE 19, 2007 PRO~r~'~ ~`~"`
a RA3\ IaWLT a~lOapCi 11D. ~
~' 8-2950 1
RAR ~.~\ ..A.w.an ~„~
JlENS
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER AIVISION OF ffiGHWAYS r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLQIfA E'
ao ' [[
i
,` +a 1
P& f
' ttt°nCd~ ~~~~i
ROADWAY DESIG `~tS~' ~ ~ G1i''~ ~
EVGAQEHR €~'~`0 ESSIq~,~i~~ ~r aF T.Iw\~°P
!~ BEAL ~~ a
1 45873 &
~~, ~ TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND STRUCTURE
C
c
`r
T
~,
~;
Y
NQ
• Tbr_
., ~-
~;f
--
FINAL PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
~1 PROP. APPROX. 11h" ASPHALT GONCAETE BUAFACE COURSE, TYPE BG.6B, AT
AN AVEAAOE RATE OF 188 LBS. PER SO. YD.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE 88.5B,
h
C2 DEPTH. TO
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER $$0. Y0. PER 1
"
BE PLACED IN LAYERB NOT LESS THAN 1Y7
IN DEPTH OA GREATER
THAN 2" IN DEPTH.
D~ PROP. APPROX. 21~" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COUABE, TYPE I19.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 286 LSS, PEA S0. YD.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
DE TYPE I1B.OB AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 L88. PEA 80. YD. PEA 1"
DEPTH, TO B~ PLACED IN LAYERB NOT LESS THAN 212" IN DEPTH OA
OAEATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.
E~ PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, AT
AN AVERAGE RATE OF 458 LBS. PER S0. 1T).
PROP. VAR, DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 826.08,
EE AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER BD. YD. PEA 1" DEPTH. TO
"
SE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LE33 THAN 3
IN DEPTH OA GREATER
THAN 6S~" IN DEPTH.
~ PROP. 8" A1IGAEGATE BASE COURSE
T EARTH MATERIAL.
U EXISTING PAVEMENT
W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT. BEE BTANDAAD WEDGING DETAIL
NOTE; PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS 6HOWN OTHERWISE.
-L-
i 32'10"
I 4'11" I 11' I 11' I 3'11" I
1 t
,~~
BRIDGE TYPICAL
-lr STA. STA 28+48,94
TO -l- STA 31+51.06
REDWING WALL ~~
1' S" Is" ~.m°ij~
SOIL STABLIWION FAB0.1C
_ _ 1' S"
^~ ~ OVABC -STA 24+50 TO 28+60 III
COPING sit ~~ LT WT AGGREGATE -STA 14+50
~,~ s ~• TO 28+60
~-RETAINING WALL
(SEE WALL PLANS: W-1 TO W~)
" INSET A "
USE INSET A WITH TYPICAL SECTION N0.3
LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATE AND 10" ABC LIMITS
-L- STA 24+50 TO 18+60
~ -~• (SR 1221)
TIE TO EXISTING SHOULDER
~~
~~~
NA7URAl GROUND
4'-b'
11'-0" 11'-0" 4'-6'
-1.5'+A ~ 1.3'+E
l I~
/ C1 RESURFACING C1 ~
OAST EXIST
_.~ -i-~_
1 ~ B" E1 D1 T
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION N0.1
TIE TO EXISTING SHOULDER POINT
NATURU GROUND
/ ~
i
~~`~~i
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.1
-lt STA 12+50.00 TO STA 23+50,00
SURVEY
C1 C2 py Dl
E2
g• MIN, MIN. 3"
MIN. U MIN.
DETAIL SHOWING MEMOD OF WEDGING
S'-0°
3p ~ ~~ /
~ ~
_NATURAL GROUND ~~-' -r T
~ -lr (SR 1222)
11'-0" 12'• "
VA0. 0' TO 3' ~ VAR.O' TO 3' 4
I P
c1 w ~ PoIM ~ w
0,_QZ OA1 O.E
. ~ _. _.
~ e" E1 D1
GRADE TO THIS UNE
TYPICAL SECTION N0.2
__
~~~~ i
LNG ANNA
NATURAL GROUN6
9,,~----
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0,1
-Ir STA 23+50.00 TO STA 24+50.00
-I. STA 35+00.00 TO STA 42+43.10
NOTE: SEE TYPICAL SECTION N0.3
FOR RETAINING WALL LOCATION
AILING
BE ~ -Ir (SR 1212) RE~AIUING
W
20' - 23'1" ~ 19' -13'1"
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.3
Dl
~ GRADE
Pr01NT
' C1 -L- STA 24+50.00 TO STA 28+48.94
Dl
~
~ (BEG. BRIDGE)
0,__01 0.02 SOIL STABLIIATION FABRIC -PLACE BETWEEN
e,
10" ABC AND UGHi WEIGHT AGGREGATE
NATURAL GROUND c>
.~ Y1~F~'" '. ./ c~ ~
1+~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~~~
f e c L NATURAL 4ROUND
10" ABC 4" SOIL STABlQA110N FABRIC -PUCE AT BASE OF UNDERCUT TO
'" SEE INSET A " LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATE SEPARATE THE LIGHT WEIGHT AGGREGATE FROM E>aSTiNG SOIL
"SEE INSET A "
PROSOSE
a
R29~ TYPICAL SECTION N0
3
S
bo LT
0 STA . PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
-l- STA 14+50 TO 28+60 RT
Ci 1 ~" S9.5B
C2 VAR S9.5B
Di 2~" I19.OB
D2 VAR I19.OB
E1 4" 625.OB
E2 VAR B25.OB
J 6" ABC
T EARTH
U EXIST
W WEDGE
NATURAL GROUND
'ADD 3.0' FOR GUARDRAIL ~ -4- ASR 1122)
Yg~-0p 12~-0R ~ 14~~ g~-0~
,. .
.s,
o~ ~ I
o,~ o~os o.01
'' ~ I
GRADE TO THIS LINE)
TYPICAL SECTION N0,4
~ -DRv
I GRADE
POINT
r.:.--- -__ s~I
3d ~ '~C
NATURAL GROUND b•
T J J T
SOIL STABUZATION FABRIC -PLACE UNDHI THE GRADE TO 1H1$ LINE
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ALL
TYPICAL SECTION N0.5
NATURAL GROUND
NATURAL GROUND
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.4
~ STA 31+51,06 )END BRIDGE) TO STA 35+00.00
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.5
-0RW STA 10+16.10 TO STA 13+75.00
~~~~I~
~~dd ~JC DENR nn
Irl~~ E I~ ~~1.! ~
.:Cl~ST~r~ i'Jt~rsul~~ ~ . ,'_~,I,
~PiZt~~''.'i`i !'i'~ 4
c
m
fl
T
v
r
n
v;
T
,;
m
u~
fJ
~d
/~
`~ 0»
to
=~
_~
~~
~~
~.a~
-.
< Uy,
~.~
0
et
0
E, F. HUMPHRIES, JA.
DB 115, PG. 627
OB 70, PG. 364
wlLl BN. B, PL. 299
wILL Bk. 7, P0. 27B
a Sp~dal CN N' Dikh +~
I
A p Se Ddail "C" d5'
{
W Q ~
W a ~ woods '
N
$ Q +
W
~.
_ ~~ 1Y
.~- .~ ~_ .\~ ' ilk. ~
~
EAI$f Ai.
Zen "
JO A IA-24 U/C
T O
1 SR 1272 r~(~5 CRffx pp, O O
"p 10 cuRR?OGx
I
i
. ~
U ~~ _ _ 7q - il/ N
+ k $ ro 5R /272 0 N
~
+ 4 'E t aa1 'l~
~
c -
Y- C
u c - EMIS} A/w [~
~,,,,,, jVM
8 , IsTUwe6o~ ° +
I 4'6L ,$
d
M ory
¢ IA TO A/w
~ I I
I
I _
I~
, LT.1 aT,
GuLr
4
C
a . PNC
32+86.72
I g Q I~I
~ I I w~/o
I
~ -L• STA 43+06.91
J I~
~ a I W.55' RT.
~ I
I fpdal ONd~
I I >w D"M " I I
~ '' ~ II END TIP PROJECT &2950
~ ~' ~ ~' -L- POT TA
42+43
]0
n a o
o
~
}
a .
.
P
N
;
" ~ ELMEA M, WALKER rv vi
T - ~ + ~`
m
e
N •
x DB 760. PG.225
D0 352, PG. 666
TESTER iNTERPRI$ES, INC ~& PC G, PG. 262
DB 170. PG. 765
DB IIA~ PG, 35G tM4Pl
DB 112, PG, 540
06 I42, PG. 59 a4aPl ROBERT L. CaILLIER, et ux
DETAIL C
08622, PG, 67
Pf, G, PG. 262 SPECIAL DITCH
Not 10 $COIBI Front
atural ~ p( e( Slope
s
routs , D f'Rt
Nin. D• 1 Ft.
Rarw a+:a ro a+~aao LT.
NroM u+3a re ~~+uao ar,
~o
~~ ~~ ~~n
~~ ~ ~ ~~~
~U.q$lizpb fh ~ ~~~k~f ^.
NOTES;
P,S, = PAYED SHOULDER
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 8
*DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED (50 MPH,
MIN, HORIZONTAL CURVE RADIUS (610')
AND HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE X308`),
P
P
n
FEOJEQ tEFEt@JCE N0, INtLT N0.
8-2950 4
NM' fFIEET N0.
IOAOWAY DOION NYDA,WIICt
WOINFEt tN98Nt61
~o
8~,
LA P1 Sta l3+2975 P! Sio !0+33.00 0 ~
r U ~ C~25 3~8~ fRTJ 0 = ~5 ~ r3 ~~, N Y
BEGIN TIP PR CT B-2950 c - J'9T59' c = 3298'
U POC STA, 12 50,00 R ~ 2~2~rssr R = i;,Qo
SE = ExiST SE = ExlST ~
t
` O
N of +
W
$ ~ STATE OF NORTH CaADLINd
V1 ¢P a' DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
`Sl1 GORY R. BOULWARE m$ ~t ~ OB 468. PG. 455
Dfi 485, PG. 219 n ~ i ~. DB 76 PG. 540 IMAPI ~
w DB 31E. PG. 556 IMAPI
:?
Nw
n ~
EIA uARSN
tg' ~ woods - tia ~; + ~ x + ~ :
P°
~~C p NR~~
m ~INff
~J4R 1 ~ ~oo~ ~.zfi g~
~~4~sr~i. A~~~~~p
Elizabet)2 ~it<%
>r ~ .~
`fe
H
~ ~f
~~ y'• ,
+Y '( P
0
~ 4 8 °~, ae obO~°.w
9q, f
~ \ , ~'A.
\ ~ J~~3.Bf
EGRESS, INGRE55-REGRE55 ;pFy ~
OvER SOIL ROdD TD CCOg9.69T ~ "'wz•
EDGAR EvaNS PROPERTY q ~`;bp.9 2 ~ So'~'F ~
~ a ~~
~B4i ~
~ ULLIaN FLORq STEwART. HEIRS ~~// \ ~~\
DB T5. PG. 405 WESERVATION' ~ ~
DB 71, PG. 590 IMAPI
NAw$N
-ORV- PTSto.lO+4499
Y ~
NAR$N ~
- - ~ +!
i
N 7' "
'
~ I
I `~
~ ~7 $. ~
~ sF x ~
. f
4+ 60'
- - T
~
~ woods
IC
%
l ~ ~ !I
'' ~
fAEE
1aN1
~ d la
~ ~
r~
~
9~ ~. ~ ~-DAV- POTSIO.IO'AOOJ70
~
ct'r
~ +
W
-0 8 { [J
:
i
q0 ~ Y
~
.Y
~ pF FAF
r =
~
~I~ ~ „ . , ~ ' 141 woODS ~?~
Q t ~} I Q M' ~
~J ,~
s ' ~,
w
t 7 TON{
FF~n F N
~r(~~I~fl
J.,
.r 9. EX,R/W W W
~ a.t5' _ !' ~`- - __ P
wLB --~- `Y1Lg_~'~- WLB
~ - - wLB -- - 14L8 F - =4Y1.8 -- - ~'LL.9 - -- _14L6-.~+.~_~LB- W4EB-- ---•" 'YCE _.- - ~~ - -- ~I
Sfl f2P2 7 CAEfw R0. It gg/~fF' U/G R4 ~~' SF 1222 TUf15 CREEx Fp, ~B gyT p
' h ~ ro waox _ _
~ wry y. p T
i
~
R I }^ ~- -="-; e-L- ~ ~-a` ~ t'^- =-~r F --•m~C'L=- r- --~ r_s^+---r~'~.ee-- ~u ~-- :.j'~' _ ~---~~---~ I
-~
~'' EPA ~ a$ f50' TAFEI lT 1 tT
g ~~ ~=-~E ~ ~'
~
I
~ i -~ ~ care
~~
CavwL
CAV4. 8
+ -~ rtA. b+at TO 3A+to
t,en~ uon ro r
NAX n,ATm N
aNFEA
I Q 4E$~ ~H CLOq FEL710NF AJ4D
D
~ d
~
~~
- "
m
5'
-~~ ALL
A~
1lC TAFFt LT{ RT
I
„~
1
\$ G y
m_
o N
i ~ Y 3 ,
'k (/ Y III
-
ETHELYN L. E4aN5 ' ~
~ Q'~,
~
k
J` ~
BL' 6 ~
es 295. PG, tD - ~ woods Q - T uAesN s PING 12+53.32
'
\
PNVC 40+54.56 L6= r
ua+sN x
•L• STA 22*1510
216.56
,44799 Arw -
WLe ---' PNVC 5+00.00 LA s TpE QL Q 13.21` RT.
~~ wLe -~~ -L• STA 15+2LB8 Rv RAP iT,EF~AN4AEJIt
"
t 14.59' RT, s
1
~
b itl14 tl-B a/ M Ip INOI
~ ~
Y -L- Sly. 24+~,~',~ RT
' Jo sr" BEGIN RfTAINlNG WALL & ~
~
O f101'"°`
AROM rtA.»+op To rtw.»+w SINGLE FACE CONCRETE BARRIER
Y (2349' offset f0 CBNB! Of wol!)
~
i ROf,ERS ! . TICE. ESTATE
r NOTES; '
2
e
T
a
~,
rla
11a
'r' Ga
~.W
- ~.
,_,e
~~
s`r
' ~~,
~~~
~ ;r
DB 75, PG. 4,12 t. RETAINING WALL AND SINGLE FACE CONCRETE BARRIER TO
~ DB TL PD, s4G .M4P, FOLLOW A STRAIGHT LINE TAPER FROM FULL SHOULDER WIDTH (8')
r TO BRIDGE RAIL ON APPROACH SLAB.
2, SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR RETAINING WAIL AND BRIDGE DESIGN I
FOR -L- r4 -0RY- PROFILES SEE SHEET 7 & 8
FOR WALL DESIGN SEE SHEETS W-1 TO W-3
P.S. - PAVED SHOULDER
*DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED (50 MPH},
AND HORIZ ONNTAL STOPPING ISIGH6TOD}ISTANCE (30B'),
I
i
f`
r
c
e
E
r
T
~E.
s
s
~a
~_ ~~
.°,€,
o-
Y
f
+~
i f
O
~ Se ~
\'\ '~
EGRESS, INGRESS-REGRESS ` ~~
OVER SOIL ROAD 70
EDGAR EVANS PROPERTY ~ o ~ '~
DB 112, PG. 24 9
'~ ~ ;.
~ O '~m t
~\ `
~ LILLIAN FLDRA STEwaRT, HEIRS
~e `~ ~ D8 75. PG. 405 'RESERVATION' -DRV- -1-
a + T DA 71, PG. 540 (MdPI ~ P1510 r4+,36~ PrSYo 32+67,58
BEG! N ING WALC~ ~^ I4P15'55.4'rLTI ~= 24t43'35J'fLT1
SrNGLE ` NCRET Ba~RiER /,, D = rSD'59' 093' D = 523' 339'
l,~3D9'off Yoe er Df w~1O ~ ~', * 1 = n,Ir 1 ^ 26325'
~~ ~ ~J o ' ',,~ T Q ~2J5' T - 133Jr
~ R =30.00' * R •610,00'
a. srdrE of NGRrN cdeoune ~ ~
a ~ t ~'~~ '~ DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ~
RETAINING WALL ~ ` + De 469, Pc. ass
~. ~~ DB 71, PG. 540 IMAPI
~(I ~J. '
t ~ ~~ \~ ~ a ~ ~ k
~` ,. ~q ~ s
?~ lNGLE f ~ ~ ` ~°'~y1~ 1pk11L" ss ~ ~ O
~ CONCRETE * ti na' '~ E. F, NurAPNRIES, LA.
~ ~ ~ BAPtRfER ~ do ~ \ °: ~ T t .~ Y 08 IIS, PG.627
d • END CON ~ OB 70, PC.3fi4
Wa
~~' ~ ~ ~~, ' t MILL BN. A, PL. 299
~ ; ' -DRV- POTS1 r3+75.00 O : ~ wIU aK.7.PL.2Te
~x \ fi A, -b.~l~., '~ iz x
Nh F'r ~ >r ~ . es\ CLIFTON N. BANKS I~ ~ "Gj END BR/Dv^£ ~
~, <P ''' ~ ~•: DB 79. Pc.124 -L~ SYO.31+51,06 ~ ~ ~
C 4 S, '` ~ ` Vll ' ,, qff 'a. \~ati~r D8 71, PG. 540 IMAPI y ~
'1~ kw~ ~~F " ~~¢ O ~~O END.APPROACH SLAB ~
o*
F*n, ~'~,s LAUNCH LANDING PRDPERTIESJNC. +
,,, ~ ~ ,(~ -L- Sto. 3r+75A6
C ~ ,~ xgg OB 94. PG. 601 ~ 'Q ~ ~
8 6J. Sg. DB 178. PG. 4i4 ILEA9EI ~ ~
L ~ 77P57'F OB 71, PL. 540 IMAPI ~ % '~ ~ i ~
~' 8 ~~ a1 ~ FND 116 At9.1~8p lT
RETAINING Wa.l. >~ Jro~. +3 ~ ; 4~''y ~ Ia61N No >tT erw/. at+Ta.oe LT ,~ x
SINGLE FACE ~ ~ ~ , e.ry, ' ' y, . ~ Q°'~' ~ , ~, , MDOOeD sM4Aw ~ ~ * ,
-DRV- PCSro.13+34J2 ~, ~~ r- I ,, ~+
CONCRETE BARRJER ~ M '~' % 'I~ m .
O ~ /^~~~~ ,•
\ ~+ "~WbW(, ~ ' ~n .. b . ~b ~ V e. ADO ~!~ N 1adeICNN"Dhdl
ROGERS L. TICE, ESTATE ~'ws,~ \ ~ d ~ ~o~W Y rR 6w CemN'C'
DA 75. PG. 902 ~ B'qp 6q~OGF . K \ ~ 5 MM IFIS PIOGpI d PI ~ ~6' MD I
DB 71, PC. 590 IMAPI 5'' > 0 '~j'
BEGIN APPROACH SCAB ~ o,N, ~` " " "'R °^uyo x . s P Doce a ` ` ~ ,~
ENO SINGLE FACE so,ro-.,s, '~S i + `i - _ '~ ~ ~ , ' """"'
CONCRETE BARRIER * / ~,, aF BRb`` ~, 6 ~ ~ " ~ ~ I r - - - - --E;s
-1- Sfo.28+2494 ~ FdF~ a a1o a ''~
r19lJO'RT o/d 20,00'L7 ~ ,n (ti ~ ~ b•z,. _
offset r0 C°ldPJ Of worll ~ LV~~E ~ '1 fX.R/W .,, - - n
Y ; -
~^ S O
BEG/N BR/OGE ~- ~ ~~ a
x. ~ `' V ~ Mt' Prgrq.• ,~~ 19 e'DP r.i-wc ~ ,
-L- S16.28+4894 ~ ,~^ Ta _ - .~~I~,, A,w
1 I f -
END RETaNING WALL ~' cr*wo ., ~ n ~ Aemwa
-L- STA 28+6011b LT/f~T ~ ~ Y~ ~ ~ mlzTUP9EDl 8 ~ m P
Clau 7' p Ra I Grow Swale IsPG tJr Y 'Rrw To ~r.o.sa ~ aa- tY
+~ Undar &Idpe Ony sea Dekil •B• f~ 'POpR' T ~ speekl Cul N' Dkch COLT.
NOTES: ,~,, ' SM Dde11'C"
1. RETAINING WALL AND SINGLE FACE CONCRETE BARRIER TO , , Sfruduro Pay Hem ~ sc+rrEPED ,PEES u~'W, ss ~ „•ti '~' ~p~y~~g
FOLLOW A STRAIGHT LINE TAPER FROM FULL SHOULDER WIDTH (B') °' ~ g~. 5 a roNS r~~' sPLnu D]TTitaSS5M4E +
TO BRIDGE RAIL ON APPROACH SLAB, °~~ ~ t/ ~' 'S' ~~' """"°'~ ~~ +5'
a a PINC 21+53.07 55p ~ o'~ 85 85'
1. SEE STRUCTURE PLANS FOR RETAINING WALL AND BRIDGE DESIGN ~/~'~ -L- $TA 31+74.06 ::~ eD.~ ~ ~ ~~' "~ o a«ro
FOR -L- & -DRV- PROFILES SEE SHEET 7 & 8 ~ P<,+P
,tom{o~ 13.90' RT. /`~ o . u vr.
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS SEE SHEETS S-1 TO 5-23 ~ ~~ 5;>idin.,~Iwr7~~p~,~I~G}a~r~y,IBC}a~~~I~~~I~r,~I~~;,~I~t.~~p,~~I~~~l~.~ 2, ~ e.:aPr.
FOR WALL PLANS, SEE SHEETS W 1 TO W-3 n/z~ L~cPT Poops ~ ~ ; ' ~1 ra6M m+sD ro as+ao ar.
lug ~ `~~~ r ~ ~" DETAIL C
j^Y ~~
~
,`~ ~~ SPECIAL DITCH
IN01' 10 Sc01B1 Front
_
~~
F. HUPdPNAIES, JR.
ny ;IE, PL, ~2T ~
[, L
~~1 7 "V'
, ~
raturrn ~ ~o~tier $10>'e
Ground 0 ~~~
' O
~
G9 Ir, PF. 3o4 "' ~ ,.~
~ wn. o• t Ft,
WILL Bv_9. PG.?99 0 "„#:7L
~~
~~
7
PRDAI a/+10 TD Aa+b.1/ LT.
a+IJ
10 AT
O LE_TEfi INiERPEISES, !fC
P 6
DB 179
.~ 9e. v. PG. ?IZ i-
~
~~ .
.
~
Rl6M °I+11 T .
~
.
, /
A:^; i
P,S, - PAVED SHOULDER .~j ~ r ~
*DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED (50 MPH), //~' '
MIN, HORIZONTAL CURVE RADIUS (610') r~"
AND HORIZONTAL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE (308')
;~~C~iV~
>~IC DAN
~l~f~ l_ ~ ~00~
4~f~TAl. Yvi~l`J~~E(Vl~f~
~I(ZOb~ih pity
40
COLT. '_
N
_ WW
- ZN
J~
5'E =Q
L g
~Si ~
M
'r
MAR-~ii07 ILr)I
Mt07CCf IPL~B~IC! N0. fMlCT N0.
P B-2 50 8
m
N IAADWAY D!lIGN M19AAU11Ci
WGN@It
WGNIR
N rr
` ~Q
~
[EFT D1fCH - • • - a
~
ssm
R!Cl~fr 01TCN ------ i
~ ~ciN~~
~\
a
3B 39 40 41 42 4 3
~'~
n
v
~
~
-
--i
°
' 1'i
~i --
~a _
L` _ _ _ _ _
G/
10 11 12 13 14
P
m
n
r\Q
F G+
~ ~~~~~~~
~~
~~
,~
~`°` ~ Site 1
,~
..
~~e~\~
.~
[[..--
~v t t \
Retaining W ~~,
2~'~' \ ~.
vy ~ ~
Z' ~ ~ * ~
~ F\ ~
~'
x r ~~
y ~ ~~,
`~rW,, ~~
L~ ti q ' Wl8 R I ~
~(; \ ~',
F\
# ~
i
t ~
Retaining Wall ~ ~
Y
~~
fROJlCf lEFE!@~K! N0. SNlET N0,
r 8-2950 5
AW INER N0,
ROADWAY 0lSIGN NfDAAINCS
WOINEEA BiGIN!&
~. ~ ~ P.RI~LTM~~T.~Y PGAI~FS
Dd EM'F f%i:lgtt ODN11'8F7Gtlo;t;
/, +
~f
O
'/. ~ ~+' x
~~~~~ Permit Drawing
~~~ ~~~ Sheet Z of
r
:~ 1~~~ ,~ ~ ~~
~~;~~E~
~~~~,~ ~~~vi~ ~aP ~g~
~,
,,,~
O~
~~
a
z~
:~ * ~ x
\ ° ~ N
M
1,.~,~.,1,. ~ >r
„~
4 t t ~
~~
.I,.a ~ ~ r Slte r4 , ,a
- .+ p,
~ * 1 ~ \
Rlmevl dbinp Aldp/ ~ ~E9
\ ~ ~ Y +
3
l\;,4 Q Y ~ Y ~ ~ ~
~ Y ~
b . WOpOEO 5 4
' ~r, . * ~, ~~' I, w w x x ~,
I MlldNad . ,r, .' • a.. ,n . ,l, . , ,q ~ a'l, . _,~,~~~a'
~ 'L. q,.,b. .,V'~~ W~
I ~ 1•n'rf ADO
\ ~1 % 7A ~
S Nw S
IfISWN CAMP) ~6'WO 1
A A IPDC6Al ~ / W
N/ X IS F D p Op. - N / CLIT. '~
~ R/kin Bulidad~ ~l ~ k ' ~ / H
~ ~ f -~-- W
t ~ l . - - ~ ~ sm A~" Z N
t A/mew 6JWRnp Aide/ 11 ~ S J
/ ~
ti
~ ~, ~ V O
~~~ grsr n,W ~~' 1S 4'~'
I M
S I t ~/ i~ ~; F C C
~~ ~ ~ ~ IsfD 11 ie
' ~
IPOOAI
1 ~ ~~ L cu~i. I~
SCgi7EAED 1AEES ~ ~`~/ p I
•
o~-
,:~-
~a
T?
~,
IMPACTS KEY
® Flllin W.dendl
® Fill fn Surfca Wahl
® EearoMan In W/Rondf
® Dainld W/llndl
S ~ to 3 14,1 SPECUL "" ""' SILLE
P Ib1NkW1
I m~ l~jl
a 8O5T ~ ~ ~/ aa~ D aeua
RAMP
r Ic,,o~y~i,sl~i~~v~1~C~a~si~I~t~,I~r~~l~~m~~I~~~i~~~l~~y~l~~~~i~-~ 151 p~ufr.
/ IApS ir,
uGxi wcCgE ~ 1 1 lROM r+30 TO JS+lO R1.
(rI c 1 I~,
I` ~11 1 ~ ~ $~PECUL DITCH
l:} \ 14 (Not to Scale) froor
/~= • 1 , Aarura ~ ~ ,~ sloce
I =Y /~J / '0 GraurtG u p
1 1~„~ 6~~>tm. p~ I rt.
o"
~ ~ 1 ~ fRant u+s! ro ~~+u,la LT,
1 1 y ADM u+ie ro u+a.la ~.
r
1ST
~w1;,1/
;~;1
~1 1 1
rvl 1,
5Q 25 0 50 app {~
SCALE
'MARCH 14 1007
P
r
N
n
~~0~
~~P~
Y
l~~CEIV~~
:@Qe Q~~~
~~A~i ab~ h ~i~~lEl1~.
~ ~ \
s
Y
PEOJECT AEREENCE N0. EHEET ND.
B-2950 4
EhY kIER N0.
101DWAY DlSIGN NYDMUtJCE
ENGINlER [NGINl6l
PErrnit ~iGwing
Sheet ~ of 6
Y / O '~ i
r N~
~~
m s ~ NARSn
~ ~ S
3
i ~
NARSN Y
Y Y
_ NMSH MARSH
Y
Igl ~ WOWS Y i Y Y
b : I~ p, ~ ~ s ~. ~ r IN.
p w0005 ~ ICI ~~ ~ ~ W
411 ~Q; 4~ 4 x s ~ w
I p; ass ~ ~ ~ ~ s H
ply ~ fJ x
~4~1~~'I'~'''~~f~~I~li Q i ~n~fl " ~ W W
B cp~~~i WLB WL WLB ~ WLB WLB W ~ ~~ ~~
- _ l~ ~` - - - ~ ~ _- _ ~-7uv~_ _. _ - - - - - - _ .- .1B - _ _JN19 _ JYLe- -- „~~~-~-_ JO
SR IY22 CAEEw 91 /C A~B' ~/ IiYI ~ ~- -- SR 1222 7UU5 CREEn R0. Itr E51 T O
/ / _ ib JbrA7i ~~?~_ - - i'^rl=t z Mrs _~-• - - =~nz =~ ~ e'~~ ~~ „'n-=~^~ ~+--•~-~----'er:-r.+u ~^'~rr~.a- r-~-s-~-- st'` ~ Fi
\ ~ ~- cnva. ~ N
~} I I ca+x cawx Rrlo(rnng WDII
AN EA I I £~ '~'Q -~~ ~ tB~~
$ J -J7-
~~N' ~ ~ ~ t L Y ~ ~ I
L ~ ~ Y is
w0005 Q NMSa ~ Y - ~
TAI A NMSn ~
~ RP RAP AT EIBANKSFNT
~~ wLB Iwr ra Soon
~ ~ s
~ ~ ~ ~ 4'
y 10 IONS CaA~M YY Pq.
y m sr rs
nm nwc
R;OM SfA, ZS+O! TO 91A 7A+!!
t
~ ~
Y
Y
r IMPACTS KEY
Site 1
® Rll in wwdal~n
® RII In Surface Wale
50 25 0 30 100 fi
SCALE
MARCH 14 2007
\
N FROJ, R EFERE NCE N0, SHAT N0,
95 0
1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
e it ra in
h et 6 G
oJl: o u
- - - - 3, 5
3 + 0, 00
,, o.
- - 3, 7 ..
~~ rr
'J .~
o, a•
~~~
~~
I. 6 '- ~ ~5
- - -
S
a
HOU ER a
0,0 9 .0019
~ ~
~, 0,01 0. N1 C NO
IN DS
~, ,~
~-
8,
7
~~
4~~
NFD
~ _ . . _
-
C~ -
u -
~- f IN IIXCA A1fON
`^ .
?i~
u~
=
, ~ ~,
r~c-
~
$
i
?~
t
o
't
o
t
o
t
o
t
o
t
o
t
t
t o t o t o t o t o t o
v PROJ. R~EAENCE N0. SHEET N0.
8- 2960 X -
N
~
o
~i
o
i
o
i
s
i
o
~
o
i
>
>
o
io
~
o
~
o
i
s
i
o
S eet f
i
AT ON
RV- A 10 71.9
C l
na
a. i °•QS °~ 00 PE IFIE N R SS E 10 S
- - ~ - -
UND CUT LEV -1, o w
~ ~~
4 NR
-0RV STA o+i zo C nal
16.1 ' LT •1. '
°.m
,
- C nal
o.
e
na
a
1. 6
"' Ca al
J;~
mn
.m'~
mr~ - -
,inr
-Lr
,~.,/~-
_ ~~ ~ ~
V', p r
L~
i ~r
%F
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
4
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
4
1
0
1
0
1
0
MlO1KT RlFtR@!C! N0. 6HlEf N0.
Enlarged View
~ti~
a~~~b.
~~
zn~~l24b~~~ Cii~
INCOMPLE E PLANS
DD NOT O~ FOR /• ACOWRSON
PRELIMIN
DD NOT VSE FO RY PLANS
CONff~RVCTION
Permit Drawing
Sheet ~( of 6
-___.
Site 4
Site 2
Site 3
~ w' ~" Mechanized Clearing in Wetlands
` ® fill in Wetlands
m
E ® Fill in Surface Waters
z
v
® Excavation in Wetlands
® Drained Wetlands
>>
.,o
a.
.;
50 25 0 50 100 ft
SCALE
MARCH 14 2007
ri~l
a
E
~_
~~
~.~
Enlarged View
Site 1
6HEET
~~G~~N
Ss~4 ~`~~~~' ~~i~~
-~~a,~lt~ob:St~
INCOMPLE E PLANS
DO NOT VbR FOR / ~ ACOVL417ON
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
W NOT VbB IO CGNbTRUCI'ION
Permit Drawing ~
Sheet 3 of ~
6
i
6
i
~E
I
P
~
~ ~~\':
~ ~ ~~
`.
~ ~ ~ `.
~~
~ `
\
~ \~
\,~'
~~PO ~ ~ \ \ ~
`'/
Y ~ ~
Retaining Wall `'/
i ~ ~
~~
~
~ ~
, i
c
_,~_~ 1
J/
-- 18' BST ~_
-- ~ - -~
-
tA+
~`~~` t
Retaining Wall
`'~B
.
.. ,~
~
MARSH
~ ~ ~
Denotes Fill in Wetland
Denotes Fill in Surface Water
50 25 0 50 100 h
SCALE
MARCH 14 2007
a=