20160244 Ver 1_401 Application_20160316

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
o Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
4805 Green Road, Suite 100
Raleigh North, Carolina 27616-2848
[phone] Fax: [phone]
To: XAeEN �A K,(st r45 Date: 3/9/2016
Fj�,Qe
gyp`
Company: NC Division of Water Resources '51.7 Nof'Tg 6aLiS-&AQ"A S-r-
2ra�+`���1, OC, o2�(Qo�l
We are sending you: X Attached _Under separate cover via
the following:
_Shop drawings _Prints X Plans _Samples
_Specifications _Copy of letter _Change order
X Other PCS N AN b C D
Copies Date
No. Description
1
Color PCN package
3
Black and White PCN packages
2
18"x24" sets of plans
2
11 "x 17" sets of plans
I
CD with PDF copy of PCN and Plans
C 1C RE M1 r "A CC V-1 fic,�-rt
These are Transmitted as checked below:
_✓For approval _Approved as submitted
_For your use _Approved as noted
As requested _Returned for corrections
vFor review & comment _Other
Remarks:
Resubmit_ copies for approval
_Submit _copies for distribution
Return corrected prints
Please find the enclosed PCN plans and CD for the 1721 Hunting_ Ridge Project.
A
Copy To:
Signed:

VJA <
0 V4111:� Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes X❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
N Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes NX No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
1721 Hunting Ridge Road
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Michael & Susan Gray
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB 008755 PG 00310
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
1721 Hunting Ridge Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: City of Raleigh
4b.
Name:
Blair Hinkle, PE
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
City of Raleigh Public Works Department
4d.
Street address:
222 West Hargett Street, PO Box 590
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27602
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-996-3940
4g.
Fax no.:
919-996-7638
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Becky L. Ward
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
5c.
Street address:
4805 Green Road, Suite 100
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27616
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-870-0526
5f.
Fax no.:
919-870-5359
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1717558761000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.8807
Longitude: -78.6089
1 c.
Property size:
0.58 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Perry Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
B, NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Please see documentation attachment
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 130
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Please see documentation attachment
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see documentation attachment
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
UT to Neuse River
PER
Corps
8.65
55
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
55
3i. Comments:
S1: Stream stabilization will occur along the west bank. The area will be re -graded, matted, and re -vegetated.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
X❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Stream Stablization
UT to Perry Creek
No
340
0
B2 T
Construction Access
UT to Perry Creek
No
2,773
1,272
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
3,113
1,272
61. Comments: Please see documentation attachment
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Please see documentation attachment
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Please see documentation attachment
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
No
new impervious area is being added
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
18%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
N/A
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Raleigh
X❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes X❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑X Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ YesX❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ YesX❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Please see documentation attachment
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project is located in an urban stream.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC Historical Preservation Office website (www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us) was searched and no sites were listed for this property. In addition, no
architectural structures or archaeological artifacts were noted during preliminary surveys at the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
(Floodmaps.nc.gov)
Blair Hinkle, PE
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? ❑ Yes X❑ No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. _
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Please see documentation attachment
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project is located in an urban stream.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state; federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in ❑Yes ❑X No
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC Historical Preservation Office website (www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us) was searched and no sites were listed for this property. In addition, no
architectural structures or archaeological artifacts were noted during preliminary surveys at the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
(Floodmaps.nc.gov)
Blair Hinkle, PE
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
J
Applican ent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid onty if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided i
Page 10 of 10
❑X No
)-L1.I(.
Date

Documentation for Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
1721 Hunting Ridge Road, City of Raleigh, NC
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
3a. Project Description
The project is located in a fully developed residential neighborhood at 1721 Hunting Ridge
Road. The watershed contributing to an unnamed tributary of the Neuse River to be repaired is
41 acres. Land use is mostly 1/4 acre lots with single family homes and a golf course.
3b. List the total estimates acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
No wetlands are located and within the limits of disturbance for this project.
3d. Explain the purpose of the project
The purpose of this project is to stabilize the stream bank along the west bank of the unnamed
tributary. This is prevent future erosion migrating towards an existing structure and provide
protection for the exposed sanitary sewer. The existing condition of the unnamed tributary is
resulting in bank erosion which is encroaching on the northeast corner of the house on the project
site. A sanitary sewer manhole exists on the outside bend, and a 4" DIP sanitary sewer lateral
crosses the stream and connects to the manhole.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, includingthe he type of equipment to be used.
The proposed improvements (from upstream to downstream) include stabilizing the stream bank
that is eroding in close proximity to the house, providing protection for the exposed sanitary
sewer lateral crossing the stream, and stabilizing the stream around the manhole and downstream
of the manhole. Severe erosion is occurring on the bend with the near -vertical bank and will be
stabilized with a class 1 rip rap rock base and vegetated geogrid lifts. The stream bottom will be
graded to provide protection around the sewer later. Twelve (12) linear feet of constructed riffle
(class 1 mix) will hold the stream bottom around the pipe so that it does not become exposed. A
class 1 rock toe will be installed around the manhole and transitioned form the rock base under
the geogrid lifts. The rocktoe will continue for 14 LF downstream of the manhole on the west
bank. Existing class B rip rap will be utilized where appropriate. The designed stabilization
measures, rock base, rock toe, constructed riffle, vegetated geogrid lifts, and matting, exceed the
resistance required to protect the bank from the anticipated shear stress.
The equipment to be used in the project is earth moving equipment and various other support
apparatuses. Heavy equipment may include hydraulic excavator, compactors, bulldozers,
skidsteer loaders, and dump trucks to load and unload materials. The construction equipment will
enter the site from Hunting Ridge Road along an existing sanitary sewer easement and will
perform all construction within a defined limit of disturbance. All work will be completed from
the west bank of the stream. The stream will not be crossed as a part of this project.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
6i. Comments:
B1: Stream stabilization with occur along the west bank. The area will be re -graded, matted, and
re -vegetated.

B2: Construction equipment will enter from Hunting Ridge Road. Area will be re -vegetated. The
area that has been slated for dispersement of existing soil will be in an existing lawn area. This
area will be reseeded to model existing grass.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
la. Specifically describe measures taken of avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing
project.
This project is necessary to stabilize the stream channel and to eliminate active erosion of the
stream channel bank. The minimization of the project has limited the repairs to the areas of the
stream banks that are currently severely eroding. The buffer impacts will minimize impacts to
existing vegetation by accessing the site along an existing sanitary sewer easement.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques.
The proposed construction will minimize proposed impacts by performing all construction from
the top of the western stream bank. The proposed structural measures include rock for stability at
the stream toe along with the exposed sanitary sewer cleanout and vegetation to re-establish root
systems on the stream bank for long term stabilization.
F. Supplementary Information
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered
Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The site is an existing urban residential area that has been previously impacted by development.
Habitat is not present for Wake County listed vertebrate and invertebrate endangered species
with the exception of Northern Long Eared Bats. Michaux's sumac prefers open areas and is
relatively shade tolerant. The site is forested with other open areas currently being mowed. The
project requires removal of a few bushes for access. No trees are planned to be removed as a part
of this project. Therefore it is not anticipated that there will be any adverse impacts associated
with TAE species.

co
O�
�V C\2 Lo
o Cr)
/ Lo
MICHAEL R & SUSAN B GRAY♦ B �O• \ 'I I
Cico
/ 1721 HUNTING RIDGE RD ♦ �O ��
PIN:1717558761 tiF2� ; _ °D co
W �
♦ / �I I �� NORTH RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB INC.
4f, — 6612 FALLS OF NEUSE RD 1--I
// / — ^ \ \ PIN:1717337989 V �o W
CD
/WCE CP ,x / i�/ j� /d� /� ♦ co
/I
p/
/f� \ ♦ P i / z
co
♦ v
SPREAD l / �„ i lF///
/ i / / ♦ ♦ � z W z
W�
EXIST f G EXCESS EARTH I 4
y / \ ♦ ♦ / TIM R ST PS ♦/ IN THIS AREA O/ / / \ ♦ 4 rE ♦/ ip / /// / ♦ ♦ ,n
♦ I c ♦® �/ / /,/ill I�/��aCC)
/� // // j II I \� I♦
4f// / / i // /� \� ♦
IV
o /
4f 4f
4 i EXISTING 1 \
� / CENTERLINE \
�XISTING SSMHI oQ j . y' /// li — 1 e�F p, 1 \co
RIM-98.10 I .� I / rn/
V. IN (SW)=95.50 �E 1 l / NF R
! ( NSF l / i /i / EXISTING / 7 ♦ U
J I I ! I
V. IN (SE)=94.75 I OFFS </NFS \ / / . i / l TOB /
I F, T, v / o I
/ J / ! \ INV. IN (S)=91.90 1 T 85, Nq (�� / `, / M }
INV. OUT (N)=91.25 \ 36 i EXISTING 2
\ � i �� � � '� / i/ TOE 01 � \
EXISTING
DOCK
, \' \ 1 OFF F`lNF 1 \I ^ ^x� / PROPOSED / / / \�P•
� p' j CLASS I ROCK T (� / / ♦ o.'�Q v,
/ / \ ° I pB,cF F�//VF \ T �ONS���- ��S� �r o \ XISTI` G / / ' / PROTECTION ��i / I I = Q i Q z? z
SFT, STN---7,6,3
F<F�, ST//vCTF RTRAP
OF C2 1, 9 9S 7 G GRgp� \\ ; j % . A / 'L1 O,p� ♦ / ♦
GNSTRUC \ \ o CRoopoSFo / / 9/��F / / '%,��ti•'••••.. BE �.%`
I \ TFOR/FF BNS \ .,.'^ �/ I � � os IS SFC / IAG' `'Y ♦ // ���filnu��
\ ®<F GFF FT 8 S�q;/� o B I 1 o T/oNr:-
10 �/ / 3��F�F� ♦ //
a , 8 6/6 4 c) 1 IPROPOSED
I / I of SF<lNF // T ) \\ CROSS SECTION q
FSFTc15 TN,/,�> �^\ � l f I o;� // /� � / � Q
° / .8 08 i �\ p I / Z
/ 1 3 /i \ p, CONSTRUCTED oo / Q
RIFFLE6 / 1 PHILLIP W & ANN P BETTS CC J
1tXISTIN / PROPOSED / 1/ G
7201 N RIDGE DR O
o ` CLASS I RIPRAP / PIN:1717559691
\ I FSFT,FSTq� PAVER ^. I/�
/ l,��g > i, I PATI(? NG, `�\\ o C ROPOSED ' �� /♦
Q
1 O F F�/i�`c CSP I 1 ROs SECT/ / 1
\ ;/p S SEC N C
1 eF SFT, STN, /� L
CN6//V GFD 2' 85.4 ' ` I I PFl P SED , PROTECT EXITING
° ,)41 ROCK RqN �/FT 1 � i / i Q i C SS 1���CTION B EQUIPMENT OAD AL FROMrrw�� C�
as 1 SITION 1 ( �I S oPos P REPLACE IF AMAGED V G
1 EXISTING 1 EXISTING / �O CO /
° ° 1 HOUSE 4" CPP o 0 0
EXISTING ° 1 o y \\ I / �� / ♦ LL
z
CONCRETE♦ / �I
DRIVE 1 , Q \ \ \\ \7 1 1 \� / ♦ LL
� / �` / Z Z
VEGETATED GEOGRID LIFTS _ z
B1
I TOP OF ROCK BASE ELEV.-97.0 Q UJ
a ♦ I
989 �. ��� 1ST LIFT (25 LF) TOP ELEV.=98.0 J° % 4"BIRO ♦ \ \ \ ��n \��� 2ND LIFT (24 LF) TOP ELEV.=99.0 = z
/ o� \ \ Q Q
PROPOSED r c
j, // , ♦ \ II \ �� \�� '�ROPOSED CLASS I ROCK TOE (y G
° / / i , _ — — — _ — — v ♦ I I BZ 1 1 \ / �\ /�'' CLASS I RIPRAP PROTECTION Q
/ / / ♦ I I I \ 'TRANSITION r LLI 0
BVSHES I USHES
D 1 / ��� LEGEND:
/ 0
/A / / \ \\\ \ \ \Y/ ��� PROPOSED CLASS I RIPRAP
pop \ \ \ \\ \\ / \ \��� PROPOSED CLASS I ROCK TOE/BANK PROTECTION
I I \ 5 DOGI VOOD
\ / CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
I 1 1 DOGWOODS / , OQ PROPOSED GEOGRID LIFTS
47 / \\ 32"OAK ��\\ ® DATE: 20 JAN 2016
�� / // \ 94 PROPOSED CONTOUR
00 �V // I I I \ STREAM AND BUFFER IMPACTS CONSTRUCTION SET
/
32" PINE/ /I\ 14"OAK 10 5 0 10 20 SCALE: -
\ BUSHE
SCALE: 1"=10'
SHEET 3
\ /

Project Photographs

1721 Hunting Ridge Road Photo Log, Raleigh NC
Photo 1: Exposed sanitary sewer and manhole
Photo 2: Erosion occuring along the bank
Bank to be repaired

Project Location, Watershed, and Soils Map

N
205 410 820 Feet
1 inch = 400 feet
Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and am NOT e�rn.�A� nio —a,.��-t�
- yes, expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

/ O �
Q P 2V X40 OR6 DR
e New ( \ c
� � Life Camp � �P� S RIVERq`� -
F/
350 WYNNE � 1/ �1 1 1
),, AN RD, � �-
- -
1<3
LONIKER-D (\ `
/i; cp.
IJ oo o
�DR
r RIE
N
rpINLEY9 S
/ o
/�S
,OAK CREEK�l 400 /
I ) TONEGATE
450DEANWOOD DR
4 �
lNwOO THORPSHIRER \ may. �V (� /gy
YUCCP`��, � _f — Camp
spj NARPS ILL RD Durant; JJJ
c
o "
Z'
o a
E SPOTTSWOOD ST\
PROJECT AREA
WELLINGTON LT W
LATITUDE: 35.5249
LONGITUDE: 78.3632
350 /
ti
i
7 / AO Tl i� c GRESHAM LAKE RD
o88IG Sl(),4A
0 LIR
I
OjVERtif5LOOK
RHUNTING RIDGE gURO PzP_GreshamsnALE1!1
Lake
'pou"I ID
450. AGE OR ' LAND/
1721 HUNTING RIDGE ROAD
USGS QUAD MAP
WAKE FOREST, 2013
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: JANUARY 20, 2016
USGS QUADRANGLE
WAKE FOREST 2013 WARD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC
SCALE: 1 "=2000' _
4805 Green Road, Suite 100 919 870-0526
�, Raleigh, NC 27616 FAX [phone]

1►
DRAINAGE AREA PROJECT SITE
41 ACRES
TC PATH
C
FA
f�\
300 150 0 300 600
SCALE 1"=300'
1721 HUNTING RIDGE ROAD
DRAINAGE AREA MAP
CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
WARD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC
FIRM LICENSE N0: C-2619
4805 Green Rd. Suite 100 919 870-0526
Raleigh, NC 27616-2848 FAX [phone]

`�aa'< CgC2 - -
1 WY ,O �' ��\,,� Cm
A
1 pB VaB2 r /
Y CeC
l ApC2 \, . ApC2
CeDCeB2 ApB2 CeB
CeD CeB2 _ CeC2
ApB2 CeC2 •
CeC2
., e W y •
c' CeB2
Cm CeC2: ICeD% " • -
Geq ApB2
CeC2.,
- h CeB2\�
W m CeC2 \\
Y 1 �`' A
CeF v�
CeC cm A4e -7
CeB2 � i
CPF f'- CeD jt CeB
�' �� ApB2
CIC3 `�� ��, I a i �v i
CeB2
r
CeC2
Gia . CeDWkC
ApB2 CeB2
CeB2
AD
CeC2 CeC CeF Gu ''
1 ApB2
1
CeC p A B2 err 9.
WY �... -_L LoC`
Cm
CeC2
CeC2 WkE t
32 Q
CeC2 �' CeB2
CeC2 w Wk
CeC2 tl "
DuB
WY n �
N �
`� `�- � Ili '" • , .. N
4C CeB2CeB:
ApD 1 -
11 ' F
He62 co
CeD CeB2 it
CeC2 G
LoC
ApR2 Ii- CeC
1721 HUNTING RIDGE ROAD
SOILS MAP
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: JANUARY 20, 2016
SOURCE:
USDA SCS (NOW NRCS) SOIL SURVEY WARD CONSULTING ENGINEERS PC
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA �
ISSUED NOVEMBER, 1970
SCALE: NTS C 4805 Green Road, Suite 100 [phone]
\Raleigh, NC 27616 FAX [phone]

Existing Cross Section and Longitudinal Profile

Cross Section 1 Station 1+00 Riffle
102.00
101.00
100.00
=99.00
d
m
LL
6.00
C,
O
N
y>97.00
W
96.00
95.00
94.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.
Station (Feet)
+Ground �—BKF

103
102
101
100
d
LL_99
C
Ogg
A
d
W 97
Cross Section 2 Station 1+41 Riffle
Station (Feet)
t Ground f BKF

Cross Section 3 Station 1+54 Riffle
102
101
100
=99
d
d
LL
6
C
O
A
y>97
W
96
95
94
0 10 20 30 40 50 6D 7
Station (Feet)
t Ground BKF

too
W97
LL
W
95
Cross Section 4 Station 1+66 Pool
Station (Feet)
C+Ground tBKF

105
103
101
99
.-. 97
a�
0 95
a
as
W
93
91
89
87
85
1721 Hunting Ridge
Longitudinal Profile
Main Channel: Station 0+60 - 2+10
+60 +70 +80 +90
0
0
rn
z
0
a
c�
z
w
0
z
0
0
z
W
1+00 1+10 1+20 1+30 1+40 1+50 1+60 1+70 1+80 1+90 2+00 2+10
Station (feet)
TW WS BKF
S-1
S-2
XS -3
XS -4
STA:
Riffle
1+02
c
Riffle
STA:
1+41
Riffle
STA: 1+55
Pool
STA: 1+6
0
0
% °
°
0
0
0
0
°
o 0 0
0
0
+60 +70 +80 +90
0
0
rn
z
0
a
c�
z
w
0
z
0
0
z
W
1+00 1+10 1+20 1+30 1+40 1+50 1+60 1+70 1+80 1+90 2+00 2+10
Station (feet)
TW WS BKF

Proposed Plan, Profile, and Details

, F
O
�STABLI SHED 1�9�
CA �
Sheet Index
THE CITY OF RALEIGH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
�qwr•�:��►�ITi_gra:i��ri������rrr�•����:z0Nft Tlkyll
1. Cover Sheet
2. Existing Conditions,
Demolition and Erosion Control
3. Construction Layout
4. Planting Plan and Stabilization Measures
5. Cross Sections
6. Details
Plans Prepared By: CAD File Path:
Becky L, Ward, P,E, SI\Autocad Drawings\1721 Hunting Ridge Road
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
FIRM LICENSE NO: C-2619
4805 Green Rd, Suite 100 [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27616-2848 FAX [phone]
Contact—Becky L. Ward P.E., bward®wce—corp.com
� 9
���•`` �H CARO '�•,,�
FESS/0� by
�;
•.� SEAL ••
Sao` 13344 i
N N `�.`.
PROJECT
SITE
w
UNT ING �ti
RIDGE RD �
0
C RING F �RES�T
R�
SP
d
Location Map
NTS
Petition Project
1721 Hunting Ridge Road
A
d
O
z
0
w
a
CONSTRUCTION SET
SHEET 1

C\2 Lo
oLo
Lo
00co
/ 00 co
/ JEFFREY L. & LOU ANN PHILLIPS \ NORTH RIDGE 1--I
1717 HUNTING RIDGE RD = h O w
/ PIN:1717557736 \ COUNTRY CLUB INC. `/ O
\ 6612 FALLS OF NEUSE co
/ RD PIN:1717337989
°� °
/ \ C/) Fr -1 U
°
/ d 4 co
tXETING ° �o��0, 48"CM z
$CONCRETE ° / tib.E4 W P4 02
/ DRIVE - z U
r - '
WCEw Qz
d� °
4 co 04
EXISTN4 ° TIMBEIRGSTEPS CP#1 / // �o�F �� o`//� �/y ��12"TR / a
° Lo
8" HW � 15j�/ J / / / O / / / \ CC)
�
/ EXISTING / / ��"J/ PANEsE �, /, / / / d, rx
° ° HOUSE /// / // / M�%LE / /12'-4� /g.TR IR
v 11\ \
i 24' / / ' 1 % /� 12 ��TING / \ / / STEPHEN & JUDITH MICHELE ROGERS
/ / 6� r / r /� 1 TO / \ / 7205 N RIDGE DR
12" HOLLY / / I 1 �\ I/ o I /S I N X Ij /\ /72'- IF / / PIN:1717651704AM
H i
° O
cd
r 4MT
EXVSTINb 1 �� 6"TR / \RPRAP 'S� /15"TN 30"TR > EXISTING /1/�E IP° 12" HOLT I \ A 3 `� ,6"rRTOBEXISTING : 6"TR
° ° CONCRETE ° °1 12" HALY/ / / \ \ I \ \ 1\ '(..,
EXISTING
aDRIVE ° P CENTERLINE/ /
4 12HOLLY E 2„rR
�"4 T 6"TRCP#2
;��•�•�' �u' iu�
i7
4
d o"TR XS., -/Z/ EXISTING SSMH
9ry idi ♦'♦b
�♦♦i
%s
I / / RIM=98.10 \ '� ; o�PJ �•cy��.,,
l / (S)INV. IN -91.67 - c< c/3 Q� z z
4 I ; / EXISTING I DEC I
HOUSE \ / \ \ 1, } EXISTING 9 60I / / (SE)INV. IN=94.68 -":� V)
4 1 I \ IEXI N 1 1-1 S/S LATE AL 4 / (N)INV. OUT=91.50
ATI 0
a I° I o \ a
CONCRETE ° I I I 1 I \ W C�0 / ♦ /
\ ° °DRIVE °
` %N 1 \I I �\ X \ ,� / � Q
v 20 P °17
a 1 ° °° ° °° `
° a 4 ° ° G' I 3 // REMOVE EXISTING \ z
° ° �° 8"DOGWOOD ° ° ° ) ®/ EXISTING RIPRAP AS NECESSARY \ z
EXISTING ° ° s / 1�'BIRCH I 3a'TR \ �� a / 4" CPP FOR GRADING AND O z J
° ° ° l / / GEOGRID LIFT O
SSMH 22" P ° / / BUSF4ES \ / INSTALLATION Q �-
4 _d/ / I O - N \ I / EXISTING _
kiSTiNc o� I I� /�,—N�/ /z� I i w �\ \ \8TF i/ �4„ CIP J
PED. 4 ° a I I 151 D(�GW OD I 12"DOGW OD" / / / �� ( // \ \ \ \ % \ O 0- Q
SS` ° s I / o / ri \ 32"OAK % \ O
TEL. ° J U
PED °\\ IIVQ���� '// ` Bus Esll / �� W O
S y(! ° �° Qs\° \ \ \\M� HA\EL�R SU�At�I\B GOAY I 4� /// / I b W 0
\ 2\1 KU f I F� DG Rb l o ` 32" P�NE 14"OAK _
PI1%1717� 8�E�1�\ (%)
7
S �'F \\\\\j\ \\\ ` <\ O OO ,% PHILLIP W & ANN P BETTS \ — z z O
!.� S �0 �G� \`\\ \ ` \ ,` /// 7201 N RIDGE DR O z
�\ ��� �� /i PIN:1717559691 DISTURBED AREA = 4,020 SF (0.09 AC.) O U
!%i F \ I / W F \ \ Q \ / LEGEND:
` r
\ \ ` l l/l/ EXISTING CONTOURS (SURVEYED) O V_
C 7% �` \ / — — — — — — —EXISTING TOP OF BANK z U) W
`S G / PROPERTY LINE
REMOVE BUSHES ---_—_— O J
AS NEEDED FOR -- EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE U
Q
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS BUFFER ZONE LINE M
� / W
EXISTING TOE OF BANK
T ® /G / FLOW DIRECTION OF FLOW N z
I CONSTRUCTION ACCESS I,*--- 0
a L �— z
(v
I __ 0
CURB INLET
GRAVEL EXISTING
CONSTRUCTIONSSMH ° d
ENTRANCE
COR STD 20.09
tK
P
EXISTING ST�'c
CURB INLET
O ,
SS Tc1lo
\SS
� s
S
— —
— -EXISTING EASEMENT
r
Q
O
ss
X _x
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING FENCE
x
EXISTING TREE
W
SS
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
U
EXISTING 5'
LOD
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CONCRETE
SF
SILT FENCE
° SIDEWALK
Q
CONTROL POINT
14
EXISTING RIPRAP TO BE REMOVED
DATE:
20 JAN 2016
°
EXISTING BUSHES TO BE REMOVED
NOTE:
CONSTRUCTION
SET
1. CROSS SECTIONS (XS -1 THRU XS -4) SHOWN ON THIS PLAN
ARE FOR OBTAINING EXISTING STREAM DATA.
THESE ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
SCALE:
AND CAN BE FOUND IN THE APPENDIX OF THE REPORT.
20
10 0 20 40
1 "=20'
2. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DATUM ASSUMED.
3. CP# 1 - REBAR ELEV=97.29SHEET
2
CP#2 - CENTER OF MANHOLE RIM ELEV=98.10
SCALE:1"=20'

co
O�
�V C\2 Lo
o Cr)
/ Lo
MICHAEL R & SUSAN B GRAY♦ B �O• \ 'I I
Cico
/ 1721 HUNTING RIDGE RD ♦ �O ��
PIN:1717558761 tiF2� ; _ °D co
W �
♦ / �I I �� NORTH RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB INC.
4f, — 6612 FALLS OF NEUSE RD 1--I
// / — ^ \ \ PIN:1717337989 V �o W
CD
/WCE CP ,x / i�/ j� /y� /� ♦ co
/I
p/
/f�/� / / \ \ ♦ 4R1P
z
co
♦ v
SPREADF///
♦ [� z z
EXIST f GEXCESS EARTH I 4
�/ y / \ ♦ ♦ / TIM R ST PS ♦/ IN THIS AREA O / i /�/ / \ ♦ 4 rE ♦/ ip / / / ♦ ♦ ,n
..
♦ I c ♦® �/ / //CC)
41?
/� // // j II I \� I♦ o // / / i // /� \� ♦4f 4f
4f /
o 0o i EXISTING \
/ I I / /
*, / CENTERLINE \
�XISTING SSMH I oQ / rn % • ; yl /// l� -
RIco
M-98.10 I ., I / o,/ / �
O /
V. IN (SW)=95.50 EXISTING
J I I I I
V. IN (SE)=94.75 I toFFS </NES \ / / , i / / l TOB
I F, ,1`36
v l o
/ j j I \ INV. IN (S)=91.90 \ 1 T 8S, 7`3 / , / M f / / EXISTING
IN;. OUT (N)=91.25 \ 6 ,� i� �)'� //��/ TOE T
EXI,STING \ \ � \ 1 � � � ) � /
DOCK
\' \ 1 FF 1 PROPOSED / / \P... •
O•��. -/-,NF
V41p' o j CLASS I ROCK T dC, .vo
/ / \ a
FH�FcF o j '% • A /��/ i �1 O,p-q/ I / I /' \ 2T ONS���S7 �XISTIPROTECTION
Q p,RTRAP i v�dcQn� �•zcC-')I/,N GVOO27'7`639 9S
? z
CRoOpSS OSFO l / 9 j�ti�F / � / '%��Ii•'••.... BE ;�.
\ TFOR/FF B'9S I / SFC / SAG' `/ ♦ // fnu,It,�
\ ®<F OFF --6W
8 Sp
%q;7� i / fo�
T/ONE /
a , 8 676 I PROPOSED,—/ / / ♦ /
CROSS SECTION q / ♦ //
</
a / I OFFSET F STq, '
/ / I 7S 8' 7x>O �\ I I / / /
/ 1 8 i �o03 / /� ( \ p, CONSTRUCTED oo /
RIFFLE 6/ PHILLIP W & ANN P BETTS J
As N 1tXISTIN S, / / PROPOSED / 1/
7201 N RIDGE DR O o ` CLASS I RIPRAP / PIN:1717559691
\ I FSFT,FSTq� PAVER
7�>9 > i, I PATI(? PR
OPOSED ' �� /♦
° 1 O F i�`c CSP I 1 kOs T/O / 1 O
S SEC r ,
1 G/� GT 2 q, 7�8s4' \ I PFS P SEQ N C PROTECT EXITING / ♦ O v
a ORO T RlO �/F 1 Q i I C SSS. CTION B 4" CI P SS LATERAL FROM / / �� w
<4 T� 1 I ( I I ` � � � EQUIPMENT LOAD. � rr ��
NS/T/OS / �r SGS P REPLACE IF AMAGED V
� � 0
° 1 EXISTING EXISTING
° CO
Q 1 HOUSE 4" CPP o 0 0 /� / J, / ,
EXISTING z
CONCRETE ♦ �—
DRIVE�� Z
�.
VEGETATED GEOGRID LIFTS z
TOP OF ROCK BASE ELEV.=97.0 w
° ♦ I 11ST LIFT (25 LF) TOP ELEV.=98.0 J
°(0% 4"BIRO ♦ I A \ \ �p ��� 2ND LIFT (24 LF) TOP ELEV.=99.0
PROPOSED r
I // , ♦ \ \ I II \ \�� 0
'�ROPOSED CLASS I ROCK TOE (y
/ i _ _ ♦ I I 11 1 \ / ��\ / CLASS I RIPRAP PROTECTION T U
/ // � v ♦ I I I /� � 1 \ � /TRANSITION 0
BVSHES USHES i
LEGEND:
/ )
\Y/ ��� PROPOSED CLASS I RIPRAP
�Op \ \ \ \\ \\ / \ \��� PROPOSED CLASS I ROCK TOE/BANK PROTECTION
I I \ 5 DOGI VOOD
\ / / / CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
rp
I 1 1 DOGWOOD/ / , O� / \ \ \ / \\ PROPOSED GEOGRID LIFTS
32"OAK ��\\ ® DATE: 20 JAN 2016
C-9 I 1 1 / \ / \��� 94 PROPOSED CONTOUR
�Oc I I 11 \ \� CONSTRUCTION SET
\ O /
cO /
32" PINE/ /I\ 14"OAK SCALE: -
10
10 5 0 10 20 1 -
-c-)BUSHE / / � �,
SCALE: 1"=10'
SHEET 3
\ /

4A
/ 4f NORTH RLDGE—COUNTRY CLUB INC.
—6612 FALLS—DF-N€US� RD
i / ♦ / I — — PIN -1717337989
�/
/ /I
o
4D
/ y /
// // ♦�/ // / ♦ i� 41f
/4fo / 40' EB
\ I / ♦ / / k/ �� / I 41f
I N♦ I /o Ji I ✓ I / I IN,
I I I o I 1 l i / \—�i
4fCD 40'
4/ cl�o 1**
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
/00,/ CLASS I ROCK TOE
PROTECTION
\ \O
I /
h o �/ ♦/ I /
\ 1 40'IF
I /
it
a-------------
/WCHAEL R & SUSAN B GRAY /,q,�
1721 HUF'ING RIDGE RD/ /
PIN:1717558761 i
\ I /
/
O \ 1 I
/T/1'
NOTES:
Permanent Riparian Seed Mix Zone A
Scientific Name
Common Name
Percent
Elymus hystrix
Bottlebrush grass
15
Panicum anceps
Beaked panic grass
15
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
10
Bidens frondosa
Devil's beggartick
10
Coreopsis lanceolata
Lanceleaf tickseed
10
Dichanthelium candestinum Deertongue
10
Andropogon gerardii
Big bluestem
5
Juncus effuses
Common rush
5
Vernonia noveboracensis
Ironweed
5
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little bluestem
5
Sorgastrum nutans
Indian grass
5
Tripsicurn dactyloides
Gamma grass
5
ERNST PIEDMONT RIPARIAN SEED MIX MAY ALSO BE USED
Temporary Seed Mix to be Sown Simultaneously With the
Permanent Seed in Zone A & B
Grass Type Time ofYearto Plant Planting Rate (lbs/acre)
Rye Grain August 15 - May 1 15
Brown -top millet May 1 - August 15 15
�1 �0 \ / 1. PLANTING ZONE A STREAM BANK TO BE PLANTED WITH A COMBINATION
OF THE FOLLOWING SMALL TREES/SHRUBS:
(ROOTED PLANT PLUGS/TUBLINGS-12-18" IN HEIGHT)
C-700 EROSION /
CONTROL MATTING / // 36 PLANTS (3' ON CENTER SPACING)
I (Ir- / AND ZONEA, �� / ♦ LINDERA BENZOIN - SPICEBUSH (9 PLANTS)
�\ ll \o / ���` .� ^ / �, ILEX VERTICILLATA _ WINTERBERRY HOLLY (9 PLANTS)
CORNUS AMOMUM SILKY DOGWOOD (9 PLANTS)
ALNUS SERRULATA - TAG ALDER (9 PLANTS)
2. PLANTING VEGETATED GEOGRID LIFTS -PLANTS PER LINEAR FOOT = 60
EUSE A QUAL COMBI STION OF THE ABOVE PLANT SPECIES FOR ZONE A IN
AMOU3. CONTRACTOR TO REPLANT DISTURBED AREA IN ZONE B (0.07 AC)
EXISTING GSS ON SITE (NO TREES OR SHRUBS
REQUIRED FOR ZONE B)
\\\ / 4. PLANTING STOCK TO BE GROWN BY NURSERIES WITHIN THE SAME
PHILLIP W & ANN P BETTS PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGION (PIEDMONT) AND WITHIN 200 MILES OF THE
7201 N RIDGE DR PROJECT SITE.
PIN:1717559691 5. FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS:
LIME X2 TON/AC.
PHOSPHATE 20-40 LBS/AC.
POTASH 50-70 LBS/AC.
60 i // \\ WATERING REQUIREMENTS ONCE/WEEK IF NO RAIN
6. USE ONLY SHRUBS IN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
(NO TREES). 10 EITHER SIDE OF SANITARY SEWER LINE.
7. PLANT SUBSTITUTES OR THE USE OF LIVE STAKES WILL REQUIRE
C-700 EROSION\\ APPROVAL BY DESIGNER PRIOR TO ORDERING.
CONTROL MATTING / \\ 8. CONTRACTOR MAY USE RIPARIAN SEED MIX AS SHOWN IN THE TABLE
AND ZONE A / \�\ ABOVE OR EARNEST CONSERVATION SEEDS PIEDMONT RIPARIAN SEED MIX.
APPLICATION RATE 25 LBS PER ACRE.
I 1 PLANTING ZONES
I 1 \\\
\�� 0 EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND ZONE A (516 SF.)
ZONE B (2,895 SF.)
CLASS I ROCK TOE PROTECTION
. - CLASS I RIPRAP
0 EXISTING RIPRAP
® PROPOSED GEOGRID LIFTS
10 5 0 10 20
SCALE: 1"=10'
VCO 0
Lo �
I LO
�o
AJ
00 00
� L.I ao
1--I
�I rn o G4
�co
C\2
I �
to
O
�zb�
F --I
W I4 C\2
C-+ w W z
1-4
+ L N
CO
Q
z
J
O
Q
U
O
z
w
J
U-
0
ri,
u
DATE:
20 JAN 2016
CONSTRUCTION SET
SCALE:
SHEET 4

U �0
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION A
p-+ o in
AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
0 0
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION D
�-+ 00 00
W rn rn
AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM[�]
00
107
2 -
107
106
.-1VSLOPE
VATION 102
106
103
-
103
105
TIE INTO
0.5
105
102
101
3 2 2 4 1.0 1.8
102
101
104
102 CONTOUR103
1.0 2.0
104
1103
100
\
100
w
co o
102
- -
STABILIZE BANK WITH C700 COIR FIBER BLANKET
102
99
`
99
� +Q)'
101
SEED AND STRAW UNDER MAT
101
98
98
0 4
100
100
97
------
_ _
-' 97
99
1 SOIL IFTS _ - _ -
99
96
PROPOSE GRADE _
EXISTING GRADE
96
co
z % c
98
__ -
-
98
95
95
~ W
97
_ _ .
XISTING GRADE
97
94
CLASS I ROCK TOE
94
go
W z
96
MINIMIZE 2 :
SLOPE
♦
96
93
PROTECTION BA K
93
a
95
I
..
95
92
PROTECTION
92
ro
�o
BEGIN
94
J
91
� LO
93
RIPRAP TO
POCK
OTEGTION
93
90
z
90
aCO cd
d� fx
92
LEVATION 97. FT.
MINIMUM
92
89
Q �
=
89
0
91CLASS
I ROCK TOE
w 00
91
$$
Lj_ w
$$
U
910
TI
8g
86
,7 0 w
87
30%LASS A RIP -1-
d
86
Q
88
sTONEPRIGR TC)�
w
gg
0+80
0+85 0+90 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15
1+20 1+25
87
CE
87
��\1
86
e w
86
0+80
0+85 0+90
0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20
1+25
1+30
o'•4'
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION Bim:'
P�
�"'
AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION E
J�
w
TIE INTO
AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
:z.
cnCf)- c�
_ '�, c
104
102 CONTOUR
0.5��d
1.0.1.0,
104
103
103
�- °ti .. ••''� ��
0
STABILIZE BANK WITH C700 COIR FIBER BLANK' T
1 3
102
102
.g 3.4
102%%
8
101
SEED AND STRA UNDER MAT
101
101
—
101
100
1' SOIL LIFTS
___100
100 -
99
END 2HA V SLOPE
_ - - -
_ _ _
99
99-
98
98
98
AT ELEVATION 102
N.
98
97
- - -
- - _ - - - 97
Q
97
�
97
gg
- ---
96
Z
96
96
95
PROPOSEP _ - E ISTING GRAD
95
95
95
94J
PROPOSED CL
94
94
94
93
ROCK TOE
93
0
0
93
TO El EV 97.0
3,
BEGIN
93
192
92
PROTECTION
92
Q
92
91
w
91
Q
91
SS I ROCK TOE PROTECTION w
91
90
Z
90
V
90
WITH 30% CLASS A RIPRAP z o
90
gg
LO
=
89
$g
STONE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT
TO Q rn
$g
11.
W Z
$$
FILL VOIDS
`'��'.
$$
8$
� W
$$
O
87
—
w -
87
86
�' w
86
86
86
0+80
0+85 0+90 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15
1+20 1+25
0
0+80
0+85 0+90
0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20
1+25
1+30
cr U
W
z
� �
Z
_
F--
0
(J)
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION C
Z 0
W
AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
= cr
J
U
<
103
0.5103
102
`��
1.0 1.01.0
102
T
N
101
101
LL
100
��
-
_
-100
r
0
99
99
_
1' SOIL LI _TS
ji
98 STABILIZE BANK WITH
_ - - _ -
g$
to-
C700 COIR FIBER BLANKET
96
EXISTING GRADE
96
w
_j
,
`J
EED AND STRAW
95UNDER MAT-
_
-
95
94
RIPRA
— EXISTING 4"
94
Q
93
TOE
3' EWE .LA
93
O
DATE:
91
CONSTRUCTED RIFF E
g1
Ci;4D
>
20 JAN 2016
g0 CLASS I ROC TOE w o 90
89
PROTECTION MIX WITH
z
89
N
CONSTRUCTION SET
88
30% CLASS RIPRAP
= „
STONE PRIO
11
w w
88
$7
PLACEMENT
(_u w
— 87
to
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1 "=5'
"=5'
86
$6
VERTICAL 1
0+80
0+85 0+90
0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20
1+25
1+30
5 2.5
0 5
10
SHEET 5
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 "=5'

STREAM
BANK
1VI
2H
722131910M2102iVAILTI-1V12
121NO GIN11d•IryIIINQM�lI00
— END TOE PROTECTION AT BANKFULL ELEVATION
NEL
NOTE:
POOL SECTIONS WILL VARY IN HEIGHT TO BANKFULL
ELEVATION FROM 2' TO 4'.
2' MAX HEIGHT
IN RIFFLE SECTIONS
2'��
TRFNI('P
+� r
1'-0"
r
� 1
T KE AT 3' 5�'
A —
INTERVALS
r w//
ANCHOR TRENCH
ODEN STAKES
CHECK SLOT AT 25'
INTERVALS (MIN)
ISOMETRIC VI
INITIAL CHANNEL ANCHOR TRENCH INTERMITTENT CHECK SLOT
NOTES:
1. CHECK SLOTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 25' INTERVALS.
2. ALL MATTING TO BE SECURED WITH WOODEN STAKES
ACCORDING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS AT 5' INTERVALS.
3. FABRIC OVERLAP WHEN 2 ROWS OF MATERIAL ARE USED SHALL
BE PLACED WITH THE UPPER ROW OF MATERIAL PLACED OVER
THE LOWER ROW OF MATERIAL.
4. TRENCH MATTING AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF MAT AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL
5. OVERLAP FABRIC IN DIRECTION OF FLOW WITH MATTING
UPSTREAM ON TOP OF DOWNSTREAM MAT.
6. MATTING WILL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE
SPECIFICATIONS.
1
L�_S
ROCK TOE PROTECTION
2
COIR MATS -CHANNEL INSTALLATION
NOT TO SCALE
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
TERMINAL
SLOPE AND CHANNEL
� 1
T KE AT 3' 5�'
A —
INTERVALS
r w//
ANCHOR TRENCH
ODEN STAKES
CHECK SLOT AT 25'
INTERVALS (MIN)
ISOMETRIC VI
INITIAL CHANNEL ANCHOR TRENCH INTERMITTENT CHECK SLOT
NOTES:
1. CHECK SLOTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 25' INTERVALS.
2. ALL MATTING TO BE SECURED WITH WOODEN STAKES
ACCORDING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS AT 5' INTERVALS.
3. FABRIC OVERLAP WHEN 2 ROWS OF MATERIAL ARE USED SHALL
BE PLACED WITH THE UPPER ROW OF MATERIAL PLACED OVER
THE LOWER ROW OF MATERIAL.
4. TRENCH MATTING AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF MAT AS SHOWN IN
DETAIL
5. OVERLAP FABRIC IN DIRECTION OF FLOW WITH MATTING
UPSTREAM ON TOP OF DOWNSTREAM MAT.
6. MATTING WILL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE
SPECIFICATIONS.
1
L�_S
ROCK TOE PROTECTION
2
COIR MATS -CHANNEL INSTALLATION
NOT TO SCALE
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
5' TAIL LENGTH
13'
9'
J
H
_`'
J
L_
_j
STREAM FLOW
EXISTING
W
U_
W
CHANNEL
PROPOSED
O
U_ A��
CHANNEL
CENTERLINE
I?
z
RIFFLE SLOPE
_ –II
III II�11=
A
SLOPE 3H:1 V RIFFLE
NOTES:
TAPER ROCK FROM
1. RIFFLE STONE MIX SHALL CONSIST OF
BOTTOM OF TRENCH TO MIX
LONGITUDINAL
VIEW 70% - CLASS I RIP RAP (5"-17", AVG 10")
DEPTH "B' AT
NTS
25% - CLASS A STONE (2"-6", AVG 4")
END OF RIFFLE
5% - #57 STONE
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IN THE TRENCH THE STONE
SHALL BE MIXED TOGETHER WITH SOIL FROM THE SITE.
THE SOIL PROVIDES FINES TO SEAL THE VOIDS OF THE
STONE MATERIAL. THE MIX SHALL BE PLACED IN THE
TRENCH TO THE DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN IN THE
DETAIL AND LENGTHS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN
DRAWINGS.
111111 \\
B=18"
SECTION VIEW "A -A"
NTS
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
41
JSCALE: NOT TO SCALE
5 1
A SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
PLANTING DETAILS
SEEDLING / LINER BARER❑❑T PLANTING DETAIL
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR
HEALING IN
1. Locate a healing -In site In a shady, well
protected area.
2. Excavate a flat bottom trench
12' deep and provide drainage.
Y7
3. Backfill the trench with 2' well
rotted sawdust. Place a 2' layer of
well rotted sawdust at a sloping angle
atone end of the trench.
4. Place a single layer of plants
nppalnst the slopping end so that
tRe root collar is at ground level.
: ­ , eq
5. Place a 2' layer of well rotted
sawdust over the the maintaining
a sloping angle.
6. Repeat layers of plants and sawdust
as necessary and water thoroughly.
a
2'
1. Ins rt planting bar 2. Remove plantin bar 3 Insert planting bar
as smFiown and pull handle and place seedling at 2' toward planter
toward planter. correct depth. from seedling.
4. Pull handle of bar 5. Push handle forward 6 Leave compaction
toward lanter, firming firming soil at to hole open. Water
soil at �ottom. g g p' thoroughly.
PLANTING NOTES:
PLANTING BAG
During planting, seedlin s
shall �oe kept -In a molsiI
canvas bn or similar
container o prevent the
root systems from drying.
3 REFORESTATION DETAIL
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
KBC PLANTING BAR
la tin ar shall have a
la�e w�t a triangular
cross section and shall
be 12' ion 4s wide and
1' thick a center.
ROOT PRUNING
All seedlings shall be root
pruned, If necessary, so that
no roots extend more than
10 Inches (10') be,
the
root collar.
U C\20
co0
I I
00
0000
W rn rn
H� rX4
�00
� O
h---1 I
U
U] O
�zbco
W Qi G\2
F--1
E-� w Q) z
04
CD
00
4 a
O
0
Q
O
Ir
w
cD
0
Ir
0
z
z
D
T
N
T
Q
W
0
Q
z
J
O
I..L
Q
U
o�
O
z
LL
O
U
DATE:
20 JAN 2016
CONSTRUCTION SET
SCALE:
NTS
SHEET 6