20120774 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

Jacob's Ladder
Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
DMS Project # 95023
DMS Contract # 003983
Monitoring Year 02
Submitted to:
NCDEQ-DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Construction Completed: January 2014
Data Collection: 2015
Submitted: January 2016

Design and Monitoring Firm
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: Adam Spiller
Email: [e-mail]
Project No: 20110669
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 2015— MY02

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT................................................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................2
3.0 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................2
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure1. Vicinity Map...................................................................................................................4
Figure2. Site Asset Map................................................................................................................5
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits...................................................................6
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ..........................................................................7
Table 3. Project Contacts Table....................................................................................................7
Table 4. Project Attribute Table....................................................................................................8
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
CurrentCondition Plan View....................................................................................................................10
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment..........................................................12
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment..................................................................................14
PhotoReference Points.............................................................................................................................15
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos...........................................................................................................22
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment...............................................................................26
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata.......................................................................................27
Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species...............................................28
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section Plots..........................................................................................................
Longitudinal Profile Plots................................................................................................
PebbleCount Plots...........................................................................................................
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table ..................................................
Table l la. Cross -Section Morphology Data Table .................................................
Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Data Table ..................................................
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events ......................................
StreamHydrographs.................................................................................
.........................31
.........................41
.........................43
.........................53
......................... 57
......................... 58
Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 i 2015— MY02

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site is a full -delivery project that was developed for the North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Construction was completed in January 2014. The site restored a total of
4,971 linear feet and enhanced 446 linear feet along three tributaries to Irish Buffalo Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. The project is located west of China Grove and north of Kannapolis off of Saw Road in Rowan
County (Figure 1, Appendix A). This project will expand aquatic and terrestrial habitat in the Rocky River
Watershed (03040105). The project is within the 03040105020040 Irish Buffalo Creek Local Watershed Unit (14 -
digit HUC) (NCDENR, EEP 2009). In the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services' (DMS) most recent
publication of excluded and Targeted Local Watersheds/Hydrologic Units, the 03040105020040 14 -digit HUC
has been identified as a Targeted Local Watershed. The project is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province
and the project streams initiate as headwater systems out of moderately -sloped, forested hills before reaching the
floodplain of Irish Buffalo Creek. The site's 1.07 -square mile project watershed is comprised predominantly of
pasture and mixed hardwoods, with an area of rural residential development in the northeastern corner. Prior to
construction, the site was actively used for timber and cattle production for over five generations.
The project goals and objectives are listed below.
Project Goals
• Restore a diverse riparian corridor that connects forested stream systems upstream and downstream of the
project.
• Reduce the sediment supply entering Irish Buffalo Creek.
Project Objectives
• Restore stable channel planforms to streams that have been straightened and modified.
• Reshape and stabilize eroding stream banks.
• Plant the site with native trees to help reestablish a diverse riparian corridor.
• Install exclusion fencing and alternative watering options to keep livestock out of the project streams.
Vegetation success is based on the criteria established in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003). This
document states that vegetation monitoring results should have the following planted stem density minimums in
the corresponding monitoring years: 320 stems/acre through Year Three, 288 stems/acre in Year Four, and 260
stems/acre in Year Five. The second -year vegetation monitoring was based on the Level 2 CVS-EEP vegetation
monitoring protocol. The site's average density for this monitoring period is 510 planted stems/acre, with none of
the plots having live stakes in them. Thirteen of the sixteen plots had greater than 320 planted stems/acre. There
are three monitoring plots that have calculated planted stem densities less than 320 stems/acre (Plots 6, 11, and
16). This is not seen as problematic given the high potential for desirable volunteers to become established in the
plots and across the site. Like natural vegetative communities, some areas will have slightly higher densities than
others, but the data from the vegetation monitoring plots reveal that the site has an adequate average stem density.
To ensure continued vegetative success, some parts of the site received supplemental planting in early 2015.
Including volunteers, the monitoring plots averaged 723 total stems/acre. The overall vegetation assessment found
the site to be on track to meeting the vegetative success criterion.
Second -year monitoring found the Jacob's Ladder streams to be stable, with only minor changes from the as -built
conditions. No areas show signs of serious bank erosion. The monitoring components were installed in
February/March 2014. An automatic recording gauge has been installed on both T1 and T2. Both gauges recorded
bankfull events in 2015. Additionally, during the end of year site visit, many clear signs of a recent bankf ill event
were observed. The monitoring plan for each tributary is as follows: T1 has a 1,500 foot longitudinal profile, 3
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 1 2015— MY02

riffle cross-sections and 2 pool cross-sections; T2 has a 1,500 foot longitudinal profile, 4 riffle cross-sections and
1 pool cross-section; T1A is being monitored visually since it is small, partially intermittent, and a mix of
mitigation types. Pebble counts were conducted at all ten cross-sections. Nine permanent photo points have been
established with a total of nineteen photos to be taken annually. Monitoring year 2 found T1 functioning as
designed with little change from the baseline conditions. Several areas along the upper and middle portion of T2
show signs of bed degradation compared to last year. This is likely a result of yearly fluctuations in bed elevation
due to the large amount of sand input to the stream from upstream of the project. These areas will continue to be
monitored closely to ensure they are not a threat to the stability of the system.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related
to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report
appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the
Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan documents available on the DMS website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The survey data were collected with a total station instrument between August 4 and August 12, 2015.
The CVS-EEP protocol, Level 2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data from
the site. The vegetation monitoring was completed on July 28, 2015
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Priorities 2009. Raleigh, NC.
hqp://www.nceep.net/services/restplans/YadkinvPeee Dee RBRPc2009°Final.pdf
USACE. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 2 2015— MY02

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 3 2015— MY02

J
T
/
f
e
c
152
c—
HINA G
153
To reach the Site from Raleigh: proceed west on 1-40
for approximately 62 miles. Then travel on 1-85 south
ANDIS
toward High Point/Charlotte for approximately 50
miles- Take Exit 68 toward China Grove on US -29
C9
south. Turn right on NC -152 on East Church Street for
approximately 5 miles and then turn left onto Saw
Road. The Site will be approximately 1 -mile ahead on
the left (shortly after passing Goodnight Lake Road).
The subject project site is an environmental restoration
—7 -11
site of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) and is encompassed by a recorded
conservation easement, but is bordered by land under
private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary
and therefore access by the general public is not
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state
and federal agencies or their designeesicontractors
involved in the cleveiopment, oversight and
stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within
the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any
intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and
activities requires prior coordination with EEP.
DAVIE
KANNAPOLIS
IREDELL DAVIDSON
29
136
ROWAN
NC Division
of Mitigation
CABARRUS STANLY Services
FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP N
0 075 +a JACOB'S LADDER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
mil.. DMS PROJECT # 95023, ROWAN COUNTY, NC A
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 4 2015 MY02

Enhancement I
1:5,400
71,
Tl
1 inch = 450 feet Z
N
Y,a
Enhancement II
'v'..
a
440 220 0 440
KCI
Other Streams
Feet
Image Source: NC State Orlhoimagery, 2014
Conservation Easement
e�
�.
4 x'
4�M is
4
�r 7 A t
Figure 2. Site Asset Map
i` Restoration
A
I
Enhancement I
1:5,400
1 inch = 450 feet Z
N
Enhancement II
440 220 0 440
KCI
Other Streams
Feet
Image Source: NC State Orlhoimagery, 2014
Conservation Easement
A
I

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Mitigation
Credits
Non-
Nitrogen
Riparian
Stream
Wetland
riparian
Buffer
Nutrient
Wetland
Offset
Type
R
EI EII
Length
4,971 306 140
Credits
4,971 204 56
TOTAL
5,231
CREDITS
Project Components
Project Component
Design
Existing
Approach
Restoration -or-
Restoration
-or-
Stationing/
Footage
(P1, P2 etc.)
Restoration
Mitigation Ratio
Footage
Reach ID
Location
Equivalent
T1
10+00-34+89*
1,809
P1
Restoration
2,389*
1:1
TIA-1
50+00-53+06
306
-
Enhancement I
306
1:1.5
TIA-2
53+06-54+46
140
-
Enhancement II
140
1:2.5
TIA-3
54+46-59+44
470
P1
Restoration
498
1:1
T2
99+75-121+60*
1,246
P1
Restoration
2,084*
1:1
Component Summation
Stream
Restoration Level
Mitigation Units
(SMU)
(linear feet)
Restoration
4,971
4,971
Enhancement
306
204
Enhancement II
140
56
*Mitigation units have been calculated to exclude the easement exceptions and water- utility easements.
There were no BMP elements included in this project.
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 6 2015— MY02

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
Sept 12
Final Design - Construction Plans
Dec 12
Construction
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Aug 13
Planting
Jan 14
Baseline Monitoring/Report
Fcb/March 14
April 14
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 14
Jan 15
Supplemental Planting
Contact: Mr. Stephen James
March 15
Year 2 Monitoring
Au,-ust 15
Dec 15
Table 3. Project Contacts
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Design Firm
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting, LLC
160 Walker Road
Lawndale, NC 28090
Contact: Mr. Stephen James
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor
Forestree Management Co.
1280 Maudis Road
Bailey, NC 27807
Contact: Mr. Tony Cortez
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY00- MY02
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 7 2015— MY02

Table 4. Project Information
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Project Name Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site
County Rowan Count
Project Area (acres) 17.2 acres
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.) 35.552956 N, 80.653116 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin-Pee Dee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03040105 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03040105020040
DWQ Sub-basin 13-17-09
Project Drain a a Area 682 acres/1.06 square miles
Project Drainage Area Percentage o
1.1 /0/8 acres
of Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification 15.8% Cultivated, 35.1 % Managed Herbaceous Cover, 41.6% Mixed Upland Hardwoods,
6.9% Mixed Hardwoods/Conifers, and 0.5% Southern Yellow Pine
Reach Summary Information (Post-Restoration)
Parameters
TI
T1A-1, T1A-2, T1A-3
T2
Length of reach (linear feet)
2,389
944
2,084
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (acres)
231.6 acres
34.5 acres
450.1 acres
NCDWQ Water Quality
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Classification
Morphological Description (stream
C4
B4c/C4
C4
type)
Evolutionary trend
Stage II (Constructed)
Stage 11(Constructed)
Stage 11(Constructed)
Mapped Soil Series
Chewacla loam
Pacolet sandy loam
Pacolet sandy loam &
Chewacla loam
Drainage class
Poorly drained
Well drained
Well drained
Soil Hydric status
Non hydric
Non hydric
Non hydric
Sloe
0-2%
0-2%
0-2%
FEMA classification
AE (portion in backwater of
N/A
AE (portion in backwater of
Irish Buffalo Creek only)
Irish Buffalo Creek only)
Mesic Mixed Hardwood
Native vegetation community
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
Forest &
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
Percent composition of exotic
0%
0%
0%
invasive vegetation
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section
Yes
Yes, received 404 permit
N/A
404
Waters of the United States — Section
Yes
Yes, received 401 permit
N/A
401
Endangered Species Act
No
N/A
N/A
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management
No
N/A
N/A
Act CAMA
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Floodplain development permit
N/A
completed through Rowan County
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 8 2015— MY02

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 9 2015— MY02

LEGEND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
CROSS-SECTION (XS)
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING DENSITY CRITERION
VEG PLOT BELOW DENSITY CRITERION
"r, 723/511 VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY
*0 PHOTO POINT (PP)
GAUGE LOCATION
IMAGE SOURCE: NC 2014 STATEWIDE ORTHOIMAGERY
) XS6 ID
BEGIN NC GR
I NAD '83
REACH T2
BEGIN
pxpo 00" vPl PROFILE T2a.
PP6 -80' -40'0' 8 160'
p
GRAPHIC SCALE
XS7
VP2
PP7
VP3
0
50 FEET Ile 00
EASEMENT a VP6
EXCEPTION C,
XS8 x xsli>o--,.
GAUGE 2)
+
XS9
PP8
VP4
VP5
P pq
VP7
END
DDnril F: T'D ------
. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% ?VF
19

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Assessed Len th 2,389 Reach - Tl
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
significantly deflect flowlaterally (not to include
0
0
°
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
2. Riffle Condition
substrate
21
22
95%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
16
21
76%
Condition
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
16
21
76%
downstrem riffle)
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
4.Thalweg Position
11
11
100%
(Run)
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
11
11
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
2. Bank
1. Scoured/IYoding
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
0
0
°
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
2. Undercut
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
°
100/o
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
9
9
100%
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
boulders or logs.
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
2. Grade Control
9
9
°
100%
grade across the sill.
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
2a. Piping
sills or arms.
1
1
°
100/o
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for
2
2
100%
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
0
0
N/A
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 12 2015 — MY02

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Assessed Len th 2,084 Reach - T2
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
significantly deflect flowlaterally (not to include
0
0
°
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
3
139
93%
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
2. Riffle Condition
substrate
20
20
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
7
11
64%
Condition
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
7
11
64%
downstrem riffle)
4.ThalwegPosition.
1. Thalweg centering atupstream ofmeander bend
10
10
N/A
(Run)
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
10
10
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding0
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
0
o
100/
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
0
0
o
100/
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
TOWS
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
t
6
100°
Structures
1 Overall Integrity
boulders or logs.
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
b
6
o
100%
grade across the sill.
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
0
N/A
2a. Piping
sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for
3
3
100°
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
0
0
N/A
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 13 2015 — MY02

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
PlantedAcrea a 15.9 EasementAcrea a 17.2
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
% of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody
Pattern and
1. Bare Areas
0.1 acre
0
0.00
o
0.0/o
and herbaceous material.
Color
Woody stem densities clearly below
2. Low Stem Density
Pattern and
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0.1 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
Areas
Color
stem count criteria.
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor
Pattern and
class that are obviously small given
0.25 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
Growth Rates or Vigor
Color
the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
4. Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
1,000 SF
0
0.00
0.0%
Concern render aspolygons at map scale).
Color
5. Easement
Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale).
none
I Color
0
0.00
0.0%
Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 14 2015 — MY02

PP1U - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP 1 U - MY02 - 12/17/15
PPI D - MY -00 3/11/14
PPID - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP2U - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP2U - W02 - 12/17/15
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 15 2015— MY02

PP2D — MY -00 — 3/11/14
PP2D — MY02 — 12/17/15
PP3 Tributary — MY -00 — 3/11/14
PP3 Tributary MY02 12/17/15
PP3U — MY -00 — 3/11/14
PP3U — MY02 — 12/17/15
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 16 2015— MY02

PP3D - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP3D - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP4U - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP4U - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP4D - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP4D - MY02 - 12/17/15
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 17 2015— MY02

PP5U - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP5U - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP5D - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP5D - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP6U - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP6U - MY02 - 12/17/15
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 18 2015— MY02

PP6D - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP6D - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP7U MY -00 3/11 /14
PP7U - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP7D - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP7D - MY02 - 12/17/15
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 19 2015— MY02

a �
3
PP8U - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP8U - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP8D - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP8D - MY02 - 12/17/15
PP9U - MY -00 - 3/11/14
Jacob's Ladder Site
DMS Project # 95023 20
PP9U - MY02 - 12/17/15
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2015— MY02

PP9D - MY -00 - 3/11/14
PP9D - MY02 - 12/17/15
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 21 2015— MY02

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 Photo: 7/28/15 — W02
Plot 3 Photo: 7/28/15 — W02
Plot 5 Photo: 7/28/15 — W02
Plot 2 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 4 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 6 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 22 2015— MY02

Plot 7 Photo: 7/28/15 — W02
Plot 9 Photo: 7/28/15 — W02
Plot 11 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 8 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 10 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 12 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 23 2015— MY02

Plot 13 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 15 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 14 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Plot 16 Photo: 7/28/15 — MY02
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 24 2015— MY02

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 25 2015— MY02

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Monitoring Year 02
Planted Stem Density
stems/acre)
Monitoring Year 02
Total Stem Density
(stems/acre)
1
Yes
607
971
2
Yes
607
1,578
3
Yes
809
1,376
4
Yes
647
809
5
Yes
647
931
6
No
81
81
7
Yes
647
971
8
Yes
324
324
9
Yes
486
486
10
Yes
769
1093
11
No
162
162
12
Yes
688
809
13
Yes
567
647
14
Yes
486
688
15
Yes
405
405
16
No
243
243
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 26 2015— MY02

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Report Prepared By
Bethany Williams
Date Prepared
7/31/2015 13:20
database name
KCI-2014-J.mdb
database location
M:\2011\20110669 -Jacobs Ladder\Monitoring\Vegetaton CVS Database
computer name
12-3ZV4FP1
file size
61652992
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN
THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s)
and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes
live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJ ECT S U M MARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
95023
project Name
Jacobs Ladder
Description
Stream Restoration Site
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
length(ft)
5417
area (sq m)
1.06
Required Plots (calculated)
16
Sampled Plots
116
Jacob's Ladder Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 27 2015— MY02

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
95023-01-0001
95023-01-0002
95023-01-0003
95023-01-0004
95023-01-0005
95023-01-0006
95023-01-0007
95023-01-0008
95023-01-0009
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer ne undo
Boxelder
Tree
5
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
Tree
1
Alnus serrulata
Hazel Alder
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Baccharis
halimi olia
Eastern Baccharis
Shrub
2
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
7
7
7
6
6
6
1 3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Callicarpa
americana
American
Beautybcrry
Shrub
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros vir iniana
Common
Persimmon
Tree
4
1
1
1
Fraxinus
enns lvanica
Green Ash
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
5
5
5
10
10
10
3
3
3
6
6
6
4
4
4
5
5
5
Liquidambar
styraciflua
Sweetguin
Tree
2
1
2
2
Liriodendron
tuli i era
Tuli tree
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
5
5
5
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
Loblolly Pine
Tree
1
1
Platanus
occidentalis
American
Sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Po ulus deltoides
Eastern
Cottonwood
Tree
1
2
2
2
Quercus
Oak
Tree
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut
Oak
Tree
Quercus nigra—
Water Oak
Tree
Quercus palustris
Pin Oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
1
2
2
15
2
2
13
2
4
4
11
4
4
12
Sambucus
canadensis
Common
Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
2
Unknown
I
Shrub or
I Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
1 15
24
15
15
39
20
20
34
16
16
20
16
16
23
2
2
2
16
16
24
8
8
1 8
12
12
12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
3
3
8
7
7
12
6
6
8
5
5
7
5
5
5
2 2
2
7
7
7
4 4
4
6
6
6
607
607
971
617
607
1578
809
1376"7
647
809
647
647
931 81
81
647
647
971
324
324-1
486
486
486
Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 28 2015— MY02

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and S ecies cont'd.
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015) Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
95023-01-0010
95023-01-0011
95023-01-0012
95023-01-0013
95023-01-0014
95023-01-0015
95023-01-0016
MY2 2015
MYl 2014
M 2014
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer ne undo
Boxelder
Tree
1
6
1
1
2
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
Tree
1
1
Alnus serrulata
Hazel Alder
Shrub
5
5
5
9
9
9
7
7
7
Baccharis halimi olia
Eastern Baccharis
Shrub
2
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
1
23
23
23
17
17
24
39
39
39
Callicar a americana
American
Beautyberry
Shrub
7
7
7
11
11
11
9
9
9
Diospvros vir iniana
Common
Persimmon
Tree
5
5
5
2
6
6
12
6
6
8
1
1
1
Fraxinus
enns lvanica
Green Ash
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
66
66
66
32
32
32
Liquidambar
styraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
8
1
1
3
20
7
Liriodendron
tuli i era
Tuli tree
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
26
26
26
15
15
15
40
40
40
Pinus taeda
Loblolly Pine
Tree
2
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1 5
5
5
1
1 2
2
2
12
12
13
1 15
15
17
62
62
62
Po ulus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
Tree
1
2
2
4
2
2
8
Quercus
Oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut
Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus palustris
Pin Oak
Tree
10
10
10
10
10
10
7
7
7
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
19
19
19
17
17
17
24
24
24
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
12
12
54
14
14
26
13
13
13
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
2
2
Unknown
Shrub or
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
51
51
51
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
19
19
27
4
4
4
17
17
20
14
14
16
12
12
17
1010
10
6
6
6
202
202
28
6
150
150
19
1
233
233
233
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
16
16
16
0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.40
1 0.40
1 0.40
4
4
5
1 1
1
3
3
5
4
4
6
4
4
6
6
6
1 6
2
2
2
16
16
21
15
1 15
1 19
9
9
9
7619
769
1093
162
162
688
688
809
567
567
647
486
486
688
405
405
405
243
243
243
511
723
379
483
589.3
589.
3
589.
3
Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 29 2015— MY02

Jacob's Ladder Site
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 30

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
767.18
6.0
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Ladder
Date:
8/12/2015
XS ID
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS -1, Riffle (Tl)
765.91
22.2
Drainage
22.9
764.96
23.3
764.84
23.8
764.97
24.3
764.78
25.0
765.17
25.3
765.10
25.4
765.30
25.9
765.24
26.2
764.87
26.8
765.16
27.4
765.60
29.0
766.16
30.0
766.55
35.2
766.65
39.8
766.70
45.4
766.75
50.2
766.67
50.3
767.15
�r .,..
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Ladder, XS -1, Riffle (Tl)
770
768 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
w
0
------------------------
-------------- ------------------
766
----Bankfull
w
- - - Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/19/14
MY -01, 10/29/14
+ MY -Q2, 8/12/15
764
0 10
20 30 40
50
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
767.18
6.0
767.02
Area (s mi):
0.21
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
767.18
6.0
767.02
12.6
766.90
16.7
766.95
19.0
766.46
20.9
765.91
22.2
765.42
22.9
764.96
23.3
764.84
23.8
764.97
24.3
764.78
25.0
765.17
25.3
765.10
25.4
765.30
25.9
765.24
26.2
764.87
26.8
765.16
27.4
765.60
29.0
766.16
30.0
766.55
35.2
766.65
39.8
766.70
45.4
766.75
50.2
766.67
50.3
767.15
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
766.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
10.1
Bankfull Width (ft):
11.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
768.2
Flood Prone Width ft):
>50
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
765.43
4.8
765.30
Area (s mi):
Watershed:
Date:
Jacob's Ladder
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
18.9
764.14
XS ID
762.97
XS -2, Pool (T1)
762.62
20.6
762.41
21.3
762.14
21.8
762.09
22.2
762.09
22.8
Drainage
23.3
762.42
24.0
762.79
24.8
763.05
25.2
763.27
25.7
763.80
27.4
764.30
30.3
765.01
34.1
765.43
39.6
765.37
44.5
765.71
47.7
765.76
47.9
766.20
a.
,w
l
1.
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's
Ladder, XS -2, Pool (TI)
)
770
768
E 766
-- ----
0
-----------------------
764
-----------
---------------------------
W-
- - - Bankfull
As -Built, 2/19/14
762
MY -01,10/29/14
+ MY -02.8/12/15
760
0 10
20
30 40
50
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
765.43
4.8
765.30
Area (s mi):
0.21
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
765.43
4.8
765.30
10.2
765.11
15.1
764.78
17.8
764.36
18.9
764.14
19.4
762.97
20.0
762.62
20.6
762.41
21.3
762.14
21.8
762.09
22.2
762.09
22.8
762.24
23.3
762.42
24.0
762.79
24.8
763.05
25.2
763.27
25.7
763.80
27.4
764.30
30.3
765.01
34.1
765.43
39.6
765.37
44.5
765.71
47.7
765.76
47.9
766.20
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
764.4
:
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)SA
12.8
Bankfull Width (ft):
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
10.5
-
Flood Prone Width ft):
-
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
2.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.2
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
f
5.4
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Ladder
Date:
0..4
XS ID
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS -3, Riffle T1
r q'
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
Drainage
W / D Ratio:
15.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
AMpt
*_
r
w
'
i
ry-
Q'
Y
N
0
2
754
0 10
20 30 40
50
Station (feet)
Station (ft) SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft): 756.9
Elevation (ft)
0.0
757.04
5.4
757.01
Area (s mi):
0.36
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft) SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft): 756.9
Elevation (ft)
0.0
757.04
5.4
757.01
Bankfull Width (ft):
14.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
758.7
Flood Prone Width ft):
>45
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
15.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
11.9 757.08
15.0 756.77
17.0 756.57
18.7 755.84
20.2 755.62
20.3 755.34
20.8 755.18
21.4 755.06
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)::
12.9
Bankfull Width (ft):
14.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
758.7
Flood Prone Width ft):
>45
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
15.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
MY -02. 8/12/15

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
755.40
4.5
755.18
Area (s mi):
Watershed:
XS ID
Date:
Jacob's Ladder
XS Pool Tl)
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
18.2
754.25
19.4
753.78
-4,
753.39
�+.
753.09
21.3
Drainage
22.2
751.95
!'- -•..
751.77
24.0
752.00
24.9
752.35
25.9
a`
26.7
752.96
27.6
753.21
28.4
753.72
'riWy'
753.96
30.7
754.49
33.8
754.90
38.5
755.05
44.7
755.36
47.7
755.30
49.2
755.38
49.3
755.84
R'
1`-
f f
Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin, Jacob's Ladder, XS -4, Pool (Tl)
760
758
756
5
-----------------------
---------------
o------------------
754
ti
W
- - - - Bankfull
As -Built, 2/20/14
752
MY -01, 10/30/14
t nn -02, 8/12/15
750
0 10
20
30 40
50
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
755.40
4.5
755.18
Area (s mi):
0.36
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
755.40
4.5
755.18
10.3
755.23
15.2
754.92
16.5
754.91
18.2
754.25
19.4
753.78
19.9
753.39
20.7
753.09
21.3
752.66
22.2
751.95
23.2
751.77
24.0
752.00
24.9
752.35
25.9
752.88
26.7
752.96
27.6
753.21
28.4
753.72
29.7
753.96
30.7
754.49
33.8
754.90
38.5
755.05
44.7
755.36
47.7
755.30
49.2
755.38
49.3
755.84
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
755.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
25.4
Bankfull Width (ft):
17.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
-
Flood Prone Width (ft):
-
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
3.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.5
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
BankHeight Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin-Pee Dee
753.92
5.6
r-
Watershed:
036
Jacob's Ladder
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS ID
753.11
XS-5, Riffle (Tl)
752.73
22.8
75232
Drainage
75235
23.6
752.14
24.1
752.03
24.4
752.12
24.8
752.12
253
752.13
25.9
752.15
263
75234
26.9
752.78
29.5
753.49
30,5
753.73
33.0
753.99
37.6
754.05
42.0
754.10
47.2
754.19
50.4
754.24
50.4
754.74
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Ladder, XS-5, Riffle (Tl)
758
756
----------------------------------------------------------------
w
754
0 ----
-
Bankfull
752
--- Flood Prone Area
As-Built, 2/20/14
MY-01,10/30/14
MY-02, 8/12/15
750
0 10
20
30
40 50
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
753.92
5.6
753.82
Area (s mi):
036
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
753.92
5.6
753.82
12.8
753.88
183
753.71
19.0
753.61
20.5
753.11
21.7
752.73
22.8
75232
233
75235
23.6
752.14
24.1
752.03
24.4
752.12
24.8
752.12
253
752.13
25.9
752.15
263
75234
26.9
752.78
29.5
753.49
30,5
753.73
33.0
753.99
37.6
754.05
42.0
754.10
47.2
754.19
50.4
754.24
50.4
754.74
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
753.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
10.7
Bankfull Width (ft):
12.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
755.4
Flood Prone Width ft):
>50
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.8
W / D Ratio:
153
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Ladder
XS ID
XS -6, Riffle (T2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.67
Date:
1 8/12/2015
Field Crew:
I T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
756.97
4.3
756.82
9.3
756.55
11.5
756.14
15.1
754.90
18.1
754.81
19.7
754.28
21.3
753.87
21.7
753.39
22.2
753.26
22.8
753.23
23.8
753.22
24.7
753.23
25.8
753.30
26.5
753.44
28.0
754.04
30.3
754.31
31.5
754.80
37.3
755.06
42.1
756.54
44.6
757.17
48.7
757.59
54.5
757.69
57.6
757.68
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
754.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
12.7
Bankfull Width (ft):
13.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
756.4
Flood Prone Width ft):
31.3
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
14.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
760
758
E)
756
s
0
o� 754
W
752
750
0
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Ladder, XS -6, Riffle (T2)
--------- ------------------------------------ -------------------
---------------------
Bankfull
As -Built, 2/19/14
Flood Prone Area
MY -01, 11/4/14
0 MY -02,8/12/15
10
20 30 40
Station (feet)
50
60

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin-Pee Dee
755.87
g,
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Ladder
Date:
8/12/2015
XS ID
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS-7, Riffle (T2
754.42
z'
Drainage
23.6
752.46
27.7
751.99
29.2
751.39
31.0
751.10
31.4
750.74
32.5
750.73
,w r
750.52
33.5
750.51
33.9
750.61
35.2
750.63
36.3
750.61
37.1
751.03
38.1
751.22
40.3
751.79
42.5
752.24
47.6
752.29
50.9
753.38
53.7
754.08
60.3
754.40
66.3
754.34
v'
Yadkin-Pee Dee
River Basin, Jacob's Ladder, XS-7, Riffle (T2)
760
- - - - Bankfull
758
Flood Prone Area
As-Built, 2/19/14
MY-01, 11/4/14
756
+MY-02,8/12/15
0
754
W
752-------------------------
-------------- ------------------
750
0 10
20
30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
755.87
0.1
755.47
Area (s mi):
0.67
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
755.87
0.1
755.47
6.4
755.41
11.3
755.28
15.5
755.09
18.8
754.42
21.4
753.07
23.6
752.46
27.7
751.99
29.2
751.39
31.0
751.10
31.4
750.74
32.5
750.73
33.2
750.52
33.5
750.51
33.9
750.61
35.2
750.63
36.3
750.61
37.1
751.03
38.1
751.22
40.3
751.79
42.5
752.24
47.6
752.29
50.9
753.38
53.7
754.08
60.3
754.40
66.3
754.34
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
752.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
15.4
Bankfull Width (ft):
16.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
753.9
Flood Prone Width ft):
33
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
18.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
750.91
0.2
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Ladder
Date:
8/12/2015
XS ID
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS -8, Riffle (T2)
750.26
24.7
Drainage
26.7
749.37
28.5
749.08
29.0
748.79
29.6
748.79
29.9
748.79
30.2
748.90
30.4
748.60
31.0
748.61
31.2
748.54
31.5
748.57
32.0
748.57
32.7
748.82
33.5
748.82
34.2
749.22
35.3
749.45
37.4
750.02
41.7
750.40
47.1
750.40
53.4
750.44
58.7
750.40
�m
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Ladder, XS -8, Riffle (T2)
753
----------------------------------------------------------------------
751
- - - Bankfull
w 749
- - - Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/19/14
MY -01,11/4/14
MY -02,8/12/15
747
0 10
20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
750.91
0.2
750.62
Area (s mi):
0.70
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
750.91
0.2
750.62
4.8
750.45
10.1
750.46
17.2
750.27
21.9
750.26
24.7
750.15
26.7
749.37
28.5
749.08
29.0
748.79
29.6
748.79
29.9
748.79
30.2
748.90
30.4
748.60
31.0
748.61
31.2
748.54
31.5
748.57
32.0
748.57
32.7
748.82
33.5
748.82
34.2
749.22
35.3
749.45
37.4
750.02
41.7
750.40
47.1
750.40
53.4
750.44
58.7
750.40
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
750.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):14.6
Bankfull Width (ft):
16.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
752.1
Flood Prone Width ft):
>59
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
17.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
746.56
0.0
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Ladder
Date:
8/12/2015
XS ID
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
XS -9, Pool (T2)
745.52
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
Drainage
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
0
m
W
- - - -
t MY -02, 8/12/15
740
0 10
20 30 40 50
60 70
Station (feet)
Station (ft) SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft): 745.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft221.9
Bankfull Width (ft): 18.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft): -
Flood Prone Width (ft): -
Elevation (ft)
0.0
746.56
0.0
746.01
Area (s mi):
0.70
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft) SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft): 745.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft221.9
Bankfull Width (ft): 18.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft): -
Flood Prone Width (ft): -
Elevation (ft)
0.0
746.56
0.0
746.01
6.4
746.01
12.3
745.76
16.9
745.64
19.2
745.52
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.2
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
20.1 744.53
21.3 743.78
21.6 743.48
22.1 743.34
Max Depth at Bankfull ft):
2.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.2
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
745.76
0.5
745.31
Area (s mi):
Watershed:
Date:
Jacob's Ladder
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
20.0
745.22
XS ID
744.87
XS -10, Riffle (T2)
743.90
25.3
743.82
26.2
Drainage
26.7
743.64
27.0
743.48
27.2
743.41
27.6
743.41
27.9
743.41
28.3
743.45
28.6
743.58
30.2
744.09
32.9
744.90
34.4
745.54
36.8
745.56
41.4
745.71
46.9
745.82
52.2
745.89
57.8
745.86
F_
745.94
66.7
745.92
31
1 i
v
l
t
Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin, Jacob's Ladder, XS -10, Riffle (T2)
750
748
--------------------------------------------------------------------
746
-------
--
--------------
--------------------------------
y
-- - -ull
Bankf
_'
w
- - - - Flood Prone Area
-
As -Built, 2/19/14
MY -01, 11/4/14
+ MY -02,8/12/15
742
0 10
20
30 40
50
60 70
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
744
Elevation (ft)
0.0
745.76
0.5
745.31
Area (s mi):
0.70
Date:
8/12/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and B. Williams
Station (ft)
744
Elevation (ft)
0.0
745.76
0.5
745.31
4.6
745.30
10.9
745.24
16.6
745.35
20.0
745.22
21.6
744.87
24.2
743.90
25.3
743.82
26.2
743.75
26.7
743.64
27.0
743.48
27.2
743.41
27.6
743.41
27.9
743.41
28.3
743.45
28.6
743.58
30.2
744.09
32.9
744.90
34.4
745.54
36.8
745.56
41.4
745.71
46.9
745.82
52.2
745.89
57.8
745.86
63.9
745.94
66.7
745.92
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
745.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
16.9
Bankfull Width (ft):
17.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
747.4
Flood Prone Width ft):
>65
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.0
W / D Ratio:
18.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

770
765
F
0
760
d
w
755
750
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site
Longitudinal Profile
Tl MY -02
V � �
— — — SB, _ -0.0082x + 777.45
S,,s = -0.0093x + 778.41
1�
1190 1290 1390 1490 1590 1690 1790 1890 1990 2090 2190 2290 2390 2490 2590 2690
Station (ft)
As -Built, 2/20/14 MY -01, 10/29/14 tMY-02, 8/12/15 O Cross Sections ♦ Structures ■ Bankfull --- Water Surface

755
750
w
C
O
745
d
W
740
■
S,S = -0.0083x+ 839.35
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site
Longitudinal Profile
T2 MY -02
SB,, = -0.0074x + 829.82
735 1
10300 10400 10500 10600 10700 10800 10900 11000 11100 11200 11300 11400 11500 11600 11700 11800 11900
Station (ft)
As -Built, 2/19/14 MY -01, 10/30/14 +MY -02, 8/12/15 0 Cross Sections ♦ Structures ■ Bankfull --- Water Surface

Cross -Section 1 Riffle - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs Ladder
XS 1 Riffle
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 6
Fine .062-125 .125 S
—Very
Fine .125 - .25 A
Medium .25-50 .50 N
Coarse
.50 - 1
D
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine 2-4
Fine
4-5.7
G
09
S
O
�?
60%
0 As Built
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
a
MY OL (zona)
MY -02 (201 sl
Medium 11.3 - 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
c
w
e
40%
20%
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
6
0%
0.01
0.1
1 to 100 1000 10000
Particle Size - Millimeters
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C 16
Small 90-128 O 38
Large 128-180 B 28
Large 180-256 L 6
Small
256-362
B
Ir
Size (mm)
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
70
96
110
130
160
190
Size Distribution
mean 105.8
dispersion 1.5
skewness -0.03
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
6%
0%
6%
88%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512- 1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 2 Pool - MY -02
l00%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobsder
aXS 2 pool
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 100
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N
Coarse .50-1 D
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine
2 - 4
80%
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
4
40%
t MY -01 (2014)
—� MY -02 (2015)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse 16-22.6
E
a
W*
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
20%
o%
0.01 0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128- 180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362
B
Size (mm)
16 0.062
35 0.062
50 0.062
65 0.062
;D840.062
95 0.062
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness ---
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay 100%
sand 0%
gravel 0%
cobble 0%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Medium 512-1024 D '
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 3 Riffle - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
3 Ri fleer
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 4
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25-.50 N 4
Coarse
.50-1
D
2
Very Coarse 1 -2 S
Very Fine
2 - 4
4
80%
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
E~
40%
— As Built
- MY -01 (zola)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse 16-22.6
E
2
w
MY -02 (2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6
Very Coarse
32-45
S
20
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 16
Small 64-90 C 12
Small 90-128 O 20
Large 128-180 B 8
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 16
D35 39
D50 51
D65 74
D84 110
D95 150
a
Size Distribution
mean 42.0
dispersion 2.7
skewness -0.09
0
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay 4%
sand 8%
gravel 48%
cobble 40%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R 1
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:
I

Cross -Section 4 Pool - MY -02
100%
80%
Particle Size Distribution
JacobsLadder
aXS 4 Pool
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 84
Very Fine .062-.125 S 5
Fine .125-.25 A 1
Medium .25-.50 N 10
Coarse .50-1 D
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine 2 - 4
Fine
4-5.7
G
0
v
60%
T MY -01(2014)
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
f MY -02 (2015)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
a
w
e
40%
20%
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128- 180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.062
D35 0.062
D50 0.062
D65 0.062
D84 0.062
D95 0.35
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness ---
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
84%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 5 Riffle - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
obs Ladd
J XS 5 ffle r
Ri
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S 18
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N
Coarse
.50-1
D
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine 2 - 4 2
Fine
4-5.7
G
0
v
60%
- As Built
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
o
t MY_01 (2014)
—�M7_o212o1s1
Medium 11.3- 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
2
0
w
e
40 /o
20%
Coarse 22.6-32 L 10
Very Coarse
32-45
S
12
0%
0.01 0.1
1 to 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 6
Small 64-90 C 8
Small 90-128 O 24
Large 128-180 B 16
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.12
D35 33
D50 57
D65 97
D84 130
D95 160
Size Distribution
mean 3.9
dispersion 238.6
skewness -0.67
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
18%
34%
48%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 6 Riffle -MY-02
l00%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
LaddSilt/Clay
aXS 6 Riffle r
Particle Millimeter Count
< 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S 2
Fine .125-.25 A 4
Medium .25-.50 N 4
Coarse .50-1 D 10
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 18
Very Fine
2 - 4
24
80%
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R 6
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
10
F
40%
— As Built
- MY -01 (2014)
Medium 11.3- 16 V 8
Coarse 16-22.6
E
w
MY -02 (2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 10
VeryCoarse
32-45
S
7
4
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.77
D35 1.8
D50 2.9
D65 6.7
D84 14
D95 31
Size Distribution
mean 3.3
dispersion 4.3
skewness 0.05
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay 0%
sand 37%
gravel 63%
cobble 0%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 102
Note:

Cross -Section 7 Riffle - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
daXcoSb7 RLaflder
111-71, A
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25-.50 N 10
Coarse .50-1 D 18
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 16
Very Fine
2 - 4
14
80%
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 10
Fine 5.7-8 R 8
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
14
40%
- As Built
MY_01(2014)
Medium 11.3- 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E4
2
—t—MY-02(2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L
VeryCoarse
32-45
S
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
2
Size (mm)
D16 0.58
D35 1.2
D50 2.4
D65 4.9
D84 9.2
D95 19
Size Distribution
mean 2.3
dispersion 4.0
skewness -0.02
T
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
e
0%
46%
50%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L 2
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 8 Riffle -MY-02
l00%
Particle Size Distribution
daXS 8 Ladd �er
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 4
Coarse
.50-1
D
4
80%
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 6
Very Fine
2 - 4
15
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 6
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
14
T As Built
tMY_ol (zona)
Medium 11.3 -16 V 4
Coarse 16-22.6
E
C40%
w
0
—r—MY-02(2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4
Very Coarse
32-45
S
8
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 2
Small 64-90 C 8
Small 90-128 O 4
Large 128-180 B 17
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 2.2
D35 6
D50 10
D65 38
D84 130
D95 160
Size Distribution
mean 16.9
dispersion 8.8
skewness 0.17
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
14%
57%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 9 Pool - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs Ladder
XS 9 Pool
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 1
Very Fine .062-.125 S 3
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25-.50 N 14
Coarse .50-1 D 20
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 20
Very Fine
2 - 4
31
80%
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 6
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
Medium
8- 11.3
A
4-
L
Q
40%
MY -0l (2014)
—AMY -02(2015)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse 16-22.6
E
w
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.43
D35 0.89
D50 2
D65 2.4
D84 3.8
D95 7.3
Size Distribution
mean 1.3
dispersion 3.0
skewness -0.07
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay 1%
sand 56%
gravel 43%
cobble 0%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 105
Note:

Cross -Section 10 Riffle - MY -02
100%
Particle Size Distribution
JacobsXS10 Riffler
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 4
Coarse
.50-1
D
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 18
Very Fine
2 - 4
12
80%
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
0
Q
40%
T As Built
MY-01(2014)(zoza)
Medium 11.3- 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
2
w
MY -02 (2015)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 2
Very Coarse
32-45
S
2
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 4
Small 64-90 C 4
Small 90-128 O 34
Large 128-180 B 22
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 1.7
D35 15
D50 92
D65 110
D84 140
D95 170
Size Distribution
mean 15.4
dispersion 27.8
skewness -0.567
rbedrock
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
20%
24%
56%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 108
— —
Note:

Table 10a. T1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.7
8.2
9.6
2
6.9
1
10.3
11.5
10.8
11.3
12.4
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
12
14
16
2
23
1
23
70
>45
>48
>50
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
El
1.3
1.5
2
1.1
1
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.0
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
2.1
2.4
2
1.6
1
1.4
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.7
3
Bankfall Cross-Sectional Area (ft2)
9.8 1
10.2
10.5
2
7.4
1
9.0
11.0
8.8
10.3
11.6 1
3
Width/Depth Ratio4.6
6.7
8.8
2
6.4
1
12.0
12.0
11.2
12.6
13.3
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3
1.8
2.2
2
3.4
1
2.2
6.0
3.6
4.3
4.6
3
Bank Height Ratio
2.3
2.8
3.3
2
1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
*
14
26
38
2
25
70
25
48
70
Radius of Curvature (ft)
*
12
19
25
2
20
45
20
33
45
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
*
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
2
4
2
3
4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
*
43
73
102
2
65
140
65
103
140
Meander Width Ratio
*
2.0
3.8
L.
5.5
2
2.4
5.8
2.4
4.0
5.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
I"R20
31
40
21
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.010
0.035
0.011
0.025
2
0.004 0.017
0.003
0.015
0.022
21
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
12
40
18
28
49
19
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
47
95
54
76
95
19
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm)
0%/21%/79%/0%/0%/0%
1/6/8/11/17/22
0%/4%/44%/52%/0%/0%
27/49/65/89/123/163
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
2,179
2,361
2,389
Drainage Area (SM)
0.36
0.16
0.36
0.36
Rosgen Classification
G4
E4
C4
C4
Sinuosity
1.03
1.18
1.14-1.18
1.14-1.18
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.011
0.007
0.011
0.008
*Not a meandering channel and mostly composed of riffles and runs; therefore no pattern data or pool data was shown
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 53 2015-MY02

Table 10b. T2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max
n Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
12.6
16.5
3 6.9
1
13.5
13.5
14.6
14.9
15.2
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
16
24
35
3 23
1
30
70
33
34
66
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.7
2.3
3 1.1
1
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.1
4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.6
3.4
3 1.6
1
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.8
4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftp)
18.5
21.4
25.0
3 7.4
1
15.3
15.3
13.9
15.4
16.3
4
Width/Depth Ratio
4.7
8.0
13.2
3 6.4
1
12.0
12.0
13.9
14.4
15.5
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1.8
2.1
3 3.4
1
2.2
5.2
2.2
3.3
4.4
4
Bank Height Ratio
1.9
2.0
2.0
3 1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
20
40
60
3 14
26
38
2
20
70
20
45
70
Radius of Curvature (ft)
5
10
15
3 12
19
25
2
20
54
20
37
54
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.5
1.0
1.4
3 1.7
2.7
3.6
2
2
4
2
3
4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
23
87
150
3 43
73
102
2
58
140
58
99
140
Meander Width Ratio
1 1.8
3.8
5.8
3 1 2.0
1 3.8
5.5
2
2.2
5.2
2.2
1 4.0
5.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Ir
5
15
23
23
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.004
0.018
3 0.011
0.025
2
0.001
0.011
0.041
23
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
13
26
49
16
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
52
69
92
16
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
4% /21% / 75%/ 0% / 0%/ 0%
0%/20%/ 76%/ 5%10%10%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm)
1/2
/3/6/11/19
ibLl
1/5/10/22/36/57
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
2,083
2,084
2,084
Drainage Area (SM)
0.70
0.16
0.70
0.70
Rosgen Classification
G4
E4
C4
C4
Sinuosity
1.00-1.47
1.18
1.16-1.45
1.16-1.45
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.006-0.013
0.007
0.007-0.012
0.008
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 54 2015-MY02

Table 10c. T1A-1, T1A-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Mean Med Max
n Min
Max Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft) 12.7
1
7.7
9.3 10.8
2 7.0
Floodprone Width (ft) 30
1
13
15 16
2 0.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4
1
0.7
0.8 0.9
2 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.9
1
1.3
1.5 1.7
2 0.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft') 4.5
1
6.1
7.5 8.8
2 3.9
Width/Depth Ratio 35.8
1
8.5
9.9 11.4
2 12.5
Entrenchment Ratio 2.4
1
1.6
1.8 2.1
2 2.2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1
1.0
1 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
*
22
1 10
30
Radius of Curvature (ft)
*
11
23
2 12
25
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
*
1
3
2 2
4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
*
49
59
2 55
95
Meander Width Ratio
*
2
3
2 1.0
4.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.013
0.018
2
0.012
0.028
2 0.006 0.020
Pool Length (ft)
5
1 9
7
11
Pool Spacing (ft)
22
63
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
0%,18%,82%,1%,0%,0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
3, 7, 9, 13, 17, 25
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
446
446
Drainage Area (SM)
0.05
0.15
0.05
Rosgen Classification
C4
B4c
B4c/C4
Sinuosity
1.11
1.20
1.11
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.015
0.012
0.012
*Not a meandering channel and mostly composed of riffles and runs; therefore no pattern data or pool data was shown
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 55 2015-MY02

Table 10d. T1A-3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-built
Dimension - Riffle Min
Mean Med Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.3
1
9.0
9.5
10.0
2
6.0
Floodprone Width (ft) 10
1
13
17
21
2
14
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5
1
1.1
1.1
1.2
2
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7
1
1.3
1.4
1.5
2
0.9
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (112) 4.3
1
10.4
10.5
10.7
2
3.2
Width/Depth Ratio 20.1
1
8.0
1 9.0
10.0 1
2
11.2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1
1
1.3
1.8
2.3
2
2.2
Bank Height Ratio 8.6
1
1.0
1
1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
*
45
1
15
30
Radius of Curvature (ft)
*
13
42
2
12
27
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
*
1.3
4.4
2
2.0
4.5
Meander Wavelength (ft)
*
93
136
2
50
80
Meander Width Ratio
*
4.5
1
1 1
5.0 1
2
2.5
1
5.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.013
0.028
2
0.020 0.030
Pool Length (ft)
3
25
2
6
12
Pool Spacing (ft)
30
39
2
20
40
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
JN"I
ANF�
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
470
498
Drainage Area (SM)
0.05
0.40
0.05
Rosgen Classification
F4
7
B4c
B4c/C4
Sinuosity
1.06
1.20
1.09
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.018
0.013
0.017
*Not a meandering channel and mostly composed of riffles and runs; therefore no pattern data or pool data was shown
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 56 2015-MY02

Table 11. Cross -Section Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Dimension and Substrate
Cross -Section 1 (T1 -Riffle)
Station 14+75
Cross -Section 2 (T1 -Pool)
Station 16+40
Cross -Section 3 (T1 -Riffle)
Station 24+88
Cross -Section 4 ( T1 -Pool)
Station 26+98
Cross -Section 5 (T1 -Riffle)
Station 28+75
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.8
10.9
11.0
9.1
9.9
10.5
12.4
12.9
14.2
17.0
18.0
17.3
10.8
12.1
12.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50
>50
-
-
-
>45
>45
>45
-
-
-
>50
>50
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.2
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.4
1.5
0.8
0.9
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.6
1.8
1.7
2.2
2.4
2.3
1.7
1.8
1.8
3.0
3.0
3.2
1.3
1.6
1.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
10.4
10.8
10.1
11.5
12.9
12.8
11.6
12.4
12.9
21.4
24.5
25.4
8.8
10.6
10.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.2
11.0
12.0
-
-
-
13.3
13.4
15.6
-
-
-
13.3
13.8
15.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.6
4.6
4.5
3.6
3.5
3.2
-
4.6
4.1
3.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
91
100
110
-
46
38 1
51
59
24
57
Cross -Section 6 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 101+73
Cross -Section 7 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 105+67
Cross -Section 8 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 110+00
Cross -Section 9 (T2 -Pool)
Station 115+88
Cross -Section 10 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 116+28
Based on fixed baseline elevation w
Base
MY]
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY]
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY]
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY]
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.7
14.1
13.4
15.2
15.9
16.7
14.6
15.1
16.0
17.5
18.1
18.2
15.0
17.1
17.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
35.0
35.0
31.3
33.0
33.0
33.3
>60
>60
>59
-
-
-
>66
>66
>65
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
1 1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.8
3.2
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
13.9
1 14.2
12.7
16.3
16.2
15.4
15.2
15.6
14.6
26.5
23.1
21.9
16.2
16.7
16.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.5
15.4
14.1
14.2
15.6
18.1
14.0
14.6
17.5
-
-
-
13.9
17.5
18.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.0
4.1
4.0
3.8
4.4
3.9
3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 mm
21
4
2.9
5
2.5
2.4
4
2.7
10
-
10
2.8
92
Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 57 2015- MY02

Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project 4 95023 58 2015- MY02
Table 11b. Stream Reach Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Reach: T1 (2,389 ft.)
Parameter
MY01 (2014)
MY02 (2015)
MY03 (2016) MY04 (2017) MY05 (2018)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD n Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n Min
Mean
Med Max SD n Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.9
11.5
11.5 12.9
1.1
4
10.5
12.1
11.9 14.2
1.5 4
Floodprone Width (ft)
45.0
49.1
50.0 50.0
1.8
3
46.9
49.1
50.0 50.3
1.5 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
1.0
1.0 1.3
0.2
4
0.8
1.0
0.9 1.2
0.1 4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.6
1.9
1.8 2.4
0.3
4
1.7
1.9
1.8 2.3
0.3 4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
10.6
11.7
11.6 12.9
1.0
4
10.1
11.6
11.8 12.9
1.2 4
Width/Depth Ratio
11.0
12.7
13.4 13.8
1.2
3
12.0
14.3
15.3 15.6
1.7 3
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
4.1
4.1 4.6
0.5
3
3.2
3.9
3.9 4.5
0.6 3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25
48
70
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20
33
45
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2
3
4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
65
103
140
Meander Width Ratio
234.0
j 4
j j 5.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
17
34
35 46
7.00
20
6.4
35.7
37.9 56.2
12.2 20
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.009
0.02
0.02 0.06
0.01
21
0.006
0.02
0.02 0.02
0.004 20
Pool Length (ft)
8.0
28.3
27.1 49.6
10.8
16
4.8
20.2
18.2 49.4
10.8 17
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.4
2.7
3.0
2
2.3
2.8
3.2
2
Pool Spacing (ft)
38.5
50.8
45.5 99.0
14.6
15
54.1
85.7
75.0 175.8
30.8 16
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,389
2,389
Sinuosity
0.36
0.36
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0093
0.0093
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0092
0.0082
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
41%/4%/29%/26%/0%/0%
39%/8%/18%/35%/0%/0%
dl6/d35/d50 / d84 / d95
10/19/25/50/64
17/34/44/80/100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project 4 95023 58 2015- MY02

Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 59 2015- MY02
Table 11c. Stream Reach Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95023
Reach: T2 (2,084 ft.)
Parameter
MY01 (2014)
MY02 (2015)
MY03 (2016) MY04 (2017)
MY05 (2018)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankf ill Width (ft)
14.8
16.2
15.9 18.1
1.2
5
13.4
17.6
16.7 24.3
3.6
5
Floodprone Width (ft)
33.0
48.4
47.1 66.0
14.5
4
31.3
47.5
46.1 66.0
15.4
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.1
1.0 1.3
1.1
5
0.9
0.9
0.9 1.0
0.9
5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.9
1.7 2.3
1.9
5
1.6
1.9
1.8 2.3
1.9
5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
14.2
17.2
16.2 23.1
3.1
5
12.7
16.3
15.4 22.0
3.1
5
Width/Depth Ratio
14.6
15.8
15.5 17.5
1.1
4
14.1
17.0
17.8 18.1
1.7
4
Entrenchment Ratio
2.1
3.1
3.1 4.0
0.9
4
2.0
3.0
3.0 3.8
0.8
4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
4
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
4
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
20
45
70
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20
37
54
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2
3
4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
58
99
140
Meander Width Ratio
2.2
4
5.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
9.1
37.9
31.1 133.6
28.9
20
5.8
25.8
24.7 44.5
12.9
20
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.003
0.01
0.01 0.05
0.01
20
0.002
0.02
0.01 0.04
0.01
20
Pool Length (ft)
1.7
3.9
0.8 19.3
5.6
14
4.7
8.1
7.1 17.0
3.5
16
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.3
2.3
2.3
1
1.2
1.2
0 1.2
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
22.5
r44.4
47.3 237.7
r74.9 1
13
16.4
r94.7
51.4 279.5
89.0
15
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,084
2,084
Sinuosity
1.16-1.45
1.16-1.45
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0088
0.0083
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0078
0.0074
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
22%/32%/43%/3%/0%/0%
0%/35%/47%/17%/1%/0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
0.2/1/2/17/46
1.1/5/22/59/77
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
Jacob's Ladder Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 59 2015- MY02

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 60 2015— MY02

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site DMS Project # 95023
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo Number
Collection
Occurrence
4/20/2015
4/20/2015
Automatic gauge on-site
N/A
Wracklines and flattened vegetation observed at bankfull, stream
12/17/2015
Unknown
1 - 2
observed above bankfull
Photo 1. Bankfull indicators along T1, 12/17/15
Photo 2. T2 at bankfull, 12/17/15
Jacob's Ladder Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95023 61 2015— MY02

756
755
754
w
C
0
�1
W
753
752
Jacob's Ladder Restoration Site
Stage Hydrograph
Stream Gauge 1
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
r-.
751
T 1'
PA"
I
\ 11
1 \
1111/
1111
11
11 1111!11N
r I
U II
II
T
I1
1--
1�
1\I \
�iW
11
11
1\ 11_1/1
r
1\/'1111
T
\
II
IU III
N
II 11 �
1
1 Il.
I II
I
11
1
1
� r
N
W
N
N
N
N
N
pti
R
�
W
'r3
�
w
�
w
`r3'
O
O
7
rrw11
NN
.�-
N
Sy
�,
�
'c3
.-.
a
'C7
�--•
a
'C
,1�.,
Aa
`<
may-
�1
W
�A
�
W
tA
�
Sv
O
O
O
O
G
O
O
G
�
UQ
�O
aa
3✓
Z.
�O
c
�
'C
00
coo
00
coo
O
^
00
o
n
00
o
n
,1�,
O
C
�l
z
O
�l
z
O
�
(D
n
�l �l
d b
0 a
Date
Stage Bankfull Rainfall
0.6
0.4
0.2
0

747
746
0
745
W
aio
0
744
Jacob's Ladder Restoration Site
Stage Hydrograph
Stream Gauge 2
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
743
Y �_
,-
i
�--
" 1
1�
V
�
i L�
m 1
�
T 111
_ i
t
HIP
l i
u i\n
r--,
n
1 i
\I 1.J
�
I
f\ I
V' lJ
I T
I.
I V UL
T
II I �
IJ
SII
�T
N
W
N
N
N
N
N
W
N
W
N
W
�O
N
00
N
00
N
J
N
J
N
-q
a
a
110/1
1J,
0
0
o
z
z
d d
Date
Stage Bankfull Rainfall
0.6
0.4
0.2
0