510048_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240705

e 5-zy 9A„+t
Ai,/s
Facility Number 5 i y $
fO Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit:Compliance Inspection Operation Review ()Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Z Routine O Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: • S. 2--/ I Arrival Time: 2 . Departure Time: County: To�'JS% ®/f
Farm Name:.5hoj Wk i r i s /7-M Lo a.�45 I ' Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,� /bf * y 1 i % Phone: 1/0 33 " S/ 2 �-
7J�J
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 7� >'�G D Gr A DvA j . N �D I" ' .&O ✓r _
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
D
Z. /0
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
Latitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Longitude:
Region: 990
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Daig Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes EIN'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
[] Yes EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [-]Yes [3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

F'acili Number: ,S"/ - Date of Inspection: 7- _`v L +,r+
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Nq
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: r} frm o/1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andior managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental hreat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes E-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [fj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[:]Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? (:]Yes � N ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: - L
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes D<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes L '"o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e... discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes -C k10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer.. -'Inspector fail to discuss review;'inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes f j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Sp�� l LzOa�) /i Zt-13 -
30d
e,41/0AA%!0/J�"►��i
dAs ZAIlf
h,
C R'q t/c l - �. S' HA N
�
<<f s�'C
grLiZ/
Reviewer/inspector Name: 1,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: zt_79��_/
Page 3 of 3
Phone: �/l 7V ` 7 2- 5/
Date: 7 - .try Z T
511212020