Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160204 Ver 1_Bridge No 427 WBS No 17BP 7 R 86 - Part 2_20160301Carpenter,Kristi From: Thomson, Nicole J Sent: Tuesday, March O1, 2016 3:39 PM To: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil; Wanucha, Dave Cc: Carpenter,Kristi; Parker, Jerry A; Powers, Tim Subject: Bridge No 427 over Rose Creek on SR 2704 (Poley Rd), Guilford Co, WBS No. 17BP.7.R.86 - Part 2 Attachments: streama ndwetforms_400427.pdf Nicole J. Thomson Division Environmental Supervisor Assistant Division Environmental Office 919-754-7806 Mobile Nithomson2(a�ncdot.qov PO Box 14996 Greensboro, NC 27415-4996 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: ' p ��� ��? Project/Site: �� Evaluator - �, � ti County �� '` , ��; ,� , � � �� ,�' 1; � ' � : �'�i / ;�°�> Total Points: � /� ' y! l' Stream Deter iraai�+ Stream is at least intermittent �� ��. •.% E hemeral ntermit if > 99 or perennral if >_ 30' P � �'��� ��� Latitude: Longitude: ircle one) Other Perennial e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal = 2�� ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 �: 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 � ri le- ool se uence ��, 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 �f2,f 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0, 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits ; Q 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 �. 3 9. Grade control ( 0,� 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 ;�0;5.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel � No = 0 Yes = 3 a e,, e-- �.�.��ww� ..�...�w., �,��. ��v. �mc , cc i.iai. ��a ui inauuai B. Hydrology (Subtotai = �' ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 14. Leaf litter 15. Sediment on plants or debris 16. Organic debris lines or piles 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? 0 `�. 1.5 0 0 No=O 1 1 1 .5, 2 3 2 3a 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 �1'es = 3 ;� G. Biolo (Subtotal = �--� ) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 i 2,.' 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0� 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ;"0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks ;*0, � 1 2 3 22. Fish ;�0,? 0.5 1 1.5 23. Cra�sh � 0_, 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians �'0+,.� 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae ��`U'l 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 075; OBL = 1.5 Qther = 0) `perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: �C ��U >`� z-� .S I� NC DWQ Stream Identi�caiion Form Version 4.11 Date: � j� ; �� : � � ProjectlSite: �7 � t _ _ Latitude: � 1� � � ��.���- � Evaluator: � County: �'� ` / Longitude: '�„ '�td "r���..' Total Points: -� Stream is at least intermittent /) �% � Stream Determ' at+on�(circle one) Other if>_19orperennialif>_30* l.� l Ephemeral ntermitten�Perennial e.g.QuadName: A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal = (� ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � 1 2 � ri le- ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 �y, 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 % 1; 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches p � 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits �p 1 2 3 8. Headcuts � p � 2 3 9. Grade control 4�,y�� 0.5 � �.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 C� 1,� 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0'� Yes = 3 a.,.�;F,.�..i a�F„ti.... ,.. ....... ......a. _-- �`--�--�---'�- -------' .T... .._ B. H drolo Subtotal = ___J_L_ 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0„5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 �,;5� 1 --� 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 ( es = 3 C. Biolo (Subtotal = (�, , '" ) -"" 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversily and abundance) 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0� 1 2 3 `._ 22. Fish '�0.-� 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish ; 0 � 0.5 1 1.5 24.Amphibians '0.� 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 , 0.�' 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0. � `perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: �I�TLAND P�ETERMINATIC3�1 DATA ��RM — Eastern IU�aur tains and Piedmoni Region � / � Project%Site: �� Oi? � Z�7 CitylCounty (� (� � Y Sarnpling Date: �b l�� � App6canUOwner ^� i�%� State: �''��- Sampling Point W%1 -'.t:�'� Investigator(s) � + ,lx � s r�� tA -� � , �) i ti r �' �� � % ��r ,°,: �� Section, To�rnship, Range: l i LandfoCm (hillslope, terrace, e[c ): ��i�c,..�, �:, ��'{�t��� Local relief {concave, convex, none}, �rI`� C�1�'�- Slope (9�0). Subregion { RRy,,r MLRA): i� Laf: �W Z� Z� Long: ���(t>� ���� Dafum: � ;�J Soil Pv1ap Unit Name: (� ,�..�� �..1 G�P �� �j��:,;�,-r ���"l -���i_� NW! classification: �� �� Are climatic / hyclrologfc conditions on the site typical for ihis time of year� Yes � No (If no, expiain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N, Soil na __ _; or Hydrology � signifcantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No Are Vegetation N, Soil �'� or Hydrology N naturally problematic? Qf needed, explair� any ansavers in Remarks.) �UMiUTARY OF F�NDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point ibcakians, transec#s, imporfant features, efc. Nydtophytic Vegetation Presenl? Yes � No � Is the 5ampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes �. No I vvithin a Wettand? Yes � No Nlefl�nd Hydrology Present? Y�s � No HY�ROLOGY Wetland Mydrology Indicators; Secandarv Intl�cators (m�nimum of two requirEd) ( Primarv Indicators {minimum of onP is required check all that applv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) � Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) /Sparsely Vegetated Concave Suiiace (B8) ✓ High Waier Table (A2j _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ,_✓ Dratnage Pattems (B1Q) ✓Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roafs (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines {616) Water Pv9arks (B1j _ Presence ot Reducetl Iron {C�) _ Dry-Season Water lable (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled 5oils {C6) _ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (S3) _ Thin Ntuck Surface (CT} _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Itnayery (C9) Algal N1at or Crust {B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) nted or Stressed Plants (01) � � Iron Deposits (B5) �Geomorphic Position (�21 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Ef7) _ Shallaw Aquitard (D3) ^ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) icrotopographic Relief (D4) _ Ayuatic Fauna (B13) �AGNeutral Tesi (D5) j Field Observafiians: � Surtace Water Present? Yes N� �` Depth (inches):. Nlater Table Present? Yes � No Depth {inchesj. �` (/ Saturation Present? Yes 4�'� No Depth (inches}: _ f,,l �� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No (includes capillary frinye) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring vvell, aerial photos, �arevious inspeciions}, if available: � ( Remarks. � � � ! � � � ---- - --J US Ar�T�y Corps of Engineers Easterrt Nlouniains and Piedmont—Version 2.0 ��� b0`i S L Sampling Paint: '-,i("� �E �•-C':� Dominance T�st worksheet: Number of Dominar�t Species Thal Are OBL, FACNJ, or FAC: (Aj Total Number oi Dominant � Species Across All Strata: (B) �/EGETATIOPt (Four Strata� — Use scientif►c names af p(ants. / Absolute Dominant indicato Tree Stratum (Pfot size: �� ) % Cover Species? Status 1 `'`�� 4 r� 50°io of total cover: SaplinqlShrub Stratu�m (Plot size: � c� � j 1. ��,5� it� �� i"�� ��D i�-� � 2. aEs�n1 �� «( Lt.� f�_, � F���-� � 1�� 3. 4. 7 � = Total Cover 20°/0 0( fotal cover: �o � �"�:�.P � --�-- ��= /7-•Y' = Total Cover 50% of iotal cover: � 20°e of kotal cover. ��� � Herb Stratum (Ffot size: F a ) / 1.�(���✓�iL. �6.t4'� 2; 1 �' cae`�' � �)8(.� 2. E�I�� ra �'��A,.r,�t.� . � ± >iliyr€f.�r�t f `� � � r�_ 7 9, 10. 11. ,, � = Total Cover 50%o of total cover: %; _; 20% of fofal cover. ��' �� (Plot size: ) 50% of total cover: Remarks: (Include phoio numbers here or on a sep�rate = Totai Cover 20% of total covec Perc�nt of Dominani Species ' `� � That Are OBL, EACW, or FAC: �'�� �� � f�(Alg) Prev�lence Index worksheet: Total °�o Cover of: �4•lultiply bv: OBL speGies x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Toiais_ (A) (E3} Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Indlcators: 1--Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation �- Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.6' _ 4 - �v9orphological Adaptations` (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) � Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Ex{�lain} 'Indicators o( hydric soil and wetland hydrology musi. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — WUotly plants, exciuding vines, 3 in. (7.6 crr�) ot more in diameier at breast height (DBH), reg�rdless of height. SaplinglShrub—VVoody piants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 328 ft(1 m) tall. Herb — All herbaceous (no�-tivoody) plants, reyardless of size, and evoody plants less than 328 ft tali. Woody vine -- All woody vines greater ihan 3.28 Ft i� Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 / Present? Yes ✓ No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Polouniains and Piedmont — Version 2_0 �,�b��.. SOIL Sampling Point: �^%�l t+v�"� � Profite Description: (Describe to the depth needed to docume�t the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) a � Depth Nlatnx Redox Features � �mches Golor mois % Color moisx % Ty�'_ Loc` Texture Remarks ) �' '! z ��i `1 � � ;l�- '�, : � . 5 _� �'L S'i',�w� �� ��- U ! �(� ,.� {� �i ��;`? ;:.,,� �3� �,;.,,: �t�t,f.����.:�,r,� 'Ty�e C Concentration D_D�letionz R�r1-Reduced Matrix, MS Niasked Sand Grains , �Location _PL Pore Linmc� M hlatrix���� �_ Hydric Soil Indicators: T~ �� ��� ���� W��rvT� Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3� Histosal (A1 J � Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (F�10) {MLRA 147) � Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Retlox (A16) Black Histic (f�3) � thin Dark Surface (S9) (M�RA 147, 148) (MIRA 1A7, 1A8} i � Hydrogen Sulficie (A4) ,� oamy Gleyed Ntatrix (F2) �, Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) ! Stratified Layers (A5) �.f Depleted Adatrix {F3) (@JILRA 136, 147} 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N� � Redox Dark Surface (F6) � Very Shallow� Dark Surtace (TF12) � Depleted 8eiow Dark Surtace (A11 } _ Depleted Dark 5urface (F7) _ Qther (Explain iai Remarks) Thick Dark Surface (Al2j ^ Redax Depresslons (FS) � Sandy Mucky t�iineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MIRA 136) Sandy Gleyed [vlatrix (S4} � Umt�ric Surface (F13) {MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19} (MLRA 148) �vetland hydrology must be present, i Stnpped MaInx (56) Fted f'arent Nlatenal (F21) (MLRA 927, 1A7j unless disturbed or problernaUc. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches). � Hydric Soil Present? Yss �'�/ No Remarks: � � � � � 1 3) i} i � � � �- - J § US Ar��iy Corps of Engineers Eastern N1ounlains ancl Piedmont — Version 2 0 W�TL.AND DETERMINATI��! DATA FC3RM — Eastern IUfauniains ane[ Piedmont Region �Z,I /� / Project�Site: �� v��� �� CiiylCounty: �`��f ;� �`�� � c�J A t Sarnpling Date: ��i ��� lJ App6canUOwner rJ �� >> J I� State: f V C" Sampling Point ��� �- �'%�/�:s� i� Investigator(s): � 1 t �_3 i� � �.� �+ ;`'� �ct1t-�`,:y .� •.(� �'! `.+ -�) Section, To�vnshiq Range: � Landform (hillslope, Ferrace, etc.)�' �S�(���` _ Locat relief {concave, convex, nor�e} F� t"'' <-' Slope (°lo): Subregion �LRF� or M�R,4): ��', Y Lat: 3�P, ��.�7,C,%I �� Long: �7�� lf�� �,���.n�> Datum: Soil Pviap Unit�Na�ne: L�c-,�..7c( �r� (�c���>� i'� -��.f�/� NV�Ii classification: /V,� % Are climaCic ; hycirofogic conditions on the site typical for this Iime oC year� Yes i�` No ,��_____ {If no, explain in Remarks.} �i Are Vegetation iJ , Soil �v ; ar Hydrology n! significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ``' No Are Vegetation N, 5oil ,.� , ar Hydrology nl naturally prablematic? Qf neetled, explain any ansavers in Remarks.) SUMIVIARY OF FINDlNGS —Attach site rr�ap showing sampling point Eocations, tr�nsects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegeiation Present? Nydric Soil Present? l�lefl�nd Hytlrology Present? Rernarks. (.,�.,� � �,,�� �� HY�ROLOGY Yes `� No � Is the Sampled Area Yes No� �thin a Wetiand? Yes No '�" � �� 4� 3� � Yes No " � Wetiand Mydrology Indicators; Secandarv fntl�cators (minimum of two required) Primarv Indicators lminimum of one is required check all that applv) Surface Sofl Cracks (B6} i Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) � Nigh Water Table {A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) , Drainage Patterns (B10) � Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roofs (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (616) Water Pv9arks (B1) _ Yresence ot Reduce�l Iron (C4} _ llry-Seas�n Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Cra�sh Burrows {C8) Drift Deposits (s3) _ Thin Niuck Surface (C7) _ Saturatlon Visible on Aerial Irnayery (C9) =Algal Ntat or Crust (E34} _ Other (Explain in Remarks) ^ Stunled or Stressed Plants (D1) � Iron UeposiFs (65) _ Geomorphic Position (D2} inundation Visible on Aeriai Imagery (B7) � Shallow Aquitard (D3) � _,_, Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ,� �iicrotopographic Relief (D4j � _ Ayuatic Fauna (B13) ✓FAGNeuiral Test iD5) Field Observations: � { Surtace Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): � U�/ater Table Present? Yes No `"`� Oepth (inches): � Saturation Present? Yes No �' Depth (inches). Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No lf (includes capiliary fririge) � Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec.tions), if available: � � Remarks. j I I i 1 � ; � , E.- _.��__��. � � US Ar�7iy Corps of Et�gineers Easterr� Mouniains and Pietlmont - Version 2.0 i� {. � �:: �� i � � VEGETATION (Four Strataj — Use scientifie names af ptants. ,✓ r Sampling Point: w�-�� i Absolute ❑ominant Indicatnr pominance Test worksheet: (Tree Stratum {Pfot size '�i> � ) °o Cover S_ ep cies? Status - --r, ,� Number of Dominant Species � 1. � � ' � � � � % �� � �'`.�'a�, � � � � : That Are OBL; FACNl, or FAG: �, ,, (Aj ' 2. Total Number of Dominant ' 3 SpeciesAcrossAllSirata: � (B) 4. 5. 6. 7. �-:.h = Totai Cover 5�°io of total cover. �'• 3 20% o( totai cover _ b SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: �,y,? ) � , �' �l� � g� ,, � ,�F.:1���, � I ��' � b� L 2. i�'� t3 � l.;i � �% � � ✓�% �/�IL 3. � �.i't. � �`'`�! << -�i'�'�bi`� a ' _; � P�,_ � t-J , --�--- �l. � � "% � �'�' , , � � , /`� '/�� r� � = Total Cover�t 5Q% of latal cover: ��'.� 20°0 of toial cover. / i� i Herb Stratum (Plot size: ���' ) � _ �`> � I c� r c L, , , �,r ; �� � � i �/��-- 2. ,����i�����t"��=�:�,r1 I.i(�vaji'tr�-r�;j_, �z., y�` ._� � v ,, N 3. � , e � �C r� r-,t ' .� E i �", i •. _ r _.t � C (it 4. -'r � _ � /�' ? ✓� � c 6. 7. 10. 11. _:.� = Total Cover 50% of total cover. ,�.'; 20°b of iotal cover: r�� �I Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot siie: J�� ) ,. L��r��� ������n„ ���J�f��, t � .�� � Fq� 2 l�� i i i lJ� .:r ;,-„�, ;��'y i,, c�� � � �� ��i ��7 3. 4. �. _� = Total Cover 50°/a of total cover. � 20°/a of total cover: 2- (Inclucie photo numbers here or on a Perc�nt of Dominant Species � �" `� �6�� That Are OBL; FACW, or FAC: r �l�%(AlB) Prevalert�e Index workaheet: Total °'o Cover of: ta9ultipiv by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Iotais: (A) (E3) Prevalence Index = B(A = ,1.�- Rapid Test ior Hydrophytic Vegetation �2 - Dominance Test is >50°la 3 - Prevalence Index is �3.0' _ 4 - Nlorphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegeiation' (ExplainJ 'Indicators of hydric soil and weiland hydrology musi be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions af Faur Veaetation Strata: Tree — Wootly plants, exciuding vines; 3 in. ( 7,f cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBN), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub —\Noody plar�ts, excluding vines, Iess than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m) tall. Werb — All herbaceous (non-+voody) plants, regardless of size, and �voody plants less than 328 ft tall. Woody vina — All woody vines grealer than 3.28 fk in Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes v No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Nlountains and Pietlmont — Version 2.0 :'-1 ,������'f`7 SOIL Sampling Point; «i� � � ,� Profite Descriptian: {Describe to fhe depth needed to document #he indicator or conftrm tite absence of i�dicators.) i Depth Matrix Redox Features � (fnche� Golor (moist) % Golor (mois : °'o Type' Loc` Texture Remarks j ,. S � j �j s,;� � .a �� ��� � � ��- - �, ,..1 i sf �,�T (.•�'`r.J' 1 � a . L._ � s� -i �� � a��� r Y � ; lC .i �}a�5 � � � 1 � V 'T�peN C-Concentration; D=De I�etion, RN1=Reduced Matrix, I�1S=Niasked Sand Grains._ _ w`Location: PL=Pore Lining�Ni�N9atrix�___.�.___w ( Hydric Soil Indicators: � yW ��"'"." �""'""__..._._._�__,_.�._.__.___�__._.�.. _._.__� _ --•-- ��dicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: � Hislosoi (A1) � Dark Surface (S7} � 2 cm hluck (A10) (MLRA 147) ^ Histic Epipedor� {�12) _ Polyvalue Below Sur(ace (S8) (MLRA 1d7, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Mistfc (A3) _„_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (M�.RA 147,148) � Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) u ln�my Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Nlatrix (F3) (MLRA 136,147j 2 cm N9�ick (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6} � Very Shallowi Dark Suriace (TF12) � Depleted Belov✓ Dark Surtace (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Qfher (Explain iii Remarks) Thick Dark Su�fare {Al2) ^ Redox Depressions (F81 � Sandy Nlucky laiineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12j (LRR N, j MLRA 947, 1d8) MLRA 136) ( Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 936, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ( J Sandy Redox {S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148� wetland hydrology must be preseni, Stripped Matrir, (56) Iled F'arent �+laterial (F21) �MLRA 127, 147j unless disturbetl or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed�: � Type: j � /� Depth (inches). � Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ``` � Remarks: i ; 1 � j 3 i � � I � I � � 1 i � � 1 a � � 1 a � � i a US Arrtiy Corps of Engineers E�stern Mountains and Pfedmont — Version 2.0