The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20181192_Community Characteristics Report - May 2011_20151201FINAL COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS REPORT For ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Wake and Johnston Counties STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 State Project Nos. 6.401078, 6.401079, and 6.401080 Federal Aid Project Nos. STP-0540(19), STP-0540(20), and STP-0540(21) WBS Nos. 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA2, and 35517.1.TA1 Prepared for: f��`��i�i ��1,�� i � ,� �'�� r�� Prepared By: H.W. Lochner, Inc. L O C H I'�J E R May 5, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Community Characteristics Report NCDOT STIP Project No. R-2721, R-2828, R-2829 Wake and Johnston Counties EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... E-1 2 2.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 4 4.1 4.2 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 6 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................. 2 Proposed Action and Project Purpose ........................................................ 2 Functional Classification ......................................................................... 2 PRO)ECT SETTING .................................................................................... 3 Geographic and Political Description ......................................................... 3 Community Description .......................................................................... 3 Community Characteristics Methodology ................................................. 7 Data/Information Sources ...................................................................... 7 Community Study Areas ......................................................................... 8 COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................ 10 Population Characteristics ..................................................................... il 5.1.1 Population Trends ........................................................................... 11 5.1.2 Race/Ethnicity ................................................................................ 12 5.1.3 Age ............................................................................................... 14 5.1.4 Income ... ........ .... .... .... ... .... .... ........ .... .... .... .... .... .... ... . ... .... ........ .... . 15 5.1.5 Environmental Justice Considerations ................................................. 16 5.1.6 Means of Transportation ................................................................... 18 5.1.7 Limited English Proficiency ............................................................... 19 Housing Characteristics ........................................................................ 20 Business and Employment Characteristics ............................................... 21 Community Resources ......................................................................... 24 5.4.1 Educational Facilities ....................................................................... 24 5.4.2 Parks, Recreation and Commmunity Facilities ...................................... 25 5.4.2.1 Public Parks and Recreation .................................................... 25 5.4.2.2 Golf Courses ........................................................................ 26 5.4.2.3 Community Centers and Libraries ............................................ 27 5.4.3 Bicycle and Transit Routes ............................................................... .29 5.4.4 Voluntary Agricultural Districts .......................................................... 30 Neighborhoods.................................................................................... 31 Community Cohesion ........................................................................... 31 Plans and Regulations .......................................................................... 31 Potential Community Impacts ............................................................... 33 REFERENCES.......................................................................................... 35 Final Community Characteristics Report I STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 — May 5, 2011 Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4. Table 5. Table 6. LIST OF TABLES Southeast Extension Demographic Study Area Census Block Groups (2000) 9 Population Change - 1990 and 2000 .....................................................12 Population by Race and Ethnicity (2000) ................................................13 Population by Age Group and Median Age (2000) ....................................14 Median Household Income (1999) .........................................................15 PovertyStatus ...................................................................................18 Table 7. Means of Transportation to Work ..........................................................18 Table 8. Percentage of Adults Who Speak English Less than Very Well ...................19 Table 9. Housing Characteristics .......................................................................21 Table 10. Unemployment Rates ..........................................................................22 Table 11. Annual Employment Distribution - 1999/2009 (Percent) ..........................23 Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Figure 6. Figure 7. Figure 8. Figure 9. Figure 10 Figure li Figure 12 Figure 13 LIST OF FIGURES (Figures Follow Text) Project Setting Project Study Area Demographic Study Area Existing Land Use Population Change (1990/2000) Minority Population Hispanic Population Concentrated Minority Populations Population Below Poverty Level Limited English Proficiency Population Community Resources Historic Resources Voluntary Agricultural Districts Final Community Characteristics Report I I STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 — May 5, 2011 Appendix A. Appendix B. Appendix C. Appendix D. Appendix E. Appendix F. Appendix G. APPENDICES Local Government Interview List Local Government Interview Questions and Notes Detailed Population Characteristics Tables Adults Who Speak English Less than Very Well Bicycle Routes Map Transit Route Maps Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Final Community Characteristics Report I II STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 — May 5, 2011 EXECUTIVE SU M MARY This Community Characteristics Report summarizes baseline conditions and trends, and will serve as the basis for the Community Impact Assessment (CIA). The analysis component of the CIA will evaluate the direct impact of the project on the community under supplemental documentation. As impacts to communities also can be indirect in nature, a separate assessment of indirect and cumulative effects resulting from the proposed project is being conducted under a separate study. The North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA) proposes to construct an extension of the Triangle Expressway (NC 540) from NC 55 Bypass near Apex to the US 64/LTS 264 Bypass south of Knightdale. This project is designated as three projects in the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)—R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829. Together, these STIP projects would combine to complete the 540 Outer Loop around the Raleigh metropolitan area. Figure 1 shows the general project ]ocation. Based on the identified transportation needs, the purpose of the proposed action is to improve transportation mobiliry for trips within, or traveling through, the project study area during the peak travel period. A second purpose of the proposed action is to reduce forecast congestion on the existing roadway network within the project study area. Another desirable outcome of the project is to improve system linkage in the roadway network in the project study area, in accordance with state and local plans. Within southern and southeastern Wake County and northern Johnston County, there are limited alternatives for efficient local and long distance travel. Many alternative routes consist of unlimited access primary and secondary roads with lower posted speed limits and traffic signals. Much of I-40, the major corridor for interregional traffic across the area, currently operates at unacceptable levels of service (LOS) of E or F, and LOS on this and other major routes across the area is forecast to worsen significantly. Community Characteristics - Kev Community Characteristics The Demographic Study Area consists of 61 Wake County Block Groups and eight (8) Johnston County Block Groups (see Table 2 and Figure 3). This broad area was established to identify and analyze population growth, household, and other demographic characteristics. This information will be used as a foundation for determining potential project-related impacts to the human environment. The Demographic Study Area encompasses block groups within incorporated Apex, Holly Springs, Cary, Fuquay-Varina, Garner, Raleigh, Knightdale, and Clayton, as well as unincorporated Wake and Johnston counties. The general Demographic Study Area boundaries are roughly: the western edge of the Town of Holly Springs in the west, US 1/US 64 in the northwest, I-40/I-440 in the north, US 64/US 264 Business in the northeast, the Town of Clayton in the southeast, the Town of Fuquay-Varina in the southwest. The densely developed areas in central parts of Cary and Raleigh were not included within the Demographic Study Area boundary. Travel patterns and development in these areas would be less influenced than areas in southern Wake County by the presence of a new location east-west road south Final Community Characteristics Report E-1 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 – May 5, 2011 of I-40/I-440 because of their proximiiy io I-40/I-440, which is the primary existing east-west travel corridor through the Raleigh area. Demographics Between 1990 and 2000, the population of the project Demographic Study Area grew by over 77 percent—faster than Wake and Johnston Counties' growth and much faster than North Carolina's average. The populations of all of the municipalities in the study area increased over this time period, with the fastest growth in Holly Springs (over 900 percent), Apex (over 300 percent) and Knightdale (over 200 percent). Most of the highest growth areas in the Demographic Study Area are along its periphery, particularly in the Apex and Holly Springs area and in southwestern Clayton. Older urban areas in the Demographic Study Area, including central Garner and south Raleigh, have experienced slow growth or population declines. Minority populations in the Demographic Study Area are concentrated at the northern edge of the Demographic Study Area in the Garner, southeast Raleigh and Knightdale areas, and in Fuquay- Varina. Hispanic populations are concentrated in Garner, Clayton, Knightdale, and near US 401. The Demographic Study Area has a slightly lower percentage of African American residents than Wake County and a slightly higher percentage than Johnston County. The Demographic Study Area has a similar percentage of Hispanic residents as Wake County; Johnston County's percentage of Hispanic residents is higher than in the Demographic Study Area or Wake County. • Approximately 5 percent of individuals in the Demographic Study Area live below the poverty level, compared to approximately 8 percent in Wake County and 13 percent in Johnston County. • There do not appear to be any general areas where the population composition has unusually high senior or youth populations. There are no block groups in the Demographic Study Area with significantly higher concentrations of younger residents; block groups with higher than average percentages of older residents are scattered throughout the Demographic Study Area. The lowest reported median incomes are generally located in block groups concentrated in the north central and northeastern part of the Demographic Study Area, in Garner, southeast Raleigh and Knightdale. Central areas of Clayton and Fuquay-Varina are also characterized by lower median household incomes than the Demographic Study Area as a whole. Many of these areas also feature higher than average concentrations of minority residents. Median incomes tend to be much higher than the Demographic Study Area as a whole in the northwestern and western edges of the study area, in southern Cary, Apex, and Holly Springs. Over 3 percent of individuals within the Demographic Study Area have limited English proficiency. This is slightly less than the amount for Johnston County (4 percent) but higher than that seen in Wake County (10 percent). Most individuals with limited English proficiency are Spanish speakers. Twelve Demographic Study Area block groups have 5 percent or more individuals who are Spanish speakers. These block groups are located in Garner, southeast Raleigh, Knightdale, Clayton, and near Wake Technical Community College. • The Demographic Study Area features a relatively high median home value and relatively low percentages of renter-occupied and vacant units, although there is some variation across the area. The western and southern parts of the Demographic Study Area tend to feature higher median home values and lower percentages of renter-occupied and vacant units. The reverse is true for the areas in central Garner and southeast Raleigh. Final Community Characteristics Report E-2 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 – May 5, 2011 Cominunity Characieristics Land use in the Demographic Study Area is of mixed intensity and density, although low-densiry residential subdivision and rural land uses are the most prevalent characteristics of the area. Much of the Demographic Study Area was, until recently, characterized by agricultural and rural residential land uses. Many of the communities in the Demographic Study Area have become increasingly popular locations for suburban development as people coinmuting to jobs in Research Triangle Park, Raleigh, and other employment centers in the Research Triangle region seek affordable housing, open space, and the quality of life offered by southern Wake County and Johnston County. There are over 1,000 named residential subdivisions in the Demographic Study Area for the Southeast Extension, and numerous smaller, rural residential neighborhoods. The vast majority of these are single-family residential subdivisions, although there are also a number of mobile home parks. Residential subdivisions are more prevalent in the western part of the Demographic Study Area, although areas north of Fuquay-Varina and surrounding Clayton are increasingly popular locations for development of new subdivisions. • Numerous schools, places of worship, parks, recreation areas, and other community resources are located throughout the Direct Community Impact Area (DCIA) for the project. Public services such as police, fire and rescue, post offices, and libraries are available. Several bicycle and pedestrian facilities are located throughout the DCIA. Swift Creek and Middle Creek within the project study area are included on the North Carolina 303(d) list as impaired waterbodies. Local Planning Initiatives/Documents • Most of the municipalities in the Demographic Study Area have adopted comprehensive plans, which include designated future land uses. A number of these plans show the proposed route for the Southeast Extension and include special land use categories or overlay districts for the proposed route. • Several municipalities in the Demographic Study Area have adopted transportation plans, which designate the Southeast Extension as an important transportation need for the area. These municipalities include Wake County, Garner, Holly Springs, Knightdale, Johnston County, and Clayton. • The Wake County Land Use Plan includes a special Land Management Plan for the Swift Creek watershed area. The Land Management Plan identifies the Swift Creek basin's Watershed Critical Area and watershed buffer areas, within which development activities are limited, and appropriate low-density land use categories for the surrounding areas. � Several local plans identify a need to preserve area farmland and agricultural operations. Wake and Johnston Counties each have a Voluntary Agricultural District (VAD) program. Final Community Characteristics Report E-3 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Potential Communiry bnpacts • Large controlled-access, new location roadways such as tbe Southeast Extension typically have very signifcant community impacts. This project is likely to require numerous residential and business relocations, to bisect cohesive neighborhoods, to change land use patterns along the project route, and to alter area travel and access patterns. Potential community impacts will be examined in detail once Detailed Study Alternatives (DSAs) are selected for the project. Next Steps • Once DSAs are selected, a full Coinmunity Impact Assessment will be completed for the Direct Community Impact Area surrounding the DSAs. Particular concerns will include changes to area travel and access patterns, particularly for emergency response vehicles and school buses, community cohesion effects on bisected neighborhoods, and provisions for pedestrian and bicycles across and in the vicinity of the project alignment. Final Community Characteristics Report E-4 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 1 INTRODUCTION The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires agencies to consider how their actions inay impact the human environment. One element of this is development of a Community Impact Assessment (CIA) to evaluate the effects of a project on the surrounding community and its quality of life. The CIA assesses potential impacts on several aspects of the human environment, including: • social • physical • land-use • economic • visual • economic issues • mobility/access • displacements The CIA also identifies and assesses the potential for the project to have high and adverse effects on environmental justice and Limited English Proficiency (LEP) populations. Environmental justice populations are communities of minority and/or low-income people. LEP populations are coinmunities of people with limited fluency in spoken and written English. These populations have, in the past, been underserved in the decision-making process. This document, the Community Characteristics Report (CCR) serves as the first step in development of the CIA for the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension project (STIP Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829). The purpose of developing the CCR is to: • Summarize baseline conditions and trends • Identify opportunities to tailor the public involvement/outreach program throughout the project development process • Assist in early identification of minority and low-income populations • Serve as the basis for the CIA The next step in evaluating the effects of the project on the surrounding community will be to conduct the CIA. The analysis component of the CIA will evaluaie the direct impact of the project on the community under supplemental documentation. As impacts to communities can be indirect in nature, a separate assessment of indirect and cumulative effects resulting from the proposed project will be conducted under a separate study. Final Community Characteristics Report � STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 — May 2, 2011 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND 2.1 PROPOSED ACTION AND PROJECT PURPOSE To address transportation needs in the study area and the surrounding region, the North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administrarion (FHWA), proposes transportation improvements wiih a focus on the consideration of an extension of the Triangle Expressway (NC 540) from NC 55 Bypass near Holly Springs to the US 64/US 264 Bypass south of Knightdale. This project is designated as three projects in the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP�R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829. Together, these STIP projects would combine to complete the 540 Outer Loop around the Raleigh metropolitan area. The project is anticipated to be constructed in two phases, although both phases are being examined in the current study. Phase I is between NC Bypass near Holly Springs and Interstate 40 near the Walce/Johnston County line; Phase II is between Interstate 40 and US 64/US 264 Bypass in Knightdale. The general project location, shown in Figure 1, also includes the southeastern limits of the City of Raleigh, the southern limits of the Town of Cary, much of the Town of Garner, and portions of the Town of Clayton and northern Johnston County. Based on the identified transportation needs, the purpose of the proposed action is to improve transportation mobility far trips within, or traveling through, the project study area during the peak travel period. A second purpose of the proposed action is to reduce forecast congestion on the existing roadway network within the project study area. Another desirable outcoine of the project is to improve system linkage in the roadway network in the project study area, in accordance with state and local plans. 2.2 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION There are several major travel routes through the project study area; these routes are shown in Figure 1. I-40 is one of the major east-west routes through North Carolina, connecting Raleigh and its surrounding communities to southeastern North Carolina and I-95 to the east. To the west, I-40 connects the area to Research Triangle Park (RTP), Durham, and other cities in central and western North Carolina. I-440, the Raleigh Beltline, is a partial loop facility around Raleigh, connecting the suburban areas surrounding the city. The existing I-540/NC 540 currently connects farther outlying areas surrounding Raleigh to the north from NC 55 in northern Cary to US 64/US 264 Bypass in Knightdale. US 64 is another important east-west route through North Carolina; in the project study area, it traverses central Wake County. US 1 connects areas northeast of Raleigh to expanding suburban communities southwest of Raleigh. Within southern and southeastern Wake County, there are limited alternatives for efficient local and long distance travel. For residents in rapidly growing areas of southern and southeastern Walce County and northern Johnston County, alternative routes for travel to many of the region's major employment centers consist of unlimited access primary and secondary roads with lower posted speed limits and traffic signals. Mucb of I-40, the major corridor for interregional traffic across the area, currently operates at unacceptable levels of service (LOS), and LOS on this and other major routes across the area is forecast to worsen significantly. The proposed project would be a new location controlled-access toll facility. Final Community Characteristics Report 2 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 — May 2, 2011 3 PRO�ECT SETTING 3.1 GEOGRAPHIC AND POLITICAL DESCRIPTION As shown in Figure 1, the proposed project study area is located in southeastern Wake County and northern Johnston County. Portions of eight incorporated municipalities—Apex, Holly Springs, Cary, Fuquay-Varina, Garner, Raleigh, Knightdale and Clayton—and numerous unincorporated communities are located within the study area. As shown in Figure 2, the project study area consists of the following general boundaries: NC 55 to the west, the existing I-540 interchange at US 64/LTS 264 Bypass to the east, NC 42 to the south, and the southern outskirts of Raleigh and Cary to the north. Most of the project study area lies within the Neuse River basin, with a small portion of the southwestern corner of the study area in the Cape Fear basin. The Neuse River runs roughly north to south through Wake and Johnston counties, extending across the eastern edge of the study area. Several other important streams within the Neuse basin extend across the study area. Swift Creek traverses the study area from the southern outskirts of Cary, southeast to near the intersection of NC 42 and the Clayton Bypass (US 70 Bypass). Two large lakes are part of the Swift Creek subbasin, Lake Wheeler and Lake Benson; both of these lakes supply drinking water to the area. White Oak Creek, a tributary of Swift Creek, traverses the study area from north to south, east of I-40. Middle Creek extends across the southwest corner of the study area and includes Sunset Lake near Holly Springs. Swift Creek and Middle Creek within the project study area are included on the North Carolina 303(d) list, which identifies impaired waters as required under section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act of 1972 (NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/mtu/assessment). None of the waterbodies in the project study area are classified as High Quality Waters or Outstanding Resource Waters. Wake and Johnston counties lie at the eastern point of the area known as the "Triangle" region of North Carolina. The City of Durham/Durham County and the Town of Chapel Hill/Orange County form the Triangle's other two points. The Research Triangle Park (RTP), one of the oldest and largest science parks in North America, lies at the center of the Triangle and is the area's major economic engine. RTP is a 7,000 acre development housing more than 170 companies and employing over 42,000 full-time and 10,000 contract employees (Research Triangle Park website: http: //www. rtp. org/about-rtp 3.2 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION Parts of seven of Wake County's thirteen incorporated municipalities are located within the project study area: Apex, Holly Springs, Cary, Fuquay-Varina, Garner, Raleigh, and Knightdale. Clayton, an incorporated municipality in Johnston County, is also located in the project study area. These municipalities are each distinct communities that contain neighborhoods of varying characteristics. Local plans and regulations for each jurisdiction are described in Section 5.7. General descriptions of each, developed through interviews with local staff in conjunction with local plans and websites are as follows: Wake Countv – Wake County is the largest county in the Research Triangle region of North Carolina and is the ninth fastest growing county in the United States (US Census, 2008). It is currently the Final Community Characteristics Report 3 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 second most populous county in North Carolina and based on current growth trends is set to overtake Mecklenburg County as the most populous in 2012. The two largest cities in Wake County are Raleigh, North Carolina's capital, and Cary, and there are numerous smaller towns and rural communities throughout the County. The County and many of its communities consistently rank high in national surveys of livability and economic growth. Wake County's economy is influenced by State government, numerous universities, and by its proximity to Research Triangle Park (RTP), the Country's largest industrial park (Wake County Economic Development website: http://www.raleigh-wake.org/page/research parks). Important industries in the County include electrical, medical and telecommunications equipment, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and information technology. Wake County is noted for its extensive system of public parlcs and greenways and their high level of connectivity. County residents value these resources highly and the County has plans for development of new park and greenway resources. Sensitive natural resources, including Lake Wheeler, Lake Benson and the Swift Creek watershed, a Water Supply Watershed, are also an important feature of the County's landscape; protecting these resources is a key component of the County's vision for the future. Raleigh — Raleigh is the largest city in Wake County, the capital of North Carolina, and is the eighth fastest growing city in the United States (US Census, 2008). The City was chosen as the Siaie's capital in 1788 and State government has historically been one of the foundations of Raleigh's economic life. The City is home to numerous universities and colleges including North Carolina State University, Shaw University, Meredith College, Peace College, and St. Augustine's College. With a large percentage of the local economy devoted to government and education, the City has typically weathered broader economic downturns better than many other communities (Raleigh Economic Developinent website: http://www.raleigh4u.com/page/industry-base). Close proximity to RTP and several major research universities ensures that high technology industries, including information technology, biotechnology, and nanotechnology, are well represented in the local economy. According to the Raleigh 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Raleigh leaders are interested in promoting neighborhood quality, environmental sustainability, and strong downtown development. Development of local infrastructure should support these themes, enabling the City to address local growth in a way that maintains the area's strong livability (City of Raleigh, 2009). Carv — Cary is the second largest city in Wake County, the third largest city in the Research Triangle region of North Carolina, and the fifth fastest growing city in the United States (US Census, 2000). The Town of Cary is noted for its high median household income and far the large proportion of adult residents who hold a college degree. Cary is home to SAS Institute, the largest privately-held software company in the world and the Town's largest employer, and many other high-technology businesses (Cary Economic Development website: http://www.caryeconomicdevelopment.com/business_life.htm�. In addition, due to its close proximity to RTP, many workers at RTP companies make their homes in Cary. Cary is also noted for its low crime rate, its ethnically diverse population, including a large proportion of foreign-born residents, its livability, and its progressive approach to conserving natural resources and preserving open space (Town of Cary website: http://www.townofcary.org/New_to_Cary/ About Cary 272.htm). The Town has many public parlcs and well-used greenway and bicycle trails. The Town's aesthetic qualities are important in town planning and development. Final Community Characteristics Report 4 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 ApCX — The Town of Apex, at the western edge of the project study area in Wake County, is one of North Carolina's fastest growing small towns. Between 1990 and 2000, the Town experienced an over 300 percent increase in its population (US Census, 2000), and it is projected to continue its rapid growth. The Town was incorporated in 1873 and was originally named "Apex" because it was the highest point on the Chatham Railroad line between Richmond, Virginia, and Jacksonville, Florida (North Carolina History Project website: http://www.northcarolinahistory.org/encyclopedia/11/entry). Apex was one of the first towns in Wake County to develop and by the late 1800s it evolved into an important local trading and retail center. The Town values its small-town character, its historic downtown, and its livability and it seeks to maintain these characteristics as it experiences future growth (Town of Apex website: http://www.apexnc.org/around apex/facts.cfm). The Town is also interested in expanding its local jobs base as a large proportion of its residents commute to jobs in RTP, Cary, and Raleigh. Garner — The Town of Garner is a growing community south of Raleigh in Wake County, located near the intersection of US 70 and I-40. While Garner has not grown as rapidly as some of the other Wake County municipalities, it has begun to experience population growth in recent years as local residents take advantage of the Town's lower housing prices and plentiful stock of newer housing. Manufacturing has traditionally been a more important industry in Garner than in other nearby towns, although the town's manufacturing sector continues to decline, paralleling wider state and national trends. The older, central area of Garner is one of the few parts of the project study area to contain very high concentrations of minority and low-income residents. Holly Springs — Holly Springs, until recently a small rural community in southwestern Wake County, has experienced explosive population growth over the last fifteen years as residential development spreads south into the town from Apex and Cary. It is currently the fastest growing town in North Carolina (US Census, 2008). The Town welcomes new growth, particularly to expand its local job base, although the community also seeks to control the quality and location of new development while preserving open space and creating public areas (Town of Holly Springs website: http://www.hollyspringsnc.us/about/history.htm.) In late 2007, international pharmaceutical company Novartis broke ground on a vaccine production facility in Holly Springs along NC 55 Bypass. When completed, the facility is expected to employ 350 workers and generate more than $150 million annually for the Town's economy (http://www.hollyspringsnc.us/news/2007/novgroundbreak.htm). Fuquay-Varina — Fuquay-Varina is a small town in southern Wake County that has begun to experience rapid suburban growth due to its proximity to the region's employment centers and its lower housing prices and small-town character. It was traditionally an agricultural center in the area's tobacco trade, but continues to develop a more suburban residential character. The Town initially developed as two separate communities, Fuquay Springs, incorporated in 1909, and Varina, a community that developed around a local train depot. Fuquay Springs annexed Varina in 1963 and the two communities became one (Fuquay-Varina Economic Development Commission website: http://www.fvedc.com/54.htm�. The Town seeks to preserve its historic past and its small-town feel while accommodating new growth. Kni�htdale — Knightdale is a small Wake County community east of Raleigh which has been experiencing rapid population growth as new residential subdivisions are developed in the cominunity, often providing lower-cost housing opportunities for area residents. The opening of US 64/US 264 Bypass and I-540 have made Knightdale easily accessible from all parts of the Research Triangle Region (Knightdale Chamber of Commerce website: http://www.knightdalechamber.com/ Final Community Characteristics Report 5 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 about knightdale.htm). Knightdale seeks to promote growth and economic development while maintaining its small-town character. Johnston County — Johnston County lies southeast of Wake County. It is largely a rural county with a significant agricultural sector. Its location along I-95 midway between New York and Flarida helps to promote commercial, transportation and travel-oriented development in parts of the County (Johnston County website: http:// http://www.co johnston.nc.us/mainpage.cfm?category_level_id=295 &content id=320). In areas near the Wake County border, residential, commercial and industrial growth is strongly influenced by the area's proximity to Raleigh and RTP. Johnston County is North Carolina's fastest growing County (US Census, 2008). Clayton — Clayton is a rapidly growing small community in northern Johnston County, near the Wake County barder. The Town's growth is stimulated by its proximity to Raleigh and Research Triangle region, its lower housing costs, and its proximiry to I-40 and US 70, two important regional transportation corridors. It is Johnston County's fastest growing municipality (US Census, 2008). In addition to widespread residential development, the Clayton area has also experienced commercial and industrial growth. It has become an important part of the region's high-technology industrial economy, with several major biopharmaceutical companies, including Talecris, Hospira, and Novo Nordisk, locating in the area. More than ten percent of the State's biopharmaceutical jobs are in Clayton (Town of Clayton website: http://www.townofclaytonnc.org/Business/EconDev.aspx). Clayton prizes its small-town character, livability, affordability, and its good schools. The community encourages fuiure developinent that is consistent with these characteristics. Final Community Characteristics Report 6 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 4 COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS METHODOLOGY An appropriate Demographic Study Area was defined in order to describe the affected environment. Following the identification of the Deinographic Study Area, a co�nmunity characteristics profile is developed to describe the basic population and characteristics of the area. Demographic information from the US Census, North Carolina Employment Security Commission (ESC), and other resources were combined to provide a general overview of the community characteristics of Wake and Johnston Counties and the municipalities in the project study area. Demographic characteristics such as age, race, and median income are quantitative and easily measured and compared and are displayed throughout in tables and figures. Qualitative information gathered through field visits and one-on-one interviews also is discussed. This information will be used as a basis to determine potential community issues in areas surrounding the project, and to reach conclusions about what effects the proposed project would have on the community during the subsequent community impact assessment phase. 4.1 DATA/INFORMATION SOURCES Information on population and demographic characteristics was gathered from US Census data, in- person interviews, and project site visits. A complete list of documents referenced for this report is included in Section 6. The following data sources provided useful information in understanding existing conditions and likely trends: • 1990 and 2000 US Census data (downloaded from American FactFinder web site, http://fac�nder.Census.gov, and NC State Data Center, http://www.sdc.state.nc.us). • Employment Security Commission of North Carolina data (downloaded from web site, http: //www. ncesc. com). • Interviews with county and municipal staff in February 2010 (see Appendix A and B). • Field Visits in October, November, and December 2009. • ADC Map Book for Walce County. Since considerable growth and development has occurred in the study area since the 2000 decennial Census, and because the Census data are not reliable in identifying "clusters" of special populations (i.e. environmental justice) and/ar communities that have a common characteristic or interest (i.e. religion, ethnicity, income, eic.), local staff, elected officials, and community representatives were interviewed to help uncover information not identifiable through the Census data. These interviews also uncovered information about plans for the area and how the project might influence these plans. Recent socioeconoinic data provided by the Wake County Public School System (WCPSS) were also used to identify clusters of special populations and to confirm current demographic trends. Final Community Characteristics Report 7 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 4.2 COMMUNITY STUDY AREAS Consistent with the NCDOT method for CIA, a demographic study area was defined to provide a framework for assessing existing baseline conditions. The Demographic Study Area consists of sixty- one Census Block Groups in Wake County and eight Block Groups in Johnston County (see Table 1 and Figure 3). This broad area was established to identify and analyze population growth, household, and other demographic characteristics. This infonnation will be used as a foundation for determining potential project-related impacts to the human environment. Figure 3 shows the Demographic Study Area. The Demographic Study Area includes blocic groups wholly or partially within the project study area. Since this project is regional in scale, a broad, inclusive Demographic Study Area was selected to describe the baseline conditions of the community, neighborhoods, and resources present in the area. The Demographic Study Area encompasses block groups within incorporated Apex, Holly Springs, Cary, Fuquay-Varina, Garner, Raleigh, Knightdale, and Clayton, as well as unincorporated Wake and Johnston counties. The general Demographic Study Area boundaries are roughly: the western edge of the Town of Holly Springs in the west, US 1/US 64 in the northwest, I-40/I-440 in the north, US 64/US 264 Business in the northeast, the Town of Clayton in the southeast, the Town of Fuquay-Varina in the southwest. The densely developed areas in central parts of Cary and Raleigh were not included within the DA boundary. Travel patterns and development in these areas would be less influenced than areas in southern Wake County by the presence of a new location east-west road south of I-40/I-440 because of their proximity to I-40/I-�40, which is the primary existing east-west travel corridor through the Raleigh area. The Direct Community Impact Area (DCIA) is the area surrounding a project that is likely to be directly affected in any way during, throughout and after project construction. Detailed Study Alternatives (DSAs) have not yet been identified for this project. For the purposes of this report, the DCIA is the same as the project study area boundary (see Figure 1), because DSAs could be established anywhere within this boundary. Once DSAs are identified, the DCIA boundary will be modified according to the specific locations of the DSAs. This will be documented in the Community Impact Assessment Report, to be prepared following selection of project DSAs. Final Community Characteristics Report 8 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Table 1. Southeast Extension Demographic Study Area Census Block Groups 2000 Census Block As Shown Census Block As Shown on Tract Group on Figure 3 Tract Group Figure 3 Wake 522.02 1 0522021 531.03 2 0531032 528.01 1 0528011 531.03 3 0531033 528.01 2 0528012 531.03 4 0531034 528.01 3 0528013 531.04 4 0531044 528.01 4 0528014 531.04 5 0531045 528.02 1 0528021 532 1 0532001 528.02 2 0528022 532 2 0532002 528.02 3 0528023 532 3 0532003 528.02 4 0528024 532 4 0532004 528.03 1 0528031 532 5 0532005 528.03 2 0528032 534.04 1 0534041 528.03 3 0528033 534.04 2 0534042 528.03 4 0528034 534.05 1 0534051 528.04 1 0528041 541.02 1 0541021 528.04 2 0528042 541.02 2 0541022 528.04 3 0528043 541.05 1 0541051 528.04 4 0528044 541.06 1 0541061 528.05 1 0528051 541.06 2 0541062 528.05 2 0528052 541.07 1 0541071 528.05 3 0528053 541.07 2 0541072 528.05 4 0528054 541.08 1 0541081 529 1 0529001 541.08 2 0541082 529 2 0529002 541.09 1 0541091 529 3 0529003 541.09 2 0541092 529 4 0529004 544.01 1 0544011 530.01 1 0530011 544.02 3 0544023 530.01 2 0530012 530.02 1 0530021 Johnston County 530.02 2 0530022 402 4 0402004 530.02 3 0530023 410 1 0410001 530.02 4 0530024 410 2 0410002 530.02 5 0530025 410 3 0410003 531.01 1 0530011 410 4 0410004 531.01 2 0530012 410 5 0410005 531.01 3 0530013 411 1 0411001 531.03 1 0530031 411 3 0411003 Source: US Census (2000) Final Community Characteristics Report 9 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 - May 5, 2011 5 COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS Land use in the Demographic Study Area is of mixed intensity and density; although low-density residential subdivision and rural land uses are the most prevalent characteristics of the area (see Figure 4). Low-density residential uses include both single-family subdivisions and mobile home parks. Interspersed with these land uses are numerous churches, schools, daycare centers, and other similar types of development. Much of the Demographic Study Area was, until recently, characterized by agricultural and rural residential land uses. Many of the communities in the Demographic Study Area have become increasingly popular locations for suburban development as people commuting to jobs in Research Triangle Park, Raleigh, and other employment centers in the Research Triangle region seek affordable housing, open space, and the quality of life offered by southern Wake County and Johnston County. The western part of the Demographic Study Area includes significant commercial, industrial, and office development along NC 55 and NC 55 Bypass. There are also commercial shopping centers along Holly Springs Road and Kildaire Farm Road. The Holly Springs/Apex/Cary area includes numerous large planned residential subdivisions with homes on lots smaller than one-third acre. There are a few multi-family residential developments in this part of the study area, generally along Kildaire Farm Road and West Lake Road. Downtown Holly Springs features uses such as small offices, government buildings, and small retail stores. The southwestern corner of the Demographic Study Area includes the Fuquay-Varina area. This community's downtown areas also feature retail stores, restaurants, small offices, churches, schools and government buildings. South and west of Fuquay-Varina, land uses become very rural, with numerous farms along with rural, large-lot residences and farm-oriented commercial uses. Areas north and northwest of Fuquay-Varina are characterized by a mix of rural and agricultural uses, horse farms and stables, and newer residential subdivisions. Areas along and near US 401, which connects Fuquay-Varina to Garner and Raleigh to the north, include a higher concentration of industrial uses including automotive businesses, light manufacturing facilities and warehouses along with commercial uses, restaurants, bars, and small offices. East of US 401, much of the Demographic Study Area becomes increasingly rural. South of Lake Benson, there are low-density residential subdivisions and numerous farms and farm-oriented businesses. North of Lake Benson, the central area of Garner is characterized by older, more urban residential development, numerous multi-family residential developments, and significant commercial development. West and south of central Garner, newer single-family residential developments continue to develop. The US 70 corridor between Garner and Clayton features regional shopping centers along with numerous industrial developments, including manufacturing and research and development facilities. Industrial and regional commercial development also characterizes the areas surrounding I-40 east of Garner. East of I-40 and US 70, southern Wake County is highly rural, with widespread agricultural development and related rural land uses. Suburban residential development is starting to spread into this portion of the Demographic Study Area, although this type of development is not as common as in the western part of the Demographic Study Area. At the northeastern edge of the Demographic Study Area, land uses again include more commercial and industrial developments, particularly near the US 64/US 264 Bypass and along US 64 Business in Knightdale. Final Community Characteristics Report 10 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 The portion of northern Johnston County within the Demographic Study Area is also characterized by a mix of agricultural, rural residential, and newer suburban residential development. The area surrounding the NC 42 interchange on I-40 includes highway-oriented commercial development, with numerous motels, restaurants, gas stations, convenience stores and other retail uses. The new Johnston Medical Center is located on NC 42 east of the US 70 Bypass (Clayton Bypass) interchange. Central Clayton features a mix of small-town urban land uses and older residential neighborhoods. US 70 Business through this part of Johnston County features commercial shopping centers, industrial parks, and office uses. 5.1 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The following sections provide an overview of the Demographic Study Area demographic characteristics. Comparisons are made to the state, county, and town (where available) demographic data to uncover notable trends and to draw general conclusions about the area. 5.i.1 Population Trends Table 2 and Figure 5 present a summary of the population changes in the region and in the Demographic Study Area between 1990 and 2000. A detailed version of this table, including data at the block group level, is in Appendix C. Some block group boundaries changed between 1990 and 2000, and were combined in order to compare across consistent geographic areas. The Demographic Study Area, along with both Wake and Johnston counties and many of the municipalities in the study area, experienced much greater population growth between 1990 and 2000 than North Carolina as a whole. The Demographic Study Area population nearly doubled during the decade to just over 200,000 and each county's population expanded by nearly 50 percent. The populations of all of the municipaliries in the study area increased over this time period, with the fastest growth in Holly Springs (over 900 percent), Apex, (over 300 percent) and Knightdale (over 200 percent). All three of these municipalities had fairly small populations in ] 990, and over the next ten years experienced significant new suburban development and annexations increasing their incorporated areas. The slowest growth was in Garner, although its growth (18.6 percent) was nearly as fast as the State's growth (21.4 percent). Population in all parts of the study area has continued to increase much faster than the State as a whole from 2000 to 2007; both counties grew by approximately 30 percent, compared to the State's 12.6 percent growth (data not shown). Block Groups with the Hi�hest and Lowest Growth Rates. Nearly all of the Block Groups within the DA experienced population growth from 1990 to 2000, with only six Block Groups experiencing population declines. All of the Block Groups with declining populations are in older, more urban parts of the DA, including downtown Garner and south Raleigh. Land use change (e.g., conversion of residential properties to commercial properties) played a role in these declines. Ten Block Groups grew ai least twice as fast as the Demographic Study Area. The fastest growing Block Groups are in areas transitioning from rural and agricultural uses into suburban residential uses. Census Tract 534.05 Block Group 1 in Wake County, in the southern Cary/southeastern Apex area, had the largest growth rate (546 percent). Other high-growth areas were near NC 55 in Holly Springs, southern Garner, and southwestern Clayton. General Trends. Most of the high-growth block groups in the Demographic Study Area are at its periphery, particularly in the Apex and Holly Springs area and in southwestern Clayton. The southern outskirts of Garner have also experienced high growth in recent years. Older urban areas in the Final Community Characteristics Report 11 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Demographic Study Area, including central Garner and south Raleigh, have experienced slow growth or population declines. The areas along US 401 have also experienced slow growth. Table 2. Population Change - 1990 and 2000 Population Growth Jurisdiction 1990 2000 Actual Percent Difference Chan e North Carolina 6,628,637 8,046,500 1,417,863 21.4% Wake County 423,380 627,850 204,470 48.3% Ralei h 207,951 276,093 68,142 32.8°/a Car 43,858 94,536 50,678 115.6% Apex 4,968 20,212 15,244 306.8% Garner 14,967 17,757 2,790 18.6% Holly Springs 908 9,192 8,284 912.3% Fuquay-Varina 4,562 7,898 3,336 73.1% Kni htdale 1,884 5,958 4,074 216.2% Johnston Count 81,306 121,995 40,689 50.0% Clayton 4,756 6,973 2,217 46.6% Total Demographic Study Area 112,723 200,057 87,334 77.5% Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov) Summary File 1(100-Percent Data), Table P1 - TOTAL POPULATION (2000); Table P001. - PERSONS (1990). Figure 3 shows the Census boundaries. 5.1,2 Race/Ethnicity Table 3 provides a summary of the major racial and ethnic groups in the region and the project Demographic Study Area in 2000. A detailed version of this table, including data at the block group level, is in Appendix C. Whites, blacks, and Hispanics are the three largest racial/ethnic groups within the study area. Wake and Johnston counties have similar proportions of these three racial/ethnic groups and these proportions are similar to those for the State as a whole. Wake County is about 75 percent white, 19 percent black, and 3 percent Asian, and about 5 percent Hispanic/Latino. Johnston County is about 83 percent white, 16 percent black, and less than 1 percent Asian, and about 8 percent Hispanic/Latino. The racial/ethnic makeup of the Demographic Study Area is fairly similar to those of Wake and Johnston counties. The Demographic Study Area is about 78 percent white, 18 percent black, and 2 percent Asian and about 5 percent Hispanic/Latino. Block_groups with Substantially Higher than Average Populations of Racial Minority Groups. Figure 6 shows the total percentages of minority populations for block groups in the Demographic Study Area. About 26 percent of the individuals in the Demographic Study Area are members of minority groups, compared to 30 percent in Wake County and 25 percent in Johnston County. Most of the block groups in the Demographic Study Area have similar or smaller minority populations than the Demographic Study Area as a whole. Seven block groups have greater than 50 percent minority populations. Most of these are in central Garner or southeast Raleigh, along the north central boundary of the Demographic Study Area. All of these areas also have significantly greater concentrations of black populations than the Demographic Study Area as a whole. Census Tract 528.05 Block Group 2, in central Garner, has the highest concentration of minority population (97.3 percent) and black population (95.6 percent) in the Demographic Study Area. Census Tract 528.04 Blocic Groups 3 and 4, in southeast Raleigh, have the next highest concentrations Final Community Characteristics Report 12 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 - May 5, 2011 of minority population (82.9 perceni and 79.9 percent, respectively) and black populaiion (79.7 percent and 7l .1 percent, respectively). Figure 7 shows the total percentages of inembers of Hispanic/Latino ethnic groups of any race for block groups in the Demographic Study Area. The highest concentration of Hispanic/Latino population occurs in Census Tract 528.01 Block Group 4(35.9 percent), in central Garner, near the northern boundary of the study area. Other block groups with higher concentrations of Hispanic/Latino population are Census Tract 531.03 Block Group 2(15.5 percent), along the east side of US 401 near Wake Technical Community College, and Census Tract 410 Block Group 5(153 percent), in southwestern Clayton. Two block groups feature significantly higher concentrations of Asian population than the Demographic Study Area. These block groups are Census Tract 530.01 Block Group 2(7.7 percent) and Census Tract 534.05 Block Group 1(5.8 percent), both in southern Cary. However, both of these percentages are lower than the percentage of Asian population in the Town of Cary, so neither represents an unusually high concentration of Asians compared to other nearby parts of Cary. In addition, there are no defined Asian cultural centers in this area. Table 3. Population by Race and Ethnicity (2000) American Native Total Black or Indian or Hawaiian Hispanic Total Jurisdiction population White African Alaskan Asian or Pacific or Latino Minority # American Native Islander Population North Carolina 8,046,500 6,028,935 1,722,553 96,592 112,690 3,983 378,318 2,400,260 (74.9%) (21.4%) (1.3%) (1.4%) (0.1%) (4.7%) (29.8%) Wake County 627 850 473,399 122,431 1,884 21,347 244 33,904 188,912 ' 75.4% 19.5% <0.1 % 3.4% <0.1 % 5.4% 30.1 % Ralei h 276,093 185,534 75,926 828 9,387 118 19,326 109,413 g (67.2%) (27.5%) (0.3%) (3.4%) (<0.1 %) (7.0%) (39.6%) 79,316 5,767 189 7,657 28 4,065 19,555 Cary 94,526 g3.9% 6.1% 0.2% 8.1% <0.1% 4.3% 20.7% p 17,503 1,516 40 869 12 9,689 2,145 A ex 20,212 g6.6% 7.5% 0.2% 4.3% <0.1 % 3.2% 30.8% Garner 17,757 12,465 4,777 71 195 4 835 2,563 (70.2%) (26.9%) (0.4%) (1.1 %) (<0.1 %) (4.7%) (32.5%) Holly Springs 9 192 ��243 1,700 37 110 1 276 2,199 ' 78.8% 18.5% 0.3% 1.2% <0.1 % 3.0% 24.6% Fuquay-Varina 7 ggg 5,821 1,919 14 39 0 584 2,563 ' 73.7% 24.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 7.4% 32.5% Knightdale 5,958 4,188 1,591 �18 89 0 2 22 0 1,93 8 70.3 /o) 26.7 /0 0.3 /0 1.5 /o) <0.1 /0 3.7 /0 32.6 /o Johnston 121955 101,368 19,031 368 366 43 9,934 30,140 Count ' 83.1% 15.6% 0.3% 0.3% <0.1% 7.7% 24.7% Clayton 6,973 5,453 1,388 14 55 1 704 2,145 (78.2%) 19.9%) (0.2%) (0.8%) (<0.1 %) (10.1 %) 30.8%) Total 156,733 37,096 675 3,160 49 9,689 52,491 Demographic 200,057 ��g.3%) (18.5%) (0.3%) (1.6%) (<0.1%) (4.8%) (26.2%) Stud Area *Hispanic or Latino of any race(s). #Total population minus the tota� non-Hispanic white population (data not shown). Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov) Summary File 1 Total Population (100-Percent Data), Table P7. - RACE; Table P8. - HISPANIC OR LATINO BY RACE; Summary File 3 Total Population (100-Perent Data), Table P7. - HISPANIC OR LATINO BY RACE. Final Community Characteristics Report 13 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 - May 5, 2011 The highest concentrations of white population occur in Census Tract 530.01 Block Group 1 and Census Tract 530.02 Block Group 3(94.5 percent and 93 percent, respectively), along the northern boundary of the Demographic Study Area between Cary and Garner, and Census Tract 410 Block Groups 1 and 3(94.4 percent and 92.9 percent, respectively), in Johnston County along the boundary with Wake County. General Trends. Minority populations make up a larger proportion of the block groups along the northeastern and northern edge of the Demographic Study Area, with other areas of high minority concentration in Fuquay-Varina. Hispanic populations are concentrated in Garner, Clayton, and in the Knightdale area and near US 401 between Garner and Fuquay-Varina. 5.1.3 Age As shown in Table 4, the inedian age for the State is 353 years. In both Wake County (32.9 years) and Johnston County (34.2 years), the median ages are slightly lower than for the State. The median age of the population in the Demographic Study Area is 33.9 years. A detailed version of this table, including data at the block group level, is in Appendix C. Median ages for the block groups within the Demographic Study Area range between 29.5 years (Census Tract 528.01 Block Group 4), which is not notably younger than the Demographic Study Area median, and 49.3 years (Census Tract 528.05 Block Group 2), which is notably older than the Demographic Study Area median. Five block groups, most in the eastern part of the study area, have median ages over 40 years. As also shown in Table 4, approximately 25 to 30 percent of the populations of most of the jurisdictions in the Demographic Study Area consist of people aged 18 or younger. All of the jurisdictions except Fuquay-Varina have a smaller percentage of population older than 64 years than does North Carolina (12 percent). All of the block groups in the Demographic Study Area have relatively similar percentages of young residents, but there is a greater variety of proportions of older residents. The three block groups with the highest percentages of older residents are Census Tract 528.05 Block Group 2(32.7 percent) and Census Tract 528.01 Block Group 3(24.5 percent), in central Garner, and Census Tract 410 Block Group 1(25.2 percent) in downtown Clayton. Table 4. Population by Age Group and Median Age (2000) Area Total Population Percent <_18 Percent Median Age Years >_65 Years North Carolina 8,049,313 24.4 12.0 35.3 Wake Count 627,846 25.1 7.4 32.9 Raleigh 276,093 20.9 8.3 30.9 Cary 94,536 29.1 5.4 33.7 Apex 20,212 30.8 4.0 31.2 Garner 17,757 25.0 10.9 35.8 Holly Springs 9,192 31.3 2.8 30.7 Fuquay-Varina 7,898 27.3 13.0 32.6 Kni htdale 5,958 31.3 2.8 30.7 Johnston Count 121,965 26.1 9.8 34.2 Cla ton 6,973 26.8 10.0 32.6 Total Demographic 200,057 28.4 6.4 33.9 Study Area Source: US c;ensus 13ureau (zooU) (American I-actl-inder web sfte: nttp://tacttinder.census.gov) Summary File 1 Total Population (100-Percent Data), Table P12. - SEX BY AGE; Table P13. - MEDIAN AGE. Final Community Characteristics Report 14 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 - May 5, 2011 General Trends. There do not appear to be any general areas where the population composition has higher than average senior or youth populations. As described above, there are no block groups in the Demographic Study Area with notably higher concentrations of younger residents; block groups with higher than average percentages of older residents are scattered throughout the Demographic Study Area. 5.1,4 Income Data on median household incomes within the region are shown in Table 5. A detailed version of this table, including data at the block group level, is in Appendix C. As shown in the table, the median family incomes for Wake County ($54,988), Johnston County ($40,872), and all of the municipalities in the Demographic Study Area are higher than the State ($39,184). Many of the municipalities have median household incomes with substantially higher incomes than the State. Cary ($75,122), ApeX ($71,052), and Holly Springs ($69,550) all have median incomes almost twice the State's median. Fuquay-Varina ($42,903) and Garner ($47,380) have the lowest median incomes of the study area municipalities. The project Demographic Study Area has a median household income ($58,884) that is higher than either the Wake or Johnston County medians. Block Groups with Median Incomes Substantially Hi�her or Lower than the Avera�e. There are nine block groups in the Demographic Study Area with lower median incomes than the State. Most of these are in central Garner or in southeast Raleigh. Census Tract 528.01 Block Group 4 has the lowest median income ($25,817) in the study area. Five block groups in the Demographic Study Area have median incomes higher than any of the Demographic Study Area municipalities. Most of these are in the northwestern part of the Demographic Study Area. Census Tract 530.01 Block Group 2, in southern Cary, has the area's highest median income ($101,348). There are numerous high-end residential subdivisions in this block group, with little multifamily housing. General Trends. The lowest reported median incomes are generally located in block groups concentrated in the north central and northeastern part of the study area, in Garner, southeast Raleigh, and Knightdale. Central areas of Clayton and Fuquay-Varina are also characterized by lower median household incomes than the Demographic Study Area as a whole. Many of these areas also feature higher than average concentrations of minority residents. Median incomes tend to be much higher than the Demographic Study Area as a whole in the northwestern and western edges of the study area, in southern Cary, Apex, and Holly Springs. Table 5. Median Household Income (1999)* Median Median Jurisdiction Total Household Jurisdiction Total Household Households Income in Households Income in 1999 ($) 1999 ($) North Carolina 3,133,282 39,184 Holly Springs 3,235 69,550 Wake Count 242,133 54,988 Fuqua -Varina 3,130 42,903 Raleigh 112,727 46,612 Knightdale 2,195 56,021 Ca 34,297 75,122 Johnston County 46,700 40,872 Apex 7,386 71,052 Cla ton 2,806 44,750 Garner 6 933 47 380 Total Demographic 73 536 58 884 ' ' Stud Area ' ' Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFfnder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov). Summary Ffle 3(Sample Data), Table P53. — MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999 DOLLARS Final Community Characteristics Report 15 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 5.1.5 Environmenta/ Justice Considerations Federal laws and regulations require the evaluation of effects of transportation actions on minority and low-income populations, which in the past have been underserved in the decision-making process. The need to identify low-income and minority populations and incorporate their input in the project's decision-making process gained greater emphasis as a result of Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-income Populations (February 11, 1994). This Order directs all Federal agencies to determine whether a proposed action would have a disproportionately high and adverse impact on minority and/or low-income populations. In April 1997, the US Departmeni of Transportation (USDOT) issued the tISDOT Order on Environmental Justice to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (DOT Order 5610.2) to summarize and expand upon the requirements of Executive Order 12898 on environmental justice (EJ). The Order generally describes the process for incorporating environmental justice principles into all USDOT existing programs, policies, and activities that are undertaken, funded, or approved by the FHWA, the FTA, or other USDOT entities. The three fundamenial environmental justice principles are: 1) To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority and low-income populations. 2) To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process. 3) To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefts by minority and low-income populations. The USDOT Order 5610.2 defines "minority" in the definition section of its appendix and provides definitions of four minority groups addressed by Executive Order 12898. These groups are: 1) Black — a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. 2) Hispanic — a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South America, or other Spanish culture or origin re�ardless of race. 3) Asian — a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands. 4) American Indian and Alaskan Native — a person having origins in any of the original people of North America and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment. It also defines `low-income' as a person (of any race) whose household income (or in the case of a community or group, whose median household income) is at or below the US Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines. These guidelines set poverty thresholds for families which vary according to the size of the family and the ages of its members. If a fainily's income fa11s below the poverty threshold for a family of its size and age characteristics, it is considered by the Census to have poverty status. Final Community Characteristics Report 16 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Minority Populations. As discussed in Section 5.1.2, whiies, blacks, and Hispanics are ihe three largest racial/ethnic groups within the study area. There also are two block groups, Census Tract 530.01 Block Group 2 and Census Tract 534.05 Block Group 1, both in southern Cary, with higher Asian populations than the area's average (7.7 percent and 5.8 percent, respectively, compared to 1.6 percent across the Demographic Study Area. Figures 6 and 7 show the general concentrations of minority and Hispanic/Latino populations. Figure 8 shows the locations of block groups with either greater than 50 percent minority individuals or at least 10 percent more minority individuals than the County averages. This infarmation is also shown in Table 3. The black population in the Demographic Study Area is highly concentrated along the northeastern and northern edges of the study area, in central Garner, southeast Raleigh, and Knightdale. Hispanic populations are clustered in various parts of the Demographic Study Area, including in Garner, southeast Raleigh/Knightdale, along US 401, and in centra] Clayton. Interviews with local representatives revealed that the Census data are consistent with current locations of potential environmental justice populations. Low-income Populations. Low-income blocic groups were determined based on a review of the Census 2000 poverty status data set. As shown in Table 6, 5.6 percent of the population in the Demographic Study Area lives below the poverty level, substantially less than for North Carolina and Johnston County as a whole, and slightly less than for Wake County. A detailed version of this table, including data at the block group level, is in Appendix C. T and Figure 9 show that there are some block groups that contain higher concentraiions of low-income populations. Five block groups have larger percentages of low-income populations than the State average of 12.3 percent. The highest percentages are in Census Tract 528.01 Block Group 4(20.8 percent), in central Garner, and Census Tract 530.02 Block Group 2(20.1 percent), in south Raleigh near Tryon Road. These are the only two block groups with percentages of individuals below the poverty level is at least 10 percentage points higher than the county as a whole (Wake County for each). There are no block groups in the study area with 50 percent or more individuals below the poverty level. Interviews with municipal staff, field visits to areas within these block groups, and review of Walce County Public School System's more recent data on percentages of school children eligible for free and reduced lunch confirmed that the Census data indicate current locations of potential environmental justice populations. In general, higher levels of poverty occur in the north central and northeastern parts of the Demographic Study Area, with additional higher poverty areas near Clayton and Fuquay-Varina. Households within the Demographic Study Area tend to have higher incomes than the Wake and Johnston county averages, with the lowest levels of poverty in the Demographic Study Area concentrated in its western and southern parts. Final Community Characteristics Report 17 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Table 6. Poverty Status Total Percent of Population for Individuals with Individuals Below Jurisdiction Whom Poverty Income in 1999 Status is Below Poverty Level Poverty Level in Determined 1999 North Carolina 7,805,328 960,055 12.3 Wake Count 609,489 47,540 7.8 Raleigh 260,314 29,936 11.5 Ca 93,948 3,194 3.4 Apex 20,057 381 1.9 Garner 17,388 1,182 6.8 Holl Springs 9,155 439 4.8 Fuqua -Varina 7,714 7,714 11.1 Kni htdale 5,901 5,901 4.7 Johnston County 120,182 15,383 12.8 Clayton 6,828 778 11.4 Total Demographic 198,533 11,118 5.6 Stud Area Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov). Summary File 3(Sample Data), - Table P87. POVERTY STATUS IN 1999 BY AGE 5.1,6 Means of Transportation The 2000 US Census data set on means of transportation to work was used to determine the percentages of workers in Demographic Study Area block groups who traveled to work using different transportation modes. Higher percentages of workers traveling via carpools, public transportation, or other alternative modes, particularly outside of dense urban areas, can be an indicator for low-income and disadvantaged populations. Table 7 shows the results of this analysis. A detailed version of this table, including data at the block group level, is in Appendix C. Table 7. Means of Transportation to Work Percent Who Percent Who Percent Who Percent JurisdiCtion Drove Alone Carpooled Took Public Walking/Biking/Other Transportation North Carolina 79.4 14.0 0.9 5.7 Wake Count 81.1 11.2 1.2 3.9 Raleigh 78.7 11.5 2.4 7.4 Cary 84.2 8.9 0.3 6.6 Apex 87.5 7.4 0.3 4.8 Garner 82.0 12.0 0.8 5.2 Holl Sprin s 84.1 10.3 4.8 5.4 Fuquay-Varina 80.1 14.6 11.1 5.2 Kni htdale 82.0 13.1 4.7 4.7 Johnston Count 79.9 15.8 0.4 3.9 Cla ton 85.9 10.7 0.2 3.2 Total Demographic 82.9 12.1 0.2 3.5 Study Area Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov). Summary File 3(Sample Data), - Table P30. MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK FOR WORKERS 16 YEARS AND OVER There is relatively little variation in the proportions of Demographic Study Area block groups and jurisdictions using various transportation modes. About 83 percent of workers across the Final Community Characteristics Report 18 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 - May 5, 2011 Demographic Study Area traveled to work by driving alone, about 12 percent by carpooling, 0.2 percent by public transportation and about 4 percent via other modes. Most of the Demographic Study Area block groups displayed similar proportions of travel modes. Two notable exceptions were Census Tract 528.01 Block Group 4, where about 30 percent of workers carpooled, 7 percent used public transportation, and only about 60 percent drove alone; and Census Tract 528.05 Block Group 2, where about 44 percent carpooled and only about 56 percent drove alone. Both of these block groups are in central Garner along the north central boundary of the study area. 5.1.7 Limited Eng/ish Proficiency Executive Order 13166 "Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Profciency" requires all recipients of federal funds to provide meaningful access to persons who are limited in their English proficiency (LEP). The US Department of Justice defines LEP individuals as those "who do not speak English as their primary language and who have a limited ability to read, write, speak, ar understand English" (67 FR 41459). Data about LEP populations was gathered in the 2000 Census. The 2000 Census Language Spoken at Home data set was used to determine if there were block groups within the project Demographic Study Area containing a high percentage of individuals with limited English proficiency. Figure 10 shows the percentage of adults who speak English less than very well for the block groups in the Demographic Study Area. Table 8 shows the percentages of adults (18 years of age or older) who speak English less than "Very Well" by language category. Appendix D lists the percentages of adults who speak English less than very well in all block groups and jurisdictions in the Demographic Study Area. A review of Wake County Public School Systein's more recent data on percentages of school children with limited English proficiency show that areas around Knightdale, at the northeastern boundary of the study area, have growing concentrations of these children. Table 8. Percenta e of Adults Who Speak En lish Less than Ver Well Total Adult Primary Language Group of Adults Who Speak English Population Less than Very Well for Whom LEP Language Other Indo- Total LEP Data is Spanish European Asian/Pacific Other Available Total 4,441 660 693 251 6,045 Demographic 143,037 �3.1%) (0.5%) (0.5%) (0.2%) (4.0%) Study Area Johnston $9�957 4,678 180 93 87 5,038 Count 5.2%) 0.2% 0.1 % 0.1 % 5.6°/a Wake County 470,609 17,4�12 3,765 5,1�77 1,40 2 27,766 3.7 /0 0.8 /0 1.1 /0 0.3 /0 5.9 /o Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov), Summary Ffle 3 (Sample data — universe of population for whom status was determined), Table PCT10 — AGE BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME FOR THE POPULATION 5 YEARS AND OVER; Table P19 — AGE BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME BY ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH FOR THE POPULATION 5 YEARS AND OVER The DSA data indicate the presence of a Spanish language group that exceeds the Department of Justice's Safe Harbor threshold of 5% or 1,000 persons. In accordance with the Safe Harbor provisions, written translations of vital documents will be provided for the LEP language group in addition to other ineasures assuring meaningful access. These other measures include notice of Right of Language Access for future meetings for this project. According to Executive Order 13166, federal and state agencies are directed to "take reasonable steps to ensure "meaningful" access to information and services." In arder to meet this requirement, NCTA will take steps to translate vital documents Final Community Characteristics Report 19 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 into Spanish and to notify the public of their right to language access in regards to siudy materials, public outreach, and other components of the project. Thus, the requirements of Executive Ordex 13166 appear to be satisfied. 5.2 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS A review of Census data shows that much of the project Demographic Study Area consists of newer housing, built since 1990. Much of the housing in the western part of the study area in particular was built after 2000. Older housing is mainly clustered in the central areas of Garner, Fuquay-Varina and Clayton. While the recent recession has stemmed the rapid pace of residential development in the Demographic Study Area, it is expected that the pace of development will resume as the region's economy begins to improve. Table 9 provides a summary of the housing ownership and value characteristics of the Demographic Study Area. A detailed version of this table, including data at the block group level, is in Appendix C. The percentage of renter-occupied housing units is about 34 percent in Wake County, 27 percent in Johnston County, and 31 percent statewide. Raleigh has a much higher percentage of renter-occupied housing units (48.4 percent) than other jurisdictions in the area, owing partly to the large number of university students living in the city. About 19 percent of the housing units in the Demographic Study Area are renter-occupied, a smaller percentage than in the wider region. As shown in Table 9, there is a smaller percentage of vacant residential units in all study area jurisdictions as compared to the State's ll percent average. As shown in Table 9, the median value of owner-occupied housing units for the State in 1999 was $95,800. The median value of owner-occupied housing units for Wake County ($156,200) is inuch higher than the State and for Johnston County ($97,100) is slightly higher. All of the study area municipalities have higher median owner-occupied housing values than the State, with the highest median value in Cary ($193,000) and the lowest in Clayton ($103,700). Block Groups with Highest and Lowest Percent of Renter-Occupied Units. The block groups with the highest percent of renter-occupied units are located in central Garner: Census Tract 528.01 Block Group 4(87.4 percent), Census Tract 528.03 Block Group 4(73.4 percent), and Census Tract 528.02 Block Group 2(58.9 percent). These block groups also feature high concentrations of low- income and minority populations. The block groups with the lowest percent of renter-occupied are scattered across the western half of the Demographic Study Area: Census Tract 528.01 Blocic Group 1 (3.4 percent) in rural southwestern Garner, near Lake Benson; Census Tract 532 Block Group 5, in eastern Holly Springs; and Census Tract 530.01 Block Group 1, in southern Cary. Block Groups with Highest and Lowest Percent of Vacant Units. There is relatively little variation across the Demographic Study Area in the percent of vacant units in each block group. Census Tract 531.03 Block Group 2, near Wake Technical Community College, has the highest percentage of vacant units (25.3 percent). Census Tract 528.01 Block Group 1, in rural southwestern Garner, near Lake Benson, has the lowest perceniage of vacant units (1.6 percent). Block Groups with the Highest and Lowest Median Aome Values. Nearly all the block groups in the Demographic Study Area have median home values that are near or well above $100,000. Census Tract 528.05 Block Group 2, in central Garner, and 541.09 Block Group 2, in rural southeastern Wake County, have the lowest median home values ($65,700 and $66,400, respectively). Three block groups Final Community Characteristics Report 20 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 in southern Cary, Census Tract 534.05 Block Group 1 and Census Tract 530.01 Block Groups 1 and 2, have median home values above $200,000, the highest in the Demographic Study Area. General Trends. While the Demographic Study Area features a relatively high median home value and relatively low percentages of renter-occupied and vacant units, there is some variation across the area. The western and southern parts of the Demographic Study Area tend to feature higher median home values and lower percentages of renter-occupied and vacant units. The reverse is true for the areas in central Garner and southeast Raleigh. i aaie a. nousin �naracierisiics Renter- Median value Jurisdiction occupied Vacant Housing owner-occupied housing units Units (percent) units ($) percent North Carolina 30.6 11.1 95,800 Wake Count 34.1 6.5 156,200 Raleigh 48.4 6.7 54,529 Cary 27.2 5.3 193,000 Apex 23.9 7.9 177,400 Garner 30.9 4.2 119,200 Holl S rin s 14.3 9.0 160,800 Fuquay-Varina 38.4 7.5 116,300 Knightdale 25.7 7.7 132,600 Johnston Count 26.6 7.2 97,100 Cla ton 35.3 7.9 103,700 Total Demographic 18.9 6.8 143,135 Study Area source: us census t3ureau (2UOU) (American ractrinder web site: nttp://tacttinder.census.gov). Summary File 3(Sample Data), Table H7. — TENURE; Table H76. — MEDIAN VALUE (DOLLARS) FOR SPECIFIED OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS. 5.3 BUSINESS AND EMPLOYMENT CHARACTERISTICS Home to North Carolina's capital and numerous universities, and adjacent to Research Triangle Park, Wake County has a robust and diversified economy featuring many of the State's largest employers. State government has always been the foundation of the area's job base, but biotechnology, information technology, higher education, and health care are also important and growing components of the area's industrial mix. Table 10, which compares unemployment rates over time for Wake and Johnston counties and the Raleigh-Cary Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to State unemployment rates, illustrates that the Demographic Study Area maintains a stronger job base than the State as a whole. Unemployment rates in all areas have risen due to the current economic recession, but began to decrease in March 2010. Unemployment rates are consistently lower in Wake County and the Raleigh-Cary MSA than in Johnston County or the State. Final Community Characteristics Report 21 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Table 10. U Area ent Rates 1999 Annual 2009 Annual December 2010 North Carolina 3.3% 10.8% Wake Count 1.4% 8.4°/o Johnston Count 2.0% 10.1 % Raleigh-Cary MSA 1.6% 8.8% Source: North Carolina Employment Security Commission. Notes: Year 2009 most recent year in which annual data available. 9.7% 7.5% 8.8% 7.8% Table 11 lists the proportions of total employment in various supersectors or domains for industries in North Carolina, Wake and Johnston counties, and the Raleigh-Cary MSA. These proportions are shown for 1999 and 2009 to illustrate employment trends in each of these areas. The Wake County and Raleigh-Cary MSA employment distributions each display some key differences relative to North Carolina's distribution. In both 1999 and 2009, Wake County and the Raleigh-Cary MSA had a greater concentration of jobs in service-providing industries and a lower concentration of jobs in goods-producing industries than the State. This result was largely due to the much lower concentration of manufacturing jobs in Wake County and the Raleigh-Cary MSA relative to the State. The concentration of service-providing jobs, however, was slightly greater in Johnston County than for the State in both 1999 and 20089. This was largely due to the greater concentration of jobs in natural resources, which includes agricultural jobs, and in construction than the State averages. Johnston County continues to have a much greater concentration of employment in goods-producing industries than Wake County and the Raleigh-Cary MSA as a whole. Within the service-providing domain, Wake County and the Raleigh-Cary MSA had greater concentrations of employment in professional/business and information industries and in public administration in both 1999 and 2009. Johnston County had a much ]ower concentration of jobs in professional/business industries than in Wake and the MSA; its concentration of jobs in this area was also lower than the State's in 1999 and 2009. Relative to Wake and the MSA, Johnston continues to have a greater concentration of jobs in trade/transportation/utilities and education/health industries and a lower concentration of jobs in information, financial, professional/business and public administration industries. The manufacturing sector continues to decline in both Wake and Johnston counties, although it still makes up a larger share of Johnston's employment distribution than Walce's. The education and health sectors make up a growing share of each county's job base. The distribution in other sectors has been fairly consistent between 1999 and 2009 in the two counties, although Johnston Counry has experienced a slight decline in its proportion of private sector jobs and an increase in its proportion of government jobs. Much of this shift is due to the continued loss of manufacturing jobs, reflecting a larger statewide and nationwide trend. Wake County's lower dependence on manufacturing jobs has helped make its economy somewhat more resilient than in other areas of the State. Final Community Characteristics Report 22 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Table 11. Annual Employment Distribution -1999/2009 (Percent) 1999 2009 Employment Industry North Wake Johnston Raleigh- North Wake Johnston Raleigh- Carolina County County Cary MSA Carolina County County Cary MSA Goods-Producing Domain Natural Resources/Mining 1.0 0.4 2.7 0.7 0.8 0.3 2.1 0.5 Construction 6.5 7.3 8.8 7.5 5.0 5.8 7.0 5.9 Manufacturing 22.3 7.4 21.4 8.9 11.7 4.8 152 5.9 Service-Providing Domain Trade/Transportation/Utilities 12.5 22.0 21.5 21.9 19.6 18.5 21.8 18.4 Information 2.3 3.8 1.2 3.6 1.9 3.8 0.8 3.4 Financial Activities 5.0 5.5 2.9 5.2 52 5.9 2.6 5.4 Professional/Business 12.4 17.9 7.3 16.8 12.3 18.1 7.7 18.7 Education and Health 19.8 15.2 17.1 15.6 24.2 19.8 24.0 19.8 Leisure and Hospitality 9.2 8.6 8.9 8.3 10.4 10.5 102 10.1 Other Services 2.8 3.1 2.3 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.4 2.9 Public Administration 6.0 8.5 5.6 8.4 6.2 9.1 5.9 8.7 Unclassified 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 02 0.3 Total Government Sector 15.5 17.5 16.9 17.6 17.9 17.6 17.6 18.0 Total Private Sector 84.5 82.5 83.1 82.4 82.1 82.4 82.4 82.0 Source: North Carolina Employment Security Commission. Notes: Employment numbers are Annual Average Employment for aggregate of aIl types by Super sector or pomafn. Year 2009 most recent year in which annual data available. Final Community Characteristics Report STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 - May 2, 2011 23 5.4 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 5.4,1 Educational Faci/ities Two major public school districts are located in the Demographic Study Area. Wake County Public Schools, the nation's eighteenth largest school district, educates nearly 140,000 students. Thirty-four of the district's 158 schools are located within the DCIA for the project: Holly Springs Elementary* Banks Road Elementary* Timber Drive Elementary* Holly Ridge Elementary Barwell Road Elementary* East Garner Elementary* Holly Ridge Middle Middle Creek Elementary* East Garner Middle Holly Grove Elementary* Middle Creek High Creech Road Elemeniary Holly Springs High West Lake Elementary* North Garner Middle* Herbert Akins Elementary�` West Lake Middle* Hodge Road Elementary* Ballentine Elementary* Vance Elementary* Lockhart Elementary* Fuquay-Varina Elementary Smith Elementary Forestville Road Elementary Fuquay-Varina Middle Garner High Knightdale Elementary* Fuquay-Varina High Vandora Springs Elementary Knightdale High Willow Springs Elementary* Aversboro Elementary Lincoln Hei hts Elementary Rand Road Elementary* *These schools operate on a year-round calendar. Many of these schools currently operate over capacity. A new middle school, Holly Grove, will open in the Holly Springs area by 2013. Property has been acquired for three new schools east of Garner, Bryan Road Elementary, Bryan Road Middle, and an as yet unamed high school, but construction has not yet been scheduled. Johnston County Schools, a rapidly-growing school system with forty-one schools educates approximately 30,000 students. Eight of the district's schools are located within the project Demographic Study Area: • Cleveland Elementary School • Riverwood Elementary School • West View Elementary School • West Clayton Elementary School • Clayton Middle School • Cleveland Middle School • Riverwood Middle School • Clayton High School Several private schools are located within the project DCIA. The New School Montessori Center, on Sunset Lake Road in Holly Springs, includes preschool through sixth grade. Hilltop Christian School, on US 401 in Fuquay-Varina, inclues Kindergarten through twelfth grade. Wake Christian Academy, west of US 401 near Garner, includes Kindergarten through twelfth grade. Academy of Hope, on Covered Bridge Road in Clayton is an alternative school for girls in grades eight through twelve. Dozens of private daycare centers and preschools are located throughout the DCIA. Draft Community Characteristics Report STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 2, 2011 24 The main campus of Wake Technical Community College is located on the east side of US 401, just south of Donnybrook Road. The Johnston Community College Cleveland Center, which offers continuing and adult education programs, is located on Cleveland Road in Clayton. The Clarksville Theological Seminary, on West Main Street in Clayton, offers degrees in theology and religious education. The locations of public and private schools and colleges in the DCIA are shown in Figure 11. 5.4.2 Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities Figure 10 shows the locations of local parks, recreation facilities, golf courses, and other community centers and facilities in the DCIA. 5.4.2.1 Public Parks and Recreation There are several public park and recreation facilities located in the DCIA. All have the potential to be subject to Section 4(� of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 USC 303). They are as follows: Clemmons Educational State Forest — This park and conservation site is located on Old US 70 on the Wake/Johnston county border, northwest of Clayton. It features self-guided trails, ranger-conducted tours and classes, and interpretive exhibits. Crowder District Park — Wake County operates this 33-acre park on Ten Ten Road in Apex. It features landscaped grounds and hardwood forests and its amenities include three playgrounds, three picnic shelters, a sand volleyball court, play field, restrooms, an outdoor amphitheater, and a 3-acre pond with a boardwalk and an observation deck (Wake County website: http://www.wakegov.com/ parks/default.htm). Historic Yates Mill Park — Wake County also operates this park and historic site, which offers cultural and environmental experiences that interpret and preserve Wake County's agricultural history. It features walking trails and tours of the historic Yates Mill. Yates Mill Park is located on Lake Wheeler Road south of Cary. Hemlock Bluffs Nature Preserve — The Town of Cary operates this park and nature preserve, which features three miles of walking trails, observation platforms, a nature center, and a unique stand of Eastern Hemlock trees (Town of Cary website: http://www.townofcary.org/Departments/ Parks Recreation Cultural Resources/Parks_and Greenways/Parks.htm). It is located on Kildaire Farm Road in southern Cary. Middle Creek Park — Operated by the Town of Cary, this park features lighted baseball/softball fields and tennis courts, basketball courts, a greenway trail and a community center. It is located near Middle Creek High School. Bass Lake Park and Retreat Center — The Town of Holly Springs operates this site, located on scenic Bass Lake. It includes an environmental education center, conference facilities, observation decks, and a hiking �rail (Town of Holly Springs website: http://www.hollyspringsnc.us/dept/park/parks.htm). Final Community Characteristics Report 25 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Parrish Womble Park – Holly Springs operates this 46-acre parlc, in the Ballentine neighborhood, which includes lighted ball fields, soccer fields, a volleyball court, and a playground. A picnic shelter and outdoor stage host cultural and musical events. W.E. Hunt Communit� Center and Gym – This recreation center on Stinson Avenue in Holly Springs offers fitness classes, arts & crafts classes, and after school programs. Lake Wheeler Park – Lake Wheeler Park is operated by the City of Raleigh along the north shore of Lake Wheeler near Penny Road. It features boat launches, boat rentals, a volleyball court, a conference center and walking trails. Lake Benson Park – Located on Buffaloe Road and operated by the Town of Garner, this park includes a walking trail, boat launches, boat rentals, and playgrounds (Town of Garner website: http: //www.garneYnc.gov/Departments/Parks%20and%20Recreation/Def'ault. aspx). White Deer Park – Garner operates this 96-acre park, on Aversboro Road in the southern part of the town. It features a nature center, two miles of paved trails, and other recreational facilities. It is the largest municipal park in Garner. Thompson Road Park – Garner operates this park, which provides two multipurpose recreational fields. It is located in central Garner. Centennial Park – This park, located on New Bethel Church Road in southern Garner, features soccer fields, a playground, and a walking trail. Garner Recreational Park – Located in the Garner historic district, this park features two ball fields, a playground and mountain bilcing trails. Clayton Municipal Park – The Town of Clayton operates this park, located on Stallings Street in northwestern Clayton. It features a tennis court, basketball court, playground, and other recreational amenities (Town of Clayton website: http://www.townofclaytonnc.org/Residents/ Recreation Facilities.aspx). Legend Park – Located in northern Clayton, this park features mountain biking trails, hiking trails, and ball fields. Clayton Communi . Park – This 42-acre park, operated by the Town of Clayton, is located on Amelia Church Road in souihern Clayton. It features six tennis courts, eight bocce courts, walking trails, and a community center. 5.4.2.2 Golf Courses There are numerous golf courses in the DCIA—many are part of residential subdivisions. Devils Ridge Golf Club is a private, 18-hole golf course in Holly Springs. Bentwinds Golf and Country Club is a private golf course and recreation facility in northern Fuquay-Varina. Crooked Creek Golf Club, also located in northern Fuquay-Varina, is a private 18-hole golf course. Riverwood Golf and Athletic Club operates two private golf courses in the DCIA: Riverwood Golf Club in northeastern Clayton and Eagle Ridge Golf Club southwest of Garner near US 401. Garner Golf Club is a 9-hole course in southern Garner. 401 Par Golf, on US 401 in south Raleigh, is a miniature golf course and driving range. Meadowbrook Golf Club is a public 9-hole golf course in southern Garner. Pine Ridge Golf Final Community Characteristics Report 26 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 – May 5, 2011 Club, locaied on Auburn-Knightdale Road souih of Knightdale, is a private, 18-hole golf course. Pine Hollow Golf Club is a private, 18-hole golf course near US 70 near the Wake/Johnston county line. 5.4.2.3 Community Centers and Libraries Libraries. There are five libraries in the Wake County public library system located in the DCIA. They are the Southeast Regional Library in central Garner, the East Regional Library in Knightdale, the Fuquay-Varina Public Library, the Holly Springs Branch Library, and the Olivia Raney Local History Library. The Hocutt-Ellington Memorial Library, in downtown Clayton, is also in the DCIA —it is part of the Johnston County public library system. Post Offices. Six post offices in Wake County are located in the DCIA. They are in downtown Holly Springs, downtown Fuquay-Varina, on Judd Parkway in Fuquay-Varina, near NC 42 in the Willow Spring area, on Timber Drive in Garner, and near US 64 Business and Smithfield Road in Knightdale. One post office in Clayton is located in the DCIA, near the intersection of NC 42 and Cleveland Road. Places of Worship. There are 87 places of worship within the DCIA in Wake County and 19 in Johnston County. Places of worship in the DCIA are as follows: Wake Count Abiding Presence Lutheran Church Good Samaritan Baptist Church New Providence Baptist Church Aversboro Baptist Church Hayes Chapel Christian Church Palmer Memorial FWB Church Bethlehem Baptist Church Highland Baptist Church Penny Rd. Church of the Nazarene Bibleway Holiness ChLuch of God Hilltop Free Will Baptist Church Pleasant Grove Baptist Church Capital Pentecostal Holiness Church Hollands United Methodist Church Pleasant Hill Church Cary Alliance Church Holly Springs Baptist Church Plymouth Church Catawba Springs Christian Churoh Holly Springs Church of Christ Poplar Springs Christian Church Christ Holiness Teinple Holly Springs Methodist Church Raleigh East Jehovah's WiYnesses Christ Temple of AposYolic Faith Iglesia AdvenYista Hispana Rand StreeY Church of Christ Chuch Alive iglesia Bautista Nueva Vida Saint Peter's Church Douglas Chapel Church Iglesia Bautista Vida Abundante Shotwell Baptist Church Ebenezer United Methodist Church Iglesia Del Dios Vivo Solid Rock Baptist Church Ernest Myatt Presbyterian ChLuch Iglesia Raveh Springfield Baptist Church Evangel Pentecostal Church Iglesia Santa Maria St. Amanda Baptist Church Fairview Baptist Church Imnlanual Apostolic Chwch St. Andrews Methodist Church Faith Alliance Church Jehovah's Witnesses Fuquay-Varina St. Anna Free Will Baptist Church Faith Bible Fellowship Juniper Level Baptist Chruch St. Volodymyr Ukranian Church Fellowship Baptist Church Lord of Life Lutheran Church Sunrise United Methodist Church Felton Grove Baptist Church McCullers Communiry Baptist Swift Creek Baptist Church First Baptist Church (Holly Springs) Middle Creek Primitive Baptist Triangle Baptist Church First Baptist Churoh (Garner) Midway Baptist Church Triangle Community Church First Church of the Nazarene Mount Moriah Baptist Church Turner Memorial Baptist Church First Presbyterian Church Mt. Herman Christian Church Vandora Springs Free Will Church Fuquay Varina Church of Christ NC Buddhist Vihara Victory Fellowship Church Garner Advent Christian Church New Bethel Baptist Church Village Church at Holly Springs Garner Church of Christ New Covenant Life Baptist Church Wake Baptist Grove Church Garner Church of God New Hope Presbyterian Church Wake Chapel Christian Church Garner Free Will Baptist Church New Life Community Church Wentworth Bible Church Garner United Methodist Church New Life Wesleyan Church Woodhaven Baptist Church Johnston Count Amelia United Church of Christ Great Ebenezer Holiness Church Showers of Blessing Church Christ Community Methodist Church Holy Cross Lutheran Church Southside Community Church Church at Clayton Crossing Life Commtmiry Church Tippett's Chapel Free Will Community Baptist Church Mt. Pleasant Advent Church Way of Life Baptist Church Crossroads Church New Beginnings Church Wellspring Community Church Fellowship Baptist Church New Generation Fellowship Good Samaritan Church NC United Pentecostal Church Final Community Characteristics Report 27 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Community Centers. There are six community centers in the DCIA. Tl�e Holly Springs Cultural Center, near downtown Holly Springs, hosts arts and entertainment events and has public meeting space. The Middle Creek Community Center, operated by the Town of Cary near Middle Creek High School, has classroom space and a gymnasium and hosts dance, arts, and wellness classes. It also features public meeting space. The Fuquay-Varina Community Center, south of downtown Fuquay- Varina, hosts educational and other community prograins and features public meeting space. The Sanderford Road Neighborhood Center, operated by the City of Raleigh in southeast Raleigh, features educational programs and ittness classes, as well as public meeting space; as a recreational facility, it is a potential Section 4(� resource. The Barwell Road Community Center, another potential Section 4( fl resource also operated by the City of Raleigh in southeast Raleigh, features a broad range of youth and adult educational programs. Town of Garner Senior Center, another potential Section 4(� resource is a multi-purpose facility serving as a focal point for local programs and activities for older adults. It also features public meeting space. Medical Centers and Hospitals. There are three medical centers in the DCIA. Johnston Medical Center — Clayton on NC 42 east of I-40 is a new facility including emergency care, outpatient surgery and diagnostic and laboratory services. Southern Wake Hospital, in Fuquay-Varina, is part of the WakeMed system and provides skilled nursing services, rehabilitation, and outpatient care. WakeMed Clayton Medical Park, also part of the WakeMed system, is on US 70 north near Clayton. It provides outpatient care and rehabilitation services. WakeMed Cary Hospital, a large regional hospital providing general and acute care is located just north of the DCIA on Kildaire Fai7n Road in Cary. Historic Resources. Historic architectural resources also can be considered community facilities. These resources, which are subject to additional regulatory requirements, are identified in this report, but addressed in detail in other separate technical memoranda. Figure 12 shows locations of known historic architectural resources on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). It also shows potential historic sites which have been either previously identified as eligible for the NRHP or added to the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) State Study List for determination of eligibility. Several of the known historic resources in the DCIA are notable from a community character perspective. These include the following: • Panther Branch School (NRHP-listed) and Juniper Level District (Study List) — Both are located on Sauls Road in the central part of the DCIA. This area was the focal point of a rural African-American cominunity dating from the late nineteenth century. • Meadowbrook Country Club (NRHP-listed) — Located west of I-40 and south of White Oak Road, this country club was founded in 1959 by prominent African-American businessmen when other area country clubs were closed to African-Americans. It is an important part of local African-American history and its landscape is an important community feature of the area. Jones-Johnson-Ballentine Historic District (NRHP-listed) — Just north of central Fuquay- Varina, this rural historic district is a notable part of the character and landscape of the surrounding area. However, there has been significant residential development in this area in recent years. Williams Crossroads (Study List) — This rural community is located in the vicinity of Old Stage and Ten Ten Road. It is a notable part of the character and landscape of the surrounding area. Final Community Characteristics Report 28 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 A survey of historic architectural resources in the project study area will be completed as part of the Southeast Extension study. Police/Fire/EMS. Police stations in the region are located in the downtowns of Holly Springs, Fuquay-Varina and Clayton. There is also a North Carolina Highway Patrol Training Center north of downtown Garner. Fire staiions and emergency medical services (EMS) stations typically are co-located. There are several scattered throughout the DCIA, as shown on Figure 13. Stations within or near the limits of the DCIA are listed below: Apex Cary Apex Volunteer Fire Department — NC 55, south of US 1 Fairview Rural Fire Department — near the intersection of Ten Ten Road and Holly Springs Road. Cary Fire Department Station No. 6— Ten Ten Road, near Kildaire Farm Road Holly Springs . Holly Springs Fire Station No. 1— Holly Springs Road east of downtown Holly Springs • Holly Springs Fire Station No. 2— Avent Ferry Road southwest of downtown Holly Springs • Center Rural Fire Department — west of downtown Holly Springs Fuquay-Varina . Fuquay-Varina Fire Department Siation No. 1— downtown Fuquay-Varina . Fuquay-Varina Fire Department Station No. 2— Hilltop-Needmore Road Garner • Garner Fire Department — West Main Street in downtown Garner • Garner EMS and Rescue — Vandora Springs Road in downtown Garner • Garner Volunteer Department Incorporated Station — Timber Drive Raleigh Raleigh Fire Department Station No. 26 — Rock Quarry Road near Battle Bridge Road Knightdale . Eastern Wake Fire Rescue Department — Clifton Road south of US 64/US 264 Bypass Clayton Clayton Fire Department — downtown Clayton Clayton Emergency Services — downtown Clayton 5.4,3 Bicyc/e and Transit Routes Bicycle Routes. The Town of Cary maintains three existing multi-use trails in the DCIA, and has several other proposed multi-use trails and bicycle routes in the area (http://www.townofcary.org/Departments/Planning_Department/Projects Plans/Bicycle_Plan.htm). Mulii-use trails are designed for bicycle and pedestrian use. The three existing trails are the 1.3-mile Kildaire Farm Trail, along Kildaire Farm Road, the 0.62-mile Camp Branch Greenway, north of Ten Ten Road near Kildaire Farm Road, and the 0.5-mile Churchill Estates Greenway, south of Ten Ten Final Community Characteristics Report 29 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Road near Crowder District County Park. Roadways with striped bicycle lanes or wide curb lanes tend to be found in the more urban areas north of the study area. Based on the available information, the only roadway with designated bicycle lanes within the DCIA is located along Lochmere Drive within the Town of Cary limits. Within the DCIA, no roadways with wide curb lanes are specifically designated on state or local maps. In the eastern section of Raleigh, east of I-40, several roadways are identified as having planned bicycle lanes in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. A map showing the location of proposed and existing routes and trails is shown in Appendix E. There is one NCDOT bicycle route in the DCIA, the NC 5/ Cape Fear Run, which follows Kildaire Farm Road and south along Sunset Lake Road. In general, sidewalks within the DCIA are limited to more urbanized areas and in residential areas, with newer subdivisions generally having a comprehensive and well-maintained system of sidewalks. Most sidewalks in the DCIA are separated from moving traffic by a landscaped or grassed buffer and are generally found along both sides of the roadway. In general, bicycling and walking in the DCIA are for recreational purposes only. Generally low levels of bicycling and walking are observed except near trails and parks. Public Transit Routes. Maps of fixed public transit routes in the DCIA are shown in Appendix F. Within the project DA, Raleigh's Capital Area Transit (CAT) provides fixed route bus service between downtown and Wake Technical Community College along US 401 (Route 40e) and between downtown and Garner, with park and ride lots at two shopping centers along US 401 (Route 7). CAT also operates Accessible Raleigh Transportation (ART), which provides flexible para-transit services to disabled Raleigh residents (City of Raleigh website: http://www.raleighnc.gov/tNansit�. Triangle Transit (TTA) provides fixed route service connecting the major centers of the Research Triangle region and coordinates vanpools in the area (TTA website: http://triangletransit.org�. Two fixed TTA bus routes serve the project Demographic Study Area. Route 102 connects downtown Raleigh to Garner and serves a park and ride lot at the Forest Hills Shopping Center. Route 311 connects Apex to RTP, with park and ride lots at Galaxy Food near downtown Apex and Lake Pine Plaza. The Town of Cary's transit service, GTran, operates six fixed bus routes, including one in the project DCIA. Route 5 follows Kildaire Farm Road from Crescent Commons Shopping Center to downtown Cary (GTran website: http://www.townofcary.org/Departments/Planning Department/ Transportaiion/GTran.htm). GTran also operates door-to-door transit service for Cary residents who are at least 60 years old or disabled. 5.4.4 Voluntary Agricu/tural Districts Voluntary agricultural district (VAD) programs allow farmers to establish areas wbere commercial agriculture is encouraged and protected (North Carolina Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund website: http://ncadfp.org/vadprogram.htin). Authorized by the North Carolina General Assembly in the 1985 Farmland Preservation Enabling Act (61:106-738) and implemented at the county level, VADs form partnerships between farmers, county co�nmissioners and land use planners. Farm landowners receive a set of benefits in exchange for restricting development on their land for a specific time period. VADs raise public awareness in agricultural activity and help leaders plan future development that will support and encourage the continued Final Community Characteristics Report 30 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 viability of local agriculiure. Wake and Johnston Counties each have a VAD program. Each program has numerous participating farms. Figure l3 shows the locations of VAD farms in the DCIA. Neither county's VAD program includes a public hearing requirement. 5.5 NEIGHBORHOODS There are over 1,000 named residential subdivisions in the DCIA for the Southeast Extension, and numerous smaller, rural residential neighborhoods. Appendix F contains a list of the named neighborhoods, separated into general parts of the DCIA. The vast majority of these are single-family residential subdivisions, although there are also a number of mobile home parks. Due to the large number of subdivisions, a more detailed review of DCIA neighborhoods will be conducted for subdivisions in the vicinity of the project's Detailed Study Alternatives (DSAs) once the DSAs are identified in the spring of 2011. This review will be documented in the Community Impact Assessment Report, to be prepared following selection of project DSAs. 5.6 COMMUNITY COHESION Given the vast number of residential neighborhoods in the DCIA, there are also a very large number of cohesive communities. These cohesive communities include areas such as planned residential subdivisions, rural communities near crossroads areas, and communities with strong iies to local churches, etc. Once DSAs are identified for the project and the DCIA boundaries are revised accordingly, community cohesion will be examined in greater detail. 5.7 PLANS AND REGULATIONS The following sections include a cursory discussion of relevant planning documents and initiatives in the Southeast Extension study area. These plans will be further reviewed in the Indirect and Cumulative Effects Assessment being conducted under a separate study. Wake County. The Wake County Land Use Plan, last updated in March of 2004, establishes policies designed to influence the timing, type, location, and quality of future developmeni in Wake County's planning jurisdiction. These policies are intended to accommodate growth of urbanized areas within or adjoining the County consistent with the Plan's goals and strategies. The Plan includes several small area land use plans. Two of these plans cover areas within the Southeast Extension project study area. East Raleigh-Knightdale Area Land Use Plan identifies areas along a representative corridor for Phase II of the Southeast Extension with a Special Transportation Corridor designation. The Fuquay- Varina—Garner Area Land Use Plan identifies areas along the protected corridor for Phase I and a representative corridor for Phase II as a Special Highway Overlay District. The Wake County Land Use Plan also includes a special Land Management Plan for Swift Creek. The Land Management Plan identifies the Swift Creek basin's Watershed Critical Area and watershed buffer areas, within which development activities are limited, and appropriaie low-density land use categories for the surrounding areas. The Wake County Transporiation Plan (2003) identifies mobility needs in unincorporated parts of Wake County. It identifies the Southeast Extension ("Outer Loop") as a primary transportation need for the area, indicating that completion of the Outer Loop was a stated objective of the Citizen Advisory Group involved in Plan development. The Outer Loop is identified as a primary travel corridor for Wake County. Final Community Characteristics Report 31 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 Raleigh. The City of Raleigh adopted a new 2030 Comprehensive Plan in November of 2009. The Plan is the City's key policy document shaping all aspects of the community's physical development and influencing related economic and social issues. One of the goals of the Plan is to enhance land use and transportation coordination. The Southeast Extension is not specifically mentioned in the Plan, although the Plan does identify an objective of coordinating transportation planning and funding with neighboring jurisdictions and local transportation agencies so that sufficient right-of-way for future transportation corridors may be preserved. The project would be consistent with the Plan. Cary The Town of Cary Comprehensive Plan is a compilation of several separate plans and elements that together describe the Town's of�cial vision for Cary's future. The plan addresses issues including growth, land use, transportation, and housing. The Town of Cary Land Use Plan, adopted in 1996 and last amended in 2009, is the land use component of the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Plan presents the Town's official policy regarding the form and pattern of future development. One of its functions is to direct provision of public infrastructure. The Land Use Plan Map identifies the protected corridor for Phase I of the Southeast Extension as "Planned Outer Loop Right of Way." The Town's Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP), adopted in 2001 and last revised in 2007, identifies goals and recommendations for provision of transportation facilities in the Town. The CTP identifies the Triangle Expressway as a planned project, but does not specifically identify the Southeast Extension. Apex. The Town of Apex adopted its Colnprehensive Plan in 2004 with a goal of presenting a vision of the community's future to inform development decisions. The Plan includes a map illustrating proposed land uses in the Town in 2025. The map designates several activity centers—lcey areas to accommodate higher-density, mixed-use growth. One of the proposed activity centers is just north of the western terminus of the Southeast Extension at NC 55. Off"ice space in larger buildings is envisioned as a key element of this activity center. Some of the transportation-related goals of the Comprehensive Plan include "effcient traffic circulation" and "infrastructure that helps achieve land use and growth management objectives." Garner. Garner's Comprehensive Growth Plan (2006) is intended to provide a long-range vision for land development and redevelopment opportunities, community infrastructure decisions and coinmunity image. Water quality issues in the Lake Benson area are especially prominent. The Plan identifies several aciivity centers, where commercial, higher density residential, and mixed uses can be located. The area surrounding the intersection of US 401 and the protected corridor for Phase I of the Southeast Extension is identified as an activity center. The Garner Transportation Plan (1999) was developed to help guide local decisions on land use development and roadway improvemenis. This Plan designates both phases of the Southeast Extension ("Outer Loop") as a future freeway facility through the Garner area. The Transportation Plan states that failing to construct the Outer Loop will be detrimental to traffic congestion in Garner and that the facility "...will be critical to keeping through traff"ic from clogging roadways in Garner." Ho11Y Springs. Vision Holly Springs is the Town of Holly Springs Comprehensive Plan. It was last revised in 2008. The Plan seeks to establish and enhance a town-wide identity, encourage economic development, and promote livability. It establishes a future land use strategy, including a map of planned future land uses. The Plan identifies regional centers for mixed use development along major transportation routes through the town to ensure the best possible access while minimizing negative impacts on area residential development. One of these regional centers, surrounding the intersection Final Community Characteristics Report 32 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 – May 5, 2011 of Kildaire Farm Road and Holly Springs Road, is in the vicinity of the protected corridor for Phase I of the Southeast Extension. Vision Holly Springs includes a transportation element, which establishes a vision for the future transportation system in the town. The transportation element identifies the Southeast Extension ("Wake Freeway") as the largest and most significant planned road improvement that will impact the town. The plan identifies the Southeast Extension as a future freeway facility through the Holly Springs area. Knightdale — The Town of Knightdale 2027 Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 2003, is a direct response to the community's rapid growth, creating the building blocks for the Town's future development. It includes a section outlining the Town's vision for its future and sections addressing individual topics including land use and transportation. The transportation element of the 2027 Comprehensive Plan, titled the Transportation Master Plan, seeks to encourage the development of a transportation network that disperses traffic while connecting and integrating the Town's neighborhoods. I-540 is identified as an important regional roadway facility that will both provide access to all parts of the Research Triangle region and spur development in Knightdale; however, the Plan's discussion of I-540 focuses on the portion north of US 64/US 264 Bypass. The Southeast Extension project would be consistent with the Plan. Johnston County — The Johnston County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, adopted in March 2009, is organized around seven goals for County growth including managing growth and infrastructure, expanding economic opportunities, preserving farmland and rural character, and enhancing mobility. The Plan indicates that the County's growth patterns have typically been driven by the location of major transportation facilities and that the County will continue to support key roadway improvements. While proinoting future growth the County seeks to protect area farming operations both for community character and economic benefits. The Southeast Extension is shown as a planned transportation improvement in the Comprehensive Plan. The Swift Creek watershed area, east of Clayton, is shown as an Environmental Sensitive Zone. Clavton — The Town of Clayton adopted a Strategic Growth Plan in March 2008 to prepare for increasing population growth and its effects on transportation, open space, and other community features. The Plan addresses the incorporated town as well as its extraterritorial jurisdiction, which extends approximately two miles around the town limits. The Plan indicates that the fact that many Clayton residents commute to jobs in Raleigh and other surrounding areas contributes to local traffic congestion. The Plan includes a map designating proposed land uses within the town and its extraterritorial jurisdiction. The Southeast Extension is shown as a Proposed Freeway on this map. Parts of the project study area within Clayton are generally designated for moderately dense residential development, with areas along US 70 Business designated for commercial development. 5.8 POTENTIAL COMMUNITY IMPACTS DSAs have not yet been identified for the project. Once DSAs are identified and the DCIA boundaries are revised accordingly, potential coinmunity impacts will be examined in greater detail and with specificity. Large controlled-access, new location roadways such as several of the alternative concepts under consideration for the Southeast Extension typically have very significant community impacts. Residents and business owners may have to relocate if their properties are directly impacted by the selected alternative for the project. Neighborhoods can be bisected and the surrounding suburban and Final Community Characteristics Report 33 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 rural community character can become more urban. Areas near interchanges can become attractive locations for retail and other commercial land uses. Existing travel patterns and access patterns will likely change as some secondary roads are severed by the project. Emergency response times could change slightly due to changes in travel and access patterns. Final Community Characteristics Report 34 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 6 REFERENCES City of Raleigh. 2009. Raleigh 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Retrieved from http://www. raleighnc. gov/cp Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and Planning. 1996. Community Impact Assessment: A Quick Reference for Transportation. Johnston County. 2009. 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Retrieved from http://co.johnston.nc.us/mainpage.cfm?category_level_id=766 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 2008. North Carolina Integrated Report Categories 4 and 5(Impaired Waters List). Retrieved from http://portal.ncdenr. org/c/document_library/ North Carolina Department of Transportation. 2009. 2009-201 S State Ti^ansportation Improvement Progra�n. Retrieved from http://www.ncdot.org/planning/development/tip/tip/ North Carolina Department of Transportation. 2004. Guidance for Assessing Indirect and Cumulative Impacts of Ti^ansportation Projects in North Carolina. Town of Apex. 2004. Apex Comprehensive Plan. Retrieved from http://www. apex.nc. org/depts/plan/comp�lan. cfm Town of Cary. 1996, as amended. Town of Cary Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Plan. Retrieved from http://www.townofcary.org/Departments/Planning_Department/Projects_Plans/ Comprehensive_Plan.htm Town of Cary. 2007. Town of Cary Comp�ehensive Transportation Plan. Retrieved from http://www.townofcary. org/Departments/Planning_Department/Proj ects_Plans/ Comprehensive_Transpariaiion_Plan.htm Town of Clayton. 2008. Strategic Growth Plan. Retrieved from http://www.townofclaytonnc. org/Business/Planning_PlansOrdinances. aspx Town of Garner. 1999. Garner Transportation Plan — A Blueprint for FutuNe Travel. Town of Garner. 2006. Town of Garner Comprehensive Growth Plan. Retrieved from http://www. garnernc.gov/plan/plan_compplan.htm Town of Holly Springs. 2008. Vision Holly Springs. Retrieved from http://www.hollyspringsnc.us/dept/planning/policy/comp/index.htm Town of Knightdale. 2003. 2027 Comprehensive Plan. Retrieved from http://www.knightdalenc. gov/planning/compplan.html United States Bureau of the Census. 1990 Census. Final Community Characteristics Report 35 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 United States Bureau of the Census. 2000 Census. Wake County Government. 2003. Wake County Transportation Plan. Retrieved from http://www. wakegov. com/pl anning/transportplans/default.htm Wake County Planning. 2004. Wake County Land Use Plan. Retrieved from http://www. wakegov. com/planning/landuse/wake_county_lup.htm Final Community Characteristics Report 36 STIP Project Nos. R-2721, R-2728, and R-2729 — May 5, 2011 ;o� ►i Orange County `� ►i \ 15 64 15 e unty 15 Oxington-Fayette � �; �.. � � � � � � Virginia�E'acl �� m � � m � �r -- . ,. �► � ` � � ; �ID � m � m m �-' �' Rale h m� � � � n� � harlotte �• � �. � � �v � � . � ` � � � � � • . � � ` �' �' �.: °ii� � � � �' � OChapel II ,5, Carrboro 4 �►� I\ � ►I \I �5 „�,�d �:,�i 15 C O LB � k �' !;<' Chatham County Jordan Lake � ;5; ►i '' �4I \ I \� � ►i Research Triangle, ►i JWake ►� Count � ;; Apex Begin Project � (gh_p� . ernat �� Airpc ' . . � � � . . i i � i � . . . � . . � � � � ♦ ♦ ' _ _ �.. p 401 ,� \ 401 \, y� 1 \ �� ►i �� Morrisville \�� ,(� � ,�, �r `` ; r� 70 ,� 40� i nightdale /; � � O ary �� ►� ►� ►� �� oRaleltjh End Project � �o � _ /// ; �� , Holly Springs Searon Harris Reserv�ea'r a �` Fuqu T J �,� Ha rn�` �� County i Garner �� 0 \�� \% ��` Le3YS�i: Y3"G'�i�iA�'f � � Johnst Count Clayton 70 Fra klin ;;Co rnty 96 � bulon / 64 Wendell �,._ �3; \I . . . . . . . . � � I\ ` � � 64 �3; �8� \I ,��ash , County _ 264 �_ N W E S � � � � � � � � � Miles 0 3 6 Legend � Western Wake Freeway (Under Construction) � Direct Community Impact Area � NORTH CAROLINA � Turnpike Authority �_ Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension State Project No. 6.401078 8 6.401079 8 6.401080 S.T.I.P. No. R-2721 & R-2828 & R-2829 Figure 1 Project Setting � 1 cnarnam ' ,f Co✓nty � 64 � � � �� : „ I :� - � /_ARY � _ V Wake County � : 0532002 Shearon Harris Reser►'roi� �. �_� , � 0532001 " � --�.�_ Legend � Demographic Study Area � Census Block Group � DirectCommunitylmpactArea , 1 . 64 <, � APEX �� 0530012 0534051 -- 0530011 0534042 0534041 i � �� -- ��" i� 4HOLLY 2004 0532005 S`PR/NGS ; 0532003 Y� � ,� �:'� o5s�o�i ��°'� r�` 0531044 0531013 ' �; �°--�_ FUQUAY-V�4RINA� 0531012 � �� _:�� 4 .�.�- 4'`�,_ � 0531045 � � � 401 70 - � `� , � � � RALEIGH � �� 64 ��', `�' - - -_ , .,`'KNIGHTD�4iLE� �� 0541061 0541071 �� '' —BYP - - . y �' � � 64 .. ., . .. I � 264 0541072 054105 � 0541062; � , � _ - 05�28044 - _ _ �,. � �� 0521012 0525043 ��4 �� y 0541092 �� ,� 0530021 �522021 '<_ " � �� f� - 0528031-: 054 0530022 . ' � � 0525032 ii� 0528041 0528021 0528033 � r. �' GA RNER 0528022 0528034 `� 0528023 0528�0.1�4�054� ��` � � '� � � 0528042 ��" � 0528013 052�80052 � ,� � 0528024 0530023 0530025 0528012 A528053 � 70 0�528011 0410003 � 0530024 �s � �1��l� ��C#5�1� � 0528051 �, 0529001 � 0410002 ;' 0531031 2 401 ` , CL�1 "YTON ,,� �� '� 7 ,� 0410005 � � �-- BYP � 0529003 I 70 �I � 0�1t1;001 0531033 � 0529002 � � �� -- � �7 � ZEBULON � � WENDELL � WILSON'S MILLS BUS 70 \� �� \\\� � 401 N W E s � Miles 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 \I �� ANGIER , �_ ►i �i / � i �II � � � � �� - � �'�"i`-_�' ,� �� -�. �l �� __ -.� , � � � ;. cnarnam County � ►i �-- __ __ _; � �_ �- r � � 64 ;:: � � Legend � Direct Community Impact Area � Census Block Group Minority Population Percentage �] <2o°ro � 20.1 % - 40% � 40.1 % - 60% � 60.1 % - 80% i 80.1 % - 100% N W E s � '� Miles 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 J � , � � \',� RALEIGH � , 401 , , ,1� \I � ANGIER , �, .1 / � , `�`,,..1.�_"_–I i � — — _ \ , _ ; �, � . � � 1 , __ ,�� . ZEBULON ` \ -- -\- �� ,. WENDELL �� '' � WILSON'S MILLS Bus �o \ \� -- \\�� 401 N W E S � '� Miles 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 \I �� ANGIER , �_ ►i �i / � � - .�..�.�-=�C ;-� � - _ �'� _ ��, � �, :-� !� -- � � ; i� r` . , � -- Legend J ,� i-ao � wAD�Av� �� d � -; 54 J -� �_ � Demographic Study Area ; , � � � g 70 401 g 64 " � � `' � _ 64 � R ,�� / - D l . � �„_S�ti„#2S Direct Community Impact Area � � � � � `'� � � � � � � � � �-3 � 00 � g —�-�� o g _ t � � � KNIGH��D�LE _ �� • ''� '- _ � '�� wEsrERN� �i tI�ALE��Hg o ' '' - -� �.�,; ; � , � � � ��' � Place of Worship � � �� '� � � � ' � .�,�� I <l� �, � BYP ,•;, ttt Cemetery g ttt � '.\� u�?' � � 0 Bsa� � isa Educational Institution � � , � � ¢o � g g '��LE �p 264 �, g - g �� - � g - � Public Library � --,_ J��N TFERR � g � � i%� � �+/1 V � ,: � Police/Fire/EMS �+�`"iR r .. _, �� P� ttt�i g g �. � �� , o �� /� =-- � _ � �, �r � � — - � � - � Hospital - ' � ��: � , � �� -- �'' PO ,. � O 64 '� � � � p � � ,-' � � � � � r -� �� R� � _ , � � _� � �-�P � >, . � � � ��,� �� Park / Recreation Area !� I� � � Post Office I v `— �`� �' �� t ��T ��rfor�Ra� I � G� � ttt � � tt�� " %�y _ �q . , e'� ,. , � ; � � 'u 1 m � TC t �� ' _ � � � t _' ��` - 64 WakeMed Cary Hospitalrtt -��'I',Q� ; ttt � �. � � � �\ _-� J �. p tt t APEX - � , g t�t � ,� t _ �- 55 ,�c�,�,�; � � t�t � 4- , � ,� � � y � � _� \ R t t _��- (�,,_ . z, ;� � � � � � �� ,� F S� g � ii I � �CBa. .� Centerp �'`; 2� �� _, I � .�. _�_ � �� ; � V ttfi , _, �� -' T7- FB G '�C, � �' Nemia�k �� t , BA � � �� I��), F � � , ,g , � �. ,, �'� ' � � _ � o R,o � -' q �c � -�- � ru� ��w� ; � �v ��F� � ti �� - G �'o ; �' � ' �, ,'A � � P ��`D _ , ,� �` Q- � _ '�- , i - � a a ure s a �� , �g � � � -- . � � � � � � 8 �� ; � �arner Rec � � � � -y,p , - - _ � u,; ,�� i = ,,; ' , -, d StudY Are d � 70 � g t -�� , � ��%" � T'41°L OR ,�,'� �'0 v O n0 . � , � t t �a � � � � ' � t � �ake �`Vh�e�� yeriter�� ., ! �'� % 1 � ' � O . � tt _. �i n - , �' r �Lake Wheeler /1 �� A�C � � � � ' � � ' � � �Park� � � ,. _ � � � � - _ Crowde � o � / <J ' i� Vf�iRIYGR - - �� ' o � �� i� � � � � l � � � � �� District Park � � II � � , �- '� �� , I � � I�J. -- �. r �~ ��Ci L - _, � � � � � � � � '�� - „ Q" v � �'�� ' ` "' �� \ � '�� O� �m _ � � � II � �' �� P- � Clemmons -`O —��p� , ..i� � .p �--� � / � � i �:,_ �, �� j White Deer � -, �� Educationa(-'-� � � �� SR#1 � � � vmi � � T� �� v� � � � ; � � � Park� � � - � t�t � �� g �State Forest � p p�' n '- �� m ti N r �_ �� ' c � y, COV�R�� ttt � �- 55 0 ,. � RD � 401 � � ` ttt � ��, ,' �� ;� • ^ a � �� r � �� r� d P�� A� j� `'�` Middl,: � � t t Lake Be � � A� BUS - ICreek �: . � L � `� � t3 f . � � � �� t �, � � ens� � � ns�� _ � k � � � a m w ' tm tt �°t o � o a n' ' \ _ WakeMed C h'Le .��' HOLLY " __A �� . �, - �+ D� ,A� �+ , .p � � t � � Go,w ��,�r. �� layton� .� . k }iu� BYP I .7PEIT�/YGJ do '�,� jJ� : � ttt I__ � �Park tfi I� � ��,e ��G I ' Med�cjlPark� � y �, P � �Y �, �� t —I _ � _ A �� i u��. t -� t �_� , ° � � � ��,. � _, t t � N �^i � � -�' � � � I 7. 55 , a �- �, � t t � t t g �� Ra �� P ; �, � � �E. Hunf Communify �, ` '�� ttt � � � v � � � � � � t � �,� � �� Clayfo C mmunity �'��y�� t�,n cipal i ' ,C�Gtcpand�` r, �Lak� i� r' " � ,' �. ' kJy : � ■ z ;. , , G Y '� t t ` �� 0 Par � '� � � , -'r ��'� RO CL+AYTON� � � Par�ish_Womble � -'� � � �� Ryi � _—��Ba Park ke S R� � o � � �°, % � ,� % Park �' t � t �R tt gANK � �- ttt � �2 tt . � NTFp _ � % � - _r -, T �� -�/� ttt �� P E �� fi � I J � BYP � �- r7 `� � i': �� t , _ _. _ �� Joh ton Medicai Center ;��, � � �� - - � cn , ,/ - ' n , � �� . ;,, � � � _ _ � W.4DE � � - - _ � � , lVA � ��, -_ . SH` � �� , �_ � � J - � � _ v,� �1� /� � - � � , �Sc� ' �❑ '% � 'O � , _ - z , `. P ,:-�,, � �- �g � � z ; .� � a o , �-', -� G , � _ ' � � r i'j � ttt , � ttt-' � V�o I�. � � ttt ;� � � , Rp ��. ' 401 GK � J 5- � �� Q JA . � � � � �- �� p / i �' � � � #� � i�,� / � � ra�e�., �� °o,�it, #� � � � I `� ; g f��\�—,i� � � o � '�� Turnpike Auth�ority .� � i "t � � � � �- �� qr�a ,,p � � � ��s� N — lul A �_ d � ►�_ _ u � t 42 - - o y � d ti. � :�� G ttt o � ti� Triangle Expressway A 2� ' �� , Southeast Extension w e [:l �� th�rn Wake Fd s>. � I �� 0 1 0 �,, S FUQ UAY- V�4 f�l NA r� _� �� „a� State Project No. 6.401078 8 6.401079 8 6.401080 '9 � �'�� _ � `�'q��' � � � �fi� � ��F� s.r.�.a. No. R-z�z� a R-zszs a rz-zazs I i i i I � �� ' F 0 0.5 1 1.5 2Miles / . o. e Figure 11 Community Resources APPENDICES Appendix A Triangle Expressway — Southeast Extension Local Government Interviews Name/Title Re resentin Time Other Name/Title Januar 29, 2010 Gina Clapp, Planning Holly Springs 10:00 a.m. Heather Keefer, Elizabetll Goodson, and Stepl�anie Director Sudano (Town Engineering Dept.) Jenny Mizelle (Town Econ. Dev. Dept.) Dick Sears (Town Mayor) Kendra Parish (Town Planning Dept.) Len Bradley (Town Parks & Rec. Dept.) Februar 1,2010 Chris Hills, Planning Knightdale 4:00 p.m. Terry Gleason (Town Council) Director Russel1 Killen (Town Mayar) Fred Boone (Town Engineer) Seth Lawless and Jennifer Currin (Plannin = De t.) Februar 3, 2010 Berry Gray, Planning Johnston 2:30 p.in. Director Count Februar 10,2010 Dianne Khin, Planning Apex 3:00 p.m. Reed Hugerich (Transportation Planner) Director Russell Dalton (Transportation Engineer) Michael Dean (Planner) Februar 11, 2010 Brad Bass, Planning Garner 3:00 p.m. Director Februar 16,2010 Michael Sorenson, Fuquay-Varina 9:30 a.m. Andy Hedrick (Town Manager) Planning Director Februar 18,2010 Mitchell Silver, Raleigh l l:00 a.m. Eric Lamb (Public Works Manager) Planning Director Ken Bowers and Karen Duke (Planning Dept.) Julian Prosser (Asst. City Manager) Robert Hinson and Robert Massengill (Public Urilities Dept.) Victor Lesbock (Parks and Rec. Dept.) Februar 23,2010 Jeff Ulma, Planning Cary 2:00 p.in. Ricky Barker, Phillip Smith, and Wayne Nicholas Director (Planning Dept.) Kristen Dwiggins and Lori Cover (Engineering Dept.) Februar 25, 2010 Tim Gardiner, Long Wake County 9:00 a.m. Larry Morgan and Lynn Patrie (Planning Dept.) Range Transportation Ti�n Maloney (Interim PDI Director) Planner Mark Edmonson (Real Estate Pro'ect Mana er) Februar 26,2010 Skip Browder, Clayton 10:00 a.m. Plannin Director APPENDIX 6 Local Government Interview Questions Specific questions were tailored to the interview participant to encourage participants to share points of view. Example questions included: :� 0 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Are there any additional plans, policies, etc., that are relevant to our project? Ask for a summary of current development trends, patterns, etc. Are there any proposed majar development projects? Ask for a summary of the community/organization's vision. Does this project support local goals, objectives and policies? Is the project a specific component of any local plans (e.g., is it a part of an economic development plan). What are the current faciors influencing development in the community? What are the major employers in the community; do residents generally wark within the community or commute to jobs elsewhere? What (recent) past projects (development, transportation, etc.) have had a major impact on the community? What are the key elements of the community's history? What are the jurisdictions' annexation plans (where applicable)? What new schools are being planned or proposed? What are the pedestrian and bike needs/plans in the project study area? Is public transportation available in the area? How much is it used? Who uses it? What local transportation projects are planned? Whai is the status of those plans? What are the majar transportation routes through the area? What are the characteristics of traffic on those routes? What are the key truck/freight movement routes? Verify the locations of rail lines/facilities. Are there any cohesive Limited English Proficiency communities in the area? If so, could they recommend any community contacts? Verify demographic data we've collected; ask for any more current data available. Are there any seniar facilities in the area? What are the most important community landmarks? Community gathering places? What are the most significant community boundaries/barriers? Are there working agricultural operations, agricultural conservation districts, or agricultural preservation policies? Are there organized community groups who should be involved in the project? What are the general community feelings about the project? What are the area's key crime statistics, trends, etc. Are there any proposed recreation facilities? Are there any redevelopment plans in the area? What are the plans for future water/sewer service extension? What are the key considerations for EMS services? What input would the jurisdiction like to provide into the study process? What is the best way to maintain contact with the jurisdiction to receive regular updates on development projects, socioeconomic trends, etc. APPENDIX C Detailed Population Characteristics Tables Table 2. Population Change - 1990 and 2000 Population Growth Block Group or Jurisdiction 1990 2000 Actual Percent Difference Chan e North Carolina 6,628,637 8,046,500 1,417,863 21.4°/a Wake County 423,380 627,850 204,470 48.3°/a Raleigh 207,951 276,093 68,142 32.8°/a Car 43,858 94,536 50,678 115.6% Apex 4,968 20,212 15,244 306.8% Garner 14,967 17,757 2,790 18.6% Holly Sprin s 908 9,192 8,284 912.3% Fuquay-Varina 4,562 7,898 3,336 73.1°/a Kni htdale 1,884 5,958 4,074 216.2% 522.01 BG1 354 1,075 721 203.7% 528.01 BG6 1990 , 528.01 BG1 2000 354 1,075 721 203.7% 528.01 BG9 1990 , 528.01 BG2 2000 2,957 3,104 147 5.0% 528.01 BG5 1990), 528.01 BG3 2000 802 689 -113 -14.1 % 528.01 BG4 1990 , 528.01 BG4 2000 618 1,012 394 63.8% 528.02 BG8 1990 , 528.02 BG1 2000 1,365 1,486 121 8.9% 528.02 BG9 1990 , 528.02 BG2 2000 1,343 1,255 -88 -6.6% 528.02 BG7 1990 , 528.02 BG3 2000 1,562 1,647 85 5.4% 528.02 BG6 1990 , 528.02 BG4 2000 811 1,248 437 53.9% 528.03 BG5 1990 , 528.03 BG1 2000 605 582 -23 -3.8% 528.03 BG9 1990 , 528.03 BG2 2000 2,370 3,504 1,134 47.8% 528.03 BG3 655 859 204 31.1 % 528.03 BG4 358 466 108 30.2% 528.04 BG1 899 1,362 463 51.5% 528.04 BG2 1,569 1,910 341 21.7% 528.04 BG3 745 940 195 26.2% 528.04 BG4 1,238 2,974 1,736 140.2% 528.05 BG1 3,316 3,863 547 16.5% 528.05 BG2 130 113 -17 -13.1 % 528.05 BG3 532 2,992 2,460 462.4% 528.05 BG4 2,453 498 -1,955 -79.7% 529 BG1 1,602 2,173 571 35.6% 529 BG2 1,929 4,727 2,798 145.0% 529 BG3 1,873 3,653 1,780 95.0% 529 BG4 839 1,722 883 105.2% 530.01 BG1 2,823 4,907 2,084 73.8% 530.01 BG2 3,842 11,134 7,292 189.8% 530.02 BG1 3,330 4,473 1,143 34.3% 530.02 BG2 1,234 1,291 57 4.6% 530.02 BG3 1,010 1,043 33 3.3% 530.02 BG4 449 1,474 1,025 228.3% 530.02 BG5 1,448 1,597 149 10.3% 531.02 BG1 (1990 , 531.01 BG1 2000 738 1,718 980 132.8% 531.02 BG2 1990 , 531.01 BG2 2000 1,870 2,774 904 48.3% 531.02 BG3 1990 , 531.01 BG3 2000 1,332 2,159 827 62.1% 531.02 BG4 1990 , 531.03 BG1 2000 2,313 3,312 999 43.2% 531.02 BG5 (1990), 531.03 BG2 (2000) 1,729 2,578 849 49.1% 531.03 BG3 1,660 2,522 862 51.9% 531.04 BG4 2,384 3,531 1,147 48.1% 531.04 BG5 2,196 4,156 1,960 89.3% 532 BG1 1,049 1,818 769 73.3% 532 BG2 419 1,620 1,201 286.6% 532 BG3 1,620 4,515 2,895 178.7% 532 BG4 1,466 6,109 4,643 316.7% 532 BG5 1,672 3,031 1,359 81.3% Table 2. Population Change - 1990 and 2000 Population Growth Block Group or Jurisdiction 1990 2000 Actual Percent Difference Chan e 534.04 BG1 2,199 4,150 1,951 88.7% 534.04 BG2 4,609 10,018 5,409 117.4% 534.05 BG1 591 3,818 3,227 546.0% 541.02 BG1 3,283 7,609 4,326 131.8% 541.02 BG2 1,760 2,170 410 23.3% 541.01 BG9 1990 , 541.05 BG1 and 541.06 BG1 2000 4,132 10,099 5,967 144.5% 541.01 BG2 1990 , 541.06 BG2 2000 741 890 149 20.1 % 541.03 BG3 1990 , 541.07 BG1 2000 2,883 6,138 3,255 112.9% 541.03 BG4 1990 , 541.07 BG2 and 541.09 BG2 2000 3,500 3.983 483 20.1 % 541.03 BG1 1990 , 541.08 BG1 2000 753 761 8 1.1% 541.03 BG2 1990 , 541.08 BG2 2000 2,108 3,983 1,875 88.9% 544.03 BG1 1990), 541.09 BG1 (2000) 603 894 291 48.3% 544.01 BG1 1,988 2,499 511 25.7% 544.02 BG3 878 1,212 334 38.0% Johnston Count 81,306 121,995 40,689 50.0% Clayton 4,756 6,973 2,217 46.6% 402 BG4 1,661 4,669 3,008 181.1 % 410 BG1 931 862 -69 -7.4% 410 BG2 1,660 2,999 1,339 80.7% 410 BG3 1,327 2,451 1,124 84.7% 410 BG4 1,854 2,268 414 22.3% 410 BG5 1,593 2,954 1,361 85.4% 411 BG1 2,871 4,952 2,081 72.5% 411 BG3 3,018 9,691 6,673 221.1 % Total Demographic Study Area 112,723 200,057 87,334 77.5% Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFfnder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov) Summary File 1(100-Percent Data), Table P1 - TOTAL POPULATION (2000); Table P001. - PERSONS (1990). Figure 3 shows the Census boundaries. Table 3. Population by Race and Ethnicity (2000) American Native Block Group or Total Black or Indian or Hawaiian Hispanic Total Jurisdiction Population White African Alaskan Asian or Pacific or Latino Minority # American Native Islander Population North Carolina 8 046 500 6,028,935 1,722,553 96,592 112,690 3,983 378,318 2,400,260 ' ' 74.9% 21.4% 1.3% 1.4% 0.1 % 4.7% 29.8% Wake Count 627,850 473,399 122,431 1,884 21,347 244 33,904 188,912 y (75.4%) (19.5%) (<0.1 %) (3.4%) (<0.1 %) (5.4%) (30.1 %) Ralei h 276,093 185,534 75,926 828 9,387 118 19,326 109,413 g 67.2% 27.5% 0.3% 3.4% <0.1 % 7.0% 39.6% Cary 94,526 79�316 5,767 189 7,657 28 4,065 19,555 83.9%) (6.1 %) (0.2%) (8.1 %) (<0.1 % 4.3%) (20.7%) Apex 20,212 17,503 1,516 40 869 12 9,689 2,145 86.6% 7.5% 0.2% (4.3% (<0.1 % 3.2%) 30.8% Garner 17 757 12,465 4,777 71 195 4 835 2,563 ' 70.2% 26.9% 0.4% 1.1 % <0.1 % 4.7% 32.5% Holly Springs 9 192 ��243 1,700 37 110 1 276 2,199 ' 78.8% 18.5% 0.3% 1.2% <0.1 % 3.0% 24.6% Fuquay-Varina 7,ggg 5,82 1 1,9�19 �14 3 9 0 0 584 2,563 (73.7 /o) (24.3 /o) (0.4 /o) (0.5 /o) (0.0 /o) (7.4 /o) (32.5 /o) Knightdale 5 958 4,188 1,591 18 89 2 220 1,938 ' 70.3% 26.7% 0.3°/a 1.5% <0.1 % 3.7% 32.6% 522.01 BG1 1,371 �69 540 5 23 1 136 648 (56.1 %) (39.4%) (0.4%) (1.7%) (0.1 %) (9.9%) (47.3%) Table 3. Population by Race and Ethnicity (2000) American Native Block Group or Total Black or Indian or Hawaiian Hispanic Total Jurisdiction Population White African Alaskan Asian or Pacific or Latino Minority # American Native Islander Population 528.01 BG1 1,075 806 232 3 28 0 24 314 75.0°/a 21.6% 0.3% 2.6% 0.0% 2.2%) 29.2°/a 528.01 BG2 3,104 2,517 506 15 22 0 50 428 81.1 % 16.3% 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 1.6% 13.8% 528.01 BG3 689 636 45 0 2 0 13 161 (92.3%) (6.5%) (0.0%) (0.3%) (0.0%) (1.9%) (23.4%) 528.01 BG4 1,012 720 256 0 23 0 363 737 71.2°/a 25.3°/a 0.0°/a 2.3% 0.0% 35.9% 72.8°/a 528.02 BG1 1,486 1,211 230 9 21 1 36 350 (81.5°/a 15.5% 0.6% (1.4% 0.1% 2.4% 23.6%) 528.02 BG2 1,255 �18 489 5 20 0 46 505 57.2% 39.0% 0.4% 1.6% 0.0% 3.7% 40.2% 528.02 BG3 1,647 1,229 379 5 11 1 153 539 74.6°/a 23.0% 0.3% 0.7% < 0.1 % 9.3% 32.7°/a 528.02 BG4 1,248 922 292 2 15 0 40 391 73.9% 23.4% 0.2% 12% 0.0% 3.2% 31.3% 528.03 BG1 582 454 115 4 3 0 28 139 78.1 % 19.8% 0.7% 0.5% 0.0% 4.8% 23.9% 528.03 BG2 3,504 1,201 2,197 2 31 1 112 2,488 34.3% 62.7% < 0.1 % 0.9% < 0.1 % 3.2% 71.0% 528.03 BG3 859 536 306 2 3 1 31 279 62.4%) (35.6%) 0.2%) (0.3%) (0.1 %) (3.6%) (32.5%) 528.03 BG4 466 241 204 7 1 0 36 280 51.7% 43.8°/a 1.5°/a 0.2% 0.0% 7.7% 60.1 °/a 528.04 BG1 1,362 1,107 227 1 11 0 108 292 81.3%) 16.7%) < 0.1 % 0.8% 0.0% (7.9% 21.4%) 528.04 BG2 1,910 1,532 338 8 13 0 34 518 80.2% 17.7% 0.4% 0.7% 0.0% 1.8% 27.1 % 528.04 BG3 940 166 749 3 5 0 35 779 17.7% 79.7°/a 0.3% 0.5%) 0.0% 3.7% 82.9% 528.04 BG4 2,g74 ��0 2,114 15 33 0 172 2,376 25.9%) (71.1 % (0.5% 1.1 % 0.0%) (5.8% 79.9%) 528.05 BG1 3,863 2,816 970 19 23 0 116 1,201 72.9% 25.1 °/a 0.5% 0.6% 0.0% 3.0% 31.1 % 528.05 BG2 113 5 108 0 0 0 1 110 4.4% 95.6% 0.0°/a 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 97.3°/a 528.05 BG3 2,gg2 1,939 981 12 27 0 72 1,124 64.8% 32.8% 0.4% 0.9% 0.0% 2.4% 37.6% 528.05 BG4 498 410 74 0 12 0 29 162 82.3% 14.9% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 5.8% 32.5% 529 BG1 2,173 1,804 341 1 4 0 113 418 83.0% 15.7% < 0.1 % 02% 0.0% 5.2% 19.2% 529 BG2 4,727 4,155 496 24 19 0 113 728 (87.9%) (10.5%) (0.5%) (0.4%) (0.0%) (2.4%) (15.4%) 529 BG3 3,653 3,291 300 22 7 2 120 467 (90.1 %) (8.2%) (0.6%) (02% (< 0.1 %) (3.3% 12.8°/a) 529 BG4 1,722 1,546 127 15 5 0 96 264 89.8% 7.4% 0.9% 0.3% 0.0% 5.6% (15.3% 530.01 BG1 4,907 4,637 98 15 98 2 78 371 94.5°/a 2.0°/a 0.3°/a 2.0% < 0.1 % 5.5% 7.6% 530.01 BG2 11,134 9�876 278 4 857 2 178 1,441 88.7% 2.5% < 0.1 % 7.7% < 0.1 % 11.3% 12.9% 530.02 BG1 4,473 3,913 353 13 130 2 121 581 87.5% 7.9% 0.3% 2.9% < 0.1 % 12.5% 13.0% Table 3. Population by Race and Ethnicity (2000) American Native Block Group or Total Black or Indian or Hawaiian Hispanic Total Jurisdiction Population White African Alaskan Asian or Pacific or Latino Minority # American Native Islander Population 530.02 BG2 1,291 941 328 6 1 0 86 333 72.9% 25.4% 0.5% < 0.1 % 0.0% 27.1 % 25.8°/a 530.02 BG3 1,043 970 48 10 11 0 40 132 93.0% 4.6% 1.0% 1.1 % 0.0% 7.0% 12.7% 530.02 BG4 1,474 1,080 348 19 4 0 152 489 73.3°/a) (23.6%) (1.3%) (0.3%) (0.0%) (10.3%) (33.2%) 530.02 BG5 1,597 1,460 104 6 10 1 105 228 91.4% 6.5% 0.4% 0.6% < 0.1 % 6.6% 14.3°/a 531.01 BG1 � ��g 1,462 227 10 5 0 185 457 85.1 %) 13.2% 0.6% 0.3% 0.0% 10.8% 26.6%) 531.01 BG2 2,774 2,341 361 14 19 0 191 627 84.4% 13.0% 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 6.9% 22.6% 531.01 BG3 2,159 �'231 892 9 6 1 65 1,008 57.0% 41.3% 0.4% 0.3% < 0.1 % 3.0% 46.7°/a 531.03 BG1 3,312 2,663 593 7 26 0 106 757 79.5% 17.9% 0.2% 0.8% 0.0% 3.2% 22.9% 531.03 BG2 2 57g 2,261 286 8 13 1 400 711 87.7% 11.1 % 0.3% 0.5% < 0.1 % 15.5% 27.6% 531.03 BG3 2,522 2,076 386 8 18 0 202 645 82.3% 15.3% 0.3% 0.7% 0.0% 8.0% 25.6°/a 531.04 BG4 3,531 3,178 297 7 32 2 148 497 90.0%) (8.4%) 0.2%) (0.9%) (< 0.1 %) (4.2%) (14.1 %) 531.04 BG5 4,156 3,832 274 21 8 2 199 549 92.2°/a 6.6% 0.5% 0.2% < 0.1 % 4.8% 13.2°/a 532 BG1 � g�g 1,400 356 14 16 4 73 532 77.0°/a) 19.6%) (0.8%) 0.9% 02% (4.0% 29.3%) 532 BG2 1,620 1,319 266 2 15 0 55 307 81.4% 16.4% 0.1 % 0.9% 0.0% 3.4% 19.0% 532 BG3 4,515 3,052 1,336 27 54 0 153 1,619 67.6% 29.6°/a 0.6% 1.2% 0.0% 3.4% 35.9% 532 BG4 6,109 5,272 709 18 49 2 122 979 86.3 11.6% (0.3% 0.8% (< 0.1 % (2.0% 16.0%) 532 BG5 3,031 2,655 321 3 12 3 39 400 87.6°/a 10.6% 0.1 % 0.4% 0.1 % 1.3% 13.2% 534.04 BG1 4,150 2,984 979 17 108 0 212 1,347 71.9°/a 23.6% 0.4°/a 2.6% 0.0% 5.1 % 32.5°/a 534.04 BG2 10,018 $,515 1,102 10 270 3 351 1,540 85.0% 11.0% 0.1 % 2.7% < 0.1 % 3.5% 15.4% 534.05 BG1 3,818 3,379 168 2 221 1 46 496 88.5% 4.4% < 0.1 % 5.8% < 0.1 % 1.2% 13.0% 541.02 BG1 7,609 5,669 1,583 15 175 0 338 2,443 (74.5%) (20.8%) (0.2%) (2.3%) (0.0%) (5.1 %) (32.1 °/a) 541.02 BG2 2,170 1,484 649 1 19 1 180 886 68.4°/a 29.9% < 0.1 % 0.9% < 0.1 % 8.3% 40.8°/a 541.05 BG1 6,840 5,150 1,327 14 246 2 116 1,843 75.3°/a) (19.4%) (0.2%) (3.6% (< 0.1%) (1.7% 26.9%) 541.06 BG1 3,259 1,349 1,773 6 55 1 440 2,309 41.4% 54.4% 0.2% 1.7% < 0.1 % 13.5% 70.8% 541.06 BG2 ggp 570 301 6 3 0 30 427 64.0% 33.8°/a 0.7°/a 0.3% 0.0% 3.4% 48.0°/a 541.07 BG1 6,138 4,640 1,313 24 80 3 485 1,964 75.6% 21.4% 0.4% 1.3% < 0.1 % 7.9% 32.0% 541.07 BG2 2,420 1,863 525 7 5 1 220 779 77.0% 21.7% 0.3% 0.2% < 0.1 % 9.1 % 32.2% Table 3. Population by Race and Ethnicity (2000) American Native Block Group or Total Black or Indian or Hawaiian Hispanic Total Jurisdiction Population White African Alaskan Asian or Pacific or Latino Minority # American Native Islander Population 541.08 BG1 761 673 69 1 9 0 34 117 88.5 9.1 % 0.1 % 1.2% 0.0% 4.5%) 15.4°/a 541.08 BG2 3,983 2,286 1,541 16 56 0 187 1,878 57.4% 38.7% 0.4% 1.4% 0.0% 4.7% 47.2% 541.09 BG1 894 704 171 3 0 0 18 76 (87.8%) (19.1%) (0.3%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (2.0%) (8.5%) 541.09 BG2 1,563 ��264 256 16 1 0 34 357 80.9°/a 16.4°/a 1.0°/a < 0.1 % 0.0% 2.2% 22.8°/a 544.01 BG1 2,499 2,014 427 12 7 0 170 689 (80.6% 17.1 % 0.5% (0.3% 0.0%) 6.8% 27.6%) 544.02 BG3 1,212 955 231 4 2 0 27 360 78.8°/a 19.1 % 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 2.2% 29.7% Johnston 121,955 101,368 19,031 368 366 43 9,934 30,140 Count 83.1 % 15.6% 0.3% 0.3% <0.1 % 7.7% 24.7% Clayton 6,973 5,45 3 1,388 �14 5 5 0 1 704 2,145 (78.2 /o) (19.9 /o) 0.2 /o) 0.8 /o) (<0.1 /0 10.1 /o) 30.8 /o) 402 BG4 4,669 4,118 481 19 28 0 462 887 88.2% 10.3 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 9.9% (19.0% 410 BG1 gg2 814 42 1 0 0 38 60 94.4% 4.9% 0.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 4.4% 7.0% 410 BG2 2,999 2,576 366 6 30 0 180 516 (85.9%) (12.2%) 0.2%) (1.0%) (0.0%) (6.0%) (17.2%) 410 BG3 2,451 2,27� 135 0 12 5 152 455 92.9°/a 5.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.2% 6.2% 18.6°/a 410 BG4 2,268 1,388 821 2 16 0 152 1,167 61.2°/a) 36.2°/a) (0.1%) 0.7% 0.0% (6.7% 51.5%) 410 BG5 2,954 2,236 665 15 24 0 452 1,017 75.7% 22.5% 0.5% 0.8% 0.0% 15.3% 34.4% 411 BG1 4,952 4,016 847 30 15 1 168 1,093 81.1% 17.1°/a 0.6% 0.3% <0.1% 3.4% 22.1% 411 BG3 9,691 $��12 843 58 29 3 368 1,423 89.9% 8.7% (0.6% 0.3% < 0.1% (3.8% 14.7°/a) Total 156,733 37,096 675 3,160 49 9,689 52,491 Demographic 200,057 ��$ 3%) (18.5%) (0.3%) (1.6%) (<0.1%) (4.8%) (26.2%) Study Area "Hispanic or �atino ot any race(s). #Total population minus the total non-Hispanic white population (data not shown). Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov) Summary File 1 Total Population (100-Percent Data), Table P7. - RACE; Table P8. - HISPANIC OR LATINO BY RACE; Summary File 3 Total Population (100-Perent Data), Table P7. - HISPANIC OR LATINO BY RACE. Table 4. Population by Age Group and Median Age (2000) Area or Census Percent <_18 Percent Tract and Block Total Population Years >_65 Years Median Age Group North Carolina 8,049,313 24.4 12.0 35.3 Wake County 627,846 25.1 7.4 32.9 Ralei h 276,093 20.9 8.3 30.9 Ca 94,536 29.1 5.4 33.7 Apex 20,212 30.8 4.0 31.2 Garner 17,757 25.0 10.9 35.8 Holly Sprin s 9,192 31.3 2.8 30.7 Fuqua -Varina 7,898 27.3 13.0 32.6 Knightdale 5,958 31.3 2.8 30.7 522.01 BG1 1,371 16.8 10.2 33.7 528.01 BG1 1,075 27.2 5.5 35.5 528.01 BG2 3,104 25.4 6.5 37.9 528.01 BG3 689 17.9 24.5 45.5 528.01 BG4 1,012 19.9 17.1 29.5 528.02 BG1 1,486 19.4 15.7 38.0 528.02 BG2 1,255 26.5 5.8 29.9 528.02 BG3 1,647 24.4 9.5 352 528.02 BG4 1,248 26.5 11.1 362 528.03 BG1 582 24.2 19.4 39.0 528.03 BG2 3,504 30.0 8.6 31.8 528.04 BG1 1,362 22.5 7.6 35.3 528.04 BG2 1,910 23.5 9.2 38.5 528.04 BG3 940 31.0 4.9 33.4 528.04 BG4 2,974 32.4 3.8 29.9 528.05 BG1 3,863 26.6 6.8 35.6 528.05 BG2 113 16.8 32.7 49.3 528.05 BG3 2,992 26.8 10.0 36.6 528.05 BG4 498 21.9 17.5 41.3 529 BG1 2,173 28.7 6.3 34.9 529 BG2 4,727 30.1 4.0 34.4 529 BG3 3,653 28.7 6.1 34.9 529 BG4 1,722 30.6 5.0 31.4 530.01 BG1 4,907 29.4 5.6 38.6 530.01 BG2 11,134 32.8 4.8 37.1 530.02 BG1 4,473 22.5 7.2 34.1 530.02 BG2 1,291 22.6 10.5 35.8 530.02 BG3 1,043 20.8 13.9 41.6 530.02 BG4 1,474 27.1 5.0 32.7 530.02 BG5 1,597 23.5 8.2 37.1 531.01 BG1 1,718 29.6 8.6 30.9 531.01 BG2 2,774 25.3 13.9 34.6 531.01 BG3 2,159 31.4 10.8 32.1 531.03 BG1 3,312 29.3 5.2 34.5 531.03 BG2 2,578 26.8 4.8 31.9 531.03 BG3 2,522 28.5 5.3 31.6 531.04 BG4 3,531 28.1 7.4 36.5 531.04 BG5 4,156 272 7.2 33.6 532 BG1 1,818 26.6 7.2 34.7 532 BG2 1,620 29.9 5.1 31.9 532 BG3 4,515 292 4.5 30.4 532 BG4 6,109 31.4 2.9 33.6 532 BG5 3,031 31.7 3.3 35.2 Table 4. Population by Age Group and Median Age (2000) Area or Census Percent <_18 Percent Tract and Block Total Population Years >_65 Years Median Age Group 534.04 BG1 4,150 292 8.2 32.0 534.04 BG2 10,018 31.5 4.2 342 534.05 BG1 3,818 31.1 5.2 35.3 541.02 BG1 7,609 29.3 4.4 32.5 541.02 BG2 2,170 28.6 8.8 34.7 541.05 BG1 6,840 24.8 5.0 33.1 541.06 BG1 3,259 34.0 3.1 29.8 541.06 BG2 890 27.0 3.0 32.9 541.07 BG1 6,138 29.3 6.5 32.1 541.07 BG2 2,420 27.3 6.2 322 541.08 BG1 761 24.3 10.6 35.9 541.08 BG2 3,983 32.2 2.9 30.7 541.09 BG1 894 31.1 4.9 34.7 541.09 BG2 1,563 26.2 5.7 34.8 544.01 BG1 2,499 27.6 4.8 32.2 544.02 BG3 1,212 27.0 7.0 36.2 Johnston County 121,965 26.1 9.8 34.2 Clayton 6,973 26.8 10.0 32.6 402 BG4 4,669 29.1 4.7 32.0 410 BG1 862 16.5 25.2 46.3 410 BG2 2,999 27.8 6.5 31.6 410 BG3 2,451 25.3 7.8 36.3 410 BG4 2,268 29.3 9.5 33.4 410 BG5 2,954 26.8 10.4 31.7 411 BG1 4,952 30.1 4.8 32.5 411 BG3 9,691 28.5 3.6 31.9 Total Demographic 200,057 28.4 6.4 33.9 Stud Area Source: US Gensus Bureau (ZUOU) (Amerfcan FactFinder Web sfte: http://tacttinder.Gensus.gov) Summary File 1 Total Population (100-Percent Data), Table P12. - SEX BY AGE; Table P13. - MEDIAN AGE. Table 5. Median Household Income (1999)* Median Median Block Group or Total Household Block Group or Total Household Jurisdiction Households Income in Jurisdiction Households Income in 1999 $ 1999 $ North Carolina 3,133,282 39,184 531.01 BG1 587 53,826 Wake Count 242,133 54,988 531.01 BG2 1,144 43,519 Raleigh 112,727 46,612 531.01 BG3 791 44,861 Cary 34,297 75,122 531.03 BG1 1,223 57,401 Apex 7,386 71,052 531.03 BG2 869 55,865 Garner 6,933 47,380 531.03 BG3 883 51,683 Holly S rin s 3,235 69,550 531.04 BG4 1,281 65,208 Fuquay-Varina 3,130 42,903 531.04 BG5 1,576 46,220 Knightdale 2,195 56,021 532 BG1 673 49,141 522.01 BG1 564 40,550 532 BG2 572 68,833 528.01 BG1 390 83,558 532 BG3 1,722 51,653 528.01 BG2 1,196 56,324 532 BG4 2,104 79,940 528.01 BG3 273 58,304 532 BG5 1,060 80,549 528.01 BG4 375 25,817 534.04 BG1 1,508 48,971 528.02 BG1 626 52,045 534.04 BG2 3,493 73,091 Table 5. Median Household Income (1999)* Median Median Block Group or Total Household Block Group or Total Household Jurisdiction Households Income in Jurisdiction Households Income in 1999 $ 1999 $ 528.02 BG2 557 36,250 534.05 BG1 1,337 91,622 528.02 BG3 647 45,781 541.02 BG1 2,768 56,659 528.02 BG4 517 49,046 541.02 BG2 824 47,155 528.03 BG1 240 33,750 541.05 BG1 2,775 69,691 528.03 BG2 1,277 41,424 541.06 BG1 1,015 56,188 528.03 BG3 406 31,892 541.06 BG2 390 52,813 528.03 BG4 206 35,909 541.07 BG1 2,233 55,423 528.04 BG1 560 44,519 541.07 BG2 905 46,705 528.04 BG2 811 45,580 541.08 BG1 332 42,639 528.04 BG3 277 50,341 541.08 BG2 1,387 51,827 528.04 BG4 1,107 50,950 541.09 BG1 334 60,833 528.05 BG1 1,455 51,453 541.09 BG2 600 45,238 528.05 BG2 45 33,958 544.01 BG1 824 46,286 528.05 BG3 1,036 60,787 544.02 BG3 442 55,811 528.05 BG4 214 35,870 Johnston County 46,700 40,872 529 BG1 815 59,464 Clayton 2,806 44,750 529 BG2 1,615 62,479 402 BG4 59,125 54,792 529 BG3 1,326 58,148 410 BG1 89,919 85,071 529 BG4 585 52,411 410 BG2 78,003 73,490 530.01 BG1 1,721 91,345 410 BG3 59,821 56,047 530.01 BG2 3,732 101,348 410 BG4 62,574 60,595 530.02 BG1 1,757 54,834 410 BG5 47,125 46,208 530.02 BG2 557 36,736 411 BG1 59,038 47,500 530.02 BG3 435 41,449 411 BG3 50,893 47,639 530.02 BG4 570 45,833 Total Demographic 73,536 58,884 530.02 BG5 627 51,343 Study Area Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov). Summary File 3(Sample Data), Table P53. - MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1999 DOLLARS Table 6. Poverty Status Total Percent of Block Group or Population for Individuals with Individuals Below Jurisdiction Whom Poverty Income in 1999 poverty Level in Status is Below Poverty Level 1999 Determined North Carolina 7,805,328 960,055 12.3 Wake Count 609,489 47,540 7.8 Ralei h 260,314 29,936 11.5 Ca 93,948 3,194 3.4 Apex 20,057 381 1.9 Garner 17,388 1,182 6.8 Holly Sprin s 9,155 439 4.8 Fuqua -Varina 7,714 7,714 11.1 Kni htdale 5,901 5,901 4.7 522.01 BG1 1,233 152 12.3 528.01 BG1 1,059 0 0 528.01 BG2 3,143 97 3.1 528.01 BG3 639 75 11.7 528.01 BG4 899 187 20.8 528.02 BG1 1,433 97 6.8 528.02 BG2 1,233 92 7.5 528.02 BG3 1,573 50 3.2 Table 6. Poverty Status Total Percent of Block Group or Population for Individuals with Individuals Below Jurisdiction Whom Poverty Income in 1999 paverty Level in Status is Below Poverty Level 1999 Determined 528.02 BG4 1,381 98 7.1 528.03 BG1 535 21 3.9 528.03 BG2 3,524 317 9 528.03 BG3 883 69 7.8 528.03 BG4 453 14 3.1 528.04 BG1 1,383 210 15.2 528.04 BG2 1,905 158 8.3 528.04 BG3 893 20 2.2 528.04 BG4 2,968 196 6.6 528.05 BG1 3,858 301 7.8 528.05 BG2 97 10 10.3 528.05 BG3 2,971 166 5.6 528.05 BG4 477 54 11.3 529 BG1 2,229 123 5.5 529 BG2 4,660 205 4.4 529 BG3 3,687 199 5.4 529 BG4 1,618 112 6.9 530.01 BG1 4,907 25 0.5 530.01 BG2 11,128 200 1.8 530.02 BG1 4,471 255 5.7 530.02 BG2 1,290 259 20.1 530.02 BG3 983 16 1.6 530.02 BG4 1,498 61 4.1 530.02 BG5 1,630 127 7.8 531.01 BG1 1,661 125 7.5 531.01 BG2 2,756 251 9.1 531.01 BG3 2,151 282 13.1 531.03 BG1 3,289 115 3.5 531.03 BG2 2,541 117 4.6 531.03 BG3 2,522 134 5.3 531.04 BG4 3,531 138 3.9 531.04 BG5 4,152 257 6.2 532 BG1 1,772 32 1.8 532 BG2 1,621 41 2.5 532 BG3 4,506 356 7.9 532 BG4 6,109 141 2.3 532 BG5 3,019 88 2.9 534.04 BG1 4,133 260 6.3 534.04 BG2 10,010 170 1.7 534.05 BG1 3,759 34 0.9 541.02 BG1 7,544 490 6.5 541.02 BG2 2,159 168 7.8 541.05 BG1 6,840 75 1.1 541.06 BG1 3,190 102 3.2 541.06 BG2 907 0 0 541.07 BG1 6,029 458 7.6 541.07 BG2 2,420 198 8.2 541.08 BG1 792 32 4 541.08 BG2 3,933 244 6.2 541.09 BG1 934 22 2.4 541.09 BG2 1,568 110 7 544.01 BG1 2,376 176 7.4 544.02 BG3 1,226 96 7.8 Table 6. Poverty Status Total Percent of Block Group or Population for Individuals with Individuals Below Jurisdiction Whom Poverty Income in 1999 paverty Level in Status is Below Poverty Level 1999 Determined Johnston County 120,182 15,383 12.8 Cla ton 6,828 778 11.4 402 BG4 4,533 236 5.2 410 BG1 851 61 7.2 410 BG2 3,123 222 7.1 410 BG3 2,332 278 11.9 410 BG4 2,104 257 12.2 410 BG5 2,914 393 13.5 411 BG1 4,924 458 9.3 411 BG3 9,661 454 4.7 Total Demographic 198,533 11,118 5.6 Study Area Source: US Gensus Bureau (ZODU) (American Facthfnder Web sfte: http://tacttfnder.Gensus.gov). Summary File 3(Sample Data), - Table P87. POVERTY STATUS IN 1999 BY AGE Table 7. Means of Transportation to Work Block Group or Percent Who Percent Who Percent Who percent Jurisdiction Drove Alone Carpooled Took Public Walking/Biking/Other Transportation North Carolina 79.4 14.0 0.9 5.7 Wake Count 81.1 11.2 1.2 3.9 Raleigh 78.7 11.5 2.4 7.4 Cary 84.2 8.9 0.3 6.6 Apex 87.5 7.4 0.3 4.8 Garner 82.0 12.0 0.8 5.2 Holl Springs 84.1 10.3 4.8 5.4 Fuquay-Varina 80.1 14.6 11.1 5.2 Knightdale 82.0 13.1 4.7 4.7 522.01 BG1 75.4 20.7 1.4 2.5 528.01 BG1 91.0 4.5 0.0 4.5 528.01 BG2 84.2 8.4 0.9 6.5 528.01 BG3 67.0 18.4 0.0 14.6 528.01 BG4 59.1 30.1 7.1 3.7 528.02 BG1 88.2 9.5 1.2 1.1 528.02 BG2 82.4 8.6 1.4 7.6 528.02 BG3 78.8 16.4 0.0 4.8 528.02 BG4 79.6 12.5 0.0 7.9 528.03 BG1 82.0 12.4 0.0 5.6 528.03 BG2 82.2 16.2 0.3 1.3 528.03 BG3 83.4 13.7 0.0 2.9 528.03 BG4 73.4 19.3 0.0 7.3 528.04 BG1 87.8 7.9 0.0 4.3 528.04 BG2 81.9 14.5 0.3 3.3 528.04 BG3 81.2 10.8 1.1 6.9 528.04 BG4 77.8 17.6 1.7 2.9 528.05 BG1 85.9 11.1 0.5 2.5 528.05 BG2 56.2 43.8 0.0 0.0 528.05 BG3 81.8 11.9 0.0 6.3 528.05 BG4 96.3 3.7 0.0 0.0 529 BG1 78.2 17.6 0.0 4.2 Table 7. Means of Transportation to Work Block Group or Percent Who Percent Who Percent Who percent Jurisdiction Drove Alone Carpooled Took Public Walking/Biking/Other Transportation 529 BG2 86.2 8.7 0.0 5.1 529 BG3 85.0 13.5 0.0 1.5 529 BG4 81.2 16.2 0.0 2.6 530.01 BG1 82.8 8.4 0.0 8.8 530.01 BG2 83.7 7.5 0.3 8.5 530.02 BG1 82.4 14.8 02 2.6 530.02 BG2 72.1 23.4 0.0 4.5 530.02 BG3 82.1 11.2 0.0 6.7 530.02 BG4 80.1 15.0 1.4 3.5 530.02 BG5 81.6 13.0 0.0 5.4 531.01 BG1 78.4 16.7 02 4.7 531.01 BG2 82.0 12.1 0.1 5.8 531.01 BG3 86.8 8.5 0.0 4.7 531.03 BG1 81.7 12.0 0.3 6.0 531.03 BG2 74.0 21.0 0.0 5.0 531.03 BG3 85.6 11.3 0.0 3.1 531.04 BG4 81.2 10.8 0.0 8.0 531.04 BG5 79.6 16.2 0.3 3.9 532 BG1 83.6 13.7 0.0 2.7 532 BG2 83.8 10.9 0.0 5.3 532 BG3 80.2 15.6 0.3 3.9 532 BG4 82.4 10.1 0.1 7.4 532 BG5 86.3 7.6 0.0 6.1 534.04 BG1 85.5 11.4 0.1 3.0 534.04 BG2 86.6 7.3 0.5 5.6 534.05 BG1 87.4 5.3 0.0 7.3 541.02 BG1 80.8 13.2 0.0 6.0 541.02 BG2 79.1 15.9 0.7 4.3 541.05 BG1 89.4 5.9 0.0 4.7 541.06 BG1 83.3 12.9 0.0 3.8 541.06 BG2 87.1 11.2 0.0 1.7 541.07 BG1 80.8 14.6 0.1 4.5 541.07 BG2 78.3 17.5 0.3 3.9 541.08 BG1 79.5 16.3 0.7 3.5 541.08 BG2 80.5 15.7 0.1 3.7 541.09 BG1 79.5 18.4 0.0 2.1 541.09 BG2 79.6 16.5 0.0 3.9 544.01 BG1 81.6 13.2 0.0 5.2 544.02 BG3 85.6 10.9 0.0 3.5 Johnston County 79.9 15.8 0.4 3.9 Cla ton 85.9 10.7 0.2 3.2 402 BG4 83.6 12.9 0.0 3.5 410 BG1 74.5 25.5 0.0 0.0 410 BG2 85.5 10.1 0.0 4.4 410 BG3 90.0 7.2 0.0 2.8 410 BG4 79.9 11.6 0.6 7.9 410 BG5 85.1 12.3 0.0 2.6 411 BG1 83.8 13.5 0.0 2.7 411 BG3 85.2 12 0.1 2.7 Total Demographic 82.9 12.1 0.2 3.5 Stud Area Source: US Gensus r3ureau (zUUU) (Hmencan r-actrinder web site: nttp://tactnnder.C:ensus.gov). Summary t-ue 3(Sampie Data), - Table P30. MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK FOR WORKERS 16 YEARS AND OVER i anie y. housm cnaracteristics Renter- Median value Block Group or occupied Vacant Housing Jurisdiction housing units Units (percent) owner-occupied percent units ($) North Carolina 30.6 11.1 95,800 Wake County 34.1 6.5 156,200 Ralei h 48.4 6.7 54,529 Ca 27.2 5.3 193,000 Apex 23.9 7.9 177,400 Garner 30.9 4.2 119,200 Holly Springs 14.3 9.0 160,800 Fuquay-Varina 38.4 7.5 116,300 Kni htdale 25.7 7.7 132,600 522.01 BG1 39.7 6.4 79,900 528.01 BG1 3.4 1.6 170,700 528.01 BG2 17.3 2.2 128,100 528.01 BG3 13.4 4.1 116,400 528.01 BG4 87.4 8.0 112,500 528.02 BG1 35.2 4.1 121,400 528.02 BG2 58.9 6.9 98,600 528.02 BG3 22.8 3.4 108,400 528.02 BG4 16.5 3.9 108,700 528.03 BG1 15.7 3.0 89,400 528.03 BG2 28.6 8.7 104,300 528.03 BG4 50.0 7.1 103,200 528.04 BG1 73.4 4.2 104,400 528.04 BG2 19.7 10.9 145,000 528.04 BG3 16.1 5.3 104,200 528.04 BG4 15.3 11.5 116,000 528.05 BG1 23.1 3.5 111,700 528.05 BG2 14.3 5.1 107,000 528.05 BG3 35.4 11.1 65,700 528.05 BG4 24.9 2.9 141,700 529 BG1 25.8 3.2 108,200 529 BG2 9.6 7.0 153,200 529 BG3 8.2 6.1 140,700 529 BG4 9.8 4.6 125,300 530.01 BG1 17.9 9.3 113,600 530.01 BG2 6.7 4.1 239,100 530.02 BG1 14.1 4.8 270,300 530.02 BG2 36.0 5.1 176,800 530.02 BG3 25.4 6.9 137,100 530.02 BG4 17.9 5.3 112,600 530.02 BG5 15.2 11.3 91,800 531.01 BG1 30.4 10.3 186,400 531.01 BG2 29.1 9.9 131,700 531.01 BG3 39.8 7.4 129,000 531.03 BG1 31.4 6.6 113,300 531.03 BG2 12.5 5.2 120,100 531.03 BG3 14.3 25.3 132,300 531.04 BG4 14.1 5.4 115,300 531.04 BG5 9.2 5.6 155,700 532 BG1 16.8 6.2 103,000 532 BG2 15.3 11.6 104,400 532 BG3 9.8 11.4 170,300 532 BG4 19.7 6.7 121,900 i aaie y. housin cnaracteristics Renter- Median value Block Group or occupied Vacant Housing owner-occupied Jurisdiction housing units Units (percent) units ($) ercent 332.01 BG5 11.5 9.2 199,000 532 BG5 6.1 3.0 174,500 534.04 BG1 27.5 5.7 129,700 534.04 BG2 17.7 5.4 182,700 534.05 BG1 27.6 9.2 289,100 541.02 BG1 12.5 13.5 133,500 541.02 BG2 16.9 10.9 113,500 541.05 BG1 11.7 6.1 146,100 541.06 BG1 12.9 8.5 128,300 541.06 BG2 13.0 9.0 113,700 541.07 BG1 24.6 7.2 132,100 541.07 BG2 22.2 4.8 103,600 541.08 BG1 42.4 7.3 96,100 541.08 BG2 10.6 3.7 105,700 541.09 BG1 11.0 4.3 156,700 541.09 BG2 16.2 6.3 66,400 544.01 BG1 14.6 9.0 92,000 544.02 BG3 12.7 7.0 118,000 Johnston Count 26.6 7.2 97,100 Clayton 35.3 7.9 103,700 402 BG4 13.8 7.7 136,300 410 BG1 40.8 5.0 113,500 410 BG2 28.7 5.8 114,200 410 BG3 20.0 6.4 141,000 410 BG4 35.7 6.6 95,400 410 BG5 25.0 7.7 97,400 411 BG1 11.7 5.5 107,500 411 BG3 10.3 4.2 122,200 Total Demographic 18.9 6.8 143,135 Study Area 5ource: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov). Summary File 3(Sample Data), Table H7. - TENURE; Table H76. - MEDIAN VALUE (DOLLARS) FOR SPECIFIED OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS. APPENDIX D Adults Who Speak En lish Less than Ver Well Primary Language Group of Adults Who Speak Total Block Group Total Adult English Less than Very Well Limited or Jurisdiction Population Other Indo- Asian/ English Spanish European Pacific Other Proficiency (LEP) North Carolina 6,087,996 176,552 30,436 30,444 6,088 243,520 2.9% (0.5% 0.5% 0.1 % 4.0%) Wake Count 470,609 17,412 3,765 5,177 1,412 27,766 y 3.7% 0.8% 1.1 % 0.3% 5.9°/a) Raleigh 2�g ggg 11,387 1,971 2,628 1,095 17,081 ' 5.2% (0.9% 1.2% 0.5% (7.8% Ca 67,052 1,473 1,073 1,477 201 4,224 � 2.2%) (1.6% 2.2% 0.3% 6.3%) Apex 13 926 107 111 115 28 362 ' 0.8% 0.8%) 0.8% 0.2% 2.6%) Garner 13,293 339 120 66 0 585 (3.0% 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 4.4% Holly Springs 6,266 13 8 3 1 2 5 0 3 207 (2.2 /o) (0.5 /o) (0.4 /o) (0.4 /o) (0.2 /o) Fuquay-Varina 5 712 308 16 18 0 343 ' 5.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 6.0°/a Kni htdale 4,151 104 17 8 25 154 g (2.5%) (0.4%) (0.2%) (0.6%) (0.6%) 522.01 BG1 1,180 79 0 12 0 91 6.7% 0.0% 1.0%) 0.0% 7.7% 528.01 BG1 793 10 0 0 0 10 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 528.01 BG2 2,315 32 12 0 0 44 1.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 528.01 BG3 551 29 0 0 0 29 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 528.01 BG4 821 223 0 20 0 243 27.2% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 29.6% 528.02 BG 1 1,150 13 22 0 0 35 (1.1%) (1.9%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (3.0%) 528.02 BG2 982 18 0 86 1.8% 40 28 0.0% 8.8% 528.02 BG3 1,170 34 0 0 44 2.9% (0.0% 11 0.0% 3.8% 528.02 BG4 967 42 0 82 4.3% 19 21 0.0% 8.5% 528.03 BG1 455 10 0 0 0 10 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 528.03 BG2 2,480 30 0 0 67 1.2% 0.0% 37 0.0% 2.7% 528.03 BG3 658 0 0 0 17 0.0% 17 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 528.03 BG4 347 49 0 0 0 49 14.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.1 % 528.04 BG1 1,077 50 0 0 0 50 4.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.6% 528.04 BG2 1,465 15 0 0 0 15 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 528.04 BG3 609 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 528.04 BG4 2,043 90 12 27 31 159 (4.4%) (0.6%) (1.3%) (1.5%) (7.8%) 528.05 BG1 2,836 62 0 0 0 62 2.2°/a 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 528.05 BG2 gg 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0% 0.0%) 0.0% (0.0%) 0.0%) 528.05 BG3 2,210 27 24 0 0 51 1.2% 1.1 % 0.0°/a 0.0% 2.3% Primary Language Group of Adults Who Speak Total English Less than Very Well Limited Block Group Total Adult or Jurisdiction Population English Spanish Other Indo- Asian/ Other Proficiency European Pacific (LEP) 528.05 BG4 384 0 0 0 0 0 �.�°�a �.0% �.�% �.�% 0.�% 529 BG1 1,569 36 0 0 0 36 3.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1 % 529 BG2 3,268 33 7 0 0 39 1.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 529 BG3 2,621 47 8 0 0 55 1.8% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1 % 529 BG4 1,176 36 0 0 0 36 (3.1 %) (0.0%) (0.0%) 0.0%) (3.1 % 530.01 BG1 3,464 21 10 28 7 66 0.6% 0.3% 0.8% 0.2% 1.9% 530.01 BG2 7,447 22 $9 164 0 276 (0.3% (1.2% 2.2% 0.0%) 3.7%) 530.02 BG1 3,335 50 7 63 50 170 1.5% 0.2% 1.9% 1.5% 5.1 % 530.02 BG2 1,040 89 6 0 0 96 8.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 9.2% 530.02 BG3 g22 � 0 0 0 7 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 530.02 BG4 1,149 15 0 0 0 15 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 530.02 BG5 1,227 36 0 0 20 55 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 4.5% 531.01 BG1 � 2�2 95 2 8 17 122 (7.8%) (0.2%) (02%) (0.7%) (10.1 % 531.01 BG2 2,074 114 4 12 0 131 5.5% 0.2% 0.6% 0.0% 6.3% 531.01 BG3 1,466 26 1 3 0 31 (1.8%) (0.1 %) (02%) (0.0%) (2.1 %) 531.03 BG1 2,346 45 0 0 16 61 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 2.6% 531.03 BG2 1,910 244 0 0 0 244 12.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.8% 531.03 BG3 1,800 101 9 0 0 110 5.6% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1 % 531.04 BG4 2,543 $6 18 10 0 114 3.4% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 4.5% 531.04 BG5 3,025 103 6 0 0 109 3.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 532 BG1 1,338 33 0 0 7 40 2.5% (0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 3.0% 532 BG2 1,141 5 8 2 0 15 0.4% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0% 1.3% 532 BG3 3,199 74 10 10 6 99 2.3% 0.3% 0.3% 02% 3.1 % 532 BG4 4,168 46 25 17 4 92 1.1 %� �.6% ��.4% ��.1 %� 2.2%� 532 BG5 2,072 8 2 0 0 10 0.4°/a 0.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 534.04 BG1 2 g3g 56 24 15 3 97 (1.9%) 0.8%) (0.5%) (0.1%) (3.3%) 534.04 BG2 6,859 96 41 6 8 151 1.4% 0.6% 0.1 % 0.1 % 2.2% 534.05 BG1 2,628 8 63 16 0 87 0.3°/a 0.3% 2.4% 0.0% 3.3% 541.02 BG1 5,295 169 21 48 0 238 3.2% 0.4% 0.9% 0.0% 4.5% 541.02 BG2 1,551 78 3 6 5 92 5.0% 0.2% 0.4°/a 0.3% 5.9% Primary Language Group of Adults Who Speak Total Block Group Total Adult En lish Less than Ver Well Limited English or Jurisdiction Population Spanish Other Indo- Asian/ Other Proficiency European Pacific LEP 541.05 BG1 5,150 72 46 21 10 149 1.4% 0.9% 0.4% 0.2% 2.9% 541.06 BG1 2,124 242 11 6 0 259 11.4°/a 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% 12.2% 541.06 BG2 669 0 0 42 8 50 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 12% 7.5% 541.07 BG1 4,351 300 13 13 17 344 6.9% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 7.9% 541.07 BG2 1,757 135 0 0 5 141 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 8.0% 541.08 BG1 621 46 3 5 0 54 (7.4%) (0.5%) (0.8%) (0.0%) (8.7%) 541.08 BG2 2,659 72 8 5 13 98 2.7% 0.3% 0.2% 0.5% 3.7% 541.09 BG1 679 14 0 0 0 14 (2.1 %) (0.0%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (2.1 %) 541.09 BG2 1,165 3 0 0 0 3 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 544.01 BG1 1,733 50 5 0 0 55 2.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 544.02 BG3 884 22 0 13 0 35 2.5% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 4.0% Johnston County gg,957 4,6�78 180 93 87 5,0�38 5.2 /0 0.2 /0 0.1 /0 0.1 /0 5.6 /o Clayton 5,088 209 0 0 0 0 0 0 209 4.1 /0 0.0 /0 0.0 /0 0.0 /0 4.1 /o 402 BG4 3,154 � 32 19 0 0 151 (4.2%) (0.6%) (0.0%) (0.0%) (4.8%) 410 BG1 711 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 410 BG2 2,272 32 0 9 9 50 1.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 2.2% 410 BG3 1,718 96 0 7 0 103 5.6%) 0.0% (0.4% (0.0%) 6.0%) 410 BG4 1,538 134 0 0 0 134 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.7% 410 BG5 2 223 169 33 0 16 218 (7.6%) 1.5%) (0.0%) 0.7%) (9.8%) 411 BG1 3,430 65 10 0 0 75 1.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 411 BG3 6 937 264 0 7 0 271 3.8% 0.0% 0.1 % 0.0% 3.9% Total Demographic 143 037 4,441 660 693 251 6,045 Area ' (3.1 %) (0.5%) (0.5%) 0.2%) 4.0°/a) Source: US Census Bureau (2000) (American FactFinder Web site: http://factfinder.Census.gov), Summary File 3 (Sample data - universe of population for whom status was determined), Table PCT10 - AGE BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME FOR THE POPULATION 5 YEARS AND OVER; Table P19 - AGE BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME BY ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH FOR THE POPULATION 5 YEARS AND OVER APPENDIX E Bicycle Routes Map _ � _ _ _ _ _ DURHAM COUNTY _ s :;, ------ �--------- --- -------- �"-� ---- �`- ----- ;� WAKE COUNTY To Durham Z i � a County Segment � � .. of the American O � �� - Tobacco Twil V� ni:co� a�dge �% a , eieme��a�y K�� cr (zoo9) ��ekRtl Qi �� ' I� �'�/�/� 2 i � � U�Z ;) i Q 1 � � �/ 1 � V Q I '� /� 1 ' W � PARK 1 \ , Q � �i►� ; �� Research Triangle � y� �'�Y. �� , � ,.-�_: � � Park N B �� ``�� O O F� � i\ SO a • `� . � � � � . -�� 54 i_iinep F-° ••< � 7 ` � • � .`_' O'Ke11Y Cha�>el Rd qs `\ � Q 1 � �nqve � �� . I ,. f/ i � � _ f e4� � 1 �-�" � . �� ' ��.�.��`� % 1\ / i �� ,//� `� e/ _; /Z2r `I � L� / ♦ ♦` % iI Y 1 % `�� Q ♦♦ /g-.-.� el � � i Pa�cne� . 5 � �� i o-eek 1 � � v� � � �' a', / % HiBh � �� \1 s �� Pkw' Goory `� ,\ i� \h♦ m @ c� � Mc� mJ yO�'e ��1__,�i�� \`��\ Twin p ��-�� i P��1 � � �'� I �� Lakes � � I Amberly� ��_��..-• � `�/►'� � `_��-� �'�.��--__� � �� i�� akeaa i m � e�ie� F��eis�a��o� R� i ��s� +a Mo �� . � y o�e � � � Ca�P ir�►1 �.-O i r�►1 S'"'ii ca, �� r Poved � � � � �`,��_�� 1 �` `/�� Aeh�e Rn �1�� eo«e��° r �� , � , ' Ra � � � P �, „ � '� r�►� CaryPnrk ��io �dek 1 4' �od�ao`N 1 � k opN �,..I �r�^� Lake cencer 1 � � Carpenter. � �n�,�� . �� n � - �-- -- Unpaved ��hR� � �•�(� � t � �/ 1 i Q .. ��.,Lake�_��1 �� fea�es-�sl� '.►.+� 1 Q \lA ��. ^ � �l % Co� � 1 LY I Wackena Rd � .% � M� {iARJ I 1 �6�� ` MiIlsPark 1 _�1� �°� Mlestern "�s` �� 1 Cary G\e Middle i 1 �� '�.I Wake � � �zoo9) ` �'' � �Carpenter � Regional �- Morrsv'lle r � 1 �� h� j �� i�� Elementary j Library -�� Elementary / / ' k � � �` \ , F' \ � (D ` � � Rid9z Ln L� � '` � Lanlcrn � MiIlsPark X� `I 1 � e �a ,� �� 1 Elementary � � � �� ♦ '$- / m 1 1. � O� l�y � , Rd �', GreenHopes 1 � � � � �, �a � J. I` m e0 �,eve1 Gh�cch ♦.. � °or� � 1 6 G er en i� O JQ� y u/i' s/ No9�y I � IGc 1 1 tl 1 Hope �a�° d9ew' �� Highcroft High � � ay � � � `� � � � � � Elementar � Green Hope �i, � N' CP / / ♦`` � 1` `' NoPeSchpo�R O J Y � Elementary , \ eAve � `'.P�ParkDr � / ��o � i �� ce %�� P G��. 55 � �c�`� � �. � __�.-' � � o � �a �-, � / %' � : p � � � � Green Level�� , � O, �' � e F � A �;l a h��ch Rd - r Ston ' '' � , � •Connemara Dr o Creek ' � � � � � �� ^�,d� , �;� h House ftA � � ; hip p \ °' , ; n e�� m s�� 2 0 ; / I ` v2pe`I � o � � � �„� �, / �� ; � � � cornerstone _ .� � � ♦ / � Q' ��'o� ',\�j�� 1 �' H�gh■ � Park u'y Place _ � J / � �� House _� Z ; 1� Crossing �� Colli�sQ(1 Cetlar Pc u� � ,� , � � � 1 � Green Leve��est Rd � � a Wa�o '(,J / � ` DavisDrive �loo�B�Jd Y � .a U Elementary� I I� s O �� ; L _ ' �'�/' : ? DMiddleV� �I �� I\ I �� 1 PARK � i ��►� � C��zza or p � � d �i � � �� M��nt H��n o�� /�-+ �a I ..9 1 j S O ,ParkVillayt'�J�. 1Q �D f � i - � � � � TurnerCreek � n \ � Elementary � � � � �/ � herwooh Fores P / Q l�' � Nolt Rd , �"a � � � o t -1 / 6 ` _ � � d i m r. /� � i�� `,U��_ - - - ___ _ - - ____- -__\ � 40 � RDU Airport ,� � i� ' N � ��..<--`� ` Creek �Trdil � a William B. Umstead m State Park 0 a � Lake Crabtree See Website For Park Hours � � Count Park And Information �� Y � �� www.ncparks.gov f . . �\ : � ._ ,. �i a Apex 0 qpex� Community - Lake o ' Park Hwy 6q � °'�a � S �, �o�-�u. � , aaR'� sn ``` Q 64 R,r i Lake Crabtree � n � . ... ._II/__ �\�. �G American Tobacco Trail 4.67 mi Mills Park (opening in 2010) "��, � �Maccregor Green Level roburham Road Mills Park Orive - Villa e � aiham Counry Segment ot 23 mile long ATT �. � \ g ThomasBrooksPark � �� -�� ,A_ 3� Amberly Lake Greenway 0.95 mi sooa cree� �e�ei a,�ron Road L] `` .:zs smre Rd, w�in�� Ameady aia��ad oe�aioPmem Sears Farm Road Park ` � 50]] sears Farm ftoad ncy Pkwy �+ � p� Cary Park Lake Greenway 1.87 mi Green Hope High School/Park Q-ege �rer� Laval to Durhem Roetl, WitFin Gery Park PDD Q' � zsoo ca�Pe��e� uP�n�.�n aoaa p Green Ho e Elementa School/Park Symphony Southbridge Greenway 028 mi P ry 1 Lake � _.n em R�tlge Lane Within Southbridge POO Z��O Louis StepM1ans Drive White Oak Park Green Hope School Greenway 1.04 mi �Zis�enascarpemerRoaa � .:��s va,m aoaa aa�k m eamneior e�a��n c,ee�way Davis Drive School/Park zioi oa��s o�we Batchelor Branch Greenway 078 mi Davis Drive Park a� .�in Reserve Subtlivision. NG 55 to PeFlmeyer Place 1810 �avis ��ivo Preston Soccer Fields NC Hwy 55 Multi-Use Trail 121 mi aoi H�9n House Roaa � HeR N.,,�.s�e„e �aoa m co��ema�a od�e � - Fred G. Bond Metro Park e - � Penny noad PL White Oak Creek Greenway 3.86 mi 8o� ��n Ho��sP Ro�a �TQ' � v ele�„e�eary o:+�;��. odve Pare ro cree� �evei cnumn aoad North Cary Park qo. _ � � i�ooNorwaus we�era p w -= Whi[e Oak Creek Greenway 1.56 mi Robert V. Godbold Park 8ond Park to MacAhhur D�ive 2151 NW Mayna�tl Ro24 -_ Park Village Greenway 0.69 mi soi N�e Laoe Park �/ ': a- ti iu 9eRe�.earo�n.eamaa�kvna9eo.�e Urban Park F C /14 E Chatham SVeet [(� Sherwood Greens Greenway 0 26 mi d ... ooaFo�es�aiacecoParkvnaqecree�way HeaterPark(naturalarea) - � aoo s w�s� sv�e� � a`° � Indian Creek Greenway 0.37 mi Dorothy Park (natural area) r : i�or1 Boulevard lo Tawn Hall Drive l20 Griffis Streat � Rose Street Park T n rN Mill Pond - Davis Drive Multi-Use Trail 329 mi iio Rose svee� q� wllage oa��s o��e aa�x�o Mo�ds�aie ca�pe�ce�aoad R.S. Dunham Park *� 519 Walnul Sheet Wake Tech Stonecreek Greenway 0.60 mi Lions Park western �� oavison�amCarpe��erupcnurrnRoan a�sra�giewoodori�e [ampus Harrison Painte •�� U � 1 0 � � S � R i J� East �� cary beY ��Middle � � Adams � !le Shop Elemy�enfary � � �'� � O , Je�eg\ �/ ��'. CaryVillag Squarg��G2�y�� 'ARK ♦��*/� F�'�q.� � � � Ca Towne �vMichaeql a. � ry � CurranA tic � � Center � �enter ICary� ' High � �},� / m ..•. j % - � J �`�% o . � rs, � B' �haLe� �r Penn G y Rd j �D i� �emgary �` g \5`�\�`�� \' � � m � gel9ium Dr -� ♦ 3 a � - �' " I '� �"�l 1 \ 1 ♦` f� �J Louis Ste hens Multi-Use Trail 1.36 mi Cary High School _ ; � p 638 WaInul5lreet �. ` -+- lennle Park to Mort evllle Parkwey Walnut Street Park � � . B shops Gate Greenway 1.39 mi iazo wam�i svaai � o„cDr � :�:�,a,��yn svee�w�m�� s��snoPs cace aoo Annie L. Jones Park . �� 1d14TarbertStreel 1 T . Annie Jones Greenway 1.17 mi MacDonald Woods Park v j PO P 4�,iiiieJonasParkGatehouseDrlvetoLekePlneDrrve 160�SeabrookAvenue �'� e�� ?'ijrv , �R Marla Dorrel Park (Kids Together Playground) �q � d .o. \ d ' Oxxford Hunt Greenway 1.21 mi iii rn��sm� o��e ° n9�°` 1 � � we:� cnamam svee� w eo�d Pa.k Harold D. Ritter Park � " P� �P \ 3oi �o�nmere or�e wes� Pa � SW Wake Y Black Creek Greenway 1.80 mi T��, � ;+vMCq sond Park eoamou�e m Maynard Road Hembck Bluffs Nature Preserve . 261fi K Itlaire Farm Roatl �� '� . v� * - Black Creek Greenway 3.80 mi Future Park j � � Chapel H'ill Ruad lo Old Reedy Creek Road 9]01 Penny Roatl 1 Middle Creek School/Park � � Glenkirk Greenway 023 mi i5i m��ddiec�eek aa�knvenue �a \ `'�� oic. woamars�o�e way. wanm oie�e��u aoo � SK-8 Cary (at Godbold Park) co,y �,. 2040 NW Maynard Roatl (9�9) 380.29]0 Northwoods Greenwa 0.87 mi 5p 1 �. ;.,��.r.�maa�k�oNortnwoodse�me��ary GodboldDogPark ,p� I :��auel H'ill Road) 2�36 NW Meynartl Road � � Higgins Greenway 0.55 mi Koka Booth Amphitheatre �� SW Maynard Road fo Den(orth Drlve 8003 Ragency Porkway (919) 482-2025 � Future Dog Park � - Hinshaw Greenway 1 66 mi w ae��y aoaa � M,��aoo��e�Pa.k�oMa�oo�a�dwoodsPa,k West Ridge Trail (2.1 miles� MpcGregor Loo�(2.8 miles� � mcreenwoodcrcie USABaseballNationalTrainin Complex Bike Route Deseriptions .- � ;; c�� Nooe smoa R�aa �s,9� sa�-3�eaa This shori loo can be combined with ihe Three Lakes . P rates Cove Greenway 078 mi The WesT Ridge Trail is a spur off }he EasT Ridge Loop P <,. Cary 7ennis Park Loo for a uie} and leasant ride ihrou h one of � _..�,��oac�,�iemcie�9a„yo,roe � ,,.i�.,�ssiePne�son�e�sis�asz-zosi LoChmefe LoOp (6.5 mlles�; and provides access to ihe Block Creek Trail via P Q P 9 � connection oin}s alon D nas Drive. The irail Cary's best-known neighborhoods. There are a few � wakeMed Soccer Park p 9 Y »' Tryon Village Greenway 0.42 mi � This souTheast Cary loop encircles two lokes and short, sTee hills and several olf cart crossin s. - �,�<. ��n so-ee�ror o� ma�o� o��e ase e cnamam s„ee� �e,9� asa-oaea coniin�es north along Thorpe Dme, a residential road P 9 9 � � ry provides greenway access thro�gh Ritter Park. Ca�tion sfri ed with bike lanes. A short section on Ca �� ` Cary Senior Center ihould be vsed when iravelin alon hi h vol�me p ry I°'' NC BIkE ROUf@ 1 8.5 miles : o SpeightBranchGreenway0.72mi �..��ti�a��yoaeuai��e�sis�aes-aosi g g g Parkway leods to Norwell Boulevard and access To I � �- t n„�,�, Roaa m ca�y Pa�kway thoroughfares in ihe north. These include Tryon Road � Bond Park Communit Center Southeast Cary Parkwoy and a crossing over Kildaire Along Davis Drive. This route is part of ihe Carolina m Swift Creek Greenwa 0.88 mi i'�.'�` hie«o Pa�k o��e �sis�as�as�o East Ridge Trail (1.6 miles� a Y Farm Road. ConnecTion, which NCDOT has designated as a portion d � �`°'P F�°» Ro2tl `° `2e9e°°Y °ark""aY � eond Park Boathouse This short northeast Cary loop is bcated at the eastem of US Bike Route 1, which r�ns from Maine to Florida � Symphony Lake Greenway 1.33 mi �"" g�„d Pa�ko��etsis�ass-aioo Tafbeli Loop (2.6 miles� end of ihe West Ridge Troil. WyaWs Pond Lane and I �� <„�,�,eoomnmPn��meave,w�m��Re9e��y❑a�kPoo ReedyCreekRoadtakeridersposTReedyCreekMiddle I`' NC Bike RoUfe2 (11.2 miles� �� Jordan Hall Arts Center Located on ihe wesTern edge of the Three Lakes Loop, � �c�n N�nn Ha„�so� a�e��e �9�e�ae9-aose School. East Dynasty Drive forms fhe souThem bound- l - Regency Park Greenway 0.58 mi � � ihis shorter route traverses rolling hills along wide, Along High House Road from Davis Drive. This is port of �� nio�9 ae9e��y ❑a.kway m symPno�y �ake Herbert C. Young Community Center residential sheets. This route provides access to Annie L. a�Y of The loop. the Mountains-to-ihe-Sea RouTe, which exTends 700 � �� n�,vok��so� n�e��e �sis� aso-asss Jones Park and ihree greenway inTersections. Two miles from M�rphy to ManTeo, NC. Extending inTo rural � . Kildaire Farm Multi-Use Treil 1.30 mi �� greenways are bcated adjacent to Tarbert Drive, with Park Central L000 (5.5 miles): westem woke and easTem Chatham Co�ny, this route �� :,�„�„ aeek c�eenway m Fo.esi R�n Pia�e . Pa e-Walker Arts & Histo Center . � �� :��.�„nassaeo� �ooP �s�e� aso-a9srsY the Third greenway occessible by sidewalk aT The is a favorite of Triangle d�b cydisis for recreaTional rides Camp Branch Greenway 0.62 mi � Stevens Nature Center at Hemlock inTeaection of Lake Pine Drive and Souihwest Cory Characterized by wide sireets and genTly rolling terrain, }o Green Level and Jordan Lake. r�, Te�, aoaa, s�a�ro� s��a��sm� eiuffs Nature Preserve Parkwoy. CauTion sho�ld be exercised when crossing ihis cen}ral Cary route haverses through some of The -eieKiaa��eFa�mrzoaaisi9�ae�-seeo Town's oldest neighborhoods. The Ellyn Drive spur Cafy Bike ROUfe #3 (7.8 mile5): ... Churchill Estates Greenway 0.50 mi $W Ctlry Parkway. -:�„ r��, aoaa, cn�,�mu e��a�es s�ea ms�o� Middle Creek Communit Center accesses both the Hinshaw and Pirate'S Cove Green- � This si ned route runs alon so�thwest and norThwest ��. Mamec�eekaa�kn�e��e�s��ni-izss ways. Both greenways are bcated off of Greenwood � g 9 NOffhWOOdS LOOp (2.3 milES� Circle. Use cauTion along Wrenn Drive and Bargaie - Cary Parkway and serves as a connection between waTch for backing cars from apartmenT parking areas. numerous bicycle loops. Portions of the rouTe have 14� For information about public tranzit connections look for the CTran Bus Map Bordered on three sides by major Thoroughfares, wide outside lanes, while other segments are narrow cyclists should exercise caution when iraveling this loop 7h�ee Lakes L000 (6.2 miles): with IiTtle or no sho�lder. This route is recommended for or the Triangle Transit Map at Town of Cary facilities and other locations connecting �aers to the Black Creek Trail, Godbold experienced cyclisTs only. around Cary. Information can be found at the following websites: Park and Cary's Skate Park. Cyclists heading nor}h This apTly named loop route is both challenging and � towards Umsiead Siate Park will want to use the Black Serene. Caich glimpses of MacGregor powns and Cary Bike Route #7 (3.0 miles�: www.townofcary.org www.gotriangle.org Creek hailhead located on NW Moynard Road, across Kildaire Farms Lakes and }he Apex Reservoir as you ride °� Serving ihe norfhern half of Cary, this signed route r�ns * from Godbold Park. Sudbury Drive, with its sTriped bike a rouTe ihat is almosT enTirely residential in nature. South along Hanison Avenue in the north forming the easiern - (919)485-RIDE Sil �is:'�y„ =_L�� ' lanes and residenTial naT�re, makes a good af Cary Parkway ihe Terrain becomes moderately edge of }he West Ridge and Northwoods Loops. � norfh/souTh altemative to Harrison Aven�e to access rolling with sTeep (b�t shorT) segments along Queens- Located on a major throughfare, This rouTe is recom- The West Ridge Trail and Eas} Ridge Loop to ihe north. fem/ Road. mended for experienced cyclisTs only. RALEIGH / � N�tlin9�am Dr 440 Qa- 5ouch Devonshire e H'lls Lake JohnsOn Place �� Park \0� aty ot aaie�gh � � �REI C J� 1. er�� S • oads 40 e`c9 S r � � piU a � Tne � ar Or /� centrum _ O 1� 1 � / I � Middle � Creek � Elementary j I i � g i I / / i S� i � i A Middle + � �� Creek - � � O High , � m 1 1 �, O� _ o timisr Fa�m Ra i west � p yyese Lake �� Lake �-� �� Elemen[ary Middle / i � � � � � \ / 1 � � � .`, _'� i �� r--__ J APPENDIX F Transit Route Maps 4:30 a.m. - 5:30 a.m. Towne North � Spring Forest Shopping Center ��. : � 3��. 9 _ � Mini-Citi � - Shopping Center d = v a� ooi ■ Crabtree Valley Mall m: Gteed� ,�Q:�� Buffaloe U= �/IIIIIIL d �$� � � _ �ay 440 .�` = � aa`' G�,'�., `��on z � :ospifal `,``J��`````````i' j ��iinnn fi �. c Lake Boone Trail � ��` �� Lake Woodartl ��` 'iumiuw� Wade ``,``��p��`` ````�f � .�� WakeMed �p`� 440 x o o` o Hillsbarop ,�n E h - � N � Endenton eF NCSU NeWg oce5 Belltower � - ��c"� Plaza West Wester� w Martin ._M . Shopping Center `� Marlin Luther A 9fhP � King Jr F �s � p P e��FeCry Ma1'Wood � � Shopp'nguC � ter �� Avent Ferry� g � v Shopping Center �� m o5� o�F "E Rush G` � �.440 i � .� 40 S�erra e,�' �� e, Tryon Hills Raleigh OakS v � Shopping Center Shopping Center �Garner Station Shopping Center � Super K-Mart � Super Wal-Mart Purser Radial Routes / Rutas Radiales � Capital �o- Falls of Neuse �- Glascock � Rex Hospital � Biltmore Hills Crabtree �■ South Saunders � Northclift � Longview � Avent Ferry Method � Chavis Heights � WakeMed �� Oberlin � Worthdale � Apollo Heights � Caraleigh �� State Street � CAT Connector Routes / Rutas Del Conector �� Carolina Pines / Rush iiiii�iiiii Sawmill ,,,�,,, Buck Jones �� Trawick �� Millbrook �� North Crosstown �� Triangle Town Center Express Routes / Rutas del Exprese � � - Wake Tech Express � Brier Creek Express Regional Routes / Rutas de TTA Triangle Transit Service to �' Cary, Garner, Wake Forest and Research Triangle Park (RTP) TTA routes do not change on the same schedule as CAT routes. For current TTA information please call 919-485-RIDE (7433) or visit www.GoTriangle.org Las rutas del TTA no cambian durante la misma programacion como las rutas del CAT. Para informacion actual del TTA por favor Ilame al 919-485-RIDE (7433) o visite www.GoTriangle.org 7�00 p m-10�00 p m SixP�k�S�ation 8�00 a m- 8�00 p m ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Sho in Center ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ TownNorth �+�,5„t;;�kla,�a BentTree � Sho in Center � _ pP g - y� °�ur�so � Shopping Center Townridge - o � .� r, 70e continues to ■ Shopping Cenfer x z �°'o ! S,Or� Brier Creek � Stonehen e Market �`� 1`��i�9 �? C o_� Shopping Center `n'1� `�� o�,. ij�' prPs Summer� Cen�e�e Town � � �4/1iA /N O = ns / o � '3rtu�u; �t E_ � peep °O � = Colon `�°o Millbrook Hollow q v2 ShoppingCenter� �'��nn�u�� '�1Mj11b`� Crabtree ot ■Va1leyMall �_ _ Quail Comers� _ a o � > d� North Hills� Crablree Shopping Center c �`� ee 00 ■Valley Mall = �� m Gt Mall ■ gdR` North Hills rd��mont = c�� '` �S` Gce Mall■ Na <`'uPrrnuassac` Um guff�loe `� e � New Hope �iuun_ � P`d9 � � e N. Church � �a� g��e �� a� Q;� d g ° x � Duke Health � �`� gNe ,n� o, Raleigh G�ee�� Rex a t�a 440 LO�� s �y Hospital �acs j�O• o � o_ i Z ■ Hospital ■Hospital � � S op " 3= �1°�°��%�� LakeBooneTrail � r\�aW 3 Plaz cr �`,7j' Skycrest _ o Five � Lake Boone Trail � ��cer Mill `�brr m� `�� Wade ■ �r� ee inn�� .L�NewHopeCommons Points � ■ Ralei h Blvd �� ' pp' g � dar 9 ?�� ``��pmmnr� Sho in Center �, Wade � Five edar lass c �ShoppingCtr�� x o � � O Points `�.` o Hi11Sbo�o 3 � o '-` Z. o � � Lane Bertie � WakeMed NCS � � h a�i � s `�,�c o Hillsbp�oU9h � c N _ � 440 BelltowerpUnn �7 � DriftwoodManor �� Bel�ower ��u� �� Edenton NeWgeF 440 wesr M Apts � � e�n c��vo`��u�� Y ui Wesrern M Lenoir P��e c�1 ■ 0`p�` ��P'"l"aza �.q.` � � AventFer �e��e Cameusial �� vvest �-qventFer ■ C o rY P May od a`� 1 ��i Sho in ry Centennial hd� MLK �4 �° > Walnut Creek Shopping■ P � S Center a`� ��'��.�� ``�(< Centerg �Feth Campus May od �, �� m � Shopping Center a �� i��qthe � P�eo i CAT m C? ' ' LL �� nS � � Little John `�� N �n �qmwi a Peterson c c 3 a`�' �° 40 oc � �`� � � Southgate �r°' o co� C�� e �e. 40 � � Plaz. �° y Lineber ��aF VM � Triangle Town Center a m UmQ � Beacon Plaza = Shopping Center � U � °Lake � _ Woodard3 9 1° `D New Hope Commons nter� ~ � Shopping Center pe Wilder's Grove z�' Shopping Center 2 Cd/�met � y �ake- °o V1ed a � 440 � � _ � ■ Walnut Creek Shopping Cenfer � Lineberry "�r• � YMCA■ a �� Carolina Pines Park■ � y" o ��`O�a�r Pecan c�' o` R Chapanoke Sq. � P � y Carolina Pines Park `'�� , ��N�� y� v �Ok p Shopping Center� v cn Ralei h Oaks ��`��` 'k`�"� � R � `� Uarry �Shon in�"SCenter d g ��` ShoppngCenter TI��h��U`` N Garner'sStationBlvd. PP 9 \de.�oo Shopping Center ■ �� ■Tryon Hills NOTE: Some routes \ Garner's Station Blvd. Shopping Center \a�e,�o°a operate as late as Super K-Mart r ■Gateway Plaza Super K-Mart ■Gateway Plaza m�dnight. Please call � . n919-485-Ride(7433)for Super Wal-Mart • � ■ Super Wal-Mart the exact times your ¢ „___ _ route is available. Purser � Durant Rd. WukeMeri North Healthple.r �w�, :' ■ ' �— � _ � Sl nrppritq Center �`�: SAoPP �8��0!'a ;;,Ra,�� 5�� Center u�u�� ■ StYiCklB�d Rd. gi.�� Forks Stotior� r�e ',,,�/%. o �((a��''',� 4p�� C�� C�� Brennan ShoppirigCenter■ �o � �:a C�' Dura�xtRo��4�� V Brennari Stntion ■ �mu� Sr �v� � lilemen(m-y ��4� Shoppii�g Center FOfUm � � � �� ftoppi �g � SCOptiij� � bdn i.T ls ��nnuuq�n yp��ii..,,. 's q 1 to RTP, ; t c�,�r�� ,ate 70e non—sto Len�l Mine RoaA � West Millbruok �� ` ■ ��0 31'IQI' CYQB�( p ■ Fleneenlan� � Middle Sc/mnl ��d` NBfpS MIII �� Nnri reaPc�n-k ��p� o e EXPog ti ` Litchford �''. tc1 Rd. Stonehenye Market � O �� _ Vil(age '''. �p3�a ShoppinqCe�eter � � Slro/�ping � � : ( � _ �� O�Centrr : �ge�� GrevstoneVil7cxge o SMill �.� %.�� SfOnehe �p0 q. � Sha � in Center - � �Q - �'. ..iuu�u�� .j�. 7P� 8 � a ' ''. ' %, ■ Nar(h R�aleiglt : Ravenscraf! `T � '� � �•. � ��`�`��".S>� ReXio�iafLibrarv■ � Acrulenry■ '�i��''iL Glen Royal ° �a��` � Celebrntion NorNz Ridge '�y �O��i -�o ='��n�nP ��u��ntSix%orka' � ■h;deme�uary �� '��i a. � ? = Shopping Ce�iler- N _ feali�ig Q � _ = , _ V = o �for r �/P = �_?�• :':oni��inNeWiolin��7 � � Lilcltford � Road U �jy v�_ aDr G� � � Trrailer 0 0�� P��up ' o G ' Pnrk � oo, = c%. �o '��F u+ 3 a �9� - °j'�•,o oa:',•. a3 v `D :�: ,�„ ., $ _ � � . Fa��s v;��a�e - � ��i�� Sliopping Center■ � ; 0 40 E(einentar�� / . unnumumnnunuyi,p�iq `av�� , 'O;S. `�Q a ■ Fox R � 70� ��p�nnu��m` „��4�� %o �tkSRd� ShoppiSq�Center egt �\, at��uuuuwumn�� Je iera Grove .� F � s' J � ��¢ � .,,S Milll�mok O Q;� - Elenteittari' ■ � ' I .� 9 Sa�a � � ��O Eschnnge _ .�,eF ti�0/p, l�01'.> .,. � � � �'�%Q' Q�� North Rtdge �p�� Pm�k _ ��S�a � Triangle Town ��qp�l�Va �e�� O �23t�..r�° ♦W�ce � �, � � 5::' �■ Sliapping Center � Sr � � O Center � � f�� : `� 3 o`�i v ��e•.,.��,�.� `�O � � m = Tech , S N°rt � j p�C�� 2�\U� � «t F- = Porner Nurth Y hC/� p. �C��` �+� o V��a Mi[l�rook ■ '� Sumner= ■Pface Canapias o T�� Oplimist �Dr. °' �jQ��`� � � Sclwal .� ununmr �, . . . � Tau,�iridge 4qill , Z Park■ � Hi,h. �m� i ShopprngCen�e� rOokRd. : O '�.,, Bend Fa\\s •..,� -� �d, � �i�e.:::miu� Chutch > �� SheFl�e1+-Serto�no i: � Sa�tdersura �Uq\�r Cedar Hi!ls -C� m `" Creedrr�oar Crassirag ?cu-k O High Schoo[ y� m E. Millbrnok �qp�� o�eaSah •. �' a�e� Pieasanr Vald�v Shopptng Center■ Q ��` Pa�� o � Mrdd[e Schoo/ — �Promenade a ' �� Q`+ i� Millbrook Rd. � U • Q`E' � � ■S7iappingCenter � �� u �m�uu� i��r m Q. � � o _ , s a . Spi;ng:Forest� �a, Kohl's in� Jes 3( d ° ` ��'�i�i m `'� _a U� � ' � � � � � Co/onl' ��'�.. m o�� _ � = m � 70 �o, � J 1' Q0 � _ S}roj�pirig �'. m � � _ a ��pJ� Aleeander V O o��o� O��OnkPm�- C/ Yo�-k U _ Center :�� a � �= O`�� ee 1-1 Sho�nn �' _ ��nu�niu�uiu��in�,�n�„Mi��brookRd. � dlbrookRd.� �. P ll B O Glementnr�' ■ liiiili•.• Promenade ■ �ap -o= uail Corners °1jjjpjpp1°011��L4A M 3' CenEer Litlle BrierC�� Wn6Mnrl d L �= G�-��c�� Sh� �in� Cenler� rSi7i�� 7 ��' � '9 �_ Lu�heran Churdt PI 4 ■ r Q■ c � Mr/lbraok z �( � �' ■Q � � Capital Mini ? �e — Elementm � > u� c. p�i 707 �� o a� � G-ossing Cih� �� m � - �� o�a9p � zW.. . � � � N. Q o> �: - S.0 � _� � `e Gt, x o . . J N � 2 0��``C 7qrqejqnn� C8/Ld 'o !� �i' ota ....�� y :� � - d - o Cnrroll '� �� `040„ � 8 Q o�Q , � �� -' o - �■ Mir(dle Sclxoal �a Creen Road �� _ :: � U 1- ' Lt� � � r�, � N ¢ Pa� k■ _ fi` � i� � . � ; a y Green Rnad . �Ol� Q Q.d : 3 [,ibran ■ c °' Brie�� Creek .� �p0'� � = �� OU Eastgate � Ashton Crabtree �.� � "f.r, 00� �� ■Pai�k NB�qjpl��f � Tarrvmore ■Square m 4ileCa Shoppiiag Center �teed Va/ler Ma/l �. �� 1 ��Qt O' . {O� ��i� �� Eastga�e :'p Square■ � St. A\bans Or `�0�� topping Center� ��p�� NeW Ope ChurCh Rd. C \,a' ` North inm::; :�uuuinii � on�nw wo ::::�iuuuuuu�r �� '��: i� �0 Hills .� � ° �� •.. Computer St.q�b roQ � D' `auuunnq � aQg� Bre�anvod V � a� �a' o� � ��': � clh� r llernentnry '� Buffaloe Rd. r \Q' `d9e e�5 :, �; '� � `y��nuniuuuunuu~ '� �$� �JO� +�.� � .�r6li�: a�i" Slai�inount = Z , � �5 G� � .� 8a�o�� m� ■Sho>>ni��Center _� DukeHealEh �E � � a� ?� 440 �� v �� Rolcigh flospital _ o Olde Rn[eigh Vil(age � o,� o Root � �-a _� O� Elenielt(arv ■ Sho��ing Cenler■ 7 �" = 37 9 Gle y St. Dnvid's `� : 1/enn Wilbnrn s: � Eden pr m ■ High Schoo] S, �o ' E;lenaentnrv ' a �o i = • r� a�; 'rF d r Scleaol = � orkSRd �� ",�: a` ��`�uuu��uF 5�,, ``i � �` �am� 40 m � � �� J�' Hrghwoods g`pG� • pg� HI�� Rex� lake Boo�ie Highlm�d United o "' �� ■ � � MaC��`•� a o 6o,e.s �, � ��a� ' , , �u,,, � Hoe�pital Sho��ping Centei� Metliodist Churdi Q� ro � ,- '�� E(emenla�v Shoppiny �a\ � �� Q ■ ■Q ��' � Jo�v�er Plazn aQ� - .. ? Lake BOone Tfall m � � ' Elementart� �' =`� - m C.��cc � Glenwood � - �'Ip vi = ° ? °��z. Villa e Dcu�ie(s � N0i/ � _ Q '. � � NC Martin �Efementary 57topping � Sch�aol ,p�� v HOdgeS S� ❑ '� � �c ■ Art Museum Center O c _ � 4 = Micldle School ■ � � � SkycresY Dr. „� �/'d 'm Q � %In�u::::iuuuuui� %9 a�, �� o _ a �, _ ;a 0 a a�a c y a Nlhitaker M'�11 Rd. C o� = _ District Dr. � � � Ker�`�`J\ i/len' rdbt�ee �~s,Q ;u,,� � _ p N �r��a Place Bi� a - 3 : Rzdgewood � � a ❑ ' Shopping Cerrier T Five t � arksdale _ F ��on��4� � � Pnu�rs ■ se� ¢ 6 9 ,� Lake Woo oia:: �,��i WatleAve. Jnycee � ■Eleriie�tarv 0� � a� � 47j �i�u�u�::::��d8rd � �: � d�' �O d s � � �� :u� NervHapeC�namans Q /�Q, � ,,. � �. = ■Shoppiirg Ce�iter �. 1J' Pc�k N .S pe � ��o`� Sti��`�� Shoppi�ig BPla a■� � �u; � n1115 � �a �O� Cerzler ar.:: o�umu�u iuumnF )64� c Merecli�h � ■bveract V2 College � a� ' Co�u� �Vlillbank �m � ` � ��o�O", Wilder's Crove � � ■ Q' E7eme�varv PM �� P! S m H111SbotoU9h � Raleigh p�p�Brs � ■ °� Park �, M Howell M ,`� a' ■ '.��uuu�� `� Sho �i�z Center Lions aA aitlan o` ■ Ete�n�r,f��„� �(. NC State � Charter H.S. ■ r i � � 5 J� Q Farrgrounds ■ Beryl Rd. — Olds �+ Fred �o , � � t\e ��.` � � ■ MeUiodPark ro■Elenterztury O� Cmneron Fletcher■ b Cedar ¢� •r` GIaSCOCk p� ��i �.� G� p NC srare � � �a, O ascock a�` L��Vi[lage Park p7 x T . � `,.:. ,._ _ Arbnretum � � m �- � Q, o> Q Hillsborou 54 a x ' Camerong,.,,�,��,��,,, �70 �o � o Virginia Y �� gh St. � c � Clark 6 y`��' °' _ �Franklin � V� Ca� �b m Peace m � y�e ' ` Ni/ � caj�� chool� . eace UCo/fege� y m Phillips `\b�rn�a [,ongview �: uMet g �� b'G�. �sborou y Oo� � High Sclzool M ■ ElementcnyM�/b4rn� � • Western g�� Jackson St. '��, � h a Augusrine'c � o�� gertie e`° ` a� Mc�Krmrnori � North Coro/ino Wz Co/lege =� � a ' olston „ Ki� rt CerEter �� State Uiiiversity i E[ement WnkeMed � � �a, w o ■ 'x Oakwood � , Pla-o -O ` - - - _ wesr Cates >m Oun � SI. Mcu.v'r ' � �o� ' ;6GF ��Wesl �a:.� rn ��Q, R '�� n Belltower Scho: � Longriew ■Hi1,IheSchool�� ;, o b5nplo)�me��t440 e Q,d' .� � e MOftill � , ��W��W� I- Shappi�ig S m o Seairi�� ne5 �o°��`�'�o� �`� '`� Pullen _ Ce��xerNew Bern Ave. � F ta c■�Carl� Sandburg �� , -�. =■P�„k ■ Mo� RALEIGH _ �J�� Y �a M�sroii Vallev � Gm�ernor (SEE OTHER SIDE) DMV '�o R ��' m Wnke Cotot(�� /e a Socinl Services ■� � ro�- Morehead Centr� 0' O Kidd o .� � Shop�irig Center � e y a � .? �f e� Schoo( ■ Priso o c ¢ 9 Kaplan Dr. ap F O,� U.4 Clinic �e� � ��G� ��ii Con�bs N �C�. .Q � d"i ay�i J� a ��'� �t `��h �;::��i ��0�� Elemeninry � � Cerat� ieial TO MOOrC �qm � Ligor� �� 40 �:3�' ��'p;e; : �i•. 0�0` ,:' Cnmp�<,s SquaYe pu ,� o � Middle Q � a Poole Rd. 9��' O�•(� 440 ��'%�� Station ! �� —° hdvis�,�,�� Scl�ool t\��u�her King Jr. �`°o ROUTES / RUTAS LOCATION / LUGAR � _ �a.�- '�•, a °oiot�'P° °i, ■ s�„"° °' � . a . �� _ ��i��he� Hospital Oraii�ersityM in th �� MHer��lits �� j . Ffial'TuCk Rd. � � �.aplt8� C�t .SpPlllg FOC2St -�i "i1Omn Higli S�iool ■��`•'.•; et<y�d Q. Wndnut � � � � m� _.� �%' `��Blvd N Prark � .� � e�tF �ei Te�race Lee "�' m(7 Q ee// o� ■ � a� a � P'� AvenX Ferrv 6� �' � o �C � o Ed�s Wahxut � o� O� TriangleTown Center ` �a/ � ��, �� 01O4��j:� 0■ Sho��pingCenter e r �� E Bragg iA T,(, � G^ �• V ■ CreekSC m� Crabtree Valle Mall n4t St, c �^�� '�� °i = � Coi+echoriol � a�i �-�juRR MiddlO �� y � m � � m Hoke Cenrer o� � Branch J+ � �n F ■ t �o LittleJohn Elc�r�. �� i Farmer's � � Cnrna � �� Q Raiph BgAm j? Lalce Johnsore Keete � S' � � TO `�6� � ■ Cilc Yark 5`� - Mrmket o Middle School ■ NC Co� reumnnl y Carnpbe// Worthrlale Wilmington & Pecan r a� � May�'oodAve. m f ,� P��j'� P°'k o RTP o > Peterson /r��na��e o� Q � > > �cc (� A Wanie�a � North Hills & Northclift Cary �,� ��.�;..wa,,,U� c,�e� � ■ � � - so�,,,,Ru,P a � � City Farm � Sfroppirig Center� . j �� AvBllt F2fl'y ShOpplllg Celltel' � r/e �sha� Cee"'ay ,� � � cs��, so«d�gare v> hls F � � a� Balley Fuller yr Pnrk■ Ow S�CS �O . � � F�enleiit(I�l � w�� illara�r ��r 'lhotna . \� 40 440 C7 � �"�: `�■ �Pi�c�or �pol � � WakeMed o ' 0 o _ ...;,� _ 3° Sierra "`Carolina Pin New� a d\ey� % �°J =� ttY Rd. �r. eS o a ,. ; q =s �° ebe �.�y �be Om .� ```` a' '�.°�k Q =¢ h L�P �P�O�� r2 C. � Garner Rd. Ly� o ..,� �, : �� yK�� Pecan � YMCA■ t}7 � �°j.?p�L eo� ■O _ ,,�� , � Ruleiglt Oaks `!-�� Pin S��Pa�-k � �" ��O`�� c� ,1 ��`�� C%ja � '' ' � � �� 1 � ShopE�inyCenter�a•� �.: 41°`�� F e: Soud�eostRaleig/r 40 ■ .O� d%nu�� o Ilea9�e5 � -� - Higli School ��iiiiii;0�� J� �' m = � a x ;u� U � p�n�un�n RUS Cednr °� a�'i ■RonciP�ik� N I� m � TrYory �� un�un � S,", C�est Apts. � S`'Ctlbrook >. \ � x �Franklin � ��n,� �o`• � �,; n o � "�'��" Savannah � a '�� U Peare � � � e�oeO� ..... �� Peace College ■ � Peace E � o��ag c;/ � = cn _ c o r � � o 0 07 d '30 0 0 m a � � y IMI -o o .N ' w i � m � °3 �' � � Lane � � � � N � c � — ' uj (7 � x 3� o 0 Grevltou�id p � m Jones � � E Jones Edenton � � Edenton � ' Hillsborough �� Strne ' _ � Cnpitol : c New Bern Ave� � Morgan �o��' � � Hargett c � N 3 Moore � o M Square — N � Sta/ioft _ � Martin St Amtrr�k� Davie � Davie Cabarrus St. � � 0 � � Convention�� o� � o CabBfrUS St Projec� � Cerrtci� � o �^ in F,n(ightenment m E m a� � 0o\a� � Lenoir St � � W a W W Lenoir St �� so�m st � � � � Progress y � N Energ}� N ��%cenrer ' � � wester � 6 `� � Blvq . �� , y m TTA to Wake Forest %� Luther � � r � U � Martin Luther Kina Jr Blvd S1. Aiegustine's College ■ �o� 0 `o � � a � 0 `o .O � � Chapanoke Gighthouse Chapaitoke Sguare Corme�itian Sho��piny Cer2ter Center Tryon Rd. � � � � - ■ 7rnon ili/ls Sleoppin.q Center Garner's Station Blvd. Mecha Gorner Stanon � , n��a/ � Shappi�tg Cen�er ■ � Gntewnv Z Supei-� P[nza K-mnrt � To Wake Technical College Forest Hi11s Sl2oppirag Cente��. Srh,q� e. �°� ��`hq m � �e � � o � o D° a �m � . 1 1 1 1 m m 7 `� � LandmarWSenales o ao a Moore Sq. Station Transit Mall/ la Estacidn De los Buses `� State CapitollCapital del Esfado 0 Hospital/Hospital � Park&Ride/Parque y Monta � �Transfer Point/ Punto De Trasferencia White Ouk Shopping Center O CAT/TTA Transfer/ Transferencia De CAT y TT �O 2009, City of Raleigh DOT Map designed by Smartmaps, Inc. Maxway Shopping Ctr Hillsborough Durham • Triangle SportsPlex TeCh OCC Park-and-Ride � .� EubanksRd � �� NewHope Park-and-Ride �� Comr (Rte.500) �, � � � ♦ Homestead Rd � 501 Senior Ch i Downtown Durham VA Hospital • � Duke Hospital �� ' ' � ,� � � American Duke Univ Tobacco ; Park-and-Ride ,!� `fc�l_, • � NCCU � Durham Tech • Westgate Dr at Target , Old Chapel Hill Rd �� c'� j CHT/TriangleTransit --�� Transfer at Franklin St i Chapel 5� CHTITnangle _. '"'�" Tra��sitTransferat • J'-< :°;,�r:ntunicn UNC Hospitals 301 303 ��; RTP • Apex • Cary • Raleigh 402 403 412 413 RTP • Durham • Chapel Hill 420 Hillsborough • Chapel Hill (Operated by Orange Public Transportation and Chapel Hill Transit) 500/550 Express Chapel Hill • Raleigh 600/650 E��?r ��-=�=� Durharn� • IFt��e��°° �� SouthpointvMall Park-and-Ride v Q o� m` �, triar� letransit � take it. easy. System-Wide Map � Points of Interest Transit Center Park and Ride Lot � ��yr'i n .� s.' r �=igh • RTP 201 m North Raleigh • RTP mQ U NOt t0 SCa�Q. White St at � � Bus Route ElmAve WFX �xpress � - - - Park-and-Ride �� Express Route �ur„�ted stoPS� �'' �� Wake Forest • Raleigh 4� � (Operated by CAT) Wake � � Forest � ' ZWX Express ,' '� CornwallisRd � �� DavisDr c � Zebulon • Wendell • Raleigh m �� • (Operated by CAT) ��40i 4�, �r ♦ RTP � " v� '��80� ♦ employers �� - served bY � � � ��" r�..r ; ShUtfleS R�'� d a � � � �� o c ExchangeParkat + :�.�IQ 6" 42, 46, 47, � � ,�et� Spring Forest Rd � 8nd49 EmperorBlvd � �0 � � ca� . ShelleyLake �YnnRd _ Park-and-Ride �°�'�' Triangle COMING WINTER 2010 � �c - Park-and-Ride � � Town Center * � �e Miq �, � Park-and-Ride This route is in planning stages. Details to come. o riarig i � is� ♦ � dr0pk R � z � Regional l � S�afe, ��♦ � � a� 2 � D 'Qa � Pleasant Valley Transif Ceiiter ��. R D U A i r p o rt at Gold's Gym o a � ♦ � o, c�� • a �. Z � a "O�i Morrisville �� - �" � � C5r . %� Outlet Mall �' ��E� Millbrook Rd � .. , atTarget 'Po- P m ! T • Zebulon A � Raleigh . �a, e � District Dr � o � Gannon Ave � oQ' ��Park-and-Ride n � Wolflinel I atNC-97 `` '� �� ' Trianyle Transid O qq� Park-and-Ride ♦ T`° � � � • . . . ■ w� Wade Ave • rransfer � ♦ - Meredith ♦ ��,� � ■ : � � � � � � � �., -, Ki��ghtdale , - • � � ♦ S �♦ . � ■ r; , ��.�, ��an/Tr�angle Trar,a t � � � �9hst � ■ �� ♦ � 4 � i"ransferCen�e? « � ChathamSt Hillsborou N bor� � h House �� ' � t 9h St ��\S � New Bem Ave Med • ♦ � � � ►� H.ig Rd Cary Tr,iv7 Stai'c ,, a • NCSU ' �� ♦ € �� . �:d�TlTriai�gle Tr�i�sit �� Wei�de�� o��'�� westef 'r;.nsfer Center at Ntoare Square � � � � - � �� 4th Ave at . Maynard Rd � �_ South Hills Mali n g�� 64 ��4��` Oakwood Ave pY � Park-and-Ride d • Shaw Univ Park-and-Ride ____- q�p a (Rte.301) Big Lots Lake Pine Plaza Park-and-Ride �a��fS Park-and-Ride f � Cary � , �� d�s Edinburgh Apex South wavedyPlace �Galaxy Food Park-and-Ride Park-and-Ride � c c �� Garner a4o Tryon Rd + 0 ti Forest Hills p � Shopping Ctr 9�p � Park-and-Ride A •a White Oak Shopping Ctr � ��l\%%/%�) . ' '� / ( I \\ � : _ � � � � � 1 .. _.. . .. / , �: f . '.� P.� t^A \ l � � -1 . �.... . � . . � � � �� `� \ I � � �-i�,' � S' � �� ' �� . _ L � ' , ia�T��t��r�� , ... \ : � , �� c,,� ��v°�w��q . . .� . � �� _. ,,, ..,, , : , . _ n, .... _, ,1 ., , . . . . , ... , . . . �, �. _ . .� � . a, f_ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. �u v � ,, � . ..................................... .................................. .. � � , , ,�� ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ................................::. ; . .,� ) ,... r./ n t � , :::::::::::::,::::::::::::::::::� \ � � r . � I. . � , � ,,.: ., , ��: � �, ,:.. �_ , �� . d -� c� . , / �, � �_� � '��.�. . . . ..l ��,...A �• �� ,� ! _� W��`��' _ > �.,�.��, y' � w�'�,`" � , � , �, L a _ I.,�.. iS..•Vrl3iY 1�R.liU'3�1::1' _ �. . ' � : � ''s, ..,i \�. ......... i � �/ y 1 I ' .. .. . .. . . 1 .... .. . , ;'„✓ � : � � �� . .. ...� ��, �� „ ,: � r�� /\ ,_'� I � _ ., .. .. : / � . �, ry � \ J � ) . / (\.. � ,,�;.� _ ,.�.��;::w• � ;� `�. < � '1 p11WS'I 1./;IJ �� Y� .a, �l « ' , �, , 't �e)iV S i /:'i l! > � � .... ��a 1 � �a�� ' ;,;'r�� ' �� ..._ i i iau ` � � . _ ..1 i«,az�. �./ �. ,n � ` , �e , f a �u� A i � ' s; '� � . - ... .. _ Q:i�'��Isfi�mr�: ____ y \��'��'�\��'�`a 1��\��'�,� ��'��'� u'��'� �',��<a�� :� � � � � J � � _ __�� 'u€s[r �� - " �_ � .. 3 .� ...... . _ ' .. �� I ...\� \.,�� \ �` � . . . .. . . . . ... / . ...:' \. � .. �\.... � ��kei3c} ... �� C _ ' �, ' . tr�E si�ru k 'wY �� - \ � � � � . - � , � i..1" C3� .C� �� i) \� �� lJ �.__ � � ��,� � ��- �� l- , ,, ��-- ,; � �� : � �., � - �� % . _ � � � � _ 7 � c �r _ _ f �`� </ l /` \ . � \ c ,! m::: -�C � �'\ �� iC ,. \C,�,,� \ � � _ �� >, � ,_ , �� _ I � � _ �� 1 :.. � � _ -- C _ - ( � �� J I � ,y� _ .. :� l, � � � � \ s°�� . � � ��: �� _ _. _. � .._ � � h.;�>� ��, - \ � � '� f (� ( � � �� . \ %,, _ �e- � l/ � ��1��4! , i� _' , C: � /::(,) � \ � ,` � ! � � f ��/ 1, ,,.>� � (� < � ��; \ , , � i. �' . � , �� / {�� I � ` � � �r�, 1 \ / `�� { \` ,. \ }l r ,` ( � � , . ' ;� k�ri�A., ' J . ��. I f .� 1 �< r _� �� : �°','Y (,,( � � 1 I :i i \ R`�s�cx�c�1 C�� ... \ ��,. �� 1 I� - } _ �� I � ; � , ,,,,, \ l / � , � I ' ,,,, c �,�,q _ , , � -�.i.. j �(�iria 1::.. '' r:l ' \ „�4 : :� i i'm.v ....�_---- � Rf . ) ...�� < �. .�f j _ C \� � hah��tap}?�k�vy ��;:.\ 'tum�a�u:v1 i�� _. (,<. . �, :. � ;: -� /�l _ z � �� - � � .. � ,� � _, �, / � � � , � �� ` �` , _ � - . _ �_, � �c� . = � _ iJ �, �� _; _ . , � �`c _ /,� ,, - <� l �__ � ;� � � � \ � � � , 1 I � � .,... �/ 1�� 1 i 1 � � 7 �\ _1I � `„ � >/ \/ `�l� �� 1; �rt` `� 5r, �. � \ 1II\ II ` ../ �� ( )\'•.V . i ...`� l.\�e �� • <.•e <�. �' ��. !.. � \J� �(�� 'S�\ / �� " \ �� • ! \ � � � � / I \ � \\\\ \ � " i,:% ,.., � l� ) 1 � �� /\ ,( r i/ \ � \� � � l i l � - / , l `� ..:..� /\- -�� .. !.. . 1f� -- �,._.... �/�� .. /�� : ��I... ) \_ �` C �� \\ � � -��0;r;��. liaaak .p. .p RaQQi i� \ \... � / I �[��icn�Qoi�Mi ��- : - , ��/ �\ li�pPrls�ddaR \-,`/ / � I�.. AS�4 '^'aSV�ii , �'� r� �/`��,: �� - - .1 `� � � % ' (1/ 1 "�1'/ � \-`r�I ' ' %��lr i_ � J✓uld[i1b. �iluccminQa�y a ._.... -..../r �. � I r I. ln¢yakuy `\ i.,.. ' � ..� .�. � -...\1 �. :. ...1_ l_\�_/._. \ V. �_ � ' • ,. �. _ \.../..I 1 �� ..I._ .. . / . rr.,.. _ _\ ) � , 1� 1 //� � � �� »_ :.. �, I:_�� , 1 < , ,: .C, �� i.-! � ,.�� / � � 1 ( �., � 1 �r � �� C� � V7y;uasiy i7r , ' < � C � � , ` \ - %, J ILn-) ` � ��,\� J 1.. � � \\ � _ � iiPac;T _ � r . . , - � �_ �< < �-� 1 �v� � ��k� � __� � ,- � , I � �i6 � ' .�_ � . a��R , � J -� �_ � Ir._. � �� . . �) � � � '� O (�( � � �� _ ��,� . �" �� /J>d � � _. � � � � v_-_ C . 8 ��0 //r 1 I .�y� � _ �-_ .. � - - �� .,] __ � ` Cd GIllIV10'l / .. / /-'� " � A</ � II .d�.('�r � � . Oi :C�� I !1 . ..� , ��i ...iC �b S(R00{1'P�1'('�\.i�.,�. �/ �., � � "'� .f�� .......... /' � ....�� ,d' 14 .._. �� '�� .� ��.I . �l( �./ � . , .... �� .... �' ,�" J' _� � tl'�o)6� J __._ .. . . . . . � . � ..... � . :r � �_ � , � :raai �) i ..... � :..- �. . S (:e,�Fi� :��o'aeuY.•aio� � � � � � �i,-� � c'� d�D� � � :( I�� .... .. , i i ..�.ti �„_ 1� ( .� , � f .... J/� ,� �.� �' � � � / �. �... I .. � {l.i � i / � � � �0.�: WOOCg / A �� te x*Lt�$5:..i - t91[Ih� � �, � � . -' C) ��- � �C7Vi � - _ _ � / � � f[� ,'�, - �- I.'.lui::an aq, _ - �:� , . � Z ��li' ' s . [.n, l, �:��s 1.� � r � _ � � � _ �. , � i (� � /� �� ._ ( � ��es:o„ �.-- � � .�.1 � Ci ��;o�:iirii��. �. < ��I . .�o �, � ��ii _�� ,�cc�� 1 .� � )J � i � l ...... -� � Q � � l.7 � / iArg.ik � � � �.i ' �C,�c.�fk . '/R� / `...� ........ Q I � ( v /( l �f ., � GO oi:0{ U\ �` � \ � � ' � "_ / A \ � 7! I / - . � ��.�SIGg j _. . .'� ' lC S�CSG' � . � ' . A � - � � / � � �, � � �_ / � �� _ � a t �pi ..�� ,,,. . �� \ 1 crow.c,��ru�� ,...� � "inia� � .i � � �.....� , � l ( �� >� �� / C �/ � 1. V F �� ` ; <..„... `�� / \ � � � t .� �. . � V�, ��o� ' ;;. '� f\rr � �I �� , j / � � � l _ � , � �\11� � �� 1 ,:: .,, ., 1 , � i ._._. _ v ( �so _ �� : - I 1 � � � � ,::.. : � � � � l s 1 �� 3' :,�s.o o�u , � � � , � , � �. � S 1 � l� �� '� � ,-- , � � r / , r� _ �",\ 0 � ( � , � , � � l. ,�--� \ �� 'Ai'A�. . i � �_ � ._� �� .� . ��:� > l) � � � V �� qi� . _.. � Ci�V. . r � � o� �� .l� �,,_, Rc� C�o ��__ � f-� ,/ � � � (� l � �� f � ��.. � � ��: ��L � � . � �� /1� � � � ��\ �<� ....� � /A � � \._i .____. � �� __-.i FiU �e�C�..._ . �4 � �� P� PPl' 4�i'@N(>p .. .� � � � � � � �e�� "` � '� � � ... � � ,: � A. � ��+ , ' i e��l�x � '�c�4�� a� � ,� �� ` � � � � � �� l � l r . . � , � , _ �_ . . .. w n . 't r . , . C}4. i4RPi6tR s4� . I P �, i � . � _ � ,� , c _ ._ � . . - , , � - l, ,�.. � ... t. �S�.i � � C : �' ��- , I - t�:� �,�� . . � �� /1 ii �� `�.c�'de � � . I' �.fc.�ss Y �e � , . . C� C� ., �, I ,,,. . ; � ,,- �p � pV . 4i� CEtt� �. � �_ � � �Sa>i3€` �� f1� l� � � _. � K�' �, �._. �[ _.'� , �� ... JYi l=_�b_ � �S..�g/�e1C� �.... 'i � 1 � `�� 3� � � I �r K��r �:�� // kC --�. � / � . �.. � �, -�.:.. J �_J, � ) -� i �, . �.dcnsc, � . �. Dr r�bA1Ta .i ... ,.. � � � � /�r �. � � � u: 11: �.S€aiib� i . ._. . s:.: YrbP�' • B . . :; �:.- - 1 ...re. ... / . , .. `. . _..... . � � . _ � .. � ' . . . i3 . . \. _...... . � -...'x�l- ��>: � ��`r� � � { - # . .. �. � .Af � . � 1 I ��7':;V��7" i1 k�b]] (:bh??Hk�. �� (:i1 S'�1dei? -��i8<��' � �.I . _ .� � . � I�c" �'PP �� ..._ / � � � � . � �n: - ... �' a .. �n �i' ,��.�.f � I 'lS �I ,,, ( I .. .. �PB�1 �"P ..__r.- �p . .. .. . � .��. � �� 1. 7 ( > ;3r.;cii>;3r. � r �� - � �� . � `.. ��-�. �� , ....:. � _.� _- . � _ � �� -' ]� �/.. u ,�`�, \ � .. �:�.. ... S%�try \ �... �.... � . �._ .. .. ... -.. �:: C;' ✓ �'fr.cSi>;s � / � ...... � ... _ \ I �, 1....., � ��.t;f� � 'Y;aLs ; .lo.lo.,�,;� �c.�tPl.a�/�� I I ��.. �"�� _ �fr��`dSt ' � �'��..... �� Y�. u� >" . �. �. . �� . �u _ �' 1re�_-. __� . �� 1 1�>;iir.;c I , � �, �� sas50-,f w�:r�i 11W� � -��<�:: �, e� . � ., ; ? �` � � ,,.,, � / �' """s:G �:.�� 3e23� :: .. � f I <� t, �.�� , � ( � � � � � � - I ,l I ( �� - I ( ___ _ :� c; u. - __- � { ( ` S �, � �� ....,.. �p (;� c. c�� o � ��,..I. �, . , 1 \._.r l ....�� ' / \, 1 I - � 1 � I , 1�I .. ... r r .. ..:... , .�:, ......:... I I l 9 ... [ ,'I �i. I � , _. . I ., _ . I � � ( y ..... .1 �,.�V .. .__�. ,..._.. ._. .. � _./�r ��'..,r:........ � .r��. . l._.- )I _.;;" / ...,..!.". "`� . . ' / a�ll. rossrtKiicc-- �I 1 ..... �� I 1 I�..� vJnarh��lu ...' %y�/ ��.._: I � . \ I �::.. .... ' .. � �. -^:J� , .:a , ...- / �.. ( l- � c.a,yF .......... .. J i . i �; , � ., ' _ _ �iR F �\. l,_.._> ........ saci.i,ini,a ,i � I _.I �� -•'�I7)/ lP</71�) 5 _ .. .i � ._�: � \ �� , � �; x � � � / " 1 1 .�: �i ( 5J�9n�n�'l;'kvar��Pa*� � c��.St � � I l. � � r' . �. J ¢� `O � , _. �' i> � � � . .1 � Senson /„ . �/ ,� 'C�y....... . � 10� '� �.:'1: ��9€syr�s{[t3 (.re c g�� . �/( �,:. � ��l�,' � . . , . ,i ..., P6�Y �� .. � �' � � , �_, � � ' f � � � C� / �� I �' I :� � � ` � /�9 �r � �._� I `�. �. �1....'. � -b � S1f��f10r1 � (�.:,uu,,�r, 1 //", ;��e>u.ir. 1. ... �0 I➢� / �. / � � � � ....., � i� -' e:cnsc, �.� / ... j � ... �...... I �:.!� � � � { � � i . J .. � - � I .� .) � � �l. / �( .1' �.. :: � �.. .../ � .. / 'e�s .._.` � .�. . . I C:�a c» g� 1.,� � I. � �- - . .. �.i ;ane3 *a k�- _ \..... 1(Ky.:V/ L J.: C �i �(1 , { � " . � � , c:�V�b ��b��a.� �` •r'r, . . � �i ,' � " ��, n I I � If �/ � 3 _ . \ /• / � , 1 \�. ii,tnc, (.a;n;ni�; n;r 'C: �� r ( „ C.� t 0 ( a ir7[i,.. � 1 i�... J IE / � 1/ �� . y,� �� J \ I fx �.. �1 i� (:[s7r `��, J � F�.s�f �i � . � - -�. ; . ., � „ r.ow�n � � Y � . i,�,., . . i �� ., . , ._� � � .. __ . ..... e�.. l ( "� U .t.,. (, � � I 1 1„ �: . t�i� �.ap�;�el�o � �� l^C�i rr.;u._ �� .. � �� e� � � ...,�. % �� 1...... _l ._ - � im�rur,o .� c:cnscr � �. ..... � V � 1 � ��'� ; ]rs'r'�s .� � � - � � .��A � . � "$")i�� -. .�11,2 � ua .a�� .: � � i �"�l � � %. _ ----� _ . , - � --j ... � .. _ � - � .. I ..., � % � . � . � � � "_. �� :°K .ane3 *�rz - _ - ' � J t ��:€�6�rtan � i M ' � � � � C � ( � �_ � � � ��,. � � � � �� <<�� , - � , �� ' < ,_ � �� L� � � �� -�,�. _... . � f� - . � , � , � ( ( < < � s , �� -=, l <<� � l�,_ , - �� um�K�, � , .a�s:;�w�sc � `t ` � � �� n w��.aw�, � � � � i � ' � � ..., � Ke \ -' ( _ � \� (-- ` �� f .. � .! - �, � � � / � I \..... " � ' / � � ._ �� '� / ( � c 1 _ , � _ /�' �. .:: % �, F � � ��a;g �„ �/� � � .� �;,/ - � � �� a ,: , . , � � �,au,rta� � �_ - . _,� -- .rrc �' . p-°�'' ` \.. � j cm�.Q � � � �� % _ - � ! \\ � , 10��';u:°.a ' _�_ �_ � /'> I ( \ v� � R� � > ��`,�,�,�� 1,�' � � � �� / 5 � (\ � .�S I ( y< ( yy � .. � I �»,�i�. , t��aa�,s l, , c..�.,. � � -,1 .' ( /��J _ i � .. i e e n C �' �. � � /�� ` v - an i � r / \ � �:�;�c r � 1 • �� I � r \Z \ `` ?, `� `� 1 l l l � � � . I a . � / ti , S /l - � .. � I,_% 1 � za,r:: (v. ,�� . '; c�s .: �. � l '�(� �i � �� ";'\ �am � . . �iiV iV? �� Gnu r. - ua�mueb�€, ../ / � . . �c� �,/ \ J �S � ,?,v \/J �< ( ..` ,� � / g� J i . ....� _� . 1 � .C�i"� ,i l � \ i � )�, �, I i,��r�uui .. � i l e.� �E�J ,. ,\ � /... / ��ae. \... . .\ � . ...� I 1 ( � �� .z.. f, - ../ /�> j' \V._'� ) \ I l : \ ��n �:�.. j %/.�1 C : . f ;�9[s}rS[s�r `-" � />. �ts ,.. (1(� l. / � � Cy �C� - . �__ �� ;.. .. ..._\./ �� .r OA�1(� ( \ _. . ._\ \.,_. ...J.� � .... ._( J/,! � l...1 ....� � f.,..../ .61d ,. et � t%�..,. __.. �" II;�SI: �� .� I.. IL� ... �P1:K' ��I 1.� CC�:� � .!\��...._.� i;l:ilc.. .. �� ::::::�..._.. ._�\. �__�.�..I _. � rnra � . ., \ �i. < \ 1 (- � � . _. u��ia� ._%� ` �.. _ � :.�, . � \& . �. I �� . - /..� . .i,k \ � / � -p ; ._ .if l - � / i _l , 1....',l �.. . l �� i �, / � .,� \.\ � � �\� '� 8. � l�r.r,�a . �.. �.� '�� ... \ ... . � f.t�s;yr 7'e>rn�;s� l (. , �,� 1 . �._ ._! 1 r�� ( - . , . . . .., �. . -- . � I�< I � ' � � � % / � � � � ._ i L � i � �.I.l � I �' / � \ � / 1 � � � � � �� I �/ ` � I / i ka�� ., \, �� < , .ttru�4�\; Il.�_.� �� `.� � I... /I�::� 4 � .; - ;,:',rc ._._ � _ .N\� _. <�,� ., . ;,, .... . .. �/ � �.:: . �C.�:.. . �J ,:. ... .C.��. . �. .. �.., .. > ../ ��..._ ; �.r .raah ; -\ � J I. I . ` \ i � � ('� � � , a L ibs �qrt�j" ::.. ) . ` � � � .. � c,' � l: ,. `�,;:i ... I �.�I � , �<�� . - / / .�S > 1 � / - / t�f6naens , ''�•,,. -s .., l � � 1..I.J \_, \ � ..... � � , :.::'��'dt�:�� `��;�c.:,.,�. :..:. ... . i � � ` � ��Jl�� .: , �� " ` 1_...._J ( x b"I \ ,� -:'% f6na t m�„gu��+ny! I �: � ] , l �� _ � � � ' 1 . ( ..l l I� � ".�� i+fi�e�1.1: n+s cai ,� --: . \ � `t�.. - . i '104 � ` ,, ` . . l _ l� r, ;., C �' ', _ � ) % / 1 �- �'J �3 ) � ) \\\ ,...... • ;::/ .. ) cnxrwa :- � _ � / , ` ._,� i V .� �.. / � ` )\ C� ' - �� _ 4r(�`141N �� ✓, � C 1 li.. � } � (t sa4osn '� 1 � __. I __ � i. ' L _ I. _ , (� � � � . _ , . l ._ � � .. I : % i��iP�<iaRr r, I 1 ) \L0. I ,�( 9 /-�J\ �� V: � 1 . .::- ;� , : � \} { � , : � � ��..I _.. I C . . - _. _ .t , „-. � � ,, � , 1. � C , � C� \ �;., �'� , � � - - _ llu�..an �L_. ... .. ,. .. .. \�� ..i. ♦.. !C ,; - / t _ . ! �_ l . \< . ( � � > � � � � ( > _-� � c� �c'�.�?� �, � ... i,. �� :1 �e>a , >> 1 �� , , � � �� f f J ,� � �(c__ � , lcy � �� . _, , .. � � < � � � • : �.;::,�i ' / � ..�,._../ � ' (� -C / , � � V ' - _, , , � i �, , � � �. ��<c� �� < <z h 7 � � } � � ��.. �( � ,< < � _�� _� � . �� "�<..:ti � `iS.,. �.� eYi' - �.s.� � c xc fSa. �� -� .� � � � /C� C��' �c: , � . I t' i � � �� , � � � �' > /�� I .I L / _� /`. "�l � . , � � � � -�. _ (� r. _�_ � �� ri ua c�� J,��1 .._:� �� _.��.:.� � �, �! / �. �< < � (� ))f �� 7. � ,, ` S �� I , l , / �I � � ( - '" \ � � � f/ � � � � ,\� � �5��. rc � �)/ �� /�= �� ... _.� .:<�.. � � ( Ci \ � - � �, r �.. - - � � < 1 _. . . � � \ � -1 �. 1 Y� drs� ]rsr'�s . _ I .. t%. P .{.j <. r �C � -1 r- . . l i / 1� r f��PS: I \ � I .. I . \-- `�` 1 � ... `/ J ..�. \ \ � .�( .. / , . .. 1.. � ( .I � ` .. - \, \�i� % . .e>;3chS;'€`;'jhC€` I n � �:- �_ .__� �/ �" i � \ V (,_... � r I h .1, i . � ._ � � - .. . . _ . > ! . � '� 1. �/ . _ \ � �. - 1. 1 'rs,i3Sr �f ` ` . . ,_._ \ '' � �.... �� .ulldl. ii�: � (.� ,._ L_.. !. � 1. 1 "'i�i :x> - tfi]] �.. . � _ �,,... � � '�` . �fPSSf.. � , �.. ��,� � �r. . P.�,�I:c: \ _,... `, _- < - � �- � f# i ,_ � , a Ih�imE� � - �� \ / - �� . � ... � f�_. \��j �� i ..... �, t_.� 6��[��inni /'Lv� �__ � ��_ _ < ` �- � � ��i., � (�5. � � . �. ii„ Q„in� � --- �. - , �,�iwn _... � � I��c� � y ' � .�� / � ` . � 'c� � ' \ �. i �. I:�h�idk. � \,- ' l �x.�uc . _._. \� �� I��,� c: )1 • � � � . ��€•cJ �, t � � � i: � \\'�, 11 f�.. � � C �� . �.. , iowis � �- � . . I,.� ._ i.. �- �....� � � C\ i . 7 �� i> � , m Im�u / / l �, .\/ / � A�cc aKsdF \ � ,_. . (.; ��.�� ,_ � ( , � g ,, . � \ � , lL� , � � , .� � ( � 1 , �� s � 1 I �� ` J� �%`. � � �� ( � , � / / `/ e>� a7�7rs�,r. � � � t i1 <� f . �) �- ` " :\ ,� � �/ � � � II�ARIM E A i[ - y _ \ i � E.�nlYiVNi{4uM _ ,I f __ 1 _ ] Etm!` i, _/ / �% ) ,.,. � �� -: � � ,� �� / ,\ f " j � ,� ` ' 1 �:....� � t , r 1 �•/l�`,,. ��\ �J t" � �\ Z.i J �'ei , � � __ I�. ( '� _ 1/ / ,,` : � \ 1 � ` e'>v"� � � :; 11 `� � /� . , " [ / ��, bcotiks: �ci.., , � \ �1 �k�"�'Y % '< � � � \ I . � � � `� �, \ ( � � ' 1 f � � � \. . .. � . � ('� I � . _ , 0 6 �,U{q��, \ __ / � � � ewmG��eb� _... ..t fis,mw,.. 1 _ �� . _ � i l •- _ �CU�iy �- '�� ' C��1 ' � � � ��- \ � ' �� p`�� L 47`(� L ' � , � � ,. �� .. � , . _... . .. . � _. . � � � _ � _-'� .. " . . f� ._. .��n��o�.��. _ . �� ; --�; � . (:€�ni-,��n, ( ��, :: � tnmmea-ai tn�ima _ _ ��.. � _.�. EI;�R:iQE1�M .... � .. . . � nirx .._ � .__ � - � - . ��oon � � i up�ku¢i�a _ �i -- / ., ... , .. ; . . ................ ...,..,� ,.... � � , � � � � � (%+{Ni1NiUWpLV � `� A� . � � Y � � � �-�� !. _ � � � � � -.... -� � � 1'P.1:1( ., � -_ � � � � � � 1 � � ' �? . _ � i� 0%' 4u QbM �� , � > > �. - A Y�I � � � ' - ' ....... � �-. � 4�'I.f166L�frM / _� � y � - - � � �. � l_ � �� l•r.iu� � � �� c�� : � � � � __� �� j, � -�. �.� ��"! ��'�� l � � - � __ t C�� :.�� - ��, �� . � . . / � _ � �l. f � � �f _� �� (� . ,�/l._ 1. �_. � �, � i � � '�:� , �1 � � � � ( 7.A17. , � .� 1� i' . �� :r.r. _�. .. � f �� , f s�3 { � n�/ �� %�� 1 � .. � j �� ` � �� < � � � � , ..::... VWd ��y;'a�ac 7� �issinui�siY '� V � . � ,1>� ::3��. �� i � �� . � .... _� � .. .: :.. . .. ,.,. � 1 � 1'f f � -�� ._. _. t �_. ._ .. �� ..... . . Ms.iu.r .. �_' __ ... � _' � ::::: .,��;�. �::::�. ._� `�� . ,�: . , . ... /1.. tAi] g�r. 'a,k-,7-,.ied Sar�� I�h�rl: , -� . � �7� � j ;. � :;::,.. I . � . E�i� i�):" I ..... ' . . �- ._. �._J f . �/�:-'.: np�uu:� .0 �J... f � 1 �.` ..: � � � J � �. � .5.: _ ;,, ]]'P'.sciv�{c� ]_.1 U�,Le � ._ � � � \ , C "� i-' � ir.iuc �� L' � � r�aai:}aen � � �� /:- � -� t (( '� . � i0 � � � � � � � .. � u.�ae y � _ . ,._, ..: .. �.,� ._ �_ .��„ � � - . .. _ �o .., .;.:�,. � 1. 79flf �. 1� 3j7Sirr .;,: :. � �:�j � i , .... ,. .:.. . ...... � � ,., . � .. �.g�., V A �. . .., � �� , . _ :, i�� \ � � �1'�, .C.i.�, ,�,i. �� 1 -- � � �y � �(�� L� % � V r � � � L�� __ �� j �< / �r�i9q _� � � � Il � q ' � �sov,,is -- ' � �-, �� ,� J� � �� r �.: ��:,�� ,, - � , i��,�ir�. 1 ( � . �r� � (. , \<` /1 >� ,; �/' �� r:�`� � � i ;�a�P�� +�.� ,.r; ,.... \� � \ ._. \�- l .% \�tYmx'R. - , �\ \ I a ( ) � � .,>�, _ . , f � : .. \ ` .�-. l ` ` �) ` � ¢a�uto *��a�x }Sn,�„ I ; � E � C I', � ; ' \ _ /�_ i C?a ( \� / �i � i� �, � � - � � �,:,. i / � � € d��a] ° � 1�,r�\ ��Z _ �\ f _, �C� �C 1 �� J/ \ e:., ., �� o';�� \ �J �_ �)� _ % - l_.._/J ( � _ �// l � �. .,�� _____ _ \'�� { � \_ //(! �/ ,t� J� � �� :. ��p '<.. \ I � � � � \ --- (' I/� // . � .__/ / <, � � \ � .. . _ \�� fl. ,.. ,.ii: / ..:;;; �� .:.r i] (�1ef �. "� \ ,�� I 7 �, ��`��y .\/ 1 (( �_. C<-. -1__ jC7fyj.r� iL r/ ... .... ��.�. .. � ::'�,.tr6n �upimmtba�n¢u� .. L `..I. I I / ..... i / ./� \ ( /\�� ..:.: I . i � � � ��.� J I �fe69�(fM'N \ . _ � _ � �' � i � I ] \ � .....,r$bY�31 � �� 1 7 �� `� / t . / li '� � li :'� " ,. . � � i �. �, � �-� � , ,� _. , � j�,��>, � . � ia ��.. �:: �,�(�c�,�,. - ��>t��,�,�z-. � �� '��I , I�(,�, li��+�, ��C� li��+�, I� II�J �� ;�..11 , � , ��o.�.,, , , , ) , �a� , x � �( .�J � �� '�x�,��ss*Jy �f f ��'�%% � -� � . � � � � , .�ai,��,€�:I_ .I ,€n.rr,l.I I I.�n.k€� , _ ." / . - ....� ;�7cscr, . j f , c�� ` � , �......... \ ��' . _' .� �/])) . YLYk» . . �. . . . „� { . , . 1 ( C [r ��"� � ( II 1I� _ P� � _ _ iV �I-U (_ . ` i � • i 'lc � � �� /� „« . �I��:M , , .�pl�� . _ ._. ._ �, .. . PY� \ .. _� / i � _.. % ��..., i� ._ �i.� � . �� %� , _ ,. � �� q��ero �... � iL c lilih�:� ., � �� . ..i4,U^l,lbf" °i�, 4��€L��.i'�€L.I"f,� .��66;;>� � � . , <: � _ . . ::: � _ . .. - .��enaa'�� i M ( l_. I ._ \ `._ / ._.. . .. '�l-t.J I il,c�:. ( . %.�t ..i4�1.7;1�;f"e.�n i:.€L:I";I";I,�.637/�VE"� '�> . � 'l� � . . I � \� , I ._ ,, f ,. �/ � � � i . / �, � _ �. � �' \ �� 1 l. � , (' I I ., €L:r.k � _% . �. ( F ( � � . ,. i �, � � 1 I \1 \ ; f , ::,�aia�,er � (� i h a.lai��e^ :,�r,l �,a a..l�v �� -� ,5 I �� J �l � I ( . / � . � &�vg�vYte.y I kwy C. ` ( ' Hc � " �i I C€n:rx� '.I"a�v:��, .Ihl;r,�7a�: clucv � i � � � �. �• � « �; �r �i`• ��;-.. / _. I - .. �f � ��, ........ rnr,v�u �. ".. � � � « � � _/ 1 f � � , � ; � �� w�a� a � � � � -� �� :��e��a�c � �:K.�Jal�asc :�"�r �.n :�$dl �,e� ,.,,. .. ,_, �„ rri rc c s � °Q . t �� ( _� - � � � r � � +« _l � ,,... _ � �� ` � . , iuvui r � / 9 ` � � � G"'.I :r€u �� .rai;i� �ta>;> � �. � .. � _� .. � - .� . � . )'�ssa I �o:ia�y„1 rnr,rc C � � �� ' - . �'� � \ . .... , . : � � 1 . . .. � �.�.. -' � � _. ... .. , ,�a.. ... �.....� "g<1�Ail;c- n 1 .. u:�m�locrc ( .... 1 � -�� ocd'be1'bESE� 4�' r . J . �.•`fGsc'GShbetiD55h55hfl5hs � al ., �, �f ., 7 o � _ � / � � � � �� ) `� � :;�aia�,er �i (��i�c.k Ja:��c^� :�r,IC:;�€n:lcr:i�'.h c:a:��;��cr�aia:��i ! 1 S:ha;;r;>:i-��, Ccr:��,�;er:r � �., �� .�... - ..� _ L��_� �` -�� _ �/� / �,� ....�-�� I:lW7S ��nlS. IncAniwc �_ � .. . b . I� � " !�. .�. , .. ..�� \ .. ..-/ I Y }.-..� \ _ _... ..:�/ ..I� y . IdP4U10 i (AunU1' r� �;rt�lY' F.��fI�i;1��L�.��f�MCi:I��J4,G�ICDi9�� ipL�.b ::gl J'�:.I](D � ... ��.....:,fi. ..a .Mr : . .,:..... ,.. p. �.: i � -__- � < \ -:::- - ) b .SI7\Il Q 76�4' CI110 , .._ fz z z �� . (D. � r i { j �r� ` ' � w�, \ ; .,:� . .. u � ....� � , i�f¢ _�, � ... �, -� _ ( � . .� �, . /. ` �/ .. � :i�1df. :i4fDld�Gf'. � ni�'�r eni�o�?r en'� -t �� y� ��.:� _ � ::.� � , c -` � .� �.. � � ,( \ \ /� � _ �i � � . = iv � t> �A i t> � 1� ��€L.�faE'. I��E'.f,'�;IC:€L.� �iE'.7',l�;f":I" � �` . ,._ , , �� .... ,....\ . ; l / .\ V J�7=�; �J�.f;l€L37(;'.�E" �.��:I"€L37�:Ib .tlf"(,":1637€L.� .iY.�;lf'�f'�€L�� 1a771� .tlG'771b€" �. - � � I . __ LI � � , � �� , " � ° � � � � � � (" � � �/ � � � i� ITai,n3, aS .I;n3,c^:rc^�3: �� ""�'�� %� � � �- � �- � �._ , 1 �l __� � � _i1, (C ➢� °:I".r�:n�,"ic^:r :ITa:i:n3.3,a G"°":I":r�:n :3ia� :I'�aia3;e^ �' � � � ��, � ��..,.,, ' �_, � �- � f:.� ia;ea^:l�c^��n:e"i�x7c^��."t - � � � ,. .,^""' .,,�, ,� Q,��tissxa \� � i y 1. � �� Cl�l1�) "C:rm-n�aTa�:r :[ aa;n1 �.a ".C:�:im-n�;.la� ".C:rm-n�a:i.1 :Ci•r,i�a :C�a�,i.�.a� « � ..... � � u�,�m� � _� � � �- �i��,u�ak� � . , . i � .,� *��,� ` � � � � r � � �� j � �7 T; � .� a�ltn:l (3.1',f;i.c� ��al �..�� 4� � � �� f � � � � � � � � �, ��, ii�r� �� ( � (/ � i , � /'\`� "..C:er�.-n�Tr:e :�'a:rn.11a �rtt��a.ltn:l .rl:errtt ".C:er�.-n�a.1 � , , � � � �" a � � - � � , r, s*«��+ a ' � " � .[ t,i b.l,ir L�i b:rmt^�r "�ey, ,. / i Bm�nnu��p � � � - _ . .. � �_ � � � -- � � - �°.O°.O� j , 3 ml.rl.retn ..�:rm-n�.i1 .Ci�,i� .f�a�,i1e 11� � /I(� jl l� � / `. � . ,:-�I j,- � l r`�cQw, � f i �� _ J �'�,k�',,:.iD„Qi�/'�kD/Qi�s - C�"s� na.1 � ' r , ' „ „ f.,-. \ _ .. ._.. _ / �� . < � .,-_. ' % /-� , .. �� I. � E':tBUAb'01tES}dA� . l . . - �.... .......,. ) / � / �' f j " _ _ _ � � �� ,� � � � � -: � l .< t �, � , J � . � s l �t � �%/ J ( � ) I 1 � . APPENDIX G Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name Section 1— Named Neighborhoods between NC 55 and US 401 ROBERT & BILLIE ADAMS COUNTRY ACRES HALLMARK WEST HAMILTON AIRINGTON HALSTEAD ROBERT NORRIS ALEX & JACK KRONSTADT HANOVER DOWNS ROBINSON FARM ALEXANDER WOODS PH1 HARMONY GLEN ROLLING ACRES ALEXANDER WOODS PH2 HAZEL HINTON ROLLINGWOOD ESTATES ALEXANDER WOODS PH3 HEATHERSTONE RONALD DESIREE WILLIS ALEXANDER WOODS PH4 HEAVENER TRACT ROSEMARIE SANTORO ALLEN T STEVENS HENRY A COLLINS ROYAL SENTER RIDGE ALLEN WAY HERBERT ADAMS RUFUS H JONES ALLENDALE ACRES HERITAGE OAKS RUNNING CEDAR ALSLEE OAKS HERITAGE SPRINGS ACRES RUSSELL OGILVIE ALSTON POND HERNDON ESTATES RUSTIC MILL AMHERST HICKORY CREEK SADDLE RUN ANDREWS HILLS HIDDEN COVE SANCROFT ANNIES POND HIGH GROVE SANDY SPRINGS SANDY SPRINGS APPLE VILLAGE HIGHLAND CREEK TOWNHOMES ARBOR COMMONS TOWNHOMES HILLCREST SAPONI HILLS ARBOR CREEK HILLTOP POINT ESTATES SAWGRASS ARIAT ffiLTON LETT SAWYERS MILL ARROWWOOD HILLS HOLLY ACRES SCARBOROWOOD ASHFIELD COMMONS HOLLY GLEN SCHOOL ASHFIELD VILLAGE HOLLY HEIGHTS SCOTS LAUREL ATKINS FARMS INC HOLLY PARK SCOTT CHRISTOPH AUGUSTA PLACE HOLLY RUN SCOTTSDALE AUTUMN PARK HOLLYBROOK SEDGEMOOR AUTUMN TRACE HOPSON DOWNS SMITH FARMS AVENT ACRES HOWSON RIDGE SMITH FARMS PHS AVENT GLEN HUNTER GLADE SOMERSET FARM SOMERSET STREAM PH 1- BALLENRIDGE HUNTERS BLUFF 4 BALLENRIDGE PH2 HUNTERS BLUFF LAKESIDE SORRELL BALLENTINE HUNTERS COVE SORRELL POINTE BAYFIELD RUN HUNTERS GLEN NORTH SOUTH FORTY VENTURES BELLE MEADE ESTATES HUNTERS GLEN SOUTH SOUTH LAKE PH2 BELLE POINT HUNTERS MEADOWS SOUTH LAKE PH3 BELLE RIDGE HUNTERS RIDGE SOUTH POINTE BELLE RIDGE NORTH HUNTINGWOOD ESTATES SOUTH RIDGE BELMONT ESTATES INDIAN HILLS SOUTHBRIAR CREEK INWOOD AT YATES BELMONT PH1 BRANCH SOUTHERN WAKE LLC BENNY & BARBARA PERMENTER IVORY HILLS SOUTHWINDS BENNY & BARBARA PERMENTER JACK WAYLON SOUTHWOODS FINAL Community Characteristics Report STIP Project No. U-3321 — November 28, 2007 Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name BENTCREEK JAMES L CLARK SOUTHWYCK BENTWINDS JAMES R CAUDILL SOVEREIGN ENTERPRISES BERRINGTON JAMES UPCHURCH SPRING MEADOW BETTY TRUELOVE DANIELS JAMISON PARK PH1 SPRING MEADOWS BIRCH CREEK JAMISON PARK PH2 SPRINGFIELD NORTH BLACKBURN ESTATES JAMISON PARK PH2 SPRINGHILL PH1 JAMISON PARK BLACKMAN & STEWART TOWNHOMES SPRINGHILL PH2 JASPER & CHRISTINE BLONDELL J JOHNSON JOHNSON STABLES AT MILL RTDGE STAFFORD LAND BLUFFS EAST JENMAR ACRES COMPANY BOBBY G WILDER JESSE PENNY FARMER STANSTED BOULDER CREEK OSD JOHN & THELMA BUFFALOE STANTON PLACE BRACKENRIDGE JOHN BUFFALOE JR STERL]NG RIDGE BRACKENRIDGE POINTE JOHNSON & MINOR STEVE FOWLER BRADFORD PLACE JOHNSON POINTE STEWART MANOR PHl BRANSTON JOHNSON POND WEST STEWART MANOR PH2 BRASS LANTERN JOHNSON POND WEST PH2 STILLBREEZE MANOR BRAYTON PARK JUDY BECKWITH STONEBRIDGE BRENNAN WAY JULIE WRIGNT STONEBRIDGE PH2 BRIARWOOD FARMS K T SIMPKINS STONEBRIDGE PH3 STONEBRIDGE VILLAGE BRIDGEPORT KAROLY PLACE TOWNHOMES BRIDGEWATER KEITH WOODS SUE B BERTIE GAY BRIDGEWATER TOWNHOMES KILDAIRE ESTATES SUMMER OAKS BRIDLE ESTATES KILT VALLEY SUMMER OAKS PH2 BRIGHTON FOREST KIRKS GROVE SUMMERCREST LACY & CAROLYN BRIGHTON WOODS BUFFALOE SUNLAKE FARMS BROOK MANOR LAKE HOLLOWS SUNNY FIELDS BROOKSHIRE MANOR LAKE WHEELER BLUFFS SUNSET BLUFFS LAKE WHEELER VILLAGE BROOKWOOD FOREST ESTATES SUNSET CROSSING BUCKHAVEN LAKESIDE SUNSET FOREST BUFFKIN & WILLIAMS LAKEVIEW ESTATES SUNSET FOREST SUNSET FOREST AT BURNSIDE LAKEWOOD ESTATES SUNSET RIDGE CALEB KNOLL LAKEWOOD FARMS SUNSET HILLS CARCILLAR HORTON LANGSTON SUNSET LAKE CAROLTON LEAS MILL SUNSET LAKE PH 6 CARRIAGE PARK LES ARBRES SUNSET LAKE VILLAGE CARRIAGE VILLAGE LINCOLN HEIGHTS SUNSET OAKS CARROLL FARM LITTLE BEAVERDAM SUNSET OAKS CARY OAKS LITTLE BEAVERDAM PH1 SUNSET POINTE CASSIDY LUCY PROPERTY SUNSET RIDGE CENTERFIELD LYNNHAVEN SUNSET RIDGE MACGREGOR CHARI HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CO SUNSET RIDGE Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name CHARLES BARNES MAGGIE RUN PH1 SUNSET RIDGE CHARLES G NEWCOMB MAGGIE RUN PH2 SUNSET RIDGE NORTH CHEEK PARK MAGGIE RUN PH3 SUNSET RIDGE PH2 CHELSEA WOODS MAGGIE RUN PH4 SURRY POINT CHURCffiLL ESTATES MAGNOLIA RIDGE SURRY RIDGE CLANCY-MORRISON MAIN STREET SQUARE SYMPHONY RUN CLARA FARMS MANNSFIELD T S WHEELER CLEARFIELD POINT MANOR RIDGE TALICUD TRAIL CLYDE LOCKLEY MARCOM PLACE TEN TEN ROAD COBBLE RIDGE MARGARET HILL TEN TEN TERRENE THE ENCLAVE AT COLEY FARMS MARK KIRKS WINDEMERE THE ESTATES OF COLONIAL HEIGHTS MARY TURNER WESTOAK COLVIN ESTATES MATHEWS ESTATES THE HERITAGE PH2 COMMONWEALTH ESTATES MAYNARDS WAY THE HERITAGE PH9 COTSWOLD MCCULLERS PINES THE OAKS AT SIPPAHAW THE OVERLOOK AT COTTENWOOD MCKENZIE PH1 HOLLY GLEN THE PARK AT LANGSTON COUNTRY LAND MCKENZIE PH2 PH1 THE PARK AT WEST LAKE COUNTRY LANE MCKENZIE PH3 PH2 COUNTRY LANE THE PARK AT WEST LAKE TOWNHOMES MEADOW LAKE PH6,7 COUNTRY SIDE MEADOWVIEW THE PARK AT WESTLAKE COUNTRY VILLAGE MERION PH1 THE PINES THE STABLES AT MILLS CREEKSTONE MERION PH2 RIDGE THE TOWNS AT CREEKWOOD BLUFFS MERION PH3 BUCKHAVEN THE VILLAGE AT CROFTS AT BRACKENRIDGE MILL CREEK WESCOTT THE VILLAGE AT CROOKED BROOK MILL CREEK WEST WYNCHESTER CROOKED CREEK FAIRWAYS MILL RIDGE THE WOODLANDS PH4 THE WOODS OF AVENT CROOKED CREEK SOUTH MILL RIDGE FERRY TOWNHOMES CROSS POINTE VILLAGE MILL RIDGE THEYLAND FARM THOMAS & CHRISTINE CROWSDALE MILLERS CREEK SPAULDING DAVIS MILLRACE PHl 1 THOMAS A KING DE VINTAGE MILLS RIDGE THOMAS B KID TOWNES AT ARBOR DEERFIELD PARK MILLSTONE LANDING CREEK MILTON & TERESA TOWNHOMES AT AVENT DENMAN WOODS CLOWERS ACRES DENNIS P& LAURANN JAMES MIRAMONTE TREYLAND ESTATES DEWAYNE & JILL GAFFIN MONUMENT PARK TROTTER BLUFFS Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name DON S SUTTON MORGAN PARK TURNER WEEKS DONALD M NICHOLAS III MORRIS ROWLAND TURNERS VILLAGE DONALD W ALLEN MURRAY FARMS TUSCANY DUKE MYRTLE H HOPSON TWIN CREEKS DUTCHMAN DOWNS MYRTLE S HOPSON TWIN LAKE FARM TWISTED CREEK DUTCHMAN ESTATES NATURES REACH TOWNHOMES E B BANKS NEEDMORE TWO MINOR EAGLES NEST NEWBURY PARK PHl UMSTEAD EARLE RIDGE NEWBURY PARK PH2 LINNAMED EASTON ACRES NEWSTEAD MANOR V BRAXTON EDEN ROC NEWSTEAD MANOR 2 VALLEY ViEW FARM EDiTH J PARKER NTSCO CONSTRUCTTON VALLEYFIELD EDNA NESMiTH NORTH GATE VAR]NA PARK EDWARDS NORTHWOOD VICTORiAN GRACE ELiZABETH WOODS OAK CHASE VILLAGE OF SIPPIHAW ENCHANTED OAKS OAK HALL VINTAGE RIDGE ENCHANTED OAKS WEST OAK PARK W E MEDLIN ENGLEWOOD FOREST OAKHALL PH8 WACO BUSINESS PARK ERMATEEN JONES OAKLYN WAKE CHAPEL MANOR OAKS AT MEADOWRIDGE EVAN GLEN PH4-6 WALKER ESTATE F S SPENCE OKER RICHARDSON WASHINGTON HOMES FAIR HILL OLD PIERCE PLACE WAVERLY F AKINS FAIR OAKS PHl OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE WAYNE SENTER FAIR OAKS PH2 OLDE FARM WEDGEWOOD SQUARE FAIRFIELD OLDE MILL TRACE WESCOTT FAIRSTONE OLDE MILLS LAKE WESLEY WOODS FAIRVIEW WOODED ACRES OPTIMIST RIDGE ESTATES WESLYN SPRINGS FERN VALLEY ORCHARD KNOLL WEST GLEN ESTATES FERN VALLEY ORCHARD MEADOWS WEST LAKE FERN VALLEY OSCAR MONAGAS WEST LAKE PH4 FERN VALLEY PH4 OSCAR STEELE WEST LAKE TOWNHOMES OVERLAKE AT SUNSET FERN VALLEY PH4 RIDGE WEST MILL FOREST OVERLAKE POINT AT FISHERMANS COVE SUNSET RIDGE WEST OAKS FLOYD WHITAKER OXFORD GREENE WESTVIEW FOREST CREEK PARK AT LANGSTON WHEELER RIDGE FOREST RIDGE PARK GROVE WHIPPOORWILL DOWNS FOREST SPRINGS PARKSIDE WHITEHART MEADOWS FOXMOOR PARKSIDE VILLAGE WHITE�-IURST FRANK T HARE PATRICIA EDWARDS WHITNEY VILLAGE FREDERICK ELWOOD TETTERTON PAUL & JOYCE SORRELL WILBON RIDGE PH1, 2 GARNER GLEN PAYNES LANDING WILBON RIDGE PH3 GARRISON PAYNES PARK WILEYS RIDGE GEORGIANA ESTATES PEARL ADAMS WILLIAMS AND EDWARDS GERTRUDE HOOD PEBBLESTONE WILLIE MAE BECKWITH Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name GILCHRIST LANDING PEMBERLEY WINDCREST GLEASON BRIDGES PENNY WOODS WINDERMERE GLEN ARBOR PHELPS FARM PH2 WINDSOR POINT GLENDALE PHELPS FARMS WINDWARD POINTE GLENMITT STONE PINEVIEW ESTATES WOODCHASE GLENNWOOD PUD PLEASANT GROVE WOODCLIFF GLENRIDGE POWELL & POWELL WOODCREEK GRAEDON POWELL FARMS WOODFIELD ESTATES GREENBROOK FARMS PRESCOTT DOWNS WOODLAKE ESTATES WOODLANDS AT OAK GREENViEW BLUFFS PRESCOTT DOWNS PH3 HALL GREENWOOD ACRES PRESNELL POND WOODS OF ASHBURY GREG PENNY RANSDELL PARK WOODSON FARMS RAY WILLIAMS GRENADIER CONSTRUCTION WRENN 1NVESTMENTS GRENADIER PH2,3 REMINGTON WRENN MEADOW GREYHAWK RHAMKATTE VILLAGE WRENNS NEST GREYTHORNE RIDGEBROOK BLUFFS WYMAN PARK GYPSY WOODS RIVER BIRCH WYNRIDGE HALLMARK ROBENCLIFF WYNTREE Section 2— Named Nei hborhoods between US 401 and I-40 A M VINING HOLLY RIDGE ROGERS R ADAMS ALTICE ESTATES HOMEMONT ROLLING HILLS ESTATES ARBOR GREENE HOPEDALE ROLLING MEADOWS ASHEBROOK HORACE T BRITT ESTATE RONALD ANTHONY SEMAN AUTUMN CREST FARM HORACE T BRITT ESTATE ROSEMOOR PLACE AUTUMN OAKS HUDSON MEADOWS ROWLAND HEIGHTS BANKS POINTE HUDSON SEARS SAULS ROWLAND MEADOWS BANKS POINTE II HUNT FARMS ROWLAND POND BANKS POINTE PH 4 J I FUQUAY RUBY & RAYMOND DEAN BANKS POINTE PH2 J J WOOLARD RUSTIC BRICK BARECLIFF J K BOLING & J M FARLOW RUSTIC COUNTRY VILLAGE BASHFORD BLUFFS J R COLLIER SADDLE ACRES BELLEWOOD FARMS J W WILLIAMS SALLY B BEARD BENSON W COTTEN JACOBS RIDGE SALLY J ROHRBACH BLACKMAN JAMES & TONYA HARPER SANDLIN BRANCH BLALOCK FOREST JAMES W ARNETTE SANDY RIDGE BLALOCKS GLEN JAMESON PLACE SATTERFIELD COINS INC BLOOMFIELD PH1 JAMESTOWNE SAULS BLOOMFIELD PH2 JESSIE W HOCUTT SAULS RIDGE BLOOMFIELD PH3,4,5 JIMMIE & LINDA FULLER SCARBOROUGH RIDGE BLOOMFIELD PH4 JOHN LANDON HINES SEDALIA PARK BLUE STONE VILLAGE JOHN H WILLIAMS SEXTON PLACE BRANCHWOOD MANOR JORDAN RIDGE SEXTON PLACE BREEZEWAY JORDAN WOODS SHANNONDALE Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name BREEZEWAY EAST KATIE F BOWDEN SHELDON PLACE BREEZEWAY PH2 KATIE LEACH SIMON WOODS BREEZEWAY SOUTH KEENELAND TRAILS SOUTH CREEK BRISTOL KENDALL HILLS SOUTH MEADOWS BRITT KENSINGTON MEADOWS SOUTH MOUNTAIN BRITT ESTATES PH1 KENWOOD MEADOWS SOUTHERBY BLUFFS BRITT ESTATES SC2 KIMBER WOODS SOUTHERN ACRES BRITTANY HILLS KINGS RIDGE SOUTHERN MEADOWS BRITTMOORE KINGS RIDGE PH2 SOUTHERN OAKS BROADHURST KIRWALL VILLAS SOUTHERN TRACE BROOKSTONE L P RAND ESTATE SOUTHVIEW BROOKWOOD LAKE POINT SPRINGHAVEN BROWNSTONE VILLAGE LAKE RAND SPRINGWINDS BURKE & EMILY OVERBY LAKE SHORE SQUIRE ESTATES C& T PROPERTIES LAKEMOOR SQUIRES KEEP C B& SANDRA RYALS LAKESIDE ESTATES STJENS C LYNN & DIANNE BLALOCK LAKESTONE VILLAGE STACY & BETTY NORRIS CARMEL CROSSING LAKESTONE VILLAGE STAGECOACH CAROLINA MEADOWS LAKESTONE VILLAGE STAGECREST CHARLES ATKINS LAKESTONE VILLAGE STAUNTON MEADOWS LAKESTONE VILLAGE CHARLES HEATHERLY TOWNHOMES STEPHENS POINT CHARLESS & GLORIA BAKER LAKEVIEW STEPHENS POINT PH2 CHARLOTTE BRIDGE LAKEWOOD STEPHENSON CHRISTOPHER & BRENDA PENNY LANDINGHAM STEPHENSON & RANSDELL CLYDE B SAULS LANDINGS AT LAKEMOOR STERLINGWORTH COLONIAL HEIGHTS LANE B BROWN STEVENS OAKS COONIE LEE LANERIDGE STEVENS OAKS PH3 COONIE LEE PH3 LANEVIEW GLEN STONEHURST COTTONWOOD LASSITER FARMS STONEWALL FARMS CREEKSIDE LAUREL GROVE STRAWFLOWER CREST OF CAROLINA LAWNDALE SUMMERS WALK CRIMSON LAWNDALE SUN RIDGE FARM LAWRENCE & MARGARET CURTIS & BEVERLY POWELL STEWART SUNNYSIDE COLONY D L FARRAR & M L RHODES LEGACY AT FORTY TWO SUNSET ACRES DALLAS ACRES LEGACY AT FORTY TWO PH2 SUNSET FOREST DAYTON WOODS LEONE LANDING SYCAMORE CREEK DAYTON WOODS PH2 LEWIS VILLAGE TAVERNIER PH1 DAYTON WOODS PH3 LINWOOD & CAROLYN HICKS TAVERNIER PH2 DAYTON WOODS PH4 LITTLE CREEK HEIGHTS THE DUKE Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name THE ESTATES AT DEER BROOK LITTLEJOHN ACRES BROADHURST THE VILLAGE AT DUNALLIE DOWNS LUCYJORDAN AVERSBORO DUNHAVEN LUNDA WAYLAND YOUNG THE WOODLANDS EAGLE MOUNTAIN LYNNSHIRE THE WOODLANDS PH 7,8 EAGLE RIDGE MABLE B SMITH THE WOODLANDS PH4,5 EAGLE RIDGE PH 8B MAGNOLIA PLACE THISTLE PARK EARL DAVIS MAL WEATHERS ROAD TIFFANY WOODS ECHO HEIGHTS MALIBU VALLEY TIMBERBERG HILL ECHO HEIGHTS MALIBU VALLEY TREBOR MEADOWS EDGEBROOK MCCULLERS ESTATES TURNER DOWNS EDGEWATER MCCULLERS PINES TURNER DOWNS PH3 EDGEWATER PARK MEADOW WOODS TURNER DOWNS PH4 ELLIS HAYWOOD MEADOWBROOK TURNER FARMS FIELD RIDGE MIDDLE CREEK ACRES TURNER FARMS SEC 5 FOLEY STATION MIDDLE CREEK PARK TURNER POND FOREST GLEN MIKE GREEN TURNER WEEKS FOREST HILLS MONTERREY TURNERS GROVE FOREST LANDING MORRIS ROWLAND TYLER FARMS FORREST H BALL MYATT MILL FARMS UMSTEAD GARNER GLEN NATHANS LANDING UPCHURCH FARMS GARNER TOWNHOMES NEW RAND ROAD VALLEY RIDGE GARY R PRIOR NICK HARRISON VAN STORY HILLS GENTLE SLOPE NOTTINGHAM FOREST VANDORA ACRES GEORGETOWNE MANOR NOVIE GULLEY VANDORA PINES GERALD & LYNDA B SMITH OAK HOLLOW ESTATES VANDORA VILLAGE GLEN MEADOWS OAK RIDGE VALLEY W L LLOYD GREEN ACRES OLD BANKS WAKEFIELD GREENBRIAR OLD STAGE ESTATES WATER OAKS GREENFIELD MANOR OLD STAGE PLACE WAVERLY POINT GRISSOM FARMS OLDE TURNER PLACE WAVERLY POINT PH6 GRISSOM FARMS PH2 ON TRACK WAVERLY POINT PH6-B H BRUCE BUTLER ORMOND PLANTATION WEEKEND RETREAT HADLEY MEADOWS OXFORD HEIGHTS WEST ESTATES HAMPTON RIDGE PAGAN RUN WESTERN TERRACE HARRISON PLACE PANTHER RUN WHISPERING PINES HARRY L ARNETfE JR PARKLAND WHITECROFT MANOR HARTWELL MINOR PARTIN PLACE WHITEFIELD HARVEY D JOHNSON PENNYS COUNTRY ESTATES WHITTINGHAM HAYWOOD H WILLIAMS PEPPERWOOD FARM WILBUR T BRITT PERCY JOHNSON & WM HEATHER GLEN MISNER WILDERS RIDGE Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name HEATHER HILLS PERRY PLACE WILDERS RIDGE PH4 HEATHER HILLS PINE MEADOW WILLIE JOHNSON HEATHER PARK PINE NEEDLES WILLOW BLUFFS PH1.2,3 HEATHER RIDGE PINEDALE ACRES WILLOW BLUFFS PH4,5 HEATHER SPRINGS PINEWINDS WILLOW CHASE HEATHER WOODS PINNACLE RIDGE WILLOW CREEK HEATHER WOODS PHSA POND ISLAND WILLOW HILLS HEATHER WOODS PHSB POPLAR SPRINGS CHURCH WILLOWDALE HEATHERBROOK RAND MEADOWS WIND HAVEN HERBERT ADAMS RAND MEADOWS PH2 WINDHAVEN SOUTH HIGHLAND TRAILS RAND MEADOWS PH3 WINDY HILLS HILLBROOK RANGEWOOD WINDY RIDGE HOKE LANDING RICHARD & NORMA AMES WM & DOROTHY PAGE HOLLAND FARMS RIVERBIRCH TOWNHOMES WORTHINGTON HOLLAND MEADOWS ROBINFIELD ESTATES WYNSTONE HOLLAND RIDGE ROCKSIDE HILLS Section 3— Named Nei hborhoods between I-40 and US 64/US 264 B ass PLANTATION MEADOWS A L SAPAUGH GATEWAY MEDICAL PARK S/D PLEASANT WOODS PHASE A M VINING GATEWOOD VII ABBINGTON RiDGE GEORGE LANE POOLE ACRES ABBINGTON RIDGE TOWNHOMES GERARD POULIN POOLE FARMS ADAMS POND GIPSON POND POOR BOY FARMS ALPINE ESTATES GLEN FRANCIS POPLAR CREEK AMBER ACRES NORTH GLENN JACKSON POPLAR VILLAGE AMBER RIDGE PH1 GLENROAD TOWNHOMES POUND FARM S/D GLENROAD TOWNHOMES, AMBER RIDGE PH10 LOT B PRINCETON MANOR AMBER RIDGE PH11 GOLDEN FOREST PROVIDENCE AMBER RIDGE PH3 GOLDEN PLANTATION QUARRY POINTE 2 AMBER RIDGE PH9 GOOD HOPE ESTATES QUARRY POINTE 2 AMELIA ACRES - SECTION I GOODSON & TODD QUARRY POINTE PH1 AMELIA ACRES S/D - SECTION II GRAHAM L SMITH RESTFUL PINES ANNA PLACE GRAHAM L SMITH HEIRS RETHA DEBNAM ANNIE MAE PLEASANT S/D GRAHAMSTONE HILL REX H SMITH RICHARD & JOHANNA ANTELOPE POINT GREEN ACRES RATH RICHARDSON PLACE APRIL COURT GREEN VALLEY PHASE 2 RICHARDSON PLACE SEC. ARROWSPRING GREEN VALLEY S/D LOT 4 1 PH. 1 RICHARDSON PLACE SEC. ARROWSPRING II GRIFFIS GLEN 2 PHASE 1 HANNAHS CREEK LOTS 49R, ASHLEY ESTATES SOR, S1R RIDGEVIEW ASHLEY HILLS HANNAHS CREEK PHASE RIVER CHASE Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name ONE HANNAHS CREEK PHASE RIVER OAKS ASHLYN TWO COMMERCIAL PARK HANNAHS CREEK PHASE RIVER OAKS AUBURN HILLS TWO COMMERCIAL PARK AUBURN HILLS PH3 HARMONY ACRES RIVER OAKS FARM RIVER OAKS FARM RE- AUSTIN POND PHASE ONE HARRY GARREY'S S/D COMB. LOTS 2 AND 3 AUSTINS POND HARVEST MILL RIVER RIDGE AUSTINS POND LOT 78 PHASE 4 HENRY FERRELL FARM RIVERBOOKE II PH3 AUSTINS POND PHASE 3 HENRY KELLY RIVERBROOKE AUSTINS POND S/D PHASE 2 PART A HERITAGE MANOR RIVERKNOLL AUSTINS POND S/D PHASE 2 PART B HIALEAH RIVERVIEW ESTATES AUSTINS POND, PH. 4D HICKORY MEADOWS RNERVIEW NORTH AUSTINS POND, PHASE 4A HIDDEN HOLLOW ROBERT E POWELL AUSTINS POND, PHASE 4B HILLANDALE ROBERT L KIRK AUSTINS POND, PHASE 4C HILLANDALE OAKS ROBERT L KIRK AUTUMN WOODS HILLINGTON ESTATE SEC. 1 ROCKBRIDGE AVALON HILLINGTON ESTATE SEC. 2 RONNIE A THOMPSON HILLINGTON ESTATE, LOT AVERY PARK 50 ROYAL ACRES AVERY PARK PH3 HILLINGTON ESTATES RUBY S RICHARDSON HILLINGTON ESTATES SEC. BAINBRIDGE 3 RUTLEDGE LANDING PH 3 BARBARA H GOWER HILLINGTON WEST RUTLEDGE LANDING PH 4 BARRINGTON HILLS HILLINGTON WEST PHS RUTLEDGE LANDING PH1 BARRINGTON VILLAGE HILLINGTON WEST PH6 RUTLEDGE LANDING PH2 BARRY & DEBORAH KEITH HILLINGTON WEST PH7 RYANS CREEK BARTEX M1LL VILLAGE S/D HOLIDAY ESTATES RYANS CREEK BARTEX MILL VILLAGE S/D HONEYCUTT & KENNEDY RYANS CREEK RYAN'S CREEK AND BARWELL ESTATES HOPKINS WEST BEDDINGFIELD HEIGHTS BARWELL ROAD HOUSE SCHOOL ACRES BATTLE BRIDGE HUGH WILLIAMS SHELDON PLACE BATTLERIDGE NORTH HUNTERS MARK SHERRON AND FRAZIER BATTLERIDGE NORTH HUNTERS MARK PH 3 SHOTWELL CENTER BATTLERIDGE NORTH HUNTERS MARK PH1,2 SMITH LANDING BAYWOOD FOREST HUNTS BRIDGE S/D SMITHS CREEK PHASE 2 BEECHWOOD HUNTSBORO SOUTH CREEK BELLA SERA VILLAS AT HURSHEL & MAXINE SOUTH HILLS RECOMB WHITE OAK STRICKLAND LOTS 141 AND 142 SOUTH HILLS RECOMB. BERGEN & ARBUTiNA iMPERIAL ESTATES LOTS 189, 190 SOUTH HILLS S/D SEC. IX BETHEL CREEK 1NDIAN CREEK OVERLOOK SHEET 1 OF 2 BINGHAM STATION INVERNESS SOUTH HILLS S/D SEC. IX Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name SHEET 2 OF 2 BIRCHWOOD SEC. 1 J R GRIFFIN SOUTH HILLS S/D SEC. V BIRCHWOOD, SEC. 2 JAMES W. TYNDALL S/D SOUTH HILLS S/D SEC. V BISHOP POINTE JERRY & LAURA BRANCH SOUTH HILLS S/D SEC. VI BLAIRE WOODS JERRY GOWER SOUTH HILLS S/D SEC. VII BLUE RIVER DEVELOPMENT CO INC JERRY PRICE SOUTH HILLS S/D SEC. VIII SOUTH HILLS, SEC. V BOBBIE C BELVIN JESSE & LOLA PULLEY RECOMB. LOTS 85-89 BOONE RIDGE JOE BROUGHTON SOUTHERN TRACE BRANDYWOOD JOE CARROLL S/D SOUTHERN TRACE PH6 BRECKENRIDGE JOHN MULLAN SOUTHERN TRACE PH7 BROOKHILL ESTATES SEC. SOUTHGATE BUSINESS ONE PHASE ONE JOHN R. HOWELL, JR. PARK BROOKHILL ESTATES SEC. SOUTHWIND ONE PHASE THREE JOHNNY WATSON DEVELOPMENT BROOKHILL ESTATES SEC. SOUTHWINDS ONE PHASE TWO JOHNS POINTE PH 3&4 DEVELOPMENT SPRING VALLEY S/D (15 BROOKWOOD PARK JOHNS POINTE PH1 LOTS) BUCKINGHAM S/D SEC. 2, PHASE 1 JOHNSON T. TALTON ST MARYS ESTATES BUCKINGHAM S/D SEC. 4 PHASE 2 JOHNSONS POND ST. JAMES, PHASE 1 BUCKINGHAM S/D SEC.1 JOHNSONS POND, RECOMB. PHASE 1 LOTS 55, 56 ST. JAMES, PHASE lA BUCKINGHAM S/D SEC.3 PHASE 2 JOSEPH BLAKE HEIRS FARM ST. JAMES, PHASE 2 BUFFALOE GROVE JOSEPH F REHM JR STACY & BETTY NORRIS BURWELL FOREST S/D SECT. STANLEY & BETTY 1 KINGS GRANT GRADY BURWELL S/D SEC. 2 KIRBY MARSHBURN STEPHEN HESTER LAFAYETTE PLACE S/D RE- C L KELLY COMB LTS 33,34 STILLWATER LANDING LAFAYETTE PLACE S/D SEC. C W ALLEN ] STONEBROOK S/D LAFAYETTE PLACE S/D SEC. CAMELOT 2 STONEBROOK S/D ADD. 2 LAFAYETTE PLACE S/D CAMELOT VILLAGE SECT. 3 STONEBROOK S/D ADD. 3 CAMERON CORPORATE PARK PHASE 2 LAKEWOOD ACRES S/D STONEWATER CAMERON PARK LANDMARK S/D STONEY CREEK CAMERON PARK, PHASE 1 LANDMARK S/D SEC. 2 STONEY CREEK PH2B CAMILLA P BAUCOM LANDMARK S/D SEC. 6 SUMERLYN CANDLEWOOD S/D PHASE II LANDMARK S/D SEC. IV SUMMERLYN CANNON S/D LANDMARK S/D SEC. V SUN VALLEY SECTION I CARDINAL ACRES (LONNIE D. SANDERFORD) LANDMARK S/D SEC. VI SUN VALLEY SECTION ll Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name CARMETTS RIDGE LANDMARK S/D SEC.3 SUTTON SPRINGS CARRIAGE MANOR LANDMARK, SEC. 8 SWADE E BARBOUR LANDS END AT CARRINGTON PLACE EAGLECHASE SWADE E BARBOUR CARRINGTON PLACE PHASE I LAUREN CHASE SWADE E. BARBOUR CARRINGTON PLACE PHASE TALON RIDGE AT II LAVONNE M BAGWELL EAGLECHASE CARRINGTON PLACE PHASE LAWRENCE & MARGARET lII STEWART TANGLEWOOD Carroll R Jackson LAWS TEALBROOK THE BLUFFS OF AUSTIN CASSEDALE LEAMON WRIGHT & WIFE POND LEE AND DUPREE MOBILE CEDAR WOODS HOME ACRES THE GLENS AT BETHEL THE HARVEST AT CHARELS & MINNIE SUMMERWIND CARROLL LEE CHASE PLANTATION THE HARVEST AT SUMMERWIND CHARLES & JANET TILTON LEE CHASE - SECTION I PLANTATION LOTS 13-16 THE MEADOWS OF SOUTHFORT PLANTATION, SECTION III, CHARLES & LISA MITCHELL LEE FOREST PHASE III LEE-CHASE SUBDNISiON THE PRESERVE AT LONG CHARLES BARNES SECTION IV BRANCH THE PRESERVE AT CHASTAIN LEE-HERITAGE S/D LONGBRANCH FARMS THE RIDGES OF CHASTEAL TRAILS LEES PLANTATION MAYBROOK THE TRACE AT LEES PLANTATION PHASE SUMMERWIND CHELMSHIRE DOWNS TWO PLANTATION CLAYTON CROSSING RETAIL THE VILLAGE AT CENTER LEES PLANTATION, PHASE 3 CLEVELAND SPRINGS THE VILLAGE AT CLAYTON PROFESSIONAL CLEVELAND SPRINGS LOT PARK CONDOMIMUM LEGEND HILLS A BLKS l, 8-11 THE VILLAGE AT CLEVELAND SPRINGS LOT CLAYTON TOWN CENTRE LELAND H POOLE A BLOCK 12 THE VILLAGE AT CLEVELAND SPRINGS LOT CLEMMONS CREEK S/D LEONARD PROPERTY A BLOCK 13 THE VILLAGE AT CLEVELAND CROSSING LESTER & MARIE CLEVELAND SPRINGS PHASE 1 STALLINGS PHASE 1 CLEVELAND CROSSING PHASE II LIONSGATE THE VINEYARD CLEVELAND OAKS LIONSGATE T-REX Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name LIONSGATE SUBDNISION CLEVELAND OAKS PH3 PHASE 4 TRUDY A MURRAY LTONSGATE SUBDiVTSION CLEVELAND OAKS, PHASE 1 PHASE 4 TRYON PLACE II LIONSGATE SUBDIVISION CLEVELAND OAKS, PHASE II PHASE 4 REVISED TUNBRIDGE LIONSGATE SUBDIVISTON CLOVERDALE PHASE 4 REVISED TURNER FARMS PH 9& 10 CLYDE BARRINGTON LISBON WOODS TURNER FARMS SEC 4 LYNNFIELD VILLAGE - CLYDE E HICKS SECTION I TURNER FARMS SEC4 PH8 LYNNFIELD VILLAGE - COLON HEIGHTS SECTION II TURNER POND LYNNFIELD VILLAGE - COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK SECTION III, PHASE I ULICE WILLIAMS LYNNFIELD VILLAGE - COTTONWOOD SECTION IlI, PHASE II UMSTEAD COUNTRY HILLS ESTATES - SECTION III LYNWOOD ESTATES VICTOR G BYRD COUNTRY HILLS ESTATES- SECTION I M.C.W. VILLAGE OF WffiTEOAK COUNTRY SQUIRE ESTATES M.C.W. S/D VINYARDS TOWNHOMES COUNTRY TRAILS SUBDNISION M.C.W. S/D SEC. 3 WALNUT BLUFFS COVINGTON CROSS M.C.W. S/D SEC. II WALNUT CREEK M.C.W., SEC. II (RECOMB. OF WALNUT CREEK II PHASE COXWOODS - SECTION II LOTS) I WALNUT CREEK II PHASE COXWOODS S/D - SECTION I MACDIE PARK II WALNUT CREEK II PHASE COXWOODS S/D SECT. 3 MALLARDS RIDGE III WALNUT CREEK II, PHASE CREECH ROAD MARCELLE A PEELE III CRICKET HOLLOW S/D - PHASE ONE MARGARET B PHILLIPS WALNUT RIDGE WEST CLAYTON TOWN CURTISS ROAD PROPERTY MARY PRICE ESTATES PLAT WEST PARK S/D - SECTION D A& J R JOENK MAURICE BRACKET II WEST PARK S/D SEC. DALLAS ACRES MAYBROOK CROSSINGS THREE DANIELS LANDING MCCULLERS ESTATES WESTON RIDGE DAVID W BANNISTER MEADOWBROOK ESTATES WESTON TRACE DEER TRACT S/D - SECTION 1 MEADOWBROOK PARK WHISPERING PINES S/D MEADOWS AT WHISPERING PINES S/D DEERFIELD AT EAGLECHASE EAGLECHASE PHASE II DOGWOOD FOREST - SECTION II MIAL PLANTATION PH1 WHITE OAK ESTATES DUCHESS DOWNS S/D MIAL PLANTATION PH2 WHITE OAK FARMS DUTCHMAN CREEK MIAL PLANTATION PH3 WHITE OAK LANDING Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name WHITE OAK PLANTATION E. B. MCCULLERS S/D MTAL PLANTATION PH4 RECOMB. LOTS 95 & 96 WHITE OAK PLANTATION EAGLESTONE SOUTH MIKE SMITH SEC. 2 MINGO CREEK WHITE OAK PLANTATION EAST POiNTE LOT 2 TOWNHOMES SEC.1 M1NG0 CREEK WHTTE OAK RIDGE S/D - EAST POINTE S/D LOT 10 TOWNHOMES SECTION II WHITE OAK RIDGE S/D, EAST POINTE S/D LOT 4 MIRY BRANCH SECTION 2 EAST POINTE S/D LOT 6 MOBILE HILL ESTATES WHITFIELD ESTATES EAST POINTE S/D LOTS 3 AND 5 MOOREFIELDS WHITLEY TRAILS EDGE OF AUBURN MOSS CREEK LOT 0-2 WIGGINS EFIRD CREECH MOSS CREEK VILLAGE WILLIAM H DAVIS MOSS CREEK VILLAGE EL CAMINO ACRES BUSINESS PARK WILLIFORD PLACE MOSS CREEK VILLAGE ELBERT BATTEN (LOTS 5& 6) BUSINESS PARK WILLOW BROOK, PHASE 3 MOSS CREEK VILLAGE WILLOW PARK - SECTION ELBERT L BATTEN PHASES 3& 4 II ELBERT L BATTEN S/D N B GOWER WILLOWBROOK WILLOWBROOK - A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ELLA TAYLOR NATHAN WATSON - PHASE I, SECTION IV WILLOWBROOK PH. 1 SEC. ELLENDALE NC 42 WEST BUSINESS PARK ] ELLINGTON S/D PHASE 4A WILLOWBROOK PH. l SEC. SEC. 1 NEUSE RIVER ESTATES 6 ELLINGTON S/D PHASE 4A WILLOWBROOK PH. 1, SEC. 2 NEUSE WOODS SEC. 5 ELLiNGTON S/D PHASE 4A WiLLOWBROOK PH. 1, SEC. 3B NEW RAND ROAD SEC. 9 ELLINGTON S/D PHASE WILLOWBROOK PH. 2, THREE NORTH RIDGE PHASE 2 SEC. 12 ELLINGTON S/D PHASE NORTH RIDGE S/D PHASE WILLOWBROOK PH. 2A THREE, SEC. ONE ONE LOTS 35 THROUGH 46 NORTH RIDGE S/D PHASE WILLOWBROOK PH. 2A ELLINGTON S/D SEC. ONE TWO SEC. 10 WILLOWBROOK PH. 2A ELLINGTON S/D SEC. THREE NORTHSIDE SEC. ll WILLOWBROOK PH. 2A ELLINGTON S/D SEC. THREE OAK FOREST S/D SEC. 13 WILLOWBROOK PH. 2A EMERALD VILLAGE OAKDALE MOBILE ESTATES SEC. 14 WILLOWBROOK PH. 2A ERWIN DUKE HOCKADAY, JR. OAKES PLANTATION SEC. 17 ESTATES AT SMITH OLD NORTH VINEYARD WILLOWBROOK PH. 2-A CROSSING SEC. ONE PHASE ONE SEC. l9 EVERWOOD OLD NORTH VINEYARD WILLOWBROOK PH. 2A, Appendix F. Named Neighborhoods Within the Demographic Study Area Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Neighborhood/Community Name Name Name SEC. ONE PHASE TWO SEC. 15 OLD NORTH VINEYARD FARMDALE ACRES SEC. TWO WILLOWBROOK PH. 2B FARMINGTON WOODS PH11 & 12 OLD RIVER RIDGE WILLOWBROOK PH. 2B WILLOWBROOK PHASE 1 FASHION HOMES OLDE TOWNE SECTION EIGHT WILLOWBROOK PHASE 2- FASHION HOMES ORTON ACRES A SEC. 18 FIELDCROSS AT OXFORD HILLS WILLOWBROOK PHASE EAGLECHASE SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 SECTION SEVEN WILLOWBROOK S/D PH. 1, FIELDSTONE CROSSING PANTHER ROCK SEC. 2 WILLOWBROOK S/D PH. FIELDSTONE S/D SEC. ONE PARKSIDE 2A, SEC. 16 WILLOWBROOK S/D PH. FOLEY STATION PARKSIDE 2B SEC. 24 WILLOWBROOK, A PLANNED DEV. PHASE 1, FOREST LANDING PARRISH MEADOWS SECTION 5 PAUL & JOANNE FOREST PARK S/D BRADSHAW WINSTON PLANTATION FOREST PARK S/D - SECTION WINSTON POINTE PHASE II PEARL CREEK ] B WINSTON POINTE PHASE FOX HAVEN PEARL RIDGE 1 B W]NSTON POINTE PHASE G E CLARK PEARL RIDGE PH3 ] B WINSTON POINTE, PHASE GARDEN ACRES PEDDLERS VILLAGE, INC. lA GARLAND SHERRILL PEDDLERS VILLAGE, INC. WOODBROOK ESTATES GARNER ESTATES PENWYCK ESTATES WOODWAY GARNER ESTATES - SECTION II PERDUE DEVELOPMENT WYNSTON PHASE 1 GARNER ESTATES - SECTION III PHEASANT RUN S/D WYNSTON PHASE 5 GARNER ESTATES, SECTION IV P1NE ACRES DEVE. WYNSTON, PH. 4 GARRISON S/D PHASE 2 PINE ACRES DEVELOPMENT WYNSTON, PHASE SEVEN GARRISON S/D PHASE 3 SEC. 3 PINE COUNTRY ESTATES WYNSTON, PHASE SIX GARRISON S/D PHASE 3 SECTION 2 PINEHURST PARK WYNSTON, PHASE THREE GARRISON S/D PHASE ONE PLANTATION MEADOWS WYNSTON, PHASE TWO GARRISON S/D PHASE THREE SEC. 1 PLANTATION MEADOWS