680020_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20241113

(aw 1 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number s - } 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
I11-13 11i I
Arrival Time:
Departure Time: County: oran� e Region: 1212 O
Farm Name _
t -f eY- Fav
rn S t Yt U
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
-Tj,\ClrnCA�
j -e eY
Phone: \y. -
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ry S�)G) 1'0—tY R d Ckr 42P kA-\1 \
Facility Contact: M1{,V-1t, e 1 Tie Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude: — `I q - Z Z is )
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I E I I Layer
Non -La er
Non-L;
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
,❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: (X -1 Z`1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Onnr',AC­�
Spillway?: I/ �� J
Designed Freeboard (in): 30" 21 P� lLi`A
Observed Freeboard (in): N 2-1 N —p C L-GSL tYi SF1l.LW >`1-1 : C 6 f\J''1V M PF51{' N �6n L'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E'No [] NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No C] NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? qV 9e "I oq C V �-Z I l
Waste Application f
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [—]Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [] NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Fp S 1 L .
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
❑'No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
E] NE
[:]Yes
p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [/] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, clher the approp t box below
1i� Yes ❑ No
❑
K + M�''k YLWaste Application El Weekly Freeboard Waste Anal sis' Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑'No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes J2] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - G Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?<W JO Yes ❑ No
ea
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check �1� y El
�No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes � No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Z No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e- discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface We drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review?inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E:fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes Q No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �]'No [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 01 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
sulk -�e5} (201"^) 1 I
L-V Sol l Hers -t- 2 0Z 1
N 'atkby- o�A, a n j V\A0 j 0 u1h walA-e
AVO1 Cckb oy1s
Wk\\ �rjs1ow..P
\Y,\ s �g.5\,rnr�r ,and mow 19 wah-e samptPs'? rtcoyj) �.
SQCGnd,aVb coo}e -�O sCA -
4-e C IBC k ci21 j
PfCM�T 1pc D
Leh d �h o� o S,
I I z H, Fo cn-\ ) IV-e n
�rnpeo� dower , W\t -'-cellUvjur P(-) Cyr r�X�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: In0-t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
a�A-en 1n�Vt & Aect -IBC _40v
Phone: O�' Zl U- 7j Z1
Date:
511212020