770020_Routine Inspection_20241113

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 15 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (25 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: j ,� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: ao
Farm Name: W Iyk'4 Ail t(lWIS ELK M Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 'n
Facility Contact: WI 1 I u I4 A1/ w\&A S Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ' [a yY1 e, Integrator: Slmlki,f�4?ld
Certified Operator: Sciy"._ Certification Number: 1-7�)I Z
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILa er I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder 0 L, \ Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
DischarEes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JEJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes EZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes tLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 77 - Date of Inspection: 1,3 )
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No tSI NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _ 1
Spillway?: n0
Designed Freeboard(in): 19
Observed Freeboard(in): tom_
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? +re_eS Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:] Yes 'Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 'nZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes JS�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): nC kSW BUPA PA1 Aat>LSGO l P.S14-)P—S64)
13. Soil Type(s): �I(��C�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'EQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No *'S;j NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ISNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: 7 - Date of Inspection: 1 2
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No D NA NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ONE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ONE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document Yes No DNA ONE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. MYes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No NA D NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? Yes �ZNo ❑NA D NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 0 Yes Tq%No NA D NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
t�2�MW� Sooni fnm ctv\ Silt- Ck
C
IvyS`�2�,bm
r q_'A_kt S win SIB k� I v� kkb , vi tt C'InkLI - M,m s("MpQs
Reviewer/Inspector Name: VIC rL Re 7 L /R/ U1 Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Cc''`- l/i`, ��% Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020