20061349 Ver 2_More Info Received_20160308

Strickland, Bev
From:Bill Mullin <[e-mail]>
Sent:Tuesday, March 08, 2016 1:23 PM
To:Smith, Cherri L
Subject:RE: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49
Ms. Smith,

Attached is the revised PCN. Apparently in the design process the impacts were altered after I submitted the
application to your office and then not updated by the engineer as I had the pcn here. Thank You for your assistance,
have a great spring. -Bill

From: Smith, Cherri L \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:38 AM
To: Bill Mullin
Subject: RE: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Bill,

I was just going by what you had in the impact table of the application. Send me the revised table so I can make the
change.

Cherri

From: Bill Mullin \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 10:35 AM
To: Smith, Cherri L <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Ms. Smith,
We were awarded the attached 401 for Galway Glenn but the impact is shown as 89 feet instead of the 148 feet
shown on the attached grading plan. Can the permit be easily altered for the correct impact length? Let myself or Kevin
Burke know if there is anything else you need. Thank you as always. –Bill Mullin

From: Kevin Burke \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 11:16 AM
To: Bill Mullin
Cc: Preston Royster
Subject: FW: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Bill the length(89’) of disturbance does not match the length (148’) that I showed in the attached drawing. The total

148’ includes riprap.

These drawings were also sent to the state. Will it be a big deal to get it revised?

From: Kevin Burke \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 12:02 PM
To: 'Montalvo, Sheri A' <[e-mail]>
1

Cc: 'Bill Mullin' <[e-mail]>

Subject: RE: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Sheri attached is a copy of are revised grading plan. We have removed the bottomless culvert from the plan and
replaced them with reinforced concrete pipe. The length of disturbance has highlighted on the PDF. This plan also shows
the two dry detention ponds on the site that were required by the City of Durham. The detention is for the 2-yr, 10-yr,

and 25-yr rain events.

Please let me know if you need a copy of our Storm Water Impact Analysis that was done for the City of Durham.

Kevin Burke

Project Manager

Coulter Jewell Thames, P.A.

p.919-682-0368

m.919-219-2379

From: Bill Mullin \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 3:05 PM
To: 'Kevin Burke' <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Montalvo, Sheri A' <[e-mail]>

Subject: RE: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

State DENR DWR office contact is [e-mail] for Sheri Montalvo.

From: Kevin Burke \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:23 PM
To: Bill Mullin

Subject: RE: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Thanks I am available if you want to call.

From: Bill Mullin \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 1:57 PM
To: 'Kevin Burke' <[e-mail]>

Subject: RE: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Mr. Burke,

I thought we had what we needed for the State permit for the wetlands impacts. However upon further inspection
of their request, I see that they in fact need the geo tec report for the bottomless culverts and they also want the actual
stormwater management plan complete with calculations, and supportive materials etc. I do not have the stormwater

report only the figures you sent. I will call you shortly to make sure we are on the same page. Thanks –Bill.

From: Kevin Burke \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 8:24 AM
To: Bill Mullin

Subject: FW: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Bill not sure if you got a copy of these comments. But these are the comments that were sent to the owner.
2

We would also like to know if we could revise the bottomless culverts to a regular pipe. Does NCDEQ still recognize the

bottomless culvert as non-disturbance of the wetlands?

From: Preston Royster \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:42 PM
To: Kevin Burke <[e-mail]>

Subject: Fwd: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Begin forwarded message:
From:
Jim Mckinney <[e-mail]>
Date:
November 5, 2015 at 12:24:44 PM EST
To:
Dan Jewell <[e-mail]>, Preston Royster <[e-mail]>
Subject:FW: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

fyi

-----Original Message-----
From: Jimmy Woody \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:21 PM
To: Jim Mckinney <[e-mail]>; Joe Dority
<[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Send data from MFP07486753 11/05/2015 12:49

Hi Jim and Joe, we received the attached letter in the mail at our office today. I wanted to get it
to you as I assume some contact information on a recent application was filled out incorrectly
and wasn't sure if Dan Jewell is finishing things up for you.

I hope all is well!

Jimmy Woody
Managing Partner
209 W. Millbrook Rd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.833.2213 (direct)
919.369.1191 (mobile)
3

Office Use Only:

Corps action ID no. _____________

DWQ project no. _______________

Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008

Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification:

Yes No

Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation

Yes No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu

fee program.

Yes No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.

1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Galway Glen Crossing
2b. County: Durham
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Durham
2d. Subdivision name: Galway Glen
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state

project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Galway Glen LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if

applicable):
3d. Street address: ste 007 8341 Bradford Way
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27615
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
1
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)

4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name

(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)

5a. Name: William Mullin
5b. Business name
Dr. J. H. Carter III and Associates Inc…
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 515 F Midland Road
5d. City, state, zip: Southern Pines, NC 28387
5e. Telephone no.: 910 695-1043
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
2
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Latitude: 36.6213N Longitude: - 78.9589W

1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):

(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 9.0 acres
2. Surface Waters

2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Mud Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-V; NSW
2c. River basin: Haw River - 03030002 - (Jordan Lake/Cape Fear)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Suburban - light industrial. Housing and small bussiness are found in the surrounding area, on the south side of the City
of Durham.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.5ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
800 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project proposes to cross the wetland area with a roadway in order to utilize uplands on both sides of the wetland
system that divides the property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
the project involves the placement of culverts on streams to establish road crossings. typical materials will be used
including, excavators, tampers, silt fencing and typical construciton equipment to place bottomless culverts over the
stream channels to accomadate subdivision roads.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Yes No Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: J H Carter and Associates
Name (if known): William Mullin Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
8-14-13
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
Yes No Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.

3
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.

4
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number – Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ – non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
Yes Corps
W1 P T
No DWQ
Yes Corps
W2 P T
No DWQ
Yes Corps
W3 P T
No DWQ
Yes Corps
W4 P T
No DWQ
Yes Corps
W5 P T
No DWQ
Yes Corps
W6 P T
No DWQ
. Total wetland impacts
2g

2h. Comments:

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this

question for all stream sites impacted.
3g.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
Impact
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average
length
number -(PER) or stream
(Corps - 404, 10
(linear
Permanent (P) or intermittent width
DWQ – non-404,
feet)
Temporary (T) (INT)?
(feet)
other)
PER Corps
S1 P T bottomless culvert UT Mud Creek 4.5 82.5'
INT DWQ
PER Corps
S2 P T bottomless culvert UT Mud Creek 4.5 65.5'
INT DWQ
PER Corps
S3 P T
INT DWQ
PER Corps
S4 P T
INT DWQ
PER Corps
S5 P T
INT DWQ
PER Corps
S6 P T
INT DWQ
Total stream and tributary impacts
3h.
148.0'
3i. Comments:
5
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number – (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
O1 P T
O2 P T
O3 P T
O4 P T
4f. Total open water impacts

4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction

If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b.
5c. 5d. 5e.

Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded

P1
P2
5f. Total

5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:

5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
MUST
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you fill out Section D of this form.
.
6a
Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Durham-
Catawba Randleman
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number – Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T) impact required?
Yes
B1 P T road fill ut to muddy creek 3847 2933
No
Yes
B2 P T road fill ut to muddy creek 2660 1505
No
Yes
B3 P T rip rap ut to muddy creek 86 284
No
Total buffer impacts
6h.
6593 4722
6i. Comments:
6
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Roads were set at the minimal width possible to meet raodway requirements and crossings were established at the narrowest
location possible for each bottomless culvert crossing
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best management practices will be used, including silt fencing, dust abatement and general clean site practices
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for Yes No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?

2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWQ Corps
Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank

3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

7
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes No
buffer mitigation?

6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
Zone
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Zone 2
Total buffer mitigation required:
6f.

6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).

6h. Comments:
8
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1a. Does the projectinclude or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes No
Comments: the site plan and road layout were approved by the City of Durham prior
to diffues flow buffer rules being enacted, the plan is till vaild.
2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?42.3 %

2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater plan proposes two dry detention ponds to retain 2yr, 10yr and 25 yr storm to pre-development quantities.
This meets the City of Durham Stormwater ordinance that was in effect at the time of site plan approval
Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? DWQ Stormwater Program
DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? City of Durham
Phase II
NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been Yes No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Yes No
9
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State Yes No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, Yes No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No
2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.

municipal sewer
10
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes No
impacts?
Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical

Habitat?

on site investigation and data base search by JCA Biologists
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No

6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
on site investigation and data base search by JCA Biologists
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO data base search.

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)

8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:

8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM mapping

William Mullin
9-3-15
_______________________________

Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant

is provided.)

11
Page of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version