Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20170537 Ver 2_2017-0537v2_HannahBridge_BufferConversion_Package_20241022
M E M O R A N D U M 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 | 919.209.1052 tel. 919.829.9913 fax TO: NC DWR FROM: Katie Obenauf and Jamey McEachran - RES DATE: October 21, 2024 RE: Request to Modify the Final Bank Parcel Development Plan: Addition of Riparian Areas for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits to the Hannah Bridge Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site (DWR #2017-0537 V.2) within the RES Neuse UMBI in Johnston County, NC EBX-Neuse I, a wholly owned entity of RES, would like to request the addition of 6.32 acres be added to the Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits (as shown in the attached table and figure) to the Hannah Bridge Buffer and Nutrient Mitigation Project. MY5 monitoring activities for Hannah Bridge Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, within the RES Neuse UMBI, are now complete. Due to some wetland areas not consistently meeting a 12% hydroperiod, RES requested, as allowed in the RES Neuse UMBI Section IX that these areas be converted from wetland credit to buffer credit. At this time, RES received approval from the IRT to Modify the Stream and Wetland Credit Areas to remove the 4.07 Wetland Credits (total wetland area of 6.95 acres) from the Mitigation Project Credit Totals. Upon this approval, RES would like to request that NCDWR allow these areas to be used to generate Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset Credits as proposed in the attached Maps as a modification to the Hannah Bridge Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP). The Proposal modification is allowable under the RES Neuse UMBI Section IX Procedure for Debiting and Crediting Mitigation Credits (I), made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality-Division of Water Resources (DWR). The Hannah Bridge Site meets all of the conditions stated below and in the RES Neuse UMBI Section IX (6) and (7). “I. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (l)(6), the Sponsor may be able to add additional riparian acreage to a Bank Parcel under this Instrument to generate additional Riparian Buffer Credits under the following conditions: 1. The riparian acreage was identified in a viability letter and BPDP as being viable to generate Riparian Buffer Credits; 2. The riparian acreage must have already been identified and described in the BPDP as Preservation, Enhancement or Restoration; 3. The riparian acreage has been included in an approved Mitigation Plan to generate wetland mitigation credits; 4. The riparian acreage must fully comply with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) and (o) (where applicable) at the time the request is submitted to DWR; 5. The riparian acreage must be removed from all wetland credit ledger/s; and 6. The acreage being removed from the wetland ledgers must be authorized in writing by the ACOE. J. Requests to add Riparian Buffer Credits in accordance with Item I of this section must be submitted to DWR in writing prior to or as part of, the submittal of the Year 5 Monitoring Report for that Bank Parcel to be eligible for review. Only one request per Bank Parcel under this Instrument will be accepted. Riparian Buffer Credits added in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (l)(6) will not be able to be converted into Nutrient Offset Credits and will be required to be tracked accordingly.” Each of these areas have had vegetation plots within them and have consistently met success criteria for Buffer Credits. NCDWR walked these areas with the IRT in December 2023 to determine the success of these areas. A more detailed breakdown is provided below, but this conversion would result in a gain of 173,969.000 buffer restoration credits, 4,146.500 buffer enhancement credits, 396.300 buffer preservation credits and a 4,644.295 nitrogen credits. As requested by Katie Merritt from NCDWR during the IRT comment period closed on July 17, 2024 for the Site Modification for the RES Neu-Con UMB- Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site RES has provided: a. A figure showing the width categories/boundaries (0-50, 51-100, 101-200) represented from top of banks off streams where wetland credits are released See attached. b. The mitigation type (restoration, enhancement, enhancement via cattle exclusion, and/or preservation) where released wetland credits are located See attached figure. c. The stream category where the released wetland credits are being measured adjacent to. By stream category, DWR has the following options: “pond, ephemeral, or I/P) The areas that are being converted to Buffer Credit were already generating buffer / nutrient credit on other areas along the riparian area. All three areas are associated with an I/P stream (HB1, HB3, and HF1). d. Veg Plot data for any plots located within the released wetland credit areas. If no plots are located within these areas, EBX would have to provide vegetation data for DWR review. RES has included Vegetation Plot Data for Plot 1, 4, and 8 to NCDWR that shows the success of these areas. The area around HB1 that is being added includes additional vegetation plots 1 and 4. Vegetation Plots 2 and 3 have always been reported to NCDWR but have also included a random through the 5 years since half of the plot was in the Wetland and half was in the nutrient area. The additional area associated with a smaller section near Vegetation Plot 6 was already being recorded and reported to NCDWR. The area along the left bank of HB3 that will be added to the Buffer was monitored by Vegetation Plot 8. This Data is reported to NCDWR in the attached documents. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 69 DARLINGTON AVENUE WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343 September 16, 2024 Regulatory Division SUBJECT: Modification Approval of the RES Neu-con- Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site, Action ID SAW-2015-01799 Ms. Jamey McEachran EBX-Neuse I, LLC 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 Dear Ms. McEachran: Please reference the correspondence received by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on May 16, 2024, regarding the proposal to modify the RES Neu- Con, Hannah Bridge (SAW-2015-01799) Final Mitigation Plan, the correspondence received by the USACE on September 11, 2024, providing clarification on credit totals. Based on the information submitted with this request, the Wetland Credit Total will change from 10.743 credits to 6.670 credits due to several wetland gauges not meeting success criteria across the site. The submittal package requested removal of 4.073 Wetland Mitigation Credits (6.95 acres of riparian wetland) from the Hannah Bridge Mitigation Project Credit totals as reflected in the attached Credit Release Schedule for the Site. The wetland credit loss is associated with Wetland 1 (1.192 acres of restoration, 1.192 Wetland Credits) and Wetland 14 (5.761 acres of enhancement, 2.881 Wetland Credits). As bank sponsor you are required to comply with the approved RES Neu-Con UMB Instrument and Hannah Bridge Site Final Mitigation Plan and this Modification, and the Corps’ regulations regarding compensatory mitigation (33 CFR 332). Please note that no credit release is approved with this correspondence. When credits are debited from the mitigation site, the bank sponsor must provide the Corps with an updated ledger form identifying the purchaser of the credits, the project name, the permit number, and the number and type of credits to be debited. When all stream and/or wetland credits have been consumed, no more credits may be sold from this mitigation site. -2- Please note that this electronic copy provided to you via email is your official copy. Should you wish to receive a paper copy of this correspondence, please contact us. Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact me by email at Casey.M.Haywood@usace.army.mil or by phone at (919) 799-0536. Sincerely, Casey Haywood Project Manager Wilmington District, Mitigation Branch Enclosure cc (by email): NCIRT Distribution List Project Name: Sponsor Name: USACE Action ID: NCDWQ Action ID: Warm Water Cool Water Cold Water Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non-Riparian 4,643.00 10.743 4,643.00 10.743 4,643.00 6.670 Scheduled Releases Warm Water Cool Water Cold Water Scheduled Releases Riparian Riverine Adjusted Schedule with updated Credit Totals Non-Riparian Scheduled Releases Coastal 1 (Bank/Site Establishment)1, 2 15%846.90 15%2.23 1.621 15%10/11/2018 2 (Year 0/As-Built)3 15%670.00 15%1.50 0.891 15%8/12/2019 3 (Year 1 Monitoring)10%446.600 10%1.00 0.594 10%12/19/2019 4 (Year 2 Monitoring)10%446.600 10%1.00 0.594 15%11/20/2020 5 (Year 3 Monitoring)10%446.600 15%1.50 0.891 20%11/31/2021 11/16/2021 6 (Year 4 Monitoring)5%223.300 5%0.50 0.297 10%12/31/2022 2/3/2023 7 (Year 5 Monitoring)10%446.600 15%1.50 0.891 15%12/31/2023 12/22/2023 8 (Year 6 Monitoring)5%446.600 5%0.50 0.346 NA NA 12/31/2024 9 (Year 7 Monitoring)10%223.300 10%1.00 0.594 NA NA 12/31/2025 Stream Bankfull Standard4 10%446.500 NA NA NA NA NA NA Dec-22 Total Credits Release to Date 2856.70 4643 5.73 6.670 Date Johnston 3020201 6/27/2018 5/16/2024 County: 8-Digit HUC: Year Project Instituted: Date Prepared: Actual Release Date Potential Credits from As-Built Survey Stream Credits Credit Classification Non-Forested Wetland CreditsForested Wetland CreditsStream Credits Current and Future Credit Releases Credit Release Milestone Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan Modification (Wetland reduction) Non-Forested Wetland Credits Coastal Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule 4 - A 15% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met. 1 - The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan. 2 - The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria: 1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE; 2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan; 3) Mitigation bank site must be secured; 4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan; 5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE; 6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required. 3 - The second credit release is based on the credit totals from the as-built survey, and may differ slightly from the credit totals stated in the mitigation plan. Contingencies (if any): Wetland Credits are on hold until further information is provided Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release Hannah Bridge EBX-Nesue I SAW-2015-01799 2017-0537v1 Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan Forested Wetland Credits Total Potential Credits Projected Release Date Table 1. New Buffer Credit Areas (converted from wetlands), [DWR #2017-0537 V.2], Project Credits Project Area N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound) P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound) Credit Type Location Subject? (enter NO if ephemeral or ditch 1) Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min-Max Buffer Width (ft)Feature Name Total Area (ft2) Total (Creditable) Area of Buffer Mitigation (ft2) Initial Credit Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit Final Credit Ratio (x:1) Convertible to Riparian Buffer? Riparian Buffer Credits Convertible to Nutrient Offset? Delivered Nutrient Offset: N (lbs) Delivered Nutrient Offset: P (lbs) Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 0-100 HB1 125,107 125,107 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 125,107.000 Yes 6,528.250 — Buffer Rural Yes I / P Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 0-100 HB1 8,293 8,293 2 100% 2.00000 Yes 4,146.500 No — — Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101-200 HB1 51,428 1 33% No — Yes 2,683.582 — Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 0-100 HF1 7,065 7,065 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 7,065.000 Yes 368.661 — Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101-200 HF1 27,542 1 33% No — Yes 1,437.178 — Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 0-100 HB3 41,797 41,797 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 41,797.000 Yes 2,181.023 — Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101-200 HB3 10,033 1 33% No — Yes 523.535 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Totals (ft2):271,265 182,262 178,115.500 13,722.229 0.000 Total Buffer (ft2):182,262 182,262 Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):89,003 N/A Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit:0 0 Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2):46,556 0.0%Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation (ft2):60,754 1.6%Preservation as % TABM Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min-Max Buffer Width (ft)Feature Name Total Area (sf) Total (Creditable) Area for Buffer Mitigation (ft2) Initial Credit Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit Final Credit Ratio (x:1) Riparian Buffer Credits Buffer Rural Yes I / P 0-100 HB1 3,963 3,963 10 100% 10.00000 396.300 — — — — Preservation Area Subtotals (ft2):3,963 3,963 Square Feet Credits 173,969 173,969.000 8,293 4,146.500 3,963 396.300 186,225 178,511.800 Square Feet Credits Nitrogen:4,644.295 Phosphorus:0.000 Neuse 03020201 - Outside Falls Lake 19.16394 N/A Restoration: Enhancement: Mitigation Totals 89,003 TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM) TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION Mitigation Totals Nutrient Offset: Preservation: Total Riparian Buffer: 1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a). last updated 08/03/2020 Hannah Bridge 3 Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site September 2019 Table 1. Hannah Bridge Mitigation Credits *According to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (4) and (5), “the area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation”. All riparian restoration in the table above is generated on land determined by DWR as being agricultural. Therefore, the 4.585 acres (199,724.56 ft²) of Neuse riparian buffer restoration credits shown in the table above, can be used for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both. Neither riparian buffer preservation nor enhancement credits can be converted into nutrient offset credits. The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer request submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor is to provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions that have occurred up to the date of the request. 1.4 Riparian Restoration Approach The land use adjacent to most of the streams on the Bank Parcel was pasture. Neuse riparian buffer restoration was used for riparian buffer credit in cultivated areas while enhancement or preservation was used in forested areas. All riparian restoration areas were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet from the stream with bare root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8 foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. The buffered channels provide water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Neuse River watershed. Rapidly regenerating species and invasive species may develop greater individual species density and create a less diverse mix. During the site visit on April 16, 2015, DWR determined the upstream portion of reach TH3 to be a ditch, while the downstream portion was a stream. The portion classified as a Riparian Zone Credit Type Mitigation Type Existing Acreage Used Acreage Credit Per Acre (ft2)Ratio % Full Credit Mitigation Assets Riparian Buffer Restoration 4.585 4.585 43,560 1:1 100%199,724.56 ft² (4.59 ac) Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 0.147 0.147 43,560 2:1 100%3,197.83 ft² (0.07 ac) Riparian Buffer Preservation: Subject Streams 2.717 1.622 43,560 10:1 100%7,065.43 ft² (0.27 ac) Riparian Buffer Preservation: Non- Subject Streams 0.038 0.038 43,560 5:1 100%331.06 ft² (0.01 ac) Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 0.238 0.238 43,560 2:1 33%1,709.22 ft² (0.04 ac) Riparian Buffer Preservation: Subject Streams 0.653 0.000 43,560 10:1 33%0.00 ft² (0.02 ac) Riparian Buffer Preservation: Non- Subject Streams 0.002 0.000 43,560 5:1 33%0.00 ft² (0.00 ac) 4.585 4.585 Zone Credit Type Mitigation Type Credit Per Acre (lbs)Ratio 0-100'Nitrogen Restoration 2,273.02 N/A 101-200'Nitrogen Restoration 2,273.02 N/A TOTAL 3.20 4.79 Buffer Preservation 3.410 1.660 Acreage 1.59 Mitigation Assets (lbs) 3,619.66 7,272.05 10,891.71 includes ratios & reductions Riparian Buffer Credit 101-200' Nutrient Offset Credit 7,396.49 ft² (0.30 ac) 4,907.04 ft² (0.11 ac) 199,724.56 ft² (4.59 ac)Total Restoration includes ratios & reductions 0-100' Total Enhancements 0.385 0.385 TH3 HB1 HF2 HB2 HF1 HB3 HB3-I/P HB3-Nutrient Offset 100-200 (10,032 sq ft) HB3-Restoration 0-50 (24,657 sq ft) HB3-Restoration 50-100 (17,139 sq ft) HB1-I/P HB1-Nutrient Offset 101-200 (51,428 sq ft) HB1-Enhancement 0-50 (5,283 sq ft) HB1-Enhancement 50-100 (3,009 sq ft) HB1-Preservation 0-50 (3,524 sq ft) HB1-Preservation 50-100 (438 sq ft) HB1-Restoration 0-50 (76,830 sq ft) HB1-Restoration 50-100 (48,276 sq ft) HF1-I/P HF1-Nutrient Offset 101-200 (27,542 sq ft) HF1-Restoration 50-100 (7,064 sq ft) 12 18 17 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 9 8 10 11 13 14 15 16 Ca r t o g r a p h e r : k o b e n a u f | P O C : X X X X | P a t h : R : \ R e s g i s \ P r o j e c t s \ N C \ 1 0 0 1 3 5 _ H a n n a h _ B r i d g e \ P R O \ M Y 6 \ 1 0 0 1 3 5 _ H a n n a h B r i d g e _ M Y 6 . a p r x | L a y o u t : H a n n a h B r i d g e _ B u f f e r C o n v e r s i o n _ N e w L a y o u t www.res.us Reference: Project limits are approximate. The property boundaries depicted on this map have not been surveyed and are for prospect assessment purposes only. This information is not to be used as final legal boundaries. Imagery Source: ESRI 2022 Spatial Reference: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Ft US Date Exported: 10/22/2024 Project Number: 100135 0 300150 Feet 1 in = 300 ft Conservation Easement Top of Bank Treatments Ditch Enhancement I Enhancement II Enhancement II-out HWV-out Preservation Restoration Vegetation Plots USACE USACE Plot of Interest DWR Buffer Approach Buffer Restoration 0-50 (New) Buffer Restoration 50-100' (New) Buffer Enhancement Via Cattle Exlusion 0-50' (New) Buffer Enhancement Via Cattle Exlusion 50-100' (New) Buffer Preservation 0-50' (New) Preservation 50-100' (New) Nutrient 0-100' (New) Nutrient 101-200' (New) Buffer Restoration 0-100' (Original) Buffer Enhancement Via Cattle Exclusion 0-100' (Original) Buffer Enhancement Via Cattle Exclusion 101-200' (Original) Buffer Preservation 0-100' (Original) Buffer Preservation 101-200' (Original) Nutrient 0-100' (Original) Nutrient 101-200' (Original) Wetland Area Over 200' From Stream (No Credit) Hannah Bridge Mitigation Johnston County, NC 2024 Additional Buffer Credit from Wetland Conversion © Cartographer: tschwartz | POC: XXXX | Path: R:\Resgis\Projects\NC\100135_Hannah_Bridge\PRO\MY6\100135_HannahBridge_MY6.aprx | Layout: Raparian Zones www.res.us Reference: Project limits are approximate. The property boundaries depicted on this map have not been surveyed and are for prospect assessment purposes only. This information is not to be used as final legal boundaries. Data Source: XXXX Spatial Reference: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Ft US N 0 450225 Feet 1 in = 438 ft when printed at 8.5x11"Hannah Bridge Johnston County, North Carolina 78.4166°W 35.3791°N Riparian Zones H F 2 TH3 HB1 HF1 HB2 HB4 HB3 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 98 Conservation Easement Stream Alignment Top of Bank Riparian Zones 0-50' 0-100' 0-200' USACE Old Wetland Vegetation Plots DWR PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Acer rubrum red maple Tree 3 1 4 Baccharis halimifolia eastern baccharis Shrub 2 Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 7 7 7 2 2 7 3 3 3 1 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 3 6 8 4 6 Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 3 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 2 2 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 Quercus oak Tree Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 6 6 6 3 3 3 4 4 4 6 6 6 8 8 8 5 5 5 6 6 6 1 1 1 3 3 3 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 Rhus glabra smooth sumac shrub Salix nigra black willow Tree 20 Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 16 16 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 5 Ulmus americana American elm Tree 22 22 28 19 19 25 14 14 22 27 27 27 25 25 53 17 17 17 16 16 22 12 12 13 19 19 19 13 13 24 11 11 11 16 16 25 7 7 9 8 8 9 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 8 5 5 5 6 6 9 5 5 6 7 7 7 5 5 7 7 7 7 6 6 9 890 890 1133 769 769 1012 567 567 890 1093 1093 1093 1012 1012 2145 688 688 688 647 647 890 486 486 526 769 769 769 526 526 971 445 445 445 647 647 1012 PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Acer rubrum red maple Tree 8 3 Baccharis halimifolia eastern baccharis Shrub 2 Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 28 28 34 25 25 25 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 30 30 30 Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 2 2 2 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 5 5 5 1 1 1 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 11 11 11 5 5 5 5 5 5 Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 18 18 19 19 19 21 21 23 20 20 20 22 22 22 33 33 33 Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 7 3 40 77 158 18 15 18 Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 3 1 1 1 5 5 15 5 5 20 12 12 23 7 7 9 8 8 8 27 27 27 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 11 3 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 8 8 8 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 9 9 9 55 55 55 54 54 54 52 52 52 52 52 52 44 44 44 65 65 65 Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 13 13 13 122 122 122 Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 44 44 44 43 43 43 48 48 48 49 49 49 45 45 45 11 11 11 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 7 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 33 33 33 33 33 35 38 38 38 32 32 32 29 29 29 7 7 7 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 5 5 5 Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 9 9 9 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 38 38 38 34 34 36 34 34 36 33 33 35 31 31 31 24 24 24 Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rhus glabra smooth sumac shrub 4 Salix nigra black willow Tree 20 113 3 89 89 Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 36 36 36 33 33 36 34 34 34 32 32 32 21 21 21 28 28 28 Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 5 21 31 Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2 2 23 23 23 14 14 14 14 14 21 9 9 15 14 14 14 8 8 48 293 293 421 284 284 614 300 300 340 288 288 434 262 262 369 367 367 367 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 6 8 4 4 4 4 4 5 13 13 18 14 14 20 13 13 16 14 14 19 13 13 15 13 13 13 931 931 931 567 567 567 567 567 850 364 364 607 567 567 567 324 324 1942 659 659 947 639 639 1380 674 674 764 647 647 976 589 589 830 825 825 825 size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE Current Plot Data (MY5 2023) Current Plot Data (MY5 2023)Hannah Bridge Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Stem count Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 05082019-01-0001 05082019-01-0002 05082019-01-0003 05082019-01-0004 05082019-01-0005 05082019-01-0006 05082019-01-0008 05082019-01-0009 05082019-01-0010 05082019-01-0011 05082019-01-0012 Hannah Bridge 1 0.02 Annual Means MY5 (2023) MY4 (2022) MY3 (2021) MY2 (2020) MY1 (2019) MY0 (2019)05082019-01-0013 05082019-01-0014 05082019-01-0015 05082019-01-0016 05082019-01-0017 05082019-01-0018 05082019-01-0007 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 18 0.44 18 0.44 18 0.44 18 0.44 18 0.44 18 0.44