The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151242 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160218Homewood, Sue From: Darrin Peine <DPeine@smeinc.com> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:01 PM To: Bailey, David E SAW; Homewood, Sue Cc: Naeger, Michael Subject: RE: Williams Gas MP1350 - Guilford Cty; SAW -2015-02638 Attachments: 5_impactsrev.pdf, 4_impactsrev.pdf, PCN_20160218.pdf David and Sue Thank you both for the follow up emails Sue —you are correct about the mistake on the previous figures I emailed on 2/2 (i.e., incorrect County and buffer depiction), appended are corrected figures to replace the previous versions of 4_impactsrev and 5_impactsrev. As shown in the figures, we have recalculated the buffer impacts and will notify the local municipality and apply for the compensatory mitigation for the portion that is not exempt. Regarding impacts to the eastern portion of Stream 1 (i.e., parallel section), Williams does not intend to impact that section of stream, unless necessary due to the tight construction space. The engineer explained that if during construction it is determined that work in the portion of stream is necessary, the contractor would pump around and work in the dry for approximately one work day. Re-establishing the bank would include bank matting and vegetation (armoring is not expected), thus a temporary impact. Darrin Peine Mi a-V- Iff www.smeinc.com From: Bailey, David E SAW[mailto:David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil] Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 3:26 PM To: Darrin Peine <DPeine@smeinc.com>; Sue Homewood (sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov) <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Naeger, Michael <Michael.Naeger@williams.com> Subject: RE: Williams Gas MP1350 - Guilford Cty; SAW -2015-02638 Thanks Darrin. Please also send the updated signed PCN. -Dave Bailey David E. Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE -SAW -RG -R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30. ZONE 2 364 FTI of Proposed Clearing Within the Existing Right -of -Way ALLOWABLE I I 4�, O I I I I I / I 0 tO +� 7 + � tr � rI ♦ �I ♦ t+ � +t 1 1 1 ZONE 1 565 FTI of Proposed Clearing 1 Within the Existing Right -of -Way Non -Perpendicular Section - (ALLOWABLE WITH MITIGATION) 40 t it it lo %+ II oo STREAM 1 97 LF of Proposed Temporary Stream Impacts Due to Pipe Excavation and Replacement/ Equipment Crossing t sZONE2• • • ZONE 1 -- • Wetland 1 �i 0.015Acres of Proposed Temporary Wetland Impacts Due to Equipment Crossing /Access r r 1 it ZONE 1 328 FTI of Proposed Clearing — — - Stream Buffers 10 � Within the Existing Right -of -Way Perpendicular Crossing(ALLOWABLE)AVVN Woods Line (Surveyed) �• • �ZONE.2 r • t +I t P i r` 30 6W (IN FEET) Zone 1 Clearing Zone 2 Clearing Project Limits of Disturbance • ® Jurisdictional Wetlands 1 Proposed Temporary Stream Impacts Proposed TemDorary Wetland Impacts REFERENCE: Existing Pipelines GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DATA WAS PROVIDED BY WILLIAMS TRANSCO. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED Proposed Replacement Segments ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED p p g SCALE: 1 " = 30 ' FIGURE NO. DATE: 2-9-16*S&ME PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS DRAWN BY: DDH Williams 2016 DOT Replacement Projects 4 PROJECT NO: Mileposts 1350 L 4335-15-068 Guilford County, North Carolina ♦ r 41 4K ♦ rr , ♦♦ / rrr e� r r ♦ rr rr ♦ /err f e rer ♦ ®r ♦ r'r rr e� ► i rre ®► ,0 rerr ;r Np ;r i ri 2Fg ri � r+ r i STREAM 2 AVOIDED: No Proposed Channel Impacts r r it ♦ +0 rr ®t rr ♦ rr N rr NO rrr m'r e m rrr rr' 1 a / ` ► rr � r \ 1 1 Zir Z rr 1 1 r N N re° ► ► it 1 ree 1 1 it 1 1 rr I ►' r e14* 1 i r� ► ► ro'�, 1 rr r r N Z +� re ! sr Z err Z / r 1 rrr i rrr�r Stream Buffers ei ri 1 1 Woods Line (Surveyed) rr ri 1 1 Zone 1 Clearing 'k 1 1 rr r 1 1 Zone 2 Clearing rr dr 1 / rrr ia'\ 1 Project Limits of Disturbance Vit. i �► �.� 1 r; r;r® Jurisdictional Wetlands r 0 30 1 Proposed Temporary Stream Impacts r� r 1' � r 60 � � �,, �, - i ` ,(IN IF Proposed Temporary Wetland Impacts REFERENCE: Existing Pipelines GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DATA WAS PROVIDED BY WILLIAMS TRANSCO. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED Proposed Replacement Segments ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED P P g SCALE: 1 " = 30'FIGURE FIGURE NO. DATE: 2-9-16*S&ME PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS DRAWN BY: DDH Williams 2016 DOT Replacement Projects 5 PROJECT NO: Mileposts 1350 � 4335-15-068 Guilford County, North Carolina ZONE 1 253 FTI of Proposed Clearing Within the Existing Right -of -Way (Perpendicular Crossing- ALLOWABLE) ZONE 2 200 FTI of Proposed Clearing Oy� Within the Existing Right -of -Way (Perpendicular Crossing -ALLOWABLE) % r ♦ r 41 4K ♦ rr , ♦♦ / rrr e� r r ♦ rr rr ♦ /err f e rer ♦ ®r ♦ r'r rr e� ► i rre ®► ,0 rerr ;r Np ;r i ri 2Fg ri � r+ r i STREAM 2 AVOIDED: No Proposed Channel Impacts r r it ♦ +0 rr ®t rr ♦ rr N rr NO rrr m'r e m rrr rr' 1 a / ` ► rr � r \ 1 1 Zir Z rr 1 1 r N N re° ► ► it 1 ree 1 1 it 1 1 rr I ►' r e14* 1 i r� ► ► ro'�, 1 rr r r N Z +� re ! sr Z err Z / r 1 rrr i rrr�r Stream Buffers ei ri 1 1 Woods Line (Surveyed) rr ri 1 1 Zone 1 Clearing 'k 1 1 rr r 1 1 Zone 2 Clearing rr dr 1 / rrr ia'\ 1 Project Limits of Disturbance Vit. i �► �.� 1 r; r;r® Jurisdictional Wetlands r 0 30 1 Proposed Temporary Stream Impacts r� r 1' � r 60 � � �,, �, - i ` ,(IN IF Proposed Temporary Wetland Impacts REFERENCE: Existing Pipelines GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DATA WAS PROVIDED BY WILLIAMS TRANSCO. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED Proposed Replacement Segments ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED P P g SCALE: 1 " = 30'FIGURE FIGURE NO. DATE: 2-9-16*S&ME PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS DRAWN BY: DDH Williams 2016 DOT Replacement Projects 5 PROJECT NO: Mileposts 1350 � 4335-15-068 Guilford County, North Carolina W A 0 �� Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑Q Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑x No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ❑x No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ❑x No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes ❑x No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑x No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Williams Gas Pipeline 2016 DOT Replacements 2b. County: Guilford 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Colfax 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 2800 Post Oak Blvd 3e. City, state, zip: Houston TX 77056 3f. Telephone no.: 713-215-4627 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Michael.Naeger@williams.com Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑x Other, specify: Utility Company 4b. Name: Michael Naeger 4c. Business name (if applicable): Williams Gas Pipeline 4d. Street address: 2800 Post Oak Blvd 4e. City, state, zip: Houston TX 77056 4f. Telephone no.: 713-215-4627 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: Michael.Naeger@williams.com 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Darrin Peine 5b. Business name (if applicable): S&ME, Inc. 5c. Street address: 9751 Southern Pine Blvd 5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte NC 28273 5e. Telephone no.: 704-523-4726 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: dpeine@smeinc.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Project is a linear utility line 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.125594 Longitude: -80.028707 1 c. Property size: acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Reedy Fork 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: 2c. River basin: Haw River 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Land use in the vicinity of the project corridors consists primarily of scattered residential areas which include landscaped or maintained lawns, roadway ROWs or lightly -developed areas 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.015 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 200 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the project is to replace existing transmission line with new pipeline that is compliant with federal safety and inspection requirements. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Williams is planning to replace sections of natural gas transmission line with Class III compliant pipe. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases)in the past? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? El Preliminary El Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes E] No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑x Wetlands ❑Q Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 - Excavation Small -Basin Wetland No Corps 0.015 W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.015 2h. Comments: Wetland W1 is located within maintained utility right-of-way. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 - Excavation S1 PER Corps 3 97 S2 - Excavation - - S3 - Choose one - - S4 - Choose one - - S5 - Choose one - - S6 - Choose one - - 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 97 3i. Comments: Stream S2 is avoided (MP 1350) Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 - Choose one Choose 02 - Choose one Choose 03 - Choose one Choose 04 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 0 4g. Comments: No open water impacts are proposed 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: No lake or pond construction is proposed 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑x Other:Jordan Lake 6b. Buffer Impact number— Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet B1 P non -electric utility maint. S1 - perpendicular crossing No 328 364 B2 P non -electric utility maint. S1 - non perpendicular Yes 565 0 B3 P non -electric utility maint. S2 - perpendicular crossing No 253 200 B4 - Yes/No B5 - Yes/No B6 - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 1,146 564 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. As proposed, the project will not result in permanent changes in pre -construction elevation contours or affect dimension, pattern or profile of affected streams. Cleared areas are proposed to be restored in accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (Appendix IV) following completion of the work. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Construction activities will be limited to 80 -feet through the wetland and stream areas (which are currently maintained), within the 100 -foot existing ROW, and is the minimum amount necessary to facilitate access for pipeline replacement construction in these areas. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑x Yes ❑ No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): 0 DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank ❑ X Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 565 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: ILF Buffer Mitigation Request submitted on 2/18/2016 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑x Yes ❑ No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 non -electric utility maintenance 565 3 (2 for Catawba) 1,695 Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 1,695 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). required buffer mitigation will be through payment into the North Carolina in -lieu fee program. 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑x Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Project is a linear utility constructed belowground. The ROW will remain grassed with no impervious E] Yes No surfaces. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 1 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ❑x No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project will not result in additional imperveous surface 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? ❑ Phase II ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): E] Session Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes Q No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑x No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑x No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. - 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? S&ME completed a field reconnaissance of the project area on Apri 21, 2015. This effort revealed the site consisted of maintained utility rights -of -ways and adjacent residential lawns. None of the listed species were observed. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑Q No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coraI/ims/viewer.htm 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑x No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? S&ME reviewed the North Carolina Historical Preservation Office Online GIS Web Service (HPOWEB) for properties listed or potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. No such properties were located within the vicinity of the project area. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑x No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Available FEMA mapping pe Darrin M. Peine At, - � 02-18-2016 _ Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant isprovided.) Page 10 of 10