The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160324 Ver 1_Application_20160401Carpenter,Kristi From: Dagnino, Carla S Sent: Friday, April O1, 2016 12:55 PM To: Crystal Amschler (Crystal.C.Amschler@usace.army.mil); Chapman, Amy Cc: Andrew Henderson; Ayscue, Phillip W; Harmon, Beth; AI-Ghandour, Majed N; Hood, Donna; Koch, Thomas K; Carpenter,Kristi; Chambers, Marla J; Mellor, Colin; Mitchell, Subject: Louis L; Moore, Brenda L; Staley, Mark K; Thompson, Larry B; Wilkins, Ronald B; Cheely, Erin K; Williams, John L; Zerman, William S Permit Application for B-2506, Anson County The Permit Application for B-2506 has been posted to the NCDOT website. The electronic copy can be viewed /downloaded at https://connect.ncdot.qov/resources/Environmental/ This email serves as NCDOT's permit application submittal to the NC Division of Water Resources and the US Army Corp of Engineers. Thank you. Carla Dagnino Western Region Environmental Program Supervisor II Natural Environment Section Project Development and Environmental Analysis NC Department of Transportation 919 707 6110 office cdaqnino(cDncdot.qov 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598 1020 Birch Ridge Drive Raleigh, NC 27610 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Tre�nsportati�rn March 30, 20 ] 6 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ATTN: Ms. Crystal Amschler NCDOT Coordinator PAT McCR�RY Gflvernar NICHOLAS J. TENNYS{]N Secretary Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23 and 33 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 8 over Brown Creek on SR 1627 in Anson County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ- 1627(13), Division 10, TIP No. B-2506, Debit $240 from WBS 326381.1. Dear Madam: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 8 over Brown Creek with a 125' long, two-span cored slab bridge 13 feet downstream of the existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained during construction via an off-site detour. As a result of the bridge replacement and slight alignment shift, there will be <0.01 acre (33 linear feet) of temporary stream impacts, 0.09 acre of permanent fill in wetlands and 0.03 acre of mechanized clearing in wetlands. Please see enclosed copies of ihe Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), DMS acceptance letter, stormwater management plan, permit drawings and design plans for the above-referenced project. The Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed on January 29, 2015 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. This project calls for a]etting date of September 20, 2016 and a review date of August 2, 2016; however, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available. �Nothirag Carr�pares�_ State of NoRh Carolina � Department of Transportation I PDEA-Natural E�viia�ment Section 1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 I 1598 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598 919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Erin Cheely at (919) 707-6108. Sincerely, 1 ��. �. Philip S. arris III, P.E., C.P.M. Natural Environment Section Head cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 & 33 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 8 over Brown Creek on SR 1627 2b. County: Anson 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Ansonville 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state B_2506 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6108 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: ekcheely@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.063599 Longitude: - 80.052803 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 1 acre 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to grown Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The land use within the vicinity of the project consists of about 60% forest land, 10% developed or disturbed lands (roadsides and residential areas), and 30% cultivated land (agricultural fields and pastures). The project is located within the Pee Dee National Wildlife Refuge. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.95 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2340 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of this project is to replace a structurally deficient bridge (sufficiency rating 19.2 out of 100). 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing an 81-foot two-span bridge with a 125-foot two-span cored slab bridge 13 feet downstream of the existing aligmnent. All traffic will be detoured off-site during construction. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: PJD package submitted June 2015. Site visit with Crystal Amschler on 6/24/15 to confirm resources. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): NCDOT and CEI Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. See 4a above. During the June 2015 JD site visit, we determined that the PJD could be issued during permitting. The NCDOT requests a PJD with this permit application. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T Site 1� P❑ T Fill WD - Bottomland � Yes � Corps <0.01 Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ Mechanized WD - Bottomland � Yes � Corps Site 1� P � T Clearing Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ <0.01 Mechanized WE - Bottomland � Yes � Corps Site 2� P❑ T Clearing Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ �0.01 Site 3� P❑ T Fill WC - Bottomland � Yes � Corps 0.04 Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ Mechanized WC - Bottomland � Yes � Corps Site 3� P � T Clearing Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ <0.01 Site 4� P❑ T Fill WB ' Bottomland � Yes � Corps 0.05 Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ Mechanized WB - Bottomland � Yes � Corps Site 4� P � T Clearing Hardwood Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ 0.02 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.12 Permanent 0 Temporary 2h. Comments: Rounded total is sum of actual impacts. All wetlands riparian. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact length number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) Site 5❑ P� T Temporary grown Creek � PER � Corps 35 33 Work Bridge ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 0 Perm 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 33 Temp (<0.01 ac Temp) 3i. Comments: • Permanent surface water impacts due to new piers in the water =<0.01 acre (21.21 sq ft) 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Temporar T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑POT 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 0 Permanent 0 Temporary 4g. Comments: No open water within construction limits. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction roposed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland (acres) Pond ID Proposed use or number purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Exca Flooded vated P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: This project is not located within a protected buffer area. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed replacement bridge will be very close to the same alignment as the existing bridge and will be slightly longer. This slightly shifted alignment avoids an archaeological resource just upstream of the existing bridge. Three-foot grassed shoulders will be utilized on each side of the road instead of paved shoulders to maximize vegetative conveyance and allow runoff to remain in a diffuse flow patter to encourage passive stormwater treatment. Deck drains will be installed only over land and none installed over the stream on the new bridge to minimize direct discharge. Deck drain dissipator pads provided under deck drains and rip rap at pipe outlets will provide energy dissipation and encourage diffuse flow pattern. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Traffic will be maintained via an off-site detour during construction. A temporary work bridge will be used instead of a causeway which will minimize temporary impacts. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be utilized during construction to attempt to reduce the stormwater impacts to the receiving streams due to erosion and runoff. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain: 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): � DWQ � Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.12 acre 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: The NCDOT does not propose mitigation for the 33 linear feet (<0.01 acre) of temporary stream impacts. These impacts do not require permanent fill in the stream bed and, therefore, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, do not constitute Loss of Waters of the U.S. and are not subject to compensatory mitigation. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: If required from 1 a, see attached buffer permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: Categorical Exclusion (CE) approved 1/29/15 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? As of July 14, 2015 the USFWS lists three federally listed species for Anson County. There is no habitat present for the red-cockaded woodpecker. Surveys were conducted for the Carolina heelsplitter by NCDOT biologists and Jay Mays from USFWS in August 2013 and no individuals were found. Surveys were conducted for Schweinitz's sunflower by NCDOT biologists in August 2011, October 2013 and October 2015 and no individuals were found during any of the surveys. This project will have No Effect on all listed species in Anson County. In July 2015, both the shortnose sturgeon and Atlantic sturgeon were removed from the USFWS list for Anson County but remain listed under the jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Communication with the Division of Marine Fisheries in 2010 and 2014 indicated that this project will not affect either of these species. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑ No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps Philip S. Harris, III, P.E. ��,,, �3/�� O � Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name �' Date App �cant/Agent's Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) 11 Environmen tal Quality PAT MCCRORY Governor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Secretary March 29, 2016 Mr. Philip S. Harris, III, P.E., PLS Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598 Dear Mr. Hams: Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter: B-2506, Replace Bridge 8 on SR 1627 over Brown Creek, Anson County The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the compensatory riparian wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on March 23, 2016, the impacts are located in CU 03040104 of the Yadkin River basin in the Southern Piedmont (SP) Eco-Region, and are as follows: Yadkin 03040104 Sp Cold Impacts „ Stream Cool Wetlands Wa� �p�� Non- Coastal Riparian Marsh 0.12 C�] Buffer (Sq. Ft.) Zone 1 Zone 2 0 0 *Some of the stream and/or wetland impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details. DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS. cc: If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420. Sincerely, Jam . Stanfill Credit Management Supervisor Ms. Crystal Amschler, USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR File: B-2506 .. � Statec�f North Carolin� � Environmer�ial Ouality 1 ti01 Mail Service Center I Raleigl�, NortPi Carolina 27G99-1501 919-707-A600 k lig;f7��'�3�,' North Carolina Department of Transportation S€oritlrw�sile•r Highway Stormwater Program �f STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 32638.1.1 TIP No.: B-2506 County(ies : Anson Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 32638.1.1 TIP Number: B-2506 Pro'ect T e: Brid e Re lacement Date: 11/23/2015 NCDOT Contact: William S. Zerman, PE Contractor / Desi ner: Address: NC DOT Hydraulics Unit Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Ralei h, NC 27699 Phone: 919-707-6755 Phone: Email: bzerman ncdot. ov Email: Cit ITown: Ansonville Count ies : Anson River Basin s: Yadkin-Pee Dee CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0294 Miles Surroundin Land Use: Rural, Pee Dee Wildlife Refuge Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. O.S ac. 0.6 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 10 ft. lanes with 2 ft to 5'-10" shoulders. Two 9 ft. lanes with 4 ft wide grassed shoulders Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 300 Year: 2040 Existing: 200 Year: 2016 General Project Narrative: The purpose of this project is to replace the structurally deficient bridge #008 on SR 1627 (Pinkston River Rd.) over Brown Creek in Anson County with a new bridge located (Description of Minimization of Water 13 feet downstream. Three foot grass shoulders are used on each side instead of paved shoulders to maximize vegetative conveyance and allow runoff to remain in a diffuse Quality Impacts) flow pattern to encourage passive stormwater treatment. Deck drains have been placed only over land and none over the body of water to route runoff to natural areas and minimized direct discharge. Deck drain dissipator pads provided under deck drains and rip rap at pipe outlets provides energy dissipation and encourages a diffuse flow pattern. Design maintains existing flow patterns to minimize impacts. A temporary work bridge will be used instead of a causeway which will minimize impacts. Waterbod Information Surface Water Bod 1: NCDWR Stream Index No.: 13-20 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primar Classification: Class C Su lemental Classification: Other Stream Classification: Im airments: A uatic T8E S ecies? Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Pro'ect Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? no (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � m � L � � � I �' � � 2 � �I HJ � N �' m `� � N � � � z c� 3 "� � � o z � �� K Eff�fA �' � a �*�� o u � �,, a �`»� U — �' a ��G � }��. - ��w _ �, � �, � v o ��J. o ;� tn�»+» Cv p�= EAL'J'd,� N c i tA G? rp S Q� �b lA 0 � N � � � � � 0 V � � � V � � O V See Sheet 9-A /-or lndex ot ;heets BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-2506 —L— STA.10 + 00.00 BEGIIV BRIDGE -L- STA.17 + 98.81 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L- STA. 17+87.81 _ SITE 2 `SITE 4 SITE 3 �°�[l°�� I � �IF �� IIF�� I��II��1�� A1�1S01�1 CO U1�TY LOCATI0IV: BRIDGE 8 OVER BROW11l CREEK 0111 SR 1627 PINKSTON RIVER ROAD TYPE OF WORK GRADIIVG, PAVI11lG, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT END TIA PROJECT B-2506 —L— STA. 25 + 50.00 CIVU [SKIU(iC 1 � -L- STA.19+2619 �y�. � v�1 E1YD APPROACH SLAB � j -L- STA.19+37.19 i, � �; i I �� /`� � I n^ - � L _ � _ _— a�-- . ----- _ = � II �� ,� � SITE 5 „� � THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOU11iDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA ADT 2016 = 200 50 25 0 50 l00 ADT 2040 = 300 PLANS DHV = 15 % D = 65 % 50 25 0 50 100 T = 21 %* V = 60 MPH PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =2% DUAL 19% l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS= RURAL LOCAI PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB-REGIONAL TIER �- PROJECT LENGTH Prepo�ed !n !he Office of: DIVISI011t OF HIGHWAYS ]000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 2012 ST9NDARD SPEC/FICATlONS RIGHT OF WAY DATE: G. E. BREW, PE SEPTEMBER 18,. 2015 �Ro�Fcr FxcrNFFn LETTING DATE: T. F. DUNCAN, PE SEPTEMBER 20, �LO�6 �'ROJECT DESIGN ENG/NEER �� B-2506 32638.1.1 BRZ-1627(13) 32638.1.2 I BRZ-16271131 � P.E. ROW. UTIL PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 7 � � NS sq� e o; HYDRAULICS ENGIMEER P.E. SlGNATURE: ROADWAY DESIGN ENGIIVEER SlGNATURE: P.E. 1�'ff8][;1LINH][hTAIIB i� l�1LA\N� DO NOT U3E FOR CONSTRUCTION C� — _v � �J �� ----- — S, �(1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA o�„^ o i ' � �, , E � �, O � �� I � i �� -�I ��. V **a • '**�\ , y�� I � ,T �� 1 �� * — _ //.�i. � o. i9za �\" y\ / \ � /X . F / / � \ � � - % _ EXCAVATION 98 CY EXCAVATE T$�.- � > ',,s,,u,�,�`�'"" , r �,,,�,,,�'s, � NV=198.16' � �o / � !' �, �� i � �i /�l 'Y � � � ��v �, �w�e� � --,, , ,, DETAIL A DECK DRAIN DISSIPATOR PAD ,Ho��o s<o�e, � DISSIPAiOR � PA� 'NOTE�. CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BEIOW DEGK DRAINS caouHo I �p 3� � 0 r �P� �eo.exrae � ,.o� �- ar Type af liner= 8 TONS CL B Ri�Rap Gaoiextile= 1B s FROM STA. 78+02 TO STA. 78+7g _L- Rt. 4 _ E_ _ E � GRAU 350 7L-3 �� nove a d � , ,r�- � f j�� INV=195.50' � ��, \�; � � � SITE �� .-�, ;�� q� � � � �� -� UMTED SiATES OF AI,ffRiCA ''�4:�-�;:rw-��w-t, _1S__—__—_._—_—�15—� .. �_JS O ___ --� ._�_` -. _,.,�. �15— �- �S �-.�� ___—`1S -. \ -. � -- .. .. 1S� -\ -- .. . �- .. .. .. `JS '_- J$� .. .__`JS� —� .. .. . .. �JS ___/J5� �_-15 ..;�'�,r _- __ __ _. _. _. __ - --_ _13��3� U �_.�S ]/172016 DRAWINGS\B2506 Hyd prm wet psh4.d9n ROM STA.19+02 TO STA.19-18 -L- Ri \� \ � I \ f � ` � I ' I � 1 '. I 1 I S � �' E'��} � CLASS II� P I L PDE{{� I�� ,b� � � �`oo� �� RM' SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER 1P]f�lEd.d��NR�iB� 1Pb,AN� DO NOT [ISE FO� CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 7 y.c+�� ,(i / i / �,' � �' �, � i � �Y � i \\\� ='f� �,Y�i��e O � � � ___ UNITED STATES OF AMERIL O �j5--/ O � �� -� c� � �_ / � � 5-�I'RIP RAP SHOULDER POINT (TYP.) � �� E E E E E J � — — — ..—,w -t;;',.-�'--'��` . � -� '-�-�;--� .n,.i-�� INKSrON RNER ROAD !7'9S7 � _ _ —� � -- — —� F- —� -_ _ i_ _ �4'.:u ,'=tiir �'_n rM��-"'_'_ _ ''�"v _ -- [ws'nN W W N W Z J UMTEO STATES OF AMER�CA T V O � � 50' 0' S0' 100' 150' GRAPHIC SCALE � TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGE � DENOTCLEA ING NIZED � DE WET ANDL IN 0 � 0 ,� , .. �\ �� UNiTE0�5TATE5 OF AMERICA ; - �� _ � � �1 b6� �� A -�� - � °� � � � � i�a-> �%�� ' �' � —'� i �� ,� �� . i� �� V � �' S�'�� 3 � �,� �, i � � � �� ' � �� li � �, .l �� - DETAIL A DECK DRAIN DISSIPATOR PAD ,Ho��o s<o�e, � DISSIPAiOR � PA� 'NOTE�. CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BEIOW DEGK DRAINS caouHo I �p 3� � 0 r �P� �eo.exrae � ,.o� �- ar Type af liner= 8 TONS CL B Ri�Rap Gaoiextile= 1B s FROM STA. 16+02 TO STA. 78+18 -L- Rt. FROM STA. 19+02 TO STA. 19+18 -L- R _ � , �\ � / � \ � � \`�, �, ��;\ - `rl ; , � Q M� �1 � � �` , � ' �,��'E 4 ��55� \ �� RDE- I � \ E E aOP9.T1R _ � �,� �_� Liy� / � � ` , . � - � � �, � � � ="'1"'��R;w-� iN�_i55.z�� - � � � �_ _ �- � g . - � � � ,y =Y � �M ,y S — � � � . �� a �, /1 i I i � �-� ` , � �, ,�� , � � '� � , s l r � r � 1 / � � , �,_ � �� — �, �� x' �' � � � `�, � UNiTED SiATES OF AI,�RiCA � —,�6j �� J — � � � � � � � � /` V �19� , ` ^ ' � _ �'�'-`�'�N _ i -, ` ``- \ 6 _ _ � � .'s�____ � - � o � �as - ��s —� —� \'S� - \ �\ � = i �_- -`�-r^,�.t� �� ,,s - i , �_ � � - -- --�--,-�s� <� - � , � � r ' _ _ .IS - � - ----��5 � - '�v � � .' ' .. ��J$'�'i��S� _-_ '__ J5� �15 "`_v.��s' , � �� .. .. . . , S\� . . Y -:: � ... -. � �S ]/172016 '�� -_��\\ . .�- DRAWINGS\B2506 Hyd prm wet psh4.d9n �`oo� �� e�m— �,- �I ;� �, r� �,� - - �� , � , �� , - RM' SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 1P]f�lEd.d��NR�iB� 1Pb,AN� DO NOT [ISE FO� CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 7 � �,, / �� , --�._ _ � � � , .. � 50' 0' S0' 100' 150' GRAPHIC SCALE � TEMPORARY WORK BRIDGE � DENOTCLEA ING NIZED � DE WET ANDL IN � � PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. � 8-2506 6 � ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS �� ENGINEER ENGINEER ESIGN D CHARGE = 4 00 FS ESIGN F E�/ENCY = 2 RS ESIGN ELEVAT N = 2 B T ��-�� -�N� DO NOT U56 FO CONSTAliCTION ASE FR OUENCY = l RS ASE HW ELEVATlO = 2 J7 T ERTOP NG DISC E= 3 00 FS -L STA. 10 + 00. 0 -L STA. 7+ 98. B1 ERTOPF NG ELEV TION = � T E RM T D W I G EL V. = 202.81 SHE T 6 OF E D BRIDG -L- S A. 19 26.19 Pl = l 50.00 � _ /6+3 AO - L= 205 8' EL = 20 .7/' EL = 2A6' �= VC = 30 ' VC = 00' _ /84 K = l38 K = l8 STA 15+50 � � EGIN SPECIAL UT DITCH � TA ,s.zs �+107 45% -J03000' � � � � � _ '_ _ _ —! + 53� ,� -- � — — — — — � , f �9f P 8. _ � � ` '— ♦ OQ �=0.002 Q 30 �`-ni rk�*ni RCP-lll TEMPORA Y WORK BRIDGE L.197+/- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 EN G DE -L STA. 5 + 50. 0 Pl = 24+ OAO EL = 2/ 43' K=/52 +l►9178% f+10.5000. m BM # -L- ST . 24 + 2 .62 � 32.90 RT � ELEV. 07.56' ;� BM 2 " PINE � � � � � Z � �o �� ,� �� . �� ,� �� VIY1016 qfng�yen �� R: M draulics CADD PERMIT DRAWINGS 82506 H d m fl.d n WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPA T URFA E WATER IMPA T Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 13+63/13+74 -L-�T 30" RCP < 0.01 < 0.01 2 13+82 / 13+98 -L-RT W ETLAND < 0.01 3 14+58 / 15+03 -L- 24" RCP 0.04 < 0.01 4 15+68/16+51 -L- 24" RCP 0.05 0.02 5 18+27 / 18+50 -L- TEMP. WORK BRIDGE < 0.01 33 TOTALS": 0.09 0.03 < 0.01 0 33 0 "Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: PERMANENT SURFACE WATER IMPACT DUE TO PIER = 21.21 SQ. FT (<0.01 AC) Revised 2013 �0 24 r � L U T tY �' n w mf ,� ti o� N Lf �� N� T- � o� o �� ,� z °� Q �F �LY � �F N�f 0 � N � .� � V W O � � � � �?e �hee� � A r �,� i nde v vr `,heets �Ne h,��t l- � o� i?;nvetl�nal �ymbols �� V ��1L1L ��1L�� V 1L�� 1L1�11L�� V'V' � 1l � A1�S01� CO U1�lTY LOCATIOIV: BRIDGE 8 OVER BROWIV CREEK 01V SR 1627 PINKSTON RIVER ROAD TYPE OF WORK: GRADIIVG, PAVI11lG, DRA711tAGE, A111D STRUCTURE � ^ NS sq� 200, �� T O ��.��.�� ..�N� DO NOT USE POR CONSTRUCTION HYDRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepo�eo in tne ottice ot: ADT 2016 = 200 DIVISIOIV OF HIGHWAYS rJ� 25 0 Jr0 10� 1000 Birch Ridge Or., Raleigh NC, 276l0 �'�Q0 p � � � � � � � � ADT 2040 = 300 �°� �' ��o PLANS DHV = 15 % LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-2506 = 0.270 MILES zmz srANnann s�EciFicArroNs /a� �o� � D= 65 % LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-2506 = OA24 MILES s�cnnruns: r.E. � � 50 25 0 50 100 T= 21 %* RIGHT OF WAY DATE: G. E. BREW, PE a � LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-2506 = 0.294 MILES — ��, � V= 60 MPH SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 PRo�FCT FNcrNFFn ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =2% DUAL 19% ��`'�p ��i� l0 5 0 lo �a FUNC CLASS= RURAL LOCAL LETTING DATE: _ PT.�� DUNCAN�P R �� 'a�'� SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB-REGIONAL TIER PE SIGNATURE: SURVEY BEGI11t TIP PROJECT B-2506 -L- STA. IO + 00.00 BM'I C01�TROL SHEET \ ' �\ i♦, � O' �� _ _i I� � ��„ x _ i�=� i 1 � - �2506-2 �-L� ��_ PRELIMII�AR Y E1VD PRO BMu2 � e_�-- ____-- --------- �- ---- C7 SR# 1627 PINKST0111 RIVER ROAD BL1 POlNI D�SLo N��R"� E11=�;1 �L�V�I1G� L`;l�l�l(_1N OFFS�T 1752 RtBRR 47'i82�o8�4� 1685245o4�2D 19'�017 18�8�035 26�036 LT E��1751 REBGR 47969�e73�4� 16f�5P29,899� 241e�7 19t3��84 13076 LT BL POINT DESCo NORT�I EF1,T ELEVATION L STl�TION OFFSET 1116 k-B�k 48G377o�21GJ 16845`i��'i'��'i�� i�l_o6/ 11a14o8'� 2ioLL- HI 2 B25�6-2 479843,924� 1684958a84�� 2�3,73 17t62,67 1,7� RT 1751 REBRR 47969�,73�D 1685�2908994 2D1eD7 19�3�,84 1�,76 LT 2�i77 f�EBRR 479382,1�30 1685Dq4,312� 2�5,95 22�44,19 Z2e�?E RT 1 F,�F�6 ] 47�'u�� =;, 6i'3� 1 FiQr?_ 3r e"�_'(�'7�71 ?_ I iZ�, 8`=! �',IIT� I DF PRO .!E�T I__ T M I TS BMl ELEVRTION = 2��io�'6 N 4�(�119 E 16848�4 L �TRTION 14�45 2 RIGHT f3M 3�" ORK ROW M�1RKEn� 2M� ELEVRTION = Z�7o56 N 479235 E 1E�352�6 L STRTION 24�21 33 LEFT BM Z4" PINE RLIGN STRTION OFFSET NORTH E�ST L 1��0�� -5�0�� 48D5B8o71�1 168461609�64 L 1�� -�2,14 48�543,1652 168459�7,g331 L 1Dt5�,89 32,24 4��424,78`�4 168456001615 L 13t45o78 58053 �48G156o7177 168469703233 L 13�57,27 -5�,�� 48�221,21�8 1684785,435�3 L 16�12,4�3 58,5� 47�952,5(��J 1684846,2544 L 17t85o�7 -5�n�� 1�7984�102292 1685(1502�8� L 18�26078 4206] 47976�09175 168494108�23 L 1�1��35,�i7 -S�JeD� 479698e8E�2 16B5�i65e462� L 22t52,�� 37,��7 47936�,8474 1685�810124� L 22�72093 -5�oD0 47�137602087 16851720425� L 25�27019 3�013 47�11209353 15�5195o6�J61 L 25�5P�,��1 -5�,�� 479131e2363 16�35176e9644 L 25t5�,D� -30n�� 47�1r1,5767 168525�,451� L 25�5�0�� 3�00@ 479�q2o5976 16852�i6o914�i NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE P,?SGf> I T PROJEC7 REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-2506 1C-1 Location and Survevs DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCAL RED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE CO�RDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "82506-2"' WITH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 479843.924(ftl EASTING: 1684958.840(ftl ELEVATION: 203.73(ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT IGROUND TO GRIDI IS: 0.999873 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRI� BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM '"82506-2" TO -L- STATION 10+00.00 IS N 30°57'27.6" W 757.116' ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM 11SE� IS NAVD 88 TYPE STRTION NORTH ERS1� PC l�•!��e�D 4Q4G93n1�33 16�3456qe3783 PRC 13t57o27 4�I�187,3251 1684748a6697 PT 17-850�7 47982305�48 1684968a1Ec9 PC 19�35,P7 47�682,1448 16f�5�18,342� P�C 22�72e`=13 479361,4736 1685124a6456 PT 25�4504�6 47�1 ll 0�585 168523�0`�924 POT 25-5�0�� 4791�7a7871 1G85233a183� NOTES: 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT: HTTPS.//CONNECT.NCDOT. GOU/RESO UR CES/L,OCATION/ THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: B2506_LS_CONTROL. TXT B2506_LS LOCAL.TXT 2. SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED,PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. 3. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM, UTILIZING THE NCGS RTN SYSTEM (VRSj. MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.• • INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS FOR HORIZONTAL CONTROL ■ INDICATES BASELINE MONUMENTS FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL E� INDICATES BENCHMARKS FOR VERTICAL CONTROL -L - Pl Sta Il+81.42 Pl Sto 15+74.12 p= 24° 34' 25.1" fLTJ p= 23° 07' 26.0" (RTJ D= 6' S2' 4/.7" D= 5' 24' �8.9" L = 357.27' L = 427.80' `^ T = IS1.42' T = 216.85' ti Q R= 833.00' R= 1,060.00' � SE = 06 SE = 06 W lNC = 27' lNC = 27' ^' RO = �62' RO = l62' � 2 g 0 � U W � O � � W � z � w x ti 0 � ti w � W � W � � -L- + z 52'I Q UNITED STATES OF AMERICA F;��'� � 30' I � a BEGIN T lP PROJECT B-2506 �� 82 P� ob '� � �, �m3 OB 183 PC i9 �� I�, � � z -L - PC .SfO. �� f0�.�� 40' LT � � � � � 1 L- +83 53' LT I � � v � � � � � � v � � � 52' LT I v � � -L- PRC Sfa. 13+5727 �i � i � +� � �� 1 -L- + i �v 30' LT � -L- + 6 I � I 30' LT ` � '� � _ r �O � —�— +oo� �, � �� ,,-- R , � 36' L �� 45' LT , - - -L- + 0 � ��'�'' � -L- +57.2 �� 30'LT � � � 30' L �� , �oao _�_ W � _ o��o � -' � � � , o_L- + 0 -L- +63 -L- +25 � / sM =i � , , " - ,_. < ti EXIST. fLW 42' LT 30' LT �� - ,s;,- � � �! 7' L 0' LT6 oaoi 30' LT4 �..�kr,�._ t.a-_ � �� I - t�3 2 � � � � �_ - " � �� 30' RT � 0 27� 30' LT � I N � __� ,�o EM�� c� � -L- + 0 °� = ��' /N - �� - -L- +08 BEG/N BRIDGE -L- Sto.17+98.81 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L- POT Sfa. 17+87.8/ -L- PT Sta.17+85.07 30' LT 2�' \ � o � � INC R2506-�' � � + � E �'E -v" N � -- - --- n G �U 350 TL�: a 'Y \ �.. � =�- K '-�J �- ,r 4N-q� ��30 fjLrti- Q __ , � 30' RT 09I ov r � \1 . � �� - - / � ,� � REM�OVE A1�9.�'EPYACE -L- i- 0 0 �v _yy- __ o oo,� �"� L- +06 60' RT BEGIN � N y - � -__' �,v _ - � 70' RT SAFETY f ti � � � Q _"' � � � co�ua nN � � -L- �-w 3v � -L- +26 70' RT00 � _ Z � �� 30' RT � 62' RT ii � . �� Q � ------ = = 1 �� -- + _�_ + � �� '�v� � � -L- +47 30 RL- +72 67' RT � � � > o � �� -L ��+25� 30' RT 30' RT � <a� � � � � �i � 30' RT -L- +7 � � � � �� -L- +0 -L- +20 60' RT� �0' RT ENVIRONMENTALY SENSITNE � w EXIST. WW \ 40' RT AREA BOUNDARY o� vWi � � UWTED STATES OF AMERiCA � � �L}L-III� OB i57 PC i49 � Q ''�i:r S-�'r`"`�-�"``,"-":;.,-k�� DDBi883PPG054 � JS O � _Z1S- � � � �,S =� �l � -_��5�4.;� \ i"'�,-�;,� ^ _ _- '-( �1S � p _ � I� �`�'��n�'�,_r,"�r,�"�"�r4s. ��__ � 5 ��. �-��L�` ` S� �� s� � ��n _-15� _—�S� �✓-�n�.r4 � -� "'i�.�.. _�15 u �,� ��, � �r�,�n, �s� �- � T� � \\�S- � DETAIL A DECK DRAIN DISSIPATOR PAD i N � �a s�a�e� � OISSIPATOR Pier� v � PAD 'NOTE: CENTER PAD DIRECTLY BELOW DECK �RAINS cxouNo �32� ' ' .{ GEOTEXTILE � � L= 3]' Type ofLiner= 8 TONS CL 6 R'ip-Rop cemeMae- ia ,y FROM STA. 76+02 TO STA. 18+18 -L- Rt. FROM STA. 79+02 TO STA. 19+18 -L- R}. �U ��, � � �� BL �R52 � � � �� ` �� I�� 50' LT LT I I� L 40' LT � PDE RAP DECK PADS, ��OZ �S /��8 �N O N END BRIDGE , = � Q�Nv -L�� Sto. 19+26./9�i i � � � �I i ; � �L- h'C��ta l9-�.3b.(�'7� � , , � � � � �, � END APPROACH SLAB -L- POC Sta./9+37J9 � �5� BL� 1751 � i S�CI�Sb-IIRIP RAP � TO SHOULDER POINT (TYP.� � 'Z7' L- +55 - � lNC 40' LT 30' LT PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-2506 4 WW SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER 9�ff81EIl,IA'gIN�R�' R�]L.�NS DO .�*OT USE PO CONSTRUCTION -L- PRC Sto.22+7293 0 LJNITED STATES OF AMERIC O DB 157 PG 149 ODB1883PP�054 � O � N L 30' LT _�_ + � 45' LT �%i -E E I : �,��, � ��k;, J ---_- � y -- I _ - -- - — � �_ _' � � F'�' �— -� x�s,iNo � W L- + 72.93 = 30' LT N W J UNITED STATES OF AMERICA T DB i57 PG i49 J� �DB i883 PPG �Si ( � O �i � ~ � �i . sF r�z� ��n�.esr�v r�vER oa�� d 'I - GRAU 350 1'G3- - - - 6 oao 7YpQ�e_.___. _._,� �-. ,.�. -� CL B RIP RAP 1 TON, 5 SY FF _L- t O ssc srn i9+azie 30' RT END TO STA 19+80 , CAFF E - F- _- BL-2077 �- �� y�,,,s,,,1. „�' ^' 7 SKETCH OF BRIDGE lN RELATIONSHIP TO PAVEMENT BEGIN BRIOGE END BRIOGE -L- Sto. 17+98.8/ -L- Sta. /9+26./9 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END APPROACH SLAB -L - PT Sto. 17+87.8/ -L - PC Sta. l9 t37.19 25:1 TAPER N 25:1 TAPER GRA�50 TL-3 TYPE III YPE III GRAU 350 TL-3 TL-3 "�` "' � I 25:lTAPER � GRAU 350 TL-; 25:/ TAPER FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 6 FOR STRUCTURES SEE SHEET S? TO S? l D Ll NFF �� / M� �iW _ �a �i� � �W Z �- �C� :� NCC&t l D Ll NFF �� / M� �iW _ �a �i� � �W Z �- �C� :� NCC&t l D Ll NFF �� / M� �iW _ �a �i� � �W Z �- �C� :� NCC&t l D Ll NFF �� / M� �iW _ �a �i� � �W Z �- �C� :� NCC&t l D Ll NFF �� / M� �iW _ �a �i� � �W Z �- �C� :� NCC&t l D Ll NFF �� / M� �iW _ �a �i� � �W Z �- �C� :� NCC&t l D Ll NFF �� / M� �iW _ �a �i� � �W Z �- �C� :� NCC&t