20120182 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

Annual Monitoring Report Final
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project
DEQ Contract Number: 6496
USACE Action ID: SAW -2011-02268
DWR Project Number: 20120182
SCO# 09-08566-01
Surry County, North Carolina
Data Collected: October 26 -December 11, 2015
Data Submitted: January 2016
Submitted to:
rk�
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
CLearWaLerWW
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Prepared by:
V1jIL N+IDS
ENGGINNEERING
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806

Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY..........................................................................................1
1.1 Project Goals.......................................................................................................1
1.2 Project Performance Standards........................................................................1
1.3 Project Setting and Background....................................................................... 3
1.4 Project Components and Approach................................................................. 3
1.5 Project Performance.......................................................................................... 4
2.0 METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................5
3.0 REFERENCES........................................................................................................7
Appendix A. Figures and Background Tables
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts
Table 4: Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5a -d: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Point Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7: Vegetation Plot Results (All Stems)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Cross -Sections with Annual Overlays
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 8 a -c: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9: Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross Sections)
Table 10 a -c: Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Table 11: Verification of Bankf ill Events
Monthly Precipation Graph: 30-70 Percentile Surry County, NC
I

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) restored, enhanced, and preserved a
total of 9,923 linear feet (LF) of stream channel at the Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation
Site (Site) in Surry County, North Carolina generating 5,089 Stream Mitigation Units
(SMUs). The restoration project was developed to fulfill stream mitigation requirements
accepted by DMS for the Upper Yadkin River Basin Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
03040101. This report documents the results of the Monitoring Year 1 monitoring efforts
(MY 1).
1.1 Project Goals
The project goals identified in the Mitigation Plan (Confluence, 2012) include:
• Improve water quality in Hogan Creek and the UTs through reductions in
sediment and nutrient inputs from local sources;
• Create conditions for dynamic equilibrium of water and sediment movement
between the supply reaches and project reaches;
• Promote floodwater attenuation and secondary functions associated with more
frequent and extensive floodwater contact times;
Improve in -stream habitat by increasing the diversity of bedform features;
Enhance and protect native riparian vegetation communities; and
• Reduce fecal, nutrient, and sediment loads to project streams by promoting and
implementing livestock best management practices.
1.2 Project Performance Standards
The performance of the project will be evaluated in accordance with the geomorphic,
visual, hydrology, and vegetation components outlined in the Stream Mitigation
Guidelines (USACE 2003). The following are specific performance standards.
Performance Standards
Proposed Ecological Service
Metrics/Success Criteria
Enhancements
a. Evidence of at least two out -of -bank flows (wrack lines, crest gage data) by
Flood attenuation
year 5
b. BHR < 1.2 each year
Fine sediment storage
a. Evidence of fine sediment on floodplain at least twice by year 5
a. Annual changes in riffle cross sectional area generally modest (e.g. <20%)
Maintenance of stable channel
and exhibit a stabilizing trend
bed and banks
b. Annual width -depth ratio changes generally modest (e.g. <20%) and
exhibit a stabilizing trend
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/ 94708 1 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Monitoring will consist of collecting morphological, vegetative, and hydrological data to
assess the project success based on the restoration goals and objectives on an annual basis
for five years or until the success criteria are met. The success of the project will be
assessed using measurements of the stream channel's dimension, substrate composition
permanent photographs, vegetation, surface water hydrology, and visual assessments.
Monitoring requirements include:
a. No trends in widespread development of robust (e.g. comprised of coarse
Requirements
material and/or vegetated actively diverting flow) mid -channel bar features
Equilibrium sediment transport
Parameter
Monitoring Feature
b. Majority of riffle pebble counts indicate maintenance or coarsening of
Reach (ft)
UT2 UT3
substrate distributions
a. Overall number and distributions of riffle and pool features are generally
2
maintained
Maintenance of in -stream riffle
b. Pool depths may vary from year to year, but the majority maintain depths
and pool habitats
sufficient to be observed as distinct features in the profile
1
c. Majority of riffle pebble counts indicate maintenance or coarsening of
I
substrate distributions
Filtration of runoff
a. Evidence of floating debris or fine sediment on buffer vegetation at least
1,500
twice by year 5
675
a. Density of 320 live, planted stems/ac at year 3; 260 live, planted stems/acre
Riparian buffer habitat density
at year 5
and diversity
b. Four dominant species at year 5 shall be native
c. <20% non-native species at year 5, based on measurements of aerial extent
Protection of water quality from
a. Observations of intact livestock fencing and absence of evidence of
nutrient and pathogen inputs
livestock access to streams each year
Protection of banks from
a. Observations of intact livestock fencing and absence of evidence of
livestock trampling
livestock impacts each year
Re -vegetation of areas treated
a. Bare soil areas shall comprise no more than 10 percent of the total treated
for non-native species
area, based on measurements of aerial extent
Monitoring will consist of collecting morphological, vegetative, and hydrological data to
assess the project success based on the restoration goals and objectives on an annual basis
for five years or until the success criteria are met. The success of the project will be
assessed using measurements of the stream channel's dimension, substrate composition
permanent photographs, vegetation, surface water hydrology, and visual assessments.
Monitoring requirements include:
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/ 94708 2 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
M nitoting
Requirements
Parameter
Monitoring Feature
Quantity Length By
Hogan Rl Hogan R2 UTl
Reach (ft)
UT2 UT3
Frequency
Riffle XS
2
2
2
Annual
Dnnension
Poo1XS
1
1
I
Annual
Pattern/Profile
Longitudinal Profile
1,500
1,000
675
Annual
Substrate
100 Pebble Count
2
2
Annual
Hydrology
Crest Gauge
I
1
Semi -Annual
Vegetation
Vegetation Plots
3
2
1
Annual
Visual Assessment
Project Site
Y
Y Y
Y Y
Semi -Annual
Reference Photos
Permanent Photo Points
18
6 3
10 4
Annual
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/ 94708 2 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

1.3 Project Setting and Background
The Site is located in the Piedmont physiographic province (NCGS 2004). The Piedmont
is characterized by gently rolling, well rounded hills and long low ridges. Hogan Creek
is a main tributary to the Yadkin River in the Upper Yadkin River Basin (HUC
03040101). The site is located approximately 2 miles south of NC 268 on Miller Gap
Road, which bisects the project site at the triple box culvert over Hogan Creek. The
project site is bordered to the north by Trajan Trail, to the south by Anderson Road, and
to the west by Siloam Road. Latitude and longitude for the site are 36.321609 N and
80.602389 W, respectively. A vicinity map is included in Appendix A as Figure 1.
Agriculture is the primary land use in the watershed (41% agriculture land cover). Non -
forested buffers and livestock operations were identified as major stressors to water
quality within the watershed. The site assessment phase of the project identified other
stressors as well, including bank erosion, sediment deposition, disconnection of the
streams and floodplains, and exotic plant species. The majority of the project area was
utilized as a cattle operation for over fifty years. Cattle accessed Hogan Creek and the
downstream reach of UT2 exacerbating bank erosion and allowing direct nutrient and
fecal inputs to the streams. Deforested riparian buffers and levee construction along
Hogan Creek and unnamed tributaries also contributed to channel degradation.
1.4 Project Components and Approach
Stream restoration was accomplished using a natural channel design approach to restore
appropriate channel dimension, pattern, and profile (Appendix A Table l; Appendix B
Figure 2). These improved conditions will promote water and sediment transport
equilibrium between the stream and its watershed, reconnect the stream to its floodplain
and promote healthy in -stream and riparian habitats. The project goals were addressed
through the following project objectives:
• Restoration of the dimension, pattern, profile of 761 LF of Hogan Creek Reach 1,
992 LF of Hogan Creek Reach 2, 650 LF of UT2, and 275 LF of UT3.
• Restoration of the dimension and profile (Enhancement I) of 1,200 LF of Hogan
Creek Reach 1;
• Limited channel work coupled with livestock exclusion and/or invasive species
control (Enhancement Il) on 66 LF of UTI and 280 LF of UT2.
• Livestock exclusion fencing and alternative water source installations;
• Invasive plant species control measures across the entire project wherever
necessary; and
• Preservation of approximately 5,699 LF relatively un -impacted forested streams
in a permanent conservation easement.
The target stream type for Hogan Creek was a moderately sinuous, moderate width -depth
ratio C4, which was appropriate for the relatively flat and wide alluvial valley. Reach 1
was constructed largely within the existing channel with in -stream structures incorporated
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/ 94708 3 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

to promote sediment transport equilibrium, riffle and pool formation, and enhanced bank
stability. Reach 2 of Hogan Creek was constructed mainly off-line in order to position
the channel in the low point of the valley and improve floodplain access on both banks.
The target stream type for UT2 and UT3 was a B4, with a moderate width -depth ratio and
moderate sinuosity which is suited to the somewhat steeper and more confined tributary
valleys. Bankfull benches cut on 10:1 slopes were provided on both banks. The off-line
channel segments were designed to promote the formation of riffle and pool sequences
while also affording the ability during construction to maintain clean flow separate in the
original channel.
The final design was completed in November of 2012. Construction activities and as -
built surveys were completed in December of 2014. Planting of the Site took place in
March of 2015. The baseline monitoring efforts began in May of 2015 and monitoring
year 1 efforts began in October 2015. More detailed information related to the project
activity, history, and contacts can be found in Appendix A, Tables 1, 2 and 3.
1.5 Project Performance
The region experienced an unusual high amount of precipitation during fall/winter 2015.
A nearby gauging station recorded over three inches of rain from October 2-4, 2015,
resulting in a bankfull event. This storm event created several areas on Hogan Creek
Reach 1 and Reach 2 that required maintenance. The following maintenance activities
were completed during December 2015:
• Hogan Reach 1 — Station 18+12. Cross vane was repaired to fix dislodged
boulder.
• Hogan Reach 1 — Station 20+12. Left bank was repaired to alleviate scour behind
root wad cluster.
• Hogan Reach 2 — Stations 34+00, 36+00, and 38+00. Substrate was added to
three constructed riffles in order to address channel incision and repair damaged
grade control structures.
• Hogan Reach 2 — Station 36+00. Bank work was required on the left bank to
repair 50 linear feet of erosion.
A visual inspection of the entire project was conducted after the repair work to ensure
that the project is performing well. Visual assessment tables and photo points are
included in Appendix B. With the exception of two areas of aggradation and six areas of
toe or lower bank erosion in Reaches 1 and 2 of Hogan Creek, the project as a whole is
performing as designed and stream issues were minimal. The six areas, labeled on the
current condition plan view (Figure 2 Sheets 1-3) as bank scour/erosion, are scheduled to
be live staked during the winter of 2016. Year 2 monitoring efforts will include an
evaluation of the need for additional adaptive management.
Vegetation monitoring was conducted October 26, 2015. The MY1 vegetation plot data
indicate that the project is on track to meet the interim criterion for survival and growth
of 320 stems per acre at the end of the year three monitoring period. Vegetation plot data
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/ 94708 4 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

and photographs are included in Appendix C. The average stem density for planted
stems is 465 stems per acre. The site includes a diverse assemblage of 10 species of
native trees and shrubs. Vegetation Plot 3, with a density of 243 stems per acre, was the
only plot that did not meet the interim success criteria of 320 stems per acre. Planted and
volunteer stem densities were between 243 and 6,232 stems per acre with an average of
2,226 stems per acre for the entire restoration site. Vegetation Plot 1 had a density of
6,232 stems per acre. The high density of volunteers in this plot may have skewed the
results for the entire site. Densities are expected to decrease in Vegetation Plot 1 during
future monitoring years as herbaceous vegetation becomes more established. Herbicide
treatments of exotic invasive plants were conducted during the construction phase and
again in July 2015. Observations indicate that the extent of invasive plants has been
greatly reduced since the initial treatment; however additional treatments are warranted
during 2016, particularly along the upstream reaches of UT2 and the downstream third of
Hogan Creek Reach 1. A supplemental planting for the entire site occurred in January
2016.
The geomorphic survey was conducted immediately after the repairs were completed.
MY1 data indicate that the streams are generally stable and performing well. Stream
survey data and summary tables are included in Appendix D. Cross-section data showed
little change between MYO and MY1, with the exception of areas of minor bed scour in
Hogan Creek Reaches 1 and 2. Changes in cross-sectional area and width to depth ratios
were generally modest and expected to occur between the baseline and MY1 monitoring
years. Longitudinal profile data indicated that the number and distribution of riffle and
pool features remained consistent between monitoring years. Pool depths increased in all
reaches particularly in Hogan Creek Reach 1 and 2. Riffle lengths and slopes remained
consistent with previous monitoring data. Riffle pebble counts indicated a coarsening of
bed material overall. The project is meeting the geomorphic performance standards set
forth in the mitigation plan.
A bankfull event was documented in October 2015 based on visual observation of wrack
lines and sediment deposition throughout the floodplain. Both crest gauges recorded
readings indicating a bankfull flow had occurred. A nearby gauging station recorded
over three inches of rain from October 2-4, 2015 (NCCRONOS, 2016).
Summary data related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and
supporting information can be found in the mitigation plan document. All raw data,
supporting tables, and figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in 2015 are based on standard guidance
and procedures documents (Rosgen 1996 and USACE 2003).
• Stream longitudinal profile and cross-section data were collected throughout three
reaches using a total station survey. Approximately 3,175 linear feet of stream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/ 94708 5 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

and 9 cross-sections were surveyed. Cross-sections and longitudinal profile start
and stop locations were permanently marked with capped rebar and PVC conduit.
• 41 permanent photo points were established throughout the project to visually
monitor stream stability and vegetation. Permanent photo points were marked
with labeled wooden or PVC stakes.
• Wolman pebble counts were conducted at four representative riffle cross-sections
to evaluate particle size distribution over time. A minimum of 100 particles were
selected at random and measured (Harrelson 1994).
• Vegetation monitoring included documenting species composition and survival of
planted and volunteer species within six randomly located vegetation plots. Each
0.025 acre vegetation plot was permanently marked with rebar and PVC conduit
at all four corners.
• Two crest gauges were installed and will be checked during semi-annual visits to
determine if a bankfull event has occurred. The crest gauges were installed and
surveyed at riffles on Hogan Creek Reach 2 and UT2.
• Visual assessments will be performed on all stream and buffer restoration areas on
a semi-annual basis. Problem areas will be noted such as channel instability
(lateral and/or vertical instability, structure failure/instability and/or piping,
headcuts), vegetation health (low stem density, vegetation mortality, invasive
species or encroachment), beaver activity, and livestock access. Areas of concern
will be mapped, photographed, and described in future monitoring reports.
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/ 94708 6 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

3.0 REFERENCES
Confluence Engineering, PC. 2012. Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Plan. NCEEP,
Raleigh, NC.
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort
Collins, Colorado.
NCCRONOS (North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the
Southeast Database). 2015. State Climate Office of North Carolina. Version
2.7.2. Pilot Mountain 0.7 NW Station ID No. NC -SR -9. Accessed January 2016.
NCGS (North Carolina Geological Survey). 2004. Physiography of North Carolina.
Map compiled by the Division of Land Resources. Raleigh.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality.
Wilmington, North Carolina.
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/ 94708 7 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables

Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation/Project No. 94708
Directions: The Hogan Creek project site is
located southeast of Level Cross in Surry County,
268
North Carolina. The site is accessed from 1-77
north out of Statesville. Turn east off 1-77 at exit
85 (NC 268 Bypass) and travel approximately 3
r�tG
miles to the intersection with NC 268. Turn east
and travel approximately 12 miles to a south turn
onto Miller Gap Road (SR2088). The site is
located approximately 2 miles south of NC 268 on
Miller Gap Road, which bisects the project site at
the bridge over Hogan Creek. The project site is
bordered to the north by Trajan Trail, to the south
by Anderson Road, and to the west by Siloam
Road. Latitude and longitude for the site are
36.321609 N and 80.602389 W, respectively.
Rd'
(.
jbOur
V
Project Boundary jk6
a Ln
6k
O�Ikp
fi
0
0
+� N
Legend
_
'e
Hogan Creek
r Easement
0 0.25 0.5 1
Drawn by: RKM 7.10.15; CTC Project#
645ps``
Miles
CLearWater
Vicinity Map
Surry County,
,
North Carolina
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
32 Clayton Street
Figure I
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 A-2
Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
January 2016
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation/ DMS Project No. 94708
Mitigation Credit Summaries
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen Nutrient Offset
Phos homes Nutrient Offset
Overall Credit
5,089
N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project
Component or
Reach ID
Stationing
Pre -project
Footage or
Acreage
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Restoration
Level
Restoration or
Rest Equiv.
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Credits
Notes
Hogan Reach 1
10+00 - 22+00
1,331
1,200
P2
EI
Ll
1,200
Hogan Reach 1
22+00 - 29+61
797
761
P2
R
1:1
743
Cmssin was removed fromtotal
Hogan Reach 2
30+11 - 40+03
876
992
P2
R
Ll
992
UTI,1A, IB
U streamof10+32
1,517
1,517
Preservation
P
5:1
303
UTI
10+32 - 10+98
66
66
1 P3
Ell
2.5:1
26
UT2,2A,2B,2C
Upstream of6+50
3,230
3,230
Preservation
P
5:1
646
UT2
6+50-9+30
280
280
P3
Ell
2.5:1
112
UT2
9+30- 15+80
633
650
P2
R
1:1
602
Crossing was removed from total
U13
Ustreamof9+30
952
952
Preservation
P
5:1
190
UT3
9+30- 12+05
260
275
P2
R
1:1
275
Length and Area Summations
Restoration Level
Stream(L' wear Feet )
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Non -riparian
Wetland (acres)
Buller (Square feet)
Upland (acres)
Rivenne
Non-Rivenne
Restoration
2,678
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
1,200
Enhancement 11
346
Creation
Preservation
5,699
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Element
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 A-2
Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
January 2016

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation// DMS Pro'ect No. 94708
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
M' ' p tion Plan
Oct -11
Feb -l2
Final Des — Construction Plans
Oct -11
Nov -12
Construction
N/A
Dec -14
Temporary S&E Mix Apphed
N/A
Dec -14
Permanent Seed Mix Applied
N/A
Dec -14
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach/segments
N/A
Mar -15
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
Jun- 15
Aug -15
Stream Repair/Maintenance
N/A
Dec -15
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec -15
Jan -16
Supplemental Planting
N/A
Jan -16
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitorin
Year 4 Monitorin
Year 5 Monitorin
N/A -Not Applicable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 A-3 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation/ DMS Project No. 94708
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Primary project design POC
Andrew Bick 828-606-0306
Construction Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
150 Pine Ridge Road
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Construction contractor POC
Wayne Taylor 336-341-6489
Survey Contractor
Turner Land Surveying, PLLC
PO Box 41023
Raleigh, NC 27629
Survey Contractor POC
David Turner 919-623-5095
Planting Contractor
Keller Environmental, LLC
7921 Haymarket Lane
Raleigh,NC 27615
Planting Contractor POC
Jay Keller 919-749-8259
Seeding Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
150 Pine Ridge Road
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Seeding Contractor POC
Wayne Taylor 336-341-6489
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resources 336-855-6363
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Foggy Mountain Nursery 336-384-5323
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
ClearWater Environmental Consultants
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Andrew Bick 828-606-0306
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Andrew Bick 828-606-0306
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 A-4
Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
January 2016

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation/ DMS Project No. 94708
County
Project Area (acres)
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Surry
36
36.321609 N, 80.602389 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
River Basin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
DWR Sub -basin
Project Drainage Area (acres)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classificationj
Piedmont
Yadkin
3040101
3040101110060
Pee Dee River Subbasin 03-07-02
1,514 ac (2.37 to)
0.40%
Managed Herbaceous Cover, Broadleaf Deciduous Forest Land
Reach Summary Information
Reach 1 Reach 2
Parameters Hogan Creek Hogan Creek Main Stem UT1 Main Stem UT2 UT3
Length of Reach Post Construction (LF) 1,961 992 1,442 2,869 1,227
Valley classification (Rosgen) VIII VIII VI VI VI
Drainage area (acres) 1,479 1,514 60 81 18
NCDWQ stream identification score 40 37 31 31.5 32.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification C C C C C
Morphological Description (Rosgen stream type) C4 C4 E4b E4b G4
Evolutionary trend C -F C -F Eb-G Eb-G Eb-G
Underlying mapped soils CsA CsA CsA, FsE FsE FsE
Drainage class well drained well drained well drained well drained well drained
Soil Hydric status not hydric not hydric not hydric not hydric not hydric
Slope 0.007 0.005 0.031 0.021 0.030
FEMA classification AE AE Not in SFHA Not in SFHA Not in SFHA
Native vegetation community Felsic Mesic Forest Felsic Mesic Forest Felsic Mesic Forest Felsic Mesic Forest Felsic Mesic Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetationl 0 0 0 0 0
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Wetland 3
Wetland 4
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.09
0.02
0.13
0.10
Wetland Type
riparian non-riverine
riparian non-riverine
riparian non-riverine
riparian non-riverine
Mapped Soil Series
CsA
CsA and FsE
CsA and FsE
CsA and FsE
Drainage class
well drained
well drained
well drained
well drained
Soil Hydric Status
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
Source of Hydrology
Creek (oxbow)
Toe seep
Toe seep
Impoundment
Hydrologic Impairment
none
none
none
none
Native vegetation community
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Herbaceous
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0
0
0
0
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404 Y Y 02268
Waters of the United States — Section 401 Y Y NCDWR # 20120182
Endangered Species Act Y Y CE Approved 9/30/11
Historic Preservation Act N N/A -
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) N N/A -
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Y Y LOMR Submitted 5/2015
Essential Fisheries Habitat N N/A -
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 A-5 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Hoaan Creek Stream Mitiaation/ Project No. 94708
-_-----_--_--_--_--_--_--_-----_--_--_-----_--_--------------------------------_-
Sheet 1
r.
ter.
UT1
VT1 B '+
Wetland 3
UT1.•
I _ -
I_-�
UT2 f
f+
f+
f
If
UT2C
UT2A
}4�
Wetland 4
N
0 125 250 500
Feet
Drawn by: RKM 12.13.15; Project# 645; Aerial Photo NAIP (2014
Surry County,
North Carolina
i
Sheet 3 j
e'5°\\
Prd
rk�
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Structure
Legend
Constructed Riffle
Root Wad
CrossVane
Rocksil l
Log
JHook
CLearWaLer
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Legend
Crest Gauge
Cross -Section
Longitudinal Profile Start/End
Enhancement Level II
Enhancement Level I
Restoration
Preservation
Fencing
Sheet
I-- — —
InvasivesPresent
Vegetation Plots
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
Top of Bank
Wetland
Easement
Integrated Current Condition
Plan View
DMS Project # 94708
Figure 2

r*% w -7#"% &"%

r*% w -7#"% &"%

1 1 A* -1 1 r1 1 11 A• 1• 1• / 11 • 1 w l
F�ik-W, Gr�TAkI

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Hogan Creek Reach 1
Assessed Length: 1,961 feet
Adjusted %
Major
Number
Numberof
Amount of
% Stable,
NumTotal
Footage with
for
Channel
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Stable,
Stable,
Numberin
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Foody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally
2
52
97%
(Riffle and Run units)
not to include point bars
2. Degradation- Evidence ofdowncuttmg
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
14
14
100%
3. Meander Pool
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfafl Depth >: 1.6)
13
13
100°
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail ofupstream rim and
13
13
100°
head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream ofineander bend (Ram)
13
13E100
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
13
13
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and
erosion
_
130
93%
0
0
93
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totalsl
5
130
93%
1 0
1 0
1 93%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
15
15
100°
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance ofgrade across the sill.
5
5
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath says or amts.
12
12
100°
Bank erosion within the structures extent ofinfivence does not exceed 15%. (See
3. Bank Protection
guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
15
IS
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
4. Habitat
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
15
15
100°
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-5 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Hogan Creek Reach 2
Assessed Length : 992 feet
Major
Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Numberin
As -built
Numberof
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
NumTotal
Staber ilizing
Stabilizing
Foody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradatlnn - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally
not to include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence ofdowncuttmg
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
6
6
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfrdl Depth >: 1.6)
5
5
100°
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail ofupstream ries and
head of downstrem riffle)
5
5
100°
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream ofineander bend (Run)
5
5100%
2. Tbalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
5
5
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and
erosion
I
15
98%
0
0
98
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
T.talsl
1
15
98%
0
0
98%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
6
6
100°
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance ofgmde across the sr7L
I
1
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sus or arms.
5
5
100°
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent ofinfluence does not exceed 15%. (See
guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
6
6
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfrdl Depth ratio >
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
6
6
100°
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-6 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
UT2
Assessed Len th:930feet
Major
Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Numberin
As -built
Numberof
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Perfonrring
as Intended
NumTotal
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Foody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally
not to include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence ofdowncuttmg
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
14
14
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfa➢ Depth >: 1.6)
13
13
100°
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail ofupstream rim and
head of downstrem riffle)
13
13
100°
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream ofineander bend (Ran)
13
13E100
2. Tbalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
13
13
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and
erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totalsl
0
0
100%
0
0
100
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
6
6
100°
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance ofgrade across the sr7L
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sus or arms.
4
4
100°
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent ofinfluence does not exceed 15%. (See
guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
6
6
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
6
6
100°
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-7 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
UT3
Assessed Len th:275feet
Major
Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Numberin
As -built
Numberof
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
NumTotal
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Foody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally
not to include point bars
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence ofdowncuttmg
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
4
4
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfa➢ Depth >: 1.6)
4
4
100°
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail ofupstream ries and
head of downstrem riffle)
4
4
100°
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream ofineander bend (Ran)
4
4100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
4
4
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and
erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totalsl
0
0
100%
0
0
100
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
1
1
100°
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance ofgrade across the sr7L
1
1
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sus or arms.
1
1
100°
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent ofinfluence does not exceed 15%. (See
guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
1
1
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfu l Depth ratio >
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
1
1
100°
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-8 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Hogan Creek/94708
Planted Acreage 6.7
Mapping
CCPV
Numberof
Combined
%of Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Pattern and
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover ofboth woody and herbaceous material
0.1 acres
0
0.00
0.0%
Color
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.1 acres
Pattern and
0
0.00
0.0%
Color
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.25 acres
Pattern and
0
0.00
0.0%
Color
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreage
36
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Numberof
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (iftoo small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Cross Hatch
14
2.00
5.6%
Pink
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (iftoo small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern and
0
0.00
0.0%
Color
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-9 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 1 B — Downstream
Photo Point 1C— Upstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-11 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

1_
50, Atoopl'4
'1' SSSFFFSF'�� }o P
f
t � a �- .. 1 SsYr•1 � _ �'�,
'k
� ty � � - A
_ d f
_ J^il • - _ ,g1�*"°ill? c as!' Vii` 3 ' .,.
� � is �. �.N �'.T �� .L .`� ��� �� Q'+s'•U'
� p
41
n_
f
r, fh ..Ca - � � <:d-�- r .- Z •A+. A Rte. ..� e`. L _� .�

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 5 — Downstream
Photo Point 6 - Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-14 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 7 — Downstream
Photo Point 8 — Upstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-15 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
PINK;�t �1 � � rw�h�t'�f�, � 'ib.'...1F ,�• .
}
.G
Photo Point 9 — Downstream
Photo Point 10 — Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-16 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 11 — Downstream
Photo Point 12 — Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-17 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 13 — Downstream
Photo Point 14 — Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-18 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 15 — Downstream
Photo Point 16 — Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-19 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

ya�
h•
r,
? R•..�i � Y r• `�rI
ty V
• � � 9Fy

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 19 — Downstream
Photo Point 20 — Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-22 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 21 — Downstream
Photo Point 22 — Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-23 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

J nr
m
F, •
y'!G � ✓.W;'- } 4�' " i '-.'� `k�„�� r7e ".�'^ ^'k'�l.t ��� ... +'A'a'"r =itr�
b
3 I p
X015

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 25 — Upstream
Photo Point 26 — Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-25 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 27 — Downstream
Photo Point 28 — Upstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-26 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

+7-
VIPa�
�o,r,
'Or 3 r:
' r
_ x� �gT
� �h.- �rJ• i.�� �1 ar��� 4.-rµ- ,� �.{•r J3� u.�
I M7
� Vy
zzYItift
tet; ti
{'1 T
+7-
VIPa�
�o,r,
'Or 3 r:
' r
_ x� �gT
� �h.- �rJ• i.�� �1 ar��� 4.-rµ- ,� �.{•r J3� u.�

��h�. `"
_� ;�
�; Vin-. �.-.-
.. � � ` ..
�,�, �S

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 30 — Downstream
Photo Point 31 — Downstream
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 B-29 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Results (All Stems)
Current Data (MY1 2015)
Annual Means
Annual Means
Common
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
MYO (2015)
MY1 (2015)
Name Type
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
Betula nigra
River birch Tree
3
115
0
25
1
3
6
6
0
0
0
0
10
10
10
149
Fraxinus pemsylvanica
Green ash Tree
4
4
3
3
2
2
4
4
1
1
0
0
17
17
14
14
Juglans nigra
Black walnut Tree
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar Tree
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
68
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
70
Nyssa s lvatica
Black gum Tree
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
7
7
12
12
12
12
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore Tree
2
2
4
5
1
1
7
7
0
1
0
1
13
13
14
17
Prunus serotina
Black cherry Tree
0
30
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
27
0
41
Quercus alba
White oak Tree
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Quercus pheflos
Willow oak Tree
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
6
6
4
4
Quercus rubra
Northern red oak Tree
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
Quercus lyrata
Overcup oak Tree
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
5
13
13
15
15
Plot area (acres)
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.15
0.15
Species count
4
6
4
8
4
5
4
5
4
6
2
4
6
10
6
10
Stem Count
11
154 1
9
1 45
6
11
19
87
12
19
12
14
71
102
69
330
Stems per Acre 1
445
6,232
364
11,8211243
1445
769
3,521
486
769
486
567
479
688
465
2,226
Meets Success Criteria
Fails to Meet Interim Success Criteria
Type = Tree, Shrub, Uvestake
P= Planted
T =Total
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 C-1 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 1 — October 26, 2015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 C-2 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 1 — October 26, 2015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 C-3 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 1 — October 26, 2015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 C-4 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
Cross -Section 1 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 1— Right Top of Bank
Reach 1 Hogan Creek
Cross -Section 1 - Riffle
Station 22+67
996
995
994
993
d
ii 992
c
2
m 991
LU
990
989
988
987
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50
Distance (Feet)
MY0 6/8/2015 MY1 12/212015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-1 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section 2 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 2 — Right Top of Bank
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-2
Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
January 2016
Reach 1 Hogan Creek
Cross -Section 2 - Pool
Station 23+07
995
994
993
992
991
d
--------------------------------
--------------------
LL
0 990
d
w
989
988
987
986
985
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60
Distance (Feet)
MY0 6/9/2015 -- MY1 12/212015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-2
Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
January 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section 3 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 3 — Right Top of Bank
Reach 1 Hogan Creek
Cross -Section 3 - Riffle
Station 26+78
993
992
991
990
. 989
iv
m
LL
0 988
----------------d
w
987
986
985
984
983
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60
Distance (Feet)
-MY061912015 MY1121212015 ----- BKF
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-3
Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
January 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section 4 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 4 — Right Top of Bank
Reach 2 Hogan Creek
Cross -Section 4 - Pool
Station 33+68
989
988
987
986
985
m
m
LL
0 984
d
w
983
982
981
980
979
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 0+90
Distance (Feet)
-MY0619/2015-MY11202015 ----- BKF
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-4
Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
January 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section 5 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 5 — Right Top of Bank
Reach 2 Hogan Creek
Cross -Section 5 - Riffle
Station 34+49
989
988
987
986
^ 985
w
v
LL
0
984
16
---
---------------
----------------
--
m
w
983
982
981
980
979
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70
Distance (Feet)
- MY0 6/9/2015 - MY7 121212015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-5 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section 6 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 6 — Right Top of Bank
Reach 2 Hogan Creek
Cross -Section 6 - Riffle
Station 37+95
987
986
985
984
983
d
w
,
LL
0
----
--•----------------------------•
-
982
.2
m
LU
981
980
979
978
977
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70
Distance (Feet)
- MY0 6/9/2015 - MY7 121212015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-6
Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
January 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section 7 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 7 — Right Top of Bank
UT 2
Cross -Section 7 - Riffle
Station 13+25
997
996
995
994
w
ii 993
c
0
m 992
LU
991
990
989
988
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60
Distance (Feet)
-MYO 6/9/2015-MY7121212015 ----- BKF
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-7 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section 8 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 8 — Right Top of Bank
UT 2
Cross -Section 8 - Pool
Station 13+74
995
994
993
992
w
ii 991
C
O
.5
m 990
LU
989
------------
988
987
986
0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60
Distance (Feet)
-MY061912015-MY7121212015 ----- BKF
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-8 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section 9 — Left Top of Bank
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section 9 — Right Top of Bank
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-9 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
UT 2
Cross -Section 9 - Riffle
Station 14+73
993
992
991
990
m
i 989
c
0
.5
m 988
w
987,41
986
985
984
0+00
0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50
Distance (Feet)
- MY0 6/9/2015 - MY7 121212015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-9 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek Longitudinal Profile
Reach 1
Station 14+29 - 29+61
998
997
e
996
A
995
•
994
993
e
e
992
991
d 990
LL
p
989
cc
d
988
W
987
A
986
XS1
985
XS2
'
984
�
983
982
981
980
14+00 16+00 18+00 20+00 22+00 24+00 26+00 28+00 30+00
Distance (Feet)
Longitudinal profile stationing does not match As -Built
stationing due to differences in field data collection
methodologies.
—Baseline (MYO) 6/9/2015 MY1 12/2/2015 Water Surface BKF Structures Linear (BKF)
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-10 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-1 1 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
Hogan Creek Longitudinal Profile
Reach 2
Station 30+11 - 40+96
987
0
986
0
985
984
983
0
982
m
•
0
s
LL
p
981
>
i
W
980
i
979
XS4
XS5
978
977
XS6
976
975
30+00 32+00
34+00 36+00 38+00
40+00
Distance (Feet)
Longitudinal profile stationing does not match As -Built
stationing due to differences in field data collection
methodologies.
—Baseline (MYO) 6/9/2015 MY1 12/2/2015 Water Surface BKF Structures
Linear (BKF)
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-1 1 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT2 Longitudinal Profile
Station 8+70 - 15+45
1000
999
998
997
996
995
994
993
y 992
LL
p
991
a
d
990
W
989
988
�
o
987
986
8
985
984
S9
983
—
982
8+50 9+50 10+50 11+50 12+50 13+50 14+50 15+50
Distance (Feet)
Longitudinal profile stationing does not match As -Built
stationing due to differences in field data collection
methodologies. —Baseline (MYO) 6/9/2015 MY1 12/2/2015 Water Surface BKF Linear (BKF)
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-12 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Summary Data
D50 23
D84 44
D95 59
120%
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation / 94708
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Reach 1
100%
80%
MY1
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
Individual
Cumulative
silt/clay
0.062
a
v
0.0%
0%
veryfinesand
0.125
1
1.0%
1%
fine sand
0.250
0.0%
1%
medium sand
0.50
0.0%
1%
coarse sand
1.0
0.0%
1%
very course sand
2.0
0.0%
1%
very fine gravel
4.0
0.0%
1%
fine gravel
5.7
0.0%
1%
fine gravel
8.0
8
7.8%
9%
medium gravel
11.3
13
12.6%
21%
medium gravel
16.0
7
6.8%
28%
course gravel
22.3
19
18.4%
47%
course gravel
32
20
19.4%
66%
very course gravel
45
20
19.4%
85%
very course gravel
64
13
12.6%
98%
small cobble
90
2
1.9%
100%
medium cobble
128
0.0%
100%
large cobble
180
0.0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
4096
0.0%
100%
Total
103
100.0%
100%
Summary Data
D50 23
D84 44
D95 59
120%
100%
80%
a
LL 60%
ao%
a
v
20%
E
L) O%
N O O
� � r
O O
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
a
0
c 15.0%
v
a 10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
N O
O �
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Cross-section 1 - Riffle
o O o eNi m N n N a
4 N
N
Particle Size (mm)
-MY05128115-MY110/26115
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Percent Individual
Cross-section 1 - Riffle
N
Particle Size (mm)
MYO 5/28/2015 MY110/26/2015
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-13 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Summary Data
D50 29
D84 44
D95 70
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation / 94708
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Reach 1
100%
MY1
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
Individual
Cumulative
silt/clay
0.062
0.0%
0%
veryfinesand
0.125
a
v
0.0%
0%
fine sand
0.250
E
0.0%
0%
medium sand
0.50
0.0%
0%
coarse sand
1.0
0.0%
0%
very course sand
2.0
0.0%
0%
very fine gravel
4.0
0.0%
0%
fine gravel
5.7
1
1.0%
1%
fine gravel
8.0
0.0%
1%
medium gravel
11.3
4
4.0%
5%
medium gravel
16.0
4
4.0%
9%
course gravel
22.3
18
18.0%
27%
course gravel
32
33
33.0%
60%
very course gravel
45
26
26.0%
86%
very course gravel
64
8
8.0%
94%
small cobble
90
4
4.0%
98%
medium cobble
128
2
2.0%
100%
large cobble
180
0.0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
4096
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Summary Data
D50 29
D84 44
D95 70
35.0
30.0%
25.0%
a 20.0%
15.0%
a
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
b N
O N
O O
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Cross-section 3 - Riffle
0 0 o eNi m N n N a
4 O
N
Particle Size (mm)
-MY05128/15-MY110/26115
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Percent Individual
Cross-section 3 - Riffle
O O O O N N
4 O 16
N
Particle Size (mm)
■MY05/2812015 ■MY110I26N5
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-14 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
120%
100%
80%
a
LL
60%
ao%
a
v
20%
E
L)
0%
c � r
O O
35.0
30.0%
25.0%
a 20.0%
15.0%
a
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
b N
O N
O O
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Cross-section 3 - Riffle
0 0 o eNi m N n N a
4 O
N
Particle Size (mm)
-MY05128/15-MY110/26115
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Percent Individual
Cross-section 3 - Riffle
O O O O N N
4 O 16
N
Particle Size (mm)
■MY05/2812015 ■MY110I26N5
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-14 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Summary Data
D50 32
D84 51
D95 72
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation / 94708
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
Reach 2
100%
MY1
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
Individual
Cumulative
silt/clay
0.062
0.0%
0%
veryfinesand
0.125
a
v
0.0%
0%
fine sand
0.250
E
0.0%
0%
medium sand
0.50
0.0%
0%
coarse sand
1.0
0.0%
0%
very course sand
2.0
0.0%
0%
very fine gravel
4.0
0.0%
0%
fine gravel
5.7
0.0%
0%
fine gravel
8.0
1
1.0%
1%
medium gravel
11.3
1
1.0%
2%
medium gravel
16.0
4
4.0%
6%
course gravel
22.3
15
15.0%
21%
course gravel
32
30
30.0%
51%
very course gravel
45
28
28.0%
79%
very course gravel
64
14
14.0%
93%
small cobble
90
6
6.0%
99%
medium cobble
128
1
1.0%
100%
large cobble
180
0.0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
4096
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Summary Data
D50 32
D84 51
D95 72
ao.o%
35.0%
30.0%
5 25.0%
15
20.0%
y 15.0%
a
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
b N
O N
O O
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Cross-section 5- Riffle
0 0 o eNi m N n N a
4 O
N
Particle Size (mm)
-MYO5128115-MY110/26115
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Percent Individual
Cross-section 5- Riffle
O O O O N N
4 0 6
N
Particle Size (mm)
■MY05/28/15 ■MY110/26N5
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-15 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
120%
100%
80%
a
LL
60%
ao%
a
v
20%
E
L)
0%
Nr• O O
G N r
O O
ao.o%
35.0%
30.0%
5 25.0%
15
20.0%
y 15.0%
a
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
b N
O N
O O
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Cross-section 5- Riffle
0 0 o eNi m N n N a
4 O
N
Particle Size (mm)
-MYO5128115-MY110/26115
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Percent Individual
Cross-section 5- Riffle
O O O O N N
4 0 6
N
Particle Size (mm)
■MY05/28/15 ■MY110/26N5
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-15 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Summary Data
D50 30
D84 53
D95 69
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation / 94708
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Reach 2
100%
MY1
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
Individual
Cumulative
silt/clay
0.062
0.0%
0%
veryfinesand
0.125
a
v
0.0%
0%
fine sand
0.250
E
0.0%
0%
medium sand
0.50
0.0%
0%
coarse sand
1.0
0.0%
0%
very course sand
2.0
0.0%
0%
very fine gravel
4.0
1
1.0%
1%
fine gravel
5.7
0.0%
1%
fine gravel
8.0
2
2.0%
3%
medium gravel
11.3
2
2.0%
5%
medium gravel
16.0
10
10.0%
15%
course gravel
22.3
16
16.0%
31%
course gravel
32
22
22.0%
53%
very course gravel
45
22
22.0%
75%
very course gravel
64
19
19.0%
94%
small cobble
90
5
5.0%
99%
medium cobble
128
1
1.0%
100%
large cobble
180
0.0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
4096
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Summary Data
D50 30
D84 53
D95 69
30.0
25.0%
20.0%
a
15.0%
a 10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
b N
O N
O O
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Cross-section 6 - Riffle
0 0 o eNi m N n N a
4 O
N
Particle Size (mm)
-MYO5128115-MY110/26115
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Percent Individual
Cross-section 6 - Riffle
O O O O N N
4 0 6
N
Particle Size (mm)
■MY05/28/15 ■MY110/26N5
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-16 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
120%
100%
80%
a
LL
60%
ao%
a
v
20%
E
L)
0%
o � r
O O
30.0
25.0%
20.0%
a
15.0%
a 10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
b N
O N
O O
Stream Survey Data
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Cross-section 6 - Riffle
0 0 o eNi m N n N a
4 O
N
Particle Size (mm)
-MYO5128115-MY110/26115
Hogan Creek
Pebble Count- Percent Individual
Cross-section 6 - Riffle
O O O O N N
4 0 6
N
Particle Size (mm)
■MY05/28/15 ■MY110/26N5
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-16 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Not Applicable
- Information Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-17 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
Table 8a. Baseline Stream Data Sumniary
Hogan Creek/94708 - Reach 1 1,532 feet)
Parameter Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean
Med Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft) -
_ _ -
21.5
- 25.7 29.7 -
- 27.2 -
30.4 33.6
- 22.5
23.3
24.0
22.8
24.2
24.2 25.6
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
178.0
- 220.0 246.0 -
- 72.1 -
72.3 72.5 -
- 100.0
150.0
200.0
>100
>100
>100 >100
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) _
_
2.0
- 1.9 2.1 -
- 1.9 -
2.0 2.2
- 1.8
1.9
2.2
1.7
1.8
1.8 1.8
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) _
2.5
- 2.7 3.2 -
- 2.4 -
2.5 2.7
- 2.5
1 2.6
2.8
2.7
2.8
2.8 2.9
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fC) -
-
45.1
- 48.6 59.3 -
- 50.8 -
61.6 72.4
- 40.6
44.1
47.6
41.4
42.7
42.7 43.9
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio _
10.3
- 13.6 14.9 -
- 14.5 -
15.0 15.6 -
- 12.5
12.3
12.1
12.6
13.8
13.8 14.9
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio -
8.3
- 8.6 8.3 -
- 2.7 -
2.7 2.7
- 4.4
6.5
8.3
>3.9
>4.2
>4.2 >4.4
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio -
1.3
- 1.3 1.4 -
1.0 -
1.0 1.1
- 1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1 1.0 1.0
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
_ _
_ _
_ _ _
_ _
_
-
37.17
58.9
- 98.4
-
8
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.010
- 0.024 0.055 -
- 0.019
0.020 0.021 -
- 0.007
0.010
0.013
0.002
0.010
- 0.018
-
8
Pool Length (ft)
-
- - _
_ _ _
_ _ _
_ -
-
-
25.0
62.6
- 1 88.0
-
13
Pool Max depth (ft)
4.0
4.3 4.7-
- 3.4 -
3.5 3.5 -
- 4.0
4.0
4.0
2.5
3.2
- 4.1
-
13
Pool Spacing (ft)
-
- - - -
- - -
- - -
- -
-
-
73.3
120.9
- 200.1
-
12
Pattern
Channel Behwidth (ft)
44.0
- 65.0 117.0 -
- 86.0 -
86.0 86.0 -
- 48.0
88.0
126.0
63.0
96.5
101.0 121.0
24.9
4
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20.0
- 29.0 52.0 -
- 19.6 -
22.7 25.8
- 67.0
73.0
101.0
70.0
76.5
75.0 86.0
6.8
4
Re Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.9
- 1.1 1.8 -
0.7 -
0.8 0.9
3.0
3.1
4.2
2.9
3.2
3.1 3.6
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)
133.0
- 297.0 479.0 -
81.0 -
81.0 81.0
- 133.0
311.0
325.0
165.0
263.7
306.0 320.0
85.7
3
Meander Width Ratio
Substrate, Bed, and Transport parameters
2.0
- 2.5 3.9 -
- 3.2 -
3.2 3.2 -
- 2.1
3.8
5.3
2.6
4.0
4.2 5.0
N/A
N/A
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%'
7
-
-
-
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
-
-
0%,3.5%,96%,0.5%,0%,0%
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
-
-
14, 19, 23, 41, 56
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f `
-
P
-
-
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
M-
I
-
-
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m
E&M
-
-
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification _
C4
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps) _
_ _ _
_
_
-
Bankfull Discharge (cls) _
_ _ _
-
Valley length (ft)
2,525
4,730
1,294
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2,762
327
2,897
1,532
Sinuosity (ft)
1.12
1.26
1.15
1.18
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) _
0.0064
0.0127
0.0071
0.0063
BF slope (Tfl) _
0.0071
0.0101
0.0062
0.0067
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
_
_
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
-
-
-
Biological or Other
-
-
N/A - Not Applicable
- Information Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-17 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Not Applicable
- Information Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-18 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
Table 8b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Hogan Creek/94708 - Reach 2 1,085feet)
Parameter Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean
Med Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft) -
_ _ -
21.5
- 25.7 29.7 -
- 27.2 -
30.4 33.6
- 22.5
23.3
24.0
24.2
24.5
24.5 24.7
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
178.0
- 220.0 246.0 -
- 72.1 -
72.3 72.5 -
- 100.0
150.0
200.0
>100
>100
>100 >100
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) _
_
2.0
- 1.9 2.1 -
- 1.9 -
2.0 2.2
- 1.8
1.9
2.2
1.9
2.1
2.1 2.3
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) _
2.5
- 2.7 3.2 -
- 2.4 -
2.5 2.7
- 2.5
1 2.6
2.8
3.2
1 3.4
3.4 3.6
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fC) -
-
45.1
- 48.6 59.3 -
- 50.8 -
61.6 72.4
- 40.6
44.1
47.6
45.2
50.9
50.9 56.6
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio _
10.3
- 13.6 14.9 -
- 14.5 -
15.0 15.6 -
- 12.5
12.3
12.1
10.8
11.9
11.9 13.0
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio _
8.3
- 8.6 8.3 -
- 2.7 -
2.7 2.7
- 4.4
6.5
8.3
>4.0
>4.1
>4.1 >4.1
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio _
1.3
- 1.3 1.4 -
1.0 -
1.0 1.1
- 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0 1.0
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
_ _
_ _
_ _ _
_ _
_
_
95.63
111.6
- 130.3
-
5
Riffle Slope (fl/ft)
0.010
- 0.024 0.055 -
- 0.019
0.020 0.021 -
- 0.007
0.010
0.013
0.004
0.005
- 0.007
-
5
Pool Length (ft)
-
- - _
_ _ _
_ _ _
_ -
-
-
43.7
68.8
- 1 117.1
-
5
Pool Max depth (ft)
4.0
4.3 4.7 -
- 3.4 -
3.5 3.5 -
- 4.0
4.0
4.0
3.80
4.73
- 5.8
-
5
Pool Spacing (ft)
-
- - - -
- - -
- - -
- -
-
-
164.1
208.4
- 253.1
-
4
Pattern
Channel Behwidth (ft)
44.0
- 65.0 117.0 -
- 86.0 -
86.0 86.0 -
- 48.0
88.0
126.0
84.0
114.0
117.0 141.0
28.6
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20.0
- 29.0 52.0 -
- 19.6 -
22.7 25.8
- 67.0
73.0
101.0
69.0
73.3
74.0 75.0
2.8
5
Re Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.9
- 1.1 1.8 -
0.7 -
0.8 0.9
3.0
3.1
4.2
2.8
3.0
3.0 3.1
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (R)l 1
133.0
- 297.0 479.0 -
81.0 -
81.0 81.0
- 133.0
311.0
325.0
292.0
307.0
301.0 1328.0
18.7
3
Meander Width Ratio
Substrate, Bed, and Transport parameters
2.0
- 2.5 3.9 -
- 3.2 -
3.2 3.2 -
- 2.1
3.8
5.3
3.4
4.7
4.8 5.8
N/A
N/A
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%-
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
-
-
0%,3%,9%,89%,0%,0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
-
-
13, 24, 22, 35, 49
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f `
-
P
-
-
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
-
-
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m
-
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification _
C4
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps) _
_ _ _
_
_
-
Bankfull Discharge (cls) _
_ _ _
-
Valley length (ft)
2,525
4,730
794
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2,762
327
2,897
1,085
Sinuosity (ft)
1.12
1.26
1.15
1.37
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (fl/ft) _
0.0064
0.0127
0.0071
0.0050
BF slope (fl/fl) _
0.0071
0.0101
0.0062
0.0053
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
_
_
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
-
-
-
Biological or Other
-
-
N/A - Not Applicable
- Information Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-18 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Not Applicable
- Information Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-19 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
Table 8c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Hogan Creek/94708 - iJ I2 675 feet)
Parameter Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean
Med Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
_ _ _
_
- 8.2 - -
- -
7.1 -
-
9.0
-
6.5
7.1
7.1 7.6
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
- 66.0 - -
-
15.0 -
-
30.0
-
21
24.9
24.9 28.8
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) _
_
_ 1.5 - -
0.9 -
-
0.7
-
0.5
0.6
0.6 0.7
N/A
2
Bankfi ll Max Depth (ft) _
- 2.1 - -
1.2 -
- -
1.0
-
0.9
1.1
1.1 1.2 1
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fC)
12.1 - -
-
6.6 -
- -
6.5
-
4.0
4.4
4.4 4.7
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio _
- 5.6 - -
- -
7.6 -
- -
12.5
-
8.9
11.6
11.6 14.2
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio _
- 8.0 - -
2.1 -
- -
3.3
-
3.2
3.5
3.5 3.8
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio _
-
- 1.6 -
-
1.0 -
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
_
_ _
_
_ _ _
_ _
_
-
14.3
34.4
- 67.3
11
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.030
- 0.033 0.056 -
0.023
0.033 0.036 -
- 0.027
0.032
0.038
0.014
0.028
- 0.052
11
Pool Length (ft)
_
_ _ _
_
_ _ _
_ _
-
-
4.2
11.0
- 27.1
12
Pool Max depth (ft)
-
- 2.7 -
- -
1.5 - -
- -
1.6
-
1.2
2.0
- 3.2
-
12
Pool Spacing (fl)
-
- - -
- -
- - -
- -
-
-
13.1
54.8
- 151.0
-
11
Pattern
Channel Behwidth (ft)
28.0
- 42.0 56.0 -
- 62.0 -
67.5 73.0 -
- 17.0
26.0
49.0
26.0
38.0
39.0 54.0
2.7
5
Radius of Curvature (ft)
16.0
- 18.5 21.0 -
7.0
16.0 25.0
- 22.0
27.0
30.0
19.0
21.6
22.0 26.0
2.4
6
Re Bankfull width (ft/ft)
2.0
- 2.3 2.6 -
1.0
2.3 3.5
2.4
3.0
3.3
2.7
3.0
3.1 3.7
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)
128.0
- 159.0 190.0 -
53.0
58.5 64.0
- 73.0
103.0
130.0
101.0
112.3
109.5 132.0
2.7
6
Meander Width Ratio
Substrate, Bed, and Transport parameters
3.4
- 5.1 6.8 -
8.7
9.5 10.3 -
- 1.9
2.9
5.5
3.7
5.4
5.5 7.6
N/A
N/A
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
-
-
SC%/Sa%/G°/u/C%/B%/Be%
-
N/A
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
-
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f
-
-
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
-
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m
6�
-
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification _
E4b
E4b
B4
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cls)
Valley length (ft)
641
1,350
544
Channel Thalweg length (fl)
568
1,980
555
675
Sinuosity (ft)
1.33
1.47
1.4
1.24
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (fl/fl)
0.0235
0.0263
0.0223
0.0218
BF slope (ft/fl) _
0.0312
0.0356
0.0312
0.0229
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
_
_
_
_
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
-
-
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
-
Biological or Other
-
-
N/A - Not Applicable
- Information Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-19 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Not Applicable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-20 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
Table 9. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters
- Cross Sections)
Hogan Creek /94708
Segment/Reach: Hogan Reach 1 (1,532 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5 Base
MYl MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record elevation datum used
990.8
990.8
990.7
990.7
987.6 987.6
Bankfull Width (tt)
25.6
25.4
29.1
30.6
22.8 22.9
Floodprone Width(ft)
>100
>100
N/A
N/A
>100 >100
BankfiM Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
1.6
2.0
2.2
1.8 2.0
Bankfiill Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.9
4.5
4.9
2.7 3.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
43.9
41.8
57.6
1 66.7 1 1
41.4 45.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.9
15.4
14.7
14.1
12.6 1 11.4
BankffAEntrenchment Ratio
>3.9
>3.9
N/A
N/A
>4.4 >4.4
BanktiA Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
d50 (mm)
19
23
N/A
N/A
26 29
Hogan Creek /94708
Segment/Reach: Hogan Reach 2 (1,085 feet)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5 Base
MYl MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
984.0
984.0
983.6
983.6
982.1 982.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
44.6
45.5
24.2
24.8
24.7 28.1
Flood roneWidth(ff)
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
>100 >100
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft)
2.2
2.1
1.9
2.0
2.3 2.0
BankFA Max Depth (fl)
4.2
4.3
1
3.2
3.6 1
1
3.6 3.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
98.9
95.4
45.2
49.2
56.6 56.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
20.1
21.7
13.0
12.5
10.8 1 14.0
BankfiA Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
>4.1
>4.0
BankfuU Bank Hei t Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (nm)
N/A
N/A
27
32
31 30
Hogan Creek /94708 Segment/Reach: IM (675 feet)
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5 Base
MYl MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
989.4
989.4
988.2
988.2
986.4 986.4
Bankroll Width (ft)
7.6
6.9
6.9
7.1
6.5 6.8
Floodprone Width (fl)
28.8
29.0
N/A
N/A
21.0 20.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.3
1
1.2 1.1
BankfiillCross Sectional Area ft) 1
4.0
1 3.5
1 1 1 1
4.4
1 5.1 1 1
4.7 4.6
Bankfiill Width/Depth Ratio
14.2
13.6
10.7
9.8
8.9 10.3
BankfuR Entrenchment Ratio
3.8
4.2
N/A
N/A
3.2 3.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
d50 (rmn)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A - Not Applicable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-20 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Not Applicable
- Infoxrration Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-21 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
Table 10a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Hogan Creek/94708 - Hogan Creek/Reach 1 (1,532 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SO n Min Mean Med Max SO n Min Mean Med Max SO n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft) 22.8
24.2
24.2 25.6
N/A
2
22.9 24.2
24.2 25.4
N/A
2
Floodprone Width(ft) >100
>100
>100 >100
N/A
2
>100 >100
>100 >100
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.7
1.8
1.8 1.8
N/A
2
1.6
1.8
1.8 2.0
N/A
2
BankfA Max Depth (ft) 2.7
2.8
2.8 2.9
N/A
2
2.9
3.3
3.3 3.6
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Areae 41.4
42.7
42.7 43.9
N/A
2
41.8 43.9
43.9 45.9
N/A
2
Width/DepthRatio 12.6
13.8
13.8 14.9
N/A
2
11.4 13.4
13.4 15.4
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio >3.9
>4.2
>4.2 >4.4
N/A
2
>3.9 >4.2
>4.2 >4.4
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1 1.0 1.0
N/A
2
Profile
Rifle Length (ft) 37.2
58.9
- 98.4
8
15.0 62.1
73.5 98.0
8
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.002
0.010
- 0.018
-
8
0.006 0.013
0.011 0.020
-
8
Pool Length (ft) 25.0
62.6
- 88.0 1
-
13
20.0 67.1
76.0 105.0
13
Pool Max depth (ft) 2.5
3.2
- 4.1
-
13
2.8
3.7
3.4 4.8
13
Pool Spacing (ft) 73.3
120.9
- 200.1
-
12
52.0 112.8
111.0 148.0
-
12
Pattern
Charnel Bchwidth (ft) 63.0
96.5
101.0 121.0
24.9
4
Radius of Curvature (ft) 70.0
76.5
75.0 1 86.0
6.8
1 4
Rc Bankfull width OHL) 2.9
3.2
3.1 3.6
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)l 165.0
263.7
306.0 320.0
85.7
3
Meander Width Ratio 2.6
Additional Reach Parameters --AL-
4.0
4.2 5.0
N/A
N/A
77
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1,532
1,530
Sinuosity (ft)
1.18
1.18
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (fl/ft)
0.0063
0.0064
BF slope (fl/ft)
0.0067
0.0069
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% -
-
- -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% 0%
3.5%
96% 0.5%
0%
0%
0%
0.5%
98% 1.5%
0%
0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / 14
19
23 41
56
13
21
27 44
62
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
7%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Not Applicable
- Infoxrration Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-21 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Not Applicable
- Information Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-22 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
Table 10b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Hogan Creek/94708 - Hogan Creek/Reach 2 (1,085 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2 MY- 3 MY 4 MY 5
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle only Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft) 24.2
24.5
24.5 24.7
N/A
2
24.8
26.5
26.5 28.1
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft) >100
>100
>100 >100
N/A
2
>100
>100
>100 >100
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.9
2.1
2.1 2.3
N/A
2
2.0
2.0
2.0 2.0
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.2
3.4
3.4 3.6
N/A
2
3.6
3.7
3.7 3.8
N/A
2
BankfA Cross Sectional Areae 45.2
50.9
50.9 56.6
N/A
2
49.2
52.9
52.9 56.5
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio 10.8
11.9
11.9 13.0
N/A
2
12.5
13.3
13.3 14.0
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio >4.0
>4.1
>4.1 >4.1
N/A
2
>3.6
>3.8
>3.8 >4.0
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 95.6
111.6
- 130.3
-
5
56.0
91.0
101.0 125.0
-
5
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.004
0.005
- 0.007
-
5
0.004 0.009 0.007 0.018
-
5
Pool Length (ft) 43.7
68.8
- 117.1
-
5
60.0
87.3
64.0 135.0
-
5
Pool Max depth (ft) 3.8
4.7
- 5.8
-
5
4.0
4.8
4.6 5.7
-
5
Pool Spacing (ft) 164.1
1208.4
- 253.1
-
4
169.0
196.5
189.5 238.0
-
4
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 84.0
114.0
117.0 141.0
28.6
3
Radius of Curvature (ft) 69.0
73.3
74.0 75.0
2.8
5
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/fl) 2.8
3.0
3.0 3.1
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) 292.0
307.0
301.0 328.0
18.7
3
Meander Width Ratio 3.4
Additional Reach Parameters
4.7
4.8 5.8
llw!
N/A
N/A
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1,085
1,085
Sinuosity (ft)
1.37
1.37
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0050
0.0045
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0053
0.0053
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% -
I -
- -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%0%
3%
9% 89%
0%
0%
0%
0%
99% 1 %
0%
0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / 13
24
22 1 35
49
18
25
31 52
70
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
2%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Not Applicable
- Information Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-22 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Not Applicable
- Infoxrration Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-23 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
TableI 1 _ Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
1. 0: (675 feet)
Hogan
Parameter
DimensionandSubstrate-Rfffle only
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
BankfiA Max Depth
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
Width/DepthRaimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
- • ®®®M®©MMM®®©-_-----_-----_-----_----
Bank Height R.M.
Riffle.. Slope
PoolMax depthPool
Spacing
RadiusofCurva
mmmmmm
1 ®M®®MMMMMMMM
MMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMeander ����
Wavelength
Meander WidthAmmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
arameters
Additional Reach PIi
----..--------.-----�.-
Thalweg length (M
WaterChannel
Y. Slope (Channel)
:
:
MIBF
-_-----_-----_-----_----
slope (Ndl
' '
. , :.:
... 1 . .:. •=aaas==aass=======MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
of Reach with Eroding BanZ
Channel% .. 1 or Habitat -Biological
-_-----_-----_-----_-�-
or Oth:
N/A - Not Applicable
- Infoxrration Unavailable
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 D-23 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
*Crest Gauge was damaged from bankfull event
Photograph of wrack lines on Hogan Creek Reach 1 Station 26+00
Photograph of wrack lines on Hogan Creek Reach 1 Station 25+00
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 E-1 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016
Table 11. Verification of Bankfull Events
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation/ 94708
Date of Data
Reach
Date of Occurrence Method Measurement (ft) Photo (If Available)
Collection
Hogan Creek Reach 2 10/26/2015
10/2/2015-10/3/2015 Crest Gauge *4.0
UT2 10/26/2015
10/2/2015-10/3/2015 Crest Gauge 0.9
*Crest Gauge was damaged from bankfull event
Photograph of wrack lines on Hogan Creek Reach 1 Station 26+00
Photograph of wrack lines on Hogan Creek Reach 1 Station 25+00
Hogan Creek Stream Mitigation Project/94708 E-1 Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Annual Monitoring Report January 2016