20130186 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

CEDAR CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT AND AS -BUILT REPORT
SAMPSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, PROJECT # 95718
Prepared for:
Division of Mitigation Services
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
December 2015

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
Cedar Creek
Sampson County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID 95718
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 3030006090060
Prepared by:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-209-1061
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC i

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Cedar Creek Stream Restoration Project is located within an agricultural watershed in Sampson
County, North Carolina, approximately three miles southwest of Clinton. The stream channels had
been heavily impacted by channelization and agricultural practices. This project involved the
restoration and protection of streams in the Great Coharie Creek watershed. The purpose of this
restoration project is to restore and enhance a stream and wetland complex located within the Cape
Fear River Basin.
The project area is comprised of a single easement area along four tributaries to Great Coharie Creek
(UT1, UT2, UT3 and UT4). UTI is the primary channel at this site, and had been channelized
throughout the project area. It flows westward through the site from Boykin Bridge Road to Great
Coharie Creek. The upper drainage of UTI originates to the southwest of Boykin Bridge Road (SR
1214) near Butlers Crossroads. The tributaries UT2, UT3, and UT4 flow southward into UTL UT2
begins at the confluence of two headwater streams and had been ditched to the edge of the field. Flow
is redirected along the upslope side of the cultivated field to an unnamed tributary to Cedar Creek.
This unnamed tributary (UT4) enters Cedar Creek upstream of the natural valley for UT2. UT3
begins below a pond east of the airport and had been channelized down to a cultivated field where it
had been redirected to the west. The historical flow path continues in a southerly direction through the
cultivated field to its confluence with UT 1.
The site consists of cultivated farmland and wooded areas. The total easement area is 42.0 acres, 26.9
acres of which are wooded. The remaining area is agricultural or clear-cut. The wooded areas along
the corridors designated for restoration are classified as disturbed deciduous forest, and invasive
species are common along the enhancement reaches. Several ditches existed throughout the project
and flow into the main channel. All existing agricultural channels were degraded to a point where
they no longer could access their floodplain, water quality was poor, and aquatic life was not
supported. Little habitat was available to support aquatic life, and the channels were not maximizing
their potential to filter nutrients because they were entrenched and/or had no buffer.
The objective for this restoration project is to restore wetland areas and design a natural waterway
through a stream/wetland complex with appropriate cross-sectional dimension and slope that will
provide function and meet the appropriate success criteria for the existing streams. Accomplishing
this objective entailed the restoration of natural stream characteristics, such as stable cross sections,
planform, and in -stream habitat. The floodplain areas were hydrologically reconnected to the channel
providing natural exchange and storage during flooding events. The design was based on reference
conditions, USACE guidance (USACE, 2005), and criteria that were developed during this project to
achieve success. Additional project objectives, such as restoring the riparian buffer with native
vegetation, ensuring hydraulic stability, and eradicating invasive species, are listed in Section 1 along
with several other project objectives.
The design approach for Cedar Creek was to combine the analog method of natural channel design
with analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and
floodplain. The analog method involved the use of a "template" stream adjacent to, nearby, or
previously in the same location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach are
replicated to create the features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed
and boundary conditions are similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore, et al., 2001).
Hydraulic geometry was developed using analytical methods in an effort to identify the design
discharge.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC ii

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
The headwater valley restoration approach was performed along the upper end of UT2 and UT2C.
The existing ditches/channels were plugged and then backfilled to the extent possible such that cut
and fill was balanced along the reach. Priority Level I restoration was performed on UT2 and UT3 for
the majority of the restoration reaches, the channel were rerouted from its current location to adjacent
natural valley features.
Enhancement Levels I and II were performed for UTI and Enhancement Level II only for UT4.
Enhancement Level I included grading floodplain benches, bank stabilization treatments, and habitat
improvements, while Enhancement Level II included minor bank grading and habitat improvements.
Wetland restoration occurred adjacent to UTI and UT3. The approach was to reconnect the floodplain
wetland to the stream, fill ditches, create shallow pool habitat, micro contour, and plant appropriate
small stream swamp vegetation.
The site has been monitored on a regular basis after all construction and planting activities were
completed. A physical inspection of the site is conducted a minimum of twice per year throughout the
seven year post -construction monitoring period, or until performance standards are met. These site
inspections identify site components and features that require routine maintenance. The measure of
stream restoration success is documented bankfull flows and no change in stream channel
classification. Sand bed channels are dynamic and minor adjustments to dimension and profile are
expected. The measure of vegetative success for the site is the survival of at least 210 trees per acre at
the end of Year 7 of the monitoring period. Annual monitoring data is reported using the DMS
monitoring template.
Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to the
State of North Carolina (State). The State shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to
ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement or the deed restriction document(s) are
upheld.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC iii

Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC iv
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline
Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North
Carolina • December 2015
Proposed
Existing
As -Built
Mitigation
Reach
Mitigation Type
Stationing
Length (LF)
Length (LF)
Ratio
SMUs
UTI
Enhancement 11
1+01 to 31+65
3,064
3,064
1:2.5
1,226
UTI
Enhancement I
31+65 to 35+80
415
415
1:1.5
277
UTI
Enhancement II
35+80 to 41+95
615
615
1:2.5
246
UTI
Enhancement I
41+95 to 44+60
265
265
1:1.5
177
UTI
Enhancement 11
44+60 to 53+51
891
827
1:2.5
331
UT2
Headwater Valley
0+11 to 3+48
364
337
1:1
337
UT2
P1 Restoration
3+48 to 9+28
587
518
1:1
518
UT2C
Headwater Valley
0+02 to 1+95
NA
193
1:1
193
UT3
P1 Restoration
0+69 to 20+10
1,428
1,941
1:1
1,941
UT4
Enhancement II
0+36 to 1+14
78
78
1:2.5
31
Total
7,707
8,253
5,277
Mitigation
Mitigation
Wetland
Mitigation Type
WMUs
Area (ac)
Ratio
W1
Restoration
13.72
1:1 13.72
Total
13.72
13.72
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC iv

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES........................................................ 1
1.1 Location and Setting............................................................................................................... l
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives..................................................................................................
1
1.3 Project Structure.....................................................................................................................
3
1.3.1 Restoration Type and Approach.....................................................................................
3
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data......................................................................... 5
1.4.1 Project History................................................................................................................
5
1.4.2 Project Watersheds.........................................................................................................5
2 Success Criteria..............................................................................................................................
6
2.1 Stream Restoration.................................................................................................................
6
2.1.1 Bankfull Events..............................................................................................................
6
2.1.2 Cross Sections................................................................................................................ 6
2.1.3 Bank Pin Arrays.............................................................................................................
6
2.1.4 Digital Image Stations....................................................................................................
7
2.2 Wetland Success Criteria........................................................................................................7
2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria....................................................................................................
7
2.4 Scheduling/Reporting.............................................................................................................7
3 MONITORING PLAN...................................................................................................................
8
3.1 Stream Restoration.................................................................................................................
9
3.1.1 As -Built Survey..............................................................................................................9
3.1.2 Bankfull Events..............................................................................................................
9
3.1.3 Cross Sections..............................................................................................................10
3.1.4 Digital Image Stations..................................................................................................10
3.1.5 Bank Pin Arrays...........................................................................................................10
3.1.6 Visual Assessment Monitoring.....................................................................................10
3.1.7 Surface Flow.................................................................................................................11
3.2 Wetland Hydrology..............................................................................................................11
3.3 Vegetation............................................................................................................................11
4 Maintenance and Contingency plan.............................................................................................
11
4.1 Stream...................................................................................................................................11
4.2 Wetlands...............................................................................................................................12
4.3 Vegetation............................................................................................................................12
5 AS -BUILT CONDITIONS (BASELINE)....................................................................................
12
5.1 As -Built Drawings................................................................................................................12
5.2 Baseline Data Collection......................................................................................................13
5.2.1 Morphological State of the Channel.............................................................................13
5.2.2 Vegetation.....................................................................................................................13
5.2.3 Photo Documentation...................................................................................................13
5.2.4 Hydrology.....................................................................................................................13
6 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................
14
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 1

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring Report • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
Appendices
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Condition Overlays
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Appendix B. Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 5. Morphological Parameters Summary Data
Table 6. Dimensional Morphology Summary — Cross Sections Data
Cross Section Plots
Stream Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Data Tables
Table 7a. Baseline Planted Stem Count Summary
Table 7b. Planted Species Totals
Table 7c. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix D. As -Built Survey Plan Sheets
As -Built Survey Plan Sheets
Design Red Line Plans
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC ii

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
l PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Site is located in Sampson County approximately 3.1 miles
southwest of Clinton, NC (Figure 1). To access the Site from the town of Clinton, travel west on
Highway 24 (Sunset Avenue), take a left onto Airport Road and go 1.3 miles. Turn right onto West
Main Street Extension, go approximately 350 feet, and turn left onto a dirt farm path. Follow the farm
path along the cultivated field edge to the southwest corner and enter the forest. Follow the dirt path
to cultivated fields adjacent to the project below UT2. Turning to the left will take you to UT2. Going
to the right will take you to UT3.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project has provided numerous ecological and
water quality benefits within the Cape Fear River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to
the project area, others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have
more far-reaching effects. Expected improvements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are
outlined below.
Design Goals and Objectives
Benefits Related to Water Quality
Benefit will be achieved through filtering of runoff from adjacent agricultural fields through buffer
Nutrient removal
areas, the conversion of active farm fields to forested buffers, improved denitrification and nutrient
uptake through buffer zones, and installation of BMPs at the headwaters of selected reaches.
Benefit will be achieved through the stabilization of eroding stream banks and reduction of
Sediment removal
sediment loss from field areas due to lack of vegetative cover. Channel velocities will also be
decreased through a reduction in slope, therefore decreasing erosive forces.
Increase dissolved oxygen
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures to increase turbulence and
concentration
dissolved oxygen concentrations and riparian canopy restoration to lower water temperature to
increase dissolved oxygen capacity.
Runoff filtration
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas that will receive and filter runoff,
thereby reducing nutrients and sediment concentrations reaching water bodies downstream.
Benefits to Flood Attenuation
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas which will infiltrate more water
Water storage
during precipitation events than under current site conditions. Wetland areas will provide
additional storage of runoff and flood waters.
Improved groundwater
Benefit will be achieved through the increased storage of precipitation in buffer areas, ephemeral
recharge
depressions, and reconnection of existing floodplain. Greater storage of water will lead to
improved infiltration and groundwater recharge.
Improved/restored
Benefit will be achieved by restoring the stream to a natural meandering pattern with an
hydrologic connections
appropriately sized channel, such that the channel's floodplain will be flooded more frequently at
flows greater than the bankfull stage.
Benefits Related to Ecological Processes
Benefit will be achieved by restoring riparian buffer habitat to appropriate bottomland hardwood
Restoration of habitats
ecosystem. Protected riparian corridors will create contiguous natural areas with uninterrupted
migration corridors.
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures designed to improve
Improved substrate and
bedform diversity and to trap detritus. Stream will be designed with the appropriate channel
instream cover
dimension and will prevent aggradation and sedimentation within the channel. Substrate will
become coarser as a result of the stabilization of stream banks and an overall decrease in the
amount fine materials deposited in the stream.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
Addition of large woody
Benefit will be achieved through the addition of wood structures as part of the restoration design.
debris
Such structures may include log vanes, root wads, and log weirs.
Reduced temperature of
water due to shading
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of canopy tree species to the stream buffer areas.
Restoration of terrestrial
habitat
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of riparian buffer bottomland hardwood habitats.
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project is located in the Great Coharie Creek
Watershed (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/DMS/priorities-map). This 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC 03003006090060) and is identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the Cape Fear
River Basin Restoration Priority (RBRP).
The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) develops River Basin Restoration
Priorities (RBRP) to guide its restoration activities within each of the state's 54 cataloging units.
RBRPs delineate specific watersheds that exhibit both the need and opportunity for wetland, stream
and riparian buffer restoration. These TLWs receive priority for DMS planning and restoration
project funds. Currently, no Local Watershed Plan (LWP) is available for the project area.
The 2009 Cape Fear RBRP identified water quality and agricultural impacts as major stressors within
this TLW. The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project was identified as a Stream and
Wetland opportunity to improve water quality, habitat, and hydrology within the TLW.
The project goals addressed stressors identified in the TLW, and include the following:
• Water quality improvements,
• Natural resource protection, and
• Manage agricultural impacts.
The project goals were addressed through the following project objectives:
• Converting active farm fields to forested buffers,
• Stabilization of eroding stream banks,
• Reduction in stream bank slope,
• Restoration of riparian buffer bottomland hardwood habitats, and
• Construction of in -stream structures designed to improve bedform diversity.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
1.3
Project Structure
Table la. Cedar Creek Site Project Components
— Stream Miti ation
Reach
Mitigation Type
Proposed
Existing
As -Built
Mitigation
SMUs
Stationing
Length (LF)
Length (LF)
Ratio
UT1
Enhancement 11
1+01 to 31+65
3,064
3,064
1:2.5
1,226
UTI
Enhancement I
31+65 to 35+80
415
415
1:1.5
277
UTI
Enhancement II
35+80 to 41+95
615
615
1:2.5
246
UT1
Enhancement I
41+95 to 44+60
265
265
1:1.5
177
UTI
Enhancement II
44+60 to 53+51
891
827
1:2.5
331
UT2
Headwater Valley
0+11 to 3+48
364
337
1:1
337
UT2
P1 Restoration
3+48 to 9+28
587
518
1:1
518
UT2C
Headwater Valley
0+02 to 1+95
NA
193
1:1
193
UT3
P1 Restoration
0+69 to 20+10
1,428
1,941
1:1
1,941
UT4
Enhancement II
0+36 to 1+14
78
78
1:2.5
31
Total
7,707
8,253
5,277
Table lb. Cedar Creek Site Project Components — Wetland Mitigation
Mitigation Area
Mitigation
Wetland
Mitigation Type
WMUs
(ac)
Ratio
W1
Restoration
13.72
1:1
13.72
Total
13.72
13.72
1.3.1 Restoration Type and Approach
Stream restoration efforts along the unnamed tributaries to Great Coharie Creek were accomplished
through analyses of geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach
applied a combination of analytical and reference and/or analog reach based design methods that meet
objectives commensurate with both ecological and geomorphic improvements. Proposed treatment
activities ranged from minor bank grading and planting to re-establishing stable planform and
hydraulic geometry. Reaches that required full restoration, natural design concepts have been applied
and verified through rigorous engineering analyses and modeling. The objective of this approach was
to design a geomorphically stable channel that provides habitat improvements and ties into the
existing landscape.
The Cedar Creek Site included Priority Level I stream restoration, headwater valley restoration,
stream Enhancement Levels I and 11, and stream buffers throughout the project site have been
restored and protected in perpetuity. Priority Level I stream restoration was incorporated into the
design of a single -thread meandering channel, with parameters based on data taken from the reference
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 3

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
site. Priority 1 stream restoration was performed on 2,459 linear feet of stream channel. Headwater
valley restoration was applied to 530 linear feet of channel. Enhancement Level I was applied to 680
linear feet of channel that required buffer enhancement, bank stabilization and habitat improvements.
Enhancement Level 11 was applied to an additional 4,584 linear feet of channel that required buffer
enhancement and/or minimal bank and habitat improvements.
UT1 (STA 1+01 to STA 53+51)
UTI flows from southeast to northwest across the project, totaling 5,186 linear feet of Enhancement
Level I and lI. The upper -most portion of UT (reaches UT1A and UT1B) is stable and has a forested
buffer along both banks; however, privet was dominant within the right buffer. The downstream
portion of UTI (reaches UTIC, UTD and UTIE) was moderately stable and exhibited some areas of
localized erosion. The buffer along this section consisted of a five year old clear-cut along the left
bank and cultivated fields along the right bank. A 60 -foot easement break is present within the
downstream section (UT1E) to account for an existing farm crossing which has been upgraded. 680
linear feet of Enhancement Level I was performed along reach UTI. Selective locations were
identified to include streambed structures, minor bank grading, planting a native stream buffer and
invasive species control. Primarily, Stabilization/Enhancement 11 activities included performing
minor bank grading, planting the buffer with native vegetation, and invasive species control.
UT2 (STA 0+11 to STA 9+28)
UT2 is the middle tributary of the project, totaling 337 linear feet of headwater valley restoration
along the upstream section and 518 linear feet of Priority 1 restoration through the downstream
section. The upper section of the channel was channelized and bordered by cultivated fields to the
northwest and a pine stand to the southeast, while the lower portion was a small ditch surrounded by
cultivated fields. The headwater valley portion relocated the flow path to the natural valley (to the left
of the existing ditch), and the abandoned ditch has been back filled. The performed P1 restoration
included relocating the channel to follow the natural valley and emptying into Cedar Creek near STA
25+50. A 60 -foot easement break crossing is present at STA 4+66 along UT2. Twin 24" HDPE
culverts were installed within the easement break crossing. Restoration activities included
constructing a meandering channel, installing habitat and drop structures, filling and plugging the
abandoned channel, planting the buffer with native vegetation, and invasive species control.
UT2C (STA 0+02 to STA 1+95)
UT2C is also located in the middle of the project (adjacent to UT2), totaling 193 linear feet of
headwater valley restoration. The upstream end of the reach begins at an existing wetland that borders
a farm path to the north. Flow from the wetland originally had been diverted to a ditch that ran east -
west along the farm path before it was conveyed across the path and into UT2 near the upstream end.
Restoration activities involved redirecting channel flow to the natural valley and grading out the
existing ditch and path such that the area matches existing grade on either side of the path. Additional
activities included planting the buffer with native vegetation and invasive species control.
UT3 (STA 0+69 to STA 20+10)
UT3 is the western most tributary of the project, totaling 1,941 linear feet of Priority 1 restoration.
The upper section of the channel was incised/oversized and began at a pond outlet east of the airport
and flowed through a wooded area consisting of saplings and some mature hardwoods, while the
lower section flowed through a cultivated field. The restored channel has been relocated to the west to
follow the natural valley, and now flows through the middle of the wetland restoration area (W1).
UT3 now outlets into Cedar Creek near STA 43+10. Restoration activities included constructing a
meandering channel, installing habitat and grade control structures, filling and plugging the
abandoned channel, planting the buffer with native vegetation, and invasive species control. Small
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
ditches located adjacent to UT3 and within the conservation easement have also been plugged and
filled to redirect and diffuse flow through the wetland restoration area and/or into UT3.
UT4 (STA 0+36 to STA 1+14)
UT4 is the eastern most tributary of the project, totaling 78 linear feet of Enhancement Level IL The
reach was relatively stable, but had been historically channelized. The buffer along this section
consisted of an agricultural field along the right bank, and a forested buffer along the left bank;
however, privet was common within the left buffer. Stabilization/Enhancement 11 activities included
performing minor bank grading, cutting a floodplain bench, and planting the buffer with native
vegetation, and invasive species control.
Wetland W1 (13.72 Acres)
This 13.72 -acre wetland is located along UT3 and where it reaches the confluence of with UTI Reach
E. The pre -restoration land use was sparsely wooded and active cropland. Wetland restoration
activities consisted of removing valley fill, filling drainage ditches, removing subsurface drainage
tiles, and raising adjacent stream channels to reconnect the floodplain with seasonal and out of bank
flows. Raising the stream bed will also reduce the "dry shoulder" effect near the stream channel.
Specific wetland restoration activities included: reconnecting low lying areas of hydric soil with the
floodplain, plugging agricultural drainage ditches, planting native tree and shrub species commonly
found in small stream swamp ecosystems, and surface roughening to increase infiltration and storage.
Wetland restoration limits and hydroperiods will be determined by on-site soil investigations and
hydrologic modeling in conjunction with pre -construction water table monitoring at the restoration
sites and reference wetlands. Combined with the stream restoration, these actions will result in a
sufficiently high water table and flood frequency to support hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology, resulting in restored riparian wetlands.
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
1.4.1 Project History
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site was restored by Resource Environmental
Solutions, LLC (RES) through a full -delivery contract awarded by NCDMS in 2012. Tables 2, 3, and
4 provide a time sequence and information pertaining to the project activities, history, contacts, and
baseline information.
1.4.2 Project Watersheds
The easement totals 42.0 acres and is broken into four tributaries, UTI, UT2, UT3, and UT4. The
land use in the 2,778 -acre (4.34 mit) project watershed that drains to UT1 consisted of row crop
production, livestock production, silviculture, and sand mining areas. Past land use practices caused
increased erosion and sedimentation along drainage -ways and stream banks in the watershed.
UT2 has a drainage area of 32 acres (0.05 mit) and flows southwest into UTI. Land use in this small
drainage area consisted entirely of row crop production and disturbed hardwood forest. UT2
originated in a disturbed hardwood forest and flows through a cultivated field to its confluence with
UTL
UT3 has a drainage area of 147 acres (0.23 miz) and flows south into UTI. Land use in this drainage
area consisted of row crop production, historical and future livestock production, disturbed hardwood
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
forest, maintained open space, and impervious surfaces associated with residential commercial
development. Portions of the Sampson County Airport, including parts of the runway, terminal, and
apron areas, lie within the UT3 drainage area. UT3 originates at a pond that is adjacent to the airport
property. This reach flowed through a disturbed hardwood forest, and then through a cultivated field
to its confluence with UT I.
UT4 has a drainage area of 77 acres (0.12 mi2), originates within a disturbed hardwood forest, and
flows southwest into UTI. Land use in this small drainage area consisted of a mix of row crop
production and disturbed hardwood forest located primarily along the drainage way.
UT2, UT3 and UT4 were straightened, dredged, or re -aligned in the past to promote drainage. Soil
investigations showed that much of the low-lying landscape adjacent to UTI and its confluences with
UT2 and UT3 exhibited hydric characteristics and a shallow seasonal high water table. The low lying
fields in this area were considered prior converted wetlands (PC) that were drained and are currently
utilized for row crop and livestock production.
The land use in the watershed is characterized by evergreen forest (47 percent), cultivation (31
percent), woody wetlands (9 percent), open space (8 percent) and shrub/scrub (5 percent).
2 Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Cedar Creek Site stream restoration will follow accepted and approved
success criteria presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent NCDMS and
agency guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below. Monitoring reports are
prepared annually and submitted to DMS.
2.1 Stream Restoration
2.1.1 Bankfull Events
Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The two
bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until
two bankfull events have been documented in separate years. Bankfull events will be documented
using crest gauges, auto -logging crest gauges, photographs, and visual assessments for evidence of
debris rack lines.
2.1.2 Cross Sections
There should be little change in as -built cross-sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example
down -cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example
settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross-
sections are classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross-
sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
2.1.3 Bank Pin Arrays
Bank pin arrays will be used as a supplemental method to monitor erosion on selected meander bends
where there is not a cross section. Bank pin arrays will be installed along the outer bend of the
meander. Bank pins will be installed just above the water surface and every two feet above the lowest
pin. Bank pin exposure will be recorded at each monitoring event, and the exposed pin will be driven
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
flush with the bank.here should be little change in as -built cross-sections. If changes do take place,
they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition
(for example down -cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for
example settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio).
Cross-sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored
cross-sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream
type.
2.1.4 Digital Image Stations
Digital images are used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images
should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
2.2 Wetland Success Criteria
Success criteria and monitoring for wetland hydrology within the wetland restoration areas on the site
follows NCDMS Guidance dated 7 November 2011. The target minimum wetland hydroperiod is 9
percent of the growing season. Stream hydrology and water balance calculations indicate the wetland
area will meet jurisdictional criteria (5 percent hydroperiod). However, due to immature vegetation
and reduced PET, a longer success criterion is appropriate. Auto recording gauges are used to
measure daily groundwater elevations throughout the Sampson County growing season in all 7 years
of monitoring.
If a hydrology gauge location fails to meet these success criteria in the seven year monitoring period
then monitoring may be extended, remedial actions may be undertaken, or groundwater modeling
may be used to demonstrate the limits of wetland restoration.
2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the wetland restoration and riparian
buffers on the site will follow NCDMS Guidance dated 7 November 2011. Vegetation monitoring
plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum of two percent of the planted area.
The following data is recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer),
and grid location. Monitoring occurs in the fall of Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. The interim measures of
vegetative success for the site is the survival of at least 320 three-year old planted trees per acre at the
end of Year 3, and 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. The final vegetative success
criteria is the survival of 210 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 7 of the monitoring period.
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or alter
the desired community structure of the site. If necessary, RES will develop a species-specific control
plan.
2.4 Scheduling/Reporting
The monitoring for the Cedar Creek Site stream mitigation follows current accepted and approved
monitoring requirements presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines, NCDMS
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
requirements, and subsequent agency guidance. The monitoring program has been implemented to
document system development and progress toward achieving the success criteria. The restored
stream morphology is assessed to determine the success of the mitigation. The monitoring program is
undertaken for seven years or until the final success criteria are achieved, whichever is longer.
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to NCDMS.
The monitoring reports will include all information, and be in the format required by NCDMS in
Version 2.0 of the NCDMS Monitoring Report Template (Oct. 2010).
3 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the DMS monitoring template. The monitoring report
shall provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and
trends, population of DMS databases for analysis, research purposes, and assist in decision making
regarding project close-out. The success criteria for the Best Site stream and wetland mitigation will
follow current accepted and approved success criteria presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation
Guidelines, NCDMS requirements, and subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria
components are presented in Table 2. Monitoring reports will be prepared annually and submitted to
NCDMS.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USCS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
Table 2. Monitoring Requirements
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
As per April 2003
Additional surveys will be performed if
USACE Wilmington
Pattern
Baseline
monitoring indicates instabilityor
District Stream
significant channel migration
Miti ation Guidelines
As per April 2003
Baseline,
USACE Wilmington
Years
Dimension
Surveyed cross sections and bank pins
District Stream
12,35, and
Mitigation Guidelines
7
As per April 2003
USACE Wilmington
Additional surveys will be performed if
Profile
Baseline
District Stream
monitoring indicates instability
Mitigation Guidelines
Crest Gauges and/or Pressure
As per April 2003
Transducers will be installed on site; the
Surface Water
USACE Wilmington
devices will be inspected on a
Annual
Hydrology
District Stream
quarterly/semi-annual basis to document
Mitigation Guidelines
the occurrence of bankfull events on the
project
Groundwater monitoring gauges with data
Groundwater
recording devices will be installed on site;
Annual
Hydrology
the data will be downloaded on a quarterly
basis during the growing season
Vegetation will be monitored using the
Vegetation
Annual
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS)
protocols
Exotic and
Locations of exotic and nuisance
Nuisance
Annual
vegetation will be mapped
Vegetation
Locations offence damage, vegetation
Project
Sem i-
damage, boundary encroachments, etc.
Boundary
annual
will be mapped
Stream Visual
Annual
Semi-annual visual assessments
Wetland Visual
I
JAnnual
Semi-annual visual assessments
3.1 Stream Restoration
3.1.1 As -Built Survey
An as -built survey was conducted following construction to document channel size, condition, and
location. The survey will include a complete profile of thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of
bank to compare with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by NCDMS or USACE.
3.1.2 Bankfull Events
Three sets of manual and auto -logging crest gauges were installed on the site, one along UT2, one
along UT2C, and one along UT3. The auto logging crest gauges were installed within the channel and
will continuously record flow conditions at an hourly interval. Manual crest gauges were installed on
the bank at bankfull elevation. Crest gauges will be checked during each site visit to determine if a
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
bankfull event has occurred since the last site visit. Crest gauge readings and debris rack lines will be
photographed to document evidence of bankfull events.
3.1.3 Cross Sections
A total of 27 permanent cross sections were installed to monitor channel dimensions and stability.
Four cross sections were installed along UTI where enhancement activities were performed. Eight
cross sections (three pools, two runs, and three shallows) were installed along UT2 also. UT2C has
one cross sections installed throughout its length. Stream reach UT3 has 14 cross sections installed
along its length where stream restoration was performed. Cross sections were typically located at
representative riffle/shallows and pool sections along each stream reach. Each cross section was
permanently marked with 3/8 rebar pin to establish a monument location at each end. A marker pole
was also installed at both ends of each cross section to allow ease locating during monitoring
activities. Cross section surveys will be performed once a year during annual monitoring years 1, 2, 3,
5, and 7 and will include all breaks in slope including top of bank, bottom of bank, streambed, edge of
water, and thalweg. Permanent cross-sections were installed at a minimum of one per 20 bankfull
widths with half in pools and half in shallows. All cross-section measurements include bank height
ratio and entrenchment ratio. Cross-sections are monitored annually. There should be little change in
as -built cross-sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated to determine if they
represent movement toward a less stable condition (for example, down -cutting or erosion), or are
minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example, settling, vegetative changes,
deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2,
and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within restored reaches. Channel stability should
be demonstrated through a minimum of two bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring
period.
3.1.4 Digital Image Stations
Digital photographs will be taken at least once a year to visually document stream and vegetation
conditions. This monitoring practice will continue for seven years following construction and
planting. Permanent photo point locations at cross sections and vegetation plots have been
established so that the same directional view and location may be repeated each monitoring year.
Monitoring photographs will also be used to document any stream and vegetation problematic areas
such as erosion, stream and bank instability, easement encroachment and vegetation damage.
3.1.5 Bank Pin Arrays
Eight bank pin array sets have been installed at pool cross sections located along UT2 and UT3.
These bank pin arrays were installed along the upstream and downstream third of the meander. Bank
pins are a minimum of three feet long, and have been installed just above the water surface and every
two feet above the lowest pin. Bank pin exposure will be recorded at each monitoring event, and the
exposed pin will be driven flush with the bank.
3.1.6 Visual Assessment Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas is conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year by
qualified individuals. The visual assessments include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species, and
easement encroachments. Visual assessments of stream stability include a complete stream walk and
structure inspection. Digital images are taken at fixed representative locations to record each
monitoring event as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of visual monitoring
are presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital images.
Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal photos
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 10

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel
depth. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks
over time. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
3.1.7 Surface Flow
The headwater valley restoration reaches on UT2 and UT2C will be monitored to document
intermittent or seasonal surface flow. This will be accomplished through direct observation, photo
documentation of dye tests, and continuous flow monitoring devices (pressure transducers). An auto
logging crest gauges has been installed within the headwater valley channel and will continuously
record flow conditions at an hourly interval. This gauge will be downloaded during each site visit to
determine if intermittent or seasonal flows conditions are present.
3.2 Wetland Hydrology
Wetland hydrology will be monitored to document hydric conditions in the wetland restoration areas.
This will be accomplished with automatic recording pressure transducer gauges installed in
representative locations across the restoration areas and reference wetland areas. A total of fourteen
automatic recording pressure transducers (Auto -Wells) have been installed on the site. Eleven auto -
wells have been installed within the wetland restoration area and three within reference areas. The
gauges will be downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods will be calculated during the growing
season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory and DMS guidance. Visual observations of
primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators will also be recorded during quarterly site visits.
3.3 Vegetation
A total of 20 vegetation plots were randomly established within the planted stream riparian buffer
easement. Vegetation plots measure 10 meters by 10 meters or 5 meters by 20 meters (0.02 acres) and
has all four corners marked with metal posts. Planted woody vegetation was assessed within each
plot to establish a baseline dataset. Within each vegetation plot, each planted stem was identified for
species, "X" and "Y" origin located, and measured for height. Reference digital photographs were
also captured to document baseline conditions. Species composition, density, growth patterns,
damaged stems, and survival ratios will be measured and reported on an annual basis. Vegetation plot
data will be reported for each plot as well as an overall site average.
4 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
All identified problematic areas or areas of concern such as stream bank erosion/instability,
aggradation/degradation, lack of targeted vegetation, and invasive/exotic species which prevent the
site from meeting performance success criteria will be evaluated on a case by case basis. These areas
will be documented and remedial actions will be discussed amongst NCDMS staff to determine a plan
of action. If it is determined remedial action is required, a plan will be provided.
4.1 Stream
Any stream problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities will be
documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual
monitoring report. Stream problem areas or areas of concern may include bank erosion,
aggradation/degradation, structure failure or not performing as designed, beaver dams, cattle
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 11

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina - December 2015
encroachment due to fence damage, etc. If it is determined through NCDMS correspondence that
remedial action is required to repair an area, a proposed work plan will be submitted for remediation.
4.2 Wetlands
Any wetland problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities will be
documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual
monitoring report. Wetland problem areas may include planted vegetation or wetland hydrology not
meeting success criteria. If it is determined through NCDMS correspondence that remedial action is
required to repair an area, a proposed work plan will be submitted for remediation.
4.3 Vegetation
Any vegetation problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities will
be documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual
monitoring report. Vegetation problem areas or areas of concern may include vegetation plot not
meeting success criteria, invasive species abundance, sparse vegetation areas, etc. If it is determined
through NCDMS correspondence that remedial action is required to repair an area, a proposed work
plan will submitted for remediation.
5 AS -BUILT CONDITIONS (BASELINE)
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration as -built survey was completed in August 2015. A
topographic survey on the constructed stream channel and adjacent floodplain areas was performed to
document post construction conditions. The survey involved locating the stream channel thalweg, top
of bank, stream structures, culvert crossings, woody debris, monitoring cross sections, vegetation
plots, crest gauges, and a rain gauge.
The as -built survey drawings indicate that the Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration site was
constructed to the mitigation plan design. Profile and dimension parameters are within the tolerances
for stream and wetland mitigation construction. The Cedar Creek Site was constructed to design plan
specifications with minimal modifications. Along UT2 and UT3 rock was placed in some of the riffle
beds to prevent degradation and scour. Over time it is anticipated that the rock placed within the
channel bed will be covered with sediment and perform as a grade control. A few additional log
grade control structures were installed to the upstream portion of UT2 to prevent down cutting during
construction activities. All changes were approved by the design engineer and are documented on the
as -built drawings and red line markup drawings.
5.1 As -Built Drawings
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration As -Built Drawing is located in Appendix D which
documents post construction conditions for the project.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 12

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
5.2 Baseline Data Collection
5.2.1 Morphological State of the Channel
All morphological stream data for the as -built profile and dimensions were collected during the as -
built survey performed during August 2015. Appendix B includes summary data tables,
morphological parameters, and stream photographs.
Profile
The baseline (MY -0) profiles closely matches the proposed design profiles. The plotted longitudinal
profiles can be found on the As -Built Drawings in Appendix D and morphological summary data
tables can be found in Appendix B.
Dimension
The baseline (MY -0) cross sectional dimensions closely matches the proposed design cross section
parameters. All cross section plots and data tables can be found in Appendix B.
Sediment Transport
The as -built conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all
restoration/enhancement reaches. Pre -construction conditions documented all four reaches as sand
bed channels and remain classified as sand bed channels post -construction. Visual assessment shows
the channel is transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation
and degradation.
5.2.2 Vegetation
The baseline monitoring (MY -0) vegetation survey was completed in May 2015. The baseline
vegetation monitoring on the Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site resulted in an
average of 1,105 planted stems per acre, which is greater than the required 680 stems per acre density.
The average stems per vegetation plot was 27 planted stems. The minimum planted stems per plots
was 22 stems and the maximum was 42 stems. A total of 25,500 bare root stems were planted across
the Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site. A total of 3,500 live stakes were also installed
along the stream banks for bank stabilization. Vegetation summary data tables and vegetation plot
photos can be found in Appendix C. Invasive species treatment will be continued as needed to
promote the establishment of the target community.
5.2.3 Photo Documentation
Permanent photo point locations have been established at cross sections, vegetation plots, stream
crossings, and stream structures by RES staff. Any additional problem areas or areas of concern will
also be documented with a digital photograph during monitoring activities. Stream digital
photographs can be found in Appendix B and Appendix C for vegetation photos.
5.2.4 Hydrology
Three sets of manual and auto -logging crest gauges were installed on the site, one along UT2, one
along UT2C, and one along UT3. The auto logging crest gauges were installed within the channel and
will continuously record flow conditions at an hourly interval. Manual crest gauges were installed on
the bank at bankfull elevation. Crest gauges will be checked during each site visit to determine if a
bankfull event has occurred since the last site visit. Crest gauge readings and debris rack lines will be
photographed to document evidence of bankfull events. Wetland hydrology will be monitored with
eleven automatic recording pressure transducer gauges that have been installed in representative
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 13

Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030006
Baseline Monitoring • Sampson County, North Carolina • December 2015
locations across the wetland restoration areas. An additional three gauges were installed in reference
wetland areas.
6 REFERENCES
Chow, Ven Te. 1959. Open -Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
DDMSwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological
Services, FWS/OBS-79/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Environmental Banc & Exchange (2014). Cedar Creek Stream Restoration Project Final Mitigation
Plan. North Carolina Ecosystems Enhancement Program, Raleigh, NC.
Horton, J. Wright Jr. and Victor A. Zullo. 1991. The Geology of the Carolinas, Carolina Geological
Society Fiftieth Anniversary Volume. The University of Tennessee Press. Knoxville, TN.
Johnson PA. 2006. Assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions.
U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Report Number
FHWA-HRT-05-072.
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.S. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). 2007. Stream Restoration Design Handbook (NEH
654), USDA
NCDENR. "Water Quality Stream Classifications for Streams in North Carolina." Water Quality
Section. http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wqhome/html (June 2005).
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 14

I: ' ' ► l :1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information

Cedar Creek Stream• •
Wetland Mitigation
Hoondros
. r
WJ
i4set 0 c�
o` 0
Sampson County Airport m
ai
CD
° `I
e o• $ Q
0
LT' -
CI
°
r
d`war m I
TUrk—
v.0
v
Le end
e ill
© Airports
NC Highway o
Kenn
State Roads c� Ca er
m
i Streams -2
Cedar Creek Easement The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Site is located in Sampson County approximately 3.1 miles southwest
Waterbody of Clinton, NC. To access the Site from the town of Clinton, travel west on Highway 24 (Sunset Avenue),
take a left onto Airport Road and go 1.3 miles. Turn right onto West Main Street Extension, go
5 -Mile Aviation Zone approximately 350 feet, and turn left onto a dirt farm path. Follow the farm path along the cultivated field
03030006090060 edge to the southwest corner and enter the forest. Follow the dirt path to cultivated fields adjacent to the
project below UT2. Turning to the left will take you to UT2. Going to the right will take you to UT3.
Figure 1 Date: 11/6/2015
Project Vicinity Map Drawn by: BSH
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
0 0.75 1.5 res
Sampson County, North Carolina
Miles

a
•� �' y: u. i',� "may �^'
mol'NO
0 175 350
y4 M f r �g • . c�'�
�Y
Feet
1 inch 350 feet
A
a. •
lit
• •` t'rF
Y`
�•�-' ,r P �t'+�' r e r � p % .+;A-- a ., r � j � � r - w ..,f�,i�. 3 a"� :+' � .m y
Restoration Project
7S � h .,;� f `'k - ,�' •••�„ µ � Y v ti�'�J .fit �' ,y 7 � rL
Current Conditions
;L y1'
Overview Map
UT2
UT3
a. .- .
UT1�.- tT t ►
i , ;,.
wf
UT4
i
�` .n..i l.•..K M• - `�' _ _ d r _ - �; �m -M.; ,u •.k` A yc V'��' 'lly,, 1�►� 1� I _♦
t.Fi Jnr k • ! �:•e ��
. y
t..
47141
.. d !' ,. r 7S '�' :: �G , �n � •oi� i ' � +! 6i �,Y+ - ; F ,� 1� •�,i rte" `�- • .Jt ` `r�i„�" yn,
yp .
"f, `. C +. "'i ± a �" l 2 c r• tiro .ti.
y�PP
• !'fc`
_ �.5�• V
}r',�j,.,�,�ti?'
'' ..Ad.$ �`�,>A a • r,, .� ' �( (}.�y�' -Y - .,`i.(<�'--Rob:.li'i.'a�" :.�'N.. i. y,� _ i ••y-.
yE P-` . -moi Y:' �'..i �f` ,ykY-`6 l - .•\;r,. ,,N.:
V
y 3�
r � - . 4. 3 � � `^� } • � i �. 4 * 't �,f -Y. .:1 �i m't. Y. '�i'�i,m�� � •& � ,��`,'#�w jf �'�4'` _ 'l., � . + - -
yyyy r .,+� �¢ ,�',; �``• �-. �, Via.
q, }rr:y. UT1 .�
,i r r 1 k `�'"'� ..�,y,•' j, �4 m�, 'y R' ♦+Yy�j;. �roS-� 1•�� •. •,lM �Sy� 9" • +r,
L ti +^{d�.mj� ply,, JI• _ ..tn r�Jl�'.; It k�L �.{.F �° �. ts�. .•r,�n i � -� .'
�'ply �', •^ , °
� " ,' A ... • �t t� x {,.�% � 'f'"t"`� � � .�y � � ,. � } ' w �� , -�� f am+ �$'f �$' `ml ,y r k
w --• t' ��> rr �� yCar�;"t,`3t'� �a� �'� r.P�t �, ti•"•'? .�•4������iyr� � t lm#aF' «k�
..1 ..• .i: s': ' . r, a tfi -. fi.� , r ..�.. - ..... _ _ _ .. ...., .e,'. ¢._,V, _... ylY . _]� ...,aa �,1ri ryes .t - . r 1. ., : ir:. s�.A:�,rt3s JfL. a�tt. �.r r-.'e.frc!t.,a� a._.. -4.
.
LEGEND
Z -
C3 Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plots
mea • Stream/Wetland Gauges
"r State Roads
Enhancement I
— Enhancement 11
Headwater Valley Restoration
— P1 Restoration
Cross Sections
--1 Wetland Restoration Area
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
N Present Marginal Absent
d
Absent No Fill
a
to
Present IIII
•y IIII I
R
> Common ____

yy
�- ..'VAS,
•
all
�"� ,�. �•�..1 !'eK _.',Fil "` -;�. i _ ,an,, �.^ ;r�'�, x��'"�i ._ -w� rte• .. } }L .� .� ` N' ! fir'+
Enhancement 11
17+00 r: Mkt
16+0
15+00
14+00
13+00
*
go,
•;Lt�i ar�le.
L _ J
12+00
�4 .. •,.', ` ,�, � �,j . �,. .s � _ � ,. �; ,,,ljyr � .•�y�±+r:.t "�,k� -
� � -_• ` y,�•w� .rbc ., , Y}fir. `� � �� a -���,c �#
JRAil
Ar
TA
q�P
Iva
- too
s.
;2k ev
1 `
tp
AL
' z
t " ,� A �,• -• ," .• ' +,�+�a Y� �. 'r• - -6N.MMpi
.�., ' r � F11 r•y p�, .�y. 7f�"�i����.'►►Y_,�1T�"}�—"a � a , S7.
1 40. ....:.V_i ,� ,8- y �- ' -',C * � . r•!q
� •r
It f'ffiY'%44.. K f_ • �.!i� � r � � ^� �s �. .,r �� _ . r:a
t ,�' • �:, ��g•-r - 'A.. .:, �`,+�'*y� 1I 'rr _a `• ` - • 1,
r
r` tail• yL�' r 1.f kr ' �t •4 ' '�A�` '1f00
�� -. �► - . •moi-. u - .
s �.•9 i ia�, '_?/]:t!' ,fir i y; •_. `n_tll - •},! f i +-,�i•1! W, a. - r`�i,►i� # 0
.{ ""f•.' -t + 'Yy_ ' , '�;'rL6. • �J .n - _ ,4 . 1" t.S..i►1 1�` a`
s`1' �F •r" L • • ? +Y �r �� +r 'G� L i
"+' • mo of f �• y jr '� • �` ' f t .: ICA
M ^�`+•'• t � � '' ���' 1�'.14
~ �� ~ -� •' '• ' � '�� • ,R • � T�-+ '4 + ,( -�w _ �/ITJLI�'h'�il /J.'l UV Wim/ O a W�AJIJ.TL I r
e,���, s r...
�;�� h

4 ,' t
1. •� )n�]�r t.� I f J r
11 -
VP 15
CG -1 'o
O
(-1-) ACG -1
VP 9 AW -5
Cross Section 13
Cross
S00%,
14
C�1
ss
MCI 1Uoss
VP 12
,10
UT3
P1 Restoration
(0+69 - 20+10)
AW -6
n_
VP 8
ss
SecoAW-7
° AW -8
Cross Sectio"?�VP 6
AW -10 VP 11
VP 13 r
,o
N may! c
0461
' ' ^•M - r n
' 0
A
U 11 UT1
<71'
e
�r/Q
Enhancement I
* Enhancement II �• , ♦*"�",� rr ;i d �` r ,� •� , r .}� -* �,�. •�
'Y • -
(41+95 - 44+60) (35+80 -
CG -1
35+80 -
fires I
0 50 100
Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
Figure 2c.
Cedar Creek
Restoration Project
UT1
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
I Date: 1/5/2016 1 Drawn by: BSH
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plots
• Stream/Wetland Gauges
State Roads
Enhancement I
— Enhancement 11
Headwater Valley Restoration
4 — P1 Restoration
UT1
�• '•� Cross Sections
Enhancement II
t : k
(44+60 - 53+51) UT1 t .�E; Wetland Restoration Area
9 �r .r , 3r r Enhancement
- 35+80)
REFAW-2 � _ w �d, 1. :/: ` ��Tt ';yrs c `'�'• v� �a' g'.• s r ik �,• �
.�. ✓), aY .�,R,l ,� ''S",r. K.s,4 .� •,p"' _q}Y, 1,,�.�' *�- - 'h`•.a •.:+r C.�ri �'a �*.� i
'T
,� � �/� I:"!r ,. .�,:r'•�°`�"�`..� ° ��� ..�Y�. �•� �.. 1Yi '1,� fit`,^ .� t�:. +^ !6, via'. r. a
+, - A�ri:a. E,�Y. -.-,� �-r: ..., ;h+r. r, '�'�J4'r :X�' LyG. ,.i M'J -•. j,
' ! �• � �r n A� yrri � 4T. ' N� � • -i �' ., J A - Y-� ` � "} .� \ w� � /-
1
'
IveY �Oriemap Aerial Imageryl�
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
N Present Marginal Absent
m
•� Absent No Fill
a
rn IIIII
Present
IIIII
Commor

1! -
.• dr,
tAl
1
UT1
Enhancement II
(44+60 -53+51
4
P
r %
.41
Lt.
1.s�:
I
I Wetland 1 1
UT3
P1 Restoration
(0+69 - 20+10)
AW -10
VP 13
VP 12
01-0
1,9
Cross 5
UT1
Enhancement 1
;41+95 - 44+60)
01
fires
N
0 50 s 100
Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
Figure 2d.
Cedar Creek
Restoration Project
UT1
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
Date: 1/5/2016 1 Drawn by: BSH
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
L Vegetation Plots
• Stream/Wetland Gauges
State Roads
Enhancement I
— Enhancement 11
Headwater Valley Restoration
— P1 Restoration
Cross Sections
® Wetland Restoration Area
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
N Present Marginal Absent
m
Absent No Fill
a
to
Present IIII
•y IIII I
R
> Common

UT2
P1 Restoration
(3+48 - 9+28)
UT1
Enhancement II
(1+01 - 31+65)
%.4
T"
Jim
i h
r•e
t.
REFAW 3
UT2C
HWV Restoration
(0+02 - 1+95)
CG2
6055•Rain Gauae
UT2
P1 Restoration
(3+48 - 9+28)
UT2
HWV Restoration
(0+11 - 3+48)
Source
NC OneMap, NC Center fo Ge c
fires
N
W E
s
0 50 100
Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
Figure 2e.
Cedar Creek
Restoration Project
UT2/UT2C
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
Date: 1/5/2016 1 Drawn by: BSH
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plots
• Stream/Wetland Gauges
State Roads
Enhancement I
— Enhancement 11
Headwater Valley Restoration
— P1 Restoration
Cross Sections
D Wetland Restoration Area
Riparian Buffer Conditions
kAi
Target Community
N Present Mar inal Absent
m
0 Absent No Fill
a
4,
Present IIII
•y IIII I
R
> Common ____

UT1
Enhancement 1
(41+95 - 44+60)
Q
C0 00
sNS m
5
u
AW -9
VP 12 Crpss
S v
rn"�p
O
U
VP 15 AW -11
17
-.. ,. • :: -- - Crp .
VP 19'
Crp ss
h y
n
` VP 18
p p n AW 3'
u+NN VP 17f
s
11 C, r:
C'J0
C N
O N
CG -1
ACGy 0
P
� U �
0
N NS VP9AW5
N O
N co
UT3
P1 Restoration
M (0+69 - 20+10) '
VP 16
1Ft 4W.. f.
�Wetland ,4
ro
v,
fires
N
W
f
s
0 50 100
Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
Figure A
Cedar Creek
Restoration Project
UT3
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
Date: 1/5/2016 1 Drawn by: BSH
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plots
. •Stream/Wetland Gauges
State Roads
Enhancement I
— Enhancement 11
Headwater Valley Restoration
— P1 Restoration
Cross Sections
Wetland Restoration Area
Y
. ..
.. ..
- i • 1 .:
UT3 AW -6 ";f a.,•
�<,
y
P1 Restoration f-
(0+69 - 20+10) VP 8
.L "
4
a.
r
=V P, 1 -Ok
Source. 2013 NC Onemap Aerial,71mager
.=
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
w Present Mar inal Absent
m
d Absent No Fill
a
to
Present IIII
•y IIII I
R
> Common ___

Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Baseline Monitoring Report Year 0
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Pro'ect/DMS Pro'ect # 95718
Mitigation Credits
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-ri anan Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE R
RE R
RE
Totals
2,989
1 2,288 13.72
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project Component -or-
Reach ID
As -Built
Stationing/Location (LF)
Existing Approach
Footage/Acreage (PI, PII etc.)
Restoration -
or -Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
SMUs/
WMUs
UTI
0+01 to 31+65
3,064 Enhancement II
RE
3,064
1 : 2.5
1,226
UTI
31+65 to 35+80
415 Enhancement I
RE
415
1 :1.5
277
UTI
35+80 to 41+95
615 Enhancement II
RE
615
1 : 2.5
246
UTI
41+95 to 44+60
265 Enhancement I
RE
265
1 :1.5
177
UTI
44+60 to 53+51
891 Enhancement II
RE
827
1 :2.5
331
UT2
0+11 to 3+48
364 Headwater Valley
R
337
1 : 1.0
337
UT2
3+48 to 9+28
587 P1 Restoration
R
518
1 : 1.0
518
UT2C
0+02 to 1+95
NA Headwater Valley
R
193
1 :1.0
193
UT3
0+69 to 20+10
1,428 P1 Restoration
R
1,941
1 : 1.0
1,941
UT4
0+36 to 1+14
78 Enhancement II
RE
78
1 : 2.5
31
Wetland 1
Adjacent to UT & UT3
17.30 Restoration
R
13.10
1 : 1.0
13.72
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland Non -riparian
(acres) Wetland
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
2,459
13.72
Headwater Valley
530
Enhancement I
680
Enhancement II
4,584
Creation
Preservation
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed
Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Activity and Reporting History
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project / DMS Project #95718
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
NA
August 2014
Final Desi — Construction Plans
NA
December 2014
Construction Completed
March 2015
May 2015
Site Planting Completed
May 2015
May 2015
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
July 2015
November 2015
Year 1 Monitoring
Jose h Wright
Year 2 Monitoring
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
Year 3 Monitoring
Raleigh, NC 27605
Year 4 Monitoring
[phone]
Year 5 Monitoring
Seeding Contractor
Wright Contracting
Year 6 Monitoring
O Box 545
Year 7 Monitoring
[phone]
Table 3. Project Contacts
Project Contacts Table
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project /DMS Project # 95718
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Frasier Mullen, PE
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting
O Box 545
Siler City, NC 27344
[phone]
Jose h Wright
Planting Contractor
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
David Godley
Seeding Contractor
Wright Contracting
O Box 545
Siler City, NC 27344
[phone]
Joseph Wright
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbogen, NC Forestry Services Nursery
Full Delivery Provider
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
Project Manager:
Daniel Ingram
Monitoring Performers
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
[Project Manager:
Brian Hockett, PLS

Table 4. Project Information
Project Information
Project Name
Cedar Creek Site
County
Sampson
Project Area (acres)
42.0
Project Coordinates (latitude and
longitude)
34'57'59.663"N 7812210.778"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Outer Coastal Plain
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03030006
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03030006090060
DWQ Sub -basin
03-06-19
Project Drainage Area (acres)
2,890 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Impervious Area
4.5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Woody wetlands, Shrub/scrub, cultivated crops, evergreen forest
Reach Summary Information (As -Built
Conditions)
Parameters
UT1
UT2
UT3
UT4
Length of reach (linear feet)
5,250
917
1941
78
Valley Classification
X
X
X
X
Drainage area (acres)
2780
35
151
77
NCDWQ stream identification score
50.0
34.5
40.0
42.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Morphological Description (stream
type)
E5
E5
E5
E5
Evolutionary trend
Stage II
Stage II/III
Stage
Stage
II/III
II/III
Underlying mapped soils
BH
Jo
BH
BH
Drainage class
frequently
undrained
frequently
frequently
flooded
flooded
flooded
Soil Hydric status
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Hydric
Slope
0.20%
1.40%
1.10%
1.0%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
AE
N/A
cultivated
cultivated,
mixed
mixed
Native vegetation community
, mixed
mixed
hardwood
hardwoo
hardwood
hardwood
forest
d forest
forest
forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive
<5
0
0
<5
vegetation

Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
UT1/3
Size of Wetland (acres)
13.72
Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine
Riparian Riverine
Mapped Soil Series
Bibb/Johnson
Drainage class
Frequently Flooded
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Runoff/Groundwater Discharge
Hydrologic Impairment
Incised Channel, Dredging
Native vegetation community
Forested
Percent composition of exotic invasive
vegetation
1-2%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW -2013-00389
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR # 13-0186
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
USFWS (Corr. Letter)
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
SHPO (Corr. Letter)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
NA
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
EEP Floodplain Requirements
Checklist
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
NA
N/A

Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 5. Morphological Parameters Summary Data
Table 6. Dimensional Morphology Summary — Cross Sections Data
Cross Section Plots
Stream Photos

Table 5. Cedar Creek Morphological Parameters
Reference Reach
Existing'
UT1 (Upper) I UT1 (Lower) I UT2 Reach A
UT3 Reach A UT3 Reach A
UT4 UT2
(Upper) (Lower)
Design
UT3
UT2
As -Built
UT3
Feature
Pool I
Run
I Shallow
Shallow I
Pool
Shallow I
Pool
Shallow I
Run
Run
Shallow I
Run
Shallow
Shallow I
Pool
Shallow I
Pool
Shallow I
Pool
Shallow I
Pool
Drainage Area (ac)
81
2514
2780
34
116
150
79
41
146
41
146
Drainage Area (mi)
0.13
3.93
4.34
0.05
0.18
0.23
0.12
0.06
0.23
0.06
0.23
NC Regional Curve Discharge (cfs)Z
---
---
3.7
44.3
47.7
2.0
4.8
5.8
3.7
2.3
5.7
2.3
5.7
NC Regional Curve Discharge (cfs)3
---
---
1.8
24.9
26.8
0.9
2.4
2.9
1.8
1.1
2.9
1.1
2.9
Design/Calculated Discharge cfs
---
---
5
-
- -
-
---
4.0
1
6.0
1
4.0
1
6.0
Dimension
BF Width ft
6.3
14.0
6.2
18.2
14.1
11.0
10.9
4.8
5.2
4.0
10.4
7.7
6.2
4.6
5.4
6.0
7.0
7.5
7.1
7.9
7.2
Floodprone Width ft
100.0
100.0
100.0
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
4.0
5.9
2.9
42.1
46.4
32.2
29.2
2.4
3.0
3.4
5.5
4.8
5.6
2.2
3.1
3.6
4.8
2.9
2.9
4.1
4.2
BF Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.4
0.5
2.3
3.3
2.9
2.7
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.0
0.5
0.8
3.2
4.4
3.7
3.3
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.8
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
33.3
13.4
7.9
4.3
3.8
4.1
9.6
10.5
4.7
19.7
12.2
6.9
10.2
9.4
10.2
10.1
20.1
18.1
15.6
13.2
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
1.2
1.3
1.6
2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Wetted Perimeter ft
7.1
14.2
6.7
20.4
18.8
15.8
16.2
5.2
5.9
5.8
10.7
8.2
7.1
4.9
5.9
6.4
7.6
7.7
7.5
8.3
7.7
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.6
0.4
0.4
2.1
2.5
2.0
1.8
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
Substrate
Medium/Coarse Sand
Medium/Coarse Sand
Medium/Coarse Sand
Medium/Coarse Sand
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
---
---
---
---
---
---
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Channel Beltwidth ft
13.0
19.3
13.9
---
---
---
---
---
---
10.5
15.7
12.6
18.8
10.3
23.9
14.3
23.3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
5.2
11.7
9.9
---
---
---
---
---
---
4.2
9.4
5.1
11.3
8.6
22.0
6.4
20.8
Radius of Curvature Ratio
0.7
1.6
1.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
1.1
2.9
0.8
2.6
Meander Wavelength (ft)
13.3
22.5
21.1
---
---
---
---
---
---
4.6
13.8
6.0
18.0
5.0
18.3
6.5
19.5
Meander Width Ratio
2.1 1
3.1
1 2.2
- -
- -
--
- -
2.1
1
3.1
1 2.1
1
3.1
1.4
1
3.2
1 1.8
1
2.9
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
2.0
30.9
10.9
---
---
--
---
---
1.6
24.5
1.9
29.4
2.5
26.2
2.3
33.2
Run Length (ft)
1.0
20.1
6.9
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.8
15.9
0.9
19.1
2.1
18.5
2.3
23.2
Pool Length (ft)
2.6
12.1
5.8
---
- -
---
---
---
2.1
9.6
2.5
11.5
3.2
10.2
3.7
12.2
Pool -to-Pool Spacing (ft)
10.1
61.0
28.6
---
---
---
---
---
8.0
48.3
9.6
57.9
12.5
55.6
10.1
60.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
164
3376
1515
255
486
731
78
643
1600
643
1600
Channel Length (ft)
203
3694
1574
275
496
739
78
724
1912
740
1941
Sinuosity
1.24
1.09
1.04
1.08
1.02
1.01
1.00
1.13
1.20
1.15
1.21
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.009
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Channel Slope (ft/ft
0.009
0.0022
0.0016
0.012
0.0164
0.007
0.010
0.0170
0.0095
0.0202
0.0130
Rosgen Classification
E/C5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
1 Bankfull stage was estimated using NC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions data
2 NC Regional Curve equations source: Doll et al. (2003)
3 NC Regional Curve equations source: Sweet and Geratz (2003)

1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Appendix B. Table 6a. - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: Cedar Creek Site/ NCDMS Project # 95718
Cross Section 1 (Run)
Cross Section 2 (Run)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Run)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY r
Record elevation (datum) used
89.8
89.2
88.1
85.8
106.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
19.0
14.3
23.8
14.4
6.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.2
1
2.7
1
1.9
1
1.7
1
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.8
3.9
3.3
2.5
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
41.6
38.0
45.5
24.7
3.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.6
5.4
12.4
8.4
12.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
2.1
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross Section 10 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
105.3
103.5
103.5
97.9
97.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.9
7.3
7.1
7.5
5.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area LL
2.1
4.5
5.0
4.0
3.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.0
11.8
9.9
14.2
9.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
Cross Section 13 (Pool)
Cross Section 14 (Riffle)
Cross Section 15 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
93.5
93.1
90.9
90.9
89.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
8.1
9.3
9.6
6.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
4.8
6.6
3.9
3.7
4.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
10.0
22.2
25.0
10.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 16 (Pool)
Cross Section 17 (Pool)
Cross Section 18 (Riffle)
Cross Section 19 (Run)
Cross Section 20 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYI MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
88.8
87.4
87.1
108.8
105.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.1
7.1
7.0
7.5
8.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1.3
1.1
0.8
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
3.8
4.2
4.0
2.9
2.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.1
12.0
12.3
19.6
29.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Appendix i. Table 6b. 1 1 ' Dimensional 1 1 1 1' I (Dimensional •arameters — Cross Sections)
Project1' IProject95718
Cross 1 itl)
Cross Section1 1n 23 (Riffle)
Cross Sectionitl)
Cross Sectionit
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
.. i i ''
®'
______®______
• • ______®______®______
•••. •
1 1
______
1 1
______ 1 1 ______
1 1
______
1 1
______
BankfullMeanDepth(ft)MMMMMMMMMMMMMM=MMMMMMMMMMMMM=MMMMMM
D•p
m______
1 •
______®______®______=______
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
BankfullWidth/DepthRatiommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
R' •
®
_
_ _ _ _
_
®
_ _ _ _ _ _ ® _ _ _ _ _
_
®
_
_ _
BankfullBankHeightRatio=MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Cross1 1 26 (Riffle)
Cross Section 27 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Recordelevation (datum)
Bankfall Cross Sectional Area (ft)
BankfullWidth/DepthRatio=MMMMMM=MMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
R' •
®
_
_ _ _ _
_
®
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _
R' •
m
_
_ _ _ _
_
m
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
.. i i i i '
___________________________________
•••. •
_
_
_ _ _ _
_
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _
De
_
_
_ _ _ _
_
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
BankfullWidth/DepthRatiommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•R' •
_
_
_ _ _ _
_
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _
i.� C - _' '••___________________________________
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
.. i i '
___________________________________
BankfullCrossSectionalArea(ft2)MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
_
BankfullWidth/DepthRatiommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•
_
_
_ _ _ _
_
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _
R' •
_
_
_ _ _ _
_
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT1 Cross Section 1 - Run
95
94
93
92
91 4
c
° 90
400-00'
89
w
88
87
86
85
0 10 20 30 40 50
Distance (ft)
�UT1 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT1 Cross Section 2 - Run
94
93
92
91
90
0
> 89
a)
LU 88
87
86 -
85
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
—0—UT1 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UTI Cross Section 3 - Riffle
92
91
90
89
C:
0 88
WON
Lu 87
86
85
84
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40. 45 50
Distance (ft)
�UT1 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT1 Cross Section 4 - Run
89
88
87
86
c
0
> 85
a)
LU
84
83
82
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*---UT1 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

107.5
107
106.5
C:
° 106
W 105.5
105
104.5
0
Upstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 5 - Riffle
5 10 15 20 25
Distance (ft)
--e---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Downstream
30 35

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 6 - Pool
107
106.5 -
t
106
c
° 105.5
>
W 105
104.5
104
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 7 - Riffle
106
105.5
105
104.5
c
° 104
103.5
W
103
102.5
102
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--O---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 8 - Pool
105
104.5
104
c
° 103.5
Lu 103
102.5
102
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--O---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

99
98.5
98
0
0
.7�
97.5
W
97
96.5
Upstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 9 - Riffle
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
—�UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 10 - Run/Pool
99
98.5
98
c
° 97.5
W 97
96.5
96
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--O---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 11 - Riffle
95
94.5
94
c
°
93.5
Lu
93
92.5
L
92
i
i
i
I
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 12 - Pool
96
95.5
95
94.5
94
c
° 93.5
93
W
92.5
92
91.5
91
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--O---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 13 - Pool
93
92.5
92
91.5
c
° 91
90.5
W
90
89.5
89
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--O---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 14 - Riffle
93
92.5
92
91.5
c
° 91
90.5
W
90
89.5
89
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*---UT3 Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 15 - Riffle
92
91.5
91
90.5
90
c
°
89.5
>
a)
89
Lu
88.5
88
87.5
87
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--O---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 16 - Pool
92
91.5
91
90.5
90
C:
° 89.5
89
Lu
88.5
88
87.5
87
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 17 - Pool
90
89.5 - - -
89
88.5
C: 88
0
0
87.5
Lu 87
86.5
86 -
85.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--o—UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT3 Cross Section 18 - Riffle
89
88.5
88
87.5
c
0
> 87
0
W
86.5
86
-
85.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*---UT3 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT2 Cross Section 19 - Run
110
109.5
109
c
0
a) 108.5 -
LU
108
107.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*--UT2 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT2 Cross Section 20 - Run
106.5
106
105.5
c
0
0 105
W
104.5
104
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*---UT2 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

103
102.5
102
c
0
101.5
w
101
100.5
0
Upstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT2 Cross Section 21 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--o—UT2 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
i'
Cedar Creek Reach UT2 Cross Section 21 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--o—UT2 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT2 Cross Section 22 - Riffle
103
102.5
102
c
° 101.5
a�
Lu 101
100.5
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--O---UT2 Approx. Bankfull FloodproneArea

98
97.5
97
96.5
c
° 96
W 95.5
95
94.5
94
0
Upstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT2 Cross Section 23 - Riffle
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
--o--UT2 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
50

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT2 Cross Section 24 - Pool
97
96.5
96
°
95.5
>
W
95
94.5
94
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
--*--UT2 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT2 Cross Section 25 - Pool/Run
93
92.5
92
C
° 91.5
W 91
90.5
90
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
f-UT2 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

a
—

106.5
106
105.5
c
0
0 105
W
104.5
104
0
Upstream
Cedar Creek Reach UT2-C Cross Section 27 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
—�UT2-C Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
45 50

Appendix B.
Cedar Creek Stream/Wetland Photos
UT1 Cross Section 3 Looking Upstream (6/8/2015)
UT2 STA 7+50 Looking Upstream (5/20/2015)
UT3 STA 2+50 Looking Upstream (5/20/2015)
Appendix B. Stream Photos
UTI STA 25+50 Looking Upstream (7/30/2015)
UT2 STA 8+50 Looking Downstream (5/20/2015)
UT3 STA 14+00 Looking Downstream (5/20/2015)

Appendix B.
Cedar Creek Stream/Wetland Photos
r ; :f
j
Wetland Restoration Area 1 and UT3 (5/13/2015)
Crest Gauge 1 — UT3 (7/30/2015)
Crest Gauge 3 — UT2 (7/30/2015)
Appendix B. Stream Photos
Wetland Hydrology Gauge AW6 (6/8/2015)
Crest Gauge 2 — UT2C (7/30/2015)
Rain Gauge and Ambient — (7/30/2015)

Appendix B.
Cedar Creek Stream/Wetland Photos
-`, N L
Bank Pin Array at Cross Section 6 (6/8/2015)
Bank Pin Array at Cross Section 12 (6/8/2015)
Bank Pin Array at Cross Section 16 (6/8/2015)
Appendix B. Stream Photos
Bank Pin Array at Cross Section 10 (6/8/2015)
Bank Pin Array at Cross Section 13 (6/8/2015)
Bank Pin Array at Cross Section 17 (6/8/2015)

Appendix B.
Cedar Creek Stream/Wetland Photos
Bank Pin Array at Cross Section 24 (6/8/2015)
Appendix B. Stream Photos
Bank Pin Array at Cross Section 25 (6/8/2015)

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Data and Tables
Table 7a. Baseline Planted Species Summary
Table 7b. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Criteria Summary
Table 7c. Vegetation Plot Data Summary (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot Photos

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7a. Baseline Planted Species Summary
Planted Date: May 26, 2015
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Total Stems Planted
Asiminaa triloba
Pawpaw
Bare Root
800
Betula nigra
River Birch
Bare Root
3,500
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Common Buttonbush
Bare Root
600
Chamaecyparis thyoides
Atlantic White Cedar
Bare Root
1,650
Malus angustifolia
Crab Apple
Bare Root
400
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Bare Root
1,500
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Bare Root
4,800
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
Bare Root
4,900
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Bare Root
2,200
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Bare Root
2,100
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Bare Root
900
Sambucus sp.
Elderberry
Bare Root
250
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Bare Root
2,400
931
0
Total
26,000
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Live Stake
2,000
Populus deltoides
Cottonwood
Live Stake
1,000
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Live Stake
500
0
1174
Total
3,500
Table 7b. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Criteria Summary
Plot #
Stream/ Wetland
Stems2
Volunteers
Total'
Success Criteria
Met?
1
1174
0
1174
Yes
2
1295
0
1295
Yes
3
1700
0
1700
Yes
4
1093
0
1133
Yes
5
1335
0
1335
Yes
6
1335
0
1335
Yes
7
1255
0
1255
Yes
8
971
0
971
Yes
9
890
0
890
Yes
10
971
0
971
Yes
11
931
0
971
Yes
12
931
0
931
Yes
13
890
0
890
Yes
14
1133
0
1174
Yes
15
1174
0
1174
Yes
16
931
0
931
Yes
17
890
0
890
Yes
18
1295
0
1295
Yes
19
890
0
890
Yes
20
890
0
890
Yes
Project Avg
1099
0
1105
Yes

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7c. Vegetation Plot Data Summary (Species
by Plot)
Current Plot Data (MYO2015)
Current Plot Data (MYO2015) Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95718-01-0001
95718-01-0002
95718-01-0003
95718-01-0004
95718-01-0005
95718-01-0006
1 95718-01-0007
95718-01-0008
95718-01-0009
95718-01-0010
MYO(2015)
Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T
Asiminatriloba
Pawpaw
Tree
Pawpaw
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1 1
1
2
2
2
1
1
13
13
13
30
30
30
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
13 13
13
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
28 28
28
28
28
Chamaecyparis thyoides
Atlantic White Cedar
Tree
13 13
13
6
6
6
3
3
3
12
12
12
34 34
34
Liriodendron tulipifera
34
34
34
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
2 2
2
7
7
7
3
3
3
19 19
19
Malus
1
Tree
19
19
19
Malus
Crab Apple
Tree
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
10 10
10
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
2
2
2
10
10
10
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
1 1
1
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
9
9
9
Oak sp.
Tree
14
1
1
1
40
40
40
Quercus
Oak sp.
Tree
9 9
9
1
1
1
7
7
7
11
11
11
15
15
15
23
23
23
14
14
14
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
181
181
181
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
6 6
6
4
2
2
2
6
6
6
2
2
2
5
5
35 35
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
35
35
35
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
1
1
1
Willow Oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
6 6
6
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
Sambucus
Elderberry
Shrub
3
3
3
2
2
2
21
21
21
Sambucus
Elderberry
Shrub
I I
I
1
1
1 1
1
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Tree
I
4
4
10 10
10
4
4
4
5
5
5
8
8
8
1
1
1
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Tree
31
31
31
23
23
23
142 142
142
Unknown
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
4
4
4
8
8
8
142
142
142
Unknown
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
3 3
3
1
1
1
24
24 23 23 23
22
22
22
29
29
29
29
29
29
23 23 23 22
22
22
32
32
32
22
3
3
3
22
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
29 29 29
32
32
32
42
42
42
28
28
28
33
33
33
33
33 33
31
31
31
24
24
24
22
22
22
24
24
24
546
546
546
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.49
4 1 4 4 2 2 2 6 6 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 5 5 5 7 7 7 3 3 3 5 5 5 13 13
1890.3
13
1174 1174 1174 1295 1295 1295 1700 1700 11700 1133 1133 1133 11335 11335 11335 1335 1335 1335 1255 1255 11255 1971.2 1971.2 1971.2 890.3 18903 971.2 971.2 9711105 1105
1 1105
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Current Plot Data (MYO2015)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95718-01-0011
95718-01-0012
95718-01-0013
95718-01-0014
95718-01-0015
95718-01-0016
1 95718-01-0017
95718-01-0018
95718-01-0019
95718-01-0020
MYO(2015)
Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all
T
Asiminatriloba
Pawpaw
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
30 30
30
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
5
28 28
28
Chamaecyparis thyoides
Atlantic White Cedar
Tree
13 13
13
3
3
3
34 34
34
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
2 2
2
7
7
7
3
3
3
19 19
19
Malus
Crab Apple
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
10 10
10
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
7
7
7
3
3
3
40 40
40
Quercus
Oak sp.
Tree
14
14
14
4
4
4
15
15
15
5
5
5
10 10
10
8
8
8
21
21
21
7
7
7
7
7
7
181 181
181
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 6
6
4
4
4
1
1
1
5
5
5
35 35
35
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
1
1
1
2 2
2
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
1
1
1
21 21
21
Sambucus
Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1 1
1
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Tree
4
4
4
10 10
10
4
4
4
5
5
5
8
8
8
4 4
4
7
7
7
9
9
9
4
4
4
142 142
142
Unknown
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 3
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
24
24
24 23 23 23
22
22
22
29
29
29
29
29
29
23 23 23 22
22
22
32
32
32
22
22
22
22
22
22
546 546
546
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.49
7 7 7 2 2 2 8 8 8 5 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 5 5 5 13 13
1930.8
13
971.2 971.2 971.2 930.8 930.8 930.8 890.3 890.3 890.3 1174 1174 1174 1174 1174 1174 930.8 930.8 890.3 890.3 890.3 1295 1295 1295 890.3 1890.3 1890.3 890.3 1890.3 18903 1105 1105
1105
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Appendix C.
Cedar Creek MYO Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 5 (6/8/2015)
Appendix C. Cedar Creek Site MYO Vegetation Photos
Vegetation Plot 2 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 4 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 6 (6/8/2015)

Cedar Creek MYO Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 7 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 9 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 11 (6/8/2015)
Appendix C. Cedar Creek Site MYO Vegetation Photos
Vegetation Plot 8 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 10 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 12 (6/8/2015)

Cedar Creek MYO Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 13 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 15 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 17 (6/8/2015)
Appendix C. Cedar Creek Site MYO Vegetation Photos
Vegetation Plot 14 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 16 (6/8/2015)
Vegetation Plot 18 (6/8/2015)

Cedar Creek WO Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 19 (6/8/2015)
Appendix C. Cedar Creek Site MYO Vegetation Photos
Vegetation Plot 20 (6/8/2015)

APPENDIX D
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Proj ect
As -Built Survey
As -Built Survey Plan Sheets
Design Red Line Plans

STfrox��EAM AN#
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
HUC** 3030006090060
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
PROJECT
CONTRACT
1229
7262 1222
Sampson County
Airport 7291
c�
Q
1228
SITE 1222
1274
o�
s
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
OF MITIGATION SERVICES
# 95718
# 005011
A S ro 0
—iDDUILT SUIPAVEY
PROJECT COORDINATES:
LATITUDE: 34.9668277780 N
LONGITUDE: 78.367605560 W
PROJECT DIRECTORY
DESIGNER:
W. K. DICKSON
720 CORPORATE CENTER DR.
RALEIGH, NC 27607
[phone]
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR:
WRIGHT CONTRACTING
PO BOX 545
SILER CITY, NC 27344
[phone]
FULL DELIVERY PROVIDER:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
[phone]
MONITORING PERFORMERS.
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
[phone]
SURVEYING:
MATRIX EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE A
KINSTON, NC 28501
[phone]
SHEET INDEX
COVER SHEET
LEGEND, NOTES, & CROSS SECTION CONTROL
STREAM BASELINE OVERVIEW
STREAM MONITORING OVERVIEW
STREAM BASELINE AS-BUILTS
WETLAND DETAIL
CROSS SECTION CHARTS
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5 THROUGH S10
S11
S12
SEAL �
9 �
SEAL
i149i8B
CA
ESEAL
L-4712 f9sa
R NO
Uj
M2 in
wm
z
Uj D.
W
W
y
CC
W
�
O
t�
ch
Ul U)
L
U)
UA
d -
d-
N
J
N-1-a
XL
HN U)
o Ln , �
(� 00 N N X
NXCD
Q I
U E
zz ova
LLJ o
0 p J a)
�W
�zN��
zYl��
N
w
_1
CO
o INn Q
0)1
. ••
N W
Ln
N
J
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, N.C. 27605
SCALE
DEPARTMENT
DRAWNBY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
1 OF 12
APPROVED
JRW
DRAWING NO.
sl
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

Cedar Creek Baseline Monitoring Cross Section Control
SEAL
CSA 0
516
-;
®� L,4712 m
Description
Northing
Easting
Elevation
Description
Northing
Easting
Elevation
XS1-LEFT PIN
442909.73
2190246.16
91.00
XS15-LEFT PIN
443774.12
2189077.12
88.92
XS1-RIGHT PIN
442940.33
2190285.57
91.80
XS15-RIGHT
PIN
443822.99
2189065.98
89.29
XS2-LEFT PIN
443219.45
2189973.62
90.92
XS16-LEFT PIN
443784.49
2189080.22
88.99
XS2-RIGHT PIN
443269.31
2189981.01
89.57
XS16-RIGHT
PIN
443795.46
2189031.36
89.10
XS3-LEFT PIN
443226.78
2189431.41
89.16
XS17-LEFT PIN
443676.19
2188992.79
87.18
XS3-RIGHT PIN
443275.85
2189421.61
88.43
XS17-RIGHT
PIN
443717.62
2188964.88
87.58
XS4-LEFT PIN
443585.84
2188910.65
87.67
XS18-LEFT PIN
443668.81
2188990.37
87.29
XS4-RIGHT PIN
443631.93
2188930.04
86.90
XS18-RIGHT
PIN
443695.99
2188948.57
86.94
XS5-LEFT PIN
444773.29
2189675.02
106.00
XS19-LEFT PIN
443417.25
2190821.06
108.44
XS5-RIGHT PIN
444804.99
2189665.46
106.52
XS19-RIGHT
PIN
443466.82
2190825.15
108.97
XS6-LEFT PIN
444764.44
2189661.76
105.58
XS20-LEFT PIN
443422.52
2190741.23
105.87
XS6-RIGHT PIN
444767.87
2189611.85
105.09
XS20-RIGHT
PIN
443471.94
2190734.31
105.95
XS7-LEFT PIN
444610.33
2189566.84
104.07
XS21-LEFT PIN
443336.80
2190628.28
101.85
XS7-RIGHT PIN
444618.61
2189517.37
103.80
N
XS21-RIGHT
PIN
443378.65
2190601.27
101.85
X58 -LEFT PIN
444598.28
2189563.58
104.23
XS22-LEFT PIN
443337.84
2190614.80
101.79
XS8-RIGHT PIN
444608.19
2189514.63
103.80
XS22-RIGHT
PIN
443359.99
2190570.06
101.15
XS9-LEFT PIN
444347.64
2189462.74
97.90
�>
CO
XS23-LEFT PIN
443264.39
2190400.45
94.46
XS9-RIGHT PIN
444378.78
2189423.44
98.03
XS23-RIGHT
PIN
443308.72
2190423.22
96.44
XS10-LEFT PIN
444336.48
2189451.40
97.00
XS24-LEFT PIN
443254.69
2190406.53
94.35
XS10-RIGHT
PIN
444367.99
2189418.79
97.93
XS24-RIGHT
PIN
443314.00
2190398.54
96.02
XS11-LEFT PIN
444076.87
2189246.76
93.01
RALEIGH,
XS25-LEFT PIN
443179.48
2190325.55
91.68
XS11-RIGHT
PIN
444116.06
2189215.39
93.54
DRAWN BY
JRW
XS25-RIGHT
PIN
443206.89
2190283.81
91.01
XS12-LEFT PIN
444067.66
2189228.24
93.12
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
XS26-LEFT PIN
443167.33
2190305.38
91.16
XS13-LEFT PIN
443962.58
2189171.86
91.13
XS26-RIGHT
PIN
443214.82
2190290.16
91.17
XS13-RIGHT
PIN
443991.46
2189130.82
91.33
XS27-LEFT PIN
443464.26
2190664.31
105.64
XS14-LEFT PIN
443932.56
2189147.47
90.54
XS27-RIGHT
PIN
443449.88
2190616.48
104.46
XS14-RIGHT
PIN
443971.75
2189116.11
91.34
LEGEND
CIL =CENTERLINE
R/W =RIGHT OF WAY
N/F =NOW OR FORMERLY
HDPE =HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE
XS =CROSS SECTION
VP =VEGETATION PLOT
0 =WELL
RG/A =RAIN GAUGE/AMBIENT GAUGE
0 =GAUGE
CG =CREST GAUGE
ACG =AUTO -CREST GAUGE
AW =AUTO -WELL
=LOG STRUCTURE
® =ROCK STRUCTURE
=ROCK AREA
LCE =CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
- - - - =BOUNDARY LINE
=WETLAND BOUNDARY LINE
= WOODLINE
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD 83(2011) AND THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 88.
J. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES.
4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO SHOW POST CONSTRUCTION AS -BUILT CONDITIONS OF
THE STREAM RESTORATION AND MAY NOT SHOW ALL UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND
BOUNDARIES.
5. NO PROPERTY LINES WERE SURVEYED DURING THIS SURVEY. ALL CONSERVATION
EASEMENTS, PROPERTY LINES, AND ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS ARE SHOWN BY PREVIOUS
SURVEYS BY MATRIX EAST, PLLC AS RECORDED IN THE SAMPSON COUNTY REGISTER OF
DEEDS OFFICE.
SEAL
SEAL
CSA 0
516
-;
®� L,4712 m
`°li%SiIIt�\l,
1Z kAO71a�g_
O
UJ
x
O
v
z
O
LIJ
LU
L
zW
W
O
cccc04
I=
z
W
I
O
Lai
z
w
L
z
W
W
W
d -
h
N
J
0
J
O
(CONN
NX
O
Q
C/) U
I
E
zz
wz
0
_
°
Q
��oU)
Cf)z
Z N
�>
CO
� W
Y
N
CO
LL_ _I
W
t0
O
rn I
Q
�
i-A�
N
N
W
J
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
N.C. 27605
SCALE
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
2 OF
12
APPROVED
JRW
DRAWING NO.
��
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

i
i
\ SAMPSON COUNTY /
CITY OF CLINTON i
DB 1616, PG 268
FRANCES J.
HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 704, PG 150 i
DB 733, PG 298 \
DB 752, PG 729 \\<ce
R4LPH H. HAMILTON
DB 1148, PG 985
MB 1, PG 306 ,
301
33l--
UT1 3"
UT1
END ENHANCEMENT II
(STA 53+51)
RALPH H. HAMILTON
DB 1148, PG 985
MB 1, PG 306
FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 704, PG 150
DB 733, PG 298
DB 752, PG 729
UT1
END ENHANCEMENT I,
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT lI
(STA 44+60)
AGE
FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 704, PG 150
DB 733, PG 298
DB 752, PG 729
I
WETLAND W 1
UT3
JAMES L. HAMILTON ET ALS. l
DB 955, PG 767
i
POND
i
i
i
i
UT3
/ RALPH HARVEY \ \
/dill HAMILTON \
/ DB 1220, PG 990
MB 29, PG 4
1
WETLAND W 1
RALPH HARVEY
HAMILTON
DB 814, PG 82
' UT3
30l 331
RALPH H. HAMILTON
DB 1148, PG 985
MB 1, PG 306
UT3
END P l RESTORATION
(STA 20+10)
N0 FR4NCES J.
m HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 915, PG 163
UT3
BEGIN P 1 RESTORATION(STA
i \ 0+69)
i
THE ELEANOR H.
LAMB REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST
DB 1442, PG 914
UT2C
BEGIN HEADWATER
VALLEY RESTORATION
(STA 0+02)
UT2C - \
END HEADWATER VALLEY
RESTORATION (STA 1+95) `
UT1
1� END ENHANCEMENT //, BEGIN
UT1
ENHANCEMENT I (STA 31+65)
� ccf
J,
UT1 �
Cf
END ENHANCEMENT 1/, -6, \
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT 1 \
(STA 41+95)
SHEET 11
WETLAND
MITIGATION TYPE
MITIGATION AREA
WMUs
W1
RESTORATION
13.72 ACt
13.72
REACH
MITIGATION TYPE
AS -BUILT LENGTH
IN EASEMENT
SMUs
UT1
ENHANCEMENT I
680'
454
UT1
ENHANCEMENT II
4,506'
1803
UT2
HV RESTORATION
337
337
UT2
P 1 RESTORATION
518
518
UT2C
HV RESTORATION
193'
193
UT3
P1 RESTORATION
1,941'
1941
UT4
ENHANCEMENT II
78'
31
TOTAL
8,253'
5277
RALPH H. HAMILTON
DB 1148, PG 985
MB 1, PG 306
i
UTI
END ENHANCEMENT I, BEGIN '
ENHANCEMENT 11 (STA 35+80)
I
r
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
UT2
\<cf
UT2
END P 1 RESTORATION
(STA 9+28)
F
R
SHEET 5
UTI
UT2C
FRANCES J.
HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 915, PG 163
UT4
END ENHANCEMENT 1/ (STA 1+14)
RALPH HARVEY
HAMILTON
DB 814, PG 82
r- UT2
UT2
BEGIN HEADWATER VALLEY
RESTORATION(STA 0+ 11)
DONALD RAY \
I JORDAN
IDB 1737, PG 137 \
-UT2
END HEADWATER VALLEY / \
RESTORATION, BEGIN Pl
RESTORATION(STA 3+48)
I j
I
i�
I \
i \
I \
I `
i \
i
i
UT4
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT 11 (STA 0+36)
\ UT4
MARY LILY JOHNSON
NUCKOLLS, ET ALS. F
DB 1807, PG\
MB 14, PG 100 �
J \
U \
C> \
191
WILLIAM M. BENNET\
DB 874, PG 756
16\
UTI
�c
F
MARY LILY JOHNSON
ALS.
DB 18
DB 18077,, PGG 489 /
MB 14, PG 10 O N
UTI �9L. ��%
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT J
11 ��> A` ��
(STA 1+01)
WATER TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT
DB 1545, PG 316
0 200' 400'
mmmml
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEAL r
SEAL
S -a' s -
• � L-4712
•®7, ®0
s, GY . \
W
W
L
W
�p0
W
Z
3
J
W
W
�
W
CCQ
H
d-
vN
< Ln
I
�
~O
U7 00 N
N
N x
� Q
O
ii
U)
Z z
W Z
O
QZ
�--O O
CN
J >
i�W
zY'Fcn
W
W
O
Q
�A
C
N
• i
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
N.C. 27605
SCALE
1 " =
200'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
3 OF
12
APPROVED
JRW
DRAWING NO.
��
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

JAMES L. HAMILTON ET ALS.
FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRS DB 955, PG 767
DB 704, PG 150 0� POND
DB 733, PG 298
DB 752, PG 729
/ VP -20 /
WETLAND W l XS -5
XS -6 UT3 \
AW -2
G
FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 704 XS -7 VP -19 PG 150 / /
/ \
DB 733, PG 298 � l
DB 752, PG 729 v X3-8
p-18 / THE ELEANOR H. LAMB
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
DB 1442, PG 914
\
LAW -3 \ /
/ UT3 '
v� �\ /v� VP -17
FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRS CF \/ XS9
DB 704, PG 150
DB 733, PG 298 / \ XS -10 / \ \
/ RALPH HARVEY
� " DB 752, PG 729 �, \ \
/ HAMILTON �
/ v / DB 1220, PG 990 \ Q
MB 29, PG 4 \ 2
/\ -- --
VP- 15 / VP-16
A \ WETLAND W 9
SAMPSON COUNTY WETLAND W l ( AW- 1 J
\ \ CITY OF CLINTON
\DB 1616, PG 268 v I CG -1 \ RALPH HARVEY
XS -11 HAMILTON
ACG -1 XS -12 \ DB 814, PG 82
FRANCES ✓. \ / FRANCES J. HAMILTON HE/RS
HAMILTON HEIRS \ DB 704, PG 150 VP -9 \
DB 704, PG 150 / / DB 733, PG 298
DB 733, PG 298 \ DB 752, PG 729 FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRSAW-5
DB 752, PG 729 \ ` / DB 704, PG 150 / AW -6
�/ CF DB 733, PG 298 / XS -13
\ccF DB 752, PG 729 XS -14 JUS �R
RALPH H. HAMILTON VP -8 m \
DB 1148, PG 985 VP -14
MB 1, PG 306 5� `cE�
AW -9 _ / / FRANCES J.
�LCE E
AW -10 XS -16 . HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 915, PG 163
UT REFAW-1
/ / \
ao, /
� � -12
.� -AL VP XS -15
VP -
13 XS -17 VP -10 \
\
RALPH H. HAMILTON XS -18
DB 1148, PG 985 �' - UT3 \
MB 1, PG 306 _ �_ AW-8
\<ce REFAW-3
3c> 30, 30, 3c, ` _ R %� w RALPH HARVEY
OO ccF HAMILTON
VP -6
REFAW-2-\ac��, XS -4 \ � VP -11 \ FRANCES J. UT2c ccF
\ DB 814, PG 82
3�, \
HAMILTON HEIRS FRANCES J. \cce\
RALPH H. HAMILTON\\30(ND) I� DB 915, PG 163 WETLAND W l HAMILTON HEIRS W ACG -2
DB 1148, PG 985 AW -7 �l DB 915, PG 163 j ce
MB 1, PG 306 \ / ccF
CG -2 XS -27
" \ \\cce FRANCES J. RG/A VP -2
(f ] ' ccF HAMILTON HEIRS -3 3 \
\ DB 915, PG 163 CG
\cc �� XS -21 XS -20 XS -19
F\ccF �cE ACG -3
e
\ VP -5 c ccF �0� S-24 XS -23 XS -22 FRANCES J. UT2
�J \ XS -3 XS -2 6E/ of / DB HAMILTON E
15, PG 16J
XS -26
UTI XS -25
3�
_33' � 3 VP -4 U T2
RALPH H. HAMILTON
DB 1148, PG 985 i \
MB 1, PG 306 ! FRANCES J.
' HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 915, PG 163
�n
! F
MARY LILY JOHNSON XS -1 \
' NUCKOLLS, ET ALS
DB 1807, PG 489
MB 14, PG 10 ccF
`cF UT1
! J�
F
!
� FRANCES J. �
HAMILTON HEIRS /
! DB 915, PG 163 /
i O nF
!
' poi /
\ VP -1 '
uT4
0 150' 300'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEAL (� f D
SEAL
C
Lu
W
�
ui
cc
ul
ul
LO
Z>
z
0
O
Z
O
a
W
W
y
W
V
'
N
J
J
�0
(J°) DO N
NXo'i
co
N �
cn �'
U LL
0
E
z z
wz
@
°
Q
F- O
• Z N
J >
� �
.-
uj(o
z
W
W
CN
O
0
�
N
Ln
W
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL.
SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
N.C. 27605
SCALE
1 " =
150'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
4 OF
12
APPROVED
JRW
DRAWING NO.
��
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

SEAL a 1�
SEAL
t�{r
A P, ,
mw , Essa
R L- 4 712
-7
R.*
24 HDPE
W
m
J
NE INV.=99.04' I�LCE�LCE----.110E- LCE
\
CE--
LIJ
40
W `o
Z W
J
J
W u'
SW INV.=98.92'
11
`°E-____-
low
Z
W
cc J
I=
W U)
\\
\I
=g
/
v6'/\ \
/
/ y \ \
\
\
— 114''_'
T--
J
CNo
0 co
V) 00 N N
N C:)
QQ
X
Q �
V) U E
z z©
wz 0
\
� 0 0 J >
Z N
Lu
/ / /
\ \
(D
O LN Q
LO
Lil
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, N.C. 27605
SCALE
1"=30'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
FRANCES
/F
✓. HAMILTON HEIRS110
DB 915, PG 163
/ i / / vel,
/ l l <�
JRW
DRAWING NAME
ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080
4
/ / \to
+OXOO
/ / 10wc�
102
>
/ / / / /I WOODS �\
60 1
/
/
/ STA: 0+ 11 1�ti / wooDs
/
/
F
/
500
/ / —
(
\ \ O
\
/
I
\ \ Z
\ I
/ / orf
v
XS -21 STA: 4+66
/ 1 /
STA:5+28
\ \ /
�\ i v
/
XS -22
II'>
\� ✓�
UT2 l
I Imo•/
/
�� Z— 1 /
/
--�
1'-°0 L/
II j
STA:3+48
/ Dxx� / � o� I \
24 HDPE
�,
I
\ / END HEADWATER VALLEY RESTORATION
BEGIN P1 RESTORATIONf
\ / � \
\ /
I \
_
NE INV. -99.47 \
SW INV.=99.01' \
\
��
XS -2J
o G'�
\\ ACG -3
XS -24 \
CO
\2-00 _
< \ 9d
\\
/00
xs-19
\ UT2C
\
\
VP -3 _
\� `STA: 1 +95 ' _ �O3
�3s 30, �,�—i�---�,�--ao,—�—�,
a
°,\ END HEADWATER ' \
\
\ \
\ \
\ \ \
UT2C
905
\ VALLEY RESTORATION — ,
4
RG/A \\
\
/'
/
\
XS -20 \
XS -27
\ ,
70
\ \ 1
\
\
\ \ \
\ \ \ \
RALPH HARVEY HAMILTON \
DB 814, PG 82 \
\
\ \ \
7Os
\
\ \ \ \ \
\
\ \ \ \ \ \
\
ACG -2 706
\
\ \ \
\
CG -2
\
440
X106
0
30'
60'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0
3'
6'
VERTICAL SCALE
0+00
0+50 1+00 1+50
2+00 2+50
3+00 3+50
4+00 4+50 5+00
5+50
6+00 6+50 7+00
7+33
115
115
RIGHT
TOP
OF SA
VK
LEPT
TOP
OF
BANK
w
Z
z
w
w
110110
AS
BUILT
THALWEG
0
ve-
RIGH
TOP
OF BA
NK
w
z
LE
TOP
OF BANK
RIGHT
TOP
F BA
K
105
105
LE
TO
OF LANK
a
24"
DPE
A
—BUl
T THA
WEG
24"
DPE
100
100
S—B
LT T
LWEG
IN11.
Q9.47'
RIGHT
TOP
OF
BANK
IN
9
.04'INV.
99.01'
LEFT
TOP 0
BA N
V
INV.
98.
2'
95
95
A
—BU!
T TH
LWEG
90
90
0+00
0+50 1+00 1+50
2+00 2+50
3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00
5+50
6+00 6+50 7+00
7+33
SEAL a 1�
SEAL
t�{r
A P, ,
mw , Essa
R L- 4 712
-7
R.*
W
m
J
m O
LIJ
40
W `o
Z W
J
J
W u'
04 CC
ccmL
low
Z
W
cc J
I=
W U)
L
N
L
d-
N
T--
J
CNo
0 co
V) 00 N N
N C:)
X
Q �
V) U E
z z©
wz 0
= fA
14
� 0 0 J >
Z N
Lu
of InN
z Y LL_
J
W
(D
O LN Q
LO
Lil
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, N.C. 27605
SCALE
1"=30'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
5 OF 12
APPROVED
DRAWING NO.
JRW
�20130080
s
DRAWING NAME
ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

7+33 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+28
95
.e
85
:/
7+33 7+50
OF
THAL
8+00
WA
8+50
TOP I OF
TOP I OF
95
m
85
9+00 9+28
MARY LILY JOHNSON NUCKOLLS, ET ALS.
DB 1807, PG 489
MB 14, PG 10
91 - <
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
SEAL ��
SEAL
®moi ®tla�
a
u� S E A+E
L -47
A
LIJ
N
1- +
■
+
cch
W
Z W
J
J
W
00
Q
�
m L
cd
Wox Z
CC
LU CC IA
L
� N
L
F
Lm
N
H N
O Ln � D
N N
00 N
N X O L
WIA
4-1
c/) U E
zz�
a
wz °
:DU' � 0 >
�LL-
Lu
Z N :3
ryU)
zYi
N J
W
CO
O LN Q
0) 1
-,
v�
N W
L0
J
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, N.C. 27605
SCALE
1 " = 30$
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
6 OF 12
APPROVED
DRAWING NO.
JRW
��
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

/ WOODS
o UT2
\ \
XS -27 /
REFAW-3
UT2C
/0+00
ick WOODS
J
1I 1+00 1 '\ )1 ACG -2
CG -2
\UT2C
/
O I ` —
RG/A
VP -3
X09\ cp \ UT2C
\ \ \
STA: 1 +95
0+00
115 r-
110 110
105
0+50
v
0+50
\ \ LEND HEADWATER
\ \ \ VALLEY RESTORATION
OF
WEG
1+00
1+00
1+50
1+50
LEFT
705
1-704—
C)
-704—
i s \ UT2 \
STA:3+48
END HEADWATER VALLEY RESTORATION
I BEGIN P 1 RESTORATION \
ACG -3 \ \
/ CG -3 —
57 ,� 102�
x0
O
XS -21 wooDs-
/ \
// XS-22\�----
/ 24" HDPE
NE INV. =99.04'
l SW INV. =,98.92'
UT2 \�\ 1 \\STA:4+��� goo
/101
, _
100 �
1+95
r—I 115
110
105
100
'J 95
1+95
IV40
0 30' 60'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
SEAL �� 7
,tt11§�PtBlil���
SEAL
�,� 8 A
rFSj�
L-47
1(;�;Itett\
� e
H
W
+
J �
O
ca o
H
og 0W
z�
J um
cc
Qa
UA
L
W
N
OL
F
W
t�
N
'
4-j
Ho N
o
N
N
cn 00
NXO
N
-
E— Q
V) U
z z
-
n 0
@-
U)
wz
0
C
cn Lo
°
J >
:3
as 2
Z_ N
zYI
N
ry
_i
W
c0
O L
rn
Q
.
N
DC7
N
W
_1
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON
ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, N.C. 27605
SCALE
1" = 30'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
F9-30-15
SHEET No.
7 OF
12
APPROVED
DRAWING NO.
JRW
S7
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT N0.
2013080

0+60 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50
115
110
105
100
95
0 30' 60'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
7+00 7+26
LE TOP OF BANK
RIGHT T0 OF BANK
EFTOP 0 BAN
RIGHT TOP F HAW
RIGHT TOP F BA W
LEFT TOP OF BANK
AS -BUILT HALW G
LFT TP OF BANK
RIGHT TC P OF BANK
AS -BUILT HALW G
AS -BUILT T ALWE
AS BUILT THAL EG
0+60 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50
115
110
105
100
95
7+00 7+26
SEAL �qq
SEAL
yyq g gg g 4
,
�@7
R ®
i �� Q e
y
_46
��o�
W
Ofmk
40
N
F +
J '`
•
ILLI
CC
LIJ
L
+
Q O
Z W
J
J Iiiiiiiiivii
W �1.
Q CC
m L
c
Z
W
ch
� J
LU
CC
U)F
L
d'
d'
N
;
'c
X
cn00 NN
N
O
Q
�4-,
U)
z z
w z
D 0o
C_
C3 °
� Q
zz C"
�W
z�'��
N
.J
W
CO
® INC)
Q
N
N
Li
_i
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
N.C. 27605
SCALE
1"=30'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BYP9-30-15
JRW
ATE STARTED
SHEET No.
8 OF
12
APPROVED
DRAWING NO.
JRW
��
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT N0.
2013080

1� //— ---LCE / / / AW -4
109 / LiRE / \
OLCE CE LCE °
LCE -- LCE -- ---LCE T— / / 2
L6� / / / / / / / �
,1oa / /
WETLAND Wl LIMITS /
/ WOODS / / / / '� / / l / WOODS
/
di, 2dL
WOODS
WOODS
XS -9
\ I �JL / shit a,lic �hlt Milt �dL 0�� O
VP -17
XS -10 \ / — — — O(} \ / / XS -13 /
_ 0
AW -3 O—J/ — \ /���k ` \// XS -11 --,�� AW -5
N 0 \ o /
CO vp—g
L / \00 AIL \ XS -12 Q
\�—/ \ l \� —� 96—__ UT3 \\—=� \ �� /j �\ ` ��— V)
UT3 95 �-LI
z ilc �\ �dL /' f gilt \ 1 ,,h, /
J
�f4+0,o; s 91
� . — \ � � � � � � � I � / VP-16 9 4 / � � M CV ACG- i / / �� - - 91 — \ Z
XS- 14
� oCG-1
I\ \
_
40p'-97 \ — --- \ UT3 \
�JL\ \ 9 \
WOODS / 1 / \__� ���5.,,� �> v� 9
► „
l ( / WOODS -95
\ \ ►
\ \ \ WETLAND W1 LIMITS /
/ IAL
WETLAND W 1 LIM/TS \ \ \ — 98 \ \ ' / - / WOODS
93
-- — — — 93—
99
7+26 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00
105
95
85
10+50
11+00
11+50
12+00
12+50
13+00
i 4 -I -nn
0 30' 60'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
1,d -L r,n
RIGHT TOP OF iANK
LE TOP OF B NK
RIGHT TOP OF BANK
LEFT TOP CF BANK
GHT 7 OP 0 BAN
A BUIZ T THAL WEG
7 _7`7
E>-1 TOP OF BAN
AS--BUIL7 THAL VEG
�IGHT TOP C F BA K
LEFT TOP OF BANK
A -BUIL THA WEG
AS BUILT THAL EG
7+20 +w 8+00 5+50 9+00 9+50 10+00
10+50
11+00
11+50
12+00
12+50
13+00
13+50
14+00
14+50
105
95
85
15+00
SEAL , SEAL
CA
0
fill �
Lu
00m% oft
�64J �
. W
y N
UJ L Z
Q +
r%W
Z W
1 �
W 116
O
Q
m L
Z
W Q
J W
L
(AF
4-1
W
d-
N
I
J W
~ AN +,
O Lc)vj
(�00NN X
NX�'�
I- Q ( 0
E% (/) U XL
LL E
zzU)©
W Z
O O J
aI- O
a Z N
ry
WLu
W ®
LO Q
W
•N �
k'� N
J
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, N.C. 27605
SCALE 1"=30' DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BYDATE STARTED SHEET No.
JRW 9-30-15 9 OF 12
APPROVED DRAWING NO.
JRW
DRAWING NAME ��
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

15+00
100 r-
95
85
80 '-
15+00
15+50
15+50
T
OF
16+00
16+00
AL oh,
UTI
\ \ o
--- -A
--
-4
ur3 \ \ /9
0
\ o C�51
\ � xs-18 \ \ \ I
\ �> /
XS- 17
XS -16 \ �
16+50
16+50
17+00
17+00
17+50
17+50
T
OF
OF
18+00
18+00
18+50
18+50
19+00
19+00
\II
_ o�,�
20 O WETLAND WI LIMITS
I \ \\ { \ \ \ II RALPH H. HAMILTON
DB 1148, PG 985
MB 1, PG 306
l 20+ 10alL
cp
\\ \ UTIcp
—as
\ o \\\ \
o\\\
19+50
19+50
TOP
T
20+0020+10
--7- 1 1 100
95
••
m
0 30' 60'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
SEAL (
SEAL
VP -12 \
1
SEAL
�L I114
_ a i x4712
AW -9
R.
( e
I
UT3
/
�JL �II� /
A �c
'lilt
.
r
o
\
Mj N
LLI
L
40
cc
W 9
Z W
plc alt LIQ -\IL
Ah,I �llc
�Ik
1c\\
alt
U)
O
Q
L
zmCC
Q
I
\
W Z
cc a
H J
CC
U)
0 L
�\
L
/
�dL
/
W
.IIIA .Ih, .III. All,
,Ih. / .III.
All,
.III.
\IIIA
16+50
16+50
17+00
17+00
17+50
17+50
T
OF
OF
18+00
18+00
18+50
18+50
19+00
19+00
\II
_ o�,�
20 O WETLAND WI LIMITS
I \ \\ { \ \ \ II RALPH H. HAMILTON
DB 1148, PG 985
MB 1, PG 306
l 20+ 10alL
cp
\\ \ UTIcp
—as
\ o \\\ \
o\\\
19+50
19+50
TOP
T
20+0020+10
--7- 1 1 100
95
••
m
0 30' 60'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
SEAL (
SEAL
���ia� i Wily!
�� -0i
SEAL
_ a i x4712
R.
( e
r
o
Mj N
LLI
L
40
cc
W 9
Z W
W �
U)
O
Q
L
zmCC
Q
W Z
cc a
H J
CC
U)
0 L
L
F
W
d-
N
W
N
N
cn 00 N
NL X
L-
Q I
V) U
0
E
z z
-
U)
Q
wz _
U
O O J
N
°
T
>
z r
ry
W
O LN
07
Q
. •+
N
Ln
W
`
J
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
N.C. 27605
SCALE
1" =
30'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
10 OF 12
APPROVED
DRAWING NO.
JRW
slo
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT N0.
2013080

`'CE
24" HDPE
N.E. INV! =117.57'
S.W. INV! =108.72'
1 14 \\ \ \ POND
UT3
v�110
108
/ VP -20 \ 1 \ \ \\\
^)\�
AW -1
XS -5
01
AW -2
y
AW -2
�C)o�/��� � { I Ill l � f
FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRS v� ��g� / ` VP -19
DB 704, PG 150 O� o� -
DB 733, PG 298 -
DB 752, PG 729 XS 7 /
WETLAND W 1
BOUNDARY �// / /'�`\ j j / / /l /l ��/ ^I��l//� ; 11 it WETLA ND W 1
BOUNDARY709— ` ((/ ////✓� lS� l THE ELEANOR H.
'oo III I I LAMB
I l \ \\ \ REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUST
DB 1442, PG
FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRS / / / i\, \ W-3 I I \
914
DB 704, PG 150 — // 9g o \
DB 733, PG 298
DB 752, PG 729 — — /// / 98 \ XS -9 f. VP 17xs— 10
>
�7
�100�c�
RALPH HARVEY \
97 _ / o ' I HAMILTON
VP-16 / / l { m \ o \ DB 1220, PG 990 \
96 � `� l� \ M8 29, PG 4
'/ \ \ \ /
— — 98 / / v / / 9 \ �/�V//
— 97�/ �/ VP -15 9599
v 96 i-�
l
-�-9s // I�/ / AW -11 �i� JI / /� \ AW�
---94 Z/^ �\ /\9 / r 9 ✓ // UT3
93 �� �Ir / V 7 CGI , \ RALPH HARVEY
ACG - XS -11 ' �HAMILTON
6-— — 9� XS- 12 ` \ DB 814, PG 82
92 — 92— -3` / \ 95 \
G� XS -13 \ AW -5
WETLAND W1 / \ / 97-- — VP -9' 94 \ \
BOUNDARY \ xsj 4 ,l \ \
FRANCES J. HAMILTON HEIRS 9AL
DB 704, PG 150
DB 733, PG 298
DB 752, PG 729
'98
XS -15
AW -9 { XS -16 \\ 92
_-LCE / i - - 87 _ / m \
i \ VP -12 \ \
[TIP,
8 6 HAM
IL
\ \ " 8j XS -17 \ \ VP -10 \ \ / / ^ / \ 1 m ` \ \ \ FRANCES
HEIRS
L\ \� 8UT3 \ \ DB 915, PG 163
xs-18 \ \\ 90 \
UTI
\\ \ \ \
VP -11
3J� 3J'I � ..
WETLAND W1
REFAAW-2
XS -
\3J) 4 _ _ \ \�.
\3J, \ I \ \ BOUNDARY
\3J7 \ \ \ AW -7 VP -6 )
RALPH H. HAMILTON
DB 1148, PG 985
MB 1, PG 306
3J7
UT1 \
VI
-65
r
x �J
90
xs-3 1
\
F /
3p�
FRANCES J. A REA IN WETLA ND W I _ 13. 72 A C. �-
HAMILTON HEIRS
DB 915, PG 163
\CCF
\�Cf
\\ \ <CF
z
VP -5
UT 1
0 100' 200'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEAL
SEAL
P) pr
t •
UJ
ml Ift
JMl
Z
L
W49
cc
r
z
W
ch
UJ C C Gq
L
d -
N
N4-j
Q
LIJ0
J
V) 0 N N N
N •-
JGCD
L
U W W
U)
z z @
W z o
0 a
14
J
D
o Ln
�CO
Z Y '
N W -I
W
CD In Q
0') '
�
•�,
Y
N W
LO
W
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH, N.C. 27605
SCALE
1 " = 100'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
F9-30-15
SHEET No.
11 OF 12
APPROVED
JRW
DRAWING NO.
S11
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

SEAL �o(5
XS- 71
XS -2
XS -3
SEAL
w L-471
R.g��
® ytl:���9Q4��
_
i\0
93
93
92
■
ZN
92
91
Lu
x
91
02
O
cc
W
CC
z
D.
zUA
r
■
0
z
cl
y
Z
0
■
chW
O
cc
L
ccW
F
XS- 4
J
IN
4-j
JLi
L
DN N
N
92
xj-�
H Q
U W W
F-
zz
w zd
:)OCD
-
°
92
91
>
�a
W
zY
W
O L
Q
A
��.Tj�
91
90
N
Ln
N
W
w
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
90
89
SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
89
N.C. 27605
SCALE
=
1 1$20'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
12 OF 12
APPROVED
JRW
DRAWING NO.
S12
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080
91
91
90
90
89
89
88
88
XS- 7
90
90
89
89
88
88
87
87
106
106
XS -5
XS- 6
89
89
88
88
87
87
86
86
108
108
107
107
105
105
88
88
87
87
86
86
85
85
107
107
106
106
104
1-11
100
11
104
87
87
86
86
85
85
84
84
106
106
105
105
103
103
86
86
85
85
84
84
83
83
105
105
104
104
102
111
1101
102
85 -20
20 85
84 -20
20 84
831-20
20 83
821_--H-
2 _20
20 82
104 -20
20 104
103 -20
20 103
101 -20
20
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 JO
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
XS -8
1 XS -12
XS -14
106
106
100
100
95
95
93
93
XS -10
XS -1 1I
XS -13
105
-
105
99
99
99
99
95
95
94
94
93
93
92
92
104
104
98
98
98
1 1111
98
94
94
93
93
92
92
91
91
103
103
97
97
97
97
93
J
-IT
LL
93
92
92
91
91
90
90
102
102
96
111
1
96
96
E
11111
96
92
I
Ittli
92
91
91
90
90
89
89
101 -20
20 101
95 -20
20 95
I I
95 -20
I 1
11
20 95
91R--20
20 91
90 _20
20 90
89 -20
I
Ti
20 89
88 -20
20 88
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
XS -15
XS- 6
XS -21
91
91
91
91
104
104
XS -17
XS -18
XS -20
90
90
90
90
89
89
89
89
107.
107
103
103
XS -19
89
89
89
89
88
88
8801
88
110
110
106
106
102
102
88
1 1188
88
if
88
87
87
87
87
109
00
109
105
1105
101
101
87
87
87
187
86
E
86
86
86
108
108
104
104
100
100
86 _20
111
Tim
20 86
E
86 -20
11L
1
20 86
85 -20
20 85
85 -20
20 85
J07 -20
20 1107
103 -20
20 103
99 -20
20 99
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
XS -23
XS -24
98
98
98
98
-
XS -22
1 XS -26
XS -27
103
103
97
97
97
97
93
93
93
93
107
107
-
102
102
96
96
96
196
92
92
92
92
106
1 1
1106
101Lj
00
101
95
000 00
95
95
00
95
91
91
91
91
105
105
100
1
100
94
1
94
94
11
11
11
94
90
1 LLL.
90
90
- 111111
11111
111
90
104
104
99 -20
20 99
93
-20
20 93
93 -20
20 93
89 -20
20 89
89 -20
89
20
103
30 -20
20 30 03
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
-10 0 10
0
2' 4'
VERTICAL SCALE
0
20' 40'
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEAL �o(5
SEAL
SEAL
w L-471
R.g��
® ytl:���9Q4��
_
i\0
■
ZN
N
Lu
x
02
O
cc
W
CC
z
D.
zUA
r
■
0
z
cl
y
Z
0
■
chW
O
cc
L
ccW
F
N
J
IN
4-j
JLi
L
DN N
N
xj-�
H Q
U W W
F-
zz
w zd
:)OCD
-
°
J
CS)
Z
N'ryV)
>
�a
W
zY
W
O L
Q
A
��.Tj�
N
Ln
N
W
w
RESOURCE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS,
LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST., SUITE 110
RALEIGH,
N.C. 27605
SCALE
=
1 1$20'
DEPARTMENT
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE STARTED
9-30-15
SHEET No.
12 OF 12
APPROVED
JRW
DRAWING NO.
S12
DRAWING NAME
20130080 ASB
PROJECT NO.
2013080

v °
ORi��]SC1neii7C)P3'dla
Al I
T�Ik.,
�Sampson County Airport
Ck
o
® Cedar Creek Stream and��
Wetland Mitigation Site John mar
..' w
Vine r�
�a -� a
y,.
Burke o c7 0
016
VICINITY MAP
NTS
AS -BUILT SURVEY PREPARED BY:
MATRIX EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE A
KINSTON, NC 28501
[phone]
CEDAR CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT
SAMPSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN CU 03030006
JANUARY 2016
NC DMS PROJECT#: 95718
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST, SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
Resource
Environmental
Solutions
300 0 150 300 600
HORIZ. 1 inch = 300ft.
Sheet List Table
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
1
COVER
2
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
3
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
4
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
5
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
6
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
7
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
8
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
9
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
10
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
11
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
12
Reach UT -1 Plan & Profile
13
Reach UT -2 Plan & Profile
14
Reach UT -2 Plan & Profile
15
Reach UT -2 Plan & Profile
16
Reach UT -3 Plan & Profile
17
Reach UT -3 Plan & Profile
18
Reach UT -3 Plan & Profile
19
Reach UT -3 Plan & Profile
20
Reach UT -4 Plan & Profile
21
WETLAND
\NCA
��
ISEAL
' ,
w
�v, a
M }
PROFESSIONAL SEAL
0
0
LJ
jam©
LTJ
0
Z
0
0
ZU
(�j a
OZoipz
CL
0� ± 2 ", 3: w
Q ON h
o E i ci, ah
izz EM U
Z
0
U
U
8
E
V3
U) U) Y
J � Z
a w
Z
U 0 O
(0
n �
tV
z
z U_
a U'
o �
0 U U
n d d
0
113
O
ccZ
O
I=
Q
ItY
O
C O V)
cr Z
0
Z
0
I--
Ilr
c'S Q
W
IIr
H
U)
W
w 11!
z U
U
w
0 0
w w
0
I�
W
U
w
z
Q
w N
z w
z
z Q
O
d �
WKD PROJ. NO.: 2013000100RA

I Fxl%zll I I 'I", vv.r%. OL 11-o'. MLI RIGH i 3 RESERVED. REFRODUC, i ivni OR USE OF i HE CON I EN I S Or i rijo LjUUUIvIr_I-4 I ; AUU1 1 Iul'cnp UN Ut:Lt I IUNZj I U I Hlb UUUUMI=N I , IN MIULt UN IN I'Ah I , VVI I NUU I WHI I I tN UUNZjtN I OF W.K. DICKSON & uu., iNu., ib thumtm I Eu. uNLY uumimb I-HuM I NE, UHIUINAL OF I Hlb DUUUMENT, MAHKLL) W11 H AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL 13E CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME: I:\Prpjects\EBX\20130001 0019A - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetiand Mitigation Site\CADD\Record DravVings\20130001 00 RECORD DRAWINGS UT -1 dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
Dvw
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(� 919.782.9672
A
NC. LICENSE NO, F-0374
B
C
SEAL
0 435
31
old
_'*#%fbQq
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0 30 60
211 = FULL SCALE
1 = HALF SCALE
LEGEND
z
0
I -
a_ C/)
Ir (9
z
0
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
-50-
En- w 0
5� -1 0
w w W
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
�46 -
w
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS -
0
Cr
a. 2
j
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
Z _j
_j
AS -BUILT STONE
0— (6
U_
0
Ile
I-- z
1 2
0
cc
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
0
_j
A
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
W
15\
Uj
of Z (/)
�q
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
_j
0 �
to
Rol
z �
< w z
CL
_j 0 LL]
F-
111 0
F-
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
0� Z
0 0
G)
'Tip-
0�' REACH UT -1
ENHANCEMENTII
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
3:
3
(STA 1 +0 1 TO STA 31+ 65)
0
<
F:-:
LOG TOE PROTECTION
w w
LJJ
w
cr
z
L)
(PROPOSED)
3
0
< (1)
3+00
3+00
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
z W
CY
>
4+00 Nk
(9
z
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
N.VV WV-�92'12'
--------
LL LL W
z
a 0
C)
(PROPOSED)
ir
0-
0+00
0=0
0 < 5- 2
5
+
DOUBLE LOG DROP
PROJ. DATE:
NOV
2014
LO
(PROPOSED)
FM
ZZ,
PROPOSED FILL AREA
2016
DRAWIN NUMBER:
2
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA
J
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
'000i�'
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
Ile,
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
SCALE: 1 "=30'
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
2
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
0
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
105
105
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
102 - - -------------
......
-N ................. .............
.......... ...... ...... ......... ............. ............. .............
........... ............. .......
........ ......
102
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
EXISTING GRADE ALONG
(PROFILE)
A
TOP OF BANK (LEFI)
EXISTING GRADE ALONG
99 . . ...........
...............
1. TOP OF BANK (RIGHT)
............. ............. .......
............. ............. ............. ...... ............. .............
....... ...... ....... ............ .
99
RT—
- - ----­------
96
....... .......
........... ............
LT: LT
/
....... .............. ........... �7-7 7 0
........ T
RT
T_ ...........
96
LT
tr
EX113TING GRADE ALONG
STF�EAM CENTERLINE
93 . . ...........
.......
........... .............
...... ­: ........ ...... ...... ...... .........
............. ............. ............. :­ .......... ...........
93
9 F. ......
0
....... ...........
...........................
........... ...... ...... ............. ........ ......... ........ ........ ......
........
............. ............. ..................... ............. .......
go
87
............ ...........................
........... ............. .......... ............. ......
............. ....... ............. ........... ...........
87
84
............ .............
....... ......
......... ........
............. ............. ............. .............. ......
............. ............. ................. ......... :­ ......
84
SME: HOR V -:F30'; VERTT'=3'
81
81
04
C14
C1 O� q C�
qd:
C3
o, CD
v-:
C\i C\i 0) C\I 0)
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
0)
CD 0) 0) co 0) cri
0+00
1+00
2+00 3+00
4+00 5+00
A
C
...... - -----
I Fxl%zll I I 'I", vv.r%. OL 11-o'. MLI RIGH i 3 RESERVED. REFRODUC, i ivni OR USE OF i HE CON I EN I S Or i rijo LjUUUIvIr_I-4 I ; AUU1 1 Iul'cnp UN Ut:Lt I IUNZj I U I Hlb UUUUMI=N I , IN MIULt UN IN I'Ah I , VVI I NUU I WHI I I tN UUNZjtN I OF W.K. DICKSON & uu., iNu., ib thumtm I Eu. uNLY uumimb I-HuM I NE, UHIUINAL OF I Hlb DUUUMENT, MAHKLL) W11 H AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL 13E CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME: I:\Prpjects\EBX\20130001 0019A - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetiand Mitigation Site\CADD\Record DravVings\20130001 00 RECORD DRAWINGS UT -1 dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
Dvw
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(� 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO, F-0374
cilp'
SEAL
0 435
31
old
_'*#%fbQq
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0 30 60
211 = FULL SCALE
1 = HALF SCALE
6i
z
0
I -
a_ C/)
Ir (9
z
0
0
U_ Ir
z
0 fr
En- w 0
5� -1 0
w w W
w
0
Cr
a. 2
j
w
Z _j
_j
0— (6
U_
I-- z
1 2
0
cc
0
_j
CL
06
0
Uj
of Z (/)
z
_j
0 �
1�
z �
< w z
CL
_j 0 LL]
F-
111 0
F-
0� Z
0 0
06 L5 2�
3:
:2 w >
< ()� z
0
<
F:-:
w w
LJJ
w
cr
z
L)
C
0
< (1)
z W
CY
(9
z
CC (n
w
Q
0 111
IL)
I<:
cc
LL LL W
z
a 0
ir
0-
0=0
0 < 5- 2
PROJ. DATE:
NOV
2014
Q.C':
FM
O.C. DATE:
JAN
2016
DRAWIN NUMBER:
2
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA

COPYRIGHT ©, W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT; ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC., IS PROHIBITED. ONLY COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME: I:IPro`ects\E W2013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1CADD1Record Drawings12013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1,dw -_January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
WK
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urian Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
A
(f) 919.782.9672
- B
NC. UGENSE NO, F-0:374
C
Net
AL
031435 031435
� e
LEGEND
0 30 60
2° = FULL SC�A�L�E____
1" = HALF SCALE
LIJ
F—
O
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
U Z
I
I
a
LL CE
0Lija
.� DLL, O
ac
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
F_
U
w
O
C
a
Z
F_ z 0
9 it
AS --BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
ry Z © Z
Z
Z 11
�jp� h -
z
06a2 _
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
www W <
W w z
U)
a w F_ z
Lu F- 1w
w < z w www
Q �'CCzm
U a O
AS -BUILT STONE
PROJ. DATE: INOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
O.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
3
BO BO
PROJ. NO.:
B0 30 BO 30 BO
�0 30 g0EXISTING
-
BOTTOM OF BANK
O
REACH UT -1
0�
_Bvg
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
( � 1
ENHANCEMENTII
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
0
(STA 1+01 TO STA 31+65)
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
r'
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
'
o�
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
3
40
3
LOG TOE PROTECTION
(PROPOSED)
8+00
LOG STRUCTURE
e
+Od
+00 a
(PROPOSED)
�-
I ,.
/ ,.
s
< -,� �_ —..'�
LOG GRADE CONTROL
_;
-�
$'iL1�
g i��--;�- --� - -
=a.s,� _
..r--_-- — — �,� -' iiC1
C'�
.�.
STRUCTURE.
(PROPOSED)
r
DOUBLE LOG DROP
y
�
1�--
(PROPOSED)
-�
LPROPOSED
FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
C)
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
4
PRCHANNEL PLUG
W/OSED
OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
' s
y
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
�...�
011
901
010� Ol 07
Old
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
a A�
a7
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
a
t
(PROPOSED)
r
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
SCALE:1 "-30'
F
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
2
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
105
105
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
(�
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
U
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
102 :...........................:.............
'.............:...........................:...........................;...........
, . ; ............ ...........................
; ..........................._........................... ..............;............. , ...........
102
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
— - --- ---
(PROFILE)
— --
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
EXISTING GRADE ALONG
(PROFILE)
TOP OF BANK (RIGHT)
:
99..................-...............................................:
.................,...............,...............................,....,........................:.........,...;....................-.......
........ .....:........ ................. ..:...........
99
EXISTING GRADE ALONG
TOP OF BANK (LEFT)
— 98 ......�...� � -- ,��. �............
.........
........... :............ ........................., ............ .,o......,..........,.....
,........... ....,......,o.....,................... .......................... .......................
96
—
i—;
-- R—._.._._�_. ; �,4� PT—•—�
RT
93 ............. ..........................
...................,............,........:.........................
EXISTING GRADE ALONG..........:.
STREAM �ENTEFtLINE•:
.........,:........................ .:.,.,.........:...... .......:....,........ :............. :....... .,,.
:
93
90 \�..:...�"...,� .... .r
. ..:.............:.............:....
:`. -........ ............. .......... ......
_-...~......:............z :......-.—.—.—. —..... .....,,..... ". -...,-�. �.....
90
87 ........... .......................... ............
......................................
.............................................................................
............................................................... ........ .....:......... ..
87
1
1
84..................................:.............:.......................................
.............:..,.......................:..........................:........
...............,......,....,,......... ............. ......... ....:...........
84
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT:1"=3'
81
81
0
M N V:
0) co 0 ci' 0 G7r
[� 00 (tit r~ 0 Ln
DO N 0 co �'
� O to Q � ¢1_ N a0 0)
t� i7 C3G7
O?
O p C) C! O
0) 0) 0) 0 0) 0)
Q O 0) C 6 CS G7 0J
0 00 0) 0) W 0000
5+00
6+00
7+00
8+00 9+00 10+00
A
B
I
C
COPYRIGHT ©, W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT; ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC., IS PROHIBITED. ONLY COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME: I:IPro`ects\E W2013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1CADD1Record Drawings12013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1,dw -_January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
WK
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urian Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782,0495
(f) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. UGENSE NO, F-0:374
Net
AL
031435 031435
� e
FULL SCALE: V= 30
0 30 60
2° = FULL SC�A�L�E____
1" = HALF SCALE
LIJ
F—
O
z
O
CL 07
rr 0
U Z
I
I
a
LL CE
0Lija
.� DLL, O
ac
I ir Er Cr
F_
U
w
O
C
a
Z
F_ z 0
9 it
o
_j 06
ry Z © Z
Z
Z 11
�jp� h -
z
06a2 _
www W <
W w z
U)
a w F_ z
Lu F- 1w
w < z w www
Q �'CCzm
U a O
I QILM
PROJ. DATE: INOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
O.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
3
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA

COPYRIGHT O, W.K. DICKSON & CO„ INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUQ1 IUN OH USL UI" 1 HL UUN I LN 16 OF I HIS DUCUMEN 1; AUUI I IONS UK DELL I TUNS I U I HIS DUUUMkN I , IN VVHULL UH IN rAH I , vvl I muu I W HI 1 1 tN UUNZ:1tIN I Ur W.K. UIC;I«UN & kiu„ IIVL;., 1z) rrjUr1101 I LLS. U1NLY uumr-S rnum 1 mr ul'il"w4mL Or F nFo LJu'vuFvFE:N F , witAr mmu m i n nry vn!%;Iw ALL oi`aiwne tin" ruku nr%L��
FILE NAME: I:IPro'ectslEBX12013000100RA-Caviar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1CADD1Recard Drawin x12013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1.dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
DDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(� 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
¢
9.
LEGEND
031t4�35
v'
jVli`*oda
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
HALF SCALE
W
F- m
�
a
AS-BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
—50
z
Q
IL U)
0
x
UjI
Uj V_
O i
Y
w
F IZ
U
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
W
0
CL U
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
--
Z -�
F_ Z
X80`
"""�
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTUREF-
U_
0
B0� -�`"~�-BO
30
w(D0
W Z
ani
I•.��_ ��BO
Z
AS -BUILT STONE
zz<IQ-
ow
-
It ©
T
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
TB - - —
www
-�
U
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
Uj
z
0
O
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
w
z (]
F_
C\I
W `�
Z
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
0 ❑
Z WZJ
0
a
dad
0 a
PROD. DATE;
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
NOV
2014
0_
FM
+
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
LCE ME
JAN
2016
l
// LID
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
4
PROJ, NO.:
201 30001 00RA
y
11+00
LOG TOE PROTECTION
�`�
W
Z
I
�
12+00
I � f��• �
W
LU
��
(PROP ED)
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
00
X
U
- i
-�_
l-
LOG GRADE CONTROL3iQ
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
dD �� C?
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
-_
I
— ��� \
�'ti
I ti
•�[�\`\ �-_- _ `�
PROPOSED FILL AREA
Il�
/
PROPOSED WETLAND
III
G Ii
REACH UT -1
ENHANCEMENT If
I\\
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
II
✓
—
111I
(STA 1+01 TO STA 31+65)
/
07
�
:.
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
Oi
f
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
0'I
0'1 y
STRUCTURE
BEDDED LOG (PROPOSED)
4
FLOODPLAIN SILL
I
(PROPOSED)
_J
-
A
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPDSED)
S'CALEA "-3Q'
m, - '`
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED
�2
2-
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
105
i
i i
105
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
(j
0
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
102 :.............:.............
................ . . ........:.............:......
•...................:....................................................:............
.......................... ............-:.............:............. ..... , .....
102
AS BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
- --
(PROFILE)
-
- -
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
-.
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
99 ........................................
..:.......... ...:........... ..:...... .....................
.............. ......... ................... ..............
.............. ..............:...........................:...........................:.........................
99
(PROFILE)
rr
1,
EXISTING:GRADE ALONG
TOP
OF BANK (RIGHT)
.........................:.............
..............
..............................................
..........
..........,.................................:
9B96......
EXISTING GRADE ALONG
TOP OF BANK (LEST)
`^
E'i fa'F �- -LT _ LT- SRT � � �� � � � li 7
'r.
� � �' :
93 ........................ .... T. :-,=
.......,.............,,... �... 1......,..........rr..,�.
�
.,r.�rt.............,.Lr..,,..-,=.
+r��. r. �. .. _ �7. - .� :,.� ,tr.�.......J
r ' '-�•�'�r •�rr•.__.' ..� °-� -_ ��.�
93
+�
EXISTING GRADE ALONG
RT-
x4
STREAM CENTERLINE
90e...................................+.......,............................
.......... ........... ....,........
.,..,..,..,....... ............. ..,....,.............. ...,........... ............... ..........,........ ......
90
w :---�------
1 87 ............ ..........................
.......................................
............ ............. ...................................................
.............................................................................. ..........
87
1
84 .....................................
............. :...... ....... ............. ..................................................:..
..........:.........
................ ............. . . .......... . ................................................................
84
SCALE: HOR 1"=30; VERT1"=3'
81 :
81
C) 00 Lr)
CT
00(�
st M 1�- (fS
Co r T CST C T
et C1 i4 Iti © It:
O C37
00 6 00 00
6 QT rn
co 00
rn 06 00 00 00
00 CO 00 00
00 00 00 00 °D 00 t* 00 °°
00 00 00 00 00 00 CO
10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00 14+00 15+00
A
I
B
I C
COPYRIGHT O, W.K. DICKSON & CO„ INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUQ1 IUN OH USL UI" 1 HL UUN I LN 16 OF I HIS DUCUMEN 1; AUUI I IONS UK DELL I TUNS I U I HIS DUUUMkN I , IN VVHULL UH IN rAH I , vvl I muu I W HI 1 1 tN UUNZ:1tIN I Ur W.K. UIC;I«UN & kiu„ IIVL;., 1z) rrjUr1101 I LLS. U1NLY uumr-S rnum 1 mr ul'il"w4mL Or F nFo LJu'vuFvFE:N F , witAr mmu m i n nry vn!%;Iw ALL oi`aiwne tin" ruku nr%L��
FILE NAME: I:IPro'ectslEBX12013000100RA-Caviar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1CADD1Recard Drawin x12013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1.dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
DDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(� 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
¢
9.
cmn °
031t4�35
v'
jVli`*oda
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
HALF SCALE
W
F- m
�
a
Q
z
Q
IL U)
0
x
UjI
Uj V_
O i
Y
w
F IZ
U
W
CL U
Z -�
F_ Z
J
L)
U_
0
O
a
w(D0
W Z
ani
Z
zz<IQ-
ow
It ©
T
06o0
:2W >
D
www
-�
U
Uj
z
0
O
w
z (]
F_
C\I
W `�
Z
Lr (n.
LU
0 ❑
Z WZJ
0
a
dad
PROD. DATE;
NOV
2014
Q.C.:
FM
Q.C. DATE:
JAN
2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
4
PROJ, NO.:
201 30001 00RA

REACH UT -1
30* l ENHANCEMENT II
(STA 1+01 TO CTA 31+65)
16+00r �
00
^f- /
I
00
TB �p
x Xx & VAS_ a x
2-
99
96
93
90
87
84
1 81
78
75
e
t _s
X' IX i �ix N 5 1 0XI 01 x 3071 X 371 01 X --.
1111 1111��
x,11 1
1111 11 t��
1111 11
11111 11,1 SCALE:1 "=30'
lE
n.
93
TIE
87
A
W.
75
+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
A I B
, INC.,
FILE NAME: 1:1Projects`EBX12013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1CADD\Record Drawin s\2013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1.dw - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
LEGEND
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
Urban Development + Geomatics
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
Raleigh, INC 27607
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
(f) 919.782.9672
AS -BUILT STONE
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
s
EXISTING TOP OF BANK —
— TB --- --
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
031435 a
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
0 30 60
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
ttl
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
u� u 3
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
z
O
LOG TOE PROTECTION
Z
(PROPOSED)
OW
LOG STRUCTURE
QC w
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
J
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
0 rn
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
J_
Li.
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
0
0
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
W(�} 0
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
06
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
❑ �
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
—2
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
❑w
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
O
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
X02
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
C
DWK
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, INC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(f) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
s
A; SSI(j�
m
031435 a
PO. wwek�
poll
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" - FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
ttl
0 D
0 m
_j T-
CL
z
O
L U)
U �
Z
I o
I
OW
' 0
QC w
W iw LIJ
M CC aC
U
w
J
Z
0 rn
L(J
OZ
J_
Li.
0
0
W(�} 0
a.
W Z 0
06
❑ �
Z
ddz
❑w
a
O�p
X02
FL
www
U)
w �e
wz
ui
0
< Wcc
Q 0)
r
Z w
U pC
f=-
�
w Q
"3 ©
Z
I<:to
©C N W
jrzm
ate.
a
dCL2
PROJ. DATE:
Nps/
2014
Q.C.,
FM
Q.C. DATE:
JAN
2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
5
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA
_j

13
A I !
2 —
99
96
93
90
87
84
1 81
78
75
REACH UT
ENHANCEI
STRUCTURE
�O
TO
�O
\
ELEV
STA
i
2 —
99
96
93
90
87
84
1 81
78
75
REACH UT
ENHANCEI
•
93
•a
87
84
81
78
75
20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
1
A I B
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK"
\
ELEV
STA
i
LOG VANE
23+00
86.25
23+16
88.25
w_-
" RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
(v) 919.782.0495
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
(17 919.782.9672
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
_L=—LCE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOG TOE PROTECTION
3
•
93
•a
87
84
81
78
75
20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
1
A I B
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK"
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG VANE
23+00
86.25
23+16
88.25
w_-
" RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
C
LEGEND
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS–BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS ---
AS–BUILT IN–STREAM STRUCTURE
-
AS–BUILT STONE
720 Corporate Drive
EXISTING TOP OF BANK —
— -- TOS–
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
(v) 919.782.0495
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
(17 919.782.9672
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
_L=—LCE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOG TOE PROTECTION
3
(PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
MOM
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
H
U
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
W
O
QrIL {J
j
(PROPOSED)
Z J
0 (n W
J
lL
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
Q 0
CC
CONTROL (PROFILE)
Wc Q a
PROPOSED LOG
O� Z W 06
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
Z
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
" ' 2
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
(�
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
�J
AS–BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
W W Q
Lu U z
AS–BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
c~i� w o
YCC
(PROFILE)
-
AS ---BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
U �
(PROFILE)
W z WW
__2❑ Z
AS–BUILT STRUCTURE
U d 0
(PROFILE)
¢�
CL
COPYRIGHT O, W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT; ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC., IS PROHIBITED. ONLY COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME; I:\Pro'ects\EBX\20130001 OORA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1CADD1Record Drawin s12013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1.dwg -January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Ceomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(17 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
�0ag11OW431ged4�
CARO ®®.
SEA
03143
w X s,
V. .�
a� W . Q
***owe o
i
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE I'
lil
H
�
o
O10
T
fL
z
O
I Q
w O Q
d
Y W 0
9 /may.: /��.• /c
1.L. i.i,. tY
H
U
W
O
QrIL {J
j
Z J
0 (n W
J
lL
Q 0
CC
Wc Q a
O� Z W 06
Z
F Q 2 IZ
LU
O r
V
W W Q
Lu U z
c~i� w o
YCC
_
W w o _
d
U �
W z WW
__2❑ Z
U d 0
¢�
CL
el PROJ. DATE; NOV 2014
Q.C.. FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
6
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA

2-
99
96
93
90
87
84
1 81
75
A I
f
\ N
VP .4
n.
93
•A
87
84
81
75
25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00
A I g
0
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG VANE
28+36
85.50
28+54
87.90
----
RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
LEGEND
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT STONE
.
EXISTING TOP OF BANK—
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
3
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
u� u
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOG TOE PROTECTION
(PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
p
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
—
,--PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/- VERQ_, FLOW SPIILLLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
U
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
w
O
..........
..........
w U
Q J
(PROPOSED)
Z J
© (n I.1J
ZO J_
iL
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
O Q
CONTROL (PROFILE)
W O O CL
PROPOSED LOG
..� 2
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
-e z
PROPOSED DOUBLE
z
re Z
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
F!pw a
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
� Z r
O H
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
IJ
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
:Ewj
< X z = ¢
(PROFILE)
U
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
W O
(PROFILE)
a W J) � _
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
W �=- N ft
Z
(PROFILE)
w Q LU N LU w
w 4 Z
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
Q QOm
U
O 010
(PROFILE)
a. o
vw
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(f) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NG. LICENSE NO. F-0374
�p04@g5ra�9gas®
GCA
Oqq�� •,JS�emO ea{
SEAL
031435
o
,41— AE
/� iF"�, �•a�s�®g�st�� lll
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" - FULL SCALE
`"
1 = HALF SCALE
111
H to
O
O 1D
r
d
z
0
U
Z
©
O <
'
O IZ
YU5d
Q
IW W
" rr Ir CIC
U
w
O
w U
Q J
Z J
© (n I.1J
ZO J_
iL
O Q
W O O CL
LL Z (h
-e z
z
re Z
F!pw a
� Z r
O H
06 U 0
:Ewj
< X z = ¢
U
W O
a W J) � _
W �=- N ft
Z
w Q LU N LU w
w 4 Z
Q QOm
U
O 010
a. o
PROJ. DATE; NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
7
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100 FSA

3
s 1
*nc I
f x'35
lI REACH UT -1
ENHANCEMENT I
(STA 31+65 TO STA 35+80)�t3n
a Q0 r'
z 00
REACH UT -1 I S
ENHANCEMENT II L -ti \ ! S00010
(STA 1+01 TO STA 31+65) \
X X
X 1 �
Y _ \
99
96
93
90
87
1 84
81
78
C
L
VP_5
-I of X 3� X �-x 01
SCALE:111=30'
30+00
93
87
0.1
31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00
A I B
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*.
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG GRADE CONTROL
31+82
84.76
----
----
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
LOG GRADE CONTROL
32+61
84.83
---
----
---
LOG VANE
32+90
85.00
33+06
87.00
---
LOG GRADE CONTROL
33+43
84.79
-
----
---
LOG GRADE CONTROL
34+50
84.88
---
----
----
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
DOUBLE LOG DROP
qw ;� SEA
(PROPOSED)
- --_
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
!uu
�!�]
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
030 60
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
O �R
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
LL
(PROPOSED)
� U3
U 0
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
E p
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
i
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
Lu LL
A p z w
-I of X 3� X �-x 01
SCALE:111=30'
30+00
93
87
0.1
31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00
A I B
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*.
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG GRADE CONTROL
31+82
84.76
----
----
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
LOG GRADE CONTROL
32+61
84.83
---
----
---
LOG VANE
32+90
85.00
33+06
87.00
---
LOG GRADE CONTROL
33+43
84.79
-
----
---
LOG GRADE CONTROL
34+50
84.88
---
----
----
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
LEGEND
AS—BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
AS—BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
community infrastructure consultants
AS—BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS -
AS—BUILT IN --STREAM STRUCTURE
-'
AS—BUILT STONE
-
EXISTING TOP OF BANK —
— — TB — — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
Raleigh, NC 27607
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
u
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOG TOE PROTECTION
3
(PROPOSED)
NC, LICENSE Nd. F-0374
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
AN
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
qw ;� SEA
(PROPOSED)
- --_
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
!uu
�!�]
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
030 60
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
O �R
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
LL
(PROPOSED)
� U3
U 0
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
E p
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
Lu LL
A p z w
—2
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
(j
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
�J
AS—BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS—BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
U
(PROFILE)
AS—BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
tr U
�-J
AS --BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
COPYRIGHT 0, W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT; ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF W,K. DICKSON & CO., INC,, IS PROHIBITED. ONLY COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME: I:\Pro'ects\EBX1,20130001OORA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site\CADD\Record Drawin s\2013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1.dw -January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
1
vw
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(f) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC, LICENSE Nd. F-0374
CRO
AN
": �mID A
qw ;� SEA
03143
FULL SCALE: V'=
030 60
2 - FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
© 0
O �R
LL
Z
O
� U3
U 0
Z
E p
O
Lu LL
A p z w
O cc
F W O
cc ir Er
U
LU
O
tr U
�-J
Z J
Z J
0
H
O Q �
J a
0Y 06
Z
291-
Z T
0
© FL>
w =
LLI W Q
W U i-
Z
F- U
"' oc
Gj
LU
o_jz LU
U �=
0
yi�y.�
)cc Z
m
0
a o aa2
PROJ. DATE: INOV 21314
Q.C.: FM
Q.C. DATE: ,IAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
8
PROD. NO.:
20130001 OORA

It
ENHANCEMENT]
` ISA 31+65 TO STA 35+80)
A
BOA
s
I
QR
,A
XS 3
I B
2 ___.
99
96
93
90
87
84
1 81
78
75
a
e
C
LEGEND
STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
AS --BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
STA
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS —
--
AS--BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
LOG GRADE CONTROL
AS -BUILT STONE
84.22
EXISTING TOP OF BANK --
— TB — — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE, REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
�aa�aeefia� 1�
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
0 30 60
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
=
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
o
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LCE La
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
3
4
35+00
36+00
A
)DUCTIOI
37+00
38+00
39+00
1
B
I.K. DICI^
& CO., INC.,
Mr
93
N9
78
75
40+00
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG GRADE CONTROL
35+75
84.22
----
I
----
----
I
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE, REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
I
;DOCUMENT,
C
3CE
LOG TOE PROTECTION
DVW
DICKSON
(PROPOSED)
Transportation + Water Resources
LOG STRUCTURE
720 Corporate Drive
(PROPOSED)
(v) 919.782.0495
LOG GRADE CONTROL
www.wkdickson.com
STRUCTURE
8�e®
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
�aa�aeefia� 1�
PROPOSED FILL AREA
0 30 60
PROPOSED WETLAND
=
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
o
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
J 'P
0..
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
r
(PROPOSED)
O
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
w
FLOODPLAIN SILL
IY
ta..
(PROPOSED)
O c6 W
00 J_
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
l­_
I--
W 0 O 11
w Z U) 06
Q Z
(PROPOSED)
w
W Q T
06 Q w
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
W LU Q
CONTROL (PROFILE)
Lij
Q W © FJ- T
PROPOSED LOG
z aUj c ww-)
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
Ct CL
U a Qa 2
PROPOSED DOUBLE
_ 2
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
0
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROJ. NO.:
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
-
(PROFILE)
AS --BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
i11
DVW
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(f 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
8�e®
03143 m b
�aa�aeefia� 1�
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
211= FULL SCALE
1" HALF SCALE
=
1,1,1
co
�
o
b�
J 'P
0..
z
O
U z
Z
2
O
Uj L-
O
0
I --
Q
w
O
IY
ta..
Z J
O c6 W
00 J_
I"i"
QF—
l­_
I--
W 0 O 11
w Z U) 06
Q Z
w
W Q T
06 Q w
=
W LU Q
f) ry LU 0
W Y D IY
Lij
Q W © FJ- T
Z U � FZ
z aUj c ww-)
w
a oCZ=�
0
Ct CL
U a Qa 2
PROD. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.C, DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
9
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA

-4-A - - I C
"4y ,s rt
+r
BO
-30-1
BO 33 �JO1--„ �0 30 BO 30 BOA, BO BO
REACH UT -1
— ENHANCEMENT II
1 (STA 44+60 TO STA 53+51)
3 ��1-HCA UT -1
�� (STA 41 +95 TO STF 44+60)-00 � � �•ct
f
s' •riiy l Y 13L — ��45
r —
= 4+00 � '' X11
' `chi
s TB
X X X .�.� _ - x X X —
X X
XS -4
REACH UT -1
ENHANCEMENTII
(STA 35+80 TO STA 41+95)
2
VP_ 11
AW -e C)
trl~�
93
E:iI
1 81
m
75
u
C
0
XS18
)<S 17
SCALE:1 "=30'4
E�
CI
4
AW -10
Kaffelf,
93
75
41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00
A I B
FILE NAME: I:�PrajeotslEBX12D13000100RA -Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Miti anon Site1CADD�Recard Drawin s12013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1.dwg -January 6, 2016 -Frasier Mullen
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG GRADE CONTROL
41+99
83.00
----
-�-
- --
LOG VANE
44+36
1 82.75
44+54
1 84.80
---
" RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
WK
DICKSON
LEGEND
Transportation + Water Resources
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
—50 -
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
(v) 919.782.0495
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS —
- —
AS -BUILT IN --STREAM STRUCTURE
40
f�AR
AS -BUILT STONE
EXISTING TOP OF BANK —
— — TB — — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
2" — FULL SCALE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LLl
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
u
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Z
0
LOG TOE PROTECTION
0
(PROPOSED)
�
O 121:LU 1L
LOG STRUCTURE
Y U) W O
(PROPOSED)
I --
U
LOG GRADE CONTROL
w U
(L
STRUCTURE
Z
(PROPOSED)
W U 0 LL
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
-�
PROPOSED FILL AREA
06 Qaf
D
PROPOSED WETLAND
www q
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
\a=
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
O ¢M2
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
Q.C.: FM
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
10
FLOODPLAIN SILL
PROD. NO.:
(PROPOSED)
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
0
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
—
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS --BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
31
—21
WK
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(fl 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
40
f�AR
E
a Oq114
a
•
,gyp ��//''//aa yy'1
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0 30 60
2" — FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALA
LLl
© Q
O R
J r
a.
Z
0
w GD
Fr 0
0
0
I o �
�
O 121:LU 1L
° n Q
Y U) W O
I --
U
w
O
w U
(L
Z J
J
Z
0 O0
cc
W U 0 LL
IY Z U) 06
Z Iz-
W d
of Z0 FL
06 Qaf
D
06 af H
www q
U W O
pci U
Z U CM
U z
qC (�i
w o` 1300
O ¢M2
PRQJ. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
10
PROD. NO.:
20 1 3000 1 00 RA

0
E REFAW-2
(BO
1
\�. So REACH UT,1! r „
0 ENHANCEMENT it
STA 44+�� f
( 6a TO STA 53+51) � � --TB --IETL 48+00
'1
x
2-
93
90
87
84
81
78
11 75
ria
2-.a2o°corp C7
J N. VV. ! L0
S -E t v=7,9,.
Uj
X X�/�� �a
1� X
ell CPP
S.W. /A/V- =8'3.82`
N.E, JNV.=84.33,
j f' %
X Ol X ,a� 01 X
r �
SCALE:1 "=30'
[.*A
84
81
m
75
W
As
45+00 48+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00
i
A
, INC.,
FILE NAME: k: Pro'ectsjEBX120130001 OORA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1CADD1Record Drawings12013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-1,dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
COPI
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG VANE
46+85
82.50
47+01
84.40
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
" RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
GINAL
C
LEGEND
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS–BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
AS–BUILT IN–STREAM STRUCTURE
Of U
a
AS --BUILT STONE
M- _ _ _> _
EXISTING TOP OF BANK ~–
(B — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
O (
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
IL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
Q
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
LM tCE 3
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOG TOE PROTECTION
ojf
(PROPOSED)
©¢
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
Dow
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
~
DOUBLE LOG DROP
06O�
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
„
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
iii
w
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
U
_
(PROPOSED)'
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
U
(PROPOSED)
pC U) w
FLOODPLAIN SILL
ez�
[�
(PROPOSED)
U
IL
D
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
—2
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
(�
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
�J
AS–BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS–BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS --BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS --BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
l�
a
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Ceomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919,782.0495
(f) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NO. LICENSE NO. F-0374
`a®yea®e�eaess
A
SEAL w
431435
M
irk
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE'
z
0
F -
w
0
w
CC Q
0
a
Q 2 cr
F w O
¢ it Ir
H
U
w
O
Of U
a
Z -J
O (
LU
O
IL
F-
F-
Q
0
W Z N
ojf
©¢
z
Dow
a.
~
06O�
2 LU
0� w
d
u1
q
U
z
O
iii
w
Uj aC
U
_
©
z W
U
pC U) w
ir w
ez�
[�
0
U
IL
D
O
O ¢a=-2
PROJ. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA

UUr- 7 rlI+an 1 kW, vv. n. UIk,NOVIv O LU., IINk.. /Al -L, MIUr"I 10 1'1L,.,tL MV CU. nrrnUUUU I I u N Uri u7C Ur 1170 t%VIV I CIV I S UI- I N15 UUUUMtN I ; AUDI I IUNS UH UI Lt I IUNS I U 1 NI5 UUUUMtN I , IN VVhULt UH IN VA I , VVI I H U U I VV hi I I t U U N S t N I UI- VV. K, UIUKSUN & LU., INC:., IS VHUNIbII LU. UNLY C;UI'It5 i -HUM I HL UHIUINAL UI-• I H 1 UUUUMLN I , MAHKLU WI I H AN UHIUINAL Z5IUNA I U H L AN 6tAL bHALL kat= QUNZ5II..)tHt0 1 U E3 VALID, I HUt UUVIkS.
FILE NAME: I:\Projects\EBX\2013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site\CADD\Record Drawings\2013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-i,dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
el
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(fl 919.782.9672
A -� ,
i
I
C
d
w y
SE
O
14
.`
���9PBeY � 'ma k41�
FULL SCALE: V=
0 30 60
LEGEND
1" = HALF
LLI
❑ C7
d r-
O_
AS --BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
U)
IUj
<
-
_
�0
V J 1 Y 1 Q
LU
LU
w LU
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
-
0L
J
ro_
O J
0 U_
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
ZOIL
U) 06
❑�
z
F-
z T
0(.5
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
i
www q
W Wt E
z
F- L) l.l�
+� O
WO _
7
z CC
pOH
O W ¢¢
rr UQ 0
4a2
PROJ. DATE: INOV 2014
Q.C.. FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016.
DRAWING NUMBER:
AS -BUILT STONE
12
PROJ. NQ.:
20130001 OORA
EXISTING TOP OF BANK —
— — TB — — —
,�
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
r
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
;
4
„ REACH UT -1 n•
ENHANCEK4ENT II
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
m
rt (STN44+60 TO STA 53+51)
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
() -� -
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
LCE -LCIE
REFAW-1 ��
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
3
/ /�
m / `� _
LOG TOE PROTECTION
3
Y
65l`—,. -A. /
!/ s
(PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
r - _-✓
11 -l'-
(PROPOSED)
�= --
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
r+*•
��..
_QO
_ — n
~ ~=_
` _ \ / f / %� � ^�4 =- ., �1� � --
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
Q�-
—
_ -1---
54+48
(PROPOSED)
U r'_� f-~ y~'�._.�..`.'-�..�
�' �` a T % - - �^��' -�
PROPOSED FILL AREA
_
_
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
INV
co\
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
_1 X
X X liX X X X X—
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
r
(PROPOSED)
`
/STRUCTURE
BEDDED LOG (PROPOSED)
ar
VP -14 a� X
Q E X 0 X
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
01 0� X
X
`,
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
/
SCALE:1 "=30' ;
,�
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
2 --
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
—2
Yf}
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
�J
93
93
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
-
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
a
:............. :.............:.............:.............:.............:...............................................
....:............. ........ ..... ............. ............. ............. ...... .......
........ ...............
90
(PROFILE)
EXISTING GRADE ALONG:
TOP OF RANK (LEFT)
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
-
EXISTING GRADE ALONG
TOP OF BANK (RIGHT)
87............:.............:.............:.............:.............:.............:.....
:.............:........,....::.............:.............:.........................:.............:.............:.............:
.......
87
RT_ 117-_ f _LT
LT
84.........
....:.............:......
....... :.............:.............:............. :..............:...........,.:.........,...:......,......;....,,..,....;.......,.....:...... .:........ .......
f7 - ......,,...:,..........
84
`' EXISTING GRADE ALONG
: STREAM CENTERLINE ;
81 '4,,
,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,
..,....,...,:....,.,,,,,.,;..,.....,.,.,:.....,.,.....:.............:.............:......,......:.............:.............:......,.,,...:...,.,.--.-.:.......,.,,..:.............:.........,...:...........81
78.............
......... .................
......... ....:......................................... .......... ................:............. .............:...... :.............:...............................................................
78
1 75...............................................................................................................................................................•
,,..,.,,....,,,.,.....,...........,,.,...............................
:
75
1
7.............
:........ .....:.............:.............:.............:.............:.............:.............:.............:..........,..:.............:.............:.............:.............:......,......:............:.............
:...........
72
SCAM: HOR 1"=30', VERT :1"=3'
69
69
M O
c� v-
Nr N C) c
(P [1 LO lnrS (�OLo
M N
Co
oo co
ao °D ao Co Co 00 co CO 00 to a`o 0 o
°b
50+00
51+00 52+00 53+00
54+00 54+48,22
A {
1
C
UUr- 7 rlI+an 1 kW, vv. n. UIk,NOVIv O LU., IINk.. /Al -L, MIUr"I 10 1'1L,.,tL MV CU. nrrnUUUU I I u N Uri u7C Ur 1170 t%VIV I CIV I S UI- I N15 UUUUMtN I ; AUDI I IUNS UH UI Lt I IUNS I U 1 NI5 UUUUMtN I , IN VVhULt UH IN VA I , VVI I H U U I VV hi I I t U U N S t N I UI- VV. K, UIUKSUN & LU., INC:., IS VHUNIbII LU. UNLY C;UI'It5 i -HUM I HL UHIUINAL UI-• I H 1 UUUUMLN I , MAHKLU WI I H AN UHIUINAL Z5IUNA I U H L AN 6tAL bHALL kat= QUNZ5II..)tHt0 1 U E3 VALID, I HUt UUVIkS.
FILE NAME: I:\Projects\EBX\2013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site\CADD\Record Drawings\2013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-i,dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
el
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(fl 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
���gOQ8t4�e�edddd
C/3Rjd® o%
,b'9�� pare 1 es1da,rJ,r
ss d°�y,'�@®@@
1% ®`
d
w y
SE
O
14
.`
���9PBeY � 'ma k41�
FULL SCALE: V=
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
SCALE I`
1" = HALF
LLI
❑ C7
d r-
O_
L U)
U 0
z
U)
IUj
<
O Ir
U) p 0
` QQ ir
�0
V J 1 Y 1 Q
LU
LU
w LU
U
W
0L
J
O J
0 U_
O00. O
NS
ZOIL
U) 06
❑�
z
F-
z T
0(.5
est
W Of
www q
W Wt E
z
F- L) l.l�
+� O
WO _
H {� Uj N
0
z CC
pOH
O W ¢¢
rr UQ 0
4a2
PROJ. DATE: INOV 2014
Q.C.. FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016.
DRAWING NUMBER:
12
PROJ. NQ.:
20130001 OORA

3
2-
1
117
114
111
W10i
102
93
A B
I �
% / 1
le
i f
1+001
1
\ } t
\ 6
\ \
�4 \ \ � lam' —•. . ':�,
f �
J`
\\ \ \
SCALE:1 "=30' �
VP 3
j
40
RGIA
G-2 / s
� Jf
� e
rl
S! / 0
117
114
111
U11:1
105
102
K-1
M
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+50
A i e
FILE NAME: I:\Projects\EBX\20130001 ODRA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site\CADD1Record Drawings\2013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-2.dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
GTA
ELEV
STA
I ELEV
LOG STRUCTURE
0+00
113.00
----
- -
----
LOG STRUCTURE
0+11
112.90
---
---
----
LOG GRADE CONTROL
0+46
112.50
aIC11
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LMLCE 3
LOG STRUCTURE
1+11
109.90
---
---
----
LOG STRUCTURE
1+66
107.90
----
--_
v
a J
LOG STRUCTURE
2+45
104.50
---
---
m -
LOG GRADE CONTROL
3+09
102.50
------
- --
---
LOG TOE
3+49
102.00
3+56
102.0
R
LOG STRUCTURE
3+73
101.80
--
- -
----
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
4+07
100.80
----
---
-----
LOG TOE
4+30
100.40
4+37
100,40t
R
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
LEGEND
DICKSON
AS --BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
—50-
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
46
AS–BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS -
s
AS–BUILT IN–STREAM STRUCTURE
www.wkdickson.com
AS–BUILT STONE
o®gee®e��oetn
CAp, fig` �p
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
— TB — —
EXISTING BOTTOM BOTTOM OF BANK
e,OMOf&
if �
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
2" --FULL SCALE
SCALE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
H
Q co
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
aIC11
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LMLCE 3
LOG TOE PROTECTION
0ac
z
(PROPOSED)
0
LOG STRUCTURE
I O Q
F0 w O
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
w
STRUCTURE
v
a J
(PROPOSED)
O W
z0 J_
DOUBLE LOG DROP
C J
(PROPOSED)
W z C
PROPOSED FILL AREA
J
PROPOSED WETLAND
EkfO cu
00
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
w >
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
� w U I—
H U < z
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
W 0 Iii cr
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
LU Lu
(PROPOSED)
¢ 0
cZ ® O Q n. :E
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
Q.C.: FM
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
1 3_
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
2013000100 RA
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
—2
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
(}
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
0
AS—BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS—BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS–BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE) —
AS–BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
1
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultands
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0496
(f) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NO. UCENSF NO. F-0374
o®gee®e��oetn
CAp, fig` �p
4
3 U\ ea tl
0314Al-
.i,Fy�+�ya9g ua'Y'17� �4
�.
�9 fJa'g,C6
e,OMOf&
if �
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" --FULL SCALE
SCALE
1" = HALF
H
Q co
© O
aIC11
_J r
d
z
O
rr
0ac
z
i o
0
p Z uw-I tD
I O Q
F0 w O
U
w
0
v
a J
z J
O W
z0 J_
Q~
[1' LL
C J
w(.90 a.
W z C
z z
z
woLIJ
g (L
EkfO cu
00
F-
w >
¢afz = ¢
� w U I—
H U < z
O
U
W 0 Iii cr
Z U W ~ N
LU Lu
w w w UA
ii Z J
CCU ?tp�FO
¢ 0
cZ ® O Q n. :E
PROJ• DATE: INOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
1 3_
PROD. NO.:
2013000100 RA

w�
SCALE:1 "=30'
102
99
96
93
1 87
84
81
C
C
C
e
4+50
5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00
4-
105
102
Ro
93
87
RM,
1.1
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
DOUBLE LOG DROP
5+15
98.82
5+21
98.37
-_--
DOUBLE LOG DROP
6+00
96.30
6+06
95.80
---
LOG TOE
6+63
94.42
6+70
94.42
R
DOUBLE LOG DROP
6+80
94.08
6+86
93.58
---
LOG STRUCTURE
7+55
91.81
--_
--_
ar O
ct j
LOG TOE
7+65
91.25
7+71
91.25
L
LOG GRADE CONTROL
7+83
91.10
----
---
2w5;
www =
LOG TOE
8+13
90.40
8+20
90.40
L
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
8+41
89.93
____
____
----
LOG STRUCTURE
8+78
89.34
-----
- -
----
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
9+07
88.45
----
----
----
RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
LEGEND
DICKSON
AS --BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
—50—
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
720 Corporate Drive
AS–BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS —
(v) 919.782.0495
AS–BUILT IN–STREAM STRUCTURE
www.wkdickson.com
AS–BUILT STONE
r%"%JIM06418��
CAP0. I®rm
W
Z/
.. 9�
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
B
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
�`���trrtw�rrrrw°
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
FULL SCALE: 1 30
0 30 60
2"- FULL SCALE
SCALE
1" - HALF
Etl
d
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
3
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
w Z
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
u
LOG TOE PROTECTION
O Q tr
(PROPOSED)
i Or L)L tr
LOG STRUCTURE
w
n
(PROPOSED)
ar O
ct j
LOG GRADE CONTROL
O LU
~ z0 J_
STRUCTURE
O � 0
0) 0) J IY
(PROPOSED)
....�
DOUBLE LOG DROP
F_ Z
F_Qw
(PROPOSED)
(XO N
PROPOSED FILL AREA
2w5;
www =
PROPOSED WETLAND
o
x
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W
W Ir
W ~ 191-
U
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
w ww LU
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
IL 0 (L
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
Q.C.: FM
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
4
FLOODPLAIN SILL
PROJ. NO.:
(PROPOSED)
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
-- 2
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
(�
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
AS–BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS --BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS–BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS–BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
r
COPYRIGHT O W.K, DICKSON & CO. INC, ALL RIGHTS SERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS O CSIGNATURE A S S D
K RE F THIS DOCUMENT; ADDITIONS QR DELETIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHALE DR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF W.K. DICKSONDICKSDN & CO., INC., IS PROHIBITED. ONLY COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL DI= THIS DQCUMENT, MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL ND SEAL HALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES,
FILE NAME: 1:1Projects\EBX12013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetiand Mitigation Site\CADDIRecord Drawin s\2013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-2.dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(' 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
r%"%JIM06418��
CAP0. I®rm
W
Z/
.. 9�
.4!Q4.7 ri Or YYY
a Sp L w
03 1 w
�`���trrtw�rrrrw°
4�
FULL SCALE: 1 30
0 30 60
2"- FULL SCALE
SCALE
1" - HALF
Etl
d
❑ a
J r
d
Z
O
U 0
w Z
� fr
<
0
Uj LL
q z w o
O Q tr
arc Uj w 0
i Or L)L tr
w
n
O
ar O
ct j
Z J
O LU
~ z0 J_
O � 0
0) 0) J IY
w 0 CL
06
z
F_ Z
F_Qw
(XO N
0660 FL
2w5;
www =
rY w U i—
o
x
w CC
J
W
W Ir
W ~ 191-
U
c� C\1
0 — v;
w ww LU
Xzm
©
IL 0 (L
PROJ. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
4
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100 RA

3
IFM
XS -20
r �
f� 1
/ 1
f rr
f XS -27 r
f
f
f �
ACG -2 p I
`N ___� " \ ` / CG -2
1
SCALEA "=30' rl II
/r r�
,6' 1
0
117
114
111
106
105
102
W
S
L
S
'' P o
RG1A
117
114
111
W:
105
W111%
93
0+00 1+00 2+00
THIS DOCUMENT:
I ILL- IM/'IIYIL- 1.�1 IV GVL. LI..^%\ IUV 1 VVI V - VG4 -1G V -1 1 1 u - I.M -,vi -'I • v1 I VVVV. VV vI r.
, INC„
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG GRADE CONTROL
0+40
106.84
------
- -
---
LOG STRUCTURE
0+91
105.60
--
- -
---
LOG STRUCTURE
1+41
104.50
---
----
---
LOG STRUCTURE
1+76
103.06
---
_--
-
LOG STRUCTURE
1+89
102.82
----
----
_--
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
LEGEND
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
community infrastructure consultants
-
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE=�
Transportation + Water Resources
AS -BUILT STONE
-
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
-
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
720 Corporate Drive
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
u _LCE —
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
www.wkdickson.com
LOG TOE PROTECTION
(PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
CAP� ®�
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
aro
9 ;
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
x 031435
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
FULL SCALE: 1 "'=30
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
2" = FULL SCALE
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
o
(PROPOSED)
0
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
8
8
0
Qi
—21
DDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(f 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NO. LICENSE NO. F-0374
CAP� ®�
aro
9 ;
W SEAL W
x 031435
Z
dds�i9�n6�
FULL SCALE: 1 "'=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
LLI
O
o
a
z
0
L 07
U 0
Z
uy
I LU
n z w
I ❑
I O Vn Cc
Uj
w
I
I i c owc rW
U
w
w
�-J
Z J
Q z J
O0
J
0� Z 06
z¢� z
Q'
F_pwLU 0
0°w `;r
g0YZ = U
ww w = N
W
W p
O Iii Er
Iw CD
it W LLJ
z CY N
U Z lar ii
w ® w wwr
fr o� 0 =
n. fU O ¢o_
PROJ. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C,: FM
Q.C. DATE: .JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
15
PROD. NO.:
2013000100 RA

3
24" CPP
N.E. INV.= 117.57'
S.W. INV =409.72'
KAZ
117
114
111
108
105
1
102
99
96
A
SCALE:1 "=30'
..6 —) _
\\
FROM
TO
SANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
L../11V I IIYu 1 L.IY V1�,
SEE ADJACENT DWGS
0
A I
, WITHOUT
4+00
8
117
114
111
H111*1
105
102
5+0q
.m
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
SANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG GRADE CONTROL
0+96
107.37
---
-----
- -
LOG TOE
1+62
106.50
1+69
106.50
L
LOG TOE
2+27
106.00
2+34
106.00
R
LOG TOE
2+62
105.80
2+69
105.80
L
DOUBLE LOG DROP
2+73
105.64
2+79
105.14
----
LOG TOE
3+27
103.91
3+34
103.91
L
LOG GRADE CONTROL
4+20
103.23
----
----
----
LOG TOE
4+73
102.37
4+80
102.37
R
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
LEGEND
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
—50-
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
vw
AS–BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
–
AS–BUILT IN --STREAM STRUCTURE
AS–BUILT STONE
community infrastructure consultants
EXISTING TOP OF BANK -
— — _I_P — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
Urban Development + Geomatics
C
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOG TOE PROTECTION
(PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
AS—BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS—BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS–BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS --BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
Q'Aa
in
3
-LCE
LCE
vw
Q'Aa
in
vw
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(� 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F 0874
'�„'wwL•
� W
SM.�Y 1�. W kh
31�"�3•. , � �
ewall�e °q
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0 30 60
211 — FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
Q�
� o
� w
a.
CO
0
z
I
1
0
Uj
o O !
1
Q
(5 w 0
w aWc
U
LU
n
w U
a -
z z -�
0
o LU
J
O ~ U_
0 cc
CL
wcx z
rn
_j Cif
zQl`— z
�pW
LLI0CL
0 0 �?
a�f UtY �
Miw> D
i� 2 U
w
(WjQ z
W CU
�e Z)
J Ir
W �
z i- 1�r
N
N [ 0
w 0 z w W�
iu,j
'wz°CZm
U
0 °¢ate
a o
PROJ. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.G. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
16
PROD. NO.:
2013000100RA

13
IF
V
108
105
102
99
93
108
105
102
M
5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00
w
FILE NAME: I:\Pro'ects\EBX\2013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland mitigation siteNL;Auu\rtecora urawin swul uuuui uu htc:Uhu Uh AVV11'4US U i -0.awg - january o, 4Vlo - Frasier IVIIAIIeri
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
5+37
102.00
-
----
---
LOG TOE
6+12
101.36
6+19
101.36
R
DOUBLE LOG DROP
6+54
100.94
6+60
100.43
--
DOUBLE LOG DROP
7+17
99.34
7+23
98.82
--
LOG STRUCTURE
7+77
97.86
----
---
- -
LOG TOE
7+84
97.42
7+91
97.42
L
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
8+54
96.78
---
-_-
PROPOSED WETLAND
LOG TOE
9+27
96.00
9+41
96.00
R
LOG TOE
9+70
95.60
9+77
95.60
R
LOG GRADE CONTROL
9+92
95.36
----
---
z U IY
h—
RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
LEGEND
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
5O -
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
� o
0
� U
O"
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS --BUILT STONE
J
Z
EXISTING TOP OF BANK -
— — TB — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
w J
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
z
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
W(7 0
O
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
LCE—LGE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
06
LOG TOE PROTECTION,
U)
(PROPOSED)
^`
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
U
0
LOG GRADE CONTROL
Z
STRUCTURE
+•�
(PROPOSED)
0
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
-
PROPOSED FILL AREA
LU
PROPOSED WETLAND
w w2
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
IW
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
(PRO FILE)
®1
=11
K
DIC
YYKSC)N
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(f) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0 30 60
2"— FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE P
N-
U
6i
w
� o
0
� U
O"
04
0 �
J
Z
J •"
0
F -o
6
w J
O Z)
z
W(7 0
O
_
z¢�
06
U)
ow
Z
F-
U
0
Z
I
I.
�
0
0
cn
0
in
Q
U_
(A cc
w 0
J U
<wZ
LU
U
N-
U
w
0
� U
O"
J
Z
0
F -o
6
w J
O Z)
O
W(7 0
fel.
_
z¢�
06
ow
Z
F-
af Z[+0
00
<wZ
U
w w2
IW
0
1Qf
W W 0
J
I�
� w
Z
Cr
z U IY
h—
H
0
cV
C) p
-3w
U
w ui
Ir
zcrzm
O
a_
¢a2
r PROJ. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q,C, DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
17
PROD. NO.:
20 1 3000 1 00 RA

13
AU -
11+00
AV
w..- •. y
y r � XS -12
- 13+00
ACC -1
fl �Ly a XS -14 '
a
t
S)'ALE:1 "=30'
2-
105
102
99
96
93
90
1 87
84
81
r
10+00
11+00
A
imelf,
COPYRIGHT 0, W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT; ADDITIONS OR DELETIC
FII F NAM F, 1-1Prn4ar-t_Q%PRYl9r)1 gnnni nnRA - r`.evA r r`ro®I, Q+-.- -4 1Aio+l—A IIAi+i rn+i QW-1f+nnniD, -, i -„,.,,.,., M----- ---I.H. -,r` , ,-r – .
13+00
THIS DOCUMENT, IP
14+00
1
g
& CO., INC.,
105
iwl
�0I:1
93
.0
n
15+00
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG TOE
11+25
93.95
11+32
93.95
L
LOG STRUCTURE
11+50
93.72
z
--
-
LOG TOE
12+05
92.55
12+12
92.55
R
LOG GRADE CONTROL
12+50
92.30
--
- -
--
LOG STRUCTURE
13+46
91.30
---
-
--
LOG TOE
14+69
89.65 1
14+83
89.65
R
" RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
LEGEND
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR 50
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR a
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT STONE
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — TB — — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED ice L
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
LOG TOE PROTECTION
(PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)”
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED) -
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED) ...�
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG (�
STRUCTURE (PROFILE) 0
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
3
—2
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(1) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F os74
CpaA'��
a. ..
Oa i
wr
n
0314;35
F Mk3
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
F-
U
d ca
w
n
O
O �
Ll.` iJ
r -
Z -�
�
z
©_
O
4~4
J_
U)
O M
a
� J
0
U
w
Uj ®
Z
f
Q
o
V}
III M
<
LL �
ir
W O
M rr
n
F-
U
w
n
O
Ll.` iJ
Z -�
©_
W
4~4
J_
O M
a
� J
LL.
0
Uj ®
CLQ'
Z W
zz
co
w
z
F_
WZ
O a
"
2Y
Ofz
w
:i
ul
2 w
H-
_
Z U ix
F-
of
H [tr
w p
0
z
im
wIr
� ui iii
Ow
U
¢
oom
CL
O
Qczi2
PROJ, DATE: INOV 2014
Q.C.; FM
O.C. DATE: ,IAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
18
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100 RA

SCM
A
2 ---
99
96
93
90
87
84
81
78
75
SCALE: V=30'
Kz
93
M
V
r1*1
15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
A I B
I C
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG GRADE CONTROL
15+02
89.40
---
----
----
LOG STRUCTURE
16+06
88.35
---
----
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
LOG TOE
16+77
87.67
16+84
87.67
R
LOG GRADE CONTROL
17+06
87.45
---
----
---
LOG TOE
17+91
86.45
17+98
86.45
R
LOG STRUCTURE
19+25
85.37
----
---
----
LOG STRUCTURE
19+59
84.50
---
--
-
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
19+72
84.41
----
---
_--
RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
C
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR
50
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
3
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS --
community infrastructure consultants
AS---BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
+�
AS -BUILT STONE
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
- - - TB — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
-----
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
I
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
Raleigh, NC 27607
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
u ' 3
LOG TOE PROTECTION
(PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
NC. LICENSE NO. F -G374
(PROPOSED)
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
- s
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
m
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
031435
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE,
p0'�4Y@4�®rW
1 �
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
2" — FULL SCALE
1" — HALF SCALE
(PROPOSED)
W
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
o
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
_ r
�2
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
a �
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
ff��
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
1J
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
_z
I pCIE
'0
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
LU LL
i a
AS -BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
t.ur r rtiun 1 kw, vv.ra. uiur\0Ury ac UU., uvU�. n. M�iur� 10 ncor-orncrr-tuuuu i iuiv vri uar- ur a rlc uui-4 i r-1-41 a Ur- I M 5 UUUUMtN I ; AUUI I IUN� Uh UtLt I IUN6 I U 1 H16 UUUUMtN I , IN WHULE UH IN NAF{ I , WI I HOU I WHl I I EN UUN6LN I OF W.K. UICK`5UN & CU., INC., IS PROHIBITED, ONLY COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME: I:\Pro'ects\EBX12013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1CADD\Record Drawings\2013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-3.dwg -January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
WK
DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(t) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F -G374
$A SCA&
SEAQ.
031435
m • �
OWE
p0'�4Y@4�®rW
1 �
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" — FULL SCALE
1" — HALF SCALE
W
o
0'
_ r
z
O
a �
0
U 0
_z
I pCIE
'0
LU LL
i a
O � cr-
cn w 0
0
W
0
Ir �
a J
Z J
0 W
J
0 LL
J
cr_
Z� IL
d�Z
I -
I -©w
IL
Xz
d0
X F_
w> 0
U
www = Q
t—
Ix W 0
Id w
J
2 LLI �
zv P N
3 W Z it Z
x Cr 0
CL © 0 {( d 2
PROJ. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C., FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
19
PROD. NO.:
2013000100RA
_j

3
2-
A
102
M.
93
.E
rr:3
w
Q
C
C
r
f'
REACH \UT -4
ENHANCEMENT�11
STA 13+36 TO STA 1+14
41
f�9 \ \
0 r< J
ll
C1 /
0+00
1+00
--- -- -
l�
� r
r
/ it
SCALE:1 "=30'
0+00 1+00
102
R*111
99
93
M
RE
m
FILE NAME: hProjects\EM20130001 OORA- Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site1,CADD\Record Drawin s\2013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS UT-i.dw -January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
B
, INC.,
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
u
1+04
88.65
---
---
--
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
LOG GRADE CONTROL
ZOO
STRUCTURE
�•
(PROPOSED)
c�
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
U
z
O
0
U z
vs
r�
1 p z W ❑
O rk ❑C
SQ w 0
1 M Er arc
H
U
B
, INC.,
STRUCTURE TABLE
STRUCTURE
FROM
TO
BANK*
STA
ELEV
STA
ELEV
LOG GRADE CONTROL
1+04
88.65
---
---
--
* RIGHT (R) AND LEFT (L) BANK LOCATIONS ARE REFERENCED LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
, MARKED WITH AN
rm
C
LEGEN D
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR 50
AS–BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS --BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
AS --BUILT IN–STREAM STRUCTURE — –
AS–BUILT STONE
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — T3 — —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
WK
DICIC ON
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
Transportation + Water Resources
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
720 Corporate Drive
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
-LCE—LM
3
LOG TOE PROTECTION
www.wkdickson.com
(PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
83148 m
LOG GRADE CONTROL
ZOO
STRUCTURE
�•
(PROPOSED)
!�
DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED)
�r
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(PROPOSED)
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
PROPOSED LOG GRADE
CONTROL (PROFILE)
PROPOSED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP (PROFILE)
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE)
AS–BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
(PROFILE)
AS–BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS–BUILT RIGHT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
AS–BUILT STRUCTURE
(PROFILE)
--2;
WK
DICIC ON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(f) 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. LICENSE NO. F-0374
A
83148 m
ZOO
FULL SCALE: 1'= 30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1 ° = HALF SCALE
LLI
of
�r
z
O
0
U z
vs
Lu O
1 p z W ❑
O rk ❑C
SQ w 0
1 M Er arc
H
U
w
rc
11 0
z J
v� LLI
OF-
Z
p J
LL
O O
LLJ 0 LCL
W z 06
z¢I¢
-
Qw
F-
CCp 'gt
0FL0 FL
Z
www U z
M
Cr
ty W ~
L) w P:04
z � w , illi
Z �zm
arc v a x Q
a- ❑ O <[ CL
PROJ. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
20
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA

LEGEND
'�X11 AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR 50
1 ,•' } " k� `� ! AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS —
��l` AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE -
AS -BUILT STONE
1�` I 1 `� • EXISTING TOP OF BANK _ - - - 13 - - —
�o EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
r 1� � r ti • EXISTING (ORIGINAL) CHANNEL FOOTPRINT
PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
�y111 I `
P1, PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED u
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
��x /^ U LOG TOE PROTECTION
����� x I, - �' (PROPOSED)
LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED) ..
LOG GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
VPs � �� L -_�-
AW -7, - DOUBLE LOG DROP
(PROPOSED) -
PROPOSED FILL AREA
PROPOSED WETLAND
J
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
R �ky
1 I \ <I f f 1 PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
W/ OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
A. } c LOG OUTLET STRUCTURE
/ u; 1 j i 1 •. (PROPOSED) .,
1 1 f 1 AW-ro I j BEDDED LOG STRUCTURE
(PROPOSED)
VP -11
I 1 l 1 i4 GP -10
y 4 yr 1p # ° FLOODPLAIN SILL
- f f 1^ �. 1, ' y.r I 0 Avtr-s (PROPOSED)
W 1 DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
.,t
__ _AA
w
_._
y As
f 7- f j AW -4 f " I PROPOSED LOG GRADE
- - =
- - ` .� - �O� '` _ `� J;D- `� d � �,•/ ''` ,f f � 7., - � `^� 4,�� I '� ';�'��' • CONTROL (PROFILE)
jk• ! f,'r f I 1 r o 1 " PROPOSED LOG
Z` ' �A 1 f ✓ ri A, t STRUCTURE PROFILE
AL-
�' ,, PROPOSED DOUBLE
- F
AW -6 / � a� ` LOG DROP (PROFILE)
f-
1
AyV_g
PROPOSED BEDDED LOG
STRUCTURE (PROFILE) a
{
f (�� \, w /`,�'- VP-16% ' ti "� _._.�1.`° i ✓II Iti AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
AW-` PROFILE
lu AS -BUILT LEFT TOP OF BANK
(PROFILE)
I
f
_� ...
1 I 1 I ,� �---. 1 f� - `��, ,.AVU-2 a J t °,.- •�-.. .,, ., � ;�..� ;� ,� M �f I '�, � " IAL AS RIGHT TOP OF BANK
,
(PROFILE)
If I �, ',. VI'-2� r .a :.1�,✓` ri-�'•�r ,e. � -'_- _ '_ -- "�_�,--,_- - a r. a, � �I ,r "°' ; f ,` ��•'� �V
tA,W-1 AS -BUILT STRUCTURE
1
� _— .
I -- - -- _ - _Y _ X ` � � t, '' (PRO FILE)
m = M� P-18 ,9�1 161, AL
II� �. `\ _ .� ,\ \ ,-.\ I` \ _. :. i`J•! '^�' _ .._-^—~ -- "—V .4- — .`- _`_ - _,..- _ _ ._ _`. ,` - f f'YY 11 � 3 j 1 �, ,iaf �
01
`1� �..
\ � \1l1' •14 \I �• 9' � � j� ,
l �
-q
1 `
i,
11
4
COPYRIGHT 0, W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT; ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC., IS PROHIBITED, ONLY COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES.
FILE NAME: I:IProjects\EBX\2013000100RA - Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site\CADD�Record Drawin s12013000100 RECORD DRAWINGS WEiLANDS.dwg - January 6, 2016 - Frasier Mullen
D'DICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Transportation + Water Resources
Urban Development + Geomatics
720 Corporate Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(v) 919.782.0495
(t 919.782.9672
www.wkdickson.com
NC. UCENSE No. F-0374
� ���
o R �
�� m
ie"S�r®P�
py�
° ..
l
EA
q� p
�� 43
ar
*0 Alp
1
FULL SCALE: 1" =80
0 80 160
-
2 FULL SCALE
1" SCALE��`
HALF
L!J
O
a
I-
a e
� r
a
z
O
U �
U7 Z
t Q
Lu
r O (A LC
'
U) Ul O
ZE'
U
w
x
IL J
7s... J
O
pp
I
U)LLI 0Q C]
�ZZ
J
X Z
O
W > U
w w d
ry W z
O
U
w
J
U LU W ~ N
z cc
w Q Lu wWW
0 � Z q: z
0
a dal
PROD. DATE: NOV 2014
Q.C.: FM
Q.C. DATE: JAN 2016
DRAWING NUMBER:
21
PROJ. NO.:
2013000100RA