Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0045787_Staff Report_20241024 Docusign Envelope ID:04104899-4E05-4EA8-AEC8-77FC8EA9CB8A State of North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Quality Regional Operations Section Environmental Staff Report Quality To: ❑NPDES Unit®Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: WQ0045787 Attn: Elton Loung Facility Name: 3546 Andersons Place,Franklinton County: Granville From: Dorothy Robson Raleigh Regional Office I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION 1. Was a site visit conducted? ®Yes or❑No a. Date of site visit: 10/23/2024 b. Site visit conducted by: Dorothy Robson c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or®No II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS 1. Facility Classification: SFR Description: 1,000-gallon septic tank,Advantex Treatment unit(800-gallons), UV disinfection,rain sensor,2,500-gallon storage/pump tank, fenced,a six-spray nozzle irrigation area of 10.14 in/yr on 0.32 acres. Proposed flow: 240 gpd Current permitted flow:NA 2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or❑No If no, explain: 3. Are site conditions(soils, depth to water table, etc.)consistent with the submitted reports? ® Yes ❑No ❑N/A If no,please explain: 4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells, etc.)? ®Yes ❑No ❑N/A If no,please explain: 5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes ❑No ❑N/A If no,please explain: 6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ® Yes ❑No ❑N/A If no,please explain: 7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or®No If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ® Yes ❑No ❑N/A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: 9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑Yes ®No ❑N/A If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions(Certification B) Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme: 10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: NA 11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only): NA FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 2 Docusign Envelope ID:04104899-4E05-4EA8-AEC8-77FC8EA9CB8A III.REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or®No If yes,please explain: 2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an additional information request: Item Reason See notes below 3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued: Condition Reason 4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued: Condition Reason 5. Recommendation: ® Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office ❑ Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information ❑ Issue ❑ Deny(Please state reasons: ) 6. Signature of report preparer: EA ^^Do//c''u''Siigne��dby: Q&A Na Signature of regional supervisor: s79ncecRr1Paaae Date: 10/24/2024 IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS 1. It is not clear as to whether the irrigation field is wooded or grass. Currently it is a wooded area. Please clarify. 2. Map WW-2 indicates the spray nozzles will overlap in the irrigation area. Have calculations taken into account for the overlapping irrigation in the central area of the spray field? 3. The number of nozzles are not discussed in the report. Please discuss how many spray heads will be the irrigation field and why that many. Only in calculations and the map could I find how many heads are proposed. Six(6) nozzles seems like a lot for a two bedroom. Will the spray heads get enough run time(7.9 min/dose four times a day) and provide sufficient"pressure"on the heads to operate properly? FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 2