20120748 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
FINAL
Project Name: Junes Branch Stream Restoration
NCDMS Contract No.: 003979
NCDMS Project No.: 95027
Jackson County, NC
Data Collected: July 2015 - November 2015
Date Submitted: January 2016
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
NCDEQ-DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Prepared for:
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Prepared by:
EQUINOX
bolonce through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Contents
1.0 Project Summary ------------------------------------------.|
Ll. [oml-----------------------------------------------
l
12 Success Criteria .............................................................................................................................
l
1.3. Project Setting and ---------------------------------2
1.4. Project Approach ----------------------------------------'2
1.5. Project Performance ......................................................................................................................
3
2.0 Methods .............................................................................................................................................
4
lOReferences .........................................................................................................................................
5
Appendix /\ General Tables and Figures ----------------------------------7
Appendix 0Visual Assessment Data .........................................................................................................
l5
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data ...............................................................................................................
4|
Appendix D5bcum Geomorphology Data .................................................................................................
49
AppendixE Hydrologic Data ......................................................................................................................
97

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Goals
The project goals address stressors identified in the Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) and include the
following:
• Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream watercourses
through:
o reducing turbidity by stabilizing existing stream banks and altering stream channel
dimension, pattern and profile
o reducing nutrient loads and fecal coliform bacteria from adjacent agricultural fields
by fencing the riparian area to keep livestock out of the stream and restoring a
wooded riparian buffer
Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the restored channels and
their vicinity through:
o reducing water temperatures by planting native vegetation in the riparian zone and
creating shade
o improving habitat complexity by restoring the stream profile to stable riffle/pool
complex and step/pool complexes
o improving terrestrial habitat by excluding livestock and creating a riparian buffer
comprised of native plant species
o improving aquatic habitat by establishing tree canopy to provide organic material
such as woody debris and leaf packs to stream
o removing invasive exotic species and planting native vegetation in the riparian buffer
Improve flood flow attenuation on-site and downstream through:
o raising the bed or creating bankfull benches to allow for overbank flows every 1-2
years and improve the connection to the active floodplain
1.2. Success Criteria
1.2.1. Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Restored and enhanced streams shall be in compliance with the standards set forth in the USACE 2003
Stream Mitigation Guidelines and should demonstrate morphologic stability to be considered successful.
Stability does not equate to an absence of change, but rather to sustainable rates of change or stable
patterns of variation. Restored streams often demonstrate some level of initial adjustment in the several
months that follow construction and some change/variation subsequent to that is also to be expected.
However, the observed change should not be unidirectional such that it represents a robust trend. If some
trend is evident, it should be very modest or indicate migration to a stable form.
Dimension - Cross-section measurements should indicate little change from the as -built cross-
sections. If changes do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether the adjustments are
associated with increased stability or whether they indicate movement towards an unstable condition.
Pattern and Profile - Measurements and calculated values should indicate stability with little
deviation from as -built conditions and established morphological ranges for the restored stream type.
Pool depths may vary from year to year, but the majority should maintain depths sufficient to be
observed as distinct features in the profile. The pools should maintain their depth with flatter water
surface slopes, while the riffles should remain shallower and steeper. Pattern measurements will not
be collected unless conditions seem to indicate that a detectable change appears to have occurred based
on profile and/or dimension measurements.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 1 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Substrate - Calculated D50 and D84 values should indicate coarser size class distribution of bed
materials in riffles and finer size class distribution in pools. The majority of riffle pebble counts
should indicate maintenance or coarsening of substrate distributions. Generally, it is anticipated that
the bed material will coarsen over time.
Sediment Transpor t- Depositional features should be consistent with a stable stream that is
effectively managing its sediment load. Point bar and inner berm features, if present, should develop
without excessive encroachment of the channel. Isolated development of robust (i.e. comprised of
coarse material and/or vegetation actively diverting flow) mid -channel or lateral bars will be
acceptable. Likewise, development of a higher number of mid -channel or lateral bars that are minor in
terms of their permanency such that profile measurements do not indicate systemic aggradation will be
acceptable, but trends in the development of robust mid -channel or alternating bar features will be
considered a destabilizing condition and may require intervention or have success implications.
Surface Water Hydrology - Monitoring of stream surface water stages should indicate recurrence of
bankf ill flow on average every 1 to 2 years. At a minimum, throughout the monitoring period, the
surface water stage should achieve bankfull or greater elevations at least twice. The bankfull events
must occur during separate monitoring years.
1.2.2. Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring shall be conducted for a minimum of five years to ensure that success
criteria are met per USACE (2003) guidelines. Accordingly, success criteria will consist of a minimum
survival of 320 stems per acre by the end of the Year 3 monitoring period and a minimum of 260 stems
per acre at the end of Year 5. If monitoring indicates either that the specified survival rate is not being
met or the development of detrimental conditions (i.e., invasive species, diseased vegetation), appropriate
corrective actions will be developed and implemented.
1.3. Project Setting and Background
The Junes Branch Restoration Site (Site) is located in central Jackson County approximately 2 miles east
of Sylva, NC (Figure 1). The site encompasses 5.8 acres of formerly agricultural land and includes
portions of Bumgarner Branch and three unnamed tributaries that, for purposes of the project, are referred
to as Junes Branch, Higdon Branch, and Doris Branch. The site is located within the Little Tennessee
River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit 06010203020010, and
the North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) sub basin 04-04-02. The site watershed
is characteristic of the Blue Ridge region with moderate rainfall with annual precipitation averaging 52.9
inches. Elevation within the site ranges from 2,200 feet at the northwestern extent, to 2,150 feet along
Junes Branch. The drainage area of Bumgamer Branch at the downstream end of the Site is 1.03 square
miles (668 acres). Land use within the watershed is predominately forested (68%) with the remaining
land use composed of low-density residential (21%) and agricultural (11%). Additional information
regarding project setting and background is found in the Final Mitigation Plan (EBX 2013).
1.4. Project Approach
Channel restoration involving improved pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile was completed on all
four stream reaches. A Priority I approach was applied to all four reaches of the project (Rosgen 1996;
NCSRI 2004).
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 2 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

1.5. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 2 (MY2) data was collected from July through November 2015. Monitoring included
the following activities: visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement, collection of
photos at fourteen permanent photo stations, documentation of vegetation at five permanent monitoring
plots, surveying of 3,050 feet of longitudinal profile, fifteen cross-sections, and conducting pebble counts
at eight riffles.
Generally, visual assessment of the project as a whole indicates that the streams are performing as desired
and, with the exception of two small bare areas, vegetation is well established throughout the easement.
Summary tables and photos taken at the permanent photo stations associated with the visual assessment
are presented in Appendix B. Visual assessment of the stream was performed to document signs of
instability, such as eroding banks, in -stream structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. No
indication of instability was observed (Table 5 and Figure 2). Structures are intact and performing as
designed. Herbaceous vegetation has become well established in both the wetland fringes along the
stream as well as upland areas. Planted stems are becoming well established; however, two bare areas
totaling 0.07 acre were noted along the Junes Branch reach (Table 6, Figure 2). The one small area of
encroachment (mowing) noted at the private driveway crossing during MY1 has been corrected and
vegetation is becoming re-established.
Monitoring of permanent vegetation monitoring plots (n = 5) was completed during September 2015.
Summary tables and photographs associated with MY2 monitoring can be found in Appendix C.
Vegetation data for MY2 indicate that all vegetation monitoring plots are on track to meet the MY3
interim success criteria of 320 stems per acre. Stem densities ranged from 364 to 688 stems per acre with
a mean of 526 stems per acre across all plots. A total of 12 species were documented within the
monitoring plots. When volunteer stems are included, densities ranged between 728 and 2,064 stems per
acre with a mean of 1,392 stems per acre across all plots.
Geomorphic data for MY2 was collected from October through November 2015. Summary tables, cross-
section plots, and longitudinal profiles related to stream morphology are located in Appendix D. Changes
in the cross-section data between MY and MY2 were limited to Cross -Sections 3 and 13 (Appendix B,
Table l la). Riffle cross-section 3, where downcutting of the channel was evident in MYl has begun to
stabilize, however the max depth still increased by 0.2 feet from MY to MY2. Deposits of finer material
in pools led to a decrease of 0.1 feet to 0.6 feet in maximum pool depth in cross-section 13.
Generally, longitudinal profile data (Appendix B, Table l lb) indicated relatively little change in riffle and
pool dimensions between MY1 and MY2. All reaches showed a decrease in riffle length of between 0.2
feet and 1.6 feet, however these numbers are now falling closer to the baseline conditions. Each reach,
with the exception of Doris Branch, also showed a decrease in average maximum pool depth between 0.1
feet and 0.2 feet.
Substrate monitoring was also performed during MY2. Riffle D50 has decreased between MY and MY2.
The average D50 fell into the coarse sand size class for Bumgarner I, fine gravel for Bumgarner 11,
medium sand for Junes Branch, fine sand for Higdon Branch, and silt to fine sand for Doris Branch. The
shift towards finer particle size classes throughout the project is likely due to fine sediment being
transported into the project area from upstream and dropping out of the water column during the falling
limb of high flow events. Additionally, the dense herbaceous vegetation throughout all reaches increases
entrapment of fine material during high flows. As woody vegetation continues to establish, herbaceous
vegetation density in and near the channel will decrease, allowing more efficient transport of finer particle
size classes during high flows. A gravel and cobble layer is still present under a layer of finer silts and
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 3 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

sand at all riffles assessed during pebble counts. Substrate will be monitored in future years for shifts in
size composition.
Overall, documented shifts in stream morphology do not exceed expectations between MY1 and MY2 as
the constructed stream adjusts to conditions at the site. The project is meeting success criteria regarding
stable dimension, pattern, and profile as well as substrate and sediment transport.
A bankfull event was recorded on the crest gauge at Bumgarner Branch II on a July site visit, at 0.1 feet
above the bankfull elevation (Appendix E, Table 12).
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on DMS's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from DMS upon request.
2.0 METHODS
Visual assessment of the stream was performed at the beginning of the monitoring period. Permanent
photo station photos were collected during the initial visual assessment. Vegetation or stream problem
areas occurring outside of the monitoring stations were documented with additional photographs.
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon* NPR 332 Total
Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section and profile data were collected in
the field and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data was limited to 15
cross-sections, and 3,050 feet of longitudinal profile. Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and
Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman
Pebble Count outlined in the Harrelson et al (1994) and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 5 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring follows
the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool.
In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot are
taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Precipitation data was collected using an Onset® HOBO' Data Logging Rain Gauge. Bankfull events
were documented with crest gauges. During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the corkline was
recorded and cross-referenced with known bankfull elevations at each crest gauge.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 4 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

3.0 REFERENCES
EBX (Environmental Banc and Exchange). 2013. Junes Branch Stream Restoration, Final Mitigation
Plan, Jackson County, North Carolina. NCEEP Project No. 95027
Lee, M.T.,R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm.
NCSRI (North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute). 2004. Stream Restoration: A Natural Channel
Design Handbook. North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant.
Raleigh. http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/programs/extension/wqg/srp/guidebook.html
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources -Division of Water Quality.
Wilmington District.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 5 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 6 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Im
E
•ani
1 y 1Y 1Y .7
�l
r�
. �sr
10 Jum's 1ranch
■■ ' AT [hrecrmns Frnm Amh+ flc. Lkc t-4DWcdfor eMmimilcl}' If n'r
Te
sP lt cxn 27,3"w LE -74 taw�uall •1`l F'h-de ti'3-?i�1n7xa+�[ti
79 FJT i Leif exrt ] Fr7 lewvd fenea C'mv kosd and merge ory
` - L'5-23 3aeiih,'LJS-74 YSsul. A]%r aroxrmetcly :[�mrlci laks ncn
}�� • $3 t",d NC- I07•'Call"kv AwT nuhl •t dx IiA m the raiw
eml®cle este V5-'i+`.Le.heu rile I Isghrva '. lllake s alq[ht k!1
44i _ nolo NC-i01r tai NUM UlZd for appraXamlcl}' *2 m1lca bclorc
'+ mmy k!I cnaa Funim kwJ t A 171—.1}
�.— a f 1"i7 E�'�I lee ulilstl l+fnJkra Vee s, ah ern'or:Mlmo'Au�l lCortisCati4i ntl uf7hr
' 1,{ills '.i`CH:r�[7iuuien �\irty�al.un ber.'It��Tx'+i$)anJ rc
- _. �,-icmnpraan[ kn a rtcsrol�l c,mseri-rur �e tamnena.. Brea ra
�-. _ I*,rda+.til+}•Iarwlotalellrticy.ta»unsa�Ioq+ Acve trgLhc,.r.,
rr,tuut travrrMng arena near or nl vr� thr c-wmxvn h+wi+�lnn ,�,
theraY+rt accta+b4 the geeeraB I+ut+lia is rp'a frrnnu xl Ac. m to
,urlm&m[ pere 9WJ aCsaaW and frskral �#nuly ur 11WU
lkK% eaa+ennlrworr mtotwod In the dt+ AnFrn&e•.avwv,a l W
s ~wdmhrp of rhe reranrmem bac is pe mcA within ala rerma ar•..
nrr[iraaaca nt'rhmr definerl. rain Anv rnrewdod ww vnuai.ism ur
_ Flo+�tv by NOV "n:utynQtal'Fhe+t Trn9.++a1ti• unni.+arrA rolr
.n.I �:Inn,ca rrtsrr.-c �nrx c.wdrm+rsnn ti,:ri7s 6D1i:;
r�
i
Pre-i7awd I'm
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map res
June's Branch
Prujw No, 95027
Jvkson Cowiiy, North Ciroi➢m
11repamd tw9
7T U I N 0'
t�t�S:C'tan- Iti: [il,ll I a6ktri4lu Ilt:[la Ket
W1rqing VA
0 [.5 t 2 3
htide s
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 9 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

`BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter
Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 10 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Junes Branch / Project Number 95027
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nutrient
Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
3,162
-
I -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Project Components
Project
Approach
pP
Restoration
Restoration
Component -or-
Stationing/Location
Existing
Footage/Acreage
(PI, PII
-or-
Restoration
Footage or
Mitigation
Ratio
Reach ID
etc.)
Equivalent
Acreage
Bumgarner Branch
100+21 - 107+49
610
PI
R
631
1:1
1
Bumgamer Branch
107+49 - 112+92
550
PI
R
501
1:1
2
June's Branch
200+97 - 215+77
1,311
PI
R
1,374
1:1
Higdon Branch
300+45 - 304+27
530
P I
R
376
1:1
Doris Branch
400+00 - 402+88
260
PI
R
280
1.1
Component Summation
Restoration
Stream
Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Upland
Level
(linear feet)
(acres) (acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
3,162
Enhancement
-
Enhancement
Enhancement
II
Creation
-
Preservation
-
-
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
FB
Entire Site
Protect Stream
`BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter
Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 10 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Junes Branch / Project Number 95027
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Deliver
Mitigation Plan
Aug -12
April -2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
N/A
April -2013
Construction
N/A
June -2014
Temporary S&E Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
May -14
Permanent Seed Mix Applied
Ma -14
Containerized and B&B Plantings
May -14
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring -
Baseline
July -2014
July -2014
Year 1 Monitoring
Jan - 2015
Feb - 2015
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov - 2015
Nov - 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 11 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Table 3. Project Contacts
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site — Project # 95027
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson St., Suite 110
Prime Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Brian Hockett [phone]
Wolf Creek Engineering
12-1/2 Wall St., Suite C
Designer
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Grant Ginn [phone] ext 102
Northstate Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Construction Contractor
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Northstate Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Planting Contractor
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Kee Mapping and Surveying
PO Box2566
As -built Surveys
Asheville, North Carolina 28802
Phillip B. Key [phone]
Green Resource
5204 Highgreen Court
Seedling Mix Source
Colfax, North Carolina 27235
[phone]
Dykes & Son Nursery
825 Maude Etter Road
Bare Root Seedlings
McMinnville, Tennessee
[phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery
797 Helton Creek Road
Live Stakes
Lansing, North Carolina 28643
[phone]
Equinox
Monitoring Performers (YO-MY2)
37 Haywood St.
2014-2015
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Hunter Terrell [phone]
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 12 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 13 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site — Project # 95027
Project Information
Project Name
Junes Branch
County
Jackson County
Project Area (acres)
5.8 ac.
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.357378° N and longitude 83.191391° W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Blue Ridge
River Basin
Little Tennessee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
6010203 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
6010203020010
DWQ Sub -basin
4/4/2002
Project Drainage Area (acres)
668
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
2.01.03 Hay and Pasture Land
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Bumgarner Br. 1 Bumgarner Br. D Junes Br.
Higdon Br.
Doris Br.
Length of reach (linear feet)
610 550 1311
530
260
Valley classification (Rosgen)
11 H Il
H
11
Drainage area
0.93 1.03 0.23
0.08
0.01
NCDWQ stream identification score
40 40 38
38
29.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C C -
-
-
Morphological Description (stream type) (Rosgen)
E G G
E
G
Evolutionary trend(Rosgen)
C F F
E
G
Underlying mapped soils
CwA, WtB CwA, WtB WtB
CwA
CwA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly Somewhat Poorly Somewhat
Drained -Mod Well Drained -Mod Well Mod Well Drained Poorly
Drained Drained Drained
Somewhat
Poorly
Drained
Soil Hydric status
Non -Hydric Non -Hydric Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Slope
2.20% 2.20% 2.30%
FEMA classification
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Agricultural Agricultural Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
30% 30% 30%
40%
40%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1 Wetland 2
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.03 0.13
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or riparian
Riparian Riparian
non-riverine) Non-Riverine Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series
CwA CwA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly Drained Somewhat Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Seep Seep
Hydrologic Impairment
None Dredging/Ditching
Native vegetation community
Scrub -Shrub Forested
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
2% 42%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States— Section 404
Yes Resolved
Action ID #2012-01101
Waters of the United States— Section 401
Yes Resolved
NCDWR Project # 20120748
Endangered Species Act
No Yes
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
No Yes
ERTR
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No NSA
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A N
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A N. A
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 13 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 14 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

2. Integrated current Condition Plan view 1)ralt
V—P&I1_!. :- Buragarner
Branch
1
0 125 250 500
Feet
Prepared for �� Lo Vane Notes: Prepared by
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project Cross -Section Hook -Log Run g
101Mdd with Hook 1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping
Monitoring Year 2 �i Thalweg 2) Orthoimagery provided by NCOneMap (20 10)
Sylva, Jackson County, NC Top of Bank %Hook Run Log sill
NCDMS Contract No. 003979 Contour- Major Log sill
Boulder -Arch no Baffle
res NCDMS Project No.: 95027 Contour- Minor
Boulder -Arch Brush Toe
November 2015 Vegetation Plot A with Log EQUINOX
Overview
Sheet Boundary Armored Riffle

3UP-i PDIODUV lauzun e1131u0 -
zout zno Z JO i 131tiS
IXONInO
_5oZ q�tnn layQ eualiz� YQ -luo� S i OZ .TaquTanoN
aos UE[ oujE[ f qoi� iapinog ssaaanS Iola uoile;a�aA zo[aW-znoluoa ��
ag3eg ou uojV-zapinog 1lisuaG W31S mol LZOS6 :'oN �aafozd ST�iQaN
WS 207 �Neg3o dos lutod lozluoa 6L6£0� N I �u0Aw-
�� a sv�QaN
luaunloeo�aug $a°niIL �, lutod ologd ON `t�lun0D uOS}ioL f `L'AittS
DIS X07 ung xoog
sai
ea.V Ong pug/utoag Oid 2uo7 agnug isaiD
(0 10Z) dBWOUC)ON gig papiAozd A.ta2Uuno�p (Z Z I�a� �LTT TO�TiTOj�
x��x ult�+
�utddeW aax)ig pop!Aozd elba out(aseg (T ung 2o7-xooH luauzase uotloa ssor �� a2ne ut �a COd u0T u.TO sa uivo au>?.i Saun zo a.Iuda.I
�q pa�eda�d ausA 20-1 d`. S- O H ® I. d 2i �iS u S f 3 p d
:saloN
I .zaujui?umg
Vk
x +
add
4
LO
Al
mw.' �`+• . 'r'f"rrRQ++.
pp
y3uejg72!I '
uauezg stzoQ
s +
a bISX
V l dd =- --t-s �_ S I,X ��-_ie a -e;
`00 Ai
00
Ild
AleF
ZISOX £lSX bSX SSXow
`o +'
�+ O 1. � O M 00 •� •� O
cl lo
"V
N O O O +
R
USX
lsx zsx _.. I
. , _ • Edd" Asx. ;
br-: _1
0
)idd •-#•�
Ile
�t
. `-1
`
! *
oo
tsx
x
O
4.4dd� i gzuezg saunf _II zau.ze�/uz
ng
�
40o,x
Alf -Sea 9 0,
A01A Uvid u0111pu03 ivaaan3 p31ea21aiul -z aan&A

2. Integrated current Condition Plan View
PP3
__—O • �- O r
W • OOCD
a) CD U N
I O .��l� � NO rr� 4A o �i •��~ . W +
+ O �of AO+
O+ + O+ CD
C, M'
O O O O
O PP2
01 �� o XSS
0 o + CO XS9
O� i
P1' 1 ID 1
•� r
Y °■
7! \
��� Junes_ Branch
50 100 200
-'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillilliillillillillililliI Feet
Notes:
Prepared for Log vane Prepared b
p Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project � Rain Gauge Cross -Section � � � Easement Hook -Log Run 1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping P Y
with Hook
Monitoring Year 2 & Crest Gauge Long Pro Begin/End Bare Area 2) Orthoimagery provided by NCOneMap (20 10)
Sylva, Jackson County, NC Photo Point Thalwe Hook Run Log Sill
;_,%. ��/ g Encroachment
NCDMS Contract No. 003979 Log sill 0 control Point To of Bank
Top Low Stem Density Boulder -Arch no Baffle
NCDMS Project No.: 95027 Contour- Major Vegetation Plot Success I I
November 2015 Boulder -Arch Brush Toe U I N O
Sheet 2 of 2 Contour- Minor Criteria Met A with Log
- Criteria Unmet Armored Riffle

podag 5utzoliuoW ienuud
xoumbg
OZ
3IuRIS jp'I SIlnuotjualul a2itd SlgjL
S jo Z JUD k 5uizojnzow
LZO96 'ON Pafoid SMIDN
130f0zd uorIEzo;sa-d UTU311S pu ug saunf

N
e
� C o
z
z
z
y C O
z
z
z
' a
z
z
z
z �
�
ND
�ws
o
0
0
0
0
o
z
0
a
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
acc
o� d
w
V
d
Qn
z
w
� M
r
v
r
md
�
oo�
z
kn
z
w
a04
4 p �
y
Al
o
•�""
iL
sV
F
>
�
y •0�
�
U
�
o
� '�
o
Q
�
z
°
�
cC
a
w
an
5
d
o
#t
t
otn
ao 3
0
0
a
o w
8
co o
U
c
> 9
a ZI °
o
3
p,'
3C2on
co
U
a
c
o 0
on {cy
N
r. b
N
N '�
N
❑❑
FO c�
Pa � m
Pa
r%1
wr
C�
V1
fA ani
°
0..i p7 •D
bD
c d
�, �
�
a°
a°
w
�
❑�'
C
i°
N
M U
'7
N
M
N
6i
rte+ O
v y
L
N L
^I
N
M V]
N

N
N
e
� C o
z
z
z
y C O
z
z
z
' a
z
z
z
z �
�
CV
00
0
o
a
o
0
0
o
a
y
�ws
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
wcc
o� d
w
Vi
y ~
`n
zz V1
y yy
CR
f FO
t-
ao
N
oo
c0
r
r
r
t-
t-
`~4
bA O
A
own r en
p.
v
t—
00
N
00
0o
r
r
t—
t—
—
r -
o c
Z 04
04
C+ a
Cd
C; GJ
w
CP
•iOi y
^
r,
AI
O,y
N
00
V] 6J
A
'C
y
O
A .
P
OO
p
2
Q
z
p
U
y
Qt
y �
h
to
'"
Al
7�4
'�' C
.� P.
'S
3C2co
co
a
c
o o
co
❑❑
wr
p
bD
c d
�, �
�
a°
a°
w
�
❑�'
a
iU°
N
M
6i
rte+ O
v y
L
N L
^I
N
M V]
N
N

M
N
e
� C o
z
z
z
y C O
z
z
z
' a
z
z
z
z �
�
ND
�ws
o
0
0
0
0
o
z
0
a
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
wcc
o� d
w
�
C d
y
z
d vi
_y
�N w
z
0
cd
/ y
�cl
a
y
,
a
^O
Al
o
ani
s
A.
.a
g
y to
4
a�
tz
toN
'd
30
i
Al
ami
>
wr
❑❑
p
bD
c d
�, �
�
a°
a°
w
�
❑�'
a
i°
N
6i
rte+ O
v y
L
N L
^I
N
M V]
M
N

e
� C o
z
z
z
y C O
z
z
z
' a
z
z
z
z �
�
CV
00
0
o
a
o
0
0
o
a
y
n w jo
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
c
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
wcc
o� d
w
�
C d
y
z
N w
en
o
z 04
04
cl
O
U
N
l
is
'� Y�.i �
?N❑
ti
Q
B
G
C7
0
.� �
O
�
O
O
.. �
to
tz
Al
7�4
'�' C
'" .� P.
'F
ami
co
3C2co
co
a
c
o o
❑❑
r%1
r
o
V1
fA ani
p
0..i p7 ,D
bD
c d
�, �
�
a°
a°
w
�
❑�'
a
i
N
M U°
M
6i
rte+ O
v y
L
N L
^I
N
M V]

N
N
e
� C o
z
z
z
y C O
z
z
z
' a
z
z
z
z �
�
ND
�ws
o
0
0
0
0
o
z
0
a
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
wcc
o� d
w
�
C d
y
z
Ay
I�1
M
M
Q
M
m
N
F
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
z
N
N
N
N
N
N
� o w
ou o
on �n
O N
ry
y y
M
N
M
N
Q
z
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
M
N
C
:4
r.
Al
o,y
C
a
0
b
>
A.
QM
.a
y to
a�
tz
8
g
Al
7�4
'�' C
'��" .� P.
'G
c
O
3C2co
Oc
co
a
c
o o
co
r. b
N
NI
N
❑❑
FO c�
Pa � m
Pa
r%1
C�
V1
fA ani
p
0..i p7 ,D
bD
cu,
c d
�
�
a°
a°
w
�
❑�'
a
x U
v
n?
3
°
Im
L
Y
6i
rte+ O
v y
L
N L
^I
N
M V]
N
N

yO bA
yt y
O
O
O
O
O
O
y y
O
O
U
o
0
0
0
o
U
o
0
4.
N
O
N
O
rl
C
za
za
0
H
0
o
a
u
�
u
3
9z
z
z
z
9z
o�
z
� n
O
�a
U
•—
O
T
G� ii
^O
73
o
0
73
y
N
O O
O
O
p O
N
0
O
r+
y
ci
ii
Vi

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 202+60 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 202+60 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 27 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 206+30 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 206+30 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 28 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking South/Downstream Junes Branch
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking North/Upstream - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 29 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 210+60 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 210+60 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 30
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Station 211+10 - Upstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 214+00 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 31 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 214+00 - Upstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 7
Station 100+21 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 32 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 102+70 - Downstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 102+70- Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 33 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 105+25 - Downstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 105+25 —Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 34 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Bumgamer Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Junes Branch
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 35 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

� .._ — ..•11.1 �. o
Bumgarner Branch II — Permanent Photo Station 1 I
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Higdon Branch
Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1 I
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch II
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 36 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Bumgarner Branch II — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Doris Branch
Doris Branch — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch II
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 37 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 302+80 - Downstream
Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 302+80 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 38 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

CL
er {
'4 ti r
•ytr�'8f'c'. A". moi:#'i !!��..`i"2.`,Tt4_ A3
Doris Branch — Permanent Photo Station 14
Station 400+00 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 39 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 40 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes �EEI
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 43 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
September 11, 2015
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
September 11, 2015
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 44 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

-"C }_,� E
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
September 11, 2015
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
September 11, 2015
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 45 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
September 11, 2015
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 46 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Report Prepared By
Drew Alderman
Date Prepared
9/11/2015 13:23
database name
Equinox_ 2015_ A_Junes.mdb
database location
Z.\ES\NRI&M\EBX Monitoring\Junes\MY2-2015\Data\Veg
computer name
FIELD -PC
file size
61181952
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary
of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each
year. This excludes live stakes.
Prot' total stems
year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems,
dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences
and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species
for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing
stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95027
project Name
Junes Branch
Description
River Basin
Little Tennessee
le ngth(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Re quire d Plots (calculate d)
Sampled Plots
5
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 47 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

H
cl
00
O �
6
C
O
�
y
p
v�
vi
a�
7
wwwwc�
H
O
a
p
ra
V
iSl
Cl
V't
1O
�
�°
�°
l�
�
NIc
N
R
N
G
O10
V1
V1
r
�
R
QI
M
C-4
O
\O
rl
h
Q
O
\O
M
10lD
�10
W
kn
F
M
r
Vl
N
M
M
N
M
M
V
V
Cl
C,
N
�
N
N
M
Cl
IDe4
1010O
10
N
V
N
�
—�
QI
h
N
CVl
M
N
--�
�
•--�
O
�
10
�
A
�
7
a
nr
O
Rl
o
o
N
p„
Z.
N
� y
N
Y
y
M
ON
N
U a
A
a
G!
L
O
U
H �
O
II
a
y
G
�
Or
p
a
M
D\
F
V
rn
m
r�
R
F
�
W
a
10
a
»
v�h
Hv,
°
C
g
y
o
m
.'c
CG
U
Ul
O
z
0.i
U
cn
v
°
ptztIz
ZI
�
?
�
°
tl
0
�
3
ti
S
N
4
CS
i
o
�
O
5
°
>{
�
Cii
Is
ti
O
O
'N
�
tl
�
tl
� O
Y
Z
�
3
N
3
Obi �
•�
tl
�
�
N
N>
y
4, ?
h
01
Ol
n
H
cl
00
O �
6
C
O
�
y
p
v�
vi
a�
wwwwc�
H
cl
00

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

U
N
O
0
0
M
O
y
GL
t y
u
p
d
V
4
O
00
N
p
N
rj
�O
'f
i
N
n
M
O
U
N
p
'C
O
G
N
V
4
Oi
N
N
A
p
M
O
�i
�
R
N
b+
CJ
N
M
M
u c
u
o0
z
•� L 'a
U m
r
A
F
y p
ova
00
O
p
N
O
�
�O
n
N
O0
'7
n
N
z
�
U
d
�
N
N
O
•� � �
O •O
�
N
n
m
m
M
�
N
Z
A a U
y
bD �
U
N
O
y
O
'••�
.•-I
L
N
r
N
A
O
n
N
r
N
�
o
o0
M
z
.Np
�
�
G
�
O
G
0
N
p
.o
�
❑
O
�❑�yy
�
C
OtiO
�
J7
U
x"
W
E
N
`
L
w
o
X
n
3
W
a
.a
�
o
U
C
0
0
U
E
A
U
N
O
0
0
O
d
y
O
N
N
L
U
N
�
N
O
V O
•� L 'a
U m
r
A
F
y p
y
GiI
00
O
p
N
�O
N
O0
'7
n
N
z
z
U
�
N
N
O
•� � �
O •O
�
N
n
m
m
M
�
N
Z
�
y a
U
N
W`6
�
�
G
�
O
G
0
O
U
E
L
U
N
O
0
0

E
0
u u
�
�
�
W
p
V
N
oo
n
O
N
N
Vi
A
O
N
O
L
m
O
7
N
(7,n
O
n
Sr
U
v
pp
iG
�O
N
..
n
y
FQ
m
N
N
O
6
n
M
z
A
O
•G!
1/'J
O
N
M
O
Q�
l�
Vl
\O
�
M
O
O
Qi
b+
by C>
O
w
F
u
O
u
�
l�
y
C U �
M
I'm '�
W
O
N
N
z
C U r
M
� 1 e4h
C.
ti
01
h
M
O
�
Q
Fi
00
^
N
o0
l�
n
N
�
1
In
r.+
Q i.w U
C� 6>
C � •O
z
C
V �
L
N
en
6l C
p
'.
7
r�
v1
O
M
G L
V u
1
N
_
^�
C�
N
n
O
^�
�
N
06
o
o
O
n
V
z
N
N
N
N
�
.o
W
U
W
P4
b
o
w
C
0
v
m
pa
Q
.p
e
W
o
C
0
0
U
e
A
E
p
N
N
U
O
0
O
0
a
�
�
W
p
V
N
oo
n
O
N
N
Vi
A
O
N
O
L
7
N
(7,n
O
n
v
Q\
�
N
iG
� �
� W
O
•G!
1/'J
O
N
M
O
Q�
l�
Vl
\O
�
M
O
O
Qi
y
C U �
M
CE � •O
A � U
C.
L
z
C
V �
L
N
.-
'.
7
r�
v1
O
M
N
^�
C�
V
N
O
n
V
z
.o
W
U
wu
P4
w
C
0
0
U
.p
e
A
p
N
N
U
O
0
O

M
N
r.
K
M
O
u p
�
00
A
O
N
Q
N
� �
U
7
o06
N
O
o
U
�
co
�
^
oo
M
�
m
°O
O
�
L
� y �
o
�
A r
� �
H •^7
'�1
O
M
M
O�
�
O
�
O
�
�
A so. C
O
N
C
00
rq
lam+
M
CC O O
N
'O
O
O
N
PLO
cq
N
o A
c
-i
�
^
O
O
N
cG
^
CG
y
i
ayir
.m
•Ui �
M
MA
A
C pa
x
.s
.s
.2
�
o
�
c
O
U
:J
O
M
N
O
u p
�
00
Q
N
U
�
06
o06
N
O
is •w
OL
�
co
�
^
oo
M
�
m
°O
O
�
s00^
o
�
O
C
lam+
M
CC O O
N
PLO
N
•�
c
-i
�
^
O
O
N
^
� O
.m
•Ui �
M
MA
A
C pa
x
.s
.s
.2
O
-131
�
�
o
U
Vl
O
c
U
v
i�
M
N

2157
2156.5
2156
2155.5
2155
2154.5
2154
,153.5
0 2153
152.5
W
2152
2151.5
2151
2150.5
2150
2149.5
2149
0+00
Bumgarner I
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Station 103+31
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
— MYO — MYl —MY
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 54
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
0+30 0+35
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Bumgarner I
Cross Section 2 - Pool
Station 103+56
2157
2156.5
2156
2155.5
2155
2154.5
2154
_-2153.5
0 2153
42152.5
W
2152
2151.5
2151
2150.5
2150
2149.5
2149
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35
Station (feet)
-MYO -MY1 -MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
55
0+40
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Bumgarner I
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Station 106+36
2149
2148.5
2148
2147.5
2147
2146.5
2146
_-2145.5 ----- ---- — ----- ------
0 2145
42144.5
W
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
Station (feet)
MYO — MY1 � MY2
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 56
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Klgnt Uescenaing tSank
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Bumgarner II
Cross Section 4 - Pool
Station 109+24
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
,2140.5
0 2140
42139.5
W
2139
2138.5
2138
2137.5
2137
2136.5
2136
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35
Station (feet)
—MYO —MY1 —+—MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 57
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
0+40 0+45 0+50
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Bumgarner II
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
Station 109+58
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
d 2140.5
w
e 2140
-- ----- ----- --— — — — — —
----- ---
2139.5
W 2139
2138.5
2138
2137.5
2137
2136.5
2136
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
Station (feet)
—MYO —MY1 —0--MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 58
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
0+45 0+50
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Station 202+94
Lrii
2176.5
2176
2175.5
2175
2174.5
2174
w2173.5
e 2173
-------------- —— — — — — — — — — — — — —
�2172.5
W
2172
2171.5
2171
2170.5
2170
2169.5
2169
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
—MYO —MYl tMY2
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
0+30 0+35
Downstream
59 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 7 - Pool
Station 203+50
2176
2175.5
2175
2174.5
2174
2173.5
2173
,2172.5
0 2172
42171.5
W------ ----------- — ----
2171
2170.5
2170
2169.5
2169
2168.5
2168
0+00 0+05. 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
—M -VO —MY1 —MY2 ---BKF
LGIL ""IIA
aR s
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 60
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
0+30 0+35
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Station 20+99
2167
2166.5
2166
2165.5
2165
2164.5
2164
,163.5
-------------- -- ------ ------ -------------------
0 2163
tZ162.5
W
2162
2161.5
2161
2160.5
2160
2159.5
2159
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
Station (feet)
-M-VO -MY1 -MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 61
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 9 - Pool
Station 207+18
2167
2166.5
2166
2165.5
2165
2164.5
2164
_-2163.5
0 2163
42162.5
W
2162
2161.5
2161
2160.5
2160
2159.5
2159
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
Station (feet)
-M-VO -MY1 -MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
0+35 0+40 0+45
Rieht Descendine Bank
Y 4.p
Downstream
62 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

2148
2147.5
2147
2146.5
2146
2145.5
2145
_-2144.5
0 2144
42143.5
W
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
21441
2140
0+00
Junes Branch
Cross Section 10 - Pool
Station 214+53
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
Station (feet)
-MYO -MY1 tMY2 ---BKF
Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 63 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

2148
2147.5
2147
2146.5
2146
2145.5
2145
_-2144.5
0 2144
42143.5
W
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
21441
2140
0+00
Junes Branch
Cross Section 11 - Riffle
Station 214+65
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
Station (feet)
-M-VO -MY1 -MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 64 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

2145
2144.5
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
122141.5
r2141
ea
;2140.5
W
2140
2139.5
2139
2138.5
2138
2137.5
2137 +-
0+00
Higdon Branch
Cross Section 12 - Riffle
Station 301+99
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
---MYO —MY1 —MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 65
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
0+25 0+30
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
,2140.5
0 2140
42139.5
W
2139
2138.5
2138
2137.5
2137
2136.5
2136
0+00
Higdon Branch
Cross Section 13 - Pool
Station 302+26
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
-M-VO -MY1 -MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
0+25 0+30
Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 66 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Doris Branch
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
Station 401+12
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
2140.5
2140
_-2139.5
0 2139 ----- ----------- --
d213S.5
W
2135
2137.5
2137
2136.5
2136
2135.5
2135
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
-m-VO -MY1 tMY2
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 67
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
0+25
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

2142
2141.5
2141
2140.5
2140
2139.5
2139
_-2138.5
0 2138
42137.5
W
2137
2136.5
2136
2135.5
2135
2134.5
2134
0+00
Doris Branch
Cross Section 15 - Pool
Station 401+35
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
-M-VO -MY1 -MY2 ---BKF
Upstream
0+25
Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 68 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C= Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 69 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table IIb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner I 631 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY - 2
MY -3 MY -4 MY - 5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mcan Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
14.6
14.6 15.8
N/A
2
13.4
15.5 15.5 17.6
3.0
2
12.7
14.5
14.5 16.3
2.5
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>42
>61
>61 >79
N/A
2
>42
>61 >61 >79
26.2
2
>42
>61
>61 >79
26.2
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9 0.9
N/A
2
0.8
0.8 0.8 0.8
0
2
0.8
0.9
0.9 0.9
0.1
2
Bankf ill Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.4
1.4 1.5
N/A
2
1.3
1.5 1.5 1.7
0.3
2
1.3
1.6
1.6 1.9
0.4
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftz)
11.7
12.0
12.0 12.2
N/A
2
11.3
16.4 16.4 21.4
7.1
2
10.2
12.5
12.5 14.8
1 3.3
2
Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
17.8 1
17.8 1 20.4 1
N/A 1
2
1 15.8
1 18.6 1 18.6 1 21.4
4.0 1
2
1 15.8
1 16.9
16.9 18.0
1.6
2
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.7
>4.3
>4.3 >59
N/A
2
>2.4
>4.15 >4.15 >5.9
2.5
2
>2.6
>4.4
>4.4 >6.2
2.5
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
0.5
13.7
14.4 23.0
7.4
14
10.5
17.0 14.5 25.6
5.7
11
11.4
17.5
14.9 26.6
6.1
11
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.016
0.061
0.039 0.251
0.063
14
0.019
0.030 0.027 0.055
0.010
11
0.017
0.028
0.025 0.040
0.009
11
Pool Length (ft)
5.2
10.2
9.2 22.5
4.3
12
5.0
7.6 7.3 13.4
2.2
12
5.4
7.7
7.0 12.9
2.1
12
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.8
2.8 3.6
0.5
14
1.9
2.5 2.4 3.7
0.5
14
1.9
2.3
2.2 2.7
0.3
14
Pool Spacing (ft)
24.2
45.2
44.1 60.3
10.3
11
25.3
41.8 41.1 59.9
11.9
11
28.8
41.4
37.6 57.5
10.3
11
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
24.5
25.3
25.3 26.2
N/A
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
41.6
48.3
41.6 60.1
10.3
3
Rc: Bankfall Width (ft/ft)
2.8
3.3
2.9 4.1
0.7
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
69.8
81.7
75.9 105.4
16.6
4
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.0
2.0 2.1
N/A
2
Additional Reach Parameters J
Rosgen Classification
Bc
B
B
Chantel Thalweg Length (ft)
728
713
704
Sinuosity (ft)
1.09
1.09
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0233
0.0243
0.0247
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0235
0.0245
0.0250
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
37%
32%
24%
7%
0%
38%
34% 19% 9%
0%
40%
35%
19% 7%
0%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%/Be%*
dl / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C= Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 69 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

lzoda-d 2utjoltuoW junuuV
xoumbg
OL
S 3o Z JL,3A 5utzoltuow
LZO96 'oN 133f0id SMIDN
loo fold uotiviolsag wua4S goueig sounr
alq,peAeun uoTle1uuo3ul
3100upag = ag / zapinog = g / alggo3 = 3 / JOA19JD = 9 /PUBS = VS / fBjD-1I?S = DS
dolS=S/ORD =D/Iood=d/UU2l=ng/QUJPd=RI
'Aldd>2 lou scop uoil>?uuojul - V/N
zagl0 zo luoBololg
ouloW 1u1TquH io X11IIgv1S Iauuugo
s3Iuegfucpozg gltm gazagJO %
(URU)S6P/78P/OSP/SEP/9TP
*%ag/%g/%D/%J/%VS/%DS
%0
%01 %SZ
%8 i
%87
%0
%Ol %7Z
%9I
%OS
%0
%8 %8Z
%8I
%S7
%S / %D / %d / %n -d / %!-a
S7T0'0
7910'0
Z9I0'0
(8/$) o o 111[n3 -g
9910'0
ISTO'0
0710'0
(Ijllj) (lauueq:)) odolS ompnS jolvA1
LOI
90'1
L0'T
(lj) AllsonuIS
9Z9
ZZS
£79
(13) gltfua-1 tamluu, IOU-gD
lUoljv3u!ssnjD
ag
og
og
uatso-d
saalatunjud gauag IuuolltppV
£
Co
9'Z I'Z
Z'Z
0'Z
oilug glp!M j3puroW
£
871
917£1 Z'99
Z'£ZI
£'601
(13)gldualaAEmzapueaIN
Z
V/N
9'9 £'7
£'7
i'£
(ARID g1PIA1 Unpuug :og
Z
V/N
£'69 7'7S
7'79
9'6£
($) aml7?—DJD snlpug
£
8'£
Z'9Z Z'9Z
0'8Z
7'SZ
(U) g1PAM 113giauulegD
-
uaallud
9
L'9
8'9L L'L9
9'L9
0'69
9
I'9
S17L 7'99
L'99
L'09 9
9
Z'08 6'69
Z'OL
9'19
(AD ful3vdSlood
L
£'0
0'£ LT
97
T'Z
L
7'0
Z'£ L'Z
L'Z
Z'Z L
7'0
7'£ FE
67
£'Z
(13)g1daQ-IN ood
L
I'7
I'OZ 0171
9171
6'L
L
9'9
Z'9Z L'ZI
6'£I
T'6 L
7
VZZ Z'6I
8'L1
171
($) glfua-I Iood
9
900'0
7Z0'0 910'0
LI0'0
£10'0
9
Z00'0
TZO'0 910'0
L10'0
910'0 L
L10'0
790'0 OZ0,0
9Z0'0
910'0
(13/Ij) odolS DUJT a
9
6'S
077 £'Z£
6'Z£
9'9Z
9
S'S
077 S'7£
917£
Z'LZ L
ZI
9'8£ £'Z£
6Z
I'£
(13) q uo-I alljTN
algoad
I
V/N
O' i
i
V/N
-
0' T
-
1
V/N
O' l
011md ftp?aH ung
I
V/N
0'£<
1
V/N
-
i'£<
-
I
V/N
- -
£<
otleg luaunlauazlug
I
V/N
8'OZ
I
V/N
7'8I
1
V/N
-
Z'ZZ
-
o?1t2I g1daQ/g1PIA1
I
V/N
97I
1
V/ISI
7'£T
-
i
V/N
-
6'11
-
(Z$) L'azV luuolloaS-ssoiD Iln33luug
I
V/N
£'I
I
V/ISI
£'T
-
I
V/ISI
-
Z'T
-
(13)g1 oa-WIIn3Tmg
I
V/N
8'0
1
V/N
6'0
-
1
V/N
- -
L'0
-
(1,1) gldaQ uVOW IIn3*Wg
I
V/N
87<
I
V/N
-
87<
1
V/N
- -
L7<
(8) g1P!M auozdpool,g
I
V/N
Z'91
l
V/N
-
L'SI
I
V/N
-
£'9I
(13)g1P?AkIInpur-a
u QS xuy�l pays uuay�l uly� u QS xuy� pays ueaw ury* u QS xeyV pays ueay� uly�l u
QS
xuyv pays
uuay�
uly�l
u
QS
xuyV pays
ueayV
urW u
QS
xeyV paW
ueayV
ulW
al33ld- aluilsgnS V uolsuauilQ
S -AN 7 -AN £ -AN
Z - AW
I - AN
aulla sug
Ja;amuaud
6553 £t,S II aauau uing - LZOS6 'ON laa,oad gauwag saunp
,UuuttunS uluQ gauag tuvaalS - uluQ Nuliol!uoIV 'aii algn.L

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
'Number of riffle cross-sections mis-reported in baseline; Corrected value included here.
2Variation in channel thalweg length due to differences in length of monitored longitudinal profile from as -built.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 71 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes Branch 1,375 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3 MY -4 MY- 5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n'
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
9.3
9.6 9.8
0.6
3
8.8
9.6
9.0 10.8
1.1
3
8.0
9.1
8.6 10.6
1.4
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>38
>62
>53 >94
29.2
3
>38
>62
>53 >94
29.0
3
>38
>61.7
>53 >94
29.0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.6
0.6 0.7
0.2
3
0.5
0.5
0.6 0.6
0.1
3
0.4
0.5
0.5 0.6
0.1
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1.0
1.2 1.2
0.3
3
0.9
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.1
3
0.7
1.0
1.0 1.2
0.3
3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.7
5.3
5.8 1 6.4
1.4
1 3
4.1
1 5.2
5.2 1 6.4
1.2
3
3.0
4.6
5.2 1 5.7
1.4
3
Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
16.8
16.5 19.7
2.7
3
15.9
17.7
18.2 18.9
1.6
3
14.1
18.5
19.8 21.7
4.0
3
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.9
>6.8
>5.5 >11
3.7
3
>4.2
>6.6
>4.9 >10.7
3.6
3
>4.4
>7.0
>5.0 >11.7
4.1
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
3
1.0
1.0--1.0
1.0
0.0
3
Riffle Length (ft)
7.8
14.9
14.4 33.7
4.1
44
4.9
13.8
14.1 20.5
3.5
43
5.6
13.6
13.8 20.9
3.4
43
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.007
0.029
0.030 0.052
0.010
44
0.007
0.030
0.032 0.049
0.010
43
0.014
0.034
0.031 0.093
0.014
43
Pool Length (ft)
4.7
10.7
10.4 19.5
3.0
42
1.6
7.8
7.6 14.8
2.9
43
3.7
9.7
9.7 14.5
2.7
43
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.9
1.9 3.2
0.4
44
1.0
2.1
2.0 3.8
0.6
43
0.8
2.0
2.0 3.6
0.6
44
Pool Spacing (ft)
12.3
30.0
30.5 42.1
6.2
41
19.7
29.8
31.5 38.2
5.4
40
11.9
29.0
30.0 38.6
6.4
41
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
18.5
19.7
20.1 21.0
1.5
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
31.9
35.8
36.7 38.9
3.6
3
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
3.3
3.7
3.8 4.0
0.4
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
53.7
67.1
61.4 88.3
12.5
6
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.1
2.1 2.2
0.2
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Be
B
B
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,480
1,4272
1,414
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0231
0.0245
0.0271
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0246
0.0248
0.0272
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
50%
0%
34% 9%
7%
47%
0%
26% 18%
9%
46%
0%
33% 1 13%
8%
SC%/ SA%/G%/C%/B%/Be%*
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
'Number of riffle cross-sections mis-reported in baseline; Corrected value included here.
2Variation in channel thalweg length due to differences in length of monitored longitudinal profile from as -built.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 71 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

lioda-d 2utlo;tuoW junuuV
xoumbg
ZL
S 3o Z Ju3A 5utzo;tuoW
LZO96 'oN 133f0id SMIDN
loo fold uotiuzo;sa-d urea4S goueig sounr
algulteAeun uotluuuojul -
sonpA p31031JODI
ilowpog = og / zaptnog = g / olggoD _ 0 / IaAIUD =`J / PUUS = VS / fETD-jpS = DS
dols=S/ap?IJ=IJ/food=d/ma =n-d/ald3pl=pl
•,ildde lou scop uo!lnuzzo3uI - V/ISI
za410 zo Iu4�01019
auloW luliquH zo X1111quIS lo—gO
sjuug �?utpozg gltm gound jo %
( )S6P/78P/OSP/SEP/ 91P
*%3g/%g/%D/%'J/%VS/%0S
%Z
%S I %I £
%9
%97
%0
o l I %7£
%S
%1 S
%Z:
%L I %L7
%I
%Z7
%S / % %d / 0n21 / 0t2T
£910'0
9910'0
810'0
(8/8) a oIS iinj)luug
7810'0
1610'0
OZO'0
(8/8) (lou-qD) a oIS oou3zns zaluM
90'1
90' I
90' I
(8) �T!sonuls
89£
OLE
Z8£
(8) q—,i 2omiplu, la—gD
og
os
og
uotluoytssulD uat?sog
saa;auieiud gaeaH IuuoMiPPV
Z
V/N
S'l £' l
Cl
l' l
oilug giP!M zapuua W
L
£'6
9'6£ 9' T£
T' I £
8' T I
(13) glfualanuM zapuua W
£
7'0
67 9'Z
S'Z
07
13/8) g1PiM iln3*mg and
£
7'£
67Z I'OZ
L'6T
Z-91
(8) aznlunznO3o snipug
Z
I'Z
171 9'01
9'01
1'6
(8) glPiM 113g IauuegO
ml
ula;;ud
£I
S'£
8'SZ £'81
8'81
L'ZT
ZI
S'7
Z'I£ 0'61
£'OZ
9171
£I
8'£
9'9Z 9'LI
9'81
I'£T
(8)OutoudS Iood
71
Z'0
Ci 7'T
7'1
Z'T
Zi
£'0
0'Z 7'T
9'1
Z'T
£T
Z'0
Z L'I
L'I
£'T
(8)gldo(I-WIood
71
8'I
Z'8 9'9
9'9
S'Z
71
L'I
I'6 £'9
T'9
S'Z
7I
8'1
11 7'8
I'8
9'7
(8) 1412-1 100d
£I
600'0
9£0'0 910'0
610'0
900'0
£I
T 10'0
070'0 610'0
IZO'0
L00'0
£T
ZIO'0
L70'O LIO'O
IZO'0
Z00'0
(8/8) odolS aWrd
£T
8'Z
8'71 7'8
6'8
67
£T
67
9'SI T'6
8'6
9,9
£I
67
ST 9'L
L'L
S'Z
(8) g15ua7 ag31g
aiyo.ld
I
V/N
-
0' I
-
I
V/N
0' I
-
1
V/N
-
O' I
09122l lgdlaH �Iuug
I
V/N
-
9'9<
I
V/N
-
67<
-
I
V/ISI
9<
olluZlluauzgouazlug
I
V/N
-
9'OZ
I
V/N
-
L'7Z
-
l
V/N
TL
-
opmd gl aQ/g1p!M
I
V/m
-
7'Z
I
V/N
-
97
-
I
V/N
S'Z
(Z8) uazV IuuotlooS-ssoz0 IIn33luug
I
V/N
-
6'0
-
I
V/N
-
L'0
-
I
V/N
-
L'0
(8) gl oCl-W Iin3Tuug
I
V/N
-
£'O
I
V/N
-
Co
-
I
V/N
-
7'0
(8) gldaQ uroW Iinpl ug
I
V/N
-
i
V/N
-
07<
-
I
V/N
07<
(8) g1PiM 3uozdpooT3
I
V/IST
l
V/N
-
I'8
-
l
V/N
0'8(13)
glpiM Tin3�ug
u QS xeyV pays uuay� utY�i u QS xey� pays uuay� utIt u QS xuy� pays ueay� ulL�i u
QS
xey� Et
uiy�
u
QS
xey� pays
ueay�
uty�
u
QS
xey� pays
�uuay�
uty�
al{31g- a;uilsgnS V uotsuaunQ
S -AW t, NN £-AIT
Z -AN
I -AN
aullasug
Ja;awuaud
13;)J 9L£ gaue.xg uop IH - LZOS6 'oN iaa,o.ld / gauuag saunp
huwtunS u;uQ gauag wean;S - u;uQ Nupo;ruoW •qI I alqus

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
'Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 73 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Table I Ib. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Doris Branch 288 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY- 2
MY -3 MY -4 MY- 5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min
Mean'
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.2
N/A
1
6.6
N/A
1
6.9
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>23
-
N/A
1
>23
-
N/A
1
>23
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
0.4
-
N/A
1
-
0.4
- -
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
0.7
N/A
1
-
0.7
- -
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
-
2.3
N/A
1
-
2.4
- -
N/A
1
1.9
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
-
16.7
N/A
1
-
18.2
- -
N/A
1
25.7
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
N/A
1
>3.5
- -
N/A
1
>3.4
-
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
-
N/A
1
1.0
-
N/A
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
2.5
6.1
6.3 11.4
2.5
18
3.7
6.5
6.5 11.3
2.0
18
3.6
6.3
6.1 9.3
1.9
18
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.011
0.022
0.013 0.036
0.008
18
0.002
0.023
0.020 0.055
0.014
18
0.004
0.026
0.027 0.056
0.014
18
Pool Length (ft)
2.4
3.7
3.5 6.6
1
19
2.5
3.8
3.8 5.3
0.8
19
2.5
3.8
3.6 7.3
1.1
19
Pool Max De th (ft)
1.2
1.6
1.6 2.3
0.3
18
0.7
1.1
1.1 1.5
0.2
19
0.6
1.2
1.2 1.8
0.3
19
Pool Spacing (ft)
7.2
12.4
12.6 19.9
2.9
18
7.5
12.4
13.3 18.4
3.0
18
7.6
12.4
12.9 18.5
3.0
18
Patte rn
Channel Belt Width (ft)
9.4
9.9
10.0 10.3
0.5
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7.9
12.0
12.0 16.1
5.8
2
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
3.1
4.3
4.3 5.5
N/A
2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
16.6
22.6
24.5 27.1
4.5
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.0
2.1
2.1 2.2
0.1
3
Additional Reach Parameters
-
Ros en Classification
Be
Be
Be
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
288
274
274
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.06
1.06
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.018
0.019
0.020
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.018
0.020
0.020
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
48%
8%
31% 12%
1%
51%
6%
32% 11%
0%
49%
7%
31% I1%
2%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%/Be%*
dl / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
'Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 73 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

S 3o Z JL'3A 5utzoltuow
lioda-d 5utjojtuoW iunuuV
LZO96 'oN 133f0id SMQDN
xoumbg VL loo fold uotivzolsag urea4S goueig sounr
SM ,lIS OAN-ain;ani3S o STOZ/LO/L ZAAi-A1.LS1OZ/91/1 iAAi-AU ITOZ/Oi/S OAW-AU
Oaaj) uopeIS
ofx9°! ofx�°l
x°o
1
6£TZ
LZ+LOI of L£+OOI 2luiuOICIS
apjo.id Ivuipnii2tuorl
I gaunag aaua��uzng
OfiiZ
- TbTZ
Zti1Z
£171Z
bbiZ
SPIZ
9bIZ
Lb1Z
- 8h1Z M
ZSTZ
£SIZ
17SIZ
SSIZ
9SIZ
LSIZ
SSIZ
6SIZ
09TZ
i91Z
-£-SX
b
iv
..........
d -
i_x
2�-T-SX
LZ+LOI of L£+OOI 2luiuOICIS
apjo.id Ivuipnii2tuorl
I gaunag aaua��uzng
OfiiZ
- TbTZ
Zti1Z
£171Z
bbiZ
SPIZ
9bIZ
Lb1Z
- 8h1Z M
ZSTZ
£SIZ
17SIZ
SSIZ
9SIZ
LSIZ
SSIZ
6SIZ
09TZ
i91Z

2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
2139
40
O
2138
2137
2136
2135
2134
2133
2132
Bumgarner Branch 11
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 107+27 to 112+35
Station (feet)
ITW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW- MYI 1/15/2015 --s— TW - MY2 10/07/2015 BKF --------- WS 0 Structure - MYO
Juries Branch Stream Restoration Project 75 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
..........
AverageBankfufl Slope
VV
............
-----.........
XS -4-P
I...........
Station (feet)
ITW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW- MYI 1/15/2015 --s— TW - MY2 10/07/2015 BKF --------- WS 0 Structure - MYO
Juries Branch Stream Restoration Project 75 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

poda-d 2utjojtuoW iunuuV
xoumbg 9L
SAA,--------- AM oAw-ain;anps p S1/ii/Ii ZANI-ALLSi/S1/1 INN -A1.L ITOZ/OI/S OANi-AU
Oaa j) uO14niS
s�x�Or sx:9. S�xAo� Six?"
S 3o Z JL'3A 5utzoltuow
LZO96 *ON 133f0id SMIDN
loo fold uotivzolsag urea4S goueig sounr
11�1
xoo
z
d -6 -SX
•
b -B -SX
d -L -SX
�-s
------------
Al
adoiSi[n33Iuega2IV.IaAV
---
Si+SIZ 01 L6+OOZ 21MU01Ell
IS
apjo.id lumpnii2tuoZ
I jaagS - gautag saunr
9SiZ
LSIZ
8SIZ
6SIZ
091Z
i9IZ
Z9IZ
£91Z
V9IZ
S91Z
99iZ
L9IZ
0
89iZ
6912
OLIZ
ILIZ
ZLIZ
£LIZ
17LIZ
SLIZ
9LIZ
LLIZ
8LIZ
6LIZ
08iZ

2160
2159
2158
2157
2155
2154
2153
2152
2151
2150
y 2149
w
p 2148
0
2147
W 2146
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
2139
2138
2137
Junes Branch - Sheet 2
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 200+97 to 215+15
2136
�o
�x
�s
llOx�t 11-I'X 11I"X
Station (feet)
TW -MYO 5/10/2011 TW -MYI 1/15/15 TW -MY2 11/11/15 ° Structure- WO BKF --------_ WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 77 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
-------
Aver
age Bankfull Slope
-
XS -11-R
------
--------------------------
XS -10-P
2136
�o
�x
�s
llOx�t 11-I'X 11I"X
Station (feet)
TW -MYO 5/10/2011 TW -MYI 1/15/15 TW -MY2 11/11/15 ° Structure- WO BKF --------_ WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 77 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

lzoda-d 2utjoltuoW junuuV
xoumbg
`
SL
Ams
SM--------- OAR -aan;ana;S p SI/01/11 ZANi-Au
SIOZ/SI/I IAN AU
ITOZ/OUS OAN AU
(laaj) UOIIUIS
s�x�o�
s�X�o� s�X�o�
s<x�o� s�xro�
s<xlo�
srxlo� s
Xooe
S 3o Z Jw)A 5utzoltuow
LZO96 *ON loafoid SMIDN
loofozd uotivzolsad ureazlS gouejg saunr
,�-
"o
o�,
9M
........... o
�-ZZ-SX
----------------
uUg a!IU.IaAV
'4
adojS do
..........
ZZ+bO£ of 9b+00£ 2'uiuoiujs
apjoad ieulpT4!Nuod
uauu.ig u029piH
L£IZ
8£IZ
6£IZ
1171
ZbIZ
bb1Z

2142
2141
%4[il7
2139
y 2138
2137
W
2136
2135
2134
2133
Doris Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 400+00 to 402+82
�o°x°o �o°moo roj�o �ojxso �o�x°o �o��o �o�%o
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 — TW - MY 1/15/2015 TW - MY2 11/10/15 O Structure - MYO BKF WS
79
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
--------------
•
-----------
Average Bankfull Slope
)PI
XS-14-R
•
--- -------------------
XS -15-P
�o°x°o �o°moo roj�o �ojxso �o�x°o �o��o �o�%o
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 — TW - MY 1/15/2015 TW - MY2 11/10/15 O Structure - MYO BKF WS
79
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

lioda-d 2utjojtuoW iunuuV
xoumbg
08
juelg I3a'I ,fljcuotjualul a�tud sig,l
S 3o Z JL'3A 5utzoltuow
LZO96 'oN 133f0id SMIDN
loo fold uotivzolsag urea4S goueig sounr

Junes Branch
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Monitorin
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
0-0.062
0.062 - 0.125
0.125-0.25
0.25-0.5
0.5 - 1.0
1-2
2-4
4-8
8-16
16-32
32-64
64-128
128-256
256-512
512-1024
1024-2048
2048-4096
Bedrock
Total
Year - 2015; MY2
Number
Individual
14
13.3%
12
11.4%
22
21.0%
2
1.9%
6
5.7%
1
1.0%
1
1.0%
6
5.7%
6
5.7%
7
6.7%
13
12.4%
12
11.4%
3
2.9%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
105
100%
Summa
D50
D84
D95
Cumulative
13%
25%
46%
48%
53%
54%
55%
61%
67%
73%
86%
97%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
,y Data
0.67
60
110
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 81 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 82 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
n
0
7
60%
a
50%
c
40%
a
c
t MY1 Cumulative %
30%
f MY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
Obti ytih py5 Oy tiO
O' O• y' c�'
O' pp�,y" p,Y'yh Oti O
y ti y'A p 0 ,��O 3ti r°b 1�W 'Lyd
9i ro' ti A 4"
'r 3 6 ti
1
y1ti O�"b Ob1D
�o' 'Y 'L b at
h ti A 9i e
'L y'1 yOti ryOA 0
Particle Size Groups
JunesBmnch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
n
0
70%
0
m
H
60%
a
50%
m
L
~
40%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
2F
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
0%
O6ti ytih O.yh Oh ,'� titi
O 0 ti 0 by O,yS Oy
Op6 01
y'A p'b Nb ';'L t°P
$ 16 3ti
1,1W 'Lyb yy'L O,1"b Ob0 Oo'6 o��F
(Ot, ytiO '1y6 'y�'y ��ti 0$p 0eac
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 82 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
34
31.8%
32%
0.062 - 0.125
1
0.9%
33%
0.125-0.25
11
10.3%
43%
0.25-0.5
4
3.7%
47%
0.5 - 1.0
8
7.5%
54%
1 -2
5
4.7%
59%
2 - 4
2
1.9%
61%
4 - 8
6
5.6%
66%
8-16
7
6.5%
73%
16-32
11
10.3%
83%
32-64
6
5.6%
89%
64-128
11
10.3%
99%
128-256
1
0.9%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
107
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.68
D84
43
D95
99
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 83 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 84 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
P
0
v 60%
H
a
/
50%
v 40/
t MY1 Cumulative %
.
MY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
O6ti 'Y,�h by Oy ,yO 'y b
o• oro 6' ti a �' 6 ti ti A at
O 5 h• ti ti �` 1 3 6y ti� by ti0 GO �bO e o
O' Oo ti ytih Oti O 1 'L y1 yO'L SOA 0
O'
Particle Size Groups
JunesBmnch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
in
60%
a
50%
~
40%
c
■ MY1 % by Size Group
e
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
0%
Ob'L yyh O•L� O5 ,yO
O O. � O.. may, Ory Oy,
000
,.' L y G p 0 ,�b 3'L yb y�W 'Lyb yy'L O�,b 0�0 O�6 0��1-
$ �6• ,�,y Off` 1ryy6 y�y bbl, bOp 0eat
5 yO .tO
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 84 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
18
17.0%
17%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
17%
0.125-0.25
4
3.8%
21%
0.25-0.5
8
7.5%
28%
0.5 - 1.0
9
8.5%
37%
1 -2
12
11.3%
48%
2 - 4
1
0.9%
49%
4 - 8
5
4.7%
54%
8-16
8
7.5%
61%
16-32
17
16.0%
77%
32-64
12
11.3%
89%
64-128
11
10.4%
99%
128-256
1
0.9%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
4.9
D84
50
D95
100
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 85 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 86 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
o.
P
0
0 60%
a
50%
c
L
~
40%
t MY1 Cumulative %
30%
f MY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
O6ti 'Y,�h by Oy ,yO 'y b
O 5 h• ti ti �` 1 3 6y ti�
O' Oo ti ytih Oti O 1
O'
A 6
by ti0 GO �bO e o
'L y1 yO'L SOA 0
Particle Size Groups
JunesBmnch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
0
70%
0
0
60%
a
50%
~
c
40%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
aE
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
1 -. I
0%
OO6ti ytih O,yh Oh , '�
� ti 0 by ply Oy
006 01
ti'L y'A p' b ,y6 '�'L toP
$ 16 3ti
1,1W 'Lyb yy'L O,l"b Ob0 Oo'6 o��F
b� ytiO 'ly6 'y�'1 'L�`~ �$A 0eac
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 86 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
48
45.7%
46%
0.062 - 0.125
4
3.8%
50%
0.125-0.25
10
9.5%
59%
0.25-0.5
7
6.7%
66%
0.5 - 1.0
3
2.9%
69%
1 -2
3
2.9%
71%
2 - 4
2
1.9%
73%
4 - 8
1
1.0%
74%
8-16
4
3.8%
78%
16-32
2
1.9%
80%
32-64
7
6.7%
87%
64-128
12
11.4%
98%
128-256
2
1.9%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.13
D84
53
D95
86
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 87 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 88 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
P
0
v 60%
H
a
50%
v 40/
t MY1 Cumulative %
It
30%
f MY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
O6ti 'Y,�h by Oy ,yO
o• oO 5 h•
O' Oo ti ytih Oti O
O'
'y b
ti ti �` 1 3
ro �' ti
a �'
6y ti�
1
6 ti ti A 6,0
by ti0 GO �bO0 e
'L y1 yO'L SOA
Particle Size Groups
JunesBmnch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
n
2
70%
0
m
60%
a
c
50%
c
40%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
ki
,
0%
.
.
O6ti yp O,Oh , '�
O ti 0 by ply Oy
006 01
ti'L y'A p' b ,y6 '�'L t°P
$
1,1W 'Lyb yy'L O,l"b Ob0 Oo'6 o��F
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 88 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
38
35.8%
36%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
36%
0.125-0.25
12
11.3%
47%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
47%
0.5 - 1.0
8
7.5%
55%
1 -2
0
0.0%
55%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
55%
4 - 8
1
0.9%
56%
8-16
6
5.7%
61%
16-32
14
13.2%
75%
32-64
17
16.0%
91%
64-128
8
7.5%
98%
128-256
2
1.9%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.65
D84
50
D95
84
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 89 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 90 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
0
t7
w 60%
H
a
50%
L
~
` 40%
c
t MY1 Cumulative %
30%
f MY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
O6ti 'Y,�h by Oy ,yO
o• oO 5 h•
O' Oo ti ytih Oti O
O'
'y b
ti ti �` 1 3
ro �' ti
a �'
6y ti�
1
6 ti ti A 6,0
by ti0 GO �bO0 e
'L y1 yO'L SOA
Particle Size Groups
JunesBmnch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
n
70%
0
m
60%
a
c
50%
c
40%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
0%
O6ti yti5
O � ti 0 by ply Oy
006 01
$
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 90 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 11 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
40
38.1%-
38%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
38%
0.125-0.25
16
15.2%
53%
0.25-0.5
2
1.9%
55%
0.5 - 1.0
1
1.0%
56%
1 -2
0
0.0%
56%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
56%
4 - 8
3
2.9%
59%
8-16
6
5.7%
65%
16-32
16
15.2%
80%
32-64
8
7.6%
88%
64-128
11
10.5%
98%
128-256
2
1.9%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.21
D84
49
D95
86
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 91 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 92 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 11 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
P
0
v 60%
H
a
50%
c
40%
t MY1 Cumulative %
30%
f MY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
O6ti 'Y,�h by Oy ,yO
o• oO 5 h•
O' Oo ti ytih Oti O
O'
'y b
ro �' ti a �'
ti ti �` 1 3 6y ti�
1
6 ti ti A 6,0
by ti0 GO �bO0 e
'L y1 yO'L SOA
Particle Size Groups
JunesBmnch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 11 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
9
70%
0
w
m
N
60%
1
a
a`
50%
m
L
~
40%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
X
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
EL-
0%
O6ti ytih O,yh Oh , '� ti'L
O � ti 0 by ply Oy
006 01
y'A p' b ,y6 '�'L t°P
ob,
1,1W 'Lyb yy'L O,1"b Ob0 Oo'6 o��F
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 92 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 12 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
52
49.5%
50%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
50%
0.125-0.25
15
14.3%
64%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
64%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
64%
1 -2
0
0.0%
64%
2 - 4
1
1.0%
65%
4 - 8
1
1.0%
66%
8-16
3
2.9%
69%
16-32
8
7.6%
76%
32-64
15
14.3%
90%
64-128
10
9.5%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.13
D84
45
D95
77
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 93 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 94 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 12 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
0
v 60%
H
T
a
50%
c
40%
t MY1 Cumulative %
It
30%
f MY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
O6ti 'Y,�h by Oy ,yO
o• oO 5 h•
O' Oo ti ytih Oti O
O'
'y b
ti ti �` 1 3
ro �' ti
a �'
ro 'r ti�
1
6 ti ti A 6,0
by ti0 GO �bO0 e
'L y1 yO'L SOA
Particle Size Groups
JunesBmnch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 12 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
m
Vi
60%
T
a
50%
z
~
40%
c
■ MY1 % by Size Group
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
0%
Op yp O,yh
O ti 0 by ply Oy
006 6.
$ 16 3ti
b� ytiO 'ly6 'y�'1 'L�`~ �$A 0eac
h .yO ,yO
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 94 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
55
51.4%
51%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
51%
0.125-0.25
31
29.0%
80%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
80%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
80%
1 -2
0
0.0%
80%
2 - 4
1
0.9%
81%
4 - 8
3
2.8%
84%
8-16
5
4.7%
89%
16-32
4
3.7%
93%
32-64
6
5.6%
98%
64-128
2
1.9%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
107
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
7.7
D95
51
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 95 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 96 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
P
0
v 60%
H
a
50%
c
T`
40%
t MY1 Cumulative %
It
30%
MY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
06ti 'Y,�h by Oy ,y0
o• oO 5 h•
O' Oo ti ytih Oti O
O'
'y b
ti ti �` 1 3
ro �' ti
a �'
6y ti�
1
SO c.
6 ti ti A a�
by ti0 GO �b0 e o
'L y1 y0'L SOA 0
Particle Size Groups
JunesBmnch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
y
60%
a
50%
~
c
40%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
aE
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
0%
06ti ytih O,yh Oh , '�
O ti 0 by ply Oy
006 01
ti'L y'A p' b ,y6 '�'L t°P
$ 16 3ti
1,1W 'Lyb yy'L O,l"b Ob0 Oo'6 o��F
b� yti0 'ly6 1 ~ �$A 0eac
h .y0 ,y0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 96 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 12. Verification ofBankfull Events
Junes Branch/ Project No. 95027
Reach Date of Data Collection Date ofOccurrenee Method
Feet Above
Bankfidl
Evevation
Photo #
(if available)
Bumgamer 11 7/28/2015 Unkown Crest Gauge
0.1
E-files
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 99 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Figu
Figure 3. Dailv Precipitation Totals for the Junes Branch Restoration Project
2
1.8
1.6
s 1.4
u
c
1.2
c
0
�a
Y
Q
'u
0.8
a
T
m 0.6
0
0.4
0.2
N Data
Collected
0
In In In In Ln In In In In In In to
L L C 5 on Q + > U
cm Q In O z C�
re 4. Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to Average, 30"', and 70"' Percentiles for Jackson Coi
7.0Growing5eason�
6.0
5.0
4.0
.2 -
3.0
.L
n 2.0
1.0
No Data
Collected
0.0
Jan -15 Feb -15 Mar -15 Apr -15 May -15 Jun -15 Jul -15 Aug -15 Sep -15 Oct -15 Nov -15 Dec -15
Site Monthly Rainfall ----• 30th Percentile — — —70th Percentile Average
znty
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 100 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 5