260063_Compliance Inspection_20241118

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 - - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: M Compliance Inspection O Operation Review p Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: �9 Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral 0-Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 Qtt Arrival Time: 5cw. Departure Tinter County:�,nrt,"_u,rlplRegion: MU
Farm Name: �QUIhfAA 4t, k I r Owner Entail:
Owner Name: fed WV1,21/�� ttaLL Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Qock kG , Vila - _Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: " Integrator:
Certified Operator: w Certification Number: 1"tIS 21
Back-up Operator: CA, �, }p��t Certification Number: 1 ` �_C.Q
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder iono Non-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy 1 leifer
Farrow to Wean - Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkev Points
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation:' ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance ratan-made'? El )"es N No ❑ NA NF
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'?(if yes,notify DWR) ❑ Ycs No ❑ NA NF
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'?(If yes,notify DWR) Ycs N No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Ycs N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes �N'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 111212020 Continued

Facilit Number: (/ - Q 3 I Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NL NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: V10 VLd
Designed Freeboard(in): Iq_ �A
Observed Freeboard(in): 4(n
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C!jl 9-1e,
p,
13. Soil Type(s): f►U ft
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes N�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes lR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes tkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes tLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:] Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 'Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes tQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon 1
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: °�o (ao 2�)
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes tQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes LEI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes h No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
caves + 14A Y work.. CV) �W on 60 W
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Ol. Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020