SW8900225_Historical File_20140113

Weaver, Cameron
From: Brad Sedgwick[[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday,January 31, 2014 9:39 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron
Subject: Need Help
Attachments: 1-13-14 Approved Plan Revision.pdf
Cameron, Linda Lewis sent me an approval letter for Lockwood Folly. She sent me the preliminary copy which
is attached. Anyway I can get you to email me the final letter. I see my name on the copy list but I have never
received the final letter.Thanks. I can pick up if neccessary
S Consulting, P
Planning, Engineering,Project Management
Brad Sedgwick,PE
7332 Cotesworth Drive
Wilmington,NC 28405
Phone:[phone]
Email [e-mail]
1

,
Permitted Existing
Impervious Area Impervious Adjustments to Lot
Lot Lot Area(SF) (SF) (SF) %Imp. Impervious Area" New Total
Lot Subtotal 3090500 1440782
Available Lot BUA 1649718
Lot Area Permitted BUA Existing BUA %impervious Adjustments
Genoes Pt.Tr.2 Town
Homes 52,676 11,640 11640 22.10%
Proposed Tr.6 Condos 163,350 75,000 0 0.00%
Sales Office 83,162 23,509 23509 28.27%
The Links Town Homes 84,732 35,494 35494 41.89%
LWF Lot 10,572 8,000 0 0.00%
Genoes Pt.Condos 51,263 17,791 17791 34.71%
Clubhouse Tracts 256,383 44.29%
Cart Barn 5,071
Parking 65,361
Tennis Court 2,000
POA Clubhouse 13,192
New POA Clubhouse 10,381
Sidewalks 3,147
New Tennis Courts 14,400
Maintenance 67,707 27,892 27892 41.20%
Roadways 991,773 991773 100.00%
Cartpaths 218,891 218891 100.00%
All Other 9,207,206 0.00%
LFPOA Park 10400 incorporated into Clubhouse Tracts
Sub Totals 20,001,952 4,614,042 2,767,772 13.84% ;5,11d 2,771,000
Maximum Allowed BUA 5,000,488
Total BUA used 4,614,042
Reserved for POA Distribution 386,446

Piv
CONSULTING, PA
7332 Cotesworth Drive
111
Wiilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
PLANNING-ENGINEERING-PROJECT MANAGEMENT
December 12, 2013
NCDENR-DWQ
Attention: Linda Lewis
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Stormwater Plan Revision
Lockwood Folly Clubhouse
Stormwater Permit Number: SW8 900225
RESPONSE TO EMAIL DATED 12/9/13
Dear Linda:
This letter is in response to your email dated 12-9-13 and subsequent
conversations.
Your first questions was to provide drainage basins and calculations proving
that the volume and flow rate of stormwater is not increased by the
proposed project. Attached with this letter are the pre and post drainage
basins. I was able to modify the drainage basins going to the piping system
by redirecting stormwater from the demo'ed building and the proposed
clubhouse to do sheet flow away from the piping system. The attached
spreadsheet shows that the overall drainage basins (SB #1,2,3,4,5,6) are
reduced by 14,623 SF (205,258 SF-190,635 SF). The drainage basin shown are
the only contributing basins to this pipe system. In addition to reducing the
overall size of the drainage basin I was able to reduce the BUA within the
basin by 7,923 SF (112,666 SF - 104,743 SF). Considering that we are replacing
the existing pipes with the same size pipes I believe I have documented that
this project does not increase the net volume or increase the flow rate to the
offsite pond. Please keep in mind that these numbers will not correspond to
overall BUA on the proposed site.
Should you have further questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely yours;

$
rtA
Brad Sedgwick, PE
President
Attachments 2 - Pre Drainage Basins
2 - Post Drainage Basins
1 -Stormwater Area Calculations Sheet
2 of2

J
-J
Q
Z CO
I--
O LU
a re C k
UJ 0S Z
�_ c
W W W W Z m Z W z Z ZN co W
a d d 4 LLJ I-- Cal I- a in H Ca9 a
00 N O ID N N O N N N t} w-I 1", M
_ CO In In Cr it CO 0 00 M In CO N cp
t'I- O M ID N. M No 01 ei CO O to N
•-i e-I N .-I N O
a ei
M
m
I-
in
0
a
N co d' ILD Lnn M
.LLB.. N M 3 73 O
N N ei a-I 1fl
in
Q .M-1
W
ce
Q
I-
V)
0
O.
0
2
z Iu
0 0
O Uj
N
N
u I- I- cc O O
LU Z Z Z Z 0 O Z Z Z O Z Z CO
0 W W LU W V V W W LU U 0 W tL D
W W LU W Z W Z W W W Z W W W V
Q Q Q Q I— a 0 I-LUQ Q Q W a Q Q 0
a a a aa a a I-- t9 a a 0
N 00 00 01 01 N N. N 01 ei 0 N ID In 0 00 L
Z 0 171 - M 0 N ID ID to 01 In 1r1 ei <D
N cf O 00 .re eI rI M ID 1� N ID
0 V 1� NiN 1-10 ei 1,1 C1 In ID N st M .-1 ID N tf1 N
{-- ,1 ei .-i e-1 N ei
g a
o3
D
U m
J tL
6 °C
a
a'
3 esiN O cr m NN Oh 0000 in
CO
N N a�-I N Ian LC) in
In
OC Q N
O Iu
t~n a
W W
N CC
D a
0
2
m
D
0 Z
J 1/t
0 W J
0 0 el N M st to Lo I---
00 Z O
• g
UCi
0

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Monday, December 09,2013 3:53 PM
To: Sedgwick, Brad
Subject: FW: Lockwood Folly SW8 900225
As I draft the permit, it's making more sense to me:
Please delineate the contributing drainage basin to the existing pipe system and to the new piped system. You need to
provide calculations which demonstrate that you have not increased the net amount(volume)or rate(flowrate cfs)of
stormwater discharge through the existing 15" piped outfall.
The majority of the BUA increase is associated with the parking lot(59427 existing, 65361 proposed). Hopefully,you
have been able to divert some of that flow away from the pipes,or you are using a permeable pavement for the new
parking lot which allows infiltration of the runoff. I don't see any permeable pavement proposed on the plans or in the
details.
Please note an addition error.Your cover letter from July indicated that there is 113582 sf of proposed BUA. However,
the plans total up to 113,552,a difference of 30 sf. The total increase is 162 sf, not 192 sf.
I will also need an updated master spreadsheet where the Reserved BUA Balance is reduced down by 162 or 192,
depending on which one is correct.
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:49 PM
To: Sedgwick, Brad
Subject: Lockwood Folly SW8 900225
Brad:
I've looked at this until I'm blue in the face. It looks like some of this new project will"overlap"with the plan revision we
approved in 2011?Is that plan revision going away in whole or in part,to be replaced by this plan revision? It looks like
the new tennis courts were built, but some of the other things were not.Some of the sidewalk, horse shoe court, bocce
ball court,shuffle board court and basketball court were not constructed. It looks like a portion of the old tennis court
was restriped for the basketball court. If this is all part of the POA clubhouse area, it should all be together on one plan,
not parceled up between different revisions.Am I missing something?
Linda Lewis
Environmental Engineer III
Division of Energy,Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28405
Main Office—910-796-7215
Direct Line—910-796-7343
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
1

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:52 AM
To: 'Brad Sedgwick'
Subject: RE: Lockwood Folly SW8 900225
I'm into early September at the moment.Sorry
From: Brad Sedgwick[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:44 AM
To: Lewis,Linda
Subject: RE: Lockwood Folly SW8 900225
Good Morning Linda,just wondering where we are on this review. I resubmitted plans on 10-18-13. Not
pushing just prodding.
JBS Consulting, PA
Planning, Engineering, Project Management
Brad Sedgwick,PE
7332 Cotesworth Drive
Wilmington,NC 28405
Phone:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Lockwood Folly SW8 900225
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:24:10+0000
Replacement of the pipe with the same size is fine. Adding one inlet is fine, too, because whatever water
enters that inlet was already getting into the system. You just have to figure out how to keep the volume and
flow rate the same if you are adding more impervious area.
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Energy,Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28405
910-796-7215
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
From: Brad Sedgwick[mailto:bradsedgwickahotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 8:52 AM
To: Lewis,Linda
t

Cc: Joe Geise; John Van Dusen
Subject: RE: Lockwood Folly SW8 900225
Linda, Sheet C1 shows the existing piping. All of the existing piping in the parking lot and to the pond is 15"
cmp pipe. The cmp pipe is in poor shape and needs to be replaced. If I propose to just replace this piping
system with the same size pipe (I want to use corrugated plastic pipe instead of the corrugated metal pipe due
to corrosion of the existing system). And add just one catch basin,would this qualify as a plan modification?
Call me if my explanation is not clear.
JBS Consulting, PA
Planning,Engineering,Project Management
Brad Sedgwick,PE
7332 Cotesworth Drive
Wilmington,NC 28405
Phone:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
From: Iinda.lewis@'ncdenr.gov
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
Subject: Lockwood Folly SW8 900225
Date:Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:41:30+0000
Brad:
I have replaced part of the original 2008 approved subdivision plan and the approved plans for the
2011 plan revision. I also have a copy of the 2008 permit application which is a transfer of ownership
and a modification to reallocate the previously permitted amount of BUA. I still need for Jay Houston
to replace the plans that showed all the existing pipe locations. I will probably not be able to replace
any of the file notes, or the older permit drawings or the previous applications. Mr. Giese is looking
through Gordon's files to see if he can find anything.
The 2008 permit, schedule of compliance condition 11.7, indicates that no additional piping beyond
that shown on the approved plan, will be allowed. The existing piping within the clubhouse area is
relatively short, and only exists in the north-most end of the parking lot. The proposed piping is much
more extensive. It's labeled as "CPP". Is that Corrugated Perforated pipe? I'm not sure how this
would qualify as a plan revision since it appears that an infiltration trench system is being proposed to
treat this pocket of higher density within an overall low density project? Please remember that
meeting low density is more than just meeting the magic number.
Since I lost my historical plans and review notes ! do not know how we approved the clubhouse with
all that piping under low density. I'm guessing it was an inexperienced reviewer, or that we may have
decided to overlook the clubhouse piping since it was already in and an expansion was planned in the
future where treatment would be provided. It's also possible that the clubhouse predated the rules,
but was pulled in as "existing"when the rest of the subdivision developed in 1990. If you have any
proof of that, I would appreciate having a copy.
My concerns are:
2

1. Under low density, infiltration piping is still piping, and is not allowed.
2. The existing condition plan does not provide the pipe size for any of the existing pipes except for the
lone 15" CMP in the parking lot itself. Your proposed plan indicates that a 36" CPP will now be
discharging to SA waters. What are the sizes of the existing pipes that are being replaced? It is not
appropriate to increase the size of an existing conveyance that discharges to SA waters, or to
increase the volume or flowrate through existing conveyances that discharge to SA waters.
3. If you want to design and propose an infiltration trench system to treat the pocket of high density, with
the excess design storm overflowing to SA waters via a vegetated filter, I can certainly live with
that.
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
3

CONSULTING,PA
7332 Cotesworth Dnve
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
PLANNING-ENGINEERING-PROJECT MANAGEMENT
October 18, 2013
NCDENR-DWQ
Attention: Linda Lewis
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Stormwater Plan Revision
Lockwood Folly Clubhouse
Stormwater Permit Number: SW8 900225
Revised Drawings
Dear Linda:
Attached are revised drawings that address your concerns on the piping
system. We have removed the large pipes and are just proposing to replace
existing piping with the same size pipes. 1 have also edited the drainage plan
to assure that no more runoff is entering the piping system than currently
enters the system.
All other items in the original submittal remain the same.
Should you have further questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely yours;
A2.)
pA V l DECEIVE
2013
Brad Sedgwick, PE OCT 1 $
President BY,
Attachments 2 sets of plans (Cover Sheet, C1, C2, C3, C4, C5)
(Sheets c6 & C7 pertain to the on site waste water system
which does not affect the stormwater portion of this
project)

wmpteieness Review wItU UI L
Project Name: jw 9 c,0 2-a-g /,t,c.kcnxecJ Received Date: cf,_ 3 `-' 6
Project Location: jL-,�pj� dl}� ??747/,�, Accepted Date: /a.c//3
Rule(s) 02008 Coastal 019 Coastal ElPhase II (WIRO ) Universal 01988 Coastal
Type of Permit: New or Mod • PR Existing Permit#(Mod or PR): nPE Cert on File?
Density:::_HD._-..or.....-_:..LD-.:.-Type:-_-Com.mercial:—o.r_L._Residential- = ......
%: ri(%OK?) Stream Class: OSA Map EOffsite to SW8
Subdivided?: Subdivision or Single Lot nORW Map Exempt
Paperwork Emailed Engineer on:
®Supplement(s) (1 original per BMP) BMP Type(s):
1:::10&M with correct/original signatures(1 original per BMP except LS/VFS and swales)
Application with correct/original signatures Deed
DCorp or LLC: Sig.Auth. per SoS or letter Email Address: Design Engineer
0$505(within 6mo) V✓'1``rl ®Email Address: Owner
IJSo3fteport ^i with SHWT (iv)` Q, Note to Reviewer:
Iculations(signed/sealed) a e"
0No obvious errors
Density includes common areas,etc
Deed Restrictions, if subdivided:
❑Signed &Notarized
❑Correct Template(Comm/Res&HD/LD) or Dec.Covenants& Rest.
Plans - - � _ _
.
Z El. ets ODetails(roads,cul-de-sacs,curbs,sidewalks,BMPs, Buildings,etc)
Grading Wetlands: Delineated or No Wetlands
Vicinity Map ®Layout(proposed BUA dimensions)
®Legend DDA Maps ®Project Boundaries
Infiltration _-� Wet Pond Offsite
Soils Report ®Soils Report UPE Cert for Master Lot#:
SHWT: USHWT: ®Deed Rest for Master OLot#Matches Master
Bottom: PP: BUA Permitted (Master): sf
Visited: BUA Proposed(Offsite): sf
_
Additional Information:
Permitted Proposed: Proposed: Proposed:
R!JA (cf) I I I _ ..
DA(sf) .
PP(el)
SHWT(el) I
Depth(ft)
SA(sf) .

CONSULTING, PA
2 . 7332 Cotesworth Dnve
Imington, NC 28405
[phone]
PLANNING-ENGINEERING-PROJECT MANAGEMENT
July 24, 2013
NCDENR-DWQ ECEIVE
Attention: Linda Lewis JUL 2 5 2013
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405 BY.
RE: Stormwater Plan Revision
Lockwood Folly Clubhouse
Stormwater Permit Number: SW8 900225
Dear Linda:
This letter is a request for a plan revision for this project. Based on the existing
permit (dated 9/29/13) and a approved plan revision (dated 7/29/11). My
understanding is this area is covered by a low density permit with allowable
BUA and a reserve of BUA for future allocation. The permit and the plan
revision contain a spreadsheet showing allocation for the subdivision and
amenity areas.
This project entails, demolishing the existing pro shop/restaurant facility and
building a new POA clubhouse that will be used as the new pro
shop/restaurant/clubhouse (three uses). In addition to the building work the
existing parking lot will be removed and a new parking lot will be constructed
in the same footprint at an improved geometry to accommodate additional
cars. In addition the old tennis court will be demolished except for a
basketball sized court to remain.
I have accounted for the existing BUA on site and the proposed BUA from this
proposed project in the attached spreadsheet. The top portion of the
spreadsheet contains the numbers from the permit and the bottom numbers
show what I calculated from the field run topographical survey. Based on
this compilation the existing BUA on site is 110,389 SF. Based on the permit the
existing total is 113,390 SF of BUA. After removing and adding the proposed
improvements the total proposed BUA for this portion of Lockwood Folly is
113,582 SF. This is an addition of 192 SF from the permit revision dated 7/29/11 .
As per NCDENR instructions I am attaching a completed plan revision
application form, 2 sets of plans on this project, and this letter will serve as a

narrative for the planned changes. I trust this enough information to allow for
this proposed plan revision
Should you have further questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerell rdaw1i •
t....,,,
Pre :�► .,b SE*
r A
Attachments 2 sets of plans (Cover Sheet, Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5)
(Sheets c6 & C7 pertain to the on site waste water system
which does not affect the stormwater portion of this
project)
Signed Application (1 - original, 1 - copy)
FFCEIVE
0
JUL 2 5 2013
BY:
•
2 of

d .
September,2007 ,cckwood Folly Subdivision Stormwater Calculations
Revised August,2008 Firunswick County,NC Impervious Surfaces
, .Permitted -.:;:'ELinc_ ,
Adjustments to
LOT AREA IMPERVIOUS Iraparvi,r's ! Permited POA
___LOCATION _is!' AREA(SF) 7-.7:: c/r,IMPERV NOTES: Reserve LSF) Date _ ...
Genoa Pt.Tr. 2 i •
Town Homes : 52,676: _11,640 : A 1) 22.10 •
Proposed Tr.6
Condos 164,4501_ 75,000 0.001. ' .
SALES OFFICE 83,162 23,509, . '.:()9. '28.27._ •
THE LINKS Town
Homes 817321 35 494 '.!9-1 41.891 _ _
LINE I pi: 10,572.1_ 8,000 n
., o.oql _ _
GENOA P3iNT
Condos 51.263 17,791 34.711
:POA Approved Additions with-1r mit
— —
POA CU.IB 51,981L_ 9,084 •..,8-i 16,837 '
- 1 -_ ...._. ___.r.
PRO Shop/Cart t
- I
Barn ' 202 402 tic., 79,506 .: ', 39.28
)14.4 Proposed
Clubhouse
Expansion iI
I
.
J 9000 c i
0.00! — .
41
•
Proposed Pool . ,
Deck Expansion I 5.400 ,.: 9•01
MAINTENANCE _ 67,7071 . 2?-E92. .,';...02 41.20
ROADWAYS 991,773! __
':!'-' 100.00.
CARTPATHS 7 --- -218 8911 --.1-•;•L'''I 100.001
, ..
ALL OTHER 9 207 206' 0. ii 0.00 o
Sub Totals 20,001,952' 4,613,880 2,850. 39 23.07 3228
Current Tennis Courts :•'960 !LWFP0A Park
Lots P4-057 81134-058 10400 i
LWFPOA Park . 4c
LFPOA Park
16.4
IMP.SURF. =
34329 35329 10,400 .
. ...;:ei
, I
11969
Total form Reserve
Reserve : Balance ._
.. . -
Reserved for
POA
Redistribution I 340,547. 340,547 4.46_ 15497 325,350 _ ..
TOTALS 20,001A527 4,975,227 2...737 1339 24.87 ' —
1
RECEIVE
JUL 2 5 2013
Date Printed:Printed: 6/20/2011 1-,ape 13
...

. t„ _ .1 v. •ins
a m 4 �a
zIll
o E 8
° d
2 ' o 0 °B E
8
°o ° c ° 0 3 Y
0Ti
o. 0 1°+ 00 € N
eii
on E C 0
0 o a1 �W( - n u
o u ,
W W N x d Z z Z
{ QNt O pO^ .4 �0 0 a
1-1
Q -a .m-1 N Ill
N O 1HI
m 0 t��000
LG
W
2 W
o °
. ..
O. ed
W
L
Q
ID FR
m O o-oml
ccin.
O d
W N
Q
m =
H
III
0 LU m N O N ��
2
aIn
m Um' CV
mii
533I- o rF —1
A p S § p O m � O ah. N
.ro1 Of
en
F •4
.a
tn
N cr
W
'� a
.1
n
Q Q roll
I-I IN N'1
m 1.11 n
0 m 0est m o~1
z ¢ Lg.-
O N N
D. o
W
G 7
Z Z O
no a
0 a J
u
us
co
O —u°i G '
3 a m c 5 o
In F a4 z a a 0o u
o 14
w o 6 E 3 `d' c coe 3 °s w ¢ z O a
�'a. 0.Z m t 0 U Y U. Y .,,La
Z O 2 m
t+ a c •= E z 0 0 X O u m c,
3 a n a° F a a W m a a Z Z tJi
° �+ + `y g i^ O t z z 0 0 L.
2 ac u •s '^a °a. c a a g u . ¢ '�� Q in a
T.
z O 2 2 a F° ? a a a 6 ± o9 8 z 3 $
a °• a cg o z z z 1-

Weaver, Cameron
From: Bob Tweedy[btweedy©ccusa-water.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:49 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron; Scott, Georgette; Gregson, Jim
Subject: Lockwood Folly Subdivision SW8900225 Mod
Attachments: Lockwood Folly- Project M-1.pdf
All,
Sorry for the inconvenience. It works better when you attach the file that you want people to
see.
Robert C. Tweedy, PE
From: Bob Tweedy
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:40 PM
To: 'Weaver, Cameron'
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Gregson, Jim
Subject: Lockwood Folly Subdivision SW8900225 Mod
Mr. Weaver,
Thank you for providing information and forwarding my inquiry to Ms. Scott.
Ms. Scott,
Earlier this week I was notified by our POA that construction of a stormwater improvement
project was expected to start in the next two weeks. Please see the attached scan which I have
marked to show what I believe to be the extent of the project, M-1. My property is Lot 7 , 408
Genoes Point Road SW, and I am thinking about buying Lot 8. I plan to meet with a POA
representative this Saturday to learn more about the project.
I believe they plan to construct an open swale within a POA owned strip of land along my rear
property line. The strip is only 10' wide. In reading the stormwater permit for Lockwood Folly, I
see where the side slopes of the swales can be no steeper than 3:1.
If you have time, please answer a few questions, so I can be better prepared fro my meeting
with the POA on Saturday.
Under what conditions can the swales have steeper side slopes?
1

If a swale, of adequate depth, cannot be constructed in the POA strip can the drainage be
piped?
Should a project of this apparent scope be reviewed by NCDENR? If so, has it been submitted
and approved?
Thank you for your assistance.
Best Regards,
Robert C. Tweedy, P.E.
From: Weaver, Cameron [mailto:cameron.weaverOncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52 AM
To: Bob Tweedy
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Gregson,Jim
Subject: Lockwood Folly Subdivision SW8 900225 Mod
Mr.Tweedy:
Patrick Grogan with our Mooresville Regional Office forwarded your email to me here at the Wilmington Regional Office
to address your Stormwater permitting issue. I am including the electronic copies of the September 29,2008 permit
and the approved plan revision issued July 14,2011 that we discussed. The full file with plans is with Georgette Scott
([e-mail])or 910-796-7335 and I am copying her on this message. She will assign a person to
contact you and respond to your questions. (Jim Gregson is also copied as we discussed.)
If you would like to schedule a file review, please let Georgette or me know and one of us will work to get you a time to
come to the office and review the file information. If you have any other issues,don't hesitate to contact me.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
[e-mail]
Environmental Assistance Coordinator
NCDENR/Division of Environmental Assistance and Outreach (DEAO)
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303 (F)910-350-2004
http://ncenvironmentalassistance.org/
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
2

441.0. ''R i
-----, , J74
KS Ai` �r~� x,2 \a 71
._
. (1 J-j` ` 1 t ,19•.2,f1�� Y•`�., .i��34z
! tr { t j '7 f'8115 i 11 1l 8 7 I _`� i 238 f � �:
'F 7k } 1 1 i,-k 12 1S �li ,�.� ` r:iS. .-, C 33 --4 •kj8'-\1, 14i N
��. .� F
ki � G• `�..-- �� mot. ' ., �31 • �� 3 \
di. 4� 3 \ I . i✓ >- . \ 335
-r' t L I. '' 1 1., ,1„`9 ` I,1•• 'i'' its 'S-
„ ,- ,4 •
- 1r"4_. r :��'� 1 - '-I"I 4
7 z52 rja! 3?5 �•32a . aZ3 r
,* .s.K ag f,, :•" l ' ssa r
• , '. r �}.. 1 ! ■S 281 1Z42 IYi3 254 226 Y .�• �,� 4Y%r V
a1 . F•{} �.�Jlf i' .. t��� ; i,2yQ�i1+3�.i2t3}/,24t Yib!'�51 +.t 549 j 1 x7 ,2G7• 1g !�y`•1",,..".
..
,:.--. i�6 •L l _ �. ! r�` _ / :•'fir,. 239 L3?1`238'+��� .1"`."'_'-•-�_1__j ii Dua t5i216 277 '\. .' �i]] 765 - -/�/'� 326
i 6 ) m--"1 225 2z:'z23 i222'7t! -7�t " ';� �!� `r:28 226 1_. _�_..� zso rz,:f t6l -.: c21 '
11 ••�.��r•"' , }tom 223�,�' }•. ir Ilf- ` 2 1S`' k �•r -�: j:Ki, f03
r ',owl E8 , 1 j •z� ", _ 1213 1 i YKB• fi'r. 1 --
-•� .� --L--�. 1' 1 '-r•-`-. 3� , :'```,zao' _ '1 w e, 2' 1_ ./., ?,, • xe.,/ `~,1r_,_.. -.--' ,t. . ^•`r' ,F
%�, "�:.;/' '•'`1`� I /j•r .✓``4 { .z3'~ i. ass,/ , ,e. 1+2gr zit „„'� >_�-
f �r y' • , Y ; .. �r28t . r h z30 c
/ `' /,i •
''E�, `� i� ruy:e o t^ 256/ tse i ram.. }`'
/a/>, 1 �` .f `�, Y d _1 �733 *iii;:..• :L:- .1•:}�:•.- . ' `:� .,j- f1._,-f ' r" ��'� �•3t•a
q e`,.r - `1 _ +ram�,.rl� ...,r--'' �. �. / ..,( Z
Tx"' za"?'. _•.:. ;.._ L � � ; zap 2 •R� .�� p,/ ,
i.
•
•
.,5,,, ; "]]` .5 `{�.- `I / `/ `1 rl'' CIIe`$��, :y a. } 7 - �-. r,/ • •r / r� go
/ . A ((1LV r i f /`,, r i �j i '7•-•>\1\" ,,,,,,.,...\,...-: y f ,.
\2 / �7, a; 1 C / 38 / 5� t 1 L-�. _ 305 ,, '
f/t >864 1. l J..� l ,✓l -'•,yr- Y r
� 1 3Ti \� t -
\ -Art.41 i , ., •
. ... - iti �T ' r % 7••r 312 ......_
- '-'---
\ Yy e� ; S r ys � � .~ p�@i4- �_ ,. 1 �. I. I��/' I 3S3 ; 's�3 31 �`.
\ �,>.Q �8 + •_ - 7�3 , r1 'sE2\ ._.1",,
- 1. 1'"�35i,' -. ; _
51
�' `,/�i� - _ _r • i `•.. J ,. iiSnA iD` ' -..,~�\ /ate 29E 2
` � �s' r
•
ir
1 -- 76 •, n5 tit t i `^ /�-` ( / ._
/■� f' ••^•' -- .�,�+•' 71l7 , �� •i+ 9F f i01 !� l ,�53/ f \ '.i61 S` r W� v•' •I /�yiqr
�+.r NB-lb- 34;. �� - .- - 4, ,` - ^� f,86 , •�\�Vl �102 4- � ) \_ ?'— - 4
r 11, `j, if !-�,A344 sr, ' El'l a' . '•� mat .%r!',r3 ' s� / 5f ''.. `\ �� y 47/47 �s
it.
/ �° 4. 1'}�` toy` ,-,....),,,,\�� >+� 34fi
ack
, . . .
wii4
7? �l Jl; // /r; ,' ` t f • 3 4. ;ram as�t 1yof ,•
e \ +I f s+
1411
.�Y s • 1 { �� II
`t1 J t t a
�y /�,` -'�'-�•-�. r- 75~ t it (�' ^.f 1112 •.,4178 . ' ;i, 1 , • 4 go
-, 24 416t �. f-�_
3 '.34 , t \i\';Ys isa, \\; 11:, A' 1'9,:\\.'.25�°'Vie.11,k'361'ti`• 1?S
ti
.;� ,.
•}9i:
I
, re;
..„,
1.
' 1
i .•
. s
tl. Project Area Locations
ONE COMPANY{Many Solutions
Lockwood Folly Property Owners Assoaatlon I Lockwood Folly Stoniwater Master Plan

Weaver, Cameron
From: Grogan, Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:54 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron
Subject: FW: Statew Stormwater Management Systems Permit No. SW8 900225 Mod.
You asked for it and I'll send you one. Good Luck!
From: Bob Tweedy [mailto:btweedyCaccusa-water.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Grogan, Patrick
Cc: Shelby Tweedy
Subject: Statew Stormwater Management Systems Permit No. SW8 900225 Mod.
Mr. Grogan,
This email pertains to an existing stormwater management permit that may have been modified recently.
Please forward this inquiry to the appropriate person if this is not in your area of responsibility.
I live at 408 Genoes Point Road SW in the Lockwood Folly Subdivision, located near Varnum and Supply in
Brunswick County. Two days ago I received a notice from our property owner's association (POA) indicating
construction of a stormwater improvement project, located immediately adjacent to my property, is
scheduled to begin in about 2 weeks.
This is the first I have heard of the project.The project does not appear on the master stormwater plan for our
subdivision.The master plan was prepared by the engineering firm of HDR.
During two phone calls, since receiving the notice, the POA representative for the project has not been overly
helpful with details but has agreed to meet with me this weekend. I'm trying to find out what I can prior to
that meeting.
I have performed on-line research and have found a copy of the above mentioned permit. The permit was
issued on September 29, 2008 to Gordon Ackley and Lockwood Folly POA. One of the requirements of the
permit is that changes to the defined projects and any additional projects must be submitted to NCDENR for
review and approval.
The POA approved this project just this last Friday, March 16, 2012. Has this project been submitted to, and
approved by, NCDENR?Were engineered plans submitted, and are they available from NCDNER via email?
Thank you for any assistance you can provide.
Robert C.Tweedy, PE
434-609-4688
1