20052046 Ver 1_CAMA Application_20051109

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
20052046
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Annlicable" or "N/A "A
1. Processing
II.
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39 (verbal verification
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Applicant Information p ??[9 5W? D
1. Owner/Applicant Information N 0 V 9 -.2005
Name: AGRI-Ethanol Products LLC
Mailing Address: 3209 Gresham Lake Road, Suite 1JAgg _ WATER QUALITY
Raleigh NC 27615 WETLANDS AND STORMwAI tK aKww.n
Telephone Number: 919-872-6237 Fax Number: 919-872-4745
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Libby Pavlides
Company Affiliation: URS Corporation
Mailing Address: 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 400
Morrisville NC 27560
Telephone Number: 919-461-1517 Fax Number: 919-461-1415
E-mail Address:_ libby navlides@urscom com
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: AGRI-Ethanol Products Aurora Facility
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Portions of 6557-54-3662, 6557-44-2958
6557-64-0766, 6557-46-7536, 6557-87-1398, 6557-43-5440, 6557-35-6133, 6557-24-5616
4. Location
County: Beaufort Nearest Town: Aurora
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): '/Z mile North of the
intersection of Highways 33 and 306 in Aurora, NC. The site is at the Norfolk Southern
railroad crossing, on the West side of Highway 306.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.3108 ON 76.8056 °W
6. Property size (acres): 1
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Bailey Creek (SC, NSW) DWQ Index No.29-28-6-(2)
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico, Sub-basin 03-03-07
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is an active agricultural field, as is the land bordering_
to the North and West. The Norfolk Southern railroad and Highway 306 border the property
to the South and East, respectively. Photos of existing site conditions are attached
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A fuel-
grade ethanol plant will convert high-starch feedstock to ethanol The ethanol production
plant will consist of grain handling operations grain fermentation and ethanol distillation
equipment, and ethanol product storage and transfer facilities Construction of the facility
will involve various types of heavy equipment !ypically associated with grading, hauling, etc
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: An agricultural drainage feature is located in the
northeast quadrant of the site This feature will be filled for the construction laydown area
and for construction of the facility driveway and a stormwater wet detention pond
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No permits have been requested previously. A DWQ letter (Au ug s`t 8,
2005) exempts the blue line drainage feature from the Tar Pamlico River Riparian Buffer Rules
The letter is attached to this application
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future USACE or DWQ jurisdictional permits or certification requests are anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The drainage feature will be filled for the
construction lavdown area, and for construction of the facility driveway and a stormwater wet
detention pond. The USACE has claimed 200 LF of this drainage feature (shown as a blue line
on the Aurora USGS topo) from Highway 306 west with a classification of "open water"
Page 7 of 12
1. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiDly length X width- then divide by 41 5(0
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
acres
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage bulkheads etc
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Impact # I N/A Fill Unnamed tributary 0.009

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.009
Page 8 of 12
5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.009
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.009
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): State Stormwater Permit requirement (SW7050730),
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: agricultural field
Size of watershed draining to pond: Pond #1: 61.6 acres. #2: 56.1 acres. #3: 44.3 acres
Expected pond surface area: Pond #1: 45,615 sf, #2: 43,095 s£ #3: 26,406 sf
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Configuration of the facility
was reviewed in preparation of the site plan The railroad spur and the access road allow for
transport of goods to and from the facility and their location dictate much of the facility layout
The access road was moved further south to add stormwater wet detention pond #1 in the
northeast corner of the site per the State Stormwater Permit requirements
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
I. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The waterbody being impacted is a converted agricultural ditch No mitigation is proposed
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes E] No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No ® A DM letter (August 8, 2005)
exempts the blue line drainage feature on the site from the Tar-Pamlico River Riparian
Buffer Rules. The letter is attached to this application
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Total = 162 acres. Existing impervious = 0 acres
Proposed impervious = 19.14 acres (11.8 % Facility.will meet the requirements of State SW
Permit No. SW7050730. Controls include 3 wet detention ponds
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer connects to the municipal system All industrial wastewaters are recycled into the
process and are not discharged except cooler tower blowdown and boiler blowdown waters The
blowdown water discharges are permitted under NCG500628
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes E] No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
business will employ approximately 40 people and manufactured products will be distributed to
markets outside of the local area. Therefore the project is not expected to result in additional
development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is -the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
/% r/S
A)xflicant/Agent's Signature Date
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

I

a
.. ?
11 II 11 /
1
X10 j I 1

1s
2
?? --- /°
aeacNa`?¢r
"
J
Rlvarthom `R.
_
p ` T - ." fi -. ref - - ° -3-
/ d? - S' ?.w. (a Holland r't
' ? J'aNS i
C'_/ e0k Ywn (A i??
_. Y _'FitR?'? y, { ! S ? \ -E P
?
b ?. BIWtl (C14 . ?
eep

% 4 kn

d
wron l01 ?Pf
- \ \•
a J
'-'1•?se
O
l ,

_ l?l
????.._Htl ??? ? -
_?.,/? i
A
4?4[0?-. a-1'c?\
. ,,`?. '19?•-D
".?11 ?.- .
FILE NO.
jIRS
31823947
AGRI Ethanol Products, LLC URS Corporation - North Carolina
SITE LOCATION FIG NO
Aurora, North Carolina Morrisvvilleille, North Carolina lina 27560 .
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
1
SCALE: DRAWN BY: TLR DATE: /1
USGS 7.5 Minute Series: Aurora, NC 1lnchequa1s0.63Mile NECKED BYWMM DATE: /12/
KO
Me
Pt L
To
We
Hy
4 ELI
Pe
To i Ro
� t At c�
At
Ro AaA
Me At o tU
Pm
�
At T v1
T
Ds \ Me o
At � -At � 3o Me
Ap To Ds a Bb
10
Cu Cu
Cu
To Me CnB 7 Deephole
m Me Sb f
P 'n
i
o
Ap-
Cu To Ds
Pt To To Ds
O Ds AaA Sb
To Cu To
Ap�
AaA Cu
Ap Ds Cu 1
aA
To Me
o Ds ¢ u 1_ '
At
\` At DsDs ` To
Ds Ds Ds Me �t
_ Ap � AaA \
' Pe
Ds To Pt \
gNN At
At To :' At l4 Ora To l
Pt
To At `Ds
Pt
Ro 1 Pt Ds
JA
Ap Pt To
Pt
Cf , 193s Ap
Ap
To
` 1938
fo
i
To t '
� Ds
To
` \
At Pt To \i Ds
Cf \ Pt
To
Ile
vrw;
At
Me
,. At
At
Ro
To � StA
At At
M ems'(/r�J
SCA

AGRI-Ethanol Products, LLC
Aurora, NC - Site Photos
r r ar r , rFY ?;.;} !} r. ,:^u,? _c _ ?C4aq., v {.4e
?z r !,,
AN
??
?? .F. ?- tip ???r'n•" r ? 5?F- T ? t? +F 1 } _1 J S ? -1?}1 y,.
Lie
1w 'y"4?
?`+ tax 4ys - ?' } 3 ATM" t, y y?' .y,"' t 3 a, R
-?? r t h ;da ? a r r7 1ii?i r 1 4*? F n y e
Photograph 1. Project area overview looking east.
W

30*
."
y.,fiy s

x

Photograph 2. Project area overview looking west.
Aug 10 05 05:18p 919-872-4745 p.1
Michael F_ Easley, Governor
\QF W ATWilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\Oc QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co Y Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
r Division of Water Quality
p -r
August 8, 2005
Mr. Terry Ruse
General Manager
Agri-Ethanol Products LLc.
3209 Gresham Lake Road
Suite III
Raleigh, NC 27615
Re: On -site Determination, Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules
Subject Property: UT of Baileys Creek, West side of HWY 304
Aurora, NC
Beaufort County
Dear Mr. Ruse,
As per your request on 03 August 2005 and subsequent site visit on 03 August 2005 to the above referenced property, staff from this
office have made a determination concerning a drainage feature located on Agri-Ethanol Properly.
The feature in question corresponds to a drainage feature that appears as a blue line on the USGS Quad (1:24,000), but not on the
Beaufort County Soil Survey.
The drainage feature, located and identified as a UT of Bailey Creek, exists as a functioning stream from its mouth on the north
western side of the main stem of Bailey creek and runs in a northwesterly direction, crossing under Hwy 306 and then leading straight
west in an agricultural ditch. The feature on the Agri-Ethanol Property has been determined to be EXEMPT from the Tar-Pamlico
River Riparian Buffer Rules. (15 A NCAC 02B .0259) from a location approximately 50 feet east from the centerline of Hwy 306.
tie downstream reach from this point has not been re-evaluated, but remains SUBJECT to the Tar-Pamlico River Riparian Buffer
-.ules. (15 A NCAC 02B.0259)-
Should you have any questions concerning this transmission or its applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules, please call
Kyle Barnes at 252-948-3917.
III
Cc: WaRO / DWQ files
Central Files
Central Office / DWQ
VT V
.L
N. C Division of Water Quality 1fi17 Mail Service Center Raleiah. NC 27699-1617 19191 733-7015 Customer Service
i
I xn
V, Mg,
- `A
^ ? S
-- ?' r BEACIf 1?11- `-
.r
x
;y
.. 1 , 1
P P,
- - . M •..-\ Imo' i xl/ ,.,>ei 'N r?/
s. i t a G ?i
%
Me14nd
Icl O
_ _ 14L -_a4 •,? t .,F . ±+? e???, ?'?Src.t '? »••,,`^y \ `Y-lp
u - Mum i - I{ Pit r
?,Q?.q- w..x?
ILI
.
t_ <
IT,
I
.e l
Ala{ AK's
l .,
., ? .? Xa _ ? ?AafAp ?
4 ?
4Ja C
ims
a- -
1 v .f
Z?tS FILE NO.
31823947
AGRI Ethanol Products, LLC URS Corporation - North Carolina
C 1600PenmeterPark Drive SITE LOCATION FIG NO
Aurora, North
arolina
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560 .
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
1
SCALE: DRAWN BY: TLR DATE: 8/12/0
USGS 7.5 Minute Series: Aurora, NC 1lnchequala0.63 Mile HECKED BY:MMMODATE:8/12/05
KO 11-3 r
p � 4
x To
a
NVI
j
s -i
At
To
i s
To
+mow.
Stan .
ms's
�x
{ L
v
t
aP
_ r -
I n,
Y
At
e
l
At Ds tD Ds D TO
s 3 .,. s _. _ -..b' ., .'. _.. -�"s` ta+, �' »-}• swI-d e "b 'a`,li.o - - , i
T d41 2 '.i, §axia•`K'"'
's. ora'
Yo
1 ^J 4
�At
.'
r srr Pt .d
To �xxr# t CPtd t-
Jk4
4
x` t
,
t
t
i
v..
1939
m
ToAli
u
.aa rw+ {s^�
98t ' v y N
sx To t r > f
fi 3
ToPt A>
- z ,
Pt
•
To
Wv­
a estY i a to x
To
XII
w
9 G
a
.LL

AGRI-Ethanol Products, LLC
Aurora, NC - Site Photos

Photograph 1. Project area overview looking east.

i
f r
r c. s ,t<s,? ? r? a i
i ?
Photograph 2. Project area overview looking west.
Aug 10 05 05:18P 919-872-4745 P.1
OF W AT4ZR Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
at QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Y Alan W_ Klimek, P.E. Director
r Division of Water Quality
> -i
.p ?
August 8, 2005
Mr. Terry Ruse
General Manager
Agri-Ethanol Products LLc.
3209 Gresham Lake Road
Suite III
Raleigh, NC 27615
Re: On -site Determination, Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules
Subject Property: UT of Baileys Creek, West side of HWY 304
Aurora, NC
Beaufort County
Dear Mr. Ruse,
As per your request on 03 August 2005 and subsequent site visit on 03 August 2005 to the above referenced property, staff from this
office have made a determination concerning a drainage feature located on Agri-Ethanol Property.
The feature in question corresponds to a drainage feature that appears as a blue line on the USGS Quad (1:24,000), but not on the
Beaufort County Soil Survey.
The drainage feature, located and identified as a UT of Bailey Creek, exists as a functioning stream from its mouth on the north
western side of the main stem of Bailey creek and runs in a northwesterly direction, crossing under Hwy 306 and then leading straight
west in an agricultural ditch. The feature on the Agri-Ethanol Property has been determined to be EXEMPT from the Tar-Pamlico
River Riparian Buffer Rules. (15 A NCAC 02B .0259) from a location approximately 50 feet east from the centerline of Hwy 306.
tie downstream reach from this point has not been re-evaluated, but remains SUBJECT to the Tar-Pamlico River Riparian Buffer
..ules. (15 A NCAC 02B .0259).
Should you have any questions concerning this transmission or its applicability to the Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules, please call
Kyle Barnes at 252-948-3917.
U[
Cc: WaRO / DWQ files
Central Files
Central Office / DWQ
N. C. Division of Water nuality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleiah. NC 27699-1617
(9191733-7015
Customer Service
?o?? COASLt(??
S
z
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
19 September 2005
Mr. Randall K. Taylor, CCM, QEP
URS Corporation
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
Dear Mr. Taylor:
This letter is in reference to your. 15 September 2005 request to review a proposed site on
the west side of NC 306 adjacent the Norfolk Southern Railroad north of the Town of Aurora in
Beaufort County, North Carolina to see if CAMA jurisdiction is warranted.
I have reviewed the information you supplied and have determined that the proposed
project area does not fall within any Area of Environmental Concern (AEC), as designated by the
Coastal Resources Commission, and therefore not within the regulatory authority of the Division
of Coastal Management. Therefore, no permit is required from this Division for development at
these sites. However, your project proposal(s) will be reviewed through the Coastal Management
consistency program as to development within the coastal area.
I appreciate your concern and effort to comply with the permit requirements of this
Division and encourage you to continue to consult representatives of this Division for future
questions regarding CAMA jurisdiction. Thank you for your time and concern in these matters
and if you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
David W. Moye
Coastal Management Representative
cc: Terry Moore - District Manager, Washington Regional Office, DCM
Stephen Rynas - Federal Consistency Coordinator, DCM
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet www.nccoastaimanagement.neY
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
GENERAL PROJECT NOTES
a
9 ~ a
" G DESCRIPTIVE 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE STATE AND
or " NORTH LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS 2. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN IS
r'~ APPROXIMATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
e~ ~ I zo, ~E VERIFYING LOCATION OF ALL PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTLITIES WHICH
c a~ LIE IN OR ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
50 URST H rM1CREEK ~ WHITEN 3. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS IS NOT AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE
o n ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF-SITE GRADING, PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE AFFECTED
g,R.1941 ~ Z PROPERTY OWNERS.
4. MATERIAL USED TO CONSTRUCT EMBANKMENTS, BACK-FILL
E`ti- `PO AROUND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES OR IN UTLITY TRENCHES OR ANY
ca`` I_ Gay ! OTHER DEPRESSION REQUIRING FILL OR BACK-FILL SHALL BE
0P1~~~- ~ p ( / SITE 'P~ COMPACTED TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (ASTM D-698). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
F E PRIOR TO ANY OPERATIONS INVOLVING FILLING OR BACK-FILLING
pAIlROAD 1dtlleSt %NEHN ~ / ; ~otiKSOU _ ~s, SUBMIT THE RESULTS OF THE PROCTOR TEST TO THE CLIENT'S
NORT ~ ~ / REPRESENTATIVE
N.C.33 ~,~a„~~_, ~ ~ ~ M 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT, IN WRITING,
N.C.33 ' / i ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FILED CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS TO THE ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION. ANY
AURORA PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY INC. WORK DONE BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER HIS DISCOVERY OF SUCH
F. R. ALFRED TRACT N BB'36'39'E D.B. 592, PG. 566 DISCREPANCIES AND PRIOR TO RESOLUTION BY THE ENGINEER SHALL
VICIMTY MAP ~ ' D.B. 1024, PC. 588 BE DONE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK.
' I 1 ' r , PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY IN PRATE COMPANY INC. _ ~ „O„ 6. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY FROM SURVEY PERFORMED BY MAYO AND
j ~ F, R. ALFRED TRACT / D.B. 592, PG. 586 ALFRED TRACT _ ~ ? _ ~ 592, PG. 586 I 10 ~ N 88'36'39'E 1907.45' ASSOCIATES, P.A.; DATED JANUARY 13, 2005. NO WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED.
~ D.B. 1024, PG. 588 r 1024, PG. 588 s - Ycr
( $C N BS'23'5S'E 1053.03' _ - ERISTING i8' RCP UTILITY NOTES
i = - \ - 1 ~ ~ INV. 4.30' ~ ~ aULVERT /1 ~ ~ WATER QUALITY PDND /1 I
i ~ I I PI I "-~-CORN L - ~ SURFACE ARfil 45,6(3 SF TBM "B" - ~ PERM. PODL ELEV.: 5.00 TOP 18" RCP I I ~--_ETHANOL.~D~GS 37T X 112' ~ ELEV. 5.94' 1. INSTALLATION, MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP OF ALL
~ I ~ ALL TRUCKS OUT__ _ _ - CULVERT.. p° - - I ~ ~ ~ ~ TRUCK SCALES IN/OUT 4 RCP Ili m UNDERGROUND PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUILDING CODE.
r ~ rs ~ I/ ~ I r ~ I o ~i I I o I ) Ild ~ ~ _ ~ 2. STORM WATER PIPING SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
J~ { I 1 I ~ (RCP) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWING
~ 1 I~ I ( ~ L 1 / NIA I ~ gm I1~ A. RCP SHALL BE CLASS IV AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM C-76.
~ ~ r ~ > NEw R I ~ 9 TRUCKS I I ~m NEW RAILROAD LOCATION PROVIDED BY ~ I ~ % - _ - ~ - - - - - _ _ _ - _ - -1- I I ~ JOINT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE TONGUE & GROOVE WITH A "0" RING RUBBER GASKET AS PER ASTM C-361.
I I ~ ~ BENCH! i ~ f ~ BENCHMARKDESICN. UiU A l i ~ X~ I I I I ~ , ~ I B. RCP UNDER RAILROAD TRACKS SHALL BE CLASS V REINFORCED
/ r ~ r; 1 I I ~ ~ I WALL B CONFORMING TO ASTM C-76. CONNECTIONS SHALL BE TONGUE
i l it 1 I '~~I~~ I~ ~ to-- - - r ~ ALL Tos i ~ 10 ~ II//~ o ; /_1 & GROOVE WITH A "0" RING RUBBER GASKET AS PER ASTM C-361.
i ' z ++J~P.+~'2, i~ffiS~S~~a:aasesex as~asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ~ n$ 3. BACKFILLING
i ~ ~ II r~i i ~ r A. BACKFILLING OF TRENCHES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PIPE IS LAID. THE FILL AROUND THE PIPE
i' I ~ I I S - r-- 10 - / w ~ _ t $o ~ I ~ II rn ~ ~ I"I;~a ~ , a - ~ I SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED SIX (6) INCHES (EACH
f I ~ I I i ~ I Iti ~ ~ I , w ~ i, I/ I I III ~ I lo,, ~ I ) / I I Impact 1 ~ LAYER SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COMPACTED), 95% SPD (100% TOP SIX
~ ~ I r I / r ~~r I w w I l i I I I 1 / I III (6) INCHES).
~ I I ' N~ I l o r ~ ~ ~I I I ~ / I La _ 1 ~ f B. ALL BACKFILL SHALL BE NON-PLASTIC IN NATURE, FREE FROM
;l ' I ~ ~ Y i~ ~ ~o - I i i I I W wl ~ ~ I ROOTS, VEGETATIVE MATTER, WASTE, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OR OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. SAID MATERIAL SHALL BE CAPABLE
1, ~ ~ I z z II I ,~.,ae o, W P 1 ' OF BEING COMPACTED BY MECHANICAL MEANS AND SHALL HAVE NO
o r ~ I " I ~w ^ I SS I 1 = w J p Q 0 I i TENDENCY TO FLOW OR BEHAVE IN A PLASTIC MANNER UNDER THE
w o 1/ d~ I' I, z z ' l l i l - I I 61,6 ACRES ~ I, 1 I J P U U ~ - ,I ~ I I ~ ~ TAMPING BLOWS OR PROOF ROLLING.
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY INC. ~ r ~ ,w J j I FISCHER-THOMPSON TRACT ~ / I I, I- I I ~ ~ v 6~ Q d i~ C. MATERIAL DEEMED BY THE ON SITE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AS
D.B. 632, PG 1J0 ~ ~ I ; h ~ I Y FIRST TRACT ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ / ~ ~ - _ _ p / P _ - ALL_TRUC OUT - _ I F UNSUITABLE FOR BACKFILL PURPOSES SHOULD BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL.
D.B. 1024, PG. 588 h / / 2 ~ I ii r I, E RAID ~ ~ ~ 1 ? / QP D. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL WATER BE PERMITTED TO RISE
r / I IJ I T1 u4 ~ 7~ N I J, 14", i C L~ERT ~'3 i IN UNBACKFILLED TRENCHES AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN PLACED.
1 I i' I I ~ to carom ~ 1 'iRCP I X ~'S~ I n i I E. COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE ATTAINED BY THE USE OF
.,M„ I ~ I /1 ~ / MECHANICAL COMPACTION METHODS. EACH LAYER OF BACKFILL SHALL
r II I I i a I - ~ ~,a BE PLACED LOOSE AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED IN PLACE. F. BEDDING SHALL BE TYPE II - GRANULAR MATERIAL EMBEDMENT:
J ~ f I ~ I I s°~~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ THE TRENCH BOTTOM SHALL BE UNDERCUT A MINIMUM OF SIX (6)
r I I if ~ I ~c I ~ i I I / ~r ~ I o I I ~ INCHES BELOW THE PIPE BARREL GRADE AND FILLED WITH AN
r ~ T I Iz / i I 1 ~I I I ~ S/ _ _ I J,' l 54000000 CPY ETH ~ ~ a , ) ~ 1 APPROVED STONE. VERTICAL HEIGHT OF THE STONE SHOULD BE SUCH
~ I I~ ~ ~ 1 III Iw 3-1500 HP GAS fIREO ~ i l I BOILERS ~ ! ' I a ~ 1 THAT THE PIPE WILL BE COMPLETELY AND UNIFORMLY BEDDED TO ONE- g
I I ~ I I I+ I i u _ :~_N?_ ~ ~ ~ / A ~ ~ . THIRD THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE BELL FOR THE PIPE'S ENTIRE LENGTH AND FOR THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE DITCH.
r ' J I~~ - 1 I MATCH LINE SEE I I - - - s _ _ _ ~ , i i, MATCH LINE SEE DWG 8904_ C 003 - u _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - LINE SEE DWG 8904 C 002 - DEPENDING UPON SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS, GREATER
- ' -I - ~ ~ DEPTHS (UNDERCUT) MAY BE REQUIRED TO CREATE A STABLE
- I MATCH LINE -SEE ~ IX / , rl -SEE DWG 8904-C-004 I ~ ~ S 88~ 243.7<' LINE i a ~ ~ ~ I 1 CONDITION. SOIL IS THEN BACKFILLED BY HAND AROUND THE PIPE
i ~ ~ I I ~ i / 1, 0 / w 7920 S 88 1~~ - 30' EASE. . / X 91.27 AND COMPLETELY UNDER THE PIPE HAUNCHES IN UNIFORM LAYERS NOT
I I 1 I I r I ~s2- - - ' ~ / i (TOTAL) ~:'~"r . Li I S" EXCEEDING SIX (6) INCHES IN DEPTH TO AN ELEVATION ONE (1) FOOT ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE BELL.
~ Si kl i WQP 2 3 STORAGE SILOS I , , ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 850,000 BUSHELS EACH I ~ ~ ~ / / i : ~ f _J
i j I i 56,1 ACRES I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ 1 I / 'Ii 1
! ~ I / . / I Ln ' -
! ~ - i - _ - ~ -_DDCS I ~ ° / / ~ ` ~ , / I GRADING NOTES
/ I a S l T 1 1. ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT
i _ 10 1 ~ ~ ~ TB 'o I ~ I ; I I i ~ rBM 'c' III / 9 FINISH GRADES, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE
i , a I _ TO r rE TOP OF FLANGE ON WELL ~ ~ ~ ' ~ / I - ~ TEE 61.D. STEEL WELL CASING O O X AS SPECIFIED BY THE CONTOURS PLUS OR MINUS 0.10 FOOR EXCEPT
i ~ i ~ I _ ~1 ~ .9.91 WW I I ~ / r~~~,,, - ~ rc I 1 ~ i WHERE A LOCAL CHANGE IN ELEVATION IS REQUIRED TO MATCH
i ~ I I 1 / N { C.~ I C.~ I I / SIDEWALKS CURBS, MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS, OR TO INSURE
i ~ f I i I ~il~ ~ ~ 41~ PROPER DRAINAGE. ALLOWANCE FOR TOPSOIL AND GRASS COVER, AND SUBBASE AND PAVEMENT THICKNESS SHALL BE MADE SO THAT THE
I ' ~ I 11 I I 11 D D ~ I / O I i C 0 z I ~ X <v I I I ~ ~ I I / Q~ ~ K ~ SPECIFIED THICKNESS OF TOPSOIL CAN BE APPLIED TO ATTAIN
r SC I I I ~ I I w ~ ~ I I I 0 w ~ , I I ti, ~ ~ I F 0~ ` I I , cn I cn 170 0 0 1 o~ FINISHED GRADE.
I I I i Iz I= ~ I ti I I ~ I / h 2. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK, AND
i n ~ to IN r ~ ~ Iro I to ~ o~ 0 ~ ~ I ~ / B„ °0 I~ ' I I ~ ~ I I ao a.r ~ --J ~0 X i MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO BREAKING
i o TS I ~ I I a ~ w ~ I I e~° / 4 a I ~ / I Z Z GROUND. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER
i ~ I I~ i ~ f i IJ I , X I III X JIJ y ` lt'R I I i~ ~ ~ - ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND
i a~II Is ! ~ I ~ I I p I v I ~ . ` i ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR INSTRUCTIONS PRIOR
i pi T I i. I I ~'~U 1 1 ~ ~ ~ w/ ~ / X n I _ C i / 9 TO PROCEEDING.
r 3I I I I 1 I I I " ~ ~ ~ ~ I I - i~ ~ o 1 - ~ I ~I ---I ,i / rn 4. FINISH GRADING SURFACES SHALL BE SMOOTH, COMPACTED AND
I I I ~ I si / ~ FREE OF IRREGULARITIES. THE DEGREE OF FINISH SHALL BE THAT NORMALLY OBTAINABLE WITH A BLADE-GRADER.
r o If I I 1 " ~ n+ _ I I ~ I I I LVERT 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ QL1A PQND ~'2 ~ ~ ~ % / ~ $ I i R CE EA: 43,095 SFi i i ~ ~ A I 41' RCP ~ ~ ~ 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE SO THAT
~ a II r W I f l O. I I I~ I ~ ~ F I 1 I ~ h I WQP 3 l o ~ RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY FLOW AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND
r p . a II I r * I W I I I I I i~ I k I I 44,3 ACRES ~ ACROSS NEW PAVEMENT AND/OR LANDSCAPE AREAS TO NEW OR
I ~ ~ N ~ 1 I i a. ~ „ I I I ~ - ~ EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLETS, DRAINAGE SWALES, OR OVERLAND
I ~ ~ a I I Zr ~ I I I a' i ~ TOTAL A I 1 ~Y i I I I I I aex~c 161.865 A SHEET FLOW. i5
i I i ~ ~ Z i 1 I I I ~ FE~ ® NCGS "BEA 63° I N~ 8.63'NAVD 88 I
r I ~ i I 11 I ~ II ~ ~ I 111 ~ x 2~K~ II
1 I ~ I I I / ~ /k I NEW RAILROAD LOCATION PROVIDED BY I BENCHMARK DESIGN. I I ~ '
I NEW RNLRDAD LOG.TION PROVIDED BY I y M ! - I I ~ ,
I + BENCHMARK DESIGN, I b I I I I I b -9-`'L / ~ 8 I i
®I I i ..I ST / 1 ~I I I ELECTRICAL k ( TRANSMITTER .r
I ~ ~ I I~ 1 ~i I ? ~5 W I ~TN~F I 11 1 I / 11 UNE RI ` 9~,.
I I I ~ al ~ I I it I I PO.2 SION ' .t' II ~ / " e• 614, ~S I ~ ~ ~ D. PNS~ ' ~ MAT E~INE - SEE. ~DW~~8904-C-005 I ~R ~ ~ LEGEND
~~I ~ i - I I- MATCH LINE SEE DWG 8904+ 00 a - 1 - I - I [ 89041 '-004 N~RGV _ 'k
I MATCH LINE SEE DWG 8904, -00 - - -A,.~~k-- -4~--- - .SNOW"TD BONE i - ~ PRO - k ' - 4-~~'~aazaz2' 8904, 006 M~,TC~ LINE SEE DWG 890
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY INC. FISCHER-THOMPSON TRACT ~ ~ ~ I' I II ' , g. ~ I II ~ ' k -a'I. 10 EXISTING GRADES
D.B. 832, PG. 130 I I FRST TRACT I I I I ~ / ,.ti I 1 ill C ~
D.B. 1024, PG. 58B I I I I I ~ -S'' pit E RIW NCGS "SNOW" 1966 I I I I ~ TA ~ 1,1N ` N~ 573085.173 10 NEW GRADES
I 'K" ~ h y I ~ ` y i ~ ~ . -1 ' / 250KV 5~ SMISSION ~ ®E~ 2658814.427 1 I I ~ (RPN
c cuc i /a 11 it I r I 11 ' _ 10 I / 4-- k.. 1;RG~ G• 146 ~8 J I I r ~ f ~ S EN 801, P 9+8 ---f-+-~---- RAILWAY
i p~..10 I to ~ ~ 10 I to ~ ~t-.~'' PROGRES D•B.,p1~ PG. 'o ~ ` ~ PP~Y DB
i + CULVERTS
~ I ~ypw':'a`"
i I T s HEAD WALL
O O O O
I~ o~ ~ SSIGN ~1N I I I I ,4'' U~U FLOW
~ ~ ~ 3 s ~ENSI •~RpNSM~ ~ ~I I li I - -t~ 'Y I I
I vo26, sj 5E ERGY I I ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ FlREgS EN . -R O O
/I w~ E~CE E<sy ~RpGR ~nc1c, j ~ w. ~ z SxK~,~,c C aA O IOC -.t V 00100
i ,1- ,o- -i V C~MpFN
I 'CULVERT f9 - D ~~~~1P C~ C + ' ERN ~e S 'S
~ ,1- 4' pRf~~K pF ~K S~~'(H gp1, Pa, a - 0 ~ NpRFO ag. I
Ii IW W W
(n cn
I I I
WIW A?n 971 18971 9/1/05
L 8.~ / PY CaMP z z C 108904 1100 REVISED F01 J J REVISED FOR PERMITTING PER NCDENR COMMENTS CMS
/ 2•~~ } ''k USNERN9G Lei AIM 7u 189n 8-10-05
N' fQ~( S D.B ggg =I= B 108904 1100 REVISED FOI REVISED FOR PERMITTING PER NCDENR COMMENTS CMS
as
Off, / 189n 971 189n 167n 7-26-05
A 108904 1100 FOR PERMIT y FOR PERMITTING CMS
ZONES CLIENT
Al WATER QUALITY PONDS DRAINAGE ~~Ev PERIG6 N Mlsc PROD # DETAIL # PROD R # DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHECKED JAPPROVED APPROVED APPROVED APPCLIENT OJ ROVAL DATE
NG~?T~ TG? INS'
' ALL OWNER SAFETY GUIDELINES, AS n GUIDELINES, AS WELL AS MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS, ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY CODES, REGULATIONS,
AND STANDARDS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT Ll. (DING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NFPA AND OSHA, MUST BE FOLLOWED AS MINIMUM SAFETY PRECAUTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION
,%Aftkl CHARLOTTE 931 Industrial Drive, Matthews, NC 28105 [phone]
PERif"'Aml www.perigoneng.com
CLIENT
;I ETHANOL PRODUCTS, PLC
LOCATION
AURORA,l FORA, NC
7-5-05 TITLE
0 150 300 450 DRAWN BY CMS
mmili CHECKED BY S. ?TlaioAamo, ,m,m 7-26-05 AURORA PLANT SITE
SCALE: 1 150' APPROVED BY 971, 2atRa,m, in 7-26-05 OVERALL PLOT PLAN
APPROVED BY
0 7-26-05 FILENAME: 8904-C-001 SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWING NUMBER REV
APPROVED BY Z. 7natm.
CLIENT APPVL AutOCAI7 R 14 PLOT FACTOR: 1 8904-C-001 C