20181192_Right of Way and Relocation Report - March 2015_20151201

RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION REPORT
For
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
�
•
��: �U�P�E�'�
�`i :S4C)
Trlan�le F�r�ssw�y
�.�:d���r�� ���t�����
Wake and Johnston Counties
STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
State Project Nos. 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Federal Aid Project Nos. STP-0540(19), STP-0540(20), and STP-0540(21)
WBS Nos. 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA2, and 35517.1.TA1
Prepared for:
Prepared By:
HDR, Inc. as a Subconsultant to
H.W. Lochner, Inc.
��Z L O C H N E R
March 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
Right of Way and Relocation Report
NCDOT STIP Project No. R-2721, R-2828, R-2829
Wake and Johnston Counties
1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................. 1
1.1 Proposed Action ......................................................................................1
1.2 Existing Roadway Network .......................................................................1
1.3 Project Alternatives .................................................................................2
2 RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION ............................................................ 4
3 CONCLUSIONS ..........................................................................................6
4 REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 7
Right of�Way and Relocation Report i
STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829— March 2015

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Preliminary Corridor Alternatives Comprising Each Detailed Study
Alternative...........................................................................................3
Table 2 Right of Way and Relocation Impacts/Costs for Each Detailed
StudyAlternative ..................................................................................5
LIST OF FIGURES
(Figures Follow Text)
Figure 1 Project Setting
Figure 2 Detailed Study Alternatives
APPENDICES
(Appendices Follow Figures)
Appendix A Right of Way Estimate Summary Sheets
Appendix B EIS Relocation Reports
Appendix C Segment Breaks and Right of Way & Relocation Impact Spreadsheets
Right of�Way and Relocation Report ii
STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829— March 2015

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
1.1 PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), in cooperation with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), proposes transportation improvements in the project study area and
surrounding region to address transportation needs as defined in the project's Purpose and Need
Statement (Lochner, 2011). The focus of these improvements is a potential extension of the Triangle
Expressway (NC 540) from its current terminus at the NC 55 Bypass in Apex to the US 64/US 264
Bypass (I-495) in Knightdale. This action is designated as three projects in the NCDOT 2012-2018
STIP: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829. Together, these STIP projects would combine to complete the 540
Outer Loop around the Raleigh metropolitan area. In some instances, the proj ect is referred to as having
two phases: Phase I is the western portion of the study area between NC 55 Bypass in Apex and I-40
near the Wake/Johnston County line; Phase II is the eastern portion of the study area between I-40 and
US 64/US 264 Bypass in Knightdale. NCDOT established a protected corridor for the project between
NC 55 Bypass and I-40 in 1996 and 1997. For purposes of ineeting the requirements of NEPA, both
phases are being examined in the current study as a single and complete project. It is likely that the
project would be constructed in phases, but depending on the availability of funding, may ar may not be
consistent with the current phase descriptions noted. Figure 1 shows the general project vicinity.
The project study area is located south and southeast of the City of Raleigh between the towns of Holly
Springs to the west and Knightdale to the east. The project study area extends as far south as NC 42
between Fuquay-Varina and Clayton. While most of the project study area is within Wake County, a
small portion of western Johnston County is also included. Figure 2 shows the project study area.
This project, referred to as the Complete 540 — Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension, is intended
to improve transportation mobility for trips within, or traveling through, the project study area during
the peak travel period, and reduce forecast traffic congestion. The proposed action is included in the
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO joint
2035 Long Range Ti^ansportation Plan (LRTP) (2011), as well as the Capital Area MPO 2012-2018
Metropolitan Transportation Improveinent Program (MTIP) (2011). In addition, the proposed action is
included in the State's system of Strategic Highway Corridors (SHC) aimed at providing a safe, reliable,
and high-speed network of highways within North Carolina (NCDOT, 2008).
NCDOT developed the Purpose and Need Statement (Lochner, 2011) for this project with input from
federal and state environmental regulatory and resource agencies and the Capital Area MPO at resource
and regulatory agency meetings and at Capital Area MPO meetings held on June 16, 2010, and
September 15, 2010. NCDOT also incorporated public input solicited at public meetings held in
September 2010, December 2010, and October 2013.
1.2 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK
There are several major trave] routes through the project study area; these routes are shown in Figure
1. I-40 is one of the major east-west routes through North Carolina, connecting Raleigh and its
surrounding cormnunities to southeastern North Carolina and I-95 to the east. To ihe west, I-40 connects
the area to Research Triangle Park (RTP), Durham, and other cities in central and western North
Carolina. I-440, the Raleigh Beltline, is a partial loop facility around Raleigh, connecting the suburban
areas surrounding the city. Existing I-540/NC 540 currently extends around the north and west sides of
Right of Way a�nd Relocation Report 1
STIP PYoject Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 —March 2015

the Raleigh area respectively, connecting outlying areas in Apex, Cary, northern Raleigh, and
Knightdale. US 64 is another important east-west route through North Carolina; in the project study
area, it traverses central Wake County. US 1 connects areas northeast of Raleigh to expanding suburban
communities southwest of Raleigh.
Within southern and southeastern Wake County, there are limited alternatives for efficient local and
long-distance travel. For residents in rapidly growing areas of southern and southeastern Wake County
and northern Johnston County, routes for travel to many of the region's majar employment centers
consist of unlimited access, primary and secondary roads with lower posted speed limits and frequent
traffic signals. Much of I-40, an important transportation corridor for local freight and commuter traffic,
and the majar corridar for interregional traff'ic across the area, currently operates at unacceptable levels
of service (LOS) E ar F. LOS on I-40 and other major routes across the area is forecast to worsen
substantially. The proposed project would be a new location, fully controlled-access toll facility.
1.3 PR07ECT ALTERNATIVES
The project's Alternatives Development and Analysis Report (Lochner, 2014) evaluated several possible
alternatives associated with this project through a three-tiered screening process. The alternatives
remaining under consideration fall into two main categories: No-Build and Build Alternatives.
The No-Build Alternative is the baseline comparative alternative. It assumes that the transportation
systems in the project study area will continue to develop as currently planned in the Capital Area MPO
and Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO joint 2035 LRTP, but without the proposed Complete 540 -
Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension project.
The project's Build Alternatives were developed and evaluated as color-coded segments termed
Preliminary Corridor Alternatives. Combinaiions of the various Preliminary Corridor Alternatives
comprise end-to-end project alternarives. The end-to-end project alternatives remaining following the
screening process outlined in the Draft Alternatives Development and Analysis Report are termed
Detailed Study Alternatives (DSAs), which will be documented and evaluated in detail in the project's
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Ten Preliminary Corridor Alternatives comprise
seventeen end-to-end DSAs. Figure 2 shows the locations of the Preliminary Corridor Alternatives that
make up the DSAs for the project. Table 1 lists the Preliminary Corridor Alternatives that make up
each of the DSAs. The Orange Corridor Alternative between NC 55 Bypass and I-40 corresponds to
the existing protected corridor.
The DSAs under consideration are proposed to be toll facilities. An open road (highway speed
transponder-based system) will likely be used as the primary means of toll collection. This would allow
drivers to travel unobstructed through the toll collection points at highway speeds.
Right of�Way and Relocation Report 2
STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829— March 2015

Table 1 Preliminary Corridor Alternatives Comprising Each Detailed Study Alternative
DSA Preliminary Corridor Alternatives
j Orangeto Green
2 Orange to Green to Mint Green to Green
3 Orange to Brown (South) to Tan (North) to Green
4 Orange to Brown to Green
5 Orange to Green to Teal to Brown to Green
6 Orange to Red to Green
'] Orange to Red to Mint Green to Green
$ Orange to Purple-Blue-Lilac to Green
9 Orange to Purple-Blue-Lilac to Green to Mint Green to Green
10 Orange to Purple-Blue-Lilac to Brown (South) to Tan (North) to Green
j j Orange to Purple-Blue-Lilac to Brown to Green
] 2 Orange to Purple-Blue-Lilac to Teal to Brown to Green
13 Orange to Lilac to Green
14 Orange to Lilac to Green to Mint Green to Green
15 Orange to Lilac to Brown (South) to Tan (North) to Green
1( Orange to Lilac to Brown to Green
1'] Orange to Lilac to Green to Teal to Brown to Green
Right of�Way and Relocation Report 3
STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829— March 2015

2 RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION
The methods used for this right of way and relocation analysis follow the current NCDOT Right of Way
Manual as well as the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of
1970, as amended.
Qualified right of way agents and appraisers reviewed the plans for the various color-coded Preliminary
Corridor Alternatives and identiiied properties that could have potential right of way impacts and
properties that could have potential relocation impacts. Field reconnaissance was conducted along each
Preliminary Corridor Alternative including identification of impacted residences/businesses and
potential displacements. All field worlc was conducted from the existing roadway right of way.
However, current aerial photography sources and county Geographical Information System (GIS) data
was also reviewed to identify buildings and other improvements not visible from the road.
Displacements were identiiied based on the potential physical impacts of the highway to existing
buildings as well as impacts to support systems such as water supply and/or septic systems. If a septic
system or water supply appeared to be impacted and no utilities were planned for the area, the parcel
was included as a relocation. This did not apply to large acreage tracts if it appeared that sufficient areas
adjacent to the non-impacted structures were available for replacement systems. Additionally, if a
developed parcel had right of way and damage costs that exceeded the value of the property even though
the building improvements were not directly impacted, the parcel was included for relocation.
Right of way and relocation impacts were calculated for each of the ten color-coded Preliminary
Corridor Alternatives. These ten color-coded alternatives are composed of shorter corridor segments.
These segments allow for combining of the ten color-coded alternatives into the 17 unique Detailed
Study Alternatives (DSAs).
A right of way estimate summary sheet is included in Appendix A for each of the segments of each
color-coded Preliminary Corridor Alternative. The summary sheet includes the number and type of
parcels that will be involved in the right of way acquisition process, the number and type of relocations,
and an estimate of the right of way and relocation costs.
A relocation report for each of the segments of each color-coded Preliminary Corridor Alternative is
included in Appendix B. For the relocations, this report shows the type of displacees for each type of
relocation.
Appendix C includes a key for how the various segments of the ten color-coded Preliminary Corridor
Alternatives combine to form the 17 DSAs. Also included here are spreadsheets that combined the
results from the right of way and relocation analysis for the 17 DSAs.
Table 2 shows the compilation of the right of way and relocation impacts for each of the 17 DSAs. Also
shown in this table is the right of way and relocation cost estimate by DSA.
Right of�Way and Relocation Report 4
STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829— March 2015

Table 2 Ri ht of Wa and Relocation Im acts/Costs for Each Detailed Stud Alternative
Number of Parcels Im acted Relocations
DSA Non- Right of Way & DSA
Commercial Residential Vacant Total Residential Business Farms profits Total Relocation Cost
1 38 510 l93 74l 269 6 0 3 2'78 $314,476,100 1
2 38 511 ] 95 744 271 6 1 3 281 $313,954,600 2
3 44 509 201 754 256 5 1 3 265 $298,581,400 3
4 44 484 191 719 234 5 1 3 243 $280,882,300 4
5 40 506 191 737 263 6 0 3 272 $310,769,100 5
6 63 673 257 993 435 12 0 2 449 $438,920,400 6
% 63 6'73 259 995 437 12 0 2 45l $442,337,600 7
$ 57 861 295 1,213 548 15 2 1 566 $543,553,700 8
9 57 862 297 1,216 550 15 3 1 569 $543,032,200 9
10 63 862 305 1,230 537 15 3 1 556 $529,009,600 10
11 63 837 295 1,195 Sl5 15 3 1 534 $511,310,500 ll
12 59 857 293 1,209 542 15 2 l 560 $539,846,700 12
13 45 765 174 984 466 14 0 1 481 $411,581,500 13
14 45 766 176 987 468 14 1 1 484 $411,060,000 14
15 51 766 l84 1,001 455 14 1 1 47] $397,037,400 15
16 51 741 174 966 433 14 1 1 449 $379,338,300 16
17 47 76l l72 980 460 14 0 1 475 $407,874,500 17
Right of Way and Relocation Report
STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — March 2015

3 CONCLUSIONS
Alternatives 1 through 5 impact the fewest parcels, involve the fewest relocations, and have the lowest
right of way and relocation cost estimates of the 17 DSAs. Parcel impacts range from 719 to 754 parcels
for Alternatives 1 through 5. The remaining 12 DSAs all have parcel impacts between 966 to 1,230
parcels. Relocations for Alternates 1 through 5 range from 243 to 281 total relocations. This compares
to between 449 to 569 relocations with the remaining 12 DSAs. Similarly, the right of way cost for
Alternatives 1 through 5 are about 52% to 83% of the other 12 DSAs.
The lowest right of way relocation cost option is Alternative 4(Orange to Brown to Green). This
alternative also involves the fewest total parcels and the fewest total relocations of all DSAs. This
alternative also has the fewest residential parcels impacted and the fewest residential relocations.
Right of Way and Relocation Report 6
STIP PYoject Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 —March 2015

4 REFERENCES
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO). 2011. 2012-2018 Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program.
CAMPO and Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization. 2011. Joint 2035
Long Range Transportation Plan.
H.W. Lochner. 2014. Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Alternatives
Development and Analysis Report.
H.W. Lochner. 2011. Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Purpose and Need Statement.
Right of�Way and Relocation Report 7
STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829— March 2015

FIGURES

►i
Orange
County
��
\\
►i
15 64
,o�
oLexington-Fayette �
��r: g�w � � �
.� � .
1� � � -
� � � � VirginiaJ3�'ach
� � A
� �, � � � i
i
75
140 26 40 85
77 5i �
40 240 �� , 79: ^
� 95
•
�� - �
�` ♦
� ♦
� ♦
♦ `
� � ♦
♦
♦
� �
.., : � ..,:.. : � � �� �
OChapel II ,5,
Carrboro I
�►� i�
►5I \I 15 � ���;:r- � ^
15 C O C& v'
Chatham
County
Jordan Lake
�
►i -.�
�4i
►i ` .� �
►i
aleigh-C '
nternar ��
Research arp.
Triangle �.
Park�% ��
►i
� uWake
Counf
;; Apex
Begin Project
.
.
�
�
�
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
►i
�� _-._ `!i�
Morrisville ,,,
��j �� (( �
� �
401 \
O a ry ��a� ��� � � I �
u `� �� Raleigh
0
;.
Holly Springs
Searon Harris Reservoir \
` Fuqu
✓� -��`��
Flarn��
�� County
401
��
�
�
401
Garner
�
►i
Lsari� ��ia�t�ri
�
�
401
401
�(nightdale
�� .
� End Project
Johnsi
COUl11
♦
♦
♦
♦
�
♦
♦
♦
♦ `
♦
� � 64
_ Fra klin /="
�� Co nty /
,6,
�3;
►i
�, ° �'ash
�"sa -_, sa � � �County
64 Zebulon �
� 264 `
/%
64 264
,� ``
Wendell 64
N
Clayton
70
�
�
�3;
\I
�8�
W E
S
� � � � � � � � � Miles
0 3 6
Legend
� Study Area Boundary
� Triangle Expressway
� ra�arii r.; .� i.�r,n �
� Turnpike Authority
Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway
Southeast Extension
State Project No. 6.401078 & 6.401079 & 6.401080
S.T.I.P. No. R-2721 & R-2828 & R-2829
Figure 1 Project Setting

APPENDIX A
Right of Way Estimate Summary Sheets
(Segment order matches table in Appendix C)

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: ORANGE State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: Ol - STA. 21+45.00 - STA. 385+95.66 O_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 10 Non-residential 1
Residential 204.5 Residential 101
Vacant 77 Total Relocatees 102
Total Parcels 291.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 291.5 x $15,000 = $4,372,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 291.5 x $2,000 = $583,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $4,955,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 291.5 = 291.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $1,457,500
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 291.5 = 146 Parcels x $2,500 = $365,000
6. Title Services 100% x 291.5 = 291.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $437,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 291.5 = 146 Parcels x $2,500 = $365,000
8. Mediators 30% x 146 = 15 Parcels x $2,000 = $30,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 146 = 4 Parcels x $2,500 = $10,000
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 90 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $1,800,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAI R/W OPS $4,466,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $35,658,813 x 125% * Design plan stage = $44,5�3,500
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $6,686,000 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $15,600,700 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 146 x $500 - $73,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAI R/W LAND COSTS $66,933,200
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1) PD&Eplans-115% (2) 30%plans-320% (3) 60%plans-115% (4) 90%plans-130% (5/ ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 291.5 = $2,915,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 102 =$1,020,000 TOTALACQ/RELO STAFF $3,935,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 57 = $2,565,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 44 = $660,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 57 = $199,500
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 44 $88,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 1 = $60,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $3,572,500
26.
27.
28. TOTALR/W ESTIMATE $83,863,000
(��7 te �� �>7�Qa-oY�_.
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: lanuary 6, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10%will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements loca[ed within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcels 6, 13, 22, 39, 86, 138, 142, 180, 181, 182, 198, 200, 250, 265,
266, 277, and 282. The value of the NCDOT owned parcels included in Fhis estimate is based on their purchase price. However, there are a few sections within the
corridor where the property has already been removed from the tax rolls. The cost of acquiring those parcels that have since been removed from the tax rolls is not
included in this estimate. Other government or utility owned parcels incude Parcels 20 and 186. Parcel 283 is split between Ol and 02.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: ORANGE State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: 02 - STA. 385+95.66 - STA. 484+00.00 O_L County: Wake
Date: December 30, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 2.5 Non-residential 0
Residential 51.5 Residential 22
Vacant 11.5 TotalRelocatees 22
Total Parcels 65.5
R/W SUPPORT CO5T5 Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 65.5 x $15,000 = $982,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 65.5 x $2.000 = $131,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,113,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 300% x 65.5 = 65.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $327,500
S. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 65.5 = 33 Parcels x $2,500 = $82,500
6. Title Services 100% x 65.5 = 65.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $98,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 65.5 = 33 Partels x $2,500 = $82,500
8. Mediators 30% x 33 = 3 Parcels x $2.000 = $6,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 33 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 22 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $440,000
11. Miscellaneous Contretts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru li) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,041,300
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $14,703,484 x 125% * Design plon stage = $18,379,400
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $2,756,900 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $6,432,800 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 33 x $500 - $16,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $27,585,600
" Design contingencyfor design plan stage:
(1) VD&Eplans-125% (1) 30%plans-110% /3) 60%plans-135% (4/ 90%plans-330% (5) FOWF/ons-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 65.5 = $655,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 22 =$220.000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAFF $875,000
RELOCATION CO5T5
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 17 = $765,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 5 = $75,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner 53,500 x 17 = $59,500
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 5 $10,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $909,500
26.
27.
28. TOTALR/WESTIMATE $31,524,900
C .�7iec l�.ntPaa,-�_
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: � Date: lanuary 8, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to
the remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcel 315. The cost of the NCDOT parcels are
being included in these estimates based on the purchase price. However, there was no price disclosed on the deed for this particular parcel. Therefore the cost of
this parcel has been estimated based on the land only. Other governmen[ or utility owned parcels include Parcel 330. Parcel 283 is split between Ol and 02.
Parcels 326 and 330 are split between 02 and 03/03L.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: ORANGE State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: 03-STA.4S4+00.00-STA.877+65.00 O_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRq: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 9 Non-residential 2
Residential 145.5 Residential SS
Vacant 51 Total Relocatees 60
Total Parcels 205.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 205.5 x $15,000 = $3,082,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 205.5 x $2,000 = $411,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $3,493,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations S00% x 205.5 = 205.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $1,027,500
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 205.5 = 303 Parcels x $2,500 = $257,500
6. Title Services 100% x 205.5 = 205.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $308,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 205.5 = 103 Parcels x $2,500 = $257,500
8. Mediators 10% x 103 = 10 Parcels x $2,000 = $20,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 103 = 3 Parcels x $2,500 = $7,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 63 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $1,260,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $3,140,300
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $33,115,385 x 125% * Design plan stage = $41,394,200
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (%increase) _ $6,209,100 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $14,488,000 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 103 x $500 = $51,500
17. (Lines 13 thru i6) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $62,142,800
* Design con[ingency far design plan stage:
/i) VD&Eplans-125% (2) 30%plans-320% (3f 60%plans-11595 (4) 90%plans-IIO% (5) ROWVIans300%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 205.5 = $2.055,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 60 = $600,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $2,655,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 41 = $1,845,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 17 = $255,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 40 = $140,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,OOD 16 $32,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 2 = $120,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $2 392 000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE 573.823,600
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: ��� F Date: lanuary 12, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10Y will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates 6elow averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcels 359, 364, 415, 437, 459, 474, 486, 504, 515, and 532. The value
of the NCDOT owned parcels being included in this estimate is based on their purchase price. However, there are a few sections within the corridor where the property has
already been removed from the tax rolls. The cost of acquiring those parcels that have since been removed from the tax rolls is not included in this estimate. No government
or utility owned parcels have been identified in this segment. However, Parcels 330 and 330-1 are part of the Wake Technical Community College campus and Parcels 450 and
453 are owned by the Garner Volunteer Fire Dept. (non-profit). Based on the current plans, Parcel 450 has been identified as a displacee. Parcels 326 and 330 are split
between 02 and 03/03L. Parcels 533 is split between 03 and 04.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: ORANGE State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: 04 - STA. 877+65.00 - STA. 952+00.00 O_L County: Wake and Johnston Counties
Date: December 10, 2014 HDR#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Non-residential 0
Residential 9.5 Residential 7
Vacant 12 Total Relocatees 7
Total Parcels 21.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost �Parcels) 21.5 x $15,000 = $322,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 21.5 x $2,000 = $93,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $365,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 21.5 = 21.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $107,500
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 21.5 = 11 Parcels x $2,500 = $27,500
6. Title Services 100% x 21.5 = 21.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $32,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 21.5 = 11 Parcels x $2,500 = $27,500
8. Mediators 10% x 11 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 11 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 6 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $120,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $318,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $10,560,487 x 125% * Design plan stage = $13,200,600
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $1,980,100 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (�O increase) _ $4,620,200 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 11 x $500 = $5,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND CO5T5 $19,506,400
' Design contingenry foi design plan stage:
/1) PD&Eplans-125% /2/ 30%plans-120% /3/ 60%plans-115% (4) 90%p/ons-110% (5) ROWP/ans-100Y
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
is. n�y��5�c�oo Slo,000 « us = 5z1s,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 7 = $70,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $285,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 5 = $225,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 2 = $30,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 5 = $17,500
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 2 $4,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $276,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $21,052,200
C ,�LiL �� �1i�?_�-o��-
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: Date: lanuary 14, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcel 537, which is a remnant from the purchase of right-of-way for
U5 70 Clayton Bypass; therefore, the parcel is not included in the parcel count and no cost for this parcel is included in this estimate. Other government or utility owned parcels
include Parcel 533, which is owned by the City of Raleigh and is improved with a waster water treatment plant and spray fields. Parcel 533 is split between 03 and 04. Parcels
539, 540, 542, 543, 544, and 545 are split between 04 and G3.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: RED State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: Rl-STA.385+95.66-STA.495+0O.00R_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 8.5 Non-residential 3
Residential 30.5 Residential 19
Vacant 7 Total Relocatees 22
Total Parcels 46
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 46 x $15,000 = $690,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 46 x $2,000 = $92,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $782,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 46 = 46 Parcels x $5,000 = $230,000
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 46 = 23 Parcels x $2,500 = $57,500
6. Title Services 100% x 46 = 46 Parcels x $1,500 = $69,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 46 = 23 Parcels x $2,500 = $57,500
8. Mediators 30% x 23 = 2 Parcels x $2,000 = $4,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 23 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 18 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $360,000
il. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $782,500
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $17,366,405 x 125% * Design plon stage = $21,708,000
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $3,256,200 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $7,59�,800 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 23 x $500 = $11,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $32,573,500
* Design contingency Jor design plan stage:
(iJ FO&Ep/ans-125% /1/ 30%plans-110% (3) 60%plans-135% (4/ 90%plans-110% /SJ ROWPIons-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 46 = $460,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 22 = $220,000 TOTALACQ/RELO STAFF $680,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 9 = $405,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 10 = $150,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 9 = $31,500
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 10 $20,000
24. Non-residential/farm $60,000 x 3 = $180,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION CO5T5 $786,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $35,604,500
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: ���rL��". L� ��1`"��-o'��_ . Date: December 22, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total partels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized [o identify additional improvements Iocated within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcel 2 is split
between Ol and Rl. Parcels 26, 27, 28, 36-1, 38, 39, and 42 are split between R3 and R2.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: RED Sta[e Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: R2 - STA. 495+00.00 - STA. 618+00.00 R_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRti: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 2.5 Non-residential 3
Residential 22 Residential 13
Vacant 52.5 TotalRelocatees 16
Total Parcels 77
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 77 x $15,000 = $1,155,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 77 x $2,000 = $154,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,309,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 77 = 77 Parcels x $5,000 = $385,000
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 77 = 39 Parcels z $2,500 = $97,500
6. Title Services 300% x 77 = 77 Parcels x $1,500 = $115,500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 77 = 39 Parcels x $2,500 = $97,500
8. Mediators 10% x 39 = 4 Parcels x $2,000 = $8,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 39 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 16 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $320,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. �Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,028,000
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severence Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $16,461,830 x 125% * Design plan stoge = $20,577,300
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $3,086,600 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $7,202,100 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 39 x $500 = $19,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $30,885,500
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 77 = $770,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 16 = $160,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAFF $930,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 8 = $360,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 5 = $75,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 8 = $28,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2.000 5 $30,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 3 = $180,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION CO5T5 $653,000
26.
27.
28. TOTALR/W ESTIMATE 534,805,500
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: ��-��� �/��6Y� Date: December 22, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume SO% of the total parcels will 6e condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
30% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Government and utility owned parcels intlude Parcels 85, 86, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, and 113.
Parcels 26, 27, 28, 36-1, 38, 39, and 42 are split between Rl and R2. Parcel 113 is split between R2 and R3.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: RED State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.403079, and 6.401080
Segment: R3-STA.618+00.00-STA.854+74.06 R_L/RREV_L County: Wake
Date: December 30, 2014 HDRri: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 9 Non-residential 1
Residential 319.5 Residential 242
Vacant 55 Total Relocatees 243
Total Parcels 383.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLaborCost (Parcels) 383.5 x $15,000 = $5,752,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 383.5 x $2,000 = $767,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $6,519,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 383.5 = 383.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $1,917,500
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 383.5 = 192 Parcels x $2,500 = $480,000
6. Title Services 100% x 383.5 = 383.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $575,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50� x 383.5 = 192 Parcels x $2,500 = $480,000
8. Mediators 30% x 192 = 19 Parcels x $2,000 = $38,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 192 = 6 Parcels x $2,500 = $15,000
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 246 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $4.920,000
il. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $8,427,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount 564,675,145 x 125% * Design plan stage = $80,843,900
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $12,126,6D0 (of line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $28,295,400 (of Line 13)
16. OtherCondemn.Costs 192 x $500 = $96,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $121,361,900
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1J VD&Eplans-125% (1/ 30%plans-110% (3) 60%plans-115% (4/ 90%plons-110% (5) FOWP/ans-100%
R/W S7AFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 383.5 = $3,835,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 243 = $2,430,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $6,265,000
RELOCATION CO5T5
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 218 = $9.810,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 24 = $360,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 218 = $763,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 24 $48,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 1 = $60,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $11,041,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE 5153,615,200
"�,.)r'lu L���1.E'.a����..- -
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: j Date: December 29, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
l0Y will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates Yhe reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visi6le from the existing right of way. Government and utility owned parcels include Parcels 113, 116, 224, 238, 303, 351, 356, 420, and 469.
Parcel 113 is split between R2 and R3. Parcels 474 and 478-2 are split between R3 and R4.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: RED State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.403080
Segment: R4-STA.854+74.06-STA.916+65.58 R_L/RREV_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 13 Non-residential 1
Residential 19.5 Residential 6
Vacant 21.5 Total Relocatees 7
Total Parcels 54
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 54 x $15,000 = $810,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 54 x $2,000 = $108,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $918,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppreisalFees-Negotiations 300% x 54 = 54 Parcels x $5,000 = $270,000
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 54 = 27 Parcels x $2,500 = $67,500
6. Title Services 300% x 54 = 54 Parcels x $1,500 = $81,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 54 = 27 Parcels x $2,500 = $67,500
8. Mediators 10% x 27 = 3 Parcels x $2,000 = $6,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 27 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 6 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $120,000
il. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $616,500
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $17,378,430 x 125% * Design plan stpge = $21,723,000
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $3,258,500 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $7,603,100 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 27 x $500 = $13,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $32,598,100
* Design contingency Jor desiqn plon stage:
(1J VD&Eplans-125% (2) 30%plans-120% (3) 60%plans-115% (4l 90%plans-110% (5) ROWF/ans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition 510,00o X sa = Ssao,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 7 = $70,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $610,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 3 = $135,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 3 = $45,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 3 = $10,500
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 3 $6,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 1 = $60,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS 5256,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $34,999,100
�=,� C � �
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: ,� Date: December 29, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvemen[s located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Parcels 497 and 505 are owned by NCRR; no value for the NCRR crossing is included in this estimate;
it is assumed NCDOT will have a separate agreement with NCRR for railroad crossings. Government and utiliYy owned parcels included Parcels 499 and 503.
Parcels 474 & 478-2 are split between R3 and R4. Parcels 514, 515, 530, 531, 532, and 533 are split between R4 and R5.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: RED State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: RS-STA.916+65.58-STA.986+64.48RREV_L/R_L County: Wake
Date: December 30, 2014 HDRri: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 6.5 Non-residential 2
Residential 6 Residential 3
Vacant 17 Total Relocatees 5
Total Parcels 29.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 29.5 x $15,000 = $442,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 29.5 x $2,000 = $59,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $501,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 29.5 = 29.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $147,500
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 29.5 = 15 Parcels x $2,500 = $37,500
6. Title Services 100% x 29.5 = 29.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $44,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 29.5 = 15 Parcels x $2,500 = $37,500
8. Mediators 10% x 15 = 2 Parcels x $2,000 = $4,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 15 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 5 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $100,000
il. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 PerSegment x $2,000 - $2.000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $372,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $20,404,997 x 125% � Design plan stage = $25,506,200
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $3,825,900 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $8.927,200 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 15 x $500 = 57,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $38,266,800
* Design contingency Jor design plan stage:
(1) VD&Eplans-125% (2J 30%plans-110% (3) 60%plans-115% (4/ 90%plans-110% (5f FOWFIons-300%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 29.5 = $295,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 5 = $50,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $345,000
RELOCATION CO5T5
Replacement Housing Number Amount
zo. owner Sas,000 x i = Sas,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 2 = $30,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 1 = $3,500
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 2 $4,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 2 = $120,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $202,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $39,688,600
�� c �._
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: December 30, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50%of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvemen[s located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. There are no government or utility owned parcels identified in this segment. Parcels 514, 515, 530, 531,
532, and 533 are split between R4 and R5. Parcels 559, 561, and 562 are split between RS and R6/R7.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: RED State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: R6-STA.986+64.48-STA.1064+0139 R_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 5.5 Non-Residential 0
Residential 25 Residential 10
Vacant 9.5 Total Relocatees 10
Total Parcels 40
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 40 x $15,000 = $600,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 40 x $2,000 = $80,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $680,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appreisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 40 = 40 Parcels x $5,000 = $200,000
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 40 = 20 Parcels x $2,500 = $50,000
6. Title Services 100% x 40 = 40 Parcels x $1,500 = $60,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 40 = 20 Parcels x $2,500 = $50,000
8. Mediators 30% x 20 = 2 Parcels x $2,000 = $4,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 20 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 8 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $160,000
11. MiscellaneousContracts 1 PerSegment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $528,500
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severence Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $6,991,288 x 125% * Design plan stage = $8,739,100
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $1,310,900 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $3,058,700 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 20 x $500 = $10,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $13,118,700
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(I) PD&Eplans-125Y (2) 30Yplans-320% (3) 60%plans-115% (4J 90%plans-110% (5) ROWPIons-IOOY
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 40 = $400,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 10 = $100,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAfF $500,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 4 = $180,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 6 = $90,000
Move Costs
22. ResidentialOwner $3,500 x 4 = $14,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 6 $12,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $296,000
26.
27.
28. TOTALR/W ESTIMATE $15,123,200
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: � C�- Date: December 30, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels have been identified in this segment.
Parcels 559, 561, and 562 are split between RS and R6. Parcel 579 is split between R6 and GS (aka G-78).

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: RED State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.403079, and 6.401080
Segment: R7 - STA. 986+64.48 - STA. 1064+44.44 RxM_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRri: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 5.5 Non-residential 0
Residential 25 Residential 10
Vacant 9.5 TotalRelocatees 10
Total Parcels 40
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLabor Cost (Parcels) 40 x $15,000 = $600,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 40 x $2,000 = $80,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $680,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees- Negotiations 300% x 40 = 40 Parcels x $5,000 = $200,000
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 40 = 20 Parcels x $2,500 = $50,000
6. Title Services 300� x 40 = 40 Parcels x $1,500 = $60,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 40 = 20 Parcels x $2,500 = $50,000
8. Mediators 10% x 20 = 2 Parcels x $2,000 = $4,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 20 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 8 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $160,000
11. MiscellaneousContracts 1 PerSegment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $528,500
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severence Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $7,002,797 x 125% * Design plan stage = $8,753,500
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $1,313,OD0 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $3,063,700 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 20 x $500 = $30,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $13,140,200
* Design ron[ingenry for design plan stage:
(1) PD&Eplans-115% (2) 30%plans-120% (3J 60%plans-115% /4f 90%plans-110% (5/ ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 40 = $400,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 30 = $100,000 TOTALACQ/RELO STAFF $500,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
zo. owner Sas,000 x a = Slso,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 6 = $90,000
Move Costs
22. ResidentialOwner $3,500 x 4 = $14,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 6 $12,000
24. Non-residential/Farm 560,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION CO5T5 $296,000
26.
27.
28. TOTALR/W ESTIMATE 515,144,700
l �r � C �7�-Po.�_
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: December 30, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
30% will go through mediation; and 3� of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimaie:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within ihe proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified on this segment. Parcels 559, 561, and 562
are split between RS and R7. Parcel 579 is split between R7 and M2.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: LILAC Sta[e Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: 03L-STA.484+00.00-STA.636+25.41 O_L County: Wake
Date: December 14, 2014 HDRti: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 4.5 Non-residential 0
Residential 58.5 Residential 22
Vacant 18 Total Relocatees 22
Total Parcels 81
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 81 x $15,000 = $1,215,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 81 x $2,000 = $162,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,377,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 81 = 81 Parcels x $5,000 = $405,000
5. Appraisal Fees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 81 = 41 Parcels x $2,500 = $102,500
6. Title Services 100% x 81 = 81 Parcels x $1,500 = $121,500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 81 = 41 Parcels x $2,500 = $102,500
8. Mediators 30% x 41 = 4 Parcels x $2,000 = $8,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 41 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 19 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $380,000
11. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,124,000
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $12,897,804 x 125% * Design plan stoge = $16,122,300
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $2,418,300 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70� (% increase) _ $5,642,800 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 41 x $500 = $20,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $24,203,900
' Design contingenry for design plan stage:
(1J VO&Eplans-125% (1J 30%plans-110% �3) 60%plans-135% (4/ 90%plans-110% (5) ROWG/ons-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 81 = $810,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 22 = $220,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $1,030,000
RELOCATION CO5T5
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 12 = $540,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 10 = $150,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 12 = $42,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 10 $20.000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $752,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE 528.486,900
(� �v�� �i �/LRa-r,�
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: February 1, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidente
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcels 359 and 364. The value of the NCDOT owned parcels being included
in this estimate is based on their purchase price. No other government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. However, Parcels 330 and 330-1 are part of the
Wake Technical Community College campus. Parcels 326 and 330 are split between 02 and 03L. Parcel 404 and 409 are split between 03L and OxL.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2S29
Alternate: LILAC State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: OXL-STA.636+25.41-STA.735+55.88 OXL_L County: Wake
Date: December 14, 2014 HDR#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Non-residential 0
Residential 80 Residential 61
Vacant 9.5 Total Relocatees 61
Total Parcels 59.5
R/W SUPPORT CO5T5 Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 89.5 x $15,000 = $1,342,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 89.5 x $2,000 = $179,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,521,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees- Negotiations 100% x 59.5 = 59.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $447,500
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 89.5 = 45 Parcels x $2,500 = $112,500
6. Title Services 100% x 59.5 = 59.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $134,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 89.5 = 45 Parcels x $2,500 = $112,500
S. Mediators 10% x 45 = 5 Parcels x $2,000 = $10,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 45 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 47 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $940,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,761,300
R/W LAND CO5T5 Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $12,211,324 x 125% * Design plan stage = $15,264,200
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) SO% x 30% (% increase) _ $2,289,600 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $5,342,500 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 45 x $500 = $22,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $22,918,800
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1) PD&E plans - 325% (2) 30%plans -120% �3J 60% plans -115% (4J 90%plans -110% (5� ROW Plans -300%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 59.5 = $895,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 61 = $610,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAFF $1,505,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 57 = $2,565,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 4 = $60,000
Move Costs
22. ResidentialOwner $3,500 x 57 = $199,500
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 4 $8,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $2,832,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $30,539,100
C ,�r_Lc�, C' � /L2-,J �o r�- -
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: February 2, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3Y of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the mosY confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcels 0-415, 12, and 35. The value of the NCDOT owned parcels being
included in this estimate is based on their purchase price. No other government owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 21 and 54 are owned by Heater Utilities,
Inc.; both sites are improved with community wells. Parcel 21 will require a break in the C/A line to maintain access to the well site. The well on Parcel 54 will have to be replaced
to avoid an undetermined number of residential displacees. Parcel 404 and 409 are split between 03L and OxL. Parcel 92 is split between OxL and L2.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: LILAC State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: L2 - STA. 742+97.43 - STA. 865+00.00 L_L County: Wake
Date: December 14, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 6.5 Non-residential 9
Residential 145.5 Residential 78
Vacant 6 Total Relocatees 87
Total Parcels 158
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 158 x $15,000 = $2.370,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 158 x $2,000 = $316,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $2,686,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 158 = 158 Parcels x $5,000 = $790,000
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 158 = 79 Parcels x $2,500 = $197,500
6. Title Services 100% x 158 = 158 Parcels x $1,500 = $237,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 158 = 79 Parcels x $2,500 = $197,500
8. Mediators 30% x 79 = 8 Parcels x $2,000 = $16,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 79 = 2 Parcels x $2,500 = $5,000
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 84 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $1,680,000
il. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $3,125,000
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severence Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $28,196,051 x 125% * Design plon stage = $35,245,100
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $5,286,800 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $12,335,800 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 79 x $500 = $39,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $52,907,200
• Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1J FD&Eplans-125% (2) 30%plans-110% �3) 60%plans-115% (4) 90%plans-110% (SJ ROWFIons-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition Slo,000 x iss = Sl,sso,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 87 = $870,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAFF $2,450,000
RELOCATION CO5T5
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 68 = $3,060,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 10 = $150,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 68 = $238,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 10 $20,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 9 = $540,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION CO5T5 54,008,000
26.
27. TOTALR/W ESTIMATE $65,176,200
,� �%i�L'a-nr
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: �-'`��" `� � Date: February 3, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50� of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple torridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized [o identify additional improvements located wi[hin the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Parcel 249 is owned by the City of Raleigh and is improved with a wastewater treatment facility with
spray fields. Parcels 116 and 163 are owned by Heater Utilities, Inc.; both sites are improved with community wells. The well on Parcel 116 will have to be replaced to avoid an
undetermined number of additional residential displacees. The impact to Parcel 163 is nominal; it is assumed that the well and water lines are not impacted. Parce1144 is
occupied by a strip center, gas station/auto repair, and self-storage site with an estimated 184 units. The self-storage units were counted as one business move and the cost
for the personal property moves was included in the acquisition estimate. There is a major impact to a large subdivision, Turner Farms, located on the eastern side of Benson
Rd. (NC 50) and just southof Ten-Ten Rd. This segment bisects the neighborhood severing the remaining homes from the neighborhood amenities provided on either side
and more than 50 homes will be directly impacted in this subdivision. Given these conditions, it is likely that the remaining homes will suffer a loss in value.
Parcel 92 is split between OxL and L2. Parcel 249 is split between L2/L28L and l3.
Parcel 133 is owned by Southern Bell Telephone and is improved as an equipment site. The costs included in this righriof-way estimate for Parcel 133 are for the real estate
only. The estimate does not include consideretion for the cost of relocating the equipment and lines. Feedback received from experienced design project managers was that
the cost and schedule implications were so tremendous, they had to design around these types of facilities to keep the project feasible. It is recommended that direct
conversation wiYh the property owner take place to identify the full implications of this acquisition before moving forward with this segment.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: LILAC State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: L3 - STA. 865+00.00 - STA. 937+80.98 L_L County: Wake and lohnston
Date: December 14, 2014 HDRN: 192576
Partels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 2.5 Non-residential 0
Residential 27 Residential 17
Vacant 11 Total Relocatees 17
Total Parcels 40.5
R/W SUPPORT CO5T5 Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 40.5 x $15,000 = $607,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 40.5 x $2,000 = $81,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $688,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 40.5 = 40.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $202,500
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 40.5 = 20 Parcels x $2,500 = $50,000
6. Title Services 100% x 40.5 = 40.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $60,800
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 40.5 = 20 Parcels x $2.500 = $50,000
8. Mediators 10% x 20 = 2 Parcels x $2,000 = $4,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 20 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 23 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $460,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $831,800
R/W LAND CO5T5 Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $15,254,743 x 125% * Design plan stoge = $19,068,400
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $2,860,300 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $6,673,900 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 20 x 5500 = $10,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $28,612,600
' Design contingenry for design plan stage:
(IJ PD&Eplans-125% (2/ 30%plans-120% /3/ 60%plans-115% (4J 90%plans-110% (SJ ROWPIons-300%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
is. a�y��5�c�oo Slo,000 X aos = Saos,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 17 = $170,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $575,D00
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
2D. Owner $45,000 x 9 = $405,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 8 = $120,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 9 = $31,500
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 8 $16,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $572,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE 531,280,400
( �2re �'� / 1<Ad o �-. _
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: Date: February 4, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50� of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Parcels 252 and 280 are owned by NCDOT. These parcels are remnants that were acquired as part of
prior projects; they are not included in the parcel count and no cost has been included for these parcels in this segment. Parcel 249 is owned by the City of Raleigh
and is improved with a wastewater treatmentplant and spray fields. Parcel 249 is split between L2/L2BL and L3. Parcels 258, 253, 292, 294, 297, 298, 301, 302, 303, and 305 are
split between L3 and L4.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: LILAC State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment:l4-STA.937+80.98-STA.984+98.45 L_L County: Wake andJohnston
Date: 41987 HDR#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 2 Non-residential 0
Residential 104 Residential 87
Vacant 4.5 Total Relocatees 87
Total Parcels 110.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 110.5 x $15,000 = $1,657,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 110.5 x $2.000 = $221,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,878,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 110.5 = 110.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $552,500
5. Appraisal Fees- Condemnation/Trial 50% x 11U.5 = 55 Parcels x $2,500 = $137,500
6. Title Services 100% x 110.5 = 110.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $165,800
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 110.5 = 55 Parcels x $2.500 = $137,500
8. Mediators 10% x 55 = 6 Parcels x $2,000 = $12,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 55 = 2 Parcels x $2,500 = $5,000
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 87 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $1,740,000
11. MiscellaneousContracts 1 PerSegment x $2.000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $2,752,300
R/W LAND CO5T5 Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $19,127,390 x 125% * Design plan stage = $23,909,200
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $3,586,400 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $8,368,200 �of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 55 x $500 = $27,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $35,891,300
" Design contingenry for design plan stoge:
(1) PD&Eplons-125% (2/ 30%plans-120% /3/ 60%plons-115% (4J 90%plans-130% (5J ROWPIans-100Y
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition Slo,000 X iio.s = Sl,los,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 87 = $870,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $1,975,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 78 = $3,510,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 9 = $135,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 78 = $273,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 9 $18,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $3,936,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $46,433,100
' �a u C' 11<.(a_,or._ _
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: February 4, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50%of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visibie from the existing right of way. No government owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 307, 322, and 367 are owned by Heater
Utilities, Inc.; all three sites are improved with a community well. Parcels 307 and 322 are both located in the same neighborhood. It appears that the entire neighborhood will either
be impacted directly or damaged out due to loss of access. Further investigation is needed, but it may not be necessary to replace these two wells. Parcel 367 will need to be replaced
to avoid an undetermined number of additional residential displacees. The subdivision is being severed by the new roadway, so it is possible that two new wells will be needed.
Parcels 258, 283, 292, 294, 297, 298, 301, 302, 303, and 305 are split between L3 and L4. Parcel 379 is split between L4 and LS as well as L4 and L6.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2S2S, and R-2829
Alternate: LILAC State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment:LS-STA.984+98.45-STA.1012+50.98L_L County: Wake
Date: December 14, 2014 HDRq: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Non-residential 0
Residential 1.5 Residential 0
Vacant 1.5 Total Relocatees 0
Total Parcels 3
R/W SUPPORT CO5T5 Amount
1. DirectLaborCost (Parcels) 3 x $15,000 = $45,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 3 x $2,000 = $6,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $51,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees- Negotiations 100% x 3 = 3 Parcels x $5,000 = $15,000
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 3 = 2 Parcels x $2,500 = $5,000
6. Title Services 100% x 3 = 3 Parcels x $1,500 = $4,500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 3 = 2 Parcels x $2,500 = $5,000
S. Mediators 10% x 2 = 0 Parcels x $2,000 = $0
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 2 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 0 Imprvmet x 520,000 = $0
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $31,500
R/W LAND CO5T5 Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $1,095,941 x 125% * Design plan stage = $1,369,900
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% �% increase) _ $205,500 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (Y increase) _ $479,500 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 2 x $500 = $1,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $2,055,900
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(I/ PD&E plans -125% (2� 30%plans -120% (3J 60% plans -115% (4� 90% plans -110% (5� ROW Plans -300%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 3 = $30,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 0 = $0 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $30,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20.Owner Sas,000 x o = So
21. Tenant $15,000 x 0 = $0
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 0 = $0
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 0 $0
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $U
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $0
26.
27.
2S. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $2,165,400
'' -/L2.ar>��
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: ���� `-1 �` � Date: February 5, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcel 379
is split between L4 and L5. Parcel 380 is split between LS and G2L.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-282S, and R-2829
Alternate: LILAC State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: L6 - STA. 984+98.45 - STA. 1085+00.00 LxB / B_L County: Wake
Date: December 14, 2014 HDRk: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Non-residential 0
Residential 12 Residential 0
Vacant 9.5 Total Relocatees 0
Total Parcels 21.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cosi (Parcels) 21.5 x $15,000 = $322,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 21.5 x $2,000 = $43,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $365,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appreisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 21.5 = 21.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $107,500
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 21.5 = 11 Parcels x $2,500 = $27,500
6. Title Services 100% x 21.5 = 21.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $32,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 21.5 = 11 Parcels x $2,500 = $27,500
8. Mediators 10% x 11 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 11 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 0 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $0
li. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $198,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severence Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $2,910,439 x 125% * Design plan stage = $3,638,000
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $545,700 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $1,273,300 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. CosYs 11 x $500 = $5,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $5,462,500
* Design contingency for design plon stoge:
/1J PD&Eplans-125% /2J 30%plans-120% (3J 60%plans-115% /4J 90%plans-110% (SJ ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
is. a�qU�s�r�o� Slo,000 x us = Szis,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 0= $0 TOTALACQ/RELO STAFF $215,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 0 = $0
21. Tenant $15,000 x 0 = $0
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 0 = $0
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 0 $0
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $0
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $6,241,800
� �i-z u C' �71t_P-a-a �-� _
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: Date: February 6, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcel 379 is split
between L4 and L6. Parcels 8 and 21 are split beteen L6 and B1L.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: LILAC State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: G2L-STA.1055+84.23-STA.1158+0030G_L County: Wake
Date: December 14, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commertial 8.5 Non-residential 2
Residential 32 Residential 25
Vacant 13.5 Total Relocatees 27
Total Parcels 54
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 54 x $15,000 = $830,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 54 x 52,000 = 5108,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $918,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 54 = 54 Parcels x $5,000 = $270,000
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 54 = 27 Parcels x $2,500 = $67,500
6. Title Services 100% x 54 = 54 Parcels x $1,500 = $81,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 54 = 27 Parcels x $2,500 = $67,500
8. Mediators 10% x 27 = 3 Parcels x $2,000 = $6,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 27 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 15 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $300,000
11. MiScellaneous ContreCts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $796,500
R/W LAND CO5T5 Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $16,567,125 x 125% * Design plan stage = $20,708,900
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $3,106,300 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $7,248,100 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 27 x $500 = $13,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $31,076,800
* Design contingenry for design plan stage:
(1) PD&Eplans-115% (2) 30%plans-120% (3J 60%plans-115% (4J 90%plans-110% (5) ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 54 = $540,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 27 = $270,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $830,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 20 = $900,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 5 = $75,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 20 = $70,000
23. Residential Tenant $2.000 5 $10,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 2 = $120,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $1,175,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE 534,776,300
(._ �!2ec l� 'TZ<Pa� �r�
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: February 5, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37Y of those condemned will settle prior to mediation; 10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the
condemned parcels will go to trial.
Alignment - The current segment match line for Lilac to Green does not seem to match up entirely. The segment break occurs just prior to the White Oak Rd interchange. The two
segments have completely different configuretions, so trying to match up the two corridors at this location has been confusing. The GIS data derived from the design shape files
appears to follow the original segment break for the end of Lilac to Green located at Sta. 1019+16.75 L L. The acquisition areas identified for the parcels located in-between these
two points seem to follow Lilac rether than Green. Due to this discrepancy, the estimator's confidence has been reduced to below averege.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
Type B- indicates above average confidence
X Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing mul[iple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to iden[ify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing righ[ of way. Government owned parcels include Parcel 45 owned by NCDOT and Parcel 386-1 owned by Wake County.
Parcels 43 and 44 are N/redio tower sites. Parcel 380 is split between LS and G2L. Parcels 54, 56, and 59 are split between G2/G2L and G3 as well as TLl.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: LILAC State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: B1L- STA. 1085+00.00 - STA. 1206+55.08 B_L County: Wake and lohnston
Date: December 14, 2014 HDRN: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 13 Non-residential 3
Residential 15.5 Residential 10
Vacant 6 Total Relocatees 13
Total Parcels 34.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLaborCost (Parcels) 34.5 x $15,000 = $517,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 34.5 x $2,000 = $69,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $586,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 34.5 = 34.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $172,500
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 34.5 = 17 Parcels x $2,500 = $42,500
6. Title Services 100% x 34.5 = 34.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $51,800
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 34.5 = 17 Parcels x $2,500 = $42,500
8. Mediators 30% x 17 = 2 Parcels x $2,000 = $4,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 17 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 30 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $200,000
11. Miscellaneous Contratts 1 PerSegment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $517,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $6,382,328 x 125% * Design plan stage = $7,977,900
14. Negotiated Settlements (Facior) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $1,196,700 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Fattor) 50% x 70Y (% increase) _ $2,792,300 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 17 x 5500 = $8.500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND CO5T5 $11,975,400
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1) FO&Eplans-125% (1J 30%plans-110% �3) 60%plans-115% (4J 90%plons-130% �SJ ROWFIons-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 34.5 = $345,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 13 = $130,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $475,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 6 = $270,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 4 = $60,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 6 = $21,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 4 $8,000
24. Non-residential/farm $60,000 x 3 = $180,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS 5539,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $14,093,70D
f_nl2i.. C' �k�a.-cr��.- -
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: February 5, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impatts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Parcels 24 and 28 are owned NC Dept. of Agriculture. Parcels 8 and 21 are split between L6 and B1L.
Parcel 52 is split between B1L and B2.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: GREEN State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: G1-STA.952+00.00-STA.1009+1439 O_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRt#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Nomresidential 0
Residential 2.5 Residential 0
Vacant 3 Total Relocatees 0
Total Parcels 5.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLabor Cost (Parcels) 5.5 x $15,000 = $82,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 5.5 x $2,000 = $11,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $93,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 5.5 = 5.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $27,500
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 5.5 = 3 Parcels x $2,500 = $7,500
6. Title Services 300% x 5.5 = 5.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $8,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 5.5 = 3 Parcels x $2,500 = $7,500
8. Mediators 10% x 3 = 0 Parcels x $2,000 = $0
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 3 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 0 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $0
11. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS 552,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $3,768,568 x 125% * Design plan stage = $4,710,700
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $706,600 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $1,648,700 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 3 x $500 = $1,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $7,067,500
* Design contingency Jor design plan stoge:
(1) VD&Eplans-115% (1) 30Yplans-110% (3) 60%plans-115% (4) 90%plans-110% /Sf ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 5.5 = $55,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 0= $0 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF 555,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 0 = $0
21. Tenant $15,000 x 0 = $0
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 0 = $0
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 0 $0
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $0
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $7,268,800
C � �a.z� (� �11<N�� �-� _
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: January 17, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go Yhrough mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utlity owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 539, 540, 542, 543, 544,
and 545 are split between 04 and Gl. Parcel 1 is split between Gl and G2 as well as G1 and Bl.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: GREEN State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: G2-STA.1021+00.00-STA.1158+0030G_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 8 Non-residential 3
Residential 36 Residential 28
Vacant 17 Total Relocatees 31
Total Parcels 61
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 61 x $15,000 = $915,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 61 x $2,000 = $122,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,037,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees- Negotiations 100% x 61 = 61 Parcels x $5,000 = 5305,000
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 61 = 31 Parcels x $2,500 = $77,500
6. Title Services 100% x 61 = 61 Parcels x $1,500 = $91,500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 61 = 31 Parcels x $2,500 = $77,500
8. Mediators 10% x 31 = 3 Parcels x $2,000 = $6,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 31 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & A6ate., ett. 25 Imprvmet x $20,000 = SS00,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 PerSegment x $2.000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,062,000
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $18,821,279 x 125% * Design plan stage = $23,526,600
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $3,529,000 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $8,234,300 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 31 x $500 = $15,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $35,305,400
* Design ron[ingenry for design plan stage:
(1) PD&Eplans-115% (2) 30%plans-120% (3J 60%plans-115% /4f 90%plans-110% (5/ ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 61 = $610,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 31 = $330,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAFF $920,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 20 = $900,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 8 = $120,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 20 = $70,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2.000 8 $16,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 3 = $180,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION CO5T5 $1,286,000
26.
27.
28. TOTALR/W ESTIMATE $39,610,400
( 12u �� �/7<!'.�.ar...-.
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: lanuary 18, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10%will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcel 45. Other government or utility owned parcels include Parcel 19.
Parcels 43 and 44 are TV/radio tower sites. Parcel 1 is split be[ween Gl and 62. Parcels 54, 56, and 59 are split between G2/G2L and G3 as well as TLl.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: GREEN State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: G3-STA.1158+0030-STA.1195+3130 G_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRri: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0.5 Non-residential 0
Residential 12 Residential 11
Vacant 3 TotalRelocatees 11
Total Parcels 15.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 15.5 x $15,000 = $232,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 15.5 x $2,000 = $31,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $263,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppreisalFees-Negotiations 300% x 15.5 = 15.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $77,500
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 15.5 = 8 Parcels x $2,500 = $20,000
6. Title Services 300% x 15.5 = 15.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $23,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 15.5 = 8 Parcels x $2,500 = $20,000
8. Mediators 10% x 8 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 8 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 10 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $200,000
11. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $344,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $3,603,426 x 125% * Design plan stoge = $4,504,300
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $675,600 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $1,576,500 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 8 x $500 = $4,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND CO5T5 $6,760,400
* Design contingency Jor design plan stoge:
(1) VD&Eplans-115% (1) 30%plans-110% (3) 60%plans-115% (4) 90%plans-110% /Sf ROWP/ans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition Slo,000 X is.s = Slss,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x il = $110,000 TOTAL ACQ/RElO STAFF $265,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 10 = $450,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 1 = $15,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 10 = 535,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 1 $2,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $502,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $8,135,700
C .,fai<< �' �fl�P_ac.��__ _.
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: Date: January 19, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go Yhrough mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 54, 56,
and 59 are split between G2/G2L and G3. Parcels 75 and 76 are split between G3 and G4 as well as G3 and Ml (aka Parcels M-1, M-2).

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: GREEN State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: G4-STA.1195+3130-STA.1238+53.22G_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRN: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Non-residential 0
Residential 2.5 Residential 1
Vacant 1 TotalRelocatees 1
Total Parcels 3.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLaborCost (Parcels) 3.5 x $15,000 = $52,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 3.5 x $2,000 = $7,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $59,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppreisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 3.5 = 3.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $17,500
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 3.5 = 2 Parcels x $2,500 = $5,000
6. Title Services 100% x 3.5 = 3.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $5,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 3.5 = 2 Parcels x $2,500 = $5,000
8. Mediators 30% x 2 = 0 Parcels x $2,000 = $0
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3� x 2 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 2 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $40,000
11. Miscellaneous Contretts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru il) TOTAL R/W OPS $74,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $4,148,710 x 125% * Design plan stoge = $5,185,900
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $777,900 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $1,815,100 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 2 x $500 = $1,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $7,779,900
* Design contingenry Jor design plan stage:
(1) FD&Eplans-125% (1/ 30%plans-110% /3) 60%plans-115% (4/ 90%p/ans-110% �5) ROWG/ans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 3.5 = $35,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 1 = $10,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAFF $45,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 0 = $0
21. Tenant $15,000 x 1 = $15,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 0 = $0
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 1 $2,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION CO5T5 $17,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $7,976,200
C .�<t.ic (� �72<O_a-o��_ _.
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: Date: lanuary 20, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50%of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impatt Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or u[ility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 75 and 76
are split betweeen G3 and G4. Parcel 78 is split between G4 and G5.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: GREEN State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: GS - STA. 1238+53.22 - STA. 1388+00.00 G_L County: Wake
Date: December 30, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Non-residential 0
Residential 19.5 Residential 13
Vacant 10.5 Total Relocatees 13
Total Parcels 30
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLabor Cost (Parcels) 30 x $15,000 = $450,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 30 x $2,000 = $60,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT 5530,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppreisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 30 = 30 Parcels x $5,000 = $150,OOD
S. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial SO% x 30 = 15 Parcels x $2,500 = $37,500
6. Title Services 300% x 30 = 30 Parcels x $1,500 = $45,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 30 = 15 Parcels x $2,500 = $37,500
8. Mediators 10% x 15 = 2 Parcels x $2,000 = $4,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 15 = 0 Parcels x 52,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 12 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $240,000
11. Miscellaneous Contratts 1 PerSegment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $516,000
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severence Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $7,537,919 x 125% * Design plan stage = $9,422,400
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $1,413,400 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $3,297,800 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 15 x $500 = $7,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $14,141,100
* Design contingenry for design plan stoge:
(3) VD&Eplans-115% (1) 30%plans-110% /3) 60%plans-115% (4/ 90%plons-130% /5f ROWP/ons-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 30 = $300,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 13 = $130,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $430,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 9 = $405,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 4 = $60,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 9 = $31,500
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 4 $8,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $504,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE 516,101,600
C )z.�z ��.�t�o-a�-�-
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: T Date: January 20, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewers's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Oreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Government and utility owned parcels include Parcel 83. Parcel 84 is identified as a potential
Civil War site. Parcel 78 is split between G4 and GS as well as R6 and GS (aka Parcel R-579�. Parcel 1D9 is split between GS and G6.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: GREEN State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.403080
Segment: G6-STA.1388+00.00-STA.1439+0O.00G_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 7 Nomresidential 3
Residential 8.5 Residential 15
Vacant 3 TotalRelocatees 18
Total Parcels 18.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLabor Cost (Parcels) 18.5 x $15,000 = $277,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 18.5 x $2,000 = $37,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $314,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 300% x 18.5 = 18.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $92.500
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 18.5 = 9 Parcels x $2,500 = $22,500
6. Title Services 300% x 18.5 = 18.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $27,800
7. Condemnation Costs SO% x 18.5 = 9 Parcels x $2,500 = $22,500
8. Mediators 10% x 9 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 9 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 30 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $200,000
11. MiscellaneousContracts 1 PerSegment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $369,300
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severence Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $11,27],425 x 125% * Design plan stage = $14,096,800
14. Negotiated Settlements (Fac[or) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $2,114,500 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $4,933,900 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 9 x $500 = $4,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $21,149,700
* Design con[ingency for design plan stage:
(1) PD&Eplans-125% (2) 30%p/ans-120% (3/ 60%plans-115% (4) 90%plans-110% (5J ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 18.5 = $185,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 18 = $180,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $365,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 2 = $90,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 13 = $195,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 2 = $7,000
23. Residential Tenant $2.000 13 $26,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 3 = $180,000
25. (Lines 2D thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $498,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $22,696,500
C .�L�c C� �>f .P�-n�
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: January 21, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
30% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewers's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were indentified in this segment. Parcei 109 is split
between GS and G6 as well as M2 and G6 (aka M-38). Parcel 117 is improved with a mobile home park that will need to have access provided via a service road. Parcel 116
is assumed this parcel can be utilitized to provide the necessary access to Parcel 117. Parcel 120 is a rugby/soccer field owned by a non-profit corporation that will be
has been damaged out and itdamaged out in its entirety. The site is also improved with a cell tower that is in the area of acquisition.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: GREEN State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.403079, and 6.401080
Segment: G7 - STA. 1439+00.00 - STA. 1529+00.00 G_L County: Wake
Date: December S0, 2014 HDRt#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 1 Non-residential 0
Residential 18 Residential 13
Vacant 4 Total Relocatees 13
Total Parcels 23
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 23 x $15,000 = $345,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 23 x $2,000 = $46,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPOR7 $391,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees- Negotiations 100% x 23 = 23 Parcels x $5,000 = $115,000
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 23 = 12 Parcels x $2,500 = $30,000
6. Title Services 300% x 23 = 23 Parcels x $1,500 = $34,500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 23 = 12 Parcels x $2,500 = $30,000
8. Mediators 10% x 12 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 12 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 3 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $60,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $273,500
R/W LAND CO5T5 Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severence Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $591,318 x 125% * Design plan stoge = $739,100
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $110,900 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $258,700 (of Line 13)
16. OYherCondemn.Costs 12 x $500 = $6,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $1,114,700
* Design con[ingenry for design plan stoge:
(I) PD&Eplans-125% (1) 30%plans-120% (3) 60%plans-115% /4) 90%plans-110% (5) ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 23 = $230,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 13 = $130,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $360,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 2 = $90,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 11 = $165,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 2 = $7,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 11 $22.000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $284,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $2,423,200
C �a.a� C� �11<Pa-n�r�._.
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: January 22, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10%will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewers's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type 8- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing mul[iple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the exis[ing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcels 137, 139, 141, 143, and 156. These parcels are the remainders
of parcels acquired on a prior project. Therefore, there is no cost for these parcels included in this right-of-way estimate. No other government or utility owned parcels were
identified on this segment and there are no split parcels on this segment.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: MINT State Project Nos.: 6.401075, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: M3 - STA. 1195+31.30 - STA. 1239+00.00 MG_L County: Wake
Date: December 5, 2014 HDR#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial �0 Non-residential �1
Residential 3.5 Residential 1
Vacant 1 Total Relocatees 2
Total Parcels 4.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 4.5 x 15,000 = 67,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 4.5 x 2,000 = 9,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $76,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 4.5 = 4.5 Parcels x 5,000 = 22,500
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 4.5 = 2 Parcels x 2,500 = 5,000
6. Title Services 100% x 4.5 = 4.5 Parcels x 1,500 = 6,500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 4.5 = 2 Parcels x 2,500 = 5,000
8. Mediators 10% x 2 = 0 Parcels x 2,000 = 0
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 2 = 0 Parcels x 2,500 = 0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 2 Imprvmet x 20,000 = 40,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x 2,000 = 2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $81,300
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount 2,004,429 x 125% * Design plan stage = 2,505,500
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) = 375,500 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) = 876,900 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 2 x $500 = 1,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $3,759,200
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1J PD&E plans -12536 (2J 30% plans -120% (3) 60% plans -115% (4J 90% plans -110% (SJ ROW Plans -100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $30,000 x 4.5 = 45,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 2= 20,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $65,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 0 = 0
21. Tenant $15,000 x 1 = 15,000
Move Costs
22. ResidentialOwner $3,500 x 0 = 0
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 1 2,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 1 = 60,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $77,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $4,059,000
(_�z2�r_ C��1).cE'�aar��_
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: January 19, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 1 and 2(aka G-75 & G-76)
are split between G3 and M1. Parcel 6 is split between M1 and M2.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: MINT State Project Nos.: 6.401075, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: M2 - STA. 1239+00.00 - STA. 1388+00.00 MG_L / G_L County: Wake
Date: December 5, 2014 HDR#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Non-residential 0
Residential 19.5 Residential 15
Vacant 12.5 Total Relocatees 15
TotalParcels 32
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 32 x $15,000 = $480,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 32 x $2,000 = $64,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $544,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 32 = 32 Parcels x $5,000 = $160,000
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 32 = 16 Parcels x $2,500 = $40,000
6. Title Services 100% x 32 = 32 Parcels x $1,500 = $45,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 32 = 16 Parcels x $2,500 = $40,000
8. Mediators 10% x 16 = 2 Parcels x $2,000 = $4,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 16 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 14 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $280,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 = $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $574,000
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $9,293,758 x 125% * Design plan stage = $11,617,200
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $1,742,600 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $4,066,000 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 16 x $500 = $8,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $17,433,500
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(iJ PD&E plans -125% (2) 30% plans -110% (3) 60% plans -115% (4) 90% plans -110% (5) ROW Plans -100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $30,000 x 32 = $320,000
19. RelOtatiOn $10,000 X 15 = $150,000 TOTAL AC4/RELO STAFF $470,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 7 = $315,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 8 = $120,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 7 = $24,500
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 8 $16,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $475�500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $19,497,300
� lyLre. C� �%Zc�1av�--
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: -�` Date: lanuary 19, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume SO% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Government/utility owned parcels include Parcel 14. Parcel 6 is split between Ml and M2. Parcel 38
(aka G-109; R-579) is split between M2 and G6 as well as R7. Parcel 13 is identified as a potential Civil War site.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2S2S, and R-2829
Alternate: BROWN State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401050
Segment: Bl - STA. 1021+00.00 - STA. 1206+55.08 B_L County: Wake & Johnston
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRk: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 12.5 Non-residential 3
Residential 28 Residential 11
Vacant 15.5 Total Relocatees 14
Total Parcels 56
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLaborCost (Parcels) 56 x $15,000 = $840,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 56 x $2,000 = $112,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $952,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100q x 56 = 56 Parcels x 55,000 = 5250,000
5. Appreisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 56 = 28 Parcels x $2,500 = $70,000
6. Title Services 100% x 56 = 56 Parcels x $1,500 = $54,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 56 = 28 Parcels x $2,500 = $70,000
8. Mediators 10% x 28 = 3 Parcels x $2,000 = $6,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 28 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 11 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $220,000
11. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segmen x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $734,500
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $9,953,358 x 125% * Design plan stage = $12,441,700
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $1,866,300 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $4,354,600 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 2S x $500 = $14,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $18,676,600
• Design contingency Jor design plan stage:
(1J PD&E plans -125% (2J 30% plans -120% (3� 60%plans -115% �4J 90% plons -110% (SJ ROW Plans -100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 56 = $560,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 14 = $140,000 TOTALACQ/RELO STAFF $700,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 7 = $315,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 4 = $60,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 7 = $24,500
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 4 $8,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 3 = $180,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $587,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $21,650,600
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: �� ���- Date: December 18, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized Yo identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Government and utility owned parcels include Parcels 24 and 2S. Parcel 1 is split between Gl and Bl.
Parcel 52 is split between Bl/B1L and 62 as well as Tl (aka T-24�.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2S29
Alternate: BROWN State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: 82-STA.1206+55.08-STA.1330+00.00 8_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDR#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relotatees:
Commercial 1 Non-residential 0
Residential 6.5 Residential 1
Vacant 8 Total Relocatees 1
Total Parcels 15.5
R/W SUPPORT CO5T5 Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 15.5 x $15,000 = $232,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 15.5 x $2,000 = $31,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $263,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 15.5 = 15.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $77,500
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 15.5 = 8 Parcels x $2,500 = $20,000
6. Title Services 100% x 15.5 = 15.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $23,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 15.5 = 8 Parcels x $2,500 = $20,000
8. Mediators 10% x 8 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3� x 8 = 0 Parcels x $2.500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 1 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $20,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $164,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount 53,646,131 x 125% * Design plan stage = $4,557,700
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $683,700 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $1,595,200 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 8 x $500 = $4.000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) 70TAL R/W LAND COSTS $6,840,600
` Design rontingenry for design plon stage:
(1/ PD&E plans - IISY (2) 30Y plans - 120% /3f 60°h plans - 115% (4f 90%plans -I30% (SJ ROW Plans -500%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition Slo,000 X is.s = Slss,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 1 = $10,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $165,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 1 = $45,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 0 = $0
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 1 = $3,500
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 0 $0
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $48.500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE 57,482.400
L_ � � ��J-���_
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: � Date: December 18, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37Y of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10%will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visi6le from the existing right of way. Government and utility owned parcels include Parcels 69, 70, and 71. Parcel 52 is split between Bl/B1L and 82.
Parcels 70 and 71 are split between 62 and B3.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: BROWN State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: B3 - STA. 1330+00.00 - STA. 1446+86.68 B_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDR#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 1 Non-residential 0
Residential 9.5 Residential 6
Vacant 6 Total Relocatees 6
Total Parcels 16.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 16.5 x $15,000 = $24�,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 16.5 x $2,000 = $33,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $280,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appreisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 16.5 = 16.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $82,500
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 16.5 = 8 Parcels x $2,500 = $20,000
6. Title Services 100% x 16.5 = 16.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $24,800
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 16.5 = 8 Parcels x $2,500 = $20,000
8. Mediators 30% x 8 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 8 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 6 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $120,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 = $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $271,300
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $4,330,552 x 125% * Design plan stage = $5,413,200
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $812,000 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $1,894,600 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 8 x 5500 = $4,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND CO5T5 $5,123,500
* Design contingency far design plan stage:
(1J PD&E plans - 125% (2J 30%plans - 120% �3) 60% plans -115% (4J 90% plans -IIO% (5) ROW Plans -100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 16.5 = $165,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 6 = $60,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $225,000
RELOCATION CO5T5
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 3 = $135,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 3 = $45,000
Move Costs
22. ResidentialOwner $3,500 x 3 = $10,500
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 3 $6,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $196,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $9,097,100
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: _�� �✓u'- ���a�"�-" Date: December 18, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50� of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Government and utility owned parcels include Parcels 70 and 71. Parcels 70 and 71 are split
between B2 and B3. Parcel 87 is split between B3 and G6.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: TAN State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: T3 - STA. 1206+55.08 - STA. 1426+45.29 T_L County: Wake
Date: December 5, 2014 HDRri: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 2 Non-residential 0
Residential 41 Residential 29
Vacant 24 Total Relocatees 29
Total Parcels 67
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 67 x $15,000 = $1,005,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 67 x $2,000 = $134,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,139,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees- Negotiations 100% x 67 = 67 Parcels x $5,000 = $335,000
S. Appraisal Fees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 67 = 34 Parcels x $2,500 = $85,000
6. Title Services 100% x 67 = 67 Parcels x $1,500 = $100,500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 67 = 34 Parcels x $2,500 = $85,000
8. Mediators 10% x 34 = 3 Parcels x $2,000 = $6,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 34 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 28 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $560,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 = $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,176,000
R/W LAND CO5T5 Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $15,910,461 x 125% * Design plan stage = $19,858,100
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $2,983,200 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $6,960,800 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 34 x $500 = $17,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $29,849,100
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1J PD&E plans -125% (2J 30% plans -120% (3J 60% plans -115% (4) 90% plans -I10% (5J ROW Plans -100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $30,000 x 67 = $670,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 29 = $290,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFf $960,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 21 = $945,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 8 = $120,000
Move Costs
22. ResidentialOwner $3,500 x 21 = $73,500
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 8 $16,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24� TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $1,154,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $34,278,600
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: (/ C��y Date: December 8, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume SO% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Government/utility owned parcels include Parcels 32, 55, 71, and 72. Parcel 24 is split between
Bl (aka B-52) and Tl and Parcel 94 is split between Tl and G6 (aka G-109).

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2S28, and R-2829
Alternate: TEAL State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: TL3 - Sta. 1158+00.30 - Sta. 1327+70.00 TL_L County: Wake
Date: December 5, 2014 HDR#: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 1.5 Non-Residential 0
Residential 20.5 Residential 13
Vacant 6.5 Total Relocatees 13
Total Parcels 28.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 28.5 x $15,000 = $427,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 28.5 x $2,000 = $57,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $484,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 28.5 = 28.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $142,500
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 28.5 = 14 Parcels x $2,500 = $35,000
6. Title Services 100% x 28.5 = 28.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $42,500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 28.5 = 14 Parcels x $2,500 = $35,000
8. Mediators 10% x 14 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 14 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 12 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $240,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 = $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $499,300
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $9,282,406 x 125% * Design plan stage = $11,603,000
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase� _ $1,740,500 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase� _ $4,061,100 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 14 x $500 = $7,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $17,411,600
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1J PD&E plans -125% (2J 30% plans -120% (3J 60� plans -115% (4) 90% plans -110% (5J ROW Plans -100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 28.5 = $285,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 13= $130,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAFF $415,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 12 = $540,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 1 = $15,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 12 = $42,000
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 1 $2,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $599,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $19,409,400
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: ✓ C��J Date: December 8, 2014
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
30% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Parcel 001-3 is owned by NCRR; no value for the NCRR crossing is included in this estimate;
it is assumed NCDOT will have a separate agreement with NCRR for railroad crossings. Government/utility owned parcels include Parcels 26 and 28. Parcels 1-1, 1-2,
and 1(aka G-56, G-54, & G-59) are split between G2/G2L and TL3. Parcels 26 and 28 (aka B•70 & B•71) are split between TL3 and B3.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: PURPLE State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: O1PU - STA. 21+45.00 - STA. 197+34.10 O_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRk: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 8 Non-residential 1
Residential 103 Residential 44
VacanY 61 Total Relocatees 45
Total Parcels 172
R/W SUPPORT CO5T5 Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 172 x $15,000 = $2,580,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 172 x $2,000 = $344,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $2,924,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppreisalFees- Negotiations 100% x 172 = 172 Parcels x $5,000 = $860,000
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 172 = 86 Parcels x $2,500 = $215,000
6. Title Services 100% x 172 = 172 Par[els x $1,500 = $258,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 172 = 86 Parcels x $2.500 = $215,000
8. Mediators 10% x 86 = 9 Parcels x $2,000 = $18,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 86 = 3 Parcels x $2,500 = $7,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 44 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $880,000
11. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $2,455,500
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $19,005,378 x 125% * Design plan stage = $23,756,700
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $3,563,500 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $8.314,800 (of Line 13)
16. OtherCondemn.Costs 86 x $500 = $43,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $35,678,000
• Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1J PD&Eplans-125% (2) 30%plans-120% (3) 60%plans-11595 (4J 90%plans-110% (SJ ROWPIons-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition Slo,000 x vz = Sl,�zo,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 45 = $450,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $2,170,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 29 = $1,305,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x IS = $225,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 29 = $101,500
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 15 $30,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 1 = $60,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $1,721,500
26.
27.
28. TOTALR/W ESTIMATE $44,949,000
ir ��7�Pa-o,�� _
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: �-"�"` � Date: January 23, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidente
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County 61S maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from ihe existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcels 6, 13, 22, 39, 86, 138, and 142. The value of the NCDOT parcels included
in this estimate is based on their purchase price. However, there are a few sections within the corridor where the propety has already been removed from the tax rollls. The cost
of acquiring those parcels that have since been removed from the tax rolls is not included in this estimate. Other government or utility owned parcels include Parcel 20.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: PURPLE State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: PUl - STA. 195+84.46 - STA. 338+53.25 PU_L County: Wake
Date: December S0, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 1 Business 0
Residential 43 Residential 23
Vacant 15 Total Relocatees 23
Total Parcels 59
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 59 x $15,000 = $885,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 59 x $2,000 = $118,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,003,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 59 = 59 Parcels x $5,000 = $295,000
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 59 = 30 Parcels x $2,500 = $75,000
6. Title Services 100% x 59 = 59 Parcels x $1,500 = $88.500
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 59 = 30 Parcels x $2,500 = $75,000
8. Mediators 30% x 30 = 3 Parcels x $2,000 = $6,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 30 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 20 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $400,000
11. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $944,000
R/W LAND CO5T5 Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $15,971,780 x 125Y * Design plan stage = $19,964,700
14. Negotiated Settlements (Fac[or) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $2,994,700 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $6,987,600 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 30 x $500 = $15,000
17. (Lines 13 thru i6) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $29,962,000
* Design ron[ingenry for design plan stage:
(1) PD&Eplans-115% (2) 30%plans-120% (3) 60%plans-115% �4) 90%plans-110% (5/ FOWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 59 = $590,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 23 = $230,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAfF $820,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
zo. owner Sas,000 x is = Ssio,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 5 = $75,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 18 = $63,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 5 $30,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION CO5T5 $958,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $33,687,000
C �=ti�c �' �fl<Psan�---.
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: January 24, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
30% will go through mediation; and 3� of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcels 3, 4, and 5. No other government or utility owned parcels
were identified in this segment. Parcel 2 is improved with a community well; it is assumed the well and water lines are not impacted. Parcels 59 and 61 are split between
PUl and PU2.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: PURPLE State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: PU2 - STA. 338+5315 - STA. 478+00.00 PU_L County: Wake
Date: December 10, 2014 HDRri: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 2 Non-residential 0
Residential 115.5 Residential 73
Vacant 53 Total Relocatees 73
Total Parcels 170.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLabor Cost (Parcels) 170.5 x $15,000 = $2,557,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 170.5 x 52,000 = $341,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $2.898,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppreisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 170.5 = 170.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $852,500
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 170.5 = 85 Parcels x $2,500 = $212,500
6. Title Services 300% x 170.5 = 170.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $255,800
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 170.5 = 85 Parcels x $2,500 = $212,500
8. Mediators l0Y x 85 = 9 Parcels x $2,000 = $18,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 85 = 3 Parcels x $2,500 = $7,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 74 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $1,480,000
11. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru il) TOTAL R/W OPS $3,040,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $40,338,727 x 125� * Design plan stoge = $50,423,400
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) SOY x 30% (% increase) _ $7,563,500 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70� (% increase) _ $17,648,200 (of Line 13)
16. OtherCondemn.Costs 85 x $500 = $42.500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $75,677,600
* Design contingency Jor design plan stoge:
(1) VD&Eplans-115% (1) 30Yplans-110% (3) 60%plans-115% (4) 90%plans-110% /Sf ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition Slo,000 X i�o.s = Sl,�os,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 73 = $730,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $2.435,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 70 = $3,150,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 3 = $45,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 70 = $245,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 3 $6,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $3,446,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $87,497,900
),,� �_
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: C�T"�" c` `>t��J-�y`--- Date: January 25, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go Yhrough mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 59 and 61 are
split between PUl and PU2. Parcel 256 is split between PU2 and BLl (aka BL-2�. There is a lot of new home construction in this segment. It should be expected that the number
of residential relocations and right-of-way costs will continue to increase due to this active housing market.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: BLUE State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: BLl - STA. 478+00.00 - STA. SOS+OO.00 BL_L County: Wake
Date: December 16, 2014 HDRN: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 4.5 Non-residential 2
Resideniial 6 Residential 2
Vacant 5 Total Relocatees 4
Total Parcels 15.5
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 15.5 x $15,000 = $232,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 15.5 x $2,000 = $31,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $263,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appreisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 15.5 = 15.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $77,500
5. Appraisal Fees - Condemnation/Trial 50% x 15.5 = 8 Parcels x $2,500 = $20,000
6. Title Services 100% x 15.5 = 15.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $23,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 15.5 = 8 Parcels x $2,500 = $20,000
8. Mediators 30% x 8 = 1 Parcels x $2,000 = $2,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 8 = 0 Parcels x $2,500 = $0
30. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 15 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $300,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $444,800
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $6,511,210 x 125% * Design plon stage = $8,139,000
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor� 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $1,220,900 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $2,848,700 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 8 x $500 = $4,000
17. (Lines 13 thru i6) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $12,212,600
* Design ron[ingenry for design plan stage:
(1) PD&Eplans-115% (2) 30%plans-120% (3J 60%plons-115% �4) 90%plans-110% (5) ROWPIans-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 15.5 = $155,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 4 = $40,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $195,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 2 = $90,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 0 = $0
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 2 = $7,000
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 0 $0
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 2 = $120,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $217,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $13,332,900
< �v« <� >Lp��,,,
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: January 28, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
30% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were indentified in this segment. Partel 2 is split between
BL3 and PU2 (aka PU-256�. Parcels 11, 13, 17, and 29 are split between BL3 and BL2.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: BLUE State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401050
Segment: Bl2-STA.505+00.00-STA.680+69.898L_L County: Wake
Date: December 16, 2014 HDRH: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 6.5 Non-residential 0
Residential 140.5 Residential 95
Vacant 48.5 Total Relocatees 95
Total Parcels 195.5
R/W SUPPORT CO5T5 Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 195.5 x $15,000 = $2,932,500
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 195.5 x $2,000 = $391,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $3,323,500
R/W OPS Amount
4. Appraisal Fees - Negotiations 100% x 195.5 = 195.5 Parcels x $5,000 = $977,500
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 195.5 = 98 Parcels x $2,500 = $245,000
6. Title Services 100% x 195.5 = 195.5 Parcels x $1,500 = $293,300
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 195.5 = 98 Parcels x $2,500 = $245,000
8. Mediators 10% x 98 = 10 Parcels x $2,000 = $20,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 98 = 3 Parcels x $2,500 = $7,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 91 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $1,820,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $3,610,300
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $31,969,121 x 125% * Design plan stage = $39,961,400
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50% x 30% (% increase) _ $5,994,200 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $13,986,500 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 98 x $500 = $49,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND CO5T5 $59,991,100
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition $10,000 x 195.5 = $1,955,000
19. Relocation $10,000 z 95 = $950,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $2,905,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Num6er Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 78 = $3,510,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 17 = $255,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 78 = $273,000
23. Residential Tenant $2,000 17 $34,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $4,072,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $73,901,900
� %' �n .�t��..ar
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: ��'�'/'" - Date: lanuary 28, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above averege confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additionai improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. However, there are severel parcels
that are improved with community wells. The wells will have to be replaced to avoid many additional displacements. The parcels with impacted community wells include Parcels 102,
115, 145, and 148. Parcels ii, 13, 17, and 29 are split between BLl and BL2. Parcels 219, 220, 221, 226, and 227 are split between BL2 and BL3. There is a lot of new construction within
this segment. It should be assumed that the number of residential displacements and right-of-way costs will continue to increase.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: BLUE State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.403080
Segment: BL3 - STA. 680+69.89 - STA. 850+50.00 BL_L County: Wake
Date: December 16, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0 Non-residential 1
Residential 81.5 Residential 52
Vacant 22.5 Total Relocatees 53
Total Parcels 104
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLaborCost (Parcels) 104 x $15,000 = $1,560,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 104 x $2,000 = $208,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,768,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 104 = 104 Parcels x $5,000 = $520,000
5. AppreisalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 104 = 52 Parcels x $2,500 = $130,000
6. Title Services 300% x 304 = 304 Parcels x $1,500 = $156,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 104 = 52 Parcels x $2,500 = $130,000
8. Mediators l0Y x 52 = 5 Parcels x $2,000 = $10,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 52 = 2 Parcels x $2,500 = $5,000
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 43 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $860,000
11. Miscellaneous Contratts 1 PerSegment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,813,000
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $17,257,300 x 125Y * Design plan stage = $21,571,600
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) SOY x 30% (% increase) _ $3,235,700 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $7,550,100 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 52 x $500 = $26,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND CO5T5 $32,383,400
* Design contingency for design plan stage:
(1) FO&Eplans-125% (1) 30%plans-110% �3) 60%plans-115% (4J 90%plons-130% /SJ ROWFIons-300%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition Slo,000 X ioa = Sl,oao,000
19. Relocation $10,000 x 53 = $530,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF $1,570,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 40 = $1,800,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 12 = $180,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 40 = $140,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 12 $24.000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 1 = $60,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS 52.204,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE 539,738,400
r� ,�-r �e �� _T�1�ao,-�--
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: Date: lanuary 29, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose af comparing multiple corridor alignments. All partels were inspetted from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized [o identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. No government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 219, 220, 221, 226, and 227
are split between BL2 and BL3. Parcel 333 is split between BL3 and Blxl. There is a lot of new construction within this segment. It should be assumed that the number of
residential displacees and righriof-way costs will continue to increase.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: BLUE State Project Nos.: 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: BLxL-STA.850+50.00-STA.958+13.126LxL_L County: Wake
Date: December 16, 2014 HDRtt: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 13 Non-residential 9
Residential 78 Residential 32
Vacant 35 Total Relocatees 41
Total Parcels 126
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. Direct Labor Cost (Parcels) 126 x $15,000 = $1,890,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 126 x $2,000 = $252,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $2,142,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 126 = 126 Parcels x $5,000 = $630,000
5. AppraisalFees-Condemnation/Trial SO% x 126 = 63 Parcels x $2,500 = $157,500
6. Title Services 100� x 126 = 126 Parcels x $1,500 = $189,000
7. Condemnation Costs SO% x 126 = 63 Parcels x $2,500 = $157,500
8. Mediators 10� x 63 = 6 Parcels x $2,000 = $12,000
9. ExpertWitness(Trial� 3Y x 63 = 2 Parcels x $2,500 = $5,000
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 36 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $720,000
11. Miscellaneous Contracts 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,873,000
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $18,416,870 x 125� * Design plan stage = $23,021,100
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) 50� x 30Y (% increase) _ $3,453,200 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) SOY x 70Y (% increase) _ $8,057,400 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 63 x $500 = $31,500
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND COSTS $34,563,200
' Design rontingenry foi design plan stage:
(IJ PD&E plans -125Y (2) 30� plans -120Y (?) 60% plans -115Y (4) 90%plans -130% (5) ROW Plans -100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
iS. Acquisition $10,000 x 126 = $1,260,000
19. Relocation $30,000 x 41 = $430,000 TOTALACQ/RELOSTAFF $1,670,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 17 = $765,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 15 = $225,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 17 = $59,500
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 15 $30,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 9 = $540,000
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $1,619,500
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $41,867,700
< %+ie� L� �>7<�a o � . -
Reviewer lane C. Nelson Signed: Date: lanuary 30, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of those condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below average confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. NCDOT owned parcels include Parcel 378. No other government owned parcels were identified in this segment.
Parce1432 is owned by Southern Bell Telephone and is improved as an equipment site. The costs included in this right-of-way estimate for Parcel 432 are for the real estate only.
This estimate does not include consideration for the cost of relocating the equipment and lines. Feedback received from experienced design project managers was that the
cost and schedule implications were so tremendous, they had to design around these types of facilities to keep the project feasible. It is recommended that direct
conversation with the property owner take place to identify the full implications of this acquisition before moving forward with this segment.
Parcel 348 is improved with a community well for a new developmeni, which is being severed by the mainline from the community it serves. A new well will be needed north of the
corridor to avoid additional residential displacements or additional damages to the remaining development. There are new subdivisions being developed in this segment as well as
commercial sites along Benson Road near Ten-Ten Road. It should be assumed that the number of residential and non-residential displacements, as well as the right-of-way costs,
will continue to increase. Parcel 333 is split between BL3 and BLxL. Parcels 444, 445, and 446 are split between BLxL and L2BL (aka L-172, L-174, and L-175�.

COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE - SUMMARY SHEET
Page : 1 of 3 TIP Nos.: R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829
Alternate: BLUE State Project Nos.: 6.403078, 6.401079, and 6.401080
Segment: L28L-STA.794+00.00-STA.865+0O.00L_L County: Wake
Date: December 16, 2014 HDRfi: 192576
Parcels: Estimated Relocatees:
Commercial 0.5 Non-residential 0
Residential 68.5 Residential 45
Vacant 3 Total Relocatees 45
Total Parcels 72
R/W SUPPORT COSTS Amount
1. DirectLaborCost (Parcels) 72 x $15,000 = $1,080,000
2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels) 72 x $2,000 = $144,000
3. (Lines 1 thru 2) TOTAL R/W SUPPORT $1,224,000
R/W OPS Amount
4. AppraisalFees-Negotiations 100% x 72 = 72 Parcels x $5,000 = $360,000
5. AppreiSalFees-Condemnation/Trial 50% x 72 = 36 Parcels x $2,500 = $90,000
6. Title Services 300% x 72 = 72 Parcels x $1,500 = $308,000
7. Condemnation Costs 50% x 72 = 36 Parcels x $2,500 = $90,000
8. Mediators l0Y x 36 = 4 Parcels x $2,000 = $8,000
9. Expert Witness (Trial) 3% x 36 = 1 Parcels x $2,500 = $2,500
10. Demolition, Asb. Survey & Abate., etc. 45 Imprvmet x $20,000 = $900,000
il. Miscellaneous Contrects 1 Per Segment x $2,000 - $2,000
12. (Lines 4 thru 11) TOTAL R/W OPS $1,560,500
R/W LAND COSTS Amount
13. Land, Improvements & Severance Damages
and Cost to Cure Amount $16,247,448 x 125% * Design plan stoge = $20,309,300
14. Negotiated Settlements (Factor) SOY x 30% (% increase) _ $3,046,400 (of Line 13)
15. Legal Settlements & Awards (Factor) 50% x 70% (% increase) _ $7,108,300 (of Line 13)
16. Other Condemn. Costs 36 x $500 - $18,000
17. (Lines 13 thru 16) TOTAL R/W LAND CO5T5 $30,482,000
* Design contingenry for design plan stage:
(1) FD&Eplans-125% (1/ 30%plans-120% /3) 60%plans-135% (4/ 90%plans-310% /5) ROWP/ons-100%
R/W STAFF AND/OR CONSULTANT FEES
18. Acquisition 510,000 x 72 = 5720,000
19. Relocation 530,000 x 45 = 5450,000 TOTAL ACQ/RELO STAFF 51,170,000
RELOCATION COSTS
Replacement Housing Number Amount
20. Owner $45,000 x 44 = $1,980,000
21. Tenant $15,000 x 1 = $15,000
Move Costs
22. Residential Owner $3,500 x 44 = $154,000
23. ResidentialTenant $2,000 1 $2,000
24. Non-residential/Farm $60,000 x 0 = $0
25. (Lines 20 thru 24) TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS $2,151,000
26.
27.
28. TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE $36,587,500
( ,� zt_ C� -rl<P-d-or
Reviewer Jane C. Nelson Signed: Date: lanuary 31, 2015
REMARKS:
Condemnation - Assume 50% of the total parcels will be condemned; 37% of [hose condemned will settle prior to mediation;
10% will go through mediation; and 3% of the condemned parcels will go to trial.
The following indicates the reviewer's confidence in the above estimate:
Type A- indicates the most confidence
X Type B- indicates above average confidence
Type C- indicates below averege confidence
Type D- indicates the least or no confidence
The following indicates the purpose for this estimate: Dreft Environmental Impact Statement and Corridor Evaluation
Comments: This is a preliminary right of way estimate for the purpose of comparing multiple corridor alignments. All parcels were inspected from the existing
right of way. County GIS maps and Google Earth were also utilized to identify additional improvements located within the proposed right of way and/or impacts to the
remainders when they were not visible from the existing right of way. Parce1249 is owned by the City of Raleigh and is improved with a wastewater treatment plant
and spray fields. No other government or utility owned parcels were identified in this segment. Parcels 172, 174, and 175 are split between BLxL and L26L
(aka BL-444, BL-445, and BL-446). Parcel 249 is split between L2/L2BL and L3.

APPENDIX B
EIS Relocation Reports
(Segment order matches table in Appendix C)

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Orange
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 1
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 57 44 101 0 0 2 14 25 60
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 1 0 1 0 o-2onn 0 $ 0-150 p o-2onn 0 $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn �g 400-600 g 70-100nn 44 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 41 600 uP 38 100 uP 1112 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 57 44 1156
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (R@Sp011d by NUIYIb@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
�
�
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
UD 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
UD 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
�� �� `�"1.��_
ht of Wav Aqent
12/10/14
Date
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
4
61
65

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
ORANGE — SEGMENT 1
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
2. It is assumed that the well and/or septic system are impacted on Parcel 012, which is
owned and occupied by Word of Truth Church. The property is improved with a 640SF
frame dwelling/church, which would indicate that this is a very small congregation.
Further investigation and/or design modifications may eliminate the need to relocate this
displacee.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
ORANGE — SEGMENT 1
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 101 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Orange
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 2
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 17 5 22 0 0 0 0 8 14
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn � 400-600 p 70-100nn 38 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP �g 600 uP 5 100 uP 1220 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 17 5 1258
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (Respond by Number)
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
�
�
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
UD 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
C-�L,ce � i�`-_
ht of Wav Aaent
12/10/14
Date
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
2
71
73

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
ORANGE — SEGMENT 2
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
ORANGE — SEGMENT 2
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 22 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Orange
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 3
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 41 17 58 0 0 0 0 14 44
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 2 0 2 Q 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn � 400-600 p 70-100nn g 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 40 600 uP �7 100 uP 1140 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 41 17 1149
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
UD 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
��. � ����
ht of Wav Aqent
12/10/14
Date
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
1
57
58

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
ORANGE — SEGMENT 3
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, one of the non-profit displacees is the Garner Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
(Parcel 450). It is likely that the services provided by this station will have to be
reestablished elsewhere before this station can be closed. While options may be
available to accomplish this, for planning and project scheduling purposes, assume that
a new station will have to be built. Early coordination with this displacee will be critical
due to the complexity and time required for relocation. A more in-depth study should be
conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any other special relocation needs. For
the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special needs for
residential displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a
factor.
2. Parcel 445 is owned and occupied by Juniper Level Baptist Church. While the building
itself is not impacted, the proposed right-of-way line is at the front steps. There are
significant impacts to parking, loss of a monument sign, and impacts to the well and
septic system. There may be options to cure the site, but given the extent of the
impacts, it is presumed that this property will no longer function for or provide utility to
the current owner. This church is estimated to have 200+ members and does appear to
be a minority congregation.
3. The Garner Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. owns and occupies Parcel 450. Their
services will need to be reestablished elsewhere before this station is closed.
4. The fire department mentioned above is identified as a displaced business for this
question in order to bring attention to the need to replace these services within the
immediate area. Garner Volunteer Fire and Rescue is a combined department operating
out of four stations and appears to have a total of 75+ staff and volunteers.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
ORANGE — SEGMENT 3
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 58 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are vacant sites within the study area that could accommodate both the church
and the fire station. However, both of these entities will have a limited radius in which to
relocate. Potential sites were identified by field inspection and through loopnet.com.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake & Johnston Alternate Orange
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 4
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 1
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn 2 400-600 p 70-100nn �p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 3 600 uP 2 100 uP 1140 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 5 2 1150
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
�
�
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
UD 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
�� � / � YL�
��--
ht of Wav Aqent
12/10/14
Date
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
1
57
58

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
ORANGE — SEGMENT 4
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
ORANGE — SEGMENT 4
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 7 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Red
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Seament 1
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 9 10 19 0 0 0 0 8 11
BUSIIIeSSeS 1 2 3 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn � $ 0-150 p o-2onn � $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn 27 250-400 p
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 7o-1ooM p 40o-soo p 7o-1ooM 330 400-soo 26
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP g 600 uP �p 100 uP 297 600 uP 23
displacement? TOTAL 9 10 654 49
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
)( 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
)( 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-24 months
� 12/10/14
Date
ht of
RennaRKs (Respond by Number
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 1
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There are three businesses that may be impacted by this segment; a nursery, a gas
station/convenience store, and a cell tower. Sufficient services will remain if the nursery
and gas station/convenience store are unable to relocate within the immediate area.
The cell tower is a more complicated displacement. This could have an impact on many
businesses and government services in the area if the cell tower is not replaced within
the immediate vicinity.
4. The business services being displaced are a new Sheetz gas station/convenience store
(Parcel 34) and what appears to be a nursery (Parcel 14). Sheetz provides multiple
services including a convenience store, restaurant, gas station, and ATM services. This
Sheetz store is located at the NW corner of Fayetteville Road (US 401) and Ten-Ten
Road. This is a 24/7 operation and the number of employees is estimated to be 15-20.
This location may be salvaged if a new driveway connection to Fayetteville Road can be
made at the southern property line adjacent to the Walgreens store. However, there
also appears to be sites available that could accommodate a gas station/convenience
store should they be required to relocate.
On Parcel 14 there is the presence of nursery activity; however, there is no verifiable
business name. This may indicate that the nursery supports a landscaping business
rather than being a retail outlet. It appears to be a family operation with probably only a
few employees. The nursery may have a more difficult time staying in the immediate
area. There are large, vacant tracts, but their availability and suitability for a nursery are
more limited. There are also plenty of nursery resources available in the area. At least
10 nurseries were identified within a ten mile radius of the subject, including large
retailers such as Lowe's, which is located 5.5 miles north on Fayetteville Road.
The cell tower (Parcel 26) will be a difficult and expensive displacement. Not only will
the structure itself be impacted, but there will likely be multiple "tenants" who utilize the
tower. It is not uncommon for a new tower to be constructed and service reestablished
prior to removing the existing structure in order to avoid disruption of the services being
provided. This could have a significant impact on the cost as well as the schedule for
the project. An interview with the displacee is recommended before pursuing this
alternative due to the unknowns involved, the costs associated with this type of move,
and the potential impacts to the project schedule.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 1
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the muitiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to rep�ace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 19 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
2

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 1
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. As noted in the field, there are vacant business sites available within the vicinity of this
segment and along Fayetteville Road that could accommodate a gas
station/convenience store. Additional commercial resources can also be found through
LoopNet.com. However, as previously discussed, it will be more difficult for the nursery
and the cell tower to find suitable replacement sites in the immediate area to meet their
specific criteria.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
3

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Red Segment 2
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 8 5 13 0 0 0 0 6 7
BUSIIl2SS2S O 3 3 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-zonn p $ 0-�5o p o-zonn p $ o-�so p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M � 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70m p 250-400 p 40-70m 27 250-400 p
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 7o-1oonn p 400-soo p 7o-1oonn 330 40o-s0o 26
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP g 600 uP 5 100 uP 297 600 uP 23
displacement? TOTAL 8 5 654 49
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (Respond by Number)
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
)( 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12- 18 months
" 12/10/14
Date Relocation Coordinator Date
: of Way Aqent

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 2
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There are three business displacements on this segment; a gun/knife store, trailer
rentals and sales, and an auto repair shop. The business services will not remain the
same unless the affected owners and tenants are able to relocate within the project
corridor. Two of the businesses appear to be owned by the same individual.
4. The businesses being displaced by this segment are Ralph's Gun & Knife store, Go
Slow Tow Trailer Rental and Sales, and Bill's Auto repair shop. All three businesses are
located on Parcel 40. It appears that Ralph's Gun & Knife and Go Slow Tow Trailer
Rental and Sales are owned by the same entity. Their combined merchandise includes
pig cookers, 55-gallon barrels, firearms, holsters, ammunition, jackhammers, swords,
DVDs, trailers, trailer accessories, fax machines, credit card processors, and cooking
supplies. It is estimated that these two businesses combined employ 2-3 people. Bill's
Auto is a small, independent auto repair shop with two service bays. This business
probably maintains just a couple of employees. A more in-depth inspection with the
ability to obtain business surveys is needed to determine the correct employee status.
These businesses, while smaller and more specialized than other services in the area,
rely heavily on the exposure they receive from their current location to support their
business. Finding a similar situation that would allow them to maintain their current
clientele within the immediate area could be problematic for all three business
displacees. Both the gun/knife store and the auto repair shop will likely have restrictions
associated with their location. If the gun/knife store and trailer business are in fact
owned by one entity they will probably want to relocate to one location. Retail space,
exposure, and outside storage areas will be a concern for these displacees.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 2
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 13 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. The gun/knife store and trailer sales and rental businesses typically would not be
too difficult to relocate and a few suitable replacements sites were noted in the vicinity
of this segment. These two businesses specialize in certain equipment and services.
Their current clientele will likely follow if they do not move too far from the subject
location. However, the exposure they receive from their current location contributes
significantly to their survival as a retail business. Potential obstacles for these two
businesses will be finding a site that can accommodate both businesses, assuming they
will relocate together, and location restrictions due to the merchandise they carry.
Outside storage areas will also be a factor.
2

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 2
The auto repair shop will be challenged to find a suitable replacement site within the
timeframe of a right-of-way project. This appears to be an older, established repair
shop, which means they will likely encounter new codes and zoning restrictions during
their move. Independent repair shops also tend to have loyal clientele, but with so
many substitute services available in the immediate area, it will be difficult for them to
maintain their current level of business if they have to move out of the area. The
exposure they receive from their location is also a contributing factor to the survival of
their business.
As noted in the field, there are vacant business sites available within the vicinity of this
segment and along Fayetteville Road that could possibly accommodate all three of
these businesses. Additional commercial resources can also be found through
LoopNet.com. For the repair shop, the resources will likely be very limited. The
gun/knife store and trailer sales and rentals will have more options; however, there
may also be restrictions associated with their new location due to the products they sell.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
3

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Red
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
Type of
Displa
Reside
Busine
Farms
Non-P
Yes
X
X
�
X
X
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
cees Owners Tenants Total Minoritie
ntial 218 24 242
sses 0 0 0
0 0 0
rofit 1 0 1
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
No Explain all "YES" answers.
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
3. Will business services still be available
after project?
4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
)( 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 36 months
� 12/10/14
Date
of W
INCOME LEVEL
Seament 3
s 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
0 0 1 2 60 179
O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
p Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
� 0-20M Q $ 0-150 � 0-20M 0
20-40M � 150-250 � 20-40M �
40-70M � 250-400 � 40-70M 27
�o-�oonn g aoo-soo 3 �o-�oonn 330
�oo uP 212 soo uP 21 �oo uP 297
TOTAL 218 24 654
REMARKS (Respond by Number
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
$ 0-150 0
150-250 �
250-400 0
aoo-soo 2g
soo uP 23
49
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 3
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
4. There is one non-profit homeowner's association (Parcel 316) that is impacted by this
segment. The site contains a new recreation center with a pool that serves the
neighborhood. This lot is equivalent to approximately four home site lots. It does not
appear that another site is available to reestablish this neighborhood feature and it will
impact an additional 3-4 residences to acquire enough room to rebuild this facility. The
loss of this facility will have an impact on the value of the remaining properties in the
neighborhood.
There is a cell tower located on Parcel 227. However, it appears that there will be room
to accommodate a driveway connection to Thompson Road to maintain access to this
site. The property also abuts Timber Drive if an alternative driveway location is required.
For the purposes of this report, it is assumed that access will be provided and the cell
tower will not be impacted.
Parcel 351 is owned by the City of Garner and contains a sewer pump station. This
parcel has not been included as a relocation parcel. Depending on how utilities are
reestablished along the corridor, this pump station may or may not be needed in the
future. For the purposes of this report, it is assumed that the sewer pump station will be
addressed during the utility relocation process.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 3
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 242 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment; however, additional housing resources in
surrounding communities may be necessary to fully accommodate all displacees. Due
to the number of single family homes being impacted, it is likely that new home
construction will be needed for some of these displacees. A portion of those who are
displaced will move out of the area or into a different living situation. The remaining
residential displacees should be able to find suitable replacement housing within a 5-15
mile radius of their current location.. It should be noted that the available properties
identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are DS&S.
Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local housing
codes and be habitable.
The number of residential displacements identified here is quickly changing. New
housing is currently being developed within the segment boundaries. Additional
displacements will be impacted as the new homes are sold. Five residential
developments will lose 20+ homes from their subdivisions. These types of impacts can
have a significant trickle down effect for the surrounding community and local
municipalities. Considerations may include a reduced property tax base and loss of
other municipal revenues as well as impacts to school, voting, and public service
districts such as police and fire protection. The loss of this many residences in the area
will also have a significant impact on the surrounding business community, including
non-profit organizations such as churches and fraternal organizations, since many of
2

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 3
these businesses/organizations are established to support residential neighborhoods.
These are just a few of the potential impacts associated with this volume of residential
displacements located within a limited area. Consideration should also be given to the
impacts of the other segments within the corridor.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. The one non-residential displacement is a recreational facility for a homeowner's
association. There does not appear to be any suitable replacement sites available to
reestablish this facility.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
3

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Red
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Seament 4
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 3 3 6 0 0 0 0 2 4
BUSIIIeSSeS 1 O 1 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn � $ 0-150 p o-2onn � $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn 27 250-400 p
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 7o-1ooM p 40o-soo p 7o-1ooM 330 400-soo 26
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 3 600 uP 3 100 uP 297 600 uP 23
displacement? TOTAL 3 3 654 49
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
)( 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
)( 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
� i� """ "" � �' ��_ 12/ 101 /4
Date
ht of
RennaRKs (Respond by Number
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 4
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There is one business being impacted by this segment; Penske Truck Rental. Available
business services will remain the same even if this displacee relocates to another area.
4. The one business being displaced is Penske Truck Rental (Parcel 514), which is located
in the Greenfield Business Park in the southeast quadrant of the I-40 and US 70
interchange. This location provides both personal and business rentals, including semi-
tractors and trailers. They maintain regular business hours Monday-Saturday. It is
estimated that this business supports 5-10 employees.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources avaiiable for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and pienty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 4
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 6 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. Penske Truck Rental (Parcel 514) is located in a new facility within the Greenfield
Business Park. There are vacant lots within the business park that would allow the
displacee to rebuild in their immediate area. Additional commercial resources can also
be found through LoopNet.com. It is unlikely that this displacee will be able to relocate
to an existing facility within their service area that will meet their needs. This needs to
be considered in the project schedule.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as ►isted in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Red
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Seament 5
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 2
BUSIIIeSSeS O 2 2 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn � $ 0-150 p o-2onn � $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn 27 250-400 p
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100M p 400-600 p 70-100M 330 400-600 26
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 2 600 uP � 100 uP 297 600 uP 23
displacement? TOTAL 2 1 654 49
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
)( 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
)( 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
" 12/10/14
Date
ht of
RennaRKs (Respond by Number
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 5
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, there is a medical facility that will be impacted by this segment. This facility
will likely need specialized services for moving and reestablishing the medical equipment
as well as for the transportation of pharmaceuticals. A more in-depth study should be
conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any other special relocation needs. For
the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special needs for
displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are two businesses being impacted by this segment; Strategic Behavioral
Center and Byrd's Auto Service. Strategic Behavioral Center is a specialized
treatment center that provides services that are not easily replaced. The available
services for this segment would not remain the same if they are unable to reestablish
their facility within the immediate area. There are other auto service establishments in
close proximity to this segment; therefore, these services will not be diminished.
4. Strategic Behavioral Center (Parcel 531) is a hospital which is a part of Strategic
Behavioral Health's (SBH) national network of treatment and education programs.
Strategic Behavioral Center is a new facility that opened in 2012 with 72 residential beds
for children and adolescents and 20 acute beds. This is a facility treating adults and
children in need of inental health and substance abuse care. The facility may employ
over 50 staff physicians, nurses, administrative, housekeeping, security, and health care
specialists based on the size of the facility. This parcel is located in the Greenfield
Business Park and it is presumed that the facility could rebuild on another available
parcel within the park. However, there are several concerns associated with this
relocation. Their options are very limited and logically they would need to rebuild and
fully furnish a new facility before moving out of the existing site. Even under the best
circumstances, this move will be very disruptive for the patients and staff. The move
may have to be completed in stages in order to transition small groups at a time. Caring
for the patients before, during, and after the move is critical. In addition, there are
special requirements for transporting pharmaceuticals. Some of the equipment may be
able to be relocated but the medical equipment would likely require specialized movers
with follow-up service/calibration of the equipment. This is a very complex, expensive,
and time consuming relocation that could have a significant impact on the cost and
schedule for this segment.
Byrd's Auto Service (Parcel 559) has provided comprehensive auto repair services in the
Raleigh area since 1993, including general services for cars and trucks, undercar
services, brakes, tires, engine & transmission, heating and cooling services, electrical
services, and towing. They appear to have 8-10 full-time staff. Byrd's is located on E.
Garner Road and there does appear to be vacant sites available in the area that could
provide the same utility and exposure as their current location. One concern may be
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 5
zoning restrictions due to the type of services being provided, including automotive
repair and towing. Finding an existing structure that can accommodate the business
would be more difficult and could require moving a greater distance or out of the
immediate area.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
2

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 5
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 3 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are vacant business sites available within the Greenfield Business Park should
the medical facility wish to rebuild in the immediate area. There are also sites available
in the vicinity of Byrd's Auto Service unless zoning restrictions become an issue.
Alternative locations are available along the US 70 corridor and additional commercial
resources can also be found through LoopNet.com.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
3

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Red
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Seament 6
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 4 6 10 0 0 0 1 2 7
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn � $ 0-150 p o-2onn � $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn 27 250-400 p
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 7o-1ooM � 40o-soo � 7o-1ooM 330 400-soo 26
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 3 600 uP 5 100 uP 297 600 uP 23
displacement? TOTAL 4 6 654 49
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
)( 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
)( 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? g_12 months
� 12/10/14
Date
ht of
RennaRKs (Respond by Number
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 6
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 6
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 10 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether rep�acement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax ro►Is.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Red
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Seament 7
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 4 6 10 0 0 0 1 2 7
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn � $ 0-150 p o-2onn � $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn 27 250-400 p
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 7o-1ooM � 40o-soo � 7o-1ooM 330 400-soo 26
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 3 600 uP 5 100 uP 297 600 uP 23
displacement? TOTAL 4 6 654 49
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
)( 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
)( 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 9-12 months
� 12/10/14
Date
ht of
RennaRKs (Respond by Number
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 7
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
RED — SEGMENT 7
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 10 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax ro►Is.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Lilac
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minoritie:
Residential 12 10 22 (
Businesses 0 0 0 (
Farms 0 0 0 (
Non-Profit 0 0 0 (
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers.
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
� 12/14/14
Date
ht of Wav Aqent
INCOME LEVEL
ent 03L
0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
0 0 0 5 17
VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
0-20nn 0 $ 0-150 0 0-20nn 0 $ 0-150
20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
70-100M � 400-600 � 70-100M 9 400-600
�oo uP 12 soo uP �p �oo uP 1140 soo uP
TOTAL 12 10 1149
REMARKS (ReSp011d by NUfllb@I'�
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
1
57
58

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 03L
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 03L
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 22 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Lilac Segment OxL
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minoritie:
Residential 57 4 61 (
Businesses 0 0 0 (
Farms 0 0 0 (
Non-Profit 0 0 0 (
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers.
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
� 12/14/14
Date
Riqht of Way Aqent
INCOME LEVEL
0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
0 0 6 12 43
VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
0-20nn 0 $ 0-150 0 0-20nn 0 $ 0-150
20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
70-100M � 400-600 � 70-100M 9 400-600
�oo uP 56 soo uP 4 �oo uP 1140 soo uP
TOTAL 57 4 1149
REMARKS (ReSp011d by NUfllb@I'�
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
1
57
58

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT OxL
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT OxL
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 61 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Lilac
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minoritie:
Residential 68 10 78 (
Businesses 1 8 9 (
Farms 0 0 0 (
Non-Profit 0 0 0 (
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers.
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
� 12/14/14
Date
ht of Wav Aaent
INCOME LEVEL
Seament 2
0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
0 0 0 8 70
VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
0-20M � $ 0-150 � 0-20M 0 $ 0-150
20-40M � 150-250 � 20-40M 0 150-250
40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
70-100nn 5 400-600 � 70-100nn 9 400-600
10o uP 63 soo uP �p �oo uP 1140 soo uP
TOTAL 68 10 1149
REMARKS (ReSp011d by NUfllb@I'�
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
1
57
58

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 2
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There are nine businesses being displaced in this segment which are clustered at or
near the intersection of Ten-Ten Road and Benson Road (NC 50). This will eliminate
almost all of the services available along Benson Road from Timber Drive �3.5 miles
north to NC 42 —3.5 miles south.
4. Five of the businesses being displaced are located on Parcel 144, which is improved
with a small strip center, auto repair shop, and mini self-storage units. The businesses
on this site all appear to be local "mom and pop" type of entities including:
• Best Buy Grocery and Grill — 6-8 employees
• Reality Workout Gym — 2-4 employees
• Chanellos (restaurant) — 6-8 employees
• Hills Auto Service — 2-3 employees
• Fuel Depot — 4-6 employees
• Turner Farms Mini Storage — 2-3 employees
o Note: Turner Farms Mini Storage will involve 200+ personal property
displacements. They have not been included as individual displacees for the
purposes of this report; however, a cost has been added to the acquisition of this
parcel to address the expenses associated with this type of displacement.
These businesses are locally owned and operated. Their clientele is primarily derived
from the residential neighborhoods located along Benson Road. The ability to
reestablish all of these businesses in the immediate area, and within the timeframe of a
right-of-way project, will be difficult due to the limited business sites currently available.
The other businesses being displaced include a BP Service Station located on Parcel
132, Tart's Grocery on Parcel 128, and a new Dollar General store located on Parcel
147. Tart's Grocery appears to actually be a very small, local bar based on information
found on the internet. It is unlikely that this business will be able to be reestablished in
the immediate area, unless this very old and possibly historic building can be moved
onto the remaining property. Like the businesses identified above, it will be difficult to
reestablish these remaining businesses in the immediate area due to the limited
business sites currently available. The BP station and Dollar General will likely have a
better chance than the local entities. As national chains, they have more resources
available to them and probably have experience with road projects impacting their
businesses.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 2
• TarYs Grocery (bar) — 1-2 employees
• BP Service Station — 8-10 employees
• Dollar General — 8-10 employees
It is unknown if any of these businesses are minority owned based on off-site field
review of the subject businesses. Personal interviews of the displacees during the
Needs Assessment Survey phase of the project will determine minority status.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
2

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 2
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 78 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there wiil be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are plenty of vacant sites along Benson Road; however, this is still a rural
community and most of the vacant land is used for farming. Commercially developed
sites along Benson Road are very limited. Very few, if any, of the displaced businesses
will have an opportunity to relocate into an existing building in the immediate area.
Commercial zoning is typically clustered at intersections in rural areas and there are only
a few intersections along this stretch of road. Zoning/land use codes could have an
impact on reestablishing the businesses on Benson Road. This will be more problematic
for the local "mom and pop" businesses as they rely heavily on the surrounding
neighborhoods for their clientele; and the services being offered are easily replaced
within a five mile radius. Dollar General and the BP station will have more options to
move to other nearby market areas. They are limited primarily by there own boundaries
for competing locations. Potential sites were identified in the field and through
loopnet.com, but as discussed above, it will be very difficult to reestablish these
businesses along Benson Road within the timeframe of a right-of-way project.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
3

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Lilac
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minoritie�
Residential 9 8 17 (
Businesses 0 0 0 (
Farms 0 0 0 (
Non-Profit 0 0 0 (
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers.
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 9-12 months
� ��� 12/14/14
Date
Riqht of Way Aqent
INCOME LEVEL
0-15M 15-25M
0 0
VALUE OF DWELLING
Owners Tenants
0-20M � $ 0-150
20-40nn � 150-250
40-70nn 0 250-400
70-100nn � 400-600
100 UP $ 600 UP
TOTAL J
REMARKS
ment 3
25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
2 5 10
DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
For Sale For Rent
Q 0-20M � $ 0-150
� 20-40nn � 150-250
� 40-70nn � 250-400
� �o-�oonn g aoo-soo
7 �oo uP 1140 soo uP
8 1149
espond bv Number)
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
�
1
57
58

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 3
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 3
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 17 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax ro►Is.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Lilac
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M
Residential 78 9 87 0 0 0
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn p $ o-�so
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400
UD �. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn 12 400-600
)( 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP gg 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 78
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
� / +-wLl���
12/14/14
Date
ht of Wav Aqent
REMARKS
Seament 4
25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
10 25 52
DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
For Sale For Rent
0 0-20nn 0 $ 0-150
0 20-40nn 0 150-250
0 40-70nn 0 250-400
p 70-100M g 400-600
g �oo uP 1140 soo ua
9 1149
:spond bv Number)
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
1
57
58

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 4
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT 4
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 87 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax ro►Is.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Lilac
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
nt 5
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BUSIn2SS2S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-zonn p $ o-�so p o-zom p $ o-�so
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M Q 150-250 0 20-40M 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 � 40-70nn � 250-400
N/A 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100m p 400-600 p 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP p 600 uP p 100 uP p 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 0 0 0
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bY NU11lb@1')
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
)( 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
N/A 8� Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
N/A 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
N/A 11. Is public housing available?
N/A 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
N/A 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? N/A
� 12/14/14
Date
qht of Wav Aqent
NO RELOCATION FOR THIS SEGMENT
Relocation Coordinator
Date
1
�
u
n
V
n
u
n
V
n
�
n
�

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Lilac
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minoritie:
Residential 0 0 0 (
Businesses 0 0 0 (
Farms 0 0 0 (
Non-Profit 0 0 0 (
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers.
N/A 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
N/A 8� Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
N/A 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
N/A 11. Is public housing available?
N/A 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
N/A 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? N/A
``" 12/ 14/ 14
Date
Riaht of Wav Aaent
INCOME LEVEL
ent 6
0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
0 0 0 0
VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
0-20nn 0 $ 0-150 0 0-20nn 0 $ 0-150
20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
70-100M � 400-600 � 70-100M � 400-600
100 UP � 600 UP 0 100 UP � 600 UP
TOTAL O O O
REMARKS (ReSp011d by NUfllb@I'�
NO RELOCATION FOR THIS SEGMENT
Relocation Coordinator
Date
C
0
0
0
0
0
0

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Lilac
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minoritie:
Residential 20 5 25 (
Businesses 1 1 2 (
Farms 0 0 0 (
Non-Profit 0 0 0 (
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers.
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9• Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
`- � 12/14/14
Date
ht of Wav Aaent
INCOME LEVEL
ent G2L
0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
0 0 4 16
VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
0-20nn 0 $ 0-150 0 0-20nn 0 $ 0-150
20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
70-100M 3 400-600 2 70-100M � 400-600
�oo uP 17 soo uP 3 �oo uP 507 soo uP
TOTAL 20 5 507
REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUfllb@I'�
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator Date
5
0
0
0
0
28
28

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT G2L
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There are two businesses being displaced in this segment; however, these services are
still available through other vendors in close proximity to the subject businesses (less
than five miles).
4. American Metal & Parts, Inc. (Parcel G-047) is a scrap metal/recycling and auto parts
enterprise. They enjoy a prominent location on US Highway 70, which may be a little
difficult to duplicate due to zoning requirements. This third generation, family-owned and
operated business has been at this location for 40+ years. They are estimated to have
5-6 employees.
Lee's Collison (Parcel G-058), as well as the property owner's residence, both occupy
this site. This is small "mom & pop" automotive repair/collision shop that has been at
this location since 1967. As with the metal recycling, relocation of this business may be
somewhat difficult due to zoning requirements. This business also enjoys a prominent
location on US Highway 70 which may be difficult for this small business owner to
duplicate due to the development trends along this corridor. This business is estimated
to employ 2-3 employees.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT G2L
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 25 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are vacant sites within the study area that could accommodate these three
businesses. The difficulty will be zoning and replacing the exposure that all three
entities enjoy being located on US Highway 70. Potential sites were identified by field
inspection and through loopnet.com.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake & Johnston Alternate Lilac
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent B1 L
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 6 4 10 0 0 0 0 3
BUSIIIeSSeS O 2 2 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 1 1 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 2 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 p 70-100nn 15 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP g 600 uP 4 100 uP 321 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 6 4 338
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
)( 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
`-'" 12/14/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
7
0
0
0
0
18
18

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT B1 L
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. Two used car dealerships located on US 70 will likely be displaced due to loss of parking
and display areas. New and used car dealerships will still be available within the study
area. The data research indicates that there are nine dealerships located on US 70
Business Highway in Clayton, North Carolina, which will be available for services.
4. There are four business tenants on Parcel 38. Based on the proposed plans, two of the
businesses will likely be affected by the project and may be eligible for relocation. Cloud
9 Auto Sales and Car Arena are two used car dealerships located on Parcel 38. The
acquisition will affect the frontage of both dealerships as a strip take. The businesses
both utilize the frontage as display area for approximately 13 automobiles each. The
office structures on the site are not affected by the proposed acquisition. Based on the
size of the businesses, they both appear to have 3-5 employees. Should the property
owner be unable to reconfigure the current site for display, it may be necessary to offer
relocation assistance to these two used car dealerships.
There are two hog houses in the area of acquisition on Parcel 24, which is owned by the
NC Department of Agriculture. They also own Parcel 28, which is adjacent and
contiguous to Parcel 24. It is likely the displacee will be able to relocate the livestock to
another facility, but that will depend on the operation involved at this site. A more
extensive inspection at a later stage in the project will be needed to determine the extent
of relocation advisory assistance required for this parcel.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
LILAC — SEGMENT B1 L
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 10 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are vacant sites within the study area that could accommodate these two
businesses. Potential sites were identified by field inspection and through loopnet.com.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Green
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 1
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 p 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP p 600 uP p 100 uP p 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 0 0 0
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? NO RELOCATION FOR THIS SEGMENT
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
N/A 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
N/A 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
N/A 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
N/A 11. Is public housing available?
N/A 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
N/A 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? N/A
� `-' 12/10/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aqent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
C
0
0
0
0
0
0

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Green
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 2
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 20 8 28 0 0 0 2 3 23
BUSIIIeSS@S 1 2 3 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250 0
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400 0
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 3 70-100nn p 400-600 p
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 20 600 uP 5 100 uP 507 600 uP 28
displacement? TOTAL 20 8 507 28
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
UD 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
� ��—� 12/10/14
Date
ht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 2
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There are three businesses being displaced in this segment; however, these services
are still available through other vendors in close proximity to the subject businesses
(less than five miles).
4. American Metal & Parts, Inc. (Parcel 047) is a scrap metal/recycling and auto parts
enterprise. They enjoy a prominent location on US Highway 70, which may be a little
difficult to duplicate due to zoning requirements. This third generation, family-owned and
operated business has been at this location for 40+ years. They are estimated to have
5-6 employees.
Greenfield Housing Center (Parcel 054) is a sales center for modular homes. There are
11 units currently constructed on the site. Relocation services for this displacee may
include moving the 11 structures as personal property/business inventory. This is a
small enterprise estimated to support 2-4 employees at the sales center; however, there
may be additional employees associated with the construction of the homes.
Lee's Collison (Parcel 058), as well as the property owner's residence, both occupy this
site. This is small "mom & pop" automotive repair/collision shop that has been at this
location since 1967. As with the metal recycling, relocation of this business may be
somewhat difficult due to zoning requirements. This business also enjoys a prominent
location on US Highway 70 which may be difficult for this small business owner to
duplicate due to the development trends along this corridor. This business is estimated
to employ 2-3 employees.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 2
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 28 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are vacant sites within the study area that could accommodate these three
businesses. The difficulty will be zoning and replacing the exposure that all three
entities enjoy being located on US Highway 70. Potential sites were identified by field
inspection and through loopnet.com.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Green
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
Seament 3
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 10 1 11 0 0 0 0 3
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 p 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP �p 600 uP � 100 uP 507 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 10 1 507
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
X
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 9-12 months
� 12/10/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
E.'•'
0
0
0
0
28
28

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 3
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 3
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 11 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as ►isted in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Green
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
Seament 4
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 � 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP p 600 uP p 100 uP 507 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 0 1 507
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
X
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 6-9 months
� � �"`"" " �" 12/10/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
C
0
0
0
0
28
28

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 4
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 4
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 1 residential property. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as ►isted in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Green
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 5
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 9 4 13 0 0 0 1 3
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn � 400-600 � 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP g 600 uP 3 100 uP 507 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 9 4 507
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
X
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 9-12 months
� 12/10/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
E
0
0
0
0
28
28

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 5
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 5
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 13 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as ►isted in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Green
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
Seament 6
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 2 13 15 0 0 0 2 9
BUSIIIeSS@S O 3 3 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 2 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 2 600 uP � � 100 uP 507 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 2 13 507
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
)( 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
`-' 12/10/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
4
0
0
0
0
28
28

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 6
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There are three businesses being displaced in this segment; however, these services
are still available through other vendors in close proximity to the subject businesses
(less than five miles).
4. Alan's Towing & Recovery (Parcel 114) appears to have a fleet of towing trucks to
accommodate almost any type of haul. They are a 24/7 operation and are estimated to
have 8-10 employees, including drivers. Salvaged vehicles that will need to be relocated
are also stored on the site.
Paul's Grill & Grocery (Parcel 115) provides multiple services including groceries, a grill,
butcher, gas station, hardware, bait, and propane. Assuming they are a 24/7 operation
and given the multiple services, they are estimated to have 10-15 employees.
An Exxon gas station/convenience store (Parcel 126) provides typical C-store services.
They are open daily from 5 a.m. — Midnight and are estimated to have 8-10 employees.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 6
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 15 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are vacant sites within the study area that could accommodate these three
businesses. Zoning could be a complicating factor for Alan's Towing & Recovery in
locating a replacement site. Potential sites were identified by field inspection and
through loopnet.com.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Green
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 7
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 2 11 13 0 0 3 8 2
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 2 250-400 � 40-70nn 0 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 g 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP p 600 uP 3 100 uP 507 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 2 11 507
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
X
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 9-12 months
`-' 12/10/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
C
0
0
0
0
28
28

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 7
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
GREEN — SEGMENT 7
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 13 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as ►isted in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate MINT
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 1
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 1 1 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 14 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 � 70-100nn 20 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP p 600 uP p 100 uP 280 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 0 1 314
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
X
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
�
Riqht of Wav Aaent
12/05/14
Date
Relocation Coordinator
Date
C
0
0
0
0
24
24

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
MINT — SEGMENT 1
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
MINT — SEGMENT 1
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of one residence and one farm. The home
appears to be tenant occupied and for the purposes of this report, it is assumed that the
tenant is also leasing the farm. Based upon the analysis of available housing, it appears
that there will be adequate decent, safe, and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment.
There are many farms in the area; however, locating another residence with a farm that
is for lease will be difficult. It should be noted that the available properties identified
during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are DS&S. Properties
referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local housing codes and
be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate MINT
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ment 2
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 7 8 15 0 0 0 1 6
BUSIIIeSS@S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 2 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 � 70-100nn �� 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 7 600 uP 7 100 uP 287 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 7 8 306
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
X
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 9-12 months
( �j,l'fl� �� J ��-�%`��
�/
Riqht of Wav Aaent
12/05/14
Date
Relocation Coordinator
Date
E.'•'
0
0
0
0
20
20

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
MINT — SEGMENT 2
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
MINT — SEGMENT 2
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 15 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake & Johnston Alternate Brown
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent B1
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 7 4 11 0 0 0 1 4
BUSIIIeSSeS O 2 2 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 1 1 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 2 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 � 70-100nn 15 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 7 600 uP 3 100 uP 321 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 7 4 338
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
)( 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
`-'" 12/10/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
0
18
18

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BROWN — SEGMENT 1
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. Two used car dealerships located on US 70 will likely be displaced due to loss of parking
and display areas. New and used car dealerships will still be available within the Brown
DSA and study area. The data research indicates that there are nine dealerships
located on US 70 Business Highway in Clayton, North Carolina, which will be available
for services.
There is a storage warehouse with individual bays located on Parcel 27. Based on the
field inspection there appear to be four or five bays affected by the acquisition, which
may necessitate tenant personal property relocations. The owner of the facility could be
a potential business displacement; however, the ROW cost estimate considered a cost
to cure to repair the site and maintain the on-going business. For the purposes of this
study, personal property only moves have not been identified or counted toward the
number of displacements. Therefore, no relocation is identified for this parcel at this
time.
4. There are four business tenants on Parcel 38. Based on the proposed plans, two of the
businesses will likely be affected by the project and may be eligible for relocation. Cloud
9 Auto Sales and Car Arena are two used car dealerships located on Parcel 38. The
acquisition will affect the frontage of both dealerships as a strip take. The businesses
both utilize the frontage as display area for approximately 13 automobiles each. The
office structures on the site are not affected by the proposed acquisition. Based on the
size of the businesses, they both appear to have 3-5 employees. Should the property
owner be unable to reconfigure the current site for display, it may be necessary to offer
relocation assistance to these two used car dealerships.
There are two hog houses in the area of acquisition on Parcel 24, which is owned by the
NC Department of Agriculture. They also own Parcel 28, which is adjacent and
contiguous to Parcel 24. It is likely the displacee will be able to relocate the livestock to
another facility, but that will depend on the operation involved at this site. A more
extensive inspection at a later stage in the project will be needed to determine the extent
of relocation advisory assistance required for this parcel.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BROWN — SEGMENT 1
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 11 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
2

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BROWN — SEGMENT 1
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are vacant sites within the study area that could accommodate these three
businesses. Zoning could be a complicating factor for Alan's Towing & Recovery in
locating a replacement site. Potential sites were identified by field inspection and
through loopnet.com.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
3

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Brown
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 2
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 0 250-400
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 p 70-100nn 15 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP � 600 uP p 100 uP 3�g 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 1 0 333
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
�
�
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 6-12 months
`-' 12/10/14
Date
ht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
C
0
0
0
0
22
22

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BROWN — SEGMENT 2
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BROWN — SEGMENT 2
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 1 residential property. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as ►isted in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Brown
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ent 3
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 3 3 6 0 0 0 0 3
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 0 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn 2 250-400
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn � 400-600 p 70-100nn 15 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 2 600 uP 3 100 uP 321 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 3 3 338
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
X
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 6-12 months
� 12/10/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
3
0
0
0
0
18
18

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BROWN — SEGMENT 3
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BROWN — SEGMENT 3
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 6 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as ►isted in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EISRELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Tan
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
Type of
Displacees
Residential
Businesses
Farms
Non-Profit
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
WCOME LEVEL
ent 1
Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
21 8 29 0 0 0 2 15 12
O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
0 0 0 � 0-20M 0 $ 0-150 � 0-20M � $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250
Explain all "YES" answers. 40-7onn p 250-400 p 40-7onn p 250-400
1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn � 400-600 2 70-100nn 6 400-600
2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 20 600 uP g 100 uP 252 600-up
displacement? TOTAL 21 8 258
3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (R@Sp011d by NUn'lb@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
� ��
12/05/14
Date
ht of Way Aqent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
0
0
0
0
56
56

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
TAN — SEGMENT 1
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
TAN — SEGMENT 1
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 29 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Teal
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
ment 1
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 12 1 13 0 0 0 1 12
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20nn p $ 0-150 p 0-20nn p $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn 0 150-250 0 20-40nn 52 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn 0 250-400 0 40-70nn ] 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600 p 70-100nn 30 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 12 600 uP � 100 uP 251 600 uP
displacement? TOTAL 12 1 340
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (ReSp011d bj/ NUf11b@I'�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X
X
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 9-12 months
;� c -��
12/05/14
Date
Riqht of Wav Aaent
Relocation Coordinator
Date
C
0
0
0
48
43
91

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
TEAL — SEGMENT 1
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project. However, given the number of residential displacements in this segment it is
likely that any or all three of these categories of displacees will be present.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
TEAL — SEGMENT 1
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 13 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as ►isted in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Purple
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M
Residential 29 15 44 0 0 0
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants **
Non-Profit 1 0 1 0 o-2onn 0 $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn � 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-7oM p 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn 7 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 22 600 ua �
displacement? TOTAL 29 1
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
)( 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
� 12/10/14
Date
ht of
ment 01 PU
25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
4 16 24
DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
For Sale For Rent
� 0-20M 0 $ 0-150 �
� 20-40nn � 150-250 �
� 40-70M � 250-400 �
2 70-100nn � 400-600 �
3 �oo uP 834 soo uP 21
5 834 21
REMARKS (R@SpOtld by NUlllb@r
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
PURPLE — SEGMENT 01 PU
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
2. It is assumed that the well and/or septic system are impacted on Parcel 0-012, which is
owned and occupied by Word of Truth Church. The property is improved with a 640SF
frame dwelling/church, which would indicate that this is a very small congregation.
Further investigation and/or design modifications may eliminate the need to relocate this
displacee.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
PURPLE — SEGMENT 01 PU
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 44 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Purple
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
oEscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M
Residential 18 5 23 0 0 0
BUSIIl2SS2S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants **
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn � $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn � 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-7onn p 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP �g 600 ua
displacement? TOTAL 18
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
� 12/10/14
Date
ht of
Seament 1
25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
0 0 23
DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
For Sale For Rent
� 0-20nn 0 $ 0-150 �
� 20-40nn 0 150-250 �
� 40-70M � 250-400 �
0 70-100M 4 400-600 0
5 �oo uP 394 soo uP 21
5 398 21
REMARKS (R@SpOtld by NUlllb@r
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
PURPLE — SEGMENT PU1
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
PURPLE — SEGMENT PU1
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 23 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate Purple
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES
INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M
Residential 70 3 73 0 0 0
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants **
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn 0 $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn � 150-250
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-7oM p 250-400
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn p 400-600
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 70 600 ua
displacement? TOTAL 70
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
)( 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
`-' 12/10/14
Date
ht of
Seament 2
25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
0 0 73
DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
For Sale For Rent
� 0-20M 0 $ 0-150 �
� 20-40nn � 150-250 �
� 40-70M � 250-400 �
0 70-100nn 4 400-600 �
3 �oo uP 394 soo uP 21
3 398 21
REMARKS (R@SpOtld by NUlllb@r
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
PURPLE — SEGMENT PU2
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
PURPLE — SEGMENT PU2
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 73 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax ro►Is.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate BLUE
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Seament 1
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
BUSIIIeSSeS O 1 1 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 1 0 1 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn � $ 0-150 p o-2onn � $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn � 2 250-400 p
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-10oM p 400-600 p 70-10oM 110 400-600 16
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 2 600 uP p 100 uP 227 600 uP 13
displacement? TOTAL 2 0 349 29
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-18 months
(� 12/16/14
Date
ht of
RennaRKs (Respond by Number
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT 1
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There is one business being displaced in this segment; however, these services are still
available through other vendors in close proximity to the subject businesses (less than
one mile).
4. Inline Auto Sales is a used car dealership located on Parcel 008, with frontage along
Fayetteville Road (US 401) just outside the town of Fuquay-Varina. This medium-sized
dealership is open seven days a week and is estimated to support 6-8 employees. Two
rows of parking and display area will be impacted and the proposed right-of-way line is
near the front of the building. This is a large site and the remainder will still be adequate
in size; however, it may no longer be suitable for the existing business which may make
them eligible for relocation benefits.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT 1
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of one farm and two residences. One of the
residences is on a separate parcel adjacent to the farm. It is assumed that the owner of
the home is also operating the farm and they would most likely need to relocate
together. There are large acreage tracts in the area currently used for farming, but
locating an existing home/farm replacement will be very difficult. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are vacant sites and commercially developed sites within the study area that could
accommodate the used car business. Potential sites were identified by field inspection
and through loopnet.com.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate BLUE
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Seament 2
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 78 17 95 0 0 0 0 8 87
BUSIIIeSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn � $ 0-150 p o-2onn � $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 � 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn � 2 250-400 p
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-10oM �p 400-600 p 70-10oM 110 400-600 16
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP gg 600 uP 17 100 uP 227 600 uP 13
displacement? TOTAL 78 17 349 29
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
� 12/16/14
Date
ht of
RennaRKs (Respond by Number
See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT BL2
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT BL2
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 95 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate BLUE Segment 3
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 40 12 52 0 0 0 0 10 42
BUSIIl2SS2S O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 1 1 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn 0 $ 0-150 p o-2onn � $ 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40nn � 150-250 � 20-40nn � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn � 2 250-400 p
UD 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100nn 2 400-600 4 70-100nn 110 400-600 16
X 2. Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 38 600 uP g 100 uP 227 600 uP 13
displacement? TOTAL 40 12 349 29
X 3. Will business services still be available REMARKS (R@Sp011d by NUmb@P�
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
x 7. Will additional housing programs be
needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be
considered?
UD 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
UD 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
� � 12/16/14
Date Relocation Coordinator Date
ht of Way Aqent

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT BL3
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT BL3
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 52 residential properties and one farm.
Parcel 333 is a potential displaced farm operation along with two residences. The
property is owned by a revocable trust, so it is possible that this is an owner-occupied
residence and farm. There are large acreage tracts used for farming in the area, but
replacing a home/farm operation will be very difficult. However, this site will have a large
remainder and most likely the buildings being impacted will be reestablished on the
remaining property. Based upon the analysis of available housing, it appears that there
will be adequate decent, safe, and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should
be noted that the available properties identified during the analysis have not been
inspected to determine if they are DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as
available are presumed to meet all local housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate BLUE
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
ment BLxL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 17 15 32 0 0 0 0 6 26
BUSIf1eSSeS 1 8 9 O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn Q $ 0-150 p o-zonn p $ o-�so p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M � 150-250 0 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn � 2 250-400 p
UD � Will special relocation services be necessary? �o-loonn p 400-soo p �o-loonn 110 400-600 16
X 2 Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP � 7 600 uP � 5 100 uP 227 600 uP 13
displacement? TOTAL 17 15 349 29
X 3 Will business services still be available REMARKS (Respond by Number)
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
X 4 Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5 Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6 Source for available housing (list).
X 7 Will additional housing programs be needed?
X 8 Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
UD 9 Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10 Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11 Is public housing available?
X 12 Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13 Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
X Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15 Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
`-� 12/ 16/ 14
Date
Riaht of Wav Aqent
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT BLxL
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
A more in-depth study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any
other special relocation needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that
there are no special needs for displacees and that alternative housing, such as the build
option, will not be a factor.
3. There are nine businesses being displaced in this segment which are clustered at or
near the intersection of Ten-Ten Road and Benson Road (NC 50). This will eliminate
almost all of the services available along Benson Road from Timber Drive �3.5 miles
north to NC 42 —3.5 miles south.
4. Five of the businesses being displaced are located on Parcel 420, which is improved
with a small strip center, auto repair shop, and mini self-storage units. The businesses
on this site all appear to be local "mom and pop" type of entities including:
• Best Buy Grocery and Grill — 6-8 employees
• Reality Workout Gym — 2-4 employees
• Chanellos (restaurant) — 6-8 employees
• Hills Auto Service — 2-3 employees
• Fuel Depot — 4-6 employees
• Turner Farms Mini Storage — 2-3 employees
o Note: Turner Farms Mini Storage will involve 200+ personal property
displacements. They have not been included as individual displacees for the
purposes of this report; however, a cost has been added to the acquisition of this
parcel to address the expenses associated with this type of displacement.
These businesses are locally owned and operated. Their clientele is primarily derived
from the residential neighborhoods located along Benson Road. The ability to
reestablish all of these businesses in the immediate area, and within the timeframe of a
right-of-way project, will be difficult due to the limited business sites currently available.
The other businesses being displaced include a BP Service Station located on Parcel
424, Tart's Grocery on Parcel 425, and a new Dollar General store located on Parcel
415. Tart's Grocery appears to actually be a very small, local bar based on information
found on the internet. It is unlikely that this business will be able to be reestablished in
the immediate area, unless this very old and possibly historic building can be moved
onto the remaining property. Like the businesses identified above, it will be difficult to
reestablish these remaining businesses in the immediate area due to the limited
business sites currently available. The BP station and Dollar General will likely have a
better chance than the local entities. As national chains, they have more resources
available to them and probably have experience with road projects impacting their
businesses.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT BLxL
• TarYs Grocery (bar) — 1-2 employees
• BP Service Station — 8-10 employees
• Dollar General — 8-10 employees
It is unknown if any of these businesses are minority owned based on off-site field
review of the subject businesses. Personal interviews of the displacees during the
Needs Assessment Survey phase of the project will determine minority status.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
2

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT BLxL
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 32 residential properties. Based upon
the analysis of available housing, it appears that there wiil be adequate decent, safe,
and sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
14. There are plenty of vacant sites along Benson Road; however, this is still a rural
community and most of the vacant land is used for farming. Commercially developed
sites along Benson Road are very limited. Very few, if any, of the displaced businesses
will have an opportunity to relocate into an existing building in the immediate area.
Commercial zoning is typically clustered at intersections in rural areas and there are only
a few intersections along this stretch of road. Zoning/land use codes could have an
impact on reestablishing the businesses on Benson Road. This will be more problematic
for the local "mom and pop" businesses as they rely heavily on the surrounding
neighborhoods for their clientele; and the services being offered are easily replaced
within a five mile radius. Dollar General and the BP station will have more options to
move to other nearby market areas. They are limited primarily by there own boundaries
for competing locations. Potential sites were identified in the field and through
loopnet.com, but as discussed above, it will be very difficult to reestablish these
businesses along Benson Road within the timeframe of a right-of-way project.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
3

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
� E.I.S. ❑ CORRIDOR ❑ DESIGN
WBS ELEMENT: COUNTY Wake Alternate BLUE
T.I.P. No.: R-2721 R-2828 R-2829
�EscRiPTioN oF PRo�ECT: Complete 540 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
ment L2BL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 44 1 45 0 0 0 0 0 45
BUSIf1eSSeS O O O O VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants ** For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 o-2onn Q $ 0-150 p o-zonn p $ o-�so p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M � 150-250 0 20-40M � 150-250 �
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70nn p 250-400 p 40-70nn � 2 250-400 p
UD � Will special relocation services be necessary? �o-loonn p 400-soo p �o-loonn 110 400-600 16
X 2 Will schools or churches be affected by 100 uP 44 600 uP � 100 uP 227 600 uP 13
displacement? TOTAL 44 1 349 29
X 3 Will business services still be available REMARKS (Respond by Number)
after project? See the 15 E Addendum for Remarks
�
�
X 4 Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5 Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6 Source for available housing (list).
X 7 Will additional housing programs be needed?
8 Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
UD 9 Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10 Will public housing be needed for project?
11 Is public housing available?
12 Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
UD 13 Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A . Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15 Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 18-24 months
`-� 12/ 16/ 14
Date
Riaht of Wav Aqent
Relocation Coordinator
Date

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT L2BL
1. Special relocation services cannot be determined without individual consultation with the
displacees. Individual consultations are not conducted during this phase of the project.
However, the field review did not visually indicate any special needs. A more in-depth
study should be conducted at a later date to identify and quantify any special relocation
needs. For the purposes of this study, it may be presumed that there are no special
needs and that alternative housing, such as the build option, will not be a factor.
3. There are no businesses being impacted on this segment; business services will remain
the same.
6. The sources utilized for the available housing list are the multiple listing service (MLS),
realtor.com, and zillow.com. Based on the data derived from these resources, there are
more than 1000 properties available for sale and rent within the study area. However,
there may be a shortage of resources available for replacing mobile home units or rental
lots. The data research is based upon the availability of a fluctuating inventory of
available properties.
7. There is a very active real estate market in the study area, and throughout Wake and
Johnston counties. Available inventory, low interest rates, and plenty of new housing
starts and subdivision developments would indicate that additional housing programs will
not be needed.
8. Last resort housing will apply if the replacement housing computations reflect that
adequate housing cannot be offered within the monetary threshold of the Uniform Act.
Last resort housing will be examined more carefully during the Relocation Needs
Assessment phase of the project and determined on a case-by-case basis. If last resort
housing is applicable, it will not require a build alternative to replace current housing.
9. Unable to determine the types or special needs of the residential displacees without the
benefit of individual consultations, which are not conducted during this phase of the
project.
10. No public housing units were identified within this segment, which would indicate that
public housing will not be required for replacement housing.
11. Although public housing is available in the study area, it is not anticipated to be a factor
for this segment of the project. However, should the need arise there are multiple
sources available within the study area that can provide public housing or assistance.
Wake County offers multiple types of affordable rental apartments. There are also HUD
sponsored apartments and single family homes as well as non-profit housing assistance
resources. There are available listings that also specify: non-profit housing resource,
HUD apartment, and subsidized housing.
1

FRM15-E EIS RELOCATION REPORT ADDENDUM
COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION
BLUE — SEGMENT L2BL
12. This segment will necessitate the relocation of 45 residential properties. Based upon the
analysis of available housing, it appears that there will be adequate decent, safe, and
sanitary (DS&S) housing for this segment. It should be noted that the available
properties identified during the analysis have not been inspected to determine if they are
DS&S. Properties referenced in this report as available are presumed to meet all local
housing codes and be habitable.
13. The question regarding whether replacement housing is within the financial means of
those proposed to be displaced cannot be determined without individual consultation,
verification of income, and consideration of other resources.
NOTE:
• UD — Undetermined in this project phase; additional information required.
• The data provided in this report was collected via a visual inspection of each property.
Thus it is difficult to determine occupancy status, ethnicity, family size, age, or special
needs until such time that individual consultations take place. Owner versus tenant
occupancy was based on the property owner's mailing address as listed in the County's
tax rolls.
2

APPENDIX C
Segment Breaks and
Right of Way & Relocation Impact Spreadsheets

NOT TO SCALE
��
� ��,-�
�
►
401
�
/����I 4 ��/
� / �
�
-----_,_�.��
,
�
- - � � � __ �iP(YII F RQP�D
�'�� 1 �' i
/� B�L3 I � �
_�V /
�� �-�— ��`— � ao
\�� ' � -'
� ,,
i �
b
ah"qp�

COMPLETE 540 QUANTITY SEGMENT BREAKS (DESCRIPTION)
APPROX. APPROX. LENGTH
# SEG ID. ALIGNMENT BEGIN STA. END STA. (Miles) SEGMENT RANGE SEGMENT DESCRIPTION
ORANGE CORRIDOR
i 01 O L 21+45.00 385+95.66 6.904 NC 55 BYP TO BEG. OF 02/R1 Protected Corridor from Beginning of Project to a point where the Red Corridor ties.
2 02 O L 385+95.66 484+00.00 1.857 FROM 01 TO 03/03L Protected Corridor from 01 to 03/02L-US 401 (Builds only the Portion of US 401 needed to complete R-2721)
3 03 O L 484+00.00 877+65.00 7.455 From 02 to 04 Protected Corridor from 02- US 401 (Builds the Remaining Portion of US 401 Interchange) to a point where the I-40 Interchange starts.
a 04 O L 877+65.00 952+00.00 1.408 From 03 to G1 Protected Corridor From 03 to I-40 Interchange (Only builds a portion of I-40 Interchange needed to complete R-2828)
GREEN CORRIDOR
s G1 O L 952+00.00 1009+14.39 1.082 04 to G2/B1 Green Corridor from I-40 (Completes Ultimate I-40 Interchange) to a point where the Brown Corridor ties.
5 G2 G L 1021+00.00 1158+00.30 2.595 From G1 to G3/TL1 Green Corridor from B1 tie to a point where Teal ties to Green
� G3 G L 1158+00.30 1195+31.30 0.707 From G2 to G4/M1 Green Corridor from a point where Teal ties to Green to a point where Mint ties to Green.
s G4 G L 1195+31.30 1238+53.22 0.819 G3 to G5/R6 Green Corridor from a point where Mint ties to Green to a point where Red ties to Green.
9 G5 G L 1238+53.22 1388+00.00 2.831 From G4 to G6/M2/63/T1 Green Corridor from a point where Red ties to Green to a point where Mint, Brown, and Tan ties back to Green.
io G6 G L 1388+00.00 1439+00.00 0.966 From G5 to G7 Green Corridor from a point where Mint/Brown/Tan ties back to Green to Poole Rd. (Former corridor rie Poinr)
il G7 G L 1439+00.00 1529+00.00 1.705 From G6 to End of Project Green Corridor from Poole Rd to Green to end point north of US 64/US264
TAN CORRIDOR
1z T1 T L 1206+55.08 1426+45.29 4.165 Frrom B1 to G6 Tan Corridor from a point where Brown ties to Tan to a point where Tan ties to Green
TEAL CORRIDOR
13 TL L 3.214 From G2/G2L to B3 Teal Corridor from a point where Teal ties to Green to a point where Teal ties to Brown
MINT CORRIDOR
i4 M1 MG L 1195+31.30 1239+00.00 0.827 From G3 to M2/R7 Mint Corridor from a point where Mint ties to Green to a point where Red ties to Mint
15 M2 MG_L/ G-L 1239+00.00 1388+00.00 2.905 From M1/R7 to G6 Mint Corridor from a point where Red ties to Mint to a point where Mint ties back to Green
BROWN CORRIDOR
15 61 B L 1021+00.00 1206+55.08 3.514 From G1 to 62/T1 Brown Corridor from a point where Brown ties to Green to a point where Tan ties to Brown
1� 62 B L 1206+55.08 1330+00.00 2.338 From 61/B1L to 63 Brown Corridor from a point where Tan ties to Brown to a point where Teal ties to Brown
is 63 B L 1330+00.00 1446+86.68 2.213 From 62/TL1 to G6 Brown Corridor from a point where Teal ties to Brown to a point where Brown ties back to Green.
RED CORRIDOR
19 R1 R L 385+95.66 495+00.00 2.065 From 01 to R2 Red Corridor from Orange to US 401 (Builds only the portion of the US 401 Interchange needed to complete R-2721)
2o R2 R L 495+00.00 618+00.00 2.330 From R1 to R3 Red Corridor from US 401 to a point where Red Mod (Former CorridorJ ties to Red (Builds the remaining portion of the US 401 interchange)
2i R3 R_l/RREV-L 618+00.00 854+74.06 4.484 From R2 to R4 Red Corridor from a point where Red Mod (Former Corridor ) ties to Red west of Old Stage Rd to a point where Red Mod (Former CorridorJ ties back to Red west of I-40.
22 R4 RREV-L 854+74.06 916+65.58 1.173 From R3 to R5 Red Corridor from a point where Red Mod (Former Corridor ) ties back to Red west of I-40 to I-40 (Includes building only a portion of I-40 need to complete R-2828)
zs RS RREV_L/R_L 916+65.58 986+64.48 1.326 From R4 to R6/R7 Red Corridor from R4 to cross over for Red to Mint and Red to Green (Includes building the remaining portion of the I-40 Interchange)
z4 R6 R L 986+64.48 1064+01.39 1.465 From R5 to G5 Red Corridor cross over from Red to Green
25 R7 RxM L 986+64.48 1064+44.44 1.473 From R5 to M2 Red Corridor cross over from Red to Mint
LILAC CORRIDOR
25 OxL OXL L 636+25.41 735+55.88 0.881 From 03L to L2 Lilac Corridor from a point where Orange ties to Lilac (Former Cross OverJ (L1 Segment south of Orange was eliminated J
2� L2 L L 742+97.43 865+00.00 2.311 From OxL to L3 Lilac Corridor from a point where Orange X-Over ties to Lilac to a point where the I-40 Interchange begins (Not Inclusive of I-40 Interchange)
2s L3 L L 865+00.00 937+80.98 1.379 From L2/L2BL to L4 Lilac Corridor I-40 interchange (Builds only the portion of the I-40 Interchange needed to complete R-2829)
29 L4 L L 937+80.98 984+98.45 0.893 From L3 to L5/L6 Lilac Corridor From I-40 (Completes I-40 Interchange) to a point where Lilac Cross Overs begin.
3o L5 L L 984+98.45 1012+50.98 0.521 From L4 to G2L Lilac Corridor cross over to Green Corridor
31 L6 LXB_L / B_L 984+98.45 1085+00.00 1.122 From L4 to B1L Lilac Corridor cross over to Brown Corridor
PURPLE/BLUE CORRIDOR
32 PU1 PU L 195+84.46 338+53.25 2.702 From 01PU to PU2 Purple Corridor from Orange Corridor to a point after the Optimist Farm Road crossing
33 PU2 PU L 338+53.25 478+00.00 2.641 From PU1 to BL1 Purple Corridor from the point after the Optimist Farm Road crossing to a point before the US 401 Blue Corridor Interchange
34 BL1 BL L 478+00.00 505+00.00 0.511 From PU2 to BL2 Blue Corridor from a point before the US 401 Interchange to a point just after the US 401 (Builds only the Portion of US 401 needed to complete R-2721)
35 BL2 BL L 505+00.00 680+69.89 3.328 From BL1 to BL3 Blue Corridor from US 401 (Builds the Remaining Portion of US 401 Interchange) to a point after the Old Stage Road Interchange
36 BL3 BL L 680+69.89 850+50.00 3.216 From BL2 to BLxL Blue Corridor from a point after Old Stage Road Interchange to where Blue Crossover to Lilac picks up
3� BLxL BLxL L 850+50.00 958+13.12 2.038 From BL3 to L2BL Blue Corridor Crossover to Lilac ties in to the middle of Lilac segment L2
SUPPLEMENTAL SEGMENTS
3a 03L O L 484+00.00 636+25.41 2.884 From 02 to OxL Portion of Orange Corridor from US 401 Interchange (Includes completing US 401 Interchange) to a point where Orange to Lilac Cross Over Begins.
39 G2L G L 1055+84.23 1158+00.30 1.935 From L5 to G3/TL1 Portion of Green Corridor from a point where Lilac ties to Green to a point where Teal ties to Green
40 61L 1085+00.00 1206+55.08 2.302 From L6 to T1/B2 Portion of Brown Corridor from a point where Lilac ties to Brown to a point where Tan ties to Brown.
ai 01PU O L 21+45.00 197+34.10 3.331 From 01 to PU1
az L26L L L 794+00.00 937+80.98 2.724 From BLxL to L3 Portion of Lilac Corridor that ties the Blue Corridor to a common segment break between L2 & L3

0
R
L
G
M
B
T
TL
PU
BL
ORANGE
RED
LI LAC
GREEN
MINT
BROWN
TA N
TEAL
PURPLE
BLUE
COMPLETE 540 END TO END QUANTITY SEGMENTS
01 02 03 04
03L OxL L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 G2L
M1 M2
,� . .
�.;n.:, . .
T1
• . , w .
1 B L2 B L3
RANGE—GREEN
RANGE—GREEN—MINT—GREEN
RANGE—BROWN—TAN—GREEN
RANGE—BROWN—GREEN
RANGE—GREEN—TEAL—BROWN—GREEN
RANGE—RED—GREEN
RANGE—RED—MINT—GREEN
RANGE—PURPLE—BLUE—LILAC—GREEN
RANGE—PURPLE—BLUE—LILAC—GREEN—MINT—GREEN
RANGE—PURPLE—BLUE—LILAC—BROWN—TAN—GREEN
RANGE—PURPLE—BLUE—LILAC—BROWN—GREEN
RANGE—PURPLE—BLUE—LILAC—GREEN—TEAL—BROWN—GREEN
RANGE—LILAC—GREEN
RANGE—LILAC—GREEN—MINT—GREEN
RANGE—LILAC—BROWN—TAN—GREEN
RANGE—LILAC—BROWN—GREEN
RANGE—LILAC—GREEN—TEAL—BROWN—GREEN
B1L
R-2721
01 02
01 02
01 02
01 02
01 02
01 R1
01 R1
01PU PU1
01PU PU1
01PU PU1
01PU PU1
01PU PU1
01 02
01 02
01 02
01 02
01 02
R-2828
-
03 04
03 04
03 04
03 04
03 04
-
R2 R3
R2 R3
-
PU2 BL1
PU2 BL1
PU2 BL1
PU2 BL1
PU2 BL1
-
03L OxL
03L OxL
03L OxL
03L OxL
03L OxL
G1
G1
G1
G1
�
R4
�
BL2
BL2
BL2
BL2
BL2
�
L2
L2
L2
L2
L2
G2
G2
B1
B1
�
R5
�
BL3
BL3
BL3
BL3
BL3
�
L3
L3
L3
L3
L3
G3 G4
G3 M1
T1 G6
B2 B3
TL1 B3
R6 G5
R7 M2
BLxL L2BL
BLxL L2BL
BLxL L2BL
BLxL L2BL
BLxL L2BL
L4 L5
L4 L5
L4 L6
L4 L6
L4 L5
G5
M2
G7
G6
�
G6
�
L3
L3
L3
L3
�
G2L
G2L
B1L
61L
G2L
G6
G6
G7
�
G7
�
L4
L4
L4
L4
�
G3
G3
T1
B2
TL1
R-2829
-
G7
G7
L5 G2L G3 G4 G5 G6 G7
L5 G2L G3 M1 M2 G6 G7
L6 B1L T1 G6 G7
L6 B1L B2 B3 G6 G7
L5 G2L TL1 B3 G6 G7
G4 G5 G6 G7
M1 M2 G6 G7
G6 G7
B3 G6 G7
B3 G6 G7
28.328
28.411
29.056
29.442
29.399
25.247
25.330
32.247
32.330
33.014
33.400
33.319
26.591
26.674
27.358
25.964
27.663

Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
R/W & Parcels Displacees
Segment Relocation Residential Business Farms Non-Profits Total
Estimate Commercial Residential Vacant Total Owners Tenants Total Owners Tenants Total Owners Tenants Total Owners Tenants Total Owners Tenants Total
01 $83,863,000 10.0 204.5 77.0 291.5 57 44 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 58 44 102
02 $31,524,900 2.5 51.5 11.5 65.5 17 5 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 5 22
03 $73,823,600 9.0 145.5 51.0 205.5 41 17 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 43 17 60
04 $21,052,200 0.0 9.5 12.0 21.5 S 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 7
R1 $35,604,500 8.5 30.5 7.0 46.0 9 10 19 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 12 22
R2 $34,805,500 2.5 22.0 52.5 77.0 8 5 13 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 16
R3 $153,615,200 9.0 319.5 55.0 383.5 218 24 242 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 219 24 243
R4 $34,999,100 13.0 19.5 21.5 54.0 3 3 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 7
R5 $39,688,600 6.5 6.0 17.0 29.5 1 2 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5
R6 $15,123,200 5.5 25.0 9.5 40.0 4 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 10
R7 $15,144,700 5.5 25.0 9.5 40.0 4 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 10
03L $28,486,900 4.5 58.5 18.0 81.0 12 10 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10 22
OxL $30,539,100 0.0 80.0 9.5 89.5 57 4 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 4 61
L2 $65,176,200 6.5 145.5 6.0 158.0 68 10 78 1 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 18 87
L3 $31,280,400 2.5 27.0 11.0 40.5 9 8 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 17
L4 $46,433,100 2.0 104.0 4.5 110.5 78 9 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 9 87
L5 $2,168,400 0.0 1.5 1.5 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L6 $6,241,800 0.0 12.0 9.5 21.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
G2L $34,776,300 8.5 32.0 13.5 54.0 20 5 25 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 6 27
B1L $14,093,700 13.0 15.5 6.0 34.5 6 4 10 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 7 13
G1 $7,268,800 0.0 2.5 3.0 5.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
G2 $39,610,400 8.0 36.0 17.0 61.0 20 8 28 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10 31
G3 $8,135,700 0.5 12.0 3.0 15.5 10 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 11
G4 $7,976,200 0.0 2.5 1.0 3.5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
G5 $16,101,600 0.0 19.5 10.5 30.0 9 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 13
G6 $22,696,500 7.0 8.5 3.0 18.5 2 13 15 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 18
G7 $2,423,200 1.0 18.0 4.0 23.0 2 11 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 13
M1 $4,059,000 0.0 3.5 1.0 4.5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2
M2 $19,497,300 0.0 19.5 12.5 32.0 7 8 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 15
B1 $21,650,600 12.5 28.0 15.5 56.0 7 4 11 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 7 7 14
B2 $7,482,400 1.0 6.5 8.0 15.5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
B3 $9,097,100 1.0 9.5 6.0 16.5 3 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 6
T1 $34,278,600 2.0 41.0 24.0 67.0 21 8 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 8 29
TL1 $19,409,400 1.5 20.5 6.5 28.5 12 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 13
01PU $44,949,000 8.0 103.0 61.0 172.0 29 15 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 30 15 45
PU1 $33,687,000 1.0 43.0 15.0 59.0 18 5 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 5 23
PU2 $87,497,900 2.0 115.5 53.0 170.5 70 3 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 3 73
BL1 $13,332,900 4.5 6.0 5.0 15.5 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 4
BL2 $73,901,900 6.5 140.5 48.5 195.5 78 17 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 17 95
BL3 $39,738,400 0.0 81.5 22.5 104.0 40 12 52 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 40 13 53
BLxL $41,867,700 13.0 78.0 35.0 126.0 17 15 32 1 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 23 41
L2BL $36,587,500 0.5 68.5 3.0 72.0 44 1 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 1 45
March 2015 Right of Way and Relocation Report

Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
R/W & Parcels Displacees
Alternative Relocation Residential Business Farms Non-Profits Total
Estimate Commercial Residential Vacant Total Owners Tenants Total Owners Tenants Total Owners Tenants Total Owners Tenants Total Owners Tenants Total
1 $314,476,100 38 510 193 741 163 106 269 1 5 6 0 0 0 3 0 3 167 111 278
2 $313,954,600 38 511 195 744 161 110 271 1 5 6 0 1 1 3 0 3 165 116 281
3 $298,581,400 44 509 201 754 152 104 256 0 5 5 0 1 1 3 0 3 155 110 265
4 $280,882,300 44 484 191 719 135 99 234 0 5 5 0 1 1 3 0 3 138 105 243
5 $310,769,100 40 506 191 737 159 104 263 1 5 6 0 0 0 3 0 3 163 109 272
6 $438,920,400 63 673 257 993 313 122 435 2 10 12 0 0 0 2 0 2 317 132 449
7 $442,337,600 63 673 259 995 311 126 437 2 10 12 0 0 0 2 0 2 315 136 451
8 $543,553,700 57 861 295 1,213 428 120 548 2 13 15 1 1 2 1 0 1 432 134 566
9 $543,032,200 57 862 297 1,216 426 124 550 2 13 15 1 2 3 1 0 1 430 139 569
10 $529,009,600 63 862 305 1,230 416 121 537 1 14 15 1 2 3 1 0 1 419 137 556
11 $511,310,500 63 837 295 1,195 399 116 515 1 14 15 1 2 3 1 0 1 402 132 534
12 $539,846,700 59 857 293 1,209 424 118 542 2 13 15 1 1 2 1 0 1 428 132 560
13 $411,581,500 45 765 174 984 341 125 466 2 12 14 0 0 0 1 0 1 344 137 481
14 $411,060,000 45 766 176 987 339 129 468 2 12 14 0 1 1 1 0 1 342 142 484
15 $397,037,400 51 766 184 1,001 329 126 455 1 13 14 0 1 1 1 0 1 331 140 471
16 $379,338,300 51 741 174 966 312 121 433 1 13 14 0 1 1 1 0 1 314 135 449
17 $407,874,500 47 761 172 980 337 123 460 2 12 14 0 0 0 1 0 1 340 135 475
March 2015 Right of Way and Relocation Report