20160307 Ver 1_401 Application_20160328

Kimley>>> Horn _
Transmittal ;
,,IAN 2 8 2016
Date: May 14, 2015 Job Number: 015016172
Project Name: Reedy Creek Monitoring Structure Repair
To: Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 91 Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
We are sending these by
❑ U.S. Mail ® FedEx
❑ Other:
We are sending you
® Attached Under separate cover via
❑ Hand Deliver
the following items:
❑ Shop Drawings Ej Prints/Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications E] Change Orders
® Other: 404/401 Pre -Construction Notification Package (NWP#27)
Copies
Date
No.
Description
4
3/24/2016
1
404/401 Pre -Construction Notification Package (NWP#27)
1
3/24/2016
2
PCN Application Fee Check
2
3/24/2016
3
Full -Size Plan Sheets
4
3/24/2016
4
Half -Size Plan Sheets
1
3/24/2016
4
CD -R
These are transmitted as checked below:
® For your use Approved as submitted Resubmit Copies for approval
❑ As requested Approved as noted ® Submit Copies for distribution
❑ For review and comment E] Returned for corrections Return Corrected prints
Remarks:
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 704-409-1802.
Copy to: File
Signed Gam_
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name: Reedy Creek Monitoring Structure Repair
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: KimlQ -Horn & Associates, Inc.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): SAW -2011-01410
5. Site Address: 9601 Plaza Road Extension
7. City: Charlotte
8. County: Mecklenburg
9. Lat: 35.256511 Long: -80.700904 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Harrisburg
11. Waterway: Reedy Creek
12. Watershed: HUC: 03040105/Rocky
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 27
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request (Mitigation Proposal)
The following information will be completed by the Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

Kimley>»Horn
March 24, 2016
Ms. Crystal Amschler
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: 404/401 Permit (Nationwide 27) Application
Reedy Creek Monitoring Structure Repair
(Action ID: SAW -2011-01410)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Amschler and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, Kimley-Horn is
submitting the enclosed joint Section 404/401 Preconstruction Notification Application for the
above referenced project for your review pursuant to a Nationwide Permit #27 and General
401 Water Quality Certification number 3885. This application is to repair/replace an existing
cross -vane monitoring structure for the purposes of maintaining water quality monitoring,
provide bank stabilization, and to restore aquatic life passage within Reedy Creek. The
following information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Project Site Figures
■ Figure 1 —Vicinity
■ Figure 2 — USGS Topo (Harrisburg Quadrangle, 1993)
■ Figure 3 — SSURGO Soils (2015 Aerial Photograph)
■ Figure 4 — Impact Summary (2015 Aerial Photograph)
Construction Drawings for Reedy Creek Monitoring Structure Repair
• Project Site Photo Pages
• Approved Jurisdictional Determination
The project is located at 9601 Plaza Road in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina (35.256511 ON, -80.700904°W). Existing land use in the vicinity of the project
includes undeveloped forested land and single family residential properties. An approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) was issued on December 3, 2012 as part of the Reedy
Creek Feasibility Study and the proposed Reedy Creek Stream Restoration Project. The

Kimley>>> Horn Page
extents of the project area proposed for the structure repair are encompassed by the
existing approved JD (Action ID: SAW -2011-01410)
In 2014, an in -stream monitoring structure was permitted and constructed under a non -
reporting NWP 18, because the installation required less than 25 cubic yards of fill material.
Since construction of the original structure, a concrete weir installed by the USGS
(presumably many years ago) has blown out immediately downstream of the culvert
crossing at the Plaza Rd Extension. This has created a drop in grade and thus a structural
"jump" to form at the installed monitoring cross-section. The fall at the structure is now
approximately 18" which is creating a problem for passage of aquatic life as well as scour
around the footers which has led to structural instability and failure.
The proposed new step -pool structure will restore/stabilize 96 linear feet of Reedy Creek
and require 15 linear feet of temporary stream impacts in order to allow for work in dry
conditions. The project will result in 96 linear feet of permanent impact -no net loss of waters
of the US and 15 linear feet of temporary impacts from the restoration activities necessary to
replace/restore the monitoring structure. The proposed step -pool structure will compensate
for the change in grade, prevent the formation of a head -cut that would migrate upstream,
restore aquatic life passage, and create a more stable cross section in order to continue
water quality monitoring for the Reedy Creek Stream Restoration Project. Water quality
monitoring at the structure will continue during the restoration in order to monitor the effects
of restoration activities on water quality parameters. The proposed Reedy Creek
Restoration will tie -into the proposed structure repair, therefore, additional modifications will
not be required as a result of the restoration project.
Please feel free to contact Erin Turner at [phone] if you have any questions, or if
additional information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
Cc: Erin Turner
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

o�0 W ATF9QG
' Em
I I >
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page l of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
N No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Reedy Creek Monitoring Structure Repair
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mecklenburg County
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
20094-573
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
600 E 4th Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page l of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Public Agency
4b.
Name:
Erin Turner
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
4d.
Street address:
600 East Fourth Street
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-336-3927
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.:
704-409-1802
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
10511104
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.256511 Longitude: - 80.700904
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
1.0 acre
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Reedy Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C Waters
2c. River basin:
Rocky
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project is located at 9601 Plaza Road in the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Existing land
use in the vicinity of the project includes undeveloped forested land and single family residential properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
NA
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
—111 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to replace/restore an existing monitoring structure with a step -pool structure to compensate
for the change in grade, prevent the formation of a head -cut that would migrate upstream, restore aquatic life passage,
and create a more stable cross section in order to continue water quality monitoring for the Reedy Creek Stream
Restoration Project.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
In 2014, an in -stream monitoring structure was permitted and constructed under a non -reporting NWP 18, because the
installation required less than 25 cubic yards of fill material. Since construction of the original structure, a concrete weir
installed by the USGS (presumably many years ago) has blown out immediately downstream of the culvert crossing at the
Plaza Rd Extension. This has created a drop in grade and thus a structural 'jump" to form at the installed monitoring cross-
section. The fall at the structure is now approximately 18" which is creating a problem for passage of aquatic life as well as
scour around the footers which has led to structural instability and failure.
The proposed new step -pool structure will restore/stabilize 96 linear feet of Reedy Creek and require 15 linear feet of
temporary stream impacts in order to allow for work in dry conditions. The project will result in 96 linear feet of permanent
impact -no net loss of waters of the US and 15 linear feet of temporary impacts from the restoration activities necessary to
replace/restore the monitoring structure. The proposed step -pool structure will compensate for the change in grade, prevent
the formation of a head -cut that would migrate upstream, restore aquatic life passage, and create a more stable cross section
in order to continue water quality monitoring for the Reedy Creek Stream Restoration Project. Water quality monitoring at the
structure will continue during the restoration in order to monitor the effects of restoration activities on water quality
parameters. The proposed Reedy Creek Restoration will tie -into the proposed structure repair, therefore, additional
modifications will not be required as a result of the restoration project. It is anticipated that a back -hoe and/or mini excavator
will be used to reshape the banks and construct the step -pool structure. The work will be performed in the dry by utilizing a
pump -around system.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Name (if known): Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or
State determinations and attach documentation.
Approved JD (Action ID: SAW -2011-01410) issued December
3, 2012
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
7NYes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NWP 33 issued 6/11/2015 for contruction of a temporary haul road to stock pile soils on site for future use.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact number —
Type of
Permanent (P) or
Type of impact
Type of
Forested
jurisdiction
Area of
Temporary (T)
wetland
(Corps - 404,
impact
(if known)
10
(acres)
DWQ — non -
404, other)
W 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact number -
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of
Average
Impact
Permanent (P) or
(PER) or
jurisdiction
stream
length
Temporary (T)
intermittent
(Corps -
width
(linear
(INT)?
404, 10
(feet)
feet)
DWQ —
non -404,
other)
S1 - Impact 1
Installation of Impervious Dike
Reedy Creek
® PER
® Corps
10
15
❑ P ® T
and Pump Around
❑ INT
® DWQ
S1 - Impact 2
®P❑T
Restoration/Stabilization
Reedy Creek
® PER
E] INT
® Corps
®DWQ
10
96
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
111
3i. Comments: The proposed project will result in no net loss of waters of the US.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
or Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
I Filled
I Excavated
Flooded
I Filled
I Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number- Reason
Permanent (P) for
or Temoorary (T) impact
B1 ❑P❑T
B2 ❑P❑T
B3 ❑P❑T
6i. Comments:
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6e. I 6f. I 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Grading within the channel will be the minimum length necessary in order to install the structure. The proposed Reedy Creek
Restoration will tie -into the proposed structure repair, therefore, additional modifications will be avoided by the future
restoration project. Three steps are incorporated into the design to ensure aquatic life passage.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Several of the measures that will be implemented in order to minimize impacts include the utilization of a pump -around to
facilitate work in the dry, the use of temporary erosion control matting and planting of native vegetation for stabilization. All
sediment and erosion control and de -watering measures will be removed upon completion of construction and the temporary
areas of disturbance will be stabilized and restored to pre -construction contours.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0 % (No impervious added)
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Linear public transportation projects will
be
required to treat stormwater runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable in accordance with
the practices described in the
NCDOT
Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual. (No new development)
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ 0 R
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project objective is to repair/replace an existing in -stream monitoring structure in order to maintain water quality
monitoring, restore fish passage, and to stabilize the stream banks. These repairs will not result in additional
development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated in the construction of this project.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS informal consultation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panel 4595 (Map Revised February 19, 2105);
Flood Risk Information System (FRIS)
Digitally signed by Erin Turner
DN: n=Erin Turner, o=City of Charlotte,
ou=Erin Turner emailtoe n turn @c charlotte.nc.us,
Erin Turner
C=US
3/24/2016
Date: 2016.03.2414:20:35 -04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

^6
6
N
1
Figure 1 a�
o�
c�
Q�
�cc
e
Charlotte
°OaR
D sn"),rH
1 2
Miles 4 0
'v
N� O�
4
1-4 a 0 3
E
Q\aya
Nd Ext 3 Casa Cy^oa Ln
a
n
o _ _
s o
a
4i
od !y 3 a
!� m
s
Pv
a
Y
7
Q
O
0
E
i ° Pra?a
� Rq
Fkl
T—
t��i
Hammond W
D
c Charblle
o Memorial
Myra Way = Gardens
C
t.
� Povr ell Rd K CMI -b"
° o -adzn
Title: Figure 1 - Vicinity Legend:
D Project Area Charlotte -Mecklenburg
0 500 ,000 STORM
�
KimlepMorn 1 WATER
Services
Feet

t:
i
F7
19
8 Mx'G
0
0
Figure 2 - USGS 7.5' Topo (Harrisburg Quad)
0 250 500
Kimley>>>Horn
Feet
:l
ti
f
sj Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Soc`ietyli-cube(
Legend:
QProject BoundaryCharlotte-Mecklenburg
STORM
WATER
Services

4-
O
U
T
E
Lo
C0
O
CV
CV
N
L�
Z
Q
J
a-
0
CT
3
O
L
0
c
C7
I
L
O
Q_
T
/
co
�I
U
Q
Q_
-1
4-1O
U
O
0
0
0 -
CL CL
O
V
C7
a�
L
N
rn
U
E
0
c
c
.3
O
I`
0
U
c
N
v
0
a
v
c
v
0
x
T
N
Y
T
2
...
0
0
3
0
v
N
U
c
N
0
v_
•O
0
co
c
v
0
x
T
N
E
Y
0
0.
v
v
v
v
v
0
N
0
v
3
00
iu
E
0 0
v
N
i
0
0
c
c
g
0-
0
0
0.
E
v
c
v
0
0
N
v
•d
v
0.
coa
3
r-
.2 .
v
c
v
a�
0
0.
U
U
N
rn
N
O
T
O
a
v
aci
N
0
0
0
c
v
E
f/1
c
v
v
v
co
Iu
0.
co
c
v+
0
v
c
v
0-
U
c
0
Q
.3
0
v
0
c
a�
E
0
HEADER BOULDER ,TYP. SPLASH ROCK TOP ELEVATION
SEE PROFILE FOR SHOWN IN PROFILE
ELEVATION
SCOUR POOL, ARMORED WITH WELL
GRADED MIX OF NCDOT CLASS 1, A AND
B RIP -RAP, #57 STONE AND EXISTING
FLOW STREAM CHANNEL BED MATERIAL
.zv
\�\\
SEE PROFILE FOR
POOL DEPTH
a�
SEE PROFILE
BACKFILL (TYP) FOR LENGTH
OF POOL
EXCAVATED TRENCH FOOTER BOULDER
FOR ROCK CROSS BOULDERS IN VANE ARM SHOULD NOT BE
VANE CONSTRUCTION GAPPED OR HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT SPACES
FOOTER BED. 6" DEPTH OF #57 STONE
NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP.
SECTION A -A
BANKFULLHEADER BOULDERS
WELL GRADED MIX OF NCDOT
CLASS 1, A AND B RIP -RAP,
#57 STONE AND EXISTING
STREAM CHANNEL BED MATERIAL
COVER UPSTREAM
WITH NONWOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABF
ARMOR ENTIRE POOL BOTTOM
DEEP WELL GRADED MIX OF NCDOT
1, A AND B RIP -RAP, #57 STOP
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL BED MF
KEY INTO BANK
MINIMUM OF 6.0'
FLOW
TIE VANE ARM INTO
ELEVATION SPECIFIED IN
PLAN VIEW
ARM SLOPE (A)
NONWOVEN
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC, TYP
SECTION B -B
THROAT WIDTH
= 2.5'
L TIE INTO ELEVATION
SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW
FOOTER BOULDERS
BOULDERS IN VANE ARM SHOULD
NOT BE GAPPED OR HAVE ANY
SIGNIFICANT SPACES
PLAN VIEW
1 ROCK CROSS VANE
Not to Scale
ROCK CROSS VANE CRITICAL DIMENSIONS
VANE 1
VANE 2
VANE 3
ARM LENGTH (L)
32' (LEFT)
9' (LEFT)
12' (LEFT)
42' (RIGHT)
7' (RIGHT)
14' (RIGHT)
THROAT WIDTH T
2.5'
2.5'
2.5'
ARM SLOPE (e)
6% (LEFT)
5% (RIGHT)
6%
6% (LEFT)
5% (RIGHT)
MINIMUM BOULDER DIMENSIONS
HEIGHT WIDTH LENGTH
REEDY CREEK 1 2.0' 3.0' 4.0'
BACKFILL MATERIAL (WELL GRADED MIX)
NCDOT CLASS 1 40%
NCDOT CLASS A AND B 30%
ON-SITE SAND 20%
#57 STONE 10%
f:AREIV, IXcvY11:7:11DIE :M&NO]Ito] 1:11
NOTES:
1. POOL DEPTHS SHOULD MATCH ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THE
PROFILE.
2. DO NOT EXCAVATE POOL TOO CLOSE TO FOOTER BOULDERS.
3. VOID SPACES BETWEEN BOULDERS SHALL BE PLUGGED WITH
APPROPRIATE SIZED STONE.
4. BOULDERS SHALL BE 2.0' X 3.0' X 4.0' MIN.
TIE VANE ARMS INTO BANK AT
ELEVATIONS AND STATIONS
SHOWN IN THE PLAN VIEW
+ r r ^1
!f f
+ _----
--
--^-
\`------------ \ 1 s\ \
--------- UM ---------_ ~
------- ----- ---
154
^i ` i` t EXISTI N'G
`y , s
U'1`GUARD RAIL'\
\\ �� r-. ~'\ IN \\ \\ rr \r 1 \1\
1 \
' + 1 i N 1 r\ rl \r \\ 1 " \\ \\ \ 1 s\\
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 8" DIP SANITARY r`� `may 1 ', \\ ', \\ 11 s ► "
SEWER PIPE AND EASEMENT. `, ,k `�� \\ 11 11 \\ \\ \\ \\ 11 `\ s, \,, \\ 1 \\
\\ 1 \ \1 ' ' 1 1
r \ \ 1 1 1 \s \\ \\ 1 \ e \
N.
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD LOCATE TOP OF EX. 8" ,`, \\ \I y% 1 t `\ \ \\ \\ 1
r l t ti\ \\ r \ \ N. y y s d \
SANITARY SEWER PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN V
1 (/l y 1 y \ 1 \ 1 r \ \ 1 \ \ 1 \ \
s EASEMENT. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN 2' OF FILL fl, f \ \ 'r 1 \ r \ \ 1 y \ r 1 1 \
fIf OVER EX. 8" DIP AND AVOID PLACING A FOOTER U`\ \\ \s \\ 1 \\ \\ r'
s / + BOULDER DIRECTLY OVER SANITARY SEWER. A
WELL GRADED MIX OF RIP -RAP CAN BE UTILIZED ' ,1 \
INSTEAD OF A FOOTER BOULDER IN THIS LOCATION. TOP OF BOULDER TOE \� ref' s\ ss \\ \i 11
PROTECTION = 640.0
I 1 1 4 \� , �� \ 1
V 644J41i r h� t
r `-- CHANNEL BANKS TO BE TIE ARM INTO LEFT BANK _ t I t t \ s \
rri PLANTED WITH LIVE STAKES -`' AT ELEVATION 641.0
r r y \ it
� \ i
EXISTING S , `r\ I�r\s sr\ `\
s
RIPRAP
titer ~ --------------------------
IE1 v
�\ 1 s \ \
_______ g
T
NK
mss- .,. .,
^--' AT ELEVATION 638.3BA
X00 *00_ '�-'`�_--________
keb y 0
O� O
L %t O
_ - _ -- -------------------
-----------
------------
---__-__ - --_ O
----
- - - _- -
ROCK CROSS
`- VANE 1
x --
CHANNEL BANKS TO BE
PLANTED WITH LIVE STAKES
`--� - AT ELEVATION 641.0
' s
'r ROCK CROSS 4�
r'r VANE 3
1 n
r I
1 I , 0
-Jr i \
---------------
TIE M P RARY
1 1 CONST UCTION A CESS/
ass 35s ass ass ass + STALIN AREA
------- ------ \-3S - CHANNEL BANKS TO BE
-� �- �` s• n PLANTED WITH LIVE STAKES
rn
— -----------------------___— �� 1 SMH
ss18' DIP `1
5S 5S 5S SS EXISTING MONITORING
642
641
640
639
638
637
636
635
634
633
632
631
FLOW
PLATFORM SS SS ` SS — 55 1$" DIP
SS -..
1�
PROPOSED PLAN VIEW
W
Q
LL
U) Ln
� � O
m
Q +I +
3Z o
00 or
z� oZ
HQ m0
Dw m�
ww ZU)
W
J
LL
LL_
v
W
H
U
D
U) LO
z +
O o
Uor
LL Z
0000
o
H
w>�
= Z U
2' DEEP WELL GRADED MIX OF
NCDOT CLASS 1, A AND B RIP -RAP,
#57 STONE AND EXISTING STREAM
CHANNEL BED MATERIAL
W
J
LL
LL
LL . Z
0 co
LU
= Z U
I �u
NOTE: COIR MATTING WITH SEED AND STRAW TO BE ADDED
TO ANY DISTURBED AREAS. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT
SEEDING TO BE USED IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS.
W
J
LL
LL
Qf
LU
U
D
CD_
Z +
000
LLO Z
QtoO
LU
= Z U
w
U
U)I­
LU c
Wo
j +I
0 O
z�
H�
�W w
w
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 5 10 20
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
100+20 100+40 100+60 100+80 101+00
PROPOSED STRUCTURE PROFILE
1011+20
EXISTING RCBC
101+40
�C)
0.6' DROP V
v
CD —
rn
J
O M
r
> o
N
J
W
N
® O
LU
a�
N
N
U
rl w
W
J
LL
LL_
v
W
H
U
D
U) LO
z +
O o
Uor
LL Z
0000
o
H
w>�
= Z U
2' DEEP WELL GRADED MIX OF
NCDOT CLASS 1, A AND B RIP -RAP,
#57 STONE AND EXISTING STREAM
CHANNEL BED MATERIAL
W
J
LL
LL
LL . Z
0 co
LU
= Z U
I �u
NOTE: COIR MATTING WITH SEED AND STRAW TO BE ADDED
TO ANY DISTURBED AREAS. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT
SEEDING TO BE USED IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS.
W
J
LL
LL
Qf
LU
U
D
CD_
Z +
000
LLO Z
QtoO
LU
= Z U
w
U
U)I­
LU c
Wo
j +I
0 O
z�
H�
�W w
w
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 5 10 20
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
100+20 100+40 100+60 100+80 101+00
PROPOSED STRUCTURE PROFILE
1011+20
EXISTING RCBC
101+40
4b
caaaa
c i
� y
v
J
r
0
N
N
® O
a�
N
N
U
it
WZz
C
a =�,
� L
z �U
O
O
eq
z
O
0.
v
w
n
w
F-
c�
O
Y
r
O\
:2 z.
'r
a Q
(0
O
N w
In
O O
Q
C]
W
U
N
N
7�
y
u^z
O
zW
�
OPLO�
W�
z
W
PLO
W
Nw
�I

c
0
c
a
u
L L
ce I1 �
v
Know wean below.
Call before you dig.
vric y
d INSTALL WOVEN COIR FIBER MAT 1/2" — 2"
—` OVER SEED OR SOD
FLAT TOP END
v ESTABLISHED PLANT SHOWN
y Pte. FOR INFORMATION ONLY
y J
o
GROUND
° ((
LATERAL BUD SURFACE
INSTALL SPLIT 2" X 2" X 12"
1 II II
T DEAD STOUT STAKES PER SPECIFICATIONS =
a�
E
Y O
T BARK RIDGE
i�
PLANTING TO TOP
SIDE BRANCH
.J OF RIP RAP (TYP) REMOVED J iv
s LO
II
° � u
° 30" LIVE CUTTING (DORMANT) EXISTING
WOODY VEGETATION - LIVE STAKING
COMMOM NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
SPACING
SILKY WILLOW
SALIX SERICEA
24" O.C.
SILKY DOGWOOD
CORNUS AMOMUM
24" O.C.
ELDERBERRY
SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS
24" O.C.
BUTTON BUSH
CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS
24" O.C.
N GROUND NOTES: V CONTRACTOR TO USE A MINIMUM OF 2 SPECIES WITH NO ONE SPECIES >50% OF TOTAL STAKES. •• = c c
1. IF USING WOVEN COIR FIBER c �; (14
tiC MAT, INSTALL LONG STRAW — LIVE STAKES ARE 1/2' TO 2' IN DIAMETER AND 1'-3' IN LENGTH ^ N
s TF2 MULCH BENEATH MAT. BLACK WILLOW SPECIES ARE ONLY TO BE USED IN THE OUTSIDE OF BENDS OR OTHER HIGH STRESS AREAS ^ Z
° LOW SEASONAL AND ARE NOT TO BE GROUPED.
co
WATER TABLE
2. 2 ON CENTERS
45' TAPER
o BUTT END
O H i
E
LIVE STAKE (IN EARTH) LIVE STAKE DETAIL z o v
�Ic NNOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
O
c N
a
v
v
v
v
c
v
0
.v
N
O
.t..
v
c ZO
3 0.
U
L
r ^w^
C
E
V
O
An
ANCHOR TRENCH
ON 1' CENTERS
�a
° 18" (TYP.) FLOODPLAIN/EXISTING MATTING IN
BACKFILL GROUND TRENCH ANCHOROVERLAP
COIR FIBERw
MATTING ON 1 CENTERS
a
0-
0
a
v
O
w ANCHORS ON ANCHORS ON 3 CENTERS
3' CENTERS
6 MIN
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
CL ANCHORS ON 1'� ANCHORS (TYP)
CENTERS IN TRENCH
3 y
MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN
TRENCH AND BACKFILLED
L
w STREAM BED EXTEND MATTING BELOW TOE 6" OVERLAY (MIN.)
OF SLOPE AND KEY INTO
STREAMBED MIN. 6"
v
PLAN VIEW
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
a
U
U
N
T
0 7" Y 7" (NInnAINIAI 1
PERMANENT SEEDING — RIPARIAN SEED MIX
J
BOTANICAL NAME
i
REDTOP PANICGRASS
PANICUM RIGIDULUM
23
0
ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
N
RIVER OATS
CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM
20
O
PANICUM ANCEPS
N
®
INDIAN GRASS
a�
10
WINTER BENTGRASS
N GROUND NOTES: V CONTRACTOR TO USE A MINIMUM OF 2 SPECIES WITH NO ONE SPECIES >50% OF TOTAL STAKES. •• = c c
1. IF USING WOVEN COIR FIBER c �; (14
tiC MAT, INSTALL LONG STRAW — LIVE STAKES ARE 1/2' TO 2' IN DIAMETER AND 1'-3' IN LENGTH ^ N
s TF2 MULCH BENEATH MAT. BLACK WILLOW SPECIES ARE ONLY TO BE USED IN THE OUTSIDE OF BENDS OR OTHER HIGH STRESS AREAS ^ Z
° LOW SEASONAL AND ARE NOT TO BE GROUPED.
co
WATER TABLE
2. 2 ON CENTERS
45' TAPER
o BUTT END
O H i
E
LIVE STAKE (IN EARTH) LIVE STAKE DETAIL z o v
�Ic NNOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
O
c N
a
v
v
v
v
c
v
0
.v
N
O
.t..
v
c ZO
3 0.
U
L
r ^w^
C
E
V
O
An
ANCHOR TRENCH
ON 1' CENTERS
�a
° 18" (TYP.) FLOODPLAIN/EXISTING MATTING IN
BACKFILL GROUND TRENCH ANCHOROVERLAP
COIR FIBERw
MATTING ON 1 CENTERS
a
0-
0
a
v
O
w ANCHORS ON ANCHORS ON 3 CENTERS
3' CENTERS
6 MIN
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
CL ANCHORS ON 1'� ANCHORS (TYP)
CENTERS IN TRENCH
3 y
MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN
TRENCH AND BACKFILLED
L
w STREAM BED EXTEND MATTING BELOW TOE 6" OVERLAY (MIN.)
OF SLOPE AND KEY INTO
STREAMBED MIN. 6"
v
PLAN VIEW
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
a
U
U
N
T
0 7" Y 7" (NInnAINIAI 1
PERMANENT SEEDING — RIPARIAN SEED MIX
COMMOM NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
PERCENTAGE
REDTOP PANICGRASS
PANICUM RIGIDULUM
23
VIRGINIA WILDRYE
ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
20
RIVER OATS
CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM
20
BEAKED PANICGRASS
PANICUM ANCEPS
18
INDIAN GRASS
SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
10
WINTER BENTGRASS
ARGOSTIS HYEMALIS
4
MISTFLOWER
EUPATORIUM COELESTINUM
3
LEATHERY RUSH
JUNCUS CORIACEUS
2
r m o
:2 z a Q N
o
Ln z 7) N o
O O C] U N
7�
ERNST NC PIEDMONT RIPARIAN MIX (ERNMX-307)
APPLICATION RATE 20 LBS/ACRE
WOODEN STAKE
.c, 1
v
5 NOTES:
w 1. IN AREAS TO BE MATTED, ALL
° SEEDING, SOIL AMENDMENTS, AND N
E SOIL PREPARATION MUST BE N N
COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR
FIBER MATTING.
2. COIR MATTING WITH SEED AND
STRAW TO BE ADDED TO ALL
DISTURBED AREAS. ANCHOR
..
L
a
TEMPORARY SEEDING
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
PERCENTAGE
RYE GRAIN
SECALE CEREALE
70
BROWNTOP MILLET
UTOCHOLA RAMOSA
20
ANNUAL RYE
LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM
10
co *130 LBS/ACRE
v
v
c r l
NOTE: TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND STRAW TO BE APPLIED IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS r
INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR
EROSION CONTROL MATTING W
NOT TO SCALE
,3 W
b
0
°
E
V
O
y
w N LL-
O 04
W
� wO/
W
a
W
co *130 LBS/ACRE
v
v
c r l
NOTE: TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND STRAW TO BE APPLIED IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS r
INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR
EROSION CONTROL MATTING W
NOT TO SCALE
,3 W
b
0
°
E
V
O
y
w N LL-

enoto rage 1
Reedy Creek facing upstream at the existing structure. Notice failed right boulder arm
and excessive fall over the cross -vane header rock
Reedy Creek facing upstream at the existing structure. Notice staining from the
former ordinary base flow line along the left boulder arm.
Title Photo Pages
Prepared ForPrepared By
Project Reedy Creek Monitoring Structure Repair
b Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
STORM
WATER Date Project Number Kimley>»Horn
3/21/16 015016172

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action I.D.: 2011-1410 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: Harrisburg
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Stormwater Services / Attn: Jarrod Karl
Address: 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone No.: 704-432-0966
Property description:
Size (acres): 23,468 linear feet of stream channels & 3.1 acres of wetlands
Nearest Waterway: Reedy Creek River Basin: Yadkin
Coordinates: 35.269275 / -80.715953 Hydrologic Unit Code: 03040105
Location Description: The site is located at 2900 Rocky River Road, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be waters on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). ). If you wish, you may
request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the waters on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
_ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory
Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination
may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

Action Id.: 2011-1410
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Amanda Jones at 828-271-7980.
C. Basis For Determination
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Interim
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region. These
wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks. The
stream channels on the property are unnamed tributaries to and including Reedy Creek which eventually flows into the Yadkin
River. The Yadkin River joins the Uwharrie River to form the Pee -Dee River. The Pee Dee River enters the Atlantic Ocean
through Winyah Bay in South Carolina.
D. Remarks: This jurisdictional determination applies to jurisdictional features associated with the "Reedy Creek
Feasibility Study" area as submitted on June 25, 2011 and May 24, 2012. This determination replaces the previous one
dated August 22, 2011. Related AID 200902008 is an additional jurisdictional determination that also includes portions of
this study area (and which this determination does not replace).
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved
jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a request for
appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following
address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by January 31, 2012.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: --Amanda Jones
Issue Date: December 3, 2012 Expiration Date: December 3, 2017
CF: Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc., Attn: Chris Tinklenberg, 2000 South Boulevard, Suite 440, Charlotte, NC
28203
2