NCG030063 DMR SW (10)

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
ANNUAL SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
Calendar Year ADI S
Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS❑❑❑❑❑❑ or
Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG❑0 ®5-1❑O ©0
This monitoring report summary of the calendar year is due to the DWQ Regional Office no later than March 1s' of the following year.
Facility Name: GE Me,6ckyw_.
County: Omytye-
Phone Number: ( 914 ) 563- 71;Lh1 Total no. of SDOs monitored 7
Outfall No. 00
Is this outfall currently.in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes © No ❑
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑X No ❑
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No
Parameter, (units)
Total
Rainfall
inches
Trial
s,.
Solids �
_
� A
CO ppl-r
Lead.
:,
Z i A1C
IJwe-'Polar
©SFr paler.
li arr crArl.&IS
Togl
ar niC
Benchmark
N/A
100 L
4,0- 9.O
0.007 rK L
0.033' L
0.0(117 L/S
L
1 rt L
N A,
Date Sample
Collected,.
mm/dd/yy
-
03 30 r
0.1q
O.ollo
o.a10
0,1y3
<S
NIA
07 a.3 IS
0.30
8
S: X9
O, 00T
_C01010
0./5,_q
< 5
N A
08 31 iS
O.11?
< a•S
(0,49.
0.a08
<61010
0 . OL
<5
N A
0 /5
0.a_ -I
11
740
0.005
<0,®10
0.036
<5
N A
o IS
0.�3
8y
7.3
0. O;Lq
<0.010,
0.697
<S
NIA
7
T. y12.
0, 005
<01010 1
0.05,3
< s
< m.oa.0
/;.I/915, 1,alq 138
7,0
o.00y
<0,010
<0,010
crr
NIA

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. 002,
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ® No ❑
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑9 No ❑
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010
--
Parameter, (units)
TotalI
Rainfall,
inche
s
:. I.ks ,.
COP�ac,r
;
ZinL `.
04-C-lilr:
-
r�1
To�i�
Benchmark
N/A
100 wtg L
IQ .0 s q.0
O.00 7 -s/L
0.0 3 'L
0, dab_ L
157 L
I L
N A
Date?Sample
.
Collected,
mm/ddLyy
a
. .
�
_
.
A3 30 1S
O.ly
b0
7, 0'i
O.9 A-
<0.0/0`
0.06
<S
xl k
07 a,3 /S
0.30
4
X1.77
0.017
40:010
0,098
<S
N/A
08 31 /S
0.18
4
6"/9-
0.0140
`0,010
0.096
-C
N ,A
011 a9 /S
o. xi
8
7, AG
0.004
40.010
<0.010
N ,A
to 2.7 1 S
0. ;L.3
S Iq
7, 6a.
O . OaL3
4 0..610
0.18'7
< 5
A/ A
o, d-9 -
1
.5-- a..6
0,005
1 <0.0to
1 0.oA5
<S-
<0.09-0
1a +7 tS
1.yN
/80
,AD
O.oyy
1 --0.610
1 0,169
«'
I lu/e
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. 00.9
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)?
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year?
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities?
Yes ® No ❑
Yes ® No ❑
Yes ❑ No
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010
Parameter, (units)
Benchmark
Date Sample
Collected,
mm/cid%yy03 30 12T
07 /S
0731 /S
0?. a°! 1S
10 X7 /S
11
a
Total
Rainfall,
inches.S
N/A
0,30
0.18
0,�7
0.2,3
0.12-9
-M.
,,cc�
lt�s
0
1 p n-9 L
19
<,2-S
<A
19L
1S
S
P�
l� 0- 9 O
r
5�4
6.33
re.s1
-7.og
.� 14
• BO
Co�pe.r
0.00 7 r43 L
0.0/(0
0.00
O.Olo2
0.0®S
.0;,1
p 3 ay
o3
0.010 '
<O.O/O
4C0,010
-� ,010
<O.©!d
<0.0/0<m.0.'l0
< 0.010
0 OG7
..
0 - 09SL
Tdkat
n+` .;
I S
i L
,
N .A
<S
N. A
0 , !at{
0,117
<s-
of A
<5r
NIA
0.13b
O. /l8
<5
N A
<g
NIA
0,135
< S
N �
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. 0041
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)?
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year?
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities?
Yes ® No ❑
Yes © No ❑
Yes ❑ No
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010
Parameter, (units)
Benchmark
Date Sample
Collected,
mm/dd/yy
Total
Rainfall,
inches
N/A
;'
TS�� V'"
S 1t�5
fD0 mg L
r�.0-q,0
CoPex-
0,007 my L
_
�
0,033
Ziv►G
O. CJG7 rw ' L
A64--i't)i��-
o 6-
drb rh�,15.
f S L
0, ctni�5
I L
N A
15
0 7 ;t,3 I.S'
08 31 li'
0.30
0,11
3
. a7
a. 3
0.0041
0. 01/
.01
<0.010
< 0.0 10
<0.O O
0. 149
0,/06,
0,118
< S
e S
<S
<,
<S
N A
N A
� A
04 Al !S
Io a 5
p, a,
0.A3
r1
.08
7• a.
0,00-5-
0, 0/.J,,,
<0,010
<0.0/0
.0
0,/yl
A
N A
<01090
11 oa /S
►
o.�
1.y
7
1
�o�
.7a
0. MV
0,00
<0,0/0
<O.old
0.08
0./05-
<5
<
N
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. 005'
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)?
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year?
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities?
Yes ®
No ❑
Yes ©
No ❑
Yes ❑
No ❑X
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010
Parameter, (units)
Benchmark
Date Sample
Collected,
mm/dd/yy
o� ors
0
07 ,x3 15-
O:r 3t1r
a0.;.
1I ox ►S
I
Total
Rainfall,
inches
N/A
0.1q
0.30
0119
O. X3
o, Aq
.�l
T5�1
lyes
to mg L
a®
<;L- - S
/
1S
Ifa
7
,5
'PuiJe.�-'P,i�.�-
c 0
. 7
%, l
.os'
,5�
� �S
7.%�
Ca�apz,c-
0.010,16
O ,Ol y
0,0/0
0,006
0.00
0,007
o.00
0 ®�� ►
j,
<O.o/0
<0.01
<0.010
-_01010
< 0.010
<o,010
iris.
1, 7
n ..,..�.
0.067
0,OLM
0, oma...
44 C--/ INpj .
K �j'OCItY�G.15
�J
< _S-
<S
<5'
•r 1-�.
� 1
Tc�ic:
..
rn
l^
N A
N A
s
01076
®.opt
<�
<S
N A
< o.oaD
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. 006
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)?
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year?
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities?
Yes X❑ No ❑
Yes ® No ❑
Yes ❑ No FA
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010
Parameter, (units)
Total
Rainfall,
inches
TM+AI
Sµs
S 1t5
�PP'c'r
4.
Benchmark
Date Sample{
Collected,-
mm/dd/yy
30 /S
N/A
_
O. //
i
?.6�
-0-007-3/L
�
©.Oe
d 033
, s
f
< 0.016
d.o�7 i
`
fS t.
l Irv+ t�
��i>03
N A
�- � f ✓v%fiz � .'i.f.a
0.098
NIA
0 /5
08 31 S
o T a.9 15'
0.30
0.19
0. A,7
;L -T
to
g
- gq
6.5'5'
6. got
0.01'4
.OAL
0.010
40,010
<o.n/o
<0.0/0
< 0.0 10
0.J34
<5'
N A
01137
<5
0.0'y
0.31
.05'7
66
<
45-
<S
N RO
0.0A
04
N A
/
0.2
< AS
.37
, A3
0,0,0
0.
<0,o10
<6.010
/S
yy
,r
.10
0.007
<0.010
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. 007
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)?
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year?
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities?
03 -130 -lir
Total
`Me -W
07 13 OS
Rainfall,
:5, iSr
ff 3 i5
inches
0,007,E
Benchmark
N/A
IUD -L
Date Sample
4
`
Co lected,
r,I
� ;F
_
mm/aa/yy
7-51
,
03 -130 -lir
0./,y
►0
07 13 OS
0.30
Cc PPl-Ir
ff 3 i5
0.1y
0,007,E
o rS
0.9-7
8
4
<
r
_
Paramet'
'P K
JL
Cc PPl-Ir
ry.0-9,0
0,007,E
0.0"
<5"
FA
N
4
<
r
_
«
7-51
0.004
� 0.010
5.8?
0.9
<0.016
6- A-2-O.0/s-
< S
<0.0/0
7.05-
Q, 006
<010/0
• a.9
0.0/3
<®.0/0
5. SI
p, ag
< 0.0/0
. 190
O.Oo4
<0.010
Yes © No ❑
Yes No ❑
Yes ❑ No
r, (units)
H d'l�Cs=tY�1S (�'r� ,:1YliC:S
U,0�7 L3
JL
t4
0.0"
<5"
FA
N
O.OAS
< S
:4
N A
0.013
«
N q
0.05-0
<
q
O.. 0 AL
< S
< , O�L0
A
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010

y
Jf
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signz
Date
man Annual UMR Summary Reports to:
DWO Regional Office Contact Information:
ASIII3VILL'F REGIONAL-nrF10E
TA-1',E7�TEVIL;L`E'RrGiC)NAt:.OFkIC�;
MUORESVILI:E RI.GbNAli OIbIGL�
2090 US Highway 70
225 Green Street
610 East Center Avenue/Suite 301
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Systel Building Suite 714
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
i [phone]
_
[phone]
RAI FIGH REGIUNAL-,Or' ,ICE
WASIiINGT©NtRCGIONAL:OI?FIGF
4
WIL`AIINGTQN:=REGT(.)NAI. OGFICE
3800 Barrett Drive
943 Washington Square Mall
i 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Raleigh, NC 27609
Washington, NC 27889
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
WINSTbN-SA`LE11�, REGiONCL OFFICF�
CENTRAL OFRICF.•
1.617 Mail Service Center
585. Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
g
arrc�'ertfrartce
[phone]
(9] 9) 807-6300
'1uttrUi°Cerratfrra`5 'i r
SW U-264-Generic-25May2010