20080185 Ver 1_CAMA Application_20080124

,©~~ 08-0185
~~~_
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor James H. Gregson, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
January 23, 2008
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Environmental Biological Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Francis and Susan Hughes
JAN 2 4 2008
DENR • WATER QUAUTI'
V'lETt.ANDS AND STQRMWATER t3RAliCH
Project Location: Adjacent to Core Creek at 245 Gatsey Lane, in Stanton Landing Subdivision,
Beaufort, Carteret County
Proposed Project: The applicant is proposing new dredging and relocation of one of the two
existing boatlifts and new construction of a finger pier for private use.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return-this form by
2/13/2008. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
Brad Connell at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are
requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED 400 Commerce Avenue, MoI~14~City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

MAJflR PERiV1IT FEE 1~1A,TRIX
r- ~.'Ja'~-'.~~luyr~~:..r'~~11u.'..4S~Y•:]~f. t:T~W~i~~~Q:• • JF~~i . ~ ., ~~:b6 .l
Selection .,_.[)eveicrn•rert-Type~--~._. Fee DCM °o DLYO ~/o
,.-~" '"'~ (14300 1601 X35100093 1625 6253) (24300 1602 435100055 2341)
~,
.~ I. Private, non-commercial
development that does not $~50 100% ($250) 0% ($0}
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
~
or o en wa a~eas~'~
""-'"° .Public or commercial
development that does not $400 100% ($400) 0% ($0)
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or o en water areas:
III. Far development that
involves the filling and/or
excavation of up to 1 acre
of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if A, .
B, C, or D below a lies:
III(A). For Private non-
commercial development, if $250 100% ($250) 0% ($0)
General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see
attached can be a lied:
II){B). For public or
commercial development, if $400 100% ($400) 0% ($0)
General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 {see
attached can be a lied:
III(C). tf General Water
Quality Certification No. $400 60% ($240) 40% ($160)
3301 (see attached) could
be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional
review and written DWQ
concurrence is needed
because of concerns
related to water quality or
a vatic life:
III(D). If General Water
Quality Certification No. $400 60% ($240) 40% ($160)
3301 (see attached) cannot
be a lied:
IV. For development that
involves the filling and/or $475 60% ($285) 40% ($190)
excavation of more than
one acre of wetlands and/or
o en water areas:

r
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAME: Francis and Susan Hughes
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: The project is located adjacent to Core Creek at 245 Gatsey Lane,
at the Stanton Landing subdivision in Beaufort in Carteret County.
Photo Index - 2006: 46-8758, grids L-13;2000: 46-584, grids M-13
State Plane Coordinates - X: 404288.15 Y: 2693711.56 Rover #: M120313A
Longitude: 34 50 19.15 Latitude: 76 41 16.30
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/Dredge & Fill
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 12/03/07
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - cc: 1/22/08
Office - MHC
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan -Carteret County
Land Classification From LUP -Rural/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, PTA
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing -Septic system
Planned -None
(F) Type of Development: Existing -Residence, shoreline stabilization, and private docking facility
Planned -New finger pier, new excavation, and relocation of boat lift
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
DREDGED FILLED INCORP/SHADED
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other- O~-en inlgl'et~ 2,352 sf 2,561 sf incorp
40 sf shaded
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2,561 sf
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA; HQW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant has an existing private docking facility with two slips. He
is proposing new dredging and relocation of one of the two boatlifts and new construction of a
finger pier for private use.

' Field Investigation Report:
Francis Hughes
Page 02
9. Narrative Description:
The property is a 0.67-acre private residential property on Core Creek in the Stanton
Landing subdivision off of NC Highway 101 in Carteret County. The owners, Francis and
Susan Hughes, wish to dredge around their existing docking facility, relocate a boat slip
and construct a finger pier, and are applying for a permit to do so.
The parcel lies at 245 Gatsey Lane in the Stanton Landing subdivision on Core Creek in
Carteret County. The property fronts the east side of Core Creek, a tributary of Newport
River. Core Creek is approximately 375' wide at the project location.
There is 90' of shoreline on this property. The current vegetation on the tract mainly
consists of well-established lawn grasses. None of the project area has submerged aquatic
vegetation or other wetlands present. The elevation of the tract is + 6' nhw. Man-made
features on the parcel include riprap revetment, private docking facility, and private
residence. The existing docking facility extends 80' waterward of the existing bulkhead
and is 101' from the edge of the AIWW channel. The adjacent properties also consist of
similar private residences with docking facilities.
The Carteret County Land Use Plan has classified this area as Rural, with CAMA AEC's
classified as Conservation. These waters of Core Creek are not designated as Primary
Nursery Area, and are closed to the harvest of shellfish north of the NC Highway 101
bridge. These waters carry a water quality classification of SA; HQW. The bottom
substrate is fine silt, without submerged aquatic vegetation. These waters have an
approximate +/-3' lunar tidal amplitude.
10. Proposed Development:
The request is for new dredging, relocation of a boatlift and new construction of a finger pier
in conjunction with an existing private docking facility. The proposed excavation and
construction activity is to take place waterward, to the west, of the existing riprap, and
expand the footprint of the existing docking facility on the property. The proposed dredging
by barge mounted excavator is of approximately 242 cubic yards of bottom substrate, with
one section being 20' long by 90'wide on the outside of the platform and the other section
being 46' long by 12' wide on the north of the proposed finger pier, to depths of -6.0' nlw
to be disposed of at an upland location off-site by a marine contractor, requiring the prior
approval of the DCM. Current soundings in the slips range from -1.8' nlw on the landward
edge, down to -7.0' nlw immediately waterward of the docking facility.
The existing decked area of the platform is 8' by 45' (approximately 360 sf). The proposed
finger pier would be 10' long by 4' wide and would consist of relocating a boat slip with a
lift 13' long by 13' wide, both of which would connect to the existing pier and platform.
The existing platform would also be reduced to 8' by 40'. This reconfiguration of the
existing platform would have no net increase of total platform area. The proposed
development would remain outside of the 15' riparian corridor as it is drawn perpendicular

to the existing channel. At the terminus of the structure, there is -7.0' of water at nlw. The
proposed structure is to be used for private boat docking of 22' and 32' boats.
11. Anticipated Impacts:
As proposed, the finger pier will shade an additiona140 square feet of shallow shell bottom
habitat, with the boat lift incorporating an additional 169 square feet. There will be 360
square feet of platform area along 90 linear feet of shoreline. No SAV or wetlands were
observed in the area and this waterbody is closed to shellfishing. Turbidity impacts should be
short term relating to the dredging and bucket removal of 242 cubic yards of fine sand and
driving of the pilings. The intended uses include private dockage of marine vessels resulting
in a reconfiguration of an existing docking facility. The excavation of the area should prevent
future scarring. The proposed structure should not be a hazard to navigation since it will
remain within the footprint of the existing structure and will not exceed the established pier
length within this creek.
Brad Connell January 22, 2008 Morehead
City

Q~~
~~-
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F, Easley, Governor James H. Gregson, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 22, 2008
TO: Doug Huggett
THRU: Tere Barrett
~~
FROM: Brad Connell ~`
SUBJECT: Comments and Recommendations - CAMA Major Permit -Francis and
Susan Hughes, Carteret County .
The following is my assessment and consequent recommendations of the above
referenced proposal: The project, as proposed, will have minimal environmental
impacts. Small scale excavation of this type produces only minimal, short-term water
quality impacts. Proper dredging of the two existing boat slips will have little impact due
to the less productive biological strata, and the fine sand disturbance to water quality
will be short-lived in nature. The proposed finger pier and boatlift are within the footprint
of the existing structure and pose no threat to navigation. This proposal is not in conflict
with the current usage of this tributary of Newport River, and this waterbody should not
be deleteriously affected. There is no submerged aquatic vegetation, the waterbody is
not a PNA. This area is closed to shellfish harvest. Assuming that state and federal
agencies concur with the proposal, I recommend the project be authorized as proposed,
contingent upon the following conditions:
1) That the disposal area of the excavated material be pre-approved by DCM before
any dredging is to take place;
2) That the structure be strictly for private, non-commercial use;
3) That the docking facility not interfere with access to riparian property with a
minimum setback of 15 feet from the riparian property lines;
4) Excavation will not exceed 6.0 feet below the normal low water level. In no case
shall the depth of excavation exceed the depth of connecting waters;
5) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within
waters or vegetated wetlands is not authorized;
6) No spoil material is to be placed within 30 feet of the normal high water line;
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Francis and Susan Hughes
January 22, 2008
Page 2 of 2
7) This permit authorizes a maximum of two boat slips at this structure;
8) The authorized structures and associated activity must not cause an
unacceptable interference with navigation, and shall not exceed the existing
footprint;
9) This permit authorizes only the docks, piers, and other structures and uses
located in or over the water that are expressly and specifically set forth in the
permit application. No other structure, whether floating or stationary, may
become a permanent part of this docking facility without permit modification. No
non-water dependent uses of structures may be conducted on, in or over public
trust waters without permit modification;
10) That the total platform area is not to exceed 360 square feet.
11) All excavated materials will be confined above mean high water and landward of
regularly or irregularly flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining
structures to prevent spillover of solids into any marsh or surrounding waters.
12) The pier and associated structures shall have a minimum setback distance of 15
feet between any parts of the structure and the adjacent property owner's
riparian access corridor, which is determined by drawing a line parallel to the
channel, then drawing a line perpendicular to the channel line that intersects with
the shore at the point where the upland property line meets the water's edge.
13) Approval of the structure was based on a determination that there would be no
obstruction to navigation. Under conditions existing within the AIWW, a
possibility exists that the structure may be damaged by wave wash from passing
vessels. Unreasonable slowing down of vessel traffic can not be required
because such an action would tend to nullify the navigational benefits on which
the AIWW was justified. Issuance of this permit should not be construed as
relieving the permittee of taking proper steps to ensure the structure and moored
boats will not be damaged by wave wash normally to be expected in the AIWW.
The permittee shall not hold the United States liable for any such damage.
14)The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United
States requires the removal, relocation, or other alteration of the structure or
work authorized by this permit, or if in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or
his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable
obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be
required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove relocate or
alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the
United States or the state of North Carolina. No claim shall be made against the
United States or the state of North Carolina on account of any such removal or
alteration.

Francis and Susan Hughes
January 22, 2008
Page 3 of 3
NOTE: The permittee's contractor is advised to contact the U.S. Coast Guard at
[phone] to discuss operations and appropriate lighting, markers,
etc. for all dredge equipment.
CC: Tere Barrett, DCM
Ted Tyndall, DCM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Francis and Susan Hughes
245 Gatsey Lane
Beaufort, NC
Carteret County
The proposed project will serve an existing single-family residence located at 245 Gatsey
Lane, Beaufort, North Carolina. The project site is located adjacent Core Creek in the
Stanton Landing subdivision. An existing pier with a platform, two boatlifts, and
shoreline stabilization were previously installed at the site.
The project consists of relocation of one of the existing boatlifts, excavation to
accommodate the pier and boatlifts, shortening of the existing platform, and construction
of a finger pier.
The areas to be excavated measure 90' x 20' and 46' x 12'. The larger area is parallel to
the existing platform and will provide better access to the channel for the boat to be
stored on the existing lift. The other area to be dredged is perpendicular to the platform
and parallel to the boatlift proposed for relocation (see plan drawings). Existing water
depths average -3.6 NLW in front of the existing platform and - .5 NLW in the area of
the relocated lift. Dredging will result in NLW depths of -6.0 NLW in both areas. A
"bucket to barge" system will remove a total of 242 cubic yards of sand and mud. Spoils
will be trucked off-site to apre-approved disposal area.
The existing platform (45' x 8') will be shortened to measure 40' x 8'. A new finger pier
measuring 4' x 10' will be constructed perpendicular to the north end of the shortened
platform. An existing boatlift measuring 12.5' x 12.5' will be relocated north of the new
finger pier as shown on plan drawings.

OS-01 85
~~M M!-1
APPLICATION for ~ ~ -~-
MaiorDevelopment Permit ,a. _ _
(last revised 72127106)
North Carolina~bIVISCON OF COAi'ST~L~~II AGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant Landowner Information
Business Name Project Name (if applicable)
N/A n/a
Applicant 1: First Name MI Last Name
Francis A. Hughes
Applicant 2: First Name MI Last Name
Susan A. Hughes
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address PO Box City State
110 E. Navesinak Drive Little Egg Harbor NJ
ZIP Country Phone No. FAX No.
080871107 USA 609 - 294 -9433 ext. 609 - 294 - 0163
Street Address (~f different from above) City State ZIP
n/a -
Email
[e-mail]
2. AgentContractor Information
Business Name
Coastal Planning Services, Inc.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name MI Last Name
Kathy B. Vinson
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name MI Last Name
Na
Mailing Address PO Box City State
827 Morehead City NC
ZIP Phone No. 1 Phone No. 2
28557 252 - 240 - 929 7 ext. 252 - 354 - 4916 ext.
FAX No. Contractor #
252 247 5875 n/a
Street Address (~f different from above) City State ZIP
n/a -
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5) ~~ --•- APPLICATION for
' ;Major Development Permit
a ~:- ~ -
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple) Street Address State Rd. #
Carteret 245 Gatsey Lane 1 ~ ~ gin. ; ,. ~ n/a
Subdivision Name City ` State Zip
Stanton Landing Beaufort NC 28516 -
Phone No. Lot No.(s) (d many, attach additional page with list)
n/a - - ext. 23,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located? b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak Core Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade? d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ^Manmade ^Unknown Core Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
^Yes ®No work falls within.
Carteret County
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.) b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
90' 29,142
c. Size of individual lot(s) d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
29,142 square feet, NWL (nom-al water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list) +6.0 ®NHW or ^NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Grass and landscape vegetation
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Single-family residence
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
Vacant single-family residential lots to the north and south.
h. How does local government zone the tract? i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
R-15 (Attach zoning compliance certificate, 'rf applicable)
®Yes ^No ^NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ^Yes No
k. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ^Yes ®No ^NA
If yes, by whom? n/a
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ^Yes ®No ^NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Fonm continues on next page>
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ^Yes ®No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ^Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ^Yes ®No
(Attach documentation, if available)

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
On-site individual septic system.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Individual well.
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems. ~ ,:4` ,~
Stormwater sheet-flow into Core Creek.
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ^Commercial ^PubliGGovernment
®Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Docking facility and associated dredging will serve asingle-family residence located on the project site.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
One excavator on barge will perform the excavation and will be stored on Core Creek at night; one barge with pile-driving
equipment and working platform will install the boatlift and modify the platform.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Relocate existing lift, shorten existing platform, construct finger pier, dredging for pier & lifts.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Both
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 0 ^Sq.Ft or ^Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ^Yes ®No NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Stormwater sheet flow to Core Creek.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ^Yes ®No ^NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinfty as the receiving water? ^Yes ^No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ^Yes ®No ^NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
6. Additionallnformation
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) - (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by cert~ed mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Gregory A. Ricker
Phone No. - , _.
Address 441 Dogwood Trail, Goldsboro, NC 27534
Name Tracey A. Nelson
Phone No.
,~
Address 7529 Bradshaw Road, Kingsville, MD 21097
Name
Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
GP 46788, Frank Hughes, 12f1/2006
GP 47399, Frank Hughes, 8/10/2006
GP 32997, Frank Hughes, 1/3/2003
SW8 02 0717 Gary Hill, Sr. 12/03/2002
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal-review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date _January 14, 2008 Print Name ~_Kathy B. Vinson
Signature ~ of
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ^DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 5 of 5)
^DCM MP-3 Upland Development
®DCM MP-4 Structures Information
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit

w

Form DCM MP-2 ` ~ _.
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts) ~~ >
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete atl other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access Other
Channel
(NLW or Canal Boat Basin Boat Ramp Rock Groin Rock
Breakwater (excluding
shoreline
NWL stabilization
Length 90'/46' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Width 20'/12' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Avg. Existing -3.6 (NL11u)
n/a
n/a
n/a
NA
NA
n!a
Depth -2 0 (NLV~
Final Project _6.0 (NLW) n/a n/a n/a NA NA n/a
Depth
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
cubic yards.
242 cy
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
^CW ^SAV ^SB
^WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
n/a
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area.
Spoils will bp,~ placed off-site in apre-approved disposal
location. ~ ll"e ~,.+~.'ss/o p ~ Qe a h]Sa ~ ~eL/ h~~-
W/Qrr~~/1/ ~4aD~'QCP~r a/Yd!' 7c~ darO4Sa/
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area? ~ v ~~at~08
^Yes ^No ®NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
b. Type of material to be excavated.
mud and sandy material
^This section not applicable
d. High-ground excavation in cubic yards.
0
50'x50'x2.6'
area.
^This section not applicable
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
^Yes ®No ^NA
(ii) If yes, where?
n/a
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
^CW ^SAV ^SB
^WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
n!a
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
^Yes ®No ^NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
n/a

3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ®_ This sc~e~n not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP-4 -Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length:
^Bulkhead ^Riprap ^Breakwater/Sill ^Other:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
^Yes ^No ^NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER F/LL ACTIV-T1ES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ^Yes ^No ^NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
suomergea aquanc vegetation tarw~, sneu uuuum ~ao~, u~
other wetlands (V1IL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
^CW ^SAV ^SB
^WL ^None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
controlled?
The project will employ a "bucket to barge" process. As such,
excavated material will not be placed on-site, but will be trucked
to apre-approved disposal site.
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Bucket to barge
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project? d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
^Yes ®No ^NA site? ^Yes ®No ^NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented. (ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
n/a environmental impacts.
n/a
January 14, 2008
Date
Project Name
plicant Name
!/ p
plicant Sig t e
Francis and Susan Hughes

Form DCM MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for LAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
7. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA CHARACTERISTICS ^This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the docking facility/marina: b. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
^Commercial ^PubliGGovernment ®Private/Community ^Yes ®No
c. (i) Dock(s) and/or pier(s)
(ii) Number n/a
(iii) Length n/a
(iv) Width n a
(v) Floating ^Yes ®No
e. (i) Are Platforms included? ®Yes ^No
If yes:
(ii) Number 1
(iii) Length 40' (when shortened, per proposal)
(iv) Width 8'
(v) Floating ^Yes ®No
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
g. (i) Number of slips proposed
2
(ii) Number of slips existing
2
d. (i) Are Finger Piers included? ®Yes ^No
If yes:
(ii) Number 1
(iii) Length 10'
(iv) Width 4'
(v) Floating ^Yes ®No
f. (i) Are Boatlifts included? ®Yes ^No
If yes:
(ii) Number 1_ {to be relocated)
(iii) Length 12.5'
(iv) Width 12.5'
h. Check all the types of services to be provided.
^ Full service, including travel lift and/or rail, repair or
maintenance service
^ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
® Dockage ("wet slips") only, number of slips: 2
^ Dry storage; number of boats:
^ Boat ramp(s); number of boat ramps:
^ Other, please describe:
i. Check the proposed type of siting:
^ Land cut and access channel
®Open water; dredging for basin and/or channel
^Open water; no dredging required
^Other; please describe:
k. Typical boat length: 22' for smaller lift. 32' for larger lift
m. (i) Will the facility have tie pilings?
^Yes ®No
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
n/a
j. Describe the typical boats to be served (e.g., open runabout,
charter boats, sail boats, mixed types).
open runabout
I. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
^Yes ®No
2. DOCKING FAClL1TY/MARINA OPERATIONS ^This section not applicable

~~ a. f e hD~ .1)('0 ~D aSi' ~ "~-~~S~i^u c 7~' at tM_R P~ r~a~. _
a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities that will a inclu ed in the pro osed proiect.
^ Office Toilets
~ `~ ^ Toilets for patrons; Number: ;Location:
I ^ Showers
Y1 `Q'' ^ Boatholding tank pumpout; Give type and location:
b. Describe treatment type and disposal location for all sanitary wastewater.
n!a
c. Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and trash.
n/a
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats be controlled?
n/a
e. (i) Give the location and number of "No Sewage Discharge" signs proposed.
n/a
(ii) Give the location and number of "Pumpout Available" signs proposed.
n/a
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
n/a
g. Where will residue from vessel maintenance be disposed of?
n/a
h• Give the number of channel markers and "No Wake" signs proposed. 0
i. Give the location of fuel-handling facilities, and describe the safety measures planned to protect area water quality.
n/a
j. What will be the marina policy on overnight and live-aboard dockage?
n/a
k. Describe design measures that promote boat basin flushing?
n/a
I. If this project is an expansion of an existing marina, what types of services are currently provided?
n/a
m. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area?
^Yes ®No
n. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area?
®Yes ^No
o. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
^CW ^SAV ^SB
^WL ®None

p. Is the proposed marina/docking facility located within or within close proximity to any shellfish leases? ^Yes
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder(s), and give the proximity to the lease.
n/a
s
- e
3. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts) ®This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the boathouse structure(s):
^Commercial ^Public/Government ^Private/Community
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iv) Width
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
4. GROIN (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc. If a rock groin, use MP-2, Excavation and Fill.) ®This section not applicable
a. (i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
5. BREAKWATER (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc.) ®This section not applicable
a. Length b. Average distance from NHW, NWL, or wetlands
c. Maximum distance beyond NHW, NWL or wetlands
6. MOORING PILINGS and BUOYS ®This section not applicable ~
a. Is the structure(s): b. Number
^Commercial ^PubliGGovernment ^Private/Community
c. Distance to be placed beyond shoreline d. Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present.
e. Arc of the swing
7. GENERAL
a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines
17.5' to north, 22' to south
Note: For buoy or mooring piling, use arc of swing including length
of vessel.
c. Width of water body
375'
e. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
^Yes ®No ^NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
nia
b. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent docking facilities.
Approximately 40'
d. Water depth at waterward end of structure at NLW or NWL
-ti.0' after dredging
8. OTHER ®This section not applicable

a. Give complete description:
January 14, 2008
Project Name
Francis and Susan Hughes
Ap
plicant Name
°, ,
'+
plii;ant Sign~re

G o CORE CREEK
~ ~
s ~,
~o
a ~
~ n ~0~ ~
~ ~ ~~y Gotsey lone
~C 0,
a
Old Sfonton oa
a
GJ, 9~
til o°a-
Beaufort, NC ~
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
T
~~
N
c
C
ro
r
U
~~
Imo
LL cp a
~~
m z
N
„~„ U
~ ~
m~
W ~
Riparian Corridor
,„
Propose to Shorten Dock, Relocate
~g Boat Lift, add Finger Pier & Dredge
RIPRAP
Permitting Set
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Until All Appropriate Permits &
Approvals Received
I
xo
~r
~d
0
z<
24
(Residenioil Lot)
REGORY A. RICKER
247 GATSEY LANE
BEAUfORT, NC
PIN: 6490.03.34.5258
DB t079, PG 118
~"
~.~ ~ --__ --.__. ~` --_._ LOT 24, PHASE 2, STANTON LANDING
p~1j ~ ...: -, ~ aROCERr two
' ~~~ BULKHEAD = NHW ~ ~ ----
BOAT ' "~
w ~ uFT ~~o '~ `~ fill/%lll , -
Ex. ;~., ,: ~ fill/ - ~~
~ 1~ 4, 5 ~ soAr ~'~ b ,/ , 23 ,
U ~ ~ • LIFT R f ~~, ~ ....
~ ~~~ '. v ~4? ~' ® ~ F245CGATSEY LANES
O Q '~~ le ExISimG wELL ExiSTINC DwELUNC
U ~~ • -~ ~ ~ BEAUFORT, NC
DOCK ~` ,,.: ~ PIN: 6490.03.34.5159
~"~"r` DB 1054, PG 174
'~ ' ,~ ~~ ~ LOT 23, PHASE 2, STANTON LANDING
Riparian Corridor
Width of Waterbody This Location ~ 380 ft
_. ~= i
ij'1 Water depths shown are ~NHW
NLW=O depths are approximately
2 ft less Per Surveyor
NH1+1J =Normal Hiyh Water
NLW =Normal Lowe Water
a 111//fill//ll/l/ I
... 24'
~ FROPE~N SINE ~-
~~ ~ NOTES: --__ -' - I
This plan document is for CAMA permitting purposes only. Owner &!or Contractor
responsible to insure all project constniction is consistent with owners intended
uses.
SURVEY & BASE MAP PROVIDED BY.
NEWCOMB Land Surveyors, LLC
246 West Millbrook Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone], [phone] (fax}
(THIS DRAWING IS NOT FOR RECORDING OR CONVEYANCES)
Stabilize all dishirbed areas (stockpiles, etcetera -temporarily or permanently as
appropriate) wl silt fence, seed and anchored mulch or sad, rolled erasion control
products or any means necessary to minimize erosion and prevent sediment
transport.
Owner &lor contractor responsibility for project compliance with all applicable codes,
ordinances and regulations including building codes, setbacks, on-site wastewater
system specifications, built upon area requirements, etcetera.
Contractor responsibility to inspect site and identify field conditions and related
project cost implications thereof.
1 `=
(Re~~JenUal I_cl)
Ti2A~ E1 a. iILL.UPI
?4 rT E~" tAhIL
Ii~~Iilf;I Ih
hIN . t ~~~ ~' ~ r ~ I ;.;
DC3` Irl,r, F'G aCl
LCT '?". PHASE '_'. ';TADITOPI LP,hIDING
W
Z
Q
J
W
F-
Q
C7 I
'~', ,~,~
~- ~, 1
V ,q, '°`',~, y1
r k Ai ..
. ~ ~ ~
1~
,/
v v
0 o v
0
w
z
o °'
a
„
a
„
d
N ~ o 0
~ ~ N ~
~ ~ ~ ~

a
N C
c
o 'o
~
~
c v
v
U ~

u N
o
c 2
~
' ~~
x
W ~ ~

7N w
=Z
o a
LL
o~
Q Q~o
N w~ 3
aY
a
a y
~m
a ,~ z o

H
C 0
N
~ J ~
a °
m
~ ~ °>
~Z~
:
u ~
N }
~m
U z
~ w ~ 3
u a ~ ~
~ o a o

0.,
. L

C c

L .~
w N
n'
UJ N
a~ U
c Zo
3 ~~
.~ N W x
C
U ~ LL

W _~
~ >~

.L.~ ~ Qg
m 3 0

~ o o "'
Q ~ W O
U ' Wr
~ ~m
w W
~n z
_
~ ~
~ ~
o
~ ,~ ~
n.
~ >
u
L
U

Permitting Set
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Until All Appropriate Permits &
Approvals Received
PROPOSED: Existing dock platform length reduced
5ft (+l-) as adequate for compliance with Riparian
Setback and platform area requirements, Boat
Lift relocated for improved access with 4'x10'
adjacent finger pier & dredging as indicated by
cross hatching
SECTION 8-B Note: Elevations interpolated fromfbeiween
Scale 1" = 20' survey point elevations Lift Piles (Typ)
,~.
Section Area of Existing Bottom
Proposed Excavation I I ~
NHW
NLW=O
-5
-10
U Proposed Bottom-J
9 -
N
C
C
lQ
t
U
WI
.~ `°
~ o
b
~, ro v
NI
L11 ~ Z
Em
~ U
u1 ~
m:
L11 C
Y
W
W
a
U
w
0
U
•......_1...
Min. Riparian Setback
7
15 ~~~JJJ
~~
$1~J
~_ .'~ ~-- 2 0'
_: ~_.
/%/ i~ , -,
%i„;,,;
%.'
~.
>;;
',_I O
I
~ ~ ~ 1 ,
~;` ~
~~~,~,
%~i~y;
;~;~,.,
i/~~
j'%f
Proposed excavation area -2,352 SF
Indicated by cross hatch(Typ)
46
~t ,
~Gr ., .:
~}~
'~`'~N
=o
~~
z$
W
Z
Q
J
W
F-
Q
U I
~ "''~
l1
1
Proposed Rebated Boat LiR
O•..: t, -__._~ ~~ ~ -.._ ~ PRUpERIv iNE
~Il/llll!!/l//i
ft .~.. 1l)' CL Lift Piles ..~.
'ier / FRANCIS A. HUGHES
®E%ISTINC WELL 245 CATSEY LANE
El(ISiINC DWELLING gEAUFORT, NC
' / PIN: 6490.03.34.St 59
~.~ DB 1054, PG 174
LOT 23, PHASE 2, STANTON LANDING
/ I
l//l//1///l/Jll/
{~ ~ f
~ " -- DUPE Tt~NE ---- -_.__ _„ _
12.5' --'~ ~ ~--,-