20120773 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

Design and Monitoring Firm
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: Adam Spiller
Email: [e-mail]
Project No: 20110675
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 2015— MY02

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT................................................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................2
3.0 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................2
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure1. Vicinity Map...................................................................................................................4
Figure2. Site Asset Map................................................................................................................5
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits...................................................................6
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History..........................................................................7
Table 3. Project Contacts Table....................................................................................................7
Table 4. Project Attribute Table....................................................................................................8
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
CurrentCondition Plan View....................................................................................................................10
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment..........................................................12
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment..................................................................................14
StreamStation Photos...............................................................................................................................15
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos...........................................................................................................23
ProblemArea Photos................................................................................................................................ 21
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment...............................................................................27
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata.......................................................................................28
Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species...............................................29
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section Plots..........................................................................................................
Longitudinal Profile Plots................................................................................................
PebbleCount Plots...........................................................................................................
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table ..................................................
Table 11 a. Cross -Section Morphology Data Table .................................................
Table 11 b. Stream Reach Morphology Data Table ..................................................
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events .....................................
Stream Hydrographs.................................................................................
64
65
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 i 2015— MY02

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site is a full -delivery project that was developed for the North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Construction was completed in November 2013. The site restored 4,484
linear feet and implemented 109 linear feet of enhancement on four tributaries to Irish Buffalo Creek in the
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. The project is located west of China Grove and north of Kannapolis off of Saw
Road in Rowan County (Figure 1, Appendix A). This project will expand aquatic and terrestrial habitat in the
Rocky River Watershed (03040105). The project is within the 03040105020040 Irish Buffalo Creek Local
Watershed Unit (14 -digit HUC) (NCDENR, EEP 2009). In the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services'
(DMS) most recent publication of excluded and Targeted Local Watersheds/Hydrologic Units, the
03040105020040 14 -digit HUC has been identified as a Targeted Local Watershed. The project is located in the
Piedmont Physiographic Province and the project streams initiate as headwater systems out of moderately -sloped,
forested hills before reaching the floodplain of Irish Buffalo Creek. The site's 0.72 -square mile watershed is
mostly pasture and mixed hardwoods with small pockets of rural residential development. Prior to construction
the site was actively used for timber and cattle production for over five generations.
The project goals and objectives are listed below.
Project Goals
• Restore a diverse riparian corridor that connects forested stream systems upstream and downstream of the
project.
• Reduce the sediment supply entering Irish Buffalo Creek.
Project Objectives
• Restore stable channel planforms to streams that have been straightened and modified.
• Reshape and stabilize eroding stream banks.
• Plant the site with native trees to help reestablish a diverse riparian corridor.
• Install exclusion fencing and alternative watering options to keep livestock out of the project streams.
Vegetation success is based on the criteria established in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003). This
document states that vegetation monitoring results should have the following planted stem density minimums in
the corresponding monitoring years: 320 stems/acre through Year Three, 288 stems/acre in Year Four, and 260
stems/acre in Year Five. The second -year vegetation monitoring was based on the Level 2 CVS-EEP vegetation
monitoring protocol. The site's average density for this monitoring period is 445 planted stems/acre, with none of
the plots having live stakes planted in them. Twelve of the thirteen plots had greater than 320 planted stems/acre.
There is one monitoring plot that has calculated planted stem densities less than 320 stems/acre; (Plot 6). This is
not seen as problematic given the high potential for desirable volunteers to become established in the plots and
across the site. Like natural vegetative communities, some areas will have slightly higher densities than others,
but the data from the vegetation monitoring plots reveal that the site has an adequate average stem density. To
ensure continued vegetative success, some parts of the site received supplemental planting in early 2015.
Including volunteers, the monitoring plots averaged 1,068 total stems/acre. The overall vegetation assessment
found the site to be on track to meeting the vegetative success criterion.
Second -year monitoring found the Jacob's Landing Site to be stable, with only minor changes from the as -built
conditions. Two small areas of bank erosion are present on T1, but these areas appear to be isolated instances of
erosion and do not represent a systematic problem. The monitoring components were installed in February/March
2014. Two automatic recording gauges have been installed along T1 and T2. The stream gauge on Tl recorded
several bankfull events during 2015, and although the gauge on T2 did not record any, there was clear evidence of
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 1 2015— MY02

a recent bankfull event during the end of year site visit in December. The monitoring plan for each tributary is as
follows: T1 has a 1,500 foot longitudinal profile, 3 riffle cross-sections, and 1 pool cross-section; T2 has a 1,500
foot longitudinal profile, 5 riffle cross-sections and 2 pool cross-sections; T1A and T2A are being monitored
visually since they are short reaches and small channels. Pebble counts were conducted at all eleven cross-
sections. Ten permanent photo reference points have been established with a total of twenty-two photos to be
taken annually. The second year of monitoring found the site to be functioning as designed and all of these
features show little change from the baseline conditions.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related
to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report
appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the
Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan documents available on the DMSs website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The survey data were collected with a total station instrument between August 4 and August 12, 2015.
Some of the cross-sections have shown minor settling in the floodplain. The bankfull elevations at these cross-
sections have not been changed to reflect this. For calculating cross-sectional morphologic data the cross-section
width has been limited to a width that appropriately reflects the top of bank location so as not to inaccurately
skew data.
The CVS-EEP protocol, Level 2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data from
the site. The vegetation monitoring was completed on July 28, 2015.
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2 (bU:Hcvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Priorities 2009. Raleigh, NC.
hqp://www.nceep.net/services/restplans/Yadkin Pee Dee _RBRP_2009_Final.pdf
USACE. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 2 2015— MY02

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 3 2015— MY02

i
`
miles. Take Exit 68 toward China Grove on US -29
ro
I.
�i
approximately 5 miles and then turn left onto Saw
I
Road. The site will be approximately 0.5 -mile ahead
�
on the right.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration
-11
Ra
Program (EEP) and is encompassed by a recorded
conservation easement, but is bordered by land under
pa..
Leo'et
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary
and therefore access by the general public is not
o!
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state
and federal agencies or their designeesicontractors
_
involved in the deveiopment, oversight and
-
stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within
- —
the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any
-
intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and
activities requires prior coordination with EEP.
_
DAVIE
KANNAPOLISI '.
�1
29
136
F
152 -1
I 15
N
IO
� I
7
ym
To reach the site from Raleigh: proceed west on 1-40 tee,
for approximately 62 miles. Then travel on 1-85 south
t d H h P tlCh I tt f t l 50
owar ig oin aro a or approxima e y
`
miles. Take Exit 68 toward China Grove on US -29
ro
south. Turn right on NC -152 on East Church Street for
approximately 5 miles and then turn left onto Saw
—
Road. The site will be approximately 0.5 -mile ahead
l.. —
on the right.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration
-11
site of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) and is encompassed by a recorded
conservation easement, but is bordered by land under
private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary
and therefore access by the general public is not
�1-
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state
and federal agencies or their designeesicontractors
_
involved in the deveiopment, oversight and
-
stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within
- —
the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any
-
intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and
activities requires prior coordination with EEP.
_
DAVIE
KANNAPOLISI '.
IREDELL DAVIDSON-
29
136
ROWAN
yS
CABARRUS STANLY rn �'Q1�CE1 elft
FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP N
0 0-75 5 JACOB'S LANDING STREAM RESTORATION SITE
mi' s EEP PROJECT # 95024, ROWAN COUNTY, NC
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 4 2015- MY02

Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 5 2015— MY02

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Miti ation Credits
Non-
Nitrogen
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
riparian
Buffer
Nutrient
Wetland
Offset
Type
R
EII
Length
4,484
109
Credits
4,484
44
TOTAL
4,528
CREDITS
Project
Com onents
Project
Design
Existing
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Component
Stationing/
Footage
Approach
Restoration
Footage
Mitigation
-or-
Location
(pI PH etc.)
Equivalent
Ratio
Reach ID
T1
10+00 — 13+03
326
P2
Restoration
303
1:1
T1
13+52 —14+61
158
-
Enhancement II
109*
1:2.5
T1
14+61 —23+54
846
P2
Restoration
893
1:1
T1A
40+00 —41+78
294
P2
Restoration
178
1:1
T2
50+00 —77+45
2,935
P2
Restoration
2,645*
1:1
T2A
100+00 —104+65
465
P2
Restoration
465
1:1
Component
Summation
Restoration
Stream
Mitigation
Units (SMU)
Level
(linear feet)
Total Restoration
4,484
4,484
Total
Enhancement II
109
44
TOTAL SMU
4,528
*Mitigation units have been calculated to exclude the easement exceptions and water utility easements.
Though not formal BMPs, several small water quality detention structures were installed throughout the project to improve
water quality from the surrounding drainage area.
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 6 2015— MY02

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Sept 12
Final Design - Construction Plans
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dec 12
Construction
Nov 13
Planting
Fax: [phone]
Jan 14
Baseline Monitoring/Report
Feb/March 14
April 14
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 14
Nov 14
Supplemental Planting
March 15
Year 2 Monitoring
August 15
Dec 15
Table 3. Project Contacts
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Design Firm
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting, LLC
160 Walker Road
Lawndale, NC 28090
Contact: Mr. Stephen James
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor
Forestree Management Co.
1280 Maudis Road
Bailey, NC 27807
Contact: Mr. Tony Cortez
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -00 - MY -02
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 7 2015— MY02

Table 4. Project Information
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration
Site, DMS Project # 95024
Project Name
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
County
Rowan County
Project Area (acres)
13.9 acres
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.)
35.552956 N, 80.653116 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03040105
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 03040105020040
DWQ Sub -basin
13-17-09
Project Drainage Area
459 acres/0.72 square miles
Project Drainage Area Percentage
o
2.3 /o / 6 acres
of Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification
4.8% Cultivated, 60.1% Managed Herbaceous Cover, and 35.1% Mixed Upland Hardwoods.
Reach Summary Information (Post -Restoration)
Parameters
T1
TIA
T2
T2A
Length of reach (linear feet)
1,305
178
2,645
465
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (acres)
258.6 acres
136.9 acres
200.6 acres
35.7 acres
NCDWQ Water Quality
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Classification
Morphological Description (stream
C4
134c/C4
C4
134c/C4
type)
Evolutionary trend
Stage II
Stage II
Stage II
Stage II
Constructed
(Constructed)
(Constructed)
(Constructed)
Mapped Soil Series
Chewacla loam
Chewacla loam
Pacolet sandy loam
Pacolet sandy loam
and Chewacla loam
Drainage class
Poorly drained
Well drained
Poor to Well drained
Well drained
Soil Hydric status
Non hydric
Non hydric
Non hydric
Non hydric
Sloe
0-2%
0-2%
0-2%
0-2%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Piedmont Alluvial
Piedmont Alluvial
Piedmont Alluvial
Mesic Mixed
Forest
Forest
Forest
Hardwood Forest
Percent composition of exotic
0%
0%
0%
0%
invasive vegetation
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section
Yes
Yes, received 404 permit.
N/A
404
Waters of the United States — Section
Yes
Yes, received 401 permit.
N/A
401
Endangered Species Act
No
N/A
N/A
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act*
N/A
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management
No
N/A
Act (CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Floodplain development permit obtained
N/A
through Rowan County
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 8 2015— MY02

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 9 2015— MY02

LEGEND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
CROSS-SECTION (XS)
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING DENSITY CRITERION
VEG PLOT BELOW DENSITY CRITERION
"r, 723/511 VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY
*0 PHOTO POINT (PP)
GAUGE LOCATION
IMAGE SOURCE: NC 2014 STATEWIDE ORTHOIMAGERY
) XS6 ID
BEGIN NC GR
I NAD '83
REACH T2
BEGIN
pxpo 00" vPl PROFILE T2a.
PP6 -80' -40'0' 8 160'
p
GRAPHIC SCALE
XS7
VP2
PP7
VP3
0
50 FEET Ile 00
EASEMENT a VP6
EXCEPTION C,
XS8 x xsli>o--,.
GAUGE 2)
+
XS9
PP8
VP4
VP5
P pq
VP7
END
DDnril F: T'D ------
. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% ?VF
19

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Assessed Len th 2,389 Reach - Tl
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
substrate
21
21
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
14
16
88%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
14
16
88%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
(Run)
11
11
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
10
10
100%
2. Bank
I. Scoured/Eroding?
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
40
99%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
°
100/o
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
2
99%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
boulders or logs.
6
6
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
6
6
°
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
sills or arms.
0
0
N/A
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for
6
6
100%
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
0
0
N/A
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 12 2015 — MY02

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Assessed Len th 2,084 Reach -T2
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing as
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
substrate
23
65%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
26
26
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
26
26
100%
owns rem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position*
L halweg centering at upstream of meander bend
N/A
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/EYoding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
100
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
boulders or logs.
L�
S
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
I g
o
100/o
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
sills or arms.
I
I
o
100/o
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for
6
6
100%
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.60
L
0
N/A
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
1
*Due to this reach's small size and the scale of the pattern, the exact position of the thalweg in relation
to the meanders and morphological features is inconsistent and not practical to evaluate
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 13 2015 — MY02

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
IJacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Planted Acreage 12.83 Easement Acreage 13.9
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
% of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody
Pattern and
1. Bare Areas
0.1 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
and herbaceous material.
Color
Woody stem densities clearly below
2. Low Stem Density
Pattern and
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0.1 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
Areas
Color
stem count criteria.
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor
Pattern and
class that are obviously small given
0.25 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
Growth Rates or Vigor
Color
the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
4. Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
1,000 SF
0
0.00
0.0%
Concern render as polygons at map scale).
Color
5. Easement
Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale).
none
Color
0
0.00
0.0%
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 14 2015 — MY02

Stream Station Photos
Photo Point lu: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Photo Point ld: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point ld: MY -02 —12/17/15
Photo Point 1 Tributary: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 1 Tributary: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 15 2015— AI -Y02

Photo Point 2u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 2u: MY -02 —12/17/15
Photo Point 2d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 2d: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Photo Point 3u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 3u: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 16 2015— AI -Y02

Photo Point 3d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 3d: MY -02 —12/17/15
Photo Point 4u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 4u: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Photo Point 4d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 4d: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 17 2015— AI -Y02

Photo Point 5u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 5u: MY -02 —12/17/15
Photo Point 5d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 5d: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Photo Point 6u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 6u: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 18 2015— AI -Y02

Photo Point 6d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 6d: MY -02 —12/17/15
Photo Point 7u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 7u: MY -02 —12/17/15
Photo Point 7d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 7d: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 19 2015— AI -Y02

Photo Point 8u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 8u: MY -02 —12/17/15
Photo Point 8d: MY -00 3/11/14
Photo Point 8d: MY -02 12/17/15
Photo Point 9u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 9u: MY -02 —12/17/15
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 20 2015—MY02

Photo Point 9d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 9d: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Photo Point 9 Tributary: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 9 Tributary: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Photo Point 10u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 10u: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 21 2015— AI -Y02

Photo Point 10d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 10d: MY -02 — 12/17/15
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 22 2015— AI -Y02

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 3 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 5 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 2 Photo: 7/28/15 — W02
Plot 4 Photo: 7/28/15 — W02
Plot 6 Photo: 7/28/15 — W02
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 23 2015— MY02

Plot 7 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 9 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 11 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 8 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 10 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 12 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 24 2015— MY02

Plot 13 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 25 2015— AI -Y02

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 26 2015— MY02

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Monitoring Year 02
Planted Stem Density
(stems/acre)
Monitoring Year 02
Total Stem Density
(stems/acre)
1 Yes
324
769
2 Yes
567
567
3 Yes
324
526
4 Yes
324
1,619
5 Yes
405
445
6 No
283
445
7 Yes
688
2,752
8 Yes
324
405
9 Yes
486
1,214
10 Yes
486
607
11 Yes
567
2,347
12 Yes
526
931
13 Yes
486
1,255
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 27 2015— MY02

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Report Prered By
Bethany Williams
Date Prepared
7/29/2015 15:49
database name
KCI-2014-L.mdb
database location
M:\2011\20110675-Jacobs Landin \Monitorin \Ve etaton CVS Database
computer name
12-3ZV4FP1
file size
162001152
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEET'S
IN THIS DOCUMENT-----
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary ofproject(s) and
project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each lot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -----------------
Project Code 95024
project Name Jacob's Landing
Description Stream Restoration Site
River Basin Yadkin-Pee Dee
length(ft) 4593
areas m 0.72
Required Plots calculate 13
,SampledPlots 13
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 28 2015— A1 -Y02

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
95024-01-0001
95024-01-0002
95024-01-0003
95024-01-0004
95024-01-0005
95024-01-0006
95024-01-0007
95024-01-0008
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer ne undo
Boxelder
Tree
Baccharis halimifolia
Eastern Baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
1
11
11
1 11
2
1 2
2
1 5
5
1 5
1
5
1 5
5
1 10
10
1 10
Callicar a americana
American Beautyberry
Shrub
Dios ros vir iniana
Common Persimmon
Tree
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
Juglans nigra
Black Walnut
Tree
3
Juni ecus vir iniana
Eastern Redcedar
Tree
1
1
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
11
5
31
3
46
2
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tuli tree
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
7
7
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus
Oak
Tree
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus palustris
Pin Oak
Tree
5
5
5
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
7
7
7
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Ste ms pe r ACRE
8
8
19
14
14
14
8
8
13
8
8
40
10
10
11
7
7
11
17
17
68
8
8
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
2
2
3
1 2
2
2
5
5
6
1 3
3
5
3
3
4
2
2
4
4
4
7
2
323.75
323.7
1768.91566.561566.61566.61
323.75
323.7
526.1
323.75
323.7
1619
404.69
404.7
445.2
283.28
283.3
445.2
687.97
688
2752
323.75
±Ld
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 29 2015— MY02

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species (Continued)
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
95024-01-0009
95024-01-0010
95024-01-0011
95024-01-0012
95024-01-0013
MY2 (2015)
MY1 (2014)
MYO (2014)
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
1
Acer ne undo
Boxelder
Tree
1
1
4
6
3
Baccharis halimi olia
Eastern Baccharis
Shrub
1
1
2
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
7
1
1
1
42
42
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
Callicar a americana
American Beau berry
Shrub
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9
9
11
11
12
Diospyros vir iniana
Common Persimmon
Tree
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
9
9
9
1
1
1
Juglans nigra
Black Walnut
Tree
3
Juni ecus vir iniana
Eastern Redcedar
Tree
4
Li uidambar sryraciflua
Sweetgurn
Tree
15
3
35
9
11
171
272
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tuh tree
Tree
1
3
3
3
3
10
11
11
17
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
1
2
16
16
19
21
21
32
3
3
3
Quercus
Oak
Tree
11
11
11
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
4
1
1
1
Quercus palustris
Pin Oak
Tree
5
5
5
5
5
5
Quercus hellos
Willow Oak
Tree
7
7
7
7
7
7
10
10
10
10
10
10
46
46
46
41
41
41
54
54
54
Quercus rubra
Northem Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
5
5
5
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
133
133
133
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
12
12
30
12
12
15
14
14
58
13
13
23
12
12
31
143
143
343
149
149
444
246
246
246
1 1 1 1 1 13 13 13
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.32
3
37 3
3
4 4
4
9 4
4 6 3
3 7 11
11 17 11
11 14 6
6
6
485.62
485.6 1214 485.62
485.6
607 566.56
1566.6
1 2347 526.091
526.1 930.8 485.62
1485.61 1255 445.15
1445.211068 463.83
1463.811382 765.79
765.8
765.8
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 30 2015— MY02

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Ass,
DMS Project # 95024 31

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
800.58
3.3
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Landin
Date:
h
XS ID
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS -1, Riffle (T1)
795.70
21.3
Drainage
23.3
795.54
25.5
795.15
26.5
794.63
27.2
794.48
27.7
794.48
27.9
794.49
a_4
794.50
29.5
794.66
30.7
795.04
33.3
795.71
38.2
795.58
44.1
795.89
48.1
796.20
52.7
797.24
57.6
799.10
60.8
799.85
64.2
799.74
64.7
799.88
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -1, Riffle (T1)
802
800
798
-------------------------------------------------
- -
- -
------------
s
0
796 ---------------
---------- -------
---•Bankfull
Gy
- - - • Flood Prone Area
794
As -Built, 2/25/14
MY -01, 10/27/14
+ MY -02, 8/11/15
792
0 10
20 30 40 50
60
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
800.58
3.3
800.03
Area (s mi):
0.37
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
800.58
3.3
800.03
7.2
799.33
11.0
797.43
14.1
796.28
18.5
795.70
21.3
795.82
23.3
795.54
25.5
795.15
26.5
794.63
27.2
794.48
27.7
794.48
27.9
794.49
28.9
794.50
29.5
794.66
30.7
795.04
33.3
795.71
38.2
795.58
44.1
795.89
48.1
796.20
52.7
797.24
57.6
799.10
60.8
799.85
64.2
799.74
64.7
799.88
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
795.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftZ):
8.7
Bankfull Width (ft):
12.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
797.2
Flood Prone Width (ft):
40.7
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft :
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.7
W / D Ratio:
16.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
;1
XS -2, Riffle (Tl)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.38
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
0 T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.46
1.8
794.31
10.8
792.36
17.1
792.30
27.9
792.20
34.3
792.21
36.1
792.19
37.3
792.43
39.2
792.10
40.1
791.59
41.5
791.25
42.2
791.04
42.6
790.92
43.1
790.98
43.7
791.05
44.2
790.89
44.5
790.94
45.0
790.98
45.9
790.97
47.0
791.76
48.3
792.06
51.2
792.59
56.6
792.61
63.6
792.89
68.0
792.95
73.1
793.10
76.4
793.92
77.9
794.40
78.1
794.94
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
792.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2):
10.3
Bankfull Width (ft):
12.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
793.9
Flood Prone Width (ft):
72.5
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.8
W / D Ratio:
15.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -2, Riffle (Tl)
796
794
-- -------------------------------------------------------------
0
----Bankfull
w 792
- - - - Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/25/14
MY -01,10/27/14
+ MY -02. 8/11/15
790
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
0.0
Yadkin -Pee Dee
2.0
793.74
6.3
Watershed:
9.0
791.63
Jacob's Landing
0.4
Date:
791.21
XS ID
Field Crew:
'
XS -3, Pool T1
30.5
791.46
34.6
Drainage Area (s mi):
36.1
790.56
37.5
790.32
38.0
789.86
38.6
789.40
39.4
789.00
40.6
788.54
41.7
788.60
42.3
788.84
43.4
789.07
43.3
789.97
44.8
790.56
47.4
791.65
51.7
791.73
56.3
792.85
60.1
793.91
62.2
793.89
62.3
794.34
..
y
-
G
ti..
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -3, Pool (Tl)
794
792
o
---------
-----------74=7--Bankfull
---------
a
ti
W 790
As -Built, 2/25/14
MY -01, 10/27/14
+ MY -02.8/11/15
788
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.12
2.0
793.74
6.3
792.41
9.0
791.63
�
0.4
Date:
791.21
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
'
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.12
2.0
793.74
6.3
792.41
9.0
791.63
10.9
791.21
14.7
791.21
17.7
791.21
24.3
791.23
30.5
791.46
34.6
791.02
36.1
790.56
37.5
790.32
38.0
789.86
38.6
789.40
39.4
789.00
40.6
788.54
41.7
788.60
42.3
788.84
43.4
789.07
43.3
789.97
44.8
790.56
47.4
791.65
51.7
791.73
56.3
792.85
60.1
793.91
62.2
793.89
62.3
794.34
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
791.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
17.5
Bankfull Width (ft):
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
14.0
-
Flood Prone Width (ft):
-
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
2.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.3
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -4, Riffle (Tl)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.40
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
792.28
0.9
792.12
6.2
790.24
10.4
790.11
16.4
790.09
23.1
789.96
26.5
789.97
27.8
789.53
28.4
789.37
29.4
789.05
30.4
788.87
30.9
788.72
31.2
788.80
31.4
788.64
31.4
788.69
31.7
789.00
32.0
788.94
32.9
788.90
33.4
789.19
34.6
789.37
36.5
790.09
40.8
790.37
48.5
790.36
57.1
790.34
61.0
790.64
64.7
792.03
67.2
792.99
67.4
793.57
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
789.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
6.4
Bankfull Width (ft):
9.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
791.2
Flood Prone Width (ft):
58.8
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.7
W / D Ratio:
13.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
795
793
5
s 791
0
W
789
787 +
0
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -4, Riffle (Tl)
__________________________________________________________pro`____
Bankfull
%_ _ _ - Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/25/14
MY -01, 10/27/14
+ MY -02. 8/11/15
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
818.58
. .
817.85
Watershed:
0.23
Jacob's Landin
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS ID
813.43
XS -5, Riffle (T2)
813.45
14.2
813.42
Drainage
812.63
17.0
812.68
17.5
811.88
18.7
812.14
19.2
812.03
20.0
811.82
21.0
812.01
21.8
812.02
�.
812.33
24.0
812.82
25.8
813.55
28.6
813.54
31.2
813.72
33.7
815.60
a
816.51
38.7
817.32
y
1
`F
s
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -5, Riffle (T2)
821
818
w
s
° 815
W
- - - - Bankfull
---------�������
-------------
---- �������---�FloodProneArea
813
As -Built, 2/24/14
MY -01, 10/28/14
+ MY 02 8/11/15
810
0
10
20
30 40
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
818.58
0.1
817.85
Area (s mi):
0.23
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
818.58
0.1
817.85
1.0
817.65
4.1
815.76
7.4
814.04
10.5
813.43
13.6
813.45
14.2
813.42
16.2
812.63
17.0
812.68
17.5
811.88
18.7
812.14
19.2
812.03
20.0
811.82
21.0
812.01
21.8
812.02
23.0
812.33
24.0
812.82
25.8
813.55
28.6
813.54
31.2
813.72
33.7
815.60
37.3
816.51
38.7
817.32
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
813.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
9.9
Bankfull Width (ft):
10.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
814.8
Flood Prone Width ft):
26.8
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS 1D
XS -6, Riffle (T2)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.23
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
812.26
4.8
811.69
10.1
810.94
15.6
809.94
18.7
809.68
20.0
809.62
22.3
808.79
23.7
808.51
24.1
808.11
25.8
808.33
27.2
808.49
28.0
808.91
29.3
808.98
31.7
809.79
36.5
810.22
42.3
811.07
45.8
812.09
46.9
812.72
46.8
813.88
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
809.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
8.0
Bankfull Width (ft):
10.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
810.9
Flood Prone Width (ft):
31.1
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.8
W / D Ratio:
14.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -6, Riffle (T2)
815
813
E
E
811
------------- ----------------------------------------------------
0
y
809
----Bankfull
W
- - - -Flood Prone Area
807
As -Built, 2/24/14
MY -01, 10/28/14
� MY -02. 8/11/15
805
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -7, Pool (T2)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.23
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
810.70
0.0
809.92
1.9
809.58
4.0
808.11
7.6
806.99
10.5
806.66
12.0
806.44
14.7
805.33
16.0
804.74
17.0
804.41
17.8
804.36
18.8
804.76
25.3
806.34
35.9
806.70
40.4
808.24
42.2
809.18
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
806.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2):
13.9
Bankfull Width (ft):
14.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
-
Flood Prone Width (ft):
-
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -7, Pool (T2)
812
810
808
0
806
- - - - Bankfull
W
As -Built, 2/24/14
804
MY -01, 10/28/14
t MY -02, 8/11/15
802
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin-Pee Dee
805.41
0.2
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Landing
Date:
8/11/2015
XS ID
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS-8, Riffle (T2)
801.53
16.8
Drainage
19.3
800.16
_ -
s `
799.89
21.0
799.72
21.8
•' �,
22.2
799.55
23.0
799.42
23.5
799.61
24.8
799.97
26.3
800.94
28.8
801.41
30.7
801.26
32.7
801.21
36.2
802.79
39.2
804.05
41.8
804.78
r`1
ti
id y
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS-8, Riffle (T2)
808
806
c 804
0
802
----Bankfull
fil
Flood Prone Area
As-Built, 2/24/14
goo
MY-01, 10/28/14
+ MY-02,8/11/15
798
0 10
20 30 40
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
805.41
0.2
804.87
Area (s mi):
0.23
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
805.41
0.2
804.87
3.1
804.49
6.3
803.39
10.6
801.85
15.3
801.53
16.8
801.27
19.3
800.16
20.5
799.89
21.0
799.72
21.8
799.58
22.2
799.55
23.0
799.42
23.5
799.61
24.8
799.97
26.3
800.94
28.8
801.41
30.7
801.26
32.7
801.21
36.2
802.79
39.2
804.05
41.8
804.78
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
801.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
12.7
Bankfull Width (ft):
12.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
803.3
Flood Prone Width (ft):
31.0
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.0
W / D Ratio:
12.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
801.50
3.1
800.70
Watershed:
0.31
Jacob's Landing
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS ID
797.66
XS -9, Riffle (T2)
797.22
19.3
797.15
Drainage
796.83
20.7
796.70
21.7
796.59
22.1
796.78
23.6
796.78
24.2
796.61
25.1
796.98
26.7
797.52
28.5
798.06
33.9
797.92
42.0
pyyS6Smms
48.7
798.85
52.0
799.77
52.3
r.
�4
rs,
�.
�7Y
,r
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -9, Riffle (T2)
805
- - - - Bankfull
As -Built, 2/24/14
803
Flood Prone Area
MY -01,10/29/14
+ MY -02,8/11/15
to 801
0
799------------------------------------------------------------
---
ti
W
797
795
0 10
20
30 40
50
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
801.50
3.1
800.70
Area (s mi):
0.31
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
801.50
3.1
800.70
6.4
798.84
8.7
798.24
15.8
797.82
17.0
797.66
18.4
797.22
19.3
797.15
20.3
796.83
20.7
796.70
21.7
796.59
22.1
796.78
23.6
796.78
24.2
796.61
25.1
796.98
26.7
797.52
28.5
798.06
33.9
797.92
42.0
798.14
48.7
798.85
52.0
799.77
52.3
800.24
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
797.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
7.6
Bankfull Width (ft):
11.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
798.9
Flood Prone Width (ft):
42.8
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.7
W / D Ratio:
16.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -10, Pool (T2)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.31
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
797.69
0.0
796.34
7.2
796.39
11.7
796.45
17.5
796.33
23.9
795.59
26.5
795.32
26.2
794.67
28.0
794.21
28.8
794.36
29.2
794.37
30.8
794.79
31.8
795.49
33.3
796.54
37.4
796.81
43.7
796.72
50.8
797.21
56.5
797.80
59.3
799.19
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft): 796.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft): 16.4
Bankfull Width (ft): 15.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft): -
Flood Prone Width (ft): -
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft): 2.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft): 1.0
W / D Ratio: -
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
800
798
w
s
0
W 796
794 +
0
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -10, Pool (T2)
� V ----Bankfull
As -Built, 2/24/14
MY -01, 10/29/14
+
MY -02,8/11/15
10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
60

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin-Pee Dee
794.16
5.5
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Landin
Date:
.2
XS ID
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS-11, Riffle T2
792.63
.z
- n,!
Drainage
19.7
792.27
r,
792.16
21.0
792.12
21.4
'_¢..
21.8
792.18
23.3
792.27
24.4
792.66
26.1
793.25
27.6
793.53
31.6
793.32
38.4
793.18
45.5
793.55
50.2
794.49
54.7
795.68
55.3
795.96
55.5
796.47
J
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS-11,
Riffle (T2)
798
796
-------------------------------------------------------------
----
794
o
_
- -Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
792
As Built, 2/24/14
MY-01, 10/29/14
+ MY-02, 8/11/15
790
0 10
20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.16
5.5
793.98
Area (s mi):
0.31
Date:
8/11/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.16
5.5
793.98
10.6
793.87
14.7
793.61
16.1
793.43
17.7
792.63
19.0
792.29
19.7
792.27
20.5
792.16
21.0
792.12
21.4
792.02
21.8
792.18
23.3
792.27
24.4
792.66
26.1
793.25
27.6
793.53
31.6
793.32
38.4
793.18
45.5
793.55
50.2
794.49
54.7
795.68
55.3
795.96
55.5
796.47
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
793.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
9.7
Bankfull Width (ft):
11.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
794.9
Flood Prone Width (ft):
51.9
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.8
W / D Ratio:
14.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

800
798
796
794
792
° 790
°
w
788
786
784
782
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
Longitudinal Profile
T1 MY -02
— SBKF = -0.0064x + 803.74
_
■
Sws = -0.0066x + 802.88 — — —
_
780
1050
1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750 1850 1950 2050 2150
Station (ft)
As -Built, 2/20/14 MY -01, 10/27/14 MY -02, 8/10/15 ■ Bankfull — — - Water Surface ® Cross-sections
2250 2350

812
810
808
806
804
802
0
0
800
W
798
796
794
792
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
Longitudinal Profile
T2 MY -02
U AL
■
SBxF _ -0.0106x + 867.36
Sws = -0.0107x + 866.28
790
5560
5660 5760 5860 5960 6060 6160 6260 6360 6460 6560 6660 6760 6860 6960 7060 7160 7260 7360
Station (ft)
As -Built, 2/19/14 MY -01, 10/29/14 MY -02, 8/12/15 ■ Bankfall — — - Water Surface O Structures ♦ Cross-sections

Cross -Section 1 Riffle - MY -2
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aXS 1 Riffleng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 5
Very Fine .062-.125 S 1
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 15
Coarse .50-1 D 2
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 14
Very Fine
2 - 4
11
80%
0
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
ns soar
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
F
L
tMY-01 (2014)
MY -02
Medium
Medium 11.3- 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
1
c 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 2
Very Coarse
32-45
S
5
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 to 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 5
Small 64-90 C 9
Small 90-128 O 14
Large 128-180 B 19
Large 180-256 L 2
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
a
(mm)
0.43
2.2
27
79
140
170
Size Distribution
mean 7.8
dispersion 34.0
skewness -0.34
t
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
5%
29%
26%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 110
Note:

Cross -Section 2 Riffle - MY -02
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aXS 2 Riffleng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 16
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 14
Coarse
.50-1
D
8
100%
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 8
Very Fine
2 - 4
10
80%
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
T As Built
Fine 5.7 - 8 R 2
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
6
H
t MY -01 (2014)
—� MY -02 (zols)
Medium 11.3 -16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
2
c 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 2
Very Coarse
32-45
S
4
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 2
Small 64-90 C 2
Small 90-128 O 26
Large 128-180 B 28
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.32
2
11
100
140
170
Size Distribution
mean 6.7
dispersion 23.6
skewness -0.13
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
12%
23%
23%
42%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 132
Note:

Cross -Section 3 Pool - MY -02
R
l00%
80%
Particle Size Distribution
JacobsXS 3 Pooling
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 28
Very Fine .062-.125 S 6
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium .25-.50 N 15
Coarse .50-1 D 4
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 3
Very Fine
2 - 4
11
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 6
Fine 5.7-8 R 6
Medium
8- 11.3
A
11
i7
E~
p
40%
t MY -01 (2014)
T MY -02 (20 5)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5
Coarse
16-22.6
E
w
o
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Coarse
32-45
S
20%
o%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O L
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.062
D35 0.15
D50 0.41
D65 2.5
D84 7.9
D95 11
Size Distribution
mean 0.7
dispersion 12.9
skewness 0.16
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
28%
34%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 101
Note:

Cross -Section 4 Riffle - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
4 Riffle
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
VeryFine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 2
Coarse
.50-1
D
R
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine
2 - 4
3
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
�
40%
T As Built
MY -01 (2014)
t MY
Medium 11.3- 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
5
w
a
-02 (2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 9
32-45
S
20
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—VeryCoarse
Very Coarse 45-64 14
Small 64-90 C l 1
Small 90-128 O 16
Large 128- 180 B 18
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm)
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
26
41
56
87
130
160
Size Distribution
mean 58.1
dispersion 2.2
skewness 0.02
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
2%
53%
45%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 5 Riffle - MY -02
100%°
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aXS 5 Rifeng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N
Coarse
.50-1
D
.A
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 2
Very Fine
2 - 4
0
v
60%
T As Built
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
1
tMY_ol(zola)
—A,—MY-02 (2015)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
3
iw
a
40%
20%
Coarse 22.6-32 L 14
Very Coarse
32-45
S
16
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 13
Small 64-90 C 19
Small 90-128 O 17
Large 128- 180 B 12
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
Size Distribution
Type
Small 362-512 L
D16 27 mean 56.9
D35 41 dispersion 2.1
D50 61 skewness -0.04
D65 81
D84 120
D95 160
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
2%
50%
48%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 6 Riffle -MY-02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aRS 6 Riffleng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 2
Coarse
.50-1
D
3
R
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 2
Very Fine
2 - 4
1
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
5
�
F
40%
- As sunt
tMY-ol (2014)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 4
Coarse
16-22.6
E
3
[
w
a
-
MY -02 (2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 19
Coarse
32-45
S
11
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64 10
Small 64-90 C 10
Small 90-128 O 16
Large 128-180 B 13
Large 180-256 L 1
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 15
D35 30
D50 45
D65 76
D84 120
D95 160
Size Distribution
mean 42.4
dispersion 2.8
skewness -0.03
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
7%
53%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 7 Pool -MY-02
Particle Size Distribution
JacobsXS 7 Pooling
Particle Millimeter t Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 21
Very Fine .062-.125 S 14
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium
.25-.50
N
1
100%
80%
Coarse .50-1 D
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 1
Very Fine
2 - 4
16
a
v
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 12
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
Medium
8-11.3
A
10
t_oi (zoia)
—�MY_oz(zoisl
Medium 11.3- 16 V 13
Coarse
16-22.6
E
4
w
a
40%
Coarse 22.6-32 L I
Coarse
32-45
S
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64 3
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.062
D35 0.25
D50 3.5
D65 6
D84 13
D95 20
Size Distribution
mean 0.9
dispersion 30.1
skewness -0.39
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
21%
16%
63%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 8 Riffle -MY-02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
daXSb8L�antdeng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N
Coarse
.50-1
D
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine
2 - 4
a
v
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
1
91
91
F
- As Built
tMY-ol (zola)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
1
w
o
40%
MY -02 (2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L I
Coarse
32-45
S
3
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 to loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64 17
Small 64-90 C 17
Small 90-128 O 32
Large 128-180 B 24
Large 180-256 L 4
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 55
D35 81
D50 100
D65 120
D84 150
D95 180
Size Distribution
mean 90.8
dispersion 1.7
skewness -0.06
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
0%
23%
77%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 9 Riffle - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
9 fliffleng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 12
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 4
Coarse
.50-1
D
4
R
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 6
Very Fine
2 - 4
8
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
N
[
40%
— As Built
4 MY -01(2014)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
2
w
a
—AMY -02(2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 12
Coarse
32-45
S
10
20°x'
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64 8
Small
64-90
C
2
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small 90-128 O 38
Large 128- 180 B 4
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.7
D35 23
D50 29
D65 92
D84 110
D95 130
Size Distribution
mean 8.8
dispersion 22.6
skewness -0.35
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
11%
13%
38%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 112
Note:

Cross -Section 10 Pool - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs Landing
XS 10 Pool
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 5
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 3
Coarse
.50-1
D
3
R
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 9
Very Fine
2 - 4
15
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 8
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
Medium
8-11.3
A
3
F
d
40%
MY -01 (2014)
—�Mv_oz(zols)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 3
Coarse
16-22.6
E
4
w
0
Coarse 22.6-32 L 7
Very Coarse
32-45
S
5
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 5
Small 64-90 C 2
Small 90-128 O 13
Large 128- 180 B 11
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 1.5
D35 4
D50 11
D65 34
D84 110
D95 150
Size Distribution
mean 12.8
dispersion 8.7
skewness 0.05
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
5%
15%
54%
26%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 11 Riffle - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
JaXS 11LRi fle g
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 6
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 4
Medium .25-.50 N 16
Coarse
.50-1
D
2
R
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 4
Very Fine
2 - 4
20
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 4
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
E~
40%
- As Built
tMY-ol (2ola)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 8
Coarse
16-22.6
E
8
[
w
0
-
MY -02 (2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 2
Coarse
32-45
S
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64 10
Small 64-90 C 10
Small 90-128 O 22
Large 128-180 B 10
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.4
D35 3.2
D50 14
D65 57
D84 110
D95 140
Size Distribution
mean 6.6
dispersion 21.4
skewness -0.21
e
Small 362-512 L
l
r
:wood/det
5%
20%
43%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%l 0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 130
Note:

Table 10a. Tl Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.5
9.1
4
6.9
1
11.5
12.2
10.1
11.0
12.1
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
1
26
4
23
1
25
70
40
56
71
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
1.8
4
1.1
1
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
2.8
4
1.6
1
1.5
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.4
3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area ftZ
8.6
12.1
4
7.4
1
11.2
12.6
7.9
8.8
10.0
3
Width/Depth Ratio
3.7
9.6
4
6.4
1
12.0
12.0
12.9
13.8
14.6
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
3.3
4
3.4
1
2.2
4.9
3.7
5.1
5.9
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.6
1
2.2
4
1.0
0_
_
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
13
26
2
14
26
38
2
25
50
25
38
50
Radius of Curvature (ft)
6
30
2
12
19
25
2
20
45
20
33
45
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.7
4.6
2
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
2.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
75
110
2
43
73
102
2
65
125
65
95
125
Meander Width Ratio
1.4
4.0
2
2
1 3.8
1
5.5 1
2
1.9 1
3.5
1.9
3.0
3.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
22
32
21
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.007
0.043
2
0.011
0.025
2
0.007
0.012
0.001
0.013
0.026
21
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
12
30
6
18
38
23
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
20
75
30
56
79
23
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
0% / 24%/ 76% / 0% / 0%/ 0%
0%/25%/52%/23%/0%/0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm)
1/5/7/10/17/25
5/15/22/38/94/143
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
1,330
1,305
1,305
Drainage Area (SM)
0.40
0.16
0.40
0.40
Rosgen Classification
G4
E4
C4
C4
Sinuosity
1.07-1.15
1.18
1.09-1.12
1.09-1.12
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.009-0.014
0.0070
0.007-0.010
0.007
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 56 2015-MY02

Table 10b. T1A Baseline Stream Data Summar
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.7
1
6.9
1
8.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
15
1
23
1
19
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
1
1.1
1
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1
1
1.6
1
1.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
6.4
1
7.4
1
6.2
Width/Depth Ratio
9.3
1
6.4
1
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
1
3.4
1
2.2
Bank Height Ratio
2.2
1
1.0
1
1.0
_
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
20
75
1
14
26
38
2
19
24
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8
24
1
12
19
25
2
10
25
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1
3.1
1
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
1.2
2.9
Meander Wavelength (ft)
25
50
1
43
73
102
2
50
55
Meander Width Ratio
2.6
9.7
1
2
3.8
5.5
2
2.2
2.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.013
0.019
1
0.011
0.025
2
0.010 0.012
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
7
14
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
22
34
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% G% C% B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
294
178
178
Drainage Area (SM)
0.21
0.40
0.21
0.21
Rosgen Classification
E4
B4c
B4c/C4
B4c/C4
Sinuosity
2.10
1.20
1.11
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.023
1
0.013
1
0.017
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 57 2015-MY02

Table 10c. T2 Baseline Stream Sums
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration
Parameter
Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft
Floodprone Width (ft
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2
Width/Depth Rati<
Entrenchment Rati<
Bank Height Rati(
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft
Radius of Curvature (ft
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft
Meander Wavelength (ft
Meander Width Rati<
Profile
Riffle Length (ft
Riffle Slope (ft/ft
Pool Length (f(
Pool Spacing (ft
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft
Draina¢e Area (SM
Water Surface
DMS Project # 95024
Reference Reach(es) Data
Pre -Existing Condition
Min
Mean Med Max n
8.8
12.3 4
17
20 4
1.0
1.0 4
1.3
1 1.8 1 4
9.2
11.7 4
8.4
12.9 4
1.4
2.3 4
1.5
1 1 4.7 4
1.3
14 26 38 2
10 60 2
8
35 2
0.9
3.9 2
65
130 2
1.1
6.8 2
6%/25%/68%/1%/0%/0%
1/2/3/6/12/24
2,935
0.31
E4, F4
1.09-1.45
0.007-0.010
0.16
E4
1.18
0.0007
0.025 2
23 2
57 2
I
10.4
23
0.9
1.4
9.1
12.0
2.2
1.0
25
20
2.0
60
2.2
0.006
8
30
Max
11.6
50
1.0
1.5
11.1
12.0
4.3
1.0
50
45
4.0
130
4.8
0.017
35
95
2,641
0.31
C4
1.16-1.31
0.009-0.0100
Reference Reach(es) Data
Min
Mean Med Max n
6.9
1
23
1
1.1
1
1.6
1
7.4
1
6.4
1
3.4
1
1.0
1
1.2
1.3
14 26 38 2
12
19 25 2
1.7
2.7 3.6 2
43
73 102 2
2
3.8 5.5 2
6%/25%/68%/1%/0%/0%
1/2/3/6/12/24
2,935
0.31
E4, F4
1.09-1.45
0.007-0.010
0.16
E4
1.18
0.0007
0.025 2
23 2
57 2
I
10.4
23
0.9
1.4
9.1
12.0
2.2
1.0
25
20
2.0
60
2.2
0.006
8
30
Max
11.6
50
1.0
1.5
11.1
12.0
4.3
1.0
50
45
4.0
130
4.8
0.017
35
95
2,641
0.31
C4
1.16-1.31
0.009-0.0100
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 58 2015-MY02
As -built
Min
Mean
Max
n
10.4
10.9
12.0
5
27
32
42
5
0.8
0.8
0.9
5
1.2
1.3
1.4
1 5
8.8
9.2
9.7
5
11.8
12.9
15.2
5
2.6
3.2
4.2
5
1.0
1.0
1.0
5
25 38 50
20
33
45
2.0
3.0
4.0
60
95
130
2.2
4.0
4.8
14 22 36 33
0.004
0.016
0.041
33
7
18
35
31
42
59
107
31
0% / 6%/ 58% / 32% / 3% / 0%
16/30/44/65/109/144
2,641
0.31
C4
1.16-1.31
0.009
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 58 2015-MY02

Table 1Od. T2A Baseline Stream Data Summar
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6
1
6.9
1
6.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
11
1
23
1
14
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
1
1.1
1
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1
1.6
1
1
1
0.9
Bankfall Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
3.4
1
7.4
1
3.5
Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
1
6.4
1
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.7
1
3.4
1
2.2
Bank Height Ratio
6.3
1
1.0
1
1
1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
8
15
1
14
26
38
2
8
15
Radius of Curvature (ft)
10
12
1
12
19
25
2
10
25
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.5
1.8
1
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
1.5
3.8
Meander Wavelength (ft)
50
63
1
43
73
102
2
50
63
_
Meander Width Ratio
1.2
1
2.3
1
2
1 3.8
5.5
2
1.2
2.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.010
0.017
1
0.011
0.025
2
0.010 0.012
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
2
4
15
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
2
22
42
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%I'
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
_
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
465
465
465
Drainage Area (SM)
0.06
0.40
0.06
0.06
Rosgen Classification
G4
B4c
B4c/C4
B4c/C4
Sinuosity
1.16
1.20
1.13
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.019
0.013
1
0.014
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 59 2015-MYO2

Table 11. Cross -Section Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Dimension and Substrate
Cross -Section 1 (T1 -Riffle)
Station 12+29
Cross -Section 2 (T1 -Riffle)
Station 17+79
Cross -Section 3 (T1 -Pool)
Station 19+25
Cross -Section 4 ( T1 -Riffle)
Station 21+36
Cross -Section 5 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 52+53
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.8
11.8
12.1
12.1
10.9
12.6
15.5
15.5
14.0
10.1
11.2
9.3
10.4
11.8
10.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
40.0
41.2
40.7
71.0
70.7
72.5
-
-
-
58.0
59.8
58.8
27.0
27.4
26.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.8
1.2
1.1
1.3
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5 0
2.8
2.9
2.7
1.2
1.3
1.3 1
1.3
6.0
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftp)
8.5
8.9
8.7
10.0
10.3
10.3
18.1
17.2
17.5
7.9
8.7E6.
9.0
10.5
9.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.7
15.6
16.8
14.6
11.5
15.4
-
-
-
12.9
14.4
12.0
13.3
12.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.7
3.5
3.4
5.9
6.5
5.8
-
5.7
5.3
2.6
2.3
2.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50(mm)
2
1
27
28
12
11
-
35
44
47
63
61
Cross -Section 6 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 56+18
Cross -Section 7 (T2 -Pool)
Station 60+09
Cross -Section 8 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 63+84
Cross -Section 9 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 66+63
Cross -Section 10 (T2 -Pool)
Station 68+61
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
11.4
10.6 1
13.3
13.5
14.7
10.7
11.6
12.5
10.8
10.9
11.2
12.5
16.5
15.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
29.0
32.0
31.1
-
-
-
30.0
30.1
31.0
42.0
43.1
42.8
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.7
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4 1
1.4
1.9
2.0
2.0
1.3
1.8
2.0
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.8
2.1
2.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftZ)
8.8
8.8
8.0
13.8
16.5
13.9 1
9.7
11.8
12.7 1
9.2
8.0
7.6
14.5
17.1 1
16.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
14.8
14.0 1
-
-
-
11.8
11.4
12.3
12.7
14.9
16.5
-
-
-
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.7
2.8
2.9
-
-
2.8
2.6
2.5
3.9
4.0
3.8
-
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
LO
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
d50 (mm)
49
60
45
-
-
66
40
100
41
37
29
-
-
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftZ)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
d50 (mm)
Base
12.0
>50
0.8
1.4
9.5
15.2
4.2
1.0
16
Cross -Section 11 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 72+48
19 111
MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
11.9 11.7
>50 >50
0.8 1 0.8
1.5 1.5
9.6 9.7
14.8 14.1
4.4 4.4
. 1 1.0
3 1 14
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 60 2015- MY02

Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 61 2015- MY02
Table llb. Stream Reach Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Reach: T1 (2,389 ft.)
Parameter
MY01 (2014)
MY02 (2015)
MY03 (2016) MY04 (2017) M Y05 (2018)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Mcd Max SD n Min
Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Mcd Max
SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.9
12.4
11.5 15.5
1.8
4
9.3
12.0
12.4 14.0
1.7
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
41.2
57.2
59.8 71.0
12.2
3
40.7
57.3
58.8 71.0
13.0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9 1.1
0.1
4
0.7
0.9
0.8 1.3
0.2
4
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.3
1.8
1.4 2.9
0.6
4
1.3
1.7
1.4 2.7
0.6
4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
8.7
11.3
9.6 17.2
3.5
4
6.4
10.7
9.5 17.5
4.1
4
Width/Depth Ratio
11.5
13.9
14.4 15.6
1.7
3
13.5
15.3
15.4 16.8
1.4
3
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
5.1
5.3 6.5
1.2
3
3.4
5.1
5.8 6.3
1.3
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25.0
38.0
50.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20.0
33.0
45.0
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.0
3.0
4.0
M eander Wavelength (ft)
65.0
95.0
125.0
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
3.0
3.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3.0
34.0
32.0 85.0
16.1
21.0
10.9
31.1
31.9 44.6
10.1
21
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.01
0.02
0.01 0.05
0.01
20
0.006
0.01
0.01 0.03
0.007
21
Pool Length (ft)
4.0
13.0
10.0 27.0
7.4
14.0
4.0
9.7
8.7 21.5
4.4
17
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.9
2.9
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
41.0
83.0
62.0 233.0
60.4
13.0
36.9
74.5
56.2 231.1
51.6
16
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,305
1,305
Sinuosity
1.09-1.12
1.09-1.12
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.0066
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.0064
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
29%/22%/36%/14%/0%/0%
l l%/22%/35%/32%/0%/0%
d16/d35/d50 / d84 / d95
7/10/14/49/88
7/11/24/104/128
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
1%
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 61 2015- MY02

Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 62 2015- MY02
Table 11c. Stream Reach Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Reach: T2 (2,084 ft.)
Parameter
MY01 (2014)
MY02 (2015)
MY03 (2016) MY04 (2017) MY05 (2018)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mcan Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.9
13.2
11.8 18.0
2.6
7
10.6
12.5
11.7 15.7 1.8
7
Floodprone Width (ft)
27.4
37.0
32.0 52.3
9.3
5
26.8
36.7
31.1 51.9 9.3
5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.9 1.0
0.1
7
0.7
0.9
0.9 1 1.0 0.1
7
Bankfull M ax Depth (ft)
1.3
1.7
1.6 2.1
0.3
7
1.2
1.7
1.5 2.2 0.4
7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
8.0
11.8
10.5 17.1
3.5
7
7.6
11.2
9.9 16.4 3.0
7
Width/Depth Ratio
11.4
13.8
13.8 14.9
1.3
5
12.0
13.8
13.8 16.5 1.6
5
Entrenchment Ratio
2.3
3.2
3.2 4.4
0.8
5
2.5
3.2
3.2 4.4 0.8
5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
5
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0 0
5
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25.0
38.0
50.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20.0
33.0
45.0
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.0
3.0
4.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
60.0
95.0
130.0
Meander Width Ratio
2.2
4.0
4.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
5.0
14.0
17.0 24.0
5.9
15
7.8
32.4
30.4 61.6 11.5
27
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.007
0.02
0.02 0.05
0.01
14
0.001
0.02
0.02 0.03 0.006
27
Pool Length (ft)
4.1
15.8
14.7 26.9
6.5
29
5
13
12 28 6
25
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.0
2.1
2.1
2
2.0
2.1
2.2
2
Pool Spacing (ft)
31.8
61.8
54.4 160.9
29.0
28
42.7
69.5
59.9 173.7 34.2
24
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,641
2641
Sinuosity
1.16-1.31
1.16-1.31
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0106
0.0107
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0109
0.0106
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
29%/22%/36%/14%/0%/0%
6%/10%/46%/38%/0%/0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
12/21/32/46/83/127
14/26/38/105/134
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 62 2015- MY02

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 63 2015— MY02

Photo 1. Bankfull indicators T1, 12/17/2015 Photo 2. Bankfull indicators T2, 12/17/2015
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 64 2015— MY02
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site DMS Project # 95024
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo Number
4/19/2015
4/19/2015
On-site automatic gauge
N/A
10/3/2015
10/3/2015
On-site automatic gauge
N/A
11/9/2015
11/9/2015
On-site automatic gauge
N/A
Unkown
12/17/2015
Wracklines and flattened vegetation observed at bankfull
1 -2
Photo 1. Bankfull indicators T1, 12/17/2015 Photo 2. Bankfull indicators T2, 12/17/2015
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 64 2015— MY02

w
791
790
Jacob's Landing Restoration Site
Stage Hydrograph
Stream Gauge 1
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
UMMIA
788
°
_ iwt
11
1 %
'Yu
x111
4J11wLLLIe%lh�l
u i r
(I
JI
JI
M A
I
11
A,1IIh
11
)'M11
Ji
IU QUI
AMP
L
I
1 Fl-
YF
'i' I
f I
'I
I iii
r
w
v
a
a
'7
'7
i -A
c -A
Y
c-,
o
cn
cn
O
v
O
v
o
Z
Z
s
d
i --
d d
v v
Date
Stage Bankfull Rainfall
0.8 x
0.6
0.4
0.2
0

795
794
w
0
0
793
W
o,o
792
Jacob's Landing Restoration Site
Stage Hydrograph
Stream Gauge 2
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
791
T La"r`_
4�4
"
�T1
111 ! I
IKT11�1
1�
1 1�
AiLI
L
, I
A I S
IA I N
I- It
I I l
_ 1 1
l u III
Mill
L.
I
I IL-
, I 1
11 1
T�,
III, —
N
N
w
N
w
Vp
N
co
N
oC
N
�l
N
J
N
0
C
a
'Y
'Y?
0
0
0
o
z
z
d
d d
Date
Stage Bankfull Rainfall
0.8 99
0.6
0.4
0.2
0