20120102 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

MONITORING YEAR 2
ANNUAL REPORT
Final
BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Person County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 003987
NCDMS Project Number 95020
Data Collection Period: March 2015 -October 2015
Draft Submission Date: November 12, 2015
Final Submission Date: November 30, 2015
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
W
ILDLA NDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full -delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (NCDMS) to restore and enhance a total of 7,328 linear feet (LF) of stream in Person
County, North Carolina. The project streams consist of Byrds Creek, a third order stream, as well as three
unnamed first and second order tributaries to Byrds Creek (South Branch, Southeast Branch, and West
Branch). The project provides 5,371 stream mitigation units (SMU's). At the downstream limits of the
project, the drainage area is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is approximately 1.8 miles south of
Hurdle Mills, NC off of Wolfe Road in southwestern Person County (Figure 1). The Site is located in the
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Site is within the South Flat
River watershed, North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Subbasin 03-04-01 of the Neuse
River Basin and United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201010020.
Land use within the watershed is rural and is dominated by forestry, agriculture, and livestock operations;
with approximately 60% of the watershed used for agriculture and 40% forested. The Site is located in an
active cattle pasture surrounded by wooded lots, small agricultural operations, and rural residential areas.
Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Site were heavily impacted by cattle, which led to
stream bank erosion and instability.
The following project goals were established to address the effects from watershed and project site
stressors:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing, if not eliminating, sediment loads;
• Restore riffle/pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
These goals were achieved by restoring 3,096 LF of perennial and intermittent stream channel and
enhancing 4,232 LF of perennial stream channel. Restoration and enhancement construction and planting
efforts were completed in December 2013. A conservation easement is in place on 24.4 acres of riparian
corridor and stream resources to protect them in perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 2 (MY -2) monitoring and site visits were completed between the months of March and
October 2015 to assess the conditions of the Site. All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as
designed. The Sites overall average planted stem density of 590 stems/ acre is greater than the interim
success criteria of 320 stem/ acre density required for MY -3. Hydrologic monitoring gages documented
bankfull events for all streams on the Site. Two streams have met the Monitoring Year 5 (MY -5) hydrology
success criteria and one has partially met for the Site at this time.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL iii

BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
Appendix 1
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
Project Vicinity Map
1.2
Monitoring Year 2 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
Table 1
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-3
Project Activity and Reporting History
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
Table 4
1.2.3
Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
Visual Assessment Data
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-4
Table 5a -i
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-4
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
1.2.6
Maintenance Plan..............................................................................................................1-4
1.3
Monitoring Year 2 Summary......................................................................................................1-4
Section 2:
METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3:
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Vegetation Plot Data
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a -i
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Photographs
Appendix 3
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Table — Metadata
Table 9
Planted and Total Stem Counts
Appendix 4
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a -c
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11
Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Table 12a -f
Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL iv

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events
Bankfull Verification Photographs
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in southwestern Person
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201). The project site is located south
of Hurdle Mills off of Wolfe Road. The Site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont
Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Multi -Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC, 2001)
classified approximately 57% of the land in the project watershed as managed herbaceous cover or
agricultural, 42% is classified as forested/scrubland, and the remaining 1% is open water. The drainage
area for the Byrds Creek Site is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The project stream reaches consist of Byrds Creek reach 2 (BC2), Byrds Creek reach 3 (130), South branch
(SB1), Southeast branch reach 1 (SEI), and Southeast branch reach 2 (SE2) which are stream restoration
and/or enhancement level I approach and Byrds Creek reach 1 (BC1), Byrds Creek reach 4 (BC4), and West
branch (WB1) which are enhancement level II approach. Mitigation work within the Site included restoring
and enhancing 7,328 linear feet of perennial and intermittent stream channel. The stream areas were also
planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. The project provides 5,371
stream mitigation units (SMU's). The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by the NCDMS in
January of 2013. Construction activities were completed by North State Environmental in September
2013. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. in December 2013.
Baseline monitoring (MY -0) was conducted between October 2013 and January of 2014. Annual
monitoring will be conducted for five years with the close-out anticipated to commence in 2019 given the
success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more detailed project activity, history, contact information,
and watershed/site background information for this project. Three separate conservation easements have
been recorded and are in place along the riparian corridors and stream resources to protect them in
perpetuity. Directions and a map of the Site are provided in Figure 1 and project components are
illustrated for the Site in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Byrds Creek Site were heavily impacted by cattle, which
led to stream bank erosion and instability. Related degradation included declining aquatic habitat, loss of
forest, degraded riparian buffers, and water quality problems related to increased sediment and nutrient
loadings. Tables 10a, 10b, and 10c in Appendix 4 present the pre -restoration conditions in detail.
The Site was designed to meet the over -arching goals as described in the mitigation plan (Wildlands,
2013). The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Site, others, such as pollutant removal and improved
aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects. The following project specific goals
established in the mitigation plan include:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing sediment loads;
• Restore riffle/pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-1

The design features of this project were developed to achieve multiple project objectives. The stream
restoration elements were designed to frequently flood the reconnected floodplain. This design
approach provides more frequent dissipation of energy from higher flows (bankfull and above) to
improve channel stability; provide water quality treatment through detention, settling, and biological
removal of pollutants; and restore a more natural hydrologic regime. The project objectives defined in
the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2013) are as follows:
• On-site nutrient inputs will be decreased by removing cattle from streams and filtering on-
site runoff through buffer zones. Off-site nutrient input will be absorbed on-site by filtering
flood flows through restored floodplain areas, where flood flow will spread through native
vegetation. Vegetation is expected to uptake excess nutrients.
• Stream bank erosion which contributes sediment load to the creek will be greatly reduced in
the project area. Eroding stream banks will be stabilized using bioengineering, natural channel
design techniques, and grading to reduce bank angles and bank height. Storm flow containing
grit and fine sediment will be filtered through restored floodplain areas, where flow will
spread through native vegetation. Spreading flood flows will also reduce velocity and allow
sediment to settle out. Sediment transport capacity of restored reaches will be improved so
that capacity balances more closely to load. Sediment load reduction will be monitored
through assessing bank stability with cross section and profile surveys and visual assessment
through photo documentation which serves as an accepted surrogate for direct turbidity
measurements.
• Restored riffle/pool sequences will promote aeration of water and create deep water zones,
helping to lower water temperature. Establishment and maintenance of riparian buffers will
create long-term shading of the channel flow to minimize thermal heating. Lower water
temperatures will help maintain dissolved oxygen concentrations.
• In -stream structures will be constructed to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus. Wood
habitat structures will be included in the stream as part of the restoration design. Such
structures may include log drops and rock structures that incorporate woody debris.
• Adjacent buffer and riparian habitats will be restored with native vegetation as part of the
project. Native vegetation will provide cover and food for terrestrial creatures. Native plant
species will be planted and invasive species will be treated. Eroding and unstable areas will
also be stabilized with vegetation as part of this project.
• The restored land will be protected in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design streams were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding landscape, climate,
and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing watershed conditions
and trajectory. The designs were developed to correct incision and lack of pattern caused by
channelization, bank instability caused by erosion and livestock access, lack of vegetation in riparian
zones, and lack of riparian and aquatic habitat.
1.2 Monitoring Year 2 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and quarterly site visits were conducted during MY -2 to assess the condition of the
project. The stream success criteria for the Site follows the approved success criteria presented in the
Byrds Creek Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2013).
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-2

1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 14 vegetation plots were established during the baseline monitoring within the project
easement area. The majority of the plots were established as standard 10 meter by 10 meter plot with
one plot established as a 5 meter by 20 meter plot. The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival
of 260 planted stems per acre in the riparian corridor along restored and enhanced reaches at the end of
year five of the monitoring period. The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the
survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period.
The MY -2 vegetative survey was completed in June 2015. The 2015 annual vegetation monitoring resulted
in an average planted stem density of 590 stems per acre, which is greater than the interim requirement
of 320 stems/acre. All 14 vegetation plots met success criteria during MY -2. The MY -2 planted stem
density is approximately 20% less than the baseline density recorded (734 stems/acre) in January 2014.
There is an average of 14 stems per plot and all plots are on track to meet the success criteria required
for MY -5 (Table 9, Appendix 3). Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs and the vegetation
condition assessment table and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
An isolated area of tree of heaven (Ailanthis altissima) was treated during MY -2 upstream of the culvert
crossing on Byrds Creek near station 34+00. This area will be assessed during subsequent monitoring
efforts for new seedlings and will be treated with the appropriate herbicide as needed. The presence of
this invasive species does not appear to be affecting the survivability of planted stems. Refer to
Appendix 2 for the integrated current condition plan view map (Figure 3), and the vegetation condition
assessment table.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for the MY -2 were conducted in March 2015. All streams within the Site are stable
with little to no erosion and have met the success criteria for MY -2. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual
assessment table, integrated current condition plan view map (Figure 3), and reference photographs.
Refer to Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
While there have been some minor post -construction adjustments within the restored channels; the cross
sections show little to no change in the bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width -to -depth ratio.
Surveyed riffle cross sections fell within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen
stream type. The surveyed longitudinal profile data for BC2, BC3, SB1, SE1, SE2a and SE2b illustrates that
the bedform features are maintaining lateral and vertical stability. The riffles are remaining steeper and
shallower than the pools, while the pools are remaining deeper than the riffles and maintaining flat water
surface slopes. The longitudinal profiles show that the bank height ratios remain very near to 1.0 for the
restoration reaches.
Bank scour was observed along portions of Byrds Creek Reach 3 below the culvert crossing at the end of
MY -1 and the beginning of MY -2. However, these areas have stabilized as vegetation has grown. Cross
sections seven and eight show some of this bank scour that has occurred on Byrds Creek Reach 3. Cross
section seven has had some scour on the right bank between MY -1 and MY -2. Cross section eight has
shown similar scour on the left bank between MY -0 and MY -1. This scour on cross section eight looks to
have stabilized between MY -1 and MY -2. The cross-sectional areas and bankfull widths have increased
on cross sections seven and eight, but still fall within the appropriate Rosgen stream type parameters.
These areas will be monitored for any active scour during MY -3.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-3

Pattern data will be collected in MY -5 only if there are indicators from the profile or dimensions that
significant geomorphic adjustments have occurred. No changes were observed during MY -2 that indicated
a change in the radius of curvature or channel belt width have occurred.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
During MY -2 localized areas of instability were observed along Byrds Creek between stations 35+00 and
48+00. Additional live stakes and herbaceous plugs were installed in the late winter/early spring of 2015
to help stabilize these areas. Wildlands will continue to monitor these areas, but as of the summer of
2015, each of these areas appeared well vegetated and stable.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the five year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in separate
years within the restoration reaches. Bankfull events were recorded on all three gaged streams during the
MY -2 data collection. Byrds Creek and South Branch have each had bankfull events during MY -1 and MY -
2. Therefore, they have met the hydrology success criteria for the Site. Southeast Branch recorded a
bankfull event during MY -2 and is on track to meet hydrology success criteria. Please refer to Appendix 5
for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Maintenance Plan
Maintenance of invasive vegetation will be assessed in the winter of 2015/2016 and a follow up herbicide
application will occur in the spring of 2016 if deemed necessary. Additional follow up treatments will be
conducted annually as necessary to control their spread and dominance.
1.3 Monitoring Year 2 Summary
All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. The average planted stem density for
the Site is 590 stems per acre and is on track to meeting the MY -5 success criteria. Bankfull events were
documented with the gages located on all three streams during MY -2. The MY -5 stream hydrology success
criteria has been met on Byrds Creek and South Branch, and partially met for Southeast Branch at this
time.
Summary information and data related to the performance of the project and monitoring elements can
be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
NCDMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from
NCDMS upon request.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 1-4

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). Longitudinal and cross sectional data were collected using a
total station and were georeferenced. All CCPV mapping was recorded using a Trimble handheld GPS with
sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcView. Crest gages were installed in surveyed
riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly. Hydrology attainment installation and monitoring methods
are in accordance with the USACE (2003) standards. Vegetation monitoring protocols followed the
Carolina Vegetation Survey-NCDMS Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008). Reporting follows the NCDMS
Monitoring Report Template and Guidance Version 1.3 (NCDMS, 2010).
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2010. Monitoring Report Template and
Guidance. Version 1.3. Raleigh, NC.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi,
Pages 12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDEQ-
DWR, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. NCDMS, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and As -
Built Baseline Report. NCDMS, Raleigh, NC.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report — FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
- NCDMS Targeted Local Watershed
J ♦f 4y
4
0301 Q104061030
Directions:
The Site is located in southwestern Person County,
southwest of Roxboro. From Roxboro take
Route 157 south 9.8 miles. Turn right on Charlie
Monk Road. Travel 1.0 miles and turn left on Wolfe
Road. Travel 0.4 miles to the end of Wolfe Road.
The project site is located south and east of the end of
Wolfe Road and is bound by Route 157 to the west
and Walnut Grove Church Road to the east.
The site is within the Nuese River Basin
(HUC 03020201).
03010104062020
- T{aabata
a
030 201010010
.r
f f,j
r
0104061
0301010406107
rya
Deep,cre'
-103020201010040
0302W%,
302%, 1010020
e
a '
ti
03020) 1010030
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement,
but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the
site may require traversing areas near or along the easement
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not 40
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and
federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in
the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration
site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined
roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activites
requires prior coordination with DMS.
�A
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
I L D L A N D S Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
r Iv U I N E E R I N G0 1 2 Miles NCDMS Project No. 95020
rk� I I I I I Monitoring Year 2- 2015
Person County, NC

Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Easement Area
Culverted Stream Crossing
4%.
•
10 .
k
Culverted Stream
Crossing
•
��
IN
L �
�
1 •
Culverted Stream
Crossing
i
Awl Awl,#
• 4
Im
Figure 2 Project Componenet/Asset Map
ftI Byrds Creek Mitigation Site A,,WLDLANDS t
E N G I N E E R IN G 0 250 500 Feet NCDMS Project No. 95020
I i i i I Monitoring Year 2- 2015
rk Person County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
M
M
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type R
RE
R
RE
R RE
Totals 5,371
0
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
Project Components
N/A
N/A
N/A
Reach ID
As -Built Stationing /
Location (LF)
Existing Footage (LF)
/ Acreage (Ac)
Approach
Restoration or Restoration Restoration Footage (LF) / Acreage
Equivalent (Ac)
Mitigation Ratio
Credits (SMU/
WMU)
Streams
BC1
10+00-16+43
643
N/A
Enhancement Level II
643
2.5:1
257
BC2
16+43-32+89
1,630
N/A
Enhancement Level 1
1,646
1.5:1
1,097
BC3
32+89-34+05
34+64-47+55
1,368
Priority 1
Restoration
1,407
1:1
1,407
BC4
47+55-55+51
796
N/A
Enhancement Level II
796
2.5:1
318
SBI
60+00-66+48
67+08-70+69
976
Priority 1
Restoration
1,009
1:1
1,009
SE1
80+00-84+85
916
Priority 1
Restoration
485
1:1
485
SE2a
85+88-91+24
524
N/A
Enhancement Level
536
1.5:1
357
SE2b
91+24-93+19
50
Priority 1
Restoration
195
1:1
195
WB1
Restoration Level
100+00-106+11
Stream
(linear feet)
611
N/A Enhancement Level II
Riparian Wetland Non -Riparian Wetland
(acres) (acres)
611
Buffer
(square feet)
2.5:1
244
Upland
(acres)
Restoration
NEENEENNEEM
3,096
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
Enhancement II
Creation
2,182
2,050
Preservation
High Quality Preservation

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Activity or Report
Date Collection
Complete
Completion or Scheduled
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
January 2013
January 2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
June 2013
June 2013
Construction
September 2013
September 2013
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project areal
September 2013
September 2013
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
September 2013
September 2013
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
December 2013
December 2013
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
October 2013
January 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
September 2014
December 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
October 2015
December 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
2016
December 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
2017
December 2017
Year 5 Monitoring
2018
December 2018
1Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95020)
Monitoring Year 2 -2015
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Jeff Keaton, PE
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seeding Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Bare Roots
ArborGlen, Inc
Live Stakes
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
919.851.9986, ext. 107

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No.95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Project Name
Project Information
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
County
Person County
Project Area (acres)
24.42
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
36° 14.744' N, 79° 79° 2.636' W
Project Watershed Summary
Information
Physiographic Province
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
September 2015
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-01
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
2,957 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
157% managed herbaceous cover/agricultural, 42%forested/scrubland, 1% open water
Parameters
BC1
BC2
BC3 BC4 SBI SE1 SEZa SE2b
WBI
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
643
1,646
1,407 796 1,009 485 536 195
611
Drainage area (acres)
2,635
2,637
2,703 2,957 164 56 62
NCDWQ stream identification score
51.75
25.75 46.25
46.75
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -III, NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P
P
I
P
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
IV/V
IV
IV/V
IV
III
Iv/V
III/IV
III/IV
IV/V
Underlying mapped soils
Chewacla / Georgeville Loam
Drainage class
---
---
--- ------ --- --- ---
Soil Hydric status
---
---
--- --- ---
--- --- ---
---
FEMA classification
---
---
--- --- --- --- ---
Native vegetation community
Piedmont bottomland forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-Restoration
1
Regulatory
Considerations
0.8%
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Waters of the United States - Section 401
X
X
X
X
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification No. 3885
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X
X
Byrds Creek Mitigation Plan; no critical habitat for listed species exists within the project area
(Pedestrian Survey)
Historic Preservation Act
X
I X
lNo historic resources were found to be impacted (letter from SHPO)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

'PP #34"'� .�•� PP #16
."...PP #35 PP #36
XS5 "%PF
•�� � , :' XS9
PP #8ol
/
I
P P%#9 1
�� �• %PP#12 fl 1
1 1 �'� .. .� .i•
•�� •� PP #33j
1 ♦ 1 \4p #6• XS7 .. PP #10 I 1,�•
PP #11 `. PP #32 •�•�
PP #31
1 1 �•� .�•����, _ s #PP #301
PP #26XS1�.�• 1� IPP #29
1 �•�.�,XS14 1 m '•�•�,
j PP 5
PP #251 '•�.�.�.�.�1� �XS13 XS12
PP #2$— /
j % •�.�PP #,#27
1 1 PP #244XS3j
•�•'. •.
`• PP #4 .�.�'� XS11 j , 1
1. PP 43 i PP 123
si
_XS2 pp t221
1
j 1 j II, PP k21
1
I• j
% PP #1 PPV20
'y PP #19
�i
ell yiN+A€ IIS V `ii l

Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek Reach 1 (643 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degradation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek Reach 2 (1,646 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degradation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
10
10
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
9
9
100%
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
9
9
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
9
9
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
9
9
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
1
1
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
1
1
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
2
2
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow

Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek Reach 3 (1,407 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degradation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
11
11
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
11
11
100%
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
11
11
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
11
11
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
11
11
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
5
280
80%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
10
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
5
5
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
3
3
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow

Table 5d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
BYrds Creek Reach 4 (2,957 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
n/a n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Za. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
South Branch Reach 1 (1,009 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
17
17
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
14
14
100%
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
14
14
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
14
14
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
14
14
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
10
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth> 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Reach 1 (485 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
12 12
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
7 7
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
7 7
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
7 7
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
7 7
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
11
11
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
11
11
100%
3. Engineered
Za. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
11
11
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
11
11
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5g. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Reach 2a (536 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
12 12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
8 8
100%
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
8 8
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
8 8
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
8 8
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
9
9
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
6
6
100%
3. Engineered
Za. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
6
6
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
9
9
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
3
3
100%
baseflow

Table Sh. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Reach 2b (195 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
4
4
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
3
3
100%
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
3
3
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
3
3
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
3
3
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
3
3
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
3. Engineered
Za. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
3
3
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table Si. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
West Branch Reach 1 (611 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
n/a n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
2. Undercut
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Za. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Planted Acreage 38
Easement Acreage 38
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Number
Combined
Acreage
%of
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000
1
Combined
0.8%
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
of
Planted
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
0
0
Acreage
(Ac)
Polygons
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0.1
0
0
0.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
criteria.
Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
0.25 Ac
0
0
0%
year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.0
0%
Easement Acreage 38
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(SF)
Number
of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000
1
0.29
0.8%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
0
0
0%

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Monitoring Year 2
PHOTO POINT 1— looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 1— looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 3 —looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 3 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 4 —looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 4 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 5 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) PHOTO POINT 5 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 6 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 6 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 7 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 7 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 8 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 8 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 9 —looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 9 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 10 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 10 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 11— looking upstream (03/12/2015) I PHOTO POINT 11— looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 12 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 12 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 13 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 13 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 14— looking upstream (03/12/2015) PHOTO POINT 14— looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 15 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 15 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 16 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 16 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 19 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) PHOTO POINT 19 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 20 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 20 — looking downstream (03/12/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 21— looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 21— looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 22 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) PHOTO POINT 22 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 23 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 24 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 24 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 25 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 26 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 26 — looking downstream (03/12/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 27 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 27 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 28 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) I PHOTO POINT 28 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 29 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 29 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 30 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 30 —looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 31 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
rnu i u rum i sl — iooKing aownsiream kuj/iz/zu15)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 32 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 32 — looking downstream (03/12/2015) 1
PHOTO POINT 33 — looking upstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 33 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 35 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 35 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
PHOTO POINT 36 — looking upstream (03/12/2015) 1 PHOTO POINT 36 — looking downstream (03/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

VEGETATION PHOTOGRAPHS
Monitoring Year 2
VEG PLOT 1 (06/12/2015) 1 VEG PLOT 2 (06/12/2015)
VEG PLOT 3 (06/12/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 4 (06/12/2015)

VEG PLOT 5 (0611212015) 1 VEG PLOT 6 (0611212015)
VEG PLOT 7 (0611212015) 1 VEG PLOT 8 (0611212015)
VEG PLOT 9 (0611212015) I VEG PLOT 10 (0611212015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data —Vegetation Photographs

Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Plot
MY2 Success Criteria
Met (Y/N)
Tract Mean
1
Y
100
2
Y
3
Y
4
Y
5
Y
6
Y
7
Y
8
Y
9
Y
10
Y
11
Y
12
Y
13
Y
14
Y

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Database name
Byrds Creek MY2 cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1.mdb
Database location
F:\Projects\005-02128 Byrds Creek\Monitoring\Year 2\Vegetation Assessment
Computer name
KENTON
File size
55648256
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
JA matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95020
project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Description
Stream Mitigation Site
River Basin
Neuse
Sampled Plots
14

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol-S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0001
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Corpinus coroliniono
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
Cercis conodensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanicc
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
8
8
11
9
9
9
13 13
18
1
1
1
4
4
4
Liquidomborstyrocifluo
sweetgum
Tree
1
5
23
5
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
3
4
4
14
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Plotanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
26
4
4
4
Quercus michouxii
swamp chestnut oak
ITree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
ITree
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
6
1 1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
Inorthern red oak
ITree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
7-7
Stem count 11 11 13 18 18
size (ares) 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02
Species countl 7 1 7 1 8 6 1 6 1
Stems per ACRE 445.2 445.2 526.1 728.4 728.4
7 36_
7
1457
15
5
607
15
1
0.02
5
607
23 14 14
1
0.02
6 2 2
930.8 566.6 566.6
43
4
1740
14 14
1
0.02
6 6
566.6 566.6
39
7
1578
15
8
607 1
15
1
0.02
8
607
20
9
1809.41
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol-S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol-S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0010
PnoLS P -all TPnoLS
95020-01-0011
P -all T
95020-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Corpinus caroliniono
American hornbeam
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
10
Cercis canodensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanicc
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
12
12
12
5
5
5
2
2
2
Liquidomborstyrocifluo
sweetgum
Tree
7
20
5
3
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
21
Plotonus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus michouxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
ITree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
Inorthern red oak
ITree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
Stem count 10 10 10 14 14 2115
size (ares) 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02
Species countl 6 1 6 1 6 8 8 9
Stems per ACREJ 404.7 404.7 1404.7, 566.6 1566.61849.81
5
607
15
1
0.02
5
1 607
35
6
1 1416
18 18 23 13 13
1 1
0.02 0.02
5 5 6 5 5
728.4 728.4 930.8 526.1 526.1
46
7
1862
12 12
1
0.02
7 7
485.6 485.6
17
8
688
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
Pnol-S: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0013
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2015)
PnoLS P -all I T
MY1 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
24
24
24
29
29
29
41
41
41
Corpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
12
12
12
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
11
Cercis conadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
8
8
8
8
8
8
Froxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
7
7
7
75
75
83
73
73
73
72
72
72
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
20
102
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
28
25
25
81
40
40
40
49
49
49
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
21
30
30
70
31
31
31
32
32
32
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
11
13
13
13
19
19
19
Quercus phellos
willow oak
ITree
3
3
3
2
2
2
22
22
26
20
20
20
13
13
13
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
ITree
1
1
1
8
8
14
9 1
9
9
16
16
16
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species counti
Stems per ACREI
17
6
688
17
1
0.02
1 6
1 688
22 18 18
1
0.02
1 7 7 1 7 1
1890.3, 728.41728.41
83
8
3359
204 204
14
0.35
1 9 1 9 1
1589.71589.7 1
431
11
1246
226 1 226 226 254 254 254
14 14
0.35 0.35
9 1 9 1 9 8 1 88
653.3 1653.3 1653.3, 734.21734 . 2 734.2
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek
Parameter
Gage
PRE -RESTORATION CONDITION
Byrds Creek Byrds Creek
Spencer
Downstream
Creek
REFERENCE REACH DATA
UT Cane Creek' UT Richland Creek
Upstream'
LIT Rocky Branch2
Byrds
4& Reach
Creek
DESIGN
Byrds
2 Reach
Creek
3
Byrds
Reach
AS-BUILT/BASELINE
Creek Byrds Creek
2
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min I Max
Min
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
19.0
26.1
27.4
35.9
10.7
11.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
33.2
38.3
25.0
28.9
42.7
20.4
36.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
145 231 116 124 60.0 114+ 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 156 160 95 F 350 150+ 150+ 150+
150+
Bankfull Mean Depth
2.2 3.4 1.9 2.3 1.6 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.6 2.1 1.0
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth
3.8 4.4 2.6 3.4 2.1 2.6 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.8 3.2 2.8 2.9 3.4 2.1
3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
58.4 64.5 62.5 66.7 17.8 19.7 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 59.8 61.5 45.3 56.2 88.7 28.8
37.4
Width/Depth Ratio
5.6 11.7 9.3 19.3 5.8 7.1 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 18.0 24.5 13.8 14.8 22.2 14.5
36.5
Entrenchment Ratio
5.5 12.1 3.2 5.5 5.5 10.2 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 4.1 4.8 3.8 1 14.0 3.5+ 5.2+ 4.7+
7.4+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 --- 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.41
22.6
12.5
26.4
29.3
45.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
13
59
12
57
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0074 0.0075
0.0043
0.0133
0.0130
0.0188 1 0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0029
1
0.0052
0.0076 1 0.0134
0.0036 0.0097
0.0022 0.0190
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
--
---
--
---
34
179
46
129
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
1.21
2.58
0.97
2.43
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft).
Pattern
54
103
70
124
71
27
73
N/A
26 81
102
211
60
141
84
278
73
129
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
38
41
102
N/A
N/A
---
52
116
26
57
31
62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A N/A
11 15 23 38 N/A N/A
---
50 80 19 79 44
84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
--- ---
1.0 1.3 2.0 3.1 N/A N/A
---
2.0 3.2 0.7 1.9 2.2
2.3
Meander Length (ft)
N/A N/A
46 48 45 81 N/A N/A
177 263 279 603 190
255
Meander Width Ratio
3.6 3.7 3.9 6.6 N/A N/A
2.1 4.6 0.9 1.3 1.5
1.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
N/A
MENEM=
sC/0.19/0.41/116/
232/>2048
SC/0.41/22 6/
143.4/2048/>2048
---
---
---
MEN=
---
SC/SC/SC/55/
128/362
SC/SC/SC/107.3/
362/>2048
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftz
--- ----- 0.69 1.71 N/A 0.23 0.31
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
4.12
4.22
0.96
0.29
0.28
1.10
4.12
4.22
4.12
4.22
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
1% <1% --- --- --- --- 1% <1% 1% <1%
Rosgen Classification
C5/E5 C4/E4 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b C4 C4 C4 C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.7 1 3.0 2.5 1 2.5 4.9 5.4 3.8 3.5
4.1 5.5 3.0 1 3.3 4.6 3.6 7.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
--- --- 97 40 29.1
32.0 85.0 200 210 200 210
Q-NFF regression
--- --
--- ---
--- ---
--- ----- --- ---
Q-USGS extrapolation
Q-Mannings
Valley Length ft
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,630 1,368 --- --- --- --- 1,630 1,402 1,646 1,407
Sinuosity.
1.18 1.01 1.30 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.11 1.18 1.06
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.0039 0.0016 0.0043
Bankfull Slope (ft ft)
--- --- --- ----- --- 0.0046 0.0013 0.0042
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 30b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
South Branch and Southeast Branch
Parameter
mom
GaJ6Scuth
PRE -RESTORATION CONDITION
Branch Southeast Branch
Reach 1 Reach 1
Spencer
Upstream
Creek
UT Richland
Downstream
REFERENCE REACH DATA
Creek UT Cane Creek' UT Richland
Upstream2
Creek
&
UT Rocky Branch 2
South
Reach
Branch
DESIGN
Southeast
1 Reach
Branch
1
South
AS-BUILT/BASELINE
Branch Southeast Branch
Reach I Reach 1
Min
Max
Min I Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min I Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
7.4
7.9
7.7
8.7
13.3
15.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
10.0
8.0
9.3
19.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
96.0 98.0 9.5 229.0 >50 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 70.0 1 375.0 30 100 >100
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.7
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
2.3 2.4 1.0 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
8.0 8.7 6.2 10.6 16.5 17.5 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 9.6 5.7 6.5
9.6
Width/Depth Ratio
6.2 7.8 9.6 7.3 10.1 13.9 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 10.4 11.2 13.4
37.7
Entrenchment Ratio
12.4 13.1 1.2 26.3 >2.5 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 7.0 1 37.5 3.8 1 12.5 >2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0 3.7 1.0 1.4 2.1 --- 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
1.0
0.09
56.1
28.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
--
8 46
10 28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0176 0.0349 0.0247 0.049 0.0188 1 0.0704 0.0183 1 0.0355 0.0188 1 0.0704 0.0210 0.0450 0.0606 1 0.0892 0.0052 1 0.0199 0.0220 1 0.0410 0.0021 0.0178
0.0023 0.0527
Pool Length (ft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- 20 64
7 45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
- - --- -- --- --- --- --- 0.4 2.2
0.9 2.3
Pool Spacing (ft)
30
62
35 90
13
47
33
93
27
73
N/A
26 81
34
85
21
53
36
116
26 58
Pool Volume (ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
24
52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
25
48
16
39
14
35
10
27
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
N/A
5.4
22.1
NA
23
38
N/A
N/A
20
35
18
26
17
32
14
30
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
---
0.6
2.5
NA
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
2.0
3.5
2.3
3.3
1.8
3.4
1.3
2.9
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
N/A
54
196
NA
45
81
N/A
N/A
76
120
47
93
78
127
65
74
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
2.8
6
NA
3.9
6.6
N/A
N/A
7.6
12.0
5.9
11.6
8.4
13.6
6.3
7.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
N/A
SC/5C/1.0/45/
107.33/180
sC/sC/0.09/26.23
/50.61/180
SC/SC/SC/103.6/
256/362
SC/5C/SC/68.1/
180/362
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftZ
--- -- 0.28 0.98 0.94 34 0.23
0.43
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
0.25
0.09
0.50
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.25
0.09
0.25
0.09
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1% 1% --- --- --- --- --- <1% 1% <1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E5 E6/G6 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b E4 E4 C3
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.7 2.8 --- 4.2
4.5 3.8 3.5
4.1 5.5 3.1 3.5 4.6
2.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
--- --- --- 68.9
78.6 40 29.1
32.0 85.0 30 20 30
20
Q-NFF regression
---
---
--- -
--- - --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Q-USGS extrapolation
Q-Mannings
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
976 916 --- --- --- --- --- 971 792 1,009
485
Sinuosity
1.03 1.31 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.13 1.06
1.18
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.0068 0.0161 0.0070
0.0138
Bankfull Slope (ftft)
--- --- --- ------ --- 0.0075 0.0182 0.0068
0.0136
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Branch
Parameter
Gage
PRE -
RESTORATION
Southeast Branch
Reach 2 1
Spencer
Upstream
Creek
UT Richland
Downstream
REFERENCE REACH DATA
Creek UT Richland
UT Cane Creek' Upstream
Creek
2
UT Rocky Branch
Southeast
A Reach
DESIGN
Branch Southeast
2a Reach
Branch
2b
AS-BUILT/BASELINE
Southeast Branch Southeast Branch
Reach 2a Reach 2b
Min
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min I Max
Min
Max
Min
I Max
Min Max
I
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
7.2
7.4
8.7
13.3
15.2
11.5
1z.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
11.7
15.0
9.0
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.0 9.8 229.0 >50 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 114.7 120.1 140.0 310.0 >100
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.6 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
8.9 9.4 10.6 16.5 17.5 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 10.2 10.5 6.5 6.8
Width/Depth Ratio
5.8 7.3 7.3 10.1 13.9 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 13.5 21.3 12.5 16.5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6 6.2 26.3 >2.5 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 7.7 10.3 15.6 1 34.4 >2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.5 2.1 1.0 1.4 2.1 --- 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
D50 (mm)
o.aa
37.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
--
---
---
4 20
11 36
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0047 0.0147 0.0188 1 0.0704 0.0183 0.0355 0.0188 1 0.0704 0.0210 1 0.0450 0.0606 1 0.0892 0.0122 0.0367 0.0202 0.0145 0.0454
0.0119 0.0606
Pool Length (ft)
--- - --- --- --- --- --- 21 53
27 45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- --- 1.3 2.6
0.89 2.23
Pool Spacing (ft)
7 22 13 47 33 93 27 73 N/A 26 81 27 55 43 49 25 54
34 73
Pool Volume (ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
24
52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
N/A
27
3 22
12
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
5.4 22.1
NA
23 38 N/A N/A N/A 22
30 7 58
21
25
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
---
0.6 2.5
NA
2.0 3.1 N/A N/A N/A 2.4
3.3 0.7 5.5
N/A
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
54 196
NA
45 81 N/A N/A N/A 82.0 43 80
88 88
Meander Width Ratio
---
2.8 6
NA
3.9 6.6 N/A N/A N/A 3.0 4.1 7.5
N/A
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
RI%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
N/A
sC/0.02/0.04/0.05/33.z
/79.6
5C/SC/5C/70.9/
256/362
SC/SC/SC/70.9/
256/362
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftz
---
0.93
1.14
0.93
1.14
0.47
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
0.09
0.50
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.09
0.10
0.09
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
1% --- --- --- --- --- 1% 1% 1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E6/G6 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b C4 C4 C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.9 1 3.4 --- 4.2
4.5 3.8 3.5
4.1 5.5 3.0 1 3.3 3.1 4.4
N/A
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
--- --- 68.9
78.6 40 29.1
32.0 85.0 30 20 30
N/A
Q-NFF regression
---
---
--- ----- ---
Q-USGS extrapolation
Q-Mannings
Valley Length ft
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
524 --- --- --- --- --- 533 180 536
195
Sinuosity.
1.17 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.21 1.11
1.23
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)z
--- --- --- --- --- --- 0.0101 0.0144
0.0160
Bankfull Slope (ft ft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- 0.0122 0.0146
0.0168
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 11. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross
Section 1
Cross
Section 2
Byrds Creek- Reach 2
Cross
Section 3
Cross
Section
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MYl
(Riffle)
MY2 I MY3 MY4
MYS Base
MY1
(Pool)
MY2 I MY3
MY4 MY5 Base
MYl
(Riffle)
MY2 I MY3 MY4
MYS Base
MYl
4 (Riffle)
MY2 I MY3 MY4 MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
574.4
574.6
574.2
572.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
36.4
36.6
35.3
42.2
42.1
42.6
28.9
24.7
22.9
42.7
36.0
36.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
N/A
N/A
N/A
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.7
2.7
4.6
4.5
4.3
3.4
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft )
59.8
51.1
50.6
80.3
79.9
79.6
56.2
51.6
46.5
88.7
78.3
83.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
26.2
24.6
22.1
22.2
22.8
14.8
11.8
11.3
20.6
16.6
16.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.5+
4.1+
4.2+
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.2+
6.1+
6.6+
3.4+
4.2+
4.1+
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)l
12.5
28.7
18.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
26.4
42.9
28.1
22.6
32.0
36.4
-OWL I
Dimension and Substrate
Base
Byrds Creek- Reach 2
MY3 MY2 Section MY3 • •MY4
MY5 Base
MY1
MY2 Section MY3 •
l) AMimr-
•MY4 MY5 Base
Byrds Creek- Reach 3
MY3 Cross MY2 Section MY3 MY4
Cross2
Section MY3 MY4 MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
572.0
569.0
568.7565.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.8
34.3
35.3
26.2
25.4
25.9
20.4
22.6
23.4
.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>150
>150
>150
W32.
0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.4
2.3
2.5
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.4
1.4
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.3
4.5
3.2
3.0
3.1
2.1
2.2
2.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft )
84.3
80.2
86.7
47.5
45.8
47.8
28.8
31.0
31.0
20.5
23.4
24.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
14.7
14.4
14.4
14.1
14.1
14.4
16.5
17.7
15.1
13.3
13.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7.4+
6.6+
6.4+
8.5+
8.5+
8.2+
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I I
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I I
1 1 29.3 1
41.3
1 37.2 1
.0
1 49.1 1
66.2
Byrds Creek- Reach 3
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Cross
Section 10 (Riffle)
South Branch- Reach 1
Cross
Section 11 (Pool)
Southeast Branch- Reach 1
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2 MY3 MY4
MYS Base
MY3
MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5 Base
MY3
MY2 MY3 MY4
MYS Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
565.5
571.4
571.3
580.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.2
33.6
33.7
9.3
8.8
9.0
10.2
9.7
9.2
10.4
9.1
8.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
>100
N/A
N/A
N/A
>75
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
2.0
2.1
0.7
0.7
0.6
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.6
0.5
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.9
3.8
3.7
1.4
1.3
1.3
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.5
0.9
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft )
69.6
66.5
69.3
6.5
6.4
5.5
11.6
10.1
9.1
6.7
4.7
5.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.8
17.0
16.3
13.4
12.2
14.8
8.9
9.2
9.4
16.3
17.6
12.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
10.7+
11.4+
11.1+ 1
N/A
N/A
N/A
7.2+
8.3+ 1
9.1+
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I 1
56.1 1
9.4 1
30.9 1 1
1 1 N/A I
N/A
I N/A I
1
28.5
1 37.0 1
68.0

Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Bvrds Creek- Reach 2
Parameter
As-Built/Basellne
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
Min
MY -2
MY -3 MY -4 MY -5
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
28.9
42.7
24.7
36.6
22.9
36.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.6
2.1
1.4
2.2
1.4
2.3
Bankfull Max Depth
2.9
3.4
2.7
3.2
2.7
3.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (fe)
56.2
88.7
51.1
78.3
46.5
83.9
Width/Depth Ratio
14.8
22.2
11.8
26.2
11.3
24.6
Entrenchment Ratio
3.4+
5.2+
4.1+
6.1+
4.1+
6.6+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
12.5
26.4
28.7
42.9
18.0
36.4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
13
59
12
59
18
59
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0036
0.0097
0.0019
0.0147
0.0003
0.0110
Pool Length (ft)
34
179
34
182
59
183
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.6
4.3
4.5
4.2
5.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
84
278
80
214
81
225
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
26
57
1
Radius of Curvature (ft)
19
79
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.7
1.9
Meander Wave Length (ft)
279
603
Meander Width Ratio
0.9
1.3
EL
_W
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,646
1,646
1,646
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0016
0.0018
0.0019
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0013
0.0018
0.0020
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d10D
0.2/0.6/5.6/55/128/362
0.3/1.2/2.9/75.9/122.5/256
0.21/1.0/3.7/80.3/168.1/362
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Rvrds Creek- Reach 3
Parameter
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
Min
rviY-2
MY -3 ��V- MY -4 MY -5 ��
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.6
20.4
17.6
22.6
18.3
23.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.2
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.4
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft')
20.5
28.8
23.4
31.0
24.9
31.0
Width/Depth Ratio
14.4
15.1
13.3
16.5
13.4
17.7
Entrenchment Ratio
7.4+
8.5+
6.6+
8.5+
6.4+
8.2+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
29.3
45.0
41.3
49.1
37.2
66.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
12
57
26
43
18
44
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0022
0.0190
0.0065
0.0311
0.0018
0.0304
Pool Length (ft)
46
129
33
134
32
132
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.2
3.9
3.0
3.8
2.9
4.3
Pool Spacing (ft)
73
129
82
190
92
199
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
31
62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
44
84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.2
2.3
Meander Wave Length (ft)
190
255
Meander Width Ratio
1.5
1.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,407
1,407
1,407
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0043
0.0045
0.0052
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0042
0.0047
0.0047
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d10
0.1/0.6/16/107.3/362/-2048
0.2/9.1/29/82.6/180/362
0.2/1.68/32.0/112.6/430.5/2048
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
20%

Table 12c. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
South Branch- Reach 1
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
MY
Min
-2
MY -3 MY -4 MY -5
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
8.8
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.7
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.4
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (fe)
6.5
6.4
5.5
Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
12.2
14.8
Entrenchment Ratio
10.7+
11.4+
11.1+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
56.1
9.4
30.9
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)8
46
10
39
13
37
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0021
0.0178
0.0022
0.0431
0.0029
0.0298
Pool Length (ft)
20
64
22
65
21
67
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.9
2.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
36
116
22
87
32
117
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
14
35
Radius of Curvature (ft)
17
32
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.8
3.4
Meander Wave Length (ft)
78
127
Meander Width Ratio
8.4
13.6
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C3
C3
C3
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,009
1,009
1,009
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0070
0.0065
0.0078
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.0062
0.0070
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
T
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d10D
SC/SC/SC/103.6/256/362
SC/0.2/5.3/71.7/141.1/180
SC/0.09/0.3/75.9/143.4/256
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Branch- Reach 1
As-Built/Basellne
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
Min
MY -2
MY -3 MY -4 MY -5
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
9.1
8.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>75
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.5
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.5
0.9
1.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (fe)
6.7
4.7
5.6
Width/Depth Ratio
16.3
17.6
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
7.2+
8.3+
9.1+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
28.5
37.0
68.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
10
28
10
28
11
29
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0023
0.0527
0.0100
0.0390
0.0039
0.0630
Pool Length (ft)
7
45
10
54
19
48
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.3
2.6
Pool Spacing (ft)
26
58
18
78
22
56
Pool Volume (fO)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
10
27
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14
30
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.3
2.9
Meander Wave Length (ft)
65
74
Meander Width Ratio
6.3
7.1
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
485
485
485
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0138
0.0140
0.0133
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0136
0.0141
0.0126
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d10D
SC/0.2/8/68.1/180/362
SC/0.1/4/67.2/151.8/362
SC/SC/0.3/86.7/180.0/512.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Table 12e. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Branch- Reach 2a
As-Built/Basellne
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
MY
Min
-2
MY -3 MY -4 MY -5
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (fe)
6.8
5.8
4.9
Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
17.6
Entrenchment Ratio
9.4+
10.3+
10.8+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
37.2
13.5
45.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)4
20
4
26
3
28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0145
0.0454
0.0017
0.0845
0.0026
0.0750
Pool Length (ft)
21
53
9
44
16
49
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
3.4
Pool Spacing (ft)
25
54
16
88
21
66
Pool Volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
3
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7
58
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.7
5.5
Meander Wave Length (ft)
43
80
Meander Width Ratio
4.1
7.5
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
536
536
536
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0144
0.0134
0.0137
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0146
0.0135
0.0148
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
SC/0.13/24.7/128.0/214.7/256
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
1 0%

Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Branch- Reach 2b
As-Built/Basellne
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
11
Max
MY
Min
-2
MY -3 MY -4 MY -5
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (fe)
6.8
5.8
4.9
Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
17.6
Entrenchment Ratio
9.4+
10.3+
10.8+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
37.2
13.5
45.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
36
14
36
12
31
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0119
0.0606
0.0017
0.0520
0.0073
0.0580
Pool Length (ft)
27
45
27
44
28
45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
2.7
Pool Spacing (ft)
34
73
33
60
29
55
Pool Volume (ft')
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
12
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
21
1
25
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
_
Meander Wave Length (ft)
88
1
88
Meander Width Ratio
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
195
195
195
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0160
0.0085
0.0092
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0168
0.0092
0.0081
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
�_
T
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d10D
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
5C/0.13/24.7/128.0/214.7/256
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek Reach 2
585
583
581
579
577
X
X
575
a
x
�n
x
573
---------
A
41�
571
4
569
c
nrv
0
X
567
v
w 565
563
561
559
557
555
1600 1700 1800
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
2400 2500 2600
2700 2800 2900 3000
3100 3200 3300
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-9/2013)
— TW (MY1-4/2014) —� TW (MY2-3/2015)
------- WS (MY2-3/2015)
♦ BKF/TOB (MY2-3/2015) 0
STRUCTURES (MY2-3/2015)
X
X
a
x
�n
x

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek Reach 3
580
578
x
x
576
�
X
574
572
570
-- -----------
568
566
w
c 564
0
v 562
w
560
X
558
556
554
552
550
3250 3350 3450
3550 3650
3750
3850 3950 4050
4150 4250 4350 4450
4550 4650
4750
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-9/2013)
t TW (MY1-4/2014)
t TW (MY2-3/2015)------- WS (MY2-3/2015) ♦ BKF/rOB (MY2-3/2015) •
STRUCTURES (MY2-3/2015)
x
x
�
X

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
South Branch Reach 1
585
580
575
v
c
570
m
d
w
X X
565
560
555
6000 6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013) TW (MYl-4/2014) TW (MY2-3/2015)------- W5 (MY2-3/2015) ♦ BKF/TOB (MY2-3/2015)
O
N
h

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Reach 1

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Reach 2a
585
580
57s
v 570
0
v
565
560
555
550
8550 8600 8650 8700 8750 8800 8850 8900 8950 9000 9050 9100 9150
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013) TW (MYl-4/2014) f TW (MY2-3/2015)------- WS (MY2-3/2015) ♦ BKF/T08 (MY2-3/2015) • STRUCTURE5 (MY2-3/2015)
------ - ---
ti ti
x x

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast Reach 2b
572
570
568
------------------- ---------- --- -------------------------------
-----------------------------
-----------------------------566
566
0
v
w
564
562
560
558
9100 9150 9200 9250 9300 9350
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-9/2013) - TW (MYI-4/2014) t TW (MY2-3/2015)------- WS (MY2-3/2015) • BKF/TOB (MY2-3/2015) • STRUCTURES (MY2-3/2015)

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 1-Byrds Creek Reach 2
16+62 Riffle
578
�
576
S74
c
� 572
v
w
-7
O"Wq
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)—a—MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
50.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
35.3 width (ft)
1.4 mean depth (ft)
2.7 max depth (ft)
35.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.4 hyd radi (ft)
24.6 width -depth ratio
m`
150.0 W flood prone area (ft)
4.2 entrenchment ratio
r
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
�
S74
c
� 572
v
w
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)—a—MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015 41
19+69 Pool
578
576
574
c
0 572
v
w
570
IL
568
0 10 20
30 40
50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)
— MY1 (3/2014)
--s.Bankfull
tMY2(3/2015)—Bankfull
Dimensions
79.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
42.6 width (ft)
1.9 mean depth (ft)
4.3 max depth (ft)
45.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
yy� t
22.8 width -depth ratio
'A
Survey D.
fEJ
p
F11''
Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 3-Byrds Creek Reach 2
20+85 Riffle
sso
578
576
574
0
c
'w s72
w
570
568
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
+MYO(9/2013)
—a—MY1(3/2014)
`
46.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
22.9 width (ft)
2.0 mean depth (ft)
3.2 max depth (ft)
24.8 wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9 hyd radi (ft)
11.3 width -depth ratio
150.0 W flood prone area (ft)
6.6 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
h
Survey Date: 3/2015
Fie ld Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
'w s72
w
570
568
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)
—a—MY1(3/2014)
tMY2(3/2015) —Bankfull
—FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30+04 Riffle
578
576ts
-
574
–
c
� 572
v
w
s70
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)–a–MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015)—Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
�I ,4
83.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
J� •f-
yC,
..
width (ft)
_
2.3 mean depth (ft)
3.3 max depth (ft)
wetted36.9
38.9 , arimeter (ft)
2.2 hyd �
16.2 width -depth ratio
150.0 W flood prone area (ft)
4.1 entrenchment ratio ;n
S • yds
1 �
r rt
Survey Date: 1 15
Crew: Wildlands Engineering
t
DownstreamField
View
-
574
–
c
� 572
v
w
s70
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)–a–MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015)—Bankfull—FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
30+93 Pool
576
574
572
c
� 570
v
w
568
)
+MYO (9/2013) tMY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015)-Bankfull
566
0 10 20 30
40 50 60
70 80 90
100 110 120
Width (fBankfull
Dimensions
86.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
35.3 width (ft)
2.5 mean depth (ft)
4.5 max depth (ft)
37.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
g
14.4 width -depth ratio
..
1. 015
Surveyt
Crew: Wildlands Engineering
�4-
DownstreamField
View
)
+MYO (9/2013) tMY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015)-Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
36+84 Pool
574
572
570
-
0 568
w
—
w
566
—
564
0 10 20 30
40 50 60
70
80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)
— MY1 (3/2014)
--s.Bankfull
tMY2(3/2015)
—Bankfull
Dimensions
47.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
25.9 width (ft)
1.8 mean depth (ft)
3.1 max depth (ft)
27.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
14.1 width -depth ratio
Survey D.
t
D.

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015Bankfull Dimensions
Icross section 7- Byrds Creek Reach 3
574
572
570
s\
c
� 568
-
w
566
—
564
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)—a—MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015)—Bankfull—FloodproneArea
1
23.4 width (ft)
1.3 mean depth (ft)
2.4 max depth (ft)
24.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
17.7 width -depth ratio
1 1 W flood prone area (ft)
6.4 entrenchment ratio
1low bank height ratio
Survey1. 1
Crew: Wildlands Engineering
DownstreamField
View
37+23 Riffle
574
572
570
s\
c
� 568
-
w
566
—
564
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)—a—MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015)—Bankfull—FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 8- Byrds Creek Reach 3
46+25 Riffle
569
567
565
c
0
v
S63
4—It
FloodproneArea
S61
0 10
20 30
40 SO 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)
—a—MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015) —Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
24.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
18.3 width (ft)
1.4 mean depth (ft)
2.2 max depth (ft)
18.8 wetted parimeter(ft)
1.3 hyd radi (ft)
13.4 width -depth ratio
150.0 W flood prone area (ft)
;e
8.2 entrenchment ratio
i
1.3 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Icross section 9- Byrds Creek Reach 3
47+03 Pool
570
568
566
c
� 564
v
w
562
)
+MYO (9/2013) +MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015)—Bankfull
560
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70 80 90
Width (fBankfull
Dimensions
69.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
N
33.7 width (ft)
2.1 mean depth (ft)
3.7 max depth (ft)
34.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
16.3 width -depth ratio
Date:3/2015
Surveyt
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View ��
)
+MYO (9/2013) +MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015)—Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 10 -South Brach Reach 1
65+41 Riffle
574
573
572
c
� 571
v
w
570
FloodproneArea
569
0 10
20
30 40 50
60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)
—+—MY1(4/2014) tMY2(3/2015) —Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
5.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.0 width (ft)
0.6 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
9.7 wetted parimeter(ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
14.8 width -depth ratio
100.0 W flood prone area (ft)
11.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Icross section 11- South Branch Reach 1
65+54 Pool
574
573
572
571
0
'w 570
w
-Bankfull
569
568
0 10
20 30
40 50 60
t)
Width (fBankfull
+MYO (9/2013)
�MY1 (4/2014)
tMY2 (3/2015)
Dimensions
9.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
t14i
_ r
1
a _.
• max (ft)
1depth
.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
1
,._
9.4 width -depth ratio
Survey1. 1 15
Crew: Wildlands Engineering
DownstreamField
View
-Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 12 - Southeast Reach 1
82+39 Riffle
583
582
581
c
� 580
v
w
579
FloodproneArea
578
0 10
20
30 40 50
60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)
—+—MY1(4/2014) tMY2(3/2015) —Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
5.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.2 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
9.0 wetted parimeter(ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
12.0 width -depth ratio
75.0 W flood prone area (ft)
9.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2015
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Icross section 13 - Southeast Reach 1
82+54 Pool
583
582
581
580
c
0 579
w 578
)
+MYO(9/2013) �MY1(4/2014) tMY2(3/2015)—Bankfull
577
576
0 10 20
30 40
50 60 70
t
Width (fBankfull
Dimensions
9.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
1 max depth (ft)
9.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
1 th-depth ratio
_
Date:8.
Survey 1
�+
�.
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View 1�
)
+MYO(9/2013) �MY1(4/2014) tMY2(3/2015)—Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Icross section 14 - Southeast Reach 2
88+10 Pool
s77
s76
'e
s75
s74
s73
o s72
'w s71
w
570
-
569
568
0 10 20
30
40 50 60 70
t)
Width (fBankfull
+MYO(9/2013)
�MY1(4/2014)
tMY2(3/2015)—Bankfull
Dimensions
23.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
jF
1
1.8 mean depth (ft)
3.1 max depth (ft)
1
14.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
�p
7.3 width -depth ratio
ii
Survey1. 1
Crew: Wildlands Engineering
DownstreamField
View

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Cross Section 15 - Southeast Reach 2
88+35 Riffle
576
575
�
574
573
c
0
�
'w 572
w
571
570
FloodproneArea
0 10
20
30 40
50
60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO(9/2013)
—+—MY1(4/2014)
�MY2(3/2015)
—Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
4.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.3 width (ft)
0.5 mean depth (ft)
~
1.0 max depth (ft)
i +
9.5 wetted parimeter(ft)
0.5 hyd radi (ft)
R
—'-
17.6 width -depth ratio
0, _
100.0 W flood prone area (ft)
10.8 entrenchment ratio
+rj
1.0 low bank height ratio
"'
t
Survey Date: 3/2015
-
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
0.21
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
3.7
8
8
8
8
D100 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
2
10
v 30
Fine
0.125
0.250
10
8
8
8
18
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
7
8
8
26
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
7
9
9
35
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
6
7
7
42
80
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
3
5
5
47
v
u 60
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
3
1
4
4
51
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
1
3
3
54
m 30
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
3
5
5
59
20
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
2
3
3
62
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
2
5
5
67
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
3
3
70
Coarse
22.6
32
3
3
3
73
Very Coarse
32
45
2
2
2
75
Very Coarse
45
64
5
5
5
80
Small
64
90
6
6
6
86
Small
90
128
5
5
5
91
Large
128
180
5
5
5
96
Large
180
256
3
3
3
99
Small
256
362
1
1
1
100
iiiii
Small
Medium
362
512
512
1024
100
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
50
1 50 1
100 1
100 1
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.21
D35 =
1.00
D50 =
3.7
D80. =
80.3
D95 =
168.1
D100 =
362.0
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay
Sand avel
bble r
gp
a ro
2° 70
60
550
E
40
v 30
a 20
00u
10
0
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO -02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
c
v
u 60
iv
a 50
0
u 40
m 30
20
c
10
oyti y�� ti5 oy
1 ti Lb P 56 4 yv yo p 0' Lo �L p5 bb �O tb �O h� dti yL �P
ti ti ti 3 h
ti do ,yo tp
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013 . MYl-04/2014 r MY2-03/2015

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
6.59
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
18.0
D84 =
0
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
90
Fine
0.125
0.250
0
Medium
0.25
0.50
r
0
Coarse
0.5
1.0
m
0
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
2
50
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
3
5
m
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
7
Fine
4.0
5.6
4
4
11
Fine
5.6
8.0
11
11
22
Medium
8.0
11.0
11
11
33
Medium
11.0
16.0
13
13
46
i? 40
Coarse
16.0
22.6
12
12
58
Coarse
22.6
32
13
13
71
Very Coarse
32
45
8
8
79
Very Coarse
45
64
9
9
88
Small
64
90
11
11
99
Small
90
128
1
1
100
Large
128
180
100
Large
180
256
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10(
Small
256
362
100
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
1 512 1
1024
512
1024 1
2048
1
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
100
1 100
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
1VV
Cross Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
6.59
Di5 =
11.65
D50 =
18.0
D84 =
54.7
D95 =
79.5
D100 =
128.0
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
1VV
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Individual Class Percent
-
100
90
SIIUCIay
Sand avel
90
bble
r
gp
m
d
e r
a; 70
a
50
m
s 60
u
40
m
50
20
c
E
0
o, p �h Oh S 'ti ,tib
o° 01 CJ -
b 5� 1ti y6 6 ,y'ti b� 6b CO ,ti'6 �O y0 1p'ti y'ti ,tib b4 90
titi ti ti ti e yo yo bo
Particle
Particle Class Size (mm)
i? 40
0 MYO-02/2013
MYI-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015
c: 30
d
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10(
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO-02/2013 �MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
m
d
60
a
50
m
u
40
m
30
20
c
10
0
o, p �h Oh S 'ti ,tib
o° 01 CJ -
b 5� 1ti y6 6 ,y'ti b� 6b CO ,ti'6 �O y0 1p'ti y'ti ,tib b4 90
titi ti ti ti e yo yo bo
Particle
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013
MYI-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Diameter (mm)
Channel materials (mm)
Summary
10.25
Das =
Particle Class
Riffle 100-
Count
Class Percent
D84 =
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
D95 =
min max
Percentage
Cumulative
90
Silt/Clay
0.000 0.062
0
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Very fine
0.062 0.125
70
0
100
Fine
0.125 0.250
0
90 SIIUCIay
d av el
bble r
Medium
0.25 0.50
50
0
80
e r
Coarse
0.5 1.0
0
a; 70
Fine
Very Coarse
1.0 2.0 1
1
1
s 60
Fine
Very Fine
2.0 2.8
1
1
3
Fine
5.6
8.0
6
6
50
Medium
Very
11.0
9
9
E
Medium
11.0
16.0
12
12
i? 40
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
10
30
u
Coarse
22.6
32
16
16
a 20
Very Coarse
32
45
18
18
74
Very Coarse
45
64
18
18
10
Small
64
90
4
4
96
Small
90
128
3
3
0
Large
128
180
1
1
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Particle Class Size (mm)
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015
Total
100
100
100
6'ti p by p
o° 01 0-
S 'ti ,tib b 5� % 1ti y6 6 ,y'ti b� 6b �O ,ti'6 �O y0 b'ti y'ti ,tib b4 90
titi ti ti ti '� e yo ,yo bo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO-02/2013 MYI-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015
Cross Section 3
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
10.25
Das =
19.02
Dso =
28.1
D84 =
54.7
D95 =
82.6
D100 =
180.0
90
80
70
�
w
d
60
a
50
m
u
m
Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
2
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
3
Fine
5.6
8.0
6
6
9
Medium
8.0
11.0
9
9
18
Medium
11.0
16.0
12
12
30
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
10
40
Coarse
22.6
32
16
16
56
Very Coarse
32
45
18
18
74
Very Coarse
45
64
18
18
92
Small
64
90
4
4
96
Small
90
128
3
3
99
Large
128
180
1
1
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross Section 3
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
10.25
Das =
19.02
Dso =
28.1
D84 =
54.7
D95 =
82.6
D100 =
180.0
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
�
w
d
60
a
50
m
u
m
40
30
20
c
10
0

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
12.31
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
1
1
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
Fine
0.125
0.250
bble
1
m
Medium
0.25
0.50
30
gp
1
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
10
1
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
2
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
3
50
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
4
Fine
5.6
8.0
3
3
7
Medium
8.0
11.0
6
6
13
Medium
11.0
16.0
10
10
23
Coarse
16.0
22.6
11
11
34
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
44
Very Coarse
32
45
16
16
60
Very Coarse
45
64
17
17
77
Small
64
90
11
11
88
Small
90
128
6
6
94
Large
128
180
4
4
98
Large
180
256
1
1
99
Small
256
362
1
1
100
Small
Medium
iiiii Large/Very Large
362 1
512 1
1024
512
1024
2048
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
100
1 100
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
1VV
Cross Section 4
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
12.31
Di5 =
23.40
D50 =
36.4
D84 =
79.5
D95 =
139.4
D100 =
362.0
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
1VV
Individual Class Percent
100
-
90
90
SIIUCIay
nd avel
70
m
60
d
a 50
bble
m
r
30
gp
20
e r
a; 70
10
0
s 60
50
E
i? 40
c: 30
d
U
at 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10(
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 � MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
m
60
d
a 50
m
40
u
m
30
20
c
10
0
p, ti0 ,b b o tiy,', ;', , 0 9° 01 10
,yo bo
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013 MYI-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015
100

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
Reach Summary00
Particle Class
Class
Percent
min max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Silt/Clay
0.000 0.062
7
7
7
7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Very fine
0.062 0.125
2
2
2
9
100
Fine
0.125 0.250
3
6
9
9
18
90 sgVCIay d
avel
le
Medium
0.25 0.50
1
5
6
6
24
gp
�ler
a ro
Coarse
0.5 1.0
5
5
5
29
0 70
Very Coarse
1.0 2.0
2
6
8
8
37
60
Medium
8.0
Very Fine
2.0 2.8
40
37
11.0
16.0
4
4
4
44
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3 50
4
Very Fine
2.8 4.0
Coarse
2
2
2
39
2
2
50
Fine
4.0 5.6
45
5
4
9
39
�? 40
Very Coarse
45
Fine
5.6 8.0
1
7
1
1
40
v 30
90
7
4
11
11
77
Small
90
128
a 20
3
11
11
88
Large
128
180
4
4
4
92
Large
180
256
2
2
2
10
Small
256
362
94
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
96
98
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
0
100
Total
50
50
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO-02/2013 MVl-04/2014 �MY2-03/2015
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
60
50
Medium
8.0
11.0
40
Medium
11.0
16.0
4
4
4
44
Coarse
16.0
22.6
4
4
4
48
Coarse
22.6
32
2
2
2
50
Very Coarse
32
45
5
4
9
9
59
Very Coarse
45
64
3
4
7
7
66
Small
64
90
7
4
11
11
77
Small
90
128
8
3
11
11
88
Large
128
180
4
4
4
92
Large
180
256
2
2
2
94
Small
256
362
94
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
96
98
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi = 0.21
Di5 = 1.68
Dso = 32.0
D84 = 112.6
D95 = 430.5
yotib �0�
D100 = 2048.0
80
� 70
d
w
d
16 40
u
A 30
20
E 10
0
Oob'LO1,yh O,lh Oy S 1. ,ti0 b 5� � yti y6 ��6 3ti by 6�` �O 1�<b 160 �yb 36'1. yyti 0 X96
Particle Class Size (mm)
0MVO-02/2013 MVl-04/2014 • MY2-03/2015
60
50

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
Diameter (mm)
Summary
Particle Class
Riffle 100-
Count
Class Percent
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
min max
Percentage
Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000 0.062
4
4
4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Very fine
0.062 0.125
4
100
Fine
0.125 0.250
13
13
17
90
SIIUCIay d
avel
Medium
0.25 0.50
3
3
20
80
r
e r
Coarse
0.5 1.0
5
5
25
a; 70
40
Very Coarse
1.0 2.0
1
1
26
s 60
Very Fine
2.0 2.8
1
1
27
50
Very Fine
2.8 4.0
6'ti �h �h Oh S
27
E
Fine
4.0 5.6
2
2
29
i? 40
Fine
5.6 8.0
3
3
32
30
u
128
10
Medium
8.0 11.0
2
2
34
a 20
13
91
Medium
11.0 16.0
5
5
39
96
Small
256
362
2
2
98
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
10
512
1024
2048
1
1
Coarse
16.0 22.6
5
5
44
100
Coarse
22.6 32
2
2
46
0
0.01
0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Very Coarse
32 45
9
9
55
Particle Class Size (mm)
Very Coarse
45 64
3
3
58
Small
64 90
10
10
68
t MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
6'ti �h �h Oh S
titi6 y'ti 6b
Small
90
128
10
10
78
Large
128
180
13
13
91
Large
180
256
5
5
96
Small
256
362
2
2
98
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
1
1
1
1
99
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
D100 = 1024.0
Cross Section 7
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi = 0.24
Das = 11.86
Dso = 37.2
D84 = 149.8
D95 = 238.6
Cross Section 7
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi = 0.24
Das = 11.86
Dso = 37.2
D84 = 149.8
D95 = 238.6
60
50
40
6'ti �h �h Oh S
titi6 y'ti 6b

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
Diameter (mm)
Summary
Particle Class
Riffle 100-
Count
Class Percent
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
min max
Percentage
Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000 0.062
0
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Very fine
0.062 0.125
0
100
Fine
0.125 0.250
0
90
SIIUCIay d
avel
bb r
Medium
0.25 0.50
50
0
g0
e r
Coarse
0.5 1.0
0
a; 70
40
Very Coarse
1.0 2.0
0
s 60
Very Fine
2.0 2.8
0
50
Very Fine
2.8 4.0
0
E
Fine
4.0 5.6
2
2
2
i? 40
Small
64
Fine
5.6 8.0
5
5
7
30
u
128
10
Medium
8.0 11.0
10
10
17
a 20
11
80
Medium
11.0 16.0
10
10
27
88
Small
256
362
11
11
99
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
10
512
1024
2048
1
Coarse
16.0 22.6
4
4
31
100
Coarse
22.6 32
5
5
36
0
0.01
0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Very Coarse
32 45
5
5
41
Particle Class Size (mm)
y
VerIL
t MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015
I
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
Coarse
45
64
8
8
49
Small
64
90
10
10
59
Small
90
128
10
10
69
Large
128
180
11
11
80
Large
180
256
8
8
88
Small
256
362
11
11
99
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
1
1
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Channel materials (mm)
D16 = 10.66
Das = 29.85
Dso = 66.2
D84 = 214.7
D95 = 319.1
D100 = 512.0
Cross Section 8
Cross Section 8
60
50
40

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
South Branch, Reachwide
'p,D1oo = 256.0
South Branch, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
Diameter (mm) Particle Count
Reach Summary
Particle Class
Class
Percent
min max Riffle
Pool
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
South Branch, Reachwide
Silt/Clay
0.000 0.062 5
24
29
29
29
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Very fine
0.062 0.125 1
9
10
10
39
100
Fine
0.125 0.250 1
9
10
10
49
90 SIIUCIay d
avel
bble
r
Medium
0.25 0.50 1
6
7
7
56
gp
a ro
Coarse
0.5 1.0
1
1
1
57
0 70
Very Coarse
1.0 2.0
1
1
1
58
60
Very Fine
2.0 2.8
58
3 50
Very Fine
2.8 4.0 1
1
1
59
£
Fine
4.0 5.6
59
�? 40
Fine
5.6 8.0
59
v 30
Medium
8.0 11.0 2
2
2
61
a 20
Medium
11.0 16.0 5
5
5
66
10
Coarse
16.0 22.6 5
5
5
71
Coarse
22.6 32 4
4
4
75
0
256
362
100
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
1000 10000
Very Coarse
32 45 3
3
3
78
>2048
100
Total
50
Particle Class Size (mm)
100
Very Coarse
45 64 3
3
3
81
Small
64 90 6
6
6
87
t MYO-02/2013 MV1-04/2014 �MY2-03/2015
Small
90 128 6
6
6
93
Large
128 180 6
ri
6
6
99
Large
180 256
South Branch, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
60
50
1
1
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 = Silt/Clay
Di5 = 0.09
Dso = 0.3
D84 = 75.9
D95 = 143.4
"p
� 70
d
w
d
16 40
u
A 30
20
c 10
0
oobtio1,yh oye oy ti ti ti� a 5� ro titi tib �ti� 3'a'a5 �a �0 1,yro 1�o ytiti soya �oaro �9e
Particle Class Size (mm)
0MVO-02/2013 MVl-04/2014 • MY2-03/2015
60
50

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
7.22
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
6
6
6
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
d
6
Fine
0.125
0.250
6
m
Medium
0.25
0.50
b le
6
ul
Coarse
0.5
1.0
80
6
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
10
6
e r
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
6
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
6
s 60
Fine
4.0
5.6
5
5
11
Fine
5.6
8.0
7
7
18
Medium
8.0
11.0
8
8
26
Medium
11.0
16.0
8
8
34
Coarse
16.0
22.6
7
7
41
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
51
Very Coarse
32
45
11
11
62
Very Coarse
45
64
9
9
71
Small
64
90
12
12
83
Small
90
128
9
9
92
Large
128
180
5
5
97
Large
180
256
3
3
100
0
Small
256
362
100
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
100
100
100
Particle Class Size (mm)
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
South Branch, Cross Section 30
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
1VV
Cross Section 10
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
7.22
Di5 =
16.81
D50 =
30.9
D84 =
93.6
D95 =
157.1
D100 =
256.0
South Branch, Cross Section 30
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
1VV
Individual Class Percent
100
-
80
90
SIIUCIay
d
avel
60
d
a 50
m
40
u
m
b le
20
ul
r
80
c
10
e r
a; 70
s 60
50
E
i? 40
r
d 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10(
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO-02/2013 �MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
m
60
d
a 50
m
40
u
m
30
20
c
10
0
0�' ti0 by Oh S 'ti ,tib b 5� 0 1ti y0 6 ,y'ti b� 0b Co ,ti'6 00 0 01' ;y' ,tib 0 90
o° 01 o titi ti ti ti e 10 ,yo bo
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013 MYI-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015
100

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast R1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
10
28
38
38
38
D100 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
2
40
Fine
0.125
0.250
10
10
10
50
Medium
0.25
0.50
70
50
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
4
5
5
55
w
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
d
55
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
16
55
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
A
55
Fine
4.0
5.6
30
55
20
Fine
5.6
8.0
C
1
1
1
56
Medium
8.0
11.0
0
a 20
56
Medium
11.0
16.0
0 MYO-02/2013
3
3
3
59
10
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
2
5
5
64
Coarse
22.6
32
2
2
2
66
Very Coarse
32
45
4
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
4
4
70
Very Coarse
45
64
6
6
6
76
Small
64
90
9
9
9
85
Small
90
128
6
6
6
91
Large
128
180
4
4
4 1
95
Large
180
256
2
2
2
97
Small
256
362
1
1
1
98
iiiii
N ...........
illli
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
2
2
2
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
Silt/Clay
D50 =
0.3
D84 =
86.7
D95 =
180.0
D100 =
512.0
Southeast R1, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Individual Class Percent
100
90
SIIUCIaySand'
ravel
bble
r
90
80
a ro
80
0 70
00
70
60
d
w
60
d
3 50
50
16
£
�? 40
u
40
A
30
30
20
C
v
10
0
a 20
a 5� ro titi tib �ti� 3ti a5 k �p 1yro 1�o tiyo 'p,ytiti soya �o0 �0
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013
MYl-04/2014 • MY2-03/2015
10
0
1-4
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO-02/2013 MV1-04/2014 MY2-03/2015
Southeast R1, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
d
w
60
d
50
16
u
40
A
30
20
C
10
0
oobtio1yh oye oy ti ti ti�
a 5� ro titi tib �ti� 3ti a5 k �p 1yro 1�o tiyo 'p,ytiti soya �o0 �0
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013
MYl-04/2014 • MY2-03/2015

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Diameter (mm)
Channel materials (mm)
Summary
16.00
Das =
Particle Class
Riffle 100-
Count
Class
Percent
138.7
Southeast R1, Cross Section 12
172.9
min max
Percentage Cumulative
90
Silt/Clay
0.000 0.062 13
13
13
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Very fine
0.062 0.125
70
13
100
Fine
0.125 0.250
13
90 SIIUCIay
d avel
byle r
Medium
0.25 0.50
50
13
g0
e r
Coarse
0.5 1.0
13
a; 70
40
Very Coarse
1.0 2.0
30
13
s 60
20
Very Fine
2.0 2.8
13
c
50
Very Fine
2.8 4.0
10
13
E
00
Fine
4.0 5.6
0
13
i? 40
Fine
5.6 8.0
13
30
Medium
8.0 11.0
13
U
a 20
Medium
11.0 16.0 3
3
16
Coarse
45
64
7
7
10
Small
Coarse
16.0 22.6
17
16
64
Small
Coarse
22.6 32 8
8
24
0
Large
128
180
17
17
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Very Coarse
32 45 16
16
40
99
Small
256
362
99
Particle Class Size (mm)
Very
512
1024
2048
1
1
99
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
tMYO-02/2013 �MYl-04/2014 �MY2-03/2015
Total
100
100
100
p�h Oh
o� 01 o
S 'ti ,tib b 5� 1ti y6 6 3ti b� 6b �O ,ti'6 �O y0 b'ti y'ti ,tib b4 90
titi ti ti ti e yo yo bo
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013 MYI-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015
Cross Section 12
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi =
16.00
Das =
40.45
Dso =
68.0
D84 =
138.7
D9s =
172.9
D1oo =
1024.0
90
80
70
�
w
d
60
a
50
m
u
m
40
30
20
c
10
0
Coarse
45
64
7
7
47
Small
64
90
17
17
64
Small
90
128
16
16
80
Large
128
180
17
17
97
Large
180
256
2
2
99
Small
256
362
99
Small
Medium
��iiiii Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
1
1
99
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross Section 12
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi =
16.00
Das =
40.45
Dso =
68.0
D84 =
138.7
D9s =
172.9
D1oo =
1024.0
Southeast R1, Cross Section 12
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
�
w
d
60
a
50
m
u
m
40
30
20
c
10
0

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
Diameter (mm) Particle Count
Reach Summary
Particle Class
Class
Percent
min max Riffle
Pool
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Silt/Clay
0.000 0.062 7
20
27
27
27
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Very fine
0.062 0.125
8
8
8
35
100
Fine
0.125 0.250 1
10
11
11
46
90 SIIUCIay d
avel
60
le
r
Medium
0.25 0.50
50
46
gp7
a ro
Coarse
0.5 1.0 1
2
3
3
49
0 70
Fine
Very Coarse
1.0 2.0
49
60
Medium
8.0
Very Fine
2.0 2.8
49
Medium
11.0
16.0
49
Coarse
3 50
22.6
Very Fine
2.8 4.0
49
Coarse
49
£
3
1
Fine
4.0 5.6
53
Very Coarse
32
49
40
�?
1
5
5
58
Very Coarse
45
64
7
v 30
10
10
68
Small
64
90
10
1
a 20
11
79
Small
90
128
5
5
5
84
Large
128
180
5
1
6
6
10
Large
180
256
7
3
10
10
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
0 114
-L l��
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
1000 10000
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO-02/2013 MV1-04/2014 �MY2-03/2015
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
60
50
40
Fine
5.6
8.0
49
Medium
8.0
11.0
49
Medium
11.0
16.0
49
Coarse
16.0
22.6
49
Coarse
22.6
32
3
1
4
4
53
Very Coarse
32
45
4
1
5
5
58
Very Coarse
45
64
7
3
10
10
68
Small
64
90
10
1
11
11
79
Small
90
128
5
5
5
84
Large
128
180
5
1
6
6
90
Large
180
256
7
3
10
10
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
100
100
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Channel materials (mm)
D16 = Silt/Clay
Di5 = 0.13
Dso = 24.7
D84 = 128.0
D95 = 214.7
D100 = 256.0
Reachwide
Reachwide
60
50
40

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Diameter (mm)
Channel materials (mm)
Summary
8.37
Das =
Particle Class
Riffle 100-
Class
Percent
158.8
D95 =
227.6
Count
2048.0
90
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
min max
Percentage Cumulative
80
Silt/Clay
0.000 0.062 9
9
9
�
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Very fine
0.062 0.125
9
100
60
Fine
0.125 0.250
50
9
90 SIIUCIay
d avel
bb e r
Medium
0.25 0.50
9
80
e r
Coarse
0.5 1.0 1
1
10
a; 70
20
Very Coarse
1.0 2.0
10
s 60
10
Very Fine
2.0 2.8
10
0
50
Very Fine
2.8 4.0 1
1
11
E
Fine
4.0 5.6 1
1
12
i? 40
Fine
5.6 8.0 3
3
15
30
L III
Medium
8.0 11.0 7
7
22
U
a 20
#
Medium
11.0 16.0 6
6
28
55
17 1
44
64
90
5
5
10
Small
Coarse
16.0 22.6 8
8
36
7777
T7
Coarse
22.6 32 8
8
44
0
__t7t__T__
180
256
6
6
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Very Coarse
32 45 6
6
50
97
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
1
2
1
2
97
98
100
Particle Class Size (mm)
Very
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
�MYO-02/2013 �MYl-04/2014 �MY2-03/2015
110110 bill 11 Ll W
All, 1.
0'ti �h �h Oh
o° 01 0-
S 'ti ,tib b 5� 1ti y0"- ,y, b0 0b -O ,ti', 00 y0 ,', e ;', ,tib b4 90
titi ti ti ti 3 yo ,yo bo
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013 MYI-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015
Cross Section 15
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi =
8.37
Das =
21.65
Dso =
45.0
D84 =
158.8
D95 =
227.6
D1oo =
2048.0
90
80
70
�
w
d
60
a
50
m
u
m
40
30
20
c
10
0
Coarse
45
64
5
5
55
Small
64
90
5
5
60
Small
90
128
12
12
72
Large
128
180
19
19
91
Large
180
256
6
6
97
Small
256
362
97
Small
Medium
Large/Very Large
362
512
1024
512
1024
2048
1
2
1
2
97
98
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
Cross Section 15
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi =
8.37
Das =
21.65
Dso =
45.0
D84 =
158.8
D95 =
227.6
D1oo =
2048.0
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
�
w
d
60
a
50
m
u
m
40
30
20
c
10
0

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCDMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 2 - 2015
*data collected, but level was below bankfull elevation
Date of Data Approximate Date of
Reach
Collection Occurrence
Method
3/9/2015
Byrds Creek
10/14/2015 10/3/2015
Crest Gage /
3/9/2015 *
South Branch
Pressure
10/14/2015 10/3/2015
Transducer
Southeast
3/9/2015
Branch
10/14/2015 10/3/2015
*data collected, but level was below bankfull elevation

BANKFULL VERIFICATION PHOTOGRAPHS
Monitoring Year 2
Byrds Creek — (10/14/2015) 1 Byrds Creek — (10/14/2015)
Byrds Creek — (10/14/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 5: Hydrology Summary Data — Bankfull Verification Photographs

F -q
Byrds Creek — (10/14/2015) 1 Byrds Creek — (10/14/2015) 1
Southeast Branch — (10/14/2015)
Southeast Branch — (10/14/2015)
South Branch — (10/14/2015)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
44/ Appendix 5: Hydrology Summary Data — Bankfull Verification Photographs