SW3160801_Supplement-EZ Form_20241021

SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE
FORMS LOADED
PROJECT INFORMATION f
1 Project Name Glenview Meadows
2 Project Area(ac) 29.8
3 Coastal Wetland Area(ac) 0
4 Surface Water Area(ac) 0.57
5 Is this project High or Low Density? Low
6 Does this project use an off-site SCM? No
COMPLIANCE WITH 02H.1003(4) 11
7 'Width of vegetated setbacks provided(feet) 50
8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes
9 If BUA is proposed in the setback,does it meet NCAC 02H.1003(4)(c-d)? _ N/A
10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No
NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs:
11 Infiltration System
12 Bioretention Cell
13 Wet Pond
14 Stormwater Wetland
15 Permeable Pavement
16 Sand Filter
17 Rainwater Harvesting(RWH)
18 Green Roof
19 Level Spreader-Filter Strip(LS-FS)
20 Disconnected Impervious Surface(DIS)
21 Treatment Swale
22 Dry Pond
23 StormFilter
24 Silva Cell
25 Bayfilter
26 Filterra
FORMS LOADED
DESIGNER CERTIFICATION
27 Name and Title: Matthew C.Kirchner
28 Organization: Eagle Engineering,Inc
29 Street address: 2013-A Van Buren Ave
30 City,State,Zip: Indian Trail,NC 28079
31 Phone number(s): 704-882-4222
32 Email: [e-mail]
Certification Statement:
I certify,under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision;that the
information provided in the form is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete;and that the engineering plans,specifications,
operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here.
Designer _
\\�\\\Illllii////
\'\ c CARD
O .oE ip ;
SEAL < = Signature of Designer
04550 i•
•
INS
,/ 'yFw \( \ ,.\� 08/27/2024
///////I4614\\\\\\ Date

DRAINAGE AREAS
1 Is this a high density project? No
2 If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs 0
3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes
4 If so, number of low density drainage areas 1
Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule
5 versions? No
FORMS LOADED
DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION i Entire Site LD 1
4 Type of SCM Roadside Swale Roadside Swale
5 Total drainage area (sq ft) 1,273,246 1,273,246
6 Onsite drainage area (sq ft) 1,273,246 1,273,246
7 Offsite drainage area (sq ft) 0 _ 0
8 Total BUA in project(sq ft) 305075 sf 305075 sf
New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to permitting)
9 (sq ft) 241185 sf 241185 sf
New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to
10 permitting) (sf) 51960 sf 51960 sf
11 Offsite BUA(sq ft) - -
12 Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots:
- Parking (sq ft) 350 sf 350 sf
-Sidewalk(sq ft) 125 sf 125 sf
- Roof(sq ft) -- Roadway(sq ft) 45910 sf 45910 sf
- Future (sq ft) --Other, please specify in the comment box
below(sq ft) 5575 sf 5575 sf
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
13 subdivided lots (sq ft) -New infiltrating permeable pavement not on
14 subdivided lots (sq ft) - _ -
Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to
15 permitting)(sq ft) 11930 sf 11930 sf
16 Existing BUA that is already permitted (sq ft) - -
17 Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft) - -
18 Percent BUA 24% 24%
19 Design storm (inches) 1.0 in 1.0 in
20 Design volume of SCM (cu ft) N/A N/A
21 Calculation method for design volume N/A N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
22 drainage area(s):
Other' BUA accounts for portions of concrete driveways inside the public right-
of-way. All runoff is conveyed through vegetated roadside ditches. There are
no proposed SCMs on site. The pads &driveways shown are approximate
and final locaions are to be determined by the home builder.

LOW DENSITY
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H.1003
1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes
2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes
3 Has the use of piping been minimized per.1003(2)(c)? Yes
4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances(H:V) 3H:1V
5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 3.97
6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No
7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s)(%)
8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s)(feet)
9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s)(H:V)
10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s)(feet)
11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales?
12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? Yes
13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes
14 Are variations to rule.1003 proposed? No
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
15 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project:
Vegetated roadside swales designed to accommodate channel&slope stability.All swales are grass lined,except#7 which is
designed to be lined with stone as labeled on the construction documents.
Drainage Pervious
Swale BUA Q Slope Vaiiow Vattaa, Flow depth
Area area
# (ac) (ac) I (ac) C (cfs) (%) (fps) (fps) (ft)
1 4.84 1.16 3.68 0.50 9.29 0.04 I 4.00 I 3.85 I 0.70
2 3.12 0.75 2.37 0.50 7.11 0.04 4.00 3.91 0.72
3 0.92 0.22 0.70 0.50 3.50 0.02 4.00 2.78 0.60
4(3A) 16.74 4.02 12.72 0.50 32.81 0.02 4.00 3.97 0.98
5(4) 5.56 1.33 4.22 0.50 11.56 0.02 4.00 3.75 0.94
6(5) 6.27 1.51 4.77 0.50 12.30 0.01 4.00 2.78 0.99
7(6) 0.92 0.22 0.70 0.50 3.49 0.05 4.00 3.70 0.52
8(7) 29.66 7.12 22.54 0.50 58.14 0.01 4.00 2.26 1.35
9
10 .
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21