SW8110804_Historical File_20220811

PAR'PARAmouNTE
E N G 1 N E E F2 1 N G , 1 N C.
1 2 2 CINEMA DRIVE
WILMINGT ON , NC 28403
9 1 0 - 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 ( 0 ) 9 1 0 - 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 ( F )
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: NCDEQ—DEMLR—Stormwater Date 8/10/2022
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28403 Re: Bishop Creek Apartments—SW8110804
SWM Permit Modification Application
Attn: Garrett Zorda Project No. 20364.PE
IWe are sending:) ❑Originals ®Prints 0 Shop Drawings ❑Calculations
The following items: ❑Correspondence ® Plans ❑ Specifications ® Other as listed below
Quantity Date Dwg.No. Description
2 8/9/22 Revised Plan Sheets C-3.0 and C-7.1A
1 8/9/22 Comment Response Letter
Issue Status: ®For Approval ❑As Requested ❑Construction ❑Bid
❑For Your Use ❑For Review and Comment ❑Approved as Noted El See Remarks
(Action Taken: 0 No Exceptions Taken ❑ Make Corrections Noted ❑ Amend&Resubmit
❑ Rejected-See Remarks 0 Approved as Submitted 0 Other
`Remarks.
Contact us with any ad i• or uestions. Thank you.
jblair@paramounte- .com�
AUG 10 ,_W::_.
Cc: Signed:
Jer y Blair,PE

PA ' 1Q1
N C_
August 9, 2022
Garrett Zorda
NCDEQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28405
RE: Request for Additional Information r '
Stormwater Project No. SW8 110804'
Bishop Creek Apartments AU( I } `
Pender County
BY•
Dear Mr. Zorda:
On behalf of Hudson Bishops Creek Property,LLC, et. al., we are submitting a response to
your comments emailed 8/9/2022. Please find your comments listed below with our response
provided in bold.
1. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(vii): Two of the drop inlets on the southern
portion of the project(near the Charlie Medlin Dr. access) are labeled as DI-
148. Based on the provided Storm Drain Schedule,however,it appears one of
these drop inlets should be DI-146,which is currently not labeled on the plans.
Please confirm the drop inlets are labeled consistently with the Storm Drain
Schedule and revise the plans appropriately. Please ensure that two (2) signed,
sealed and dated copies of any revised plans/documents are provided.
RESPONSE: A duplicate DI-148 label was inadvertently assigned to DI-
146. Please find enclosed two signed,sealed and dated copies of revised
Sheet C-3.0 which show DI-146 correctly labeled. No other changes to the
Storm Drain Schedule or calculations are required.
2. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(h):
a. and .1019(7)(c)(iii): The secondary outlet structure detail on plan sheet C-
7.1C shows a 4 inch outlet orifice at the permanent pool elevation of 21.0
fmsl,which causes a portion of the design volume to bypass the level
spreader-filter strip. While this orifice appears to have been inadvertently
left on the secondary outlet structure detail when revising the plans,please
confirm the intended design and ensure all requirements are being met.
Please revise the plan detail appropriately and ensure that two (2) signed,
sealed and dated copies of any revised plans/documents are provided.

Mr. Garrett Zorda
8/9/22
Page 2
RESPONSE: The 4-inch outlet orifice was inadvertently shown on the
secondary outlet structure on Sheet C..7.1A. Please find enclosed two
signed, sealed and dated copies of revised Sheet C-7.1A which show the
inadvertent orifice to be removed from the secondary outlet structure.
The previously submitted calculations, supplement and O&M
agreement are not affected by this change.
b. The pond cross section detail on plan sheet C-7.1C still reports the
temporary pool elevation as 22.0 finsl. The other plan details, calculations,
supplement and O&M agreement report that the permanent pool has been
revised and set to an elevation of 23.0 finsl. Please confirm the temporary
pool elevation and ensure that it is presented consistently throughout the
entire application package. As noted above,please ensure that two (2)
signed, sealed and dated copies of any revised plans/documents are
provided.
RESPONSE: Please find enclosed two signed, sealed and dated copies
of revised Sheet C-7.1A which correctly show the WQV Storage
Elevation (temporary pool)Required(22.89) and Provided(23.00) on
the pond cross section detail. These correct elevations are consistent
with information shown on the previously submitted calculations,
supplement, and O&M Agreement.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed
documents or require any additional information,please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, E Cr E',�E
Paramounte Engineering,Inc.OAP AUG 1 0 4f,
BY:
Jeremy R. Blair, PE
Enclosure
1 2 2 CINEMA D R I V E, W I L M I N G T O N , NC 2 13 4 D 3
PH : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A X : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0

Zorda, Garrett D
From: Zorda, Garrett D
Sent: Tuesday,August 9, 2022 10:55 AM
To: pmeisner@hudsonco_com:Jeremy Blair
Subject: Bishop Creek Apartments (SW8 110804) - Request for Additional Information
Good Morning All,
I have reviewed the additional information received on May 17,2022 for the subject project and there are just a few
items that need to be addressed. Due to the potentially minor nature of these items, and hopefully quick turnaround, I
am sending this email request in lieu of a formal request letter.With that said, please address the following items:
1. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(vii):Two of the drop inlets on the southern portion of the project(near the Charlie
Medlin Dr. access) are labeled as DI-148. Based on the provided Storm Drain Schedule, however, it appears one
of these drop inlets should be DI-146,which is currently not labeled on the plans. Please confirm the drop inlets
are labeled consistently with the Storm Drain Schedule and revise the plans appropriately. Please ensure that
two (2) signed,sealed and dated copies of any revised plans/documents are provided.
2. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(h):
a. and .1019(7)(c)(iii):The secondary outlet structure detail on plan sheet C-7.1C shows a 4 inch outlet
orifice at the permanent pool elevation of 21.0 fmsl,which causes a portion of the design volume to
bypass the level spreader-filter strip.While this orifice appears to have been inadvertently left on the
secondary outlet structure detail when revising the plans, please confirm the intended design and
ensure all requirements are being met. Please revise the plan detail appropriately and ensure that two
(2) signed,sealed and dated copies of any revised plans/documents are provided.
b. The pond cross section detail on plan sheet C-7.1C still reports the temporary pool elevation as 22.0
fmsl.The other plan details, calculations, supplement and O&M agreement report that the permanent
pool has been revised and set to an elevation of 23.0 fmsl. Please confirm the temporary pool elevation
and ensure that it is presented consistently throughout the entire application package.As noted above,
please ensure that two (2)signed,sealed and dated copies of any revised plans/documents are
provided.
As noted above, hopefully these items will have a quick turnaround, however, please ensure that all of the requested
information is received by August 24,2022. In the meantime, since these minor items appear to likely be clerical errors,
I will begin drafting the permit so that it is mostly ready to go once the revised documents are received. Please let me
know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
Department of Environmental Quality
910 796 7215 office
910 796 7343 direct **Please note the change to my direct phone number**
garrett.zordaCa?ncdenr.00v
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
1

+ioFssi-_csrt ow.r..k« o�wNr
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2

PARA? PYPiE
N G.
1 2 2 CINEMA DRIVE
W I L M I N G T O N , NC 28403
9 1 0 - 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 ( 0 ) 9 1 0 - 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 ( F )
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: NCDEQ—DEMLR—Stormwater Date I 5/17/22
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28403 Re: Bishop Creek Apartments—SW8110804
SWM Permit Modification Application
Attn: Garrett Zorda Project No. 20364.PE
IWe are sending: /, Originals ®Prints 0 Shop Drawings /1 Calculations
The following items: ❑Correspondence ® Plans ❑ Specifications ®Other as listed below
Quantity Date Dwg.No. Description
2 5/16/22 State Stormwater Permit Application(Revised Page 3 of 6)
2 5/16/22 Operation&Maintenance Agreement
2 5/16/22 Supplements(Wet Pond and LS-FS)
2 5/16/22 SW Design Narrative(Revised Portions)
2 5/16/22 Design Plans(24"x36")
2 1/6/21 ECS Report of Seasonal High Water Table Estimation and Infiltration
Testing
1 5/16/22 Comment Response Letter R7 wa eat
MAY 1 7
Issue Status: ®For Approval ❑As Requested ❑Construction El Bid
❑For Your Use 0 For Review and Comment ❑Approved as Noted ❑See Remarks
(Action Taken: ❑ No Exceptions Taken ❑ Make Corrections Noted ❑ Amend&Resubmit
❑ Rejected-See Remarks ❑ Approved as Submitted El Other
I' -marks:
Contact us with any additional information or questions. Thank you.
[e-mail]
Cc: Signed:
3 R.Blair,PE

pARAmouT\TTE
ENGINEERING, 1 N C.
May 16, 2022
Garrett Zorda
NCDEQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28405
RE: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 110804
Bishop Creek Apartments DECEIVE
Pender County MAY 1 ]
2022
Dear Mr. Zorda:
BY:
On behalf of Hudson Bishops Creek Property,LLC, et. al., we are submitting a response to
your comments emailed 4/14/2022. Please find your comments listed below with our
response provided in bold.
1. 15A NCAC 02H.1019(5)(a)(i and ii): It is noted that the current version of the permit was
written as greater than 'A mile from SA waters,as mentioned in the January 28, 2022
response,however,the current version of this permit was written under a previous version of
the rules. The proposed modification,however,brings the site up to the 2017 Rules and as
such, must meet all of the applicable rules and minimum design criteria(MDC). The provided
USGS map appears to measure the %2 mile radius from SA waters (Becky's Creek/Bishops
Creek, SA;HQW) only from the outfall of the pond. An SCM with any portion of its drainage
area located within the SA waters boundary,however, must be designed to meet
SA water requirements. Based on the provided information,as well as aerial imagery
(attached for reference), it appears that a portion of the drainage area is located within '/2 mile
of the surface waters. As such,this project would be subject to SA requirements. Please
confirm the intended design and ensure that all applicable rules and requirements, including
the SA requirements,have been met. Please ensure that any revisions are made completely
and consistently throughout all affected application documents.
• RESPONSE: Based on your comment,we have revised the plans,narrative,
calculations,application, supplements and O&M Agreements to comply with
requirements for discharging SCM's located within '/2 mile of SA waters. The
following summary identifies the changes made to help guide you efficiently
through the review and approval process.
a. Section IV, Paragraph 1 on Page 3 of 6 of form SW11-101 has been revised
to clarify that the design meets the requirements of discharging SCM's
located within %mile from SA waters.
b. The relevant portion of the Stormwater Design Narrative has been revised
to remove reference to the site being outside of'A mile from SA waters.

Mr. Garrett Zorda
5/16/22
Page 2
Also,revised calculations are included which show the required runoff
volume(121,613cf)to be based on the difference between the pre vs. post
volume for the 1-year,24 hour storm. These calculations show the revised
storage elevation (22.89 ft) at the required volume(121,613cf),the revised
storage elevation provided (23.00 ft) and volume provided (128,750 cf),
and drawdown times for both the volume required (2.86 days) and volume
provided (2.94 days). Calculations also include flowrate from the primary
outlet(1.13 cfs) as the basis for sizing the level spreader(20 ft).
c. The design plans have been revised to include a primary outlet structure
for discharge of the design storm to a level spreader and filter strip. The
revised plans include details for the primary outlet structure,level
spreader and filter strip. The plans also include details for a secondary
outlet structure for control and bypass discharge of runoff in excess of the
design volume.
d. The Operation& Maintenance Agreement has been revised to show the
updated temporary pool elevation(23) on the Wet Pond Diagram and to
note that the SCM does have a vegetated filter. Also,the O&M =C - V E
Agreement has been revised to include the relevant pages for iLeve
Spreader-Filter Strip Maintenance Requirements.
c. The Supplements have been revised as follows:
• Cover Page revised to add 1 LS-FS on Line 19 BY:
• Drainage Areas page revised to show a design storm of 3.74 inches
on Line 19,the Design Volume of SCM as 128,750 cf on Line 20,
and indicate the Calculation method for design volume to be SCS
on Line 21.
▪ The Wet Pond supplement revised to show minimum required
treatment volume of 121,613 cf on Line 2,the elevation of the
temporary pool as 23.00 feet on Line 25,the design volume of SCM
as 128,750 cf on Line 35,the orifice diameter of 5 inches on Line
37, and the drawdown time for the temporary pool of 2.8612.94
days on Line 40.
• The Level Spreader-Filter Strip supplement is included to show the
design parameters consistent with the rules, calculations and
design plans.
f. A report from ECS is included that shows the seasonal high water table
and infiltration rates to be unsuitable for infiltration.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. We have made every effort to address the design
request and provide a submittal which addresses all of the relevant information required on
the plans,narrative/calculations, application, supplements and O&M agreements. However, if
possible,l would like to request a meeting or call at your earliest convenience to discuss this
information and address any concerns or clarify any questions you may have. Any effort you
can make to expedite this review is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions regarding
1 2 2 CINEMA D R I V E, W I L M I N G T O N , NC 2 9 4 D 3
PH : ( 9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A X : 191 0) 79 1 - 6 7 6 0

Mr. Garrett Zorda
5/16/22
Page 3
any of this information or require additional material,please feel free to call. Thank you for
your time and effort.
Sincerely,
P amounte Engineering,Inc.
Jeremy R. Blair,PE
Enclosure
flECEIVE
MAY 17 2022
1 2 2 CINEMA D R I V E, W I L M I N I 'I U N , NC 2 B 4 0 3
P H : (9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 D 7 F A X : (9 1 C ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 D

BISHOP CREEK APARTMENTS
PENDER COUNTY, NC
STORMWATER DESIGN NARRATIVE
Prepared for:
Hudson Bishops Creek Property, LLC
160 Mine Lake Court, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared by:
P4RAppflE
N C.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
NC License#: C-2846
Project#20364.PE
August 2021 '\ s� y
Revised May 2022 _
040501
****
0/011111110\
11 flEcEIvE
MAY } 72022
BY:

PROJECT NARRATIVE
Hudson Bishops Creek Property,LLC is proposing to construct a 198-unit multifamily
development on an approximately 20-acre site located off Charlie Medlin Drive in the Town of
Surf City,Pender County,North Carolina. The development will consist of multifamily
buildings, amenities, associated driveways,parking,utilities and stormwater management
facilities. The proposed development is bound by Charlie Medlin Drive(existing) and Caretta
Drive (proposed). The property is further identified by Pender County Tax Parcel ID 4235-36-
0239-0000 and described in Deed Book 4745 Page 1974 and Map Book 67 Page 98. Rights of use
and access for Caretta Drive are described in an easement recorded in Book 4745 Page 1979.
The property has an approximate latitude and longitude of 34°26'40"N,77°33' 50"W.
The project is designed to be built in two phases,however,the stormwater pond permitting and
BUA calculations account for the full impervious of both phases as shown on the plans with
additional future impervious allocation as needed.
The ground cover for the subject property is mixed with open meadow,isolated(non-404)
wetlands,and woodlands. The topography of the site varies from EL. 30 to EL. 19 in the
isolated wetlands. The soils consist of Onslow loamy fine sand(On) and Pits(Pt) according to
the provided soils map from NRCS Web Soil Survey Map.
According to the attached USGS information,the project drains to Becky's Creek(Bishops
Creek)which has a stream classification of SA;HQW [18-87-8] and is within the White Oak
Basin.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The multi-family development will capture and treat all stormwater runoff associated with the
development according to Town of Surf City and NCDEQ requirements. All stormwater runoff
associated with the development will be captured within a storm drainage system that will
convey the runoff to a Wet Pond Stormwater SCM.
Please find all reference material and calculations in the following pages of this report. Note
that some calculations have also been located on the plans for easy reference during
constr action.
flECE1VE
fAY17 2022
BY:

Bishop Creek-Wet Pond#1
NCDEQ Wet Retention Basin MDC[15A NCAC O2H.1O53]
Objective:Design a wet retention basin with the following characteristics:a permanent water pool depth between 3-and
8-feet with a temporary water pool sized to detain the design storm(1.5"coastal depth or 1-yr pre-post vol)depending on which
watershed the project drains into. The storm water flow path shall be adequate for water quality and discharges in non-erosive manner
Long Term Pond Performance Is up to the permitee's responsibility in regards to the O&M standards per the permit conditions.
Step 1:Determine the surface area required based on SA/DA Ratio Coastal and Average Depth MDC 1 4 2.
Post-Development Conditions
Total Drainage Area 18.74 ACRE Value from CAD
Impervious Drainage Area 11.14 ACRE Value from CAD
Impervious Cover 59.4% Impervious Cover=(Impervious Drainage
Area)/(Total Drainage Area)*100%
Elevation of Permanent Pool Surface 21.0 FT Value selected by designer
Elevation of Wet Detention Pond Bottom 16.0 FT Value selected by designer(Excludes Sed.Storage)
Depth of Permanent Pool 5.0 FT
Avg.Depth of Permanent Pool FT Value from Avg.Depth Calculation[MDC 2;Equation 3]
Required SA/DA Ratio Value from Coastal NC Chart
Required Surface Area=(Required SA/DA
Required Permanent Pool Surface Area 32,965 SF Ratio)*(Total Drainage Area)
Provided Main Pond Penn.Pool Surface Area 48,335 SF From stage-storage calculations
Step 2:Determine the Design Storage Elevation within the wet detention pond.MDC 2 and MDC 3.
Runoff Coefficient,Rv 0.585 IN/IN Rv=0.05+0.009*(%Impervious)
Required 1.5"Runoff Volume 59,696 CF 1.5"Runoff Volume=1.5 inch*Rv*1 foot/12
(Volume of Temporary Pool) Inch*(Total Drainage Area)
1-yr,24-hr Pre-Dev Volume 46,111 CF HydroCAD SCS Hydrographs
1-yr,24-hr Post-Dev Volume 167,724 CF HydroCAD SCS Hydrographs
Required Runoff Volume 121,613 CF 1.5"Runoff Volume or 1-yr,24-hr Pre/Post
(Volume of Temporary Pool) Volume Difference as applicable
Storage Elevation at Required Volume 22.89 FT Value from stage-storage table.
Storage Elevation Provided 23.00 FT Value selected by designer
Storage Volume Provided 128,750 CF Value is based upon stage-storage values.
See HvdmG1D state-storage hvdrooraohs.
Step 3:Calculate the required forebay volume(15-20%of perm.pool volume). MDC 5.
Main Pond Volume 159,578 CF Main PPool Volume
15%Main Pond Volume 23,937 CF Forebay Volume=(Main Pond Volume)*15%
20%Main Pond Volume 31,916 CF Forebay Volume=(Main Pond Volume)*20%
Provided Forebay Volume 30,955 CF Value from stage-storage tables
Forebay Percentage 19.4%
Step 4e: Verify the time required to drawdown the required runoff volume is within 2 to 5 days. MDC 7.
Diameter of Proposed Low-flow Orifice 5.00 IN Value chosen by designer
Storage Elev for Required Volume 22.89 FT Value from above
Head(Ho) t 69 (Ho)=(Design Storm Staging Elev)-(Centrold of
orifice elevation)
Driving Head(Ho)for Orifice Equation(Ho/3) 0.56 FT Ho/3
Cd,Coefficient of Discharge 0.60 Value chosen by designer
Q,Flowrate Through Low-flow Orifice 0.49 CFS Q=Cd*(Pi)*[(Diameter ofOriflce)*(1 ft/12
in)]^2/4*(2*32.2*(Averge Head)]^1/2
Drawdown Time for Required WQV 2.86 DAYS (Drawdown 77me)=(Required Runoff
Volume)/Q*(1 day/86400 seconds)
Step 4b: Verify the time required to drawdown the provided runoff volume is within 2 to 5 days. MDC 7.
Diameter of Proposed Low-flow Orifice 5.00 IN Value chosen by designer
Storage Elev at Next Highest Outlet 23.00 FT Value from above
Head(Ho) 1,79 (Ho)=(Design Storm Staging Elev)-(Centrold of
nri11e elevation)
Driving Head(Ho)for Orifice Equation(Ho/3) 0.60 Fr Ho/3
Cd,Coeffident of Discharge 0.60 Value chosen by designer
Q,Flowrate Through Low-flow Orifice 0.51 CFS Q=Cd
*(pl)*((Diameter of Orifice)*(1 R/12
In)]^2/4*(2*32.2*(Avergc Head)]^1/2
Drawdown Time for Provided WQV 2.94 DAYS (Drawdow*77me)=(Provided Runoff PrCrilisir0
Volume)/Q*(1 day/86400 seconds)
■
BY:
1 of,

Bishop Creek -Wet Pond #1
Stage-Area-Storage Calculations
Stage/Storage Above Permanent Pool (Including Forebay)
Cumulative
Contour Incremental Volume, S
Contour Area (SF) Volume(CF) (CF)
21.0 57,455 0 0 +-Permanent Pool
22.0 64,320 60,888 60,888
23.0 71,405 67,863 128,750
24.0 78,725 75,065 203,815
25.0 86,265 82,495 286,310
26.0 94,030 90,148 376,458 +-Top of Pond
Stage/Storage Main Pond
Cumulative
Contour Incremental Volume, S
Contour Area (SF) Volume (CF) (CF)
16.0 31,335 0 0 Pond Bottom
17.0 33,980 0 0 +-Sediment Storage
18.0 36,685 35,333 35,333
19.0 39,455 38,070 73,403
20.0 42,280 40,868 114,270 Bottom of Shelf
21.0 48,335 45,308 159,578 -Permanent Pool
Forebay#1
Cumulative
Contour Incremental Volume, S
Contour Area (SF) Volume(CF) (CF)
15.0 2,570 0 0 +-Forebay Bottom
16.0 3,500 0 0 +-Sediment Storage
17.0 4,500 4,000 4,000
18.0 5,570 5,035 9,035
19.0 6,695 6,133 15,168
20.0 7,880 7,288 22,455
21.0 9,120 8,500 30,955 +-Forebay Volume
flEcElvEn
MAX 1 ./ 2022
Br

• ( 2S
Pre 1 Post 1
RECE
W E
BY: -
Bobcat Reach 'on• Routing Diagram for 20364.PE SWM-SA Volume
Prepared by{enter your company name here), Printed 5/16/2022
HydroCAD®10.10-5a s/n 08877 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC

20364.PE SWM-SA Volume Type III 24-hr 1-Yr Rainfall=3.74"
Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 5/16/2022
HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 08877 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pre 1
Runoff = 8.57 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 46,111 cf, Depth= 0.68"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 1-Yr Rainfall=3.74"
Area (ac) CN Description
6.127 30 Woods, Good, HSG A
12.440 77 Woods, Good, HSG D
18.567 61 Weighted Average
18.567 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
15.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 1S: Pre 1
I
Hydrograph
I I I I I
I I I IIfl Runoff
I I I I I I I
i 8.57 GIs ri
_ I�I I I IF 24-�
__ _ J L... 1 1 1 L L _ r_ _ I, J J_J L I
��
I I 1 I i I I
8J L _ _ J L Orr F aiinfaII= .74'
I I I I I I I I I I
7f Runoff Area:18.567 ac
RUnoff 1/olume:46,111 cf
5 Rp> of 0ptti=4.601
T- "O-rnki-
LL 4 I I I I I I I I
CN=61
I I I
3
I I 1
2J,
- I I
- r------ r r 1
1J I I I i i i
I I
0 -.� .,
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

20364.PE SWM-SA Volume Type III 24-hr 1-Yr Rainfall=3.74"
Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 5/16/2022
HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 08877 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Post 1
Runoff = 50.13 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 167,724 cf, Depth= 2.49"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 1-Yr Rainfall=3.74"
Area (ac) CN Description
* 11.140 98 Impervious
* 1.723 98 Water Surface, 0% imp
1.882 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A
3.822 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D
18.567 88 Weighted Average
7.427 40.00% Pervious Area
11.140 60.00% Impervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
8.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 2S: Post 1
Hydrograph
I III II , I I ,-
// - II I
55� I I I l i I Runoff
I I
�. . . - -1 50.13 cfsl I--1- -I--I--I -I
50� Type I I I I 24 I -hr I
1;11;
45_ 1 iYYr Riinfal031;74''
r_r_____..y sy_y_+_+_+_r _r _ _ rI _ _I_ yr_
40� �yiku-no1'ff Ara=i 8..56/14
35. I Unlof IrQ1ui;ni46/, 7241Cf
v r k ti n
oI 1 bI n tiff44r
30.J
I25.-' I
CN= -
- -r------ -y-t- -t-r-r ti--+-y`y-t-r-r-*-r---------
20� 1 1
I 1 I I 1 I I
I I I I I I
I I I
153' I
I I 1
T-1- 1 -1- Fr 7 1 1 T r-r '1 1 7 r
10 ' I I
I I
I I J J 1 1 1
I I
0 , .. .., . .......... ....... ............
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)

20364.PE SWM-SA Waters Type III 24-hr 10-Yr Rainfall=7.03"
Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 5/16/2022
HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 08877 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Summary for Pond 4P: Wet Pond #1
Inflow Area = 808,779 sf, 60.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.62" for 10-Yr event
Inflow = 109.34 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 378,954 cf
Outflow = 15.70 cfs @ 12.66 hrs, Volume= 350,178 cf, Atten= 86%, Lag= 32.7 min
Primary = 15.70 cfs @ 12.66 hrs, Volume= 350,178 cf
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 24.18' @ 12.66 hrs Surf.Area= 80,071 sf Storage= 217,992 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 743.8 min calculated for 350,129 cf(92% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 704.4 min ( 1,492.5- 788.1 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 21.00' 376,458 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic) Listed below(Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
21.00 57,455 0 0
22.00 64,320 60,888 60,888
23.00 71,405 67,863 128,750
24.00 78,725 75,065 203,815
25.00 86,265 82,495 286,310
26.00 94,030 90,148 376,458
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 21.00' 8.0" Round Low Flow Culvert
L= 20.0' Box, headwall w/3 square edges, Ke= 0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 21.00'/20.00' S=0.0500 '/' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.35 sf
#2 Device 1 21.00' 5.0"Vert. Low Flow Orifice C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads
#3 Primary 20.75' 36.0" Round Culvert
L= 100.0' Box, headwall w/3 square edges, Ke=0.500
Inlet/Outlet Invert= 20.75'/20.75' S= 0.0000 '/' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013, Flow Area= 7.07 sf
#4 Device 3 23.00' 36.0"W x 12.0" H Vert. Primary Spillway C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads
#5 Device 3 24.00' 24.0"x 48.0" Horiz.Top of Box C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads
#6 Primary 24.50' Emergency Spillway, C=2.60
Offset(feet) 0.00 4.50 24.50 29.00
Height(feet) 1.50 0.00 0.00 1.50
Erimary OutFlow Max=15.69 cfs @ 12.66 hrs HW=24.18' (Free Discharge)
-Low Flow Culvert (Passes 1.13 cfs of 2.84 cfs potential flow) i=No f ota 'b LSV
2=Low Flow Orifice (Orifice on rols 1.13 cfs @ 8.30 fps)
- =Culvert (Passes 14.55 cfs of 33.37 cfs potential flow)
Primary Spillway (Orifice Controls 11.59 cfs @ 3.86 fps) ���'��
=Top of Box (Weir Controls 2.96 cfs @ 1.38 fps)
=Emergency Spillway ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
MQY
BY:

20364.PE SWM-SA Waters Type III 24-hr 10-Yr Rainfall=7.03"
Prepared by{enter your company name here) Printed 5/16/2022
HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 08877 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Pond 4P: Wet Pond #1
Hydrograph
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I q--- ---I -i ♦ L-I--I- -+ F-H-II-y-=-♦- I- II + I- i I -+- ----- - -+-I-- �in110W
'' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1
120 p - I I I i 109.34 c(s l-1 I I I I I I II I I I I Ipp I II I I I I I I I I I ,
•Primary-
105 1_a_ -1--1-Je;_+_L_1 -1 ! + L I- I I J + L L 1_ I-4-+ L 1 1 1 -1 +-L_
' ' 1 I 1 1 - I , f I h `�/� A Q
100 ,, , I T T-r r 1 r1 T r r I 1 r Peak - lev=24.-i18",-
95� IJ1_ J1L_L- 1 1 L L 1_ 1_1_1_L1__I_J11LL1J11L_
J III 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /�iI I }�
90�, 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 T r r 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 `tOrage: 1 1-1 2-ci-
85� I_J_1_ I J_1_L_1__I_J_ I_1_L_L_1__1_ 1 �i1�_r _1 �T L
III I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
80i" - ------------ - I 1 T r r 1 17 T r r I 1 T T r I I T T r I 1 1 T Tr
75= I J 1 ; L I_ I J 1 L I I J 1 L 1 1 1 1 L 1 I J_1_1_L_
I1' 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I ! rill I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
y— 70- /, ---1-1-T- -I- -I---Y r I' 1 T T r 11 I I '1 t r-1--I---T- r-r-I--I-Y-1-t-r-
v 65� , ___I_J_1_ I I J j 1, t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 JIII I I 1 1
V5. I I ir II I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 . 11 1 III
60_' 1 T T r I I I T T 1- 1 -I-1—r-r-1-7-T-r-r
p 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I
LL 5J�'' 1 1 I -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
504' - 1--I_1-Y- I I--l-+ - t-F-I--1 ,-t- -r-1---,---t I I --t-r-1-`I---1-t—r-
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 II I
45� 1 I I
401 --I--I -1-'+- -I--I- --. F 1--I--I - 4 t h-I--I -1 + t -1- -1__. i-+ F -1 * +.. 1--
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 III
30 ,, I - I I 1 I 1 pp , 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I III
_I -I 1 4- I- I- --.., - + _1,-_I__I_.i_+ I _I 1 +_L I I J +_L-
1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 11 . 11 . 1 1 1 1 1 II I
254- 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I
, JJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I 1 1
20— ,', -1--I -I 15.70 ds -I- .1- 1_+-✓--L-I--I - + L L I- 1 J-. .I F I 1 - 1 -+ I. I 4 1... + L
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 liP • ii 1 1 1 1 III
154 i 1 1 , I 1 I. , , I 1 I I I I I I r
10; ,
54' I
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
Time (hours)
BEG E IV E
BY:

6/8/2024 Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14,Volume 2,Version 3
0*.,..`.' ' Location name: Holly Ridge, North Carolina,USA* /'lam '`'°
Latitude:34.4464°,Longitude:-77.5641°
n°eti-
Elevation:21.74 ft**
li
'source:ESRI Maps
source:USGS N""`" `'
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M.Bonnin,D.Martin,B.Lin,T.Parzybok,M.Yekta,and D.Riley
NOAA,National Weather Service,Silver Spring,Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1
Average recurrence interval(years)
___.I
Duration
Duration --- -�
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 F 1000
5-min 0.501 0.596 0.696 0.775 0.875 0.951 1.03 1.10 1.21 1.29
(0.464-0.543) (0.552-0.645) (0.643-0.753) (0.714-0.838) (0.803-0.944) (0.868-1.03) 0.933-1.11) (0.997-1.19) (1.08-1.31 (1.14-1.40)1
L10-min 0.801 0.952 1.12 1.24 1.40 1.51 1.63 1.75 1.91 1 2.03
__ I(0.742-0.867) (0.882-1.03) (1.03-1.21) (1.14-1.34) (1.28-1.50) (1.38-1.63) (1.48-1.76) (1.58-1.89) j(1.70-2.07)f 1.80-2.20)
75-min 1.00 1.20 1.41 1.57 1.77 1.92 2.07 2.21 2.40 2.54
(0.927-1.08) (1.11-1.30) (1.30-1.53) (1.45-1.70) (1.62-1.91) (1.75-2.07) (1.88-2.23) (1.99-2.39) (2.14-2.60) (2.25-2.76)
30-min 1.37 1.65 2.01 2.27 2.62 2.89 3.16 3.44 3.82 4.12
(1.27-1.49) (1.53-1.79) (1.85-2.17) (2.09-2.46) (2.40-2.83) (2.64-3.12) (2.87-3.41) (3.103.72)1(3.41-4.14)j(3.65-4.47)
60-min 1.71 2.08 2.57 2.96 3.49 3.91 4.36 4.82 5.48 I 6.01
(1.59-1.85) (1.92-2.25) (2.37-2.78) (2.73-3.20) (3.20-3.76) (3.57-4.22) (3.96-4.70 (4.35-5.21) (4.89-5.93)1(5.33-6.53)1
2-hr 2.08 2.55 3.24 3.80 4.62 5.30 6.04 6.84 8.01 j 9.00
(1.92-2.27) (2.35-2.77) (2.98-3.52) (3.49-4.14) (4.21-5.01) (4.81-5.75) (5.45-6.55) (6.12-7.42)117.10-8.71)1(7.91-9.82)
3-hr 2.24 2.74 3.50 4.15 5.10 5.92 6.82 7.82 I 9.31 10.6
(2.07-2.46) (2.53-3.00) (3.22-3.83) (3.79-4.53) (4.63-5.56) (5.34-6.45) (6.11-7.43) (6.94-8.51y)j 8.17-10.2 ,(9.20-11.61
6-hr 2.75 3.36 4.30 1 5.10 5.29 7.32 0.47 9.75 11.7 I 13.4
(2.52-3.03) (3.08-3.71) (3.93-4.74) I (4.64-5.62) I (5.69-6.91) (6.57-8.04)11(7.54-9.28) (8.59-10w7)jL(10.1-12.811 11.55-14.7)1
12-hr 3.24 3.96 5.10 6.08 7.55 8.85 10.3 11.9 14.4 16.6
(2.95-3.61) (3.59-4.40) (4.62-5.67) L(5.48-6.76) (6.75-8.36) (7.85-9.77) (9.06-11.4) (10.4-13.2) (12A-15.9) (14.0-18.4)1
4.54 5.88 7.03 8.78 10.3 12.0 14.0 17.0 I 19.6
j] (4.18-5.00) (5.39-6.46) (6.43-7.71) (7.94-9.62) (9.25-11.3) (10.7-13.2) (12.2-15.4) [114.5-18.7 16.5-21.7
2-day 4.37 5.28 6.78 8.08 10.0 11.8 13.7 15.9 19.2 22.1
(4.01-4.81) (4.85-5.82) (6.20-7.47) (7.35-8.89) (9.07-11.1) (10.5-13.0) (12.1-15.1) (13.9-17.6) (16.4-21.4) (18.6-24.8)
3-day 4.62 5.59 7.13 8.45 10.4 12.1 14.0 16.1 19.4 22.2
(4.25-5.08) (5.13-6.14) (6.53-7.83) (7.70-9.27) (9.43-11.4) (10.9-13.3) 12.5-15.4 14.1-11. (16.7-21.6 (18.8-24.9)
4-day 4.88 5.90 7.48 8.82 10.8 12.5 14.3 16.4 19.6 22.3
(4.49-5.35) (5.42-6.46) (6.86-8.20) (8.06-9.66) (9.79-11.8) (11.2-13.7) (12.8-15.7) (14.4-18.1) (16.9-21.1) (19.0-25.0
7-day I 5.62(5. 6.77 8.51 9.96 12.1 13.8 15.7 17.8 20.8 23.4
20-6.11) (6.26-7.36) (7.86-9.25) (9.16-10.8) (11.0-13.1) (12.6-15.0) (14.2-17.1) (15.9-19.4) (18.2-22.9) (20.2-25.9)
10-day 6.26 7.50 9.29 10.8 12.9 14.7 16.7 18.8 21.8 24.2
(5.80-6.80) (6.95-8.15) (8.60-10.1) (9.95-11.7) (11.9-14.0) (13.4-16.0) (15.1-18.1) 16.8-20.5 (19.2-23.9)I(21.1-26.8)
20-day 8.29 9.87 12.0 13.8 16.3 18.4 20.6 22.9 I 26.2 i 28.8
(7.74-8.91) (9.22-10.6) (11.2-12.9) (12.8-14.8) (15.1-17.5) (16.9-19.7) (18.8-22.2) (20.7-24.7) (23.3-28.5) 25.4-31.6
30-day 10.1 12.0 14.5 16.4 19.1 21.3 23.5 25.8 28.9 31.4
(9.52-10.8) (11.3-12.8) (13.6-15.4) (15.4-17.5) (17.8-20.4) (19.7-22.7) (21.7-25.2) (23.6-27.7))(26.231.3) (28.2-34.1)
I 12.7 15.1 17.9 20.2 23.5 26.1 28.7 31.5 I 35.3 38.3
a5-day I (120-13.6) (14.1-16.1) (16.8-19.2) (18.9-21.6) (21.9-25.1) (24.2-27.9) (26.5-30.9) (28.833.9)1(31.938.2) (34.3-41.7)
60-day 15.4 18.2 21.4 23.9 27.3 30.0 32.7 35.4 39.1 41.9
(14.6-16.4) (17.2-19.4) (20.2-22.7) (22.5-25.4) (25.6-29.0) (28.1-31.9) (30.4-34.9) (32.837.9).,05.8-42.0) (38.1-45.3)
t Precipitation frequency(PF)estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series(PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90%confidence interval.The probability that precipitation frequency
estimates(for a given duration and average recurrence interval)will be greater than the upper bound(or less than the lower bound)is 5%.Estimates at
upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation(PMP)estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical " fI'VE
143
BY._
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?tat=34.4464&Ion=-77.5641&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 1/4

miej ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
1. Geotechnical •Construction Materials• Environmental • Facilities r.egsterc�S*3 -°3 Firm F-1071,
€'Y Fwgisvared:iES'i ws5 F.Ill
SC Rsrstgnt Enay, €rn,:3
January 6, 2021
Mr. Bill Schoettelkotte
GHK Cape Fear Development
1051 Military Cutoff Road
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Reference: Report of Seasonal High Water Table Estimation and Infiltration Testing
Surf City Apartments
Surf City, Pender County, North CarolinaRECEIVE
ECS Project No. 49.12943
Dear Mr. Schoettelkotte: MAY• 1 7
ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) recently conducted a seasonal high water table
and infiltration testing within the stormwater control measure (SCM) area(s) behind the Walmart
and Food Lion stores off of Highway 50 in Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina. This letter,
with attachments, is the report of our testing.
Field Testing
On January 5, 2021, ECS conducted an exploration of the subsurface soil and groundwater
conditions, in accordance with the NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual section A-2, at two
requested locations shown on the attached Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). ECS used GPS
equipment in order to determine the boring locations. The purpose of this exploration was to
obtain subsurface information of the in situ soils for the SCM area(s). ECS explored the
subsurface soil and groundwater conditions by advancing one hand auger boring into the
existing ground surface at each of the requested boring locations. ECS visually classified the
subsurface soils and obtained representative samples of each soil type encountered. ECS also
recorded the SHWT and groundwater elevation observed at the time of the hand auger borings.
The attached Infiltration Testing Form provides a summary of the subsurface conditions
encountered at the hand auger boring locations.
The SHWT and groundwater elevation was estimated at the boring locations below the existing
grade elevation. A summary of the findings are as follows:
Location SHWT Groundwater
I-1 0 inches 10 inches
1-2 0 inches 4 inches
ECS has conducted two infiltration tests utilizing a compact constant head permeameter near
the hand auger borings in order to estimate the infiltration rate for the subsurface soils.
Infiltration tests are typically conducted at two feet above the SHWT or in the most restrictive
soil horizon. Tests in clayey conditions are conducted for durations of up to 30 minutes. If a
more precise hydraulic conductivity value is desired for these locations, then ECS recommends
collecting samples and performing laboratory permeability testing.
ECS Capitol Services.PLLC „ ECS Florida,LLC ° ECS M:d-Atlantic..LLC ECS Midwest,LLC s ECS Southeast,LLP ECS Texas,LLP
www.eeslimited.com

Report of SHWT Estimation and Infiltration Testing
Surf City Apartments
Surf City,Pender County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49.12943
January 6, 2021
Field Test Results
Below is a summary of the infiltration test results:
Location Description Depth Inches!
hour
I-1 Gray fine SAND w/clay (saturated) 10 inches <0.001
1-2 Gray fine SAND w/clay (saturated) 10 inches <0.001
Infiltration rates and SHWT may vary within the proposed site due to changes in elevation, soil
classification and subsurface conditions. ECS recommends that a licensed surveyor provide
the elevations of the boring locations. ECS observed that majority of the site appears to be a
wetland feature that is below the existing groundwater elevation. ECS recommends that a
wetland delineation be conducted for the site.
Closure
ECS's analysis of the site has been based on our understanding of the site, the project
information provided to us, and the data obtained during our exploration. If the project
information provided to us is changed, please contact us so that our recommendations can be
reviewed and appropriate revisions provided, if necessary. The discovery of any site or
subsurface conditions during construction which deviate from the data outlined in this
exploration should be reported to us for our review, analysis and revision of our
recommendations, if necessary. The assessment of site environmental conditions for the
presence of pollutants in the soil and groundwater of the site is beyond the scope of this
geotechnical exploration.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you on this project. If you have any
questions concerning this report or this project, please contact us.
Respectfully,
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
kr• 1/4-1 11/4*rote'A. --/`
K. Brooks Wall W. Brandon Fulton, PS
C, PWS, LSS
Project Manager Environmental Department Manager
bwallaecslimited.com [e-mail]
910-686-9114 704-525-5152
Attachments: Figure 1 - Boring Location Plan
Infiltration Testing Form
GRA Document
2

_...LL_-'I ,4 II i
ppo. _,..„. . -ii it„..,,,-•- .,"
N' « I•_ --ref- .7" .y\Ili"- 1: .c ii , • 4 .4-,.,,. .:-,-
ii*% .rJ3 4 4
., ;
.
I-i
1-2 1 4 i
• -1111: . it t
•
. , 4a- ti it la -
ilk
r *
r
..„.... ..... vix:
eo-
7},�t?2. :C,114
d
G85 ft y;- s
°¢ ro. c \
N
0 APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS �*1
w E
1
SCALE SHOWN ABOVE
s
, rr
ii Surf City Apartments Figure 1—Boring Location Plan
Surf City, Pender County,
North Carolina Provided by: Google Earth
ECS Project#49.12943
January 5,2021
KBW C.

Infiltration Testing Form
Surf City Apartments
Surf City, Pender County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49.12943
January 5, 2021
Location Depth USCS Soil Description
1-1 0-24" SM Gray fine SAND wl clay
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 0 inches below the
existing grade elevation.
Groundwater was encountered at 10 inches below the existing grade
elevation.
Test was conducted at 10 inches below existing grade elevation
Infiltration Rate: <0.001 inches per hour
Location Depth USCS Soil Description
1-2 0-24" SM Gray fine SAND w/ clay
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 0 inches below the
existing grade elevation.
Groundwater was encountered at 4 inches below the existing grade
elevation.
Test was conducted at 10 inches below existing grade elevation
Infiltration Rate: <0.001 inches per hour

Importaot Information about This
Gootocboical•Eoginooring
Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes.
While you cannot eliminate all such risks, you can manage them. The following information is provided to help.
The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include
has prepared this advisory to help you—assumedly those that affect:
a client representative—interpret and apply this • the site's size or shape;
geotechnical-engineering report as effectively • the function of the proposed structure,as when it's
as possible. In that way,clients can benefit from changed from a parking garage to an office building,or
a lowered exposure to the subsurface problems from a light-industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse;
• the elevation,configuration,location,orientation,or
that,for decades, have been a principal cause of weight of the proposed structure;
construction delays, cost overruns,claims,and • the composition of the design team;or
disputes. If you have questions or want more • project ownership.
information about any of the issues discussed below,
contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. As a general rule,always inform your geotechnical engineer of project
Active involvement in the Geoprofessional Business changes-even minor ones-and request an assessment of their
Association exposes geotechnical engineers to a impact.The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept
wide array of risk-confrontation techniques that can responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical
be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise
construction project. would have considered.
This Report May Not Be Reliable
Geotechnical-Engineering Services Are Performed for Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it:
Specific Purposes, Persons,and Projects • for a different client;
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific • for a different project;
needs of their clients.A geotechnical-engineering study conducted • for a different site(that may or may not include all or a
for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil- portion of the original site);or
works constructor or even a different civil engineer.Because each • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent
geotechnical-engineering study is unique,each geotechnical- to it;e.g.,man-made events like construction or
engineering report is unique,prepared solely for the client.Those who environmental remediation,or natural events like floods,
rely on a geotechnical-engineering report prepared for a different client droughts,earthquakes,or groundwater fluctuations.
can be seriously misled.No one except authorized client representatives
should rely on this geotechnical-engineering report without first Note,too,that it could be unwise to rely on a geotechnical-engineering
conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it.And no one report whose reliability may have been affected by the passage of time,
-not even you-should apply this report for any purpose or project except because of factors like changed subsurface conditions;new or modified
the one originally contemplated. codes,standards,or regulations;or new techniques or tools.If your
geotechnical engineer has not indicated an"apply-by"date on the report,
Read this Report in Full ask what it should be,and,in general,if you are the least bit uncertain
Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical- about the continued reliability of this report,contact your geotechnical
engineering report did not read it in its entirety.Do not rely on an engineer before applying it.A minor amount of additional testing or
executive summary.Do not read selected elements only.Read this report analysis-if any is required at all-could prevent major problems.
in full.
Most of the"Findings" Related in This Report Are
You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer Professional Opinions
about Change Before construction begins,geotechnical engineers explore a site's
Your geotechnical engineer considered unique,project-specific factors subsurface through various sampling and testing procedures.
when designing the study behind this report and developing the Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at
confirmation-dependent recommendations the report conveys.A few those specific locations where sampling and testing were performed.The
typical factors include: data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your
• the client's goals,objectives,budget,schedule,and geotechnical engineer,who then applied professional judgment to
risk-management preferences; form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site.Actual
• the general nature of the structure involved,its size, sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ-maybe significantly-from
configuration,and performance criteria; those indicated in this report.Confront that risk by retaining your
• the structure's location and orientation on the site;and geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team from project start to
• other planned or existing site improvements,such as project finish,so the individual can provide informed guidance quickly,
retaining walls,access roads,parking lots,and whenever needed.
underground utilities.
J

This Report's Recommendations Are perform their own studies if they want to,and be sure to allow enough
Confirmation-Dependent time to permit them to do so.Only then might you be in a position
The recommendations induded in this report-including any options to give constructors the information available to you,while requiring
or alternatives-are confirmation-dependent.In other words,they are them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming
not final,because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied from unanticipated conditions.Conducting prebid and preconstruction
heavily on judgment and opinion to do so.Your geotechnical engineer conferences can also be valuable in this respect.
can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface
conditions revealed during construction.If through observation your Read Responsibility Provisions Closely
geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist Some client representatives,design professionals,and constructors do
actually do exist,the recommendations can be relied upon,assuming not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other
no other changes have occurred.The geotechnical engineer who prepared engineering disciplines.That lack of understanding has nurtured
this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation- unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments,delays,
dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform cost overruns,claims,and disputes.To confront that risk,geotechnical
construction observation. engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports.
Sometimes labeled"limitations,"many of these provisions indicate
This Report Could Be Misinterpreted where geotechnical engineers'responsibilities begin and end,to help
Other design professionals'misinterpretation of geotechnical- others recognize their own responsibilities and risks.Read these
engineering reports has resulted in costly problems.Confront that risk provisions closely.Ask questions.Your geotechnical engineer should
by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a full-time member of the respond fully and frankly.
design team,to:
• confer with other design-team members, Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered
• help develop specifications, The personnel,equipment,and techniques used to perform an
▪ review pertinent elements of other design professionals' environmental study-e.g.,a"phase-one"or"phase-two"environmental
plans and specifications,and site assessment-differ significantly from those used to perform
• be on hand quickly whenever geotechnical-engineering a geotechnical-engineering study.For that reason,a geotechnical-
guidance is needed. engineering report does not usually relate any environmental findings,
conclusions,or recommendations;e.g.,about the likelihood of
You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants.
report.Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project
prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction failures.If you have not yet obtained your own environmental
observation. information,ask your geotechnical consultant for risk-management
guidance.As a general rule,do not rely on an environmental report
Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance prepared for a different client,site,or project,or that is more than six
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift months old.
unanticipated-subsurface-conditions liability to constructors by limiting
the information they provide for bid preparation.To help prevent Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture
the costly,contentious problems this practice has caused,include the Infiltration and Mold
complete geotechnical-engineering report,along with any attachments While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater,
or appendices,with your contract documents,but be certain to note water infiltration,or similar issues in this report,none of the engineer's
conspicuously that you've included the material for informational services were designed,conducted,or intended to prevent uncontrolled
purposes only.To avoid misunderstanding,you may also want to note migration of moisture-including water vapor-from the soil through
that"informational purposes"means constructors have no right to rely building slabs and walls and into the building interior,where it can
on the interpretations,opinions,conclusions,or recommendations in cause mold growth and material-performance deficiencies.Accordingly,
the report,but they may rely on the factual data relative to the specific proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer's recommendations
times,locations,and depths/elevations referenced. Be certain that will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration.Confront
constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, the risk of moisture infiltration by including building-envelope or mold
including options selected from the report,only from the design specialists on the design team.Geotechnical engineers are not building-
drawings and specifications.Remind constructors that they may envelope or mold specialists.
GBUSINESSEOSPROFESSIONAL
�I 1 ASSOCIATION
Telephone:301/5 b5-2733
e mail:[e-mail] wwwgeoprofessional.org
Copyright 2016 by Geoprofessional Business Association(GBA).Duplication,reproduction,or copying of this document,in whole or in part,by any means whatsoever,is strictly
prohibited,except with GBA's specific written permission.Excerpting,quoting,or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission
of GBA,and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review.Only members of GBA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an element of a report of any
kind.Any other firm,individual,or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent

1 - ^a + • i
'l' . • ,'4 �_ l i, P_ i t
f: —-.. - - 1p-d • • ... . ,. .."1...' 'Ns 4itiLr- ..
=. •, ...
i +. •• ", ....
1 J yr ✓- r��
•
f�\ �. • i 1 M 4i.i�..-i1 • Ems- .... : .\ .
} i P. 1:1 4 "y' r r
__ SITE LOCATION - - _ . ,
%\\:r( - ,
r4• 1 — •
y f _ . . T i Z s
w w
•
- . .7,- •- - :_._ ,,.. ....r ...Lc \ 4
, •
,, • ,...., .. ........... ...
,tit ,.._ .
, , . . . ,
•
ii % ~�. `� r
. . . ..---- -0,\ 7
•� _ as •.
r , _ _ - I.,
Nilie(
+I r -.
L .
,..._I ' -
r R~
*k.4.• 1.
.r i
iimie I.,-,i, ...„7101.,
woe
. • . -".1.1"frif , 5 II
. -j: r1.:. -k, • __.o is, ..• .._,. _,_. 1111&
AMI 1 �. A,...ci ter. - -,Or
r
'OF
•
Ill
ti r X r
•
Date: 01/27/22
PARAMOUNTE Scale: , SA WATERS EXHIBIT
E N O 1 N E E R 1 N O, INC Dra - JRB BISHOP CREEK APARTMENTS
122 Cinema Drive,Wilmington,NC,28403(910)-791-6707 Chk: JRB
NC License#:C-2846 I Prof.No: 20364.PE SURF CITY,NORTH CAROL NA

Zorda, Garrett D
From: Zorda, Garrett D
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 9:38 AM
To: Jeremy Blair
Cc: Hall, Christine
Subject: RE: [External] SW8 110804 - Bishop Creek Apartments
Good Morning Jeremy,
That extension is acceptable. Please ensure that all of the requested information is received by May 17,2022.
In the meantime, if you have any additional questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
Department of Environmental Quality
910 796 7215 office
910 796 7343 direct '"*Please note the change to my direct phone number**
oarrett.zordaancden r.gov
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
e°.. #11YEM.
�rlq
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From:Jeremy Blair<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday,April 29, 2022 4:48 PM
To:Zorda,Garrett D<[e-mail]>
Cc: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] SW8 110804-Bishop Creek Apartments
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Garrett,
We are working through the changes to accommodate the most recent comment on the above referenced
project. Given the complications and our desire to provide a complete response for approval, may I request an
extension of up to two weeks from the stated deadline of May 2?
i

Thank you,
Jeremy
Jeremy R. Blair, PE
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
2

do„..%ATE.
ROY GAR .t�' ' )75
G " nw
EUJZABETH S.LOSERSecretary 'maw,
BRIAN WRENN NORTH CARO1.NA
Directer envirtelemmtal
April 14,2022
Via email only: pmeisnetahudsoncp.com
Hudson Bishops Creek Property,LLC
Hudson Bishops Creek JV,LLC,Manager
HCP Development,LLC,Manager
HudsonCap Management IV,LLC,Manager
Attn: Philip H.Meisner,Authorized Signer
400 Frank W.Burr Boulevard, Suite 8
Teaneck,NJ 07666
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 110804
Bishop Creek Apartments
Pender County
Dear Mr.Meisner:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a modified State Stormwater Management Permit
Application for the subject project on October 18,2021 with additional information requested on January 6,2022
and received on January 28,2022.A preliminary in-depth review of that information has determined that the
application is not complete and that additional information is needed. To continue the review,please provide the
following additional information in a single,hard copy submittal package:
1. 15A NCAC 02H.1019(5)(a)(i and ii):It is noted that the current version of the permit was written as
greater than 1/2 mile from SA waters,as mentioned in the January 28,2022 response,however,the current
version of this permit was written under a previous version of the rules.The proposed modification,
however,brings the site up to the 2017 Rules and as such,must meet all of the applicable rules and
minimum design criteria(MDC).The provided USGS map appears to measure the 1/2 mile radius from SA
waters(Becky's Creek/Bishops Creek, SA;HQW)only from the outfall of the pond. An SCM with any
portion of its drainage area located within the SA waters boundary,however,must be designed to meet
SA water requirements.Based on the provided information,as well as aerial imagery(attached for
reference),it appears that a portion of the drainage area is located within%2 mile of the surface waters.As
such,this project would be subject to SA requirements.Please confirm the intended design and ensure
that all applicable rules and requirements,including the SA requirements,have been met. Please ensure
that any revisions are made completely and consistently throughout all affected application documents.
Please remember to confirm that any revised information is presented consistently throughout the application
documents including calculations,supplements,narrative,and plans. Please also remember to provide two hard
copies of any updated documents per 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2).
All of the requested information listed above should be received in this Office by May 2,2022,or the application
will be returned as incomplete.Please note that only two letters requesting additional information is allowed in
the State Stormwater Program for a total of 30 days to submit the requested additional information.If the
information is not satisfactorily provided after either the second request or 30 days, the project will be returned.
If the project is returned and you wish to re-submit later,you will need to resubmit all required items at that time,
including the application fee.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan,is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS
143-215.6A.
North C.rafitra Department of Environmental nmental Quality Division of .11 era4and Lard Resources
Wllntingto i Regional Office I W Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington,Worth Cartkna 28405
9:0.7%.7215

State Stormwater Permit No.SW8 110804
Page 2 of 2
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence.If you have any questions concerning
this matter,please feel free to call me at(910)796-7215 or email me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
-7`r a
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
DES/gdz: \\\Stormwater\Permits&Projects\2011\110804 1-PD\2022 04 addinfo 110804
cc: Jeremy R Blair,PE,Paramounte Engineering;via email:[e-mail]
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
� Irlorft'e Caroiarra DeDathe�-n8 of Env7roncr,�o�tal Quai�tq 'Div�sw�n aF Er+rr,��.�fir�r�i and i.ac+d Reaourcrs
NW":n ran Rrgiana!lnflcc : l Cattn:1:1Drive altmsfort W::n;9 North CaraNna M405
g4•N..e.tit 1 1 1•111•;; tom' 41Clig6.7.E

a . . . . . /
R I G
\ %
t - ®
k • ' ' -
§ @ § .
R : ± I J f - ° + / \ 9
: z
2 2 k 2 a ®/ ` \
. 43 % i ® . . '
d , f<'
4
\. \& � I
fil
» /
O.a a) £
y ,
_ - .�. d
I \ k $ % ii 2
2 , } k d01.
\
/ \
/
._ \ : -
\ ,. . , � ,
\ . . . . . . _ / \\
_ . NS
.
` ..«
` i.3 li\ - .• f
ill ' -
. .,
3 , \ _
. . -
•
., . .
....
�/ . . � \
- .
/ \ \•
_ \ - 4 ' " -r , `
y «
•
. 1 ! . _ I
, . . . / ,
,
S.
- # .
... //1
. \ _`— . \ z
1.
.�
..._ a���. /
so

Zorda, Garrett D
From: Zorda, Garrett D
Sent: Thursday,April 14, 2022 4:56 PM
To: [e-mail];Jeremy Blair
Subject: Bishop Creek Apartments (SW8 110804) - Request for Additional Information
Attachments: 2022 04 addinfo 110804.pdf; BishopCreekApts_SAJPG
All,
Attached is a pdf of the request for additional information for the subject project.There are just a few items that need
to be addressed.Also attached is the aerial image exhibit as referenced in the request letter. Please let me know if you
have any questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
Department of Environmental Quality
910 796 7215 office
910 796 7343 direct "Please note the change to my direct phone number**
garrett.zordaancdenr.gov
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
E
oMu�rr wtw�
Email correspende c'e to and fi 7w7 this address is subject fb the
North Carolina Pubic Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

PARA M°
UN
E N G 1 N E E R 1 N G , 1 N .
122 CINEMA DRIVE JAN282Ot? fib
WILMINGTON , NC 28403 , ,. { ''
910 - 791 - 6707 ( 0 ) 910 - 791 - 6760 ( a.,. ., __
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: NCDEQ—DEMLR—Stormwater Date 11/28/22
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28403 Re: Bishop Creek Apartments—SW8110804
SWM Permit Modification Application
Attn: Garrett Zorda Project No. 20364.PE
'We are sending: ® Originals ®Prints ❑Shop Drawings ®Calculations
[The following items: El Correspondence ® Plans El Specifications ® Other as listed below
Quantity Date Dwg.No. Description
2 1/27/22 State Stormwater Permit Application(Revised Pages 3&4)
2 _ 1/27/22 Operation&Maintenance Agreement(Revised Page)
2 1/27/22 Wet Pond Supplement
1 1/27/22 SW Design Narrative(Revised Portions)
2 1/27/22 C-3.0,Exh-1 Design Plans(24"x36")
1 1/27/22 SA Waters Exhibit
1 USACE Notice of JD(SAW-2010-00253)—Included in Narrative
1 USACE Notice of JD(SAW-2020-01877)—Included in Narrative
1 1/27/22 Comment Response Letter
Issue Status: ®For Approval El As Requested El Construction El Bid
El For Your Use ❑For Review and Comment El Approved as Noted ❑See Remarks
'Action Taken: El No Exceptions Taken El Make Corrections Noted El Amend&Resubmit
El Rejected-See Remarks ❑ Approved as Submitted El Other
'Remarks:
Contact us with any additional information or questions. Thank you.
[e-mail]
Cc: Signed:
Jere .Blair,

MOUNTEPARA
EN G 1 NEE RI N G. 1 N C.
January 27, 2022
Garrett Zorda
NCDEQ
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28405
RE: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 110804
Bishop Creek Apartments
Pender County
Dear Mr. Zorda:
On behalf of Hudson Bishops Creek Property,LLC, et. al., we are submitting a response to
your comments emailed 1/6/2022. Please find your comments listed below with our response
provided in bold.
1. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(a)(iv), .1001(1)(c), and .1002(8): The note on plan sheets C-
2.0 and C-3.0 indicate that improvements to Charlie Medlin Drive and roundabout are
proposed as part of this project,however,they do not appear to be accounted for in the
application package. Furthermore, it is not clear if the runoff from the proposed
multiuse path along Charlie Medlin Drive is being collected and treated. The drainage
area map does not appear to include this section of the multiuse path and adequate
grading information for this area is not present on the grading sheet to support that this
area is being directed to the collection system. It appears that the runoff from this
section of proposed multiuse path and Charlie Medlin Drive is likely draining to DI-
204 through DI-210,which bypasses the proposed SCM. Any right-of-way
improvements proposed for the development of this site are considered part of the
common plan of development must be included and accounted for in this project.
Options for including these improvements in the application package are:
a. Collect and treat the proposed built-upon area or an equal amount of existing built-
upon area; or
b. Demonstrate these improvements meet the requirements of a low density project
per .1003(1) and.1003(2);
• RESPONSE: Charlie Medlin Drive and the associated roundabout were
previously constructed by the Town,not part of this project. The previous version
of this permit,which was transferred to the current owner and is subject to this
pending request for modification for changes to the SCM and additional on-site
BUA,did not require Charlie Medlin Drive nor the roundabout to be included in
the drainage area for the on-site SCM. Improvements along Charlie Medlin Drive

Mr. Garrett Zorda
1/27/2022
Page 2
to be constructed as part of this project include the multiuse path,water and
sewer improvements, resurfacing, and storm drains to collect and convey
stormwater discharge from adjacent properties that flows onto the subject
property but have to be routed around the developed site. In response to this
comment,we have revised the plan to collect runoff from the multiuse path.
Please fmd enclosed the revised plan along with revised calculations,application,
and supplement showing the treatment of the multiuse path.
2. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(d): The submitted narrative indicates that this project is
greater than Y2 mile from the SA;HQW receiving waters. The submitted USGS map,
however, does not delineate a 1/2 mile radius from the receiving waters. Please
delineate a Y2 mile radius from the receiving waters on the USGS map to demonstrate
that this project is not subject to the SA;HQW requirements. Please note,projects
within 1/2 mile and draining to SA waters must be designed per the SA water
requirements.
• RESPONSE: The current version of the permit,which was transferred to the
current owner and is subject to this pending request for modification,was
written based on the site being located greater than '/2 mile from surface waters.
Further documentation should not be required; however,in response to your
comment,please find the enclosed exhibit map showing the%mile radius on the
USGS map.
3. 15A NCAC 02.1042(2)(a)(iv), .1003(3), and 1050(1): Section IV.10 of the application
indicates that the offsite drainage area is 112,820 square feet,which appears to only
include the offsite area of SW8 980720. Item#7 of the Drainage Area section of the
supplement indicates that the offsite drainage area is 190,975 square feet. Please confirm
the total offsite drainage area and ensure that it is represented consistently throughout the
entire application package.
• RESPONSE: The offsite drainage area should include the offsite area from SW8
980720, Caretta Drive which is being constructed as part of this project, and the
multiuse path along Charlie Medlin Drive as discussed in the response to
Comment#1 (above). This offsite area has been updated consistently on the
revised application,calculations and supplement.
4. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(iii): Please provide the boundaries of all surface waters,
regulatory flood zones,protected vegetated setbacks, and protected riparian buffers, or a
note on the plans that none exist. If a note is already provided on the plans, please provide
a citation of where it can be located.
• RESPONSE: A note has been added to Sheet C-3.0 to indicate that no surface
waters, regulatory flood zones,protected vegetated setbacks or protected
1 2 2 CINEMA D R I V E, W I L M I N G T D N , NO 2 8 4 0 3
PH : ( 9 1 0) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A X : (9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0

Mr. Garrett Zorda
1/27/2022
Page 3
riparian buffers exist. Also,copies of Jurisdictional Determinations from the
USACE showing that no waters exist on site are included in this submittal.
5. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(vii): Information for MH-105 and DI-106 are included in
the Storm Drain Schedule on plan sheet C-3.0,however, are not called out on the plans.
Please confirm whether or not MH-105 and DI-106 are to be included as part of the
stormwater collection system and ensure that they are represented accordingly and
consistently on the plans.
• RESPONSE: The labels for MH-105 and DI-106 were inadvertently left off of
the plan. The labels have been added to the revised Sheet C-3.0.
6. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(j):
c. The submitted operation and maintenance agreement indicates that the forebay
bottom elevation and the forebay sediment removal elevation are set at 16 fmsl and
17 fmsl, respectively. The calculations and plans, however, indicate that the
forebay bottom elevation and the forebay sediment removal elevation are set at 15
fmsl and 16 fmsl,respectively. Please confirm the correct forebay bottom
elevation and forebay sediment removal elevation and ensure that they are
presented consistently throughout the entire application package.
d. The submitted operation and maintenance agreement indicates that the temporary
pool elevation is set at 21.98 fmsl. The calculations,plans and supplement,
however, indicate that the temporary pool elevation is set at 22.0 finsl,which is the
next available outlet above the outlet orifice. Please confirm the correct temporary
pool elevation and ensure that it is presented consistently throughout the entire
application package.
• RESPONSE: The documents have been revised to show the accurate forebay
bottom and sediment removal elevations as well as the temporary pool elevations
consistently throughout the application package.
7. 15A NCAC 02H.1050(4):
a. Please provide engineering calculations demonstrating that the inlets of the SCMs will
be designed to protect the SCM from erosion resulting from stormwater flow into the
SCM during the peak flow from the 10-year storm event.
b. Please provide engineering calculations demonstrating that the outlets of the SCM
will not cause erosion downslope of the discharge point during the peak flow from
the 10-year storm event.
• RESPONSE: Please find enclosed rip rap apron calculations which demonstrate
protection of erosion at inlets into and outlets from the SCM.
1 2 2 CINEMA D R I V E, W i L Mi ) N G T G N , NC 2 8 4 0 3
PH : (9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 F A X : (9 1 0) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 D

Mr. Garrett Zorda
1/27/2022
Page 4
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding any of this
information or require additional material,please feel free to call. Thank you for your time
and effort.
Sincerely,
Paramounte Engineerin ,Inc.
Jeremy R. Blair, PE
Enclosure
1 2 2 C i N E M A D R I V E, W I L M I N G T D N , NC 2 B 4 D 3
PH : (9 1 0 ) 7 9 1 - 6 7 D 7 F A X : (9 1 D) 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 D

Zorda, Garrett D
From: Zorda, Garrett D
Sent: Thursday,January 20, 2022 3:37 PM
To: Jeremy Blair
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Bishop Creek Apartments (SW8 110804) Request for Additional
Information
Good Afternoon Jeremy,
That extension is acceptable. Please ensure all of the requested information is received by this office by January 28,
2022.
In the meantime, please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Thanks,
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
Department of Environmental Quality
910 796 7215 office
910 796 7343 direct *"Please note the change to my direct phone number"'
garrett.zordat ncdenr.gov
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
rtE
rrrry
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From:Jeremy Blair<[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday,January 20,2022 2:44 PM
To:Zorda, Garrett D<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Bishop Creek Apartments (SW8 110804)- Request for Additional Information
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious e ..
Garrett,
We have had a considerable number of folks out over the past two weeks due to COVID, including at least one person
who has been crucially involved in the Bishop Creek Apartments project. Also, now facing potential closure for the
1

storm I am writing to request a one week extension to the response deadline described in your comment
letter. Accordingly,we request to resubmit our response to comments on or before Friday,January 28,2022.
Thank you,
Jeremy
Jeremy R. Blair, PE
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
(o)910-791-6707
From:Zorda,Garrett D<[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday,January 6,2022 4:15 PM
To: [e-mail];Jeremy Blair<[e-mail]>
Subject: Bishop Creek Apartments (SW8 110804)- Request for Additional Information
All,
Attached is a pdf of the request for additional information for the subject project.There are a few items that need to be
addressed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
Department of Environmental Quality
910 796 7215 office
910 796 7343 direct *"Please note the change to my direct phone number`*
ciarrett.zorda( !ncdenr.gov
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
1::,--PW'n
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Racords Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2

4
WY COOPERt51Governer 'r
ELIZABETH S.RISERSecretary
BRIAN WRENN NORTh CaRO.1NA
Meow Eavinranuittat Quality
January 6,2022
Via email only: pmeisner(a)hudsoncp.com
Hudson Bishops Creek Property,LLC
Hudson Bishops Creek JV,LLC,Manager
HCP Development,LLC,Manager
HudsonCap Management IV,LLC,Manager
Attn: Philip H. Meisner,Authorized Signer
400 Frank W.Burr Boulevard, Suite 8
Teaneck,NJ 07666
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No.SW8 110804
Bishop Creek Apartments
Pender County
Dear Mr.Meisner:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a modified State Stormwater Management Permit
Application for the subject project on October 18,2021.A preliminary in-depth review of that information has
determined that the application is not complete and that additional information is needed. To continue the review,
please . .vide the following additional information in a single,hard copy submittal package:
15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(a)(iv), .1001(1)(c),and.1002(8): The note on plan sheets C-2.0 and C-3.0
indicate that improvements to Charlie Medlin Drive and roundabout are proposed as part of this project,
C\nGc\,e. however,they do not appear to be accounted for in the application package. Furthermore, it is not clear if
the runoff from the proposed multiuse path along Charlie Medlin Drive is being collected and treated.The
' drainage area map does not appear to include this section of the multiuse path and adequate grading
Rev, > ' information for this area is not present on the grading sheet to support that this area is being directed to
r,,;.1 ec the collection system. It appears that the runoff from this section of proposed multiuse path and Charlie
� S,da Medlin Drive is likely draining to DI-204 through DI-210,which bypasses the proposed SCM.Any right-
.� of-way improvements proposed for the development of this site are considered part of the common plan
of development must be included and accounted for in this project. Options for including these
improvements in the application package are:
a. Collect and treat the proposed built-upon area or an equal amount of existing built-upon area; or
b. Demonstrate these improvements meet the requirements of a low density project per.1003(1)
and.1003(2);
OA 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(d): The submitted narrative indicates that this project is greater than %2 mile
from the SA;HQW receiving waters. The submitted USGS map,however,does not delineate a 1/2 mile
radius from the receiving waters.Please delineate a 1/2 mile radius from the receiving waters on the USGS
map to demonstrate that this project is not subject to the SA;HQW requirements.Please note,projects
within 1/2 mile and draining to SA waters must be designed per the SA water requirements.
y. 15A NCAC 02.1042(2)(a)(iv), .1003(3), and 1050(1): Section IV.10 of the application indicates that the
offsite drainage area is 112,820 square feet,which appears to only include the offsite area of SW8
980720. Item#7 of the Drainage Area section of the supplement indicates that the offsite drainage area is
190,975 square feet.Please confirm the total offsite drainage area and ensure that it is represented
consistently throughout the entire application package.
15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(iii): Please provide the boundaries of all surface waters,regulatory flood
zones,protected vegetated setbacks, and protected riparian buffers,or a note on the plans that none exist.
If a note is already provided on the plans,please provide a citation of where it can be located.
_ North Carolina Dewt ent of En virorarnertai Quality : Division of Enemy.M rai and Lard Resources
i Wihnhvion Wionai Offices 127 C a dlml Drive Extension ViErnington,North Caroitna 2ZZ405
1 ti 910.7%.72lS

State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 110804
Page 2 of 2
15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(vii): Information for MH-105 and DI-106 are included in the Storm Drain
Schedule on plan sheet C-3.0,however,are not called out on the plans.Please confirm whether or not
MH-105 and DI-106 are to be included as part of the stormwater collection system and ensure that they
are represented accordingly and consistently on the plans.
W. 15A WAC 02H.1042(2)(j):
The submitted operation and maintenance agreement indicates that the forebay bottom elevation
and the forebay sediment removal elevation are set at 16 fmsl and 17 fmsl, respectively.The
calculations and plans,however, indicate that the forebay bottom elevation and the forebay
sediment removal elevation are set at 15 fmsl and 16 fmsl,respectively.Please confirm the
correct forebay bottom elevation and forebay sediment removal elevation and ensure that they are
/ presented consistently throughout the entire application package.
N. The submitted operation and maintenance agreement indicates that the temporary pool elevation
is set at 21.98 fmsl.The calculations,plans and supplement,however,indicate that the temporary
pool elevation is set at 22.0 fmsl, which is the next available outlet above the outlet orifice.Please
confirm the correct temporary pool elevation and ensure that it is presented consistently
throughout the entire application package.
4 15A CAC 02H.1050(4):
a Please provide engineering calculations demonstrating that the inlets of the SCMs will be
designed to protect the SCM from erosion resulting from stormwater flow into the SCM during
the peak flow from the 10-year storm event.
1. Please provide engineering calculations demonstrating that the outlets of the SCM will not cause
erosion downslope of the discharge point during the peak flow from the 10-year storm event.
Please remember to confirm that any revised information is presented consistently throughout the application
documents including calculations, supplements,narrative,and plans. Please also remember to provide two hard
copies of any updated documents per 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2).
All of the requested information listed above should be received in this Office by January 21,2022,or the
application will be returned as incomplete.If additional time is needed to submit the requested information,please
email your extension request prior to this due date to the email address provided below with a justification and a
date of when the requested information will be submitted,which shall be no later than 15 days past the original
due date.Please note that only two letters requesting additional information is allowed in the State Stormwater
Program for a total of 30 days to submit the requested additional information. If the information is not
satisfactorily provided after either the second request or 30 days, the project will be returned If the project is
returned and you wish to re-submit later,you will need to resubmit all required items at that time, including the
application fee.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of'NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS
143-215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence.If you have any questions concerning
this matter,please feel free to call me at(910) 796-7215 or email me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
-goad,
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
DES/gdz: \\\Stormwater\Permits&Projects\2011\110804 HD\2022 01 addinfo 110804
cc: Jeremy R.Blair,PE,Paramounte Engineering;via [e-mail]
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
North Carolina Department of Envtrar+mental t aiity ! Division of Energy.Mineral and Land Resources
9 tors oner ice •. 127 Calreinat Drive Exren ion °Miti'n4' �9i Eton,North CalrtiPg+a 24405
910.7%.7215

Zorda, Garrett D
From: Zorda, Garrett D
Sent Thursday,January 6, 2022 4:15 PM
To: [e-mail];Jeremy Blair
Subject: Bishop Creek Apartments (SW8 110804) - Request for Additional Information
Attachments: 2022 01 addinfo 110804.pdf
All,
Attached is a pdf of the request for additional information for the subject project.There are a few items that need to be
addressed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
Department of Environmental Quality
910 796 7215 office
910 796 7343 direct **Please note the change to my direct phone number**
[e-mail]
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
� rrrr�
Emni"correspondence tc aid f;o,•n this address is subject to tie
North Carolina Public Recc cis Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

Zorda, Garrett D
From: Zorda, Garrett D
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 10:03 AM
To: Jeremy Blair
Cc: Christine Hall ([e-mail])
Subject: RE: [External] Bishop Creek Apartments (SW8 110804)
Good Morning Jeremy,
I have looked in the file and discussed with Christine regarding the discussed timeline of this project. On March 31, 2021
Kellie Norris sent an email listing the available options for proceeding with this project.The second option in that email,
which was ultimately the option pursued,was to "submit a transfer to the regular program with the modification to get
logged in afterwards to the regular or express program."The transfer/renewal was issued on October 18,2021 and the
modification package was accepted the same day, as Kellie described, and is in my queue. I am currently reviewing
projects accepted in late August. Furthermore,this modification would not have been able to be scheduled into the
Express program until the transfer/renewal was approved. Due to the staffing issues the Express program is currently
experiencing,there is a backlog of requests to be scheduled well into the new year. With that said,the regular program,
with the accepted date of October 18,2021, is likely the quickest path forward for this project.
Hopefully this thoroughly answers your question. If you have any additional questions, however, please let me know.
Thanks,
Garrett Zorda
Environmental Engineer
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
Department of Environmental Quality
910 796 7215 office
910 796 7343 direct "'Please note the change to my direct phone number"'
q a rrett.zo rdaa n cden r.gov
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
111.1"4""r01.4,
Email coniesocnder ce to and from this address is subject to the
North Caraha Public Records Law ar?d may be cisciosed to third parties.
From:Jeremy Blair<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday,October 29, 2021 5:26 PM
To:Zorda,Garrett D<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Bishop Creek Apartments
CAUTION:External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
1

Garrett,
I am following up on your voicemail from earlier this week regarding Bishop Creek Apartments. I tried to call you back a
couple of times but could not connect.
I understand that the transfer and renewal are complete and should be in the mail. I'll be on the lookout for those
permits. In early discussions with Christine and Kelly Norris about the process for permitting this project, I understood
that the modification could be submitted at the same time as the transfer and renewal such that the review time would
run concurrent. However,with this modification only being recently"accepted" by the division, I am concerned that this
review is now deep in the queue. Can you give me some idea of the status of the review of the modification and what
kind of timeline we are looking at here? Feel free to call on Monday if you would like to discuss.
Thank you,
Jeremy
Jeremy R. Blair, PE
Paramounte Engineering, Inc.
122 Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
(o) 910-791-6707
2

Burd, Tina J
From: Burd,Tina J
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 10:29 AM
To: [e-mail];Jeremy Blair
Subject: SW8 110804 - Bishop Creek Apartments
The Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources(Stormwater Section) accepted
the Stormwater Permit Application and$505.00 fee for the subject project on October 18, 2021. The project has been
assigned to Garrett Zorda and you will be notified if additional information is needed. Please be advised that the
construction of built-upon area may not commence until the Stormwater Permit is issued.
Best Regards,
Tina Burd
Administrative Associate II
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Environmental Assistance &Customer Service
Phone [phone]
NCDEQ
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
E
Email correspondence to and from this address is suLfect to tic
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third pat ties.
Website: http://deci.nc.gov/about/divisions/energv-mineral-land-resources/stormwater
Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-i9,the Department of Environmental Quality has adjusted
operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public.Many employees are working remotely or are on staggered
shifts. To accommodate these staffing changes,all DEQoffice locations are limiting public access to appointments only. Please
check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices,as we may be able to handle your requests by phone or email.We
appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this challenging time.
1

Non-Transfer Application Completeness Review Checklist
Project Name: J�"]��J C f..Q_AL S Date Delivered to WIRO /I 7/a`
Project Coup Location: [� y f f
County/Location: }'�� . EIIMS Received/Accepted Dale: � �! � I
1
Date Given to Admin- 0 '/eta[
Permit Action: New New Permit#': BIMS Acknowledged Date': i� g C2 i
=Nat located in the ET!of the following delegated
and functioning programs:
NHC:Carolina Beach/Kure Beach I Wilmingtor/Wrightsville Beach
Bruns: Leland/Navassa(?)/Oak Island
Cart: Emerald Isle Onsl: Jacksonville Pend: Surf Ciw
Major M / Minor Mod / Renewal Existing Permit#: DtOy
Applicant& Permittee are the same?3 Expiration Date`': /a�j /at
Permit Type: HD/LD/LD Overall/HD&LD Combo f r
General Permit/Offsite/Exempt + Reoeveiopment DOffsite to SWu:
Development Type: Commercial/Residential/Other C: Offsite Lot approved in Master Permits
Subdivided?: Subdivision cr Single Lot
• Rule(s): D2C17 Coastal ❑200:3 Coastal 01995 Coastal
=Phase II =Universal 01988 Coastal
Permittee Type&Documents Needed:
=Property Owner(s) =Purchaser =Lessee =HOA =Developer
=Viable? =Viable? =Viable? =Viable? Viable?
=Deed =Purchase Aemt =Lease =Election Minutes
Paperwork
o-Application
1E1$505(wrthffi 5rrro) Check#(s): � '52)`1`C ONe Fee
OSupplement2(1 new form or for older forms.:I original per 5CM)
IO&M2
Soils Report(infif or PP)
=Calculations(signed/sealed)
Deed Restrictions,if subdivided2
Project Narrative
DUSGS Map(or on fife%) Subiect to SA?: Y / N Subject to ORW%: 'V / N
Plans(2 Sets)
NOTES:
P `Enter BIMS Acknowledged Date on this Sheet
2For New Projects-Enter New Permit#on Supplements&Deed Restriction Temniares
• If permittee is different,STOP.Needs to be transferred first.
"If w/in 6 months and they are requesting a mod,STOP. Needs a renewal-first.
slf Lot not approved in master permit; STOP Master permit needs mod.
EMAILED ENGINEER DATE: Comments:
REVIEWER NAME, (c l
G:WQ\\\Reference Library\ProcedurestCneck'ists\Compieteness Review Checklist 202109 08

PARAMOUNT t
E N G 1 N E E F2 1 N G , 1 N c. AUG7 2021
1 2 2 CINEMA DRIVE
W I L M I N G T O N , NC 28403
9 1 0 - 7 9 1 - 6 7 0 7 ( 0 ) 9 1 0 - 7 9 1 - 6 7 6 0 ( F )
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: NCDEQ-DEMLR-Stormwater Date 8/17/2021
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington,NC 28403 - Re: Bishop Creek Apartments-SW8110804
SWM Permit Modification Application Form
Attn: Christine Hall Project No. 20364.PE
IWe are sending: ®Originals 12 Prints ❑Shop Drawings ®Calculations
The following items:I El Correspondence 11 Plans ❑ Specifications ®Other as listed below
Quantity Date Dwg.No. Description
2 State Stormwater Permit Application(Original and copy)
2 Operation&Maintenance Agreement
2 Wet Pond Supplement
1 SW Design Narrative
2 Design Plans(24"x36")
1 Check#13398 for$505 processing fee
1 USACE Notice of JD(SAW-2010-00253)
1 USACE Notice of JD(SAW-2020-01877)
Issue Status:I ®For Approval El As Requested ❑Construction El Bid
❑For Your Use ❑For Review and Comment El Approved as Noted ❑See Remarks
'Action Taken: No Exceptions TakenMake Corrections Noted I� ❑ p El ElAmend&Resubmit
El Rejected-See Remarks ❑ Approved as Submitted ❑ Other U 1 0 2021
emarks BY.
Contact us with any additional information or questions. Thank you.
lblair®paramounte-eng.com
Ado. _ gal) III
Cc' - Signed. , i�l•:=�r
Jer... y R. :lair,PE ep

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2020-01877 County: Pender County U.S.G.S.Quad:Holly Ridge
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERNNIINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Richard Ray Sullivan Trust
C/o:Ms.Bonnie Sullivan.Heir Executive
96 High View Lane "'" `�•.
Address: Nellvsford.VA 22958 ! iw ;
757-344-8480 e� ' .
Size(acres) 5.06 Nearest Town Surf City
Nearest Waterway Becky's Creek River Basin Onslow Bay
USGS HUC 03030001 Coordinates Latitude:34.44692
Longitude:-77.563926
Location description: The tract is located on the undeveloped extension of Caretta Drive,on the west side of Hwy 50,
PIN:4235-26-8747-0000,in Surf City,Pender County,NC.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
There are waters,including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act(CW1IA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403). The
waters,including wetlands, have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory mitigation
requirements,and other resource protection measures,a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However,you may request an approved JD,which is an
appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).However,since the
waters,including wetlands, have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands, at the project area,which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2020-01877
The waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on .Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington,NC,at(910)796-7215 to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§401 and/or 403).If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact Thomas Charles at
[phone] or thomas.p.charlesna,usace.armv.mil.
Basis For Determination: This determination is only for the project area depicted on figure dated September 2020
and labeled"Section 404/401 Preliminary Delineation Sketch"for Caretta Drive Tract Pender County,NC(5.06 acres)
Pin#'s 4235-26-8747-0000.
D. Remarks: The protect area contains upland borrow areas that are considered to be excluded from the Navigable
Waters Protection Rule.This determination is based on information submitted by LMG and a desktop review by
Mickey Snag(7/13/2021).
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries
and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this
request.This delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the
Food Security Act of 1985,as amended.If you or your tenant are USDA program participants,or anticipate participation in
USDA programs,you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center,
prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations(as indicated in Section B.above)
If you object to this determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will fmd a Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and Request for Appeal(RFA)form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A.Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A.SHANNIN@U SACE.ARMY.MIL

SAW-2020-01877
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by 9/17/2021
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. Mickey Sugg
signed by Mickey Sugg
iv ickey Sugg Date:2021A7.13102735
Corps Regulatory Official: 04'00' FOR:Tom Charles
Date: July 13.2021, Expiration Date: July 13.2026
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public.To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey,located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0.
Copy Furnished via email:
Rob Moul,Land Management Group.Inc.
Kim Williams.Land Management Group Inc.

SAW-2020-01877
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
File Number: SAW-2020-01877 Date:July 13,2021
Applicant: Richard Ray Sullivan Trust
C/o: Ms.Bonnie Sullivan,Heir Executive
Attached is:[ INITIALSee Section below
PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
[ PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
[ PERMIT DENIAL C
g APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I-The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http//www.usace,armv.I In. 1issions/CivilWorks/ReaulatoryProgramandPermits&cox or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the
permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may:(a)modify the
permit to address all of your concerns,(b)modify the permit to address some of your objections,or(c)not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections,the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the
permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2020-01877
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved
JD(which may be appealed),by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II -REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However,you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division, US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn:Thomas Charles South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A.Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
PHILIP.A.SHANNINQUSACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation,and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi ations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn:Thomas Charles,69 Darlington Avenue,Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn:Mr.Philip Shannin,
Administrative Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone],PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(aiUSACE.ARMY.MIL

r '4 �°' t „P. r OLL
'-1110/11.
f L • .. 0.• t
Alit
w .-. L
aI. ";:%-' 'Fr' -1 ' 16 .,. :
.,, w ' % ) ad 0I P if CO
0
k + or C d
IL
• A� '�V + Z
hy ,•.+! i r
M
II,J •
•
0a a,
c
r m
E.6 UQNO
�v + • 3 Z w
�►. • W L 5
4 O
,,yam < .0 pp O
tti F �t � C�
• O
w' r r - • CO
i
i
0
i' as
f O
W011
U O
7 0c V U N
cngy � Z N
- �iE H �, 0 co
Cr)a.
Z a R 0 O N N
co a) U co
C7
Al F SD C co L w ,—
IN, 0
l O O 0.1
I- U!0 C �+
{ri ''R o WmEO e J
0104egi
e � q. a i c m`Z CO N CO
Alt
y
7 a d S flfl1
Q.7.
W 0 at
LiUm2

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2010-00253 County: Pender County U.S.G.S.Quad:Holly Ridge
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: GHK Cave Fear Development ' "
1051 Military Cutoff Rd;Suite 200
Address: Wilmington,NC 28405 I L ,
910-880-0063
Size(acres) 14.9 Nearest Town Surf City
Nearest Waterway Becky's Creek River Basin Onslow Bay
USGS HUC 03020301 Coordinates Latitude:34.4457788513914
Longitude:-77.5659399528665
Location description:
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
There are waters,including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403). The
waters,including wetlands, have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory mitigation
requirements,and other resource protection measures,a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However,you may request an approved JD,which is an
appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).However,since the
waters,including wetlands, have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands, at the project area,which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2010-00253
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on .Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are no waters of the U.S..to include wetlands,present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington,NC,at(910)796-7215 to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§401 and/or 403).If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact Thomas Charles at
[phone] or thomas.p.charlesna,usace.armv.mil.
Basis For Determination: This determination is only for the project area depicted on figure dated 12/22/2020 and
labeled"Section 404/401 Delineation Preliminary Sketch"for Bishop Creek Pender County.NC(14.9 Acres)Pin#'s
4235-36-0231-0000,4235-35-4606-0000,4235-35-4806-0000.
D. Remarks: The project area contains upland borrow areas that are considered to be excluded from the Navigable
Waters Protection Rule.This determination is based on information submitted by LMG and a desktop review by
Thomas Charles(7/8/2021).
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries
and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this
request.This delineation and/or jurisdictional determinations may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the
Food Security Act of 1985,as amended.If you or your tenant are USDA program participants,or anticipate participation in
USDA programs,you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center,
prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations(as indicated in Section B.above)
If you object to this determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and Request for Appeal(RFA)form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A.Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
AND
[e-mail]

$AW-2010-00253
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by 9/17/2021
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Mickey Sugg r,11:2; 217::; 1
Corps Regulatory Official: FOR:Tom Charles
Date: July 12,2021 Expiration Date: July 12,2026
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public.To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey,located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0.
Copy Furnished via email:
Rob Moul,Land Management Group,Inc.
Kim Williams,Land Management Group Inc.

SAW-2010-00253
Ja� ..
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: GHK Cape Fear Development File Number: SAW-2010-00253 Date:July 12.2021
Attached is: See Section below
E INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
[ PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
E PERMIT DENIAL C
Z APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I-The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at hit pp://www.usace°anny mi!/M1issions/CivilWorks/RegolatorvProRramandPermits.asnx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the
permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may:(a)modify the
permit to address all of your concerns,(b)modify the permit to address some of your objections,or(c)not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections,the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for fmal
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the
permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety,and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
I • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
I Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

sAw-2010-00253
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved
JD(which may be appealed),by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II -REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However,you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division, US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn:Thomas Charles South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A.Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
PHILIP.A.SHANNINQUSACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation,and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn:Thomas Charles,69 Darlington Avenue,Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn:Mr.Philip Shannin,
Administrative Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone:[phone],PHILIP.A.SIIANNINna USACE.ARMY.MIL

NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered , ..�
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes.
A survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific site planning.
. lir
f �� r-• f r
Pe
r' • I ''. Ilik: Itl• t[.
&se i it-..-_,.7.t-rv:i.„-.:.
{ gr.' a
11
-:_*_
Project w = . -. �` I•k `
Area . �_* .dal
s . • . DP2-UP •
. M '
F i �� iipi 210
C1
• •
Legend `; ill
r
,t,Yf
•
® Project Area— 14.9 Acres w
Uplands—9.8 Acres(66%) r •�
- , Disturbed Uplands(mined)—4.9 Acres (33%) f.-<,
Relic Stormwater Pond—0.2 Acres(1%) '44
. '7c 1\i7 I't7i,GDEC=?K,I l.l tfi -K t711W O.\_ / rbri"s
00 Data Points _# J yi
rJ7I'`,1] 35 77GG D,1 �N q11-l"%Ya l-71k3- 5amr—nupsty. Esni.HE ao
L:IWETLANDS12020 WETLANDS FILESILMG20.455--- N
Bishop Creek,Bill Schoettelkotte\Maps 0 150 300 600
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. A
Map Source: GIS World Imagery Feet
Section 404/401 Delineation
Preliminary Sketch
Bishop Creek LM
Fender County, NC
4G
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
Map Date: 12/22/2020 a IIa1sE5.Y company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG20.455 Wilmington,NC 28403 INCINIM
I [phone]