310229_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20241104

Facility Number = - 'L-76j
0 Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
p Other Agency
Inspection
for Visit:
p Follow-up O Referral
re
O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Depa rtu re Time: County: Dialin
Farm Name: � Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title:
On site Represen tative: �_ J%fel' �jl'QL sk-'
Certified Operator: VrYors� �j'�jrO W r1
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region: km
m
Certification Number: 100151 Z
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
(0 L ? 62I INon-Layer
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity POD.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Yes J5� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
NE
Yes
bjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Yes
jo No
NA
Ej NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: q1 - Date of Inspection:
Z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 2--
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ N E
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
d-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
CA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�{
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
8 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
t] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
(A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
EZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP —]Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes a No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: Q'L
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
R4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
�QNA
[_]NE
❑ Yes
U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[C4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional paces as necessary).
CA'vo'�br's
S [ �kd* k.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
AwX UA
1029
►.�� 11 : li
Phone: N 1 Q)s 2(52
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 24
S11212020