510050_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240701

':"/`7 7n{
Alj y _-A�'bivision of Water Resources
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection TTOperation Review Q Structure Evaluation Z5 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: _0�ooutine Q Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: J J� 1 Arrival Time: G G Departure Time: G County: a S i Region: J 9 d
Farm Name: Apo w /,J &/LrK Owner Email:
Owner Name: A4 k A- K letgA ud) �/ Phone: 10 - JAY r, 7 It?
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: / j '%7 L/ - [Ji✓+a !!�/f �y/ZA f�
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
L_lNon-Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Pouits
Other
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Daig Cow
Daia Calf
Dairy Heifer
Da Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ` ❑ Yes 0 No [DNA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[Z o
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
Nq.-
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
E) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: ,5'j - Date of Inspection: L
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: fMA i
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): M !
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 ►� rU
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
/❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 1bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[] Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift �^❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s). 6 ClLht i aA � nin ll �X A /� d dt /t f C L A
13. Soil Type(s):
i
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'! ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
[] NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: Date of Inspection - Z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Q No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes E No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
�]NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
i
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes /❑ No
❑ Yes Q No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
J'�; l �s l y-1 . ti� n�lt J I rlt �r� r l i�,k<-,�► «l 7.s
SIO/V
WA
2-3 2.►Y
Az
Piz
Piz
/J s 'r:
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: I/1- M— yZ Ste/
Date: 7 -
511212020