20150862 Ver 2_Stormwater Info_20160323

Strickland, Bev
From:Devane, Boyd
Sent:Wednesday, March 23, 2016 2:50 PM
To:Strickland, Bev
Cc:Johnson, Alan
Subject:FW: Troutman Charter Academy 2015-0862 v2
Attachments:Iredell Charter Academy - Plan Approval 12-11-15.pdf
Please file the note below and the attached letter in 2015-0862v2. Thanks.

NC Division of Water Resources
919-807-6420

From: [e-mail] \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:08 PM
To: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Cc: Devane, Boyd <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Troutman Charter Academy 2015-0862 v2

Hey Alan,

I understand the confusion and frustration here…as we discussed yesterday…this project has been difficult from the
th
beginning and is now on its third iteration. As far as condition #6 in the 401 approval dated January 4, I submitted a
th
copy of the report as well as full and half-size plans of the approved SMP on December 28, 2015 as requested. Looking
back at the transmittal, however, it doesn’t appear that I included the approval letter so I’ve attached it for your
records. If the submittal was never received please let me know and I’ll resubmit.

This may all be moot as this point because as pointed out by Boyd and as specifically stated in the 401 approval, the SWP
th
will need to be modified based on the new site plan. My hope was that, just as stated in the January 4 letter, we could
get 401 approval on the same conditional basis…that once the modified SWP is approved, I would forward to DWR and
we could proceed.

My apologies for the confusion…please advise how you would like to proceed.

Thanks,

Chris
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Kimley-Horn
Direct: 704 409 1802 | Mobile: [phone]

From: Johnson, Alan \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:03 PM
To: Tinklenberg, Chris <[e-mail]>
Cc: Devane, Boyd <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Troutman Charter Academy 2015-0862 v2
1

Chris, it seems there is confusion on the SW plan for the troutman charter school…go figure, huh? LOL

I believe Boyd (below) is referencing the new stream impact (modification) that we discussed yesterday. Has troutman
sent up the SW plans, etc. It seems not.

Take a look at his comments below.

Thanks
Alan

From: Devane, Boyd
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:16 PM
To: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Subject: Troutman Charter Academy 2015-0862 v2

You may not have received this yet but when you do, please help me out on this. I received the Kimley-Horn letter
th
dated March 9, 2016 asking for approval of a modification request due to a DOT issue. There was a letter sent from the
th
field office on January 4 giving them 401 approval but telling them to submit a copy of the full sized SW plan with proof
of approval from Troutman and also if there were other modifications, they should send us a plan with evidence of
approval from Troutman. . They instead sent send Karen a letter asking for approval of the plan modification. Should
th
you or I contact them and remind them what our Dec 4 letter said?

NC Division of Water Resources
919-807-6420

2

405 South Sterling Street, Morganton NC 28655
CONSULTANTS P e 828 433 5661 / ra, 828 433 5662 / loawest cansuRants.co
PLANAPPROVAL
December 11, 2015
Mr. Christopher Bostic, PE
Kimley-Horn and Associates
333 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Iredell Charter Academy Site. Plan — Cross Tie Lane at US 21
Engineering Documents Approval
Dear Mr. Bostic:
Having received and reviewed the plan sheets dated November 2, 2015 and revised December 3, 2015, and the
accompanying documents, I am issuing approval of the engineering portions of the project, subject to the
following conditions:
I. On Sheet C-4.0 the base flood elevations (BEE) should be shown.
2. On Sheet C-5.0 and C-5.1 revise the fire hydrant location at the end of the new commercial street such
that it is connected to the water main with a tee and valve. The water main shall dead end with a valve
and plug restrained by a concrete collar (see attached mark-up).
3. On Sheet C-5.0 and C-5.1 revise the water mains in the round -about area to keep the water main out of
the median. See attached mark-up. NCDOT may require further revisions, You are responsible to
determine the NCDOT's requirements. If the NCDOT requires revisions, please send the Town revised
drawings.
4. On Sheet C-5.0 and C-5.1 show the water main running parallel with the new commercial street to have
an alternate bid pipe size of 16 inches (ductile iron pipe). If the Town Council decides to pay for the
increase in material cost for the 16" DIP then it will already be permitted by Public Water Supply.
The stormwater management plan, including water quantity and water quality treatment, in accordance with
Section 8.11 of the Troutman Unified Development Ordinance is approved.
This approval does not cover the subdivision preliminary plat or any flood plain development permits that may be
required. Coordinate these approvals with Erika Martin.
This approval does not relieve the property owner or developer, and his agents and contractors, from abiding by
all applicable requirements of the Town of Troutman ordinances and standards, regardless of the information or
lack of information on the Engineering Documents. In addition, it is the owner/developer's responsibility to
obtain permits and abide by all regulations of other entities havingjurisdiction, such as the NC Department of
Transportation and Iredell County.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
WEST CONSULTANTS, PLLC
Benjamin B. Thomas, PE