20080166 Ver 1_Application_20080117

=~ 08-0166
~,~
„ ., ~ ECS CARQLINAS, LLP
a~~ ~a~.~.~~~ ~eotechnicalConstrnction 1Viaterials Environmental
Mr. Andrew Williams, Supervisor January 14, 2008
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ~, ~ , ~« ~ r ~ ~;.-
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 i I ~° ~ ~
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 ~~('r^"~ "~~~
~~_,~ "_t
RE: PCN Application for Section 404/401 NWP-29
Colleton Crossing Subdivision
Carrboro, Orange County, North Carolina
ECS Project #15105
Dear Mr. Williams:
On behalf of MBI Development ("the Applicant"), ECS Carolinas, LLP ("ECS") is filing aPre-
Construction Notification (PCN) Application requesting permission for a Section 404/401
Nationwide Permit 29 (NWP-29) for 142 linear feet of jurisdictional stream impacts resulting
from construction of a residential subdivision. Should you have any questions or concerns please
feel free to contact us at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
ECS Carolinas, LLP

Christina Breen, Mark Brown, LG, PG, RSM, Principal,
Senior Environmental Scientist Environmental Services Department Manager
Enclosures: PCN Application for NWP-29 (1 copy)
Copies: Ms. Cyndi Karoly, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetland Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (1 courtesy copy)
Mr. Jim Melville, MBI Development, PO Box 2684, Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Mr. Phillip Post, Phillip Post and Associates, 401 Providence Road, Suite 200,
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
~ ~ sr° ~. ,.,r i x w ~
~~~,
~, ,
~~~;~Ti Ri~lp:i : ,. .
90U1 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, North G~tolrna 27617-7505 • [phone] "FAX [phone] • 1-80(1-3Z7-5$3Z"www.ecslimited.com
Abenlecn, MD • Atlanta. GA -Austin, TX • Baltimore. 1<ID Buford, GA • Chantilly. VA • Charlotte, NC Chicago, IL • Dallas,'1'x
IYanviHe, VA •. Frederick. htB - Fredcricksberg, VA ~ Greensboro, I+iC • Gn~nville, SC'• NorPollc, YA ~ Orlando, k7...Raleigh, NC
Richmond, VA'• Roanoke. VA • Sou Antonio, TX Williamsburg, VA - Wilmington, NC -Winchester, VA ~ Xork, PA
#Testing Services Only

0 8 - 0 1 6 6 ~ ~~-~'~.
~, ,
~-~. m~

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP #29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here~[~~ ,~,~ !,~ ,~„~,., 4-a.,
II. Applicant Information _ -
~~ •.
,1:!a ~ ~ °~ 2~D ~3
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Jim Melville, MBI Development, Inc. '•~~~ ' r,~ ,,~ a tk ~ +~
Mailing Address: PO Box 2684 ` `~f ~?~ i ~ ~
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Christina Breen
Company Affiliation: ECS Carolinas LLP
Mailing Address: 9001 Glenwood Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27617
Telephone Number:~919) 861-9839 Fax Number:~919) 861-9911
E-mail Address: CBreen(a~ecslimited.com
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans. are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Colleton Crossing
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9870-32-4695 and 9870-42-0557
4. Location
County: Orange Nearest Town: Carrboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Colleton Crossing
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate 40, exit at NC
Highway 86 (exit #266), go south on NC Highway 86, turn right on Eubanks Road, turn left
on Rogers Road, turn right on Tally Ho Trail, turn left on Reynard Road, Reynard Road
dead-ends into the site.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35.9550°N 79.0894°W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 31.6 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Bolin Creek flows throw site
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basinse The
River Basin map is available at httpa/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admii~'maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is wooded and undeveloped. The remnants of a
former home, including multiple debris piles, are located on the property. Surrounding
properties are all residential.
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes construction of a residential subdivision, with 38 lots to be constructed
with single-family homes. Roadways will also be constructed. Project plans are located in
Appendix A.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to
construct a residential subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please. explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
A field review of the project site was held with Mr. Andrew Williams of the U.S. Arm~Corps
of Engineers (USACE) on June 19, 2007. Mr. Williams approved the delineation in the field.
The stream that runs along the western portion of the property boundary was determined to be
perennial. The stream that runs near the northern boundary of the site also was determined to be
perennial. Both USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) stream sheets
are located in Appendix C.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No further permit requests are anticipated for this project, all phases of the project are included
in this application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13

Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The impacts at Impact Area 1 will be from the placement of a 9' X 9' box culvert, which is 99
linear feet in length, in order to extend Reynard Road to the Colleton Crossing residential
subdivision. Reynard Road is the only access point to the property and needs to be extended
across Stream A (see Figure 6 in Appendix B) to provide access to the buildable area on the
other side of the stream. The culvert will result in 142 linear feet of perennial stream impact.
Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) ~ 0
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.1
Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number

(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width

Before Im act Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)
Impact 1 UT to Bolin Creek permanent Fill-
Culvert perennial 5 feet 142 0.016

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 142 0.016
Page 8 of 13

4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.016
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.016
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 142
6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Page 9 of 13

The impacts at Impact Area 1 will be from the placement of a 9' X 9' box culvert, which is 99
linear feet in length, in order to extend Reynard Road to the Colleton Crossing. residential
subdivision. Reynard Road is the only access point to the property and needs to be extended
across Stream A (see Figure 6 in Appendix B to provide access to the buildable area on the
other side of the stream.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stimgide. ht r~ t l .
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is required for this project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
Page 10 of 13

website at http:/Ih2o.enr.statealc.us/wrp/index.l~-tm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No ®Cape Fear
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Page 11 of 13

* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The proposed impervious surface percentage is
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The sewage from this proposed development will be treated by the Town of Carrboro.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.statt_.r~c,.us-ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: No this
project is a residential subdivision, which will not result in additional development and the
surroundin vicinity is already developed with residences.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 12 of 13

work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
///S/C~8
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

Mr. Andrew Williams January 14, 2008
Raleigh Regulatory Field Off Ce
U.S. Army Corps of ;tnginecrs
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Reference: Authori~aliou to Si /Submit PCN A lieation Form
Colleton Crossing
Carrboro, Orange County, North Carolina
>/CS Project 06.15105
Dear Mr. Williams:
As applicant for the referenced project, 1 hereby authorize Christina green, S~~,ior Environmental
Scientist with F,CS Carolinas, LLP of Raleigh, NC, to sign and subrrtit the attached Pre-
Construetlon Notification (PCN) Application Form. Please contact me if you need additional
information.
Sincerely,
!/id~J'
Jim Melville
MBl Development
PO Box 2684
Chapel hill, NC 27514
[phone]
T00 ~j XV,J 90 ~ 6T 00/CO/90

PROJECT: COLLETON CROSSING SUBDIVISION
LOCATION: CARRBORO, NC
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS
STREETS: 106,750 SF
HOUSES (ESTIMATED): 2,250 SQ FT / LOT X 39 LOTS = 87,750 SF
DRIVEWAY (ESTIMATED): 1,250 SQ FT / LOT X 39 LOTS = 48,750 SF
TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 243,250 SF (5.58 AC)
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0 SF (0.0 AC)
SITE AREA: 31.606 AC
TOTAL PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS FOR SITE: 17.7%

~'
y
3
~i" i

~~~~
__
-- ~
v,~~
t~~~
~~~'~~~~~'~~~ ~'~ Approximate Location
of Subject Property
~~
--~~r
I
1V~-~r~~e ~G'r€~ck
4,4
~~~~ ~~
,A - .__ ~ ~~~.
~~' `~ '~'
~..~~,
~~~~
~ s i~'
~~
P;
~~_
'~~,
tit ,; r
'~~.
~~w
~~a~c~~d~~a~ As Illustrated
Vicinity Map
2007 Mapquest Maps
Colleton Crossing
Carrboro, North Carolina
35.9550° N -79.0894° W
#t~~~'
Figure No.
I
ECS Project #
15105

~i
r- - - -- - ~ USES Topographic Map Colleton Crossing
-~

`~ Chapel Hill (NC) Quadrangle Carrboro, North Carolina
35.9550° N -79.0894" W figure o.
~
6+~~-~~
k~ ~~
-- Le Tend Scale
~
r
~
v.a~s~~or,.~~a~3
~ Approximate Location of Subject Property Map Not to Scale ECS Project #
15105

,- -- - - ~
---~
Orange County Soil Survey Colleton Crossing
Carrboro, North Carolina
35.95500 N -79.08940 W
figure No.
~~~ Lcgen
Ch - Chewacla loam TaU -Tatum silt loam ~ Scale ECS Project #
v~l~t~JIbUG:7.r'~~3 CeB/GcC -- Gcorgcillc sandy loam Approximate Location
Map Not to Scale 15105
HrC -Herndon silt loom of Subject Property

~,f
:knit
^d
~a'
~}
W ';t
~3
t^ ~q.
<ta,
a{d.
I

1-- -- -- - - National Wetland Inventory Map Colleton Crossing
-- --
Carrboi-o, North Carolina Figure No.

-~ ,
~ 35.9SSOo N -79.08940 W 4
~~~`~~ `
~~~ egenc

~;.;~~cJ~[1~1.~~ A lloximatc Location of Slltl cc,t Pro cit Scale
PI ~ .I ' ' P ' ~ Y
Map Not to Scalc
h'Ca 111 ECS Project#
15 I OS

r - - , Flood Hazard 7.ones Map Colleton Crossing
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Carrboro, North Carolina
Pro ram 35.95500 N -79.08940 W
Figure No.
S
~~l.,l

~~.~ r~.~~.uw.fa~ Lei*end Scalc N ~
~
Approximate Location of Subject Property As Illustrated ECS Project #
t 5 ~ os

' _. yr ;a~ < w ~'~ s a } A~ ~'_t,.zh'~u 1°. _ ~ ~ y~ ~ ~ ~d~ ~i(,+! ,'';~ ~"a v ~ A (:II
'lid"°G's ~ k~''d'`4 '. ,~ a p' ,&' _ ~,'Pe4`,, w'~j, "~, '9f.^s"~~7a" 't '°V~` a~ ~ r~ ~ F f r lil
4 4v ti ~ e. . f .y i ~ N' ~ sib ~ ah. r .I .'.~
J' h t "I' .. kn A ~. ^f
..~~ ~ rh. ~; '~ ; Stream li _ ~ ,>` ~ ~ ~ * 4
~ •• * r ~ ;v ~~ ,~ ~~ A fix .6t~c ~c §~.;Y .j ` ~ K * Y _
~ ' ~ ~a '~ }
+~,' :~~ =:s,Iy, ~ x ,, 8r ~ ce..F 1, ~ ~ k - e,. .'
~ ~~,
~ ~ ;~
a ," 1 ~^
~ ~ g~
.. ,~
n ~ °~ ~ ~ ~, ~ *~~ Wetland ~1 „~~r~ ~ ~~,, ~ :~ ,~ ~`~
[~. ~ ,rte>.'§~~ ~ ~` y , a ~ ~.. , ~, .'y~ T d' ~>,' ~..
wK. d$.. y
.. L. ~ ~ ~~' ~."~ .'' • f ~ ~y7 ~~ ~ ;'y, w. 2. '.,1_ gin. ,", .s ~~ 7 ,•::a ~~ , yy + `... ~ . ,1.
t" '~-}•' ~ ~. 7{" s~ k r ~ 6~'+.~ MK +# ,l, ~k:'IU~s~ rfi ~ _I
i
~ F
^ "' A ~, a ~'
~~p r ~+ M1 Y
~.
M. ... ; . .. . •.
.... - .. ' ~ .... a -'1'
s ~ tr ~ fir. X ::; ~,,,k : a{
k wh,; ~ > .ter ~ v. _ Jr' •~~ ~~~`•` ~ ~ +F'~ '. ~ °g T ` '~" ~ +~ t" ~ ~\
•eo-
t,y.+ y, ^~h ~~ W* ~'~'' ilr . L ~.~.-3~ ~ li ,.~ '~` Y v ~f f ~.tv
^J~ ,:y ~ n}. '''~•~sv},++,..$~ k ~.v,.s A ~ ~: e~ ~g :r ,~7' " o Y.~ ~IS~ ~{ :~4~d~
' ~{ f « RYA ~ '3vt q °'i'4 ~ 1 1'. / *.rs` 'e i '~.
W :R ~ f
f. 'f .*r ~ ° y. ~st. ~{`y ~Pr.r7 ~ 4 ~j~rt ~:•'r~BM ~'~*~~ T~'~ ~ " ~s~ ~ ,~! ?:!
,~ ~y...a ,,:. t,,,.
L!
~ Wetland and Stream Sketch Map Colleton Crossing
2003 Color Orthos Carrboro, North Carolina
Oran e Count IMAPS 35.95500 N -79.08940 W Figure No.
~'
foi~r~~~ Le lend Scale
~

~~I~t,Jf~uU:J:~a~
~ Approximate Location of Suhjcct Property As Illustrated
Wetland SU~eam ECS Project #

15105

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
dace: ~ - j a - 0 7 per: ~ I -eta, C.rusr;i nos Letttude: 3 5, q SS °
Eva,uator: L '~'~~, SitQ: ~ea.h r1 Longttude: / °~ "O 1 °w
Total Potnts: f' .- ~ _~.~--
Sbramk at fsastlntermkCarY 2 ~ •!J. County: ~r4~-S~'. pthQr
tf2i9or NdN290 ,J e. p. QuadNams:
A_ t~flmemt~lnny reur,r.,r~r = ~O•S ~ F._._~ht~* ___I_.__ W~~~.~_~.-._ia„a.~..:::~"-~ ~+,,,:.::=~-,~
1'. Corttlrwous bed and bank 0 - 1 2
----~r• .
-'
--
2. ShuosAY 0 i ~--
3. In-ctsannal structure: rrflle-pool aequer~ce
4. 5of1 texture or stream subsbat~ sorting 0
0 1
1 r

___ --
_
- 3

_ __ -_

3
__.__
5
Acute/relk tbod
taln - --
.
p 0 1 ! 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benctbs
re ed channel

_---
8. Recent apuvtal de sits -------.__-

t~ _------

0 ---
- --

---
2
---- ----

3
8' Nahrattevees
_ _-._ ---_._ 1 . ___---. -_--- Z _-._- . ____..3_.__-- -
10. Headcvts
_._.-.__._--- -------------------- ---- - 0 ~ Z --~ - 3
-------~---
11. Qrade controls ---_ ~.. _.. - ...---. ___ _- --- 1 -- _ -. _-"1.5_ __. _
12. Natural valley or drahageway D 0.5 1.5
3. Second or greater order on ex st '- -
USGS or NRCS mep or other doctxrrented No = 0 ( Yes =©
~~•
rawrww ui ~~>+u tiro'
B. Hydrobgy (Subtotal = 7 )
~ 74. Groundwater Aow/dieclmrge 0 !
~ j
2 3
15. Water h channel and > 48 hrs sb~ce rain, or _
_
--
~_-'--
0-~ 1 i --

Water hchannel - or orri season 3
iti. LeaAater
---v- 1.5 ~ + 0.5 Q ____
---------------.__-_-----------__....----_
17. Sedhient on plants or defxis ..----._..._ ...-_...._ ..... ------} ---. _-_- --
0 i ~ 1 ____---...-----
1.5
_.~.__-. ______
18.OrgaNc debrk Imes or plies (Wrack then _
------- _--r--__. r_. ._.~u
0
j
•5
~ 1.5
___
~ 18. Hydric sots (redoxtmorphlc isatures) present? -
-
--
_
No = 0 ~ Yes .
C. Biology (Subtotal = _,_.g~
j 20 . Rbrous roots In cherv~el S ~. _._ _ . -
,- _ ~._.._.._._-------_ -------~ ---_ _ .-- - ~ - ._ ~ __ -_ -1- -- - -- 0
..----.
21 . Rooted plar>ts h channel _ - ._-._ .._..-.. l- ~ 2 --- ~ 1 0
X22. CtaYAsh ~ ~ _ 0.5 --r-~---1 - 1.5
f 23 BlvaNes __ ____ - __ ...
1 I 2 _ _ 3
~ 24. F+sh 0 5 1 1 1 5
- ..._ ._
25 Ampl~Fans 0 0 5 1 5
r- ---._--- ---__ - _.-_--_... _ ----- - -- ------.. _- - T _ _ _
26 Macrobenthos (noes divatity and abundance} - -- U__ l 0 5 _ ~ _ - ._ 1.5 -_-
27. FilamerAous algae; periphyton 0 - 2 ~ 3
__.
- ------------- _-______-- ----_ _- 1----~ - - - - --- F
28 Iron oxidizing bacterFaMaigus. ,
~ .. __05 T 1 I - 1.5
..__.-p_.___--- --~-•---- --- --. .-- ---- - _.. ___ -
29 °. Wetland fonts in sfraambed ~ ~ ~-- FAC .5 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 _
kerns 20 and 21 ban on the preasrwe oluptand plants, Item 29 foaises on the presence or aq~tic or wetland pants.
Notes: (use back aide of this town fa sdditional notes.) Sketch:

f USACF A117k _ D\1'Q t! __ --Site d~ (indicate on attnched map)
;,~,; STREAR•i QUALITY ASSESSMENT `YORIiSIIEET ~`:',
mot: S, 7
Provide the follo~rhrE lcfaswadoa Por tlse strewn reach larder rssessment: ~l1-
t. Applicant'a nance: ~ „~t~lt~~ea~ z. Evaluator's Dame: ~ ~ i~P-~l L • 7v~k~r _
3_ Date al'evaluatinn• .fl,;~~d,z •i. Tune of evahwlirraa'~• ~ \ t:~O,dM
S. Name of stream• ~ T ~ ~~ l/~ ~~ 6. River basin• lA t>7~ ~t,..d~,.
7. Apptrxcimato dractsgc area• J3, Stream ardor: ~+~-
9. Length of reach c~•alwkd: ~"~ ~ Q~ ~£e~- 10. County:. _
1 t. 5ilc coordinate (ffknoavr-): prefer is docimei dcgras. 11. 5ubdi~avion name {ffany): p
Latitude(aY.tt,tlz9lz): ~s qSS°/V t.ougitude(ex._n.ssr,6ttx.79,~dp°~ .
J1felbad Ixatiaa deteraaiacd (eirdej: GPS opa Shre ta-i6a (Auial) Photo/GIS UtLcr G(5 Ot6Q
l3. Location of rwc6 undo' evaluation (note n roads and landmarb and attach map identd'ying stream(s) location):
TatlJri~ s A..s t+2~z~nard gds
1~. Ptopoced channel wak (if any): .. .-•-•--
1 S. Recent weathc aocditions: /~t7 i I1Li~, V+QS'4'8/t~I¢ yr
16. Sete COnditio:ss at titnc of VUII: V /1x~ ~"~ /~~r ~^. ._.
l7. Identify any special tralermy clasa'd"ications known: Section t0 Tidal Waters ~Ecaential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outatandiag Resource Warm ^Natricrrt Sensitive Wata-s ~WatcrSupply Wnterahcd (1-N)
18. Is thers a goad or take located upstream of the exaltation point? YES ~ If yea, estimate the water surface a~n:a,, _
19. Does channel apperron USt35 quad mapl ~ NO 20. puce channel appear on USDA Soil Survey^. ~ AIO
21. F~tunatcd vsatrnhed lead we: S~ %Reaidential ~°%Cammcroie! _____°o Industrial ~~.o Agricultural
~a qj° Forested °S, Cleared /Logged _% Oth~7
i
22. BaakfuII width: "~'7' ~~ 23. Bask height (from bed to top of bans:): ~ 3 a
2~. Channel s tope douv center ~ stream: ,,,~7at (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to A°%) `;tifakrsle (d to 10°,0) ____Stccp ('~10°ie}
25. Charwcl sinuatily;StraightOccasional beads Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Iratsvctioos for compktloa of ararlcs6eet (]orated on pnge 2): Beg;ut by dcirtntiniag the most appropriate ecorcgion based on
location, terraut, vegetation, stream ctassi6aetian, Die. Every characltxiatic must be scored uaiag the same cearegion. Assign points
e cash chsraatcristia within the saga shown far the ecoregion. Page 3 protitdes a brief description of how to rz~icw the
characteristics identifiod in the worbhed Soots should reDect an twuall aaaasmrnt of the stresun reach under evaluation. if a
cltarectcristic cannot be evduatcd due to silo or weather condition,!, aua 0 in the scoring box and prm~idc an explanation m the
comment section. Where then; uo obvious change in the character of a stream under retiiew (e.g., the slrcanr flm+a from a pasture
into a forest), rho s(n:sm may bt; divided into smalicr rweha that display morti continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a streaut rrsch must range between 0 and 100, with a scare of 100 rcpreseniing a stream of the
high«t quality.
Tonal Score (fl~om revttse): J ~ commmb
Evatuatos'a 3ignrtnn _ Datr _ f ~' ~~
Th6 chancel e.~slw form b In ed to be teed oely to r pulde to snslst sandorrners and tmvirontrxnWl professlonab M
gatturinq the data requlrw! by the United States .1tmy Corps of Eogfneertf to nsa4 a presknin,uy Wssesstnent of stream
quality. The tobrl srnre resulting from the compktiae of thb form b subJect to l'SAt'E approval and does not Empty a
narticutar mltlerHon rrtso or rsooiremrnt. Form subicct to cheese -vets ion 06rD3. To Commcnl. osease call 919-876-8ddl x 26.

STREAM QLIAI.TTY ASSESSMENT V4'4ItKSHEET

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream fdentifi~tion Frorm; Version 3.1
Date: s _ (U "07 Pro)ect: ~o~l~-~~-+~~~ S Latitude: 3rj~ ~ 5S°~
Evaiuator•. L ,Tvcl~tt! sna: $t,,,.iea ~ ~ Longluude: 7~J. 0$q °l,J
Total Points:
Sas,mhatJeasthYwntJlrart~.s. County: ~/'Aa Other
Yt 1~ or 112 30 ~' e. pc Ou~d Nome:
A. Geonlorohaloav (SuhMtsl = 15. S - ~ piiu-nt...-~-1----- wpai~ ":-? ~ru.;.~i~~e-"T-`c..;,;K,: ~~

1'. Corrtirwoua bed and bank

2. Sbwasity

0

0

1

_-._`. ----------~
-
2

t_._ i_._..a.
_~~

--
___..
3. In-clrannal struchue: rfffte-pool sequence 0 1
1 ~ _ . - 3 i
4. texture or stream substrata sorting 0 1 T - - ~ 3
5. ActtvaJiulic ttoodplaln _
---- -•--------

6. Depostltonal bats or benches-- - --- __.__--
T. Brakted channel ". __~. __. __ ____ ._._~ 0

-._. - 0......
~_ _ 1

. --.~ __. _. ~

l-_.. .__
~ ~ -.... -~
3

~ -...._ 3. _ ... _~

8. Recant atluvial deposits

9' Nahtral teveee
-
-
~ 2

2 ~
_..
3

10. Neadcxlta
1. controls 0

0

! 2 ----

1 ~ T

1.5
12. Natural vefey or drafnageway 0 0.5 ~ 1.5
. econd or greeter o er enns on ~
t1SGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
ll..w ....J. JY-L~.~
No ~
Yes = 3 i
I. W .NO
8. Nvdrehrrv l~rh-n-sl . ~ t
14. Gr'ourxtwatar Aovwrdfacharga 0 ~"- 2~'-'-1` 3
15. Water In charnel and > 48 tvs sktce rain, or - ! _-l-_ _
Water &t channel -- dry or growing season 0 i 1 ~ V I 3
~ 16. Leailitter

--- -----•------------.~__._.._-- --------
17
Sediment an ptards or debris 1.5
1
~ _._ ___
... -----..--- --.
- ;
05
-
._ ..~ _.__ _ _ _._-._
0
.._ __--__...-.

.
----
18, 18. Ckge~ rtJc debris 16~es Or piles (YVrack tlnesj
0
0
0
5
-
-- 1S
- ~
--
x
. 1 .5
~ 19_Nydric sons (redoximorpWc leaturesj present?
------- -
_,
_
No = 0 .
-- --...__..._. __ _ _ -_. _ _.....-_ _ ~~ Yes
.. _L._ _ .- - - - --
C. 8iotaDy (Subtotal =
3 -.-. _. _..1 _..-0
- .- .
Flblvus roots in charnel
~ 1 0 _.
- -. ._ -
111b ..Rooted plants in charnel __._ __. - - - -- _... I - ___ .__... _ _ .. ..
C 23 Blvatvrts _ ... .. _ .
~ 24. Fish- ------ .------ ---......_ _._..- ---- .. ..- - - - L... _._~ --._..- ~ t -- -- --~ -- -- ~ 3
_ _ _-
0.5 ~ 1 1.5
____ ._~..~_____~l.w _ ' - -1---
._ __.
arts
0 05
~ 15
26. Macrobertthos (Hoerr divs+nity and sbur-danc• ._ p - _ _ -
27 Fibmentous algae: pariphyton 0 _.. ~ 2 -- _ ._ _3
-- __
28 trop axidizinq baeierNNutpus.
~ ___ b-- -- ---- -----...._..........___. _ ..- ------...-- - -- . ___. .. - ~ -- - -0.5 _ ..._~.. ----~... _ _ .... __ . __ 1.5.
' 24 - Wetland pksrtts in stresmbed FAC FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2,0; Other = 0
Remo 20 and 71 ban on the presence or upland plsris, lfsm 29 focuses on the preser>ce of aqustk or wetlarxt plar>ta.
Notes: (use aacs.ida of this torrr- for additiorvt Horse.) Sketd~:

IiSACE .UDv+ DW(~ d______
Site * (indicate ou attached map)
;,~,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORh.SHEET "~"
Provide the folbw6ag inbrtartlon for the stream r+cacA under asscssanenh
1. ,lpplieanl's aame:~['S ~ 1~t,re~0o~ 2. Evabtatar'a aame:_ ~~ T .~t./G~_~_
3. Date of evahratioa: ~! rl?~O~ 4. Time of evahration:_ ;~~zM
s. xaaxs of ctnam: {v 'rt G. River basin: Sl ~ Fen r
7. Approximate drainage ara: & Strrun ocda:__ T 1
9. Length of reach evaluakd: ''`'' S~'~~'~" 10. County:__ ~; _
11. Sib coovidinates (ifknonn): prderia devmd dogrces. 1I. Subdivisiwr agate (if any}:
t.etit°d.tsx.~.r~z~tz~: 35.95s`lV Ivu&mdet~.-n.sssstu: ~~ • 0$~~~
hldhod location deeamaiaed (°orti:k): GPS apo S6 Ortho (Acrid) i'hubr'GIS Other GIS Other
l3. (,oeaCOn of reach undo evaluation (rwDe nearby roads and lartdnutka and attach map idcrttrfying sheam(a) (ovation):
ia. Proposed channel wori (if any):
15. Recent weathercoaditioaa: r'di~ ~l~S i~Cida. ~/
1 G. Site ooaditioeu rt lime of visit: ~1nQ~ ~ ^~ 7~O F
r
17. Identify any special wak^rway ela~sificationa knawo: ~Sectiat t0 ~Tidrl WatersEssential Fisheries t-Iabitat
~•Troat Waters ^,Outataodiag Resorme Waters _ Nutrient Senritive Water yWatcr Supply Watershed _(I-!t')
!>l;. Ia there a paad or lake localod upstream of the evalueliout point? YES ~O if yes, eatunabe the water anrfecc~a~re.-a-:~_.__
! 9. Does ohanrtel appear oa USOS quad mapT YES ~'O 20. Does clranuel eppcar on USDA Soil Survey? ('Y~SJNO
2i. Estimatedt3alerrhedlanduaa ~Q°ioRpidrntial ~%Comtnercial ~go[adwtrial ~`?-o~Agricultural
' .~ °a Forested °~o Cleared / Logged ^,°~° Other (_ __7____ )
22. Bankl'ull widtb: ''~ 3 '~ 23. Bank height (from bed b tap of bank):. ""
24. Chenncl slope down venter of stream: V'1'lat (0 to 2%} ~/4entle (2 to 4%) _~ioderrtt (d to 10°~6) Steep (>10°ie)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ,y,0uoasional bends t! Frequent meaudcr _Very sinuous _Bnudcd channel
Imtrrodiom for compt:tion of srorksheet (loerte,d on page 2): Hegira by deleuniniag rho moat appropriate ecoregimr based on
location, tecrttin, vegetation, stream classitriortion, eta. Every characteristic moat be adored osing rho name ocorcgioa. Assign points
to each eharaateristic within the range shown for the eooregion. Paga 3 provvides a brief description of how to review the
chrraoteristics idrnliGcd io the worluhed. Scores ahoutd reflect an overall aaseumart of the stream rcaoh under evalaatioo. if a
aharawteristia cannot bo evaluated due b sits or ttsather condition, eater 0 in the scoring box and provide an cxplsnation m the
comment scctioa. Where there arc obviow changes in the character of s atreaar under review (e.g., the stn:anr flows from a pasture
into a frmat~ the stream tray be di><~drd into atnallez reaches that display morn contnauity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
rcrch. The total score auigned b r strum roach must range between 0 and 100, with a:core of lt71) rcprcacntotg a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Scars (!Foss reversr):~ Commtnts
Evaluator's S16srtnnr ~~~~ Date ~ ~~~ O~]
This thane( evttltrr form is I es+ded to be wed only n a gtrlde to a~sslat fnudosrncra and eavironmenml profeufonab 4s
gartherln; the data rtgnlred bi the (lotted 5trtea Army Corpr of Lnt[ssers to drake a prdJminary aaseasment of scream
gtraiity. The tom( scorn rosultlni iFtmt the compktbu of thb toner b subject to I SACS approwl and does not imply a
arrtkolarmitlrrtioa ratb or reoairemeet. Form sot„cat b chan¢c - ~rnion OGN3. To Commcut. alease call 919.87G-t1A~t1 x 26.

STIZEA141 QUALITY ASSESSMENT ~VURK:SIIEE'I'

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Yroject/Site: COIIet011 Cl'OSS1rigS Date: 5-10-07
ApplicantlOwner: MBI Development, LLC County: Orange
Investigator: ECS Carolinas, LLP - C. Breen State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstance exist on the site? Yes ® No^ Community ID: WA
Is the site signiftcantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ^ No® Transect ID: W A9
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ^ No® Plot ID: Up
(ex lain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATIbN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2.Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 10.
3./!ex opaca Tree FACU 11.
4.Toxicodendron radicmis Vine FACU 12•
S.Liquidambar styract~ua Tree FAC+ 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant S ecies that are OBL, FACW,or FAC xcludin FAC- 60%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
^ Aerial Photographs ^ Inundated
^ Other ^ Saturated in Upper 12 "
® No Recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water n/a (in.) Secondary Indicators:
^ Oxidized Root Channels in Lipper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit n/a (in.) ^Water-stained leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil n/a (in.) ^FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other x lain in Remarks
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Tatum Silt Loam, 8-15% slopes (TaD) Drainage Class: Well
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirmed Map Typc? Yes ^ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colo rs Mottle Texture, Structure,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Concretions, etc.
0-2 A lOYR 3/1 absent clay loam
2-12 B 10YR4/6 absent clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histisol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
^ Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
^ Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ^ Is the Sample Plot
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ^ No ® Within a Wetland? Yes ^ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ^ No
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Projecdsite: Colleton Crossings Date: 5-10-07
Applicant/Owner: MBI Development, LLC County: Orange
Investigator: ECS Carolinas, LLP - L. Tucker State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstance exist on the site? Yes ® No^ Community ID: wA
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ^ No® Transect ID: WA2
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ^ No® Plot ID: wet
(ex lain on reverse if needed
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Herb FAC 9•
2.Pnlystichurn acrostichoides Herb FAC 10.
3.Cornus Florida Tree FACU 11.
4.Microstigium vimeniun~ Herb FAC 12•
S.Carex stipata Herb FACW 13.
6.Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 14.
7. I5.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant S ecies that are OBL FACW,or FAC xcludin FAC- 83%
Remarks: No vines
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
^ Aerial Photographs ^ Inundated
^ Other ®Saturated in Upper 12 "
® No Recorded Data Available ®Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water n/a (in.) Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit n/a (in.) ®Water-stained leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil 8 (in.) ^FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other Ex lain in Remarks
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Tatum Silt Loam, 8-15% slopes (TaD) Drainage Class: Well
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirmed Map Type? Yes ^ No
Profile Descriution:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Structure,
(inches) Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Concretions, etc.
0-2 OIA lOYR 5/4 absent clay, friable/dry
2-b B lOYR 7/3 lOYR 4/6 faint, many clay, wet
6-12 B lOYR 7/1 lOYR 4/6 distinct, many clav, saturated
Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histisol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
® Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ^ Is the Sample Plot
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ^ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ^
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ^
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site: COIIetOri CrOSS1ngS Date: 5-10-07
Applicant/Owner: MBI Development, LLC County: Orange
Investigator: ECS Carolinas, LLP - C. Breen State: Notch Carolina
Do normal circumstance exist on the site? Yes ® No^ Community ID: WB
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ^ No® Transect ID: WB 107
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ^ No® Plot ID: Up
(ex lain on reverse if needed
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9•
Z.Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 10.
3.Microstigium vimenium Herb FAC 11.
4.Smilax glaucax Vine FAC 12.
S.Cornus Florida Tree FACU 13.
6.Rltu.s copallinum Tree UpI, 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant S ecies that are OBL, FACW or FAC xcludin FAC- 66%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
^ Aerial Photographs ^ Inundated
^ Other ^ Saturated in Upper 12 "
® No Recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
^ Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water n/a (in.) Secondary Indicators:
^ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit n/a (in.) ^ Waterstained leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil n/a (in.) ^FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other x lain in Remarks
Remarks:

enrr c
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Tatum Silt Loam, 8-15% slopes (TaD) Drainage Class: Well
Taxonomy (Subgroup)' Confirmed Map Type? Yes ^ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Structure,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Concretions, etc.
0-1 A lOYR 3/1 absent clay loam
1-12 B 7.5 YR 5/8 absent clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histisol ^ Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^ Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
^ Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
^ Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
\zTCT7 ~ lUil 111'TTi'i?M7N A TTnN
•~L' 1LL'11~L LL aaJau.au.a~aav~.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ^ Is the Sample Plot
Wetland Hydrology Present'? Yes ^ No ® Within a Wetland? Yes ^ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ^ No
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site: COlletOri CrOSSIngS Date: 5-10-07
Applicant/Owner: MBI Development, LLC County: Orange
Investigator: ECS Carolinas, LLP - L. Tucker State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstance exist on the site? Yes ® No^ Community 1D: WA
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)`? Yes ^ No® Transect ID: WB2
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ^ No® Plot ID: Wet
(ex lain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus effusus Herb FACW+ 9.
2.Vitis rotttndifolia Vine FAC 10.
3.Cornus Jlorida Tree FACU 11.
4.Microstigiutn vitnenium Herb FAC 12•
S.Acer ntbrum Herb FAC 13.
6.Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 14.
7.Sntilax glauca Vine FAC 15.
8.Polystichunt acrostichoides Herb FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant S ecies that are OBL, FACW,or FAC xcludin FAC- 87.5%
Remarks:
HYDRnLnGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
^ Aerial Photographs ^ Inundated
^ Other ®Saturated in Upper 12 "
® No Recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
^ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ^ Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water n/a (in.) Secondary Indicators:
^ Oxidized Root Channels in Uppcr 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit 8 (in.) ®Water-stained leaves
^ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil 7 (in.) ^FAC-Neutral Test
^ Other Ex lain in Remarks
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Tatum Silt Loam, 8-15% slopes (TaD) Drainage Class: Well
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirmed Map Type? Yes ^ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Structure,
(inches) Horizon Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Concretions, etc.
0-2 A lOYR 4/2 absent High OM
2-5 AB 2.5 Y 5/2 absent silty clay
6-12 B 2.5 Y 6/1 2.5 Y 5/6, distinct, many sandy clay
2.5 Y 7/4
Hydric Soil Indicators:
^ Histisol ~ ® Concretions
^ Histic Epipedon ^ High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
^ Sulfidic Odor ^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
® Aquic Moisture Regime ^ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ^ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroroa Colors ^ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Layer of cobble at ~8 inches
WB.Ti.ANn T)F.TF.RMiNATinN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ^ Is the Sample Plot
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ^ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ^
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ^
Remarks: