20160096 Ver 2_Riparian Buffer Authorization Application_20160317

Strickland, Bev
From:Joey Lawler <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:57 AM
To:Montalvo, Sheri A
Cc:Strickland, Bev
Subject:RE: PNG Line 254
Attachments:CCE03152016_0001.pdf; Riparian Buffer Authroization Request - PNG Line 254.pdf
Here you go. I also included another piece of information (buffer mitigation acceptance letter) that we received since I
sent the originals - j

Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Project Manager

ENGINEERING INTEGRITY
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard

Charlotte NC 28273 Map
Ph: 704.523.4726
Fax: [phone]

Mobile: [phone]

[e-mail]

www.smeinc.com
____________________________________________
S&ME, Inc. moves up twelve spots in 2015 ENR Top 500 to 89.

This electronic message is subject to the terms of use set forth at www.smeinc.com/email. If you received this message in error please advise the sender by reply

and delete this electronic message and any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: Montalvo, Sheri A \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:40 AM
To: Joey Lawler <[e-mail]>
Cc: Strickland, Bev <[e-mail]>
Subject: PNG Line 254

Joey,

Could you please send an electronic version for the above project so that we can get them into our system easier?

Thanks

Sheri Montalvo
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit - Administrative Assistant
Department of Water Resources
1

Division of Environmental Quality

919-807-6303 (office)

[e-mail]

512 N. Salisbury St., Ste 942-G1, Raleigh, NC 27604
1617 Mail Serive Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

2

j�•
�� !
1 V-7 :
March 11, 2016
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: PNG Line 254 Right -of -Way Maintenance Project
Pre -Construction Notification for Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Impacts
Greene and Wilson Counties, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-15-043
Dear Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby submits this notification for riparian
buffer impacts in connection with the above -referenced project, which entails removal of aboveground
vegetation within portions of PNG's existing 50 -foot wide natural gas pipeline right-of-way (ROW). The
project is located in Greene and Wilson Counties, North Carolina, and lies within the Neuse River Basin. In
support of this application, please find enclosed the following:
♦ Figures: Site Vicinity Map (A), USDA SCS Soil Survey Maps (1-12) and USGS Topographic Maps (13-24)
♦ Appendix I: Completed Riparian Buffer Authorization Form and Authorization to Act as Agent
♦ Appendix II: Buffer Impact Maps (Sheets 1— 20, Provided by Piedmont Natural Gas)
♦ Appendix III: Riparian Buffer Impact Table
♦ Appendix IV: Mitigation Bank Information
This Pre -construction Notification (PCN) is being provided to the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) pursuant to the aforementioned riparian buffer impacts. The project will not entail
permanent or temporary impacts to streams or wetlands, and as such, does not require a 401 Water
Quality Certification or authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
The completed application form is included in Appendix I.
❖ General Project Information and Background
The subject ROW originates at an existing station site located on the south side of and adjacent to U.S.
Highway 264 in Wilson, Wilson County (35.696463° N, -77.848424° W). The line then runs generally
south-southeast for approximately 15 miles, terminating at an existing station on the north side of Griffin
Road, north of Snow Hill in Greene County (35.497192° N, -77.757612°). Records research indicates that
Line 254 was installed for North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation in 1991, and at that time, did not likely
require pre -construction authorization. Accordingly, it is unlikely that construction of Line 254 is
associated with an existing Action ID number. Near Stantonsburg, Line 254 parallels a second gasline
S&ME, Inc. 19751 Southern Pine Boulevard I Charlotte, NC 28273 1 p 704.523.4726 1 f 704.525.3953 1 www.smeinc.com

PNG Line 254 Right -of -Way Maintenance Project S&ME Project No. 7335-15-043
PCN for Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Impacts March 11, 2016
(Line 6), a portion of which is proposed for replacement, and was subject to permit authorization under
NWP No. 12 (USACE Action ID No. SAW -2015-02511). The portion of ROW within the Line 6 Class
Location Replacement Project will not require ROW maintenance.
General land use in the vicinity of the project corridor consists of a mix of wooded, undeveloped land, low
density residential areas, rotational agriculture, pasture, and clear-cut areas. Portions of the project
corridor are located close to areas composed of commercial and light industrial development.
Over the years, portions of the ROW that PNG has regularly -maintained through mowing and above-
ground vegetation removal have steadily decreased in width. In some areas, canopy vegetation has
obscured aerial observation of the ROW, while at others the maintained corridor has migrated such that
the gas lines are no longer appropriately centered within the ROW. To adequately perform their routine
maintenance and pipeline inspection operations, PNG is planning to reestablish and maintain the correct
ROW boundaries. The work will entail mowing and above -ground removal of woody vegetation within
the correct limits of the existing ROW. Some areas only require side -trimming or bush -hogging, while
others will require clearing where vegetation may have grown up at the periphery of the ROW. PNG has
specified that all vegetative debris, wood chips or other material generated as a result of the clearing
operation will be removed from the ROW and transported to a licensed disposal facility.
The buffer rules state that existing and ongoing uses, such as utility line ROWS, are exempt. However,
only portions of the riparian buffer occupied by the footprint of the existing use (maintained portions of
the ROW) are exempt, and activities necessary to maintain the use are only allowed provided that the site
remains similarly vegetated. Based on NCDWR Buffer Interpretation/Clarification Memo 2011-001, dated
February 3, 2011, streams within portions of the existing ROW where there has been no maintenance
within the last 10 years are subject to the buffer rules.
❖ Description of Proposed Work
The width of the existing ROW will be surveyed by a Regional Land Surveyors (RLS), PNG's land surveyor,
in order to reestablish its correct boundaries and demarcate of the limits of the maintenance activities.
Additional features such as streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, fences, outbuildings, etc. will also be also
identified and mapped to assist the contractors in performing the work. The maintenance activities
generally entail removal of aboveground woody vegetation within portions of the 50 -foot ROW that have
grown up over the years. Outside of wetland areas, mowing equipment will be used to remove the
vegetation. Removal of the aboveground vegetation within wetland areas and along stream banks will be
conducted by hand. In areas subject to rutting, encroachment of mechanized equipment to remove the
felled material will be kept to a minimum, conducted on timber mats or other measures taken to limit
disturbance of the ground surface. No grubbing, stumping or similar land disturbance will occur within
wetland areas. Efforts will be made to fell trees away from the stream banks and prevent introduction of
vegetative debris into the adjacent stream.
The existing ROW will serve as the primary means of access. To work around inundated areas, PNG will
rely on its existing network of access roads routinely used by its mowing machines. We do not anticipate
that construction of new access roads or placement of fill material will be required. In such an event, the
USACE and NCDEQ-DWR will be notified in advance to determine whether the work can proceed in
accordance with a NWP and WQC or if Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is required.
Page 2

PNG Line 254 Right -of -Way Maintenance Project S&ME Project No. 7335-15-043
PCN for Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Impacts March 11, 2016
•'• Project Purpose and Need
PNG considers establishment and regular maintenance of the existing ROW system an important part of
their responsibility to provide safe and reliable energy to the communities they serve. To that end,
maintaining at least 50 feet of easement is required to support:
Leakage surveys from ground mobile units or aerial technology.
Aerial patrolling for possible encroachment activity near the pipeline.
o Aid in identification of possible repairs and maintenance.
Promotion of damage prevention in that the easement can be more easily identified by the public.
0 Minimization of potential canopy encroachment, which creates visibility concerns.
® Minimum turn -around requirements for mechanized mowing and side -trimming equipment.
•'• Existing Environment
The project area consists of PNG's existing gasline easement and abutting areas that consist of a mixture
of woodland, agricultural field and a residential area. A majority of the gasline easement is regularly -
maintained through mowing, and is vegetated with a mixture of invasive volunteer herbaceous cover and
small shrubs/saplings. Overstory vegetation within forested portions of the project area site includes
various water oak (Quercus nigra), white oak (Q. alba), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum),
tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifero), and sourwood (Oxydendrum arboretum). Mid -story species included
horse sugar (Simplocos tinctoria) and American holly (Ilex opaca). Portions of the easement pass through
fields cultivated with cotton and soybeans.
Typical vegetation observed within the existing ROW was varied, but generally included species such as
broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), sericea lespedeza (Lespedezo cuneato), big
bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), blackberry (Rubus sp.), poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), little buttercup (Ranunculus
abortivus), Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum) and various grasses (Festuca spp.).
Woody saplings observed within less -frequently maintained portions of the ROW included sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), water oak (Q. nigra), winged sumac (Rhus copallina), black willow (Salix nigra),
red maple, tulip tree, loblolly pine and black cherry (Prunus serotina).
A number of other land use areas were observed along the project corridor, but occupy an insignificant
portion relative to that identified above. Such portions of the project corridor include landscaped or
maintained lawns, roadway ROWS or other developed areas.
•'• Riparian Buffer Impacts
To determine which streams within the ROW are subject to the buffer rules, S&ME conducted field
reviews of the project corridor over a period ranging from December 2015 through January 2016. Those
features that appeared on the most recent version of the appropriate Natural Resources Conservation
Page 3

PNG Line 254 Right -of -Way Maintenance Project S&ME Project No. 7335-15-043
PCN for Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Impacts March 11, 2016
Service Soil Survey and the appropriate 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic maps were
identified with global positioning system (GPS) equipment. Drainage features that did not appear on one
or more of the aforementioned maps were also assessed utilizing the standardized methodology
developed by NCDWR. This assessment involved use of the NCDWR Stream Assessment Form (Version is
4.11, effective September 1, 2010). Results of the field assessment were provided to Regional Land
Surveyors (RLS) for surveying and for generation of impact drawings.
For purposes of calculating buffer impacts, portions of PNG's ROW that had not been mowed or
otherwise maintained for a period of longer than 10 years, as approximated by observing existing
vegetation growth, were no longer exempted as an "existing use." In portions of the buffer where single
trees were present but the area was otherwise void of woody vegetation, impacts were calculated by
approximating the area occupied by the crown of the tree during its full canopy period.
Based on our field assessment and the subsequent mapping efforts, the project will permanently impact
21,341 square feet of Zone 1 riparian buffer and 12,331 square feet of Zone 2. These impacts are broken
out by crossing on the Riparian Buffer Impact Table (Appendix III), and are depicted on the attached
drawings (Appendix II).
• Avoidance and Minimization
Through agency coordination, the project has implemented avoidance and minimization procedures.
Impacts will be minimized by reducing the width of the permanent maintenance corridor to 30 feet
through buffered areas. The project will also incorporate the following best management practices
(BMPs):
Woody vegetation within the buffers shall be cleared by hand. No land grubbing or grading will be
allowed.
• Vegetative root systems within the buffer shall be left intact to maintain the integrity of the soil.
Stumps shall remain.
• No fertilizer shall be used other than a one-time application to re-establish vegetation.
• Construction activities shall minimize the removal of woody vegetation, the extent of the disturbed
area, and the time in which areas remain in a disturbed state.
• Active measures shall be taken following the reclamation and during routine maintenance to promote
diffuse flow of stormwater through the buffer.
PNG's contractors have been provided with maps identifying the streams subject to the protected riparian
buffers and written Environmental Guidelines detailing methods by which vegetation removal activities
should be conducted in order to avoid disturbance within protected riparian buffers. As described
previously, S&ME has delineated and demarcated all wetland areas within which the reclamation work will
occur. The delineation will serve to:
• Establish boundaries within which all vegetation must be removed by hand above ground level — no
grubbing, stumping or other land disturbance is allowed without prior authorization from the USACE
and NCDWR.
Page 4

PNG Line 254 Right -of -Way Maintenance Project S&ME Project No. 7335-15-043
PCN for Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Impacts March 11, 2016
Demarcate areas within which timber mats or similar measures must be employed to accommodate
heavy equipment and prevent extensive rutting and soil disturbance.
s Establish boundaries within which application of rye grain or a native wetland seed mix is required.
PNG understands that application of fescue within wetland areas is prohibited.
Demarcate areas where streams should be bridged or crossed in such a manner that prevents bank
impacts.
••• Mitigation
In instances where mitigation is required, the amount is determined by subtracting the wetland area from
Zone 1, then multiplying the remaining area (square feet) by 3. Mitigation for Zone 2 impacts is not
required, as Zone 2 is to remain grassed ROW with no aboveground development or impervious surface.
The project is proposed to result in permanent impacts to 21,341 square feet of Zone 1 riparian buffer. Of
these permanent impacts, mitigation is required for 6,854 square feet (see Riparian Buffer Impact Table,
Appendix III). Accordingly, PNG is required to purchase 20,562 riparian buffer mitigation credits (6,854 sf
x 3). PNG proposes to purchase the necessary credit from a private mitigation bank in the area (Greene
Environmental Services, LLC) in the watershed. A copy of the credit availability statement will be provided
electronically once it is received. A copy of the bank information is included in Appendix IV.
❖ Closing
Thank you for your review of this PCN and associated support materials. If you have questions or need
additional information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
5&ME
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Project Manager
Senior Review by Tom Raymond, P.E., P.M.P.
_ f*
V
Ashley Steele
Staff Scientist
Page 5

PNG Line 254 Right -of -Way Maintenance Project S&ME Project No. 7335-15-043
PCN for Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Impacts March 11, 2016
Attachments:
♦ Figures: Site Vicinity Map (A), USDA SCS Soil Survey Maps (1-12) and USGS Topographic Maps (13-24)
♦ Appendix I: Completed Riparian Buffer Authorization Form and Authorization to Act as Agent
♦ Appendix II: Buffer Impact Maps (Sheets 1 — 20, Provided by Piedmont Natural Gas)
♦ Appendix III: Riparian Buffer Impact Table
♦ Appendix IV: Mitigation Bank Information
cc. Jeff Smith, PLS — Regional Land Surveyors
Anthony Scarborough — NCDWR Washington Regional Office
Jim Kalish — PNG
Page 6

Figures

LLJ
y�r O J W
`. CV W > J
.,. •ice, _ ° - _ _ p m w o
W
-,j- z
PCDz
Lo
M CD
z M
W w
W
w � z
�� Q� Z
a w
ue�
- 1IF LLI
- � U
rLU
�
N
Feature L Feature N
Feature O .
.- -
� _ �• Pei •.: �t�
a
Feature M
ri C
1
• W
Z
NNDO
- J Z U Q
O
I --
U)
N O
o
I N z m9
Q g
e ■ _ - N
v
"■"fir' -. ,
c�
1 U
O
_ - - -
FIGURE NO a
Line 254 Alignment F
0 500a 1,000 � ° -a
- FPPt CountyBoundary 4

'�, • V) w
j` c O 01 C� W �� —j
J LU
O
� o
A44 C)
p 0 Q S
O w
w ■f i L c) c9
■ _
II Lb �
lip
LLU
O U'
a
UJ
r g�
o
1p v
• I
4i'' cn
'
1p
1 Feature P Feature Q Feature R
r
®' Feature S
°
CL L mw� MNMU�
WaL IF
°'��_ _ . y - _ ter.: • , ■- R� i ° ..
Ja
- - � . - .. � A ®• i'iT L .� �: ". -:� . � 'u-y{yyy■■■■��� is
i.�
�.
�. z
°-' NDO
O�
•c J ZUQ
—
tIIz i E
°
z
U) 0>O
iP Sp�
�.P
66 -.1
- z
JIMg
.. 0
d
NM
M
°
M
r o
FIGURE NO.
Zr a
0 ,5500 x 9M I Line 254 Alignment a
Feet CountyBoundary 5

, .
kr
1d
a
W
O
J
LU
N
W
y J
C `4
>. Lu
m
CID
Q
Z
0
0
WC'4
a
3
C
ol
v
w
U
M
O
- 9 z
C)
w
IF J
.� _ o m Z
LijA�1lf 6 i ¢%-- V d W
1
r c
W
= o
. - z
cd
F�;
r °fie•®r W
R
R.
A
Feature T
Tf F
n
Feature U s °�"
/ v
'■
06 Q
Uj
Z
Z J
•P. Feature W, 1 N- J z0Q
Feature W O J z =
o
cn . c�
^ - - _ - E
., , " N o o
v
Z
i
U
a
m
� cnK
O
• y46
Ar v o
i
• -_° FIGURE NO. a
500 ���Q� �` Line 254 Alignment
` et
CountyBoundary 6

z
% - 4...
%L It' I
Feature X
-
w
o
/1500 1,000
Feet
W
O J LU
N W > J
N67
W
C:!
m o0
z � w U
Q U `
of
w s
O Q =
U
�M O
z
w
O O z
O
lf) w O
II L6
O M z O
- z
E
LL
w w z
J O U
Q X z
N a w
LLI 0
�zz
cED
(41
11�
(L
w
� }z
Lr)z�
N NCO
J ZOUQ
O J Z =
OO
d O r
>� y
U z
V) D
1 (p
A.
V/ M
O
M
n
SNu1
0
I,
C)
U
w
O
FIGURE NO. a
254 Alignment
1
7
intyBoundarV

-- w
J
m0
3 w
wU
Q K U
s U
�o
- w
CD qN
J
Lo
o M
_ Z Z
w LL
w
0 CD
a
U
Feature Y
e � Feature Z . V
Feature AA Z
LU
_
_ a
F
W
L Q
N O
Q —U
y J Z W Q
J U
WW2
VW of E
O
r� R; d�
o
7L.,
. M
O
l 1n
r
a M
,
r
U
w
O
IGURE NO. a
Line 254 Alignment
0, 500 1 F
' ", 00Feet CountyBoundary 8

A
Feature LL
1w
1 4
1,000 -
beef
L0
e.
w
O
J
ui
N
w
> J
�
m
UJ
m C'
l
z
1 4
1,000 -
beef
L0
w
O
J
ui
N
w
> J
�
m
UJ
m C'
z
w
w N
3
O
O
Q
=
U
M
O
't
z
w
N
O
O
z
LLI
LO
U CO
II
L6
J
_
-
o
z
M
co
`-
z O
w LL
W
C)
w
z
Cl)
a w
M V
V
Z
v- -4, f ��
a
> a
Z J
LO 7
0
N 0
J z w U
Q(i W = o
Lu
(1)d 0
V Z o
V) o
. m
Q �
V/ M
n
0
O
U
w
O
FIGURE NO. a
Line 254 Alignment
CountyBoundary 1 1 2

Feature E
FA
r
0
LL IP
J. , ~ ~ -_
5
Feature G
Y
I mN
1�' r
rr
I
t
A
671111
Feet
— Line 254 Alignment
Countynoundary
W
O J Lu
N W > J
N m UJ m 0
O z oU
~ Q U
w
O _
U
co O
-,j- z
O O
w
O z
o M `—
z co z O
w LL
U w
O U'
x z
CL w
Uo
9z U
z
FIGURE NO
w
�Q
�z
N S O
zUUQ
U
::jZ =
00
>J o
z
Z
E
a

Appendix I: Completed Riparian Buffer
Authorization Form and Authorization to Act as
Agent

r"Aln
L*WVV 1%
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02B .0233 (8)(b), .0243 (8)(b), .0250 (11)(b), .0259 (8)(b), .0267 (11)(c), .0607 (e)(2) - Buffer Authorization
FORM: BA 10-2013
Riparian Buffer Authorization Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Project Information
1a.
Name of project:
PNG Line 254 Right -of -Way Maintenance Project
1b. County:
Greene and Wilson
1c.
Nearest municipality:
Wilson, Stantonsburg, Snow Hill
1d. Subdivision name:
1e.
Is the project located in any of North Carolina's
twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1f below.
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Owner Information
2a.
Name on Recorded Deed:
Piedmont Natural Gas (easement only)
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.
2c.
Map Book and Page No.
2d.
Responsible Party
(for Corporations):
2e.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
2f.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28210
2g.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
2h.
Fax no.:
2i.
Email address:
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify:
3b.
Name:
Jim Kalish
3c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Piedmont Natural Gas
3d. Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28210
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
4.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
4a.
Name:
Mr. Joey Lawler
4b.
Business name
(if applicable):
S&ME, Inc.
4c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
4d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
4e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
4g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 1 of 6

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Project is a linear utility line
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude:
Longitude: Origin: -
Origin:35.696463;
77.848424;
Terminus: 35.497192
Terminus: -77.575612
1c.
Property size:
Approximately 15 miles long, 50' wide
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Nahunta Swamp, Contentnea Creek, Watery Branch,
Toisnot Swamp and unnamed tributaries (multiple
crossings)
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving
C;Sw;NSW
water:
2c.
River basin:
Neuse (03020203)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
The existing ROW is primarily maintained herbaceous vegetation, although the width of the maintained
easement has decreased over time in some areas and in other areas the width has migrated to an extent
where the gas lines are no longer centered within the ROW. General land use in the vicinity of the project
corridor consists of a mix of wooded, undeveloped land, low density residential areas, rotational agriculture,
pasture, and clear-cut areas. Portions of the project corridor are located close to areas composed of
commercial and light industrial development
3b.
Attach an 8'/2 x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location
of the site
3c.
Attach an 8'/2 x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map
depicting the project site
3d.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Unknown
3e.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to restore PNG's existing ROW to a maintained state. Research suggests that
the existing ROW was acquired by PNG in 1991 and is 50 feet wide. Over the years, the width of the ROW
that PNG has regularly -maintained through mowing and above -ground vegetation removal has steadily
decreased, such that not all of the 50 -foot ROW is discernible in places. In other areas, the maintained corridor
has migrated such that the gas lines are no longer appropriately centered within the ROW. To adequately
perform their routine maintenance and inspection of the pipeline, PNG determined that the entire width of the
ROW should be maintained.
3f.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The reclamation work entails above -ground removal of woody vegetation within portions of the 50 -foot ROW
that have grown up over the years. Some areas only require side -trimming or mowing brush. Industry standard
mowing, clearing and side -trimming equipment will be used.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 2 of 6

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
Comments: A request for Riparian Buffer
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Applicability was provided to the NCDWR.
The project does not require impacts to
wetland areas.
4b.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/ Consultant Company: S&ME, Inc.
Name (if known):
Other:
4c.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach
documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain and detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 3 of 6

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Buffer Impacts
1 a. Project is in which protected
basin?
® Neuse
❑ Randleman
❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek
1 b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require
this form.
mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of
Buffer impact Reason for Type of impact
number — impact (exempt, allowable,
Permanent (P) allowable w/
or Temporary mitigation)
T
Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
mitigation impact impact
required? (sq ft) (sq ft)
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes E] No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
Total buffer impacts
1c. Comments: See Attached Riparian Buffer Impact Table.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 4 of 6

C. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1 a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
PNG contractors will be provided with maps identifying the streams subject to the protected riparian buffers. At
such locations, "no work" boundaries extending 50 feet from the top -of -bank of each subject stream are clearly
demarcated in the field. As a result, vegetation removal will not occur in these areas until the appropriate buffer
authorization has been received.
The contractors have also been provided with written Environmental Guidelines detailing methods by which
vegetation removal activities should be conducted in order to avoid disturbance within protected riparian
buffers. As described previously, S&ME has delineated and demarcated all wetland areas within which the
reclamation work will occur. The delineation will serve to: 1) Establish boundaries within which all vegetation
must be removed by hand above ground level — no grubbing, stumping or other land disturbance is allowed
without prior authorization from the USACE and NCDWQ. 2) Demarcate areas within which timber mats or
similar measures must be employed to accommodate heavy equipment and prevent extensive rutting and soil
disturbance. 3) Establish boundaries within which application of rye grain or a native wetland seed mix is
required. PNG understands that application of fescue within wetland areas is prohibited. 4) Demarcate areas
where streams should be bridged or crossed in such a manner that prevents bank impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques.
The project will incorporate the following best management practices: 1) Woody vegetation within the buffers
shall be cleared by hand and no land grubbing or grading will be allowed. 2) Vegetative root systems within the
buffer shall be left intact to maintain the integrity of the soil. Stumps shall remain. 3) No fertilizer shall be used
other than a one-time application to re-establish vegetation. 4) Construction activities shall minimize the
removal of woody vegetation, the extent of disturbed area, and the time in which areas remain in a disturbed
state. 5) Active measures shall be taken following the reclamation and during routine maintenance to promote
diffuse flow of stormwater through the buffer.
2.
Buffer Mitigation
2a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
® Yes ❑ No
mitigation?
2b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone
Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet square feet
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
2c.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a
® Yes ❑ No
mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed?
2d.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP.
2e.
If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
See Attached Riparian Buffer Impact Table.
2f.
Comments: The riparian buffer mitigation credit will be purchased from a private bank. See attached information
in Appendix IV.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 5 of 6

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
® Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
❑ Other BMP
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
1 a.
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
❑ Yes ® No
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
of public (federal/state) land?
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
1b.
Project is a linear utility located belowground. The ROW will remain grassed with
❑ Yes ❑ No
no impervious surfaces.
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use
❑ Yes ® No
of public (federal/state) land?
1b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ❑ No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
❑ Yes ❑ No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland
❑ Yes ® No
Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
03.11.16
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.—
Applicant/Agent's
.W.S._Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following:
For government transportation projects sent by For government transportation projects sent by
First Class Mail via the US Postal Service: delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
For all other projects sent by First Class Mail via For all other projects sent by delivery service
the US Postal Service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
Karen Higgins OR Karen Higgins
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 6 of 6

Appendix II: Buffer Impact Maps

Appendix III: Riparian Buffer Impact Table

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT TABLE
Line 254 Reclamation Project
Stream ID*
Sheet No. of 20
Notes
Permanent Conversion (sf)
Wetland Area Located
in Zone 1 (sf)
Required Mitigation
Credits**
Zone 1
Zone 2
A
2
Perennial UT
308
462
0
924
D
3
Perennial UT
2,168
688
1,338
2,490
H
4
Perennial UT
1,227
290
985
726
K
5
Perennial UT
963
643
963
0
L
6
Perennial UT
2,568
1,747
1,524
3,132
M
6
Perennial UT
1,976
1,171
1,976
0
P
7
Perennial UT
1,235
498
631
1,812
Q
8
Perennial UT
888
262
0
2,664
V
9
Perennial UT
971
620
971
0
W
10
Perennial UT
1,753
1,105
1,753
0
XX
11
Contentnea Creek
673
456
374
897
Y
12
Watery Branch
847
566
847
0
AA
13
Perennial UT
561
374
561
0
BB
14
Perennial UT
856
613
291
1,695
CC
15
Perennial UT
338
576
338
0

Line 254 Reclamation Project
Stream ID*
Sheet No. of 20
Notes
Permanent Conversion (sf)
Wetland Area Located
in Zone 1 (sf)
Required Mitigation
Credits**
Zone 1
Zone 2
DD
16
Perennial UT
839
370
242
1,791
EE
17
Perennial UT
370
264
370
0
GG
18
Perennial UT
1,967
476
490
4,431
KK
19
Perennial UT
578
672
578
0
LL
20
Nahunta Swamp
255
478
255
0
Totals:
21,341
12,331
14,487
j 20,562
* Buffer impacts have been avoided at those streams within the project area that are not identifieded in this table.
**Required mitigation = (total area of Zone 1 permanent conversion - wetland area) x 3. Impacts to Zone 2 do not require mitigation, as the area will consist of
a grassed right-of-way with no aboveground structures or imperveous surface.

Appendix IV: Mitigation Bank Information

Barak Information Contact f nfvruraaxallon
CU.- 03020203 Greene Environmental Services, LLC
Name: Contentnea- Little Contentnea Creek Jeffrey Becker
County: Greene 90 Ham Produce Road
Notes: Credit types: riparian buffer, nutrient offset Snow H ll, NC 28580
ofc: [phone] cell: [phone]
j rbecker@ bellsouth_n et
Mitigation bank offering riparian buffer credit- contacted by S&ME on 03.11.16 to inquire about sufficient
credits. If credits are unavailable from the private bank, they will be purchased through the NC Division of
Mitigation Services.