20120747 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

MONITORING YEAR 2
ANNUAL REPORT
Final
DEVIL'S RACETRACK MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 003989
NCDMS Project Number 95021
Data Collection Period: April 2015 - October 2015
Draft Submission Date: November 20, 2015
Final Submission Date: December 11, 2015
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
W
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full -delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (NCDMS) to restore and enhance a total of 18,936 linear feet (LF) of stream and restore
63.3 acres (ac) of wetlands in Johnston County, North Carolina. The project streams consist of five
unnamed tributaries (UTs) to the Neuse River. The largest of these streams, Devil's Racetrack Creek (East
and West), drains directly to the Neuse River. The other four streams are small headwater tributaries to
Devil's Racetrack Creek (Southwest Branch, Middle Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch). The
project proposes to provide 18,381 stream mitigation units (SMU's) and 62.1 wetland mitigation units
(WMU's). At the downstream limits of the project, the drainage area is 831 acres (1.30 square miles).
The Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in eastern Johnston
County along Devil's Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway 701 and approximately
one mile east of Interstate 95 (Figure 1). The Site is located in the western portion of the Inner Coastal
Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Site is located within the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) subbasin 03-04-02 of the Neuse River Basin (United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Hydrologic Unit 03020201140010).
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized and the surrounding
wetland complex had been drained for agricultural purposes. The primary objectives of the project were
to promote wetland hydrology; restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland community; restore
a Coastal Plain stream system to promote hydrologic connectivity with the floodplains and wetlands;
stabilize stream banks; promote instream habitat and aeration; restore riparian buffers; and further
improve water quality through removing existing agricultural practices. Figure 2 and Table 1 present the
restoration and enhancement design for the Site.
The following project goals were established to address the effects listed above from watershed and
project site stressors:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian
habitat and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwaters
streams, to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality
benefits.
Stream and wetland restoration and enhancement construction efforts were completed in February 2014.
Baseline as -built monitoring activities (MYO) were completed between January and February 2014. A
conservation easement is in place on 96.065 acres of the stream and wetland riparian corridors to protect
them in perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 2 (MY2) assessment and site visits were completed between the months of April and
October 2015 to assess the conditions of the project. Overall, the Site has met the required vegetation,
hydrology, and stream success criteria for MY2. The overall MY2 average planted stem density for the
Site is 645 stems/ acre which is greater than the year three interim density requirement of 320 stems/
acre. All restored and enhanced streams are stable and functioning as designed. Southeast Branch,
Southwest Branch, and Middle Branch all had pressure transducers installed to monitor stream flow. Two
of the three stream gages (Southwest and Middle Branch) met the hydrologic criteria for MY2. Of the 38
groundwater monitoring wells on the Site, 35 met the success criteria (water table with 12 inches of the
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL iii

ground surface for 8.5% of the growing season consecutively) and three did not. Of the three wells that
did not meet the success criteria, two showed a water table within 12 inches of the ground surface for
greater than 6% of the growing season consecutively. Nineteen wells that did not meet the success
criteria in MY1 did meet in MY2 as well as four wells that were added in MY2. This trend appears to
demonstrate that the Site was heavily drained prior to restoration and groundwater is slowly recharging
throughout the Site. It is anticipated that the wetland areas will continue to recharge and meet hydrologic
success criteria in the upcoming monitoring years.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL iv

DEVIL'S RACETRACK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
Figure 1
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
Project Component/Asset Map
1.2
Monitoring Year 2 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
Table 2
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-2
Project Contacts Table
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
1.2.3
Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-4
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-4
1.2.6
Wetland Assessment..........................................................................................................1-4
1.2.7
Maintenance Plan..............................................................................................................1-5
1.3
Monitoring Year 2 Summary......................................................................................................1-6
Section 2:
METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3:
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2a -b
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3.0-3.2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a -f Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Photographs
Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix 4 Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a -f Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11a -f Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Table 12a -f Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL v

Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data and Plots
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 14 Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Groundwater Gage Plots
Stream Flow Gage Plots
Monthly Rainfall Data
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL vi

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in eastern Johnston
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201) near the town of Four Oaks, North
Carolina. The Site is located along Devil's Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway
701 and approximately one mile east of Interstate 95. The Site is located in the western portion of the
Inner Coastal Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The project watershed consists primarily of
agricultural lands and forest. The only significant development in the watershed is a campground adjacent
to Devil's Racetrack Creek on the western portion of the project site, a middle school in the upper portion
of the watershed, a low-density subdivision with single family homes, and a small section of 1-95. The
drainage area for the project site is 831 acres (1.30 square miles) at the lower end of Devil's Racetrack
Creek (East).
The project stream reaches include Devil's Racetrack Creek (East and West), Southwest Branch, Middle
Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch, (stream restoration and/or enhancement level 1/11
approach). Mitigation work within the Site included restoration and enhancement of 18,936 linear feet
(LF) of perennial and intermittent stream channel and restoration of 63.3 acres (ac) of riparian wetland.
The stream and wetland areas were also planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect
water quality. The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by the NCDMS in January of 2013.
Construction activities were completed by Land Mechanic Designs, Inc. (East Side) and Fluvial Solutions
(West Side) in February 2014. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton Natural Systems,
Inc. in February 2014. Baseline monitoring (MYO) was conducted between December 2013 and April 2014.
Annual monitoring will be conducted for seven years with the close-out anticipated to commence in 2021
given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more detailed project activity, history, contact
information, and watershed/site background information for this project.
A conservation easement has been recorded and is in place along the stream and wetland riparian
corridors to protect them in perpetuity; 96.065 ac (Deed Book 4221, Page 419-433) within two tracts
owned by Nell Howell Revocable Trust. The project provides 18,381 stream mitigation units (SMU's) and
62.1 wetland mitigation units (WMU's). Directions and a map of the Site are provided in Figure 1 and
project components are illustrated in Figures 2a and 2b.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized and the surrounding
wetland complex had been drained for agricultural purposes. Stream valleys and other low areas were
filled to raise wet areas and even out the fields. At the same time the streams were straightened and
riparian vegetation was also removed. The project area west of Devil's Racetrack Road was used for row
crop agriculture and the eastern portion was used for timber production.
The channelization of streams on the Site resulted in severely over -enlarged channels that were extremely
deep in many locations. The alterations of the Site to promote farming practices resulted in complete
elimination of the ecological function of this small stream/wetland complex. Specifically, functional losses
at the Site include degraded aquatic habitat, altered hydrology (related to loss of floodplain connection
and lowered water table), and reduction of quality and amount of riparian wetland habitats and related
water quality benefits. Ongoing bank erosion was also occurring at some locations due to high, overly
steep banks and lack of bank vegetation. Table 4 in Appendix 1 and Tables 10a through 10f in Appendix
4 present the pre -restoration conditions in detail.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-1

The Site was designed to meet the over -arching goals as described in the mitigation plan (Wildlands,
2013). The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Devil's Racetrack Creek Site project area, others, such as
pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects. The
following project specific goals established in the mitigation plan include:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian
habitat and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwaters
streams, to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality
benefits.
Secondary project goals established in the mitigation plan were to restore fish passage from the Neuse
River to Devil's Racetrack Creek. This is a secondary goal because success will not be measured during
monitoring.
The primary project goals were addressed through the following project objectives:
• Promote wetland hydrology by raising channelized stream beds and filling drainage ditches;
• Plant wetland areas with native tree species to restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp —
Blackwater Subtype community;
• Reconstruct stream channels to have the appropriate slope, planform, and cross-sectional
geometry for the region of the Coastal Plain in which the project is located;
• Size reconstructed stream channels to flood floodplains and wetlands frequently;
• Stabilize stream banks using bioengineering, natural channel design techniques, and grading
to reduce bank angles and bank height;
• Install in -stream structures and woody debris to promote aeration of water, create habitat,
and influence the creation of bed forms commonly found in sand bed channels;
• Restore riparian buffer areas with native tree species to stabilize channels, filter flood flows
and runoff, and supplement wetland plantings; and
• Remove project area from agricultural production further improving water quality.
The design streams and wetlands were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding
landscape, climate, and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing
watershed conditions and trajectory. The mitigation project was developed to restore a large
stream/wetland complex directly adjacent to the Neuse River to a naturally occurring community to
create riparian and wetland habitat and improve water quality. Other key factors addressed in the design
were to create stable habitats, improve riparian buffers, and restore the natural migration patterns for
anadromous and other fish for spawning.
1.2 Monitoring Year 2 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and quarterly site visits were conducted during MY2 to assess the condition of the
project. The stream and wetland mitigation success criteria for the Site follow the approved success
criteria presented in the Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2013).
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 51 vegetation plots were established during the baseline monitoring within the project
easement areas. All of the plots were installed using a standard 10 meter by 10 meter plot. The final
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-2

vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the riparian corridor along
restored and enhanced reaches and within the wetland restoration areas at the end of the seven year
monitoring period (MY7). The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at
least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period (MY3) and at least 260
stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring (MY5).
The MY2 vegetative survey was completed in June 2015. The 2015 vegetation monitoring resulted in an
average planted stem density of 645 stems per acre, which is greater than the interim requirement of 320
stems/acre required at MY3, but approximately 8% less than the baseline density recorded at MYO, 702
stems/acre, in January 2014. When including volunteer stems, the average stems/acre is 722. This is well
above the MY3 interim requirement of 320 stems/ acre. There was an average of 16 stems per plot which
is a slight decrease from 17 stems per plot in MY1. All 51 of the vegetation plots individually met success
criteria for MY2, and are on track to meet the success criteria required for MY7 (Table 9, Appendix 3).
Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs and the vegetation condition assessment table and
Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
Along the lower section of Devil's Racetrack (East), there are several bare areas (approximately 15.5% of
the planted acreage). In these bare areas, the planted trees appear healthy and volunteer trees have
sprouted, but the herbaceous ground cover is still deficient and not well established. This area was graded
down several feet during construction which removed the top soil, leaving a more acidic subsoil.
Wildlands incorporated liquid and pelletized lime into the soil during construction with the expectation
that the pH would increase over the first year or two and would provide better herbaceous growing
conditions. As of MY2, this area still has low pH soils, but continues to improve as the herbaceous ground
cover density develops. Additional permanent seed, temporary seed, lime, and fertilizer was added during
MY2 to promote better ground cover. Wildlands will continue to monitor these areas and will reapply
seed and soil amendments as necessary. Refer to Appendix 2 for the vegetation condition assessment
table, the Integrated Current Condition Plan View (CCPV), and reference photographs.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY2 were conducted in April 2015. All streams within the Site are stable and
met success criteria for MY2. In general, cross sections for all streams showed little to no change in
bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width -to -depth ratio. Surveyed riffle cross sections fell within the
parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type.
Cross section 8 on Devil's Racetrack (West) has maintained a consistent bankfull width, but has increased
in depth and area. This is due to the location of the cross section within the shallow. The shallow was
built with logs buried at the stream bed elevation, perpendicular to the stream banks, for grade control.
These logs create downstream micro pools within the shallow. Cross section 8 was placed downstream
of one of these logs in a micro pool. These micro pools are expected and the increase in depth and area
of cross section 8 is typical in micro pools. Cross Section 8 is stable and performing as expected, even
though there is an increase in depth and area.
Longitudinal profile surveys are not required on the project unless visual inspection indicates reach wide
vertical stability concerns. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual stability assessment table, the CCPV map,
and reference photographs. Refer to Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-3

1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
In the spring of 2015 minor bank erosion was repaired between stations 103+00 and 107+00 on Devils
Racetrack Creek (East). The repair work consisted of regrading banks, seeding, matting, addition of native
transplants and live staking. As of the fall of 2015, the vegetation is better established in this area and
the stream banks appear to be stable.
Southeast Branch also had minor repair work performed in the spring of 2015. Several areas between
stations 309+00 and 315+00 required repairs to log grade control structures. These structures were
sealed with native stone to stabilize them. Also, several meander bends were repaired by installing native
sod mats and transplants for bank stabilization. Below this area where the stream slope decreases,
sediment that had accumulated in the channel was removed and deposited on the adjacent, stabilized
floodplain. Wildlands assumes that the sediment deposition resulted from runoff of the adjacent farm
fields prior to the riparian buffer becoming well established. Wildlands will continue to monitor the
sediment deposition along Southeast Branch in future monitoring years.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the seven year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in
separate years within the restoration reaches. Multiple bankfull events were recorded on all the streams
with crest gages and pressure transducers during the MY2 data collection. All streams on the Site had
multiple bankfull events during MY1. Therefore, the Site has met the required stream hydrology success
criteria.
Pressure transducers were also installed on Southwest Branch, Southeast Branch, and Middle Branch to
measure stream flow. These pressure transducers were installed to show that the streams have adequate
flow throughout the year, and are not ephemeral ditches. Per discussion with the Interagency Review
Team (IRT), on these three streams, consistent flow must be documented for at least 30 consecutive days
under normal circumstances. Stream flow must be documented to occur intermittently in all months
other than July through September. Southwest and Middle Branch showed consistent flow throughout
MY2. Southeast Branch had a malfunction with the pressure transducer and Wildlands was unable to
retrieve the data from the pressure transducer. The pressure transducer was replaced on July 30, 2015
and data has been recorded from this point on during MY2. Since being replaced, the pressure transducer
on Southeast Branch has recorded multiple bankfull events and flow for a maximum of 16 consecutive
days. During MY1 one pressure transducer was lost during a flood, so Wildlands decided to make the
other pressure transducers more secure during MY2. The pressure transducer for Southwest and Middle
Branch were reinstalled to make them more secure, and keep them from washing away. Two of the three
streams have met the flow success criteria for MY2. The third stream had a malfunction with the pressure
transducer for part of the year so it is unknown if it met flow success criteria. Refer to Appendix 5 for
hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Wetland Assessment
Thirty four groundwater monitoring gages were established during the baseline monitoring within the
wetland restoration zones. During MY2 four more gages were added to help assess groundwater levels
on the Site. All the gages were installed at appropriate locations so that the data collected will provide an
indication of groundwater levels throughout the Site. To provide data for the determination of the
growing season, one soil temperature probe was installed. A barotroll logger (to measure barometric
pressure used in the calculations of groundwater levels with well transducer data) and a rain gage were
also installed on the Site. All monitoring gages were downloaded on a quarterly basis and maintained on
an as needed basis. The success criteria for wetland hydrology is to have a free groundwater surface
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-4

within 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5 percent of the growing season, which is measured in
consecutive days under typical precipitation conditions. During MY1 NRCS WETS Data was used to
determine the growing season for the Site. After discussions with the United States Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), it was agreed to use on-site soil temperature data to determine the beginning of the
growing season and use NRCS WETS data to determine the end of the growing season. During MY2 the
beginning of the growing season was extended by 18 days based on soil temperatures staying above 41
degrees Fahrenheit at 12 inches below the ground surface.
The USACE also requested pre -construction groundwater well data be overlaid on hydrographs with the
current monitoring year groundwater well data. USACE requested this data to see how groundwater
levels are recharging after rain events on the Site. Wildlands overlaid the pre -construction groundwater
well data with the closest monitoring groundwater well data and rain data. It is evident from these
overlays that the Site drained more rapidly and to greater depths prior to restoration. Refer to Appendix
5 for pre and post construction groundwater gage comparison plots.
Of the 38 groundwater monitoring wells on the Site, 35 met the success criteria and 3 did not for MY2.
The 35 wells that met the success criteria generally exceeded the standard significantly. The measured
hydroperiod ranged from 12.0% to 32.4% with 17 wells exceeding 20% of the growing season. Prior to
project construction, Wildlands anticipated that it might take a year or two to see hydrology rebound on
the site due to the heavily ditched and drained pre -restoration conditions. A comparison of MY1 and MY2
monitoring results appears to support this concept. The MY2 hydrology results are significantly wetter
than the MY1 results where only 12 of 34 wells met the success criteria. This improved performance came
despite the fact that the 2014 rainfall total through October was 22 inches greater than the measured
rainfall total in 2015 through the same period.
Of the 3 wells that did not meet the success criteria, two (Gage 1 and 34) showed the water table within
12 inches of the ground surface for 6% of the growing season consecutively. It is also worth noting that
these two wells would have met for approximately 12% of the growing season had they not dropped to
approximately 13 inches for two consecutive days in March. The third well (Gage 10) that did not meet
showed the water table within 12 inches of the ground surface 4% of the growing season. This well was
very dry in MY1 as well (0.6% hydroperiod). While the 2015 results are an improvement, this well will be
monitored closely during the remainder of the monitoring period.
Groundwater wells 8 and 32 were placed outside of proposed wetland restoration boundaries to provide
data to potentially increase the wetland restoration boundary. The wetland restoration area around well
8 was modified during Mitigation Plan review due to concerns about drainage from a section of the
abandoned Devils Racetrack Creek that could not be filled. Since this channel was left open and could
possibly drain the proposed wetlands, a conservative wetland restoration boundary was agreed upon.
The MY2 well 8 results appear to indicate that the channel is not draining the area around the well, and
that wetland restoration boundaries extend farther than expected. Similarly, groundwater well 32 was
placed downstream of proposed wetland restoration boundaries to see if wetland restoration boundaries
extended farther than the hydrology model indicated they would. During MY2 well 32 showed a similar
hydrograph to wells upstream in a wetland restoration area that met success criteria. These results
appear to indicate that wetland restoration boundaries extend farther downstream than expected. Refer
to Appendix 2 for the groundwater gage locations and Appendix 5 for groundwater hydrology data and
plots.
1.2.7 Maintenance Plan
No maintenance plan is necessary at this time. Wildlands will continue to monitor Southeast Branch and
the floodplain area adjacent to the lower section of Devil's Racetrack (East). A maintenance plan will be
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-5

developed if it becomes apparent that Southeast Branch continues to have aggradation and degradation
problems. In addition, if the floodplain area adjacent to the lower portion of Devil's Racetrack (East) does
not continue to improve herbaceous cover, Wildlands will develop a maintenance plan to establish
grasses.
1.3 Monitoring Year 2 Summary
All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. There were a few areas on Southeast
Branch and Devil's Racetrack (East) that were repaired during MY2. These areas will be monitored for any
future issues and a maintenance plan will be prepared if necessary. The average stem density for the Site
is on track to meeting the MY7 success criteria; all individual vegetation plots meet the MY2 success
criteria as noted in the CCPV. There have been at least two documented bankfull events recorded by the
crest gages on each of the streams on the Site. A total of 35 out of 38 groundwater gages met the wetland
hydrology success criteria, and the Site is showing a significant trend in groundwater recharge. This trend
is fully expected to continue in the future.
Summary information and data related to the success of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
NCDMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from
NCDMS upon request.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-6

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). All the Integrated Current Condition Mapping was recorded
using a Trimble handheld GPS with sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcGIS. Crest
gages and pressure transducers were installed in surveyed riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly.
Hydrology attainment installation and monitoring methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003)
standards. Vegetation monitoring protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey-NCDMS Level 2
Protocol (Lee et al., 2008).
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi,
Pages 12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDEQ-
DWR, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2002. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Climate Information for Johnston County, NC (1971-2000). WETS Station: Clayton, NC1820.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Devil's Racetrack Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan. NCDMS,
Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Devil's Racetrack Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Baseline
Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report. NCDMS, Raleigh, NC.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

�,�
d
03020201130030
IlIq 41rre %yO
II l,a; 1 Crru,i'
M
4-
1r1"js
packlr,g Ptd,`'I� d
country C kill
6f Johns I4th
QotJn ty
ffcttt,
iof,c
RISIOXWOM
�'00001AN i 03020201140010
X00-0/
03020201150050
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
W I L D L A 0 0.5 1 Miles Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
E N 0 1 N L L. i;
I 1 I NCDMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Johnston County, NC
?,
±r. i
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
t, ; A,
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
03020201150020
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
Directions:
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms
From 1-95 exit 90, turn left onto NC -96 N.
and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
NC -96 N turns slightly left and becomes
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
Devils Racetrack Rd. Follow Devils
and activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
Racetrack Road south for 2.1 miles.
RISIOXWOM
�'00001AN i 03020201140010
X00-0/
03020201150050
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
W I L D L A 0 0.5 1 Miles Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
E N 0 1 N L L. i;
I 1 I NCDMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Johnston County, NC

•E
_ y
1 4" •►
� ra
Devils Racetrack (West)
11 1
®
IL X
ILI
Raw
..arar�r�`�
10
'2014 Aerial Photography
L
• G
�rarai
1W1 M1
I
Figure 2a. Project Component/Asset Map
' W I L D L A N D S
FNGINFFRiNG 0 250 500 Feet Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
I i I NCDMS Project No.95021
rk It
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Johnston County, NC
•
,`.,.`.,fir♦
I `.`0+ 10 %10
St�tarc r'r•
SOVthea
Powerline Easement
Conservation Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Stream Enhancement I
u
Stream Enhancement 11
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration - Partial Credit
Figure 2a. Project Component/Asset Map
' W I L D L A N D S
FNGINFFRiNG 0 250 500 Feet Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
I i I NCDMS Project No.95021
rk It
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Johnston County, NC

Figure 2b. Project Component/Asset Map
WI LD L A N D 5
FNG9NFFRING 0 250 500 Feet Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
I i I NCDMS Project No.95021
rk
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Johnston County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Mitigation Credits
JMStream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type R
RE
R
RE
R RE
Offset
Totals
18,381
0
62.1
0
N/A N/A N/A
I N/A
N/A
`7c
As -Built
Existing
Project Components
Restoration or Restoration Restoration
Footage/
Mitigation
Credits
rRpe h I D
Stationing/
Location
Footage/
Acreage
Approach
Equivalent Acreage
Streams
Ratio
(SMU/ WMU)
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West)
Restoration
0+00-0+20
20 LF
P1
20
N/A
N/A
(DOT ROW)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West)
0+20-16+47 &
4,755 LF
P1
Restoration
5,122
1:1
5,1222
17+74-52+69
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West)
16+47-17+74
196 LF
P1
Restoration
127
4:12
322
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West)
Restoration
52+69-52+73
5 LF
Pi
4
N/A
N/A
(DOT ROW)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East) (DOT
Restoration
ROW)
52+59-52+66
5 LF
P1
(No Credit)
7
N/A
N/A
52+66-70+72 &
Devil's Racetrack (East)
71+12-88+12 &
4,778 LF
P1/2
Restoration
5,364
1:1
5,3642
88+53-107+11
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
70+72-71+12
30 LF
P1/2
40
N/A
N/A
(Easement Break)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
gg+12 to 88+53
31 LF
P1/2
41
N/A
N/A
(Easement Break)
(No Credit)
Restoration
Devil's Racetrack (East)
107+11-108+21
0 LF
P1/2
110
N/A
N/A
(No Credit)
Southwest Branch
500+00-501+31
154 LF
Ell
Enhancement
154
2.5:1
62
600+00-600+23
Southwest Branch
501+31-502+07
75 LF
EI
Enhancement
76
1.5:1
51
Southwest Branch
502+07-504+89
740 LF
P1/2
Restoration
829
1:1
8292
506+05-511+52
Southwest Branch
504+89-506+OS
111 LF
P1/2
Restoration
116
4:1'
29
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Middle Branch
200+00-204+00
410 LF
Headwater Wetland
410
1:1
4102
Middle Branch
204+00-219+05
1,326 LF
P1/2
Restoration
1,505
1:1
115052
Southeast Branch
300+00-305+03
2,946 LF
P1
Restoration
2,916
1:1
2,9162
305+48-329+61
Southeast Branch (Easement
Restoration
45
r
Break)
305+03-305+48
30 LF
P1
(Partial Credit)
4:1
11
North Branch
403+89-424+39
---
PS
Restoration
2,050
1:1
2,0502
Wetlands
Riparian Wetlands (West)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
57.9
1:1
57.9
Riparian Wetlands (West)
Restoration
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
1.6
4:1
0.4
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Riparian Wetlands (East)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
3.8
1:1
3.8
Stream
Component Summation
Riparian Wetland Non -Riparian Wetland
Upland
Restoration Level
(UP)
(acres)
Riverine
(acres)
Non-Riverine
Buffer(square
feet)
(acres)
Restoration
18,706
63.3
- -
-
-
Enhancement
-
- -
-
-
Enhancementl
76
Enhancement II
154
Creation
-
- -
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
-
-
- -
-
N/A: not applicable
1. Ratio of 4:1 based on an expected
75% reduction in credits
for stream restoration with
shrub buffer zone in power line easements
2. Credits updated from baseline
report during monitoring year 1 due to errors
in calculations.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Designer
Date Collection
Completion or
Activity or Report
Complete
Scheduled Delivery
Mitigation Plan
September 2011-
January 2013
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
March 2012
126 Circle G Lane
Final Design - Construction Plans
September 2011-
August 2013
Fluvial Solutions
March 2012
P.O. Box 28749
Construction
December 2013-
February 2014
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
February 2014
P.O. Box 1197
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area 1
February 2014
February 2014
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
February 2014
February 2014
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
February 2014
February 2014
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
December 2013-
May 2014
Dykes and Son Nursery and NC Forest Service
February 2014
Bare Roots
Year 1 Monitoring
August 2014
December 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
October 2015
December 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
2016
December 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
2017
December 2017
Year 5 Monitoring
2018
December 2018
Year 6 Monitoring
2019
December 2019
Year 7 Monitoring
2020
December 2020
Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Jeff Keaton, PE
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
Construction Contractor (East Side)
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Construction Contractor (West Side)
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seeding Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Dykes and Son Nursery and NC Forest Service
Bare Roots
(Claridge Nursery)
Live Stakes
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream, Vegetation, and Wetland Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
919.851.9986, ext. 107

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Project Information
Project Name
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
County
Johnston County
Project Area (acres)
96.065 ac
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35° 27'01.58" N, 78° 23' 18.08" W
Project
Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Upper Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020201140010
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
831 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
62% forest/wetland, 34% farm land, 4% developed
Reach Summary Information
Devil's
Southwest Middle Southeast North
Branch Branch Branch Branch (west) leas ) I
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
0 0 0 0 5,273 5,562
Drainage area (acres)
20.6 10.8 69.9 49.9 493.5 831.4
NCDWR stream identification score
34.5-37 30 29-30.75 32 38 37.5
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C/NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P/I
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
---
---
---
---
---
---
Underlying mapped soils
Altavista fine sandy loam, Bibb sandy loam, Cecil loam, Goldsboro sandy loam, Leaf silt
loam, Lynchburg sandy loam, Nason silt loam, Norfolk loamy sand, and Rains sandy loam.
Drainage class
--- --- --- --- --- --
Soil Hydric status
--- --- ---
Slope
--- --- ---
FEMA classification
None
Native vegetation community
Coastal Plain bottomland riparian forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-
Restoration
0%
Feg-lation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Regulatory
Considerations
Applicable? Resolved? - Supporting D.
X X USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ 401 Water
X X Quality Certification No. 3885.
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X
X
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Plan; Wildlands
determined "no effect" on Johnston County listed
endangered species.
Historic Preservation Act
X
X
No historic resources were found to be impacted
(letter from SHPO dated 7/20/2011).
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
The project streams do not have an associated
regulatory flooplaing; however the downstream end of
Devil's Racetrack Creek is located within the floodwasy
and flood fringe of the Neuse River (FEMA Zone AE,
FIRM panel 1680).
Essential Fisheries Habitat
I N/A
I N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

Figure 3.0 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
0 500 1,000 Feet (Key)
E
W1 LD LA o; 1)rk It I I I I I Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site NGINi -I h; •..lL.
NCDMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Johnston County, NC

Legend
•
�1►.lIlk
or
• Ir ;. .
46_
moi, � ♦ � .,
J.
�in�•n��n�u��in�nuur�nuiuv�unuuun.�u.�nuiu�uuin��u . .�0.� •1b•,•,•••I•
GW 1 11 ��
-- • # 5 8 W 5 ,jam\ - GW 8-42 �<
,^ GW 11
ice''•
111 '•�•♦���♦'`, •��� ../
%/
® /�" t �// �d1 //r.!"+i, �•'•♦"s, 34 GW 10''�// r �8 ll
Cross -Section (XS)
Photo Point (PP)
Groundwater Gage (GW) Condition-MY2
GW Criteria Met
♦ GW Criteria Not Met
+ Rain Gage (RG)
Soil Temperature Probe (STP)
♦ Barotroll (BT)
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement 11
Uuur
q.. A Conservation Easement
Powerline Easement
Wetland Restoration
-22 Wetland Restoration - Partial Credit
Vegetation Plot Condition-MY2
Critera Met
Vegetation Problem Areas-MY2
Bare Areas
t
WILPLANDS
jc3INEERING
*'mss GW 3 iljR'
h..n�uuuunuu:" 7
� 1
i
i
7,
15
•
►� G W 9 d"
& RG
s't�•
0 250 500 Feet
II 1 Ii
J_
M
18
L GW,19
GW.1
.�
01,GW 12 36
� 0000
335
27 's�GW 24
GW 15 $26 4
r�
` GW 37
GW 36
37
GW 14' 25 GW 25 29 NN%o♦
10111
24
GW 33
GW 27
39�,
38
6-1mr-
GW
41
0
k IV
Y
Figure 3.1 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
(Sheet 1 of 2)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
NCDMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Johnston County, NC

Figure 3.2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
f 0 250 500 Feet Devil's Racetrack Mitigation at on Site
9I.T7LJNI7S I I g
h IV 31 N E F R I N G � NCDMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Johnston County, NC

Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack (West) (5,211 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Performing as
Footage Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0 100%
Degradation
0
0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
74
74
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
74
74
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
74
74
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
74
74
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
74
74
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
6
6
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
6
6
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
6
6
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
6
6
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
6
6
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack (East) (5,547 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Perforing as
m
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
85 85
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
85 85
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate
85 85
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
85 85
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
85 85
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
17
17
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
17
17
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
17
17
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
17
17
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
17
17
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Branch (2,891 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degradation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
121
121
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
120
120
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate
120
120
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
120
120
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
120
120
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures'
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
67
67
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
67
67
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
67
67
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
67
67
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
67
67
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Middle Branch (1,906 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degradation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
79
79
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
78
78
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate
78
78
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
78
78
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
78
78
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
52
52
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
52
52
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
52
52
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
52
52
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
52
52
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southwest Branch (1,155 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degradation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
48
48
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
47
47
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate
47
47
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
47
47
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
47
47
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
28
28
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
28
28
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
28
28
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
28
28
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth> 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
28
28
100%
baseflow
)Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
North Branch (2,418 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
35 35
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
34 34
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate
34 34
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
34 34
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
34 34
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
10
10
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
10
10
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
10
10
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
10
10
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
10
10
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Planted Acreage 96
Easement Acreage 96
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Number
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
% of
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none 0 0 0%
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
of
Planted
Acreage
(Ac)
Polygons
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0.1
2
14.9
15.5%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
criteria.
Total
2
14.9
15.5%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
0.25 Ac
0
0
0%
year.
Cumulative Total
2
14.9
15.5%
Easement Acreage 96
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Number % of
Combined
Threshold of Planted
Acreage
(SF) Polygons Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000 0 0 0.0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none 0 0 0%

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack West
Monitoring Year 2
h
f�
i
ti
PHOTO POINT 1— looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 1— looking downstream (04/06/2015)
�E
.M
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
s.
PHOTO POINT 3 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 3 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
AL
PHOTO POINT 4 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 4 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
r'T
PHOTO POINT 5 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 5 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 6 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 6 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 7 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 7 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
J
PHOTO POINT 8 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 8 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

,a x
PHOTO POINT 9 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 9 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 10 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 10 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
WNW
PHOTO POINT 11— looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 11— looking upstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 12 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 12 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 13 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 13 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
r
a �
t
PHOTO POINT 14 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 14 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

j�
PHOTO POINT 15 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 15 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 16 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 16 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
h
`
PHOTO POINT 17 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 17 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
x. • ri� l
PHOTO POINT 18 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 18 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
1
PHOTO POINT 19 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 19 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 20 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 20 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

i
PHOTO POINT 21— looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 21— looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 22 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 22 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 24 — looking upstream (04/06/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 24 — looking downstream (04/06/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking upstream (04/06/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 25 — looking downstream (04/06/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 26 (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack East
Monitoring Year 2
PHOTO POINT 27 (0 412 312 0 1 5)
PHOTO POINT 28 — looking upstream (0412312015) 1 PHOTO POINT 28 — looking downstream (0 412 312 0 1 5) 1
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
d7 I
_ P e
PHOTO POINT 29 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 29 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
•
j_
=µk
F
Y
PHOTO POINT 30 — looking upstream (05/22/2015)
PHOTO POINT 30 — looking downstream (05/22/2015)
Yf
f
4 _
PHOTO POINT 31— looking upstream(04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 31— looking downstream(04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 32 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 32 — looking downstream(04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 33 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 33 — looking downstream (04/23/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 34 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) PHOTO POINT 34 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
W
PHOTO POINT 35 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 35
— looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 36 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 36 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
{ ■4th _
_
` P
y
PHOTO POINT 37
— looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 37 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 38 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 38 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 39 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 39 — looking downstream (04/23/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 40 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) PHOTO POINT 40 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 41— looking upstream (04/23/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 41— looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 42 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) PHOTO POINT 42 — looking downstream (04/23/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 43 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 43 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 44 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 44 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 45 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 45 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 46 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 46 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
A4,
«
~
PHOTO POINT 47
— looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 47 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
r,+, ....
-
♦ 4
PHOTO POINT 48 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 48 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
J.
PHOTO POINT 49
— looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 49 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

r
PHOTO POINT 50 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) PHOTO POINT 50 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 51— looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 51— looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 52 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) I PHOTO POINT 52 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
it
_ + _ _ _
gig
YCF •ice -
".
PHOTO POINT 53 — looking upstream (05/26/2015)
PHOTO POINT 53 — looking downstream (05/26/2015)
-ot:-,
PHOTO POINT 54 — looking upstream (05/26/2015)
PHOTO POINT 54 — looking downstream (05/26/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Southwest Branch
Monitoring Year 2
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
h
Y
t -
PHOTO POINT 55 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 55 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 56 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 56 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
I
PHOTO POINT 57 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 57 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
+ L
d
PHOTO POINT 58 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 58 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 59 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 59 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Middle Branch
Monitoring Year 2
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 61— looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 61— looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 62 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 62 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 63 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 63 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 64 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 64 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
fia d di
PHOTO POINT 65 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 65 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 66 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 66 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 67 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 67 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
.4
DL4nTn Dr) IKIT f.Q —Inn Lina i inct—nm /nnIng /')nlcl
DWr)T(I D(IIKIT AQ —Inn Lina r—Ainctronm inn Ing /,)nlL;l
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Southeast Branch
Monitoring Year 2
PHOTO POINT 70 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 70 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 71— looking upstream (04/23/2015) I PHOTO POINT 71— looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 72 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 72 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 73 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 73 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
9
PHOTO POINT 74 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 74 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 75 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 75 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 76 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 76 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
1
PHOTO POINT 77 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 77 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 78 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 78 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 79 — looking upstream (04/14/2015)
PHOTO POINT 79 — looking downstream (04/14/2015)
,t
PHOTO POINT 80 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 80 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 81— looking upstream (04/23/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 81— looking downstream (04/23/2015) 1
i PHOTO POINT 82 — looking upstream (04/23/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 82 — looking downstream (04/23/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 83 — looking upstream (04/23/2015)
PHOTO POINT 83 — looking downstream (04/23/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
North Branch
Monitoring Year 2
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
! 4p
PHOTO POINT 84 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 84 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
s el -
k
. q
PHOTO POINT 85 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 85 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 86 — looking upstream (04/06/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 86 — looking downstream (04/06/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 87 — looking upstream (04/06/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 87 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 88 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 88 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
PHOTO POINT 89 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 89 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
L
v
PHOTO POINT 90 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 90 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
r
PHOTO POINT 91— looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 91— looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs
e
t �,U D' .
k:
PHOTO POINT 92 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 92 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 93 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 93 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
1
�.
pp
4"
y
PHOTO POINT 94 — looking upstream (04/06/2015)
PHOTO POINT 94 — looking downstream (04/06/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

VEGETATION PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack
Monitoring Year 2
VEG PLOT 1(06/02/2015) 1 VEG PLOT 2 (06/02/2015) 1
VEG PLOT 3 (06/02/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 4 (06/02/2015)

VEG PLOT 5 (06/02/2015) 1 VEG PLOT 6 (06/02/2015) 1
VEG PLOT 7 (06/02/2015) 1 VEG PLOT 8 (06/02/2015) 1
VEG PLOT 9 (06/02/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 10 (06/02/2015)

s
� k
fl
r,
VEG PLOT 11 (06/02/2015) VEG PLOT 12 (06/02/2015)
P
VEG PLOT 13 (06/02/2015) VEG PLOT 14 (06/02/2015)
4M
t
VEG PLOT 15 (06/02/2015) VEG PLOT 16 (06/02/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 17 (06/02/2015) 1 VEG PLOT 18 (06/02/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 19 (06/02/2015)
VEG PLOT 20 (06/02/2015)
e
u
VEG PLOT 21(06/02/2015)
VEG PLOT 22 (06/02/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
W
VEG PLOT 23 (0610212015)
VEG PLOT 24 (0610212015)
i
VEG PLOT 25 (0610212015)
VEG PLOT 26 (0610212015)
VEG PLOT 27 (0610212015)
VEG PLOT 28 (0610212015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 29 (0610212015) 1 VEG PLOT 30 (0610212015) 1
VEG PLOT 31 (0610212015) 1 VEG PLOT 32 (0610212015) 1
VEG PLOT 33 (0610212015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 34 (0610212015)

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 41 (0610212015) 1 VEG PLOT 42 (0611812015) 1
VEG PLOT 43 (0611812015) 1 VEG PLOT 44 (0611812015) 1
VEG PLOT 45 (0611812015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 46 (0611812015)

VEG PLOT 47 (06/18/2015) 1 VEG PLOT 48 (06/18/2015) 1
F.18,Kul 15 `
VEG PLOT 49 (06/18/2015) VEG PLOT 50 (06/18/2015)
w , . - t
VEG PLOT 51 (06/18/2015)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
MY2 Success Criteria
Plot Met (Y/N)
Tract Mean
1 Y
100%
2 Y
3 Y
4 Y
5 Y
6 Y
7 Y
8 Y
9 Y
10 Y
11 Y
12 Y
13 Y
14 Y
15 Y
16 Y
17 Y
18 Y
19 Y
20 Y
21 Y
22 Y
23 Y
24 Y
25 Y
26 Y
27 Y
28 Y
29 Y
30 Y
31 Y
32 Y
33 Y
34 Y
35 Y
36 Y
37 Y
38 Y
39 Y
40 Y
41 Y
42 Y
43 Y
44 Y
45 Y
46 Y
47 Y
48 Y
49 Y
50 Y
51 Y

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Database name
Devils Racetrack MY2 cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1.mdb
Database location
F:\Projects\005-02129 Devil's Racetrack\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 2\Vegetation Assessment
Computer name
JASON -PC
File size
52690944
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
1A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
95021
project Name
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site
Description
Stream and Wetland Mitigation
River Basin
Neuse
Sampled Plots
51

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0001
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
20
6
1
20
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688
17
7
688
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688=1497
37
8
17
7
688 1
17
1
0.02
7
688
23
8
1930.8
14
7 1
566.61
14
1
0.02
7
566.6 1
34
8
1376
14
6
566.6 1566.6
14
1
0.02
6
1566.61
14
6
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0010
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
5
5
5
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
3
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
15
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
7
7
7
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 1
2 1
2
2 1
2 1
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
3
3
3
Stem count 16
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 6
Stems per ACRE 647.5
16
1
0.02
6
647.5
31
7
1255
16
4
647.5
16
1
0.02
4
647.5
16
4
647.5
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688
17
7
688
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688
17
7
688
15
6
607
15
1
0.02
6
607
15
6
607
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0011
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0013
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0015
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
10
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4 1
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
5 1
5
5
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
3
Taxodium distichum
l bald cypress
ITree
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
10g15
10
8
8
8
Stem count 11
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species countl 4
Stems per ACREI 445.2 1445.2
11
1
0.02
4
11
4
1445.21647.5
16
5
16
1
0.02
5
647.5
26
6
1052
17
6 1
688 1
17
1
0.02
6
688
17
6
688
15
3
607
1
0.02
3
607
17
4
688
17 1
5
688
17 1
1
0.02
5
688
25
7
1012
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0016
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0017
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0018
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0019
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0020
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
6
6
6
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4 1
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
6
6
6
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
l bald cypress
ITree
10
10
10
5
5
5
4
4
4
7
7
7
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
17
6
688
17
1
0.02
6
688
17
6
688
16
5
647.5
16
1
0.02
5
647.51849.81
21
6
16
5
647.5
16
1
0.02
5
647.5
16
5
647.5
14
4
566.6
14
1
0.02
4
566.6 1566.61
14
4
17
5
688 1
17
1
0.02
5
688 1
17
5
688
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0021
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0022
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0023
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0024
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0025
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
3
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
7
7
7
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
2 1
2 1
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
5
5
5
7
7
7
3
3
3
4
4
4
6
6
6
Stem count 13
size (ares)
size (ACRES)0.02
Species count 3
Stems per ACRE 526.1
13
1
3
526.1
13
3
526.1
17
5
688
17
1
0.02
5
688
17
5
688
14
4
566.6
14
1
0.02
4
566.6
14
4
566.6
17
5 1
688 1
17
1
0.02
5
688
17
5
688
17
1 6
1 688
17
1
0.02
6
688
17
6
688
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0026
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0027
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0028
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0029
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0030
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
8
8 1
8
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
7
5
5
5
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
ITree
3
3
3
9
9
9
1
1
1
6
6
6
3
3
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species countl
Stems per ACRE
15
6
607
15
1
0.02
6
607
15
6
607
16
5
647.5
16
1
0.02
5
647.5
16
5
647.5
16
6
647.5 1647.5
16
1
0.02
6
16
6
647.5
17
6
688 1
17
1
0.02
6
688 1
17
6
688
17 1
5
688 1
17 1
1
0.02
5
688 1
17
5
688
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0031
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0032
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0033
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0034
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0035
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
8
8
8
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
7
7
7
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
7
7
7
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688
17
7
688
19
4
768.9
19
1
0.02
4
768.9
19
4
768.9
18
7
728.4
18
1
0.02
7
728.4
20
8
809.4
17
6
688
17
1
0.02
6
688
17
6
688
19
5
768.9
19
1
0.02
5
768.9
19
5
768.9
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0036
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0037
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0038
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0039
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0040
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1 1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
6
6
6
1
1 1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
ITree
3
3
3L526.11526.1152J6.1
3
3
6
6
6
4
4
4
5
5
5
Stem count 18
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 7
Stems per ACRE 728.4
18
1
0.02
7
728.4
18
7
728.4647.5
13
1
0.02
6
13
16
6
16
1
0.02
6
647.5
16
6
647.5
16
6
647.5 1647.51647.5
16
1
0.02
6
16
6
17
6
688 1
17
1
0.02
6
688
18
7
728.4
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0041
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0042
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0043
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0044
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0045
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
3
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
2
2
2
8
8
8
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
1 4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
ITree
6
6
6
1
1
1
4
4
4
6 1
6
6
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species countl
Stems per ACREI
17
7
688 1
17
1
0.02
7
688 1
17
7
688
15
6
1 607
1516
1
0.02
6
607
7
647.5
14
5
566.61
14
1
0.02
5
566.61
14
5
566.6
15
5
607 1
15
1
0.02
5
607 1
15
5
607
17
5
688 1
17
1
0.02
5
688
24
6
1971.2
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 - 6/2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0046
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0047
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0048
95021-01-0049
95021-01-0050
95021-01-0051
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
Cepholanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
6
6
6
5
5
5
3
3
3
2
2
2
Liquidombarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifero
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platonus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
1 2
4 1
4 1
4
2
2
2
1 1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
lbald cypress
ITree
2
2
2
1
1
1
Stem count 13
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 5
Stems per ACRE 526.1
13
1
0.02
5
526.1
13
1 5
526.1
11
4 1
445.2
11
1
0.02
4 1
445.2
11
4
445.2
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
1 1 1 1
0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02
5 5 5 1 6 1 6 6 1 7 7 1 7 1 7 7
647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 688 688 688 688 688L6J88
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY2 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
104
104
104
106
106
106
106
106
106
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
123
123
125
124
124
124
126
126
126
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
86
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
14
14
14
25
25
25
20
20
20
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
59
59
59
64
64
64
60
60
60
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
8
8
8
9
9
9
10
10
10
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
128
128
128
124
124
124
124
124
124
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
77
77
77
91
91
91
108
108
108
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
12
12
12
14
14
14
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
97
97
97
104
104
104
125
125
125
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
3
Salixsericea
silky willow
Shrub
3
Taxodium distichum
l bald cypress
ITree
190
190
190
189
189
189
206
206
206
Stem count 813
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 11
Stems per ACRE 645.1
813
51
1.26
11
645.1
910
15
722.1
850
10
674.5
850
51
1.261.26
10
674.5
850
10
674.5
885
1
9
702.2
885
51
9
702.2
885
9
702.2
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devils Racetrack- West
Parameter
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Devil's Racetrack - West
Min Max
Scout
Min
West
1
Max
Scout
Min
East
2
Max
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Min Max
Johanna
Min
Creek
Max
Jarman
Min
Oak
Max
Devil's Racetrack
Min
Design
- West
Max
Devil's Racetrack
Min
- We
Max
Devil's
Min
Racetrack
As-Built/Baseline
- West Devil's
Max Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.8
8.0
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
11.5
4.7
9.6
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
7.8
18.0
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
1
300
100
F 300
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.9
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
1.3
1.6
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.9
1
1.1
1.1
1 1.5
1.1
1.4
0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
N/A
5.7
6.3
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
5.8
9.5
2.1
8.5
4.0
Width/Depth Ratio
4.0
10.5
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
14.0
14.5
14.0
10.6
14.8
14.5
Entrenchment Ratiol
1.6
2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
11.1
33.3
8.726.1
>20.9
>42.5
>26.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.9
4.5
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.464
_
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
3.7
86.8
7.4
54.2
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0036
0.0277
0.0023
0.0072
0.0013
0.0593
0.0008
0.0195
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
5.5
63.1
18.7
72.9
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
1.2
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.9
2.1
1.1
2.5
1.1
2.9
1.4
1.9
Pool Spacing (ft)^
---
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
59
32
55
14
63
18
81
9
132
38
104
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
12.0
72.0
15.0
92.0
13.0
53.0
16.0
73.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
14.0
43.0
17.0
55.0
12.0
40.0
17.0
35.0
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.5
4.8
2.6
4.2
2.2
4.5
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
27
153
35
196
52
133
70
137
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
8.0
1.3
8.0
2.8
5.5
2.1
9.5
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.168/0.33/0.464/1.23/2.0/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
N/A
0.18w
t
t---
---
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Ca acit) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.77
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.70
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
Gc5
E/C5b
E5
E5
E5/C5
E6
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.5
1.8
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.2
1.2
4.8
3.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
9.2
10.6
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
10.0
13.0
10.0
13.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
4,976
---
---
---
---
---
4,245
966
4,239
962
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
1
1.6
1.2
1 1.6
1.2
1.4
Water Surface Slope t t
---
---
---
---
0.0054
0.0015
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0041
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0025
1
0.0087
0.0016
1 0.0022
0.0053
1
0.0054
0.0017
1
0.0023
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devils Racetrack- East
Parameter
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Devil's Racetrack - East
Min Max
Scout
Min
West
1
Max
Scout
Min
East
I
2
Max
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Min I Max
Johanna
Min
Creek
I
Max
Jarman
Min
Oak
I
Max
Devil's
Min
I Max
Design
r-
Min I Max
r-
Min I Max.
r-
Min
Max
As-Built/Baseline
r-
Min Max
Devil's
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.1
10.4
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
13.0
8.0
8.0
12.2
13.7
8.2
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
14.2
18.6
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
T 500
100
1
500
100 1 500
>300
>300
---
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0
1.8
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
1.0
0.6
---
0.8
1.1
0.7
---
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.8
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
1.4
F 1.8
0.8
1
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.7
1.1
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
N/A
14.2
19.1
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
12.8
4.8
---
10.3
13.9
5.7
---
Width/Depth Ratio
5.0
7.8
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
---
12.1
14.6
11.9
---
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
1.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
7.7
38.5
12.5
62.6
---
>21.9
>24.5
>36.5
---
Bank Height Ratio
2.6
4.3
1.1
1.3
1.0
1
F
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
---
1.0
1.0
---
D50 (mm)
0.179
_
N/A
N/A
---
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
13.0
80.1
20.8
42.4
11.3
25.9
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0007
0.0025
0.0377
0.0671
--
0.0004
0.0099
0.0192
0.0318
0.0072
0.0675
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
16.0
77.3
16.5
66.1
13.0
34.2
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
0.6
N/A
1.7
F
1.9
1.5
3.1
1.4
3.2
0.8
2.0
1.2
1.9
3.4
1.7
2.7
1.4
2.5
Pool Spacing (ft)^
---
27
67
N/A
21
1
27
16
59
32
55
21
91
39
64
---
26
131
43
73
25
70
Pool Volume ft3
_
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
17.0
65.0
10.0
40.0
---
15.0
55.0
21
41
12
32
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
20.0
62.0
12.0
36.0
---
18.0
65.0
12
26
10
35
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.5
4.5
---
1.5
4.7
1.5
3.2
---
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
39
221
64
136
---
62
203
101
140
52
112
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
5.0
1.3
5.0
---
1.2
4.0
2.6
5.0
---
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
Em-_
Mom
I
_
I r
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
-/-/0.179/0.642/1.0/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftZ
N/A
0.01
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
1.30
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
1.14
1.30
---
1.14
1.30
---
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
Gc5
E/C5b
E5
E5
E5/C5
E6
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
C
C
---
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
0.3
0.4
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.2
3.5
---
1.2
1.6
3.0
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
8.5
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
16.0
17.0
---
16.0
17.0
---
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length (ft)
---
---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
4,844
---
---
---
---
---
4,840
313
385
4,833
310
372
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.1
F
1.2
---
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)'---
---
---
---
---
--
--
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)l
0.0003
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0004
1 0.0008
0.0224
0.0251
---
0.0007
0.0008
0.0153
1
0.0166
0.0219
1 0.0231
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Branch
Parameter
OL _dW4.
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Southeast
Reference Reach Data
AL
S.
•.
outheast
Branch
Design
Southeast Branch
Southeast
Branch
Southeast
Branch
As-Built/Baseline
Southeast Branch
Southeast
Bra
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.7
5.7
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
4.0
5.4
3.0
3.8
5.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.6
11.4
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
25
35
50
70
100
300
>30
>60
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth
0.4
1.4
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.4
F
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
N/A
1.1
1.4
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
1.0
1.5
2.5
0.8
1.3
2.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.8
24.3
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
1
19.7
7.4
9.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
11.0
12.0
11.4
10.8
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
4.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
8.3
11.7
12.5
17.5
18.5
55.6
>9.9
>15.8
>37.5
Bank Height Ratio
2.2
6.0
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.409
N/A
I
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.1
64.4
3.4
144.4
6.0
47.3
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0162
0.0681
0.0144
0.0384
0.0035
0.0285
0.0010
0.0803
0.0021
0.0272
0.0005
0.0168
Pool Length (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.1
36.7
3.1
33.6
3.2
61.3
Pool Max Depth (ft)
0.4
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.5
1
1.1
0.4
1.2
0.5
1.5
0.7
1.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.1
Pool Spacing (ft)^
---
2767
N/A
21
27
16
32
55
15
20
32
9
38
4
76
8
90
14
52
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
J1159
Jnl24
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
5.0
12.0
7.0
43.0
5.3
11.2
6.8
14.3
12.7
32.8
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
6.0
18.0
8.0
26.0
5.0
23.5
10.0
25.6
10.4
29.5
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.5
1.5
4.5
1.5
4.8
1.7
7.8
2.6
6.7
2.0
5.6
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
32
68
16
92
22
63
33
70
32
74
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
1.8
3.7
1.8
3.8
2.4
6.2
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
•
•
_
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.08/0.28/0.41/0.94/1.6/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress Com etenc Ib/ftZ
N/A
0.51
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (CapacityW/mZ
iqnnw�7&E1
1
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.19
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.03
0.07
0.10
0.03
0.07
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
--
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G/F5
E/C5b
E5
E5
E5/C5
E6
---
---
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.2
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.9
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
2.4
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length ft
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,976
---
---
---
---
---
1,559
716
617
1,559
713
616
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.6
1.6
1.1
1.3
Water Surface Slope ft/ftZ
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0221
0.0174
0.0030
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0230
1
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0108
1
0.0227
0.0096
0.0128 1
0.0025
0.0089
0.0222
0.0015
F
0.0119
0.0028
1
0.0030
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Middle Branch
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Middle Branch
Scout West
1
Scout
East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna
Creek
Jarman
Oak
Middle
Branch
Design
Middle
Branch
Middle
Branch
As-Built/Baseline
Middle
Branch
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
7 Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
1.8
2.3
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
4.0
2.2
3.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.6
6.8
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
40
60
100
1
300
>50
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.4
1
0.5
0.5
F
0.6
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
N/A
0.4
0.5
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
0.9
1.5
0.7
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.9
12.0
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.119.7
7.4
10.0
10.5
10.0
12.0
6.7
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.0
3.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
33.3
100.0
22.2
66.7
>22.9
>58.8
Bank Height Ratio
5.3
6.5
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1350 (mm)
0.083
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.5
46.6
7.9
16.1
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/AJ
0.0129
0.0144
0.0489
0.0002
0.0074
0.0008
0.0492
0.0059
0.0236
Pool Length (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.9
17.3
11.2
19.8
Pool Max Depth (ft)
---
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.4
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.2
0.6
0.9
Pool Spacing (ft)^
---
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
59
32
55
15
24
5
22
8
56
18
24
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7 1
14.3 1
7.2
1
16.2
1 9.1
1
9.8 1
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
6.0
36.0
4.1
9.4
6.7
20.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.19.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
7.0
22.0
7.0
23.9
9.2
23.5
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.7
4.5
1.5
4.8
3.2
10.9
2.7
6.9
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
14
77
23
44
32
57
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
2.2
4.3
2.0
6.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru %/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
-/-/0.083/0.498/0.9/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftZ
N/A
0.24
0.27
---
---
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca aci W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.02
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G5
E/C5b
E5
E5
E5/C5
E6
N/A
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.4
1.5
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.3
0.8
1.4
0.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
0.6
0.7
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
985
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,736
---
---
---
---
---
1,060
436
1,058
432
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1
1.2
1.2
F
1.5
1.1
1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft)'
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0145
0.0064
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0240
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0096
1
0.0163
0.0024
1
0.0077
0.0148
0.0024
1
0.0066
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southwest Branch
�Parameterp
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Southwest Branch
Scout
West
1
Scout
East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna
Creek
Jarman
Oak
Southwest
Branch
Design
Southwest
Branch
Southwest
Branch
As-Built/Baseline
Southwest
Branch
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.8
3.4
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
3.3
---
2.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.9
6.2
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
40
1
60
100
F
300
---
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.3
---
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.3
0.9
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.5
1
0.6
0.4
F
0.5
---
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
N/A
0.8
0.9
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
1.0
1.0
---
0.6
Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
14.0
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
9.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
---
9.7
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1.9
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
13.3
20.0
30.3
90.9
---
82.3
Bank Height Ratio
10.0
10.7
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
--
---
1.0
D
D50 (mm)
0.105
---
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
3.8
51.6
8.3
44.1
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
0.0257
0.0648
0.0109
0.0308
0.0015
0.0339
0.0032
0.0228
Pool Length (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.7
19.9
4.3
23.4
Pool Max Depth (ft)
---
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
L3.1
0.5
1.1
0.4
1.0
0.3
1.2
0.6
1.4
Pool Spacing (ft)^
---
27
67
N/A
21
2716
59
15
24
5
23
8
53
12
51
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
=
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
1
14.3 1
7.2
1
16.2
1 9.1
1
9.8 1
14.0
1
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
4.0
26.0
3.9
10.2
5.2
18.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
5.0
16.0
10.0
19.0
7.4
20.3
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.7
4.5
1.5
4.8
3.1
8.5
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
10
56
27
50
28
54
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
---
2.2
7.9
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
11F
T
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
/0.065/0.105/0.336/0.4/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
Ell
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftZ
N/A
0.37
0.42
---
---
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca aci W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.03
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G5
E/C5b
E5
E5
E5/C5
E6
NA
E/C5
N/A
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.8
1.9
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.3
N/A
2.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
1.6
1.7
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length ft
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,080
---
---
---
---
---
650
482
646
479
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.0
1.3
Water Surface Slope ft/ftZ
---
---
---
---
---
0.0191
0.0090
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0320
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0171
0.0216
0.0078
0.0096
0.0186
1
0.0191
0.0085
1
0.0088
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10f. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
North Branch
IJE&.ra-.t"
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
North Branch
Scout
West
1
Scout
East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna
Creek
Jarman
Oak
North
Design
Branch
As-Built/Baseline
North Branch
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
9.2
8.6
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
F
300
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
---
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
---
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.9
1.1
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
N/A
---
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
5.9
5.7
6.5
Width/Depth Ratio
---
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
14.0
14.5
13.1
13.2
Entrenchment Ratio
---
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
1
26.9
10.9
32.6
>21.6
>23.2
Bank Height Ratio
---
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
D50 (mm)
---
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
0.026
---
1
0.047
---
N/A
0.033
---
1
0.051
---
N/A
---
0.0129
0.0010
---
1
0.0065
5.3
0.0013
35.8
0.0163
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
8.5
80.8
Pool Max Depth (ft)
---
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.9
2.1
1.0
3.8
Pool Spacing (ft)^
---
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
59
32
55
15
64
17
101
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
=
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
12.0
74.0
16
72
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
14.0
44.0
15
40
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.7
4.3
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
28
156
79
129
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
8.0
1.9
7.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftZ
N/A---
---
---
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.08
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.19
0.19
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate %
<
---
---
--
---
---
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
N/A
E/C5b
E5
E5
E5/C5
E6
E/C5
C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
0.9
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
5.0
5.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length (ft)
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
2,418
2,410
Sinuosity
---
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
F
1.6
1.31
Water Surface Slope ft/ftZ
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0016
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0007
1
0.0020
0.0004
1
0.0020
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table Ila. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack (West)
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7 Base
MY3
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6
MY7
based on fixed bonkfull elevation 135.4
135.4
135.4
135.1
135.1
135.1
131.0
131.0
131.0
130.6
130.6
130.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.6
7.6
7.7
10.7
10.1
10.2
9.5
10.0
10.0
11.1
11.4
11.4
Floodprone Width (ft) >200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.1
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.0
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.7
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 6.2
5.6
5.8
7.8
7.6
8.6
8.5
8.1
8.2
10.7
9.4
9.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratic 14.8
10.4
10.1
14.6
13.4
12.2
10.6
12.3
12.2
11.4
13.9
13.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratic >20.9
>26.2
>26.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
>21.1
>20.0
>20.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MV2•tMY3,MY4 MY5
1.0
MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MY2 MY3
1.0
11-7.11 E
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MY2• MY3
1.0
, MY4 MYS MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6
MY7
based on fixed bonkfull elevation 125.3
125.3
125.3
124.7
124.7
124.7
120.8
120.8
120.8
119.9
119.9
119.9
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.9
8.6
8.6
8.7
8.2
8.6
9.5
8.0
8.0
4.7
4.8
4.8
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.4
0.7
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.5
1.5
1.5
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 7.5
7.0
6.8
6.0
5.3
5.6
7.6
7.4
7.3
2.1
3.3
5.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratic 10.7
10.6
10.9
12.6
12.6
13.4
11.7
8.7
8.8
10.6
6.9
4.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratic N/A
N/A
N/A
>23.0
>24.4
>23.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
>42.1
>42.1
>41.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Bas-W5--MY6
Dimension and Substrate e
-MVI-
Cross Section 9 (Shallow)
MV2 MY3 MV4 MYS
MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
Cross Section
MV2 MY3
r •
MV4
MY7
based on fixed bonkfull elevation 116.4 116.4 116.4
116.1 116.1 116.1
Bankfull Width (ft) 7.7 7.5 7.5
6.8 5.9 5.9
Floodprone Width(ftj >200 >200 >200
N/A N/A N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5 0.7 0.7
0.6 0.8 0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7 1.0 1.0
0.9 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 4.0 5.4 4.9
4.4 4.7 4.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratic 14.5 10.4 11.4
10.6 7.5 7.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratic >26.1 >M7 >26.7
N/A N/A IN/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratial 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1 1 1
1 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0

Table 11b. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7
based on fixed bonkfull elevation 115.4
115.4
115.4
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.0
115.0
115.0
114.6
114.6
114.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 15.0
15.1
15.1
12.2
12.5
12.3
19.8
20.5
20.8
12.7
11.8
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.2
1.1
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.8
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1
2.0
2.0
1.3
1.3
1.3
2.7
2.5
2.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 18.8
16.5
17.3
10.3
8.9
9.3
30.2
24.6
26.2
13.3
10.4
10.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratic 12.0
13.8
13.1
14.6
17.6
16.1
13.0
17.1
16.6
12.1
13.4
14.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratic N/A
N/A
N/A
>24.5
>23.9
>24.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
>23.7
>25.4
>24.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
1.0
MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MY2 MY3
1.0
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MY2 MY3
1.0
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6
MY7
based on fixed bonkfull elevation 114.2
114.2
114.2
114.1
114.1
114.1
113.3
113.3
113.3
112.6
112.6
112.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 15.6
12.4
12.4
13.4
12.6
12.7
13.7
12.5
12.7
15.5
15.3
15.3
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.1
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.6
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1
1.9
1.9
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.8
2.7
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 17.3
14.5
14.3
13.2
12.0
12.3
13.9
12.5
12.7
25.0
22.4
21.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratic 14.0
10.6
10.7
13.6
13.2
13.0
13.4
12.5
12.6
9.5
10.5
11.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratic N/A
N/A
N/A
>22.3
>23.9
>23.6
>21.9
>24.0
>23.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
19 (Shallow)
MY2 MY3 MV4 MYS
MY6
��bOMMi�
MY7 Base
MYl
Cross Section
MY2 MY3
20 (Shallow)
MV4 MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
SectionCross-Section
MV2 MY3
MV4 (Pool)
MY6
MY7
based on fixed bonkfull elevation 112.7 112.7 112.7
109.0 109.0 109.0
108.1 108.1 108.1
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.3 14.3 14.2
8.2 7.9 7.9
8.8 8.9 9.1
Floodprone Width(ftj >300 >300 >300
>300 >300 >300
N/A N/A N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7 0.8
1.2 1.1 1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.6 1.6 1.6
1.1 1.1 1.2
2.0 1.9 2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 12.5 11.2 11.9
5.7 5.9 6.1
10.8 9.7 11.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratic 14.1 18.4 17.1
11.9 10.6 10.3
7.3 8.1 7.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratic >22.6 >20.9 >21.1
>36.5 >37.8 >37.8
N/A N/A N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratial 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0

Table 11c. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Branch
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MY1 I
MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.1
137.1
137.1
122.8
122.8
122.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.8
3.3
3.3
3.0
2.9
2.6
3.8
4.1
3.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
>30
>30
>30
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1.2
1.2
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
1.5
1.7
1.6
0.8
1.1
0.8
1.3
1.7
1.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratiol
9.3 1
6.6 1
7.1 1 1
11.4
1 7.7
8.3
11.2 1
9.4
11.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A I
N/A I
N/A
>9.9
>10.4 >11.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MYi
Cross Section 31 (Shallow)
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
Cross Section
MY2 MY3
32 (Shallow)
MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MYS
Cross Section 33 (Pool)
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
122.7
122.7
122.7
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.4
116.4
116.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.8
3.9
3.8
5.3
5.1
3.9
6.3
5.8
5.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftp)
1.3
2.0
1.3
2.1
1.8
1.2
2.4
1.7
1.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
7.8
11.2
13.8
14.6
13.0
16.8
19.7
13.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>15.8
>15.4
>15.8
>37.5
>39.9
>51.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Table 11d. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Middle Branch
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
Cross Section 24 (Shallow)
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
Base
MYl
Cross Section
MY2 MY3
25 (Pool)
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross Section 26 (Pool) 1111111F�
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
124.7
124.7
124.7
Bankfull Width (ft) 2.2
2.3
2.2
3.1
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.8
5.0
Floodprone Width (ft) >50
>50
>50
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft?) 0.7
0.8
0.7
1.2
1.6
1.1
1.4
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 6.7
6.8
6.8
8.1
6.0
9.1
>11.9 >21.9 >24.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >22.9
>21.5
>23.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 124.6
124.6
124.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.4
3.2
3.1
Floodprone Width (ft) >200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft?) 1.1
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.1
10.7
10.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >58.8 >62.5 >64.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0

Table Ile. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southwest Branch
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
Cross Section
MY2 MY3
22 (Pool)
MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY3
Cross Section 23 (Shallow)
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.9
4.8
5.0
2.4
2.9
3.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftp)
1.8
1.9
2.1
0.6
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.2
11.9
11.7
9.7
11.2
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
>82.3 >68.6 >67.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Table 11f. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
North Branch
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 118.6
118.6
118.6
118.73
118.7
118.7
116.8
116.8
116.8
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.8
10.0
10.2
8.6
9.2
9.2
9.3
9.0
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3
1.4
1.4
1.0
1.2
1.2 1
1.2
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe) 7.5
7.2
7.5
5.7
6.0
6.4
6.5
7.0
6.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratiol 12.8 1
14.0
13.9
1 13.1 1
14.1
13.2
13.2
11.5
11.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio N/A I
N/A
N/A
>23.2 >21.7 >21.7
>21.6 >22.2 >22.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
Cross Section 37 (Pool)
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6
MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 116.5
116.5
116.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 10.6
11.1
10.7
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.4
1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe) 9.2
9.2
9.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratiol 2.3
13.4
12.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol 1.0
1.0
1.0

Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack (West)
M
M
Min
Min Min Min Max Min Max in x Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.7
11.1
4.8
11.4
4.8
11.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.4
1.0
0.7
0.9
0.6
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth
0.7
1.7
1.0
1.9
1.0
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
2.1
10.7
3.3
9.4
4.6
9.9
Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
13.9
6.9
13.9
4.0
13.4
Entrenchment Ratio
>20.9
>42.5
>20
>42.1
>20.1
>41.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack (East)
M
M
Min
Min Min Min Max Min Max Min x Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
19.8
7.9
20.5
7.9
20.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
1.6
0.7
1.5
0.8
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth
1.1
2.8
1.1
2.5
1.2
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
5.7
30.2
5.9
24.6
6.1
26.2
Width/Depth Ratio
7.3
14.6
8.1
18.4
7.2
17.1
Entrenchment Ratio
>21.9
>36.5
>20.9
>37.8
>21.1
>37.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Branch
M
M
Min
Min Min Min Max Min Max Min x Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.0
6.3
2.9
5.8
2.6
5.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>30
>200
>30
>200
>30
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
0.4
0.8
0.5
1.2
0.5
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
0.8
2.4
1.1
2.0
0.8
1.8
Width/Depth Ratio
9.3
16.8
6.6
19.7
7.1
13.7
Entrenchment Ratio
>9.9
>37.5
>10.4
>38.9
>11.4
>51.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
10%
0%

Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Middle Branch
M
M
Min
Min Min Min Max Min Max Min x Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.2
4.1
2.3
4.8
2.2
5.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>200
>50
>200
>50
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
0.7
1.4
0.8
1.6
0.7
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.7
>11.9
6.0
>21.9
6.8
>24.3
Entrenchment Ratio
>22.9
>58.8
>21.5
>62.5
>23.2
>64.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Table 12e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southwest Branch
M
M
Min
Min Min Min Max Min Max Min x Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.4
4.9
2.9
4.8
3.0
5.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth
0.4
0.8
0.4
1.0
0.5
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
0.6
1.8
0.8
1.9
0.9
2.1
Width/Depth Ratio
9.7
13.2
11.1
11.9
10.1
11.7
Entrenchment Ratio
>82.3
>82.3
>68.6
>68.6
>67.5
>67.5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
North Branch
M
M
Min
Min Min Min Max Min Max Min x Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
10.7
9.0
10.0
9.0
10.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth
1.0
1.4
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
5.7
9.2
6.0
8.7
6.4
9.2
Width/Depth Ratio
12.4
13.2
9.7
14.1
11.7
13.9
Entrenchment Ratio
>21.6
>23.2
>21.7
>22.2
>21.7
>22.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 1 -DRC West
9+38 Shallow
140
138
136 ,Ih
c
g 134
CU
W
132
130
0 10
20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014) 4 MY2(4/2015) —Bankfull— FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
5.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
-
7.7 width (ft)
t
0.8 mean depth (ft)�
-
1.5 max depth (ft)
8.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
"•t.: '' , s:. +'
10.1 width -depth ratio'~
-
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
•" r
26.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 2 -DRC West
9+70 Pool
140
138
136
x
C
y
�
CU
134
W
132
130
0 10
20
30 40 50
Width (ft
)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
Bankfull Dimensions
-
8.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.2 width (ft)
'
0.8 mean depth (ft)
-
2.0 max depth (ft)
-
11.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
12.2 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 3 -DRC West
18+48 Shallow
136
134
132
�
r
c
130
CU
W
128
126
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014) s MY2(4/2015)
—Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
8.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.0 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
10.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
qa
12.2 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
20.0 entrenchment ratio
w'
.
1.0 low bank height ratio+
,.�.-
Ig.
Survey Date: 4/2015
_
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
_o-
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Section 4 -DRC West
18+80 Pool
x -section area (ft.sq.)
136
width (ft)
0.9
134
1.7
max depth (ft)
132
c
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8
130
CU
13.1
width -depth ratio
W
128
126
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) t MY1 (7/2014) t MY2 (4/2015) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
9.9
x -section area (ft.sq.)
11.4
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.7
max depth (ft)
12.3
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8
hyd radi (ft)
13.1
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 5 -DRC West
28+73 Pool
130
128
126 ,y
C
124
CU
W
122
120
0 10 20 30
40 50
60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
—MY1(7/2014)
0 MY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
6.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.6 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.5 max depth (ft)
r -. -
8.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
IF
-.
10.9 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 6 -DRC West
29+11 Shallow
130
128
126
g
CU
124
W
122
120
0 10 20
30 40
50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
—
FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
5.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.6 width (ft)
0.6 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
9.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
13.4 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
23.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
k
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering'--'
"
..
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 7 -DRC West
37+04 Pool
125
123
121
g
CU
119
—
W
117
115
0 10 20 30
40 50
60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014)
t MY1 (7/2014)
Bankfull Dimensions
7.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.0 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
8.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
8.8 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
g
—
W
117
115
0 10 20 30
40 50
60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014)
t MY1 (7/2014)
t MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 8 -DRC West
37+46 Shallow
124
122
-
120
c
�
118
CU
W
116
114
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80
90 100
Width (ft)
FloodproneArea
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
5.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
4.8 width (ft)
1.2 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
6.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.9 hyd radi (ft)
4.0 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
41.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 9 -DRC West
45+77 Shallow
120
118
116
FloodproneArea
c
�
CU
114
W
112
110
0 10 20 30
40
50 60 70 80 90
100 110
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull—
Bankfull Dimensions
4.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.5 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.0 max depth (ft)
8.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
11.4 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
26.7 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
r .
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Cross Section 10 -DRC West
46+14 Pool
120
118
116
c
m 114
CU
W
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) t MY1 (7/2014)
t MY2 (4/2015) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
4.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
5.9 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.0 max depth (ft)
6.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
7.6 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 11 -DRC East
57+24 Pool
120
118
116
c
)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
�
CU
114
W
112
110
0 10 ZO
30
40 50 60 70
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
17.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
15.1 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
2.0 max depth (ft)
15.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.1 hyd radi (ft)
13.1 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 12 -DRC East
57+74 Shallow
120
118
116
o
-
CU
114
�
W
112
110
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
9.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.3 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
yr
1.3 max depth (ft)
12.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
16.1 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
24.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 13 -DRC East
66+64 Pool
120
118
116
g
v
30
114
W
112
110
0 10 20
40 50
60 70 80 90
Width (ft
)
t MYO (2/2014)
t MY1 (7/2014)
Bankfull Dimensions
26.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
20.8 width (ft)
1.3 mean depth (ft)
2.5 max depth (ft)
21.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.2 hyd radi (ft)
16.6 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
t MYO (2/2014)
t MY1 (7/2014)
t MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 14 -DRC East
67+02 Shallow
120
118
c
116
�
CU
114
-
W
112
110
0 10
20 30
40 50 60
70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
10.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.4 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.6 max depth (ft)
13.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
14.0 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
S
24.3 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
+ #
Survey Date: 4/2015
Y
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 15 -DRC East
77+04 Pool
120
118
116
)
t MYO (2/2014) t MY1 (7/2014) t MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull
c
�
-
CU
114
W
112
110
0 10 20
30
40 50
60 70
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
14.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.4 width (ft)
1.2 mean depth (ft)
1.9 max depth (ft)
13.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.1 hyd radi (ft)
10.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015��
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
t MYO (2/2014) t MY1 (7/2014) t MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 16 -DRC East
29+11 Shallow
120
118
116
�
CU
114
W
�
112
110
0 10
20
30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull—
Bankfull Dimensions
12.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.7 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
13.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.9 hyd radi (ft)
13.0 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
23.6 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
s
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 17 -DRC East
86+95 Shallow
118
116
114 -_
c
�
v
112
W
110
108
0 10
20
30
40 50 60
Width (ft)
FloodproneArea
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015)
—Bankfull—
Bankfull Dimensions
12.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.7 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
13.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
12.6 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
23.6 entrenchment ratio
4 Via..
1.0 low bank height ratio
t-
u
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 18 -DRC East
91+00 Pool
118
116
114
g 112
CU
W
110
108
0 10 20 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
+MY1(7/2014) +MY2(MM/YYYY) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
21.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
15.3 width (ft)
1.4 mean depth (ft)
2.6 max depth (ft)
16.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.3 hyd radi (ft)
11.2 width -depth ratio
-
Survey Date:
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 19 -DRC East
91+48 Shallow
118
116
c
114
�
112
CU
FloodproneArea
W
110
108
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80
90 100
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015)
—Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
n
11.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
14.2 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.6 max depth (ft)
14.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
17.1 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)`
21.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
r
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 20 -DRC East
102+92 Shallow
115
113
111
-
c
�
,
v
109
W
107
105
0 10
20 30 40
50 60
FloodproneArea
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
6.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.9 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
8.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
It
10.3 width -depth ratio
W flood prone area (ft)
37.8 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
f
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
a
R
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 21 -DRC East
103+37 Pool
114
112
110
c
m 108
CU
W
106
104
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) t MY1 (7/2014) t MY2 (4/2015) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
11.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.1 width (ft)
1.3 mean depth (ft)
2.1 max depth (ft)
10.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.1 hyd radi (ft)
7.2 width -depth ratio _
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 22 -Southwest Branch
509+04 Pool
140
138
—
c
136
0
CU
_
134
132
)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
0 10
20
30 40 50
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
2.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
5.0 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
s
0.9 max depth (ft)
5.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
x
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
11.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 23 -Southwest Branch
509+15 Shallow
140
138
C
O
CU
W
136
[L
FloodproneArea
134
0 10
20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull—
Bankfull Dimensions
0.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.0 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
3.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
10.1 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
67.5 entrenchment ratio
_
1.0 low bank height ratio
a'
Survey Date: 4/2015
"
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 24 -Middle Branch
207+00 Shallow
140
138
—
c
136
0
CU
_
134
132
FloodproneArea
0 10 20
30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull—
Bankfull Dimensions
0.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.2 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
2.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
6.8 width -depth ratio
50.0 W flood prone area (ft)
23.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 25 -Middle Branch
207+08 Pool
140
138
—
c
136
0
CU
_
134
132
)
t t
MYO (2/2014) MY1 (7/2014) t MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull
0 10
20
30 40 50
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
1.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.2 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
3.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
9.1 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
t t
MYO (2/2014) MY1 (7/2014) t MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 26 -Middle Branch
216+22 Pool
128
126
c
0
I
CU 124
W
122
0 10
20 30 40
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014)
t MY1 (7/2014) t MY2 (4/2015) - Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
5.0 width (ft)
v` .J,
0.2 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
5.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.2 hyd radi (ft)
24.3 width -depth ratio
-
s
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 27 -Middle Branch
216+34 Shallow
128
126
c
0
FloodproneArea
CU
W
124
122
0 10
20 30 40
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull—
Bankfull Dimensions
1.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.1 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
3.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
10.2 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
64.3 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 28 -Southeast Branch
310+03 Pool
142
140
- 138
0
_v
136
134
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014)
--#—MY1 (7/2014) 0 MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.3 width (ft)
-w
0.5 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
4.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
7.1 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 29 -Southeast Branch
310+15 Shallow
142
140
-
—
138
c
0
CU
_
136
134
FloodproneArea
0 10 20 30
40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull—
Bankfull Dimensions
l
0.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.6 width (ft)
`
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
3.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
8.3 width -depth ratio
30.0 W flood prone area (ft)
11.4 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 30 -Southeast Branch
318+11 Pool
126
c
124
0
122
W
CU
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) t MY1 (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.5 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
3.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
-
11.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
122
W
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) t MY1 (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 31 -Southeast Branch
318+27 Shallow
126
124
c
0
m
CU 122
W
�
120
0 10
20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull— FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
1.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.8 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
4.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
11.2 width -depth ratio
60.0 W flood prone area (ft)
- -
G-
15.8 entrenchment ratio
-
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 32 -Southeast Branch
325+58 Shallow
120
118
0
M
y 116
W
114
0 10 20
30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014)
4 MY2(4/2015) —Bankfull— FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
1.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.9 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
4.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
13.0 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
51.3 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 33 -Southeast Branch
325+73 Pool
120
11s
—
116
c
0
_
CU
114
112
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
5.0 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
5.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
13.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
—
c
_
112
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 34 -North Branch
407+67 Pool
lzz
lzo
lls
0
_
CU
116
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.2 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
10.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
13.9 width -depth ratio
a
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
_
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 35 -North Branch
407+67 Shallow
122
120
C
O
M
CU 118
W
04
116
0 10 20
30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014)
s MY2(4/2015) —Bankfull— FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
6.4 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.2 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
9.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
13.2 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
21.7 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 36 -North Branch
416+47 Shallow
120
118
— 116
A
11
c
0
_v
114
112
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) 4 MY2(4/2015) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
6.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.0 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
9.4 wetted parimeter (ft) _
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
11.7 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 37 -North Branch
416+85 Pool
120
118
—
116
c
0
_
CU
114
112
0 10 ZO 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
9.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.7 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.5 max depth (ft)
11.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
12.5 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
—
c
_
112
0 10 ZO 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO(2/2014) tMY1(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) —Bankfull

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Reach
Date of Data Date of
Collection Occurrence
Method
Devil's Racetrach (West)
5/19/2015 3/5/2015
Crest Gage/
Pressure
Transducer
7/30/2015 6/3/2015
10/30/2015 10/2/2015
Devil's Racetrach (East)
5/19/2015 2/26/2015
7/30/2015 6/3/2015
10/30/2015 10/2/2015
Southwest Branch
5/19/2015 3/5/2015
7/30/2015 6/3/2015
10/30/2015 10/2/2015
Middle Branch
5/19/2015 3/5/2015
7/30/2015 6/3/2015
10/30/2015 10/2/2015
Southeast Branch
7/30/2015 u
10/30/2015 10/2/2015
North Branch
5/19/20153/5/2015
7/30/2015 6/3/2015
10/30/2015 10/1/2015
u. unknown

Table 14. Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Summary of Groundwater Gage Results for Monitoring Years 1 through 7
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Gage
Year 1(2014)*
Year 2 (2015)
Year 3 (2016)
Year 4 (2017)
Year 5 (2018)
Year 6 (2019)
Year 7 (2020)
No/7.5 Days
No/16 Days
1
(3.1%)
(6.0%)
No/14.5 Days
Yes/ 58 Days
2
(6.0%)
(22.3%)
No/2.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
3
(1.0%)
(12.8%)
No/13.5 Days
Yes/57 Days
4
(5.6%)
(21.9%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/34 Days
5
(5.2%)
(13.0%)
No/11.0 Days
Yes/53 Days
6
(4.6%)
(20.3%)
Yes/21.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
7
(9.0%)
(25.6%)
No/5.0 Days
Yes/31 Days
8
(2.1%)
(12.0%)
Yes/ 22.0 Days
Yes/80 Days
9
(9.2%)
(31.0%)
No/ 1.5 Days
No/10 Days
10
(0.6%)
(3.9%)
No/9.0 Days
Yes/65 Days
11
(3.8%)
(25.2%)
No/7.5 Days
Yes/31 Days
12
(3.1%)
(12.0%)
No/8.0 Days
Yes/34 Days
13
(3.3%)
(13.0%)
No/ 8.5 Days
Yes/32 Days
14
(3.5%)
(12.4%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
15
(5.2%)
(12.8%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
16
(5.2%)
(12.8%)
No/15.0 Days
Yes/34 Days
17
(6.3%)
(13.2%)
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
18
(29.0%)
(25.6%)
Yes/31.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
19
(13.1%)
(25.6%)
No/19.5 Days
Yes/35 Days
20
(8.1%)
(13.4%)
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/79 Days
21
(29.0%)
(30.4%)
Yes/ 31.0 Days
Yes/66 Days
22
(12.9%)
(25.6%)
No/8.0 Days
Yes/31 Days
23
(3.3%)
(11.8%)
No/13.0 Days
Yes/33 Days
24
(5.4%)
(12.8%)
Yes/25.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
25
(10.6%)
(25.6%)
Yes/39.0 Days
Yes/83 Days
26
(16.3%)
(32.2%)
Yes/29.5 Days
Yes/67 Days
27
(12.3%)
(26.0%)
No/19.5 Days
Yes/81 Days
28
(8.1%)
(31.2%)
Yes/70.0 Days
Yes/81 Days
29
(29.2%)
(31.4%)
Yes/52.5 Days
Yes/83 Days
30
(21.9%)
(32.0%)
No/9.0 Days
Yes/77 Days
31
(3.8%)
(29.7%)
No/ 7.0 Days
Yes/78 Days
32
(2.9%)
(30.2%)
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/84 Days
33
(29.0%)
(32.4%)
No/2.0 Days
No/16 Days
34
(0.8%)
(6.0%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
35
MY2
(12.8%)
Added During
Yes/34 Days
36
MY2
(13.0%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
37
MY2
(12.8%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
38
MY2
(12.8%)
* NRCS WETS data was used to determine the growing season for monitorg year 1. After discussions with the US Army Corps
of Engineers, on-site soil temperature probe data is being used to determine the beginning of the growing season.

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #1
o
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
0
°�
U91) u,
20
-
0
6.0
3 0
rn
c
.3 r4
o rn
o -1
10
(Dm
C7
0
0 `i
5.0
�
0
vi
c
LU
IN
1,
- 4.0
10
— — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
—
— — — — —
v
-
3.0
-20
L
CU
C
R
-30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
LL
IL
0.0
-60
C T C W Q +-' > U
Q Q to 0 Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #1 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
o
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #2
C
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
0
°�
U91) u,
20
-
0
6.0
3 0
c
.3 �
o
o
10
(Dm
C7
0
0 `i
5.0
ro
0
vi
C
UR M i\
4.0
10
— — — — — —
"
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — —
v
>
-
3.0
-20
w
L
CU
C
�
-30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
0.0
-60
C
— li c
C
T C W Q
Q cD ai n O
G Q
> U
O o
Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #2 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
o
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #3
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
0
°�
U91) u,
20
-
1-4
6.0
3 0
c
3 0
o
o
10
(D
0
0 `i
5.0
�
0
vi
c
LU
VAWq
4.0
10
— — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — —
v
-
-20
3.0
L
CUm
C
m
-30
—
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
0.0
-60
C -
? C 00 CL ''
O
U
2: Q to
Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #3 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
co v Q Q in O Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #4 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
o
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #5
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
0
°�
U91) u,
20
-
0
6.0
3 0
rn
c
.3 r4
o rn
o -1
10
(Dm
C7
0
0 `i
5.0
�
0
vi
c
LU
4.0
S-10
— — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — —
v
>
-
3.0
-20
L
CU
C
R
\9
-30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
0.0
-60
— ii
75
Q Q n 0
Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #5 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
o
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #6
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
0
°�
U91) u,
20
-
0
6.0
3 0
rn
c
.3 r4
o rn
o -1
10
(Dm
C7
0
0 `i
5.0
�
0
vi
c
LU
4.0
10
— — — — --y AW
—
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — —
v
>
-
3.0
-20
L
CU
C
R
Oc
-30
2.0
-40
14
1.0
-50
0.0
-60
— ii
Q 2: Q n 0
Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #6 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #7
o
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
0
°�
U91) u,
20
-
0
6.0
3 0
rn
c
.3 r4
o rn
o -1
10
(Dm
C7
0
0 `i
5.0
0
�
vi
c
w
tkr
4.0
10
— — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — —
— — — — —
S
c
v
>
I
-20
3.0
L
CU
C
30
—
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
60
0.0
Y
0
— Q 2: Q Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #7 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
o
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #8
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
0
°�
U91) u,
20
-
0
6.0
3 0
rn
c
.3 r4
o rn
o -1
10
(Dm
C7
0
0 `i
5.0
�
0
Ln
4—
c
LU
I
%�-- A A N �, h
f
4.0
10
— — — f —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
v
-
3.0
-20
L
CU
C
-30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
0.0
-60
C
ii
T C W Q +-'
Q Q o 0 ai
> U
Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #8 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #9
o
C
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
0
°�
vSu,
20
-
ao 0
6.0
3 0
rn
c
.3 r4
o rn
o -1
10
(Dm
C7
0
0 `i
5.0
ro
LUC
V"h'�
TA W N
4.0
10
— — — — — —
— — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
1
v
\ R A A
-
3.0
-20
w
L
CU
C
R
-30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
J.0.0
-60
— ii Q 2: Q n 0 Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #9 — — Criteria Level

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
o Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #10
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
c U T c an a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #10 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
E ;4
to o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
o
m
0
(7
0
N
c
w
.1 L J
c U T c an a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #10 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUm
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #13
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
cL L c on a +�
LL Q Q vvi O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #13 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
E
3.0 m
C
m
ac
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
to o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
0
0
0
N
c
w
.1 L J
cL L c on a +�
LL Q Q vvi O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #13 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
E
3.0 m
C
m
ac
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
o Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #14
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
E ;4
°n o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
o
m
(7
0
0
N
c
w
M-
4��M
I J
Ii
J
c U c an a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #14 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUm
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #15
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
C U T C OU a) U
ii Q ca Q to O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #15 — — Criteria Level
O N
Z O
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
ac
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
to o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
0
0
0
N
WA
c
w
IT — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
C U T C OU a) U
ii Q ca Q to O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #15 — — Criteria Level
O N
Z O
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
ac
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
bD CLY
v a 2:< o z° o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #17 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
o Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #20
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
c U T c an a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #20 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
E ;4
�3 0
o
m
to o
c
.3 �
o
0
N
(7
0
c
w
M I:- -"Wr-Vk - - - - - - - - -
L
k,
J
1, J
I L J
U I
N , d �h
c U T c an a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #20 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #24
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
C 0. T C W Q
LL QQ vOi O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #24 — — Criteria Level
O v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
E
3.0
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
to o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
0
0
0
N
U
wL
I L1.11
J
C 0. T C W Q
LL QQ vOi O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #24 — — Criteria Level
O v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
E
3.0
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #25
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Q Y
CU W Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #25 — — Criteria Level
O N
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
°° o
O
� N
o
o
L
0
0
o
t'
_0
m
c
LU
L
I ali, -.J-
I
I I J
Ilii J
L J
MI-
u 1 11 11
Q Y
CU W Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #25 — — Criteria Level
O N
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #27
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
cL L c on a +�
—° LL a < o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #27 — — Criteria Level
o v
z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
E
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
to o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
(D m
o
0
(7
0
tc
N
A M
d J Ii N J1
I I
cL L c on a +�
—° LL a < o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #27 — — Criteria Level
o v
z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
E
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
bD CLY
Q Q to O Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #28 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
ca v Q 2:Q v°'i O Z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #29 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
o Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #30
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
c U c an a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #30 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
E ;4
°n o
3 0
c
.3 �
o
o
m
0
(7
0
m
NA
Aw
c
\A
1�
I N
J
1,
L J
c U c an a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #30 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #31
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
ii Qca Q to O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #31 — — Criteria Level
O v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
E
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
to o
3 0
c
.3 �
o
m
0
0
(7 -4
0
N
c
w
ii Qca Q to O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #31 — — Criteria Level
O v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
E
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #35
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
c U c nn a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #35 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
to o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
0
0
0
�..'
c
W
N
J,U
c U c nn a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #35 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #36
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
nn a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #36 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
to o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
(D m
0
0
(7
0
N
c
wV.
\N\
�� — — --- — — — — — — — — — — —
-\�N
Iq
AI
J
I
nn a
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #36 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #37
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
cL Lc nn a u
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #37 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
�3 0
o
to o
c
.3 �
0
0
N
0
C:
w
\��
A
k -W
�� MA
k
I
-y
cL Lc nn a u
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #37 — — Criteria Level
o v
Z 0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
CUL
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #38
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
c L c on a +�
LL a a' o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #38 — — Criteria Level
o v
z O
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0
c ;4
to o
�3 0
c
.3 �
o
0
0
0
N
c
w
I J
Ii J
L J
I
"N
c L c on a +�
LL a a' o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #38 — — Criteria Level
o v
z O
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 m
c
m
2.0
1.0
0.0

Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
x
1.0
0.5
Devil's Racetrack: Stream Flow Gage for SW Branch
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Id I �.1 L1�III I,JIA
CC - W Q >
N m O_ m n d O
LL g a 5 a ., o z
Rainfall SW Branch Water Depth — — Stream Bed — •eankfull
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
c
2.0
G
M
cc
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0

Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack: Stream Flow Gage for Middle Branch
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
1.0
4.0
``
Gage reinstallled
on 8/5/2015
3.5
0.5
I I
3.0
2.5
c
v
>
11 0.0
–
2.0
-
G
d
0
3
M
cc
1.5
-0.5
1.0
0.5
-1.0
—
U
0.0
N N Q f6
LL Q
>
7 UJ O Ol
Q �n O Z O
Rainfall
Middle Branch Water Depth — Stream Bed • Bankfull

Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack: Stream Flow Gage for SE Branch
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
1.5
4.0
3.5
1.0
3.0
$ 0.5
2.5
�
>
Gage reinstallled
J
d
on 7/30/2015
2.0
G
cc
3 0.0
1.5
1.0
-0.5
0.5
L
11111
-1.0
i I i
c > c75 en Q > u
0.0
Q Z
Rainfall SE Branch Water Depth Stream Bed :—• • Bankfull

Monthly Rainfall Data
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2015 Four Oaks, NC
10
9
8 -
7
S 6
c
0
m 5
Q
Z
v
a` 4
3
2 -I
1 -
0
Jan -15 Feb -15 Mar -15 Apr -15 May -15 Jun -15 Jul -15 Aug -15 Sep -15 Oct -15
Date
2015 Rainfall Data (weather station) 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
1 2015 monthly rainfall collected by Weather Underground Station KNCFOUR02 (Four Oaks, NC).
2 30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from weather station NC1820, in Clayton, INC (USDA, 2002).

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #1
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30
c
00
M
5.0
20
v
tw Lnc
0
GJ Ln
Nao 0
4.5
O
C C-4
3
°m
4.0
10
C7 m
C7
0
0
t=
v
3.5
0
(nN
LJJ
�IMN
N AA
3.0
a, -10
>
_ _ _ _ _
VV
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
2.5 w
-20
m
2.0 °C
\V \
�
-30
1.5
-40
L I N^1J
1.0
-50
0.5
ILI,0.0
-60
C -0T C — to
LL Q Q
CL +' > U
V1 O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall
Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth
Gage #1 — — Criteria Level

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #6
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30
c
00
M
5.0
20
v
tw c
0
GJ Ln
tw 0
4.5
0
S C-4
3
° m
�o
4.0
10
!7M
—
C7
0
0
t=
v
3.5
0
;?
N
LU
3.0
a, -10_
>
_ _ _
_ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
2.5 w
-20
ro
2.0 °C
-30
1.5
-40
1.0
-50
0.5
60
1 1
0.0
C
C
TC — to
� Q
Cl > U
Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall
Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth
Gage #6 — — Criteria Level

30
20
10
0
c
v -10
J
v -20
m
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #8
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
C -0 � > C 00 d > U
v m a m - m u o v
LL Q 2 Q v) O Z D
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #8 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5 w
C
2.0 "�
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #12
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
-30
-40
-50
-60
C >� C — to CL +' > U
LL Q Q vi O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #12 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
C
2.5 w
C
M
2.0 °C
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #21
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30
c
00
M
5.0
20
v
C I ao 0
f0
OXLn
4.5
�C-4
3
° m
W
o �I
4.0
10
C7 m
C7
0
0
0
t
3.5
0
;?C
_
N
W
3.0
a, -10
S
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2.5 w
W-20
M
2.0 °C
M
-30
\4,
Nk
N
1.5
fw^\ I
-40
1.0
-50
0.5
-600.0
C
LL Q
T C — tlO
Q
CL +' > U
In 0 Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall
Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth
Gage #21 — — Criteria Level

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #28
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30
c
00
M
5.0
20
v
tw c
0
GJ Ln
tw 0
4.5
�C-4
3
° m
W
o �I
4.0
10
—m
—
C7
0
0
t=
v
3.5
0
;? VW_
N
LJJ
AN
qV
3.0
a, -10
J
_
_
1�
_ _
2.5 w
-20
ro
2.0 °C
J
-30
1.5
-40
1.0
-50
Ni
0.5
ILIJ
ILI 1. IILIII
0.0
-60
C
LL Q
TC to
Q
CL +"' > U
In O z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth
Gage #28 — — Criteria Level

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #36
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30
c
0
'^
5.0
20
m
a,
a°on
f0
a,
aoo
4.5
30A
E
.3�
o m
°
4.0
10
C7 m
C7
0
0
7
3.5
0N
�1�
�
LJJ
)
3.0
a -10
_
_
2.5 9
�J
-20
32.0
NA
K
cc
-30
1.5
-40
1.0
A
-50,—,
f1l,
0.5
L
LL111
11
0.0
-60
C
TC — to
Q �"' > U
Pre -Construction Rainfall
Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth
Gage #36 — — Criteria Level

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #38
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30
c
0
0
5.0
20
m
v
Ln
M
m
a,
Sao 0
4.5
o
3 F
° m
4.0
10
C7 m
C7
0
0
t3.5
0
;a
N
LD
3.0
a -10
_
_
2.5 9
-20
3
2.0 Cr
-30
1.5
40
1.0
-50
0.5
60
J
L
LL
11 A
1
�t70.0
to 2
V1 O
> U
z 0
Pre -Construction Rainfall
Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #38
— — Criteria Level