20151164 Ver 1_Corrected Final Decision Granting Variance_20160315

Burdette, Jennifer a
From: Shaw, Denise <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:22 AM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Reeder, Tom; Burdette, Jennifer
a; Thomas, Lois; Weaver, Adriene; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; Higgins, Karen
Cc: Hauser, Jennie; Shaw, Denise
Subject: Petition for Variance from 15A NCAC 2B .0259 Tar -Pamlico River Riparian Area
Protection Rules by Daniel E. Whitford
Attachments: 2016-03-15_Ltr from JH -Revised Variance for Tar -Pamlico River Riparian Area.pdf,
2016 -03 -15 -Revised Variance Decision for Tar -Pamlico River Riparian Area.pdf
Attached is an electronic copy of the Cover Letter and Revised Decision Granting Major Variance
with Conditions which our office forwarded by US Mail today. Please let Jennie Hauser know if you
have any difficulty opening the attachments.
Thank you

IDaniel 1-7-, Whitford J?ece�et Wegiiested
748, E)owri Shore Drive
Blounts Creek, NC 27814
Ize: Revised Final Decision Granting Variance with conditions
Dear Mr. Whitford:
At its January 13, 2016 meeting, the Water Quality Corm-nittee of the Environmental
Management Commission granted your request for a variance with conditions. Previously you
received a decision containing an incorrect rnitigation credit requirement. Attached is a copy of
the Revised Final Agency Decision containing the correct rnitigation credit requirement. If For
son -ie reason you do not agree with the terms of the variance as issued, you have the right to
appeal the Con-u-nission's decision by filing a petition for judicial review in the superior court of
the county in which you reside within thirty days at -ter receiving the order PLU-SUal-11 to the
procedure set forth in the Worth Carolina General Statutes § 15013-45. /k copy of the judicial
review petition must be served on the Com u-nission's agent For service of process at the following
address:
Sant N4. Hayes, General Counsel
Dept. of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
If You Choose to file a petition for judicial review, T request that you also serve a copy of
the petition for judicial review on n-te at the address listed in the letterhead. If you have any
questions, please Beel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jennie Wilhelm Hauser
Special Deputy Attorney General and
Counsel for the Environi-rental Management Con-m-nission
STA -FE C)F 1*14C)R--1, H
C--A1.-(DL11,',4A
IDEPAPLTMENT «FJUS-nCE
P-OY (.-:--<DOPER- 11.CY. 11c) -x 629
1 1 A I VA -3, I I I A ITSI-A'.
A-rToFLNEY CENER-AL RAI A-A(;i i, N C27602
ENVIRC).N.MEN-1-Al I-J1N'1,S1CJN
(9 If)) 716-6462
F �-.[phone]
jimuser Ilcdqj.gov
March 15, 2016
IDaniel 1-7-, Whitford J?ece�et Wegiiested
748, E)owri Shore Drive
Blounts Creek, NC 27814
Ize: Revised Final Decision Granting Variance with conditions
Dear Mr. Whitford:
At its January 13, 2016 meeting, the Water Quality Corm-nittee of the Environmental
Management Commission granted your request for a variance with conditions. Previously you
received a decision containing an incorrect rnitigation credit requirement. Attached is a copy of
the Revised Final Agency Decision containing the correct rnitigation credit requirement. If For
son -ie reason you do not agree with the terms of the variance as issued, you have the right to
appeal the Con-u-nission's decision by filing a petition for judicial review in the superior court of
the county in which you reside within thirty days at -ter receiving the order PLU-SUal-11 to the
procedure set forth in the Worth Carolina General Statutes § 15013-45. /k copy of the judicial
review petition must be served on the Com u-nission's agent For service of process at the following
address:
Sant N4. Hayes, General Counsel
Dept. of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
If You Choose to file a petition for judicial review, T request that you also serve a copy of
the petition for judicial review on n-te at the address listed in the letterhead. If you have any
questions, please Beel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jennie Wilhelm Hauser
Special Deputy Attorney General and
Counsel for the Environi-rental Management Con-m-nission

Daniel E. Whitford
February 1'7, 2©16
Page 2
cc: w/ encl.: Steven J. Rowlan, Chair of the Commission, electronically
Steve Tedder, Chair of the WQC, electronically
Tom Reeder, Director, DWR electronically
Jennifer Burdette, Senior Environmental Specialist electronically
Lois Thomas, recording secretary for Commission, electronically
Adriene Weaver, Environmental Specialist, electronically

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BEAUFORT
BEFORE THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF: )
PETITION FOR VARIANCE FROM ) REVISED
15A NCAC 213 _0259 ) DECISION GRANTING MAJOR
TAR-PAMLICO RIVER RIPARIAN ) VARIANCE WITH CONDITIONS
AREA PROTECTION RULES BY )
DANIEL E_ WHITFORIi }
On May 11, 2000 the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
(Commission) delegated to the Commission's Water Quality Committee all decisions relating to
requests for variances from the riparian buffer rules. This matter came before the Water Quality
Committee at its January 13, 2016 meeting in Raleigh, N.C. upon Daniel E_ Whitford's (the
Applicant's) request for approval of a Major Variance from the Tar -Pamlico River Riparian Area
Protection Rules pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B .0259 for a shelter and storage shed at 748 Down
Shore Drive in Blounts Creek, N.C. (the Site). The development will impact 164 square feet of
Zone I and 194 square feet of Zone 2 of the riparian buffer_ The Applicant has agreed to provide
mitigation for the proposed impacts, including purchasing mitigation credits and implementing a
Stormwater Management Plan for the Site.
Based on the information provided, the Division of Water Resources (DWR) supported
the request for a major variance. Jennifer Burdette, Senior Environmental Specialist, Buffer
Permitting Unit, Division of Water Resources, presented the request to the Water Quality
Committee. Mr. Whitford was represented before the Committee by Keith D. Hackney, Esq.

-2 -
Upon consideration of the record documents, including the request and the staff
recommendation, and based upon the approval of the Water Quality Committee, the Commission
hereby makes the following:
FINDING OF FACTS
1. The Applicant owns the property at 748 Down Shore Drive in Blounts Creek,
N.C. (the Site). The Site is located along the Pamlico River in an area where there are riparian
buffers.
2. The property was purchased by Mr. Whitford's company on lune 26, 2013 and
then transferred to Mr. Whitford individually on November 24, 2014, and both dates are after the
effective date of the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Area Protection Rules.
3. In 2014 the Applicant applied for a building permit at the Beaufort County
Building Inspector's Office to build a shelter. Mr. Whitford was told the structure did not
require a building permit. He was not told that the buffer rule would not allow siting the
structure close to the water.
4. The Applicant was unaware that the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules do not
allow shelters and sheds within the riparian buffer.
5. The shelter and a shed were built on the Site within Zones 1 and 2 of the protected
riparian buffer.
6. On September 9, 2015, OWR issued a Notice of Violation to Daniel E_ Whitford
for violations to the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules.
7. Since learning of the Rules, the Applicant has requested approval of a major
variance from the Tar -Pamlico River Riparian Area Protection Rules pursuant to 15A NCAC
0213 .0259 to allow the shelter and shed to remain within the riparian buffer on the Site.

-3-
8. The development impacts 164 square feet of Zone 1 and 194 square feet of Zone
2 of the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer.
9. The Applicant's plan for mitigation includes purchasing 780 square feet of buffer
credits from the N.C. Division of Mitigation Services and installation of a level spreader and
vegetated filter strip as part of a Stormwater Management Plan approved by DWR with
conditions. The approved Stormwater Management Plan is based on the Applicant's submission
dated October 28, 2015, which proposes the installation of a level spreader outside the riparian
buffer to treat stormwater runoff from the existing shelter and storage shed. Additionally, the
level spreader installed by the Applicant will have sufficient capacity to capture runoff from a
proposed home.
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Environmental Management Commission
makes the following,
CONCLUSIONS OF LAw
1. The Site owned by Daniel E. Whitford is subject to the Tar -Pamlico River
Riparian Area Protection Rule, 15A NCAC 2B .0259-
2- The Environmental Management Commission is authorized to issue a final
decision granting the variance including riparian buffer mitigation conditions pursuant to a
request under 15A NCAC 2B .0259 upon a finding that:
(1) There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships;
(2) The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
the buffer protection and preserves its spirit; and
(3) In granting the variance, the public safety and welfare have been
assured and substantial justice has been done.
3. The Commission affirmatively finds that the Applicant has demonstrated the
following:

-4 -
First Factor: There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships that prevent
compliance with the strict letter of the riparian bsrffer protection requirements.
In its assessment of whether the Applicant had made a showing of "practical difficulties
or unnecessary hardships," the Commission considered the following factors.
A. If'the applicant complies with the provisions ofthis Rule, helshe can secure no
reasonable return from, nor make reasonable use of, his/her property. Merely
proving that the variance would permit a greater profit from the property shall
not be considered adequate,justification for a variance. Moreover, the Division or
delegated local authority shall consider whether the variance is the minimum
possible deviation from the terms of this Rule that shall make reasonable use Qf
the property possible.
B. 1 -he hardship results from application of this Rule to the property rather than
from otherfactors such as deed restrictions or other hardship.
C. The hardship is due to the physical nature of the applicant's property, such as its
size, shape, or topography, which is differentfrom that of neighboring property.
D. The applicant did not cause the hardship by knowingly or unknowingly violating
this Rule.
E. The applicant did not purchase the property after the effective date of this Rule,
and then requesting an appeal.
F. The hardship is unique to the applicant's property, rather than the result of
conditions that are widespread. If other properties are equally subject to the
hardship created in the restriction, then granting a variance would be a special
privilege denied to others, and would not promote equal justice;
15A NCAC 02B .0259 (9)(a)(i)(A) through (F).
The Commission finds that although the Applicant has not shown that there are practical
difficulties preventing compliance with the strict letter of the riparian buffer protection
requirements, the Applicant has shown that his lot is more narrow than most of the surrounding
lots. Specifically,
A. The Applicant could make reasonable use of the property without impacting the
protected riparian buffer.

-5-
B. The hardship results from the Applicant's lack of awareness of the Rule rather
than application of the Rule.
C. The hardship is not due to the physical nature of the Applicant's property_
Although the 50 -foot wide lot is more narrow than most of the surrounding lots,
the lot is of sufficient length for the Applicant to have located the shelter and
storage shed outside the riparian buffer had the Applicant known of the Rule.
D_ The Applicant unknowingly violated the rule by building the structures after
contacting the Beaufort County Building Inspector's Office a building permit,
which resulted in the Applicant being told that he did not need a building permit.
The Applicant was not told that he could not build his proposed structures close to
the water.
E. The Applicant's company purchased the property on June 26, 2013, and
transferred the property to the Applicant on November 24, 2014, which
acquisitions are both after the effective date of this Rule_
F. The Applicant unknowingly violated the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Rule by locating the
shelter and shed in the riparian buffer prior to obtaining a variance from the Rule,
and the Applicant's hardship occurs from a lot that is exceptionally narrow and is
more narrow than most of the surrounding lots.
Second Factor: The variance is in harmony •with the general purpose and intent of the
State's riparian buffer protection requirements acrd preserves its spirit.
The Commission affirmatively finds that the Applicant has demonstrated he meets the
second factor required under 15A NCAC 02B .0259(9)(x). Specifically, the purpose of the
riparian buffer rules is to protect existing riparian buffer areas. The Applicant has agreed to

-6 -
purchase 780 buffer mitigation credits from the N.C. Division of Mitigation Services and will
treat stormwater from the Site. By granting the requested variance with the conditions set out
below requiring the purchase of buffer mitigation credits and implementation a Stormwater
Management Plan that is approved by DWR, the development will be in harmony with the
general purpose and intent of the riparian buffer protection rules and will preserve their spirit.
Third Factor: In granting the variance, the public safety and welfare have been
assured, water quality has been protected and sttbsta"Iialitrstice has bee" done.
The Commission affirmatively finds that the Applicant has demonstrated he meets the
third factor required under 15A NCAC 02B .0259(9)(a). Specifically, in granting the variance
subject to the conditions that the Applicant purchase 780 square feet in buffer mitigation credits
and treat stormwater from the Site, the proposed development will protect water quality and
provide substantial justice.
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Eaw set forth above, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the request for the variance is GRANTED pursuant to 15A NCAC 213 .0259 as a
major variance to the Tar -Pamlico River Riparian Area Protection Rule with the following
conditions:
1. Mitigation. The Applicant shall provide mitigation for the development
impacts by purchasing 780 buffer credits from the N.C. Division of Mitigation
Services.
2. Stormwater Management Plan (SMP). The Applicant shall be
responsible for obtaining an approved Stormwater Management Plan for the Site
in accordance with the design for a level spreader and vegetated filter strip and all
associated stormwater conveyances, inlet and outlet structures, and the grading
and drainage patterns depicted on plan sheets dated October 28, 2015, which are
incorporated by reference and are enforceable by DWR.

-7-
a. The limitations on drainage area and footprint of the diffuse flow
device contained in DWR's recommendation on this Applicant's variance request
are incorporated herein.
b. The approved diffuse flow device shall be constructed and
operational before any permanent building or other structure is occupied at the
Site.
c_ The diffuse flow plan may not be modified without prior written
authorization from DWR, and, if modified, the Applicant shall provide one copy
of the approval letter and the modified SMP, including plan details on full-sized
plan sheets, to the Division of Water Resources 401 &� Buffer Permitting Unit
(1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650) before the commencement
of any modifications.
d. Maintenance activities for the level spreader and vegetated filter strip
shall be performed in accordance with the notarized Operation &_ Maintenance
agreement signed by Daniel E. Whitford on October 29, 2015- The Operation 8t.
Maintenance agreement shall transfer with the sale of the land or transfer of
ownership or responsibility for the BMP facility. The Applicant shall notify
DWR promptly of any transfer using the above -referenced mailing address.
This is the q day of March, 2016.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Steven J. Rowl n, Chairman

C -3F SEIZVICE
"]'his is to, certify that I have this day served the foregoing; Revised Decision Granting
Major Variance upon the Applicant and the Division of Water Resources in the manner
described below as follows.
Daniel E. Whitford
748 Down Shore Drive
Mounts Creek, T,,TC 27814
Keith D. Hackney
Attorney at Eaw
P.O. Box 1268
Washington, '1',JC 27889-1268
Jennifer A, Burdette
40 1 /Bi-iffer Coordinator
401 & Huffer Permitting Unit
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1 6 1 7
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
Division of Water Resources,
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC, 27699-1650
'Fhis is the 11/ clay of March, 2016.
Uertifie.rl "a ll -Metziriz Reck lit Requested
USAlrailswirl
E -n -rail: lzhackncy-0)
,.h.ackneNjaw.c(--)rn
E 1 --mail: ]<-are n. 1-1 is-- g i n s(.e-i) ric d q nr. g ov
ROY COOPER
Attorney Crencral
nnie Wilheh-ri Hauser
-..---'Special Oeputy,,-Nttorney Cieneral
P. 0. Box- 629
Raleigh, N. C. 276012