20160269 Ver 1_Shoreline Stabilization_20160317

Strickland, Bev
From:Amelia H Boschen (Services - 6) <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:49 AM
To:Montalvo, Sheri A
Cc:Strickland, Bev
Subject:RE: Dominion Roanoke Rapids North Side
Attachments:Dominion Roanoke Rapids Rec Area_PCN Submittal_1 of 3.pdf
Sheri,

Absolutely. The file is rather large. To avoid running in to any size limitations on your end, I will break it up into three
parts. Part 1 is attached to this email. Parts 2 and three will follow in subsequent emails. Please let me know if you do
not receive all three emails with attachments.

Thank you,

Amelia

From: Montalvo, Sheri A \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:46 AM
To: Amelia H Boschen (Services - 6)
Cc: Strickland, Bev
Subject: Dominion Roanoke Rapids North Side

Amelia,

Can you please send the electronic version of the above project so that we can get it into our system easier?

Thanks

Sheri Montalvo
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit - Administrative Assistant
Department of Water Resources
Division of Environmental Quality

919-807-6303 (office)

[e-mail]

512 N. Salisbury St., Ste 942-G1, Raleigh, NC 27604
1617 Mail Serive Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

1

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be legally
confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer
relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The
information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is
unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents
of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
2

Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060
dom xom
March 8, 2016
North Carolina. Department of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
UN
Preconstruction Notification (PCN)
Dear Sir or Madam,
Ili`
�#'Dominion?
Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power (Dominion) is planning
the construction of a recreational area at the above referenced location as required by the Federal
Energy and Regulatory Commission (FERC) license agreement for the Roanoke Rapids and
Gaston Hydroelectric Power Generating Stations. This submittal includes a completed Pre -
Construction Notification forth and supporting information. Dominion requests that the proposed
activity be authorized under a Nationwide Permit 42.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact Amelia Boschen [phone] or
amelia.h.boschen�dom.com if you have any questions or need additional information.
Si cerel ,
Cathy C. Ta or
Director, Electric Environental Services
Attachment

cc:
Attention: Andrew Williams
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest North Carolina 27587
Via Email: [e-mail]

VJA <
0 V4111:� Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 42 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
NX 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes X❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X❑ Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Dominion Roanoke Rapids North Side Recreational Area
2b.
County:
Northampton County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Roanoke Rapids
2d.
Subdivision name:
NA
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
NA
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Virginia Electric & Power Company
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
901/659
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
NA
3d.
Street address:
5000 Dominion Boulevard
3e.
City, state, zip:
Glen Allen, VA 23060
3f.
Telephone no.:
804-273-3485
3g.
Fax no.:
NA
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
NA
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
NA
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
3999-29-0252
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.486696 Longitude: -77.673423
1 c.
Property size:
605 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Roanoke Rapids Lake/Roanoke River
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS IV B
2c.
River basin:
Roanoke River
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing site is comprised of agriculture fields, grass, and woods.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.87
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 410
3d.
The
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
project will provide a recreational fishing area on the Roanoke Rapids Lake open to the public through the use of a new gravel access road.
3e.
Describe the overall proiect in detail, including the tvI)e of equipment to be used:
The project includes the construction of a gravel access road from NC State Route 46 to a gravel parking area near the Roanoke Rapids Lake. A
gravel trail will be constructed from the parking area down to a floating dock. It is expected that the contractor will use an excavator and front
loader for the construction of this proiect.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project including all prior phases) in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
0 Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Andrew Williams
Agency/Consultant Company: LISACE
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
February 5, 2016
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
Land Clearing
PEM
No
Corps/DWQ
0.02
W2 P
Fill
PEM
No
Corps/DWQ
0.07
W3 P
Fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DWQ
0.05
W4 T
Land Clearing
PFO
Yes
Corps/DWQ
0.03
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.17
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
NA
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: NA
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: NA
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: NA
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The wetlands on the property are being avoided to the extent practical. The existing easement constrains the alignment of the access road to the
project area. One of the wetlands areas is located at the intersection of the access easement and parcel's property lines. Acquiring additional
easement for the project is not feasible and additional easement would likely not eliminate disturbance to the existing wetlands or intermittent stream.
The road has been designed to minimize the temporary and permanent impacts to the wetland areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The area of disturbance has been minimized to the extent practical. Silt fence will be installed along the perimeter of the area of disturbance to prevent
the migration of sediment into critical areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):X❑
DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.17 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
NA
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
NA
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ YesX❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.006%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This
project does not trigger regulatory requirements for stormwater management beyond submittal of an erosion and sediment control plan since it
has less than 24% built upon area for low density development per the NCDENR manual
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
NA
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NA
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Northampton County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other: NA
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
NA
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
E] Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
NA
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
X❑ Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
[?� Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-Raleigh Field Office
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFuvS information Planning and Conservation System (IPaC), North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Natural Heritage Program database for Northampton County. Documentation Attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association {NCAA} Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
n Yes N No
status (e.g., National historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Coordination with North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources. Documentation Attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑Q No
8b. If ves. explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
NA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood snap service https:fFmsc.fema.gov
David A. Craymer
1 3/-7//6
/6
ApplicantlAgent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's s6fature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if uthorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Environmental
Quality
March 2, 2016
Amelia Boschen
Virginia Electric and Power Co.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, VA 23060
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Expiration of Acceptance: September 2, 2016
Project: Dominion Roanoke Rapids North Side Recreation Area County: Northampton
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table
below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program will be
approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to
contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other
state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including
G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a
copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. I
is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an
invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the
authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory
mitigation are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact
is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
River
Basin
CU Location
(8 -digit HUC)
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool Warm
Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh
Roanoke
03010106*
0
0 0
0 0.17 0
0
0
Impact
"DMS does not have credit available In the 03010106 HUC and proposes to provide credits in Roanoke 03010107.
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be
performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as
applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
James Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
Nothing Compares--
State
omparesState of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
919-707-8600

N
- n'
Amelia H*pe, ell s a s0 oucester
c City m° ty York
3Gheste[field ic
a,w Nottoµay\e Q`eot9° CRY coq
s
W E
oma °a °®
Lunenburg e*' of
x Virginia 5°55 �``�r`
S
"
w Project Area "
Mecklenburg En!P°ri g Suffolk
Im
ao Gree Is =
'
qU
9d,
NORTHAMPTON GATES 'PG
WARREN HERTFORD z�O9
¢ y
HAL"A-Y
North
Carolina y°s
BERTIE 9y a
?P FOG
"COM.MgNriry
a ,WASHINGTON
3
50N it
z
N A'TT W
= NE BEAUFORT }
O' WAYNE GRED _
C�C
LE' IR CRAVEN PAML'IGU
ch n
Ln
sn
.y
fi�_ilt7Ir kNIPT01)
Legend
Roanoke
Parcel Boundary
Rapid,
Project Area
rry
edamood eiA L, 31 .
Cedar, "1
cen��J �v
0 2,000
4,000`
AA
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
Feet
GEBCO, USGS, FA_b, NPS; NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, KadasterNL,
Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,
N 4 V
Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
DOMINION NORTH
FEBRUARY 2016
�G
CAROLINA POWER
1ROANOKE
VICINITY MAP
Dominion-
RAPIDS RECREATION
FIGURE I
AREAS NORTH SIDE

`• �><�
Ems` I L�'� � • a • � ✓ \� z'�x Er�y4y
\gY r a ao
_1 0
46
lSCJ
. f• ¢ 4
1 to o .A • �.1
IF
_ �+= -.c' �y �j �`-.��: tic `�f ( �-� � ti � ��,�=s � •, �- �� � .��•• p '-�.��-w
��` n-� � _ c� �c� � .^ � c. �,� ;'rte`, •'- "`�-_�: {fA� ` -� r
't`�-��. � � t— _ �-dam l i. y��.i'•t
�i� r ♦\ �i f' –a s _ Frllrbii�n
la { "�
Legend%_
� Project Area
P!i(
J }
02,000 4,000
Feet
Av
�% % "` • +- .., - =' Copyright',© 201.3 -National Geographic Sooiety; i -cubed
DOMINION NORTH FEBRUARY 2016
CAROLINA POWER
� 1
DOminionM ROANOKE RAPIDS RECREATION USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE 2
AREAS NORTH SIDE

S
4� I r
.e'
T u13
— {
� f
Wlh
sA
-_ - T GO%
LSC -s
TsC TT B xB
FgE2 GoA f
T'
TsA
`A
T162
Wh Ts
LtD TSA
PCD
LtD
` + + 2
TsG
TsB
Lt� '
[
Legend
Project Area
0 1,000 2,000`
CAMAND
Feet
Elf PSI, N r
DOMINION NORTH FEBRUARY 2016
CAROLINA POWER SOILS MAP
Dominion M ROANOKE RAPIDS RECREATION 1994 SOIL COUNTY SURVEY FIGURE 3
AREAS NORTH SIDE

io
259600
36° 30'26!'N
0
0
36° 28'56'N
259600 259900 260200 260500 260800
3
�o
a Map Scale: 1:13,500 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters
N00 200 400 800 1200
Be
0 A
500 1000 2000 3000et
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UfM Zone 18N WGS84
tJ}DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Soil Map—Northampton County, North Carolina
(Roanoke Rapids Recreation Areas North Side)
259900 260200 260500 260800 261100
a
261400
O
0� 36° 30'26'N
m
g
N
M
261100
O
O
S
36° 28'56" N
261400
3
v
M
2/23/2016
Page 1 of 3

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Soil Map Unit Polygons
K --;r
Soil Map Unit Lines
0
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Wet Spot
Blowout
0
Borrow Pit
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Clay Spot
i
Closed Depression
+a
Gravel Pit
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Water Features
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
Mine or Quarry
calculations of distance or area are required.
Miscellaneous Water
I
Perennial Water
r,rr
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
US Routes
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 30, 2015
Sinkhole
:.
Slide or Slip
0o
Sodic Spot
Soil Map—Northampton County, North Carolina
(Roanoke Rapids Recreation Areas North Side)
MAP INFORMATION
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/23/2016
lim Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Stony Spot
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Very Stony Spot
measurements.
Wet Spot
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Other
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
+a
Special Line Features
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Water Features
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Streams and Canals
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
Transportation
calculations of distance or area are required.
r++
Rails
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
r,rr
Interstate Highways
the version date(s) listed below.
US Routes
Soil Survey Area: Northampton County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 30, 2015
Major Roads
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
Local Roads
or larger.
Background
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 4, 2010—Sep 10,
®
Aerial Photography
2010
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/23/2016
lim Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Northampton County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Roanoke Rapids Recreation Areas
North Side
Northampton County, North Carolina (NC131)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CrB
Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4
0.0
0.1%
percent slopes
DAM
Dam
0.5
14.4
1.3%
LtD
Lillington-Turbeville complex, 8
39.3%
to 15 percent slopes
PcE2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to
4.1
11.2%
30 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
TsA
Turbeville sandy loam, 0 to 2
3.4
9.2%
percent slopes
TsB
Turbeville sandy loam, 2 to 6
5.7
15.6%
percent slopes
TtB2
Turbeville sandy clay loam, 2 to
2.3
6.4%
6 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
W
Water
0.9
2.5%
Wh
Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent
5.4
14.7%
slopes, frequently flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
36.6
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/23/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Revisions
PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS
Typical Drawing I Library Location Cell Name
Information
FORESTED WETLANDS
\
I \ INTERMITTENT �\ \\ 1 1 I , I I I I I I I I �
' STREAM CHANNEL \ \ \ \ 1 I II I I I I I \ \
\ \ `1 ` 1 I � I I I ► I ► �� �
I
I
I \ \ I I I I I I I I I I J
r
Ip � \ ` 1 I I I I I I I I I ► � I
EMERGENT WETLANDS \\ \ I I I I I I I
1 \ \ ( I EXISTING DIRT PATH
\ \\ \\ \ (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) I I I I I I I
I \ I I I I I
`° �, 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I ►
-
1 I 1 1 � I ! N M c ^ IN
o0 � t0 r 7
� r r
1 I I
T-
41
�/-
1
/41,
I 1 I I I \ \ 1 1 <
I
Y Y Y;Y—Y Y Y -Y--Y
I
1
r—----158-----� / i
I
w
1 ,
PLAN_
SCALE: 1"=20'
41
B/M Assembly Pipe Stand Foundation Cells (Pier) Pipe Stand Foundation Cells (Spread) Foundation Cells for Other Typical Structures
(Pier) I (Spread)
Dominion WDominion"
MIL
Professional EngineerApproval
FL ROANOKE RAPIDS RECREATION AREAS
NORTH SIDE
PERMITTING WETLANDS IMPACTS
20' 40' PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS
N 0 T FOR Name Date Project No. Sheet No.
SCALE: 1 " = 20' Designed by: P. R. B. 3-1-16 04314077
CONSTRUCTION Approvals ----- ----- Scale 1 OF 2
Approvals ----- ----- AS SHOWN
B/M No. Revisions
Steel Detail & Assembly Cad File Name Drawing No.
PLOTTED:

Revisions
1 I "Ji .II 1 ` II 1 I .II I 1 \\
I \\ I 1 11 I I 1 1 II A 1 11 1 1 A \
I I \ \I A 111 1 1 V 11
I I 1 I
II
1
I I \ I 1 \ I 1 I I I I I I \ 1 I I
— — — I
1 I I — — -------\�--- — —�--- ___I--I---I——I--I--- \IN, '�--
INTERMITTENT �\ \\ 1 \ I I I I I I I I I I
I ,
STREAM CHANNEL \ \ \ \ \ I II I I I I �// I \IN,
� \\� \
N"
I I \ I I I I I
I , I \, , ► I , \ I I I I I I I
1 I , ► ,, , , 1 I I \ \ I I , I I I , I ► , �
I I , I I I , I I I I I \ \ '\ I ; 1 ; I I ; I ► ; I I
I I I , I I ► I , ; I \ \ , ► I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 1 I I \ \ I I I I I I I
FORESED ,WETLANDS EMERGENT WETLANDS
I I I I I I I I I
�111 I I 1
1
T \ I 1 1 1 1 , I I 1 woo
044000
I I I I I I I I 1 / I •�•1• 1 I \
I I 1 1 1 I I I I ,,�\•
I I \� 1 \ 1
61
T r — �-
I I I , I � I I I , ; / ,, /,� � \ I 1 1 ...: / �1• II \ 1 1 I 1 \ \ \ \ �!
I I I I 1 , I I 1 , 1 /, I I 1 .•� ,� r / •' I 1 \ 1 1 1 1 \ \\ \\
I \ I 1 I \ \ \ \ EMERGENT WETLANDS oS I I 1•� .� 1 1 1 I 1 1 I \ \ \
\ I \ \ \ \ \ \ TEMPORARY IMPACT' I �•I / I 1 1 \ 1 1 \ I \\ \ \
\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 679 SF I y•• / �6S / 1 I I 1 1 I \ \ \.
\ \ \ PROPOSED 20' GRAVEL ` \ t LrMITS Oft DISTU BANCE
\ \ \ � \ EMERGENT WETLANDS � � I ,� � I �6 ! • � \ \
\ ACCESS ROAD \ \ ! PERMANENT `IMPACT / W1 I / \1 ' 1 11 \\ \\ \\
2885 SF / I I \ •� v V 1 A I 1 v V v
15g .- I / V •fit ` � \ \ <
• ■ 160 , / �6
■. ��■■�T■• 1� W2 / I•� \ V \ v v
.. ■ ■. �. � .. � 162 �
— _ — RCP CULVERT
IT
i
I I I I Q
I o w I I I (0I 1\ I I I 'W
FORESTED WETLANDS -� — 160 „ PERMANENT IMPACT
I I� 161 2354 SF
■
ll�
I II II
II 111■ I qq ■ ■ I I I . .._
W4 FORESTED WETLANDS ■ 9' ITEMPORARY IMPACTI 15
' 1 1 D 1116 SF Dominion -
I I I 1 1 DProfessional Engineer
Approval
PERMITTING
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
Typical Drawing I Library Location Cell Name
Information
B/M Assembly I Pipe Stand Foundation Cells (Pier) I Pipe Stand Foundation Cells (Spread)
PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
Foundation Cells for Other Typical Structures
(Pier) (Spread)
Steel Detail & Assembly
0 10' 20' 40'
mi
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
\
:P7
ADominion®
ROANOKE RAPIDS RECREATION AREAS
NORTH SIDE
WETLANDS IMPACTS
NOT FOR PROPOSED CONDITIONS
CONSTRUCTION Name Date Project No. Sheet No.
Designed by: P. R. B. 3-1-16 04314077
Approvals — — — — — — — — — — Scale 2 OF 2
Approvals ----- ----- AS SHOWN
B/M No. Revisions
----- — — — — — — — — — — —
Cad File Name Drawing No.
PLOTTED: