20140547 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
FINAL
Project Name: 601 East Stream Restoration
NCDMS Contract No.:004925
NCDMS Project No.: 95756
Union County, NC
Data Collected: September 2015 — November 2015
Date Submitted: November 2015
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
DEQ -DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Prepared for:
res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Prepared by:
EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Contents
1.0 Project Summary............................................................................................................................... l
2.0 Methods.............................................................................................................................................3
3.0 References.........................................................................................................................................3
Appendix A General Tables and Figures...................................................................................................... 5
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data.........................................................................................................17
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data............................................................................................................... 39
Appendix D Stream Geomorphology Data.................................................................................................51
AppendixE Hydrologic Data....................................................................................................................101

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The 601 East Stream Restoration Site is located in Union County, approximately 13 miles south of
Monroe, NC (Figure 1). The site encompasses 12.8 acres of formerly agricultural land and includes
portions of Tanyard Branch, a tributary of Lanes Creek. The Site is located within the Yadkin River
Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit 03040105081010 and the
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) sub -basin 03-04-14. The drainage area of
Tanyard Branch at the downstream end of the site is 0.56 square miles (354 acres). Land use within the
watershed is predominately used for agriculture with the remaining land use composed of low density
residential and forested areas.
The project goals and objectives listed below were established in the 601 East Mitigation Plan and
outlined in the "601 East Stream Restoration Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline
Report Final" (Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 2015).
The project goals address the stressors identified in the Targeted Local Watershed and include the
following:
• Reduce water quality stressors originating in and around the project area affecting the project
reaches and downstream watercourses, which include population of the Savannah Lilliput
(Toxolasma pullus) and the Carolina Creekshell (Vilosa vaughiana), both listed species of
concern. Specifically involving:
o Reducing turbidity and sediment loading
o Input reductions of nutrients and crop protection chemicals
o Improving thermoregulation
• Improving aquatic habitat quality and diversity within project reaches
• Improving recruitment of instream fine organic matter (FOM) in the near term and both FOM and
large wood in the long term
• Improving terrestrial habitat diversity and quality in the vicinity of project reaches
• Establishing habitat continuity between the reach headwaters and Lanes Creek
• Improving flood flow attenuation and floodplain interaction
The project goals will be addressed though the project objectives:
• Restore or enhance reach pattern, dimension and profile
• Stabilize eroding stream banks
• Install stream structures to maintain grade and improve bed form complexity
• Implement BMP detention devices on lateral agricultural drainages
• Install a diverse native riparian buffer
• Removal of invasive exotic plant species
• Secure a protective conservation easement and establish fencing as needed
Monitoring Year 1 (MY I) data was collected from September to November 2015. Monitoring activities
included visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement, 20 permanent photo stations, ten
permanent vegetation monitoring plots, eighteen cross-sections, and nine pebble counts.
Generally, visual assessment of the project as a whole indicates that the project is performing as desired.
Summary tables and permanent photo station photos associated with the visual assessment are located in
Appendix B. With the exception of a few bare area, totaling 0.08 acres, vegetation is becoming well
601 East Stream Restoration Project 1 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

established throughout the easement (Figure 2 and Table 6). These bare areas consist mainly of small
ditches that have migrated into the easement, each coinciding with existing ditches from outside the
easement. No rip rap or grade control structures were observed, however RES will coordinate to make
repairs in the coming monitoring year. Bare areas associated with ditches will be matted and seeded and
grade control will be installed as necessary to stabilize channels within the easement.. At the downstream
portion of Reach 2, a large plot of cattails was noted below XS -12, creating a monoculture within the
wetland area. Additionally, an area of honeysuckle and privet were noted at the upper end of Reach 2,
totaling 0.16 acres. Treatment is scheduled for spring 2016. Planted stems were difficult to assess with
dense herbaceous vegetation covering the stems throughout most of the easement, however areas of
sparse vegetation were noted during MY (Table 6 and Figure 2). These conditions are typical of a new
mitigation site until the vegetation becomes established following construction activities. These areas
will continue to be monitored in subsequent site visits. Encroachment was noted on Reaches 3 and 4,
where an ATV had driven across the easement and tractors had turned into the easement while planting
adjacent fields. RES is currently coordinating with the landowners and will be installing additional
signage marking the easement in spring of 2016.
Visual assessment of the stream was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding banks,
structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. Only a few stream problem areas were noted during
visual assessment (Table 5 and Figure 2). Structures are intact and performing as designed. The project
approach on the ephemeral channel at the upstream end of the project—Reach Awas to install a series
of energy dissipating structures to provide vertical stability and sediment settling capacity within the
reach. Visual assessment of this reach indicate that structures are performing as designed, stabilizing
incision and capturing sediment from the upstream contributing area. No indications of new incision
were observed during the assessment. Thus far, the settling areas are not in need of maintenance;
however they will be assessed during upcoming site visits and maintained if needed.
Monitoring of permanent vegetation monitoring plots (n = 10) was completed during September 2015.
Summary tables and photographs associated with MY monitoring are located in Appendix C. MY
monitoring data indicates that nine of the ten vegetation monitoring plots are on track to meet the MY3
interim success criteria of 320 stems per acre (Table 7 and Table 9). Stem densities ranged from 283 to
850 stems per acre with a mean of 469 stems per acre across all plots. When volunteer stems are
included, the annual mean increases to 498 stems per acre. A total of 14 species were documented within
the monitoring plots.
Geomorphic data for MY1 was collected during September 2015. Summary tables and cross-section
plots related to stream morphology are located in Appendix D. With the exception of XS -13, noticeable
change in the cross-section data between MYO and MY were limited to pools (Appendix B, Table l la).
With the exception of XS -5, all pool cross sections showed an increase in bankfull width, ranging from
0.3 feet to 1.5 feet. Pebble counts indicate that six of the nine riffle cross sections sampled fall within the
medium to very coarse gravel range. The other three cross sections indicate that silt deposition is
occurring in riffles in the downstream portion of Reach 1 and Reach 2, with a D50 falling within the silt
particle size class. This can be attributed to an herbaceous layer forming in the channel and trapping silt
runoff from the adjacent field as well as low flows between the baseline and MY monitoring events,
which allows for little sediment transport. Substrate will be monitored in future years for shifts in
composition. The bank pin arrays indicate that no erosion is taking place in the pools with the exception
of the downstream end of XS -7. Field data indicated that there was localized erosion around the
downstream pin at XS -7, at a rate of 0.02 ft/year (Table 12). This likely can be attributed to the bent bank
pin, and is not cause for concern.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 2 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Summary information/data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly
Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on NCDMS'
website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from NCDMS upon
request.
2.0 METHODS
For MY1, visual assessment was performed during the morph and vegetation collection event. For future
monitoring years, visual assessment of the project will be performed at the beginning and end of the
monitoring year. Permanent photo station photos were collected during the initial visual assessment
during leaf -off conditions. Additional photos of vegetation or stream problem areas were documented
with photographs throughout the project area.
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon NPR 332 Total Station.
Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section and profile data were collected in the field
and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data was limited to 18 cross-
sections. Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS, and Excel for data processing and analysis.
Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman Pebble Count outlined in the Harrelson et al (1994)
and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored using 10 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 1 Protocol for MY1 and will follow Level 2 Protocol for monitoring years 2-
7 for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of composition and
density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners
of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot are taken from the origin each
monitoring year.
Precipitation data was reported from the NCCRONOS station number 315771 in Monroe, NC. Two crest
gauges were installed on the mainstem, one upstream of Lansford Road in Reach 2 and another
downstream of Lansford Road in Reach 3. During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the corkline
was recorded and cross-referenced with known bankfull elevations at each crest gauge.
3.0 REFERENCES
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2015. 601 East Stream Restoration, Baseline Monitoring
Document and As -Built Baseline Report Final, Union County, North Carolina. NCEEP Project No.
95756
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T.,R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm; accessed November 2008.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 3 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 4 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures
601 East Stream Restoration Project 5 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 6 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

DIFIVing DIWA,60Wi Fmm M611An diilO 90161 etit lltir.
NX. Tum Idt tin Lartdsliird liu al Site is loactud on Ilio
Icft and n�hL - milts dnun and acccnvcd from a `
panting area an the south std e of Lmdsicrrd Road.
']be Kubj"l tlrtrj%x( silo is au tiro nunms mlal rcslurdtion site
of the NCDMS and encompassed by a rccordc•d
cnlsenvstim eta ttelrt, but is lx3rXkred b� land %iitlt
[wivate mvnershi j ACkescin the .gke may re uiry .. .� � ✓ ' , � r ,
tra.er ing arem scar or along the canm"m mi bminday unci ``-i art= ' w- "s ,3
L7ixrsfare accH to 117e gtntral public is riot permittt�+l.
Ascom by authorized persctttcl of Start: and toderai
agmoie� tx tlli-ir im4iked in the dw
ifc4•e1cpmcnt, tivLbiglil, and Nim-eardship of th-- reattvation
situ is ix witted within the terms and timeframes of their
definedrutc Any inicnded sate: ti multt-t1r tir activtn, by aM
lietx4a OLIthick. thea, presiou9l} aat,titait.it Tiole" turd
activities requires prior eoxdination with NCDMS.
-�u�}y� �� _ r -f._ r=-.--�'F }�I'/�%1' L _ � �'l� '� '''• !1 f ��' I•"�� `JJ � /j r ``�
tt+
hwlitigaliolr SAC 1 ,
f Jfi f i
} ■may` �'' ,� f r jy `.Iia r" i
l
;VOL �~5~F. �� • V -''±V"'-:'.1 1L.811{lSffli'il �._-� { ` ,�
1 �
i [f
• � /` / }, - rte. rr' - �.a tel. . f-
•._
�.., Streams' t`l
f c,
Roads
Q Mitigation Sites
a Water BodiesNIF
Figure 1
601 East Mitigation Site
resProject Vicinity Map
EQUINOX
U 1.25 t1.3 ]
kli Ln,
601 East Stream Restoration Project 7 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 8 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

tra
z�� CD
z��. N
ndo m
�n C-Do�
i
"
°CD
CD noz�<o
N `✓-
' _ _ a
m-
�
CD
o a�a
r •'
I
o
� � a
Landsfor d Road
� � o
b
o
.
I l rai-ie,N. _INA
' 7
cn
m
•. s' �'
cri
N
0 0
'
a�
cn
CD
CL
Q
fl
i
ItCD
` f
�•
wCD
! /
�
I
rn
'
CD
0.0
z`°

x
8
I
oW
00+AA
1
ti
Q I
Op
c ��
♦`
�'0
s
♦`
` ,
U
a LM
•�
z'
00`11
00
!OOITI { a
/ /
o
i.
'
� e
/
L
/
00+91.
O
4on"%
z
/ 00+81
0
/ 00
Op,�Ol ��;F
CL.
Ems+ H W
•
7
�
0011ll 11
I
� � o
o
;�;•�
0
a
4
��
00
s
♦
go
i
o
N . / 00,9l
..
oo`Q
on
ctt - c1
♦/♦
o
CIS
p U
♦
/00+BZ ,•-
Qj
�
O
O
o z Z
/ ♦
o
U �
°O+ /
~
N O O N
Qj
o
',,-n� z
i °p"OE I
CIS W
�Q
N w U
u C13o�zz
°
�
w

a
z �
CDCDc
C
p p
�ID
CDo��� CD
CD
C
o
CD
O p p N
tt
581100
�
N
N
CD
eo
y
��. f S��`00
00 •
s'
0.1 C
e Y
op
o
�' S�00
o �
I
I
—
to •...
1 ♦
4'L00
w o
CD
53,L00
■ el / `♦
OQ
i
M M H
y• 'p��
S�0
"I1�•O eye �0• '•\w 0
CD
F�
I
491100
♦
1
481-00 s
• �° 00
CD
cr
♦
°•
CD
�
_
Vl •
1
0
`
YIOO
e
�6
AxJ
I'l �
•
CD
`.
3'`00(D
a
0
■
.1
N
�
b
CD
a.
0
X

.19

601 East Stream Restoration Project 13 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
601 Fast Stream Restoration Site
11
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland Buffer
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
T e
9
R
RE
R RE R RE
Totals
3671
43
Project Components
Mitigation
Project Component
Restoration -or- Restoration
or- Reach ID
Sta[ioningfL.oca[ion
Existing Footage/Acreage Approach (PI, PII etc.)
Equivalent
Restoration Footage or Acreage
Ratio
Credits
Reach A Ephemeral
5+45-7+60
215 Buffer establishment and BM P
215
1 : 5
43
sediment import reduction
Reach la
7+60-11+10
336 P R
350
1 : 1
350
Intermittent
Reach lb
11+10— 11+95
85 Enhancement El
85
1 :1.5
57
Intermittent
Reach le Perennial
11+95 — 13+47
136 Enhancement El
155
1 :1.5
103
Reach Id Perennial
13+97-22+00
790 Pi R
803
1 : 1
803
Reach 2a
Perennial
22+00-22+45
40 Enhancement El
45
1 :1.5
30
Reach 21,
Perennial
22+75-24+02
1
125 Enhancement El
127
1 :1.5
85
Reach 2c Perennial
24+02 —31+32
669 P 1 R
730
1 : 1
730
80' active channel
Reach 3a Perennial
42+92 —46+61
112' relic channel PI R
369
1 : 1
369
Reach 36 Perennial
47+21 — 53+70
502' relic channel PI R
649
1 :1
649
Reach 4 Perennial
53+70— 58+65
470' relic channel P3 R
495
1 : 1
495
Component Summation
Stream
Non -riparian Wetland Buffer
Restoration Level
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Upland (acres)
Mitigation
Credits
(linear feet)
(acres) (square feet)
Riverine Non-Riverme
Restoration
3396
3396
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
412
275
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation/Other
1 215
1 1 1
1
43
HQ Preservation
BMP ®ements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
Ephemeral Channel
FB, LS, S, FS
Slowing the water down for settling and filtering excess sediment
Sediment expected from future degradation upstream
5+45-7+60
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Storrawater Wetland; WDP =
Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S= Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spread; NI = Natural Infiltration
Area; FB = Forested Buffer
601 East Stream Restoration Project 13 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
601 East Stream Restoration Site
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
May 2013
Jan 2014
Final Design — Construction Plans
Sept 2013
Jan 2014
Construction
-
Dec 2014
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings
-
Jan 2015
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring
— baseline) Feb 2015
Feb 2015
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 2015
Nov 2015
Year 2 Monitoring
Survey contractor POC
Elizabeth Turner 919 827-0745
Year 3 Monitoring
Wright Contracting
Year 4 Monitoring
Construction contractor POC
Andrew Dimmette [phone]
Year 5 Monitoring
Green Resource - Raleigh, NC
Table 3. Project Contact Table
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Designer
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. (WCE)
4805 Green Road, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27616
Primary project design POC
Becky Ward [phone]
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting
P.O. Box 545, Siler City, NC 27344
Construction contractor POC
Joseph Wright 919 663-0810
Planting Contractor
H & J Forest Services
1416 Ocean Boulevard, Holly Ridge, NC 28445
Planting contractor POC
[phone]
Construction Survey Contractor
Turner Land Survey, PLLC
3719 Benson Drive, Raleigh, NC 27629
Survey contractor POC
Elizabeth Turner 919 827-0745
Seeding Contractor
Wright Contracting
P.O. Box 545, Siler City, NC 27344
Construction contractor POC
Andrew Dimmette [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource - Raleigh, NC
As Purchased by EBX 919 829-9909 x213
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbor Gen - Blenheim, SC
800 222-1290
NC Forest Service Nursery - Goldsboro, NC
888 628-7337
[Baseline] Monitoring Performers
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
4805 Green Road, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27616
Stream Monitoring POC
Rachael Zi ler - W CE - [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Chris Shears - The Cantena Group - 919 732-1300
Monitoring Performers (MYl)
Equinox
2015
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell [phone]
601 East Stream Restoration Project 14 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
601 Fast Stream Restoration Site
Project Information
Project Name 1601 East Stream Restoration Site
County Union Count
Project Area (acres) 12.78
Project Coordinates latitude and longitude) 34° 50' 21.62" N, 80° 25' 32.26"N
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin River Basin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-Digit USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 3040105081010
DWQ Sub-basin 3/4/2014
Project Drainage Area acres 361.33
Project drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 2%
CGIA Land Use Classification 2.01.01.07 Annual Row Crop Rotation
Reach Summa Information
Parameters
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Length of reach (LF)
1418, 1393 LF Restored
906, 902 LF Restored
1080, 1018 LF Restored
Relic Channel, 495 IF Restored
Valley Classification
II
II
VIII
VIII
Drainage area acres
109
135
333
359
NCDWQ stream
hitemrittent: 19.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
identification score
Perennial: 33.5
NCDW Q Water Quality
13-170-(1)
13-17-40-(1)
13-17-40-(1)
13-170-(1)
Classification
Morphological
G4/B4/C4b
C4/E4/DA
C4/G4
G4
Description streamt e
Evolutionary trend
(reference channel
G
GDA
G
G
evolution modelused)
Intermittent: Tatum gravelly silty
Underlying mapped soils
Cid channery silt loam, Tatum
Chewacla silt loam
Chewacla silt loam
Penenial: Cid channery silt loam
gravelly silt loam
Drainage class
Well Drained
Moderately Well Drained
Somewhat Poorly Drained
Somewhat Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric status
Non Hydric
Non Hydric
Non Hydric
Non Hydric
Sloe
2%
0.84%
0.67%
1.25%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Agriculture along up stream
Canopy species include Willow
Red Maple, Sweetgum, Eastern
Canopy species include Red
Canopy species include Red
Native vegetation
The remaining stream buffer
Maple, Hackberry, Willow Oak,
Maple, Hackberry, Willow oak,
within this reach is composed of
Wetland A is composed of
and Sweetgum. The presence of
and Sweetgum. The presence of
community
Willow Oak, Red Maple, River
Cattails, spike rush arrow-arum,
Chinese privet outcompete any
Chinese privet outcompete any
Birch, Black Willow, Elderberry,
and duckweed.
shrub and herb layer.
shrub and herb layer.
and Blackberry.
Percent composition of
5% of Japanese stilt ass, 80%
p gr
exotic invasive vegetation
0%
50% of Parrot feather
Chinese privet, and kudzu
80% Chinese privet
601 East Stream Restoration Project 15 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 4 con't. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Size of Wetland acres
0.43 ac
Wetland Type (non-
Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh
riparian, riparian riverine,
Mapped Soil Series
Cid channery Silt Loam
Moderately Well Drained to Somewhat Poorly
Drainage class
Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Non-Hydric
Tanyard Branch headwaters, groundwater, and
Source of Hydrology
adjacent runoff
Wetland A formed from accumulating sediments
Hydrologic Impairment
filling the channel resulting in a braided channel
systemthrough the wetland.
Herbaceous-Vegetation is domninated by
herbaceous vegetation such as Cattail (Typha
latifolia ), Bulrush (Scirpus cyperinus ), Common
Native vegetation
Rush (Juncus effuses). Some tree species such as
community
Black Willow (Salix nigra), and Red Maple
(Acer rubrum) are present in the wetland
margins.
95%-The invasive Parrot Feather
Percent composition of
(Miriophyllum aquaticum) is dominant
exotic invasive vegetation
throughout the wetland where there is standing
water.
Reg latory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United
SAW 2013-
States-Section 404
Yes
00265; EEP IMS
#95756
Waters of the United
Yes
DWR# 14-0547
States — Section 401
Endangered Species Act
No
Yes
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
No
Yes
ERTR
Coastal Zone
Management Act
(CZMA)/Costal Area
No
N/A
Management Act
LAMA)
FEMA Floodplain
No
N/A
Compliance
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
I N/A
601 East Stream Restoration Project 16 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
601 East Stream Restoration Project 17 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring
Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 18 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring
Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 1
Assessed Length 1393 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aeeradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Deeradation -Evidence of downcutting
1
15
99%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
32
32
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
33
33
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
33
33
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
33
33
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
33
33
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
1
15
99%
0
0
97%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
1
15
99%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
N/A
7N7/A]
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 19 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 2
Assessed Length 902 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as
s Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
1000/0
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
16
16
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
17
17
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
17
17
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
17
17
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
17
17
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
NIA
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
N/A
N/A
N/A
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
N/A
FN A
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 20 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 3
Assessed Len th 1018 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
Intended
ass Intenddeded
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aguadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
18
18
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
18
18
100%
Condition
2. Lenat appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
18
18
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
18
18
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
18
18
100%
2. Basil:
1. Scoured/ Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
N/A
N/A
N/A
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
N
N/A
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 21 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 4
Assessed Len th 495 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
Intended
ass Intenddeded
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aguadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
9
9
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
9
9
100%
Condition
2. Lenat appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
9
9
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
9
9
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
9
9
100%
2. Basil:
1. Scoured/ Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
2
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
2
2
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
2
2
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 22 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Planted Acreage 12.8
Easement Acreage 12.8
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
0
0.08
1%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on
2. Low Stem Density Areas
N/A
0
0.00
0%
MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Totals
0
1 0.08
1 1%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Crowth Rates or Vigor
N/A
0
0.00
o
0%
given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Totals
0
0.08
1%
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Number of
CCPV Depiction
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map
Cross Hatch
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
scale).
0
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
0.16
1%
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
N/A 0
0.12
1%
scale).
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 23 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 1— Permanent Photo Station 1
Top of Project — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 2
Cross Section 1 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 24 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

At<.,
Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 3
Cross Section 2 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 4
Cross Section 3 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 25 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 5
Cross Section 4 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 6
Cross Section 5 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 26 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 7
Cross Section 6 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 1— Permanent Photo Station 8
Cross Section 7 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 27 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 9
Cross Section 8 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 2 — Permanent Photo Station 10
Cross Section 9 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 28 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 2 — Permanent Photo Station 11
Cross Section 10 —Looking Downstream
Project Reach 2 — Permanent Photo Station 12
Cross Section 11 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 29 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 2 — Permanent Photo Station 13
Cross Section 12 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 3 — Permanent Photo Station 14
Cross Section 13 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 30 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

nNO W�
r;
CK
Project Reach 3 — Permanent Photo Station 15
Cross Section 14 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 3 — Permanent Photo Station 16
Cross Section 15 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 31 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 3— Permanent Photo Station 17
Cross Section 16 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 4— Permanent Photo Station 18
Cross Section 17 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 32 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 4 — Permanent Photo Station 19
Cross Section 18 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 4— Permanent Photo Station 20
Bottom of Project — Looking Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 33 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Problem Area Photos
Project Reach 1 — Bare Area 8+50 Left Descending Bank
Project Reach 1 — Headcut/ Degradation 9+25
601 East Stream Restoration Project 34 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Bank Erosion 9+50
Project Reach 1 — Ditch/ Bare Area 12+00 Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 35 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Ditch/ Bare Area 20+75 Right Descending Bank
Project Reach 2 — Bare Area/ Ditch 24+25 Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 36 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Project Reach 3 — Encroachment 43+50
Project Reach 3 — Encroachment 45+50
601 East Stream Restoration Project 37 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

1.:».+ir''f�::�'�'
Project Reach 3 — Encroachment 47+50 Left Descending Bank
r
t '�j'j �yY � • , r s
■
.. A-
yIP—
r e:
Aft
> P
A'�I ,kiwi
Project Reach 3 Encroachment 51+50 Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 38 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
a�
�� ✓.r•
i LJl_A 1 1A6,
i
R
�
w -fie
'ra
J ,�'
/l 4 ti
�
N•�
Project Reach 3 — Encroachment 47+50 Left Descending Bank
r
t '�j'j �yY � • , r s
■
.. A-
yIP—
r e:
Aft
> P
A'�I ,kiwi
Project Reach 3 Encroachment 51+50 Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 38 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 East Stream Restoration Project 39 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 40 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
601
East Stream Restoration Site
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold
Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
90%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
No
7
Yes
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
601 East Stream Restoration Project 41 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 42 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Report Prepared By
Drew Alderman
Date Prepared
11211201110,41
database name
Equinox-2015-A-601East.mdb
database location
Z.\ES\NRI&M\EBXMonitoring\60l_East\MY1-2015\Data\Veg
computer name
FIELD -PC
file size
44625920
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary
of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each
year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each
year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems,
dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences
and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species
for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95756
project Name
601 East
Description
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
le ngth(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
10
601 East Stream Restoration Project 42 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

z�
a n�
UIQ b �
CD
Cn•CD
CD n
0 oZ C
� O•
.'3
b
C
0
I
W
O
O�z
o
n
m
p
a
�
g
°
co
m
rn
rn
0000000
anon
CDCD
A
r
O
N
a
N
b
b
A
�
N
�
H
A
b
O
O
P'd b
00
N
C lJ
O
H
cc
LA
O
n
A
W
N
b
O
U
w
A
O
w
t -I
rn
00
N
G
H
b
cc
b
b
A
w
ry
H
R
W
H
�
O
R
O
B
y
.O~i
Vi b
�•
pWp�
K
6
�
7
N
�
ai
�
H
�
O
N
y
b
O
O
A
w
�
b O
H
�
vAi
a,
•-.
A
w
b
0
O
b b
W
O
N
p1 K
A
A
Go
N
w
N
.r. oD
H
w
N
A
A
oo
N
w
N
b
O
w
O
r
b b
�•
A
w
�O
N
01
�
H
W
A
b
O
r
J
J
O
a\
oo
N
N
��
b
b O
p7 .t
J
J
01
CD
N
N
r.
O
H
J
J
01
0o
N
N
b
O
w
O
T
to
O
�O
51
w
01
w
A
A
H+
A
A
w
in
N
cn
O
�O
w
J
w
a\
w
A
A
A
ON1
Cc
N
r a
p
O
FS1 O
00
N
N
n
O
W00
�
O�
0000
.-•
0�
O
N
Do
000
00
O
w
0\
A
N

r
s
It
mt

TM
73"
.41
.-A IV AMVqIFF.-'W

601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
September 3, 2015
601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
September 3, 2015
601 East Stream Restoration Project 46 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

t
x,
pmrp
imZOI
• s + P L
X44 •, 'rte `� �
1.
^::.fit
•
V ��` •,..
,' 9 '_ 1. p'l'".
�'
: 1 _
,
r
� .
'7'e -03-2 15

601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
September 3, 2015
601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
September 3, 2015
601 East Stream Restoration Project 48 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
September 3, 2015
601 East -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10
September 3, 2015
601 East Stream Restoration Project 49 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 50 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
601 East Stream Restoration Project 51 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 52 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 53 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 1 (1393 feet)
Parameter Ciauge Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Conditions
Reference Reach(es) Data
Des
As-built / Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD n Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
7
21
60
7.42
9.88
11.61
10
8.82
11.45
10.77
15.13 2.23
8
Floodprone Width (ft)
8
60
101
18.51
26.43
33.59
22
28
35
40.00
74.38
69.00
154.00 35.32
8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.2
0.5
0.9
0.68
0.79
0.97
0.72
0.50
0.81
0.77
1.20 0.26
8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1
1.4
1.28
1.78
2.16
1.2
0.87
1.53
1.54
2.07 0.49
8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
8
1
1.4
0.97
1.39
1.82
7.2
4.45
9.27
8.85
14.07 3.48
8
Width/Depth Ratio
1.1
27
47
8.14
12.95
16.82
13.9
8.56 1
15.45
14.89
25.33 5.40
8
Entrenchment Ratio
1 0.4
2.4
9.5
2.02
2.4
3.24
2.2
2.8
3.5
3.30
6.90
5.62
16.40 4.19
8
Bank Height Ratio
0.34
2
0.97
1.39
1.82
1 1
0.93
0.98
1.00
1.00 0.03
8
d50 (mm)
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
2.7
24.9
107.3
5.97
11.26
26.78
14
23
90
10.04
22.09
18.54
95.26 14.52
32
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0007
1.7
40
0.015
0.031
0.05
0.021
0.036
0.046
0.015
0.034
0.032
0.064 0.012
32
Pool Length (ft)
9.03
16.89
56.86
13.6
20.13
31.74
14
22
29
13.38
24.28
21.23
65.67 11.47
33
Pool Max depth (11
1
2.4
3.9
1 1.4
1.83
2.2
2.2
1,16
2.19
2.17
3.15 0.38
33
Poo1Spacing (ft)
15.5
50
128
23.5
36.2 1
57.4 1
24
36.7
58
31.42
44.63
40.18
116.51 16.87
32
Pool Volume (ft)
Patte rn
Channel Behwidth(ft)
10
19.6
25
13
17.33
20
13
18
21
13
18
21
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14.5
84
118
16
33
53
16
32.1
52
16
32.1
52
Rc: Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.7
4.6
11.5
4.35
6.04
8.9
4.3
6.1
8.9
4.3
6.1
8.9
Meander Wavelength (11)
36
96
240
43
59.67
88 1
43
61
89
43
61
89
Meander Width Ratio
0.5
0.94
1.7
1 1.32
1.76
1 2.031.3
1.8
2.1
1.3
1.8
2.1
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri%Bu%/P%/G%/S%
45.5%
53.6%
0.0% 26.8% 1
17.2%
47.9°/a 1 8.1% 1 0.0%
44.3%1
155.7%1
SC%/Sa%/G°//C%B%Be%
4.1%
27.3%
67.6% 1.0%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/dF/M' (mm)
2.71
6.72
10.56 24.89
38.23
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f'
Max part size (mm) Mobilized at bankftifl_
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
_
Drainage Area (SM)
0.166
0.144
Im ervious cover estimate (%)
Rosgen Classification
G4B4/C4b
B4/C4
B4/C4b
B4/C4b
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.2
3.2
Bankfull Discharge (efs)
24
Valley length (ft)
1425
378
Channel Thahveg len (ft)
1479
440
1438
1438
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
1.16
1.17
1.17
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0196
0.017
0.017
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.017
0.017
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
Proportion over wide (%)
Entenchment Class (ER Range
Incision Class (BHR Range
BEHI VL%/L%/M%/H % 1VH%B%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
601 East Stream Restoration Project 53 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 54 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 East Stream Restoration Site -Reach 2 (902 feet)
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Conditions
Reference
Reach(es) Data
Design
As-buil/Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD Min
Mean Med
Max SD
n Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfdl Width (ft)
7
21
19
10
12.2
14.3
12
15.50
19.73
19.63 24.18
3.56
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
40
60
214
42
77
11
48
91.5
135
62.00
108.75
102.50 168.00
50.05
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
0.5
0.5
1.33
0.92
1.12
1.34
0.9
0.61
0.93
0.90 1.31
0.32
4
Bankfall Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1
1.9
1.2
1.6
2.2
1.5
1.49
2.01
2.02 2.53
0.58
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')6
1
21
12.2
13
13.4
10.7
9.43
18.42
19.49 25.26
6.75
4
Width/Depth Ratio
6.1
27
38
7.7
11.3
15.6
13.3
14.64
23.00
22.13 33.10
8.07
4
Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
2.4
10
2.9
6.5
8.6
3.6
7.6
10
2.56
5.63
5.79 8.39
2.54
4
Bank Height Ratio
0.9
0.34
1.7
1.1
1.5
1.7
1
0.90
0.96
0.96 1.00
0.05
4
d50 (mm)
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
10.9
24.9
19.7
4.03
14.18
13.61
14
23
90
12.13
23.38
18.96 50.22
10.70
18
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.00
1.7
0.04
0.006
0.02
0.05
0.021
0.036
0.046
0.004
0.02
0.02 0.04
0.01
17
Pool Len h (ft)
11.1
16.89
525.4
18.51
32.11
58.03
14
22
29
15.06
32.87
29.14 74.26
14.68
17
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.9
2.4
4.2
1.7
2.47
3.1
2.5
1.91
2.87
2.67 4.03
0.59
17
Pool Spacing (ft)
20
50
512
29
48
84
38
57
85
32.94
55.57
47.60 110.28
20.48
17
Pool Volume (rt )
Palle rn
Channel Bel[width (ft)
12
32
42
25
40
65
25
40
65
25
40 65
Radius of Curvature (ft)
68
75
77
20
31
65
38
47
58
38
47 58
Re: Bardcfu l width (ft/ft)
5.2
5.7
5.9
3.2
3.9
4.8
3.2
3.9
4.8
3.2
3.9 4.8
Meander Wavelength (ft)
46
70
97
61
84
97
61
84
97
61
84 97
Meander Width Ratio
0.9
2.4
3.2
2.1
3.3
5.4 1 1
2.1
3.3
5.4
2.1
3.3 5.4
:Substrate, bed and transportparameters;
RN/o/Rtr% /P % /G%/S%
12.6%
87.4%
0.0% 27.2%
3.7% 61.5%
7.6% 0%
39.5%
60.5%
0.0%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%B%/Be%
0.0%
33.7%
66.3% 0.0% 1
0.0% 1 0.0%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/d?/dP(ennr)
0.90
4.57
8.92 24.42
47.93
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fr
_
Max part situ (mm) Mobfliwd at bankfull
_
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m`
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.212
0.5
Impervious cover estimate (%)
Rosgen Classification
C4/F.4/DA
C4
C4/E4
C4/E4
Banldull Velocity (fps)
2.1
2.6
Bankfu0 Discharge (cfs)
27
Valley length (ft)
830
378
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1479
440
945
945
Sinuosity (ft)
1.01
1.1
134
1.34
Water Surface Slope (Channell (ft/ft)
0.0069
0.0069
BE sloe (ft/ft)
0.0069
0.0069
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
Proportion over wide (%)
Entenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
BEHI VL%/L%MI%/H%/VH%/E%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
601 East Stream Restoration Project 54 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 55 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 East Stream RestorationSite - Reach 3 (1018 feet)
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre-
Existing Conditions
Reference Rcach(es) Data
Design
As-built/Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD n Min
Mean Med
Max SD 11
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfu0 Width (ft)
65
15.7
29
10
12.2
14.3
17
15.86
17.69
17.66 19.58
1.52
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
150
200
2601.26
42
77
11
I50
200
300
75.00
231.25
250.00 350.00
140.50
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
0.5
0.9
2.1
0.92
1.12
1.34
1.18
0.79
1.26
1.21 1.84
0.54
4
Bankfall Max Depth (ft)
1.28
1.7
19.4
1.2
1.6
2.2
2
1.58
2.51
2.52 3.44
1.06
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
10.5
14.5
31
12.2
13
13.4
21
12.85
22.79
21.12 36.08
11.26
4
Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
17.5
16.5
7.7
11.3
15.6
14.4
10.62
15.88
15.27 22.36
5.98
4
Entrenchment Ratio
9.6
12.7
4
2.9
6.5
8.6
8.8
11.8
17.6
4.73
12.74
13.17 19.90
7.31
4
Bank Height Ratio
1.3
2.2
1.7
1.1
1.5
1.7
1
0.99
1.00
1.00 1.00
0.01
4
d50 (mm)
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
0.97
10.58
23.77
4.03
14.18
13.61
15
25
103
10.12
24.10
16.77 110.25
22.07
19
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.2
0.6
0.006
0.02
0.05
0.008
0.018
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.02 0.04
0.01
17
Pool Len (ft)
7.83
20.87
64.91
18.51
32.11
58.03
25
35
50
27.38
35.18
35.18 49.71
6.68
18
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.8
2.7
3.4
1.7
2.47
3.1
3.4
1.93
2.91
2.98 3.50
0.36
18
Pool Spacing (ft)
8
48
125
29
48
84
39
66
117
41.11
58.55
54.44 137.89
20.86
18
Pool Vohmie (ft')
Patte rn
Channel Bekwidth (ft)
13
41462.0%
25
40
65
35
56
92
35
56 92
Radius of Curvature (ft)
22.5
49.7
20
31
65
27
43
63
27
43 63
Re: Banldldl width (ft/ft)
1.4
3.2
3.2
3.9
4.8
1.6
2.5
3.7
1.6
2.5 3.7
Meander Wavelength (ft)
32
57
61
84
97
97
119
134
87
119 134
Meander Width Ratio
1.3
2.6
2.1
3.3
5.4
2.1
3.3
5.4
2.1
3.3 5.4
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Rf'/o/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
38.0%
0.0%. 27.2%
3.7% 61.5%
7.6% 0.0°/
430%
57.0%
0.0%
SC°lo/Sa%/G%/C%B%Be%
4.0%
51.9%
0.0%. 0%dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/di/df°
(hmn)
0.8
3.5
19.6
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f'
Max part size (rmn) Mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m'
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.52
0.5
Impervious cover estimate (%)
Ros en Classification
C4-G4
E4/C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.2
3
3
Banldu0 Discharge (efs)
55
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (fr)
1064
1064
Sinuosity (ft)
1.05
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0056
0.0056
BE slope (ft/ft)
0.0056
0.0056
Bankfu0 Floodplain Area (acres)
Proportion over wide (%)
Entenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class C Range)
BEHI VL%/L%/M%/H % NH % B
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
601 East Stream Restoration Project 55 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 56 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 4 (495 feet)
Parameter Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Conditions
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-built / Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Eq. Mm
Mean
Med Max SD n
Mm
Mean
Med Max SD n
Mm
Med
Max
Min
Mean Med Max
SD
n
Bankfu0 Width (ft)
5.2
11.6
20
7.42
9.88
11.61
16.
14.93
15.92 15.92 16.91
1.40
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
16
20
25
18.51
26.43
33.59
30
35
40
30.39
36.19 36.19 42.00
8.21
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.76
0.9
1.1
0.68
0.79
0.97
0.98
0.98
1.37 1.37 1.76
0.55
2
Bankf dI Max Depth (ft)
12
1.33
1.28
1.78
2.16
1.8
1.49
2.11 2.11 2.72
0.87
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
12.3
15
16
0.97
1.39
1.82
15.7
14.70
22.25 22.25 29.81
10.68
2
Width0e th Ratio
7
12.9
18
8.14
12.95
16.82
16.3
9.60
12.38 12.38 15.16
3.93
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
1.7
2.2
2.02
2.4
3.24
1.9
2.2
2.5
2.04
2.26 2.26 2.48
0.32
2
Bank Height Ratio
3.3
3.5
1 4.2 1
0.97
1 1.39
1 1.82 1
1
I 1
1.00
1 1.10 1 1.10 1.20 1
0.14
2
d50 (mm)
Profile
Riffle Len (ft)
0.79
10.58
23.7
5.97
11.26
26.78
15
23
103
15.84
20.829 18.18 28.96
4.7764 1
9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.02
0.06
0.015
0.031
0.05
0.021
0.036
0.03
0.018
0.0274 0.0298 0.0382 0.0068
9
Pool Length (ft)
7.83
20.7
64.91
13.6
20.13
31.74
14
22
42
30.82
35.01 35.78 38.85
3.1243
9
Pool Max depth (ft)
2
2.5
3.2
1.4
1.83
2.2
2.2
1.997
2.8154 2.753 3.392
0.3909
9
Pool Spacing (ft)
12
29
55
23.5
36.2
57.4
38
59
93
49.77
56.111 54.805 69.26
6.2441
8
3Poo1 Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
12
32
82
13
17.33
20
21
28
32
21
28 32
Radius of Curvature (ft)
18
34.9
61
16
33
53
26
52
84
26
52 1 84
Re: Bankfrdl width (ft/ft)
1.6
3
5.3
4.35
6.04
8.9
162
3.25
5.25
162
3.25 5.25
Meander Wavelength (ft)
30
56
113
43
59.67
88
69
97
142
69
97 142
Meander Width Ratio
1.1
2.8
7.2
1.32
1.76
2.03
1.32
1.76
2.03
1.32
1.76 2.03
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
19.9%
80.1% 0.0%
26.8%
17.2% 1
47.90% 1 8.1% 0.0%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%B%Be%
_
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/di"/disp (mm)
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f'
Max part size (mm) Mobilized at bankfh0
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m'
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.56
0.144
Impervious cover estinate (%
Rosgen Classification
G4
B4/C4
134
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4
3.27
3.27
BankfullDischarge (cfs)
55
Valley length (ft)
378
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
440
465
465
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
1.16
1.13
1.13
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0114
0.0114
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0114
0.0114
Bankfidl Floodplain Area (acres)
Proportion over wide (%)
Entenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
BEHI VL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/E
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
601 East Stream Restoration Project 56 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

-Information Unavailble
601 East Stream Restoration Project 57 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
Table Ila. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 1
Cross -Section 1
Pool
Cross -Section 2
Riffle
Cross -Section 3
Pool
Cross -Section 4
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation (datum) Used 544.82
544.82
540.40 540.40
537.87
537.87
533.69 533.69
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.6
15.1
15.1 14.7
9.4
10.6
8.8
9.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
45.0
>45
77.0 >77
154.0
>154
75.0
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.6 0.5
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.2
1.2 1.2
1.8
1.7
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
14.1
13.7
9.0 1 8.0
8.7
8.6
4.5
4.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.2
16.6
25.3 27.0
10.2
13.0
17.5
17.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
10.3
>3
9.3 >5.2
1 14.9
>14.6
15.9
>8.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
23.0
21.5
14.3 13.4
14.6
133
8.6
4.7
d50 (mm)
-
-
- 8.3
-
-
-
22.0
Cross -Section 5
Pool
Cross -Section 6
Riffle
Cross -Section 7
Pool
Cross -Section 8
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation (datum) Used 530.49
530.49
528.11 528.11
525.02
525.02
522.48 522.48
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.9
12.1
11.3 11.3
10.3
11.4
10.1
8.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
61.0
>61
80.0 >80
63.0
>63
40.0
>40
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.6 0.6
1.2
1.0
0.6
0.6
BankfullMax Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.3 1.3
2.0
2.0
1_0
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
12.8
11.0
6.6 6.6
12.3
11.2
6.2
5.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.0
13.2
19.3 19.5
8.6
11.5
16.6
13.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
17.42
>5.1
9.7 >7.1
10.7
>5.5
10.9
>4.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.9
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
20.5
16.4
16.7 13.3
24.9
16.3
11.4
7.5
d50 (mm) I
-
-
- 1 26.0
-
-
-
0.062
-Information Unavailble
601 East Stream Restoration Project 57 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Information Unavailable
Table 11a cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 2
Cross -Section 9
Riffle
Cross -Section 10
Pool
Cross -Section 11
Riffle
Cross -Section 16
Riffle
Cross -Section 12
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation (datum) Used 517.50 517.50
516.22 516.22 515.16 515.16
513.68 513.68
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.2
24.3
19.2
19.7 15.5
15.8
20.0
20.6
FloodproneWidth (ft)
62.0
>62
132.0
>132 73.0
>73
168.0
>168
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
1.3
1.2 0.6
0.5
1.1
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1 1 1 1 1 2.5
1 2.6 1.5
1 1.3 1
2.5
2.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
17.7
16.5
25.3
24.4 9.4
8.6 1 1
21.3
21.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
33.1
35.6
14.6
16.0 25.5
28.9
18.8
19.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.8
>2.6
11.7
>6.7 7.1
>4.6
7.0
>8.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 0.9
1.0
0.9
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
30.4
22.3
44.9
41.0 28.4
18.8
37.3
31.3
d50 (mm)
-
0.062
-
- -
0.062
-
-
Information Unavailable
Information Unavailable
601 East Stream Restoration Project 58 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
Table Ila cont'd. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 3
Cross -Section 13 Cross -Section 14
Riffle Pool
Cross -Section 15
Pool
Cross -Section 16
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY6 MY7 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 497.88 497.88
495.50 495.50 494.42 494.42
493.73 493.73
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.9
16.9
17.6 18.4 19.6
21.1
17.7
17.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
75.0
>75
350.0 >350 350.0
>350
150.0
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
1.6 1.5 1 1.8
1.6
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.6
1.7
1 1 1 1 1 3.4 3.1 3.4
3.3 1 11
1.6
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
12.8
13.6
28.2 28.0 36.1
34.4
14.1
12.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
19.6
21.0
11.0 12.0 10.6
13.0
22.4
23.8
BankfullEntrenchment Ratio
8.8
>4.4
12.8 >19.1 5.6
>16.6
7.9
>8.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft)1
21.5
15.5
34.2 14.9 39.7
36.2
18.9
16.5
d50 (mm) I
-
20.0
1 - - -
-
-
31.0
Information Unavailable
601 East Stream Restoration Project 58 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 11a cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 4
Cross -Section 17
Pool
Cross -Section 18
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation (datum) Used
489.11
489.11 490.01
490.01
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.9
17.2 14.9
14.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.0
>42 30.4
>31
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.8
1.7 1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.7
2.9 1.5
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
29.8
29.1 14.7
14.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.6
10.2 15.2
14.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.5
>2.4 2.0
>2.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.2
1.1 1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft 2)
99.9
99.7 86.2
71.1
d50 (mm) I
-
- -
47.0
- Information Unavailable
601 East Stream Restoration Project 59 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 60 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

za,
o n�
b�
.,
Ccn.CD
CD n
oaCD
b
0
CD
O
u2
O
1
1111
■�11111111��
11111
�1111111111�
I
milli
mm0000mmv
NINON
111111111
11111
Mill
milli
11111
11111111
00000
milli
11ee1111S
IY■
■■
1B11A111R
1111111111
11111
11111
mBIlA�11�
IN■
■■
��110111�
ii:�
����e����
�■■
■■
�o�ommmov
11111
111■
■■
YIIIII�
111111111
HE
HE
HOME
-
1111
1■11111
I
Mill
11111
111111110
11
111111111
I
Mill
11111
111111119
I
Mill
11111
1111111
11
1111111
Mill
11111
111111111
ii111
11111
IIIY
i�
1■11■1�
Mill
11111
11111111H
1111111
IN■
11111
111111119
11
1111111
I
Mill
11111
111111111
1111111
IIIII
IIIA
111111110
11111=�
IY■
■■
11111
■11111
IIIY
1■11■1�
111111110
iiiii
i0iNI
�111111119
1
IeIliiiS
u2
O
I
milli
NINON
111111111
00000
milli
11ee1111S
1111111111
ii:�
����e����
MINI
11111
111111111
11111
IIIY
1■11■1�
IIIII
IIIA
11111=�
11111
IIIY
1■11■1�
iiiii
i0iNI
1
IeIliiiS
11111
11111
IIIY
11111
1■IIY19
1■11■1�
11111
11111
1■11■1�
11111
11111
1■11111
11111
11111
1■11111
11111
11111
11111
111■
1■11111
1■111114

N
1.0
x111111
10111
11111
11111
11111
ME
I
11111111111111
CIIIIII
ME
1
I
81111111111111
11111
1
1111111111
X1111■■
■II
III01111111111111
1
MEY
milill
61111111111111
MEN
I
11111
�IIIIY■
■11
1
11111
X1111■■
■11
MEN
X11■■■
■1111111
111111
��mmmmmmm
■��
���■
�
��������
■11111■
01111111111111
11111
1
111111111
milli
111
1
8111e1e�
nes
111
v
111111111
milli
NINON
I
1111111�
11111111
1
011111111
milli
11111
1
ovoeeeee
,,,,,
,,,,Billie
,
1
���CC��C�
�=CSC
�=C�
U11111
011111111
11111
N
1.0
x111111
11111
11111
CIIIIII
M11111111
1111111111
MEN
111111
ovoeeeee
,,,,,
,,,,Billie
,
1
���CC��C�
�=CSC
�=C�
U11111
011111111
11111
11111
111111111
11111
000��
�
0ee11
111e1
1
Iloilo
111111111
11111
milli
11111101111
��e
N
1.0

Table 12. 601 East Stream Restoration Site
Bank Pin Arrays
Cross Section #
Length of Exposed Pin (mm)
Upstream
At Cross Section
Downstream
Rate
(mm/yr)
Rate
(ft/yr)
1
0
0
0
0
0.00
3
0
0B
0B
0
0.00
5
0
0
0
0
0.00
7
0
0
12.7 2
6.8
0.02
10
OB
OB
OB
0
0.00
12
OB
OB
OB
0
0.00
14
OB
0
0B
0
0.00
15
0B
0
OB
0
0.00
17
0
0B
0
0
0.00
0B— Buried Bank Pin
' Rate based on 7.5 month span since installation
2 Localized erosion caused by bent tip of bank pin
601 East Stream Restoration Project 63 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 1 - Pool
Station 8+32
550
549
548
547
546
545
544
e
0
w 543
W 542
541
540
539
538
537
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
�MYO �MY1 ----- M
Upstream
0+20 0+25
10 A
Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 64 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 2 - Riffle
Station 10+95
Ivo
547
546
545
544
543
542
541
540
—-------------------------------------------------------- -- —
539
538
537
536
535
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
�MYO �MY1 ----- BI
L,cu "MIN
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
0+20
Right Ucsccnding Bank
il
Y.
t R..
Downstream
65 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East
Cross Section 3 - Pool
Station 12+20
543
542
541
540
^. 539
w_
O
0 538
W 537
536
535
534
533
0+00 0+0S 0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
�MYO �MY1 ----- BI
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
xlgnt uescenamg tsanK
Downstream
66 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
Station 14+68
538
537
536
535
m
w 534
A
O
W
> 533
W
532
531
530
529
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
-MYO TMYI ----- MF]
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
67
0+20 0+25
f
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East
Cross Section 5 - Pool
Station 16+23
535
534
533
532
^ 531
d
w_
C
0 530
W 529
528
527
526
525
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
�MYO -MYI ----- B1
Lcft Desccndin,-, Bank
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
68
0+20
0+25
lclgnt uescenaing tianx
s
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Station 17+66
532
531
530
_ 529
m
w_
C
O 528
v
W
527
526
525
524
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
-MYO TMYI ----- MF]
ecu vc�wuuuq; uaun
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
0+20 0+25
Right Descending Bank
Y -
Downstream
69 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
sir" �. AIC
w. L j
ecu vc�wuuuq; uaun
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
0+20 0+25
Right Descending Bank
Y -
Downstream
69 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

529
528
527
_ 526
w_
O
O 525
W
524
523
522
521
0+00
601 East
Cross Section 7 - Pool
Station 19+30
0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
—�MYO ----MY1 ----- BI
Upstream
0+20
Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 70 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Station 20+59
527
526
525
524
d
w 523
c
0
> 522
m
W
521
520
519
518
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
-MYO TMYI ----- BKF
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
71
0+20 0+25
K14Iht Ucsccndino tMznl<
_,W
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

521
520
519
518
m
w_
O
O $1%
i
Fd
516
515
514
513 +-
0+60
601 East
Cross Section 9 - Riffle
Station 24+25
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
—MYO TMYI ----- MF]
Upstream
0+25 0+30
Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 72 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 10 - Pool
Station 26+16
521
520
519
518
y 517
m
w
0 516
W 515
514
513
512
511
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
—MYO TMYI ----- MF]
L' -IL uaun
.a- .. G v;
i
�a-srb._ . La.._• eta=nse"+le�r,.�=-: �.�T'ir° [�S' �i 1{i ., '�ls::
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
0+20 0+25
bank
Downstream
73 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

520
519
518
517
^ 516
w_
O
O 515
W 514
513
512
511
510 4--
0460
601 East
Cross Section 11 -Riffle
Station 27+15
0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
_MYO TMYI ----- MF]
Upstream
0+20 0+25
Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 74 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 12 - Pool
Station 29+67
518
517
516
515
m514
w_
O
0 513
W 512
511
510
509
508
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
-MYO TMY1 ----- BKF
Upstream
0+20
0+25 0+30
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 75 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

503
502
501
500
ZI 499
m
w_
O
O
498
W 497
496
495
494
493
0+00
601 East
Cross Section 13 - Riffle
Station 44+45
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
-MYO TMYI ----- MF]
Upstream
0+25
Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 76 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 14 -Pool
Station 48+78
499
498
497
496
^ 495
w_
O
0 494
W 493
492
491
490
489
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
—�MYO �MY1 ----- BI
Left Descending Bank
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
0+20 0+25
Downstream
77 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

498
497
496
495
C, 494
d
w
C
0 493
W 492
491
490
489
488 +-
0+00
601 East
Cross Section 15 - Pool
Station 50+93
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
—MYO �MYI ----- B1
Upstream
0+25 0+30
Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 78 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 16 -Riffle
Station 52+29
.17
498
497
496
495
494
493
492
491
490
489
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
—�MYO �MY1 ----- BI
Left Descendin,-, Bank
Upstream
Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 79 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 17 -Pool
Station 56+42
500
499
498
497
496
495
494
493
m
w 492
e
0 491
> 490
W 489
488
487
486
485
484
483
482
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
�MYO �MY1 ----- BI
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
80
0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East
Cross Section 18 -Riffle
Station 56+51
497
496
495
494
493
492
.^. 491
w
e 490
0
m 489
W 488
487
486
485
484
483
482
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
�MYO �MY1 ----- BI
Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
81
0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
4
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East
Cross Section 2 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
40
36.4%
36%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
36%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
36%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
36%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
36%
1 - 2
0
0.0%
36%
2-4
0
0.0%
36%
4 - 8
14
12.7%
49%
8-16
17
15.5%
65%
16-32
8
7.3%
72%
32-64
15
13.6%
85%
64-128
16
14.5%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
110
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
8.3
D84
60
D95
100
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
82
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 83 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
100%
Cross Serction 2 - Riffle
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
50%
t MY1 Cumulative %
m
s
~
`w
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ppti yti5 Otis
O � 'l%O ��
opo o'r
05
ply
,y0
oy
,,'L ti b b 0 ,tido .5'L Ob yy0 gyro
� ti� �'� bb yti0
yy'L
'Lhp
1O�,b
tiff
h
tiob� Ap�6 a`o��
,vbb5' 0e
yO .10
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
0�0� 11y ply
O' OOGi 1�y/
O'
O�
p:L
�'�
O'
y � ti b b"� 1p 3ti db 1'l� ,Lye
y
yyti
1,
10ryb
y1
tipb� b0O6 aio`
b 4 e
yp'L rypb O
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 83 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
20
19.0%
19%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
19%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
19%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
19%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
19%
1 -2
0
0.0%
19%
2-4
0
0.0%
19%
4-8
2
1.9%
21%
8-16
22
21.0%
42%
16-32
20
19.0%
61%
32-64
24
22.9%
84%
64-128
17
16.2%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
22
D84
64
D95
89
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
84
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 85 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
100%
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
50%
t MY1 Cumulative %
m
s
~
`w
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ppti yti5 Otis
O � 'l%O ��
opo o'r
05
ply
,y0
oy
'L ti b b 0 ,tido .5'L Ob yy0 gyro
� ti� �'� bb yti0
yy'L
'Lhp
1O�,b
tiff
h
tiob� Ap�6 a`o��
,vbb5' 0e
yO .10
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
0�0� 11y ply
O' OOGi 1�y/
O'
O�
p:L
�'�
O'
y � ti b b"� 1p 3ti db y�� ,Lye
y
yyti
1,
10ryb
y1
tipb� b0O6 aio`
yp'L rypb O
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 85 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
33
31.1%
31%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
31%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
31%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
31%
0.5-1.0
0
0.0%
31%
1-2
0
0.0%
31%
2-4
0
0.0%
31%
4 - 8
5
4.7%
36%
8-16
8
7.5%
43%
16-32
12
11.3%
55%
32-64
26
24.5%
79%
64-128
22
20.8%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
26
D84
71
D95
89
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
:P
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 87 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
a
50%
t MY1 Cumulative %
m
s
~
`w
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05
,y0
'L b 0 ,tido .5'L Ob
b
SO
ppti yti5 Otis
ti b
ti� �'�
yy0
bb
gyro
yy'L
tiob�
O 'l%O ��
ply
oy
yti0
'Lhp
tiff
h
,vb b5' 0e
opo o'r
y0 .10
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
O�
�'�
b
1p 'hti db
,Lye
0�0� 11y ply
O'
y ti b"�
1'l�
yyti
10ryb
tipb� b006 aio`
O' 1�y/
p:L
y
1,
y1
O
OOGi
O'
"'c6, rypb
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 87 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
91
85.0%
85%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
85%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
85%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
85%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
85%
1 -2
0
0.0%
85%
2-4
0
0.0%
85%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
85%
8-16
0
0.0%
85%
16-32
7
6.5%
92%
32-64
0
0.0%
92%
64-128
9
8.4%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
107
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
0.062
D95
73
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
88
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 89 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
100%
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
50%
t MY1 Cumulative %
m
s
~
`w
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05
,y0
'L b 0 ,tido .5'L Ob
b
ppti yti5 Otis
ti b
ti� �'�
yy0
bb
gyro
yy'L
tiobobob
O 'l%O ��
ply
oy
yti0
'Lhp
tiff
h
,vb b5' 0e
opo o'r
yO .10
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
O�
�'�
b
1p 3ti db
,Lye
0�0� 11y ply
O'
y ti b"�
1'l�
yyti
10ryb
tipb� b0O6 aio`
O' 1�y/
p:L
y
1,
y1
O
OOGi
O'
yp'L rypb
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 89 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 9 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
60
56.1%
56%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
56%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
56%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
56%
0.5-1.0
5
4.7%
61%
1 -2
0
0.0%
61%
2-4
0
0.0%
61%
4-8
0
0.0%
61%
8-16
0
0.0%
61%
16-32
6
5.6%
66%
32-64
20
18.7%
85%
64-128
16
15.0%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
107
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
62
D95
94
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
90
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 91 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
100%
Cross Section 9 - Riffle
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
50%
t MY1 Cumulative %
m
s
~
`w
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05
,y0
'L b 0 ,tido .5'L Ob
b
SO
ppti yti5 Otis
ti b
ti� �'�
yy0
bb
gyro
yy'L
tiob�
O 'l%O ��
ply
oy
yti0
'Lhp
tiff
h
,vb b5' 0e
opo o'r
yO .10
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 9 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
O�
�'�
� b
1p 'hti db
,Lye
0�0� 11y ply
O'
y ti b"�
1'l�
yyti
10ryb
tipb� b0O6 aio`
O' 1�y/
p:L
y
1,
y1
O
OOGi
O'
yp'L rypb
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 91 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 11 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
65
61.9%
62%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
62%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
62%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
62%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
62%
1 -2
0
0.0%
62%
2-4
0
0.0%
62%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
62%
8-16
0
0.0%
62%
16-32
10
9.5%
71%
32-64
15
14.3%
86%
64-128
15
14.3%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
60
D95
89
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
92
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 93 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
100%
Cross Section 11-Riffle
90%
80%
a
3
70%
O
w
N
60%
T
a
50%
t MY1 Cumulative %
m
s
~
`w
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05
,y0
'L b 0 ,tido .5'L Ob
SO
ppti yti5 Otis
ti b
ti� �'�
yy0
bb
gyro
yy'L
1O�,b
tiob�
O 'l%O ��
ply
oy
yti0
'Lhp
tiff
h
,vb b5' 0e
opo o'r
yO .10
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 11-.Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
O�
�'�
� b
1p 3ti db
,Lye
0�0� 11y ply
O'
y ti b"�
1'l�
yyti
10ryb
tipb� b0O6 aio`
O' 1�y/
p:L
y
1,
y1
O
OOGi
O'
yp'L rypb
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 93 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 13 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
40
34.8%
35%
0.062 - 0.125
4
3.5%
38%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
38%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
38%
0.5 - 1.0
2
1.7%
40%
1 - 2
4
3.5%
43%
2-4
0
0.0%
43%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
43%
8-16
6
5.2%
49%
16-32
8
7.0%
56%
32-64
22
19.1%
75%
64-128
22
19.1%
94%
128-256
3
2.6%
97%
256-512
4
3.5%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
115
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
20
D84
83
D95
190
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
94
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 95 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 13 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
LD
w
N
60%
a
50%
t MY1 Cumulative %
m
s
~
`w
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05
,y0
'L b 0 ,tido .5'L Ob
b
ppti yti5 Otis
ti b
ti� �'�
yy0
bb
gyro
yy'L
tiobobob
O 'l%O ��
ply
oy
yti0
'Lhp
tiff
h
,vb b5' 0e
opo o'r
yO .10
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 13 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
O�
�'�
� b
1p 3ti db
,Lye
0�0� 11y ply
O'
y ti b"�
1'l�
yyti
10ryb
tipb� b0O6 aio`
O' 1�y/
p:L
y
1,
y1
O
OOGi
O'
yp'L rypb
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 95 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 16 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
12
10.5%
11%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
11%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
11%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
11%
0.5-1.0
0
0.0%
11%
1-2
0
0.0%
11%
2-4
0
0.0%
11%
4-8
0
0.0%
11%
8-16
2
1.8%
12%
16-32
38
33.3%
46%
32-64
36
31.6%
77%
64-128
26
22.8%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
114
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
34
D84
76
D95
100
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
.I
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 97 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 16 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
t?
y
U,
60%
T
a
50%
t MY1 Cumulative %
c
A
N
G
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OrOry y�y ply
0 0
O' bti y.1°i
04 O'
5
O'L
y
O
y'ti 'y'b b yb 3ti 6b y�$ ,tiyp
y�' ti 6a yv
1
5ti~
yO
ti
O'yb
y�
y1
Obi Oo'O oc
b~ �b ear
Id ryOb 0
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 16 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
OO'L 1.yh O.tih
O OO�i y'15'
O'
Oh
O;L
yO
O'
y,'L �; b b"4 yro '��" Ob yyg gyro
y
yy'L
1,
yO,yb
ti
yy
tiOb� b0�b aaoc
Or 4 e
yp'l• ryOb 0
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 97 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 18 - Riffle
Monitorin Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
10
9.5%
10%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
10%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
10%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
10%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
10%
1 - 2
0
0.0%
10%
2-4
0
0.0%
10%
4 - 8
3
2.9%
12%
8-16
8
7.6%
20%
16-32
12
11.4%
31%
32-64
40
38.1%
70%
64-128
24
22.9%
92%
128-256
8
7.6%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
47
D84
110
D95
150
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
98
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Stream Restoration Project 99 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 18 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
t?
y
U,
60%
T
a
50%
t My1 Cumulative %
c
A
N
G
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OrOry y�y ply
0 0
O' bti y.1°i
04 O'
Oh
5
O'L
y�
y
O
y'y'b b yb 3ti 6b y�$ ,tiyp 5ti~
y�' ti 6a yv yO
1 ti
O'yb
y�
y1
Obi Oo'O oc
b~ �b ear
Id ryOb 0
Particle Size Groups
601 East
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 18 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
v
N
60%
T
9
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
a°
30%
20%
10%
0%
OO'L 1.yh O.tih
O OO�i y'15'
O'
Oh
O;L
yO
O'
y,'L �; b b"4 yro .h'L Ob yyg gyro yy'L
y 1,
yO,yb
yy
tiOb� b0�b aaoc
yp'l• ryOb 0
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 99 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 100 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
601 East Stream Restoration Project 101 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Table 13. Verification ofBankfull Events
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Feet Above Bankfidl
Date of Data Collection Date of Occurrence Method Elevation
Photo #
(if available)
November -2015 Unknowns Crest Gauge/ Wrack Lines Unknown
Figure 3/4/5
'Suspected bankfull date 9/30/2015
Wrack Lines Downstream of Crest Gauge on Reach 2
Wrack Lines Downstream of Crest Gauge on Reach 3
Figure 4. Photo Verification of Bankful Events
Reach 3 Crest Gauge
601 East Stream Restoration Project 102 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7

Figure 6. D
6.00
5.00
4.00
v
u
C
3.00
0
R
Z 2.00
U
L
G
s 1.00
Q
0.00
ul
c -I
C
N
Totals for Monroe, NC (CRONOS Station 315771 Monroe 2
a > c on a Y >
ii QQ O Z
7
7. Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to 30" and 70t1i Percentiles for Union Count
16.0
Growing Season
14.0
12.0
i
t 10.0
V
C '
C
O 8.0
w '
Q 6.0
4.0 I
2.0 -----------------
0.0
_ -"0.0 El
Jan -15 Feb -15 Mar -15 Apr -15 May -15 Jun -15 Jul -15 Aug -15 Sep -15 Oct -15 Nov -15 Dec -15
o Monroe Monthly Rainfall - - • 30th Percentile Union County — — 70th Percentile Union County — — Union County Average Rainfall
601 East Stream Restoration Project 103 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 7