310141_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20241121

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: ( Arrival Time: Departure Time: (1; County: �y� Region:
►
Farm Name: Z�Lkt,�, Owner Email:
Owner Name: a � �V1�i� �V�L. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �tY lGr� �nQ.(j(} Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
�531O1�fI
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish k Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean / Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow i
Turkeys i
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [—] Yes !o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 6 Nc ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes F2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge`?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: r
i
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 02.
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): �
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E3NIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes ED No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? D Yes CRI�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Fj o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Lti: o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes D O ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes FZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes [:] No ❑ NA Q' E
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 7L - j Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ONo [] NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ YesF3-<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Q40 ❑ NA 0 NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [✓]NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes EKO ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes + No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes FO/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name: phone: C l(}
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0A Date: l f o2-/ p2.
Page 3 of 3 511212020