20160293 Ver 1_Bridge No 258 WBS No 17BP 7 R 86 - Part 2_20160322

Carpenter,Kristi
From:
Thomson, Nicole J
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:51 AM
To: [e-mail]; Wanucha, Dave
Cc: Carpenter,Kristi; Parker, Jerry A
Subject: Bridge No 258 over South Prong Stinking Quarter Creek on SR 3351 (Smithwood Rd), Guilford Co.; WBS No. 17BP.7.R.86 - Part
Attachments: SF-400258_HYD_SMP_20160219.pdf; SF-400258_Permit Drawings_Stream_20160219.pdf; SF-400258 Wetland Impact Summary
Sheet_20160219.pdf; SF-400258_Permit Drawings_Buffer_20160219.pdf; SF-400258 Buffer Impact Summary Sheet_
20160219.pdf; 400258 wet form.doc; 400258 SA stream form.pdf; 400258 SB stream form.pdf; 400258 upl form.doc; 400258
WA wet form.doc; 400258 WB wet form.doc
Nicole J. Thomson
Division Environmental Supervisor Assistant
Division Environmental Office
919-754-7806 Mobile
Nithomson2(cancdot.qov
PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415-4996
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Hi�;hWay North Carolina Department of Transportation �
Stormw�ter M
,,,,,�„�,,, Highway Stormwater Program �_�
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN -
(Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.7.R.86 TIP No.: SF-400258 County(ies): Guilford Page 1 of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element: 17BP.7.R.86 TIP Number: SF-400258 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 2/19/2016
NCDOT Contact: William G. (Galen) Cail, PE Contractor / Designer: TGS Engineers (David B. Petty, PE)
Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 706 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Suite 200
Ralei h, NC 27603
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Ext. 104
Email: cail@ncdot. ov Email: d ett @t sen ineers.com
Cit /Town: Libert Count (ies : Guilford
River Basin(s): Ca e Fear CAMA Count ? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Descri tion
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet): 545 ft. Surroundin Land Use: Forest, rural residential
Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site
Project Built-U on Area ac. 0.4 ac. 0.3 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Two 10' wide paved travel lanes w/ shoulders paved to face of guardrails (varies 0' to Two 10' paved travel lanes with 3' to 4' wide grassed shoulders and grassed side
5.5') and 2'-3' wide grassed shoulders and grassed side slopes ranging from 3(H):1(V) to slopes ranging from about 3(H):1(V) to 2(H):1(V).
2(H):1(V).
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 210 Year: 2015 Existin : 210 Year: 2015
General Project Narrative: Replacement of Bridge No. 400258 on SR 3351 (Smithwood Road) over South Prong Stinking Quarter Creek in Guilford County north of Liberty, NC. Proposed 60' long by 30'
(Description of Minimization of Water wide single-span bridge to replace existing 36' long by 27' wide double-span bridge (timber deck on timber joists). The proposed grade is about 6 inches above existing grade in
Quality Impacts) the vicinity of the bridge. Bridge No. 400258 is within the Cape Fear River Drainage Basin and shall adhere to the Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules. Stormwater runoff on the
existing bridge discharges directly into the water for the full length of the bridge. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into the water. No deck drains will be
installed. Stormwater runoff from the proposed bridge is to flow to a proposed drop inlet located at the west approach. Stormwater runoff will be discharged at minimum
practicable slopes, yielding minimum velocities. Discharge from the pipe outlet (Q10=0.3 cfs) will be attenuated on a riprap pad (V10=0.8 ft/s) and diffused by the existing
topographic conditions before flowing toward the buffer zones. All proposed stormwater runoff is discharged as far away from the stream and at lowest velocities as practicable.
There are two patches of wetlands west of the bridge which will not be disturbed by the proposed project.
Waterbod Information
Surface Water Body (1): South Prong Stinking Quarter Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-19-8-2-(1)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply V(WS-V) Class B
Sup lemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Ciassification: None
Impairments: None
A uatic T&E S ecies? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: South Pron Stinking Quarter Creek Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake
Project Includes Brid e S anning Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

H' ilwd North Carolina Department of Transportation ��
�StOYmwater Highway Stormwater Program � �•
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT P�AN
(Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: TIP No.: SF-400258 County ies): Guilford Pa e 2 of 2
Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators
Station & Coordinates Drainage Pipe/Structure BMP
Sheet (Road and Non Road Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/
No. Pro'ects) Water Bod Type Ri ra T e (ac) Structure (in) (cfs) (f s) Buffer Rules?
1 2 -L- 12+91 RT (1)South Riprap Apron / Pad Class 'B' 0.1 Pipe 15 0.3 0.8 N/A
35.909382°, -79.555399` Prong
Additional Comments
' Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2014), NCDOT Standards, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14), Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy
Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria.

�
�o
0
V
• �
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets
S�g��p\
,�� �S�\�.
`���`��
��
��1��� �ll' ����� �����Jl��� �
�� �Y ����� �� �1L�� V'V' � Il �
G UILFORD CO U1�lTY
LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 400258 OVER . SOUTH PRONG STINKING
QUARTER CREEK OIV SR 3351 (SMITHWOOD RD)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADI11lG, DRAl11tAGE, PAVING, A111D STRUCTURE
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 13 + 13.87
��__--
/ � �o �351 �
�
-L- STA. 10 +40.00
BEGIN PROJECT
176P.7. R.86
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR VERTICAL
CURVATURE AND VERTICAL SSD.
— ,� �O
�fi�Ns N��NS 1
\S.�Q���� G�� ..�
Qv �
END BRIDGE
S�
-L- STA. 13 + 76.13 T �
WETLAN D AN D
STREAM IMPACTS
��o
-- �
�OD Rn
WETLANDS
Sr/�K�� F�T �� -
Q�qR F� S p—�s
C,pFFK � eG
- (C►iASEFpRD 50
-� � RD)
� ���
� �
�'
-L- STA. 15 + 85.00
END PROJECT
17BP.7. R.86
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
tVCDOT CONTACT: V I R G I1V I A M A B R Y HYDRAULICS ENGINEER 0r, owr,y c
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH �
PLANS PREPARED BY: PLANS PREPARED FOR: ��,4 '�9�
ADT 2015 = 210 �� � �
TGS ENGINEER$ NCDOT �
20 10 O 20 40 804—C N. LAFAYETTE ST PRIORIN PROJECTS UNIT � �
T= b %* LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #400258 =0.091 MILES � SHELBY,NC 28750 1020 Birch Rid e Dr. �,, �
LENGTH $TRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #400258 =0.012 MILES r� PH [phone] Raleigh, NC �17610 B'�. .��
PLANS V= 50 MPH r cORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 P�. "P oF bQ°@
* TTST -3% +DUAL =3% TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BPJ.R.86 #400258 =0.103 MILES srcharuns: T�""
20 10 0 20 40
� � LEONARD G. FLETCHER PE ROADWAY DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
� PROJECT ENGIhEER ENGINEER
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = RURAL - APRIL 21, 2015
LOCAL R.E. BURNS & soNs co
P. O. BOX T 168
4 Z O 4 $ S7ATESV�LLE. NC 28687 JpROJECT DESlGN ENG/NEER LETTING DATE:
PH fT04)92<-86C6
PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER PE APRIL 21, 2015
2012 STANDARD SPEC7FICATIONS S7GNAT[IRE:
6F-400258 Permit Drawiii� tsh stream.den 2/1 A/2016 42733 PM TGS

INTERMITTENT UT TO SOUTH PRONG
STINKING QUARTER CREEK (SA) IMPACTS
Length Type Description
Temporary 0 ft None No Temporary Impacts
WETLAN D IMPACTS
Hand Clearing Permanent Fill
in Wetlands in Wetlands
F F F
f- f- F
� qC � qC
WOODS
/Ll J
��,J
%�� _ �N ��
EXISTING OH POWER LINE
(APPROX. LOCATION)
18
RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X27' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 60'X30' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 545'
EXCAVATION TO
ELEV.= 599.5 PT
CLA55 II RIP RAP
(STRUCTURES ITEM)
WOODS ��
/E� I
w
0
E — �
PERMIT
FOR BRIDGE
GUILFORD
DRAWING
#400258
COUNTY
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
l7BP.7.R.86 (SF-4002581
TGS TGS ENG/NEERS
ENciNiERS 706 H/LLSBOROUGH ST
�� SU,TE 2��
RALE/GH, /VC 27603
PH (9/9J 773-8887
STREAM AN D WETLAN D IMPACTS
� � � �i ���
�f
� °1 ��/Tc`�
I l
��j �.
� II N�� g� \g! ���j TF�T ��optio
� � � 18 \�S\G� Q� �jT ��0��
� I \� ,� RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE �1 \ q�TF � s Po
1
�IN DON�SE LEONARD HUMBLE \s!\s! � C� �%�jy `,
S� F `
�� ��� �e �� � �S�O�G
I 1 �
\g\S\81 ai
� ' � EXCAVATION TO ���_
, ELEV.= 599.5 FT. sr
J�; ei e�
m �.I 1 � b
.� \
,� ti'y CLASS II RIP RAP
i/ ` % (STRUCTURES ITBM) � ,�� \
� ��-�' v��
� � � WOODS \e-.�
- PDE � ��DE PDE � ���
/ / _ __ _-- ---- �
� - � -� � --- - — ��x�
/ ,-� - - r� �
�� �//// ._ � TB2GI I Iy�.I
,— ,
; " ,— % -�
r ,, �
r , _
--- --
�;�F���� - " - -- __ _
F\ r.�m l.[.r_
�J`s,�� -' R�) __ — ______--� i I�LI f
� 1 1�1�1 � �
, � - " ��D _� �
/ MiT N`� � , , � � ,� � �-�
, _,
� 5�� �gST � ��' -,Y - ��� r �='' �' ;-'`,
/ �R 3 2� / ,,, �-- �� _ _�_ - d':�" �e�
/ �F � .r�-;� _ _ — PDE
.�' �� ,�-' � _
�' /
�/ �;,,��`; ��YQ2 0.27CFS /�Sj��ENT TIN PG i���/
� �� �� � Q2� �� �4F �S // RM�T��N� EEK � :,�/�
� �, �, ,
, ���'��,-.� ' WOODS v�o=o.a2 FTis � �� S�UTP �ER �R /J`����',
/ p� v �
/
�
BEGIN PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
-L- STA. 10 + 40.00
NOTES:
1. SOUTH PRONG STINKING QUARTER CREEK
IS IN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN.
2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT.
3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED.
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT
METHOD II.
5. NO IMPACTS TO WETLANDS, SOUTH PRONG
STINKING QUARTER CREEK OR INTERMITTENT
UT TO SOUTH PRONG STINKING QUARTER
CREEK (SB).
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 10 0 20 40
SF-4U0258_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_sheam.dgn 2/19/2016 5283I PM TGS
CLASS B RIP RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD � ��
BM#I /�
18
RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE
� r
/ � i�
� � ��
WOODS
C
E
- � �\p� \f\
—L—
— F— — — --- " _ _
' — — — _ F — -- ---- ,_
— -- - -- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- _\_ � � � \
--- -
� — --- —
------- --
iF----------- -—
F _ _ —
-
--F-------
PDEJ - -
RETAIN ALL MUDSILLS
\
\ �'� �
WOODS
�---
---
��—�� ; — —
('�� � � � _ ,� � �
WETLANDS SHALL NOT
BE DISTURBED
18
RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE
WOODS
WOODS
%�Es- �,-- —_ _
'�50 '-----
END PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
-L- STA. 15 + 85.00
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 3

INTERMITTENT UT TO SOUTH PRONG
STINKING QUARTER CREEK (SA) IMPACTS
Length Type Description
Temporary 0 ft None No Temporary Impacts
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X27' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW PERMIT DRAWING �7BP.7.R.86 (SF-4002581
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 60'X30' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW -rG� Tcs ENG/NEERS
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 545' �v�,N:_ERs �os H/LLSBOROUGH sr
FOR BRIDGE #400258 — S�,TE Zoo
G U I L F O R D C O U N TY �� PHL�9/9J 77328887
STREAM AN D WETLAN D IMPACTS
� � � � �i � � � � _
� ; _ _ � � � �. �
�r�
\gl�o T �
��
� � �� s � _
� T
� � I °�\ ��j �� TF� ��op�o —
' I T
�_� � � 1
� exca,vaTioN ro �� S 18 ���� Q(� �T y� ��'�^��
WETLAND IMPACTS i e�ev.= ss9.5 Fr. �' RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE �1 S\\\T� ���� �Po 6�5
�`
� �, � �
�$ �� / � S DON�SE LEONARD HUMBLE s! \ s! C��Tj�, `
Hand Clearing Permanent Fill RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE ��� � � i� ��'r_� ����� %����j�
in Wetlands in Wetlands �ON�SE LEONARD HUMBLE � � I 1, \� �� G �
� j s�x
F F F � Gj 'y' ��- EXCAVATION TO e���_ el
� � � � ELEV.= 599.5 FL qsr�
r- r- F ���' , � � �'' `� Hi , � e1 � �C�
� � �� CLASS II RIP RAP p ���
O qC O qC °'� � '� (STRUCTURES ITEM) o ,�
� CLA55 II RIP RAP � � � �1 �� � � �
(STRUCTURES ITEM) �� / � �__ \a�
� �� � � � � �� WOODS ��� ��.�s�_
� W O O D S DE PDF. , �DE PDE ���
EXISTING OH POWER LINE __ E� N� TF\ �� el-
(APPROX. LOCATION) �� � � o _ �� �� d e ' c�J
e �� � -_� � F �.i � c � � � ; � ,� _ �,��,�;s���- �-�� � W 0 0 D S
_� �_.
� � �s, `r-' -k�`-v-� ����� �- i�ii i r�"�� � _ i i ia _ - —�-F-=_- �� �, �
_
�� �� �- � � � , � - _
, . � , � --__ - -
� i � -� - �' J '<- � � �
� � � � I I I �� � ��_ � � — -�� —
�J — � � � �
� �
WO�S � / � -__ _ - �
,- ___, _ ---=�
- - - - , - - _' -
�� _ _ �. �
I c �r � � (�
/ / / i i� i a - --- -- - ---- -- � �-
� / � / _ _ - --- --- - I_ _ I 1 F -V�� ��
��/ �`-"' / �J�'; � � � � � --- ----- -- -- -- \ � � � �� �
j `� ._ � � _ - I I I_� � , -- �
� r V � ` TB 2GI -L- �_ � \ � _ ,
i/ � � � �� - - \ {� � �
/ _ _ - _ �J `J"
. � �� - _ ,i . . ' � _ _ _-_
/ ��� r � ��� / � �
- 1 i - . .'V i � / _ �
- J ---- - - - � MI�ES f �_
�, _ i �
� , � � ��______ 1' i I � — % ,q /- --
\ / � ----__ W ` '� --------- ---- — �
� � � �� r , � 0 � �� -_ 1 �l�t I � � �� I I i 1J �7�� �� F ----------- — 3 50 �t� �
� ��_� F�� ,. — F\ T.C1TI I_I � _
. � ,
� , R�l _ � � ,.l.I_f„i i I.l _ _ —
/ , I�i'1`t� � F -----
� _�
� i r ; TN � � „� '--F-------- ---- - �
� QD � l,.
�� , / / / �
���5���� � �; N � R 3 5� 0 gs� �` � � - . . _," _ -a,_ �.�, ; � � ' ', _ , �� �'`��� - � — --- _ --- � � �
,
"� w e i _
M � � � � _ _
� � � � _ -- — PDE PD � ' � — - — — —
/ �__� 5 2 � � � � � - =s�� ,-' °� t �e' o � , �8 �- __
�
�
� ��'���,� � � �p — ,y � ,� �C�y, s � � � < r)e e � ,-ti�1-, � f .y � „ RCP�
, ,, � - � � � ; � _ ,
' N --
._; � - " �� �"� � � ' RETAIN ALL MUDSILLS ; ��� �
� Y -r• ta O � � �
- ;�-�j q� o.27 CFS �s �%/ � ��� I �� , � �:� � WOODS � � �' ' -
� � F °W = 0.34 CFS � M��(T N� � l5 { � �� \ �_ - EXI S TI'
S k�6 �� �-�� 2=0.77 FTiS �� �R R� EE �� � � NG ��-�
S� 3 ����� WOODS V10=0.82 FTiS I��TN��R �R ���<v��� �'� � � � � �� �
s
�° � �� �i r � R � r�
� j � � �x=' � CLASS B RIP RAP pl1 P m , �, � � /� % ' ,ti� \_ ',
� � DISSIPATOR PAD �m � � �� % � �� �� �� � %�� ���� � �� �l �
��� � � � ��� ,�� �� � � c� �
/ r�
� �"������� � BE � N PROJECT BM�� �� ��� �Q �r`'�l � E�DSTU B DALL NOT � � � �-- '
� �
-; `�5��� 1 �'P.7. R.86 � � o � �` I� � ,i� --�� �� ,
,�,�y.� � � � � � �, �
�� -L- STA. 10 � 40.00 �� - � � ��� � 1 � / �' � ' ��
� � � 1 �7 LF PERMARIENT Iv, � _ � � END PRO.IECT
�
NOTES: � � � � / �TO S�REAMBANK�S� � �N � i ���' 17BP.%.R.$6
� � _ . �
18 �
—L— STA. 15 + 85.00
1. SOUTH PRONG STWKING QUARTER CREEK `- -'�
� � �
IS IN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN. RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE - - � j' � � � � � � � � 18 ��� � � � �� �
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE i � I
2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. �� I� I`� RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE � / 6�8.
� ���
,
3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED. �_ � �'�' � DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE � ; �
i
�
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT � �� � �' � , � : �� i � � � � I� ��� � � �JZ
METHOD II. � ° � � I ��� o�
5. NO IMPACTS TO WETLANDS, SOUTH PRONG �� - ��� � I ��� � �� ��. �� � �
I
STINKING UARTER CREEK OR INTERMITTENT
� \
UT TO SOUTH PRONG STINKING QUARTER /�� �" I
�
CREEK (SB). �/ WOODS I,� � � �� WOODS � -� � � �,�� � � � �
GRAPHIC SCALE � �' � � � �� , �� � � � �� � � � �
�- � �� � � ° m
20 10 0 20 40 �i �� ��`�� �I � �� � � � � � � �
�I ��� PER IT DR�WING SHEET 2 OF
�, M 3
�, ,�� _.
SF-4U0258_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_sheam.dgn 2/19/2016 528:00 PM TGS

�� Pl = ll tg7.00
EL = 607.00'
610 _ �� = 200�
K=29
=DS = 25 MPH
/���- -'---•�
• � �
590
f +J0.3292%
EXIST. BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED
LOW SIDE -
I � � LOW CHORD
GL -L- STA. 13+45
PROP. 1 @60'
24" CORED SLAB W/4'-0" DEEP CAPS
PROP. GRADE = 607.49'
SKEW = 90°
100 YR. W.S. ELEV. = 605.38'
- 25 YR. W.S. ELEV. = 604.9'
------ •---- ---� --------- � - -- -� --- ------- --c --------- �----------
.�
Pl = l5+19.00 I�
EL = 608.06'
VC = l32'
K=97
OS = 50 MPH
�-- _
�92 j v (+11.697U/
��+oo
ST RUCTURE HYDRAULIC DAT A
DESIGN DISCHARGE _ 1300 CFS
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YRS
DESIGN HW ELEV AT lON = 604.9 FT
BASE DISCHARGE _ 1900 CFS
BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS
BASE HW ELEV AT lON = 605.38 FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 2500 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 500+ YRS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 607.57== FT
xFOVERTOPPING ELEVATION REPRESENTS LOWEST
HIGH POINT ON DECK/ROADWAY, WHICH OCCURS
AT SAG [� -L - ST A.12+87.35
SF-400258_Permit Urawing_pfl.dgn 2/8/2016 I 1:1827 AM TGS
13+00
I�)II'�(�)I.,��II I II��
14+00
PERMIT DRAWING
FOR BRIDGE #400258
GUILFORD COUNTY
15+00
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 3

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
�ate: 09/04/2014 Project/site:400258/SA �atitude:35.90936
EV8IU8tOC: James, A. Mason, J. COUIIt�/: GUIIfOrCI �ongitude: -79.55514
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 21.50
if>_ 19 orperennial if>_ 30� Intermittent e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal = 10.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 ��
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 2 0� 1 � 2 � 3 �
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � 0 � 1 � 2 � 3 ❑
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 1 0 � 1 � 2 � 3 �
5. Active/relict floodplain 2 0 � 1 � 2 Q 3 �
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 0� 1 � 2 � 3 �
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 0� 1 0 2 I❑ 3 ❑
8. Headcuts 0 0 � 1 � 2 � 3 �
9. Grade control 0 0� 0.5 0 1 � 1.5 ❑
10. Natural valley 0.5 0 0 0.5 � 1 � 1.5 �
11. Second or greater order channel 0 0 No = 0 Yes = 3 �
a _1:�:_:_� �:.-'--- --- --` -`--' -- -"-----`--- '
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
0 0 � � �
0 0 � � �
1 1.5 0 1 0
0 0 0 0.5 �
0.5 0 0 0.5 �
3 � No=O
Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.5U )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 3� 2 � 1 � 0 ❑
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 3� 2 � 1 I� 0 �
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0� 1 � 2 � 3 �
21. Aquatic Mollusks o 0� 1 � 2 � 3 �
22. Fish 0 0� 0.5 � 1 � 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0� 0.5 ❑ 1 � 1.5 ❑
24. Amphibians 0 0� 0.5 � 1 � 1.5 �
25. Algae 0 0� 0.5 � 1 � 1.5 �
26. Wetland plants in streambed 1.5 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. ❑ � �
Notes:
Wetland plant: Sagittaria latifolia; no water at time of evaluation. Stream becomes a linear wetland near its confluence with South Prong Stinking Quarter Creek.
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: 400258 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 9/4/2014
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA wet
Investigator(s): A. James and J. Mason Section, Township, Range: Kimesville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.909370 Long: -79.555139 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � Is the Sampled A?ea Yes � No ❑
within a Wetland.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
Rema�ks: Non-tidal freshwater marsh NC WAM wetland type
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) � Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) � Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
(includes capillary fringe) Yes � No ❑ Depth (inches): 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

V CVC IF111VIY - VJC JI:ICI llllll: IIQIIICJ VI IQIILJ JdfIl�Jllll(�j I"Ullll:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
� Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3� Total Number of Dominant
q, Species Across All Strata:
5 Percent of Dominant Species
g That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total % Cover of :
= Total Cover OBL species
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FAC species
1. FACU species
2. UPL species
1
100
Multiplv bv:
x1 = _
x2 = _
x3 = _
x4 = _
x5 =
3. Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:5x5)
1. Sapittaria latifolia
2. Carex lurida
3. Juncus effusus
4. Lobelia cardinalis
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
60
10
1
5
Y
N
N
N
OBL
OBL
FACW
FACW
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0�
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes � No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: WAwet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Locz Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/4 10 C PL M silt loam
10-12+ 5Y 4/1 95 10YR 4/4 5 C M scl scl=sandv clav loam
�Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA
� 147, 148) � 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes � No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft�) (ft�) (ft�) (ft�) (ft�) (ft�) (ft�) (ft�)
60'x30' single span 12+88/14+10 X 2729 1244 3973 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL: 2�2s.o 1244.0 3973.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
13+14/13+21 60'x30' single span 7
TOTALS*: 7 0 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2013 10 24

�
�o
0
V
• �
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets
��1��� �ll' ����� �����Jl��� �
�� �Y ����� �� �1L�� V'V' � Il �
G UILFORD CO U1�lTY
LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 400258 OVER . SOUTH PRONG STINKING
QUARTER CREEK OIV SR 3351 (SMITHWOOD RD)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADI11lG, DRAl11tAGE, PAVING, A111D STRUCTURE
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 13 + 13.87
%
� ,� �O
��fi�Ns N�NS 1
�N�� oNG G���
QVP��E�� �
/-L- STA. 10 +40.00
BEGIN PROJECT
176P.7. R.86
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR VERTICAL
CURVATURE AND VERTICAL SSD.
-L-
END BRIDGE S�
-L- STA. 13 + 76.13
- -- - - �
SMITHWOOD Rn
�� �
/�
� y .
�,�� WETLANDS
�
�v
�
p,� �'y �
Q� � � V
� o� -L- STA. 15 + 85.00
���> > END PROJECT
,? 17BP.7. R.86
�
BUFFER IMPACTS
��o
r�
HK�,�,F s.�
G Q��T� �
q,pTFR c� pRo s
FFjr � eG
(C►iASEFpRD 50
�' RD%
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
tVCDOT CONTACT: V I R G I1V I A M A B R Y HYDRAULICS ENGINEER 0r, owr,y c
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH �
PLANS PREPARED BY: PLANS PREPARED FOR: ��,4 '�9�
ADT 2015 = 210 �� � �
TGS ENGINEER$ NCDOT �
20 10 O 20 40 804—C N. LAFAYETTE ST PRIORIN PROJECTS UNIT � �
T= b %* LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #400258 =0.091 MILES � SHELBY,NC 28750 1020 Birch Rid e Dr. �,, �
LENGTH $TRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #400258 =0.012 MILES r� PH [phone] Raleigh, NC �17610 B'�. .��
PLANS V= 50 MPH r cORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 P�. "P oF bQ°@
* TTST -3% +DUAL =3% TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BPJ.R.86 #400258 =0.103 MILES srcharuns: T�""
20 10 0 20 40
� � LEONARD G. FLETCHER PE ROADWAY DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
� PROJECT ENGIhEER ENGINEER
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = RURAL - APRIL 21, 2015
LOCAL R.E. BURNS & soNs co
P. O. BOX T 168
4 Z O 4 $ S7ATESV�LLE. NC 28687 JpROJECT DESlGN ENG/NEER LETTING DATE:
PH fT04)92<-86C6
PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER PE APRIL 21, 2015
2012 STANDARD SPEC7FICATIONS S7GNAT[IRE:
6F-400258 Permit Drawiii� tsh buffer.den 2/IS/2016 428:55 PM'IGS

Buffer Zone (BZ) Impacts
Area of Allowable Area of Allowable
Bridge Impact Bridge Impact
within BZl within BZ2
LEGEND � � � � � ! �
,
SITE 2729 sq ft 1244 sq ft
18
RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X27' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 60'X30' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 545'
EXISTING OH POWER LINE
(APPROX. LOCATION)
BUFFER ZONE IMPACTS
���`� 1 I �.
� � ���
I�(� I, I
�
� I� �I �
EXCAVATION TO � �
ELEV. = 599.5 FT. '"\`�
��j�,
� .� -1'. ;� '
, � �i �� �,, _
CLASS II RIP RAP
(STRUCTURES ITEM)
WOOD ;
/E /
w/ i
� i
E / ,.
_�,, � , �
W 0 0 D S ; ,.�.�J � , —' � ____ ----
�� �J %%`�� � � — , � � _ _ --_— — ----
.
� �p� �—'�� /
TB 2GI
.J` i %' —_ — _ _ —
_. � — __-- _ —
/rrT� F���/ - � R�� -_ — — ___---�-- " F i i�
_ \
�- — ,--�N�� � / _�- �� ___— R��
�,�%/ R 5�12�1g5� o / ����'// � �, - . —WOODS J ; a / �i
, � s ,� � �-F � =-�s �
/ ;, ,,�� _�� , _v �t� �
�-,_ _ � / ENT ST i�
� �!,��' j' Q2 0.27 CFS /�5 j� „
/ ,,-'�% v�2°o°�4F�ss ��'�T�RM�PRo�REEK
,- v�o o.a2 FTis SaUPRTF
� �
F'� CLASS B RIP RAP y
\ � � � DISSIPATOR PAD �mm �
�iG ���
��\S��N
-L- STA. 10 + 40.00
NOTES:
1. SOUTH PRONG STINKING QUARTER
CREEK IS IN THECAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN.
2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT.
3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED.
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER
NCDOT METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 10 0 20 40
SF-4U0258_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_buffer.dgn 2/18/2016 4:14:02 PM TGS
'XISTING TRANSPORTATION
`�'ILITY BOUNDARY
18
RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE
WOODS
PERMIT DRAWING
FOR BRIDGE #400258
GUILFORD COUNTY
\a\\
� �� ze
\��
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
l7BP.7.R.86 (SF-4002581
TGS TGS ENG/NEERS
ENciNiERS 706 H/LLSBOROUGH ST
�� SU,TE 2��
RALE/GH, /VC 27603
PH (9/9J 773-8887
f
��
�I \ gl\s���j ����p'l,0
18 °�\ g!T//V��G �T `Zg ����
\�\S\gl Q(i��TF � S � `
RALPH ARLEN HUMBLE \�\ � ��� �
DON�SE LEONARD �I�U MBLE e!\Se!\�� /y � ,r
� � � � �� EXCAVATION TO
m
ELEV.= 599.5 FT.
I –� CLASS II RIP RAP
� . (STRUCTURES ITEM)
/ / i
�./
�i ;1�-- -__
( �.__ I I'-' � ��
i ' '�'� �
1 0
� �
���I � ..%/��
Cn�J� � I "�� �� � � /
�� 1 ,�, .
�r r � �' ,;
� �_� � ;
� �i�_ii_i _ _
�� l � � ���,�,a —�—
s�„ a1 F� � �'O C �
SB� � �
1\g\S\81 81 \
\ Sf
`ei e�
1 ��
� `?g WooDs
� ���\
\er
� Ze e�� Sf
�� �
f ��
����\( � �p � \
� �`�f—C�, , � � � �— � C 7J �. ._ . .. .
�— � � _ �- �� �- �� � ' � �
�- � �� za
— — -- --- ---- ----- _ F � —�� �� �
---- � �
---- � � ,�,�
--
,
— __ ,, ,
��-----------
- --
iF ----------- -- -
F _ _ —
--F-------
�l2ETAIN ALL � DSILLS
\ ��'�
WpODS
WOODS
,� --r''�- �
WETLANDS SHALL NOT
BE DISTURBED
18
RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE
` �' �' '� _ ,-..�
WOODS
�LE.S__�c/ '_"�
'�50 - '-----
--- �
—T ---
�8-��_RCPi
EX�S T��VG I� � w_---
I� � li
I END PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
—L— STA. 15 + 85.00
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 2

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X27' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW PERMIT DRAWING l7BP.7.R.86 �SF-4002581
Buffer Zone (BZ) Impacts PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 60'X30' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW TGS res ENG/NEERS
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 545- FOR BRIDGE #400258 �NG� SU/TE/2000ROUGH sr
Area of Allowable Area of Allowable f� RALE/GH, /VC zTeos
Bridge Impact Bridge Impact G U I LFO RD �, O U N� PH �9/9J 773-8887
within BZ, W;th�n BZ2 BUFFER ZONE IMPACTS
, i
LEGEND � �� � �%�i " " "
� �
� � g�� � �� � � � �� �
� �s
SITE 2729 sq ft 1244 sq ft �, � � � � � i �� � � � �� `�e � � '
�� � �
"� % : �
� � � � � -- °� '- ` � � �
� gl ����� ��\
� � � � _� � ��� �
�� � �� �����, V�`T���T%' � � �'�
� � i ' _ �� �� \ �e! �/�i�, Fi�iT ` zg �_ � ��
18 � � � / � excavArioN ro � � � � 18 �\��' Q (/T o
RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE / � � � �' /� � /' E�EV.= 599.6 FT. ,� " �' `� � RALPH ARLEN Hl1MBLE �� �r�\ ���T ��� �� ���
� � ' \ \ � o�
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE � � � - -� � � ;� �'-�I �, S� � DONISE LEONARD �I�UMBLE el \ e! C,Q Tj�, /� ,
� � /� / 1 � �, 'i� . �° B \S� \�F� /�'^O� ZA
— � � ) �'
N
�� ��� � � �'� ��� "� � / � �' � � � '� � � �� ��� � �
i
rt� S� 81 �
_ � ��V _ � � � n�j � � i �, �, '� EXCAVATION TO �� ai
i �� �U � �
�, �� ' ELEV. 599.5 FL � sr
��. � � ' ; �� � � . __, �� � � ��o, Hl�fl� �
V ' � � i � �/ � � CLASS II RIP RAP p �
/ (STRUCTURES ITEM) O ?e W O O D S
� �� I I �, / CLASS II RIP RAP �-� � � � j ����
(STRUCTURES ITEM) '�
� � � ' / � - - er
� �� . �� /� . \\ �
EXISTING OH POWER LINE �_, � " % _ , \z?e - Ze a� �_S el-
� '� � ; (APPROX. LOCATION) \ WOOD � ��� y � � ', � � E � � �e�-
� � � � i. ��
�' � i ,
� d
�¢= - -
i � /
� w �� � 1 � Q� ��e ��G�9
/ �� �/ �� F A�' ` - - 'l ' �� � � EXd'�'���' ��
�� -�_ -- -' ,` � - - � � � > ' l� �;l � -�1-����i-� r-� �z zs�'� `
�
� �- , -� � � �
I
,
� � � � L L -� (- �? �,� , ,
_ i, i � ��
� � � - � - - �J-��J`� L � � � -- �k-�-` I �I,1 I 7 � ) ' � - - _ _ _ � - _ , , - -` �
�� �
� � ��' � .� „ -
,,
� N
ti
'
n�- �
� - '
_ _ � � � -Cs� � � - � _ �=��
, � � � (�
�� � � , � -
� - -- _-___ -
� � — � � - -_'__ ', r �
_ C � �
�
� ----- - za
> ` -� � � �
� � � _ ��� - - - - ���. _ �- -- ��-
� '� � � -- -- — - _ — ` —
W 0 0 D �, � � � ` _ _ _ _ - -- ---- -- g i � � i ; - -- ---- ----- ----- F � ���
, , . ���-
co � r .
� _ � ��
; ''`y , ' � i — - �
, . ,) �d � -����� � � � �� � � re zci I I �� —i� � I I I 1 -L- �- -� � ��:����
/� tiJ %°- � � � � _
� - - - --
� ���� , %'" _ - --- - r_ - - I' � I i - - - -_ _ _ MI�ES �-
� _____-- y F\ I i I I �4
� ��� - " � � ,� - � �� i f.f I � �._I � /�F --------- — --- - TO ,q '�/- --
i r �n _ _
�"" � �� � � � . - _ � � � -- �
� �� �� �N � � � � � ��� I I I i �J l i -F - ------- - -
-� - _ - -
� i - - _- - � � F -__
� � - � - �
��
� y - N��� R , , � - �I s� �.� 1 '--F-------- ---- _ tci
; �
� �
,- T , �
�G � , SMi 0 � ��� = -
� i ��
�S��s ���JJ � 3 5� �2�� g5� �a ��- -_ „�,-r �� . � �_ o � ""': � " . `' - �. ��-- - - _ �
WO DS ��� -- _
�
,
�,`T' "_y � 5R � � < J - - . - -- - - ---- C � -
� � � �
� �/ " = _ -- -
� � � �. -,�r � _ _ _ -- -
� � � � � � ,-. _, _ ���� �� � �� � � __,-� ti _��, �, �� � �8„ R P
/ � .v� s y� �- r�
� � � � �� � K� � ��j
�, i � - ' _ / � , � ,
� ' -- ,
/- � ���;r S`� � (,�� 0.27 CFS �s �� �-�TE � ST���S � ��� ��� l2ETAIN ALL � DSILLS WOODS � � EXIST �-,�-
e� _ _
� � � � i °W - 0.34 CFS �� M ON E � � � �
-��5 �3 6 � �' �/ � � �2 =0.77 FTiS � NT ER PR �RE _� � � � � � � I� \ w -
;
- � � �s ,, � >�� � v� o - o.a2 FTi� � S��T� T F R ���� � �� �, � � � :��
°��o , ,, �� a� � , ; � �
� � F c�x% �� � � ' CLASS B RIP RAP � �' ,� � �.� � � � �� � c�� �- � �
� � , � ' � DISSIPATOR PAD ��m � �� �_ �� �� � � � t � r�^1�
/ / � h v I
� �� � � ��/� '^`° '
�� �"������ �� �/ � � BM�I �� i�� � ��� W ODS WETLANDS SHALL NOT � i % ; �-
� . � � �ti � �� � � BE DISTURBED �
��!�i -�( N _ O � /� � �-�� �
/I'/ � � � \\ . 1 W~ / r'�"J / i
� � ��� BEGIN PROJECT � � ��� � ��� � �� � �� �w / , ���
17BP.7.R.86 ��«T�N� T� sPORTaTioN� i ����� //-���,� END PROJECT
� / � ��,ci irY Bou � �ARY � i �� � � � � 17BP.7.R.86
�I ! ; � j I -L- STA. 10 + 40.00 �,��� r � � I , � � � � �, ��' ;� , , � _ � - . 5 + 85.00
� � �-. � � � � ��9 �� � , �- �-L STA 1
�J' 18
� � � , I � '� . _
,
NOTES: � �'I � I O I��. RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE � ���
� 18 � "�� / DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE
1. SOUTH PRONG STWKING QUARTER � i�' � � i
CREEK IS IN THECAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN. � C RALPH ARLENDO HUMBLE I1' _= I� �' I � �
DONISE LEONARD HUMBLE ���� I� �, I ��
2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. �� � � �� � � I �� � � � � � a �� � � �`��
3. NO DECK DRAINS REQUIRED. ,� 2� � � �� � ��, �� �� �� � ( � '� ��
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER �� � � WOODS I�� �� WOODS — � L;� � � � �� �
NCDOT METHOD IL ,' � � �. � � ��� �� � � � ) � /
GRAPHIC SCALE � � �' � � S � � � �� � /; � �
� � �, � � � � ��� ( �� � N
20 �o o zo ao �� \� , 1 �� � � ��� ,
�I �' � PER IT DR�WING SHEET 2 OF 2
� ,�� M
�� ��� � �
SF-4U0258_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_buffer.dgn 2/18/2016 4:1434 PM TGS

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
�ate: 09/04/2014 Project/site:400258/SB �atitude:35.90936
EV8IU8tOC: James, A. Mason, J. COUIIt�/: GUIIfOrCI �ongitude: -79.55514
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 2'rj.QQ
if>_ 19 orperennial if>_ 30� Intermittent e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal = 14.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 ��
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 2 0� 1 � 2 � 3 �
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 3 0 � 1 ❑ 2 � 3 ❑
ripple-pool sequence �
4. Particle size of stream substrate 3 0 � 1 � 2 � 3 �
5. Active/relict floodplain 1 0 � 1 � 2 Q 3 �
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 0� 1 � 2 � 3 �
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 0� 1 0 2 I❑ 3 ❑
8. Headcuts 0 0 � 1 � 2 � 3 �
9. Grade control 1 0� 0.5 0 1 � 1.5 ❑
10. Natural valley 0.5 0 0 0.5 � 1 � 1.5 �
11. Second or greater order channel 0 0 No = 0 Yes = 3 �
a _1:�:_:_� �:.-'--- --- --` -`--' -- -"-----`--- '
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
1 0 � 1 �
0 0 � � �
1 1.5 0 1 0
0 0 0 0.5 �
0.5 0 0 0.5 �
3 � No=O
Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.UU )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 3� 2 � 1 � 0 ❑
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 3� 2 � 1 I� 0 �
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0� 1 � 2 � 3 �
21. Aquatic Mollusks o 0� 1 � 2 � 3 �
22. Fish 0 0� 0.5 � 1 � 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0� 0.5 ❑ 1 � 1.5 ❑
24. Amphibians 0 0� 0.5 � 1 � 1.5 �
25. Algae 0 0� 0.5 � 1 � 1.5 �
26. Wetland plants in streambed 0 FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. ❑ � �
Notes:
water in pools only; no flow at time of evaluation. In northeast quadrant.
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: 400258 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 9/4/2014
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA upland
Investigator(s): A. James and J. Mason Section, Township, Range: Kimesville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.909346 Long: -79.555456 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No � Is the Sampled A?ea Yes ❑ No �
within a Wetland.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No �
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No �
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

VCVCIF111VIY- VJCJI:ICIIIIIII:IIQIIICJ VI �JIQIILJ
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Cercis canadensis
3. Fraxinus pennsVlvanica
4. Ulmus americana
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
50 Y FAC
25 Y FACU
5 N FACW
5 N FACW
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Lindera benzoin 10 Y FAC
2. Cercis canadensis 5 Y FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Microstepium vimineum
2. Lipustrum sinense
3. Campsis radicans
4. Verbesina alternifolia
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
75
30
10
2
Y
Y
N
N
FAC
FAC
FAC
FAC
117 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 58.5 20% of total cover: 23.4
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Campsis radicans 15 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
JdfIl�Jllll(�j I"Ullll: WHU�1dRQ
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: -
Total Number of Dominant �
Species Across All Strata: -
Percent of Dominant Species ��
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: -
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of : Multiplv bv:
OBL species x1 = _
FACW species x2 = _
FAC species x3 = _
FACU species x4 = _
UPL species x5 = _
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0�
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic yes � No ❑
Vegetation
Present?
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: WAupland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Locz Texture Remarks
0-12+ 7.5YR 4/4 100 silt loam
�Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA
� 147, 148) � 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No �
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: 400258 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 9/4/2014
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA wet
Investigator(s): A. James and J. Mason Section, Township, Range: Kimesville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.909370 Long: -79.555139 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � Is the Sampled A?ea Yes � No ❑
within a Wetland.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
Rema�ks: Non-tidal freshwater marsh NC WAM wetland type
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) � Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) � Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
(includes capillary fringe) Yes � No ❑ Depth (inches): 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

V CVC IF111VIY - VJC JI:ICI llllll: IIQIIICJ VI IQIILJ JdfIl�Jllll(�j I"Ullll:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
� Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3� Total Number of Dominant
q, Species Across All Strata:
5 Percent of Dominant Species
g That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total % Cover of :
= Total Cover OBL species
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FAC species
1. FACU species
2. UPL species
1
100
Multiplv bv:
x1 = _
x2 = _
x3 = _
x4 = _
x5 =
3. Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:5x5)
1. Sapittaria latifolia
2. Carex lurida
3. Juncus effusus
4. Lobelia cardinalis
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
60
10
1
5
Y
N
N
N
OBL
OBL
FACW
FACW
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0�
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes � No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: WAwet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Locz Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 4/4 10 C PL M silt loam
10-12+ 5Y 4/1 95 10YR 4/4 5 C M scl scl=sandv clav loam
�Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA
� 147, 148) � 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes � No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSite: 400258 City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 9/23/2014
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WB wetland
Investigator(s): A. James and J. Mason Section, Township, Range: Kimesville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.909356 Long: -79.555143 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandv loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � Is the Sampled A?ea Yes � No ❑
within a Wetland.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) � Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) � Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) � FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

V CVC IF111VIY - VJC JI:ICI llllll: IIQIIICJ VI IQIILJ JdfIl�Jllll(�j I"Ullll:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
� Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3� Total Number of Dominant
q, Species Across All Strata:
5 Percent of Dominant Species
g That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total % Cover of :
= Total Cover OBL species
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: FACW species
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30x30) FAC species
1. Cornus amomum 20 Y FACW FACU species
2. UPL species
4
4
100
Multiplv bv:
x1 = _
x2 = _
x3 = _
x4 = _
x5 =
3. Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2. Boehmeria cvlindrica
3. Carex spp.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
2 Y FAC
1 Y FACW
1 Y FACW
4 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: 0.8
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0�
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes � No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: WB wetland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 5YR 5/6 100 silt loam
4-12+ 10YR 5/2 90 7.5YR 4/4 10 C M PL scl scl=silt clav loam
�Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA
� 147, 148) � 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes � No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version